(,, po uox 653. i'atuxent BUmlvE, LE6NARDT.*N, MD aat. St. MenY's CoUNTY GovERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF LAND USE AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT.
|
|
- Sheila Richards
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 St. MenY's CoUNTY GovERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF LAND USE AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT William B. Hunt, AICP, Director l6j, CoMMISSIoNERS of ST. MARY'S CoUNTY: James R. Guy, President Michael L. Heu in, Commissioner Tom Jarboe, Commissioner Todd B. Morgan. Commissioner John E. O'Connor, Commissioner July 13,2018 Office of the Secretary Maryland Depaftment of Planning 301 W. Preston Street, Suite Baltimore, Maryland Attn: David Dahlstrom, AICP RE: Planning Commission Annual Report for 2017 Dear Mr. Dahlstrom: The St. Mary's County Plan-ning Commission approved the annual report lbr the reporling year 2017 as required under the Land Use Article. The repoft was approved by the Planning Commission on July 9,2018 and filed with the Commissioners olst. Mary's County. Sincerel v, Kathleen Easley, AICP Deputy Director (,, aat po uox 653. i'atuxent BUmlvE, LE6NARDT.*N, MD PHONE x FAx r com. LL]GM STN,l,\RYSN,ID.COM
2
3
4 ST. MARY S COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 2017 ANNUAL REPORT
5 Jurisdiction Name: St. Mary s County Planning Contact Name: Kathleen Easley Planning Contact Phone Number: ext. *1541 Planning Contact Kathleen.Easley@stmarysmd.com Section I: Amendments and Growth Related Changes In Development Patterns (A) Were any new comprehensive plan or plan elements adopted? Y N 1. If no, go to (B). 2. If yes, briefly summarize what was adopted. Planning Commission and staff have worked throughout the year reviewing the Lexington Park Developmennt District Master Plan Land Use Maps to verify the maps accurately reflect the intent of the Commission when the plan was adopted in The land use maps were approved and adopted in early 2018, so will be reported in the next annual report. (B) Were there any growth related changes in development patterns? Y N (Note: Growth related changes in development patterns are changes in land use, zoning, transportation capacity improvements, new subdivisions, new schools or school additions, or changes to water and sewer service areas.) 1. If no, go to (C). 2. If yes, briefly summarize each growth related change(s). New Subdivisions: There were 4 major subdivisions approved in 2017 adding 151 new lots inside the Priority Funding Areas. There were 25 minor subdivisions approved in 2017 adding 40 lots outside the PFA. 1
6 Transportation capacity improvements: 1. FDR Boulevard: Design and construction of a two lane residential access way from First Colony Boulevard to Pegg Road (NAS Patuxent River Main Gate) for a distance of 3.5 miles. Project is inside the PFA. 2. Patuxent Park: 16,100 linear feet (3.04 mile) of road improvements as part of the revitalization of the neighborhood infrastructure improvements (sidewalks, curb & gutter, storm drainage, utility and street improvements) in the Lexington Park Development District (PFA). 3. Buck Hewitt Road: widening, improvement and addition of sidewalks from Victoria Circle through to MD 237-Chancellor s Run Road. Inside the PFA. Changes to Water and Sewer Service Areas: 1. Dollar General Hollywood: 3.2 acres at Mervell Dean Road water and sewer category change from W-6D (service in 6 to 10 years, developer financed) to W-3D (service in 3 to 5 years, developer financed). The sewer service category would change from S-6D (service in 6 to 10 years, developer financed) to S-3D (service in 3 to 5 years, developer financed). Located inside the PFA. 2. Morelli Auto Group Lexington Park: Water service category change from W6D to W3D. Located inside the PFA. 3. PELBPS Commercial Office Units Three Notch Road in California (part of Lexington Park Development District) Inside the PFA. Water service category change from W-6D to W-3D and the sewer service category would change from S-6D to S-3D. (C) Were any amendments made to the zoning regulations? Y N 1. If no, go to (D). 2. If yes, briefly summarize any amendments that resulted in changes in development patterns. (D) Were any amendments made to the zoning map? Y N 1. If no, go to Section II: Mapping and GIS Shapefiles. 2. If yes, briefly summarize each amendment(s) and include a copy of the locally approved zoning map following approval of the amendment. 2
7 Section II: Mapping and GIS Shapefiles (A) Does your jurisdiction utilize GIS to prepare planning related maps? Y N 1. If no, include an address, parcel identification number or other means to identify the type and location of all new growth related changes or zoning map amendments listed in Sections I(B) and I(D). Provide a paper map(s) that indexes the general location(s) of the growth related changes or zoning map amendment(s). Contact MDP for mapping assistance. 2. If yes, include a map(s) of the location(s) of the amendment(s) and submit applicable GIS shapefiles for all new growth related changes and zoning map amendments listed in Sections I(B) and I(D). GIS shapefiles may be submitted via or cd/dvd disk. (B) Were there any growth related changes identified in Sections I(B)? Y N 1. If no, go to (C). 2. If yes, then include GIS shapefiles and map(s), that identify the location of each growth related change identified in Section I(B). If your jurisdiction does not utilize GIS then clearly identify the growth related changes on a map(s). Contact MDP for mapping assistance. (C) Were there any zoning map amendments identified in Section I(D). Y N 1. If no, skip to Section III: Consistency of Development Changes. 2. If yes, then include GIS shapefiles and map(s), that identify the location of each zoning map amendment identified in Section I(D). If your jurisdiction does not utilize GIS then clearly identify the growth related changes on a map(s). Contact MDP for mapping assistance. 3
8 Section III: Consistency of Development Changes (A) Were there any growth related changes identified in Sections I(B) through (D)? Y N 1. If no, skip to Section IV: Planning and Development Process. 2. If yes, go to (B). (B) For each growth related change listed in Sections I(B) through (D), state how the development changes were determined to be consistent with: 1. Each other (if more than one); The changes in development patterns are consistent with each other in that development is guided by the County s Comprehensive Plan and the Lexington Park Master Plan. New subdivision approvals in the PFAs, water and sewer category changes, and infrastructure improvements support the promotion of development and redevelopment in our priority funding areas. 2. Any recommendations of the last annual report; N/A 3. The adopted plans of the local jurisdiction; The changes referenced in Section 1 of this report are made under the procedural standards required for review to ensure compliance with the County Comprehensive Plan and (when applicable) the Lexington Park Development District Master Plan. 4. The adopted plans of all adjoining jurisdictions; Adjoining jurisdictions are notified of all water and sewer category changes for review and comment and to ensure compliance with their adopted plans. Also, St. Mary s and Calvert Counties coordinate on regional transporation projects through the Metropolitan Planning Organization. 5. Any adopted plans of the State and local jurisdictions that have responsibility for financing or constructing improvements necessary to implement the jurisdiction s plan. The 2040 Maryland Transportation Plan: Unified Planning Work Program FY 2018, Calvert-St. Mary's Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Improvement Program FY , and our Metropolitan Planning Organization Long Range Transportation Plan, projects are reviewed for consistency at the very earliest stages of the planning process. This includes projects listed in the county s capital improvements program and all development projects at subdivision review. 4
9 Section IV: Plan Implementation and Development Process (5-Year Report) (A) Has your community completed a five-year mid cycle review or recently updated its comprehensive plan, as indicated in the Comprehensive Plan 10-Year Transition Schedule under 1-207(c)(6) of the Land Use Article? Y N (Note: See Municipal and County Transition Schedules at: Contact your Regional Planner for additional assistance) 1. If yes, then skip to (B). Identify year five-year report completed: 2017 or; Identify year of comprehensive plan update: (Note: this date must be between ) 2. If no, include a five-year mid cycle review summary of the following: (i). Development trends contained in the previous annual reports filed during the period covered by the narrative; (ii). The status of comprehensive plan implementation tools such as comprehensive rezoning to carry out the provisions of the comprehensive plan; (iii). Identification of any significant changes to existing programs, zoning ordinances, regulations, financing programs, or State requirements necessary to achieve the visions and goals of the comprehensive plan during the remaining planning timeframe; (iv). Identification of any State or federal laws, regulations, or requirements that have impeded local implementation of the comprehensive plan and recommendations to remove any impediments; (v). Future land use challenges and issues; and (vi). A summary and expected timeframe of any potential updates to the comprehensive plan. (Note: A copy of the 5-Year Report Form is available at: 5
10 (B) In the current reporting year, did your jurisdiction identify any recommendations for improving the planning and development process within the jurisdiction? Y N 1. If no, go to (C). 2. If yes, what were those recommendations? As noted in our 2016 report, The Commissioners of St. Mary s County hired a consultant to review the development review process and make recommendations for improvement. County staff have had numerous meetings to discuss how the development review process can be streamlined, more accurate and more efficient. (C) In the current reporting year, did your jurisdiction adopt any ordinances or regulations needed to implement the 12 planning visions under of the Land Use Article? Y N 1. If no, go to Section V: Measures and Indicators. 2. If yes, what were those changes? Section V: Measures and Indicators (Note: The Measures and Indicators Sections (D) (G) are only required for jurisdictions issuing more than 50 new residential building permits in the reporting year). (A) In the Total column in Table 1, New Residential Permits Issued (Inside and Outside the PFA) in (C) below, enter the total number of new residential building permits issued in calendar year (2016). Enter 0 if no new residential building permits were issued in (Note: For annual reporting purposes, tabulate the amount of new residential building permits issued at time your jurisdiction has granted the ability for a new residential unit to be constructed. It does not mean that the unit has been constructed, will be constructed, or is occupied. If your local definition of building permit varies, please indicate the definition used to tabulate new residential building permits. Reconstruction or replacement permits should be included as new residential permits. Additionally, tracking the amount of reconstruction, replacement or demolition of residential units in Table 2A may be beneficial when conducting the Development Capacity Analysis in Section VIII.) (B) In the PFA column in Table 1, enter the total number of permits issued inside the Priority Funding Area (PFA). Enter 0 if no new residential building permits issued inside the PFA in (C) In the Non-PFA column in Table 1, enter the total number of permits issued outside the PFA. Enter 0 if no new residential building permits issued outside the PFA in
11 Table 1: New Residential Permits Issued (Inside and Outside the PFA) Residential PFA Non - PFA Total # New Residential Permits Issued (Note: At a minimum, each jurisdiction should submit the information requested in Table 1: New Residential Permits Issued (Inside and Outside the PFA) as part of their Annual Report. If no residential permits were issued, then indicate 0 in each column.) (D) If the Total number of new residential permits in Table 1 is less than 50, then Tables 2A and 2B are optional and can be used to locally monitor changes less than 50 permits. Skip to (E) if the Total number of new residential permits in Table 1 is 50 or more. Table 2A: Amount of Residential Growth (Inside and Outside the PFA) Residential PFA Non - PFA Total # Units Approved # Units Constructed # Minor Subdivisions Approved # Major Subdivisions Approved Total Approved Subdivision Area (Gross Acres) # Lots Approved Total Approved Lot Area (Net Acres) # Units Demolished* # Units Reconstructed/Replaced* *Not required. 7
12 Table 2B: Amount of Commercial Growth (Inside and Outside the PFA) Commercial PFA Non - PFA Total # Permits Issued # Lots Approved Total Building Square Feet Approved (Gross) 280,913 27, ,131 Total Square Feet Constructed (Gross) 181,468 52, ,878 (E) Were more than 50 new residential building permits issued in 2017? Y N 1. If no, then the remainder of this Section is optional. Skip to Section VI: Locally Funded Agricultural Land Preservation. 2. If yes, then complete Tables 3 through 5 for Residential Growth and Tables 6 through 8 for Commercial Growth in (F) and (G) below. (F) Amount, Net Density and Share of Residential Growth: (Note: To calculate the amount, net density and share of residential growth, jurisdictions must identify the total number of new residential building permits issued; the total number of new residential units approved; the total number of new residential lots approved; the total approved gross acreage of new residential subdivisions; and net lot area. A number of values are repeated in Tables 1 through 5. Be sure to enter consistent values for each similar category used in these tables.) Table 3: Amount of Residential Growth (Inside and Outside the PFA) Residential PFA Non - PFA Total # Permits Issued # Units Approved # Units Constructed Total Approved Subdivision Area (Gross Acres) # Lots Approved Table 4: Net Density of Residential Growth (Inside and Outside the PFA) Residential PFA Non PFA Total # Units Approved Total Approved Lot Size (Net Acres)
13 Table 5: Share of Residential Growth (Inside and Outside the PFA) Residential PFA Non PFA Total # Units Approved % of Total Units (# Units/Total Units) 79% 21% 100% (G) Amount, Net Density and Share of Commercial Growth: (Note: To calculate the amount, net density and share of commercial growth, jurisdictions must identify the total number of new commercial permits issued; the total square footage of the commercial building approved; the total number of new commercial lots approved; the total new commercial subdivision area (gross acres); and the total approved subdivision net lot area, in acres for all new commercial subdivisions. The total building square footage (gross) and total lot size values (net acres) should be the same for Tables 6 through 8. For annual report purposes, all approved square footage (gross) should be tabulated, with the understanding that not all building square footage reported may be used for commercial or retail related activities. Commercial growth should include retail, office, hotel, industrial uses and may include other uses, such as, mixed-use, institutional and agricultural structures, if approved for commercial use.) Table 6: Amount of Commercial Growth (Inside and Outside the PFA) Commercial PFA Non - PFA Total # Permits Issued Total Building Square Feet Approved (Gross) 280,913 27, ,131 # Lots Approved Total Subdivision Area (Gross Acres) Table 7: Net Density of Commercial Growth (Inside and Outside the PFA) Commercial PFA Non PFA Total Total Building Square Feet Approved (Gross) 280,913 27, ,131 Total Lot Size (Net Acres) Table 8: Share of Commercial Growth (Inside and Outside the PFA) Commercial PFA Non PFA Total Total Building Square Feet Approved (Gross) 280,913 27, ,131 % of Total Building Sq. Ft. (Total Bldg. Sq. Ft./Total Sq. Ft.) 91% 9% 100% 9
14 Section VI: (Locally) Funded Agricultural Land Preservation (A) How many acres were preserved using local agricultural land preservation funding? Enter 0 if no acres were preserved using local funds. 0 Acres. Section VII: Local Land Use Percentage Goal (A) Is all land within the boundaries of the jurisdiction in the PFA? Y N 1. If yes, then the local land use percentage goal does not need to be established. Skip to Section VIII: Development Capacity Analysis. 2. If no, then the jurisdiction must establish a local percentage goal to achieve the statewide land use goal, under 1-208(2) of the Land Use Article, to increase the current percentage of growth located inside the PFAs and decrease the percentage of growth (new lots and new residential units) located outside the PFAs. Go to (B). (B) What is the jurisdiction s established local land use percentage goal? To direct at least 70% of growth in PFA and not more than 30% be permitted outside the PFA. (C) What is the timeframe for achieving the local land use percentage goal? Annually. (D) Has there been any progress in achieving the local land use percentage goal? The county employs a zoning ordinance and a water and sewerage plan to manage land use and infrastructure. The capital improvements program and the annual report help measure the success of achieving this goal. (E) What are the resources necessary for infrastructure inside the PFAs? The Land Use and Growth Management Element of the comprehensive plan specifically states infrastructure must be built and maintained in existing communities. The basics: water, sewer, schools and roads are absolute prerequisites for denser and walkable communities, libraries, parks, cultural and recreational and other similar facilities and amenities enrich local communities. Being identified in the comprehensive plan sets up the framework for their implementation. By identifying growth areas and preservation areas, infrastructure can be built and maintained in specific areas where resources can be focused. (F) What are the resources necessary for land preservation outside the PFAs? Agricultural preservation programs, the county's comprehensive plan, zoning ordinance, subdivision ordinance, water sewer plan, TDRs, and septics law. 10
15 Section VIII: Development Capacity Analysis (DCA) (A) Has an updated DCA been submitted with your Annual Report or to MDP within the last three years? (Note: A DCA is required every 3-years and whenever there is a significant change in zoning or land use pattern. See 1-208(c)(iii) of the Land Use Article. A DCA may be submitted independently from the Annual Report, such as, part of a comprehensive plan update.) 1. If no, explain why an updated DCA has not been submitted, such as, no substantial growth changes, etc. 2. If yes, skip to (B) Y N (Note: MDP provides technical assistance to local governments in completing development capacity analyses. Please contact your MDP regional planner for more information.) (B) When was the last DCA submitted? Identify Month and Year: April 2016 (C) Using the DCA, provide the following data on capacity inside and outside the PFA in Table 9, Residential Development Capacity (Inside and Outside the PFA): Table 9: Residential Development Capacity (Inside and Outside the PFA) Parcels & Lots w/ Residential Capacity PFA Non PFA Total Residentially Zoned Acres w/ Capacity 6,183 93,676 99,860 Residential Parcel & Lots w/capacity 1,966 4,256 6,222 Residential Capacity (Units) 10,876 14,590 25,466 11
16 Section IX: Adequate Public Facility Ordinance (APFO) Restrictions (Section IX is only required by jurisdictions with adopted APFOs) (A) Does your jurisdiction have any adopted APFOs? Y N 1. If no, skip this Section. 2. If yes, go to (B). (B) Has your jurisdiction submitted a biennial APFO Report under of the Land Use Article? 1. If yes, skip this Section. 2. If no, then complete (C) through (I) below for each restriction. (Note: Jurisdictions with adopted APFOs must submit a biennial APFO report when a restriction within the PFA occurs within the reporting period. The APFO report is due by July 1 of each even year and covers the reporting period for the previous two calendar years. The last cycle included years 2014 and 2015 and the APFO report was due by July 1, APFO reports for 2016 and 2017 are due July 1, 2018.) No restrictions occurred within the PFA (C) What is the type of infrastructure affected? (List each for Schools, Roads, Water, Sewer, Stormwater, Health Care, Fire, Police or Solid Waste.) N/A Y N (D) Where is each restriction located? (Identify on a map if possible.) N/A (E) Describe the nature of what is causing each restriction. N/A (F) What is the proposed resolution of each restriction (if available)? N/A (G) What is the estimated date for the resolution of each restriction (if available)? N/A (H) What is the resolution that lifted each restriction (if applicable)? N/A (I) When was each restriction lifted (if applicable)? N/A (J) Has your jurisdiction reported the restrictions reported in (C) through (I) above as part of the required biennial APFO annual reporting requirements? N/A Y N 12
17 Election District % Total Population of St. Mary's County Average * July 1, 2010* Population Estimates and Projections by Election District July 1, 2011* July 1, 2012* July 1, 2013* July 1, 2014* July 1, 2015* July 1, 2016* July 1, 2017* ,151 86,211 75, , , , , , , , , , , , , , % 6.6% 7.1% 6.8% 7,190 7,327 7,412 7,455 7,516 7,576 7,667 7,673 8,510 9,330 10,115 10,618 11, % 8.0% 6.6% 7.0% 7,402 7,543 7,630 7,674 7,737 7,799 7,919 7,924 8,761 9,604 10,413 10,931 11, % 12.6% 11.9% 13.1% 13,852 14,116 14,278 14,362 14,480 14,595 14,693 14,703 16,395 17,973 19,486 20,456 21, % 11.1% 9.5% 10.1% 10,680 10,883 11,008 11,073 11,164 11,253 11,364 11,372 12,640 13,857 15,024 15,771 16, % 11.6% 12.5% 11.9% 12,583 12,823 12,970 13,046 13,153 13,258 13,349 13,359 14,893 16,327 17,701 18,582 19, % 15.2% 13.7% 13.5% 14,275 14,547 14,932 14,800 14,922 15,041 15,199 15,210 16,895 18,522 20,081 21,080 22, % 3.3% 4.0% 3.5% 3,701 3,771 3,815 3,837 3,869 3,899 3,922 3,925 4,380 4,802 5,206 5,465 5, % 31.3% 34.4% 33.9% 35,846 36,529 36,949 37,166 37,470 37,769 38,159 38,187 42,426 46,511 50,426 52,935 55, % 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% * Sources: Maryland Department of Planning, Planning Data Services, Actual population by Election District is available only for 1990, 2000, and Estimates by for other years are calculated by DLUGM based on the averages shown in the table.
18 Section X: Submitting Annual Reports and Technical Assistance (A) Annual Reports may be submitted via to or one copy may be mailed to: Office of the Secretary Maryland Department of Planning 301 W. Preston Street, Suite 1101 Baltimore, Maryland Attn: David Dahlstrom, AICP (B) Annual Reports should include a cover letter indicating that the Planning Commission has approved the Annual Report and acknowledging that a copy of the Annual Report has been filed with the local legislative body. The cover letter should indicate a point of contact(s) if there are technical questions about your Annual Report. Before ing the Annual Report: 1. Was this Annual Report approved by the planning commission/board? Y N 2. Was this Annual Report filed with the local legislative body? Y N 3. Does the cover letter: a. Acknowledge that the planning commission/board has approved the Annual Report. Y N b. Acknowledge that the Annual Report has been filed with the local legislative body? Y N c. Answer if all members of the Planning Commission/Board and Board of Appeals have completed an educational training course as required under under 1-206(a)(2) of the Land Use Article? Y N (Note: See Planning.Maryland.gov/YourPart/MPCA/PCBZACompletedEd.shtml for a list having completed the course.) d. Indicate a point of contact(s)? Y N (C) You may wish to send an additional copy of your Annual Report directly to your MDP Regional Office via or hardcopy. (D) If you need any technical assistance in preparing or submitting your reports, our Regional Planners are available to assist you. Regional Planner contact information can be found at: Planning.Maryland.gov/OurWork/local-planning-staff.shtml (E) Copies of this Annual Report worksheet and links to legislation creating these Annual Report requirements can be found on the Maryland Department of Planning website: Planning.Maryland.gov/YourPart/SGGAnnualReport.shtml (F) If you have any suggestions to improve this worksheet or any of the annual report materials, please list or contact David Dahlstrom at david.dahlstrom@maryland.gov. 13
Annual Report Worksheet Reporting (Calendar) Year Section I: Amendments and Growth Related Changes in Development Patterns
Jurisdiction Name: Anne Arundel County Planning Contact Name: Margaret Kaii-Ziegler. Planning Administrator, OPZ: Research/GIS Division Planning Contact Phone Number: 410-222-7462 Planning Contact Email:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION
MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION MCPB Item No. 3 Date: 06-08-17 Planning Board Draft Plan- MDP Local Jurisdiction Annual Report Jay Mukherjee,
CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PLANNING BOARD Meeting Date: July 17, 2018 Planning Board Case No. 1670I
CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PLANNING BOARD Meeting Date: July 17, 2018 Planning Board Case No. 1670I Palms Gateway Commercial Planned Development (CPD) Southeast Corner of Belvedere Road and Australian Avenue
ANNEXATION POLICY, PROGRAM, AND PLAN. Presented to the City Council By the Planning and Development Department
ANNEXATION POLICY, PROGRAM, AND PLAN Presented to the City Council By the Planning and Development Department August 2, 2011 1 Purpose Review the following: Annexation policy Annexation program Annexation
Implementation Guidance for The Sustainable Growth and Agricultural Preservation Act of 2012 Senate Bill 236
Implementation Guidance for The Sustainable Growth and Agricultural Preservation Act of 2012 Senate Bill 236 May 22, 2012 Version 1.0 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary... 1 1.1 Bill Highlights...
Residential Capacity Estimate
Residential Capacity Estimate Montgomery County Department of Park & Planning Research & Technology Center January 2005 Current plans allow 75,000 more housing units. by Matthew Greene, Research Planner
Implementation Guidance. for. The Sustainable Growth and Agricultural Preservation Act of Senate Bill 236
Implementation Guidance for The Sustainable Growth and Agricultural Preservation Act of 2012 Senate Bill 236 August 1, 2012 Version 2.0 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary... 1 1.1 Bill Highlights...
Sec Planned unit development (PUD) zoning district requirements and procedures.
Sec. 10-6.696. Planned unit development (PUD) zoning district requirements and procedures. (a) Purpose and intent of district. The planned unit development (PUD) zoning district is intended to provide
Chapter 100 Planned Unit Development in Corvallis Urban Fringe
100.100 Scope and Purpose. Chapter 100 Planned Unit Development in Corvallis Urban Fringe (1) All applications for land divisions in the Urban Residential (UR) and Flood Plain Agriculture (FPA) zones within
APPLICATION TO: PLANNING COMMISSION ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
City Staff Use Only Project Project Number Review Fee Paid Escrow Fee Paid APPLICATION TO: PLANNING COMMISSION ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 224 W Buffalo St, New Buffalo, MI 49117 City Hall: 269-469-1500 Building
Town of Yucca Valley GENERAL PLAN 1
Town of Yucca Valley GENERAL PLAN 1 This page intentionally left blank. 3 HOUSING ELEMENT The Housing Element is intended to guide residential development and preservation consistent with the overall values
Syracuse Zoning Administration City Hall Commons 201 East Washington Street Syracuse, New York 13202
October 29, 2018 Syracuse Zoning Administration City Hall Commons 201 East Washington Street Syracuse, New York 13202 RE: Lot Alteration Application Proposed Dunkin Donuts 2083-2107 Park Street CHA Project
MINOR SUBDIVISION FINAL PLAT APPLICATION Town of Apex, North Carolina
MINOR SUBDIVISION FINAL PLAT APPLICATION Town of Apex, North Carolina This document is a public record under the North Carolina Public Records Act and may be published on the Town s website or disclosed
CITY OF NORTH PORT Neighborhood Development Services Planning Division Rezoning Packet
CITY OF NORTH PORT Neighborhood Development Services Planning Division Planninginfo@cityofnorthport.com Rezoning Packet The following items are to be included in the submission: Rezoning Application Affidavit(s)
ATTACHMENTS: 1. By-law No with proposed amendments 2. Supplementary Report Public Hearing CLEARANCES: DATE: October 5, 2017 APPROVALS:
TITLE: BY-LAW NO. 7175 DEVELOPMENT CHARGES PRESENTER: Heather Ewasiuk, City Clerk DEPARTMENT: City Clerk s Office ATTACHMENTS: 1. By-law No. 7175 with proposed amendments 2. Supplementary Report Public
Impact Fee Nexus & Economic Feasibility Study
Impact Fee Nexus & Economic Feasibility Study Stakeholder Working Group December 10, 2015 Urban Economics Agenda Follow Up From Last Meeting Proposals Presentation Proposals Discussion Wrap Up 1 Oakland
WOODLAND AREA GENERAL PLAN URBAN DEVELOPMENT POLICY
APPENDIX A WOODLAND AREA GENERAL PLAN URBAN DEVELOPMENT POLICY The following text indicates proposed amendments to the Woodland Area General Plan Urban Development Policy currently adopted and included
Walworth County Farmland Preservation Plan Update, Chapter 1 Plan Summary (Cover Document)
Background Walworth County Farmland Preservation Plan Update, 2012 Chapter 1 Plan Summary (Cover Document) For over 30-years, the Wisconsin Farmland Preservation Program has served to preserve Walworth
Affordable Housing Advisory Committee Review of Recommendations. Planning and Development Department Community Development Division March 10, 2015
Affordable Housing Advisory Committee Review of Recommendations Planning and Development Department Community Development Division March 10, 2015 History of the State Housing Initiatives Partnership Program
BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. All applications must include two (2) sets of both site plans and construction documents as outlined below. Minimum fees will be collected at time of application.
City of Nogales Planning & Zoning Commission Rezoning Application
City of Nogales Planning & Zoning Commission Rezoning Application REZONING APPLICATION PROCEDURES 1450 N. Hohokam Nogales, Arizona 85621 Office (520) 285-5747 FAX (520) 287-6946 T.D.D. (520) The following
GUIDE TO THE CITY OF ANN ARBOR ANNEXATION PROCESS
GUIDE TO THE CITY OF ANN ARBOR ANNEXATION PROCESS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY PROPERTIES GENERAL INFORMATION Annexation is a process by which a parcel is released from the jurisdiction of Ann Arbor,
DRAFT. Development Impact Fee Model Ordinance. Mount Pleasant, SC. Draft Document. City Explained, Inc. J. R. Wilburn and Associates, Inc.
City Explained, Inc. J. R. Wilburn and Associates, Inc. Development Impact Fee Model Ordinance Mount Pleasant, SC Draft Document January 11, 2017 ARTICLE I. TITLE This ordinance shall be referred to as
MINUTES OF THE ST. MARY S COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ROOM 14 * GOVERNMENTAL CENTER * LEONARDTOWN, MARYLAND Monday, March 27, 2006
MINUTES OF THE ST. MARY S COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ROOM 14 * GOVERNMENTAL CENTER * LEONARDTOWN, MARYLAND Monday, March 27, 2006 Members present were Joseph St. Clair, Chair; Steve Reeves, Vice
TOWN OF SOUTH PALM BEACH 3577 South Ocean Boulevard, South Palm Beach, FL (561)
TOWN OF SOUTH PALM BEACH 3577 South Ocean Boulevard, South Palm Beach, FL 33480 (561) 588-8889 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION All information must be printed or typed. The completed application must be filed
Cover Letter with Narrative Statement
Cover Letter with Narrative Statement March 31, 2017 rev July 27, 2017 RE: Rushton Pointe Residential Planned Unit Development Application for Public Hearing for RPUD Rezone PL2015 000 0306 Mr. Eric Johnson,
SECTION A APPLICATION INFORMATION
PETITION/FILE NO. RECEIVED SENT TO FILE AMT PAID CHECKNO. REZONING MINOR AMENDMENT CITY OF ELIZABETH CITY PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT A.P. Midgett Municipal Building 302 Colonial Avenue
Implementing Pre-Application Neighborhood Meetings in Prince George s County A Discussion Paper
Implementing Pre-Application Neighborhood Meetings in Prince George s County A Discussion Paper Prince George s County Planning Department July 2016 Introduction This discussion paper focuses on the pre-application
AFFORDABLE HOUSING CONNECTIONS NOTES FOR CHART REPORTING (FOLLOW THESE INSTRUCTIONS TO AVOID FINDINGS)
AFFORDABLE HOUSING CONNECTIONS NOTES FOR HTC-12 PREPARATION AND REPORTING: PROGRAM YEAR 2015, DUE MARCH 15, 2016 (FOLLOW THESE INSTRUCTIONS TO AVOID FINDINGS) i. The HTC 12 requires the signature of the
R e z o n i n g A p p l i c a t i o n S u b m i s s i o n R e q u i r e m e n t s
H O R R Y C O U N T Y P L A N N I N G & Z O N I N G 1 3 0 1 2 N D A V E., S U I T E 1 D - 0 9 C O N W A Y, S. C. 2 9 5 2 6 P H O N E : 8 4 3. 9 1 5. 5 3 4 0 F A X : 8 4 3. 9 1 5. 6 3 4 1 R e z o n i n
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 14, 2015
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 14, 2015 The meeting of the Manteca City Planning Commission held on Tuesday,, was called to order by Chairman Nuño at 7:00 p.m. COMMISSIONERS PRESENT:
BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION GUIDE
BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION GUIDE SISKIYOU COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION 806 South Main Street, Yreka CA 96097 Phone: (530) 841-2100 / Fax: (530) 841-4076 WHAT IS A BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT? A Boundary
Nassau County Department of Planning & Economic Opportunity Nassau Place Yulee, Florida 32097
Nassau County Department of Planning & Economic Opportunity 96161 Nassau Place Yulee, Florida 32097 APPLICATION AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT (TEN (10) ACRES OR MORE) NOTICE: Florida
MINUTES OF THE ST. MARY S COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ROOM 14 * GOVERNMENTAL CENTER * LEONARDTOWN, MARYLAND Monday, May 8, 2006
MINUTES OF THE ST. MARY S COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ROOM 14 * GOVERNMENTAL CENTER * LEONARDTOWN, MARYLAND Monday, May 8, 2006 Members present were Joseph St. Clair, Chair; Steve Reeves, Vice Chair;
PROTOCOL FOR ZONING PERMIT SUBMITTAL
CALN TOWNSHIP Department of Code Enforcement Andrew F. Reczek, Director of Code Enforcement & Zoning Officer Raymond Stackhouse, Code Official &Fire Marshal Joseph Arvay, Property Main./Housing Inspector
Application to Amend the Bay County Zoning Map (Please type or print clearly)
Application to Amend the Bay County Zoning Map (Please type or print clearly) File No.: Date Received: A) Applicant Information Owners Authorized name: agent: Mailing Mailing address: address: E-mail:
HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE CITY OF PEMBROKE PINES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ADOPTION DOCUMENT
HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE CITY OF PEMBROKE PINES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RULES 9J-5.010, FAC City of Pembroke Pines, Florida ADOPTION DOCUMENT HOUSING ELEMENT HOUSING ELEMENT ADOPTION DOCUMENT VI. GOALS, OBJECTIVES
Land Development Code Update Workgroup AGENDA
Land Development Code Update Workgroup AGENDA Thursday, September 27, 2012 2:00 PM 4:00 PM Pinellas County Strategic Planning & Initiatives 310 Court Street, Clearwater, Florida 33756 ~ (727) 464-8200
COUNTY OF SONOMA PERMIT AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 2550 Ventura Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA (707) FAX (707)
COUNTY OF SONOMA PERMIT AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 2550 Ventura Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA 95403 (707) 565-1900 FAX (707) 565-1103 MEMO Date:, 1:05 p.m. To: Sonoma County Planning Commission From:
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Commissioners of St. Mary s County will hold a Public Hearing on Tuesday, May 15, 2018, beginning at 11:00 a.m. in the Chesapeake Building located
THE FOUNTAIN VALLEY HOUSING AUTHORITY
HOUSING SUCCESSOR ANNUAL REPORT REGARDING THE LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING ASSET FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013-14 PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 34176.1(f) FOR THE FOUNTAIN VALLEY
Request for Action form is also defined as an application to be considered by the Planning Commission.
CITY OF NORTH RIDGEVILLE INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING REQUEST FOR ACTION APPLICATIONS WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION (Please read the full instruction as it will help in providing a full complete application)
MINUTES OF THE ST. MARY S COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ROOM 14 * GOVERNMENTAL CENTER * LEONARDTOWN, MARYLAND Monday, June 27, 2005
MINUTES OF THE ST. MARY S COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ROOM 14 * GOVERNMENTAL CENTER * LEONARDTOWN, MARYLAND Monday, June 27, 2005 Members present were Larry Greenwell, Chairman; Joseph St. Clair,
Rule 80. Preservation of Primary Agricultural Soils Revised and approved by the Land Use Panel during its public meeting on January 31, 2006.
Rule 80. Preservation of Primary Agricultural Soils Revised and approved by the Land Use Panel during its public meeting on January 31, 2006. (A) Purpose. In accordance with 10 V.S.A. Sections 6025(b)
TOWN OF ROXBURY PLANNING BOARD
UPDATED: APRIL 2011 TOWN OF ROXBURY PLANNING BOARD Applicant s Guide for Subdivision Review The Town Planning Board administers the subdivision review process. This guide has been prepared in order to
SECTION IV. Recommended Motion: Staff recommends the following motion (with modifications and additions following discussion):
ST. MARY S COUNTY GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF LAND USE AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT William B. Hunt, AICP, Director Kathleen Easley, Deputy Director COMMISSIONERS OF ST. MARY S COUNTY James R. Guy, President Michael
THE THE CITY OF CYPRESS
HOUSING SUCCESSOR ANNUAL REPORT REGARDING THE LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING ASSET FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 34176.1(f) FOR THE THE CITY OF CYPRESS
FINAL SITE PLAN PLAT APPLICATION Town of Apex, North Carolina
FINAL SITE PLAN PLAT APPLICATION Town of Apex, North Carolina This document is a public record under the North Carolina Public Records Act and may be published on the Town s website or disclosed to third
MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION
MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION MCPB Item No. 8 Date: 03-07-13 Sonoma, Preliminary Plan, 120130040 Melissa Williams, Senior Planner, Melissa.williams@montgomeryplanning.org,
Plat/Site Plan Application
Instructions Plat/Site Plan Application For your application to be officially accepted for processing, you must complete this application in full. The owner/agent certification must be signed and notarized
WHEREAS, the staff of The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission recommended APPROVAL of the application with conditions; and
R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, Redeemed Christian Church of God is the owner of a 2.83-acre parcel of land known as Lot 9, Lot 19, P/O Lot 1 and P/O Lot 18, Block B, Plat Book A, Plat 5, said property being
Lincoln County Board of Commissioner s Agenda Item Cover Sheet
Lincoln County Board of Commissioner s Agenda Item Cover Sheet Board Meeting Date: Agenda Item Type: Consent Agenda: Public Hearing: Regular Agenda: Presentation Time (est): Submitting Person: Phone Number/Ext:
AAR SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
VILLAGE OF ROYAL PALM BEACH PLANNING and ZONING 1050 Royal Palm Beach Boulevard Royal Palm Beach, FL 33411 (561) 790-5131 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION AAR SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Application Date Submitted: Application
TOWN OF WARWICK PLANNING BOARD SKETCH PLAN APPLICATION PACKAGE
Chairperson: Benjamin Astorino TOWN OF WARWICK PLANNING BOARD SKETCH PLAN APPLICATION PACKAGE Members: Secretary: Russell Kowal Dennis McConnell Roger Showalter Bo Kennedy Connie Sardo Planning Board Engineer:
CHAPTER 26 PLANNING AND ZONING ARTICLE VII. MOBILE HOMES AND RECREATIONAL VEHICLE (RV) PARKS. Recreational Vehicle (RV) Park Development Standards
CHAPTER 26 PLANNING AND ZONING ARTICLE VII. MOBILE HOMES AND RECREATIONAL VEHICLE (RV) PARKS. Section 26-VII-1. Section 26-VII-2. Section 26-VII-3. Section 26-VII-4. Section 26-VII-5. Purpose Permitted
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION
COUNTY STAFF DATA ONLY Date Received: Project No. CPA-20 - GADSDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1-B East Jefferson Street, Post Office Box 1799, Quincy, FL 32353-1799 PLANNING
EAST COCALICO TOWNSHIP BUILDING / ZONING PERMIT PROCEDURE AND GENERAL NOTES Revised 6/12/2012
EAST COCALICO TOWNSHIP BUILDING / ZONING PERMIT PROCEDURE AND GENERAL NOTES Revised 6/12/2012 BUILDING PERMITS: Please be reminded that building and/or zoning permits are required for all construction
Updating the Housing Element Planning for your Community s Future
Updating the Housing Element Planning for your Community s Future Melinda Coy, Policy Specialist California Department of Housing and Community Development 2013 Life is Better When We are Connected The
Mount Airy Planning Commission March 26, Staff Report
Mount Airy Planning Commission March 26, 2018 Staff Report Special Exception Request Mixed Use Development in CC District Recommendation to Board of Appeals CASE MA-A-18-01 Applicant: Location: Zoning:
AB 1397 HOUSING ELEMENT LAW SITE IDENTIFICATION STRENGTHENED OVERVIEW
AB 1397 HOUSING ELEMENT LAW SITE IDENTIFICATION STRENGTHENED OVERVIEW The 2017 California legislative session yielded a housing package of 15 bills that significantly increased both the available financing
THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY PLANNING BOARD STAFF REPORT
THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY PLANNING BOARD STAFF REPORT SUBJECT Implementation of the Sustainable Growth and Agricultural Preservation Act of 2012
Planning Commission Application Summary
Planning Commission Application Summary Project Name: Ballard Property Rezone Address: 12773 & 12775 South 300 East, 415 East Pheasant View Dr. Current Zoning: RA1 (Residential 40,000 sq. ft. minimum)
CONSTRUCTION PLAN APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PACKAGE REQUIREMENTS
Development Services Department, 3363 West Park Place, Pensacola, Fl 32505 (850) 595-3475 www.myescambia.com CONSTRUCTION PLAN APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PACKAGE REQUIREMENTS All Construction Plan Submittal
PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION
PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION Application No.: W-2014-00288 Application Name: O Reilly Auto Parts Control No.: 2013-00286 Applicant: Hutton Growth Blue Sky
BALTIMORE REGIONAL FAIR HOUSING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2/19/13
BALTIMORE REGIONAL FAIR HOUSING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2/19/13 Overall Highlights Table below adds at least one shaded implementation row for each Fair Housing Action Plan item. Year columns at right provide
Community & Infrastructure Services Committee
REPORT TO: DATE OF MEETING: September 12, 2016 Community & Infrastructure Services Committee SUBMITTED BY: Alain Pinard, Director of Planning, 519-741-2200 ext. 7319 PREPARED BY: Natalie Goss, Senior Planner,
12 REGIONAL CENTRES AND CORRIDORS PROGRAM UPDATE
Clause No. 12 in Report No. 11 of was adopted, without amendment, by the Council of The Regional Municipality of York at its meeting held on June 26, 2014. 12 REGIONAL CENTRES AND CORRIDORS PROGRAM UPDATE
MASTER INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT IMPLEMENTATION IN YAKIMA COUNTY TABLE OF CONTENTS
MASTER INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT IMPLEMENTATION IN YAKIMA COUNTY TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PREAMBLE A. Purpose... 1 B. Background... 2 II. AGREEMENT A. Parties to Agreement... 3 B. Authority...
FINDINGS OF FACT. Page 1 of 8
FINDINGS OF FACT The City/County Planning staff has prepared the Findings of Fact for the Emerald View Park Subdivision, Amended Lot 1A, Block 3. These findings are based on the preliminary plat application
Conservation & Development Policies: The Plan for Connecticut
2013-2018 Conservation & Development Policies: The Plan for Connecticut CT Land Conservation Council March 21, 2015 www.ct.gov/opm/cdplan CT s Planning Framework State statutes include three separate,
RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA METHODOLOGY CY2009 (Prepared November 2010)
A. Source of Data RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA METHODOLOGY CY2009 (Prepared November 2010) The Sales data for calendar year (CY) 2009 are derived from the MdProperty View 1 Sales Databases created for Maryland
COLLIER COUNTY Growth Management Department
COLLIER COUNTY Growth Management Department March 24, 2016 Tim Hancock, AICP Stntec Consulting Services Inc. 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34105 EMAIL - Tim.Hancock@stantec.com RE: Planned Unit
Initial Subdivision Applications Shall Include the Following:
Initial Subdivision Applications Shall Include the Following: 1) Subdivision Application Form: completely filled out (12 copies) 2) Plat: The Plat must adhere to the requirements set forth in the Town
MASTER SUBDIVISION FINAL PLAT APPLICATION Town of Apex, North Carolina
MASTER SUBDIVISION FINAL PLAT APPLICATION Town of Apex, North Carolina This document is a public record under the North Carolina Public Records Act and may be published to the Town s website or disclosed
THE LONG BEACH COMMUNITY INVESTMENT COMPANY
HOUSING SUCCESSOR ANNUAL REPORT REGARDING THE LOW- AND MODERATE- INCOME HOUSING ASSET FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013-14 PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 34176.1(f) FOR THE LONG BEACH COMMUNITY
The Bonus Zoning policy will be applied in conjunction with the Implementation policies contained within the Official Plan.
Policy Title: Bonus Zoning Policy Number: 07-03-01 Section: Community Development Subsection: Planning Tools Effective Date: September 26, 2012 Last Review Date: Approved by: Council Owner Division/Contact:
2011 AICP Review Course
2011 AICP Review Course March 2011 Alex Dambach, AICP, PP Director of Policy, Planning, and Development City of East Orange Exam Content A. Strategic planning/visioning B. Goal setting C. Research methods
BOSSIER CITY PARISH METROPOLITAN PLANNING COMMISSION 620 Benton Rd. Bossier City, LA Phone: Fax: PRELIMINARY PLAT
(OFFICE USE ONLY) Application Fee: Paid: Date: CASE # Project Information BOSSIER CITY PARISH METROPOLITAN PLANNING COMMISSION 620 Benton Rd. Bossier City, LA 71111 Phone: 318-741-8824 Fax: 318-741-8827
CITY OF IRVINE HOUSING SUCCESSOR ANNUAL REPORT FOR LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING ASSET FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR
CITY OF IRVINE HOUSING SUCCESSOR ANNUAL REPORT FOR LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING ASSET FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014-2015 The City of Irvine Housing Successor Annual Report (Report) for the Low and Moderate
I. Amount Received Pursuant to Section : This section provides a total amount of funds received pursuant to Section (b)(3)(A).
HOUSING SUCCESSOR ANNUAL REPORT REGARDING THE LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING ASSET FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017 PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 34176.1(f) FOR THE TUSTIN HOUSING
Settlement Pattern & Form with service costs analysis Preliminary Report
Settlement Pattern & Form with service costs analysis Preliminary Report Prepared for Regional Planning Halifax Regional Municipality by Financial Services, HRM May 15, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...
HB-S RM8-S RS9 RM18 HB-S RS9 DOCKET #: W2872. PROPOSED ZONING: RM8-S (Child Day Care Center) EXISTING ZONING: RS9 and RM8-S
150' 80' RS9 UNIVERSITY PW STANLEYVILLE DR HB-S LB 123' 70' PROPOSED BELTWAY!( RM8-S S 289' NOEL DR 202' NITA AV MILL CREEK DOCKET #: W2872 PROPOSED ZONING: RM8-S (Child Day Care Center) EXISTING ZONING:
RS9 LB-S RSQ-S RS9 RS9 DOCKET: W2822 PROPOSED ZONING: LB EXISTING ZONING: RS-9. PETITIONER: J&J Properties of W-S, LLC, for property owned by Same
HAYMOUNT ST RS9 IP DOCKET: W2822 PROPOSED ZONING: LB POPE RD CLEMMONSVILLE RD EXISTING ZONING: RS-9 RSQ-S LB-S OLD SALISBURY RD WINSTON-SALEM ZONING FORSYTH COUNTY ZONING PETITIONER: J&J Properties of
CITY OF SPRINGDALE, OHIO SPRINGDALE BUILDING DEPARTMENT SPRINGFIELD PIKE SPRINGDALE, OHIO TELEPHONE: (513)
CITY OF SPRINGDALE, OHIO SPRINGDALE BUILDING DEPARTMENT 11700 SPRINGFIELD PIKE SPRINGDALE, OHIO 45246 TELEPHONE: (513) 346-5730 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR MINOR REVISIONS TO PUD/TRANSITION
KERN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION
KERN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION To be considered for CDBG assistance, please submit this completed application with the required attachments. Applications which do not contain
Instructions: Script:
Before the course, select four of the 11 tool topics to insert into the presentation, including at least one tool from each of the three goal categories. Replace each tool placeholder slide with the slides
Planning Department Oconee County, Georgia STAFF REPORT
Planning Department Oconee County, Georgia STAFF REPORT REZONE CASE #: 7332 DATE: November 28, 2017 STAFF REPORT BY: Gabriel Quintas, Planner APPLICANT NAME: Smith Planning Group PROPERTY OWNER: John Hadden
Washington County CDBG/HOME Application for Funds
Washington County CDBG/HOME Application for Funds Washington County Community Development Agency 2018 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) & Home Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) Funds Applicant
ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION and INSTRUCTIONS
ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION and INSTRUCTIONS INSTRUCTIONS 1. Completely fill out, sign, and date the attached form. Include a check for $35.00 payable to the Borough of Oradell or exact cash amount. Please
City of Merced Page 1
HOUSING SUCCESSOR ANNUAL REPORT REGARDING THE LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING ASSET FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016-17 PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 34176.1(f) FOR THE CITY OF MERCED
City of Altamonte Springs Developer s Guide
Section 6 SUBDIVISION PLAN & PLAT REVIEW PROCESS This section contains information, applications, and checklists related to the subdivision development plan and plat review process in Altamonte Springs.
CHAIRMAN WOLPERT AND MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE LOCAL AND MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT AND URBAN REVITALIZATION COMMITTEE
TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CHAIRMAN WOLPERT AND MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE LOCAL AND MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT AND URBAN REVITALIZATION COMMITTEE LARRY LONG, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ASSOCIATION OF OHIO (CCAO)
KERN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION
KERN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION To be considered for CDBG assistance, please submit this completed application with the required attachments. Applications which do not contain
(if more than one, give square footage for each) ANNEXATION LOT LINE Adjustments PRE/FINAL PLAT SPECIAL USE PERMIT
Planning Commission Application Building & development office 915 Third ST. Rawlins WY ph. 307-328-4599 fax. 307-328-4590 PROJECT REVIEW: GENERAL INFORMATION Project name: OFFICE USE ONLY Site address
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Jim DellaLonga, Director of Economic Development
14-O TO: ATTENTION: FROM: SUBJECT: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Jeffrey L. Stewart, City Manager Jim DellaLonga, Director of Economic Development Consideration and possible action to
CITY OF MEDFORD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BUILDABLE LAND INVENTORY
CITY OF MEDFORD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PREPARED BY CITY OF MEDFORD PLANNING DEPARTMENT 200 SOUTH IVY STREET MEDFORD, OREGON 97501 BIANCA PETROU, A.I.C.P., ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR LONG RANGE PLANNING SECTION
TASK 2 INITIAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS U.S. 301/GALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR FORM-BASED CODE
TASK 2 INITIAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS U.S. 301/GALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR FORM-BASED CODE INTRODUCTION Using the framework established by the U.S. 301/Gall Boulevard Corridor Regulating Plan (Regulating Plan),
CHAPTER REAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT FEES. Sections:
17.16.010 CHAPTER 17.16 REAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT FEES Sections: 17.16.010 Definitions. 17.16.020 Applicability, Payment and Tracking of Fees 17.16.030 Garbage collection capital fee. 17.16.040 Fee for
JURISDICTIONAL RUNOFF MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ENFORCEMENT RESPONSE PLAN
CITY OF ESCONDIDO JURISDICTIONAL RUNOFF MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ENFORCEMENT RESPONSE PLAN June 2015 Utilities Department Environmental Programs Division 201 N. Broadway Escondido, CA 92025 760-839-4668 TABLE
Greenfield Development Requirements
Greenfield Development Requirements Planning & Engineering Department City of Yorkton Saskatchewan 2014 Summary Greenfield Development refers to the development of raw land to a finished state as residential,