CONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT. September 15, 2010 (Agenda)

Similar documents
CONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT. May 12, 2010 (Agenda)

CONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT. January 8, 2014 (Agenda)

CONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT August 12, 2015 (Agenda)

CONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT. August 9, 2017 (Agenda)

CONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT. February 12, 2014 (Agenda)

CONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT. April 9, 2014 (Agenda)

LAFCO APPLICATION NO LINDE CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION TO KEYES COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT

LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA *************************************************************************

LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AGENDA. Wednesday, October 13, :00 a.m.

BUTTE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) EXECUTIVE OFFICER S REPORT. LAFCo File City of Chico Extension of Services 716 Oak Lawn Avenue

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, a map showing the location of such territory is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein by this reference; and

Item 4c. May 10, 2017

BUTTE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) EXECUTIVE OFFICER S REPORT. LAFCo File City of Chico Extension of Services 1212 Glenwood Avenue

BUTTE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) EXECUTIVE OFFICER S REPORT. LAFCo File City of Chico Extension of Services 624 Oak Lawn Avenue

BUTTE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) EXECUTIVE OFFICER S REPORT. LAFCo File City of Chico Extension of Services 16 Mayfair Drive

Memorandum /14/17. FROM: Harry Freitas TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. DATE: February 9, 2017 SUBJECT: SEE BELOW. Date.

LAFCO FILE 4-R-14: Dissolution of County Service Area No. 17 (California Valley).

Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission Change of Organization/Reorganization Application

FILING REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTING APPLICATIONS

Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission Change of Organization/Reorganization Application

AGENDA ITEM 6B. MEETING: March 21, 2018

STANDARDS FOR EVALUATING PROPOSALS

Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission Change of Organization/Reorganization Application

RD:JVP:JMD 01/10//2017 RESOLUTION NO.

San Luis Obispo Local Agency Formation Commission

Brendan Vieg, Principal Planner ( ;

DESCRIPTION OF UNINCORPORATED ISLANDS

PUBLIC HEARING ITEM LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT FOR MEETING OF: OCTOBER 2, 2017

Mayor and City Council, as and constituting The Board of Contra Costa County Sanitation District No. 6 (Board)

MIDWAY CITY Municipal Code

Proposition 218 Notification NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS OF PUBLIC HEARING ON HILLSIDE ZONE ADDITIONAL SEWER RATE. Name Address City, State, Zip

RESOLUTION NO. R2010-

WEST VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT SEWER SERVICE FACT SHEET

February 14, 2018 (Agenda) Contra Costa Local Agency Formation Commission 651 Pine Street, Sixth Floor Martinez, CA 94553

Sonoma Local Agency Formation Commission 575 Adminstration Drive Room 104A Santa Rosa, CA sonomalafco.org

Solano Local Agency Formation Commission 3700 Hilborn Rd. Ste. 600 Fairfield, California (707) FAX: (707)

TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS StaffReport to the City Council

RESOLUTION NO

EL DORADO LAFCO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION

TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS StaffReport to the City Council

TO: MEMBERS, FORMATION COMMISSION FROM: DAVID CHURCH, EXECUTIVE OFFICER (DC)

MEMORANDUM CITY COUNCIL TERESA MCCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ROBIN DICKERSON, CITY ENGINEER

EL DORADO LAFCO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION

Wednesday, September 10, :00 a.m.

c) the land area does not exceed 150 acres.

DATE: September 27, Property Owner. City of Petaluma Planning Division. Lomas Annexation 2016, FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Staff Report. Victoria Walker, Director of Community and Economic Development

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, :00 P.M.

CONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT. April 21, 2010 (Agenda)

MOUNTAIN HOUSE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT To provide responsive service to our growing community that exceeds expectations at a fair value

292 West Beamer Street Woodland, CA (530) FAX (530)

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS Staff Report to the City Council

AGENDA ITEM #4.G. TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS Staff Report to the City Council. February 15, 2018

The Town has an agreement with Santa Clara County that requires annexation of any property

Reclamation Districts

CITY OF ESCONDIDO ANNEXATION GUIDE

APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION TO THE WEST BAY SANITARY DISTRICT

ORDINANCE NO

New Home Tax Disclosure Report

Planning Commission Staff Report

Planning Commission Staff Report August 6, 2015

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT February 19, 2015

RESOLUTION NO xx

REPORT TO THE SHASTA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION

9 AGENDA REPORT Public Hearing

PROVO CITY MUNICIPAL ANNEXATION GUIDE

EXHIBIT A. City of Corpus Christi Annexation Guidelines

11 AGENDA REPORT Public Hearing

COUNTY OF SONOMA PERMIT AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 2550 Ventura Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA (707) FAX (707)

Patrick C. Jackson 600 N. Darwood Avenue San Dimas, California 91773

ARTICLE XVIII MISCELLANEOUS

Stenberg Annexation Legal Diagram Exhibit "B" W Subject Property Annexed to the City of Red Bluff VICINITY MAP "1:3:

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF PORT ARANSAS, TEXAS, BY ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT June 18, 2015

ESTES VALLEY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

IN IMPERIAL COUNTY LAFCO POLICY MANUAL (Chapter VIII) Page 107

4.2 LAND USE INTRODUCTION

CITY OF GROVER BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tentative Map Checklist

RESOLUTION NO. (ANNEXATION AREA NO. 2)

8Land Use. The Land Use Plan consists of the following elements:

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

LAFCO APPLICATION NO SHACKELFORD CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION TO THE CITY OF MODESTO

EL DORADO COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT VARIANCE

ARTICLE 15 - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Certified copy of portion of proceedings, Meeting of October 17,2017

California Office 2001 N Street Suite 110 Sacramento, CA VIA

Staff Report. Victoria Walker, Director of Community and Economic Development

This is a sample form for information ONLY. UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE CONVEYANCE AND SERVICE AGREEMENT

Central Lathrop Specific Plan

Resolution No. The following resolution is now offered and read:

NOTICE OF A REGULAR MEETING

This is a New Findings of Adequacy for a Recorded Plat (Plat Book 179, Page 131) LAND USE Vacant Effective Plan: Pompano Beach

Volume I, Part III. GENERAL PROPOSAL POLICIES. 1. General Policies

WOODLAND AREA GENERAL PLAN URBAN DEVELOPMENT POLICY

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ARCHULETA COUNTY, COLORADO RESOLUTION 2018-

CHAPTER County of Alameda Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems Ordinance

CALIFORNIA TAX DISCLOSURE REPORT

CITY OF PALMDALE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. CC

The FSZ: Preserving California's Prime Agricultural Farmland

Transcription:

CONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT : Northeast Area Annexation to Delta Diablo Sanitation District (DDSD) PROPONENT: City of Pittsburg Resolution No. 09-11357 adopted December 21, 2009 ACREAGE & LOCATION SYNOPSIS Approximately 874 acres (42 parcels) located within the City of Pittsburg. The project area is generally located within the Northeast and Loveridge Subareas (Pittsburg General Plan) and includes parcels located around the northern portion of Loveridge Road and the Pittsburg Antioch Highway, extending north to the waterfront (see attached map). The City filed an application with LAFCO to annex the properties to DDSD to extend wastewater services to numerous industrial and light industrial parcels located in the northeast area of Pittsburg. The project involves no new development at this time, and will facilitate the extension of current and future services consistent with the Pittsburg General Plan. DISCUSSION The CKH Act sets forth factors that the Commission is required to consider in evaluating any proposed change of organization or reorganization as discussed below (Gov. Code 56668). In the Commission's review and evaluation, no single factor is determinative. In reaching your decision, each is to be evaluated within the context of the overall proposal. 1. Consistency with the Sphere of Influence of Any Local Agency: LAFCO is charged with both regulatory and planning functions. Annexations are basically a regulatory act, while establishing spheres of influence (SOIs) is a planning function. The SOI is an important benchmark as it defines the primary area within which urban development is to be encouraged. In order for the Commission to approve an annexation, it must be consistent with the jurisdiction's adopted SOI. The annexation area is within DDSD s SOI as updated by the Commission in July 2009, following completion of a Municipal Service Review (December 2007) and a special SOI study to expand the SOIs of the City of Pittsburg, Contra Costa Water District and DDSD. The annexation area is within the City of Pittsburg and Contra Costa County Urban Limit Lines. 2. Land Use, Planning and Zoning - Present and Future: The annexation area consists of 42 parcels. Existing uses within the project area include heavy industrial manufacturing, custom manufacturing, transportation and distribution services, automotive sales and servicing, contractor yards, a 16-unit apartment complex, and DDSD s plant operations. Some of the major businesses in the project area include DOW Chemical, USS POSCO, Antioch Building Materials, HASA Inc., East County Tow, Mt. Diablo landscape Center, SEG Trucking and A-1 Auto Dismantlers.

Page 2 Surrounding land uses to the east include vacant marshlands, primary plant operations for DDSD and the Delta Household Hazardous Waste Facility, and various light industrial and commercial uses to the east; industrial uses and vacant land with residential just beyond to the west; Suisun Bay Delta with Browns Island just beyond to the north; and a mix of vacant land and various commercial uses to the south. Among the factors LAFCO must consider in reviewing a proposal is Consistency with city or county general and specific plans. (Gov. Code 56668) The Pittsburg General Plan designates the area General Industrial and Service Commercial District. There are no proposed zoning changes within the project area; all of the existing uses, with the exception of residential dwelling units, conform to the applicable zoning districts. Those residential units that do not conform are considered by the City to be legal nonconforming uses within their respective districts. There are several land use applications in the project area, including two use permits for K&S Towing & Auto Sales (APN 073-230-091) and All Bay Vehicle Donations (APN 073-230-091), which are complete and tentatively scheduled for a Pittsburg Planning Commission hearing in September 2010; and a design review for Bragg Trucking Companies (APN 073-023-030), which is currently incomplete. 3. The Effect on Maintaining the Physical and Economic Integrity of Agricultural Lands: The properties proposed for annexation contain no prime farmland or land covered under Williamson Act Land Conservation Agreements. 4. Topography, Natural Features and Drainage Basins: The project area is generally flat with minimal grade difference throughout the overall site. There are marshlands around the northeast corner of the area, and the entire northern boundary is waterfront land that is adjacent to Suisun Bay Delta. There is also a natural drainage course the crosses the center of the project site and runs from south to north. The project area is mostly developed with commercial and industrial uses; however, there are some parcels that are currently vacant, fallow and undeveloped. Portions of the project area are located within the 100-year flood plain. The surrounding areas are generally flat with minimal grade differences. The entire northern boundary of the project site is bounded by the Suisun Bay Delta with Browns Island nature preserve just beyond the project area. 5. Population: The project area includes a 16-unit apartment complex located along the south side of the Pittsburg Antioch Highway, and a modular home located on the north side of California Avenue. There is no residentially zoned or designated land within the project area, and no new dwelling units are anticipated.

Page 3 6. Fair Share of Regional Housing: Pursuant to 56668 of the CKH Act, LAFCO must consider in the review of a proposal the extent to which the proposal will assist the receiving entity in achieving its fair share of the regional housing needs as determined by the regional council of governments. Given the current land uses, the proposed annexation will have no effect on regional housing needs. 7. Governmental Services and Controls - Need, Cost, Adequacy and Availability: In accordance with Government Code 56653, whenever a local agency submits a resolution of application for a change of organization or reorganization, the local agency must also submit a plan for providing services within the affected territory. The plan shall include all of the following information and any additional information required by the Commission or the LAFCO Executive Officer: (1) An enumeration and description of the services to be extended to the affected territory. (2) The level and range of those services. (3) An indication of when those services can feasibly be extended to the affected territory. (4) An indication of any improvement or upgrading of structures, roads, sewer or water facilities, or other conditions the local agency would impose or require within the affected territory if the change of organization or reorganization is completed. (5) Information with respect to how those services will be financed. The "Plan for Providing Services within the Affected Territory," as required by Government Code 56653, is on file in the LAFCO office. The properties proposed for annexation are served by various municipalities and agencies including, but not limited to, the City of Pittsburg, Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, and Contra Costa Water District (CCWD) for wholesale water. With regard to wastewater services, the City of Pittsburg operates the wastewater collection system, and treatment and disposal are provided by DDSD. The City currently serves nearly 16,000 connections through 126 miles of sewer mains. DDSD currently serves a total population of over 181,565 residents within its 52 square mile service area (i.e., cities of Antioch and Pittsburg, Bay Point and surrounding unincorporated areas). DDSD s existing wastewater collection system consists of 49 miles of sewer main and five pump stations. The District s has a permitted average dry weather flow (ADWF) capacity of 16.5 million gallons per day (mgd); and in the most recent reporting year, 2008, the ADWF influent to the treatment plants was 12.9 mgd. The wastewater treatment plant capacity is 16.5 mgd (current design) and 22.7 mgd (ultimate capacity). The annexation area includes major customers on seven parcels, totaling 564+ acres, who have been served via private sewer collection systems connected to DDSD facilities since the 1990s and earlier. DDSD will continue to provide service to existing customers. Some of the existing customers include Dow Chemical and its tenants, IGS Generon, USS POSCO, and the Contra

Page 4 Costa Industrial Business park, as well as newer portion of the DDSD wastewater treatment and recycled water facilities. The existing properties on the southside of the Pittsburg Antioch Highway, and those fronting the highway, including the residential units, rely on septic systems. According to the City, and pursuant to the City s General Plan and land use designations, future development within the project area could increase wastewater flow by approximately 828,500 gallons per day, or 0.83 mgd. Although no new development is proposed at this time, DDSD has provided a letter indicating that the District s wastewater treatment plant has the capacity expansion potential to serve growth and development within the annexation area. 8. Timely Availability of Water and Related Issues: The annexation area is located in the City of Pittsburg. Municipal water services are provided by the City and Contra Costa Water District (CCWD). In 2006, Pittsburg updated its Urban Water Management Plan. This plan addresses overall water supply and future demand for the City. The City provides water treatment and distribution to its residents and businesses. The City obtains approximately 90% of its untreated water supply from CCWD through the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) Central Valley Project (CVP); water supplies are supplemented by locally produced ground water. The City currently serves over 15,000 connections. Major infrastructure includes 150 miles of main and five booster stations. The City s water treatment facilities currently operate at a peak rate of approximately 22 million gallon per day (mgd). It has a design capacity of 32 mgd, and is currently permitted by the State for 28 mgd. CCWD provides wholesale water to the project area. The District provides both treated and untreated water throughout central and portions of east Contra Costa County. CCWD s untreated water service area includes Pittsburg and Bay Point. CCWD is a CVP contractor and delivers untreated water through USBR CVP. The untreated water is conveyed through the Contra Costa Canal. The contract provides for a maximum delivery of 195,000 acre feet per year (174 mgd) with reductions in deliveries during water shortages including regulatory restrictions and drought. In addition to CVP water, CCWD has other water sources including various water rights and entitlements. The City s Urban Water Management Plan projects safe yields of well water through the planning horizon, 2020 to accommodate future development in the annexation area. 9. Assessed Value, Tax Rates and Indebtedness: The annexation area is within tax rate areas 07047, 07048, 07051 and 07071. The total assessed value for the parcels is $595,795,128 (2009-10 roll). The territory being annexed shall be liable for all authorized or existing taxes comparable to properties presently within the annexing agency.

Page 5 10. Environmental Impact of the Proposal: In January 2010, the City of Pittsburg, as Lead Agency, adopted a Negative Declaration for the Northeast Area Annexation to DDSD. The LAFCO Environmental Coordinator reviewed the document and finds it adequate for LAFCO purposes. 11. Landowner Consent and Consent by Annexing Agency: The area proposed for annexation is considered uninhabited, as there are fewer than 12 registered voters in the proposal area. The City indicates that the annexing agencies have consented to the reorganization, and that less than 100% of the affected landowners have provided written consent to the annexation. Thus, the Commission s action is subject to notice, hearing, as well as conducting authority (protest), proceedings. All landowners and registered voters within the proposal area(s) and within 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the area(s) have received notice of the September 15 hearing. As of this writing, LAFCO has received no communication from any affected party. If no written objection is received from an affected party prior to the conclusion of the hearing on September 15, the Commission may waive the protest proceedings. However, if any objection is received at any time prior to or during the hearing, then a protest hearing is required (Gov. Code Section 56663). 12. Boundaries and Lines of Assessment: There are no conflicts with lines of assessment or ownership. A map to implement this change is subject to approval by the County Surveyor. 13. Environmental Justice: Beginning January 1, 2008, Government Code 56668(o) requires that LAFCO consider the extent to which proposals for changes of organization or reorganization will promote environmental justice. As defined by statute, environmental justice means the fair treatment of people of all races, cultures, and incomes with respect to the location of public facilities and the provision of public services. The proposed annexation is not expected to promote or discourage the fair treatment of minority or economically disadvantaged groups. ALTERNATIVES FOR COMMISSION ACTION After consideration of this report and any testimony or additional materials that are submitted the Commission should consider taking one of the following options:

Page 6 Option 1 Approve the reorganization as submitted. A. Determine that the City of Pittsburg, as Lead Agency, approved a Negative Declaration for the Northeast Area Annexation to DDSD on January 19, 2010. B. Certify that the Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Negative Declaration prepared and adopted by the City of Pittsburg. C. Adopt this report and approve the proposal, to be known as the Northeast Area Annexation to Delta Diablo Sanitation District, subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. The territory being annexed to DDSD shall be included in Zone 2. 2. The territory being annexed shall be liable for the continuation of any authorized or existing special taxes, assessments and charges comparable to properties presently within the annexing agencies. 3. Prior to recordation, the applicant shall deliver an executed indemnification agreement providing for the applicant to indemnify LAFCO against any expenses arising from any legal actions challenging the reorganization. D. Find that: 1) the subject territory is uninhabited, 2) all affected landowners have consented to the annexation and 3) the annexing agencies have consented to the waiver of conducting authority proceedings. E. Waive conducting authority proceedings and direct the staff to complete the proceeding. Option 2 Option 3 Adopt this report and DENY the proposal. If the Commission needs more information, CONTINUE this matter to a future meeting. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve Option 1. Attachment Map c: Distribution LOU ANN TEXEIRA, EXECUTIVE OFFICER LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION

RESOLUTION NO. 10-02 RESOLUTION OF THE CONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION MAKING DETERMINATIONS AND APPROVING NORTHEAST AREA ANNEXATION TO DELTA DIABLO SANITATION DISTRICT WHEREAS, the above-referenced proposal has been filed with the Executive Officer of the Contra Costa Local Agency Formation Commission pursuant to the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act (Section 56000 et seq. of the Government Code); and WHEREAS, at the time and in the manner required by law the Executive Officer has given notice of the Commission s consideration of the proposal; and WHEREAS, the Commission heard, discussed and considered all oral and written testimony related to the proposal including, but not limited to, the Executive Officer's report and recommendation, the environmental document or determination, Spheres of Influence and applicable General and Specific Plans; and WHEREAS, information satisfactory to the Commission has been presented that no affected landowners/registered voters within the reorganization area object to the proposal; and WHEREAS, the Local Agency Formation Commission determines the proposal to be in the best interests of the affected area and the total organization of local governmental agencies within Contra Costa County; NOW, THEREFORE, the Contra Costa Local Agency Formation Commission DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER as follows: 1. Determine that the City of Pittsburg, as Lead Agency, adopted a Negative Declaration for the Northeast Area Annexation to DDSD on January 19, 2010. 2. Certify LAFCO has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Negative Declaration adopted by DDSD. 3. Said annexation is hereby approved. 4. The subject proposal is assigned the distinctive short-form designation: NORTHEAST AREA ANNEXATION TO DELTA DIABLO SANITATION DISTRICT 5. The boundaries of the affected territory are found to be definite and certain as approved and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 6. The subject territory shall be liable for any authorized or existing taxes, charges and assessments comparable to properties within the annexing agency. 7. That City of Pittsburg, as applicant, delivered an executed indemnification agreement between the City and Contra Costa LAFCO providing for the City to indemnify LAFCO against any expenses arising from any legal actions challenging the annexation.

Contra Costa LAFCO Resolution No. 10-02 8. The territory proposed for annexation is uninhabited. 9. The proposal has less than 100% landowner/registered voter consent; however, no affected landowners/registered voters opposed the annexation, and the annexing agency has given written consent to the waiver of conducting authority proceedings. Said conducting authority proceedings are hereby waived. 10. All subsequent proceedings in connection with this annexation shall be conducted only in compliance with the approved boundaries set forth in the attachments and any terms and conditions specified in this resolution. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 15 th day of September 2010, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTENTIONS: ABSENT: MARTIN McNAIR, CHAIR, CONTRA COSTA LAFCO I hereby certify that this is a correct copy of a resolution passed and adopted by this Commission on the date stated. Dated: September 15, 2010 Lou Ann Texeira, Executive Officer

LAFCO No. 10-02: Northeast Area Annexation to Delta Diablo Sanitation District P i t t s b u r g Pittsburg Antioch Hwy A n t i o c h E Leland Rd Loveridge Rd Urban Limit Line City Boundaries DDSD Boundary Parcels to be Annexed E Leland Rd ÄÅ4 Delta Fair Blvd Map created 8/8/2010 by Contra Costa County Conservation and Development Department-GIS Group 651 Pine Street, 4th Floor North Wing, Martinez, CA 94553-0095 37:59:48.455N 122:06:35.384W This map or dataset was created by the Contra Costa County Conservation and Development Department with data from the Contra Costa County GIS Program. Some Feet 0 250 500 1,000 accept the County of Contra Costa disclaimer of liability for geographic information. base data, primarily City Limits, is derived from the CA State Board of Equalization's tax rate areas. While obligated to use this data the County assumes no responsibility for its accuracy. This map contains copyrighted information and may not be altered. It may be reproduced in its current state if the source is cited. Users of this map agree to read and