WHITEFISH PLANNING BOARD MINUTES OF MEETING August 16, There were approximately 17 people in the audience. The motion passed unanimously.

Transcription

1 WHITEFISH PLANNING BOARD MINUTES OF MEETING August 16, 2018 CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Chair Steve Qunell called the regular meeting of the Whitefish Planning Board to order at 6:00 pm. Board members present were Councilor Richard Hildner, John Ellis, Judy Hessellund, Allison Linville, John Middleton and Rebecca Norton. Planning Director David Taylor and Planner II Bailey Minnich represented the Whitefish Planning and Building Department. There were approximately 17 people in the audience. AGENDA CHANGES 6:03 pm APPROVAL OF MINUTES 6:03 pm Norton moved, and Ellis seconded to approve the July 19, 2018 minutes with corrections as follows: 1. Page 13, last paragraph, fifth sentence, capitalize "Riverside" and insert period at end of sentence. 2. Page 14, first paragraph, second sentence, change "we" to "they" in two instances. 3. Page 21, first paragraph, second sentence, change "prosed" to "proposed." The motion passed unanimously. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC (ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA) 6:06 pm OLD BUSINESS: 6:06 pm PUBLIC HEARING 1: HOMEWORD ZONE CHANGE REQUEST 6:06 pm A request by Homeword to rezone property from WB-1 (Limited Commercial District) to WR-4 (High Density Multi-Family Residential District). The property is currently undeveloped and was the former site of a mobile home neighborhood. The property is located at 530 Edgewood Place and can be legally described as north half of Lot 4, Lots 5 and 6, Block 9, Whitefish Townsite Company 5 Acre Tracts First Addition in S25 T31N R22W P.M.M., Flathead County. Whitefish Planning Board * Minutes of August 16, 2018 Meeting * Page 1 of 13

2 STAFF REPORT WZC (Compton-Ring) Director Taylor reviewed Senior Planner Compton-Ring's staff report and findings. As of the writing of WZC 18-05, no public comments had been received. Staff recommended adoption of the findings of fact within staff report WZC and for approval of the zoning map amendment to the Whitefish City Council. BOARD QUESTIONS OF STAFF Norton asked, and Taylor said under Finding 1B, "Secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers," the word "panic" is one of the criteria listed under state law for zone changes, but he is not sure what situation that might apply to. Chair Qunell asked and Director Taylor said when a proposal comes in for development, they will evaluate what is being proposed to see if it generates in excess of 200 vehicle trips a day. At that point a traffic impact study would be required. Chair Qunell asked and Director Taylor said if zoned WR-4 they might not necessarily come back through the planning process. APPLICANT / AGENCIES PUBLIC COMMENT Heather McMilin, Housing Development Director for Homeword in Missoula. They just spent a couple of hours with community members engaging in conversations about design, pedestrian and vehicular traffic, building textures, etc., and had a good meeting. They are currently talking with Planning staff to pursue most likely a PUD, depending on timing; they will not know about their tax allocation credit until November. Chair Qunell opened the public hearing. Patricia Greenspan, 37 Washington Avenue, has owned property a couple of blocks from City Beach for ten years. Her husband is also here, along with two neighbors. She expressed concerns with the notice process as she only found out about this project today in a newspaper article. She attended the 3:00 pm meeting today that Ms. McMilin referred to, but unfortunately was not able to get ahold of very many neighbors. This is a major change in her mind and she does not think it is a good idea because of issues with safety of children, traffic, congestion for folks trying to get to/from work, wildlife and parking. She feels her neighbors would have expressed similar concerns if they had known about it. Dan Voermans, 35 Dakota Avenue, has lived there since 2006 and his wife has lived there since He thinks there are better uses for the Whitefish Planning Board * Minutes of August 16, 2018 Meeting * Page 2 of 13

3 property, expressed concerns with traffic, and suggested if there is a left turn to come out of the project that it be located on the far west side vs. the east side. There being no further comments, Chair Qunell closed the public hearing and turned the matter over to the Planning Board for consideration. Chair Qunell asked Director Taylor to speak about the public hearing process. Director Taylor said this proposal is just to change the zoning from commercial, where any kind of commercial use allowed in that WB-1 zone could go on that property, to a multi-family residential zoning that is more consistent with adjacent zoning in that neighborhood. The actual project that may or may not be coming in the future will come under a separate proposal and will most likely have to have public hearings before the Planning Board and City Council. There would be an opportunity for the neighbors to be able to weigh in with their concerns about traffic, building and property layout, etc., so there will be another chance to talk about this. This particular proposal is just to look at whether this zoning is consistent with the Growth Policy, the future land use that has been designated by the City Council and our Wisconsin Avenue Plan. It is consistent with what the future land use is as far as the proposal to multi-family from commercial on that particular lot. Chair Qunell said just to be clear, when we adopted the Wisconsin Avenue Plan that switched the land use in this area to a multi-family overlay, WR-3 or WR-4. That process happened over two years with a lot of input. In terms of public notice for a land use change, Director Taylor said all properties within 150' of the boundaries of that property were notified by mail. A notice is posted onsite for a subdivision change, but not for a zone change. Norton recalled during the Wisconsin Corridor Plan the planners were originally okay with commercial, but the property owner approached them about turning this into a residential project. Director Taylor said the steering committee spent time talking about this particular area and it was identified as one of the key development areas because it was underdeveloped and had been a trailer park and affordable housing. The property owner was invited to one of the meetings and mentioned the best use neighborhood would probably be multi-family. That could not be done without a PUD, so in discussions with the committee they decided residential would be an appropriate use, especially with the need for affordable housing. Director Taylor read a goal from Section D, Future Land Use Sub Area A, 2. Issues and opportunity, of the Wisconsin Plan that specifically says, "The former Whitefish Planning Board * Minutes of August 16, 2018 Meeting * Page 3 of 13

4 mobile home park on Edgewood has been designated as high-density residential to promote year-round work force housing." Chair Qunell asked and Director Taylor said use by right in WB-1 would be commercial uses, i.e., colleges, day cares, banks, professional offices, public buildings, restaurants, retail sales and service, vendors, etc. Conditional uses would be automobile repair, service stations, bars and lounges, boarding houses, boat and recreational vehicle storage, churches, clubs, funeral homes, microbreweries, mini storage, schools, etc., which are not allowed by right in WB-1. MOTION / BOARD DISCUSSION Hildner moved and Ellis seconded to adopt the findings of fact within staff report WZC as proposed by City Staff. Hildner reminded the public that in terms of process, this is not the final say, and there will be another chance at the public hearing before the City Council for other neighbors, etc., who might have an interest to speak. Were there to be a zone change, the public has another opportunity to weigh in on the development of that property itself. It is a multi-step process. To address the issue of the traffic study and traffic in terms of the ally for ingress and egress, that would also come later as we look at how the project might lay out. If it comes to fruition, this goes a long way towards increasing our stock of affordable housing and would be the first step in that process of affordability, which is why he is in favor of it. Norton said she appreciates the neighbors coming because they live in the neighborhood and safety issues and traffic are very big issues so the more they can observe, the more helpful. The parking requirements were just changed for high density residential and are not as generous as in the past. Residents of specific communities that are being redesigned, rezoned and rebuilt need to comment to influence the outcome. What a PUD does is allow a lot more creativity with what can be required, so community input is essential. Chair Qunell said he appreciates the questions about the process because it does not feel good when suddenly you find out something is happening in your neighborhood, but that is the process and we follow state law on that. This project is a great opportunity and the first step to increase affordable housing availability to people. We have made a big deal about that in this City and maybe not everyone who comes here understands that. We are trying to change the fact that folks have a hard time affording to live here. This is a great location for affordable housing as it is on the corridor close to town and on the way to Big Mountain, two places where people needing affordable housing work. Whitefish Planning Board * Minutes of August 16, 2018 Meeting * Page 4 of 13

5 He will be voting in favor of this proposal. There will be a Council meeting on September 4 at 7:10 pm to discuss this zone change. Then if the developer chooses to do more than what is allowed in the WR-4 zone, it will come back as a project through the planning process again, so we can look at it and determine things like traffic, screening, whether it is going to look good, and whether it fits in with the neighborhood. Linville said the Planning Board members are their neighbors, too, and she lives close to this property as well, and they consider all public input. VOTE PUBLIC HEARING 2: HOMES PRELIMINARY PLAT REQUEST 6:41 pm STAFF REPORT WPP (Minnich) The motion passed unanimously. The matter is scheduled to go before the Council on September 4, A request by Carolina Homes for a preliminary plat in order to develop a 9-lot subdivision. The property is currently undeveloped and zoned WR-2 (Two-Family Residential District). The property is unaddressed along Whitefish Avenue and can be legally described as Tract 1 in S1 T31N R22W P.M.M., Flathead County. Planner Minnich reviewed her staff report and findings. As of the writing of WPP 18-07, staff had received three public comments in opposition of the proposal with concerns regarding the proposed number of units compared to the size of the property, lack of parking on the development, and increased density in the surrounding area. One additional comment in opposition was received this week and distributed to members tonight. Staff recommended adoption of the findings of fact and conditions of approval within staff report WPP and for approval of the preliminary plat for the Whitefish Landing Subdivision, as submitted by the applicant, to the Whitefish City Council. Minnich pointed out Condition No. 7 is the requirement for the frontage improvements along Whitefish Avenue, No. 9 is the cash-in-lieu requirement, and No. 10 is the 10' wide easement along the front for dry utilities. BOARD QUESTIONS OF STAFF Hessellund asked and Minnich said one single-family residence and eight townhomes are anticipated. Hildner asked if there has been any calculation of the cumulative effects of adding 90 trips per day to the additional trips that have been created by Akers Lane. Minnich said her understanding of the traffic impact studies is that the traffic engineers do take into consideration the surrounding land uses and zoning as well as the existing levels of service Whitefish Planning Board * Minutes of August 16, 2018 Meeting * Page 5 of 13

6 and what might potentially occur. The most recent TIS that would have happened would have been for Riverview Meadows to the south and she does not know if they would have looked at this property because that would have also been prior to it being WR-2; it previously had split zoning. Hildner said earlier discussions on other subdivisions there talked about sufficient warrants to create a control at the intersection, i.e., a stoplight at that junction. Does this reach this threshold? Minnich said she would look into it more before the Council meeting. Hildner said Condition No. 7 requires street trees be installed prior to final plat. We have struggled with the issue City-wide on street trees and he thought we had a new requirement or option that streets trees would not be planted until construction of the house is complete, so we do not end up with what we have at the end of Texas, a whole bunch of dead-top trees where there was no irrigation for the trees after they were planted. Minnich said maybe they could do a cash-in-lieu so they were putting money towards the trees and Hildner thought we may need to eventually change Condition No. 7 based on Minnich's research. Hildner also said the potential is fairly great for "snout houses" and Minnich said that would be taken care of in architectural review for the townhomes, but the single-family residence would be except from the Architectural Review Standards. Hildner said a comment came up about lack of room if we allow on-street parking and asked if there is sufficient width on both sides of Whitefish Avenue for on-street parking. Minnich said it is developed to a 60' right-of-way, and she assumes it would include on-street parking. As far as she knows, it does not say "no parking" on either side but that is something that could be brought to Council to have that be designated as "no parking" on-street. Hildner asked if there is enough room between curb cuts to park a vehicle; he thinks the requirement is 18'. Minnich said it does not really show on the plans where the curb cuts are, but it is a 60' right-of-way. Again, she would assume it is paved to City standards which would include parking on both sides of the street. Hildner suggested maybe should say "no parking" on that side of the street. Norton asked and Minnich said regarding Dave Siegfried's comment, we cannot impose a ban on parking on the River's Edge community side of Whitefish Avenue, only City Council in conjunction with Public Works can do that. Norton asked and Minnich said the parking at Mountain Mall is on private property and technically private Whitefish Planning Board * Minutes of August 16, 2018 Meeting * Page 6 of 13

7 parking. Norton said the last traffic study gave Whitefish Avenue a poor rating without the additional 90 trips per day anticipated with this project and Minnich said nothing has changed from that study. Norton asked and Minnich said she is not aware of any drainage problems into the River's Edge community. Someone brought up a concern with odor and Norton asked if the City quantifies how many new units we can add to the existing wastewater treatment system without overloading it. Minnich said we are going through the wastewater treatment facility plant upgrades which Director Workman said are supposed to be completed by 2020 and operational in She does not know if they compute those numbers but if so, that would probably come up at Site Review. Director Taylor said we have plenty of capacity but need to upgrade it to meet environmental protection standards; the upgraded standards for the affluent into the Whitefish River has nothing to do with the capacity of our plant. Minnich said Director Workman replied by to the gentleman who had comments about the odors discussing the new facility with him, their process and dewatering ponds, etc., and efforts being made to reduce odors. Norton asked and Minnich said the setback between Eagle Lake and this subdivision is 93' and as far as Minnich knew everything was being dealt with on the PUD that came through on the adjacent property, not on this one. Director Taylor said this property does not abut the stormwater pond and he thinks it only has a 15' setback on the other property. Chair Qunell said this project proposes putting nine lots on less than an acre and asked if the one going on the 0.3-acre lot is the single-family residence. Minnich said no, that is Lot 9, the furthest to the south because the property has a weird shape and cannot be split off to make another lot. The sewer easement to the north forces the most northern lot to be the single-family unit because a building cannot cross that easement for the overflow. The one townhouse lot is going to be larger than the rest because of the shape of the lot. Chair Qunell asked in terms of density on this lot zoned WR-2, how many townhomes can they put on there without subdividing and Minnich said they could not have townhomes without subdividing; they could have one duplex. It is only one lot, so they have to subdivide in order to have more than one. The single-family residence has to be a minimum of 6,000 square feet and each sublot has to be a minimum of 3,600 square feet. These are closer to 4,000 square feet, with the one on the bottom being approximately 11,000 square feet. Hildner asked and Minnich said she believed the park district that would receive the cash-in-lieu includes Kids Sports and could therefore possibly be used towards the proposed play equipment. Whitefish Planning Board * Minutes of August 16, 2018 Meeting * Page 7 of 13

8 APPLICANT / AGENCIES Paul Unger, Carolina Homes, said they have been working on this challenging parcel for over a year and initially came in with a higher density of 16 units per acre. They had been hearing about the affordable housing issue in Whitefish for a long time and thought they could add a small contribution to that, but that level of density was probably not going to be favorable to the community, so they dropped it down to the nine units per acre in their present application. The site is attractive and park like, and folks maybe hoped it would stay in that condition forever, but the property has been on the market for over five years and he thinks the proposal is probably the best use of the property. The proposed parking is three parking spaces per lot, two in garages and one in driveways, which exceeds City standards. They are going to attempt to address the upper end of the affordable housing market and anticipate units costing $275,000 - $300,000 per finished unit, with 2-3 bedrooms and 2.5 bathrooms. They will comply with all City standards and thinks the City will be quite pleased with what they present. Ellis asked, and Mr. Unger clarified there will be eight units in townhouse format in four buildings and one single-family unit on the north end, for a total of five buildings. Ellis asked if only five buildings are proposed, why is the parcel being divided into nine lots. Minnich said these are townhouses and the land is sold with the unit versus a duplex where the land stays in common ownership. To sell the land you have to subdivide with half of the building. Each of these units will be individually deeded lots. Hildner asked and Mr. Unger said these units will not be short-term rentals as not zoned for in that district and they do not intend any short-term rentals. PUBLIC COMMENT Chair Qunell opened the public hearing. Paulette Mormino, 732 Clearwater Drive in the Rivers' Edge Subdivision said in the proposal Unit 2 is directly across from her home. She does not believe there was any opposition when it came forth to rezone that area and that rezoning is really what is perpetuating what is before us today. It was on the market for five years because the zoning was so haphazard. However, at that time it wasn't envisioned that they were going to put nine buildings on this little slice of pie which is less than an acre. She envisions looking at massive buildings from her living room window. She knew something would be developed there, but not so much in such a small area. She asked that we look closely to see if the Whitefish Planning Board * Minutes of August 16, 2018 Meeting * Page 8 of 13

9 proposed density is feasible on such a small slice of land. She also expressed concerns with traffic and parking in the area and feels we have too many buildings with no open space. Mike Mormino, 732 Clearwater Drive, said in River's Edge Subdivision their street right-of-way is 50', so streets are 30' wide curb-to-curb and 10' on each side. Whitefish Avenue is 40', with 10' on each side and he would recommend no parking on both sides. He also expressed concerns with the foul smell coming down Whitefish River, density, congestion and the poor rating in the traffic study. He recommended the Planning Board deny this project. Paul Unger, Carolina Homes, said under rebuttal that there are only five proposed buildings, not nine as mentioned. In terms of the concern over a "wall of buildings," they meet all minimum setbacks, 10' side yards, so 20' spacing between houses, and as far as streetscape probably have 40% open space. To the south there is a substantial space that cannot be utilized well because of setbacks, so basically what the community is getting is a park space on the south end because of the large lot which will be landscaped and left open in perpetuity. The City is getting the benefit of cash-in-lieu on that park space, so they are making a sizable contribution to the community on that point. They are familiar with the community and their architectural standards will meet or exceed what is currently in the community. They will not disappoint the community. There being no further comments, Chair Qunell closed the public hearing and turned the matter over to the Planning Board for consideration. MOTION / BOARD DISCUSSION Ellis moved, and Middleton seconded to adopt the findings of fact, within staff report WPP 18-07, with the sixteen (16) conditions of approval, as proposed by City Staff. Ellis said the proposal fits in with zoning and having five structures on the property is fine. The property was zoned different things and is going to be residential. If we can keep spaces near residential as more residential, that works out well, and this is a good use of that property. Middleton said the proposal is largely consistent with surrounding development and seems to fit well on the site. It is hard for people to see change occurring around them; however, this appears to be well thought out and will complement the area. Whitefish Planning Board * Minutes of August 16, 2018 Meeting * Page 9 of 13

10 Norton said she will be voting against it as she thinks the poor traffic studies are a significant Finding so does not agree with Finding No. 1 regarding traffic generated not having an adverse effect on the local road. She would prefer developments that include open space, so the livability of the subdivision is nicer for the people that live there. We were thoughtful as a City when we denied the Marriott at this location because of environmental issues. Eagle Lake is a natural drainage center for the City. All the water that comes down through that drainage corridor comes here because it has been a historic stormwater. Just by labeling it a stormwater pond does not mean it is not essential to the drainage in this area. When we start to build right up to the boundaries of it we do not know how that will work under unexpected conditions, so she thinks natural conveyances are essential to this town. She is not sure that parking will work because even if the City says not to park on the street, people will anyway. She would like to see a smaller design with more attention to how the parking will affect adjacent property owners and that looks more like the adjacent neighborhood right across the street. She thinks most of the neighborhoods in that area are going to hold their value because they are beautifully maintained, and she does not think this is a consistent, compatible design for that. Chair Qunell said he thinks packing five buildings and nine families on this one acre of space is too much, and he does not think it fits with what is around it. It feels like we are trying to take a lot and maximize the value out of it and he does not particularly agree with that type of development in our City, so he will also be voting against it. VOTE PUBLIC HEARING 3: CITY OF WHITEFISH ZONE CHANGE REQUEST 7:32 pm STAFF REPORT WZC (Minnich) The motion passed 5 to 2, with Chair Qunell and Norton opposed. The matter is scheduled to go before the Council on September 4, A request by the City of Whitefish to rezone one parcel annexed into City limits from County R-1 (Suburban Residential) to WSR (Suburban Residential District). The property is located at 2030 Highway 93 West and can be legally described as Tract 1CACA in S35 T31N R22W P.M.M., Flathead County. Planner Minnich reviewed her staff report and findings. No comments have been received. Staff recommended adoption of the findings of fact within staff report WZC and for approval of the zone change from County R-1 to WSR to the Whitefish City Council Whitefish Planning Board * Minutes of August 16, 2018 Meeting * Page 10 of 13

11 BOARD QUESTIONS OF STAFF APPLICANT / AGENCIES PUBLIC COMMENT MOTION / BOARD DISCUSSION VOTE PUBLIC HEARING 4: CITY OF WHITEFISH ZONE CHANGE REQUEST 7:39 pm STAFF REPORT WZC (Minnich) BOARD QUESTIONS OF STAFF APPLICANT / AGENCIES PUBLIC COMMENT MOTION / BOARD DISCUSSION Hessellund asked and Minnich said the surrounding properties have City zoning. Chair Qunell opened the public hearing. There being no comments, Chair Qunell closed the public hearing and turned the matter over to the Planning Board for consideration. Norton moved, and Ellis seconded to adopt the findings of fact within staff report WZC as proposed by City Staff. The motion passed unanimously. The matter is scheduled to go before the Council on September 4, A request by the City of Whitefish to rezone three parcels annexed into City limits from County R-4 (Two-Family Residential) to WR-2 (Two-Family Residential District). The parcels are currently unaddressed, along State Park Road and Salmon Run, and can be legally described as Lots 2, 3, and 5 in Pattons Sub Amd L1-4, L6-8 and L14-26 BLK 2 in S26 T31N R22W P.M.M., Flathead County. Planner Minnich reviewed her staff report and findings. No comments have been received. Staff recommended adoption of the findings of fact within staff report WZC and for approval of the zone change from County R-4 to WR-2 to the Whitefish City Council. Chair Qunell opened the public hearing. There being no comments, Chair Qunell closed the public hearing and turned the matter over to the Planning Board for consideration. Norton moved, and Hessellund seconded to adopt the findings of fact within staff report WZC as proposed by City Staff. Whitefish Planning Board * Minutes of August 16, 2018 Meeting * Page 11 of 13

12 VOTE NEW BUSINESS 7:43 pm GOOD AND WELFARE 7:43 pm The motion passed unanimously. The matter is scheduled to go before the Council on September 4, Matters from Board. Ellis asked, and Director Taylor said he does not know of anything specific happening with the Idaho Timber property yet. Norton said she was not here for Good and Welfare last month, but it really bugs her when people do not follow Conditions. She asked about the process for filing complaints as she has tried before without success. Director Taylor told her we have a Compliance Officer now, Major Robinson, who will go out and verify complaints. Depending on the condition and what the approval was, in order to take someone to court or revoke a Conditional Use Permit, we would need legal proof as we will possibly get sued. Norton said we need to be better about it as we do not have any repercussions and asked about bonding. Director Taylor said we bond for certain things like landscaping, street improvements, etc. Norton suggested "social shaming" or significant financial burden and asked if other cities do that, like fine for not following conditions. Director Taylor said we can take people to court or revoke their permit and usually people comply when talked to. He said we do not ignore things, but Norton thinks the perception is we do not enforce, and people can get away with things in our town. Minnich said if we do not get told about a compliant, we cannot enforce it; people must come forward and tell Planning & Building what is going on. Director Taylor said we have a zoning compliant form, and if you see something you think is a violation, fill one out and turn it in and they will investigate. Norton does not want us to be complacent; we should enforce the conditions put in place. Hessellund mentioned two of the zone changes on the agenda tonight included a list of people noticed, but the Edgewood zone change notice list was not included. Minnich said she thought Wendy just forgot to include it, but folks were noticed. 2. Matters from Staff. Minnich said we are hosting the Montana Association of Planners' annual conference this year on September and if any members would like to attend, the Planning & Building Department will pay registration fees. She has a draft agenda which she will to members. The theme this year is "Bridging the Gap: Main Streets, Mountains, and Montanans," and there are a lot of interesting topics, seminars and presenters. The event will be held at the Lodge at Whitefish Lake from 8:00 5:00 on Wednesday and Thursday and 8:00 1:30 on Friday. Whitefish Planning Board * Minutes of August 16, 2018 Meeting * Page 12 of 13

13 There will be a joint Work Session on September 17 probably starting at 5:00 pm between the Planning Board, City Council, and the Affordable Housing Work Group with our consultant coming in to discuss some of the zoning and subdivision changes that committee is pursuing so Planning Board members should try to attend. There will also be an open house regarding Highway 93 South on September 5 downstairs at the National Parks Realty building from 5:00 7:00 pm to discuss the basics of the plan and get community input. Thursday is the Snow Lot charrette. Ellis asked, and Director Taylor said the trees removed at the corner of Highways 40 and 93 were on a County lot owned by T. Bauer and he does not know if there is a development planned as it is not in City limits. Norton said we really live in a beautiful town and thanked Planning staff for doing a great job! 3. Poll of Board members available for the next meeting on October 18, Ellis will not be available, but all others indicated they thought they would be available. ADJOURNMENT 7:58 pm The meeting was adjourned on a motion by Linville at approximately 7:58 pm. The motion passed unanimously. The next regular meeting of the Whitefish Planning Board is scheduled to be held on October 18, 2018 (there were no applications for September), at 6:00 pm, at 418 East 2nd Street. /s/ Steve Qunell Steve Qunell, Chair of the Board /s/ Keni Hopkins Keni Hopkins, Recording Secretary APPROVED AS SUBMITTED / CORRECTED: Whitefish Planning Board * Minutes of August 16, 2018 Meeting * Page 13 of 13