CRN Analysis of the Fourth Quarter 2017 Housing Report

Similar documents
City of Chicago Affordable Housing Plan Fourth Quarter Progress Report April 8, 2010

Affordable Housing Plan

CHICAGO LOW-INCOME HOUSING TRUST FUND MAUI Program Guide and Application (Operating Reserve Fund)

H o u s i n g N e e d i n E a s t K i n g C o u n t y

HOUSING & NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT

bae urban economics ALAMEDA RENT STUDY Presentation to Alameda City Council November 4, 2015

CHICAGO LOW-INCOME HOUSING TRUST FUND MAUI Program Guide and Application (Capital Investment)

City of Chicago Richard M. Daley Mayor

CHICAGO LOW-INCOME HOUSING TRUST FUND MAUI Program Guide and Application (Capital Investment)

Subject. Date: 2016/10/25. Originator s file: CD.06.AFF. Chair and Members of Planning and Development Committee

BUILDING OUR FUTURE CHICAGO

Detroit Inclusionary Housing Plan & Market Study Preliminary Inclusionary Housing Feasibility Study Executive Summary August, 2016

Funding Strategies for. Developing and Operating Extremely Low Income Housing

Metropolitan Development and Housing Agency. Reviewed and Approved

Denver Comprehensive Housing Plan. Housing Advisory Committee Denver, CO August 3, 2017

APPENDIX B DESCRIPTION OF MAJOR FEDERAL LOW-INCOME HOUSING ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS

National Housing Trust Fund Implementation. Virginia Housing Alliance

Atlanta BeltLine REGIONAL SYMPOISUM ON IMPLEMENTING TRANSIT PLANS

ALAMEDA COUNTY HOUSING BOND. Stakeholder Proposals and Input

PROPOSED $100 MILLION FOR FAMILY AFFORDABLE HOUSING

ISSUE AREA I AFFORDABLE HOUSING. Median Home Value AFFORDABLE HOUSING GOAL: 12 Belmont Cragin Quality-of-Life Plan $ 400,000 $ 300,000 $243,446

Funding Strategies for. Developing and Operating Extremely Low Income Housing

Multifamily Housing For All: The Need for Affordable Housing. Solutions for an Affordable Pittsburgh

HUD RAD (Rental Assistance Demonstration) Overview

Foreclosure: How Can Philanthropy Help?

Affordable Housing Action Plan

Affordable Housing Plan Keeping Chicago s neighborhoods affordable.

Housing Assistance in Minnesota

Beyond the Moral Argument

2016 Vermont National Housing Trust Fund Allocation Plan

Housing Consortium of Everett and Snohomish County 2013 Affordable Housing 101. Paul Purcell President, Beacon Development Group

2014 LIHTC PROGRAM UPDATE

SUPPLEMENTAL SUBJECT: WINCHESTER AND SANTANA ROW/VALLEY FAIR URBAN VILLAGE PLAN BASELINE AFFORDABLE HOUSING STOCK ANALYSIS

Chapter 4: Housing and Neighborhoods

Projected FY2018 Unit Delivery. PROJECTED FY2018 UNIT DELIVERY TBD Mixed-Income Housing Redevelopment 1340 W. Taylor 37 TBD Public Housing Acquisition

Housing. Imagine a Winnipeg...: Alternative Winnipeg Municipal Budget

Document under Separate Cover Refer to LPS State of Housing

THE BOSTON HOUSING COURT RESEARCH PROJECT: A COMPARISON OF EVICTION DATA FROM 2006 AND 2010

The number of people alive today is greater than the number of people who have ever died.

Oklahoma Housing Finance Agency. Affordable Housing Programs

Risks & Responsibilities in Revitalizing Neighborhoods: Addressing Market Displacement & Resident Relocation at the Project Scale

Affordable Housing: Housing that does not cost more than 30% of an individual or family s total income to rent or own.

Statement of. Peter A. Tatian Senior Research Associate, Urban Institute

Grantee: Broward County, FL Grant: B-08-UN April 1, 2011 thru June 30, 2011 Performance Report

Housing Market Update

AFFORDABLE ATLANTA. Presented By: Presented For: ULI Atlanta: LCC Working Group on Affordable Housing 1/16/18

January 1, 2015 thru March 31, 2015 Performance Report

Federal Funding for Youth Housing Programs

Town of Limon Comprehensive Plan CHAPTER 4 HOUSING. Limon Housing Authority Affordable Housing

Understanding the Nature of Gentrification and Displacement in the Bay Area

Memo. DATE: 20 September 2018 City Planning Commission John Rahaim, Director of Planning RE: HOUSING BALANCE REPORT No. 7 1 July June 2018

Berkeley Housing Authority

[Re. Docket No. FR 6123-A-01] Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing: Streamlining and Enhancements (the Streamlining Notice )

T22- Affordable Home Ownership in Canada and Beyond

Analysis of a Troubled Deal. Keith Broadnax Joshua Ghena David Helm Josh White

HOUSING MARKET STUDY

Expectations for including affordable housing in rezoning applications o 15% of units or o comparable contributions cash

Washtenaw County Housing Affordability and Economic Equity - Analysis

The Low-Income Housing Tax Credit and the Hurricane Katrina Relief Effort

National Housing Trust Fund Allocation Plan

Strategies for Engaging Residents in Bay Area Preservation Efforts. NPH Annual Conference September 21, 2018

Arizona Department of Housing Five-Year Strategic Plan

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of September 24, 2016

WHERE WILL WE LIVE? ONTARIO S AFFORDABLE RENTAL HOUSING CRISIS

Since 2012, this is the HUD Definition

Housing for the Region s Future

Grantee: Broward County, FL Grant: B-08-UN April 1, 2012 thru June 30, 2012 Performance Report

Housing Credit Modernization Becomes Law

Housing & Homelessness Strategy Targets Report Card. Presentation to City Council February 12, 2013

Permanent Supportive Housing: An Operating Cost Analysis

CHAPTER V: IMPLEMENTING THE PLAN

Housing Program Application (HOME & HTF) County of Bucks, Pennsylvania Housing Services

2Should the next mayor require

Landmark District Proposed on Northwestern University's Chicago Campus

27 States With City Housing Trust Funds

Campaign for Housing and Community Development Funding

A National Housing Action Plan: Effective, Straightforward Policy Prescriptions to Reduce Core Housing Need

Housing/ Displacement Subcommittee Presentation. Community Working Group September 24, 2015

ANNUAL REPORT

Public Housing: Rental Assistance Demonstration

El Cerrito Affordable Housing Strategy City Council Presentation August 15, 2017

Community Revitalization Efforts 2016 Thresholds and Scoring Criteria

Overview. Five Eligible NSP Uses. Meeting the 25% Set-Aside for Low-Income Persons

Community Working Group Meeting. September 24, :00 pm 8:30 pm

Investigating an Affordable Housing Preservation Strategy

Affordability First: Concerns about Preserving Housing Options for Existing and New Residents on Atlanta s Westside

The Housing and Community Services Agency of Lane County (HACSA) Growing and Preserving Affordable Housing HACSA Board Work Session April 6, 2016

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Housing Element Implementation (CCR Title ) Table A

Lake County Consortium 2019 Affordable Housing Pre-Application Workshop. September 28, 2018

for Arizona th Annual Statewide Conference on Ending Homelessness October 30, 2013

At Home in the Lake Region A Regional Housing Study

Affordable Housing in SD 49 Area BRAD AHO EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCILMEMBER FEBRUARY 26, 2019

El Cerrito Affordable Housing Strategy

Lathrop Homes Chronology CHA s Plan for Transformation 1

October Housing Affordability in Colorado. federal resources

Housing Advisory Committee Retreat. Monday, January 9, 2017

Key Findings on the Affordability of Rental Housing from New York City s Housing and Vacancy Survey 2008

Non-Profit Co-operative Housing: Working to Safeguard Canada s Affordable Housing Stock for Present and Future Generations

Providing permanently affordable housing in Northwestern Vermont NATIONAL CONGRESS ON HOUSING AND HOMELESSNESS. Montreal 2016

Written Testimony of:

Transcription:

CRN Analysis of the Fourth Quarter 2017 Housing Report Bouncing Back: Five-Year Housing Plan, 2014-2018 Presented April 6, 2018, Chicago City Council Committee on Housing & Real Estate Crain s recent editorial House-flippers discover the South Side and that s a good thing (March 16, 2018) underscores a confluence of issues the city of Chicago must get right: housing insecurity and investments in neighborhoods. And, the good news is the city has the resources to get it right. The city has a dynamic tapestry of community development corporations that have decades of experience of working in neighborhoods, community leaders and activists, and human service providers who work to build the capacity of Chicago residents. Chicago s corporate leaders recognize the role affordable housing has for neighborhood stability, business, and workforce development. And the city s Department of Planning and Development has been pursuing a robust agenda for Chicago neighborhoods and has shown tremendous leadership in expanding linkage fees during this period of hot high end real estate development. One key challenge, in addition to the lack of resources and inequities, remains how to foster development without displacement. People on fixed incomes are always at risk during booming real estate markets even small increases in property taxes can create instability for a household, a block, a neighborhood. One Chicago must have a vision that includes a home for all. Displacement of poor people is not, however, just an unintended consequence of real estate investment; it is rather a disregard to a fundamental bond any community must have, not only for its success, but for its integrity and future competitiveness. The people of Chicago deserve to partake in the city s growth and development. In order to do so, the city will require an anti-displacement policy that utilizes a variety of strategies like property tax circuit breakers, cooperative housing, rent to own, preservation of rental housing, and other strategies to enable people to succeed. We have a ways to go: nearly 50% of Chicago renters are cost burdened and almost as many owners. The Institute of Housing Studies at DePaul pegs the shortage at approximately 112,000 units. The next Housing Plan should lay out solutions and policies to address this over 100,000-unit shortage, understanding that it will take more than 5 years and also requiring an increased investment of resources to meet needs and to reduce long term costs. You can see below in Figure 1 the Resource Commitments from the last five plans. We can t miss this opportunity to do more than we have before. The city that reversed its river and continues to innovate with our riverfront, with O Hare, and in areas across the city can certainly be the nation s leader in housing for all. Chicago Rehab Network 2018 www.chicagorehab.org 1

Figure 1 A Comparison of Five Year Housing Plan Totals in 2013 Dollars $2,500,000,000 $2,000,000,000 $1,636,554,589 $2,114,135,970 $2,175,071,240 $1,500,000,000 $1,000,000,000 $1,075,650,459 $1,329,941,604 $500,000,000 $- 1993-1998: "Affordable Housing and Community Jobs Ordinance" 1999-2003: "Housing Opportunities into the Next Century" 2004-2008: "Build, Preserve, Lead" 2009-2013: "Accepting the Challenge" 2014-2018: "Bouncing Back" Since 2004, the City has funded the rehab and new construction of 17,128 rental units in 185 different development projects across 45 of the city s 50 wards. These are projects with use restrictions passed through the City Council Committee on Housing and Real Estate and the full City Council. Most are LIHTC funded, 9% and 4% tax credits. Figure 2 - Rental Homes Developed by AMI Bracket Served, 2004-2017 81-100% 73 1% 61-80% 374 2% 100%+ 1262 8% 16-30% 1881 Below 15% AMI11% 1725 10% 51-60% 7277 43% 31-50% 4244 25% Chicago Rehab Network 2018 www.chicagorehab.org 2

Figure 3 - Rental Homes Developed by Bedroom Size 2004-2017: 1-br 7588 45% 2-br 3623 22% 3-br 2303 14% STUDIO 2831 17% 4-br 5-br 333 10 2% 0% CRN has begun data analysis by community area and ward of housing market factors and trends. The Affordable Housing Fact Book, our partnership with the Voorhees Center at UIC, will provide data on housing supply and demand at all levels of the market. Importantly, we will incorporate expanded data from partners to ensure improved attention to need indicators such including people with disabilities, the homeless, rates of foreclosure and eviction and especially waiting lists at HUD, CHA, IHDA and city-funded rental developments. Changes in population, for instance, will require public policy responses or program adjustments to support communities losing population as well as those households and communities most at risk of losing housing stability. Areas with Highest Population Growth Since 2010 Number Community Name 2015 Pop Change since 2010 76 O'Hare 14,770 15.10% 28 Near West Side 61,892 12.77% 54 Riverdale 7,062 8.95% 5 North Center 34,691 8.86% 64 Clearing 25,007 8.07% 11 Jefferson Park 27,242 7.05% 24 West Town 86,569 6.17% 60 Bridgeport 33,893 5.99% 16 Irving Park 56,457 5.81% 32 Loop 30,853 5.36% Chicago Rehab Network 2018 www.chicagorehab.org 3

Areas with Highest Population Loss Since 2010 Number Community Name 2015 Pop Change since 2010 3 Uptown 49,791-11.66% 37 Fuller Park 2,522-12.31% 41 Hyde Park 22,381-12.85% 68 Englewood 26,069-14.96% 43 South Shore 43,178-15.06% 46 South Chicago 26,355-15.52% 33 Near South Side 18,047-15.63% 77 Edgewater 45,848-18.88% 39 Kenwood 13,662-23.42% 36 Oakland 4,042-31.70% We are in the last year of the Bouncing Back plan and the trend line shows that projections are largely being met, though, again, projections were not based on addressing the larger universe of housing needs. Figure 4 Projected Funding vs. To-Date Actual Commitments, Bouncing Back 2014-2018 Plan 1,400,000,000 1,200,000,000 1,000,000,000 800,000,000 600,000,000 400,000,000 200,000,000 0 Multifamily Single Family Improvement + Preservation "Bouncing Back" Plan Funding Projections "Bouncing Back" Plan Actual Commitments (through 2017) Chicago Rehab Network 2018 www.chicagorehab.org 4

Analysis of Fourth Quarter 2017 Housing Activities Since 1994, the Chicago Rehab Network has analyzed the City of Chicago Department of Planning and Development s quarterly housing reports, which are produced in accordance with the City s five year housing plans and follow the Housing and Community Jobs Ordinance. This report covers the fourth quarter of 2017. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A total of 344 net-new units were produced in Q4, making an overall total of 1,847 netnew units during 2017. While Q4 s number was down from Q3 s 604 net-new units, the 1,847 total units produced in 2017 significantly exceeded the planned 1,300 units. Q4 saw the commitment of 5 new developments for a total of 17 developments during the year. 57 units created in Q4 will receive CHA funding, while 60 will receive RAD funding. For 2017, there were a total of 498 CHA units. During Q4, DPD invested just under $118 million in rental, homeownership, and improvement programs. Just under $403.5 million was invested during the entire year, making 173.7% of the total funding projection of $204.52 million. Q4 saw the addition of 105 ARO units, for a total of 283 during the entire year. $1,575,000 million was received in Q4 by the Chicago Affordable Housing Opportunity Fund, making the total year commitment $23,558,554. Of the 344 net-new units produced during Q4, 17 will be rented out at market rate, while 327 will be affordable. 3 of the 5 total Q4 projects are mixed-use developments that will house libraries in addition to housing. Two of these will serve residents at 60% of AMI, while one will be mixed-income and include market rate units. How does inclusion of the library facility impact the cost per unit and overall? Lincoln Park Community Shelter will be a supportive housing facility and Life Center Artist Residences will provide housing for artists and their families. Table 1 Housing Dollar Commitments Compared with Annual Goal, 2017 Q4 Rental Investments Ownership Investments Improvement/ Preservation Investments Total Investments Total Funds Committed by Year End 355,296,060 32,377,192 15,793,073 403,466,325 Total Funds Anticipated by Year End 204,520,000 25,794,031 13,299,239 243,613,270 Percent of Goal Met through Q4 173.7% 125.5% 81.5% 165.6% Chicago Rehab Network 2018 www.chicagorehab.org 5

Table 2 Housing Unit Commitments Compared with Annual Goal, 2017 Q4 Rental Units* Ownership Units Improvement/ Preservation Units Total Units YTD Units 5,396 581 2,231 8,208 Total Units Projected by Year End 5,450 434 1,769 7,653 Percent of Goal Met 99% 133.9% 126.1% 107.3% When looking at the City s planned and actual affordable apartment achievements in 2017, it is important to factor in the number of existing units receiving rental subsidies that are counted. Of the 5,450 low-income units the City planned to support in 2017, more than half (3,000) were expected to receive annual subsidies through the CLIHTF. Many of these subsidies support the same families year to year. Although the CLIHTF is a vital, flexible source of public-private housing support for some of the most vulnerable families in our city, counting these units in the same way as new construction or rehabilitation projects receiving City support obscures the number and proportion of new projects moving forward in any quarter or year. To get a clearer look at new affordable apartments being made available for individuals and families in need, CRN removes CLIHTF-subsidized units and two key preservation programs (Heat Receivership and Multifamily Troubled Building Imitative) that do not directly add new units to the available affordable housing stock in Chicago (Table 3). How is this table constructed from DPD s progress report? In order to calculate how many of the planned units receiving City funds this year would expand the net availability of income-limited apartments, CRN starts with the City s projected number of rental units planned to receive subsidies this year (5,450). We then subtract the planned units covered by those housing programs that are not constructing or rehabilitating rental housing, including 3,000 CLIHTF-subsidized units, 400 Heat Receivership units, and 750 Multifamily Troubled Building Initiative units. This leaves us with 1,300 net-new units; that is, those units that are newly built or rehabilitated and add to the total number of affordable units, rather than simply receiving subsidies. We use the same method to arrive at the number of net-new units actually committed in 2017: while 5,396 total units were committed during the year, 2,641 were CLIHTFsubsidized, 153 were Heat Receivership Units, and 755 were Multifamily Troubled Building Initiative units. Looking at the production numbers using this method lets us understand how many new affordable apartments may actually be added in Chicago throughout the year. From this analysis, we see that while fewer units ultimately received subsidies from CLIHTF, Heat Receivership, and Multifamily Troubled Building Initiative funding than planned (Table 3), the City provided resources for 547 more net-new units than planned, creating 1,847 net-new units total. This is approximately 142% of the annual goal for net-new units, with 283 of these being covenanted under the ARO. The latter figure speaks to the success of the 2015 Affordable Requirements Ordinance, as only 100 units were projected in 2017 and production had reached 283% of this target at the end of the year. Chicago Rehab Network 2018 www.chicagorehab.org 6

Table 3 Net-New Housing Unit Commitments in Comparison with Annual Goal, 2017 Total Units Planned for 2017 Total Units Committed in 2017 Total Units Committed in 2017-Q4 Total Subsidized Rental Units 5,450 5,396 745 Less Rental Subsidy Units 3,000 2,641 1 Less Heat Receivership Units 400 153 71 Less MF Troubled Building Initiative Units 750 755 329 Net New Rental Units** 1,300 1,847 344 While all of these projects are focused on affordable housing or are mixed-income, a number of market rate units have been committed as well, with 15% of units committed in 2017 being targeted toward upward of 100% AMI (Table 4). The income bracket that has seen the most development is 51-60% AMI, with a 53% share of total units. Meanwhile, less than 1% of developments are affordable for the 0-15% AMI bracket. Figure 5 on the following page shows the proportion of units produced in each income bracket over the entire Five Year Plan so far, again demonstrating that the majority of rental units serve those households whose incomes are at 51-60% of AMI. The next largest group is 31-50% AMI, with the fewest rental units serving those at or below 15% AMI. Table 4 Incomes Served by Net-New Rental Units, 2017 Income of tenants served Net-New Rental Units Share of Total Units Produced Per Income Bracket 0-15% AMI 13 <1% 16-30% AMI 153 8% 31-50% AMI 241 13% 51-60% AMI 973 53% 61-80% AMI 192 10% 81-100% AMI - - 101+% AMI 275 15% YTD Units Committed 1,874 100% Total Units Projected by Year End 1,300 Percent of Goal Met 142% Chicago Rehab Network 2018 www.chicagorehab.org 7

Figure 5 Net-New Rental Units Produced by AMI, 2014-2017 80-100% AMI, 101%+ AMI, 3, 0% 553, 10% 61-80% AMI, 251, 5% 0-15% AMI, 16, 0% 16-30% AMI, 519, 10% 31-50% AMI, 1097, 20% 51-60% AMI, 2981, 55% Another useful way of visualizing the production of new units is by size. In 2017, more 1-bedrooms were created than any other size unit, followed by 2-bedrooms (Figure 6). When 1-bedrooms and studios are combined, they account for nearly half (49%) of the net-new rental units created in 2017. This year also saw the production of SRO units as well as efficiency units for supportive housing. Figure 6 Net-New Rental Units by Number of Bedrooms, 2017 4 Bedroom, 14, 1% Efficiency, 20, 1% SRO, 90, 6% 3 Bedroom, 217, 14% Studio, 98, 6% 2 Bedroom, 441, 29% 1 Bedroom, 672, 43% Chicago Rehab Network 2018 www.chicagorehab.org 8

Table 5 Sources of Net-New Units, 2017 Quarter Source of Units Units Q1 ARO Rental Units Covenanted 66 Subtotal, Q1 66 Q2 ARO Rental Units Covenanted 99 Q2 Brainerd Park Apartments - Affordable 27 Q2 Brainerd Park Apartments - Affordable (CHA) 9 Q2 Montclare Senior Residences of Englewood - Affordable 102 Q2 Tierra Linda Apartments - Affordable 34 Q2 Tierra Linda Apartments - Affordable (CHA) 11 Q2 New West Englewood Homes - Affordable 12 Q2 La Casa Norte Pierce House - Affordable 25 Q2 Diversey Manor - Affordable 53 Q2 Diversey Manor - Affordable (CHA) 45 Q2 Woodlawn Roll Up - Affordable 24 Q2 Woodlawn Roll Up - Affordable (CHA) 121 Q2 Woodlawn Roll Up - Market 51 Q2 Preserving Communities Together - Multi-family 12 Subtotal, Q2 625 Q3 ARO Rental Units Covenanted 13 Q3 Marshall Hotel Affordable (PRAC) 90 Q3 Mayfair Commons Affordable 83 Q3 Mayfair Commons Affordable (MAUI) 13 Q3 Mayfair Commons Maintenance Staff Unit 1 Q3 The Concord at Sheridan Affordable (CHA) 65 Q3 The Concord at Sheridan Market 46 Q3 John Pennycuff Memorial Apartments - Affordable 41 Q3 John Pennycuff Memorial Apartments Affordable (CHA) 47 Q3 Lathrop Homes Phase 1A Affordable 109 Q3 Lathrop Homes Phase 1A Affordable (CHA) 143 Q3 Lathrop Homes Phase 1A - Market 161 Subtotal, Q3 812 Q4 ARO Rental Units Covenanted 105 Q4 Life Center Artist Residences - Affordable 49 Q4 Life Center Artist Residences Market Rate 9 Q4 Lincoln Park Community Shelter Affordable (CHA) 20 Q4 Taylor Street Library and Apartments - Affordable 29 Q4 Taylor Street Library and Apartments Affordable (CHA) 37 Q4 Taylor Street Library and Apartments Market Rate 7 Q4 Independence Library and Apartments - Affordable 14 Q4 Independence Library and Apartments Affordable (RAD) 30 Q4 Northtown Library and Apartments - Affordable 14 Q4 Northtown Library and Apartments Affordable (RAD) 30 Subtotal, Q4 344 Total Net-New Units YTD 1,847 Chicago Rehab Network 2018 www.chicagorehab.org 9

DEVELOPMENT SUMMARIES Five new multifamily developments were approved during 2017-Q4, for a cumulative total of seventeen during the year. One development will be a supportive housing facility, one will be artists residences, and three developments will be mixed-use projects that include both housing and a library. Three of the developments are mixed-income, with two receiving CHA funding and two receiving RAD funding. Life Center Artist Residences Serving the 20 th Ward, Life Center Artist Residences will provide apartments for artists and families and will contain 5,000 square feet of studio space on the ground floor. The project, which will be constructed on two City-owned lots conveyed at $1 each, benefits from $6,350,000 in TIF funds, $1,500,000 in 9% credits generating $15,225,000 in equity, and $270,000 in donation tax credits generating $255,700 in equity. Income Targets: - 2 studio/one-bath apartments at 60% of AMI - 1 studio/one-bath apartment at market rate - 4 one-bedroom/one-bath apartments at 50% of AMI - 30 one-bedroom/one-bath apartments at 60% of AMI - 5 one-bedroom/one-bath apartments at market rate - 2 two-bedroom/one-bath apartments at 50% of AMI - 11 two-bedroom/one-bath apartments at 60% of AMI - 3 two-bedroom/one-bath apartments at market rate Total Development Cost: $23.3 million Cost Per Unit: $402,126 Lincoln Park Community Shelter Serving the 27 th Ward, the Lincoln Park Community Shelter will be a five-story supportive housing facility containing efficiency apartments with private baths. All units will receive CHA assistance. An adjacent homeless shelter will provide case management services and support staff. The project benefits from a $2,500,000 multi-family loan. Income Targets: - 5 efficiency one-bath apartments at 30% of AMI (CHA) - 15 efficiency one-bath apartments at 50% of AMI (CHA) Total Development Cost: $7 million Cost Per Unit: $350,000 Taylor Street Library and Apartments Serving the 28 th Ward, Taylor Street Library and Apartments will see the construction of a combination Chicago Public Library branch and mixed-income housing development. The new building is part of the ongoing redevelopment of the former BLA Homes public housing complex. The project benefits from $26,000,000 in housing revenue bonds, $7,000,000 in TIF funds, $988,000 in 4% credits Chicago Rehab Network 2018 www.chicagorehab.org 10

generating $9,948,000 in equity, and $1,333,000 in donation tax credits generating $1,215,522 in equity. Income Targets: - 20 one-bedroom units, CHA - 23 one-bedroom units at 60% of AMI - 3 one-bedroom units at market rate - 17 two-bedroom units, CHA - 6 two-bedroom units at 60% of AMI - 4 two-bedroom units at market rate Total Development Cost: $36.2 million Cost Per Unit: $495,513 Independence Library and Apartments Serving the 45 th Ward, Independence Library and Apartments will be a combination Chicago Public Library branch and apartment building, and will include 30 project-based Section 8 vouchers funded through RAD. The six-story project will be built on land owned by the CHA. The project benefits from $1,700,000 in 9% credits generating $17,168,111 in equity and $935,550 in donation tax credits generating $836,673 in equity. Income Targets: - 30 one-bedroom apartments at 60% of AMI (RAD) - 6 one-bedroom apartments at 60% of AMI - 8 two-bedroom apartments at 60% of AMI - Total Development Cost: $33.3 million Cost Per Unit: $757,909 Northtown Library and Apartments Serving the 50 th Ward, Northtown Library and Apartments will be a combination Chicago Public Library branch and apartment building, and will include 30 project-based Section 8 vouchers funded through RAD. The four-story project will be built on land owned by the CHA. The project benefits from $1,420,000 in 9% credits generating $14,340,422 in equity and $1,124,800 in donation tax credits generating $1,007,944 in equity. Income Targets: - 30 one-bedroom apartments at 60% of AMI (RAD) - 14 one-bedroom apartments at 60% of AMI - Total Development Cost: $33.3 million Cost Per Unit: $757,909 Chicago Rehab Network 2018 www.chicagorehab.org 11