THE ALBERTA GAZETTE. AUGUST ,

Transcription

1

2

3 THE ALBERTA GAZETTE. AUGUST ,.- 3, ' C Owner. Engineered Homes Ltd., supported the annexation of those lands, namely the south-west quarter of section 14, in which it held an interest. It submitted that annexation should be based on the recognition of urban growth characteristics and the availability of land to accommodate future growth needs. The projected population of people by the year 2001 was suggested conservative. By the inclusion of thesaid territory within the jurisdiction of the City of Red Deer now, it would give the City an opportunity to prepare planning policies and to implement development strategies over a sufficiently large area of land to maintain stability in the housing market. Engineered Homes Ltd.. suggested that the annexation of its lands (SWU - 14) ro the City &Red Deer would: "-facilitate planned growth in a logical direction of growth with sufficient size and in sufficient time to allow properly planned, comprehensive, attractive community. "-utilize the utility and transportation capacity which is already in place or approved for construction in the very nearfuture." It was pointed out that while Engineered Homes Ltd., had previously acquired its lots directly from the City of Red Deer. on which it had built some 1200 homes since 1957, it now found the City was not providing sufficient building lots for the firm to have a viable operation and it desired to provide its own. Evidence was given on the economical serviceability of its lands with utilities and transportation. Owner. Melcor Developments Ltd., having an interest in the north-easl quarter of section 3 and the south-east quarter of section I I. supported the annexation of its lands to the City of Red Deer for the following reasons: "I. Central Alberta. and particularly Red Deer, has experienced and will continue to experience significant economic development and population growth in coming years. This will bring continued high demand for land and housing. 2. Melcor Homes. our house building company, has had difficulty acquiring sufficient lots within the City of Red Deer to maintain a viable buildingprogram. 3. The annexation of privately held land will hel~ stimulate competition in the land market of Red ~e&which~scurrentl~ dominated by the city of ~ e Deer. d Their lot sale policies has made land supply inadequate for many buildingcompanies. 4. The area proposed for annexation and particularly the land held by Melcor represents a logical extension of the City both in terms of servicing and in terms of orderly development of land to meet the increased demand in south east Red Deer." Owners granting written consent to the annexation of their respective lands to the City of Red Deer were as follows: ~athton Holdings Ltd. (NE ) Red Deer Alliance Church (SW ,057 acres) Northwestern Utilities Limited (SWU ? acres) Arno1d.P. Jerram (SE 4-3& acres) Andrew and Thorvald Nielsen (NW 3; S.W. 3,38-274) Calgary Power Ltd. (SW 3, S.E ) Owner. C.F. Bower. INE )o~oosed the nnex his lands to the City of Red Deer. These knds are his ho& quarter on which he has his residence, farm buildinas and corrals to handle his cattle operations. He auestioned the effect existingand future tity by-laws may have on his fab operations.-concern was expressed on the increased probability of trespass on his lands. Would certain services, such as the snow plowing of his driveway, be provided? Would he be able to take advantage of the many farm assistance programs, now conducted through the County of Red Deer No. 23, if brought within the City? A further concern was the effect of property taxation and would he be treated in a similar method as if he remained in the County. He pointed out that liis property, if the City of Red Deer'sgrowth Fdtedecreased, may not be developed for urban purposes for a good number ofyears and he would have to continue his farming operations for years to come. Consideration was requested in the Board Order to protect his interests.

4 Local Authorities Board ' ' - Other owners opposing the annexation of their respective lands to the City of Red Deer were Central Drive-Ins Ltd.. and Charlesand Luella Eversole. Not consentingwere Thomas and Rita Wells and Parkside Holdings Ltd. The County of Red Deer No. 23. at the meeting of Council on June , decided not to object to the City of Red Deer's application to annex the said territory. By letter to the Board, dated January it made the following requests: "1. That the land owned by Mr. Charles Bower, N.E W4th, be assessed and taxed as farm land for as long as the property is owned by Mr. Bower. 2. That the service road and intersection lying to the west of the N.W. quarter of Section W4th be included in the annexation. 3. That theeffectivedateoftheannexation. ifapproved. beset at January 1,1980." At the hearing. the County of Red Deer No. 23, stated a willingness to go along with the application to annex the said territory "... even though good agricultural land... " rather than have the said territory taken by "a number of piece-meal type applications for the next number of years," understanding this would suffice for the City's needs until the year200i. The concept of a "20-year rolling stock inventory" of land for the City was not appreciated as meaning the same as the City's 20-year needs. Alberta Transportation, by letter to the Board, dated October27, 1978, advised: "... the annexation in the south-east quadrant of the existing City of Red Deer involves a number of important roadways. Special consideration should be given to the effect of the development on Highways 2 and 2A. Secondary Roads 91 1 and 595. On-going discussions between the City of Red Deer and the Department should include consideration of right+f-way, access control and noise attenuation along these routes. It is considered most important that the sections of service road adjacent to Highway 2 and2a and the road allowances for Secondary Roads 91 1 and 595 be included within the annexed area. This will avoid problems associated with extensive usage of county roads due to the City's development." The Board. havingconsidered the evidence presented to it at the hearing, has reached the following conclusions: I. That the city of Red Deer. being central to the two major growth centres of Alberta. serving a large agricultural area and rich resource based region, with an established development record. will continue to grow in development and populations, probably at annual rates exceeding normal Alberta community growth patterns. 2. The applicant. City of Red Deer, has satisfied the Board that additional lands will be required within its jurisdiction to meet the future needs of the City. 3. That while the lands allocated to residential uses are in excess of the City of Red - D e e r ' ~ e ~ e e d ~ UdLenLyyeats,lheBoard e x f recognizes that the estimates of needs may be conservative. The estimated density of 20 personsper acres, ThEi compared to other communities throughout the Province of Alberta is high. 4. That the City of Red Deer did not establish a need for additional industrial lands; no inventory of current lands or projected needs being submitted. The argument that dispersal of industrial lands throughout the City was desirable for transportation reasons. is acknowledged. However, the owners' objection to the annexation oftheir lands to the City is also acknowledged. 5. That the City of Red Deer already owns and is planning or has in operation, certain municipal uses on other lands - namely a land-fill site and exhibition grounds, and it is assumed that there is a need for such lands for such purposes. 6. That the City of Red Deer has established capacity within its existing water and sanitary sewer main lines to service the said territory, and has or will have, when planned expansions are completed, sufficient plant capacity to service the development of the said territory. 7. That there are no topographical restraints to the development of the said territory, it falling within a common storm water shed with other areas ofthe City of Red Deer to the east and southof the Red Deer River. Further, the said territory is a logical expansion to the City of Red Deer, having been considered in utility, transportation, and planning studies. a<,.

5

6

7