South Oak Cliff Corridor Blue Line Extension. Appendix G. Chapter 26 Documentation Runyon Creek Park. Final Local Environmental Assessment G 1

Similar documents
a required for construction and of easement State to Highway Loop 12/Walton Walker Boulevard, require the conveyance 296,757 square feet

Section 4(f) Why don t we build the road through this green space over here?

CITY OF FORT COLLINS NATURAL AREAS AND CONSERVED LANDS EASEMENT POLICY

6.5 LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND ACT SECTION

6.5 LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND ACT SECTION

SECTION 4(F) & CHAPTER 26. TxDOT Environmental Conference 2017

RESOLUTION NO. R To Acquire Real Property Interests Required for the Downtown Redmond Link Extension

Documentation Standard for an Individual Section 4(f) Evaluation

DRAFT PARK COUNTY US HIGHWAY 89 SOUTH EAST RIVER ROAD OLD YELLOWSTONE TRAIL ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS

NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORPORATION SPECIAL TELEPHONE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING JUNE 25, 2013 ACTION ITEM

MOTION NO. M Property Exchange Agreement with the University of Washington for the Northgate Link Extension

Chapter 100 Planned Unit Development in Corvallis Urban Fringe

18 Sale and Other Disposition of Regional Lands Policy

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY DISPOSAL FEE OWNERSHIP OF YELLOW CREEK INDUSTRIAL PARK PROPERTIES

5. Land Acquisition and Displacement

content chapter Section 4(f) Parks, Recreation Areas, Historic Sites, Wildlife and Waterfowl Refuges

F R E QUENTLY AS K E D QUESTIONS

RESOLUTION NO

2005 Texas Local Government Code CHAPTER 422. PUBLIC UTILITY AGENCIES FOR PROVISION OF WATER OR SEWER SERVICE

METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 390 North Robert Street, St. Paul, MN Phone (651) TDD (651)

PUBLIC HEARING FM 2499 Section 4

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report for County Sale of Cary Place Government Code Consistency Determination

GRANT OF TRAIL ACCESS EASEMENT, COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS

Corporation Of The City Of Kingston. Ontario. By-Law Number A By-Law To Provide For The Conveyance Of Land For Park Purposes,

ELK RAPIDS TOWNSHIP ANTRIM COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO

HOUSE BILL lr0177

RESOLUTION NO. R To Acquire Real Property Interests Required for the Lynnwood Link Extension

DRAFT PARK COUNTY US HIGHWAY 89 SOUTH EAST RIVER ROAD OLD YELLOWSTONE TRAIL ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS

LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT OPERATING POLICIES TABLE OF CONTENTS

BEAR CREEK TOWNSHIP EMMET COUNTY, MICHIGAN. PRIVATE ROAD ORDINANCE Ordinance No. 11A-99. (to replace prior Private Road Ordinance No.


ACTION FORM BRYAN CITY COUNCIL

WASCO COUNTY PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPLICATION

Community Development Committee

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS (Ordinance No.: 3036, 12/3/07; Repealed & Replaced by Ordinance No.: 4166, 10/15/12)

Section 4 Master Plan Framework

EAST VILLAGETALUS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (FORMERLY KNOWN AS COUGAR MOUNTAIN EAST VILLAGE) Between CITY OF ISSAQUAH, WASHINGTON. and

Appendix B Real Estate Plan

FINAL DRAFT 12/1/16, Rev. to 7/18/17

WHEREAS, the Board passed Resolution approving the aforementioned Guidelines; and

TRANSBAY JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY

DATE ISSUED: 11/5/ of 5 UPDATE 98 CDB(LEGAL)-B

Understanding Texas TIRZ Statute Chapter 311 Texas Tax Code

Texas Land Trust Conference March 6, 2015

DATE: JANUARY 2011 ESTATE DIVISION

City of Cupertino AB 1600 Mitigation Fee Act Annual & Five Year Report for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2014 & 2015

VTA s BART SILICON VALLEY PROGRAM Phase 1 Berryessa Extension Project

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. and Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (collectively, the State ), hereby

Displacement and Relocation

CHAPTER House Bill No. 733

GENERAL POLICIES GOVERNING LAND USE AND CITY LAND SALES IN WAUSAU WEST BUSINESS AND INDUSTRIAL PARK

Staff Report. Victoria Walker, Director of Community and Economic Development

ORDINANCE NO

PEACE RIVER MANASOTA REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING February 2, 2017 REGULAR AGENDA ITEM 7

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND REVIEW CRITERIA

Draft Zoning Changes for the 2nd Planning Board Public Hearing, January 22, 2018.

Napa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter

Draft Continuing Authorities Program Section 1135 Detailed Project Report and Integrated Environmental Assessment

Displacement and Relocation A. INTRODUCTION B. METHODOLOGY

ARTICLE IX. DEVELOPMENT FEES

AGENDA ITEM Public Utilities Commission City and County of San Francisco

RC ; Reclassification The Garrison at Stafford Proffer Amendment (formerly Stafford Village Center)

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Recommendation to Approve Dominion Virginia Power s Request for an Easement along Route 606 at Washington Dulles International Airport.

Town of Prairie du Sac Sauk County, WI. Land Division Ordinance 07-3

RESOLUTION NUMBER 2017-

The Ironwood proclamation includes the same language and similar language is provided in the Military Lands Withdrawal Act of 1999, which states:

RESOLUTION NO

TENTATIVE MAP INFORMATION SHEET

Reading Plats and the Complexities of Antiquated Subdivisions Presented by: David W. Depew, PhD, AICP, LEED AP Morris-Depew Associates, Inc.

BY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AN ACT TO BE ENTITLED

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of September 19, 2015

REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento

City of Edwardsville, Kansas Special Benefit District Policy

Right-of-Way and Easements for Electric Facility Construction

BILL NO (Emergency Measure) ORDINANCE NO. 5072

MAYHILL ROAD WIDENING AND IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT - PUBLIC MEETING December 15, 2010 COMMENT CARD QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Attachment 22 Railroad Agreements

Diamond Falls Subdivision PROPOSED YELLOWSTONE COUNTY BOARD OF PLANNING FINDINGS OF FACT

ZONING ORDINANCE: OPEN SPACE COMMUNITY. Hamburg Township, MI

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 14-REZ-31 Cary Park PDD Amendment (Waterford II) Town Council Meeting January 15, 2015

THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION October 27, 2010 / Calendar No. 13

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF PORT ARANSAS, TEXAS, BY ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER

201 General Provisions

3.3 Acquisitions and Displacements/Relocations

BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MERCER ISLAND, WA

RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITIONS AND RELOCATIONS TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM FOR RTD SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR EXTENSION PROJECT. January 2010

Northern Branch Corridor DEIS December Appendix D: Local Tax Base

City of Grande Prairie Development Services Department

ARTICLE 23 CONDOMINIUM STANDARDS

Responsibilities of the Grant Recipient LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND PROGRAM

AMENDED DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT

Appendix B Draft Real Estate Plan

THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING THE REVISED GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF BAYONNE THE, CHAPTER 33 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS

CITY OF COLLEGE STATION SERVICE PLAN FOR THE AREA TO BE ANNEXED EFFECTIVE 14 APRIL 2011

Improvement District (T.I.D.) Document Last Updated in Database: November 14, 2016

AN ORDINANCE BY COUNCILMEMBERS ANDRE DICKENS, KWANZA HALL, AND CLETA WINSLOW

Memphis City Council Summary Sheet. S.D Roland Road Street Right-of-Way Dedication

Transcription:

South Oak Cliff Corridor Blue Line Extension Appendix G Chapter 26 Documentation Final Local Environmental Assessment G 1

A. INTRODUCTION South Oak Cliff Corridor (SOC-3) Blue Line Extension Chapter 26 Documentation The Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) South Oak Cliff Corridor (SOC-3) Blue Line Extension project will extend the light rail transit (LRT) Blue Line from its current terminus at Ledbetter Station to the UNT Dallas campus. The project is wholly funded with local funds. A Draft Local Environmental Assessment (EA) was circulated in October 2012 for public and agency review. At that time, the impact assessment relied on preliminary parcel data for parkland impacts. Recent on-ground survey work and deed research have updated those boundaries and it has been determined that a small section of the southernmost tip of would be traversed by the project. Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966 (49 USC 1653, now 49 USC 303) declares a national policy that special effort be made to preserve the natural beauty of the countryside, including public park and recreation lands, wildlife and waterfowl refuges, and historic sites. The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) amendment to the Section 4(f) requirements allows the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) to determine that certain uses of Section 4(f) land will have no adverse effect on the protected resource. These uses are referred to as de minimis impacts. While Section 4(f) does not apply to this locally funded project, DART projects are consistently evaluated regardless of funding source and thus the concept of de minimis impact can be applied. For publicly owned parks, recreation areas, and wildlife and waterfowl refuges, de minimis impacts are defined as those that do not "adversely affect the activities, features and attributes" of the Section 4(f) resource. Chapter 26 of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Code was established to protect parks, recreational and scientific areas, wildlife refuges, and historic sites from being used or taken by the state or local agencies for public projects. Chapter 26 applies to this locally funded project. This report documents the de minimis impact assessment for the DART South Oak Cliff Corridor Blue Line Extension direct use of the southern tip of, which is part of the City of Dallas parks system. Documentation of the planning, engineering and coordination activities is provided that demonstrates the use of the property is justified and necessary. Additionally, this report demonstrates that in compliance with Chapter 26 of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Code, there is no feasible and prudent alternative to the use and the project includes all reasonable planning to minimize harm to the land, as a park, resulting from the use. A. APPLICATION OF CHAPTER 26 As stated in Chapter 26 of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Code, a municipality of this state may not approve any program or project that requires the use or taking of any public land designated and used as a park unless the municipality determines that: (1) there is no feasible and prudent alternative to the use or taking of such land; and (2) the project includes all reasonable planning to minimize harm to the land, as a park, resulting from the use or taking. South Oak Cliff Corridor (SOC-3) Blue Line Extension Chapter 26 Documentation 1

B. BACKGROUND The South Oak Cliff Corridor Blue Line Extension Draft Local EA did not identify any direct, temporary or constructive uses of parkland. The alignment was designed to avoid Runyon Creek Park based on preliminary parcel data at that time. The alignment was also designed to co-exist in an existing utility corridor area that would minimize impacts to Oncor poles and avoid creation of a second utility corridor in this area. In December 2012, on-ground surveys including metes and bounds definitions and deed research was completed to prepare for final design. This information updated the parcel data and determined that the project alignment traverses a small section of the southernmost tip of. C. PROPOSED PROJECT In Spring 2013, DART will initiate final design of the South Oak Cliff Corridor Blue Line Extension (known as SOC-3) from Ledbetter Station to UNT Dallas Station in southern Dallas County (See Attachment 1, Figure 1). The project would use newly acquired right-of-way or easements given that no existing railroad corridor exists. Large areas of City of Dallas owned parkland are located near the project (See Attachment 1, Figure 2). The route and alignment for the light rail transit (LRT) guideway would include the tracks, trackbed, overhead electric system (or catenary), and ancillary equipment. LRT vehicles would operate on two-track, two-way continuously welded steel rails. The LRT extension would be integrated into DART operations as an extension of the existing Blue Line service. Service would be provided between approximately 5 a.m. and 1 a.m., with the non-service hours reserved for maintenance as needed. The proposed right-of-way for the project is generally a 100-foot wide corridor with the tracks located in the center of the right of-way. Direct Use of Parkland This area of is located in a heavily wooded, rocky area and includes an unnamed tributary of Runyon Springs Branch creek. The park was purchased in 1995 with local bond program funds as part of the City of Dallas open space protection program. It is designated as open space and no formal trails or uses currently exist. The area is unimproved and largely inaccessible by the public. An Oncor 138k overhead electric transmission line crosses over the southernmost portion of the park. The project is proposed to cross through this small section of the park parallel and immediately north of the Oncor power lines (See Attachment 1, Figure 3). There is also a 72 City of Dallas water main that follows underground parallel to the Oncor power lines. Based on the 5% level of preliminary engineering, the LRT tracks would be on a shallow aerial structure through this area given the 100-year floodplain elevation associated with the Runyon Springs Branch creek system. The length of the proposed aerial guideway crossing through this section of park would be approximately 120 feet. One or two support columns would be placed within the park area to support the structure. The proposed mass transit easement area consists of 12,184 square feet (Attachment 1, Figure 4). The proposed easement covers the entire southern tip of the parkland parcel to avoid leaving any outlying area in the utility corridor, as well as to provide for flexibility for minor shifts in the horizontal alignment during final design. This easement area accounts for 0.50% of the entire open space area that spans to the north and south of Camp Wisdom Road. The direct use of the parkland would be limited to approximately 3,989 square feet associated with the aerial structure and associated support columns. This is the only direct use of parkland proposed by the project. South Oak Cliff Corridor (SOC-3) Blue Line Extension Chapter 26 Documentation 2

Temporary Use of Parkland Temporary use of the park would be limited to construction access to place the columns and structure within the proposed easement area Constructive Use of Parkland The project would be located at the southernmost point of, in an area that is generally unused, unimproved and inaccessible. It also is an area that is largely dominated by utilities including Oncor overhead power lines and an underground water main. This section of the park includes an unnamed tributary of the Runyon Springs Branch creek, so the LRT structure would be elevated on a shallow aerial structure to avoid floodplain and creek impacts. The top of rail would be approximately 10 feet above ground level. While access would still be available under the LRT structure at the creek crossing, the southern boundary of the park ends approximately 30 feet south of the LRT structure itself and would not likely be accessed by the public. Wildlife would still be able to pass under the structure at the creek. Access to the larger area of the parkland north of the LRT alignment would not be impacted. As a result of these conditions, there would be no constructive use of parkland. De Minimis Impacts Although Section 4(f) does not apply to this locally funded project, the concept of de minimis impact is applicable to support the justification and need for the easement. For publicly owned parks, de minimis impacts are defined as those that do not "adversely affect the activities, features and attributes" of the Section 4(f) resource. The proposed use of parkland occurs at the southernmost boundary of undeveloped parkland directly adjacent to existing utility corridors, including Oncor overhead power lines and a Dallas water main. There are no existing or proposed park facilities in the vicinity. While the City of Dallas has plans to extend future Ricketts Branch Trail into, the trail will not extend to this area of the park. As noted above, this proposed easement constitutes only 0.50% of the entire Runyon Creek Park area. Furthermore, this section of the park is a heavily wooded, rocky area that is largely inaccessible to the public. These conditions indicate that no adverse effect to activities, features or attributes of would occur. D. ALTERNATIES CONSIDERED After consideration of avoidance alternatives, the City of Dallas may make a determination that there is no feasible and prudent alternative to the use of the parkland and the project has incorporated all possible planning to minimize harm. Considering that the South Oak Cliff Corridor Blue Line Extension is fully funded and supported by the City of Dallas, a No-Build Alternative was not considered to be a feasible or prudent alternative. Shifting the alignment west before it turns southwest towards UNT Dallas is not feasible as it would create additional parkland impacts and may affect the placement of the City s future Ricketts Branch Trail. Increasing the elevated structure height to minimize impacts is not prudent as it would create additional conflicts with the Oncor power lines. One potential avoidance alternative that would modify the horizontal alignment and avoid the use of the property was considered. 1. Shift the LRT alignment south to avoid the parkland The project as currently proposed was designed to thread the LRT alignment through a kink in the Oncor overhead power lines and to enter a previously identified corridor dedication area developed in cooperation with UNT Dallas. The avoidance alternative South Oak Cliff Corridor (SOC-3) Blue Line Extension Chapter 26 Documentation 3

would shift the LRT alignment south of the Oncor power lines in this area to avoid the parkland. The environmental impacts associated with this potential alignment modification have not been fully examined in the Draft EA. However, this alternative would have the following consequences: In order to maintain acceptable speeds and minimize curves (and therefore noise) the revised alignment would impact two additional parcels. First, a privately owned parcel would require a partial acquisition. This parcel includes a single-family home of which the current use is unknown. Second, a large undeveloped privately-owned parcel south of the Oncor power lines and north of Wheatland Road would be affected by the alignment. This large parcel is a key redevelopment area within the UNT-Dallas Area Plan. The traversing of the northern portion of this parcel by the Avoidance Alternative would sever a larger part of this parcel and result in a more extensive isolated remainder. This remainder parcel would be inaccessible, and thus would have no redevelopment opportunities. The City of Dallas plans to construct the Ricketts Branch Trail from the future Five Mile Creek Trail and the Camp Wisdom Station area through to connect with and use the DART rail right-of-way to continue towards the UNT-Dallas Station. Shifting the alignment south to avoid the parkland could complicate the City trail connection by requiring the City of Dallas to construct additional trail length, which would increase costs and would require additional right-of-way acquisition or agreements from one or two private properties rather than maintaining the trail only in City parkland and the DART corridor. As with the proposed alignment, the avoidance alignment would also require raising Oncor overhead power line poles to accommodate the LRT alignment. The poles that would need to be raised would be closer to the Lancaster/Camp Wisdom intersection which is at a higher elevation, and thus would create a greater visual impact for the existing community and future development. The avoidance alignment would penetrate further south into the UNT Dallas nature preserve area, which is outside of the previously agreed UNT dedication corridor for the LRT alignment. This would result in new negotiations with UNT for an alternative corridor and may affect their campus master plan for this area. The avoidance alignment would be longer than the preferred alignment and would add travel time and costs to the project. The current proposed alignment places the LRT infrastructure parallel with an existing utility corridor occupied by Oncor and the City water main. The avoidance alignment would shift the LRT alignment outside of this corridor and would create another transportation/utility corridor in the area, limiting the overall redevelopment area. Shifting the alignment south to avoid the parkland limits flexibility for the City to locate their future thoroughfare in the redevelopment area. Alignment modification to avoid the impact to this small section of does not appear to be a prudent and feasible alternative to the current plans to span the approximately 120-foot section of parkland with a shallow aerial structure. The proposed alignment is in the southernmost tip of the park and is designed so that it will not adversely affect the activities, features and attributes of the park. South Oak Cliff Corridor (SOC-3) Blue Line Extension Chapter 26 Documentation 4

Conclusions Although it results in a small use of parkland, the proposed project alignment is the most prudent and feasible alignment for this area for several reasons. First, it places the alignment in an area of existing utilities to avoid creating a second utility corridor that would reduce developable land in the area. Second, it takes advantage of the existing kink in the Oncor alignment to weave the LRT through this area and avoid relocation of any Oncor poles. Third, it provides the best opportunity for a future City of Dallas trail (Ricketts Branch Trail) to connect with the DART LRT corridor, without having to use property from private property owners and without adding length to the trail. Fourth, it only affects the southernmost tip of the park which is closest to the utility corridor, unimproved and generally inaccessible to the public given the wooded, rocky nature of the area. A less desirable and more costly alignment modification (Avoidance Alternative) is not considered to be a feasible or prudent alternative to the de minimis impact of the proposed project. The avoidance alternative requires redesign and additional environmental review, and it would create a new corridor that would create conditions undesirable for the overall UNT Dallas Area planning objectives. E. PLANNING TO MINIMIZE HARM DART has undertaken consultation and planning efforts to insure that all planning to minimize harm will be accomplished. As stated earlier, in order to minimize impact to wildlife and vegetation, and support City development and trail objectives for the area, several mitigation measures are being implemented for the project. Although the DART right-of-way is exempt from the City of Dallas Tree ordinance, DART has committed to replacing trees of exceptional size and quality within the proposed easement area. During final design, DART will engage an arborist and tree survey staff to identify quality trees in order to preserve them or provide compensation for replacement trees at a location to be determined by the City of Dallas. DART will maintain a shallow, aerial design through this easement area to allow for wildlife passage under the LRT structure at the creek crossing. This design will also avoid floodplain impacts and limit the footprint of the rail line so as to minimize vegetation impacts. While park users can also pass under the structure at the creek, given that the park boundary ends immediately to the south it is not expected that park users will pass under at this location. The Oncor electric transmission line also lies immediately to the south. In addition, DART will commit to working with the City of Dallas to provide an appropriate license agreement for the future Ricketts Branch Trail so that it can utilize the DART right-ofway from the area where the trail will connect and then as it continues toward the future UNT Dallas Station. Use of the DART right-of-way will be in accordance with DART Policy III.09: Hike and Bike Trail Use on DART Right-of-Way. Although the trail is not yet designed, it would likely utilize approximately 3,000 linear feet of the DART corridor if it connects near the proposed easement area. These mitigation measures have been incorporated into the South Oak Cliff Corridor Blue Line Extension Final Local EA and the supporting Mitigation Monitoring Program to ensure their implementation as final design and construction is initiated. South Oak Cliff Corridor (SOC-3) Blue Line Extension Chapter 26 Documentation 5

F. PROJECT COORDINATION DART has coordinated this effort with the City of Dallas Parks and Recreation Department, the entity with jurisdiction over the property. This documentation was provided to the city for review in order to schedule the appropriate actions by the City of Dallas Parks and Recreation Board and Dallas City Council to authorize a public hearing in accordance with Chapter 26 of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Code for the proposed mass transit easement. The following actions were taken by the City of Dallas: February 21, 2013 - Parks and Recreation Board recommended a public hearing for the proposed public mass transit easement. March 27, 2013 Dallas City Council approved a resolution authorizing the Park and Recreation Department to advise, in writing of such proposed use of the park property by delivering a notice for publishing to the official newspaper to be advertised once each week for three consecutive weeks, the last publication to be not less than one week, no more than two weeks before the date of the hearing, which shall be held in the City Council Chambers on April 24, 2013; and, that the approval of the aforementioned project by the City Council, at the close of the public hearing, shall be construed as making the proper findings as to the use, taking and conveyance of park land, consistent with the Texas Parks and Wildlife Code and the Texas Local Government Code. City of Dallas advertised the public hearing as noted above on March 29, April 5 and April 12, 2013. G. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION The South Oak Cliff Corridor Blue Line Extension planning and EA process included an extensive public participation process. The proposed use and easement through this small section of was not anticipated during the EA process. DART provided a letter to its Technical Work Group and Community Work Group members on February 4, 2013 informing them of the new information and the process to obtain the easement. No comments were received by DART on the proposed easement. Individuals also had the opportunity to comment at the City of Dallas public hearing on April 24, 2013. No comments were received at that public hearing. H. CITY OF DALLAS DETERMINATION On April 24, 2013, the public hearing was held at Dallas City Council meeting. The City Council then passed a resolution authorizing the public mass transit easement. South Oak Cliff Corridor (SOC-3) Blue Line Extension Chapter 26 Documentation 6

ATTACHMENT 1 South Oak Cliff Corridor (SOC-3) Blue Line Extension Chapter 26 Documentation Figure 1 Proposed Project Alignment Figure 2 Existing Land Use Figure 3 Existing Conditions/Proposed LRT Alignment Figure 4 Proposed Park Easement Location South Oak Cliff Corridor (SOC-3) Blue Line Extension Chapter 26 Documentation 7

South Oak Cliff Corridor (SOC-3) Blue Line Extension Chapter 26 Documentation 8

South Oak Cliff Corridor (SOC-3) Blue Line Extension Chapter 26 Documentation 9

South Oak Cliff Corridor (SOC-3) Blue Line Extension Chapter 26 Documentation 10

South Oak Cliff Corridor (SOC-3) Blue Line Extension Chapter 26 Documentation 11

WHEREAS, on February 28, 1990, the Dallas City Council adopted Resolution No. Rapid Transit (DART); and 90-0810, approving the Master Interlocal Agreement between the City and Dallas Area April 24, 2013 planning to minimize harm to the Lower White Rock Creek Greenbelt has been taken. Code (Chapter 26, Section 26.001 through 26.004), to determine that there is no feasible and prudent alternative to this use of this park land and that all reasonable WHEREAS, a public hearing was held, as required by the Texas Park and Wildlife and interest in land to an entity with eminent domain a uthority; a nd the Texas Local Government Code are not applicable when a municipality is conveying WHEREAS, referendum, notice and bidding requirements of Chapter 253 and 272 of property within and adjacent to the easement for hike and bike trail purposes; and independent appraisal, which may include the use of the park land and other DART market value of this easement, or equivalent in-kind value, as determined by an WHEREAS, in consideration for this conveyance by easement, DART will pay the fair providing the property for this use; and Creek Greenbelt, set forth in one Tract described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and purpose, and the Park and Recreation Board of the City of Dallas is agreeable to made a part hereof, because the use of this parkland is necessary to accomplish the easement of approximately 12,184 square feet of land from the Lower White Rock WHEREAS, said improvements require the conveyance of a permanent mass transit and is necessary for the proper construction or development of DART s South Oak Cliff has determined that a public mass transit easement is needed, in the public interest WHEREAS, the City of Dallas owns land known as Runyon Creek Greenbelt and DART Corridor Blue Line Extension (SOC-3); and Supplemental Agreement No. 2, and any amendments thereto are herinafter WHEREAS, the Master Interlocal Agreement, Supplemental Agreement No. 1, collectively referred to as the Agreement ; and construction issues related to implementation of DART s transportation system; and WHEREAS, on August 28, 1991, Supplemental Agreement No. 2 to the Master Interlocal Agreement was adopted by the Dallas City Council to address design and Agreement was adopted by the Dallas City Council to address planning and development issues related to implementation of DART s transportation system; and WHEREAS, on July 25, 1990, Supplemental Agreement No. 1 to the Master Interlocal COUNCIL CHAMBER 130 742

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DALLAS: BE IT RESOLED BY THE PARK AND RECREATION BOARD AND THE CITY Now, Therefore, April 24, 2013 adjacent park areas for violations of the covenants listed in subsection a. The City retains the right to inspect the easement tract and adjacent park and thereof, without prior, written consent of the City. To not convey to anothe any interest in the easement tract, or any portion Recreation Department, and workmanlike manner under the supervson of the Director of the Park and To do all work within the park and surrounding areas in a good a line and improvements: To bear the cost of construction, operation and maintenance of the transit To keep the adjacent park area free from construction debris and waste; disposal, water and air quality regulations; To comply with health, safety, noise, environmental protection, waste To not be detrimental to the park; To observe safety regulations; DART shall covenant to the City: conditions: Temporary Right of Entry Agreement for a portion of the Runyon Creek Greenbelt, subject to the Agreement, to this resolution and to all of the following terms and approval as to form by the City Attorney, is authorized to execute an easement and a easement has been authorized, the Park and Recreation Board has approved, and the SECTION 2. That, since DART s use of eminent domain for acquiring this Tract by public hearing with appropriate determinations has been held, the City Manager, upon resolution. Extension (SOC-3), subject to the terms and conditions of the Agreement and this A for the public mass transit easement for the South Oak Cliff Corridor Blue Line becomes necessary, by DART for interests in land by easement, as identified in Exhibit including the exercise in the City of Dallas of the right of eminent domain, if such SECTION 1. That the City of Dallas hereby approves the proposed acquisition, COUNCIL CHAMBER

covenants listed in subsection a. possession of the easement tract should DART abandon the tract or violate the DART shall provide the City with a procedure for reentering and taking SECTION 2. (Continued) April 24, 2013 accordingly so resolved. passage in accordance with the provisions of the Charter of the City of Dallas, and it is SECTION 5.That this resolution shall take effect immediately from and after its described in Exhibit A in connection with the DART South Oak Cliff Corridor Blue Line the Agreement and this resolution. Extension (SOC-3), is authorized and approved subject to the terms and conditions of SECTION 4. That the use of the easement tract at Runyon Creek Greenbelt as that there is no feasible and prudent alternative to the use of the Runyon Creek Greenbelt for the purpose stated in this resolution and that all reasonable planning to SECTION 3. That, as a result of the public hearing held today, it is hereby determined minimize harm to the tract and the surrounding adjacent parkland has been taken. Temporary Right of Entry Agreement without consultation with the Director of the Park and Recreation Department. land of park property outside of the easement tract and what is allowed by the DART shall not enter for work purposes or disturb the surface or Subsurface COUNCIL CHAMBER

PARK STATION CREEK RUNYON DALLAS SOUTH CENTRAL POLICE F EXHIBIT A J.) 1 INE i2 WATER EXISTING 5% ALIGNMENT POLE (TYPJ ONCOR STEEL BRANCH SPRINGS RtINYON PARK PROPOSED ROW CREEK RtJNYON CAMP WI WON ROAD PROPOSEO LRT ALIG1WNT SCJTH OAK CLIFF CORRIOO EXISTING CCt(HTTONS/ LI EXTENSION 1 2 4G Sk TRANSMISSION LINE EXISTING OERHEAD 7

(A1 WC, 2. P 0 FJ4T4 WWLI DC I1YL1 1S Ei2ZWiCI mwi.cuifljr UCflT3J.US FL l 8.X Mik3 _ -._L 24-a 17 1 1 DklAS, (.isi,4pllar POSED PA EkN1 kati i TH ST!iKfiS reay 1E 1!E E1tIi I sifl ox :ri tr!fo FE4 DART PROJGT j i U H H t 4 1-L-. :N - 4 DCU Q.OC.1. PThI1i1WDE DR DCT - - - f 3,t / 8 / IscH 8.R9L1. 3m Ii 8 *LA$ L!1f D1? 4wcLIC #ITi-f Cfl I _k J -k j I!T. JC4fl FL 32W? 0 W EXHIBIT A