Community Opinion Surveys

Similar documents
County Survey. results of the public officials survey in the narrative. Henry County Comprehensive Plan,

COMMUNITY SURVEY RESULTS

HOUSING ELEMENT. Chapter XI INTRODUCTION PART ONE: BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON HOUSING IN WALWORTH COUNTY

Farmland Values and Farm Prosperity: Results from Your Community

Land Use. Land Use Categories. Chart 5.1. Nepeuskun Existing Land Use Inventory. Overview

Ludgvan Parish HOUSING NEED SURVEY. Report Date: 21 st January Version: 1.2 Document Status: Final Report

TOWN OF EPSOM, NEW HAMPSHIRE PLANNING BOARD MASTER PLAN COMMUNITY SURVEY. 2. Are you a legal resident of : a Epsom b Other NH Town c Out of State

As the natural gas industry continues

Skagit Countywide UGA Open Space Concept Plan Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Ferguson Township Community Survey. Executive Summary

Palmerton Area Comprehensive Plan

BC Assessment 2006 Annual Service Plan Report. Appendix C: Supplementary 2007 Assessment Roll Information - Statistics

L. LAND USE. Page L-1

Working Together to Conserve Land

Comprehensive Plan 2030

Understanding the Cost to Provide Community Services in the Town of Holland, La Crosse County, Wisconsin

Town of. River Falls. Land Use Element Vierbicher Associates, Inc

Appraisers and Assessors of Real Estate

Faculty and Staff Housing Survey Santa Barbara City College Office of Institutional Assessment, Research, and Planning

Land Conservation Agreements Project Guidance

Wood Dale Comprehensive Plan Open House #2 Summary

LOCAL WEED INSPECTOR'S GUIDE FOR ENFORCEMENT OF THE MINNESOTA NOXIOUS WEED LAW PRODUCED BY THE

OPEN SPACE PRESERVATION. Reflections on the Value of Acquiring Property for Preservation Purposes

Dear OSU Student, Enjoy the Renter s Guide and GO BUCKS!

Open Space Model Ordinance

Headline measures for tracking revalidation

Comprehensive Plan 2030

2005 Town of Empire Community Survey Results

1 Accessory Dwelling Unit Project

WTL+ a. Summary Net Fiscal Impacts. Pasco County General Fund Pasco County, FL. WTL +a. Prepared for: Metro Development Group Tampa, FL.

SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERS (SROs) AND THE ARMING OF SCHOOL TEACHERS OR ADMINISTRATORS AS RESPONSES TO SCHOOL SHOOTINGS:

City Center Market-Rate Housing Study

Appendix T Chapter VIII IMPLEMENTATION

Frequently Asked Questions on Sustainable & Long-Term Leases in Minnesota

Rezoning Staff Report St. Croix County Community Development Committee Gerald & Joan Mellgren Hearing Date: July 16, 2015

Landlords Report. Changes, trends and perspectives on the student rental market.

Report DATE

8Land Use. The Land Use Plan consists of the following elements:

The going rate. Canadian Lawyer s 2009 legal fees survey shows many sole practitioners and small firms have lowered their prices since last year.

Landlord Survey. Changes, trends and perspectives on the student rental market.

Reappraisal Important Property Tax Information

Waterlefe Community Survey Powered by

SUBCHAPTER 23-3: DENSITY AND INTENSITY REGULATIONS

Appendix C SUMMARY OF LAND USE-RELATED EXTRATERRITORIAL AUTHORITIES

RUSSELL TOWNSHIP LAND USE SURVEY REPORT

UNDERSTANDING DEVELOPER S DECISION- MAKING IN THE REGION OF WATERLOO

Adam Brett - Eric Urban market update

Preserving Rural Landscapes Using Transferable Development Rights and Other Open Land Preservation Tools. December Alberta, Canada

Lanteglos by Fowey HOUSING NEED SURVEY. Report Date: 1 st March Version: 1.1 Document Status: Final Report

Bethlehem Open Space and Farmland Conservation Survey Results Fall

CZMP Workshop Preserving Your Community & The Environment From Development Impacts

REAL ESTATE INVESTING GUIDE. Combine IRA tax advantages with real estate investment opportunities.

Instructions: Script:

DRAFT FOR PUBLIC HEARING (rev. March, 2016)

FARMLAND AMENITY PROTECTION. A Brief Guide To Conservation Easements

Open Space Preservation Program

Open Space. Introduction. Vision. Defining Open Space. Midway City 2017 General Plan

Instructions: Script:

Streamlining Affordable Housing Approvals Proposed Trailer Bill

Date: September 17, 2018 Meeting Date: October 5, Progress Update on the 2018 Regional Parking Study Household Survey

4 Hope Township. 407 Hope-Great Meadows Road P.O. Box 284 Hope, New Jersey 07~44 Phone: / Fax:

Kent Land Trust Strategic Reassessment Project Final Report

Final 2011 Residential Property Owner Customer Survey

ALC Bylaw Reviews. A Guide for Local Governments

Connecting Conservation and Community

ARTICLE III: DENSITY AND INTENSITY

There were 1,798 unique responses to the survey with a margin of error of ±2.4% at a 95% level of confidence.

The Villas at Northville Hills Condominium Association

National Association of Realtors National Survey. Public Opinion Strategies N=800 May 2005 Margin of error +3.46% Proj #:05246

The GIS Behind Dakota County s FARMLAND AND NATURAL AREAS PROGRAM

Report on Inspection of Ferlita, Walsh, Gonzalez & Rodriguez, P.A. (Headquartered in Tampa, Florida) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

H o u s i n g N e e d i n E a s t K i n g C o u n t y

8.0 Intergovernmental Cooperation Element

Public Opinion in Wyoming on Conserving Agricultural Lands and Open Space

LIVING LANDS BIODIVERSITY GRANTS: INFORMATION AND APPLICATION. Due: January 16, 2009

ALBERTA GRAZING LEASE 2005 IN-KIND COST SURVEY RESULTS

Yolo Habitat Conservancy County of Yolo City of Davis City of Winters City of West Sacramento City of Woodland University of California, Davis

What We Heard Report Summary: Indigenous Housing Capital Program

US Worker Cooperatives: A State of the Sector

State of Washington Project Luke Rogers, University of Washington March 2010

They Ain t Making Any More of It: Conflicts, Development and Energy

Briefing Book. State of the Housing Market Update San Francisco Mayor s Office of Housing and Community Development

Handling Multiple Offers

Midway City Council 2 October 2018 Regular Meeting. Issuance of General Obligation Bonds / Public Meeting

Land Value Estimates and Forecasts for Reston. Prepared for Reston Community Center April 2013

Dodge County Year 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Recommendations Report

COMMUNITY PRESERVATION ACT Town of Hatfield OPEN SPACE PROJECT GUIDELINES

ARLA Survey of Residential Investment Landlords

Implementation TOWN OF LEON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 9-1

Saskatchewan Farmland Ownership

GUIDE. Helping students make informed off-campus living decisions. Presented by

New Brunswick Community Land Trust

First-priority individuals are eligible non-elderly individuals who are participating in HOME Choice and currently living in a facility.

Midway City Council 4 December 2018 Regular Meeting. Ordinance / General Plan Amendment

CASS COUNTY MASTER PLAN July 1, Appendix C LAND USE

Land Trust of Santa Cruz County. Strategic Plan. July 2012 to June This is a public version of a more detailed internal plan.

Chapter VIII. Conservation Easements: Valuing Property Subject to a Qualified Conservation Contribution

Midway City Council 16 October 2018 Work Meeting. Ordinance / General Plan Amendment

2014 Bay Area Council Survey Report of Selected Results: Housing and Transportation

Summary of Key Issues from Skagit County TDR Focus Group Meetings January 7, 2014

Transcription:

5 Community Opinion Surveys INTRODUCTION How strongly Washington County residents feel about the importance of preserving farmland and open space may help local policy makers decide which, if any, preservation tools to implement in their communities. Over the last five years, a number of community opinion surveys have been carried out in Washington County by a variety of entities. While surveys are by no means the only way, or necessarily the best way, to gauge public opinion, they are a legitimate tool that can provide a measure of insight into the opinions of residents. In the near future, a number of additional public input activities will be undertaken as part of Washington County s multi-jurisdictional comprehensive planning effort. These new efforts will provide a broader base of results for analysis. Until then, the surveys that have been conducted provide the best available data. This data is summarized in this chapter. TYPES OF SURVEYS Countywide Since 2002, Washington County s Planning and Parks Department has overseen three major survey efforts that included questions related to farmland and open space preservation. One of the surveys was completed as part of the County s recent park and open space planning effort and was conducted by the Center for Urban Initiatives and Research at UW-Milwaukee. The survey was a telephone survey that relied on professionally accepted methods for obtaining random samples. The other two surveys were part of a larger study on economic development in Washington County. These surveys included questions about farmland and open space preservation. This multi-version survey, developed in unison by research centers at UW-Oshkosh and UW-Milwaukee, was targeted at multiple audiences. One survey involved a random telephone sample of local residents. The other was created exclusively for local government officials within Washington County, and utilized a direct mailing to 418 identified municipal and County elected/appointed officials. In 2001, the Ozaukee Washington Land Trust (OWLT) hired the research center at UW-River Falls to conduct a countywide survey on open space preservation. Local At least four municipalities within Washington County have conducted community opinion surveys since 2003. They are the Towns of Farmington, Richfield, and Wayne, and the Village of Newburg. All of these surveys were mailed out to local households within the respective town or village boundaries. The Newburg, Richfield, and Wayne surveys were part of a larger planning process and therefore contained a variety of questions in addition to those about farmland and open space preservation. The Farmington survey was much smaller and focused exclusively on land use/preservation issues. Of these four surveys, one was prepared by a planning firm, one by UW-Extension, and the other two by local government officials and/or citizens. Washington County Farmland and Open Space Preservation Tools 67

RESULTS Sample Size Together, the eight surveys reached approximately 8,000 households in Washington County. There was a response rate of about 47 percent on the surveys that were mailed out. Categories While all eight surveys contained their own unique set of preservation related questions, it is possible to put most of the questions into categories to help evaluate the results. (Where a significant difference in the wording of a question appears within a category, the unique wording is included in the table.) The remainder of this chapter presents the survey results in the context of these broad categories. Category 1: How important is rural character? Very Not Not Sure Town of Farmington 60% 27% 10% 3% survey for residents survey for elected and appointed officials 60% 33% 5% 1% 59% 31% 9% 1% The results for Category 1 were extremely consistent across three different audiences. Category 2: How important is farmland? Very Neutral Not No Response OWLT Survey 55% 34% -- 4% 4% Town of Richfield 44% 33% 17% 6% -- survey for residents survey for elected and appointed officials 69% 24% -- 6% 1% 57% 30% -- 13% 1% Results were relatively consistent, with the exception of the Town of Richfield, where more residents tended to be neutral on this issue. This was likely due to the decreased presence of farming in Richfield. Washington County Farmland and Open Space Preservation Tools 68

Category 3: How important is the preservation of natural resources? survey for residents survey for elected and appointed officials Very Neutral Not No Response 80% 17% -- 1% 2% 65% 25% -- 10% 1% How important are woodlands? OWLT Survey 65% 28% 3% 2% 2% Town of Richfield 59% 33% 6% 2% -- How important are wetlands? OWLT Survey 60% 31% 2% 3% 4% Town of Richfield 52% 31% 12% 5% -- How important is wildlife habitat? OWLT Survey 68% 26% 2% 2% 2% Town of Richfield 54% 34% 9% 3% -- The majority of respondents from all surveys indicate that preserving natural resources is very important. Category 4: What type of residential development would you prefer? Conservation Subdivisions Conventional Subdivisions Scattered Development / No Subdivisions Not Sure Town of Richfield 53% 21% 23% -- Town of Wayne 50% 14% 35% -- Village of Newburg 68% 16% 12% The Town of Richfield has several conservation subdivisions, while the Town of Wayne does not have any yet, the support among residents in the two towns was almost identical. In the Village of Newburg, the survey asked whether residents supported conservation subdivisions or did not support them, but the survey failed to give non-supporting respondents a choice between conventional subdivisions and no subdivisions, so the preference of the 16 percent of non-supporters is unclear. Washington County Farmland and Open Space Preservation Tools 69

Category 5: Should the County or local municipality buy land or development rights to preserve farmland and/or open space? Yes No Neutral No Response Would you like to see Washington County buy lands such as woodlands and wetlands to protect wildlife and preserve natural habitats for public enjoyment? Co. Park System telephone survey 85% 14% -- 1% Should a land conservation fund be created? OWLT Survey 56% 16% -- 28% Do you favor purchase of development rights as a land management tool? Town of Wayne 31% 29% 34% -- Support for preserving farmland and open space was generally strong when no financial impacts were included. Category 6: I am willing to pay for preservation. (An example followed of the impact on a typical property tax bill.) Yes No No Response Town of Farmington 29% 45% 26% Town of Richfield 63% 37% -- Town of Wayne 52% 48% -- Similar question but without tax example OWLT Survey 49% 23% 28% Village of Newburg 50% 29% 13% Support remained fairly strong for preserving farmland and open space even when specific financial impacts were included in the question, except in the Town of Farmington (See Appendix L for Town of Richfield specific financial impacts). OTHER INDIVIDUAL QUESTIONS OF RELEVANCE OWLT Survey: Would you be willing to have a home on a less than 1 acre lot that has open space and/or natural features as a part of the neighborhood? Yes: 61% No: 29% No Response: 10% Washington County Farmland and Open Space Preservation Tools 70

Town of Wayne: Which of the following do you like best about the Town? [305 respondents] Rural and Open Environment 75% Low Taxes 7.5% Good road access to other areas 7% Compatibility of farming & new residences 7.5% Adequate level of public services 1% Other 2% Town of Wayne: If you actively farm your property, what is your current future plan? [64 responses] A family member will continue farming: 28% Sell the property for continued farming/agricultural use: 14% Sell the property for development: 9% Unsure at this time: 48% Survey: Do you agree that Washington County and the local community you represent should be protecting agriculture from residential development? Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Didn t Know /No Answer Elected Officials 41% 31% 18% 8% 2% Residents 35% 43% 14% 3% 5% Local Community 40% 25% 17% 13% 5% Washington County Farmland and Open Space Preservation Tools 71

SUMMARY This chapter presents data compiled from seven community opinion surveys undertaken in Washington County since 2001. The key findings are as follows: The majority of responses from the County Economic Survey indicated that rural character is very important to their community. Surveys that asked how important is farmland in their community, the majority of responses indicated very important except the Town of Richfield survey which still had the highest percentage of respondents indicating very important. The majority of survey respondents responding to the question regarding the importance of preserving natural resources indicated that it is very important. The Towns of Richfield and Wayne and the Village of Newburg included a question asking what type of development is preferred. The majority of responses indicated conservation development is the preferred choice. The Washington County Parks System telephone survey indicated that a large majority of survey respondents (85 percent) indicated that Washington County should purchase land such as woodlands and wetlands to protect wildlife and preserve natural habitats for public enjoyment. A majority of residents stated that rural character, farmland, and preservation of natural resources were very important to their community. When asked if the County or local municipality should buy land or development rights to preserve farmland and/or open space, responses were mixed. Washington County Farmland and Open Space Preservation Tools 72