DYSART ET AL Committee of Adjustment November 12, 2014 at 11:00 a.m. Council Chambers, Haliburton, Ontario

Transcription

1 DYSART ET AL Committee of Adjustment November 12, 2014 at 11:00 a.m. Council Chambers, Haliburton, Ontario Page ADOPTION OF MINUTES 2. DECLARATION OF PECUNIARY INTEREST PUBLIC HEARINGS D13-MV Kitchen Haliburton Lake - Champion Trail Township of Harburn Agent: N/A D13-MV Estate of Kerr Loon Lake - Clematis Trail Dudley Township Agent: Greg Bishop D13-MV Estate of Kerr Loon Lake - Clematis Trail Dudley Township Agent: Greg Bishop 4. ADJOURNMENT Page 1 of 22

2 Dysart et al Committee of Adjustment Minutes Wednesday, September 10, 2014 The Committee of Adjustment of the Corporation of Dysart et al convened a meeting on Wednesday, September 10, 2014 at 11:00 a.m. in the Dysart et al Council Chambers with the following in attendance: Members: Staff: Public Present: Don Popple, Chairman Derek Knowles Councillor Andrea Roberts Councillor Susan Norcross Jeff Iles Pat Martin Dan Sayers Dianne and Dan Molenaar Gary Davis Greg Bishop Secretary Treasurer Director of Planning & Development Chief Building Official ADOPTION OF MINUTES Motion No Moved by: Susan Norcross Seconded by: Andrea Roberts CARRIED Be it resolved that the minutes of the meeting of August 13, 2014 be adopted as circulated. Page 2 of 22

3 ADOPTION OF SITE VISIT REPORT Motion No Moved by: Susan Norcorss Seconded by: Andrea Roberts CARRIED Be it resolved that the report of August 27, 2014 site visit of the Committee of Adjustment be approved as presented. DECLARATION OF PECUNIARY INTEREST There were no pecuniary interests declared. PUBLIC HEARINGS The Chairman introduced the Committee and advised those in attendance of the procedure that would be followed. D13-MV RETURNING FILE Davis Kashagawigamog Lake Road - Kashagawigamog Lake Dysart Townslhip Agent: N/A The Chairman declared this portion of the meeting to be a public hearing with respect to the above noted application. Mr. Davis attended to discuss the application. The Chairman reviewed the status of this file, noting that the matter was first discussed at the meeting of August 13th, It was deferred at that meeting for a site inspection. The Committee met at the site on August 27th, Mrs. Roberts inspected the site separately on August 25th, The Chairman noted that Mr. Knowles was not present at the first meeting and therefore could not vote on this application. The Chairman asked the Secretary if there was any correspondence on the application. The Secretary answered that there was not. The Chairman started by noting that the existing dwelling was an old dwelling and that the proposed addition would help update and winterize the building. He noted that the Page 3 of 22

4 lot was a big lot and was well screened from the lake and neighbours. He noted that there was a kitchen in the private cabin and that it should be removed. Mrs. Roberts noted that the variance for an addition was triggered by the fact two existing dwelling existed on the property. She noted that both were old and had legal non-complying status. She noted that the addition would comply with all setbacks and that if it wasn't for the 2nd dwelling on the property, this variance wouldn't be necessary. She agreed that the kitchen should be removed. The Chairman then asked if there was anyone in attendance who wanted to comment on the application. There was no response. After a brief discussion the Committee passed the following resolution: Motion No Moved by: Derek Knowles Seconded by: Susan Norcross CARRIED Be it resolved that the Committee's decision with respect to file D13-MV (Davis) be recorded as follows: a) A variance to the provisions of Section 3.19(a)(x) to permit the gross floor area of a seasonal dwelling to increase from square metres ( square feet) to 214 square metres (2300 square feet) is granted. b) A variance to the provisions of Section 3.1(d)(iii) to permit a private cabin located in the WR4 zone to have a maximum gross floor area of 55 square metres (592 square feet) as opposed to the required maximum of 45 square metres (484 square feet) is granted. (ref. Davis - Roll No ) D13-MV Ontario Inc. Lipsy Lake, Kennisis Lake - West Shore Road Guilford Township Agent: Dan Molenaar The Chairman declared this portion of the meeting to be a public hearing with respect to the above noted application. Mr. Molenaar and Mr. Bishop attended to discuss the application. Page 4 of 22

5 The Committee reviewed the planning report dated September 9th, 2014 and discussed the application. The Chairman than asked the Secretary if there was any correspondence on the application. The Secretary answered that the applicant provided a letter of support from their neighbour Mrs. Tate. The Chairman then asked Mr. Bishop to explain the proposal. Mr. Bishop noted that they had also received letters of support from other nearby neighbours. He then stated that they were here to request two variances. The first variance was for a water setback to a creek/wetland. The second variance was for the gross floor area of the dwelling. It was Mr. Bishop's opinion that when the lot was created, this lot and the neighbouring lot were to have 20 metre water setbacks from the pond/stream. He noted that wording existed in the Severance Agreement that permits this lot and the neighbouring lot to have a 20 metre water setback from the pond/stream. He noted that the neighbour property was rezoned to WR6-4, to permitt a 20 metrer wetback from the pond/stream. Mr. Bishop noted that the proposed building would comply with the water setback from Lipsy Lake. He noted that the proposed dwelling was a 1 storey building that was designed to fit the topography of the land. He also noted that the heated area of the proposed dwelling would comply with the gross floor area maximum of 280 square metres but that the covered porches brought the total gross floor area over that limit. He also noted that it was a very large lot with lots of frontage. The Chairman then asked if there was anyone in attendance who wanted to comment on the application. There was no response. After a brief discussion the Committee passed the following resolution: Motion No Moved by: Derek Knowles Seconded by: Andrea Roberts Be it resolved that the Committee's decision with respect to file D13-MV ( Ontario Inc.) be recorded as follows: Page 5 of 22

6 CARRIED a) A decrease to the provisions of Section 5.2 to permit a seasonal dwelling to have a minimum water setback of 20 metres (66 feet) from a pond/stream as opposed to the required 30 metres (98.43 feet) is granted. b) An increase to the provisions of Section 5.2 to permit a seasonal dwelling in the WR6 zone to have a main building maximum gross floor area of any storey of 335 square metres (3606 square feet) as opposed to required maximum of 280 square metres (3014 square feet) is granted. (ref Ontario Inc. - Roll No ) ADJOURNMENT Motion No Moved by: Andrea Roberts Seconded by: Derek Knowles CARRIED Certified Correct Be it resolved that the meeting be adjourned at 11:20 AM, Chair Secretary Page 6 of 22

7 PLANNING REPORT November 6 th, 2014 REPORT AUTHUR: APPLICATION NO: REGISTERED OWNER: AGENT'S NAME: Jeff Iles D13-MV Steve and Sonia Kitchen n/a PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Part Lot 15, Concession 6 Lot 44, Plan 362 Township of Harburn ROLL NO.: FOUR TESTS: To grant a requested variance, the Committee of Adjustment must determine that the application satisfies each of the four tests as outlined by the Planning Act as follows: 1. The requested variance(s) must satisfy the general intent of the Official Plan; 2. The requested variance(s) must satisfy the general intent of the Zoning By-law; 3. The requested variance(s) must be considered minor in nature; and 4. The requested variance(s) must be desirable for the development of the land. (1) BACKGROUND: The owner would like to construct a 2 storey, 1006 square foot private garage/private cabin on his back lot located on the north side of Curry Road. As per Section 3.16 of Zoning By-law , Lots Divided by Improved Streets, this lot is deemed to be one lot for the purpose of determining the permitted uses and the applicable zone provisions. The proposed private garage/private cabin will have a rear lot line setback of 1.5 metres (5 feet) which does not comply with the required minimum of 7.5 metres (24.61 feet). The second storey of the private garage/private cabin will comply with Section 3.1(d)(iii) and have a gross floor area of 45 square metres or less. The applicants are requesting a rear lot line setback for the garage due to the location of a Hydro One easement, and the minimum require setback of 5 metres from said power line. The applicants have applied for and received an entrance permit for the proposed garage. Staff questions whether the applicants will be able to construct the proposed garage/cabin or perform future maintenance (eg. use a ladder) without trespassing onto the neighbouring property. File D13-MV : Kitchen Page 1 of 4 Page 7 of 22

8 To ensure future privacy of the neighbouring property to the rear (common user property owned by Dysart et al), staff recommends that the Committee discuss a condition stating that the vegetation buffer between properties remains in place. Staff are also of the opinion that a condition stating that no entrance or deck be permitted along the shared lot line is appropriate to minimize the impact of the requested rear yard setback variance. Dysart et al are the owner of the property that shares the rear lot line with this property. It is a user common parcel for the property owners on Plan 362. This lot does not appear developable. There is an existing seasonal dwelling located on the property. A minor variance is required to permit construction of a 2 storey private garage/cabin on a lot located in the WR4 zone. (2) REQUESTED VARIANCES: The following variance is requested to permit the construction of a two storey private garage/cabin on a lot located in the WR4 zone: a) A decrease to the provisions of Section 5.2 to permit a two storey private garage/cabin to have a minimum rear lot line setback of 1.5 metres (5 feet) as opposed to required minimum of 7.5 metres (24.61 feet). (3) SITE DESCRIPTION: Building Department Staff visited the property for the purpose of photographs. a) Lot Dimensions: Frontage: 30.5 metres (100 feet) Area: hectares (0.78 acres) b) Existing Development: Seasonal dwelling (first assessed in 1955) c) Proposed Development: two storey private garage/cabin (1006 square feet) d) Frontage: Haliburton Lake e) Access: Champion Trail/Curry Road f) Shoreline Road Allowance: The applicants purchase the shore road allowance in front of their property via By-law (4) PROVINCIAL POLICY (a) Conformity: Generally, yes. (b) Applicable Policies: Policy Policy Rural Areas in Municipalities Sewage and Water Services File D13-MV : Kitchen Page 2 of 4 Page 8 of 22

9 Policy 2.1 Policy 2 Policy 2.2 Natural Heritage Wise Management and Use of Resources Water (c) Comment: Haliburton Lake is classified by the Ministry of Natural Resources as a lake trout lake that is not at capacity for development. Critical fish habitat has not been identified in front of these lands. However, the property has not been inventoried for fish habitat. Where a proposal is to construct new development or to add to existing development, the Municipality applies best management practices to protect aquatic resources. Specifically, a 20 metre water setback is applied to new and existing development to protect sensitive water resources and fish habitat. Vegetation buffers are important to the long term health of the lake. The proposed private garage/cabin will be well setback from the Haliburton Lake. (5) OFFICIAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Waterfront Areas (a) Conformity: Generally, yes. (b) Applicable Policies: Section Section 4.6 Section 5.1 Section 9 Protection and Enhancement of the Environment Lot Size and Shape Water Resources Waterfront Areas (c) Comment: See comment under Provincial Policy. (6) PRESENT ZONING: Waterfront Residential Type 4 (WR4) (a) Compliance: The lot has legal non-complying status with regards to the lot area and the lot frontage requirements. The requested variance is necessary if the Committee decides to permit construction of a two storey private garage/cabin on a lot located in the WR4 zone. (7) NOTICE AND CIRCULATION: Notice of the minor variance was circulated to all persons and agencies required by regulation on October 28 th, The required advertisement was placed in the local newspaper. No comments or concerns have been received as of the date of this report. (8) STAFF COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION: The requested variance generally conforms to Provincial Policy and to the provisions of the Official Plan. Should the Committee decide to grant the requested variances, the following conditions would be appropriate: 1. This variance applies to a two storey private garage/private cabin as shown generally on the Property Sketch dated October 3 rd, 2014 and attached to the Decision. Any File D13-MV : Kitchen Page 3 of 4 Page 9 of 22

10 encroachment beyond the variance granted herein will require a further application for a minor variance. 2. The County of Haliburton Shoreline Tree Preservation By-law 3505 applies. The injuring or destruction of trees within 30 metres of the high water mark is not permitted. The exemptions noted in Section 3 of By-law 3535 apply. Furthermore, additional native shoreline planting is encouraged to screen the buildings, naturalize the shoreline and address environmental concerns. 3. That during construction, proper site preparation and construction methods be used to prevent sedimentation of the adjacent lake. Sediment fencing is to be installed down gradient of the construction site. The site is to be properly stabilized following construction to prevent erosion and sedimentation. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant must obtain surveyed measurements from an Ontario Land Surveyor to confirm the interior side and rear lot line setback of the private garage/cabin. 5. No entrance or deck is permitted to be located on the side of the proposed building abutting the rear lot line for which the variance was granted. 6. Section 3.16 of By-law applies and threats Parts 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 8, Plan 19R-9603 as one lot for the purpose of development. File D13-MV : Kitchen Page 4 of 4 Page 10 of 22

11 Haliburton Lake WAO LOT 16, CON 7 µ LOT 14, CON 7 LOT 15, CON 7 Haliburton - Middle Is Clubhouse Ct Curry Rd LOT 16, CON 7 Subject Lands Windstar Tr LOT 15, CON 6 Champion Tr Haliburton Lake LOT 14, CON 6 Dow Tr KEY MAP D13-MV Haliburton - South Is Date: 14/10/2014 Liftover Ln Hedgerow Ln Lands of Kitchen Part Lot 15, Concession 6 Lot 44, Plan 362 Haliburton Lake - Champion Trail Township of Harburn LOT 16, CON 6 DISCLAIMER: This map is for planning reference purposes only and is not a survey of properties. No representation is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. The Municipality of Dysart et al assumes no responsibility for any loss resulting from such use. This publication may not be reproduced in any form, in part or in whole, without written permission. BASE DATA SOURCE: QUEEN'S PRINTER OF ONTARIO Use of this data does not constitute an endorsement by MNR or the Ontario Government Meters LOT 15, CON 6 Page 11 of 22

12 Page 12 of 22

13 PLANNING REPORT November 6 th, 2014 REPORT AUTHOR: REVIEWED BY: APPLICATION NO: REGISTERED OWNER: AGENT'S NAME: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Jeff Iles Patricia Martin, Director of Planning and Development D13-MV Estate of Joyce Kerr Greg Bishop 1011 Clematis Trail Part Lot 7, Concession 1 Township of Dudley ROLL NO.: FOUR TESTS: To grant a requested variance, the Committee of Adjustment must determine that the application satisfies each of the four tests as outlined by the Planning Act as follows: 1. The requested variance(s) must satisfy the general intent of the Official Plan; 2. The requested variance(s) must satisfy the general intent of the Zoning By-law; 3. The requested variance(s) must be considered minor in nature; and 4. The requested variance(s) must be desirable for the development of the land. (1) BACKGROUND: The executor of the Kerr Estate has consent from the Haliburton County Land Division Committee to sever her holdings into two lots. The subject lands were originally two separately conveyable parcels that have merged through inadvertence. Both parcels have been developed and include existing seasonal dwellings. The owners would now like to separate their holdings. As a result the severed and retained parcels will not comply with the minimum lot frontage requirements. A minor variance is required to permit the lot to have a minimum lot frontage of 31 metres (101 ft) as opposed to the required minimum of 60 metres (196.9 feet). This application is a condition of application for consent H-041/13. There are 5 accessory buildings on the property. The applicant has removed or intends to remove two sheds and the privy bringing the total number of accessory buildings into compliance. File D13-MV Estate of Kerr Page 1 of 3 Page 13 of 22

14 The seasonal dwelling has legal non-complying status with regards to the west interior side lot line setback and the existing shed located near the right-of way, has legal non-complying status with regards to the street setback. A minor variance is requested to permit a lot in the WR4L zone to have a minimum lot frontage of 31 metres (101 ft). (2) REQUESTED VARIANCES: The following variance is requested to permit the applicants to sever their lot, which is located in the WR4L zone: a) A decrease to the provisions of Section 5.2 to permit a lot which is zoned WR4L to have a minimum lot frontage of 31 metres (101 ft) as opposed to the required 60 metres (196.9 feet). (3) SITE DESCRIPTION: Staff did not visit this site for the purpose of photographs. a) Lot Dimensions: Frontage: 31 metres (101.5 feet) Area: hectares (0.777 acres) b) Existing Development: Seasonal Dwelling (1965); Shed (1968); and Shed. Other buildings to be removed. c) Proposed Development: n/a d) Frontage: Loon Lake e) Access: Clematis Trail (off Loon Lake Road) f) Shoreline Road Allowance: The applicants to not appear to own the shore road allowance in front of this property. The site plan indicates that the buildings are not located on the shore road allowance. (4) PROVINCIAL POLICY (a) Conformity: Generally, yes. (b) Applicable Policies: Policy Policy Policy 2.1 Policy 2 Policy 2.2 Rural Lands in Municipalities Individual On-site Water and Sewage Services Natural Heritage Wise Management and Use of Resources Water Comment: This application re-creates two lots that have merged in title through inadvertence. Both lots have been developed for seasonal residential purposes. File D13-MV Estate of Kerr Page 2 of 3 Page 14 of 22

15 (5) OFFICIAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Waterfront Areas (a) Conformity: Generally, yes, given the history of development on the lot. (b) Applicable Policies: Section Section 4.6 Section 5 Section Section 9 Protection and Enhancement of the Environment Site Conditions - Lot Size and Shape Resource Protection Policies Lake Trout Lakes Waterfront Areas (c) Comment: See comment under Provincial Policy. (6) PRESENT ZONING: Waterfront Residential Type 4L (WR4L) (a) Compliance: The lot complies with respect to the lot area requirements. The requested variance is necessary to recognize the frontage of the lot. (7) NOTICE AND CIRCULATION: Notice of the minor variance was circulated to all persons and agencies required by regulation on October 28 th, The required advertisement was placed in the local newspaper. No comments or concerns have been received as of the date of this report. (8) STAFF COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION: The requested variance generally conforms to Provincial Policy and to the provisions of the Official Plan, given the history of development on the lot. The application is a condition of consent application H-041/2013. Should the Committee decide to grant the requested variances, the following conditions would be appropriate: 1. This variance applies to a lot as shown generally on the Property Sketch dated October 16 th, 2014 and attached to the Decision. Any encroachment beyond the variance granted herein will require a further application for a minor variance. 2. The County of Haliburton Shoreline Tree Preservation By-law 3505 applies. The injuring or destruction of trees within 30 metres of the high water mark is not permitted. The exemptions noted in Section 3 of By-law 3535 apply. Furthermore, additional native shoreline planting is encouraged to screen the buildings, naturalize the shoreline and address environmental concerns. 3. The applicant is to complete application for consent H-041/ accessory buildings are to be removed to bring the total number of accessory buildings into compliance with the provisions of Zoning By-law File D13-MV Estate of Kerr Page 3 of 3 Page 15 of 22

16 Hwy 118 µ LOT 5, CON 2 LOT 6, CON 2 LOT 7, CON 2 LOT 8, CON 2 LOT 6, CON 1 LOT 7, CON 1 Loon Lake LOT 8, CON 1 Date: 20/10/2014 DISCLAIMER: This map is for planning reference purposes only and is not a survey of properties. No representation LOT 6, CON is made 1or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. The Municipality of Dysart et al assumes no responsibility for any loss resulting from such use. This publication may not be reproduced in any form, in part or in whole, without written permission. BASE DATA SOURCE: QUEEN'S PRINTER OF ONTARIO Use of this data does not constitute an endorsement by MNR or the Ontario Government. Loon Lake Rd Meters Victor Neimi Ln Subject Lands Clematis Tr KEY MAP Minor Variance D13-MV Lands of Kerr Part Lot 7, Concession 1 Loon Lake-Clematis Trail Geographic Township of Dudley Page 16 of 22

17 Page 17 of 22

18 PLANNING REPORT November 6 th, 2014 REPORT AUTHOR: Jeff Iles REVIEWED BY: APPLICATION NO: REGISTERED OWNER: AGENT'S NAME: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Patricia Martin, Director of Planning and Development D13-MV Estate of Joyce Kerr Greg Bishop 1017 Clematis Trail Part Lot 7, Concession 1 Township of Dudley ROLL NO.: FOUR TESTS: To grant a requested variance, the Committee of Adjustment must determine that the application satisfies each of the four tests as outlined by the Planning Act as follows: 1. The requested variance(s) must satisfy the general intent of the Official Plan; 2. The requested variance(s) must satisfy the general intent of the Zoning By-law; 3. The requested variance(s) must be considered minor in nature; and 4. The requested variance(s) must be desirable for the development of the land. (1) BACKGROUND: The executor of the Kerr Estate has consent from the Haliburton County Land Division Committee to sever her holdings into two lots. The subject lands were originally two separately conveyable parcels that have merged through inadvertence. Both parcels have been developed and include existing seasonal dwellings. The owners would now like to separate their holdings. As a result the severed and retained parcels will not comply with the minimum lot frontage requirements. A minor variance is required to permit the lot to have a minimum lot frontage of 30 metres (100 ft) as opposed to the required minimum of 60 metres (196.9 feet). This application is a condition of application for consent H-041/13. There is a seasonal dwelling and privy located on the property. The applicant intends to remove the privy. File D13-MV Estate of Kerr Page 1 of 3 Page 18 of 22

19 The seasonal dwelling has legal non-complying status with regards to the eastinterior side lot line setback, water setback the street setback. A minor variance is requested to permit a lot in the WR4L zone to have a minimum lot frontage of 30 metres (100 ft). (2) REQUESTED VARIANCES: The following variance is requested to permit the applicants to sever their lot, which is located in the WR4L zone: a) A decrease to the provisions of Section 5.2 to permit a lot which is zoned WR4L to have a minimum lot frontage of 31 metres (101 ft) as opposed to the required 60 metres (196.9 feet). (3) SITE DESCRIPTION: Staff did not visit this site for the purpose of photographs. a) Lot Dimensions: Frontage: 30.5 metres (100 feet) Area: hectares (0.707 acres) b) Existing Development: Seasonal Dwelling (1958). c) Proposed Development: n/a d) Frontage: Loon Lake The privy is to be removed. e) Access: Clematis Trail (off Loon Lake Road) f) Shoreline Road Allowance: The applicants do not appear to own the shore road allowance in front of this property. The site plan indicates that the buildings are not located on the shore road allowance. (4) PROVINCIAL POLICY (a) Conformity: Generally, yes. (b) Applicable Policies: Policy Policy Policy 2.1 Policy 2 Policy 2.2 Rural Lands in Municipalities Individual On-site Water and Sewage Services Natural Heritage Wise Management and Use of Resources Water Comment: This application re-creates two lots that have merged in title through inadvertence. Both lots have been developed for seasonal residential purposes. (5) OFFICIAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Waterfront Areas (a) Conformity: Generally, yes, given the history of development on the lot. File D13-MV Estate of Kerr Page 2 of 3 Page 19 of 22

20 (b) Applicable Policies: Section Section 4.6 Section 5 Section Section 9 Protection and Enhancement of the Environment Site Conditions - Lot Size and Shape Resource Protection Policies Lake Trout Lakes Waterfront Areas (c) Comment: See comment under Provincial Policy. (6) PRESENT ZONING: Waterfront Residential Type 4L (WR4L) (a) Compliance: The lot complies with respect to the lot area requirements. The requested variance is necessary to recognize the frontage of the lot. (7) NOTICE AND CIRCULATION: Notice of the minor variance was circulated to all persons and agencies required by regulation on October 28 th, The required advertisement was placed in the local newspaper. No comments or concerns have been received as of the date of this report. (8) STAFF COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION: The requested variance generally conforms to Provincial Policy and to the provisions of the Official Plan, given the history of development on the lot. The application is a condition of consent application H-041/2013. Should the Committee decide to grant the requested variances, the following conditions would be appropriate: 1. This variance applies to a lot as shown generally on the Property Sketch dated October 16 th, 2014 and attached to the Decision. Any encroachment beyond the variance granted herein will require a further application for a minor variance. 2. The County of Haliburton Shoreline Tree Preservation By-law 3505 applies. The injuring or destruction of trees within 30 metres of the high water mark is not permitted. The exemptions noted in Section 3 of By-law 3535 apply. Furthermore, additional native shoreline planting is encouraged to screen the buildings, naturalize the shoreline and address environmental concerns. 3. The applicant is to complete application for consent H-041/ The privy is to be removed or moved into compliance with the provisions of Zoning By-law File D13-MV Estate of Kerr Page 3 of 3 Page 20 of 22

21 Hwy 118 µ LOT 5, CON 2 LOT 6, CON 2 LOT 7, CON 2 LOT 8, CON 2 LOT 6, CON 1 LOT 7, CON 1 Loon Lake LOT 8, CON 1 Date: 20/10/2014 DISCLAIMER: This map is for planning reference purposes only and is not a survey of properties. No representation LOT 6, CON is made 1or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. The Municipality of Dysart et al assumes no responsibility for any loss resulting from such use. This publication may not be reproduced in any form, in part or in whole, without written permission. BASE DATA SOURCE: QUEEN'S PRINTER OF ONTARIO Use of this data does not constitute an endorsement by MNR or the Ontario Government. Loon Lake Rd Meters Victor Neimi Ln Subject Lands Clematis Tr KEY MAP Minor Variance D13-MV Lands of Kerr Part Lot 7, Concession 1 Loon Lake-Clematis Trail Geographic Township of Dudley Page 21 of 22

22 Page 22 of 22