SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report for Bosshardt Appeal of Planning and Development Denial of Land Use Permit 06LUP
|
|
- Alan Lynch
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report for Bosshardt Appeal of Planning and Development Denial of Land Use Permit 06LUP Deputy Director: Zoraida Abresch Staff Report Date: October 13, 2006 Division: Dev/Rev North Case Nos.: 06APL , Supervising Planner: J. Karamitsos 06LUP Staff Contact: Shelly Ingram Environmental Document: N/A Planner s Phone #: OWNER: Justin Bosshardt 3487 Willow Street Santa Ynez, CA (805) APPELLANT/AGENT: Curt Moniot P.O. Box 839 Santa Ynez, CA (805) Application Filed: March 15, 2006 Application Denied: July 14, 2006 Appeal Filed September 08, REQUEST This site is identified as Assessor Parcel Number , known as 3457 Willow Street, Santa Ynez, Third Supervisorial District. Hearing on the request of Curt Moniot, agent to consider Case No. 06APL , [application filed on September 08, 2006] to consider the appeal of the Planning and Development Department's decision to deny Land Use Permit 06LUP , in the 10-R- 1 Zone District under Article III for a two story single family dwelling, and garage with second story Detached Residential Second Unit. The application involves AP No , located at 3457 Willow Street, in the Santa Ynez area, Third Supervisorial District.
2 Page RECOMMENDATION AND PROCEDURES Follow the procedures outlined below and conditionally approve Case No. 06LUP marked "Officially Accepted, County of Santa Barbara November 1, 2006 Planning Commission Attachment A", based upon the project's consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and based on the ability to make the required findings or deny the project based upon the project s inconsistency with the Comprehensive Plan, inability to make the required findings, and due to the resultant significant unavoidable adverse impacts (if applicable). Your Commission's motion should include the following: 1. Adopt the required findings for the project specified in Attachment A of this staff report. 2. Deny the appeal, 06APL , thereby upholding the Planning and Development Department s denial of Land Use Permit No. 06LUP Deny the Land Use Permit, 06LUP Refer back to staff if the Planning Commission takes other than the recommended action for appropriate findings and conditions. 3.0 JURISDICTION The proposed project is being considered by the Planning Commission based on, Article III, Sec of the Santa Barbara Code that states: The decisions of the Planning and Development Department on the approval, denial, or revocation of Land Use Permits, final approval of projects under the jurisdiction of the Director, or decisions of the Board of Architectural Review may be appealed to the Planning Commission by the applicant or any interested person adversely affected by such decision. 4.0 ISSUE SUMMARY The Planning Commission hearing is de novo and the commission shall affirm, reverse, or modify the decision of the Department. 4.1 Land Use Permit A Land Use Permit was submitted on March 15, 2006 for a two story approximately 3,265 sq. ft. single family dwelling, a 2,119 sq. ft garage/workshop with a second story approximately 800 sq. ft. Detached Residential Second Unit on a recently created vacant lot in Santa Ynez.
3 Page 3 Planning and Development denied the permit on July 14, 2006 based on neighborhood incompatibility issues 4.2 Appeal of Permit Denial Appeal Issues: As presented in the appeal received September 8, 2006 the applicant/appellant contends that: 1) The Santa Barbara County Planning and Development Department s methodology to define neighborhood compatibility was not uniformly applied within the Santa Ynez Township, 2) The determination regarding size, bulk and scale is not supported by the evidence, 3) The decision to deny the issuance of the land use permit was in error and an abuse of discretion, 4) The methodology used by P&D to define and analyze neighborhoods is flawed. The applicant/appellant proposes to appeal the following specific conditions: 1) The finding that the proposed Residence is in violation of Santa Barbara County planning policies, 2) The finding that the proposed Detached Residential Second Unit (DRSU)-Garage is in violation of Santa Barbara County Planning Policies, 3) The denial of a land use permit for the proposed residence, 4) The denial of a land use permit for the proposed DRSU and garage. 5.0 PROJECT INFORMATION 5.1 Site Information Site Information Comprehensive Plan Designation U Res. 3.3, Urban area maximum 3.3 dwelling units per acre Ordinance, Zone District Article III, 10-R-1, residential 10,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size Site Size 0.37 acre (16,363 sq. ft. gross, 14,214 sq.ft. net) Present Use & Development vacant Surrounding Uses/Zoning North: Residential R-1 South: Residential R-1 East: Residential R-1 West: Residential R-1 Access Via private driveway from Willow Street Other Site Information Parcel created by TPM 14,617 Public Services Water Supply: Santa Ynez River Water Conservation District Sewage: Santa Ynez Community Services District Fire: Santa Barbara County Fire Station #32, 906 Airport Road School Districts: College Elementary School District, Santa Ynez Valley High School
4 Page Setting The subject parcel was created by TPM 14,617 in It is an Interior Lot defined as a lot that (1) has no street frontage or (2) the street frontage is less than 40 feet in width and the lot was not created by a subdivision resulting in five or more lots. The lot has a gross area of 16,363 sq. feet, 14,214 net and a development envelope of 6,303 sq. feet (imposed to protect a large oak tree.) (see attachment F1- site plan) The parcel in question is larger in its entirety (16,363 sq. ft. gross) than most of the surrounding parcels which are approximately 10,000 sq. feet; however the building envelope imposed by the tract map restricts development to an area of 6,303 sq. ft. Building permit records show 12 homes in the immediate surrounding area are 1,500-2,500 sq. ft. single story homes. A visual survey of the immediately adjacent neighborhood found it to be developed with single story structures with the exception of an attic room facing the street in one home and two second story homes designed to have the second level at street level, giving the appearance of a single story dwelling. 5.3 Parcel Validity The parcel on which the proposed structures would be located is recorded in Book 58, pages as Parcel Two of Tract Map 14,617 in the office of the County Clerk & Recorder and as such is deemed a legally created parcel. 5.4 Description On March 15, 2006 Land Use Permit 06LUP was submitted for construction of an approximately 3,265.5 sq. ft. two story single family residence (outside dimensions of approximately 50 by 37 ) with second floor balconies and an average height of approximately 22 and an approximately 2,119 sq. ft. garage /workshop (outside dimensions of 30 by 44 and 23 by 34 respectively) with a second story approximately 800 sq. ft. Detached Residential Second Unit with second story balconies. The structure is located on a legal parcel with a prescribed building envelope of approximately 6,303 sq. ft. 5.5 Background Information Due to the size and configuration of the proposed structures a general analysis of neighborhood compatibility issues relative to the smaller single story homes was conducted. A petition signed by several of the immediate neighbors and several telephone calls and s opposing the project were submitted following the mailed noticing, dated March 30, PROJECT ANALYSIS 6.1 Environmental Review Pursuant to the Public Resources Code 21080(b)(1), the California Environmental Quality Act is not applicable to ministerial projects proposed to be carried out or approved by public agencies.
5 Page Comprehensive Plan Consistency REQUIREMENT LAND USE ELEMENT Land Use Development Policy 4 (Land Use Element, p.82) Prior to the issuance of a use permit, the County shall make the finding that adequate public or private services and resources (i.e., water, sewer, roads, etc.) are available to serve the proposed project. Visual Resource Policy 3. (Land Use Element pg. 91) In areas designated as urban on the land use plan maps and in designated rural neighborhoods, new structures shall be in conformance with the scale and character of the existing community. Clustered development, varied circulation patterns and diverse housing types shall be encouraged. DISCUSSION Consistent: The project site would have adequate services and resources to serve the proposed structures Inconsistent: The proposed two story single family dwelling, detached residential second unit and workshop garage is not consistent with the character of the surrounding residences. The proposed two story single family dwelling (approximately 3,265.5 sq. ft.), is nearly 75% larger than the surrounding homes which average approximately 1,700 sq. ft., and are primarily single story. 6.3 Ordinance Compliance The permit application (Case No. 06LUP ) was denied by Planning and Development on July 14, 2006, subject to a ten day appeal period. The appeal period was extended due to questions regarding an extension of that time period. The subject appeal was filed on September 8, The proposed project is ministerial in nature and requires only the issuance of a Land Use Permit. Planning and Development jurisdiction is based on Section (Land Use Permit Processing) of Article III of the County Code, which states: The Planning and Development Department shall review the Land Use Permit application for conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, this Article, and other applicable regulations, and shall decide to approve or deny the Land Use Permit. A Land Use Permit shall not be approved or issued by the Planning and Development Department until all necessary prior approvals have been obtained. Permit Findings: Article III (Sec ) requires that the following findings must be made before a LUP may be issued: (i) that the proposed development conforms to 1) the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan, and 2) with applicable provisions of this Article III; (ii) that the proposed development is located on a legally created lot; and (iii) that the subject property is in compliance with all laws, rules and regulations pertaining to zoning uses, subdivisions, setbacks and any other applicable provisions of this Article, and such zoning violation enforcement fees as established from time to time by the Board of Supervisors have been paid.
6 Page 6 Appeal Requirements: Under Section d, Article III of the County Code, appellants of Land Use Permits must specifically state in the appeal how: 1) the decision of the Planning and Development Department on a Land Use Permit, or a decision of the Director or the BAR, is not in accord with the provisions and purposes of Article III; or 2) there was an error or an abuse of discretion by the Planning and Development Department, Director or BAR. The denial of the proposed Land Use Permit is an independent action and not related to any other discretionary permit. Had the Land Use Permit been required as clearance for a previously approved discretionary permit, the appeal requirements would additionally include: that the appellant identify how: (i) the Land Use Permit is inconsistent with the previously approved discretionary permit; (ii) the discretionary permit s conditions of approval have been unfulfilled; or (iii) the approval is inconsistent with noticing requirements. However, these requirements do not apply in this case. The proposed development is inconsistent with two sections of Article III: Article III, Sec In areas designated as urban on the Land Use Element maps and in designated rural neighborhoods, new structures shall be in conformance with the scale and character of the existing community. Clustered development, varied circulation patterns and diverse housing types shall be encouraged. Article III, Sec That the proposed development conforms to the applicable policies of 1) the Comprehensive Plan and 2) with the applicable provisions of this Article and/or falls within the limited exception allowed under Section (see section 6.2) 6.4 Board of Architectural Review The Board of Architectural Review did not have jurisdiction in this case because the neither the locale nor other parameters of the development fell with in its specified purview. 7.0 APPEALS ISSUES 7.1 Grounds for Appeal: In the materials and letter dated September 8, 2006 the applicant/appellant asserts that: 1. The Santa Barbara County Planning and development department s methodology to define neighborhood compatibility was not uniformly applied within the Santa Ynez Township. 2. The determination regarding size bulk and scale is not supported by the evidence. 3. The decision to deny the issuance of the land use permit was in error and abuse of discretion. 4. The methodology used by P&D to define and analyze neighborhoods is flawed.
7 Page 7 Staff Response: The requested Land Use Permit was denied based on inconsistency with applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements. The arguments provided by the appellant assert that there was an error or an abuse of discretion by the Planning and Development Department or Director. Staff acknowledges the methodology used to define neighborhood characteristics is somewhat subjective but maintains it was uniformly applied to the Township of Santa Ynez, which within its boundaries contains several neighborhoods of varying description. A survey of Building and Safety Division permits for 12 surrounding residences showed the immediate area to contain an average single story 1,700 sq. ft. home (see attachment D). A schematic provided by Mr. Moniot also showed the immediate neighborhood to the West as one containing only one story residences. The denial of the land use permit is supported by both visual photographic and building permit records evidence. The following discussion states the four appeal points as described specifically by the applicant, followed by staff responses. Appeal issues #1 and #2 address the findings relative to denial of the Land Use Permit for the Single Family Dwelling, Detached Residential Second Unit and Garage/Workshop. Appeal Issues #3 and #4 address the denial of the Land Use Permit. Appeal Issue #1 -. The Department s finding that the proposed Residence is in violation of Santa Barbara County planning Policies. Staff Response - Approval of a Land Use Permit requires a finding that the proposed project is consistent with all policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed two story single family dwelling, with second story balconies would not be consistent with the character of the surrounding residences. The immediately adjacent homes are on approximately 10,000 sq. ft. parcels and are primarily one story structures averaging approximately 1,700 square feet. The proposed two story single family dwelling (approximately 3,265.5 sq. ft.) is nearly 92% larger than the surrounding homes. The dwelling, as designed does not conform to Land Use Element Visual Resource Policy 3 (see section 6.2) and Article III, Sec (see section 6.3). The applicant was given the option to redesign the project and chose not to pursue that option, therefore the permit was denied. Appeal Issue #2 The Department s finding that the proposed DRSU-Garage is in violation of Santa Barbara County Planning Policies. Staff Response Same as response to Appeal Issue #1 except as follows: The proposed two story single family dwelling, detached residential second unit and workshop garage would not be consistent with the character of the surrounding residences and accessory structures. There are no detached residential second units and few accessory structures in the immediately adjacent area. The two story structure with balconies is nearly 72 % larger than many of the surrounding main residences. Appeal Issue #3 - The denial of a Land Use Permit for the proposed residence. Staff Response The denial of the Land Use Permit was based on the inability to make the finding discussed in Appeal Issue #1 above.
8 Page 8 Appeal Issue #4 - The denial of a Land Use Permit for the proposed DRSU and garage. Staff Response The denial of the Land Use Permit was based on the inability to make the finding discussed in Appeal Issue #2 above. 8.0 APPEALS PROCEDURE The action of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the Board of Supervisors within ten (10) calendar days of said action. ATTACHMENTS A. Findings B. Denial Letter dated July 14, 2006 ( with letter dated May 19, 2006 attached) C. Appeal Application dated September 8, 2006 D. Aerial view of surrounding homes (based on 1990 flood control survey information) E. 1. phone log 2. petition /letters in opposition F. 1. Site Plan 2. Elevations (4) G:\GROUP\Permitting\Case Files\APL\2000s\06 cases\06apl of 06APL-00245\SR-PC Bosshardt.doc
9 Case Name, #: Page B-1 ATTACHMENT A: DENIAL FINDINGS 1 Pursuant to Section of the Article III Zoning Ordinance, a Land Use Permit shall only be issued if all of the following findings can be made: 1.1 That the proposed development conforms to the applicable policies of 1) the Comprehensive Plan, and 2) with the applicable provisions of Article III and/or falls within the limited exception allowed under , Nonconforming use of Land, Buildings and Structures. As discussed in Sections 6.2, 6.3 of this staff report the proposed project does not conform to Visual Resource Policy 3 of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element, Visual Resource Development Standard 1 in Article III (Section ) and requirements set forth in Article III, Section Therefore the finding cannot be made. The proposed two story residence and Detached Residential Second Unit and garage/workshop would be located on an interior lot surrounded by one story homes. The proposed structures are large, the main residence would be approximately 92% larger than the average surrounding residences and the DRSU/garage/workshop would be approximately 72% larger than the surrounding main residences. The immediately adjacent homes are on approximately 10,000 sq. ft. parcels and are primarily one story structures averaging approximately 1,700 square feet with few accessory structures. The design of the main structure features windows and French doors opening onto balconies on the second story that could intrude on the privacy of the surrounding residences. The DRSU has several second story windows and an outdoor stairway. Based on these and other related factors the residence and accessory structures would not be compatible with the nature of the surrounding residences. 1.2 That the proposed development is located on a legally created lot. While the subject parcel is identified as Book 58, pages as Parcel Two of Tract Map 14,617 in the office of the County Clerk & Recorder and is a legally created parcel, the project is denied and this finding does not apply. 1.3 That the subject property is in compliance with all laws, rules and regulations pertaining to zoning uses, subdivision, setbacks and any other applicable divisions of this Article, and such zoning violation enforcement fees as established from time to time by the Board of Supervisors has been paid. This subsection shall not be interpreted to impose new requirements on non-conforming uses and structures under Section et seq. While the subject property is currently in compliance with all laws, rules, and regulations pertaining to zoning uses, subdivision, setback and any other
10 Case Name, #: Page B-2 applicable divisions of Article III; the proposed project would result in inconsistency as described in Finding Therefore, while there are no zoning violations relating to the project site, the project is denied and the finding does not apply.
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT January 11, 2008
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT January 11, 2008 PROJECT: Gerrity Parking in Side Setback and Gerrity Student Housing Addition HEARINGDATE: January 28, 2008 STAFF/PHONE: J. Ritterbeck,
More informationProject Location 1806 & 1812 San Marcos Pass Road
SANTA BABARA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report for Staal Lot Line Adjustment and Rezone Deputy Director: Dave Ward Staff Report Date: June 19, 2009 Division: Development Review - South Case Nos.:
More informationMONTECITO PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report for the Montgomery Lot Line Adjustment
MONTECITO PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report for the Montgomery Lot Line Adjustment Deputy Director: Dave Ward Staff Report Date: October 31, 2008 Division: Planning & Development, South Case No.: 08LLA-00000-00003
More informationSANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT August 30, 2007
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT August 30, 2007 PROJECT: Detrana Entry Gates HEARING DATE: October 22, 2007 STAFF/PHONE: Sarah Clark, (805) 568-2059 GENERAL INFORMATION Case No.:
More informationSANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR Staff Report for Coleman SFD Addition Coastal Development Permit with Hearing
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR Staff Report for Coleman SFD Addition Coastal Development Permit with Hearing Supervisorial District: First Staff Report Date: August 10, 2005 Staff: Lisa Hosale
More informationCOUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM. Santa Barbara County Planning Commission
COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: HEARING DATE: RE: Santa Barbara County Planning Commission Florence Trotter-Cadena, Planner III North County Development Review October
More information1.0 REQUEST. SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR Coastal Zone Staff Report for Vincent New Single-Family Dwelling & Septic System
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR Coastal Zone Staff Report for Vincent New Single-Family Dwelling & Septic System Hearing Date: February 26, 2007 Supervisorial District: First Staff Report Date:
More information1. Adopted the required findings for the project specified in Attachment A of the staff report dated February 6, 2004, including CEQA findings;
February 19, 2004 Joan L. Jamieson P.O. Box 741 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR Solvang, CA 93441 HEARING OF FEBRUARY 17, 2004 RE: Eubanks Lot Line Adjustment, 03LLA-00000-00013 Hearing on the request of Joan Jamieson,
More informationCOUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM. Planning Commission. Alice McCurdy, Deputy Director Development Review Division
COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Planning Commission Alice McCurdy, Deputy Director Development Review Division STAFF REPORT DATE: July 16, 2015 HEARING DATE: July
More informationSANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT April 18, 2014
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT April 18, 2014 PROJECT: Kornbluth Lot Line Adjustment HEARING DATE: May 5, 2014 STAFF/PHONE: Julie Harris, (805) 568-3518 GENERAL INFORMATION Case
More informationSANTA BARBARA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report for Stonegate Orcutt Ventures, LLC Recorded Map Modification and Development Plan Revision
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report for Stonegate Orcutt Ventures, LLC Recorded Map Modification and Deputy Director: Alice McCurdy Staff Report Date: July 21, 2014 Division: Development
More informationSANTA BARBARA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report For Magali Farms/Sulpizio Tentative Parcel Map/Development Plan/ Conditional Use Permit
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION For Magali Farms/Sulpizio Tentative Parcel Map/Development Plan/ Conditional Use Permit Hearing Date: January 9, 2007 Deputy Director: Zoraida Abresch Date: December
More informationPlanning Commission Report
cjly City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (370) 858-5966 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: April 28, 2016 Subject: Project
More informationRESOLUTION NO
RESOLUTION NO. 2005- A RESOLUTION OF THE MARIN COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS DENYING THE PETER PAPPAS APPEAL AND SUSTAINING THE PLANNING COMMISSION S ACTION BY DENYING THE PAPPAS DESIGN REVIEW CLEARANCE
More informationREPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento
REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814-2671 www.cityofsacramento.org 9 PUBLIC HEARING December 10, 2015 To: Members of the Planning and Design Commission
More informationCOUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA
COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA CENTRAL BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW Solvang Municipal Court 1745 Mission Drive, Suite C Solvang, CA 93463 Meeting Date: April 09, 2010 (805) 934-6250 9:00 A.M. Bethany Clough,
More informationAccessory Dwelling Units
Planning & Building Department 3675 Mt. Diablo Boulevard, Suite 210 Lafayette, CA 94549-1968 Tel. (925) 284-1976 Fax (925) 284-1122 http://www.ci.lafayette.ca.us Accessory Dwelling Units 6-560 Purpose
More informationDEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA SUBDIVISION REPORT DOCKET NO: ES-89-15-PF SUMMARY NO: COUNCIL DISTRICT 2 Paul D. Johnston COUNCIL AT LARGE: A Chris Roberts B Elton M. Lagasse ADVERTISING
More informationSANTA BARBARA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report for Flood Control Easement Quitclaim
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report for Flood Control Easement Quitclaim Deputy Director: Steve Chase Staff Report Date: March 10, 2006 Division: Development Review South Case No.: 06GOV-00000-00004
More informationSANTA BARBARA COUNTY MONTECITO PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report for Klink Lot Line Adjustment and Modification
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY MONTECITO PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report for Klink Lot Line Adjustment and Modification Deputy Director: Steve Chase Staff Report Date: May 5, 2006 Staff Contact: Alice Daly Case
More informationSANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT February 15, 2013
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT February 15, 2013 PROJECT: Galbraith Lot Line Adjustment HEARING DATE: March 4, 2013 STAFF/PHONE: J. Ritterbeck, (805) 568-3509 GENERAL INFORMATION
More informationORDINANCE NO ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS (ADUs)
ORDINANCE NO. 18-01 ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS (ADUs) I. Purpose and Intent. This section establishes the procedures and development standards for the ministerial processing of applications for new attached
More informationPLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (PRD)
PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SECTION 10. PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (PRD) 10.1 Purpose Planned Residential Development allows by special permit from the Board an alternative pattern of residential
More informationTOWN OF SAN ANSELMO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. For the meeting of January 11, Agenda Item 6C. Zone X (Minimal Flood Hazard Area)
TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT For the meeting of January 11, 2016 Agenda Item 6C Owner/Applicant: Daniel and Jacqueline Olson Project Address: 321 Greenfield Avenue Assessor s Parcel
More informationGlades County Staff Report and Recommendation REZONING
Glades County Staff Report and Recommendation REZONING CASE NUMBER: RZ15-01 DATE: October 2, 2015 CASE TYPE: Application for Rezoning REQUEST: J.J. Wiggins Memorial Trust is requesting a rezoning of 22.1±
More informationTOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS January 11, 2018 Staff Report to the Planning Commission
ITEM #3.2 TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS Staff Report to the Planning Commission SUBJECT: FROM: REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMITS FOR A NEW 2,831 SQUARE FOOT, TWO
More informationCity of Piedmont COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
City of Piedmont COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT DATE: May 15, 2017 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mayor and Council Paul Benoit, City Administrator Consideration of the 2 nd Reading of Ordinance 731 N.S. - Amending Division
More informationPLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION VARIANCE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION VARIANCE DOÑA ANA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Doña Ana County Government Center 845 N. Motel Blvd. Las Cruces, New Mexico 88007 Telephone: (575) 647-7350 MEETING
More informationSANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT November 20, 2015
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT November 20, 2015 PROJECT: Acquistapace Tentative Parcel Map HEARING DATE: December 7, 2015 STAFF/PHONE: Dana Eady, (805) 934-6266 GENERAL INFORMATION
More informationEXHIBIT A: Proposed Ordinance CPC-2016-1245-CA May 12, 2016 Exhibit A CPC 2016 1245 CA ORDINANCE NO. An ordinance repealing Subsections 12.24.W.43 and 12.24.W.44 of Chapter 1 of the Los Angeles Municipal
More informationCITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 20, 2017 SUBJECT:
CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 20, 2017 SUBJECT: INITIATED BY: APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF A REQUEST TO EXPAND AN EXISTING RESTAURANT WITHIN THE EXISTING LOBBY AND ROOFTOP AREA WITH
More informationJack & Eileen Feather (PLN030436)
MIKE NOVO ZONING ADMINISTRATOR COUNTY OF MONTEREY STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. 030436 A. P. # 008-462-008-000 In the matter of the application of Jack & Eileen Feather (PLN030436) FINDINGS & DECISION
More informationWEBSTER TOWNSHIP LAND DIVISION ORDINANCE. Summary Table of Amendments
WEBSTER TOWNSHIP LAND DIVISION ORDINANCE Ordinance No. 2012 02 As Adopted 04-17-12 Summary Table of Amendments Adoption Date Affected Sections Summary October 10, 3 Added definition of Township Engineer
More informationORDINANCE NO ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors ordains as follows (omitting the parenthetical footnotes from the official text of the enacted or amended provisions of the County
More informationCOUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA ZONING ADMINISTRATOR REPORT
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA ZONING ADMINISTRATOR REPORT For the Agenda of: May 4, 2016 To: From: Subject: Supervisorial District(s): Zoning Administrator Department of Community Development PLNP2015-00222.
More informationCity of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report
City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report TO: Zoning Administrator FROM: Reviewed by: Sergio Klotz, AICP, Assistant Development Services DirctJ. o ~ Prepared by: Laura Stokes, Housing Coordinator I Assistant
More informationTHE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
ORDINANCE NO. 185462 An ordinance amending Sections 12.03,12.09 A.3 and 12.22 C.27 of Chapter 1 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code to require greater front and rear yard setbacks, restrict small lot subdivisions
More informationA GUIDE TO PROCEDURES FOR: SUBDIVISIONS & CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION
A GUIDE TO PROCEDURES FOR: SUBDIVISIONS & CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION A GUIDE TO PROCEDURES FOR: SUBDIVISIONS (TENTATIVE MAPS) PURPOSE Definition: A subdivision is defined as the division of any improved or
More informationPROPOSED FINIDINGS ZONE VARIANCE APPLICATION FOR HEIGHT VARIANCE
PROPOSED FINIDINGS ZONE VARIANCE APPLICATION FOR HEIGHT VARIANCE (PURSUANT TO LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 12.27) CONCERNING 10550 WEST BELLAGIO ROAD, LOS ANGELES, CA 90077 Pursuant to Charter Section
More informationSANTA BARBARA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report for County Sale of Cary Place Government Code Consistency Determination
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report for County Sale of Cary Place Government Code 65402 Consistency Determination Deputy Director: Steve Chase Staff Report Date: June 22, 2006 Division:
More informationORDINANCE NO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE NO. 04768 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA * * * * * * AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 22.5 (SECOND UNIT ORDINANCE) OF DIVISION VI, PART ONE (ZONING REGULATIONS) OF
More informationMONTECITO PLANNING COMMISSION Coastal Zone Staff Report for Klein Appeal of the Hughes Addition and Remodel Coastal Development Permit
MONTECITO PLANNING COMMISSION Coastal Zone Staff Report for Klein Appeal of the Hughes Addition and Remodel Coastal Development Permit Staff Report Date: September 28, 2017 Case No.: 17APL-000000-00007
More informationBEVERLY HILLS. Planning Commission Report
BEVERLY HILLS Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (510) 458-1140 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: Subject: Recommendation: December
More informationStaff Report PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. Salt Lake City Planning Commission. From: Lauren Parisi, Associate Planner; Date: December 14, 2016
Staff Report PLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS To: Salt Lake City Planning Commission From: Lauren Parisi, Associate Planner; 801-535-7932 Date: December 14, 2016 Re: 1611 South 1600 East PLANNED
More informationCHAPTER SECOND UNITS
CHAPTER 22.5. SECOND UNITS SECTION 6425. PURPOSE. Second units are a residential use that provide an important source of housing. The purpose of this Chapter is to: 1. Increase the supply and diversity
More informationAPPLICANT NAME SUBDIVISION NAME DEVELOPMENT NAME LOCATION. CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT Council District 4 PRESENT ZONING PROPOSED ZONING
SUBDIVISION, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PLANNING APPROVAL, ZONING AMENDMENT, & SIDEWALK WAIVER REQUEST STAFF REPORT Date: February 17, 2010 APPLICANT NAME SUBDIVISION NAME DEVELOPMENT NAME LOCATION David
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY. Facts. The property at issue is situated on the corner lot of SW Manning Street and 55th
FILED 1 JUL AM : 1 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CLERK E-FILED CASE NUMBER: 1--00-1 SEA SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY 1 1 BENCHVIEW NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, and Petitioner, CITY OF
More informationARTICLE VII. NONCONFORMITIES. Section 700. Purpose.
ARTICLE VII. NONCONFORMITIES. Section 700. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to regulate and limit the development and continued existence of legal uses, structures, lots, and signs established either
More informationCITY OF DERBY MEETING OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS REGULAR MEETING January 14, :30 PM MEETING MINUTES
CITY OF DERBY MEETING OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS REGULAR MEETING January 14, 2016 6:30 PM MEETING MINUTES 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL Pat Baer Jessica Rhein Justin Smith Joe Waugh Van Willis
More informationKey Provisions in Chart: Zones Floor Area Ratio Setbacks Parking Approval Timeframe Owner Occupancy Lot Size Fees HCD Oversight Amnesty Program
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Comparative Chart Current State Standards City of Santa Barbara Santa Barbara County City of Goleta City of Carpinteria Proposed State Legislation This chart was created to
More informationCHAPTER XVIII SITE PLAN REVIEW
CHAPTER XVIII SITE PLAN REVIEW Section 18.1 Section 18.2 Description and Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to provide standards and procedures under which applicants would submit, and the Township
More informationOceanside Zoning Ordinance
Oceanside Zoning Ordinance 3006 Accessory Dwelling Units (1992 and Redevelopment Zoning Ordinance) Amendments Article 42 Accessory Dwelling Units (1986 Zoning Ordinance) New [Strike-thru = Deleted language,
More informationDEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA SUBDIVISION REPORT DOCKET NO: ES-1-17-PF SUMMARY NO.: COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2 Paul D. Johnston COUNCIL AT LARGE: A: Christopher L. Roberts B: Cynthia Lee-Sheng
More informationPlanning Commission Report
çbe~rly Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: March 13, 2014 Subject: 9521 Sunset
More information1069 regarding Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) were signed into law; and
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE AMENDING TITLE 16 OF THE ARROYO GRANDE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW AND ADDITIONALLY ROOFTOP
More informationTOWNSHIP OF EDENVILLE COUNTY OF MIDLAND STATE OF MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO. 178 LAND DIVISION ORDINANCE TOWNSHIP OF EDENVILLE
TOWNSHIP OF EDENVILLE COUNTY OF MIDLAND STATE OF MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO. 178 LAND DIVISION ORDINANCE An ordinance to regulate partitioning or division of parcels or tracts of land, enacted pursuant but
More informationCity of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Joel Rojas, Development Services Director ~ )P
10/17/2017 F1b TO: FROM: SUBMITTED BY: City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council ~n Siegel, City Manager Joel Rojas, Development Services Director ~ )P PREPARED
More informationPlanning Commission Application Summary
Planning Commission Application Summary Project Name: Ballard Property Rezone Address: 12773 & 12775 South 300 East, 415 East Pheasant View Dr. Current Zoning: RA1 (Residential 40,000 sq. ft. minimum)
More informationSTAFF REPORT. Permit Number: Porter. Kitsap County Board of Commissioners; Kitsap County Planning Commission
STAFF REPORT Permit Number: 15 00461 Porter DATE: November 9, 2015 TO: FROM: Kitsap County Board of Commissioners; Kitsap County Planning Commission Katrina Knutson, AICP, Senior Planner, DCD and Jeff
More informationStaff Report: Date: Applicant: Property Identification: Acreage of Request: Current Zoning of Requested Area: Requested Action: Attached:
Staff Report: Completed by Jeff Palmer Director of Planning & Zoning Date: November 7, 2018 Applicant: Greg Smith, Oberer Land Developer agent for Ronald Montgomery ET AL Property Identification: Frontage
More informationWHATCOM COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER SUMMARY OF APPEAL AND DECISION
WHATCOM COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER RE: Administrative Appeal ) APL2010-0006 Application for ) ) FINDINGS OF FACT, Ron and Shelley Jepson ) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, ) AND DECISION SUMMARY OF APPEAL AND DECISION
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. DISCUSSION ON ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS (ADUs)
Agenda Item: 2A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DISCUSSION ON ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS (ADUs) MEETING DATE: December 3, 2018 TO: FROM: CITY PLANNING COMMISSION Planning, City of Solvang DATE PREPARED:
More informationCOUNTY SUBDIVISION. Attachments: (1) Staff Analysis (2) Subdivision Maps (3) Related Documents including the Disclosure Statement
COUNTY SUBDIVISION DOÑA ANA COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Doña Ana County Government Center 845 N. Motel Blvd. Las Cruces, New Mexico 88007 Office: (575) 647-7250 MEETING DATE: August 25, 2011
More informationBONNER COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISION STAFF REPORT APRIL 19, 2018
BONNER COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISION STAFF REPORT APRIL 19, 2018 Project Name: File Number,Type: Request: Legal Description: Location: Parcel Size: Parcel # Applicant: Project
More informationPART 1 JURISDICTION, ZONING DISTRICTS, AND LAND USES
PART 1 JURISDICTION, ZONING DISTRICTS, AND LAND USES ARTICLE 1 TITLE, PURPOSE, JURISDICTION, AND APPLICABILITY Division 1-1.1 Title and Reference Sec. 1-1.1.1 Title This Ordinance shall be known as "The
More informationORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
ORDINANCE NO. 2032 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO SECTIONS 10.04.030, 10.12.010, 10.12.030, 10.60.040 AND 10.84.120 OF THE MANHATTAN
More informationStaff findings of consistency with the Land Development Regulations and the Comprehensive Plan follow: Request One
City of Panama City Board of Adjustment January 22, 2018 Staff findings of consistency with the Land Development Regulations and the Comprehensive Plan follow: Request One Owner/ Applicant: Michael & Sharon
More informationSecondary Dwelling Unit
Secondary Dwelling Unit Review of Special Use Regulations (City Code Section 17.228.105) The purpose of this application is to determine whether or not your project meets the Planning and Development Code
More informationCITY PLAN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CITY PLAN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: FROM: MEETING DATE: February 6, 2017 PETITION: LOCATION: APPLICANT: Request for a Conditional Use Permit and Preliminary Development Plan Mara Perry, Director
More informationTaylor Lot Coverage Variance Petition No. PLNBOA North I Street Public Hearing: November 7, 2012
APPEALS HEARING OFFICER STAFF REPORT Applicant: Mark Taylor, property owner Staff: Thomas Irvin (801) 535-7932 thomas.irvin@slcgov.com Tax ID: 09-32-159-006-0000 Current Zone: SR-1A Special Development
More informationCOUNTY OF SAN MATEO PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: October 20, 2016 TO: FROM: Zoning Hearing Officer Planning Staff SUBJECT: Consideration of a Non-Conforming Use Permit, pursuant to Sections 6135
More informationState of California GOVERNMENT CODE. Section
State of California GOVERNMENT CODE Section 65852.2 65852.2. (a) (1) A local agency may, by ordinance, provide for the creation of accessory dwelling units in single-family and multifamily residential
More informationCITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PLANNING BOARD Meeting Date: July 17, 2018 Planning Board Case No. 1670I
CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PLANNING BOARD Meeting Date: July 17, 2018 Planning Board Case No. 1670I Palms Gateway Commercial Planned Development (CPD) Southeast Corner of Belvedere Road and Australian Avenue
More informationTOWNSHIP OF HARTLAND ORDINANCE NO. 57-1, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAND DIVISION ORDINANCE
TOWNSHIP OF HARTLAND ORDINANCE NO. 57-1, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAND DIVISION ORDINANCE An ordinance to amend the Land Division Ordinance enacted pursuant to but not limited to the State Land Division
More informationADUs and You! Common types of ADUs include mother-in-law suite, garage apartments and finished basements.
ADUs and You! Accessory Dwelling Units Town of Lyons Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) are a form of housing that can be an important tool for diversifying and increasing the local housing stock. Lyons lost
More informationNapa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter
Agenda Date: 7/5/2017 Agenda Placement: 8A Napa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter TO: FROM: Napa County Planning Commission Charlene Gallina for David Morrison - Director Planning, Building
More informationPLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ZONE CHANGE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ZONE CHANGE DOÑA ANA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Doña Ana County Government Center 845 N. Motel Blvd. Las Cruces, New Mexico 88007 Telephone: (575) 647-7350 MEETING
More informationREQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE: 8/4/2010 ITEM NO: 5a Division Approval Item Description: Agenda Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Request by McAdam Majors for approval of a 1,008 sq ft. accessory structure
More informationACCESSORY SECOND UNIT PERMIT Application Packet
ACCESSORY SECOND UNIT PERMIT Application Packet Contents Description & List of Requirements Permit Application Draft Deed Restriction Municipal Code Section 16.333 ACCESSORY SECOND UNIT PERMIT Description
More informationConduct a hearing on the appeal, consider all evidence and testimony, and take one of the following actions:
AGENDA ITEM #4.A TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS Staff Report to the City Council SUBJECT: FROM: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF A CONDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR A NEW 3,511
More informationHonorable Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Rafael Guzman, Director of Planning Update on Phase 2 Part 2 of the Nonconforming Buildings, Structures, and Use and the Abatement
More informationPLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT Rezoning PETITION: APPLICANT: PROPERTY OWNER: TYPE OF REQUEST: SIZE OF TRACT: LOCATION: (#17-22) Rezone from A-PUD (Agri-Business Planned Unit Development) to A-PUD
More informationARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS
ARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS SECTION 100 TITLE This Ordinance shall be known and cited as the "Rice Township Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance." SECTION 101 AUTHORITY Rice Township is empowered
More informationVERGENNES TOWNSHIP, KENT COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE
VERGENNES TOWNSHIP, KENT COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE 2003-3 An ordinance to amend portions of Chapter 2 Definitions; Chapter 3 Zoning Districts; Chapter 4, Home Occupation, Home Occupation with an Accessory
More informationBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ARCHULETA COUNTY, COLORADO RESOLUTION 2018-
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ARCHULETA COUNTY, COLORADO RESOLUTION 2018- ARCHULETA COUNTY IMPROPERLY DIVIDED PARCELS EXEMPTION INTERIM RESOLUTION - A RESOLUTION ADDRESSING PARCELS UNDER THE SIZE OF 35
More informationCOUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Consent Agenda. Doug Anthony, Deputy Director, Development Review - North
COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Consent Agenda TO: FROM: County Planning Commission Doug Anthony, Deputy Director, Development Review - North HEARING DATE: December 5, 2011 RE: Hearing
More informationCASE # LUP Commission District: # 3
CASE # LUP-15-02-038 Commission District: # 3 GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANT OWNER PROJECT NAME HEARING TYPE REQUEST Richard Frucci Lingo Lane, LLC Lingo Lane Planned Development / Land Use Plan (PD/LUP)
More informationSo you want to build a second unit A guide to the City s regulations on secondary dwelling units
Community Development Department City of Pismo Beach 760 Mattie Road Pismo Beach, CA 93449 Telephone: (805) 773-4658 / Fax: (805) 773-4684 So you want to build a second unit A guide to the City s regulations
More informationMONTEREY COUNTY STANDARD SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE
MONTEREY COUNTY STANDARD SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE Meeting: May 11, 2006 Agenda Item: 1 Project Description: Standard Subdivision Amendment of recorded Markham Ranch Subdivision Map to relocate building envelope
More informationCounty of San Mateo. Inter-Departmental Correspondence. Department: COUNTY MANAGER File #: Board Meeting Date: 9/12/2017
County of San Mateo Inter-Departmental Correspondence Department: COUNTY MANAGER File #: 16-493 Board Meeting Date: 9/12/2017 Special Notice / Hearing: Vote Required: None Majority To: From: Subject: Honorable
More informationLOT AREA AND FRONTAGE
LOT AREA AND FRONTAGE Lot Area & Frontage for the R2.1 Zone Lot Area & Frontage for the R2.4 Zone Minimum Lot Minimum Lot Zone Area Width R2.1 700 sq m 18 m R2.4 600 sq m 16 m Lot Area means the total
More informationAccessory Dwelling Unit Permit
PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT 411 Main Street (530) 87-6800 P.O. Box 3420 Chico, CA 527 Application No. APPLICATION FOR Accessory Dwelling Unit Permit Applicant Information Applicant Street Address Daytime
More informationVillage of Glenview Zoning Board of Appeals
Village of Glenview Zoning Board of Appeals STAFF REPORT August 20, 2012 TO: Chairman and Zoning Board of Appeals Commissioners FROM: Planning and Economic Development Department CASE #: Z2012-025 LOCATION:
More informationCHARTER TOWNSHIP OF RUTLAND COUNTY OF BARRY, STATE OF MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO ADOPTED: DECEMBER 14, 2016 EFFECTIVE: JANUARY 21, 2017
CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF RUTLAND COUNTY OF BARRY, STATE OF MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO. 2016-159 ADOPTED: DECEMBER 14, 2016 EFFECTIVE: JANUARY 21, 2017 LAND DIVISION, COMBINATION, AND BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT ORDINANCE
More informationBoard of Adjustment Staff Report Meeting Date: June 1, 2017
Board of Adjustment Staff Report Meeting Date: June 1, 2017 Subject: Applicant: Agenda Item Number: Summary: Recommendation: Prepared by: Phone: E-Mail: Administrative Permit Case Number Powning Family
More informationStaff Report: Date: Applicant: Property Identification: Acreage of Request: Current Zoning of Requested Area: Requested Action: Attached:
Staff Report: Completed by Jeff Palmer Director of Planning & Zoning Date: November 7, 2018, Updated November 20, 2018 Applicant: Greg Smith, Oberer Land Developer agent for Ronald Montgomery ET AL Property
More informationARTICLE 8C SITE CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE
ARTICLE 8C SITE CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE SECTION 8C.01 PURPOSE It is the purpose of this Ordinance to insure that plans for development within Oceola Township proposed under the provisions of
More informationPlanning Commission Report
~BER~9 Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 458-1140 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: April 10, 2014 Subject: 1801 Angelo
More informationCITY OF GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
CITY OF GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO ORDINANCE NO. 4778 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF THE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE (TITLE 21 OF THE GRAND JUNCTION MUNICIPAL CODE) REGARDING ADMINISTRATION AND
More informationButte County Board of Supervisors
Butte County Board of Supervisors PUBLIC HEARING January 12, 2016 Amendments to the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance AG-P5.3 (Agricultural Buffer) and Interim Agricultural Uses Butte County Department
More information