Resolution No

Transcription

1 EXHIBIT A Page 1 of 7 Resolution No RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTH ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS THAT CONFIRMS THE GRANTING OF TWO EASEMENTS TO IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT IS NOT NEW INFORMATION REQUIRING REVISIONS TO THE FINAL JOINT PROGRAM FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT/ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE DISPOSAL AND REUSE OF THE MCAS TUSTIN AND THE MCAS TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN/REUSE PLAN, AND RELATED COUNTY EXCHANGE AGREEMENT ADDENDUM, AND DOES NOT RESULT IN NEW SIGNIFICANT OR AN INCREASE IN THE SEVERITY OF PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS IN THIS EIR/EIS AND ADDENDUM, AND APPROVING GRANTING OF TWO EASEMENTS TO IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT March 27, 2017 WHEREAS, the City of Tustin ( City ) and United States Department of Navy ( Navy ) completed a joint planning document for reuse of the former Marine Corps Air Station ( MCAS Tustin ) called the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan dated October 1996, as amended by the Errata dated September The Reuse Plan is a part of the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan and consists of Chapters 1, 2 (excluding 2.17) and 5 of the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan; and, WHEREAS, the City and Navy completed a Final Joint Program Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report for the Disposal and Reuse of the MCAS Tustin and the MCAS Tustin Reuse Plan dated October 1996, as amended by the Errata dated September 1998 ( Initial FEIS/EIR ) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act ( NEPA ) and California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA ). According to the Initial FEIS/EIR, section 1.5.2, the Initial FEIS/EIR serves as a program environmental impact report and is intended to be used as the CEQA compliance document for all public and private actions taken to, or in furtherance of, the MCAS Tustin Reuse Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Initial FEIS/EIR was certified as adequate and complete under CEQA and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ( MMRP ) that was adopted by the Tustin City Council on January 16, 2001, and a Record of Decision ( ROD ) was issued by the Navy on March 2, 2001, approving the Initial FEIS/DEIR and the MCAS Tustin Reuse Plan; and, WHEREAS, in May 2002, the Navy agreed to convey 1,153 acres of MCAS Tustin to the City by federal deeds as an economic development conveyance ( EDC ) under the terms of the Agreement Between The United States of America and the City of Tustin, California, for the Conveyance of a Portion of the Former Marine Corps Air Station Tustin as amended (as so amended, the Federal Conveyance Agreement ); and, WHEREAS, pursuant to the Federal Conveyance Agreement, a portion of the MCAS Tustin was conveyed by federal deeds from the Navy to the City on May 13, 2002; and, Page 1 of 7

2 EXHIBIT A Page 2 of 7 WHEREAS, a portion of MCAS Tustin is leased to the City by the Navy under the Lease In Furtherance of Conveyance Between the United States of America and The City of Tustin, California For Portions of the Former Marine Corps Air Station Tustin ( LIFOC ) dated May 10, 2002; and, WHEREAS, the South Orange County Community College District ( District or SOCCCD ) is entitled under section of the Federal Conveyance Agreement to acres of real property known in the Federal Conveyance Agreement as Parcel 1 (less the twenty-two acre portion set aside for Rancho Santiago Community College District, RSCCD ) and the northern portion of Parcel 19 ( Property ) at the former MCAS Tustin in the City; and, WHEREAS, the City and District entered into that certain Agreement Between the City of Tustin and the South Orange County Community College District for the Conveyance of a Portion of MCAS Tustin and the Establishment of an Advanced Technology Education Campus, dated April 22, 2004 (the Conveyance Agreement ). On April 5, 2004, the City Council adopted Resolution No for the Conveyance Agreement finding that Conveyance Agreement and establishment of the Advanced Technology Education Park ( ATEP ) are within the scope of the previously approved Initial FEIS/EIR as well as the Specific Plan/Reuse Plan and that the environmental effects were examined in the Initial FEIS/EIR; and, WHEREAS, the City and District entered into the Agreement Between the City of Tustin and the South Orange County Community College District for the Conveyance of a Portion of MCAS Tustin and the Establishment of an Advanced Technology Education Campus, dated April 22, 2004 (the City Conveyance Agreement ). On April 5, 2004, the City Council adopted Resolution No for the Conveyance Agreement finding that Conveyance Agreement and establishment of the Advanced Technology Education Park is within the scope of the previously approved Initial FEIS/EIR as well as the Specific Plan/Reuse Plan and that the environmental effects were examined in the Initial FEIS/EIR; and, WHEREAS, the City, acting in its capacity as the Local Redevelopment Authority ( LRA ) for the disposition and conveyance of portions of the former MCAS Tustin, conveyed fee title to acres of the Property and personal property to the District by the Quitclaim Deed and Environmental Restriction Pursuant to Civil Code section 1471 dated April 22, 2004, ( City Quitclaim Deed ) and the Bill of Sale For Former Military Personal Property Located at the Former Marine Corps Air Station, Tustin ( Bill of Sale ) dated April 22, 2004; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to the Sublease Between the City of Tustin and the South Orange County Community College District for a Portion of MCAS Tustin dated April 29, 2004 ( Sublease ), the City has leased the remaining acres of the Property to the District and will convey fee title to such remaining portion when the Navy conveys fee title to such portion of the Property to the City; and, WHEREAS, on October 18, 2011, the City approved by Ordinance No Specific Plan Amendment No to the Specific Plan/Reuse Plan to implement that certain Agreement for the Exchange of Real Property between the County of Orange and District dated February 7, 2012 as amended (as amended the County Exchange Agreement ); and, WHEREAS, on December 5, 2011, the District certified an Addendum dated December 2011 to the FEIS/EIR by Resolution No ( County Exchange Agreement Addendum ) for the Page 2 of 7

3 EXHIBIT A Page 3 of 7 County of Orange and the District to execute the County Exchange Agreement to enable the County to develop an animal care center and to provide the District with a more rational and usable configuration of property for its proposed development of the ATEP Site; and, WHEREAS, on December 5, 2011, the District approved by Resolution No the County Exchange Agreement; and, WHEREAS, the District and County subsequently executed an Amended and Restated Land Exchange Agreement for the Exchange of Real Property SOCCCD and the County of Orange ( Restated County Exchange Agreement ) and a ground lease agreement that makes minor modifications to the County Exchange Agreement previously approved by the Board on December 5, 2011 by Resolution No ; and, WHEREAS, based on the analysis in the Environmental Initial Study and Checklist, SOCCCD determined that the potential impacts of the Restated County Exchange Agreement were previously analyzed in or are substantially similar to the impacts analyzed in the FEIS/EIR and County Exchange Agreement Addendum; and, WHEREAS, Irvine Ranch Water District ( IRWD ) requested that the District grant two easements to IRWD upon certain portions of the District s Advanced Technology and Education Park Site ( Easements ). The Grants of Easements, together with legal descriptions and maps depicting the locations of the Easements are attached hereto as Exhibits A and B and incorporated herein (the Grants of Easements ); and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Education Code section et seq., the governing board of a community college district may convey to a public corporation, or private corporation engaged in the public utility business, for utility purposes any real property belonging to such community college district upon such terms and conditions as the parties thereto may agree; and, WHEREAS, the District desires to provide the Easements to IRWD for underground facilities and appurtenances for the water and sewer pipelines and access purposes to the terms and conditions set forth in the Grants of Easements; and, WHEREAS, the District conducted an environmental review of above action pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, section 15002, subdivision (k) known as the Three Step Process under CEQA and determined that this action is a Project pursuant to CEQA; and WHEREAS, the Project will be approved, carried out, and implemented by the District and its agents, IRWD and its agents, and the County and its agents. The District is the Lead Agency under CEQA in connection with the District s approval of the Project; and, WHEREAS, the Project is consistent with the General Plan, Specific Plan/Reuse Plan as revised, Development Agreement and Restated Conveyance Agreement, the Planning Framework that was approved by the Board on June 22, 2015, and the Restated County Exchange Agreement; and, WHEREAS, based on its analysis, the District determined that the Project was previously analyzed in the FEIS/EIR and County Exchange Agreement Addendum, and that none of the conditions identified in Public Resources Code section or section of the CEQA Guideless apply. The Project will not have any effects that are not already examined in the previously Page 3 of 7

4 EXHIBIT A Page 4 of 7 certified FEIS/EIR and County Exchange Agreement Addendum, there are no new mitigation measures required and there are no new significant adverse project-specific or cumulative impacts in any environmental areas, nor will any project-specific or cumulative impacts in any environmental areas be made worse as a result of implementing the Project; and, WHEREAS, the FEIS/EIR addressed a reasonable range of alternatives for the Tustin Legacy Project. The City is implementing Alternative 1 of the FEIS/EIR, and there is no information indicating that the City should have implemented a different Alternative or that a different Alternative is feasible. Consistent with section of the CEQA Guidelines, which addresses projects that are consistent with a community plan or zoning, there is no need to address new alternatives in this Environmental Initial Study and Checklist. Additionally, there are no circumstances cited in Section of the State CEQA Guidelines that require preparation of a subsequent EIR relative to alternatives; and, WHEREAS, all feasible mitigation measures identified in the FEIS/EIR that are applicable to the Project are incorporated into subsequent actions that the District commits to fully implement; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15168, subdivision (c), there are no new effects that could occur, and no new mitigation measures are required for the Project; and, WHEREAS, the previously certified FEIS/EIR and County Exchange Agreement Addendum are adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for the Project and its implementation, and satisfy all of the requirements and obligations of CEQA; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Education Code section 81311, on February 27, 2017, the Members of the District s Board of Trustees in attendance at the regularly scheduled open meeting unanimously adopted Resolution No in which the Board declared its intention to enter into the Grants of Easements to IRWD; and, WHEREAS, the District provided adequate notice in Resolution No in accordance with Education Code section that the Board of Trustees intended to conduct a public hearing on March 27, 2017, at 6:30 p.m. at Marguerite Parkway, Mission Viejo, California in Board Room HS 145 to determine if the terms of the Grants of Easement to IRWD are acceptable to the District. WHEREAS, pursuant to Education Code section 81312, the District posted copies of the Resolution signed by the Board of Trustees in three public places in the District not less than ten (10) days before the Public Hearing, and published notice once, not less than five days before the Public Hearing, in a local newspaper; and WHEREAS, the above public notice also stated the District Board of Trustees intention to rely on the previously certified FEIS/EIR and County Exchange Agreement Addendum for CEQA compliance for purposes of its adoption and implementation of the Project. The public notice informed the public that the District s proposed activities are within the scope of the previously certified FEIS/EIR and County Exchange Agreement Addendum, and that these documents adequately describes the District s activities for the purposes of CEQA. The public notice also notified the public that all interested persons are invited to attend the public hearing and express opinions about the Project and CEQA compliance related thereto; and, Page 4 of 7

5 EXHIBIT A Page 5 of 7 WHEREAS, pursuant to Education Code section 81313, on March 27, 2017, at a regular meeting of the District s Board, the District held a Public Hearing upon the question of entering into the Grants of Easements to IRWD; and, WHEREAS, no petition pursuant to Education Code section has been filed with the District s Board; and, WHEREAS, the record of proceedings upon which the Board of Trustees bases the findings in this Resolution is available from custodian of the record of proceedings: Dr. Debra Fitzsimons, Vice Chancellor, South Orange County Community College District, Marguerite Parkway, Mission Viejo, California, NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Trustees of the South Orange County Community College District DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE and ORDER as follows: 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct, and are hereby adopted in their entirety as set forth above. 2. That on March 27, 2017, the Board of Trustees held a duly noticed public meeting at which time the public was given the opportunity to comment on the CEQA determination and Project. 3. Before considering certification of the CEQA determination and project approval, the District Board of Trustees has fully considered comments made by any party submitting verbal or written comments on any documents before the Board of Trustees. 4. The Board of Trustees has independently reviewed and considered the environmental analysis in conjunction with the Navy s ROD, the FEIS/EIR, the MMRP, County Exchange Agreement Addendum, and all of the other documents that compose the entire record before the Board of Trustees, and all comments made during the public meeting, before the Board of Trustees made a decision on the District s adoption and implementation of the Project. 5. The Board of Trustees, based upon its independent review and consideration of the facts and requirements of CEQA, has determined with certainty, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, that: A. The Project and its implementation were examined in light of the FEIS/EIR and County Exchange Agreement Addendum and it is determined that the Project and its implementation have already been adequately analyzed in the FEIS/EIR and County Exchange Agreement Addendum; B. There are no substantial changes proposed by the Project and the circumstances under which the Project will be implemented and undertaken that have the potential to cause new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects, and that there is no new information of substantial importance that affects the analysis in the FEIS/EIR, its mitigation measures, and the County Exchange Agreement Addendum; Page 5 of 7

6 EXHIBIT A Page 6 of 7 C. The adoption and implementation of the Project will not have any effects that are not already examined in the FEIS/EIR and County Exchange Agreement Addendum, there are no new mitigation measures required and there are no new significant adverse project-specific or cumulative impacts in any environmental areas that are identified, nor will any project-specific or cumulative impacts in any environmental areas be made worse as a result of implementing the Project; D. That there is no possibility that the adoption and implementation of the Project may have a significant effect on the environment; E. All feasible mitigation measures identified in the FEIS/EIR that are applicable to the Project and its implementation are incorporated into subsequent actions that the District commits to fully implement; F. There is no information indicating that the City should implement a different Alternative or that a different Alternative is feasible for the Specific Plan/Reuse Plan; G. The Project and its implementation does not propose substantial changes which will require major revisions to the FEIS/EIR due to new or substantially more severe significant environmental effects than previously analyzed in the FEIS/EIR; H. There are no substantial changes in circumstances under which the Project will be implemented and undertaken that will require major revisions to the FEIS/EIR due to new or substantially more severe significant environmental effects than previously analyzed in the FEIS/EIR; I. No new information of substantial importance as described in subsection (a)(3) of Section of the CEQA Guidelines has been revealed that will require major revisions to the FEIS/EIR or its conclusions as the result of the Project and its implementation; J. None of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines section exist and trigger the need to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR to evaluate Project impacts or mitigation measures with regard to the Project. Specifically, there have not been: (1) changes to the Project that require major revisions of the previous FEIS/EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects; (2) substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that require major revisions of the previous FEIS/EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects; or (3) the availability of new information of substantial importance relating to significant effects or mitigation measures or alternatives that was not known and could not have been known when the FEIS/EIR was certified as complete; and, K. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15168, subdivision (c), there are no new effects that could occur as the result of the adoption and implementation of the Project, and no new mitigation measures are required for the adoption and implementation of the Project. Page 6 of 7

7 EXHIBIT A Page 7 of 7 6. Therefore, the Board of Trustees finds and determines that the previously certified FEIS/EIR and County Exchange Agreement Addendum are adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for the adoption and implementation of the Project, and satisfy all of the requirements of CEQA. 7. That the Board of Trustees does hereby ratify and adopt the mitigation measures identified in the FEIS/EIR that are applicable to the Project. 8. The Notice of Determination for the Project will be filed with the Orange County Clerk and the State Clearinghouse immediately following the Board of Trustees certification of the CEQA Determination and approval of the Project. 9. That the District s Board hereby determines that the District is in compliance with all relevant sections of the Education code and all other applicable laws. 10. Prior to the approval of the Project, the District s Board of Trustees certified the CEQA Determination. 11. The District s Board authorizes and directs the President of the Board to execute the Grants of Easements and take whatever other actions is necessary to complete the granting of the Easements to IRWD. 12. The District s Board further hereby authorizes the Interim Chancellor and appropriate District officials to take all such actions as are necessary to properly effectuate, consummate, and implement Project including making minor revisions necessary to carry out the Board s approval. PASSED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Trustees of the South Orange County Community College District, Orange County, State of California, on March 27, Timothy Jemal, President James R. Wright, Vice President Dabid B. Lang, Clerk Marcia Milchiker, Member T.J. Prendergast III, Member Barbara J. Jay, Member Terri Whitt, Member Debra L. Fitzsimons, Interim Chancellor And Secretary to the Governing Board Page 7 of 7

8 Recording Requested by and Return to: Ray Thatcher, District R/W Agent Irvine Ranch Water District Sand Canyon Avenue P. O. Box Irvine, California IRWD Doc. E ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO(S).: , 21 EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT B Page 1 of 6 FREE RECORDING REQUESTED: (SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER S USE) Essential to Acquisition By Irvine Ranch Water District Exempt from Documentary Transfer Tax per Government Code 6103 Revenue and Taxation Code GRANT OF EASEMENT TO IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT BY SOUTH ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, SOUTH ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT ("Owner" herein), hereby grants and conveys to IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT, a California Water District organized under and existing pursuant to Section et seq. of the California Water Code, ("Grantee" herein), a perpetual, non-exclusive easement and right-of-way for water and sewer pipelines and access purposes. This easement shall include, but not by way of limitation, the right to construct, reconstruct, remove and replace, renew, inspect, maintain, repair, improve, enter upon, and otherwise use the hereinafter described property for these purposes, together with incidental appurtenances and connections, in, over, under, upon, along, through and across the real property located in the City of Tustin, County of Orange, State of California, as described in Exhibit "A" and depicted in Exhibit "B", which exhibits are attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Easement Area"), as necessary in connection with the use, operation and maintenance of the facilities lying within the Easement Area. This easement shall also include the right to construct, reconstruct, remove and replace, renew, inspect, maintain, repair, improve, enter upon, and otherwise use parallel or any other facilities or appurtenances of the same general type and purpose as the originally installed facilities (collectively, the originally installed facilities and any such parallel or other facilities, and any replacements, renewals, repairs and improvements of any of the foregoing are collectively referred to as the "Facilities"). Subject to: Covenants, conditions, restrictions, easements, rights, rights-of-way and encumbrances of record or apparent. A. Rights of Owner to Use Easement Area: 1. Rights of Use. Subject to the provisions of Paragraph A-2 below, it is understood and agreed that the easements and rights-of-way acquired herein are also acquired subject to the rights of the Owner to use the Easement Area for any purpose whatsoever to the extent that such use does not interfere with the Grantee's use of its easement. The Owner retains the rights which are not inconsistent with the easement. Such use by the Owner shall include, but not be limited to, the compatible use for streets, roadways, pipelines, fences or block walls, cuts, fills or other structures or other compatible improvements under, upon, over, and across the Easement Area. Project OC Animal Care Facility, Pcl. 1-E-1.1, LLA No. LLA (IRWD Code 6893) Title Company none Title Report No. vesting deed Inst. No , O.R. Project Engineer Tait FORM SF (5-2003) 6893WEsmt-1.docx

9 EXHIBIT B Page 2 of 6 2. Concurrence of Grantee. Such use by the Owner of the Easement Area for landscaping purposes which do not involve the erection of structures or other improvements upon the Easement Area and which are consistent with the Grantee's use of the easement may be made without notification to or concurrence of Grantee except that no trees shall be planted in said Easement Area without the prior written consent of Grantee. Further, such use by the Owner of the Easement Area for roadway improvements, which do not result in cuts closer than three (3) feet above the top of Grantee's Facilities or fills greater than two (2) feet above the existing ground may be made without notification to or concurrence of Grantee. It is agreed, however, that no such use for any other purposes shall be made until plans for such proposed use by Owner have been reviewed with or submitted to Grantee, and Grantee has concurred that such proposed use will be consistent with Grantee's use of the Facilities. Grantee agrees that it shall not unreasonably withhold its concurrence. B. Successors and Assigns: This Grant of Easement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of Owner and Grantee. C. Acceptance and Recordation: Grantee agrees, by acceptance and recordation of this Grant of Easement from Owner, that the terms and conditions herein set forth shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of Grantee. IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Grant of Easement has been executed this day of, 20. "Owner" COLLEGE DISTRICT SOUTH ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY By Name Title: Dr. Debra L. Fitzsimons Interim Chancellor By Name Title: Project OC Animal Care Facility, Pcl. 1-E-1.1, LLA No. LLA (IRWD Code 6893) Title Company none Title Report No. vesting deed Inst. No , O.R. Project Engineer Tait FORM SF (5-2003) 6893WEsmt-1.docx - 2 -

10 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT EXHIBIT B Page 3 of 6 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. STATE OF ) ) COUNTY OF ) On, 20, before me,, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public in and for said State (SEAL) Project OC Animal Care Facility, Pcl. 1-E-1.1, LLA No. LLA (IRWD Code 6893) Title Company none Title Report No. vesting deed Inst. No , O.R. Project Engineer Tait FORM SF (5-2003) 6893WEsmt-1.docx - 3 -

11 EXHIBIT B Page 4 of 6 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by deed or grant dated from SOUTH ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT to IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT, a California Water District, is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer on behalf of the Board of Directors pursuant to authority conferred by Resolution of the Board of Directors, adopted on September 8, 2014, and the grantee consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. Date: IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT By: Leslie Bonkowski Secretary to Board of Directors Project OC Animal Care Facility, Pcl. 1-E-1.1, LLA No. LLA (IRWD Code 6893) Title Company none Title Report No. vesting deed Inst. No , O.R. Project Engineer Tait FORM SF (5-2003) 6893WEsmt-1.docx - 4 -

12 EXHIBIT B Page 5 of 6

13 EXHIBIT B Page 6 of 6

14 Recording Requested by and Return to: Ray Thatcher, District R/W Agent Irvine Ranch Water District Sand Canyon Avenue P. O. Box Irvine, California IRWD Doc. E ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO(S).: , 21 EXHIBIT C EXHIBIT C Page 1 of 6 FREE RECORDING REQUESTED: (SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER S USE) Essential to Acquisition By Irvine Ranch Water District Exempt from Documentary Transfer Tax per Government Code 6103 Revenue and Taxation Code GRANT OF EASEMENT TO IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT BY SOUTH ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, SOUTH ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT ("Owner" herein), hereby grants and conveys to IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT, a California Water District organized under and existing pursuant to Section et seq. of the California Water Code, ("Grantee" herein), a perpetual, non-exclusive easement and right-of-way for water and sewer pipelines and access purposes. This easement shall include, but not by way of limitation, the right to construct, reconstruct, remove and replace, renew, inspect, maintain, repair, improve, enter upon, and otherwise use the hereinafter described property for these purposes, together with incidental appurtenances and connections, in, over, under, upon, along, through and across the real property located in the City of Tustin, County of Orange, State of California, as described in Exhibit "A" and depicted in Exhibit "B", which exhibits are attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Easement Area"), as necessary in connection with the use, operation and maintenance of the facilities lying within the Easement Area. This easement shall also include the right to construct, reconstruct, remove and replace, renew, inspect, maintain, repair, improve, enter upon, and otherwise use parallel or any other facilities or appurtenances of the same general type and purpose as the originally installed facilities (collectively, the originally installed facilities and any such parallel or other facilities, and any replacements, renewals, repairs and improvements of any of the foregoing are collectively referred to as the "Facilities"). Subject to: Covenants, conditions, restrictions, easements, rights, rights-of-way and encumbrances of record or apparent. A. Rights of Owner to Use Easement Area: 1. Rights of Use. Subject to the provisions of Paragraph A-2 below, it is understood and agreed that the easements and rights-of-way acquired herein are also acquired subject to the rights of the Owner to use the Easement Area for any purpose whatsoever to the extent that such use does not interfere with the Grantee's use of its easement. The Owner retains the rights which are not inconsistent with the easement. Such use by the Owner shall include, but not be limited to, the compatible use for streets, roadways, pipelines, fences or block walls, cuts, fills or other structures or other compatible improvements under, upon, over, and across the Easement Area. Project OC Animal Care Facility, Pcl. 1-E-1.1, LLA No. LLA (IRWD Code 6893) Title Company none Title Report No. vesting deed Inst. No , O.R. Project Engineer Tait FORM SF (5-2003) 6893WEsmt-2.docx

15 EXHIBIT C Page 2 of 6 2. Concurrence of Grantee. Such use by the Owner of the Easement Area for landscaping purposes which do not involve the erection of structures or other improvements upon the Easement Area and which are consistent with the Grantee's use of the easement may be made without notification to or concurrence of Grantee except that no trees shall be planted in said Easement Area without the prior written consent of Grantee. Further, such use by the Owner of the Easement Area for roadway improvements, which do not result in cuts closer than three (3) feet above the top of Grantee's Facilities or fills greater than two (2) feet above the existing ground may be made without notification to or concurrence of Grantee. It is agreed, however, that no such use for any other purposes shall be made until plans for such proposed use by Owner have been reviewed with or submitted to Grantee, and Grantee has concurred that such proposed use will be consistent with Grantee's use of the Facilities. Grantee agrees that it shall not unreasonably withhold its concurrence. B. Successors and Assigns: This Grant of Easement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of Owner and Grantee. C. Acceptance and Recordation: Grantee agrees, by acceptance and recordation of this Grant of Easement from Owner, that the terms and conditions herein set forth shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of Grantee. IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Grant of Easement has been executed this day of, 20. "Owner" COLLEGE DISTRICT SOUTH ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY By Name Title: Dr. Debra L. Fitzsimons Interim Chancellor By Name Title: Project OC Animal Care Facility, Pcl. 1-E-1.1, LLA No. LLA (IRWD Code 6893) Title Company none Title Report No. vesting deed Inst. No , O.R. Project Engineer Tait FORM SF (5-2003) 6893WEsmt-2.docx - 2 -

16 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT EXHIBIT C Page 3 of 6 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. STATE OF ) ) COUNTY OF ) On, 20, before me,, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public in and for said State (SEAL) Project OC Animal Care Facility, Pcl. 1-E-1.1, LLA No. LLA (IRWD Code 6893) Title Company none Title Report No. vesting deed Inst. No , O.R. Project Engineer Tait FORM SF (5-2003) 6893WEsmt-2.docx - 3 -

17 EXHIBIT C Page 4 of 6 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by deed or grant dated from SOUTH ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT to IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT, a California Water District, is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer on behalf of the Board of Directors pursuant to authority conferred by Resolution of the Board of Directors, adopted on September 8, 2014, and the grantee consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. Date: IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT By: Leslie Bonkowski Secretary to Board of Directors Project OC Animal Care Facility, Pcl. 1-E-1.1, LLA No. LLA (IRWD Code 6893) Title Company none Title Report No. vesting deed Inst. No , O.R. Project Engineer Tait FORM SF (5-2003) 6893WEsmt-2.docx - 4 -

18 EXHIBIT C Page 5 of 6

19 EXHIBIT C Page 6 of 6