Contra Costa County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC)
|
|
- Job Johns
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Contra Costa County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) Meeting When: Where: Wednesday, September 23, :00 P.M. Department of Conservation and Development 30 Muir Road, Martinez, CA AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Public Comment - Provides an opportunity for any member of the public to speak on any item under the purview of the ALUC that is not on the agenda. Consent (Items are subject to removal from Consent Calendar by request of any Commissioner or on request for discussion by a member of the public. Items removed from the Consent Calendar will be considered with the discussion items under Public Hearing. ) 3. Past and Pending Projects Report. Page 2* Public Hearing 4. RECEIVE report on funding of Contra Costa ALUC activities. Page 5* 5. Staff Updates 6. Commissioner Updates 7. Adjournment * - Attachment
2 Item 3 ALUC Packet Page: 2
3 Project Initiation File#/Name Location (Lead Agency) Description/Staff Determination ALUC Evaluation Completion Approval by Lead Agency August 2015 PLN : Redevelopment of Diablo Valley College ( DVC ) Shopping Plaza APN: ; -004 and (City of Pleasant Hill) Extensive remodel of the existing retail buildings at the DVC Shopping Plaza. This does not include the former K-Mart building and McDonalds restaurant at this time. Site improvements including new landscaping, hardscape and parking lot improvements. A new dog park. A new walking/bicycle trail extending from Golf Club Road to Chilpancingo Parkway adjacent to Grayson Creek. New freestanding signs (3), at entrances off of Golf Club Road and Old Quarry Road, up to 8 6 in height. A new 1,350 square foot building and a freestanding sign, up to a maximum height of 67 feet, located at 61 Chilpancingo Parkway. ALUC staff determined while the proposed project may be generally consistent with the applicable compatibility criteria, sufficient detail is not available to find the project fully consistent with the Plan. ALUC staff recommended the applicant request an FAA Obstruction Evaluation for the proposed 67 foot sign. Project may go before full ALUC. 8/25/15 Pending May 2015 PL150147: New Warehouse APN: (City of Concord) Application to construct an approximately 19,096 square foot warehouse (33-6 building height) on a 0.90-acre parcel at 2371 Stanwell Drive, Concord. Application scheduled for 6/24/15 ALUC hearing. 6/24/15 Pending March 2015 CV : Carport and Solar Installation, Pacheco APN: (Contra Costa County) Proposed installation of five (5) new carport structures (max height 21 ) and five (5) new carport mounted photovoltaic (PV) systems. Proposal does not contain characteristics likely to result in inconsistencies with the compatibility criteria set forth in the Plan. 3/18/15 Pending December 2014 (N/A): T-Mobile 1480 Gasoline Alley, Concord APN: (City of Concord) Staff reviewed proposal to add 3 antennas with associated equipment to existing guyed tower at the request of Concord staff (no formal application submitted to City at the time of this review). Project would not be inconsistent with the ALUCP (site partially within SZ-4). Existing guyed tower may be within future departure surface. Staff recommended applicant consult with Director of Airports regarding height of any temporary construction equipment. 12/16/14 No formal application submitted ALUC Packet Page: 3
4 Project Initiation File#/Name Location (Lead Agency) Description/Staff Determination ALUC Evaluation Completion Approval by Lead Agency PLN : Retail Tenant Building (Pleasant Hill Shopping Center) APN: (City of Pleasant Hill) Proposed 4,150 square-foot stand-alone tenant building. Proposal does not contain characteristics likely to result in inconsistencies with the compatibility criteria set forth in the Plan. 12/18/14 Pending October 2014 PL : Verizon Wireless Mt. Diablo High School (City of Concord) The proposed project would replace an existing football/track field light pole with a monopole with associated wireless service equipment and the existing light standards. The monopole would not obstruct Buchanan Field s protected airspace. Comment to the City of Concord indicated that light standards should be shielded or downward facing so they do not aim above the horizon creating a potential distraction and flight hazard. Overall, proposal does not contain characteristics likely to result in inconsistencies with the compatibility criteria set forth in the Plan. 10/9/14 Approved August 2014 LP : Major grading work for contractor s yard. North Martinez/Pacheco (Contra Costa County) Project site not within any of the Buchanan Field safety zones. No structures were proposed. Staff did not need to provide a formal consistency determination. 8/8/14 n/a March 2014 PR : Minor Subdivision Hosie Ave., Byron APN: & 068 (Contra Costa County) Proposed minor subdivision of an approximately 30 acre parcel into four parcels and a designated remainder. Proposal does not contain characteristics likely to result in inconsistencies with the compatibility criteria set forth in the Plan. 4/1/14 n/a (pre-app review) February 2014 PL : Commercial Development 1100 Concord Avenue, Concord APN (City of Concord) Proposed commercial development including the demolition of an existing 9,500 sq. ft. building and the construction of two (2) new buildings of approximately 7,000 and 8,000 sq. ft. Proposal does not contain characteristics likely to result in inconsistencies with the compatibility criteria set forth in the Plan. 2/19/14 Approved ALUC Packet Page: 4
5 Item 4 ALUC Packet Page: 5
6 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT 30 Muir Road Martinez, CA Telephone: (925) Fax: (925) TO: FROM: Members, Airport Land Use Commission Robert Sarmiento, Transportation Planning Division DATE: September 23, 2015 SUBJECT: Funding of the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) Activities Background Staffing of the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) is a joint effort between the Public Works Department (Airports Division) and the Department of Conversation and Development (DCD). Currently and historically, DCD provides ALUC staff support, given the land-use planning aspect of the role. The Airports Division reimburses DCD staff charges through its operating budget, which is sourced from the Airport Enterprise Fund. At the June 24, 2015 ALUC meeting, DCD staff presented an item describing a proposal to conduct a survey of other ALUC s fee schedules, which would help provide a basis when developing the County s own ALUC fee schedule, and present the results to the Commission at a future ALUC meeting. The Commission discussed various methods of assessing fees on applicants for ALUC review that the County ALUC can potentially implement. The discussion resulted in the following: The Commission expressed concern that the fee schedule that the County will eventually implement should be reasonably proportional to the costs of processing ALUC permits. The Commission requested information regarding the County s ALUC time and costs to process ALUC permits over the past few years. The Commission directed DCD staff to perform a survey of ALUC fee schedules from other counties, specifically focusing on counties that were comparable to Contra Costa County. The Commission directed DCD staff to identify ALUC costs and time over the past five years. The Commission requested that the information be presented at a future ALUC meeting. Discussion This report is intended to respond to direction from the ALUC at its June 24 meeting. Per direction from the Commission, DCD staff conducted a survey on a number of other counties ALUCs to determine their fee schedules (Attachment A). To provide a basis for comparing the County to the other similar counties, DCD staff identified the population, number of airports and median household income for each of these counties. G:\Transportation\R. Sarmiento\Committees\County\ALUC\ALUC Fee Schedule\ ALUC Meeting\ALUC Fee Schedule Memo.docx ALUC Packet Page: 6
7 Results Some ALUCs did not assess a fee. For the ALUCs that did assess a fee, the method of assessment varied, including: A flat fee for all projects Fees dependent on the type and complexity of the project being reviewed An hourly rate based on the salary of the staff reviewing the application Because of the diversity of assessment methods, the fees assessed by the different counties ALUCs for project review varied substantially as well, from a few hundred dollars to more than three thousand dollars. In addition, ALUCs had different minimum submittal requirements, with some ALUCs requiring specific submittal requirements for ALUC applications, usually detailed in a checklist, while other ALUCs using the same or very similar submittal requirements as their respective County s land-use permit applications. The fee schedule survey also included the following information from each of the other counties ALUC that would be useful in developing the County s ALUC fee schedule: Date of ALUC fee schedule adoption, if any Date(s) of ALUC fee schedule updates, if any How their ALUC fee schedule was determined Process for assessing fees for agency referrals (i.e. how cities remit payment to the ALUC/county for its review) DCD retrieved County ALUC costs and time from FY 2011/2012 through FY 2014/2015 (Attachment B). Costs and time are broken out by staff, administration, and overhead. ALUC time and costs vary considerably from year to year due to the number, complexity, and controversial nature of the projects that were reviewed in that year. Recommendation Receive report and direct DCD staff to: develop draft options for a County ALUC fee schedule, incorporating comments from the Commission, and bring the draft to a future ALUC meeting for discussion or action. Attachments: Attachment A Statewide ALUC Fee Schedule Comparison Attachment B Annual ALUC Costs and Time Attachment C Proposed Process for ALUC Fee Implementation cc: John Kopchik, DCD Director Maureen Toms, DCD Deputy Director John Cunningham, DCD Principal Planner Jamar I. Stamps, DCD Senior Planner Keith R. Freitas, Director of Airports Beth Lee, Assistant Director of Airports G:\Transportation\R. Sarmiento\Committees\County\ALUC\ALUC Fee Schedule\ ALUC Meeting\ALUC Fee Schedule Memo.docx ALUC Packet Page: 7
8 ATTACHMENT A - Statewide ALUC Fee Schedule Comparison County Population Median Income Number of Airports Contra Costa 1,102,871 $78,756 2 Agency Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development Current Fee Date of Adoption Date(s) Modified How Fee was Determined Minimum Submittal Requirements Process for Accessing Fees for Agency Referrals None N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A County Population Median Income Number of Airports Alameda 1,594,569 $72,112 3 Agency Alameda County Community Development Agency, Planning Department Current Fee -Administrative Review- $500 flat fee -Commission Determination Hearingadditional $500 flat fee Date of Adoption Date(s) Modified Before Fee based on staff salary and time. How Fee was Determined Minimum Submittal Requirements Process for Accessing Fees for Agency Referrals Minimum submittal requirements detailed in Alameda County's ALUC project application form. Amador 36,312 $53,684 1 Amador County Planning Department None N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Butte 224,323 $43,752 4 Humboldt 134,398 $41,426 9 Kern 874,264 $48, Los Angeles 10,136,559 $55, Madera 155,878 $45,625 2 Mendocino 88,863 $43,469 6 Butte County/Department of Development Services Planning Division Los Angeles County Department of Regional Planning $ minimum 2013 Never Modified Fee based on staff salary and time. -Minor Project- $1,494 flat fee -Major Project- $3,000 minimum fee, plus planner time and materials 2004 March 1 Annually Fee based on the tasks involved, estimated amount of time required to process the entitlement and hourly rate for each staff member. Staff first created a list of all the tasks involved for each aviation permit (minor & major), then the title of each staff member, as well as their hourly rate and approximate time to complete each task. Minimum submittal requirements detailed in Butte County's ALUC project application form. Applicant pays the fee to the local jurisdiction, who then forwards it to the County Treasurer. The ALUC retrieves the fees from the County Treasurer. Applicant must pay the fee to the ALUC directly. County of Humboldt - Department of Public Actual cost for the review process and Fee based on all costs incurred throughout ALUC review process and hearing for a No minimum submittal requirements. Submittal requirements vary for each Applicant may pay the fee to the local jurisdiction, who then forwards 2010 Never Modified Works - Land Use Division hearing for the project ($2,500 deposit) project. project. it to the ALUC, or pay the fee to the ALUC directly. Kern County Planning & Community Development Department None N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Minimum submittal requirements detailed in Los Angeles County's ALUC project application form. Madera County Community & Economic Development, Planning Division Mendocino County Planning and Building Services Department $1,239.20, plus automation fee. Mid 1990s Annually -Government Agency - $500 flat fee -Private Party - $1,000 flat fee Monterey 425,413 $59,168 4 Monterey County Planning Department $ flat fee , 2013, 2014 Placer 369,454 $72,725 3 Riverside 2,308,441 $56, Sacramento 1,470,912 $55, Placer County Transportation Planning Agency (PCTPA) Riverside County Transportation and Land Management Agency Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) San Benito 58,344 $66,237 2 San Benito Council of Governments (COG) San Bernardino 2,104,291 $54, County of San Bernardino, Land Use Services Department All fees below are minimum fees, with additional fee imposed based on time and materials -Minor Project- $250 -Major Project- $750 (Supplemental Deposit - $2,500) -Mandatory Project- $1,250 (Supplemental Deposit- $2,500) -ALUC Appeals- $50 Flat fees based on type of permit to be obtained. Some examples: -General Plan- $1,188 -Conditional Use Permit- $792 -Environmental Impact Report- $1,815 -Building Permit- $347 Fee based on staff time (ALUC staff and staff from other departments), time and materials of support staff, and stipend for the ALUC. To avoid back and forth, hence causing project delays, staff has preconsultation meetings prior to application submittal. The pre-consultation is also to save money. Submittal requirements are the same for land-use submittals (site map, elevations, etc.). Early 2000s Never Modified Fee based on rate for time, materials, and noticing. Description of Project, Density, Height, Noise. Fee based on four hours of staff time, plus administrative fees to review and process the application, including preparation of a staff report for the ALUC hearing Fee based on staff salary and time Submittal requirements for ALUC projects are similar to, but not the same as, land use development/permit requirements. However, each project/application is reviewed on a case-by-case basis, and the submittal requirements may be modified (e.g., expanded or reduced) based on staff review/discussions with the applicant or local jurisdiction staff. Minimum submittal requirements for ALUC project submittals can be found in Sections 2.9 and 2.10 of Placer County's ALUCP ( 202.Procedural%20Policies pdf). Fee based on each type of project that the applicant has submitted to the local jurisdiction. Over multiple cases, these fees average out to cover costs. A benefit Minimum submittal requirements detailed in Riverside County's ALUC of flat fees is that the financial obligation is known up front. It s transparent and project application form. predictable. This at least results in (presumably) no back and forth in terms of requests for additional fee deposits. None N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Minimum Application Fee- $300 Additional fee calculated based on staff hourly rates, from $45.27 to $ Never Modified Fee based on cost recovery and hourly rate of staff. Minimum submittal requirements detailed in San Benito County's ALUC project application form. None N/A N/A N/A N/A None San Diego 3,227,496 $62, San Diego County Regional Airport Authority None N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Santa Barbara 437,643 $62,779 4 Santa Clara 1,889,638 $91,702 5 Sonoma 496,253 $63,356 6 Santa Barbara County Association of Governments / Santa Barbara County Airport None N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Land Use Commission Santa Clara County Department of Planning and Development Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department -Da Minimus- $387 flat fee -Minor Project - $700 flat fee -Major Project- $3,500 flat fee Tehama 64,323 $41,924 2 Tehama County Planning Department $540 flat fee 1998 Never Modified Fee based on staff salary and time. Tuolumne 54,337 $48,426 2 Tuolumne County Community Resources Agency, Planning Division Ventura 848,073 $76,554 4 Ventura County Transportation Commission $500 flat fee 2000 Never Modified Fee based on staff salary and time. Fee based on staff hourly rate and average annual ALUC costs for the past five years and full-cost recovery over a ten-year span. Submittal requirements are similar to land-use applications, but require additional information, depending on the level of complexity of the project to be reviewed. None N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Minimum submittal requirements detailed in Tehama County's ALUC project application form. None N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Minimum submittal requirements detailed in Ventura County's ALUC project application form. Applicant may pay the fee to the local jurisdiction, who then forwards it to the ALUC, or pay the fee to the ALUC directly. Applicant pays ALUC directly. Applicant pays the fee to the local jurisdiction, who then forwards it to the ALUC. Applicant may pay the fee to the local jurisdiction, who then forwards it to the ALUC, or pay the fee to the ALUC directly. Applicant pays the fee to the local jurisdiction, who then forwards it to the ALUC. Applicant must pay the fee to the ALUC directly, with the exception of one jurisdiction, the March Joint Powers Authority, who receives the fee for projects within its jurisdiction and forwards it to the ALUC. For one of two cities in San Benito County, the applicant may pay the fee to the local jurisdiction, who then forwards it to the ALUC. For the other city, the applicant must pay the fee to the ALUC directly. Applicant pays the fee to the local jurisdiction, who then forwards it to the ALUC. Applicant must pay the fee to the ALUC directly. Applicant must pay the fee to the ALUC directly. 1 ALUC Packet Page: 8
9 ATTACHMENT B - Annual ALUC Costs and Time FY 2011/2012* Item # of Hours Cost Hourly Rate Total N/A $ 24, N/A FY 2012/2013 Item # of Hours Cost Hourly Rate Staff $ 25, $ Administrative 2.0 $ $ Total $ 25, $ FY 2013/2014 Item # of Hours Cost Hourly Rate Staff $ 23, $ Overhead N/A $ N/A Total $ 24, $ FY 2014/2015 Item # of Hours Cost Hourly Rate Staff $ 33, $ Overhead N/A $ N/A Total $ 33, $ *For FY 2011/2012, DCD staff could only obtain total ALUC ALUC Packet cost. Page: 9
10 ATTACHMENT C - Proposed Process for ALUC Fee Implementation 1. (Optional) County Staff communicates with ALUC Commissioners regarding the establishment of an ALUC fee schedule (February 20, 2015) 2. Commissioner(s) discusses the establishment of an ALUC fee schedule at public hearing and direct(s) staff to prepare a fee study (June 24, 2015) a. Public Utilities Code Section (f) allows ALUCs to establish fee schedule for services provided b. Fees cannot exceed the estimated reasonable cost of services provided 3. Staff prepares a fee schedule study (Summer-Fall 2015) a. Analyzes ALUC programs, functions, and tasks and their costs b. Analyzes staff time and costs for review c. Conducts a survey of other counties ALUC fee schedule (Summer 2015; present results on September 23, 2015) d. Develop a draft fee schedule (Fall 2015) i. Method of fee assessment 1. Flat cost 2. Cost based on type and complexity of proposal 3. Pay-per-hour a. Based on hourly wage of staff b. Based on cost of program divided by staff time/hours 4. Combination of the above choices ii. Refundable or non-refundable iii. Reviewed annually or as needed (by recommendation) for adjustment iv. Receive feedback from County Counsel v. Discuss draft fee schedule with County officials 4. ALUC receives draft County fee schedule (Winter 2016) a. ALUC provides feedback on County fee schedule b. ALUC approves draft County fee schedule 5. ALUC holds a public hearing to formally adopt County fee schedule (Winter-Spring 2016) a. Solicit input from public and other interested parties at public hearing i. Based on Government Code Section 66016, County must hold at least one open and public meeting on fee establishment or change before adoption ii. County must mail notice of time and place of meeting must be mailed at least 14 days prior to meeting to any interested party who files a written request iii. County must make public data indicating costs required to provide the service for which the fee or service charge is levied and the revenue sources anticipated to provide the service, including General Fund revenues available at least 10 days prior to the meeting b. County fee schedule effective no earlier than 60 days after adoption ALUC Packet Page: 10
$ FACTS ABOUT CALIFORNIA: WAGE HOUSING MOST EXPENSIVE AREAS WAGE RANKING
STATE #3 * RANKING In California, the Fair Market Rent () for a two-bedroom apartment is $1,699. In order this level of and utilities without paying more than 30% of income on housing a household must
More informationHousing Affordability in California
Housing Affordability in California Households with a High Housing Cost Burden: 2013 Definition: Estimated percentage of households that spend 30% or more of household income on housing costs. The U.S.
More informationINVESTORS PURCHASE RECORD NUMBER OF FORECLOSURES AT AUCTION
INVESTORS PURCHASE RECORD NUMBER OF FORECLOSURES AT AUCTION April Foreclosure Notices Drop from March Record Levels Discovery Bay, CA, May 12, 2009 ForeclosureRadar (www.foreclosureradar.com), the only
More informationCALIFORNIA FORECLOSURE ACTIVITY MIXED
CALIFORNIA FORECLOSURE ACTIVITY MIXED Foreclosure delays may be behind current peak in foreclosure activity Discovery Bay, CA, September 16, 2008 ForeclosureRadar (www.foreclosureradar.com), the only website
More informationCalifornia Economic Policy: Lawns and Water Demand in California
California Economic Policy: Lawns and Water Demand in California Data Box and Appendix Ellen Hanak Matt Davis July 2006 Data Box: Using County Assessor Data to Measure Trends in Single Family Lot Sizes
More informationMONTEREY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
MONTEREY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting: October 25, 2006 Time: 9:10 A.M. Agenda Item No.: 1 Project Description: Conduct a workshop regarding the County s regulations for covered parking (Chapter
More informationSEE BELOW SEPTEMBER 20, 2007
JOINT AGENDA: 10/2/07 ITEM: 8.3 HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL, AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY HARRY S. MAVROGENES DEBRA FIGONE SEE BELOW SEPTEMBER 20, 2007 SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF A SUMMARY 33433 REPORT FOR THE
More informationU.S. DEPARTMENT OF HUD 01/22/2014 STATE:CALIFORNIA ADJUSTED HOME INCOME LIMITS
Bakersfield-Delano, CA MSA Chico, CA MSA El Centro, CA MSA Fresno, CA MSA Hanford-Corcoran, CA MSA Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA HUD Metro FMR Area 30% LIMITS 17150 19600 22050 24450 26450 28400 30350 32300
More informationU.S. DEPARTMENT OF HUD 04/11/2017 STATE: CALIFORNIA ADJUSTED HOME INCOME LIMITS
Bakersfield, CA MSA Chico, CA MSA El Centro, CA MSA Fresno, CA MSA Hanford-Corcoran, CA MSA 30% LIMITS 13200 15050 16950 18800 20350 21850 23350 24850 VERY LOW INCOME 21950 25050 28200 31300 33850 36350
More informationU.S. DEPARTMENT OF HUD 03/25/2015 STATE:CALIFORNIA ADJUSTED HOME INCOME LIMITS
Bakersfield-Delano, CA MSA Chico, CA MSA El Centro, CA MSA Fresno, CA MSA Hanford-Corcoran, CA MSA Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA HUD Metro FMR Area 30% LIMITS 17450 19950 22450 24900 26900 28900 30900 32900
More informationOrder of Business. Board of Supervisors' Agenda Items
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS REGULAR MEETING MEETING AGENDA WEDNESDAY, APRIL 25, 2018, 9:00 AM BOARD OF SUPERVISORS NORTH CHAMBER 1600 PACIFIC HIGHWAY, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA Order of Business
More informationAGENDA OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CALIFORNIA STATEWIDE COMMUNITIES DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
AGENDA OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CALIFORNIA STATEWIDE COMMUNITIES DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY September 23, 2014 10:00 a.m. California State Association of Counties 1100 K Street, 1 st Floor Sacramento,
More informationHB , Appendix 5 PAGE 29 GUARANTEED HOUSING PROGRAM INCOME LIMITS
HB - 1-3555, Appendix 5 PAGE 29 Bakersfield, CA MSA Chico, CA MSA El Centro, CA MSA Fresno, CA MSA VERY LOW INCOME 31300 31300 31300 31300 41300 41300 41300 41300 LOW INCOME 50100 50100 50100 50100 66150
More informationOVERVIEW OF PROPERTY TAX DISASTER RELIEF PROVISIONS September 2015 Governor-Proclaimed State of Emergency
September 2015 Governor-Proclaimed State of Emergency Revenue and Taxation Code 1 Property Type Type of Relief Available Section 170 All property types New construction exclusion Section 69 All property
More informationApril 27, RE: CAO Proposal to Double the Documentary Transfer Tax (CF No )
April 27, 2012 Honorable Councilmember Paul Krekorian, Chair, City Council Budget & Finance Committee Honorable Councilmember Tony Cárdenas Honorable Councilmember Mitchell Englander Honorable Councilmember
More informationANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Housing Element Implementation (CCR Title )
page 1 of 18 Table A Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction Very Low-, Low-, and Mixed-Income Multifamily Projects 1 2 Project Identifier (may be APN No., project name or address) Unit
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of April 16, 2005 DATE: April 1, 2005 SUBJECT: Zoning Ordinance amendments to Section 36. Administration and Procedures of the Zoning Ordinance
More informationBuchanan Field. Buchanan Field. Airport Planning Program. Steering Committee. Airport Master Planning Program. March 15, 2007
Airport Planning Program Master Plan FAR Part 150 Noise Study Strategic Business Plan Steering Committee March 15, 2007 Airport Planning Program Master Plan FAR Part 150 Noise Study Strategic Business
More informationAgenda Report. Agenda Item No. 5a. Attachment 6 DATE: JULY 5, 2016 CITY COUNCIL TO: FROM: COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - HOUSING
Attachment 6 Agenda Item No. 5a Agenda Report DATE: JULY 5, 2016 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - HOUSING SUBJECT: RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A FUNDING REQUEST FOR SITE
More informationA DJUSTMENTS. A. Zoning Permits Required: Use Permit to construct a dwelling unit, as required by BMC Section 23D
Z O N I N G A DJUSTMENTS B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD ACTION AUGUST 14, 2008 2421 Ninth Street Use Permit 05-10000084 to construct a two-story 1,766 sq. ft., detached dwelling unit at the
More informationINFORMATION SUBJECT: UPDATE ON COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT PLAN FOR PROPOSED GOOGLE DEVELOPMENT AT DIRIDON STATION
city of C: San Iose CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Memorandum FROM: Kim Walesh Lee Wilcox SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: December 19, 2017 Approved \ Date V; Tv ' - INFORMATION
More informationCALIFORNIA EVICTIONS ARE FAST AND FREQUENT
CALIFORNIA EVICTIONS ARE FAST AND FREQUENT BY AIMEE INGLIS AND DE AN PRESTON MAY 2018 TENANTS TOGETHER CALIFORNIA S STATEWIDE ORGANIZATION FOR RENTERS RIGHTS MAPS BY ANTI-EVICTION MAPPING PROJECT Recent
More informationCity of Cupertino AB 1600 Mitigation Fee Act Annual & Five Year Report for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2014 & 2015
City of Cupertino AB 1600 Mitigation Fee Act Annual & Five Report for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2014 & 2015 Dept.: Community Development : Below Market Rate (BMR) Housing Mitigation Fee Local Authority:
More informationPACE Program Comparative Matrix
Program Status in Marin Government Sponsor County and 9 cities/towns have passed resolutions authorizing. California Statewide Communities Development Authority (CSCDA) Under consideration Under consideration
More informationOrder of Business. D. Approval of the Statement of Proceedings/Minutes for the meetings of June 20, 2018 and June 27, 2018.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS REGULAR MEETING MEETING AGENDA WEDNESDAY, JULY 11, 2018, 9:00 AM BOARD OF SUPERVISORS NORTH CHAMBER 1600 PACIFIC HIGHWAY, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA Order of Business
More informationTOWN OF LOS GATOS BELOW MARKET PRICE HOUSING PROGRAM GUIDELINES
TOWN OF LOS GATOS BELOW MARKET PRICE HOUSING PROGRAM GUIDELINES I. Purpose A. Purpose: The overall purpose of the Below Market Price (BMP) Housing Program is to provide the Town of Los Gatos with a supply
More informationHow Wall Street Foreclosures Are Devastating Communities
How Wall Street Foreclosures Are Devastating Communities Who Is Responsible For This Mess? Wall Street s reckless and predatory lending practices have devastated California. Bankers pushed homeowners into
More informationCCMA Conference Minutes
CCMA Conference Minutes Bakersfield, Kern County, California Holiday Inn Select, Convention Center October 18-19, 2007 DAY ONE Welcome and Introductions by CCMA President Randy Worley CCMA Officers Non-Member
More informationTHE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE
BOARD AGENDA: 4/27/10 ITEM: 8.1 THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL, AND AGENCY BOARD SUBJECT: SEE BELOW FROM: HARRY S. MAVROGENES EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
More informationDevelopment Program Report for the Alamo Area of Benefit
Julia R. Bueren, Director Deputy Directors Brian M. Balbas, Chief Mike Carlson Stephen Kowalewski Carrie Ricci Joe Yee ADOPTED BY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON Development Program Report for the Alamo October,
More informationREPORT REQUIREMENTS FOR DISCRETIONARY PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL North County (Non-Coastal) Area Plan
When is this Erosion Control Plan All Discretionary Permits Title 16 (Environment) Sections 16.08.340 (p. 25) & 16.12.060 (p. 37) Submittal is mandatory at the building permit stage. Typically requested
More informationTuesday, February 20, 2018
February 02, 2018 CITY OF OAKLAND BUREAU OF PLANNING/ZONING DIVISION 250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, 2nd Floor Oakland, California 94612 In addition to those applications listed on the City Planning Commission
More informationA G E N D A CITY OF BUENA PARK ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
A G E N D A CITY OF BUENA PARK ZONING ADMINISTRATOR December 13, 2017 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE ROOM 3:00 p.m. Members of the public who wish to discuss an item should fill out a speaker identification
More informationCity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
City of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission Meeting Date: January 8, 2018 Staff: Subject: Sarah Allen, Senior Planner SS14-17 Dexter & Patricia Louie, (MRA Zoning) Request for a Study Session
More informationThe Scope and Use of Local Parcel Tax in California: New Findings from a New Database
The Scope and Use of Local Parcel Tax in California: New Findings from a New Database Soomi Lee University of La Verne Slee4@laverne.edu 111 th National Tax Association Meeting November 15, 2018 New Orleans,
More informationCONSTRUCTION BUILDING WITH YARD SPACE 834 LENZEN AVE., SAN JOSE, CA
Offering Memorandum CONSTRUCTION BUILDING WITH YARD SPACE 834 LENZEN AVE., SAN JOSE, CA CHRIS TWARDUS Senior Vice President +1 408 282 3836 chris.twardus@colliers.com CA License No. 00933014 COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL
More informationImpact Fee Nexus & Economic Feasibility Study
Impact Fee Nexus & Economic Feasibility Study Stakeholder Working Group November 12, 2015 Urban Economics Oakland Impact Fee Stakeholder Working Group November 12, 2015 INTRODUCTIONS 1 Agenda Introductions
More informationCommunity Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)
Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA 94559-0660 (707) 257-9530 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MAY 31, 2018 AGENDA ITEM 7.A File No. PL16-0054 TRINITAS
More informationSTAFF REPORT #
STAFF REPORT #15-4000-0001 A Conditional Use PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: March 19, 2015 1. APPLICATION: A public hearing regarding a request for a conditional use permit for the installation of a
More informationCITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM: Q STAFF: ANDREW FIRESTINE FILE NO: CPC CM QUASI-JUDICIAL
Page 180 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM: Q STAFF: ANDREW FIRESTINE FILE NO: CPC CM1 06-00172 - QUASI-JUDICIAL PROJECT: APPLICANT: OWNER: 45 MONOPOLE AT 5239 GALLEY ROAD T-MOBILE MICHAEL WATTA PROJECT
More informationADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT 5.1
ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT 5.1 DATE: January 24, 2017 ITEM: RECOMMENDATION: NOTIFICATION: PROPOSAL: DEV16-0014 - Danville Office Partners, LLC Approve Final Development Plan request DEV16-0014 subject
More informationCITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE
FORM GEN. 160 CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE Date: June To: Honorable Members of the City Council From: Miguel A. Santana, City Administrative Officer Chair, Municipal Facilities
More informationREPORT. DATE ISSUED: December 19, 2014 REPORT NO: HCR Chair and Members of the San Diego Housing Commission For the Agenda of January 16, 2015
REPORT DATE ISSUED: December 19, 2014 REPORT NO: HCR15-008 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: Chair and Members of the San Diego Housing Commission For the Agenda of January 16, 2015 COUNCIL DISTRICT: 9 REQUESTED ACTION
More informationApproved. County of Santa Clara Office of the County Executive CE DATE: March 27, 2007 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM:
County of Santa Clara Office of the County Executive CE02 032707 DATE: March 27, 2007 Prepared by:patrick Love Asset & Economic Development Director TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Peter Kutras Jr County
More informationTOWN OF APPLE VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT To: Honorable Mayor and Town Council Date: July 24, 2018 From: Orlando Acevedo, Assistant Director Item No: 6 Economic Development and Housing Subject: ADOPT
More informationSUBJECT: APPROVAL OF DOWNTOWN HIGH-RISE RESIDENTIAL INCENTIVE FOR POST STREET TOWER AT 171 POST STREET
COUNCIL AGENDA FILE ITEM 11/6/18 CITY OF San Jose CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: SEE BELOW Memorandum FROM: Kim Walesh DATE: October 9, 2018 Approved Date /o/f//a
More informationAGENDA REPORT ITEM D-3 RENT PROGRAM. DATE: April 5, Members of the Rent Board. Bill Lindsay, City Manager
ITEM D-3 RENT PROGRAM AGENDA REPORT DATE: April 5, 2017 TO: FROM: Members of the Rent Board Bill Lindsay, City Manager SUBJECT: PRESENTATION REGARDING THE RICHMOND FAIR RENT, JUST CAUSE FOR EVICTION, AND
More informationColiseum Area Specific Plan zoning. Effective May 21, Chapter H - D-CO COLISEUM AREA DISTRICT ZONES REGULATIONS
Title 17 PLANNING Chapters: Chapter 17.101H - D-CO COLISEUM AREA DISTRICT ZONES REGULATIONS Chapter 17.101H D-CO COLISEUM AREA DISTRICT ZONES REGULATIONS Sections: 17.101H.010 Title, intent, and description.
More informationUSPS Administrative Data on Address Vacancies
USPS Administrative Data on Address Vacancies 2008 ESRI Federal User Conference February 22, 2008 Robert Renner U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Policy Development & Research
More informationHonorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Submitted by: Jane Micallef, Director, Department of Health, Housing & Community Services
Office of the City Manager ACTION CALENDAR October 16, 2012 To: From: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Christine Daniel, City Manager Submitted by: Jane Micallef, Director, Department of
More informationTHE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS DEPT: Board of Supervisors 9:15 a.m.(c) BOARD AGENDA # Urgent AGENDA DATE April 22, 2008 CEO Concurs with Recomm 415 Vote Required YES NO SUBJECT: Approval
More informationRevenue Summary Chart - Sewer Service Fees
ATTACHMENT NO. 3 Revenue Summary Chart - Sewer Service Fees FY 16-17 Sanitation Zone or FY 15-16 FY 16-17 FY 16-17 Rate Rate Revenue Incr. County Sanitation Rate Per Rate Per Projected Dollar Percent due
More informationCITY OF WILDOMAR PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item #2.1 PUBLIC HEARING Meeting Date: June 6, 2018
CITY OF WILDOMAR PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item #2.1 PUBLIC HEARING Meeting Date: June 6, 2018 TO: FROM: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Alfredo Garcia, Associate Planner SUBJECT: WPS/Mission
More informationPlanning & Development Services Application Fee Changes - Effective January 1, 2017
CITY COMMISSION MAYOR MIKE AMYX THOMAS M. MARKUS CITY MANAGER City Offices th St 6 East 6 PO Box 708 66044-0708 785-832-3000 www.lawrenceks.org FAX 785-832-3405 COMMISSIONERS LESLIE SODEN STUART BOLEY
More informationCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
AGENDA ITEM I-1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Council Meeting Date: June 3, 2014 Agenda Item #: I-1 INFORMATIONAL ITEM: Update on Multi-City Affordable Housing Nexus Study and Impact Fee Feasibility
More informationDEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND BUILDING Zoning Division 250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, 2 nd Floor Oakland, California
APPLICATIONS ON FILE April 4, 2014 CITY OF OAKLAND DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND BUILDING Zoning Division 250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, 2 nd Floor Oakland, California 94612-2031 In addition to those applications
More informationWEST VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT SEWER SERVICE FACT SHEET
WEST VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT SEWER SERVICE FACT SHEET Who is West Valley Sanitation District? We are a special purpose district originally formed in 1948 as County Sanitation District No. 4 under the
More informationBoard of Supervisors' Agenda Items
A. Roll Call B. Closed Session COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS REGULAR MEETING MEETING AGENDA WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 2016, 9:00 A.M. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS NORTH CHAMBER 1600 PACIFIC HIGHWAY,
More informationDevelopment Program Report for the Bethel Island Area of Benefit
Julia R. Bueren, Director Deputy Directors R. Mitch Avalon Brian M. Balbas Stephen Kowalewski Stephen Silveira ADOPTED BY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON Development Program Report for the Bethel Island August,
More informationHousing Commission Report
Housing Commission Report To: From: Subject: Housing Commission Meeting: July 21, 2016 Agenda Item: 4-B Chair and Housing Commission Barbara Collins, Housing Manager Draft Request for Proposals for Mountain
More informationSTANDARD DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS
STANDARD DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS The following steps, with accompanying time estimates, reflect the standard review process for new development in the City of Durand. Certain special uses or development
More informationProposition 218 Notification NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS OF PUBLIC HEARING ON HILLSIDE ZONE ADDITIONAL SEWER RATE. Name Address City, State, Zip
100 East Sunnyoaks Ave. Campbell, CA 95008 Regarding APN Number: APN #, Street, City Proposition 218 Notification NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS OF PUBLIC HEARING ON HILLSIDE ZONE ADDITIONAL SEWER RATE Name
More informationSUBJECT: AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 13 DATE: June 5, 2017 OF THE SAN JOSE MUNICIPAL CODE
COUNCIL AGENDA: 06/27/17 ITEM: 4.5 CITY OF cr SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY Memorandum TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: Barry Ng Rosalynn Hughey SUBJECT: AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 13 DATE: June
More informationWe contacted all RNOs in the area to come to their meetings and personally explain the draft, and take questions. Four RNOs took us up on the offer,
1 2 3 At the last TTF meeting at the end of April, the TTF reached a consensus recommendation on the draft zoning and directed staff to put it out in a draft for public review and feedback. I m going to
More informationDESCRIPTION OF UNINCORPORATED ISLANDS
DESCRIPTION OF UNINCORPORATED ISLANDS The list of islands was compiled by the Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development at the request of LAFCO staff. The map was prepared using the
More informationBuilding and Planning Fee Study Overview. March 19, 2019
Building and Planning Fee Study Overview March 19, 2019 Operational fees (fee-for-service) reviewed including: Hourly rate Fee structure, e.g., average hours spent processing applications/plan check Fees
More informationCounty of El Dorado. Vacation Home Rental (VHR) Ad Hoc Committee Meeting 5. Lake Tahoe Environmental Science Magnet School June 11, 2018
County of El Dorado Vacation Home Rental (VHR) Ad Hoc Committee Meeting 5 Lake Tahoe Environmental Science Magnet School June 11, 2018 1 VHR Meeting 6/11/18 Introduction/agenda Outstanding Items Re-cap
More informationMONTEREY COUNTY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AGENCY Carl P. Holm, AICP, Director
Agricultural Advisory Committee October 26, 2017 Item V. 2018 New Williamson Act Applications MONTEREY COUNTY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AGENCY Carl P. Holm, AICP, Director LAND USE & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PUBLIC
More informationAGENDA REPORT SUMMARY. Resolution No : 2017/18 Community Development Fee Schedule
PUBLIC HEARING Agenda Item # 7 Meeting Date: July 11, 2017 AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY Subject: Prepared by: Approved by: Resolution No. 2017-32: 2017/18 Community Development Fee Schedule Jon Biggs, Community
More informationSUBJECT Changes to Accessory Dwelling Unit, Parking, Accessory Structure and Nonconforming Parking Regulations in the Zoning Ordinance
REPORT To the Redwood City Planning Commission From Planning Staff February 21, 2017 SUBJECT Changes to Accessory Dwelling Unit, Parking, Accessory Structure and Nonconforming Parking Regulations in the
More informationCOUNTY OF TAZEWELL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
The following checklist is aid in a thorough submittal process and shall be submitted with a building permit application: Completed commercial building permit application to include a Site Plan of the
More informationBOARD o F iliiip. RT COMMISSIONERS
:141 041111 ' Los Angeles World Airports REPORT TO THE BOARD o F iliiip RT COMMISSIONERS Rem t nbor e A d 111-11C 1_% t le t A ' ttegillip r- 0 Approved Ma in Dep y ve Director Reviewed by: Debie Bowers
More informationCity of Campbell ~ Community Development Fees
Address Change or Addition (Per Address) $ 138.00 Appeal Filing Fee to Planning Commission 750.00 Appeal Filing Fee to City Council 750.00 Below Market Rate Agreement (no density bonus) 1,648.00 Below
More informationReferral Early Consultation
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1010 10 TH Street, Suite 3400, Modesto, CA 95354 Planning Phone: (209) 525-6330 Fax: (209) 525-5911 Building Phone: (209) 525-6557 Fax: (209) 525-7759 Date:
More informationNOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Design Review Commission NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Patrick Collins, Chair Anko Chen, Vice Chair Douglas Fu, Commissioner James Keppel, Commissioner BODY: Design Review Commission DATE: Monday, March 12,
More informationLegal Update for Public Works Officers League of California Cities
Legal Update for Public Works Officers League of California Cities Presented by: Deborah Wilder, President Contractor Compliance and Monitoring, Inc. 635 Mariners Island Blvd, Suite 200 San Mateo, CA 94404
More informationCity of Richmond. Just Cause Eviction Policy Options
City of Richmond Just Cause Eviction Policy Options City Council Meeting June 23, 2015 OVERVIEW I. Background I. Existing Policies and Programs II. Existing Fees III. Housing Element Data II. Community
More informationRequest for Proposal (RFP)
Request for Proposal (RFP) Real Estate Broker Services for the Sale of + 133 Acres of Land in Moreno Valley About Metropolitan The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, (Metropolitan) is
More informationSANjOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY
COUNCIL AGENDA: 05/17/16 ITEM:,1.1 fr) CITY OF *2 SANjOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT File No. C16-010 Applicant: Jeff Guinta Location Northwesterly corner of Los Gatos-Almaden
More informationNEW BRITAIN BOROUGH SCHEDULE OF FEES (Revised December 15, 2017)
Description NEW BRITAIN BOROUGH SCHEDULE OF FEES (Revised December 15, 2017) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Building Permits 2-4 Electrical, Mechanical and Plumbing Permits 4-6 Tank Removal Permits 6 Grease Trap
More informationCITY OF CLAREMONT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FEE SCHEDULE
FEE Accessory Second Unit $440 Fixed Adult Business **See Police Department for Fee Schedule Appeals Project Applicant: Deposit Deposit equal to 1/2 original deposit Fixed Fee 1/2 of the fixed fee but
More informationTINY HOUSES A F F O R D A B L E B Y D E S I G N H O U S I N G
TINY HOUSES A F F O R D A B L E B Y D E S I G N H O U S I N G Teresa Baker tbaker@latchcollective.com California s State Chapter Leader with the American Tiny House Association Founder of LA s Tiny Advocacy
More informationSecondary Dwelling Unit
Secondary Dwelling Unit Review of Special Use Regulations (City Code Section 17.228.105) The purpose of this application is to determine whether or not your project meets the Planning and Development Code
More informationPolicies and Procedures No. 50
Policies and Procedures No. 50 SUBJECT: Board Approval: 2/21/13 ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION EXPENSE COST RECOVERY FOR PLAN REVIEW, REAL ESTATE ACTIONS, AND RIGHT OF ENTRY PERMITS PURPOSE: It is the intention
More informationSAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY
CITY OF C YA SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: SEE BELOW COUNCIL AGENDA: 04/19/16 ITEM: il.tcb') Memorandum FROM: Planning Commission DATE: March 28, 2016
More information2. The AT&T WCF shall consist of a stealth design (faux saguaro cactus) with a maximum height of 30 feet above adjacent grade;
AGENDA ITEM # DATE: October 24, 2011 COAC NUMBER: 11-4698 CITY OF GOODYEAR CITY COUNCIL ACTION FORM SUBJECT: Special Use to allow the installation of a proposed AT&T Wireless Communication Facility to
More informationCounty of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Report
County of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Report Agenda Item Number: 29 (This Section for use by Clerk of the Board Only.) Clerk of the Board 575 Administration Drive Santa Rosa, CA 95403 To: Sonoma County
More informationCitv Council Staff Report
Date: April 1, 2015 Citv Council Staff Report CONSENT CALENDAR Subject: From: Initiated by: APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS WITH DUDEK & ASSOCIATES, INC.; INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP, INC.;
More informationStaff Report. Victoria Walker, Director of Community and Economic Development
9.c Staff Report Date: June 7, 2016 To: From: Reviewed by: Prepared by: Subject: City Council Valerie J. Barone, City Manager Victoria Walker, Director of Community and Economic Development John Montagh,
More informationImplementing Pre-Application Neighborhood Meetings in Prince George s County A Discussion Paper
Implementing Pre-Application Neighborhood Meetings in Prince George s County A Discussion Paper Prince George s County Planning Department July 2016 Introduction This discussion paper focuses on the pre-application
More informationPlanning Department 168 North Edwards Street Post Office Drawer L Independence, California 93526
Planning Department 168 North Edwards Street Post Office Drawer L Independence, California 93526 Phone: (760) 878-0263 FAX: (760) 8782-2712 E-Mail: inyoplanning@inyocounty.us AGENDA ITEM NO.: 4 (Action
More informationAccessory Dwelling Unit Permit
PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT 411 Main Street (530) 87-6800 P.O. Box 3420 Chico, CA 527 Application No. APPLICATION FOR Accessory Dwelling Unit Permit Applicant Information Applicant Street Address Daytime
More informationPACIFIC COAST TITLE COMPANY
PACIFIC COAST TITLE COMPANY ESCROW FEES AND CHARGES FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA EFFECTIVE: August 15, 2012 (Unless Otherwise State Herein) Table of Contents Part I Escrow Rates General Rules... 1 A. Minimum
More informationButte County Board of Supervisors
Butte County Board of Supervisors PUBLIC HEARING January 12, 2016 Amendments to the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance AG-P5.3 (Agricultural Buffer) and Interim Agricultural Uses Butte County Department
More informationDEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM # 5: Project Name: Star Dance Zoning Map Amendment, ZMA-13-02 Prepared By: Toby Stauffer, AICP City Planner
More informationRANCHO PALOS VERDES CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 02/19/2019 AGENDA HEADING: Regular Business
RANCHO PALOS VERDES CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 02/19/2019 AGENDA REPORT AGENDA HEADING: Regular Business AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Consideration and possible action to receive and file a report on Senate Bill
More informationTentative Map Application Review Procedures
FOR REFERENCE ONLY This page is not part of the application. Tentative Map Application Review Procedures The tentative map process in Churchill County is designed to provide a mechanism in order to divide
More informationSUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: December 11, 2017 INFORMATION
city of Cr *3. SAN TOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Memorandum FROM: KimWalesh SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: December 11, 2017 Approved Date 12.1 111 1A- INFORMATION SUBJECT:
More informationCHICO/CARD AREA PARK FEE NEXUS STUDY
REVISED FINAL REPORT CHICO/CARD AREA PARK FEE NEXUS STUDY Prepared for: City of Chico and Chico Area Recreation District (CARD) Prepared by: Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. December 2, 2003 EPS #12607
More informationCity of Lafayette Staff Report Planning Commission
City of Lafayette Staff Report Planning Commission Meeting Date: August 21, 2017 Staff: Subject: Deadline: Julia Koppman Norton, Assistant Planner ROW01-16 Daniel Fahrner (Owner), R-20 Zoning: Request
More information