Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Similar documents
Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

CALIFORNIA. cfr. i l fi ERIC GARCETTI MAYOR

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

COMMERCIAL EXCHANGE BUILDING West 8th Street and 800 South Olive Street CHC HCM ENV CE

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

CALIFORNIA. 'w<. LISA M. WEBBER, AICP GAIL KENNARD DEPUTY DIRECTOR VICE PRESIDENT (213) PILAR BUELNA DIANE KANNER BARRY A MILOFSKY

EXECUTIVE OFFICES CITY PLANNING 200 N. Spring Street, Room 532 CALIFORNIA. Los ANGELES, CA (213)

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

CALIFORNIA S' '( * ERIC GARCETTI MAYOR

CALIFORNIA. Si*-: A m (213) PILAR BUELNA DIANE KANNER BARRY A MILOFSKY. WOED>: ff ERIC GARCETTI

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

CATALINA SWIMWEAR BUILDING 443 South San Pedro Street CHC HCM ENV CE

DESIGNATION OF 1365 S. OAKLAND AVENUE AS A LANDMARK

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

CITY OF LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA ERIC GARCETTI MAYOR. Sharon Gin, Legislative Assistant Planning and Land Use Management Committee

City of Los Angeles CALIFORNIA

Memorandum. Overview. Background Information. To: Scott Albright, City of Santa Monica Date: 04/22/2013 Jan Ostashay, Principal OAC

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

TALBOT-WOOD DOUBLE DWELLING North Las Palmas Avenue CHC HCM ENV CE

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

HOLLYWOOD CITIZEN-NEWS BUILDING North Wilcox Avenue CHC HCM ENV CE

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

RECOMMENDATION REPORT

BRLYRLY. Cultural Heritage Commission Report. City. of Beverly. Hills Planning Division. Meeting Date: January 10, Subject:

Chapter 22 Historic Preservation/Design Review

Chapter HISTORIC PRESERVATION

M E M O R A N D U M PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA PLANNING DIVISION

City of Coral Gables. Historic Preservation Ad-Valorem Tax Exemption Program

RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Planning & Community Development Department DESIGNATION OF THE HOUSE AT 545 WESTGATE STREET AS A LANDMARK

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

VIRGINIA BEACH HISTORICAL REGISTER PROGRAM INFORMATION AND NOMINATION/APPLICATION FORM INSTRUCTIONS

Memorandum. 233 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 130, Santa Monica, CA INTERNET TEL FAX

BERGER WINSTON APARTMENT BUILDING /2 S. Ridgeley Drive CHC HCM ENV CE

2501 2nd Street Santa Monica, California City Landmark Assessment and Evaluation Report

Senior Planner, City of Santa Monica From: Christine Lazzaretto; Molly Iker Date: April 1, Gale Place

BENEFICIAL PLAZA AND LIBERTY PARK

BEFORE THE JACKSONVILLE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ORDER GRANTING REOUEST FOR DEMOLITION

Memorandum. Historic Resources Inventory Survey Form 315 Palisades Avenue, 1983.

MAR Los Angeles City Council Room 395, City Hall 200 North Spring Street Los Angeles, California 90012

PLANNING COMMISSION MAP AND TEXT AMENDMENT CASE SUMMARY

DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING. Recommendation Report. Central Area Planning Commission. Case No.: CEQA No.: Incidental Cases: Related Cases:

BACH HOUSE CORE TOUR. -Interpreters should be familiar with material at each stop, as they will operate on a rotating basis.

SRL. Cultural Heritage Commission Report

Welcome to HPOZ 101! Topics include: What is an HPOZ? How to establish an HPOZ? How do HPOZs function? Myth Busters Things You Should Know

DESIGNATION OF 377 ARROYO TERRACE AS A LANDMARK

Codified Ordinances of Pickerington, Ohio

HOLLYWOOD REPORTER BUILDING /2 West Sunset Boulevard CHC HCM ENV CE

CITY OF EVANSTON EVANSTON PRESERVATION COMMISSION A RESOLUTION

LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING RECOMMENDATION REPORT AND NOTICE

Architectural Inventory Form

& DEL VAC LLP SAN VICENTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 900 LOS ANGELES, CA October 22, 2013

CITY OF BUENA PARK MINUTES OF ZONING ADMINISTRATOR HEARING March 2, 2016

CHAPTER 20 HISTORIC PRESERVATION

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. 17-CA-02 Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance. Jon Biggs, Community Development Director

Planning Commission Report

Key for Understanding Integrity Rating and Architecture Rating used in the Showplace Square / Northeast Mission Historic Resources Survey

City of Long Beach Mills Act Program Pre-Application Workshop. Saturday, February 23, :00 am 12:00 pm Long Beach Gas & Oil Auditorium

P RESERVATION C OMMISSION

SUBJECT: DESIGNATION OF THE APARTMENT BUILDING AT NORTH LOS ROBLES AVENUE AS A LANDMARK

Transcription:

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMISSION DATE: December 15, 2011 TIME: 10:00 AM PLACE: City Hall, Room 1010 200 N. Spring Street Los Angeles, CA 90012 CASE NO.: CHC-2011-2738-HCM ENV-2011-2739-CE Location: 232 S. Saint Andrews Place Council District: 4 Community Plan Area: Wilshire Area Planning Commission: Central Neighborhood Council: Greater Wilshire Legal Description: Lot 43 of Tract Western Place PROJECT: REQUEST: APPLICANT/ OWNER: OWNER S REPRESENTATIVE: RECOMMENDATION Historic-Cultural Monument Application for the GANAHL HOUSE Declare the property a Historic-Cultural Monument Urbica Delechon Trust 200 Park Avenue S 8th New York, NY 10003 Ann Marie Brooks 1109 4 th Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90019 That the Cultural Heritage Commission: 1. Declare the property a Historic-Cultural Monument per Los Angeles Administrative Code Chapter 9, Division 22, Article 1, Section 22.171.7 2. Adopt the report findings. MICHAEL J. LOGRANDE Director of Planning [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] Ken Bernstein, AICP, Manager Office of Historic Resources [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] Lambert M. Giessinger, Preservation Architect Office of Historic Resources Prepared by: [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] Edgar Garcia, Preservation Planner Office of Historic Resources Attachments: 2011 Historic-Cultural Monument Application

Ganahl House CHC-2011-2738-HCM Page 2 of 3 FINDINGS 1) The building embodies the distinguishing characteristics of an architectural type specimen, inherently valuable for a study of a period style or method of construction as an example of Prairie style residential architecture. 2) The building is associated with a master builder, designer, or architect, as a work of noted architect and engineer Albert C Martin. CRITERIA The criterion is the Cultural Heritage Ordinance which defines a historical or cultural monument as any site (including significant trees or other plant life located thereon) building or structure of particular historic or cultural significance to the City of Los Angeles, such as historic structures or sites in which the broad cultural, economic, or social history of the nation, State or community is reflected or exemplified, or which are identified with historic personages or with important events in the main currents of national, State or local history or which embody the distinguishing characteristics of an architectural type specimen, inherently valuable for a study of a period style or method of construction, or a notable work of a master builder, designer or architect whose individual genius influenced his age. SUMMARY Built in 1913, this one-story residential building exhibits character-defining features of Prairie style architecture. The subject building is rectangular in plan with an off-center hardwood entry door flanked by two multi-pane sidelight windows. The subject building has a prominent centered chimney bisecting its hipped roof. The chimney has a smooth stucco finish with semicircular pediment. The deep overhang of the roof creates a porch space supported by massive square piers at each corner. The porch and exterior are covered in smooth stucco with wood trim. Windows are double hung wood and casement windows. Multi-paned French doors are located on rear elevations. Significant interior features include a Batchelder fireplace, wood paneling, cabinetry, and wood floors. Landscape features include mature trees, bushes, and a side driveway. Secondary buildings include a detached garage. The subject building was designed by prominent architect and engineer Albert C. Martin (1879-1960), founder of the famed Los Angeles-based architectural firm of Albert C. Martin & Associates (now A.C. Martin Partners). This firm would be responsible for such landmarks as the Million Dollar Theater (1917), St. Vincent de Paul (1925, HCM #90), and Los Angeles City Hall (1928, HCM #150). Martin designed the home for his brother in law Constance Christian (C.C.) Ganahl and his wife, Margaret Mary Martin. C.C. Ganahl was son of the president and founder of the C. Ganahl Lumber Company and would later become president of the company in the 1930s. Alterations to the subject building include texture coating on all exterior surfaces, portions of which have been removed as part of a rehabilitation. FINDINGS The Ganahl House property successfully meets three of the specified Historic-Cultural Monument criteria: 1) embodies the distinguishing characteristics of an architectural type

Ganahl House CHC-2011-2738-HCM Page 3 of 3 specimen, inherently valuable for a study of a period style or method of construction, and 2) is associated with a master builder, designer, or architect. As a residential building designed in the Prairie style by a noted architect and engineer, the property qualifies for designation as a Historic-Cultural Monument based on these criteria. BACKGROUND At its meeting of November 3, 2011, the Cultural Heritage Commission voted to take the application under consideration. On December 1, 2011, the Cultural Heritage Commission toured the subject property. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT ( CEQA ) REVIEW State of California CEQA Guidelines, Article 19, Section 15308, Class 8 consists of actions taken by regulatory agencies, as authorized by state or local ordinance, to assure the maintenance, restoration, enhancement, or protection of the environment where the regulatory process involves procedures for protection of the environment. State of California CEQA Guidelines Article 19, Section 15331, Class 31 consists of projects limited to maintenance, repair, stabilization, rehabilitation, restoration, preservation, conservation or reconstruction of historical resources in a manner consistent with the Secretary of the Interior s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic buildings. The designation of the Ganahl House property as a Historic-Cultural Monument in accordance with Chapter 9, Article 1, of The City of Los Angeles Administrative Code ( LAAC ) will ensure that future construction activities involving the subject property are regulated in accordance with Section 22.171.14 of the LAAC. The purpose of the designation is to prevent significant impacts to a Historic-Cultural Monument through the application of the standards set forth in the LAAC. Without the regulation imposed by way of the pending designation, the historic significance and integrity of the subject property could be lost through incompatible alterations and new construction and the demolition of irreplaceable historic structures. The Secretary of the Interior s Standards of Rehabilitation are expressly incorporated into the LAAC and provide standards concerning the historically appropriate construction activities which will ensure the continued preservation of the subject property. The use of Categorical Exemption Class 8 in connection with the proposed designation is consistent with the goals of maintaining, restoring, enhancing, and protecting the environment through the imposition of regulations designed to prevent the degradation of Historic-Cultural Monuments. The use of Categorical Exemption Class 31 in connection with the proposed designation is consistent with the goals relating to the preservation, rehabilitation, restoration and reconstruction of Historic buildings in a manner consistent with the Secretary of the Interior s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic Buildings.

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMISSION DATE: November 3, 2011 TIME: 10:00 AM PLACE: City Hall, Room 1010 200 N. Spring Street Los Angeles, CA 90012 CASE NO.: CHC-2011-2738-HCM ENV-2011-2739-CE Location: 232 S. Saint Andrews Place Council District: 4 Community Plan Area: Wilshire Area Planning Commission: Central Neighborhood Council: Greater Wilshire Legal Description: Lot 43 of Tract Western Place PROJECT: REQUEST: APPLICANT/ OWNER: OWNER S REPRESENTATIVE: RECOMMENDATION Historic-Cultural Monument Application for the GANAHL HOUSE Declare the property a Historic-Cultural Monument Urbica Delechon Trust 200 Park Avenue S 8th New York, NY 10003 Ann Marie Brooks 1109 4 th Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90019 That the Cultural Heritage Commission: 1. Take the property under consideration as a Historic-Cultural Monument per Los Angeles Administrative Code Chapter 9, Division 22, Article 1, Section 22.171.10 because the application and accompanying photo documentation suggest the submittal warrants further investigation. 2. Adopt the report findings. MICHAEL J. LOGRANDE Director of Planning [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] Ken Bernstein, AICP, Manager Office of Historic Resources [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] Lambert M. Giessinger, Preservation Architect Office of Historic Resources Prepared by: [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] Edgar Garcia, Preservation Planner Office of Historic Resources Attachments: 2011 Historic-Cultural Monument Application

Ganahl House CHC-2011-2738-HCM Page 2 of 2 SUMMARY Built in 1913, this one-story residential building exhibits character-defining features of Prairie style architecture. The subject building is rectangular in plan with an off-center hardwood entry door flanked by two multi-pane sidelight windows. The subject building has a prominent centered chimney bisecting its hipped roof. The chimney has a smooth stucco finish with semicircular pediment. The deep overhang of the roof creates a porch space supported by massive square piers at each corner. The porch and exterior are covered in smooth stucco with wood trim. Windows are double hung wood and casement windows. Multi-paned French doors are located on rear elevations. Significant interior features include a Batchelder fireplace, wood paneling, cabinetry, and wood floors. Landscape features include mature trees, bushes, and a side driveway. Secondary buildings include a detached garage. The subject building was designed by prominent architect and engineer Albert C. Martin (1879-1960), founder of the famed Los Angeles-based architectural firm of Albert C. Martin & Associates (now A.C. Martin Partners). This firm would be responsible for such landmarks as the Million Dollar Theater (1917), St. Vincent de Paul (1925, HCM #90), and Los Angeles City Hall (1928, HCM #150). Martin designed the home for his brother in law Constance Christian (C.C.) Ganahl and his wife, Margaret Mary Martin. C.C. Ganahl was son of the president and founder of the C. Ganahl Lumber Company and would later become president of the company in the 1930s. Alterations to the subject building include texture coating on all exterior surfaces, portions of which have been removed as part of a rehabilitation. CRITERIA The criterion is the Cultural Heritage Ordinance which defines a historical or cultural monument as any site (including significant trees or other plant life located thereon) building or structure of particular historic or cultural significance to the City of Los Angeles, such as historic structures or sites in which the broad cultural, economic, or social history of the nation, State or community is reflected or exemplified, or which are identified with historic personages or with important events in the main currents of national, State or local history or which embody the distinguishing characteristics of an architectural type specimen, inherently valuable for a study of a period style or method of construction, or a notable work of a master builder, designer or architect whose individual genius influenced his age. FINDINGS Based on the facts set forth in the summary and application, the Commission determines that the application is complete and that the property may be significant enough to warrant further investigation as a potential Historic-Cultural Monument.