ORDINANCE NO

Similar documents
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NOVATO ORDINANCE NO. 1603

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, periodically the Conservation, Development and Planning Department

ORDINANCE NO to amend subsection A to add subsection (15) which shall read as follows: (15) Attached dwelling units such as townhouses.

FULL TEXT OF MEASURE I CITY OF YORBA LINDA

TOWNSHIP OF MOORESTOWN ORDINANCE NO

URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 1228

ORDINANCE NO. 17- WHEREAS, Ordinance No , by law, is effective for only 10 months and 15 days and expires on January 26, 2017; and

ORDINANCE NO City Attorney Summary

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. 17-CA-02 Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance. Jon Biggs, Community Development Director

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO

- CITY OF CLOVIS - REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION

ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO. XXXX. WHEREAS, the proposed Rezone has been processed pursuant to Section , Title 9 of the Municipal Code; and

PUBLIC HEARING Agenda Item No.: 9a CC Mtg.: 05/24/2011

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO REPORT OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDING RECORD)

ORDINANCE NO. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Sonoma, State of California, ordains as follows:

ORDINANCE NO. 1_8_0_1_0_3_

CITY OF LOS ALTOS CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 9, 2015

Agenda Item No. October 14, Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: David J. Van Kirk, City Manager

4. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. Public hearing on revisions to Accessory Dwelling Unit Standards in the Land Development Code LEGISLATIVE

ORDINANCE NO

1069 regarding Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) were signed into law; and

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NOVATO ORDINANCE NO. 1602

TOWNSHIP OF NEPTUNE NOTICE OF FINAL ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO

ALLENDALE CHARTER TOWNSHIP ORDINANCE NO RENTAL HOUSING REGISTRATION ORDINANCE RESTATEMENT

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING THE REVISED GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF BAYONNE THE, CHAPTER 33 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS

aft of Nort4 Port Code; and ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE 115. Whereas, the District is desirous of promoting the most efficient use of water by promoting water conservation; and

Draft Ordinance: subject to modification by Town Council based on deliberations and direction ORDINANCE 2017-

BEVERLY HILLS AGENDA REPORT

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

The City Council makes the following findings:

ORDINANCE NO. STRTF Review

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, many Vacation Rentals are currently operating throughout Mendocino County; and

RESOLUTION NUMBER 4238

ORDINANCE NO

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COMMERCE, TEXAS:


SAFEGUARD OUR SAN DIEGO COUNTRYSIDE INITIATIVE. The people of the County of San Diego do hereby ordain as follows:

STAFF REPORT. The City Council referred the ordinance amending the text to the committee of the whole.

ORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO

City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum

SECTION 3. AMENDMENT OF CODE. Section Article 5, Chapter 5 Title 10 of the Redondo Beach Municipal is hereby amended to read as follows:

AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY. Express Short-Term Rental Prohibition. Jon Biggs, Community Development Director and the City Attorney s Office

ATTACHMENT 1 ORDINANCE ZONING AMENDMENTS

PLANNING BOARD FEBURARY 11, 2019

ORDINANCE NO. O-5-10

VERGENNES TOWNSHIP, KENT COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE

Special Exception Use Order Application

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1296 Page 2

MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

ORDINANCE NO. 972 N.S. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES ADDING ARTICLE V. CHAPTER OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 04/06/2017

TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS July 25, 2013 Staff Report to the Planning Commission

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NOVATO

TOWNSHIP OF ABINGTON MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ORDINANCE NO. <>209 'E:

CITY OF WILDOMAR PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item #2.3 PUBLIC HEARING Meeting Date: January 6, 2016

ORDINANCE NO BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF WACO, McLENNAN COUNTY, TEXAS:

TOWNSHIP OF MANALAPAN COUNTY OF MONMOUTH

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, City staff plan to present recommendations regarding just cause eviction policies no later than May 28, 2015; and

GLADES COUNTY, FLORIDA RESOLUTION NO

TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO ORDINANCE NO SERIES OF 2014

Andrew P. Powers, City Manager. Mark A. Towne, Community Development Director

CITY OF WILDOMAR PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item #2.1 PUBLIC HEARING Meeting Date: June 6, 2018

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY OF LIVE OAK, CALIFORNIA

2/16/2016. City Council City Hall Wilmington, North Carolina Dear Mayor and Councilmembers:

NORWOOD TOWNSHIP Short- term Rental Licensing Ordinance. Ordinance No. of 2018

CITY OF ESCONDIDO. Planning Commission and Staff Seating AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION. 201 North Broadway City Hall Council Chambers. 7:00 p.m.

City of Titusville "Gateway to Nature and Space"

a public hearing was held before the Parks and Recreation Board on June 11, 2009, to receive public input; and

Temporary Housing Ordinance Attachment. Draft 3, 11/05/10 ORDINANCE NO.

Los Angeles City Planning Department RECOMMENDATION REPORT

WHEREAS, the extreme shortage of housing in the City of Los Angeles has been well documented;

The commercial land uses will provide for increase in employment opportunities as well as an increase in retail and construction sales tax revenues.

Mammoth Lakes Town Council Agenda Action Sheet

CITY OF RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

.. ~ ORDINANCE NO. 3068

201 General Provisions

City of South Daytona

COUNCIL BILL NO ORDINANCE NO. 3594

ORDINANCE NO The City Council of the City of Monterey Park does ordain as follows:

1 ORDINANCE 4, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM 5 BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA AMENDING CHAPTER TAXATION.

City of Piedmont COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

ORDINANCE NO ( 2ND READING) AMENDING TITLE 17 ( RENT STABILIZATION) OF THE WEST HOLLYWOOD. and adopt Ordinance No ,

makes the following findings:

O~1463 ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE CREATING A MUNICIPAL SERVICE BENEFIT UNIT TO

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO Page 1 of7. Ordinance 2866 April 13, 2010 April 27, 2010

direct that agriculture is the primary land use in the County, minimize conflicts arising from

Planning Commission Report

CHAPTER 23A: SURPLUS CITY PROPERTY ORDINANCE

TOWNSHIP OF HARTLAND ORDINANCE NO. 57-1, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAND DIVISION ORDINANCE

TOWNSHIP OF MANALAPAN ORDINANCE NO

Transcription:

ORDINANCE NO. 2018-15 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ARTICLE 66 (SIGN ORDINANCE) OF THE ESCONDIDO ZONING CODE RELATING TO DRIVE-THROUGH MENU BOARDS APPLICANT: Christopher Wadleigh (Habit Burger) PLANNING CASE NO.: AZ 18-0004 as follows: The City Council of the City of Escondido, California, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN SECTION 1. That proper notices of a public hearing have been given and public hearings have been held before the Planning Commission and City Council on amending Article 66 (Sign Ordinance) of the Escondido Zoning Code relating to drivethrough menu boards. SECTION 2. The City Council has duly reviewed and considered all evidence submitted at said hearings, including, without limitation: a. Written information; b. Oral testimony from City staff, interested parties, and the public; c. The staff report, dated June 6, 2018, which, along with its attachments, is incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein; and d. Additional information submitted during the Public Hearing.

SECTION 3. That the City Council has reviewed and considered the Notice of Exemption prepared for this project, in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA ) Section 15061(b)(3) General Rule, and has determined that all environmental issues have been addressed and finds that no significant environmental impact will result from approving the code amendment. SECTION 4. That upon consideration of the staff report, Planning Commission recommendation, Planning Commission staff report, all public testimony presented at the hearing held on this project, and the Factors to be Considered, attached as Exhibit A to this Ordinance and incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein, this City Council finds the Zoning Code Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and all applicable specific plans of the City of Escondido. SECTION 5. That the specified sections of Article 66 of the Escondido Zoning Code are hereby amended as set forth in Exhibit B to this Ordinance and incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION 6. SEPARABILITY. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions. SECTION 7. That as of the effective date of this ordinance, all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.

SECTION 8. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to certify to the passage of this Ordinance and to cause the same or a summary to be prepared in accordance with Government Code Section 36933, to be published one time within 15 days of its passage in a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the County and circulated in the City of Escondido.

Ordinance No. 2018-15 Exhibit A Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT A FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED Zoning Code Amendment 1. The public health, safety, and welfare would not be adversely affected by the proposed Zoning Code Amendment. Drive-through restaurants are already permitted to have two (2) menu board signs to provide information to their customers and accommodate the placement of orders from a vehicle. Typically, one serves as a preview board and the other as an order board. This Zoning Code Amendment would only expand the number of menu boards in circumstances where an additional stacking lane(s) are provided so that each lane would have a preview board and an order board and function the same (i.e. take full advantage of the various features and benefits of the technology and menu system operation). 2. The proposed Zoning Code Amendment would not be detrimental to surrounding properties because no physical improvements are proposed as part of this Zoning Code Amendment. Future sign construction must comply with any applicable laws and standards. Furthermore, in the review and consideration of future sign permit applications, the City would ensure future signs are compatible with the structure and/or property where they are installed, do not adversely impact the visual character of the surrounding area, and do not provide additional signage beyond that necessary to serve the purpose identified above. 3. The proposed Zoning Code Amendment would be consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan because the amended Sign Ordinance would not, in and of itself, result in development or any other material change to the environment. The proposed amendment provides for new sign standards that facilitate economic development and economic development activity, which is generally consistent with the General Plan. The proposed Zoning Code Amendment would not diminish the Quality of Life Standards of the General Plan, nor adversely impact the community health or natural resources. 4. The proposed zoning code amendment does not conflict with any specific plan.

Ordinance No. 2018-15 Exhibit B Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT B PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE ZONING CODE AZ 18-0004 Amend the various zoning code sections to read as specified below. ARTICLE 66. SIGN ORDINANCE Revise Section 33-1395.2, Sign standards Freestanding signs CG and CN zones, as set forth below. (b) Number. No more than one (1) freestanding sign per street frontage shall be permitted except as follows: (4) Menu signs. In conjunction with a drive-through business: up to two (2) freestanding menu, or other similar signs up to thirty-two (32) square feet and a maximum height of six (6) feet may be permitted. Menu signs may be internally illuminated and utilize changeable copy. The area of the menu signs shall not be counted against the allowable sign area for the business. (A) Up to two (2) freestanding menu, or other similar signs up to thirtytwo (32) square feet each and a maximum height of six (6) feet may be permitted for businesses with one (1) stacking lane. (B) Drive-through businesses with more than one (1) stacking lane shall be allowed one (1) freestanding menu sign, or other similar sign, up to thirty-two (32) square feet and a maximum height of six (6) feet, and one (1) freestanding menu sign, or other similar sign, up to twenty-four (24) square feet and a maximum height of six (6) feet, for each stacking lane. (C) A maximum of two (2) freestanding menu, or other similar signs, shall be oriented toward each stacking lane. (D) Menu signs shall be screened from view from adjacent properties and rights-of-way through the use of landscaping, earthen berms, walls, etc., to the maximum extent possible. copy. (E) Menu signs may be internally illuminated and utilize changeable (F) sign area for the business. The area of the menu signs shall not be counted against the allowable