TOWN OF MOUNT PLEASANT, SOUTH CAROLINA BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS FEBRUARY 22, 2010 MINUTES
|
|
- Drusilla Leonard
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 TOWN OF MOUNT PLEASANT, SOUTH CAROLINA BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS FEBRUARY 22, 2010 MINUTES Present: Absent: Staff: Charles Moore, chair, Don Gwinnup, Robert Hollings, Saila Smyly, Mason Smith Ann Dovre-Coker and David Wilcox Michael Robertson and Linda Lancaster public. Mr. Moore called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. and reviewed the procedures with the A. Roll Call Mr. Moore stated that Ms. Ann Dovre-Coker had an excused absence. Mr. David Wilcox had an unexcused absence. B. Approval of Minutes Mr. Smith moved to approve the minutes from the previous meeting. Ms. Smyly seconded the motion. All in favor. C. Approval of Agenda Mr. Gwinnup moved to approve the agenda. Mr. Hollings seconded the motion. All in favor. D. Correspondence Mr. Robertson stated there was no correspondence. E. Unfinished business Mr. Robertson stated there was no unfinished business. New Business 1. Case V Woodland Pointe Place, Glenlake Subdivision, TMS# Request variance approval for a rear yard setback of approximately twenty-one feet for construction of a wooden deck and approval of existing encroachment by screened porch on property zoned R2, Low-Density Residential. Zoning Code Section (D)(2) requires a rear yard setback of 25 feet. Mr. Robertson reviewed staff comments as follows: Please refer to Form 3 and associated exhibits for applicant s justification of the relief sought. The property is one of several cul-de-sac lots within the Glenlakes Subdivision as indicated by the applicant s Form 3 exhibit map. The property is zoned R-2 Low-Density Residential District. The R-2 building setbacks require a 25 foot front yard, a 25 foot rear yard, and a combined side yard of 20 feet with a minimum of 10 feet on any one side yard. A Building Permit was issued by the Town s Building Inspections Department on June 6, The permit file includes a survey dated April 1, 1996 by ARC Surveying for the property showing that the proposed structure will meet the R-2 Zoning requirements.
2 Page 2 of 9 The Town was contacted by the applicant upon their desire to construct a deck on the rear of the house which includes an open portion of deck and a portion covered by a pergola. Upon review of the deck building plans, it was determined that the deck would encroach into the setback; therefore, requiring a variance. The site plan submitted for the work indicated that the existing porch encroached into the setback. Upon further research, it was determined that a variance had not been granted for the existing porch encroachment. The applicant has indicated that he believed a variance had been secured by the builder, Brentwood Homes, for the porch encroachment. The applicant has further indicated that he believed the builder set the house back further from the street and front yard setback to save a tree on the lot. The tree is not indicated on the April 1, 1996, survey by ARC Surveying. The applicant has indicated that the tree has been removed. The survey by ARC dated April 1, 1996, indicates that the front yard setback has not changed from what was shown on the building permit site plan and the existing. The survey by ARC dated April 1, 1996, when compared with the survey submitted for the variance indicates that the front setback is what was requested by the builder at 31.3 and 31.5 A comparison of the two site plans (ARC Surveying, April 1, 1996, and applicant s exhibit) appears to show a larger screened porch was constructed than what was originally shown on the building permit site plan (ARC Surveying, April 1, 1996) Mr. Robertson showed the board members the site plan from the Building Permit file which staff requested through a freedom of information act, permit number dated June 6, Mr. Robertson stated the porch may be larger than what is there and the other site plan was not to scale. Mr. Robertson stated on the screen they have R-2 low density residential as stated and the map in question is in green and the aerial shows the parcel in question. Mr. Robertson stated a similar aerial was also included in their packet by the applicant and photos of rear yard and porch were shown which concludes the staff presentation. Mr. Smith asked Mr. Robertson which photo showed the house in question. Mr. Robertson indicated which photo showed the house. Mr. Moore asked Mr. Robertson if he would show on slid and photo. Mr. Smith suggested to Mr. Robertson it appeared the surrounding homes may be in question as it appears the homes are close to the rear setback. Mr. Robertson answered he was unsure. Mr. Smith stated the aerial photo appears to show some properties encroaching on the back but without a survey it could not be certain. Mr. Gwinnup asked Mr. Robertson about the staff report if everything here is prior and everything after this is current. Mr. Robertson answered in the affirmative. Mr. Gwinnup asked if that was the current permit situation and wanted to be certain that the ARC Surveying survey was for the original building proposed. Mr. Robertson answered that the ARC survey was for the one that is constructed. Mr. Moore stated that it appears that the house permitted and drawn by ARC Surveying is not the house constructed today was not built as it was permitted. Mr. Robertson answered that it appears that everything corresponds to the ARC Survey with the exception of the screened porch.
3 Page 3 of 9 Mr. Gwinnup suggested that it was 16x14 rather than 10x14. Mr. Robertson answered that he did not scale that off. Mr. Gwinnup stated he scaled it and the survey does not match what was built, which is a problem. Mr. Charles Dwyer reviewed his request with the board and stated that he bought a house that was not built correctly. He stated that they were not aware of this until they decided to build the deck. He stated the request is based on the fact that as a second owner, there was a reasonable expectation that the house was built to town regulations because it received a certificate of occupancy. Mr. Dwyer stated whether or not at that time it was the building inspector s responsibility to measure the setbacks or not he cannot say but as a property owner buying property it seems like a reasonable expectation that the certificate of occupancy would be an approval by the town that the structure is in compliance with what was proposed. He stated that he did not have a lot of time to investigate if it was in compliance or not as the market was moving quickly. He stated that the fact is the house with the screened porch that encroaches into the setback has a certificate of occupancy issued by the town. Mr. Dwyer stated that there are various reasons, such as the number of significant trees, that pushed the house back on the lot which evidently left no room for a screened porch. Eventhough the screened porch encroaches into the setback, he would like to get this situation resolved and on record to determine if the property value is impacted by the addition which existed when the certificate of occupancy was issued and whether or not he can build a simple deck. He stated that he is not asking for a two story addition into the setback and understands that according to the building code if he does not attach it to the house, he could have a floating deck under 1,000 square feet without needing a building permit. He stated that he could come out six feet away from his property line, put in a small deck and a pergola which would be similar to a shed but would rather not do that. Mr. Dwyer stated he feels the best way and most attractive use he can get out of his property is to build an attached deck a couple of steps down from his screened porch and attach it to the house. He has two conditions, one pre-existing condition that makes it an exceptional condition particular to his property and the other is the configuration of the lot. He stated that he does not have measurements of the properties, but they do not apply to them. He stated that the variance condition already existed for some 15 years and does not impact the environment and zoning and hopes the Board would consider these factors and grant a variance to get the issues resolved. Mr. Moore asked Mr. Robertson if he would comment on the two situations, one, with the existing condition and the other what the applicant would like to do. Mr. Robertson answered if it were existing and the zoning had changed so there was no setback and suddenly he has a 25 foot setback and this was at 21 feet it would be nonconforming. Technically, since it is built over the setback line it would be considered an illegal encroachment because there is no variance for it and there was nothing at the time that would have allowed the encroachment and the site plan showed it could be built within that setback. Mr. Robertson stated the building code, in regard to the certificate of occupancy is looking only at the building code issues. Since that time, they have hired someone to review construction before certificate of occupancy, but at the time there was no one who would have looked for that. Even if the building official chose to look the other way they would not have had the authority to grant that variance to allow that as it would be outside the scope of their authority. At this point the only encroachment is the screened porch by what appears to be less than approximately 4 feet according to the survey. Mr. Dwyer stated it is not a survey. Mr. Robertson stated you have an issue where the fence could be inside the property line, so there might be some additional room. Mr. Smith asked if you have a variance for a condition that already exists does that automatically imply that they can do anything else along the rest of the house or would you need a separate
4 Page 4 of 9 variance. Mr. Robertson answered that technically if there is a variance for a porch to encroach it with only for that porch and he would have to come back for the deck. Mr. Moore asked if two of the properties have been granted a variance or if there was record of any variances being granted on the street that he is aware of. Mr. Robertson answered that he has not seen a survey to any affect, but there is only one parcel being presented tonight that matters and that is what the applicant has presented to you. The applicant has not presented any surveys showing any other properties and if there were other properties that had encroachments it still would not mean that there was a hardship for this parcel. Mr. Gwinnup asked if the applicant is representing that this was the only property that had this setback situation within the neighborhood. Mr. Robertson answered he indicated that it was set back further from the street. Mr. Robertson stated in that instance if the builder set the house back the builder has created a hardship. Mr. Gwinnup stated the applicant submitted that the builder attempted to follow a generally uniform setback on the street front and pushed the structure back on this lot and there are five or six lots in that cul-de-sac area that the buildings were set back. Mr. Dwyer stated he was commenting more in general on the entire neighborhood than on his street in particular. Mr. Gwinnup stated he counted three other properties that were set back a considerable distance. Mr. Gwinnup stated the question is legitimate because the applicant has represented that this was an unusual situation for the neighborhood and is pointing out that he is not sure that is true. Mr. Gwinnup asked Mr. Robertson if the 1996 survey showed a smaller porch that would not encroach on the 25 foot setback. Mr. Robertson answered in the affirmative and added the ARC Surveying showed the porch which appears smaller than what was constructed. Mr. Gwinnup asked if in 1999 when the applicant purchased the property did he not get a survey for mortgage purposes. Mr. Dwyer answered in the affirmative and that is what was marked out that Mr. Robertson proposed. Mr. Gwinnup asked Mr. Dwyer if he submitted the actual survey or a copy of it. Mr. Dwyer answered that on his application package there was not a measurement in the back done, it was actually ARC that did that survey and that next time they only measured the front and sides. Mr. Gwinnup asked if he used that for mortgage survey. Mr. Dwyer answered in the affirmative. Mr. Gwinnup asked if that was the only difference between the original survey and the one he obtained from ARC in Mr. Dwyer answered when he purchased the house in 1999 this is the mark up that he had. He stated that he has erased parts of it and sketched his deck on it. He has one which is more of a survey and has added on his fence because he has built it since that time. When he purchased his house his mortgage survey did not measure the back setback. Mr. Gwinnup asked Mr. Robertson if the 25 foot rear yard requirement is part of the zoning ordinance now and if it was part of the zoning ordinance when this property built in Mr. Robertson answered in the affirmative. Mr. Gwinnup stated one of the issues represented is that this lot is different than the others in the cul-de-sac area and he questions if it is much different because of front yard setbacks, additional setbacks, and tree locations. Mrs. Smyly asked Mr. Robertson when they reviewed the file for a variance to determine if one was granted in 1996 what steps were taken. Mr. Robertson answered that they requested the file from the Building Inspections Dept. Ms. Smyly asked if the Board of Zoning Appeals minutes were reviewed. Mr. Robertson answered in the affirmative and that they could not find one by date, address or tax map number from He stated that they also confirmed that the R2 zoning was in effect at that time as well. Ms. Smyly asked would this be an attached accessory building. Mr. Robertson answered that the current screened porch would be considered an attached room onto the structure and would have to meet the setback. Ms. Smyly asked if it is possible that the screened porch could have been considered in any way an accessory building. Mr. Robertson answered in the negative, which is why it was shown in the survey to meet the setbacks. Ms. Smyly stated the
5 Page 5 of 9 current inspection seems to include a framing inspection, slab inspection and certificate of occupancy and her view is even if the inspectors were not formally required to measure for the setback it would appear that there would be some construction elements in that screened porch that would require some inspections for it; either foundation, slab, framing, electrical, heating or air conditioning and should have indicated if there was that much of a discrepancy. Mr. Robertson stated the foundation survey as reviewed by the building inspector would have to meet the requirements of the building codes not the zoning codes. Ms. Smyly asked at some point it seems that someone would have had the approved plans to compare the as built to the approved plan. Mr. Robertson answered the building code inspector measures for the building code and even if they did say they are aware of a setback violation they could not approve that violation. Ms. Smyly stated there is the likelihood an inspector that would have inspected the construction would have had to look at the plans, not for the setbacks but for the actual construction. Mr. Robertson answered in the affirmative and added there was a survey submitted that was submitted by the board by ARC survey that shows that the plans met the setback requirements that are noted on the plans. Mr. Gwinnup asked if the inspector would not have seen that the porch was enlarged from 10x14 to 16x14. Mr. Robertson answered it is not the requirement of the building inspector they are just for the code requirements. Mr. Gwinnup asked if they look for conformance with the plans. Mr. Robertson answered in the negative and added not for setbacks and believed it should have been done by the closing attorney. Mr. Gwinnup asked if they would inspect in reference to room size. Mr. Robertson answered in the negative and added that would not be a building code issue. Ms. Smyly disagreed and would be dismayed if a building inspector could inspect a building for all these requirements that are currently in place and not have noticed an expansion by more than 50% in one dimension. It would not involve the foundation. She suggested that the property owner is demonstrating reasonable reliance in that certificate of occupancy in that when the Town approves the CO it is done based on the current requirements. Generally the equitable estoppel has to be based on the official s action within their authority. But now we have this appeal where this Quail vs. Richland County that gives rise to an equitable estoppels argument even outside the official s authority and the applicant has relied on the CO in this event. Mr. Moore stated that is not disputing what Mr. Robertson is saying but knows in the past they had a case in which the brick steps were built and someone before the CO was granted from the town said these steps are in the setback and you cannot have them and is not sure how to dispute that. Mr. Robertson stated the town now has someone that inspects for setbacks because of these problems because they are not part of the building code. Mr. Moore asked Mr. Robertson on a planning and zoning perspective did he have a comment on Ms. Smyly s remark. Mr. Robertson answered that as an average citizen he would think that was the case, but unfortunately the law does not substantiate it. He stated they also had a closing attorney and the attorney should have caught the encroachment or been aware of it. Mr. Robertson stated if you are going to make a reliance argument then they also relied on someone else to do the research for them too that evidently did not find this. Ms. Smyly asked what the consequences would be if this continues as an illegal use and if the town will continue to assess a fine until the illegal use is remedied. Mr. Robertson answered they could but, it is uncertain what the remedy would be from the towns perspective. He stated that they could require compliance by removal of a portion of the porch or it could just be considered a noncomplying zoning issue that would be dealt with if the house were sold. Ms. Smyly stated she would find that if the variance is not granted we will have an illegal use in our hands because we found it is not a nonconforming use. If the Zoning Administrator or the Building Official fails to enforce the
6 Page 6 of 9 zoning ordinance on any person they can appeal that decision not enforced to us, which would be a vicious circle. She stated that there is case law with the Quail vs. the Town of Richland that contemplates equitable estoppels on the grounds of official action that is beyond the official s authority in that case. She feels they have an argument for equitable estoppels and would like to consider moving forward with two motions, one being the existing conditions and the other being the proposed construction. Mr. Gwinnup asked if there had ever been a blanket variance granted for the site for the rear yard requirement from 25 feet to 20 feet, reducing the rear yard requirement. Mr. Gwinnup stated this would cover the existing and the proposed. Mr. Robertson answered that is the request before them but the other issue mentioned earlier is how these came about and had there been a request to have an encroachment to save a tree may have been considered at that time, but that is not the case now as the house is presently built. It has been indicated that one of the reasons for the location of the current house was to save a tree which does not show up on the survey, but that does not necessarily mean the tree was not there. The tree may not have been required on the survey, may not have been a grand tree, but a photo of the tree was shown to the Board that was close to the existing house. Mr. Gwinnup stated it was a significant tree, by dimension it appeared to have been 12 to 15 inches in diameter. Ms. Smyly suggested that if this were to be enforced and the illegal structure was required to be removed, the applicant could seek a claim for reimbursement of damages from not only the Town, but there may be multiple parties that could be held responsible. Mr. Hollings asked Mr. Robertson if there is no reconciliation between what an inspector is looking at and what has been proposed on paper and are looking only for codes issues such as electrical and plumbing compliance before issuing a certificate of occupancy. Mr. Robertson answered in the affirmative and stated since Mr. Dwyer pointed out that they requested that they look at the building permit code. Only the ARC Survey has been referenced, but to see what was used Mr. Robertson distributed to the Board building permit number # issued June 6, 1996 and showed them the construction for compliance prior to the silt fencing being constructed on the lot. He also distributed the inspection card with notations on them, the footing inspection had comments on the rebar, June 11, 1996, garage slab July 9, 1996, Inspection for the plumbing, August 22 nd, electrical August 23 rd, insulation inspection September 16, a series of Sept, 6, 9 12 are mechanical and framing inspections, dated September 6, 9 and the 12 th and the certificate of occupancy. Ms. Smyly stated for the record the inspectors slips were numerous and do indicate inspector s remarks but do not indicate the actual inspection requirement as to what the inspector is required to inspect. Mr. Gwinnup stated when they inspect the footing they will look to the dimension of the footing, the depth, width and the amount of reinforcement and will most likely not have a building plan with him. Mr. Robertson stated there are alos the electrical inspection and the electrical final as well as the water and sewer inspection. Mr. Smith asked to see the picture slide of the back screen porch and stated the foundation footings are stucco. Mr. Robertson answered it appears to be contiguous with the house. Mr. Dwyer concurred. Mr. Smith commented he could see where the applicant has relied and had reason to rely on the closing process for the title research and the survey, etc and is comfortable that he
7 Page 7 of 9 demonstrates a hardship from the standpoint that this screened porch, even though it is encroaching into the boundary is not his fault and has gone through the steps he was expected to do to determine that. What he is not clear on is why they would allow him to create another hardship by building an attached deck. Mr. Moore stated it is clear to him that the porch is illegally situated in the setback. He stated that there is no reason to grant a variance for the deck and he cannot support the deck in any way because they have an illegal construction in the setback. Mr. Dwyer asked if the Town would issue a certificate of occupancy today with the building being in the setback. Mr. Robertson answered there is an inspector who is in charge of checking setbacks and should not allow it to go into construction. Mr. Dwyer stated he does not have the true evidence today but it his understanding the Town was aware of the encroachment during the construction process and therefore aware of it before the certificate of occupancy was issued. He stated that the deck would also encroach into the setback, but in the building code there are certain provisions. He stated that Town Council changed the zoning and moved the setback and if it had remained at 20 feet he would still be allowed to build as far out as he is proposing. He is not asking for anything more than what exists is just asking to go out to the same line, matching his structure with the way it is presently and sees the two issues being tied together. Mr. Gwinnup stated that contrary to what the applicant feels he was trying to address the case for a variance and went through the four requirements that the Board has to meet and in looking at the applicant s submission it appears some of it is reasonable. If he were looking to grant a variance from 25 to 20 foot setback for the rear yard for one lot, based upon what is presented the ownership, the fact that the previous owner built a porch that was non-conforming to the plan, it appears there were certain issues that would meet these extraordinary conditions pertaining to the particular piece of property. Mr. Moore asked Mr. Gwinnup to make a motion and state his argument. Mr. Gwinnup answered he would like to deliberate for awhile and asked if anyone on the Board felt the same way. Ms. Smyly pointed out again for the evidence that the certificate of occupancy states that the building having been inspected and is found to be in accord with the Mount Pleasant Building Code and other applicable regulations, so the certificate of occupancy itself segregates the building code specifically referring to compliance with the building code and other applicable regulations which the zoning ordinance she cannot imagine being anything else other than applicable regulations pertaining to development of property and finds further evidencing that the town has found the building to be consistent with the Town s regulations. Mr. Moore asked the Board if they were consistent and agreed that there are two issues here and to consider each separately. Mr. Gwinnup suggested that this could be handled with one motion and one variance for both situations. Mr. Moore answered he was comfortable with that and asked Mr. Robertson his opinion. Mr. Robertson answered the board could move forward either way; they could look at it and say they are going to adjust the rear yard setback or they can take each of those items individually or do both. Mr. Smith moved to approve the following findings of fact there are extraordinary and exceptional conditions it is evident that since the applicants purchased the home and having a survey and title search done they relied on the fact that the house was constructed including the porch as required by zoning ordinances that were in affect at that time and also that this condition does not generally apply to the other properties in the vicinity and they have not had this
8 Page 8 of 9 brought before the Board for anything else and does not apply to other houses that they are aware of and under because of conditions the ordinance disputes probably would prohibit or restrict utilization of the property by having to remove the porch or go through a process of trying to rebuild the house would be beyond what would be appropriate under these circumstances and that this would not cause substantial detriment to the adjacent property or the public good as it has been that way since 1996 without any observable problems. Mr. Moore asked if he heard him say that it is not a self imposed hardship. Mr. Smith answered in the affirmative and added the porch is not self imposed because it existed when they bought the house and they relied on the fact that the certificate of occupancy that was received from the Town and also the process of the title searches and survey. They did what they were expected to do and relied on information provided and did not put themselves into this situation knowingly. Ms. Smyly seconded the motion and amended the motion to include as part of the hardship the presence of the tree that has been evidenced not on the survey but on the photograph and is cited as a reason to have had the house pushed back on the property. Mr. Smith stated he did not have a issue with that other than the setbacks were appropriate and the footprint of the original house could have fit into the setbacks and so the tree was not material but did not have problem with it being in there. Mr. Smith seconded the amendment. Mr. Moore asked if Mr. Smith s finding of fact support the motion to allow the porch to remain. Mr. Smith stated last month there was discussion on having two separate motions, one on the finding of fact and then approval or denial of the request. If the motion for facts is not approved they do not have to worry about why they approve the variance. Mr. Moore called for a vote on the motion on findings of fact. All in favor. Mr. Smith moved to grant a variance for the setback for the porch as it currently exists. Ms. Smyly seconded. All in favor. Mr. Hollings moved to deny the application for the construction of the wooden deck with the finding of fact that the reference is a requirement for a rear yard setback. of 25 they cannot allow an encroachment into the 25 feet as they do not have the authority to allow that. Mr. Smith seconded. Mr. Moore stated that the variance would have to meet all four criteria and asked if they satisfactorily stated this in their discussion that it does not meet the criteria. The Board agreed that they sufficiently outlined in their discussion that the request did not meet the four criteria for a variance. Mr. Moore called for a vote on the motion. Motion passes on a 4 to 1 vote, with Mr. Gwinnup opposed. Mr. Moore reviewed the appeals process with the applicant and asked Mr. Dwyer if he had any questions. Mr. Dwyer stated he intended to fill out a building permit that shows his deck as an accessory structure not attached to the house.
9 Page 9 of 9 Approval of Final Orders Mr. Robertson stated that there were no orders to sign. There being no further business, Mr. Smith moved to adjourn at 7:15 p.m. Ms. Smyly seconded. All in favor. Submitted by, L. Lancaster BOZA
TOWN OF MOUNT PLEASANT, SOUTH CAROLINA BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS APRIL 25, 2016 MINUTES
TOWN OF MOUNT PLEASANT, SOUTH CAROLINA BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS APRIL 25, 2016 MINUTES Present: Staff: Mason Smith, Chair, Barbara Wagner, Glyn Cowden, Joseph Belton, Mark Lamb, Saila Milja-Smyly. Kelly
More informationCITY OF WINTER PARK Board of Adjustments. Regular Meeting June 19, 2018 City Hall, Commission Chambers
CITY OF WINTER PARK Board of Adjustments Regular Meeting City Hall, Commission Chambers 5:00 p.m. MINUTES PRESENT Phil Kean (Acting Chair), Aimee Hitchner, Patrice Wenz, Zachary Seybold, Tom Sacha, Charles
More informationTOWN OF WARWICK ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MAY 29, 2012
TOWN OF WARWICK ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MAY 29, 2012 Members Present: Jan Jansen, Chairman Mark Malocsay, Co-Chairman Diane Bramich Attorney Robert Fink Norman Paulsen Kevin Shuback minutes from the meeting
More informationTOWN OF NEW LONDON, NEW HAMPSHIRE
TOWN OF NEW LONDON, NEW HAMPSHIRE 375 MAIN STREET NEW LONDON, NH 03257 WWW.NL-NH.COM ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING MINUTES Thursday, July 20, 2017 Town Office Sydney Crook Conference Room 375 Main
More informationCity of Stevenson Planning Department
City of Stevenson Planning Department (509)427-5970 7121 E Loop Road, PO Box 371 Stevenson, Washington 98648 TO: Board of Adjustment FROM: Ben Shumaker, Planning Director DATE: April 21 st, 2014 SUBJECT:
More informationTOWN OF MOUNT PLEASANT, SOUTH CAROLINA BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS JANUARY 26, 2015 MINUTES
TOWN OF MOUNT PLEASANT, SOUTH CAROLINA BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS JANUARY 26, 2015 MINUTES Present: Absent: Staff: Mason Smith, Chair, Charles Moore, Jon Chalfie, Saila Milja-Smyly, Sy Rosenthal, Tripp Cuttino
More informationMINUTES ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
MINUTES ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT The New Hanover County Zoning Board of Adjustment held a regular and duly advertised meeting at 5:30 P.M. at the New Hanover County Government Center Complex, 230 Government
More informationVARIANCE APPLICATION
TOWN OF CARY Submit to the Development Customer Service Center, P.O. Box 8005, Cary, NC 27512 Planning Department Planning Department Contact: (919) 469-4046 Fee: $600.00 For office use only: Method of
More informationTOWN OF DUCK PLANNING BOARD REGULAR MEETING. October 9, The Planning Board for the Town of Duck convened at the Duck Meeting Hall on Wednesday,
TOWN OF DUCK PLANNING BOARD REGULAR MEETING October 9, 2013 The Planning Board for the Town of Duck convened at the Duck Meeting Hall on Wednesday, October 9, 2013. Present were: Chair Joe Blakaitis, Vice
More informationAPPLICATION FOR VARIANCE OR PERMISSION UNDER SECTION 45 OF THE PLANNING ACT
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE OR PERMISSION UNDER SECTION 45 OF THE PLANNING ACT THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF LONDON, DEVELOPMENT AND COMPLIANCE SERVICES, 300 DUFFERIN AVENUE, LONDON, ONTARIO, N6A 4L9 Updated:
More informationMINUTES VILLAGE of ARDSLEY ZONING BOARD of APPEALS REGULAR MEETING WEDNESDAY, JULY 26, 2017
MINUTES VILLAGE of ARDSLEY ZONING BOARD of APPEALS REGULAR MEETING WEDNESDAY, JULY 26, 2017 PRESENT: Patricia Hoffman, Esq., Chair Jacob Amir, Esq. Mort David Maureen Gorman-Phelan Michael Wiskind 1) Call
More informationCity of Newburyport Zoning Board of Appeals October 8, 2013 Council Chambers
The meeting was called to order at 7:12 P.M. A quorum was present. 1. Roll Call City of Newburyport Zoning Board of Appeals October 8, 2013 Council Chambers In Attendance: Ed Ramsdell (Chair) Duncan LaBay
More informationPolk County Board of Adjustment October 3, 2014
Polk County Board of Adjustment October 3, 2014 Call to Order: 10:58 A.M. Members in Attendance: Kerry Winkelmann, Robert Franks, Courtney Pulkrabek, Donovan Wright and Alternate, Rolland Gagner. Members
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA Board of Zoning Appeals Agenda Item V-11338-17-UP-1: Meeting of March 21, 2018 DATE: March 16, 2018 APPLICANT: LOCATION: ZONING: LOT AREA: GLUP DESIGNATION: Hajra Zahid & Zahid
More informationKETCHUM PLANNING AND ZONING
IN RE: ) Barrow Variance and ) Fence Design Review ) KETCHUM PLANNING AND ZONING ) COMMISSION - FINDINGS OF FACT, ) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION Permit Number: 13-122 ) BACKGROUND FACTS OWNER: Strada
More informationVILLAGE OF HINSDALE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES OF THE MEETING October 15, 2014
0 0 0 0 VILLAGE OF HINSDALE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES OF THE MEETING October, 0. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Bob called the regularly scheduled meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals to order on Wednesday,
More informationSARPY COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES OF MEETING May 14, 2015
l. CALL MEETING TO ORDER SARPY COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES OF MEETING May 14, 2015 A meeting of the Board of Adjustment of Sarpy County, Nebraska was convened in open and public session at the call
More informationAnthony Guardiani, Chair Arlene Avery Judith Mordasky, Alternate Dennis Kaba, Alternate James Greene, Alternate
RECEIVED STAFFORD. CT Town ofstafford Zoning Board ofappeals Regular Meeting b- 1811 SEP loa q: I 1 September 6, 2018-7:00 p.m../. / ~ Stafford Senior Center r;;:~ait----- '/1 W\-iNCLERK Members Present:
More informationSECOND UNIT DRAFT. workbook. A tool for homeowners considering building a second unit in San Mateo County
DRAFT SECOND UNIT workbook A tool for homeowners considering building a second unit in San Mateo County Step 1 Getting Started This section will help you get started. By the end of the chapter you will:
More informationTown of Scarborough, Maine
Town of Scarborough, Maine Miscellaneous Appeal INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR ALL APPEALS Before any appeal can be processed, the following material must be submitted to the Code Enforcement Office: 1. A fee
More informationZONING BOARD OF APPEALS March 13, 2018 MINUTES
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS March 13, 2018 MINUTES Present: Aaron Burns (Chair), Philip Brown (Vice-Chair), Michael Lemay, Sherri Quint, Karen Axelsen (Alternate) Absent: David Morse (Alternate), Nancy Milton
More informationMANCHESTER TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REGULAR MEETING. Thursday, January 26, 2017
MANCHESTER TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REGULAR MEETING Thursday, January 26, 2017 Manchester Township Municipal Building 1 Colonial Drive, Manchester, NJ MINUTES OF MEETING 1. The meeting of the
More informationMinutes. Village Planning Board. March 23, 2004
Minutes March 23, 2004 A meeting of the Village of Horseheads Planning Board was held on the above date at 6:00 p.m. Present were Chairman Bob Skebey, Board Members,,, and, Alternate Members Denis Kingsley
More informationBoard of Zoning Appeals
Board of Zoning Appeals AGENDA Thursday, February 19, 2015 7:30 PM A. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE B. ROLL CALL C. CONSENT ITEMS 1. APPROVE MINUTES FROM THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS MEETING OF OCTOBER 16, 2014.
More information1. Consider approval of the June 13, 2017 Regular Meeting Minutes
Board of Adjustment Regular Meeting Agenda Tuesday August 8, 2017-6:30 PM Town Hall A. Roll Call, Determination of Quorum B. Approval of Minutes of Previous Meeting 1. Consider approval of the June 13,
More informationPlanning Commission April 23, 2008 Minutes
Planning Commission April 23, 2008 Minutes The Chairman called the meeting to order. The following members were present: John Mears, David Miller, Mike Zuilhof, Lee Silvani, Ned Bromm, Paul Ernst and Brett
More informationTOWN OF WALLINGFORD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS SEPTEMBER 19, 2011 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
Zoning Board of Appeals 1 TOWN OF WALLINGFORD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS SEPTEMBER 19, 2011 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES A regular meeting of the Wallingford Zoning Board of Appeals was held Monday, September
More informationCITY OF DECATUR, TEXAS Development Services 1601 S. State Street Decatur, TX (940) voice (940) fax
Call to Order ITEM 1: ITEM 2: ITEM 3: ITEM 4: CITY OF DECATUR, TEXAS Development Services 1601 S. State Street Decatur, TX 76234 (940) 393-0250 voice (940) 626-4629 fax AGENDA (Zoning) Board of Adjustment
More informationROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TO THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM JEFF ALLRED CITY MANAGER DATE JUNE 9 2015 6 SUBJECT MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT 15 02 AMENDING CHAPTERS 17 04 AND 17 72 OF TITLE
More informationMINUTES ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS BOARD. April 3, 2013
MINUTES ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS BOARD April 3, 2013 A Public Hearing of the City of South Daytona s Adjustments and Appeals Board was called to order in the South Daytona City Council Chambers, 1672 South
More informationApplicant for Variance. Variance Procedures & Application
COUNTY OF RICHMOND Land Use Office 101 Court Circle, P. O. Box 1000 Warsaw, Virginia 22572 Phone: (804)333-3415 Fax: (804)333-3408 Website: www.co.richmond.va.us To: From: Subject: Applicant for Variance
More informationBoise City Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes November 3, 2014 Page 1
Page 1 PUD14-00020 / 2 NORTH HOMES, LLC Location: 2818 W. Madison Avenue CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FOUR UNIT PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON 0.28 ACRES LOCATED AT 2818 & 2836 W. MADISON AVENUE IN
More informationAGENDA Wytheville Planning Commission Thursday, January 10, :00 p.m. Council Chambers 150 East Monroe Street Wytheville, Virginia 24382
AGENDA Wytheville Planning Commission Thursday, January 10, 2019 6:00 p.m. Council Chambers 150 East Monroe Street Wytheville, Virginia 24382 A. CALL TO ORDER Chairman M. Bradley Tate B. ESTABLISHMENT
More informationHistoric District Commission Meeting Thursday, September 28, :00 PM City Hall, Council Chambers. MINUTES Approved 10/26/2017
Historic District Commission Meeting Thursday, September 28, 2017 7:00 PM City Hall, Council Chambers MINUTES Approved 10/26/2017 I. Roll Call Members Present: Kristin Kenniston, David Messier, Richard
More informationBELMONT LAND USE OFFICE
BELMONT LAND USE OFFICE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Wednesday, May 27, 2015 Belmont Corner Meeting House Belmont, NH 03220 Members Present: Members Absent: Alternates Absent: Staff: Chairman Peter Harris;
More informationPALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION ZONING COMMISSION VARIANCE STAFF REPORT 6/7/2007
PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION ZONING COMMISSION VARIANCE STAFF REPORT 6/7/2007 APPLICATION NO. CODE SECTION REQUIRED PROPOSED VARIANCE ZV-2006-01927 Table 5.B.1.A-3-
More informationPresent Harmoning Oleson Naaktgeboren: T
CORINNA TOWNSHIP MINUTES BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT / PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION January 13, 2015 7:00 PM Charlotte Quiggle called meeting to order at 7:00 PM on January 13, 2015. Roll Call: Board of Adjustment/Planning
More informationMEETING MINUTES January 26, 2015
PANAMA CITY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT CITY HALL PANAMA CITY, FLORIDA MEETING MINUTES January 26, 2015 The City of Panama City Appeals Board met in regular session on the above date with the following members
More informationDICKINSON COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. Monday, May 18, :00 P.M.
DICKINSON COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Monday, May 18, 2015 1:00 P.M. The Dickinson County Planning and Zoning Commission met Monday, May 18, 2015 at the 1:00 P.M. in the community room of the
More informationCity of Pass Christian Municipal Complex Auditorium 105 Hiern Avenue. Zoning Board of Adjustments Meeting Minutes Tuesday, July 11, 2017, 6pm
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 City of Pass Christian Municipal Complex Auditorium 105 Hiern
More informationSPRINGFIELD TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS REGULAR MEETING October 17, 2018
SPRINGFIELD TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS REGULAR MEETING October 17, 2018 Call to Order: Vice-Chairperson Whitley called the October 17, 2018 Zoning Board of Appeals meeting to order at 7:30 pm at
More informationMINNETONKA PLANNING COMMISSION September 6, 2018
MINNETONKA PLANNING COMMISSION September 6, 2018 Brief Description Resolution approving an aggregate side yard setback variance for a garage and living space addition at 4660 Caribou Drive. Recommendation
More informationTOWN OF GILMANTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, PM. ACADEMY BUILDING MINUTES
Chair Elizabeth Hackett called the meeting to order at 7:03 PM. Members attending: Elizabeth Hackett, Perry Onion, & Nate Abbott, Vicky Fournier (alternate). Member not attending: Mike Teunessen Also in
More informationARTICLE 9: VESTING DETERMINATION, NONCONFORMITIES AND VARIANCES. Article History 2 SECTION 9.01 PURPOSE 3
ARTICLE 9 VESTING DETERMINATIONS, NONCONFORMITIES, AND VARIANCES Table of Contents Article History 2 SECTION 9.01 PURPOSE 3 SECTION 9.02 LOT OF RECORD AND VESTING DETERMINATIONS FOR NONCONFORMING DEVELOPMENTS
More informationCascade Charter Township, Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes July 14, 2015 Page 1
ZONING MINUTES Cascade Charter Township Zoning Board of Appeals Tuesday, July 14, 2015 7:00 P.M. Cascade Library Wisner Center 2870 Jackson Avenue SE ARTICLE 1. ARTICLE 2. ARTICLE 3. Chairman Casey called
More informationMINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF MOUNTAIN LAKES February 24, 2016
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF MOUNTAIN LAKES February 24, 2016 Chair Chris Richter called the meeting to order and announced: Adequate notice of this meeting
More informationTOWN OF WARWICK ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FEBRUARY 22, 2010
TOWN OF WARWICK ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FEBRUARY 22, 2010 Members Present: Mr. Jan Jansen, Chairman Mr. Mark Malocsay, Co-Chairman Mr. Norm Paulsen Attorney Robert Fink Members Absent: Diane Bramich Chairman
More informationZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES AUGUST 28, Chairman Garrity described the proceedings of the Zoning Board of Appeals.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES AUGUST 28, 2012 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Rick Garrity at 7:34 p.m. Board Members Gregory Constantino, Barbara Fried, Mary Loch and Dale Siligmueller were
More informationGLEN ROCK ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Minutes of the October 12, 2017 Meeting
GLEN ROCK ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Minutes of the October 12, 2017 Meeting The regular meeting of the Zoning Board of Adjustment was called to order by Chairman Diane Herrlett at 7:30 p.m. In attendance:
More informationNONCONFORMITIES ARTICLE 39. Charter Township of Commerce Page 39-1 Zoning Ordinance. Article 39 Nonconformities
ARTICLE 39 NONCONFORMITIES SECTION 39.01. Intent and Purpose It is recognized that there exists within the districts established by this Ordinance lots, structures, sites and uses which were lawful prior
More informationMeeting Announcement and Agenda Mt. Pleasant Zoning Board of Appeals. Wednesday, April 25, :00 p.m. City Hall Commission Chamber
Meeting Announcement and Agenda Mt. Pleasant Zoning Board of Appeals Wednesday, April 25, 2018-7:00 p.m. City Hall Commission Chamber I. Roll Call: Assmann, Berkshire, Friedrich, Orlik, Raisanen, White
More informationMATTER OF Mr. & Mrs. Anthony Flynn, 3 Soder Road Block 1003, Lot 54 Front and Rear Yard Setbacks POSTPONED Carried to meeting on March 21, 2018
The Meeting of the North Caldwell Board of Adjustment was held at Borough Hall, Gould Avenue on Wednesday, starting at 8:05 pm. The meeting was held in accordance with the Open Public Meetings Law and
More informationZONING BOARD OF APPEALS APPLICATION City of Grand Haven, 11 N. Sixth Street, Grand Haven, MI Phone: (616) Website:
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS APPLICATION City of Grand Haven, 11 N. Sixth Street, Grand Haven, MI 49417 Phone: (616) 847-3490 Website: www.grandhaven.org The City of Grand Haven Zoning Board of Appeals meets
More informationApproved ( ) TOWN OF JERUSALEM ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS. July 8, 2010
TOWN OF JERUSALEM ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Approved (8-12-10) July 8, 2010 The regular monthly meeting of the Town of Jerusalem Zoning Board of Appeals was called to order on Thursday, at 7 pm by Chairman
More informationSusan E. Andrade 91 Sherry Ave. Bristol, RI
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS MINUTES THE ZONING BOARD OF REVIEW OF BRISTOL, RHODE ISLAND 02 OCTOBER 2017 7:00 PM BRISTOL TOWN HALL BRISTOL, RHODE ISLAND BEFORE THE TOWN OF BRISTOL ZONING
More informationCITY OF DECATUR, TEXAS Development Services 1601 S. State Street Decatur, TX (940) voice (940) fax
CITY OF DECATUR, TEXAS Development Services 1601 S. State Street Decatur, TX 76234 (940) 393-0250 voice (940) 626-4629 fax Call to Order AGENDA (Zoning) Board of Adjustment Special Meeting* Monday, August
More informationTOWN OF CHILI 3333 Chili Avenue, Rochester, NY Tel: Fax:
TOWN OF CHILI 3333 Chili Avenue, Rochester, NY 14624 Tel: 889-6143 Fax: 889-8710 www.townofchili.org Email: kreed@townofchili.org AREA VARIANCE CHECKLIST: Application Fee - (See Town Fee Schedule for Amount.
More informationTOWN OF GILMANTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT THURSDAY, AUGUST 21, PM. ACADEMY BUILDING MINUTES
Chair Elizabeth Hackett called the meeting to order at 7:08 PM. Members attending: Elizabeth Hackett, Perry Onion, Mike Teunessen, & Nate Abbott. Members not attending: none Also in attendance: Annette
More informationAGENDA. 2. Review of Agenda by the Board and Addition of items of New Business to the Agenda for Consideration by the Board
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT/APPEALS REGULAR MEETING October 24, 2013 7:00 P.M. Town Board Chambers, 301 Walnut Street, Windsor, CO 80550 The Town of Windsor will make reasonable accommodations for access to Town
More informationThe Rootstown Township Zoning Commission met in a public hearing on Tuesday June 7, 2016, at 7 p.m. at Rootstown Town Hall.
The Rootstown Township Zoning Commission met in a public hearing on Tuesday June 7, 2016, at 7 p.m. at Rootstown Town Hall. Present: Rob Swauger, Chair Absent: Steve Brown Theresa Summers, Vice Chair George
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
03-13-08: Page 1 of 5 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March 13, 2008 The Planning Commission convened in Courtroom No. 1 at City Hall for their regular meeting. Chairman Fitzgerald called the meeting to order
More informationGary Locke, Plans Administrator Eric Fink, Asst. Law Director Jennifer Barone, Development Engineer Sheila Uzl, Transcriptionist
KENT PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: EXCUSED: STAFF PRESENT: Matt VanNote Bill Anderson Dave Wise Sean Kaine John Gargan Gary Locke, Plans Administrator Eric Fink, Asst. Law
More informationKINGWOOD TOWNSHIP BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. MINUTES May 11, :30 PM
KINGWOOD TOWNSHIP BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES May 11, 2016 7:30 PM CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by M.L. Haring at 7:31 PM. PRESENT: T. Ciacciarelli ABSENT: L. Frank M.L. Haring J. Laudenbach
More informationMINUTES MANHATTAN BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS City Commission Room, City Hall 1101 Poyntz Avenue Wednesday, July 9, :00 PM
MINUTES MANHATTAN BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS City Commission Room, City Hall 1101 Poyntz Avenue Wednesday, July 9, 2014 7:00 PM MEMBERS PRESENT: Harry Hardy, Chairperson; Connie Hamilton, Vice Chairperson;
More informationD R A F T Whitewater Township Planning Commission Minutes of 10/06/10 Regular Meeting
D R A F T Whitewater Township Planning Commission Minutes of 10/06/10 Regular Meeting Call to Order Chairperson, Zakrajsek, called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. Roll Call Members Present: Lyons, Miller,
More informationBolton Zoning Board of Appeals Regular Meeting Minutes June
Bolton Zoning Board of Appeals Regular Meeting Minutes June 10 2014 Present at the meeting were: Mark Altermatt, John Toomey, Joel Hoffman, Jon Treat, Morris Silverstein, Bob Peterson and Jim Rupert, Zoning
More informationTown of Ontario Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes September 13, 2017
Town of Ontario Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes September 13, 2017 Present: Zoning Board Members Chairman, Bill Bridson, Chuck Neumann,, Rich Williams Town Lawyer, Beth Hart Zoning Clerk, 7 members of
More informationBOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CASE SUMMARY FOR VARIANCE REQUEST. 325 Veterans Road
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CASE SUMMARY FOR VARIANCE REQUEST 325 Veterans Road April 11, 2017 at 10:00 A.M. City Council Chambers, 1737 Main Street, 3 rd Floor Columbia, South Carolina Case Number: 2017-0031-V
More informationAGENDA ITEM 1. Call to Order, Roll Call and Approval of Minutes.
PC00-0 0 0 0 WAYZATA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES March, 0 AGENDA ITEM. Call to Order, Roll Call and Approval of Minutes. Chair Gonzalez called the meeting to order at :00 p.m. Present at roll call
More informationCITY OF WINTER PARK Board of Adjustments. Regular Meeting October 17, 2017 City Hall, Commission Chambers
CITY OF WINTER PARK Board of Adjustments Regular Meeting City Hall, Commission Chambers 5:00 p.m. MINUTES PRESENT Lucy Morse Chair, Aimee Hitchner, Michael Clary, Robert Trompke, Zachary Seybold, Director
More informationCHEBOYGAN COUNTY ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CHEBOYGAN COUNTY ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 870 SOUTH MAIN ST. PO BOX 70 CHEBOYGAN, MI 49721 PHONE: (231)627-8489 FAX: (231)627-3646 CHEBOYGAN COUNTY ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING & PUBLIC HEARING WEDNESDAY,
More informationBEDFORD TOWNSHIP BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 8100 JACKMAN ROAD, TEMPERANCE, MICHIGAN MARCH 7, 2016
BEDFORD TOWNSHIP BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 8100 JACKMAN ROAD, TEMPERANCE, MICHIGAN MARCH 7, 2016 PRESENT: RICK STEINER, TOWNSHIP BOARD LIAISON TOM ZDYBEK, PLANNING COMMISSION LIAISON
More informationTOWN OF WALLINGFORD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MAY 18, 2009 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
Zoning Board of Appeals 1 TOWN OF WALLINGFORD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MAY 18, 2009 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES A regular meeting of the Wallingford Zoning Board of Appeals was held Monday, at 7:00 p.m. in
More informationMUNICIPALITY OF MONROEVILLE ZONING HEARING BOARD APRIL 5, 2017 MINUTES. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Chairman Bob Stevenson.
MUNICIPALITY OF MONROEVILLE ZONING HEARING BOARD APRIL 5, 2017 MINUTES The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Chairman Bob Stevenson. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND MOMENT OF SILENCE The Pledge of Allegiance
More informationOSHTEMO CHARTER TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES OF A MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 27, 2018
OSHTEMO CHARTER TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES OF A MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 27, 2018 Agenda PUBLIC HEARING: VARIANCE REQUEST FROM METRO LEASING, LLC METRO LEASING, LLC, ON BEHALF OF RYKSES PROPERTIES
More informationZoning Board of Appeals Minutes
Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes (meeting taped) Monthly meeting: Thursday, July 16, 2009 in the City Hall aldermanic chambers. The meeting was called to order at 6:35 p.m. By roll call, members present:
More informationZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT BELMONT, NH
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT BELMONT, NH Wednesday, October 24, 2018 Belmont Corner Meeting House Belmont, NH 03220 Members Present: Members Absent: Alternates Absent: Staff: Chairman Peter Harris; Members
More informationZoning Board of Appeals
Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes (meeting taped) Monthly meeting: Thursday, July 15, 2010 in the City Hall Aldermanic Chambers. The meeting was called to order at 6:35 p.m. Without objection the chair called
More informationSpartanburg County Planning and Development Department
Spartanburg County Planning and Development Department MINUTES Unified Land Management Board of Appeals July 28, 2015 Members Present: Members Absent: Staff Present: Marion Gramling, Chairman Angela Viney,
More informationANOKA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING ANOKA CITY HALL TUESDAY, MAY 16, :00 P.M.
ANOKA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING ANOKA CITY HALL TUESDAY, MAY 16, 2017 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER: The regular meeting of the Anoka Planning Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL:
More informationMINUTES. PARK TOWNSHIP PLANNING COMMISSION Park Township Hall nd St. Holland, MI 49418
MINUTES PARK TOWNSHIP PLANNING COMMISSION Park Township Hall 52 152 nd St. Holland, MI 49418 Regular Meeting March 17, 2015 6:30 P.M. DRAFT COPY CALL TO ORDER: Chair Pfost called the regular meeting of
More informationZoning Board of Appeals
Zoning Board of Appeals (meeting taped) Minutes Special meeting: Thursday, August 2, 2012 in the City Hall Media Center. The meeting was called to order at 6:45 p.m. By roll call, members present: Richard
More information1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes: a. November 15, 2016 Planning Commission Meeting
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, JANUARY 17, 2017 6:30 PM Regular Meeting 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes: a. November 15, 2016 Planning Commission Meeting
More informationPacket for New Home Construction
Architectural Control Committee (ACC) Packet for New Home Construction As of: 1 February 2018 Questions, - email acc@elkinslake.net or Call 936-295-8181 or visit an ACC meeting Introduction and Welcome
More informationMINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LUFKIN, TEXAS, HELD ON THE NOVEMBER 25, 1991 AT 5:00 P.M.
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LUFKIN, TEXAS, HELD ON THE NOVEMBER 25, 1991 AT 5:00 P.M. On the 25th day of November, 1991, the Planning and Zoning Commission
More informationTOWNSHIP OF SADDLE BROOK PLANNING BOARD
TOWNSHIP OF SADDLE BROOK PLANNING BOARD Following are the minutes of the Saddle Brook 's regular meeting, held on Tuesday, July 21, 2015. 1. FLAG SALUTE 2. ROLL CALL: Councilman Camilleri, Mr. Compitello,
More informationMINUTES MANCHESTER-BY-THE-SEA ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS. Meeting April 27, Michael Sullivan (Chairman), Andrew Crocker, Gary Gilbert, and
MINUTES MANCHESTER-BY-THE-SEA ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Meeting April 27, 2016 Members Present: James O Neill. Michael Sullivan (Chairman), Andrew Crocker, Gary Gilbert, and Members Not Present: James Diedrich.
More information7.20 Article 7.20 Nonconformities
Article Nonconformities.01 Intent It is the intent of this ordinance to permit legal nonconforming lots, structures, or uses to continue until they are removed but not to encourage their survival. For
More informationArchitectural Control Committee (ACC) Packet for Miscellaneous Construction 1 February 2018
Architectural Control Committee (ACC) Packet for Miscellaneous Construction 1 February 2018 Bulkheads, Remodeling, Fences, Roofing, Overhangs, Decks, Porches, Driveways, Walks Retaining Walls and other
More informationVILLAGE OF EPHRAIM FOUNDED 1853
VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM FOUNDED 1853 EPHRAIM BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES Tuesday, January 5, 2016, 5:00 p.m. Village of Ephraim Office 10005 Norway Present: Chair-Karen McMurtry, Debbie Eckert, Diane Kirkland,
More informationKAYSVILLE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION March 8, 2018
KAYSVILLE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION March 8, 2018 Members Attending: Chairperson Betty Parker, Gary Bullock, Stroh DeCaire, Lorene Kamalu, Thomas Wood Excused: Matthew Anderson, Joshua Sundloff Staff Present:
More informationThe Town of Wasaga Beach Committee of Adjustment/Consent November 20, 2017
The Minutes of the Public Hearing for The Town of Wasaga Beach Committee of Adjustment held Monday, November 20, 2017 at 4:00 p.m. in The Classroom. PRESENT: A. Sigouin Chair R. Groh Member D.Vitali Member
More informationTOWN OF GILMANTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT THURSDAY, JANUARY 19, PM. ACADEMY BUILDING MINUTES
Chair Elizabeth Hackett called the meeting to order at 7:03 PM. Members attending: Elizabeth Hackett, Perry Onion, Mike Teunessen, Nate Abbott, & Vicky Fournier. Also in attendance: Annette Andreozzi,
More informationLIVONIA JOINT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING MINUTES- May 4, 2015
LIVONIA JOINT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING MINUTES- May 4, 2015 Present: Chair P. Nilsson, M. Sharman, G. Cole, B. Weber, Rosemary Bergin Code Enforcement Officer A. Backus, Recording Secretary J. Brown
More informationPETITION FOR VARIANCE. Village Hall Glen Carbon, IL (Do not write in this space-for Office Use Only) Notice Published On: Parcel I.D. No.
(Execute in Duplicate) PETITION FOR VARIANCE Zoning Board of Appeals Village Hall Glen Carbon, IL 62034 Variance Request No. Date:, 20 (Do not write in this space-for Office Use Only) Date Set for Hearing:
More informationZone Changes, Variances, Conditional Uses, Special Uses. Explanations and Scenarios
Zone Changes, Variances, Conditional Uses, Special Uses Explanations and Scenarios Zone Changes When you want to change the use of the land Has the future envisioned by the plan arrived? Is the change
More informationZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Quality Services for a Quality Community
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Quality Services for a Quality Community MEMBERS Brian Laxton Chair Caroline Ruddell Vice Chair Konrad Hittner Patrick Marchman Eric Muska John Robison Travis Stoliker Alternate
More informationMINUTES BOROUGH OF LAVALLETTE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING BOARD Wednesday, April 28, P.M.
1 MINUTES BOROUGH OF LAVALLETTE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING BOARD Wednesday, April 28, 2010 7 P.M. Chairman Howard presiding Roll Call: Vincent Marino, Designee of Mayor LaCicero absent on roll call
More informationOCEANPORT PLANNING BOARD MINUTES May 12, 2010
OCEANPORT PLANNING BOARD MINUTES May 12, 2010 Chairman Widdis called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. and announced that the meeting had been advertised in accordance with the Open Public Meetings Act.
More informationMINUTES OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CITY OF HAYDEN, KOOTENAI COUNTY, IDAHO. September 17, 2018
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CITY OF HAYDEN, KOOTENAI COUNTY, IDAHO September 17, 2018 Regular Meeting: 5:00 PM Council Chambers Hayden City Hall, 8930 N. Government Way, Hayden, ID 83835
More information