Kitsap County Assessor

Similar documents
Kitsap County Assessor

Kitsap County Assessor

Kitsap County Assessor

Kitsap County Assessor

Kitsap County Assessor

Kitsap County Assessor

Kitsap County Assessor

Kitsap County Assessor

Kitsap County Assessor

Kitsap County Assessor

Kitsap County Assessor

Kitsap County Assessor

Kitsap County Assessor

Kitsap County Assessor

Kitsap County Assessor Narrative for Area 5 - Bremerton and Central Kitsap East

Kitsap County Assessor

Kitsap County Assessor

A market or sales approach is used. There are sufficient sales to develop a market approach.

Kitsap County Assessor Narrative for Countywide Multifamily Valuation Appraisal Date 1/01/2013, Tax Year 2014 Updated 03/27/2013 by CM20

Kitsap County Assessor Narrative for Area 3 Apartment Model Valuation Appraisal Date 1/1/2013, Tax Year 2014 Updated 03/25/2013 by CM20

UNDERSTANDING YOUR PROPERTY RECORD CARD

BUSI 330 Suggested Answers to Review and Discussion Questions: Lesson 10

Part 1. Estimating Land Value Using a Land Residual Technique Based on Discounted Cash Flow Analysis

Chapter 37. The Appraiser's Cost Approach INTRODUCTION

LLANO CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT REAPPRAISAL PLAN FOR TAX YEARS 2017 & 2018 AS ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Recommendations for COD Standards. Robert J. Gloudemans Almy, Gloudemans, Jacobs & Denne. for. New York State Office of Real Property Services

Assessment Year 2016 Assessment Valuations / Mass Appraisal Summary Report

ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY

DIRECTIVE # This Directive Supersedes Directive # and #92-003

ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY

Rockwall CAD. Basics of. Appraising Property. For. Property Taxation

Mass Appraisal of Income-Producing Properties

MAAO Sales Ratio Committee 2013 Fall Conference Seminar

STEVEN J. DREW Assessor OFFICE OF THE ASSESSOR Service, Integrity, Fairness, Internationally Recognized for Excellence

2011 ASSESSMENT RATIO REPORT

Course Mass Appraisal Practices and Procedures

STEVEN J. DREW Assessor OFFICE OF THE ASSESSOR Service, Integrity, Fairness, Internationally Recognized for Excellence

Lee Central Appraisal District

OFFERING MEMORANDUM. 415 Washington Street. Waukegan, IL PRESENTED BY: COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL

The Honorable Larry Hogan And The General Assembly of Maryland

Kitsap County Assessor Narrative for Countywide Drug Store Appraisal Date 1/1/2014, Tax Year 2015 Updated 03/31/2014 by CM20

CAMA System Depreciation. CAMA System Depreciation and Effective Age

CITY OF OWATONNA ASSESSMENT REPORT. Steele County Assessor s Department. William G. Effertz, SAMA Steele County Assessor

CALGARY ASSESSMENT REVIEW BOARD DECISION WITH REASONS

Chapter 35. The Appraiser's Sales Comparison Approach INTRODUCTION

ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY

Table of Contents 2013 Commercial Revaluation Report

Edmonton Composite Assessment Review Board

Table of Contents 2015 Commercial Revaluation Report

Appraisal Engagement Instructions

April 12, The Honorable Martin O Malley And The General Assembly of Maryland

METHODOLOGY GUIDE VALUING LANDS IN TRANSITION IN ONTARIO. Valuation Date: January 1, 2016

DALLAS CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT DCAD VALUATION PROCESSES

California Real Estate License Exam Prep: Unlocking the DRE Salesperson and Broker Exam 4th Edition

RAINS COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT

ASSESSMENT REVIEW BOARD

Demonstration Appraisal Report Utilizing a Form Report

concepts and techniques

procedures Basic Appraisal F i n a l Examination #2 2 nd edition

Typical Valuation Approaches and How to Deal With Them

CORDOVAN PARK W I-20, Arlington PROPERTY REPOSITIONING Case Study

Washington Department of Revenue Property Tax Division. Valid Sales Study Kitsap County 2015 Sales for 2016 Ratio Year.

Turnkey Cash Flow th St W Bradenton, FL For more information contact: Nataliia Musick

Table of Contents 2017 Commercial Revaluation Report

ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY

Sales Ratio: Alternative Calculation Methods

VAN ZANDT COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

2. The, and Act, also known as FIRREA, requires that states set standards for all appraisers.

8 Units in Salinas. 539 Terrace Dr Salinas, CA List Price: $750,000

General Market Analysis and Highest & Best Use. Learning Objectives

YOUNG COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT

Di Fiore Fourplex. 859 Di Fiore Dr San Jose, CA Offering Price: $1,300,000 Significant price reduction!

Reappraisal Plan. and. Mass Appraisal Report

RESIDUAL ANALYSIS PRINCIPLES AND PROCEEDURES

Hunt County Appraisal District 2015 Mass Appraisal Report

Land / Site Valuation A Basic Review. Leslie G. Pruitt Certified General Appraiser

For the Property Owner who wants to know!

GENERAL ASSESSMENT DEFINITIONS

Past & Present Adjustments & Parcel Count Section... 13

Fixed Asset Management

Sales Associate Course

Introduction. Bruce Munneke, S.A.M.A. Washington County Assessor. 3 P a g e

DEVELOPING OF MASS APPRAISAL FOR PROPERTY TAX IN INDONESIA

2017 Reappraisal. March 10, 2017

Di Fiore Fourplex. 859 Di Fiore Dr San Jose, CA Offering Price: $1,550,000

UNIFORM APPRAISAL DATASET

EXPLANATION OF MARKET MODELING IN THE CURRENT KANSAS CAMA SYSTEM

2017 Property Values and Assessment Practices Report Assessment Year 2016

68,132 SF Distribution Warehouse - For Sale

Housing Characteristics

REAL ESTATE MARKET AND YOUR TAX

LITIGATING IN A MASS APPRAISAL ENVIRONMENT

Fundamentals of Real Estate APPRAISAL. 10th Edition. William L. Ventolo, Jr. Martha R. Williams, JD

Pickens County Reassessment Program. Utilizing CAMA GIS MLS SQL

absorption rate ad valorem appraisal broker price opinion capital gain

Multi-Family Methodology Analysis

ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY

ATASCOSA COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT 2014 MASS APPRAISAL REPORT

Chapter 5: Asset Valuation (Real Estate)

Residential Revaluation Report

Transcription:

Documentation for Area 6 - Bainbridge Island Tax Year: 2019 Appraisal Date: 1/1/2018 Property Type: Office - General Office, Medical Office, and Banks Updated 5/1/2018 by CM27 Area Overview Bainbridge Island and its communities such as Lynnwood Center, Rolling Bay, and Industrial Day Road. Property Type Overview An office building is used primarily for administration, clerical work, consulting, or other client services not related to retail. Office buildings can be single tenant, multiple tenant, and are a variety of sizes. Area 6 or Bainbridge Island has 153 parcels where office is the predominant use. The income approach was applied to 141 parcels, 124 general office, 9 banks, and 8 medical offices. Twelve of the office parcels are located on residential land and are valued with the cost approach. The model is also applied to properties with mixed uses where the predominant use is not office. Land to Building Ratio: The national land to building ratio for this property type is 4-5:1. The countywide land to building ratio for this property type is: Use National. The land to building ratio is used to determine excess or surplus land. Review of zoning requirements such as total lot coverage or parking requirements, as well as topography and easements, must also be considered before calculating value for this land. Economic Overview: Valuation Summary Approach Used: Income Analysis and Conclusion Summary: The three approaches to value were considered. The cost approach was given little consideration in the appraiser's final analysis. Cost approach components such as replacement cost new, effective age, and depreciation are difficult to accurately calculate in a mass appraisal model. A market/sales comparison approach uses sale prices of comparable properties to calculate value. The market/sales approach was not applied as Kitsap County lacks sufficient, recent sales. The income approach was selected as the best method for valuing these properties. The data used to develop our current model data was collected from our mail survey, site visits, local sales, national publications, and data supplied for review or appeal. Sales indicated an increase in value for general offices was needed. An adjustment was made to general office rents, and general office cap rates were reduced 0.5% for an average increase of 20%. Medical office and bank occupancy's were not updated. Model Calibration Preliminary Ratio Analysis: Analysis of 6 sales resulted in a mean ratio of 83%, a median ratio of 87%, and a coefficient of disperson (COD) of 14.07. /Sales Comparison Approach Data and Analysis Sales: Range of Sale Dates: 1/1/2016 to 3/30/2018. A total of 6 local sales, and 0 regional sales, and 0 Printed

Property type: Office - General Office, Medical Office, and Banks (continued) national sales were used in the sales analysis. Additional information is provided on the sales analysis data sheet. Kitsap County attempts to review, analyze, and validate via telephone, mail, or in person interviews, all commercial sales within the county for inclusion or exclusion in our market/sales approach. /Sales Rates: Sales ranged from $175.32 to $446.85 per square foot. Income Approach and Data Analysis Values were calculated using a full service income model. Income and expense information was collected from mailed surveys, property representatives, on-site visits, and market research (publications, newsletters, websites, etc.) Income Model: Model rent, vacancy, expense, and cap rates attached. Final Ratio Analysis: Analysis of 6 sales resulted in a mean ratio of 91%, a median ratio of 93%, and a coefficient of disperson (COD) of 10.63. Sources Kitsap County Board of Equalization appeal documentation. Washington State Board of Tax appeal documentation. Kitsap County income and expense surveys. Kitsap County sales questionaires. The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Appraisal Institute, Third Edition, 1993 Property Appraisal and Assessment Administration, IAAO, 1990 Glossary for Property Appraisal and Assessment, IAAO,1997 LoopNet - www.loopnet.com Commercial Brokers Association - www.commercialmls.com Printed

Tax Year: 2019 Model Definition for Office: All Types Class A B Location / Visibility Excellent visibility, with similar use or companion uses nearby. Good visibility, with similar use or companion uses nearby. Access Parking Exterior Quality Interior Quality Condition of Building/ Effective Age distance to public Ample paved transportation and parking. easy in/out access. distance to public transportation. Sufficient paved parking. Roof and foundation are new or in good repair. Exterior finish is a good mixture of stone, wood, brick, tile, metal, etc.. Style is modern, and may have ornamentation. Higher quality framing such as steel or masonry. Roof and foundation are new or in good repair. A pleasing mix of two exterior coverings (could be more or less depending on the cost/quality of materials) stone, wood, brick, tile, metal, etc.. Style is modern, and may have ornamentation. Similar framing quality as the A class. Plush interior. Better quality wall, floor, trim finishes. Better quality and more windows. Higher than typical or vaulted ceilings. Architectural extras. The newest electrical, mechanical, plumbing, and heating/air handling systems. Designed to accommodate the current technology needs of businesses that will occupy the building. New or updated fire protection, locks and security, and elevators. Basic quality wall, floor, trim finishes, may have better finish in one or two categories i.e.: tile rather than vinyl flooring. Better quality windows. Higher than typical or vaulted ceilings. Simple or no architectural extras. New or updated electrical, plumbing, mechanical and heating/air handling system. May have any or all of the following; fire protection, security, updated locks. Has an elevator. New or all items in need of replacement or maintenance (consider roof, paint, any heating system, technology needs such as computer access in medical rooms, security) are in like new condition. Interior effective age is like new. The actual age may be older. Effective age generally below 7-9 years. Better construction grades typically have a longer life expectancy. All items well maintained, functional and usable. Most items needing repair or replacement are corrected in a timely manner. Little to no physical obsolescence or inadequacies exist. Effective age less than 15-19 years. Better quality construction grades would age slower. Highest and Best Use As office. As office. C D E Average visibility, not the newest locations. Location not as desirable due to limited visibility and transition from current use. Limited or no supporting services such as companion uses. Low visibility, difficult to find or give directions to. distance form public transportation. Not near public transportation. Low or high traffic flow hinders access or exit from site during peak travel time. No public transportation. Low or extremely high traffic flow impacting safe access or exit from site. Roof and foundation typical for age of Less than typical parking available may have to park off site. structure. No apparent deferred maintenance. The exterior may be similar in appearance to B. Generally, the exterior covering would be of one type. The style may not be current and lacks the embellishments of a B or A class. Frame is of standard cost for structure type. Lower cost roof or may need some Employee maintenance. Foundation typical for parking may construction. Exterior of low cost materials. be difficult, Some older buildings may match the Average limited on site quality description however dated appearance parking and deferred maintenance may lower the classification. Limited or no parking on site. Prefabricated, low cost materials, dated appearance, deferred maintenance. Basic quality wall, floor, trim finishes. Standard quality and quantity of windows. May have higher than typical wall heights (over 10 feet).generally maintained. Adequate electrical, plumbing, mechanical, heating and air handling systems. May have fire protection and elevators, has limited or no security. Low quality finish. Limited modern features. Wall height varied. Generally, no modernization of mechanical or electrical has occurred. Typical appearance is worn, or out of date. Electrical, mechanical, plumbing, or heating may need updated or replaced in the near future. Elevators are unlikely. Deferred maintenance evident overall. Mechanical, electrical, heating, or plumbing may not meet the needs of tenant. The heating system is likely in need of replacement, along with locks. No elevators. All major items maintained, and showing some small signs of wear. All short lived items are functional. While some replacement or remodel may be needed in the near future, current level of maintenance is typical for this property. Generally less than 25 year effective age. Many repair or replacement items have not been completed, effectively shortening the expected life of the building. Remodel or repair would still be more cost effective than replacement. General appearance is worn. Effective age would be higher than actual age. Many repair or replacement items need immediate attention, overall deferred maintenance costs may exceed the cost to replace building. Likely this building is no longer suitable for the intended use. Physical and economic obsolescence obvious. Nearing end of effective life. As office. May have very small functional obsolescence. As office. May have functional obsolescence. As office. Has functional obsolescence, need for updating results in alternate use or high vacancy. General items to take into account - * The guidelines here are designed to assist in the uniform classification of properties. Appraiser judgment is an integral part of the process and should be given considerable weight. * Do not include interior items considered personal property in quality of construction. * Below Class E- Consider warehouse rate. The subject would typically have excessive deferred maintenance, limited value in use or be approaching abandonment. Further, it would need major reconstruction, rehabilitation, or improvement removal in the very near future. * Below Class E- AND vacant over five years AND condition issues consider use of Aux Storage. * Year of construction and effective age should be considered. In cases of remodel or modernization the actual age and effective age can be significantly different. * Consider space in classification. Example if a building was built for a single tenant and the upper floor can only be accessed through the 1st floor tenant's space; it may be a lower classification overall than a building with a common lobby entry with two or more separate entry's and spaces. * A lower class may be used for buildings in excess of 5,000 square feet or a higher class may be used for buildings less than 1,500 square feet. * Lower level parking is drawn on the cost approach, generally the office classification includes this component so no income line is needed. Functional Obsolescence is defined as Loss in value of a property resulting from changes in tastes, preferences, technical innovations, or market standards. The international Association of Assessing Officers, Property Appraisal * and Assessment Administration.

Income Model: 302018 Property Type: Office Neighborhood: 83036 All and 93036 All Office Med Bank CondoSmOfc Condo Ofc OfficeUpper Class A 32.48 33.00 33.00 2 2 7.25 Class B 25.76 26.00 26.00 3 3 2 2 7.500 Class C 19.60 23.00 23.00 24.00 3 3 3 2 Class D 16.80 17.50 17.50 3 3 Class E 13.44 17.00 1 4 8.75 8.75

Tax Year 2019 Office - General, Medical, Bank Sales 01/01/2016 to 03/31/2018 Sale No Neighborhood - Vicinity Property Class Account Number Project Name Acres Units Excise Valid Sale Date Sale Price 2018 Tax Year Value 2018 Ratio 2019 Tax Year Value 2019 Ratio Price per Unit BA IN BR IDGEIS L A N D 1 8303601 -City ofbainbridgeisland 611 262502-3-081-2001 -Am ericanm arinebank 0.95 12,475 2016EX 06309 D -N otaneconom 8/22/2016 $3,650,000 $3,168,840 $3,235,330 8303601 -City ofbainbridgeisland 460 4114-004-007-0000 -Am ericanm arinebank-pkg 0.18 2016EX 06309 D -N otaneconom 8/22/2016 $3,650,000 $429,300 $472,160 12,475 $3,650,000 $3,598,140 0.99 $3,707,490 1.02 $292.59 2 8303601 -City ofbainbridgeisland 690 272502-4-097-2000 -DL IL easingo fficebldg 0.9 11,659 2016EX 07375 V -Valid 9/29/2016 $2,500,000 $2,272,500 0.91 $2,626,440 1.05 $214.43 3 8303601 -City ofbainbridgeisland 690 262502-2-082-2002 -S EVEN FIFT Y ER ICKS O N P T N S HP 0.41 5,258 2017EX 05442 V -Valid 7/14/2017 $1,050,000 $657,020 0.63 $783,340 0.75 $199.70 4 8303601 -City ofbainbridgeisland 690 262502-3-041-2000 -ER ICKS O N P T N S HP 0.89 14,260 2017EX 05627 V -Valid 7/17/2017 $2,500,000 $1,672,680 0.67 $1,994,270 0.80 $175.32 5 8303601 -City ofbainbridgeisland 690 272502-1-013-2007 -Dr.S tuderos 0.59 2,126 2017EX 07786 V -Valid 9/18/2017 $950,000 $899,160 0.95 $915,780 0.96 $446.85 6 8303601 -City ofbainbridgeisland 690 262502-2-083-2001 -O fficeericksenave 0.4 5,008 2018EX 00282 V -Valid 1/2/2018 $955,000 $783,240 0.82 $848,830 0.89 $190.69 Count 6.00 Count 6.00 P roperty Class M in 0.63 M in 0.75 460 -P arking M ax 0.99 M ax 1.05 690 -GeneralO ffice Average 0.83 Average 0.91 M edian 0.87 M edian 0.93 CO D 14.07 CO D 10.63