IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CASE NUMBER S SNYDER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION THIRD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DATE HEARD: JULY 2, 2014
|
|
- Annice Hunter
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CASE NUMBER S SNYDER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION THIRD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DATE HEARD: JULY 2, 2014 ORDERED BY: DOUGLAS CLARK HOLLMANN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICER PLANNER: JOHN R. FURY DATE FILED: JULY 11, 2014
2 PLEADINGS Snyder Development Corporation, the applicant, seeks a special exception ( S) to allow a Planned Unit Development on property comprising acres located along the east side of Old Mill Boulevard, south of Elvaton Road, Millersville. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION The hearing notice was posted on the County s website in accordance with the County Code. The file contains the certification of mailing to community associations and interested persons. Each person designated in the application as owning land that is located within 175 feet of the property was notified by mail, sent to the address furnished with the application. However, after the original decision was issued on May 21, 2014, this Office became aware that a significant number of interested parties, i.e., property owners surrounding the subject property, were not given adequate notice of the May 1, 2014 hearing. Consequently, the May 21, 2014 decision was rescinded and a new hearing date scheduled for July 2, Danny Boyd of Boyd & Dowgiallo, P.A., submitted an affidavit indicating that the property was posted (Applicant s Exhibit 1). I find and conclude that the requirements of public notice have been satisfied. FINDINGS A hearing was held on July 2, 2014, in which the witnesses were sworn and the following was presented with regard to the proposed relief requested by the applicant. 1
3 The Property The subject property is owned by Snyder/Elvaton, LLC, and has a street address of 8318 Elvaton Road, Millersville, Maryland It consists of separate parcels of land that total acres, more or less, and is identified as Lots 1 and 2 of Parcel 274 and Parcel 279 in Block 20 on Tax Map 16. The property is split-zoned R1, R2, and R5. 9,877 square feet of the site is zoned R1- Residential District, acres are zoned R2-Residential, and 8.68 acres are zoned R5-Residential. It is not located in the critical area. 1 The Proposal The applicant seeks a special exception to allow the property to be developed as a Planned Unit Development (PUD) that will include 53 singlefamily detached dwelling units and 66 townhouse dwelling units. The Anne Arundel County Code A PUD is governed by the provisions of , et seq., and must also meet the general standards contained in which apply to all special exceptions. The Evidence Presented At The Hearing John R. Fury, a planner with the Office of Planning & Zoning (OPZ), testified in support of the request. The property has historically been used as a 1 The Development Concept Plan is shown on Applicant s Exhibit 3. For clarity, this decision will attach a copy of page 5 of the Design Guide Manual admitted into evidence as County Exhibit 7. 2
4 farm. Parcel 279 ( Bulk Parcel A ), which adjoins Elvaton Road, will remain undeveloped. The maximum net density for the R2 and R5 portions of the site is 81.0 and 38.4 dwelling units, respectively, or units in total. The applicant seeks approval for a PUD that will contain 119 dwelling units (53 single-family and 66 townhouse units). One entrance at the Oakwood Road end of the property has been proposed. Community open space and an active recreation park have been proposed near the entrance. The single-family lots would be separated from the townhouse lots by a floodplain that will remain open space. Therefore, the proposal meets the bulk regulations of for a PUD with respect to coverage, open space, and dwelling unit composition (a) provides that the developer of a PUD shall propose bulk regulations relating to lot size, setbacks for principal and accessory structures, spacing between structures, and height limitations in a submittal of specific development and design standards and, if approved by special exception, shall govern the development of the PUD. The applicant has complied with this requirement see County Exhibit 7 Design Guide Manual, which is incorporated herein. Mr. Fury testified that OPZ has determined that the proposed development is generally compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. A traffic impact study was submitted, although not required. Agency comments were provided by the following agencies: 3
5 The Cultural Resources Division commented that there is an archeological site on the Elvaton Road portion of the property but no further investigation is needed. The Long Range Division commented that the surrounding land uses are primarily residential and that the site layout and density are generally compatible with surrounding land use. Although the General Development Plan and the Glen Burnie Small Area Plan proposed an extension of Oakwood Road, that proposal has been deleted. The applicant has executed a deed to the County for a part of that Oakwood Road right-of-way extension, and the County, in turn, has executed a deed to the applicant for a portion of a right-of-way for a possible future extension of Hospital Drive. The Transportation Division commented that the applicant will have to provide assistance in determining the details of the proposed access from Oakwood Road. The Development Division commented that Parcel A will remain undeveloped because the density potential is being used for the proposed development on the rest of the subject property. The Department of Recreation and Parks recommended approval. A portion of the property encompasses a segment of the Marley Creek Greenway. The Fire Department has no objection to the proposal but commented that a second entrance would benefit residents and improve emergency response operations. 4
6 The Soil Conservation District offered no objection to the project. Mr. Fury testified that, based upon the above findings, the proposal meets the special exception requirements of although parking will remain an issue that needs to be addressed during permit stage and a secondary means of access should be addressed. Bulk Parcel A should remain undeveloped. The applicant was represented at the hearing by Anthony F. Christhilf, Esquire who presented evidence through Mr. Boyd, the applicant s engineer, and Zachary Lette, Vice-President of Land Planning & Design Associates, that the proposed development will meet the requirements of , et seq., and A 26-page Market Assessment was admitted into evidence as Applicant s Exhibit 6 to support a finding of public need for the proposed dwelling units. Parking and landscape design requirements will be addressed and resolved at the permitting stage. A request was made to grant the applicant the opportunity to phase the development of the property as permitted by (b). The applicant requested that the special exception be conditioned on the applicant being allowed 3 years to obtain a permit and 6 years in which to complete construction in accordance with the permit. The justification for the request was based on the need to obtain approvals from many agencies, including the Maryland Department of the Environment and go through the subdivision, grading, and permit process required for a project of this size. 5
7 Elsie Cullins testified that she lives at nd Street, Pasadena and owns Parcel 703 near the subject property. Ms. Cullins expressed concern about the possible extension of Hospital Drive across her property but Mr. Boyd testified that from his knowledge of the General Development Plan and other County programs, no such extension is planned. Sarah Hakulin testified that she lives at 8240 Ahearn Road and is the President of the Village of Old Mill Community Association. She was also concerned about the possible extension of Hospital Drive and the lack of notice to her community and others about the applicant s plans for the subject property. She testified that her association does not think the proposed development fits in with the surround neighborhood. Furthermore, she objected to the increased traffic the development would put on the surrounding roads which she said were already overloaded. She would like the access from Oakwood Road to continue through the development to connect with Elvaton Road to help ease traffic on Oakwood Road. Mr. Boyd testified that the applicant is opposed to that option for the very reason that the residents in the development, once it is built, will not want to have the roadway turned into a connector between Oakwood Road and Elvaton Road. Marie Fries testified that she lives at 8285 Pond Court and questioned why the proposed road into the subject property, as depicted on the Concept Master Plan attached as County Exhibit 2 to this decision, has to swerve over against her rear yard. She would like to have the separation and buffer area increased so she 6
8 has more of a cushion between her property and the development. Mr. Boyd said the applicant would consider moving the road but suggested the presence of environmental features may have pushed the road toward Ms. Fries property line. Cheryl Lute testified she also lives at 8284 Pond Court near the Oakwood/Old Mill Blvd intersection. She said motorists have driven into the woods on her property, and almost into her pool, and, therefore, she was very concerned about the impact development would take on her property. She was shown that there would be a wooded open space behind her property. There was concern that the wooded open space at the entrance to the development behind Ms. Lute s property would be used for a 7-11 or similar business but the evidence shows that the subject property is zoned residential and cannot support a commercial use. Furthermore, with the building of the proposed dwelling units, there is no density left for another structure on the property. Finally, similar concerns about the bulk parcel on Elvaton Road were answered in the same manner. Because the density allocation has been used up for the entire property, the bulk parcel will be used for open space activities. There was no other testimony taken or exhibits received in the matter. The Hearing Officer did not visit the property. The Special Exception The applicant seeks a special exception to allow a PUD on the subject property. The law is settled that a special exception use is a use that the legislative body recognizes as compatible with permitted uses, subject to a public hearing to 7
9 show compliance with the underlying standards. Schultz v. Pritts, 291 Md. 1 (1981); Peoples Council for Baltimore County, et al v. Loyola College in Maryland, in the Court of Appeals of Maryland 137, September Term 2007, (September 9, 2008). The Code provisions that govern the granting of a special exception for a PUD are found in , et seq., which reads as follows (the evidence supporting each factor is in italics): Uses. (a) For less than 500 units. A PUD of less than 500 dwelling units may have adult independent dwelling units, duplex or semi-detached dwellings, multifamily dwellings, single-family detached dwellings, townhouse dwellings, public utility essential services, and public utility uses in accordance with The applicant proposes 119 dwelling units (single-family detached and townhouse dwellings) that will meet the provisions of this subsection Bulk regulations. (a) Generally. Bulk regulations relating to lot size, setbacks for principal and accessory structures, spacing between structures, and height limitations shall be proposed by the developer in a submittal of specific development and design standards and, if approved by special exception, shall govern the development of the PUD. The applicant has proposed specific development and design standards as part of its application for the PUD. The proposed lot sizes, building architecture, stormwater management, road sections, plantings, pedestrian connectivity and recreation areas will be reviewed at the permitting stage and appear to meet the requirements of this section relates only to utility installations and is not relevant here. 8
10 (b) Setbacks if PUD abuts residential. When a structure in a PUD is located within 50 feet of the boundary line of a residential district, the setback for the structure shall be the more restrictive of the setback requirements for the abutting residential zoning district or for the zoning district in which the structure is located. The adjoining properties are zoned R1, R2 and R5 residential. It appears that the applicant can meet the applicable setback requirements. (c) Density. The density of development in a PUD may not exceed the density allowed by the zoning district in which the development is located. The density calculations allow 119 units, which is what the applicant proposes. (d) Retail use. A single retail use may not exceed 65,000 square feet. (Not applicable.) (e) Bulk regulations. Mr. Boyd testified that the property will be able to meet the bulk regulations for a PUD on this property. Therefore, it appears that the applicant has satisfied or will be able to satisfy the requirements of , et seq. The applicant also appears able to satisfy the requirements of , which applies to all special exceptions. The evidence supporting each factor is in italics: (1) The use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; There is no evidence that the development of the site as a residential PUD will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare. (2) The location, nature, and height of each building, wall, and fence, the nature and extent of landscaping on the site, and the location, size, nature, and intensity of each phase of the use 9
11 and its access roads will be compatible with the appropriate and orderly development of the district in which it is located; The site is zoned residential, it will be developed as residential, and it is surrounded by residential uses. The use will be compatible with the district in which it is located. (3) Operations related to the use will be no more objectionable with regard to noise, fumes, vibration, or light to nearby properties than operations in other uses allowed under this article; There is no evidence that the noise, fumes, vibration, or light to nearby properties will be more objectionable than operations in other uses allowed under the Code. (4) The proposed use will not conflict with an existing or programmed public facility, public service, school, or road; Mr. Fury and Mr. Boyd testified that the use will not conflict with an existing or programmed public facility, public service, school, or road. (5) The proposed use has the written recommendations and comments of the Health Department and the Office of Planning and Zoning; Mr. Fury testified in favor of the application. The Health Department has no objection to the granting of the requested special exception. (6) The applicant has presented sufficient evidence of public need for the use; The applicant has presented sufficient evidence of public need for the use. Applicant s Exhibit 6 entitled Market Assessment Wade Property February 2041 prepared by RKG Associates, Inc., shows that there is a need for the proposed housing in the area which contains the Ft. Meade military facilities, the casino planned for Arundel Mills, the Baltimore Washington Medical Center, and the Washington Baltimore urban areas. 10
12 (7) The applicant has presented sufficient evidence that the use will meet and be able to maintain adherence to the criteria for the specific use; The applicant has presented sufficient evidence that it can maintain adherence to the criteria for a residential PUD on the subject property. (8) The application will conform to the critical area criteria for sites located in the critical area; and The property is not located in the critical area. (9) The administrative site plan demonstrates the applicant's ability to comply with the requirements of the Landscape Manual. The applicant has presented sufficient evidence to show that it will be able to comply with the requirements of the Landscape Manual. Therefore, I conclude that the applicant has complied with the requirements of and is entitled to the special exception requested. It is important to point out that the applicant has not asked for any variances to the requirements of or ORDER PURSUANT to the application of Snyder Development Corporation, petitioning to allow a Planned Unit Development on property comprising acres; and PURSUANT to the notice, posting of the property, and public hearing and in accordance with the provisions of law, it is this 11 th day of July, 2014, ORDERED, by the Administrative Hearing Officer of Anne Arundel County, that the applicant s request to allow a Planned Unit Development on property comprising acres located along the east side of Old Mill Boulevard, 11
13 south of Elvaton Road, Millersville, and identified as Lots 1 and 2 of Parcel 274 and Parcel 279 in Block 20 on Tax Map 16, as shown on Sheet 4 of 4 of County Exhibit 2, is hereby granted; AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, by the Administrative Hearing Officer of Anne Arundel County, that the Applicant s request to phase the development of the property pursuant to the provisions of (b) is hereby granted, and the applicant is given three (3) years from the date of this Decision and Order to obtain a building permit and six (6) years from the date of this Decision and Order to complete construction in accordance with the permit. Furthermore, County Exhibit 2, referenced in this decision, and County Exhibit 7, the Design Manual for Wade s Grant, are incorporated herein as if fully set forth and made a part of this Order. The foregoing special exception is subject to the following conditions: A. The applicant shall comply with the instructions and necessary approvals from the Permit Application Center, the Department of Health, and the Critical Area Commission. B. The applicant shall comply with the bulk regulations found in , including but not limited to submitting specific development and design standards to be approved by the Permit Application Center. C. The applicant shall satisfy agency comments at subdivision. D. All parking shall comply with Title 3 of Article 18 of the Anne Arundel County Code. E. The applicant shall comply with any setback and/or buffer requirements that apply to the property. 12
14 F. The applicant shall comply with County Exhibit 7 Design Guide Manual for Wade s Grant. G. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Landscape Manual. H. The Office suggests that the applicant take into consideration, if possible, an increase of the buffers between the subject property and surrounding residential properties. NOTICE TO APPLICANT Within thirty days from the date of this Decision, any person, firm, corporation, or governmental agency having an interest therein and aggrieved thereby may file a Notice of Appeal with the County Board of Appeals (a) is modified by this Decision and Order to allow the applicant three (3) years from the date of this Decision and Order to obtain a building permit and six (6) years from the date of this Decision and Order to begin construction in accordance with the permit. Thereafter, the special exception shall not expire so long as (1) construction proceeds in accordance with the permit or (2) a record plat is recorded among the land records pursuant to the application for subdivision, the applicant obtains a building permit within one year after recordation of the plat, and construction proceeds in accordance with the permit. If this case is not appealed, exhibits must be claimed within 60 days of the date of this Order, otherwise they will be discarded. 13
15
LUIS EMILLO GOMEZ AND JILL SUZANNE GOMEZ
IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CASE NUMBER 2015-0117-V LUIS EMILLO GOMEZ AND JILL SUZANNE GOMEZ THIRD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DATE HEARD: AUGUST 20, 2015 ORDERED BY: DOUGLAS CLARK HOLLMANN ADMINISTRATIVE
More informationPROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE DERBY ZONING REGULATIONS AUGUST 12, 2008
ARTICLE II Definitions and word usage 195-7. Definitions and word usage. Modify the following: HOUSING FOR THE ELDERLY OLDER PERSONS Housing in accordance with and as defined in the United States Fair
More information4.2 RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
4.2 RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS A. Purpose: To define regulations and standards for each residential zoning district in the City. The following sections identify uses, regulations, and performance standards
More informationRP-2, RP-3, RP-4, AND RP-5 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS
6.10 - RP-2, RP-3, RP-4, AND RP-5 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS 6.10.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION: 6.10.1.1 The regulations established in this Section are intended to provide optional methods of land development
More informationPERMITTED USES: Within the MX-1 Mixed Use Neighborhood District the following uses are permitted:
6.25 MX-1 - MIXED USE NEIGHBORHOOD 6.25.1 INTENT: The purpose of the MX-1 Mixed Use Neighborhood District is to accommodate the development of a wide-range of residential and compatible non-residential
More information* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
IN RE: PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL HEARING, * BEFORE THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION AND VARIANCE * DEPUTY ZONING W side of Main Street, 225 feet N of c/l of East Chadsworth Avenue * COMMISSIONER 4 th Election District
More informationZoning Board of Appeals
Zoning Administrator City of Dearborn Economic and Community Development 16901 Michigan Avenue, Suite 6 Dearborn, Michigan 48126 General Information Zoning Board of Appeals The Dearborn Zoning Ordinance
More informationZoning Regulations of the Town of Redding Connecticut
Zoning Regulations of the Town of Redding Connecticut Statutory zoning authority was adopted for the Town of Redding, and a Zoning Commission established as provided by law, at a Town Meeting held May
More informationPLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA MEMORANDUM
City and County of Broomfield, Colorado PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA MEMORANDUM To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: John Hilgers, Planning Director Anna Bertanzetti, Principal Planner Meeting
More informationOrdinance No. 04 Series of 2013 RECITALS
AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF BASALT, COLORADO, APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO PORTIONS OF CHAPTER 16, ZONING, OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF BASALT, COLORADO, CREATING A NEW R-4 MIXED
More informationDISTRICT COUNCIL FOR PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY, MARYLAND OFFICE OF ZONING HEARING EXAMINER SPECIAL EXCEPTION 4658 DECISION
DISTRICT COUNCIL FOR PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY, MARYLAND OFFICE OF ZONING HEARING EXAMINER SPECIAL EXCEPTION 4658 DECISION Application: Three Chair Barber Shop Applicants: Danta L. & Felicia B. Wright/Fort
More informationPlanning Commission Hearing Date: 2/21/2017 Board of County Commissioners Hearing Date: 3/8/2017
COMMISSIONERS: DARRYL GLENN (PRESIDENT) MARK WALLER (PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE) STAN VANDERWERF LONGINOS GONZALEZ PEGGY LITTLETON PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CRAIG DOSSEY, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
More informationDIVISION 1 PURPOSE OF DISTRICTS
ARTICLE 2 ZONING DISTRICTS AND MAP DIVISION 1 PURPOSE OF DISTRICTS Section 2.101 Zoning Districts. For the purpose of this Ordinance, the City of Richmond is hereby divided into districts as follows: DISTRICT
More informationARTICLE 14 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) DISTRICT
ARTICLE 14 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) DISTRICT Section 14.01 Intent. It is the intent of this Article to allow the use of the planned unit development (PUD) process, as authorized by the Michigan Zoning
More informationPETITION FOR VARIANCE. Village Hall Glen Carbon, IL (Do not write in this space-for Office Use Only) Notice Published On: Parcel I.D. No.
(Execute in Duplicate) PETITION FOR VARIANCE Zoning Board of Appeals Village Hall Glen Carbon, IL 62034 Variance Request No. Date:, 20 (Do not write in this space-for Office Use Only) Date Set for Hearing:
More informationStaff Report: Date: Applicant: Property Identification: Acreage of Request: Current Zoning of Requested Area: Requested Action: Attached:
Staff Report: Completed by Jeff Palmer Director of Planning & Zoning Date: November 7, 2018, Updated November 20, 2018 Applicant: Greg Smith, Oberer Land Developer agent for Ronald Montgomery ET AL Property
More informationVILLAGE OF DOWNERS GROVE PLAN COMMISSION VILLAGE HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 801 BURLINGTON AVENUE. June 2, :00 p.m. AGENDA
VILLAGE OF DOWNERS GROVE PLAN COMMISSION VILLAGE HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 801 BURLINGTON AVENUE June 2, 2014 7:00 p.m. AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call a. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approval of Minutes April
More information1. Cuyler-Brownsville planned neighborhood conservation (P-N-C) districtphase I (section ). (2) Single-family semiattached dwellings;
Sec. 8-3035. Planned unit development multifamily (PUD-M). A. Purpose. The PUD-M district is intended to allow a variety of residential development including single-family residential, two-family residential,
More informationCity of Newport. Zoning Board of Review
City of Newport Zoning Board of Review Application for a Special-Use Permit Revision 3/13/15 Instructions (Please read and follow carefully) This application is to be used when submitting an appeal to
More informationAn application to the Zoning Board of Appeals is not complete and will not be scheduled until all of the following information has been provided:
INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF PORT JEFFERSON ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 88 North Country Road, Port Jefferson, NY 11777 Telephone: (631) 473-4744 Fax: (631) 473-2049 FILING REQUIREMENTS An application to the is
More informationMay 12, Chapter RH HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL ZONES REGULATIONS Sections:
May 12, 2017 Chapter 17.13 RH HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL ZONES REGULATIONS Sections: 17.13.010 Title, intent, and description. 17.13.020 Required design review process. 17.13.030 Permitted and conditionally
More informationStaff Report: Date: Applicant: Property Identification: Acreage of Request: Current Zoning of Requested Area: Requested Action: Attached:
Staff Report: Completed by Jeff Palmer Director of Planning & Zoning Date: November 7, 2018 Applicant: Greg Smith, Oberer Land Developer agent for Ronald Montgomery ET AL Property Identification: Frontage
More informationROCKY RIVER BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING APPEALS
ROCKY RIVER BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING APPEALS SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANTS Your submittal must be received by the Rocky River Building Department no later than 2 weeks (14 days) prior to the scheduled
More informationSpecial Exception Use Order Application
Development Services Department Planning Division CITY OF OVIEDO 400 Alexandria Boulevard Oviedo, Florida 32765 Application No. Date Received Pre-application Meeting Date Phone: (407) 971-5775 (407)971-5819
More informationConditional Use Permit case no. CU 14-06: Bristol Village Partners, LLC
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT August 7, 2014 Conditional Use Permit case no. CU 14-06: Bristol Village Partners, LLC CASE DESCRIPTION: LOCATION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: EXISTING LAND USE: ZONING:
More informationUSE PERMIT AND VARIANCE APPLICATION
USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE APPLICATION Case No. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS APPLICATION FOR USE PERMITS AND VARIANCES ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M U N I T Y P L A N N I N G, H O
More informationR E S O L U T I O N. a. Remove Table B from the plan.
R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, Werrlein Property is the owner of a 0.3902-acre parcel of land in the 5th Election District of Prince George s County, Maryland, being zoned One-Family Detached Residential
More informationBowie Marketplace Residential Detailed Site Plan Statement of Justification January 13, 2017 Revised February 2, 1017
Bowie Marketplace Residential Detailed Site Plan Statement of Justification January 13, 2017 Revised February 2, 1017 Submitted on behalf of: BE Bowie LLC 5410 Edson Lane, Suite 220 Rockville, MD 20852
More informationRESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS (Amended 11/13/14; 6/9/16; 10/13/16) PART I. R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
ARTICLE X. RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS (Amended 11/13/14; 6/9/16; 10/13/16) PART I. R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Section 108: Purpose This district is designed to accommodate single family detached
More informationCONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR AN EXCAVATION/BORROW PIT INSTRUCTIONS
City of Chesapeake Department of Planning Post Office Box 15225 Chesapeake, Virginia 23328-5225 (757) 382-6176 FAX (757) 382-6406 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR AN EXCAVATION/BORROW PIT INSTRUCTIONS
More informationMidwest City, Oklahoma Zoning Ordinance
2010 Midwest City, Oklahoma Zoning Ordinance 9/2/2010 Table of Contents Section 1. General Provisions... 5 1.1. Citation... 5 1.2. Authority... 5 1.3. Purpose... 5 1.4. Nature and Application... 5 1.5.
More informationVARIANCE APPLICATION
TOWN OF CARY Submit to the Development Customer Service Center, P.O. Box 8005, Cary, NC 27512 Planning Department Planning Department Contact: (919) 469-4046 Fee: $600.00 For office use only: Method of
More informationTHE AREA PLAN COMMISSION OF ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, IN AGENDA
THE AREA PLAN COMMISSION OF ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, IN AGENDA Tuesday, June 20, 2017 Fourth-Floor Council Chambers 3:30 p.m. County-City Building, South Bend, IN PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Rezonings: A. A combined
More informationCITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM
City and County of Broomfield, Colorado CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and City Council From: Charles Ozaki, City and County Manager Prepared by: Anna Bertanzetti, Principal Planner David Shinneman,
More informationUPPER MOUNT BETHEL TOWNSHIP NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
UPPER MOUNT BETHEL TOWNSHIP NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA JOINDER DEED / LOT CONSOLIDATION TOWNSHIP REVIEW PROCESS When accepting proposed Joinder Deeds / Lot Consolidations, review the Joinder Deed
More informationCITY OF NOVI LAND DIVISION INSTRUCTIONS
CITY OF NOVI LAND DIVISION INSTRUCTIONS All applications for land division in the City of Novi must be in compliance with Chapter 32 of the City of Novi Code of Ordinances and with the Land Division Act,
More informationCHAPTER 14 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS
9-14-1 9-14-1 CHAPTER 14 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS SECTION: 9-14-1: Purpose 9-14-2: Governing Provisions 9-14-3: Minimum Area 9-14-4: Uses Permitted 9-14-5: Common Open Space 9-14-6: Utility Requirements
More informationGuide to Replats. Step 1. Step 2. Step 3. Step 4. Step 5. Step 6. Step 7. Step 8. Step 9. Step 10
Guide to Replats Introduction Douglas County is committed to providing open, transparent application processes to the public. This Guide is provided to assist anyone interested in the procedures and expectations
More informationZONING HEARING BOARD OF WARWICK TOWNSHIP BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Warwick Road Warrington, PA 18976
ZONING HEARING BOARD OF WARWICK TOWNSHIP BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Docket No. 15-7 Applicants: Owners: Subject Property: Requested Relief: Adam and Karen Sailor 2195 Warwick Road Warrington, PA 18976
More informationWHEREAS, the staff of The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission recommended APPROVAL of the application with conditions; and
R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, Redeemed Christian Church of God is the owner of a 2.83-acre parcel of land known as Lot 9, Lot 19, P/O Lot 1 and P/O Lot 18, Block B, Plat Book A, Plat 5, said property being
More informationStaff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Robert Davis
Applicant Property Owner Reed Enterprises, Inc. Public Hearing November 8, 2017 City Council Election District Princess Anne Agenda Item D1 Request Conditional Use Permit (Bulk Storage Yard) Modification
More informationARTICLE VII. NONCONFORMITIES. Section 700. Purpose.
ARTICLE VII. NONCONFORMITIES. Section 700. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to regulate and limit the development and continued existence of legal uses, structures, lots, and signs established either
More informationExhibit A-1. Piney Creek Bend Planned Development
Exhibit A-1 Piney Creek Bend Planned Development A. Purpose and Intent The Piney Creek Bend PD is composed of approximately 90.91 acres, as described in Exhibit D (Field Notes). The development of this
More informationSTAFF REPORT FOR THE CITY OF GOOSE CREEK ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
` STAFF REPORT FOR THE CITY OF GOOSE CREEK ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS For reference, the City of Goose Creek Code of Ordinances are available online at https://www.cityofgoosecreek.com/government/code ordinances
More informationPlan nt Plan Filing and
PARISH OF ASCENSION OFFICE OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPENDIX VI PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) CODE Contents: 17-601. General Purpose: Procedures... 3 17-602. General Character:...
More informationAPPLICATION PACKET LAND SPLIT OR COMBINATION REVIEW
APPLICATION PACKET LAND SPLIT OR COMBINATION REVIEW COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF PLYMOUTH 9955 N. Haggerty Road Plymouth, MI 48170 Fees Revised 9.13.2017 APPLICATION PACKET LAND
More informationPLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
` PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION CHESAPEAKE PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUD Creation PUD Modification APPLICATION NUMBER: (Assigned by Chesapeake Planning Department) GENERAL INFORMATION Project 1. Applicant(s):
More informationa. It is the intent of these regulations to encourage the preservation of natural resources and facilitate orderly growth in the County.
Part V Transfer of Development Rights Section 246. 1. Intent a. It is the intent of these regulations to encourage the preservation of natural resources and facilitate orderly growth in the County. b.
More informationPLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS (Ordinance No.: 3036, 12/3/07; Repealed & Replaced by Ordinance No.: 4166, 10/15/12)
159.62 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS (Ordinance No.: 3036, 12/3/07; Repealed & Replaced by Ordinance No.: 4166, 10/15/12) A. PURPOSE 1. General. The Planned Unit Development (PUD) approach provides the flexibility
More informationARTICLE 8: SPECIAL LAND USES
ARTICLE 8: SPECIAL LAND USES Section 8.0 - Purpose Special Land Use permits are required for proposed activities which are essentially compatible with other uses, or activities permitted in a zoning district,
More informationPLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: April 18, 2019
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: April 18, 2019 DEVELOPMENT NAME SUBDIVISION NAME Springhill Village Subdivision Springhill Village Subdivision LOCATION 4350, 4354, 4356, 4358,
More informationPlanning and Zoning Commission STAFF REPORT REQUEST. DSA : Zone Change from R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) to B-4 (Community Services).
Planning and Zoning Commission STAFF REPORT AGENDA # TO: FROM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Joseph Horn, City Planner MEETING DATES: August 4, 2016 SUBJECT: Gino Tarantini zone change requests REQUEST
More informationTown of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 14-REZ-31 Cary Park PDD Amendment (Waterford II) Town Council Meeting January 15, 2015
Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 14-REZ-31 Cary Park PDD Amendment (Waterford II) Town Council Meeting January 15, 2015 REQUEST To amend the Town of Cary Official Zoning Map by amending
More informationPlanning Division Department of Community & Economic Development. Applicant: Peter and Sandra Clark
Planning Commission Staff Report Peter and Sandra Clark Special Exception-Unit Legalization Special Exception PLNPCM2013-00336 2551 S Highland Drive Public Hearing: September 25, 2013 Planning Division
More informationPGCPB No File No and R E S O L U T I O N
R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, Buena Vista West, LLC is the owner of a 10.23-acre and an 8.56-acre parcel of land known as Vista Gardens West, being in the 20th Election District of Prince George s County,
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT REZONING CASE: RZ-15-002 REPORT DATE: January 26, 2016 CASE NAME: Thursday Lunch Club Rezoning PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: February 17, 2016 ADDRESS OF REZONING PROPOSAL:
More informationDEPARTMENT OF PLANNING Application for Variances, Special Exceptions through the Board of Adjustment
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING Application for Variances, Special Exceptions through the Board of Adjustment Dear Applicant: To assist you in completing this application and providing the Board with sufficient
More informationGuide to Combined Preliminary and Final Plats
Guide to Combined Preliminary and Final Plats Introduction The Douglas County is committed to providing open, transparent application processes to the public. This Guide is provided to assist anyone interested
More informationCity of Harrisburg Variance and Special Exception Application
City of Harrisburg Variance and Special Exception Application Note: The Planning Bureau will review all applications for completeness; incomplete applications may cause a delay in processing. Contact Ben
More informationBusiness Park District Zoning Text Amendment (PLNPCM ) ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT
Staff Report PLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT To: Salt Lake City Planning Commission From: Maryann Pickering, Principal Planner (801) 535-7660 Date: June 10, 2015 Re: Business Park District
More informationMONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING BOARD T H E MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK A N D P L A N N I N G C O M M I S S I O N MCPB NO. 10-144 Hearing Date: September 30, 2010 MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING BOARD RESOLUTION
More informationARTICLE I ZONE BASED REGULATIONS
ARTICLE I ZONE BASED REGULATIONS RZC 21.08 RESIDENTIAL REGULATIONS 21.08.290 Cottage Housing Developments A. Purpose. The purpose of the cottage housing requirements is to: 1. Provide a housing type that
More informationImplementation. Approved Master Plan and SMA for Henson Creek-South Potomac 103
Implementation Approved Master Plan and SMA for Henson Creek-South Potomac 103 104 Approved Master Plan and SMA for Henson Creek-South Potomac Sectional Map Amendment The land use recommendations in the
More informationBEFORE THE GALLATIN COUNTY COMMISSION GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA
BEFORE THE GALLATIN COUNTY COMMISSION GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF TOM MURPHY, MANAGING MEMBER OF THE BRIDGER CENTER, LLC, FOR A ZONE MAP AMENDMENT TO THE GALLATIN COUNTY/BOZEMAN
More informationCHAPTER XV PUD PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
CHAPTER XV PUD PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Section 15.1 Planned Unit Development. Planned Unit Development (PUD) includes cluster zoning, plan development, community unit plan, planned residential
More informationARTICLE 9: VESTING DETERMINATION, NONCONFORMITIES AND VARIANCES. Article History 2 SECTION 9.01 PURPOSE 3
ARTICLE 9 VESTING DETERMINATIONS, NONCONFORMITIES, AND VARIANCES Table of Contents Article History 2 SECTION 9.01 PURPOSE 3 SECTION 9.02 LOT OF RECORD AND VESTING DETERMINATIONS FOR NONCONFORMING DEVELOPMENTS
More informationAttached is a Clinton Township Zoning Permit Application and requirements for issuance of a permit.
To Whom It May Concern: Attached is a Clinton Township Zoning Permit Application and requirements for issuance of a permit. The fee for the permit application is $75.00, which shall be made payable to
More informationCITY OF FERNDALE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF FERNDALE HEARING EXAMINER RE: Planned Unit Development ) 16001-PUD Preliminary Plat ) 16018-SE Plat Variance ) 16002-VAR Application by ) ) MD General, L.L.C. ) FINDINGS OF FACT, Malloy Heights
More informationArticle 7: Residential Land Use and Development Requirements
Article 7: Residential Land Use and Section 701: Statement of Intent (A) (B) (C) The intent of Article 7 is to develop certain land use and development requirements for the residential uses within Cumru
More informationTHE AREA PLAN COMMISSION OF ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, IN AGENDA
THE AREA PLAN COMMISSION OF ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, IN AGENDA Tuesday, January 17, 2017 Fourth-Floor Council Chambers 3:30 p.m. County-City Building, South Bend, IN EXECUTIVE SESSION: A. Election of Officers
More informationARTICLE IV R-1A, R-1B, R-1C, R-1, R-2, R-3, AND R-4, ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS
ARTICLE IV R-1A, R-1B, R-1C, R-1, R-2, R-3, AND R-4, ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS PREAMBLE These residential districts are designed to provide for one family low density dwelling sites and residentially
More informationBY THE CITY COMMISSION ORDINANCE NO.:
BY THE CITY COMMISSION ORDINANCE NO.: 2005-0868 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DADE CITY, FLORIDA CREATING A DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCEDURES ORDINANCE; PROVIDING FOR INTENT, PURPOSE,
More information4027 and 4031 Ellesmere Road Zoning Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Request for Direction Report
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 4027 and 4031 Ellesmere Road Zoning Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Request for Direction Report Date: August 22, 2013 To: From: Wards: Reference Number:
More informationSUBJECT PARCEL(S) Property Owner(s) TMS Number Approximate Acreage Carolina Park Development, LLC
Staff Report Special Planning Commission Meeting November 19, 2014 For reference, the Zoning Code and Land Development Regulations are available online. AGENDA ITEM 5c. SKETCH PLAN APPROVAL REQUEST: Request
More informationSPECIAL USE FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (P.U.D.), REZONING, and COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION PACKET
SPECIAL USE FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (P.U.D.), REZONING, and COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION PACKET VILLAGE OF HANOVER PARK DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Village of Hanover Park Department of Community
More informationA G E N D A CITY OF BUENA PARK ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
A G E N D A CITY OF BUENA PARK ZONING ADMINISTRATOR September 2, 2016 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE ROOM 10:00 a.m. Members of the public who wish to discuss an item should fill out a speaker identification
More informationZONING VARIANCE APPLICATION BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT
ZONING VARIANCE APPLICATION BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT Project Information Owner/Applicant Information Project Name Name of Owner Street Address Project Address Name of Applicant (if different) Street
More informationGuide to Preliminary Plans
Guide to Preliminary Plans Introduction The Douglas County is committed to providing open, transparent application processes to the public. This Guide is provided to assist anyone interested in the procedures
More informationZONING
130.10. R3 Medium Density Residential District. 130.10.1. Purpose. To preserve existing medium density single-family neighborhoods; provide the opportunity for TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS in PLANNED RESIDENTIAL
More informationAPPLICATION PACKET LAND SPLIT OR COMBINATION REVIEW
APPLICATION PACKET LAND SPLIT OR COMBINATION REVIEW COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF PLYMOUTH 9955 N. Haggerty Road Plymouth, MI 48170 Fees Revised 7/01/2012 APPLICATION PACKET LAND
More informationCombined Zoning/Minor Variance and Boulevard Parking Agreement Exception
Residential Front Yard and Boulevard Parking Policy Name: Residential Front Yard and Boulevard Parking Legislative History: Enacted September 19, 2017 (By-law No. CPOL.-223-475); Amended June 26, 2018
More informationCity of Burlington Joint Land Use Board. Land Use Development Application Application Submission Section A
City of Burlington Joint Land Use Board Land Use Development Application Application Submission Section A Documents must be included in all application packages Land Use Development Application Affidavit
More informationARTICLE IV R-1A, R-1B, R-1C, R-1, R-2, R-3, AND R-4, ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS
ARTICLE IV R-1A, R-1B, R-1C, R-1, R-2, R-3, AND R-4, ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS PREAMBLE These residential districts are designed to provide for one family low density dwelling sites and residentially
More informationZONING CLASSIFICATION SUMMARY SHEET
Growth and Resource Management Planning and Development Services 123 West Indiana Avenue Room 202 DeLand, Florida 32720-4253 Telephone (386) 943-7059 Fax (386) 626-6570 www.volusia.org ZONING CLASSIFICATION
More informationWHEREAS, on October 6, 2015, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing and recommended the proposed Ordinance Amendments; and
ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY AMENDING ARTICLE 2, ARTICLE 5, ARTICLE 30, ARTICLE 36, ARTICLE 37, AND ARTICLE 45 OF THE REDWOOD CITY ZONING ORDINANCE AND AMENDING
More informationMedical Marijuana Special Exception Use Information
Medical Marijuana Special Exception Use Information The Special Exception Use information below is a modified version of the Unified Development Code. It clarifies the current section 5:104 Special Exceptions
More informationSECTION 6. RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS
SECTION 6. RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS 6.1 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS PURPOSE 6.2 PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES 6.3 LOT AND BUILDING BULK REGULATIONS 6.4 GENERAL STANDARDS OF APPLICABILITY 6.1 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS
More informationSecondary Dwelling Unit
Secondary Dwelling Unit Review of Special Use Regulations (City Code Section 17.228.105) The purpose of this application is to determine whether or not your project meets the Planning and Development Code
More informationTOWN OF MELBOURNE BEACH 2016 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
TOWN OF MELBOURNE BEACH 2016 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION I. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: 1. Fees per current schedule. 2. Deed to property. 3. Pre-Application meeting is mandatory. Contact the Building Official
More informationZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MANSFIELD RESOLUTION NO CONCERNING THE APPLICATION OF SHARON IRICK VARIANCE APPROVAL
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MANSFIELD RESOLUTION NO. 2017 01-04 CONCERNING THE APPLICATION OF SHARON IRICK VARIANCE APPROVAL WHEREAS, Sharon Irick has applied to the Zoning Board of Adjustment
More informationPALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION
PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT 3/16/2006 AGENDA ITEM CODE SECTION REQUIRED PROPOSED VARIANCE BA-2006-00210 3.D.2.A-6 Property
More informationMARK BELLMAWR, LLC - # RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF BELLMAWR FOR USE VARIANCE, BULK VARIANCE AND PRELIMINARY AND FINAL MAJOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL MARK BELLMAWR, LLC
More informationCHAPTER 10 Planned Unit Development Zoning Districts
CHAPTER 10 Planned Unit Development Zoning Districts Section 10.1 Intent and Purpose The Planned Unit Development (PUD) districts are intended to offer design flexibility for projects that further the
More informationPolicy Issues City of Knoxville Zoning Code Update
Policy Issues City of Knoxville Zoning Code Update ADU's (Accessory Dwelling Units) The draft zoning ordinance update permits ADU s as an accessory use in all single-family residential zoning districts.
More informationIn order to permit maximum applicability of the PUD District, PUD-1 and PUD-2 Districts are hereby created.
ARTICLE III. PUD ned Unit Development Overlay District 205-128. Purpose. The PUD ned Unit Development Overlay District is intended to provide flexibility in the design of planned projects; to encourage
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA Board of Zoning Appeals Agenda Item V-11349-18-UP-2: Meeting of March 21, 2018 DATE: March 16, 2018 APPLICANT: LOCATION: ZONING: LOT AREA: GLUP DESIGNATION: Gregory and Sarah
More informationChapter 15: Non-Conformities
Chapter 15: Non-Conformities Section 15.1 Purpose... 15-2 Section 15.2 Non-Conforming Vacant Lots... 15-2 Section 15.3 Non-Conforming Buildings or Structures... 15-3 Section 15.4 Non-Conforming Uses...
More informationCondominium Unit Requirements.
ARTICLE 19 CONDOMINIUM REGULATIONS Section 19.01 Purpose. The purpose of this Article is to regulate projects that divide real property under a contractual arrangement known as a condominium. New and conversion
More informationPlanning Department Oconee County, Georgia STAFF REPORT
Planning Department Oconee County, Georgia STAFF REPORT REZONE CASE #: 7332 DATE: November 28, 2017 STAFF REPORT BY: Gabriel Quintas, Planner APPLICANT NAME: Smith Planning Group PROPERTY OWNER: John Hadden
More informationLAND USE AND ZONING OVERVIEW
OVERVIEW OF PLANNING POLICIES LAND USE AND ZONING OVERVIEW The Minneapolis Plan for Sustainable Growth and Other Adopted Plans Community Planning and Economic Development Development Services Division
More information