STAFF REPORT.. 2 FINDINGS...6

Transcription

1

2 B F C U 2 FF P.. 2 Initiation Background Proposed rdinance Public utreach Conclusion FIIG...6 ppendices: General Plan/Charter Findings CQ Findings - Proposed esolution B - Proposed rdinance C - Categorical xemption - V C - edevelopment Plan xample - orth ollywood

3 CPC C U In 2011, the California tate egislature enacted legislation that dissolved redevelopment agencies throughout the state. he City of os ngeles elected not to become the successor agency to the Community edevelopment gency of os ngeles (C/) and, as a result, the Governor appointed a esignated ocal uthority () to wind down the operations of the former C/. dditional legislation was passed by the tate in 2012 that allowed a city to assume all land use related plans and functions of a former redevelopment agency upon request. he proposed resolution requests that the land use authority in redevelopment project areas be transferred from the C to the City of os ngeles. he resolution would allow the epartment of City Planning ( the CP ) to assume only the land use authority vested in redevelopment plans, or provided for it in the City Charter and the os ngeles unicipal Code. uthorities conferred by the redevelopment plans that are not land use related are not part of the request. In addition, the proposed ordinance (ppendix B) adds or amends ections 11.13, 12.03, 12.04, 12.21, 12.22, 12.24, 13.11, 16.05, and of the os ngeles unicipal Code in order for CP to immediately begin implementation of active redevelopment plans upon adoption of the resolution. his would allow for continuity, clarity and consistency in the processing of land use entitlement requests within redevelopment project areas. Initiation FF P n June 29, 2012, the City Council (C.F. o ) instructed the CP to prepare an ordinance that would transfer redevelopment land use plans and functions to the City of os ngeles. Background he dissolution of the Community edevelopment gency of os ngeles (C/) under B1x26 took effect on February 1, 2012 in the immediate aftermath of the California upreme Court decision regarding redevelopment in California. he City of os ngeles elected not to become the uccessor gency for the C/, an option included in the dissolution legislation. In the absence of a successor agency, the Governor appointed a three-member governing board as the esignated ocal uthority () to wind down the operations of the former C/. he s primary role is to make payments and to perform other activities related to the C/ s enforceable obligations and otherwise dispose of C assets so that revenues can be shared among taxing entities such as the County, cities, school districts and other special districts. nforceable obligations are defined in B1x26 as bonds, loans required to be repaid pursuant to a repayment schedule, payments required by governmental agencies, judgments or settlements, or contracts necessary for the continued administration and operation of the to the extent permitted by B1x26. 2

4 CPC C Under California edevelopment aw, edevelopment Plans of the former C/ contained significant authority to regulate land use and development within redevelopment project areas, going beyond that of the City Planning epartment. hile b1x26 dissolved redevelopment agencies and thereby eliminated redevelopment s economic and financing tools, it did not abolish the City s existing edevelopment Project reas or eliminate the edevelopment Plans. In June 2012, the tate passed additional legislation related to redevelopment (B 1484) which allowed a city to request that all land use related plans and functions of the former redevelopment agency be transferred to the jurisdiction that authorized the creation of the redevelopment agency. hese plans continue to exist as legal expressions of public policy, adopted by the City Council, and the land use regulations and authorities granted in the Plans remain effective until the expiration date for each plan. he last of os ngeles edevelopment Plans is set to expire in he Plans have continued to be implemented by the few remaining staff within the uccessor gency; however, the no longer has the capacity to adequately administer the plans. herefore, the Plans and their land use regulations need to be transferred to the City, specifically CP, in part to ensure their continued implementation and to seamlessly permit development to take place in those areas. ost of the 21 active edevelopment Plans (able 1) specify that permits cannot be issued without some level of signoff ensuring that development proposals are consistent with the Plans. edevelopment land use approvals are therefore essential to allow property owners and applicants to utilize their full development rights, as well as to ensure community protection through careful review of design, signage, use restrictions, historic preservation and other local priorities in some of the City s most sensitive and economically disadvantaged communities. able 1 Community edevelopment gency Project reas (xpiration ate) delante astside (arch 2031) id City ecovery (ay 2028) Broadway anchester (ecember 2026) onterey ills (July 2015) Central Industrial (ovember 2033) orth ollywood (February 2021) Chinatown (January 2022) Pacific Corridor (ay 2033) City Center (ay 2033) Pico Union 2 (ovember 2017) C 9 Corridors (ecember 2027) Vermont anchester (ay 2028) Crenshaw lauson (ctober 2027) atts Corridors (ovember 2027) Crenshaw (2026) estern lauson (ay 2028) xposition/university Park (2030) estlake ecovery (ay 2030) ollywood (ay 2028) ilshire Center (ecember 2025) arbor ilmington Industrial (July 2018) 3

5 CPC C he proposed resolution and ordinance is the City s official request to effectuate the transfer. Issues he C/ was established in 1948 and for over 60 years has carried out redevelopment activities that included land use oversight for neighborhood improvement and protection. he transition of oversight to CP of land use regulations allows for the continued implementation of adopted edevelopment Plans and creates a continuity of land use controls for some of the most sensitive and economically disadvantaged communities throughout the City. Consolidating all such land use review into the epartment of City Planning also provides an opportunity to align the epartment s land use regulations with long-standing City revitalization goals. he transition of authority to the Planning epartment centralizes the land use planning function in the City that has been housed between the two departments. uring the tenure of the C/, there was an often duplicative development review process between the two agencies. By assuming responsibility for the existing redevelopment plans still in place the transition to a single department will establish a single streamlined development review process in edevelopment Plan reas, create certainty for the development community, and advance development reform and land use permitting efficiency. edevelopment Plan and-use Provisions CP develops and administers overlay zones and specific plans that have provided more tailored land-use requirements for many of os ngeles unique neighborhoods. imilarly, most of the 21 active edevelopment Plans have tailored requirements that specify permits cannot be issued without some level of signoff ensuring that development proposals are consistent with the governing edevelopment Plans. edevelopment Plans and land use review provide important protections for neighborhoods in regards to development scale, use, density, intensity, parking, design, and historic preservation. hese land use tools provide standards for development in many of the City s most economically disadvantaged neighborhoods, in addition to large sections of owntown os ngeles, ollywood, and other employment hubs. uch review may no longer be implemented without the transfer of CP authority to do so. he protections offered in the Plans vary by geography and range from basic land use controls (e.g., prohibiting pole signs and/or incompatible uses) to highly detailed urban design guidelines. xamples include: outh os ngeles outh os ngeles commercial corridors have land use controls regulating auto related uses, design review of new construction, and preserving employment land uses. owntown os ngeles any of owntown s istoric Core neighborhoods receive design review protection 4

6 CPC C and historic preservation review by C/. hile Broadway has a Community esign verlay (C) adopted through the epartment of City Planning, all of the adjacent downtown corridors, including ain treet, pring treet, and ill treets relied upon C/ design review and historic preservation review, which may no longer be implemented. orth ollywood (ppendix ) ll development within orth ollywood underwent design review by C/ to ensure appropriate scale, pedestrian orientation, and uses. here is no design review currently performed by CP for most projects in this area. lthough most plans do not have design guidelines or standards that are as detailed as the orth ollywood edevelopment Plan, many have some level of design review oversight and historic preservation provisions. s a result, CP will have to conduct a fee study to establish a long-term revenue source to cover the City s long-term costs of implementing the land use controls contained within the edevelopment Plans. evelopment ights Conferred by edevelopment Zoning ordinances in key redevelopment areas have granted oversight of density (floor area ratio) controls to C/. In some redevelopment areas, the C/ Board must take action in order to allow developers to maximize property rights. Continued oversight will be needed to ensure that property owners have a legal mechanism to maximize their development rights. Proposed esolution and rdinance esolution he proposed resolution is the first step for CP to assume authority of the existing redevelopment plans land use related provisions. herefore, the City of os ngeles requests, by way of this resolution, that all land use related plans and functions of the former Community edevelopment gency (C/), now under the purview of the esignated ocation uthority (), are transferred to the City of os ngeles in conformance with ection of the California ealth and afety Code, as amended by B he epartment of City Planning would serve as the responsible agency for the continued implementation of the existing 21 active edevelopment Plans, the latest of which expire in s specified in the resolution, CP would have to conduct a fee study to establish a longterm revenue source to cover the City s long-term costs of implementing the land use controls contained within the edevelopment Plans. rdinance he proposed ordinance amends the os ngeles unicipal Code in order for CP staff to immediately begin implementation of active edevelopment Plans upon adoption of the resolution. his would allow for an effective transition of integrating the land use provisions in the edevelopment Plans into CP s entitlement processes. In short, it 5

7 CPC C would promote continuity and consistency in the processing of land use entitlement requests within redevelopment project areas. Public utreach CP staff held a public hearing on arch 12, otice was sent to eighborhood Councils, with a total of 8 individuals attending representing various community stakeholders. wo individuals provided oral testimony and submitted letters on behalf of C/ and ollywood eritage. Comments included: C/ 1. nticipate a swift and seamless transition of land use authority and related records to the City of os ngeles. 2. C/ expects that ongoing coordination with the City of os ngeles detailing the rights and responsibilities of both the City and successor agency will occur and result in a meaningful transfer. ollywood eritage 1. ncourage adequate funding and preparation for short and long term historic preservation planning in ollywood 2. Integrate historic preservation efforts with any potential land use overlay tools including a pecific Plan or istoric Preservation verlay Zone. U FIIG he epartment of City Planning recommends that the City Planning Commission find: General Plan In accordance with Charter ection 556 and 558, the proposed transfer of land use authority from the former C/ to the City Planning epartment is in substantial conformance with the purposes, intent, and provisions of the City s General Plan. he transition of land use authority and oversight from the former C/ to the City Planning epartment is consistent with the City s General Plan. pecifically, the proposed ordinance implements conomic evelopment bjective 7.4 to Improve the provision of governmental services, expedite the administrative processing of development applications in order to evelop and maintain a streamlined development review process (Policy 7.4.1), and to eform municipal service delivery through combining the services provided by various departments (Policy 7.4.4). ach of the redevelopment plans have been adopted by the City and found by both the City Planning Commission and the City Council to be consistent with the City s General Plan. Further, consolidating the land use controls in the redevelopment plans to the City Planning epartment is critical to ensure that the goals of the General Plan are met by maintaining important land use provisions in some of the City s most vulnerable communities and that the City retains local control over land use policy. he proposed ordinance also meets objective 7.8, aintain and improve municipal service levels throughout the city to support current residents quality of life and enable 6

8 CPC C os ngeles to be competitive when attracting desirable new development by creating a predictable and streamlined development process in parts of the City that have historically received less economic development. Charter os ngeles City Charter ection 558 requires that prior to the approval of a resolution related to the regulation of the use of land, City Council make findings that the resolution conforms to public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice. he transition of land use authority from the former C/ to the City Planning epartment makes certain that the edevelopment Plans, which serve as legal expressions of public policy adopted by the City Council, will continue to be implemented to ensure continued community protection in the redevelopment plan areas. Based on the above findings, the resolution to grant land use authority from the former C/ to the City Planning epartment is deemed in substantial conformance with the purposes, intent, and provisions of the City s General Plan, and all applicable provisions of the os ngeles unicipal Code (C) and consistent with public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice. nvironmental Categorical xemption (V C) pursuant to ection of the California tate CQ Guidelines was prepared for the proposed resolution. he nvironmental Clearance is consistent with tate Guidelines and corresponds to os ngeles City CQ Guidelines under Class 20 Changes in rganizations of ocal gencies in that the delegation of authority from the former Community edevelopment gency to the epartment of City Planning consists of changes in the organization or reorganization of local government agencies that do not change the geographical area in which previously existing powers are exercised. he attached Categorical xemption reflects the lead agency s independent judgment and analysis. he records upon which this decision is based are with the epartment of City Planning in oom 667, 200 orth pring treet. Conclusion he proposed resolution and code amendment provides a smooth and predictable path to transition land use authority of edevelopment Plans from the C/ to the epartment of City Planning. ll stakeholders that are impacted by development and uses in redevelopment project areas stand to benefit. he proposal does not change the intent or function of the regulations in the edevelopment Plans; however, it does provide certainty to the development community and neighborhoods that land use rights and controls in redevelopment project areas will continue to be enforced in a clear and consistent manner. 7

9 PPIX CPC C UI, in 1945 the California tate egislature authorized the formation of community redevelopment agencies as a tool to revitalize blighted communities;, in 1948, under this authority the City created the Community edevelopment gency of the City of os ngeles (Former gency) to establish, amend, and terminate various redevelopment plan areas;, in the summer of 2011 the California tate egislature enacted measure B1X 26, which dissolved redevelopment agencies and gave sponsoring cities the option to become the uccessor gency in charge of winding down the Former gency s operations;, on January 11, 2012 the City elected not to become the uccessor gency, and on February 1, 2012 the Governor appointed a esignated ocal uthority (C/) to wind down the Former gency s operations;, on June 27, 2012 the tate passed additional legislation (B 1484) amending ection of the California ealth and afety Code to provide that at the request of the city, county, or city and county, notwithstanding ection 33205, all land use related plans and functions of the former redevelopment agency are hereby transferred to the city, county, or city and county that authorized the creation of a redevelopment agency ;, as of ay 2014, the C/ had 21 active redevelopment plan areas that expire at various dates beginning in the year 2014 and ending in 2033;, transitioning the land use controls in the redevelopment plans to the City is critical to: 1) ensure continuity and certainty for the development community; 2) ensure that the City s economic development goals are achieved; 3) maintain important land use protections in some of the City s most vulnerable communities; and 4) retain local control over land use policy;, in order for the epartment of City Planning (the epartment) to assume the existing redevelopment plans land use related provisions and functions in a manner consistent with current epartment practices and procedures, the epartment will implement redevelopment plans land use controls to conform with the City s land use powers, the City s General Plan, the City s unicipal Code, and other federal and state laws;, in areas of the City where Community Plans are currently being updated, the epartment will incorporate the redevelopment plans land use controls into legislatively adopted Community Plan Implementation verlays, or other land use regulations, wherever possible;, in areas of the City where Community Plans are not currently being updated, the City will administer land use provisions of the Plans and incorporate them into future planning processes;, the epartment will also be responsible for historic preservation activities, consistent with City ordinances, in redevelopment plan areas where the nvironmental Impact eport for the plan area identified eligible historic resources;, the C/ has advised that due to its reduced staffing levels and limited resources, the transfer of land use authority of redevelopment plans to the City should occur immediately; 1

10 PPIX CPC C, the epartment will immediately need additional staff with expertise in epartment policies, practices and procedures to immediately assume all land use related plans and functions of the C/;, F, B I V: 1. he City of os ngeles hereby requests from the C/ that all land use related plans, records, covenants and functions, including the ransfer of Floor rea ights (F) documentation, of the C/ immediately be transferred to the City of os ngeles, as authorized by tate law. 2. he epartment shall implement the existing land use provisions of the redevelopment plans, except: (a) (b) (c) he epartment shall not require an applicant to enter into a isposition and evelopment greement or wnership Participation greement as a condition to a project approval since the epartment has no legal authority to enter into such agreements; he epartment shall not enforce any sign regulation contained within the redevelopment plans that purports to grant a licensing official unfettered discretion; instead, the epartment shall implement the City wide sign regulations, and supplement those regulations with any additional sign prohibitions (such as prohibition on pole signs) contained within the redevelopment plans; and he epartment shall not impose any exactions (including any dedications or development fees) called for in the redevelopment plans, unless those exactions comply with the itigation Fee ct, and other state and federal laws. 3. he epartment shall commence a fee study to establish a long-term revenue source to cover the City s long-term costs of implementing the land use controls contained within the redevelopment plans. P B: J UIZ Councilmember, 14 th istrict C B: 2

11 PPIX B CPC C IC. n ordinance adding or amending ections 11.13, 12.03, 12.04, 12.21, 12.22, 12.24, 13.11, 16.05, and of the os ngeles unicipal Code to remove references to the Community edevelopment gency (C), which was dissolved on February 1, P F CI F G I F: ec.1. ection of the os ngeles unicipal Code is added to read: C CI PPV B CUI VP GC recommendation or approval by the C is not required for entitlements notwithstanding any contrary provision of the Code, any applicable specific plan, supplemental use district, or other land use regulation. ec.2. he definition of owntown esign Guide Project rea in ection of the os ngeles unicipal Code is amended to read as follows: IG GUI PJC. hose portions of the Central City Community Plan rea as shown in the shaded portion of ap, dated pril 30, 2010, and attached to Council File o , generally bounded by: he map is maintained by the epartment of City Planning as part of the Geographic Information ystems database. he map is maintained by the epartment of City Planning as part of its Geographic Information ystems database. U.. ighway 101 on the north, lameda treet on the east, econd treet on the south, and arbor Freeway (110 Freeway) on the west; Fourth and Fifth treets on the north, the alley easterly of ill treet (indley Place), Grand venue, and live treet on the east, lympic Boulevard and James. ood Boulevard on the south, and arbor Freeway (110 Freeway) on the west; lympic Boulevard and leventh treet on the north, Figueroa treet on the east, anta onica Freeway (Interstate 10) on the south, and the arbor Freeway (110 Freeway) on the west; and, inth treet on the north, Crocker treet on the east, welfth treet on the south, and ain treet on the west. ec.3. ection of the os ngeles unicipal Code is amended to add a new definition of nterprise Zone as follows: PI Z. n nterprise Zone shall be that area designated by City Council resolution and which has received approval as such from the California 1

12 PPIX B CPC C epartment of Commerce under the mployment and conomic Incentive ct Program, the nterprise Zone ct Program, or any subsequent tate program. ec.4. he definition of Greater owntown ousing Incentive rea in ection of the os ngeles unicipal Code is amended to read as follows: G UIG ICIV. hose portions of the Central City and outheast Community Plan reas generally bounded by the 101 Freeway on the north, the 110 freeway and Figueroa treet (south of dams Blvd) on the west, lameda and Grand venue (south of 21 st treet) on the east, and ashington Boulevard and artin uther King Jr. Blvd (west of Broadway) on the south as shown in the shaded portions of ap B, dated January 23, 2007, attached to Council File o he map is maintained by the epartment of City Planning as part of itsthe Geographic Information ystems database. ec.5. ection of the os ngeles unicipal Code is amended to add new definitions of Community edevelopment gency, edevelopment Plan and edevelopment Project rea in proper alphabetical order to read as follows: CUI VP GC (C). he former Community edevelopment gency of the City of os ngeles which was dissolved on February 1, VP. plan adopted by ordinance and created by the Community edevelopment gency of the City of os ngeles within a edevelopment Project rea. VP PJC. n area that geographically defines a edevelopment Plan created by the Community edevelopment gency of the City of os ngeles which was dissolved on February 1, Included are those portions of the City of os ngeles shown in the shaded portions of ap C: delante astside (xpires arch 30, 2031); Broadway/anchester (xpires ecember 19, 2026); Council istrict 9 Corridors (xpires ecember 13, 2027); Central Industrial (xpires ovember 15, 2033); Chinatown (xpires January 1, 2022); City Center (xpires ay 15, 2033); Crenshaw (xpires ecember 6, 2026); Crenshaw/lauson (xpires ctober 10, 2027); xposition/university Park (xpires ay 12, 2030); ollywood (xpires ay 7, 2028); arbor/ilmington (xpires July 18, 2018); ittle okyo (xpires February 24, 2014); id-city ecovery (xpires ay 10, 2028); onterey ills (xpires July 29, 2015); orth ollywood (xpires February 21, 2021); Pacific Corridor (xpires ay 1, 2033); Pico Union 2 (xpires ovember 24, 2018); Vermont/anchester (xpires ay 14, 2028); atts Corridors (xpires ovember 15, 2027); estern/lauson (xpires ay 14, 2028); estlake (xpires ay 12, 2030); ilshire Center/Koreatown (xpires ecember 13, 2026). 2

13 PPIX B CPC C his map is maintained by the epartment of City Planning as part of its Geographic Information ystems database. ec.6. ubsection C of ection of the os ngeles unicipal Code is amended to read as follows: C. In order to regulate more adequately and restrict the height and ffloor area of bbuildings and structures, each lot shall include a height district designation. eight district designations shall be numbered from 1 to 4, C 1 to 4, and Z 1 to 4, and C 1 to 4 and shall regulate the height or Ffloor area of bbuildings and structures as provided in ections , and , , and and he height districts and their boundaries are shown on the Zoning ap by a combination of zone symbols and height district number markings such as, e.g., 2-1, C2-2, and 1-3, C1-C1, 2-Z2, C2-C3, etc. here a lot is located in more than one height district, the applicable zone symbol designations shall be separated by a slash mark. e.g., 2-C/C, C2-Z1/C2, etc. he symbol "" preceding height district number markings, when shown on the Zoning ap or used in a zoning ordinance, is an abbreviation for the words "height district." and refers to height districts. he height districts for the "C" Zone are the height districts shown in ection 6 of the Central City est pecific Plan. he height districts for the "P" Zone are height districts shown in ection 7 of the lameda istrict pecific Plan. he height districts for the "C" Zone are height districts shown in ection 7 of the arner Center pecific Plan. he height districts for the "" Zone are the height districts shown on ection 10 of the os ngeles ports and ntertainment istrict pecific Plan. ec.7. ubsection of ection of the os ngeles unicipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:. he boundaries of Community edevelopment Project areas, as geographically defined in ection and as specifically designated on aps numbered 30 to 47; nterprise Zones, as defined in ection and as specifically designated on aps numbered 48 through 50; and Centers tudy reas, as defined in ection , and as specifically designated on aps numbered 1 through 3 and 5 through 28, shall be shown on the Zoning ap. (mended by rd. o. 168,870, ff. 8/9/93.) ec.8. ubparagraph (1) of Paragraph (x) of ubdivision 4 of ubsection of ection of the os ngeles unicipal Code is amended to read as follows: (1) For any project for which an wner Participation greement or eveloper isposition greement has been signed 3

14 PPIX B CPC C between the owner or developer of a project and the Community edevelopment gency and approved by Council before February 28, 1989, the parking required shall be either the number of parking spaces described in the subject agreement, or the parking required by the os ngeles unicipal Code as of February 29, 1989, whichever is greater. (2) otwithstanding any provisions of the os ngeles unicipal Code to the contrary, for any structure designated on the ational egister of istoric pplaces or tate or City list of historical or cultural monuments, no additional parking spaces need be provided in connection with a change of use. evertheless, a decision-making body as part of a discretionary approval related to a change of use may impose conditions requiring additional parking requirements in connection with the change of use. xisting parking for such buildings shall be maintained if the proposed use requires the same or more parking. If the ffloor area of such bbuilding is increased, then parking shall be provided for the increased ffloor area as set forth in ection (4) and he parking requirements for existing buildings set forth in ection (m) 12.21(4)m shall still apply to an historic building and any change of use of that bbuilding. (3) xcept for the owntown Business istrict parking area described in ection (i), in the following described areas there need only be two parking spaces for every one thousand square feet of combined gross ffloor area of commercial office, business, retail, restaurant, bar and related uses, trade schools, or research and development bbuildings on any lot: 1. former Chinatown edevelopment Project rea, delineated by rdinance o. 153,385; 2. former ollywood edevelopment Project rea, delineated by rdinance o. 161,202; 3. former ilshire Center/Koreatown ecovery edevelopment Project rea, delineated by rdinance o. 170,806; 4

15 PPIX B CPC C 4. Central Business istrict edevelopment Project reas delineated by rdinance os. l40,069; 113,231; 135,900; 140,662; 147,480; 5.4. orth ollywood edevelopment Project rea, delineated by rdinance o. 152,030; 6.5. ny nterprise Zone as that term is defined in ection of this Code. 7. (epealed by rd. o. 177,103, ff. 12/18/05.) 8. (epealed by rd. o. 177,103, ff. 12/18/05.) 9. (epealed by rd. o. 177,103, ff. 12/18/05.) 10. (epealed by rd. o. 177,103, ff. 12/18/05.) ec.9. he first unnumbered paragraph of ection of the os ngeles unicipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: o bbuilding or structure shall be erected or enlarged which exceeds the total ffloor area, the number of stories or the height limits hereinafter specified for the district in which the building or structure is located. Provided, however, that with respect to height, bbuildings and structures located within the boundaries of the Century City orth and Century City outh pecific Plans shall comply solely with the requirements of the respective specific pplan and the requirements of ection of this Code;;. that buildings and structures located within Community edevelopment Plan reas shall comply with the requirements of ection of this Code; that buildings and structures located within nterprise Zones shall comply with the requirements of ection of this Code; and that buildings and structures located within Centers tudy reas designated on aps umbered 1 through 29 referred to in ection of this Code, shall comply with the requirements of ection of this Code. uch designations are consistent with the purposes, intent and provisions of the General Plan. ec.10. ubsection of ection of the os ngeles unicipal Code is amended to add ubdivision 11 to read as follows: 11. ithin the boundaries of a former Community edevelopment Project rea for which a edevelopment Plan has been adopted, additional limitations on the height and/or ffloor area of any bbuilding or structure may be required as set forth in each applicable former Community edevelopment Plan. 5

16 PPIX B CPC C ec.11. ection of the os ngeles unicipal Code is hereby amended as follows: ec eight of Buildings or tructures in nterprise Zones. (dded by rd. o. 161,684, ff. 11/3/86.) n nterprise Zone shall be that area designated by City Council resolution and which has received approval as such from the California epartment of Commerce under either the mployment and conomic Incentive ct Program or the nterprise Zone ct Program. ithin the boundaries of nterprise Zones, the height district limitations set forth below in ubsections through F shall apply: ec.12. Paragraphs (a) through (c) of ubdivision 18 of ubsection of ection of the os ngeles unicipal Code is amended to read as follows: (a) ny use permitted in the 5 Zone on any lot in the C, C1, C1.5, C2, C4 or C5 Zones provided that such lot is located within the Central City Community Plan rea or within an area designated on an adopted community plan as egional Center,, or egional Commercial. ny combination of 5 uses and the uses permitted in the underlying commercial zone shall also be permitted on such lot. (b) ny use permitted in the C, C1, C1.5, C2, C4 or C5 Zones on any lot in the 5 Zone provided that the lot is located within a the Central City Community Plan rea. ny combination of these commercial and residential uses shall also be permitted on the lot. Commercial uses or any combination of commercial and residential use may be permitted on any lot in the 5 Zone by conditional use pursuant to ection outside the Central City Community Plan rea. (c) ards. xcept as provided herein, the yard requirements of the zone in which the lot is located shall apply. (1) he yard requirements of the C2 Zone shall apply to bbuildings located on lots in the 5 Zone in a former Community redevelopment pproject area approved by the City Council if such bbuildings are used exclusively for commercial uses. ec.13. Paragraph (a) of ubdivision 3 of ubsection C of ection of the os ngeles unicipal Code is amended to read as follows: (a) o yard requirements shall apply except as required by the Urban esign tandards and Guidelines, as prepared by the Community edevelopment gency and approved by the City Planning Commission. he irector of Planning or his/her 6

17 PPIX B CPC C designee shall stamp and sign the plans showing the required yards. he applicant shall submit the stamped and signed plans to the epartment of Building and afety along with the plans submitted for a building permit ec.14. Paragraphs (b) through (e) of ubdivision 30 of ubsection of ection of the os ngeles unicipal Code is amended to read as follows: (b) efinition of Project. For the purposes of this ubdivision, a Project is the construction, erection, addition to or alteration, of any bbuilding or structure, or a use of land or change of use on a lot located in whole or in part within the areas described in ubparagraph (b) of this ubdivision owntown esign Guide Project rea, as defined in ection and shown on the adopted ordinance map, which requires the issuance of a grading permit, foundation permit, building permit, sign permit or use of land permit. Project does not include any of the following: (1) demolition; (2) adaptive reuse of an existing building which conforms to ection of this Code; (3) remodeling of designated historic resources; (4) alterations of or additions to any existing building or structure in which the aggregate value of the work, in any one 24-month period, is less than 50% of the bbuilding or structure's replacement value before the alterations or additions, as determined by the epartment of Building and afety; and (5) interior remodeling of any other existing bbuilding, unless the interior alterations are to the ground floor and will result in the alteration of windows, display windows, entrances, storefronts or otherwise minimize ground floor transparency. (c) owntown esign Guide. very pproject within the Project rea must comply with the owntown esign Guide standards and guidelines. he irector shall have the authority to review projects for compliance with the owntown esign Guide prior to the issuance of a building permit in the Project rea. (1) xception. Projects conforming to the owntown esign Guide shall be exempt from the mini-shopping center and commercial corner development regulations set forth in ection of this Code. ign ff. (d) dministrative Clearance - uthority of the irector for 7

18 PPIX B CPC C (1) pplication, Form and Contents. o apply for an dministrative Clearance, an applicant shall file an application with the epartment of City Planning, on a form provided by the epartment, and include all information required by the instructions on the application and any additional submission requirements. he irector shall determine if the application qualifies for dministrative Clearance and whether the Project complies with all applicable istrict regulations. (2) pplication Fees. he application fee for an dministrative Clearance shall be as set forth in ection or I of this Code. he fee in ection shall be charged for administrative clearance of new construction permits only. he fee in ection I shall be charged for all other building permit sign-offs. (3) Procedures. pplicants for Projects that comply with the provisions of the owntown esign Guide shall submit plans to the irector for conformance review and administrative sign off in accordance with ection of this Code. he irector or his/her designee shall review the Project for compliance with the standards and guidelines in the owntown esign Guide. Projects that fail to demonstrate compliance with the owntown esign Guide shall follow relief procedures set forth below. (e) djustment - uthority of the irector with ppeals to the rea Planning Commission. If an application fails to conform to the provisions of the owntown esign Guide, the irector or the irector's designee shall have initial decision-making authority to grant an djustment in accordance with ection (a) and with the procedures set forth in ection C.4-6. of this Code. (1) imitations. n djustment shall be limited to deviations from regulations which do not substantially alter the execution or intent of those regulations as applicable to a proposed Project. (2) Findings. he determination by the irector shall include written findings in support of the determination. In order to approve a proposed pproject pursuant to this subsection, the irector must find that: 8

19 PPIX B CPC C (a) here are special circumstances applicable to the pproject or pproject site which makes the strict application of the esign Guide regulations impractical; (b) In granting the adjustment, the irector has imposed pproject requirements and/or decided that the proposed pproject will substantially comply with the purpose and intent of all esign Guide regulations; (c) In granting the adjustment, the irector has considered and found no detrimental effects of the adjustment on surrounding properties and public rights-ofway; (d) he pproject incorporates mitigation measures, monitoring of measures when necessary, or alternatives identified in the environmental review which would mitigate the negative environmental effects of the pproject, to the extent physically feasible; and (e) he pproject is compatible with the neighborhood character of the surrounding district. ec.15. Paragraph (a) of ubdivision 3 of ubsection C of ection of the os ngeles unicipal Code is amended to read as follows: (a) o yard requirements shall apply except as required by the Urban owntown esign Guide as tandards and Guidelines, prepared by the Community edevelopment gency and approved by the City Planning Commission. he irector of Planning or his/her designee shall stamp and sign the plans showing the required yards. he applicant shall submit the stamped and signed plans to the epartment of Building and afety along with the plans submitted for a building permit. ec.16. he sentence beginning with ixed use developments in Paragraph (b) of ubdivision 3 of ubsection of ection of the os ngeles unicipal Code is amended to read as follows: (b) Vesting conditional use permits may be filed for the following conditional uses under the authority of the City Planning Commission, rea Planning Commission, and Zoning dministrator as described in ubsections U, V and : 9

20 PPIX B CPC C ixed use developments in the 5 Zone located in an approved redevelopment project area. ec.17. he definition of conomic ssistance reas in Paragraph (a) of ubdivision 14 of ubsection U of ection of the os ngeles unicipal Code is amended to read as follows: (a) efinitions. For purposes of this ubdivision the following words and phrases are defined as follows: conomic ssistance reas means the existing geographically defined areas: Five tate nterprise Zones, Federal mpowerment Zone, Federal enewal Community Zone, thirtyseven Community active edevelopment gency Project reas, and arthquake Project reas, and a one-mile buffer surrounding each of the above-identified zones, as identified by the Community evelopment epartment and as shown on the "os ngeles conomic ssistance reas" ap, dated January 2004, which is attached to Council File o and is on file in the Community evelopment epartment, and which may be amended from time to time. ec.18. Paragraph (d) of ubdivision 14 of ubsection U of ection of the os ngeles unicipal Code is amended to read as follows: (d) uperstores in conomic ssistance reas (1) dditional Findings. In addition to the findings otherwise required by this ection and set forth in Paragraph (b) of this ubdivision, prior to approval of a uperstore that is located in an conomic ssistance rea, the City Planning Commission or the City Council on appeal shall find, after consideration of all economic benefits and costs, that the uperstore would not materially adversely affect the economic welfare of the Impact rea, based upon information contained in an economic impact analysis report submitted by the applicant, any other information received or obtained by the Community evelopment epartment or the Community edevelopment gency, a recommendation by the Community evelopment epartment, or the Community edevelopment gency pursuant to ubparagraph (3) below, and any other information received before or at a public hearing required by this ection. he phrase "Impact rea" refers to a 10

21 PPIX B CPC C three mile radius surrounding the proposed location of the uperstore. (2) Procedures. n application for approval of a uperstore pursuant to this pparagraph shall follow the procedures for conditional use permits otherwise required by this ection. In addition, the applicant shall prepare and submit the economic impact analysis report referenced in ubparagraph (1) to the Community evelopment epartment or to the Community edevelopment gency, where appropriate, for review in conjunction with its application to the epartment of Planning. he economic impact analysis report shall be reviewed by the epartment or gency and/or a consultant, if deemed necessary by the epartment or gency and paid for in full by the applicant. he Community evelopment epartment and the Community edevelopment gency shall complete its review of the report within 60 days after receipt of the report from the applicant. he report shall identify whether: (i) fforts to establish a market larger than 20,000 square feet within the Impact rea have been unsuccessful or whether the proposed use will have an adverse impact or economic benefit on grocery or retail shopping centers in the Impact rea; (ii) he uperstore would result in the physical displacement of any businesses, and, if so, the nature of the displaced businesses or would create economic stimulation in the Impact rea; (iii) he uperstore would require the demolition of housing, or any other action or change that results in a decrease of extremely low, very low, low or moderate income housing on site; (iv) he uperstore would result in the destruction or demolition of any park or other green space, playground, childcare facility, community center; (v) he uperstore would provide lower in cost and/or higher in quality goods and services to residents than currently available or that are currently unavailable from a 11

22 PPIX B CPC C cost benefit perspective within the Impact rea in which the pproject is proposed to be located; (vi) he uperstore would displace jobs within the Impact rea or provide economic revitalization and/or job creation. For purposes of determining this impact, the applicant must identify the number of jobs displaced or created, the quality of the jobs, whether the jobs are temporary or permanent, and the employment sector in which the lost jobs are located; (vii) he uperstore would have a fiscal impact either positive or negative on City tax revenue; (viii) ny restrictions exist on the subsequent use of the property on which the uperstore is proposed to be located, including the provisions of a lease if applicable, which, in the event the owner or operator of the uperstore vacates the premises, would require the premises to remain vacant for a significant amount of time; (ix) he uperstore will result in any materially adverse or positive economic impacts or blight on the Impact rea; and (x) ny measures are available which will mitigate any materially adverse economic impacts, if any, identified by the applicant, if necessary. (3) ecommendation. he Community evelopment epartment, or the staff of the Community edevelopment gency if the uperstore is proposed to be located in a former redevelopment Project area or in the surrounding one-mile buffer zone, shall review the economic impact analysis report and, after consideration of economic benefits and costs, make a written recommendation as to whether the proposed uperstore will result in a materially adverse economic impact on the Impact rea and, if so, whether conditions are available which will mitigate the economic impact. he written recommendation, including proposed mitigation measures, if any, shall be submitted to the epartment of Planning by the Community evelopment epartment, in accordance with the written procedures on file with the epartment and the gency. 12

23 PPIX B CPC C ec.19. ubparagraph (3) of Paragraph (d) of ubdivision 2 of ubsection V of ection of the os ngeles unicipal Code is amended to read as follows: (1) in eight istrict os. 2, 3 or 4; or (2) not more than 1,500 feet distant from the portal of a fixed rail transit or bus station or other similar transit facility; or (3) within a Community edevelopment Project Plan rea, an nterprise Zone or a Centers tudy rea, as described in ections , , ec.20. ubdivision 7 of ubsection of ection of the os ngeles unicipal Code is hereby deleted. 7. he change of use of the whole or part of any Building for which the original certificate of occupancy was issued prior to eptember 17, 1971, and used in whole or in part for any use permitted in a C Zone to any residential use permitted in the 4 or 5 Zones, provided that the BbBuilding is located in whole or in part on any lot located within the former Central Business istrict edevelopment Project rea, and provided that the density of the residential uses shall not exceed one dwelling unit per 125 square feet of ot area. ec.21. ubdivision 11 of ubsection of ection of the os ngeles unicipal Code is amended to read as follows: 11. C uses in the C1, C1.5, C2, C4, and C5 Zones where located within the boundaries of a former ccommunity redevelopment PpProject area and when the uses conform to the provisions of the applicable former redevelopment PpPlan. ec.22. Paragraph (a) (e) and (f) of ubdivision 19 of ubsection of ection of the os ngeles unicipal Code is amended to read as follows: 19. Floor area ratio averaging in and esidential ensity ransfer in Uunified developments. (mended by rd. o. 182,451, ff. 4/4/13) (a) he averaging of ffloor area ratios may be permitted for BbBuildings which will comprise a unified commercial, industrial or mixed use development in the C or Zones citywide or in the 5 zone within the Central City Community Plan rea, even if BbBuildings on each individual parcel or lot would exceed the permitted FfFloor area 13

24 PPIX B CPC C ratio. owever, the FfFloor area ratio for the unified development when calculated as a whole may not exceed the maximum permitted FfFloor area ratio for the height district in which the unified development is located. (e) Procedures. In addition to the requirements of subsection. through Q. of this section, all persons with an ownership interest in the property requesting ffloor area ratio averaging, residential density transfer, or both, and all persons with mortgage interests, including those persons holding ground leases, must sign the application. current title search shall be submitted with the application to ensure that all persons with an ownership interest in the property have signed the application. (f) Covenant. If the Zoning dministrator approves the ffloor area ratio averaging or residential density transfer, then the applicants shall file a covenant running with the land with the epartment of Building and afety prior to the issuance of any building permits: (2) indicating the FfFloor area used on each parcel and the floor area potential, if any, that would remain; ec.23. ubdivision 28 of ubsection of ection of the os ngeles unicipal Code is amended to read as follows: 28. o permit two or more development incentives pursuant to ection for a ixed Use Project in a ixed Use istrict. In addition to the findings set forth in ection , the Zoning dministrator shall find that the project provides for an arrangement of uses, bbuildings, structures, open spaces and other improvements that are compatible with the scale and character of the adjacent properties and surrounding neighborhood. ec.24. ubsection X of ection of the os ngeles unicipal Code is amended to delete ubdivision odel wellings ithin Council-pproved edevelopment reas. (mended by rd. o. 173,992, ff. 7/6/01.) Prior or subsequent to the recordation of a final tract map, the Zoning dministrator may, upon application for a model dwelling, designate certain lots as sites for the construction of model dwellings, provided that the construction is occurring within the boundaries of a Council-approved Community edevelopment gency project area. In no case, however, shall more than 20 lots in a tract be designated as sites for the construction of models nor shall more than 15% of the lots in a tract or units and 14

25 PPIX B CPC C in no case shall more than 20 units in any proposed building be designated as model sites. he Zoning dministrator may also permit the operation of one sales office within any of the designated model dwellings on the proposed site. In designating certain proposed lots for use as sites for model dwellings or sales offices, the Zoning dministrator may impose any conditions specified in ections and or any other conditions which are appropriate to the particular model dwelling sites or sales offices being considered. In those cases where the Community edevelopment gency is the applicant, there shall be no fee for the designation of a site for the construction of model dwellings; in all other cases the fee, if any, shall be as set forth in this Code. ec.25. ubsection B of ection of the os ngeles unicipal Code is amended to read as follows: B. stablishment of istricts. he procedures set forth in ection shall be followed, however each ign istrict shall include only properties in the C or Zones, except that 5 Zone properties may be included in a ign istrict provided that the 5 zoned lot is located within an area designated on an adopted community plan as a egional Center, egional Commercial, or igh Intensity Commercial, or within any former active redevelopment PpProject area. o ign istrict shall contain less than one block or three acres in area, whichever is the smaller. he total acreage in the district shall include contiguous parcels of land which may only be separated by public streets, ways or alleys, or other physical features, or as set forth in the rules approved by the irector of Planning. Precise boundaries are required at the time of application for or initiation of an individual district. ec.26. ubdivision 1 (e) of ubsection C of ection of the os ngeles unicipal Code is amended to read as follows: C. equirements 1. ite Plan eview. (mended by rd. o. 172,489, ff. 4/16/99.) o grading permit, foundation permit, building permit, or use of land permit shall be issued for any of the following development projects unless a site plan approval has first been obtained pursuant to this section. his provision shall apply to individual projects for which permits are sought and also to the cumulative sum of related or successive permits which are part of a larger project, such as piecemeal additions to a building, or multiple buildings on a lot, as determined by the irector. 15

26 PPIX B CPC C (e) ny residential (including partment otel or mixeduse) building located within the Greater owntown ousing Incentive rea that is not subject to ection of this Code. (dded by rd. o. 179,076, ff. 9/23/07.) ec.27. ubdivision 3 of ubsection of ection of the os ngeles unicipal Code is amended to read as follows:. xemptions 3. ny development pproject located within the boundaries of an adopted edevelopment pproject area shall be exempt from site plan review when: (a) he former Community edevelopment gency of the City of os ngeles (C) and the City Council have approved an owner participation agreement, a disposition and development agreement, a loan agreement, a cooperation agreement or other discretionary agreement for the development project prior to February 1, 2012; and (b) he project has been considered during a public hearing prior to February 1, 2012 conducted in accordance with the former C s adopted policies and procedures for public hearings. (c) he residential (including partment otel or mixed-use) building is within the Greater owntown ousing Incentive rea and has been determined by the Community edevelopment gency (C) to comply with the Urban esign tandards and Guidelines, prepared by the C and approved by the City Planning Commission when the City Planning Commission finds that the guidelines are consistent with the applicable community plans. Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the former C shall certify to the irector and the epartment of Building and afety that the required notification, hearing and agreement have been completed. ec.28. ubdivision 7 of ubsection of ection of the os ngeles unicipal Code is amended to read as follows:. xemptions (7). ny residential (including partment otel or mixed use) building of less than 50 units and/or guestrooms and for mixed use projects less than 50,000 gross square feet of non-residential floor area 16

27 PPIX B CPC C located within the Greater owntown ousing Incentive rea that is not subject to ection of this Code. ec.29. ubdivision 2 of ubsection G of ection of the os ngeles unicipal Code is amended to read as follows: G. Procedure. 2. nvironmental eview. s part of the application for site plan review, the applicant shall file necessary forms and information for environmental review as prescribed by the irector. he irector, or his/her designee, shall cause to be prepared, concurrently with the review and approval of the site plan, the required environmental studies and notices for the PpProject.; except that in the adopted edevelopment project areas, the C shall assume lead gency responsibilities for environmental review of all projects subject to the provisions of this section and shall prepare the required environmental studies and notices. ec. 30. ubdivisions 3 (a) and 3 (b) of ubsection G of ection of the os ngeles unicipal Code is amended to read as follows: 3. otice earing ime imits. (a) he irector shall refer all completed applications for site plan review to affected City departments for their review and report. For projects in adopted edevelopment project areas, the completed applications shall be sent to the dministrator of the C for review and report as to conformity with the adopted edevelopment Plan applicable to the project. esponses shall be returned within fifteen (15) days after receipt, or such other period agreed to by the irector and the affected gency or department. (b) If the irector finds that the matter may have a significant effect on neighboring properties, the irector shall set the matter for public hearing. If the application is set for public hearing, written notice of the hearing shall be sent by First Class ail at least 15 days prior to the hearing to the applicant, owners and tenants of the property involved, owners and tenants of all property within 100 feet of the boundary of the subject site, the City Councilmembers representing the area in which the property is located, the dministrator of the C for projects within an adopted edevelopment project area, and any organization representing property owners or the community in the project vicinity if they request in writing to be notified. otice shall also be given 17

28 PPIX B CPC C by at least one publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, designated for that purpose by the City Clerk, not less than 15 days prior to the date of the hearing. ec.31. ubsection of ection of the os ngeles unicipal code is amended to read as follows:. Composition. he Green Building eam shall be composed of the following officers of the City or their duly authorized representatives: he ayor's ffice, as Chairperson; City Council President, as co-chairperson; Chairperson, nergy and nvironment Committee of the City Council, as cochairperson; Chairperson, Planning and and Use anagement Committee of the City Council, as co-chairperson; Chief egislative nalyst; he irector of Planning; he City ngineer; he uperintendent of Building; he Chief ngineer of the epartment of Fire; he Chief xecutive fficer and General anager of the epartment of ater and Power; he General anager of the nvironmental ffairs epartment; he General anager of the ousing epartment; he irector of the Bureau of anitation of the epartment of Public orks; and he Chief xecutive fficer of the Community edevelopment gency of the City of os ngeles. fficers or their authorized representatives from additional departments shall participate as needed and may include: he City ttorney; 18

29 PPIX B CPC C he General anager of the epartment of ransportation; he irector of the Bureau of treet ervices of the epartment of Public orks; he irector of the ivision of Urban Forestry of the Bureau of treet ervices of the epartment of Public orks; he General anager of the arbor; and he General anager of the os ngeles orld irport. 19

30 CPC C C ICK IG IG P C 3 G 6 I U I C K C G C 8 7 B C K 8 BI C I V U 16 IC F ,000 Feet Prepared by: ystems, GI & Graphics ivision ovember CIG CP P X P U CG Project rea P 2 0 U C owntown esign Guide Implementation rea G IFF I I 1 P 2 UC CK C I I FC P V B V 1 5 P V JU I P 2 8 P IC B B V 1 2 B V G G B I 2 PI C I V F G 2 3 V B 7 I P C PI 25 B V C P 15 B K P B G 5 24 F B P F IG U IG G G I I IV C B K I I C V C C I G 23 FIGU G BIG B V V 2 C I 9 28 B PIC V G I B I C F K P 5 3 B 4 CI C 21 I I P IV 9 IC 22 G BV B G U B P U V P IC 9 V UC U C F CI C G V G V I C 12 C I I J CK IX B 2 I F C G I 8 U B B V B I U V ICU B C C PU B C IC I I 4 12 V I F B B IX I V C V G I C B G P 7 8 P 5 3 F J. B V 10 Z V F 3 C I 8 IG B I 4 C 5 B I IG V 4 P G C G P G BU I 1 I G FI K U B C I I B B P U B I I B IX F G UC F U BI I C G I U P B I B UC U B I V U B I G U K VI I VI G C V B P U I V B FF I C F P I P & FIGU V G I 2 F P IG U 6 3 B VU C U U B CK C UG I U G BV B V B V CUCI K rdinance o. C V PPIX B - ap

31 43 43 G 7 X P V 0 20 I U KIG, BI C C K P B P UC C CK C K B G G I K B V V C P U 41 V C 1,000 C K I V P G C JU I G G U IG V B P I G F B CI C IV B B I C C G F K C P I C G F C BU B B I V G 7 GU G I I P B U FI B G G 3 21 I 8 B P Incentive rea J B V Prepared by: ystems, GI & Graphics ivision ovember ,000 Feet 2 I 1 G I C I B I B I U U C U BI I F I G P U BIX G UC B IX G I F I C I J CK B V IG IG P C I F IGU B I B G VI F I I IG U C V I K VI V VI K I I VI K V B U B C P K I K B V G I U V P U G G V U I I B KV BV P C B U B IX F I K U U V U U I B U I PI I B B V KP I F P CC V C G V VI K G C P V I I C 8 C I I F G G B C V Z C C G V F I Z C C P C CU I K U 3 I 4 C ICK C IUI P KG V B C V V B P CIG U C G BC F F C F J 1 0 U I G FIGU 12 4 G BC G BC 11 V I B V P C G I VI C V BV G I V P 5 P U I I I V 2 B IF FI 2 Greater owntown ousing Incentive rea G P IV U I U P CKI P BV BZ F C I I I B G K C P C P P U P Z I B F FIGU U 4 P 43 I 42 B V C IC BV I I C C P F CCK B IV G B F & I 40 1 C 38 I U KIG, J BV B V C 4 C C P G CG 37 FI P V B G C PI V 5 BU K B V 7 42 F 41 U 40 B V I PI F 1 8 B FIG U G I IU F 45 F J 1 I 2 8 B V V PIC IG 36 rdinance o B F G 29 I V B V V B XPII PK B U 30 C U U 37 IC F PIC 9 33 PIC VU B V 31 9 V 9 C Z C C CC J FF V B C IC U IC C C B V I F I FIGU 41 U 10 8 I F C VU U I 11 IG B V V B V I I C G 12 C B 22 6 I I P 2 7 I U B CK U P FCI BV V 14 C VI 5 CUCI C G C V U GV P PPIX B - P B CPC C P UC U CI U BIG 5 P 6 FC 7 B U

32 BVI IG G V BV G BV V I CVI G 54 I FI F BB BV F PK C U P P G F BV II F II BV 5 B BV U FI BV BIG UJUG C K C BV PG C BV I CG IK FF ZZ C VI U FF IG FX VP PI B GK BV 5 BB UXF U BV U C 210 UU V CIC BV IC VU V U BV F KI BV VI V VIC BV FBK VU F X I K 405 GI BV BUBK BV «14 PG C BV City of os ngeles edevelopment Project reas 0 1, delante astside edevelopment Project PCIFIC C 2, Broadway / anchester ecovery edevelopment Project 3, Central Industrial edevelopment Project 4, Chinatown edevelopment Project 5, City Center edevelopment Project 6, Council istrict 9 edevelopment Project 7, Crenshaw / lauson edevelopment Project 8, Crenshaw edevelopment Project - mended 9, xposition / University Park edevelopment Project 10, ollywood edevelopment Project VU BV IG F U 11, os ngeles arbor / ilmington Industrial Park edevelopment Project 12, id City ecovery edevelopment Project 13, onterey ills edevelopment Project 14, orth ollywood edevelopment Project 15, Pacific Corridor edevelopment Project 16, Pico Union 2 edevelopment Project 17, Vermont / anchester ecovery edevelopment Project 18, atts Corridors ecovery edevelopment Project 19, estern / lauson edevelopment Project 20, estlake ecovery edevelopment Project 21, ilshire Center / Koreatown edevelopment Project iles Copyright 2010 homas Brothers aps, Inc. Prepared By: ystems, GI & Graphics ivision pril 2014 PUV BV BV 405 VIC BV PCIFIC BU VIC BV BV G BV IC BV PZ G BV IG BV PIG VI 10 I X CUV BV BV G BV IPI IG CI C PK PIC BV I F C C PIC BV IC F JFF BV IC B V C C VIC BV PUV BV IJ BV U C BV BU B BV IP BV IPI CIG BV VIC BV CIG BV CI 405 CU BV II BV 105 FIFX FIFX PK U «12 IG BV «12 B CK B BV B CUG BV C BV PIC BV VI 3 II BV 10 FKI «12 «12 «12 «8 JFF BV V «7 «10 «19 FC BV XPII BV U 190 I 223 PUV BV P I 9 25 «21 U PCIFIC 110 C BV G F I BV GFF GFF P FIZ BV B PCIFIC FIGU BV BV F & I « F B BV BC G F «20 V G V FC I BV 105 G FC G BV 1 4 IV JFF BV V C BIG BV CU BV PCIFIC C IIG BV B I I V K BV 6 BV P «6 «6 «17 «9 «15 «2 BV C CP I «11 «5 I « «18 «18 «18 VUG 6 F B G CK BV 26 BI F 1 IG F PCIFIC C I I F F F «3 I «1 P II C BV K BV 110 B G 4 II BV F VU F UIG PIC BV FIGU V BV «1 FIGU P F «13 UIG I B 10 II

33