Date: January 28, Meeting Notice - Revised. 5:30 p.m. Call to Order 5:31 p.m. Pledge of Allegiance

Transcription

1 MEMBERS James Gurr 12/31/2016 Chair Rick Teague 12/31/2015 Vice Chair Barbara Bradford 12/31/2016 Secretary Jill Barnard - 12/31/2015 Bill Bailey 12/31/2016 Mike Hayes - 12/31/2016 Ron Tschudy -12/31/2017 Chuck Johnson term elected Laura Stanek term elected ADVISORY Stan Moore STAFF Pete Garwood County Administrator garwoodp@antrimcounty.org Janet Koch Associate Planner kochj@antrimcounty.org Tina Schrader Administrative Assistant schradert@antrimcounty.org Katie Verellen Secretary verellenk@antrimcounty.org To: From: Antrim County Planning Commission Antrim County Planning Commission Janet Koch, Associate Planner Date: January 28, 2015 Re: Meeting Notice - Revised The Antrim County Planning Commission meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, February 3, 2015 at 5:30 p.m. Board of Commissioner s Room Antrim County Building 203 East Cayuga Street, Bellaire, Michigan 5:30 p.m. Call to Order 5:31 p.m. Pledge of Allegiance Agenda 5:32 p.m. Conflict of Interest Disclosure 5:33 p.m. Public Comment 5:34 p.m. Approval of Minutes 5:35 p.m. Appointment recommendation to Capital Improvements Committee 5:45 p.m. Marion Township Master Plan 6:15 p.m. Norwood Township Master Plan Various Matters Public/Member Comment Adjournment OFFICE ADDRESS P.O. Box 187 Bellaire, MI PHONE: FAX: SPECIAL ASSISTANCE If you wish to attend a Planning Commission Meeting and require special assistance, please contact the Administration and Planning Office. If you have any questions, concerns or are unable to attend this meeting, please contact the Administration and Planning Office at We appreciate your cooperation in this matter. Thank you. Enclosures: 2015 Planning Commission Roster Planning Commission Minutes January 6, 2015 Board of Commissioner Minutes January 2015 Marion Township Master Plan Norwood Township Master Plan Staff Review of Master Plans

2 Peter Garwood Administrator Janet Koch Associate Planner Antrim County Planning Commission P.O. Box 187 Bellaire, Michigan First Tuesday of the month at 5:30 p.m. in the Board of Commissioners Room. Phone: Fax: James Gurr - Chair P.O. Box 162 Alden, Michigan ardenfarm@torchlake.com Barb Bradford - Secretary P.O. Box 884 Bellaire, Michigan bjbradford8335@gmail.com Mike Hayes 6542 Holly Glen Drive Elmira, MI greenacres@avci.net Bill Bailey 1592 N. Intermediate Lake Rd. Central Lake, Michigan billbailey1@outlook.com Rick Teague Vice Chair 6150 W. Elder Road Bellaire, MI RBT@torchlake.com Jill Barnard 6633 Bellaire Hwy Bellaire, Michigan jillbarnard@hotmail.com Ron Tschudy 3245 Six Mile Lake Rd East Jordan, MI ctschudy@torchlake.com Laura Stanek 5688 Stanek Rd., East Jordan, MI County Commissioner Term of Elected Office lstanek@hughes.net Chuck Johnson P.O. Box 965 Mancelona, MI County Commissioner Term of Elected Office johnsonc@antrimcounty.org Advisory Member Non Voting Stan Moore MSU Extension Educator P.O. Box 427 Bellaire, Michigan moores@msue.msu.edu

3 DRAFT County of Antrim Planning Commission Jill Barnard Jim Gurr, Chairman Laura Stanek Mike Hayes Rick Teague, Vice-Chair Karen Bargy Bill Bailey Barbara Bradford, Secretary Ron Tschudy Minutes January 6, 2015 Board of Commissioners Room, 2nd Floor, Antrim County Building, Bellaire, Michigan Members Present: Members Absent: Staff and Others: Jim Gurr, Bill Bailey, Jill Barnard, Barb Bradford, Mike Hayes and Rick Teague Karen Bargy, Laura Stanek and Ron Tschudy Peter Garwood, Stan Moore and Janet Koch 1. Meeting called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Peter Garwood, County Administrator 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Conflict of Interest Disclosure None. 4. Public Comment None. 5. Organizational Meeting Mr. Garwood chaired the organizational meeting. Nominations: Jim Gurr was nominated for Chairman by Bill Bailey. Motion by Jill Barnard, seconded by Barb Bradford, to close nominations for Chairman and cast a unanimous ballot for Jim Gurr. Motion carried unanimous. Rick Teague was nominated for Vice-Chairman by Barb Bradford. Motion by Jill Barnard, seconded by Bill Bailey, to close nominations for Vice-Chairman and cast a unanimous ballot for Rick Teague. Motion carried unanimous. Barb Bradford was nominated for Secretary by Mike Hayes. Motion by Jill Barnard, seconded by Jim Gurr, to close nominations for Secretary and cast a unanimous ballot for Barb Bradford. Motion carried unanimous. Motion by Mike Hayes, seconded by Jill Barnard, to set the regular meetings for the first Tuesday of the month at 5:00 p.m. Antrim County Planning Commission Page 1 of 2

4 DRAFT Motion by Mike Hayes, seconded by Jill Barnard, to rescind the above motion. Motion by Mike Hayes, seconded by Jill Barnard, to set the regular meetings for the first Tuesday of the month at 5:30 p.m. Motion carried unanimous. The remainder of the meeting was chaired by Mr. Gurr. 6. Approval of Minutes Three corrections were noted. Two were on the first page; Stan Moore should have been noted as absent and a line space was needed before Staff and Others. The third was a name change in the motion for agenda item 7 from Bill Bradford to Barb Bradford. Motion by Rick Teague, seconded by Bill Bailey, to approve the December 2, 2014 minutes as corrected. Motion carried unanimous. 7. Milton Township Master Plan The Planning Commission discussed the proposed Master Plan. It was noted that while the draft zoning plan had an R-3 district in the map s legend, there was no R-3 visible on the map. The Planning Commission also noted there was no R-2 zoning district. Motion by Barb Bradford, seconded by Rick Teague, that the proposed Milton Township Master Plan does not conflict with the Antrim County Master Plan, and to include the staff review with a letter to the Township. Motion carried unanimous. 8. Various Matters Public/Member Comment Ms. Bradford suggested that the Planning Commission ask Leslie Meyers, the Antrim County Emergency Services Director, if they could provide any assistance for the Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan. Mr. Garwood said the Plan was essentially complete. The Planning Commission discussed if there should be an approved Planning Commission approach toward accomplishing some of the Master Plan s implementation steps. Janet Koch, Associate Planner, said there would be two master plans to review at the next meeting. Mike Hayes described a public hearing in Mancelona Township regarding a township special assessment for the disposal of waste and the curbside/roadside collection of recyclables materials. The TCE plume was also discussed. The meeting adjourned at 8:50 p.m. Submitted and Approved Barb Bradford, Secretary Antrim County Planning Comm. Date: Antrim County Planning Commission Page 2 of 2

5 ANTRIM COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Monday, January 05, 2015 ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING Sheryl Guy, County Clerk, called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. The County Clerk delivered the oath of Office to the following Board members. Present: District #1 David Heeres District #2 Robert Wilson District #3 Karen Bargy District #4 Ed Boettcher District #5 Bryan Smith District #6 Michael Crawford District #7 Laura Stanek District #9 Christian Marcus Absent: District #8 Bernard Blackmore Pledge of Allegiance to the U.S. flag. Moment of Silence The County Clerk appointed Peter Garwood, County Administrator teller for the election. The County Clerk requested nominations for Chairman. Ed Boettcher nominated Michael Crawford. Karen Bargy nominated Laura Stanek. It was moved by Boettcher, seconded by Marcus that the nominations be closed. The results of the vote for Chairman were as follows: Michael Crawford 5 Laura Stanek 3 Michael Crawford was declared Chairman. The County Clerk requested nominations for Vice-chairman. Ed Boettcher nominated Laura Stanek. Christian Marcus nominated Karen Bargy. It was moved by Ed Boettcher, seconded by Christian Marcus that the nominations be closed. The results of the roll call vote for the Vice-Chairman were as follows: Laura Stanek 7 Karen Bargy 1 Laura Stanek was declared Vice-chairman. 1

6 ANTRIM COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Monday, January 05, 2015 Michael Crawford took the Chairman s seat and conducted the remainder of the meeting. The Chairman requested Public Comment: There was none. RESOLUTION #01-15 by Christian Marcus, seconded by Ed Boettcher REGULAR BOARD MEETING DAYS AND TIMES BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED the 2015 regular meeting of the Antrim County Board of Commissioners be held on the 2 nd Thursday of each month at 9:00 a.m. in the Commissioners Room of the Antrim County Building. Yes Heeres, Boettcher, Smith, Crawford, Stanek, Marcus; No Wilson, Bargy; Absent Blackmore. RESOLUTION #01-15 DECLARED ADOPTED. RESOLUTION #02-15 by Ed Boettcher, seconded by Karen Bargy CIVIL RIGHTS ACT/AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT/FAMILY MEDICAL & FAMILY LEAVE ACT WHEREAS, Antrim County desires to comply with the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, and the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1992 in all entities: BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED that, Antrim County shall comply with the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, and the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1992 in the employment and retention of personnel, and all other phases pursuant to these Acts, and affirms its policy prohibiting discriminatory practices, policies, and customs that violate the rights of any citizen or lawful permanent resident of the United States on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, creed, sex, age, weight, height, marital status, or physical disability and/or ability and hereby adopts a broadened policy encouraging participation of minorities, the handicapped, and the disabled. Yes Heeres, Wilson, Bargy, Boettcher, Smith, Crawford, Stanek, Marcus; No None; Absent Blackmore. RESOLUTION #02-15 DECLARED ADOPTED. RESOLUTION #03-15 by Ed Boettcher, seconded by Christian Marcus PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION OF MINUTES WHEREAS, Public Act #344 of 1982 changes and extends the procedures under which the Board of Commissioners must make the report of its meetings available to the public, and 2

7 ANTRIM COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Monday, January 05, 2015 Resolution #03-15 continued WHEREAS, the Antrim County Board of Commissioners intends to continue the procedure under which it is currently making the report of its meetings available to the public; BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED that, pursuant to P.A. #344 of 1982, the Antrim County Board of Commissioners will direct the County Clerk to make a report of session of the Board available as soon as possible after each session in the Office of the County Clerk for public inspection and copying without charge, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, pursuant to P.A. #344 of 1982, sec 9c, copies of the report of each session will be mailed or ed upon request without charge, and BE IT ALSO FURTHER RESOLVED that, it be advertised in the County newspapers that the report of each open session is available from the Office of the County Clerk without charge. BE IT ALSO FURTHER RESOLVED that, the County Board of Commissioners minutes be posted on the Antrim County web site when available and approved. Yes Heeres, Wilson, Bargy, Boettcher, Smith, Crawford, Stanek, Marcus; No None; Absent Blackmore. RESOLUTION #03-15 DECLARED ADOPTED. RESOLUTION #04-15 by Ed Boettcher, seconded by Karen Bargy 2015 ANNUAL REPORTS WHEREAS, Michigan P.A. #156 of 1851, as amended, confers on Boards of Commissioners the following power require a county officer whose salary or compensation is paid by the County to make a report under oath to the County Board of Commissioners on a subject connected with the duties of that office ; BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED that, the following county officers be required to make a 2014 Annual Report in the form stipulated by the Board of Commissioners by the second Thursday, in July 2015: Prosecuting Attorney, Sheriff, County Clerk, County Treasurer, Register of Deeds, Drain Commissioner, Dam Operator, County Surveyor, Probate Judge, District Court, Circuit Court, Abstractor, County Administrator, Planning Director, County Accountant, Building Official, Animal Control Officer, ACT Director, Airport Manager, Housing Director, I.T. Coordinator, Commission on Aging Director, Medical Examiner, Emergency Services Coordinator, and Veterans Counselor, and also the following Agencies: North Country Community Mental Health, Meadow Brook Medical Care Facility, Department of Human Services, MSU Extension, Antrim Conservation District (County Forester, Soil Erosion Control), 3

8 ANTRIM COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Monday, January 05, 2015 Resolution #04-15 continued Antrim County Community Collaborative, Road Commission, Northern Lakes Economic Alliance, Grass River Natural Area, Inc., Meadowview Apartments, the Antrim County Fair Board and Other Agencies contractually required to report to the County. BE IT ALSO RESOLVED that, each report last not more than fifteen (15) minutes. Yes Heeres, Wilson, Bargy, Boettcher, Smith, Crawford, Stanek, Marcus; No None; Absent Blackmore. RESOLUTION #04-15 DECLARED ADOPTED. It was moved by Marcus, seconded by Boettcher the Antrim County Commissioners Procedures as approved April 13, 2000 and amended on February 8, 2001, February 14, 2002, November 14, 2002, February 9, 2006, January 7, 2010, January 12, 2012, January 3, 2013, March 14, 2013, October 9, 2014, November 13, 2014 and January 5, 2015 continue to be used in the year Motion carried as follows: Yes Heeres, Bargy, Boettcher, Smith, Crawford, Stanek, Marcus; No Wilson; Absent Blackmore. Bryan Smith left the meeting at 9:30 a.m. Bryan Smith returned to meeting at 9:33 a.m. RESOLUTION #05-15 by Ed Boettcher, seconded by Karen Bargy EXPENDITURE APPROVAL WHEREAS, under generally accepted auditing standards and the standards applicable to financial audits in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Department of Treasury State of Michigan, all Antrim County expenditures shall have prior approval of the governing body, and WHEREAS, it has been determined by audit that Antrim County shall comply with this accounting standard, BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED, that all Antrim County expenditures in General Fund Type, Special Revenue Fund Type, Capital Project Fund Type, and Enterprise Fund Type Funds be approved for 2015 at the monthly meeting of the Antrim County Board of Commissioners with some exceptions, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the following expenditures be considered the exceptions and be considered approved by passage of this Resolution: 1. Special Revenue Fund Types for which the payment approval has been designated to another board or agency either by law or by action of the Board of Commissioners including but not limited to Meadowbrook Operating Fund, Road Commission, Veterans Affairs, Child 4

9 ANTRIM COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Monday, January 05, 2015 Resolution #05-15 continued Care, Register of Deeds Automation, Meadowview Operating, Commission on Aging and other similar Funds. 2. Special Revenue Fund Types that involve grant agreements including but not limited to Housing grants, Parks grants, Emergency Services grants, Antrim County Transportation/Dial a-ride grants, Law Enforcement grants, Commission on Aging grants, and other similar Funds. 3. Appropriations to other Agencies as designated in the current year s budgets. 4. Any payroll and related fringe benefit expenses. 5. Expenditures which lack of timely payment results in late fees including but not limited to utilities, credit cards, and other similar expenses. 6. Contractual obligations including but not limited to trash removal, plowing, construction projects, maintenance contracts, insurance, and other similar expenditures. 7. Any expenses which the Chief Administrative/Fiscal Officer deems, due to circumstances, should be paid immediately, such expenses to be signed as approved by the Chief Administrative/Fiscal Officer. Yes Heeres, Bargy, Boettcher, Smith, Crawford, Stanek, Marcus; No Wilson; Absent Blackmore. RESOLUTION #05-14 DECLARED ADOPTED. RESOLUTION #06-15 by Ed Boettcher, seconded by Laura Stanek DESIGNATION DEPOSITORIES BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, the Antrim County Board of Commissioners hereby adopts the following institutions and their subsidiaries as depositories of Antrim County funds for the year 2015: Alden State Bank Bank of America Bay Winds Federal Credit Union Charlevoix State Bank Chemical Bank Comerica Fifth Third Bank First Federal of Northern Michigan FirstMerit Bank Flagstar Bank 5

10 ANTRIM COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Monday, January 05, 2015 Resolution #06-15 continued Huntington Bank PNC Bank Talmer Bank & Trust The Private Bank Wolverine Bank Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Fifth Third Securities, Inc. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. Michigan CLASS UBS Financial Services Inc. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the County Treasurer be authorized to use these designated institutions. Yes Heeres, Bargy, Boettcher, Smith, Crawford, Stanek, Marcus; No Wilson; Absent Blackmore. RESOLUTION #06-15 DECLARED ADOPTED. RESOLUTION # by Ed Boettcher, seconded by Laura Stanek COUNTY TREASURER S INVESTMENT AUTHORITY WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Act No 20 of the Public Acts of Michigan of 1943, as amended ( Act 20 ) the Board of Commissioners of the County of Antrim may authorize the County Treasurer to invest County funds in certain investments; and WHEREAS, this Board wishes to authorize such investments as are permitted by Act 20; and WHEREAS, section 5, of Act 20 required this Board of Commissioners in conjunction with the County Treasurer to adopt an investment policy which complies with the provisions of Act 20; and WHEREAS, the County Treasurer has submitted a proposed Investment Policy which complies with provisions of Act 20; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF ANTRIM as follows: 1. The County Treasurer is authorized to invest funds of the County of Antrim in investments authorized by Act The Investment Policy attached hereto as Appendix 1 is approved and shall take effect on January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2016 (see pages). 3. Before executing an order to purchase or trade the funds of the County of Antrim a financial intermediary, broker, or dealer shall be provided with a copy of the County s Investment Policy and shall acknowledge receipt of the Investment Policy 6

11 ANTRIM COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Monday, January 05, 2015 Resolution #07-15 continued and agree to comply with the terms of the Investment Policy regarding the buying or selling of securities by executing the form as Appendix The County Treasurer is authorized to rely on the continuing effect of this resolution until and unless it is specifically amended or rescinded by a future resolution of the Board of Commissioners. 5. This resolution shall take effect on Thursday, January 1, Yes Heeres, Wilson, Bargy, Boettcher, Smith, Crawford, Stanek, Marcus; No None; Absent Blackmore. RESOLUTION #07-15 DECLARED ADOPTED. RESOLUTION #08-15 by Laura Stanek, seconded by Ed Boettcher TAX WAIVERS BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that the Antrim County Board of Commissioners provides all of the following taxes paid before May 1 in the first year of delinquency for the homestead property of a senior citizen, paraplegic, eligible serviceman, eligible veteran, eligible widow, totally and permanently disable, or blind person, as those persons are defined in Chapter 9 of the Income Tax Act of 1967, PA 281, MCL to , if a claim is made before February 15 for the credit provided by Chapter 9 of the income tax act of 1967, 1967 PA 281, MCL to , if that claimant presents a copy of the form filed for the credit to the County Treasurer, and if that claimant has not received the credit before March 1: a. Any interest, fee, or penalty in excess of the interest, fee or penalty that would have been added if the tax had been paid before February 15 is waived. b. Interest paid under subsection (1) of section 89 (1)(a) is waived unless the interest is pledged to the repayment of delinquent tax revolving fund notes or payable to the county delinquent tax revolving fund, in which case the interest shall be refunded from the general fund of the county. c. The county property tax administration fee is waived. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Antrim County Board of Commissioners approves the following: a. The treasurer of the local tax collecting shall indicate on the delinquent tax roll if a 1% property tax administrative fee was added to taxes collected before February 15. b. The fees authorized and collected under this section and credited to the delinquent property tax administration fund shall be used by the department of treasury to pay expenses incurred in the administration of this act. 7

12 ANTRIM COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Monday, January 05, 2015 Resolution continued c. The county property tax administration fee shall be used by the county to offset the costs incurred in and ancillary to collecting delinquent property taxes and for purposes authorized by sections 87b and 87d. Yes Heeres, Wilson, Bargy, Boettcher, Smith, Crawford, Stanek, Marcus; No None; Absent Blackmore. RESOLUTION #08-15 DECLARED ADOPTED. The Chairman requested Public Comment. There was none. The meeting adjourned at 9:55 a.m. Sheryl Guy, County Clerk Michael Crawford, Chairman 8

13 ANTRIM COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Thursday, January 08, 2015 Draft copy Chairman Michael Crawford called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. Present: David Heeres, Robert Wilson, Karen Bargy, Ed Boettcher, Bryan Smith, Michael Crawford, Laura Stanek, Christian Marcus. Absent: District #8 Pledge of Allegiance to the U.S. flag. Moment of Silence The Chairman requested Public Comment: There was none. Jim Rossiter spoke of the resignation of District #8 County Commissioner, Bernard Blackmore, and that the Board will have to make the decision to either appoint within 30 days of the resignation or call a special election to fill the remainder of the term of office. Peter Garwood reported that the Commission on Aging (COA) clerical position Clerk II was approved at the December Board meeting and that the Administration Committee makes the recommendation to the Board on which applicant to hire. Due to the delay of the hiring process, he requested that the Board authorize the Administrative Committee to make the final decision. It was moved by Marcus, seconded by Wilson to authorize the Administrative Committee to make the final hiring decision for the Clerk II position at the Antrim County Commission on Aging (COA). Motion carried as follows: Yes Heeres, Wilson, Bargy, Boettcher, Smith, Crawford, Stanek, Marcus; No None; Absent None. Peter Garwood reported that three (3) VAV box controllers in the 1905 Courthouse have failed and that eight (8) of the VAV controllers from the replacement project in the County Building were salvaged and in decent condition. Havel has provided quotes for the replacement using three (3) new VAV boxes, wall sensors and installation at a cost of $3, and the option to replace using the salvaged VAV boxes, reconnect existing sensors at a cost of $1, It was moved by Boettcher, seconded by Heeres to approve the quote from Havel for the replacement of the failed VAV box controllers in the 1905 Courthouse with units salvaged from the County Building on a time and material basis not to exceed $1,975.00, and to be paid from the 1905 General Fund budget, Building Maintenance. Motion carried as follows: Yes Heeres, Wilson, Bargy, Boettcher, Smith, Crawford, Stanek, Marcus; No None; Absent None. Peter Garwood reported that due to timing of the meeting and appointment of the Buildings, Land and Infrastructure Committee the approval will be needed for the Meadowbrook Construction 1

14 Project monthly Request for Change Orders; Owner Change Orders; and the Christman Application for payment. ANTRIM COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Thursday, January 08, 2015 It was moved by Heeres, seconded by Stanek that the Request for Change Orders #209 (Phase 4 miscellaneous drywall items), #211 (Phase 4 floor preparation), #218 (Rework of D corridor columns for fire marshal) and #220 (HVAC changes for Bulletin #31) totaling $22, be approved. Motion carried as follows: Yes Heeres, Wilson, Bargy, Boettcher, Smith, Crawford, Stanek, Marcus; No None; Absent None. It was moved by Marcus, seconded by Smith that the Request for Change Order #227 (credit for unused landscape allowance) totaling $1, be approved. Motion carried as follows: Yes Heeres, Wilson, Bargy, Boettcher, Smith, Crawford, Stanek, Marcus; No None; Absent None. It was moved by Marcus, seconded by Smith that for the Meadowbrook Renovation Project, Owner Change Order #39 totaling $8, be approved and added to Contingencies. Motion carried as follows: Yes Heeres, Wilson, Boettcher, Smith, Crawford, Stanek, Marcus; No Bargy; Absent None. It was moved by Boettcher, seconded by Bargy that the application for payment from the Christman Company for the work on the Meadowbrook Medical Care Facility Renovation Project totaling $115, be approved and paid. Motion carried as follows: Yes Heeres, Wilson, Bargy, Boettcher, Smith, Crawford, Stanek, Marcus; No None; Absent None. Consent Agenda: Bargy requested that two items be removed from the Consent Agenda as follows: Administration Officer Copier Lease Quotes and Courthouse Security It was moved by Boettcher, seconded by Marcus the Claims and Accounts in the amount of $240, be approved and paid. Motion carried as follows: Yes Heeres, Wilson, Bargy, Boettcher, Smith, Crawford, Stanek, Marcus; No None; Absent None. It was moved by Boettcher, seconded by Marcus that the Chairman be authorized to sign the one (1) year agreement with the United State Geological Survey (USGS), the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and the County for a lake level gauge on the Upper Chain of Lakes (in Central Lake) at a cost of $5, to be approved and paid from Fund #220 Special Assessments- Dams Contractual Services ( ). Motion carried as follows: Yes Heeres, Wilson, Bargy, Boettcher, Smith, Crawford, Stanek, Marcus; No None; Absent None. It was moved by Boettcher, seconded by Marcus that the County Accountant be approved to make the 2014 Year End Budget Amendments for the General Fund and Other Funds as proposed during the January 5, 2015 Finance Committee meeting. Motion carried as follows: Yes Heeres, Wilson, Bargy, Boettcher, Smith, Crawford, Stanek, Marcus; No None; Absent None. 2

15 ANTRIM COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Thursday, January 08, 2015 It was moved by Boettcher, seconded by Marcus that the vehicle bids be accepted for the high bids from Richard Powell of $1, for the 2006 GMC Savana and $ for the 2006 Crown Victoria Interceptor. Motion carried as follows: Yes Heeres, Wilson, Bargy, Boettcher, Smith, Crawford, Stanek, Marcus; No None; Absent None. It was moved by Bargy, seconded by Marcus that the Chairman be authorized to sign the five (5) year lease agreement for a Xerox 7835 copier for the Administration Office at the cost of $2, per year and that $2,350, be paid from the General Fund, County Administration, Lease ( ) and that the remaining $ be paid from the County Administrator General Fund budget. Motion carried as follows: Yes Heeres, Wilson, Bargy, Boettcher, Smith, Crawford, Stanek, Marcus; No None; Absent None. It was moved by Bargy, seconded by Marcus that the Sheriff be authorized to hire a part time officer for courthouse security at a cost of $15, and that a 2015 budget amendment be made from the General Fund, Fund Balance to the Sheriff General Fund budget to cover the wages and fringes for part time position ( ). Motion carried as follows: Yes Heeres, Wilson, Bargy, Boettcher, Smith, Crawford, Stanek, Marcus; No -None; Absent None. It was moved by Bargy, seconded by Boettcher that the minutes of December 11, 2014 be approved. Motion carried Unanimous. It was moved by Stanek, seconded by Heeres that the minutes of January 5, 2015 be approved. Motion carried Unanimous. It was moved by Stanek, seconded by Heeres that the Administration and County Services Committee begin the review process of all County Policies and present their recommendations for amendments to the full Board. Motion carried Unanimous. Robert Wilson left the meeting at 10:00 a.m. It was moved by Stanek, seconded by Boettcher that the Board retire to Closed Session to discuss pending litigation with Attorney Haider Kazim and the Prosecuting Attorney, and his Assistant, County Administrator, County Clerk and the Family Court Administrator be requested to stay in closed session. Motion carried all members present voting yes. The Board retired to Closed Session at 10:02 a.m. The Board returned to Open Session at 11:30 a.m. The Chairman appointed Christian Marcus to represent the Board for the Settlement Conference of the 13 th Circuit Court Civil Case # NM: Farris V Antrim County, etal. It was moved by Stanek, seconded by Boettcher that Christian Marcus be appointed as representative on behalf of the Antrim County Board for the scheduled Settlement Conference in Circuit 3

16 Court Case # NM: Farris v Antrim County, etal. Motion carried as follows: Yes Heeres, Bargy, Boettcher, Smith, Crawford, Stanek, Marcus; No None; Absent Wilson. ANTRIM COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Thursday, January 08, 2015 The Chairman requested input on the resignation of Commissioner District #8 Bernard Blackmore and spoke on the options available to the Board. The Board can make an Appointment to fill position with a resident and registered voter of Commissioner District #8, within 30 days from the resignation date and the appointed person will complete the term ending December 31, The County Administration office has received letters of interest from Chuck Johnson and Janice Young; or call for a Special Primary Election and a Special General Election to fill the position by the voters of Commissioner District #8. There was no decision reached. The Chairman called for a Special Board meeting to be held Tuesday, January 13, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. for the Board to review options. This will allow the County Clerk time to gather information regarding the process to set Special Election dates. The Board will make a decision at this meeting to call the Special Election or make an appointment to fill the term. The Chairman appointed Ed Kiessel to the Northern Lakes Economic Alliance (NLEA) Board. It was moved by Stanek, seconded by Bargy the appointment of Ed Kiessel to the Northern Lakes Economic Alliance Board (NLEA), term to expire be approved. Motion carried as follows: Yes Heeres, Bargy, Boettcher, Smith, Crawford, Stanek, Marcus; No None; Absent Wilson. The Chairman appointed Burt Thompson to the E -911 Board. It was moved by Stanek, seconded by Boettcher the appointment of Burt Thompson to the E-911 Board, term to expire be approved. Motion carried as follows: Yes Heeres, Bargy, Boettcher, Smith, Crawford, Stanek, Marcus; No None; Absent Wilson. Jim Rossiter spoke of the letter he received from the Office of the Attorney General on the ACUTE (Antrim County United Through Ecology), and MAWSA (Mancelona Area Water and Sewer Authority); requesting that the County become a co-sponsor to help install TCE-related improvements in the public drinking water system Plume matter. This was not an Opinion and the letter offered no changes in advice to the County than previously reported. The Chairman requested that the County Administrator contact all governmental units involved to set up a joint meeting with the Health and Public Safety Committee to determine the current status of all entities involved and continue to work to pursue a community-wide approach to reach a long range solution. The Chairman requested Public Comment: There was none. It was moved by Stanek, seconded by Boettcher to approve the Closed Session minutes of December 11, Motion carried Unanimous. The meeting adjourned at 1:07 p.m. to the Call of the Chair. Michael Crawford, Chairman 4

17 Sheryl Guy, County Clerk 5

18 ANTRIM COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Tuesday, January 13, 2015 Draft copy SPECIAL MEETING Chairman Michael Crawford called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. Present: Absent: David Heeres, Robert Wilson, Karen Bargy, Ed Boettcher, Bryan Smith, Michael Crawford, Laura Stanek, Christian Marcus. District #8 Representation Pledge of Allegiance to the U.S. flag. Jim Rossiter spoke to the Board on the options available to them according to election law when a vacancy occurs in the office of commissioner, the vacancy shall be filled by appointment within 30 days by the county board of commissioners with a resident and registered voter of that district filling the remainder of the unexpired term. If the board votes not to appoint, a special primary and a special general election will be called by the Board. Peter Garwood spoke on the revision of the proposed 2015 Commissioner Appointments of Standing Committees, Various Boards and commissions. The Chairman appointed Chuck Johnson to fill the vacant Commissioner District #8 position for the remainder of the unexpired term. It was moved by Stanek, seconded by Boettcher that Chuck Johnson be appointed to serve as County Commissioner from District #08, term to expire December 31, 2016 be approved. Motion carried as follows: Yes Wilson, Boettcher, Smith, Crawford, Stanek, Marcus; No Heeres, Bargy; Absent None. The Chairman made the following appointments to the Standing Committees. STANDING COMMITTEES Administrative & County Services Ed Boettcher, Chairman David Heeres Laura Stanek Finance, Ways & Means (Committee of the Whole) Laura Stanek, Chairman Ed Boettcher, alternate Building, Lands & Infrastructure Chuck Johnson, Chairman Ed Boettcher Bryan Smith Health & Public Safety Karen Bargy, Chairman Christian Marcus Robert Wilson 1

19 ANTRIM COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Tuesday, January 13, 2015 It was moved by Smith, seconded by Heeres that the above names of Standing Committees be approved. Motion carried as follows: Yes Heeres, Wilson, Bargy, Boettcher, Smith, Crawford, Stanek, Marcus; No None; Absent None. The Chairman made the following appointments for the Various Boards and Commissions. VARIOUS BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS Other Appointments Commissioners Antrim County Board Commission Christian Marcus term of elected office Antrim Conservation District Liaison Bryan Smith term of elected office Antrim Creek Natural Area David Heeres term of elected office Antrim Fair Board Liaison Karen Bargy term of elected office Area Agency on Aging Karen Bargy term of elected office Capital Improvement Committee Chuck Johnson term of appointment Capital Improvement Committee Ed Boettcher term of elected office Capital Improvement Committee Bryan Smith term of elected office Commission on Aging Laurie Stanek term of elected office Community Corrections Christian Marcus term of elected office Community Collaborative Board Bryan Smith term of elected office E-911 Board Ed Boettcher term of elected office EDC/BRA Board David Heeres term of elected office Grass River Natural Area Liaison Laura Stanek term of elected office Glacial Hills Work Group Ed Boettcher term of elected office Housing Committee Chuck Johnson term of appointment Housing Committee Bryan Smith term of elected office Meadow Brook Liaison Robert Wilson term of elected office North Country Community Mental Health Christian Marcus term of elected office NW MI Community Health Department Karen Bargy term of elected office NW MI Community Health Department Robert Wilson term of elected office Networks Northwest (formerly NWMCOG) Michael Crawford term of elected office Networks Northwest (alternate) Robert Wilson term of elected office Northern Lakes Economic Alliance David Heeres term of elected office Parks & Recreation Advisory Michael Crawford term of elected office Planning Commission Laura Stanek term of elected office Planning Commission Chuck Johnson term of appointment Solid Waste/Recycling Robert Wilson term of elected office Veteran s Affairs Robert Wilson term of elected office Circuit Court and District Court Liaisons Michael Crawford (Chairman Board of Commissioners) Debra Haydell (Chief Administrative Fiscal Officer) Laura Stanek (Chairman, Finance, Ways & Means Committee) Peter Garwood (Antrim County Administrator) 2

20 ANTRIM COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Tuesday, January 13, 2015 It was moved by Stanek, seconded by Smith the named appointments to Other Commissions to which Commissioners are appointed as representatives be approved. Motion carried as follows: Yes Heeres, Wilson, Bargy, Boettcher, Smith, Crawford, Stanek, Marcus; No None; Absent None. The Chairman made the following appointments: Capital Improvement Committee Mike Hayes Peter Garwood Debra Haydell Valerie Craft David Vitale It was moved by Stanek, seconded by Bargy the above named appointments to the Capital Improvement Committee be approved and that the Planning Commission make one additional recommendation to Board for approval. Motion carried as follows: Yes Heeres, Wilson, Bargy, Boettcher, Smith, Crawford, Stanek, Marcus; No None; Absent None. Peter Garwood spoke on Commissioner Orientation set for Wednesday, January 28, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. The meeting adjourned at 10:27 a.m. to the Call of the Chair. Sheryl Guy, County Clerk Michael Crawford, Chairman 3

21 Marion Township Master Plan 2014/2015 Update DISTRIBUTION DRAFT DECEMBER 2014 Planning assistance provided by: M. C. Planning & Design 504 Liberty Street Petoskey, MI (231)

22 Marion Township Master Plan 2014/2015 Update Charlevoix County Michigan Prepared by the: Marion Township Planning Commission John Ochs, Chair Dana Dvoracek Stephen Guthrie Ron Hilton Tim Matchett Walt Rosenthal Jim Shull With planning assistance from: M.C. Planning & Design 504 Liberty Street Petoskey, MI Initial Planning Commission Adoption: September 23, Update-Planning Commission Adoption: July 22, /2015 Update Adoption: PC Twp Bd

23 Marion Township Master Plan /2015 Update Table of Contents Section I: Introduction and Purpose I-1 Section II: Community Profile A. Existing Land Use II A-1 B. Natural Resources II B-1 C. Physical Opportunities and Constraints II C-1 D. Population, Housing and Socioeconomic Characteristics II D-1 E. Community Services, Facilities and Transportation II E-1 F Community Survey II F-1 Section III: Goals, Policies & Actions III-1 Section IV: Future Land Use Plan IV-1 Section V: Implementation Recommendations V-1 Appendix A: Summary and Analysis of Community Survey Results A-1 Appendix B: Public Hearing Minutes B-1 Appendix C: Legal Transmittals C-1 Marion Township Master Plan i

24 Section I: Introduction and Purpose Introduction This document, the Marion Township Master Plan 2014/2015 Update, presents a strategy for future land use and development. This plan update was prepared by the Marion Township Planning Commission with professional planning assistance from M. C. Planning & Design. The 2014/2015 Update is a minor update of the former 2008 Update. Upon review of the 2008 Update and the findings from a 2014 property owner survey, the Marion Township Planning Commission determined most of the prior plan was still applicable, but did update a few portions of the plan including demographic information, recent property value data, services and facilities information, as well as minor revisions to the goals and policies. The original plan which served as the basis for the 2002, 2008 and 2014/2015 Updates was prepared in cooperation with Banks and Norwood Township, and with professional assistance from the Charlevoix County office of MSU Extension, the Charlevoix County Planning Department, and consulting planners. The planning consultant, M. C. Planning & Design working closely with the Planning Commission reviewed, updated and supplemented the previously prepared plan(s) for the 2002, 2008 and 2014/2015 Updates. Purpose This document presents a strategy for future land use and development. It is not a zoning ordinance, and does not regulate the use or development of land in any way. This plan will assist elected and appointed officials when making choices between competing interests by serving as a guide for decision making. This Master Plan update was prepared and adopted under authority of the Michigan Planning Enabling Act (PA 33 of 2008, as amended) to serve the following purposes: Provide a basic plan consistent with the intent, purpose, and requirements of the Michigan Planning Enabling Act. Provide a legal and rational foundation for each community's zoning ordinance, and other ordinances adopted for the purpose of implementing this Plan. Provide goals and policies for future land use and development. Encourage the preservation and protection of natural and scenic resources. Promote the preservation of features that contribute to each community's character and to the area's tourism related economic base as characterized by low density of development, shorelines, woodlands, farmland, open space, and abundance of recreational amenities. Promote future patterns of land development that are consistent with goals established during the planning process. Delineate areas suited to various types and densities of land use and development. Provide guidelines and policies describing how future land uses should be established, and how land and natural resources should be altered or developed over time. Provide a tool for use by township officials during the process of reviewing future land development project proposals. Outline methods by which this plan may be implemented. Marion Township Master Plan Update I - 1 Distribution Draft: December 2014

25 Section II - Community Profile A. Existing Land Use According to the Census Bureau, Marion Township s land area is approximately 26.5 square miles. M.C. Planning & Design mapped the existing land use in the Township in February The map of existing land use, shown as Figure 2-1, illustrates the distribution of current land uses throughout the Township. Michigan Resource Information System (MIRIS) land cover/use classification categories were used to map the existing land use. The original state MIRIS mapping (1978) was updated by Charlevoix County with 1997 aerial photographs in combination with 1997 field checking, and further updated based on additional checking (conducted February 2002). The updated information was then computerized to produce the existing land use map and statistics. Figure 2-1 was reviewed by the Planning Commission for both the 2008 and 2014/2015 updates and it was determined to still reflect the existing land use. Table 2-1 presents the land uses in rank order, showing the number of acres and percent of the Township in each of the land use categories. Each of the land use categories is discussed below. Agricultural Although the percent of land in agricultural use has decreased since the earlier mapping in 1978, general and specialized farming still constitutes the predominant land use in the Township. As shown in Table 2-1, agricultural land occupied more than 29% of the Township land area in As is illustrated in Figure 2-1, the active agricultural lands are well dispersed across the Township. Prime or Important farmland soils are discussed and mapped in the Natural Resources portion of this section. Wetland Wetlands include land that has sufficient water at, or near the surface, to support wetland or aquatic vegetation. The Wetlands category includes both forested and nonforested wetlands. These areas are commonly referred to as swamps, marshes and bogs. The identified wetland areas include areas which support lowland hardwoods and conifers such as white cedar, willow and aspen species, as well as lowland brush and grasses. Wetlands and lowland forests comprise 25.4% of the Township area. As seen on Figure 2-1, the wetland areas are scattered throughout the Township, particularly along the lakes and creeks. Upland Forest Of the forested lands, northern hardwoods comprise the vast majority of the upland forestland, with limited upland conifers located in the Township. The upland forested lands are dominated by maple, beech and basswood, with some birch, white ash and aspen found there as well. The upland conifers are predominantly red and white pine. Marion Township Master Plan Update II A - 1 Distribution Draft: December 2014

26 Marion Township Master Plan Update II A - 2 Distribution Draft: December 2014

27 Nonforested / Open The nonforested land use category consists of nonforested upland and beach areas. The nonforested areas are typically comprised of herbaceous open and shrub land. As shown in Table 2-1, over 11% of the Township is in this category. Nonforested areas are scattered throughout the Township and are found in nearly all sections of the Township. Table 2-1 Existing Land Use Statistics Marion Township Land Use Acres Percent Agricultural 4, Wetlands / Forested Wetlands 4, Upland Forest 3, Nonforested Uplands 1, Residential 1, Water Recreation / Cemetery Industrial / Extractive Institutional Commercial Beaches 4 -- TOTAL 16, Residential Single family homes constitute the predominant developed land use in the community. Residential development is spread throughout the Township along roadways, as seen in Figure 2-1. Residential land use occupies more than seven (7) percent of the land area in the Township. Marion Township Master Plan Update II A - 3 Distribution Draft: December 2014

28 Water Open water comprises less than four (4) percent of the Marion Township. Included in this category are Adams Lake, East Twin Lake, West Twin Lake, Nowland Lake, Lake Marion, Skinner Lake, Matchett Lake, and the creeks. Recreation / Cemeteries The recreation land category includes the Belvedere Golf Course, the Marion Township Park and boat launch facilities. Additionally, this category includes the cemeteries located in the Township. Industrial / Extractive Marion Township has a limited amount of land in industrial use, less than one (1) percent. The majority of the property in this category consists of sand and gravel excavation operations. Additionally, the former Hoskins Manufacturing site is classified as industrial. The location of these areas is shown on Figure 2-1. Commercial Marion Township has limited commercial development, comprising 0.4 percent of the land area in the Township. As illustrated in Figure 2-1, the commercial and business development is concentrated primarily in two locations, along US-31 and along M-66 (at Loeb Road). Institutional Eighty-two (82) acres, or 0.5 percent of the Township, are mapped as institutional. This includes the recently-built high school and associated facilities on Marion Center Road, as well as the Township Hall and churches in the Township. Marion Township Master Plan Update II A - 4 Distribution Draft: December 2014

29 B. Natural Resources Marion Township s character is defined, in large part, by abundant natural resources, including lakes, ponds, streams, woodlands, farmlands, open space, wetlands, topography, and exceptional scenic beauty. These resources influence the suitability of land for various land uses and contribute to the area s desirability for year-round and seasonal residential and recreational development. Natural resources provide tangible benefits to residents and visitors alike. Lakes, streams, woodlands, meadows, wetlands, hydric soils, floodplains, topographic features, and scenic viewscapes are irreplaceable environmental, economic, and recreational resources, that are highly valued components of the community s character. The extent and location of natural resources were examined using Michigan Resource Inventory System (MIRIS) maps prepared by the Cooperative Extension Service, and other information gathered during the preliminary phases of the planning process. Maps illustrating natural features are included in this section of the plan. Descriptions of each feature appear below: Water Resources One of the most valuable natural resources of Marion Township is water. Marion Township abuts the shoreline of Lake Charlevoix. Additionally, a number of lakes and streams are found in the township. This location means the actions of this community will impact the waters and communities downstream. These waters as well as the many other smaller lakes and streams contribute to the area recreational activities. It is extremely important that the quality of these surface waters be protected from the negative impacts of development, such as pollution and loss of scenic views to open water. Lakes, ponds, and watercourses support aquatic, shoreline, and streambank wildlife habitats. Lakes and streams make significant contributions to Marion Township s character. Land adjacent to shorelines exhibits some of the community's higher densities of residential development. Proper land use management can help protect the quality of surface waters, and minimize damage to sensitive aquatic, shoreline, and streambank ecosystems in Marion Township. Both groundwater and surface water are vital resources within Marion Township. The majority of the Township relies on groundwater for drinking water. As shown in Figure 2-2, the majority of the Township is located in an area where vulnerability of drinking water aquifers to surface contamination is high due to permeable soils or sensitive drift lithology. Wetlands Wetlands provide habitat for a wide variety of plant and animal life, function as natural stormwater retention and filtration systems, and play a significant role in the groundwater recharge cycle. When drained or filled to provide developable land, these practical benefits can be irreparably altered or destroyed. The general wetland areas are mapped in Figure 2-1, Marion Township Master Plan Update II B - 1 Distribution Draft: December 2014

30 Figure 2-2: Marion Township Aquifer Vulnerability Map Marion Township Master Plan Update II B - 2 Distribution Draft: December 2014

31 Existing Land Cover / Use Map. Additionally, Figure 2-3 is a map of hydric or wetland soils. A comparison of the two maps shows more hydric soils indicated than actual wetland areas identified during the land use update. It is likely that some of the areas with hydric soils have been built upon and consequently are no longer classified as wetlands. Woodlands Woodlands provide renewable timber resources, wildlife habitat, buffer the sights and sounds of civilization, moderate the effects of wind, stabilize soils, contribute to the quality of air and surface water, store and filter stormwater, play an important role in the groundwater recharge process, and provide a wide range of recreational opportunities. The fractionalization of productive woodlands for home sites or other land uses impacts their ability to be managed for timber production or utilized by animal species requiring large contiguous areas. Clear cutting for development destroys wildlife habitat, and eliminates the benefits outlined above. See Figure 2-1 and Figure 2-4 for the locations of these forest areas. Geology and Topography According to geologists, the surface geology of the region was formed 10,000 to 12,000 years ago by glacial activity. Numerous advances and retreats by the glaciers resulted in the locally complex pattern of erosion and deposition. The drainage channels scoured by the glaciers resulted in the drumlin formations and depressions oriented linearly from northwest to southeast, as is visible in the Township s topography. Topography contributes to the Township's scenic beauty, and the region's recreational and economic base. Areas of rugged topography provide wildlife habitat, and opportunities for forestry and recreation, though are generally less suited to intensive development without extensive erosion control measures. Steep roadway grades, septic field failures, soil erosion and excavation costs are some of the difficulties associated with steep grades. The Opportunities and Constraints Map (Figure 2-8) shows areas with moderate and extreme slopes (greater than 12 percent), which are a constraint for potential development. Development in areas with severe slopes and ravines should be monitored. If development is permitted, sensitive site planning should be required along these slopes to prevent erosion. Soils Most Township residents rely on individual groundwater wells and private septic systems for water supplies and sewage disposal. Soils influence the capability of land to accommodate development. Soil characteristics present opportunities for the development of certain land uses, and limitations for others. Permeability, filtration capability, load bearing capacity, shrinkswell potential, slope, and soil type influence the suitability of land to accommodate septic system absorption fields (see Figure 2-5), building foundations and roadways. These same features influence the quality of wildlife habitat, and the productivity of agricultural and forestry operations. Marion Township Master Plan Update II B - 3 Distribution Draft: December 2014

32 Figure 2-3: Marion Township Hydric (Wetland) Soils Marion Township Master Plan Update II B - 4 Distribution Draft: December 2014

33 Marion Township Master Plan Update II B - 5 Distribution Draft: December 2014

34 Figure 2-4: Marion Township Forest Cover Figure 2-5: Marion Township Septic System Limits Marion Township Master Plan Update II B - 6 Distribution Draft: December 2014

35 The Marion Township Planning Commission examined maps illustrating the extent and location of soil characteristics during the planning process as a means of delineating areas within the community suited to various types of development. It should be noted that the maps are not site specific, and do not eliminate the need for detailed on-site investigations when land development proposals are made. Descriptions of soil characteristics examined during the planning process are as follows: Hydric/Wetland Soils Hydric/wetland soils are generally unsuited for septic system installations, road construction, and building site development. These soils tend to be of insufficient strength to support building foundations. Shrinking and swelling of soils during freeze/thaw cycles can damage building foundations unless soils are modified with appropriate fill material, see Figure 2-3. Septic Limitations High water table, wetness, slow permeability, slope, rapid permeability, and poor filtration capability influence the ability of septic systems to function properly. Hydric/wetland soils, and heavy clay soils are characterized by slow permeability and are generally considered unsuited for septic system installation. As seen in Figure 2-5, the entire Township is classified as having either moderate or severe septic limitations. Soils that exhibit rapid permeability or poor filtration capability are unable to adequately filter septic system effluent. Accordingly, septic systems constructed in such soils pose a threat of groundwater contamination from septic system effluent. Intensive development should be limited in areas with these types of soils, in order to help protect the groundwater. Farmland Soils Prime farmland soils possess fertility, nutrient holding capacity, texture, drainage, and slope characteristics which make them well suited to crop and forage production. These soils are considered important on a national basis. Soils characterized as prime if drained possess all of the above characteristics when artificially drained, see Figure 2-6. Important farmland soils possess all of the above characteristics, though slope is between six and twelve percent. These soils are highly productive when conservation tillage practices are used. For the purpose of planning, the most significant areas with prime soils are those currently in active agricultural use, as shown on the Development Opportunities and Constraints Map, Figure 2-8. Marion Township Master Plan Update II B - 7 Distribution Draft: December 2014

36 Figure 2-6: Marion Township Farmland Soils Marion Township Master Plan Update II B - 8 Distribution Draft: December 2014

37 Timberland Soils Timberland soils are rated on the basis of their timber production potential, and are classified as either national or regional. Soils classified as national are capable of producing greater than one cord, or 1,000 board feet of timber per year per acre, and are considered important on a national basis. Soils classified as regional are considered important on a regional and state basis, and are capable of producing from one-half to one cord of timber per acre. Typically, the highly productive timber soils also include the prime farm soils discussed above. The timber soils include a greater area because slope is not considered a significant limiting factor, see Figure 2-7. Marion Township Master Plan Update II B - 9 Distribution Draft: December 2014

38 Figure 2-7: Marion Township Timberland Soils Marion Township Master Plan Update II B - 10 Distribution Draft: December 2014

39 C. Physical Opportunities & Constraints As discussed in the previous Natural Resources portion of this Section, land in Marion Township is not uniformly suited for development. Figure 2-8 shows a Development Opportunities and Constraints Map. Thus the Development Opportunities and Constraints Map combines septic limitations information (steep slopes and hydric soils) with active agriculture on prime soils and existing development. The resulting map shows constraint areas where development should be severely restricted. Conversely, the white areas on the map identify pockets within the Township where development can be accommodated with the least impact to resources. The Opportunities and Constraints Map, in combination with the goals and policies identified in Section III, serves as the basis for the future land use map in Section IV. The primary areas identified for farmland preservation efforts are the areas shown on this map where active agriculture is identified on prime soils, and secondarily any other active agricultural areas. Marion Township Master Plan Update II C - 1 Distribution Draft: December 2014

40 Marion Township Master Plan Update II C - 2 Distribution Draft: December 2014

41 D. Population, Housing & Socioeconomic Characteristics Population The 2010 U.S. Census lists the population of Marion Township as 1,714 persons. The Township population is 50.8% (871) female and 49.2 (843) percent male. Marion Township experienced a population increase of 222 persons between 2000 and 2010, a 14.9% increase in population. As seen in Table 2-2 below, the population for Marion Township has increased by more than 80% in the past 30 years. Additionally, Marion Township has been steadily growing as a percent of the County population over at least the last 40 years. Charlevoix County's population has decreased slightly from 26,090 persons in 2000, to 25,949 persons in This represents a decrease of 141 persons or approximately -0.5% over ten years Table 2-2 Population Growth Marion Township and Charlevoix County % Change % Change % Change Marion Township % 1, % 1, % 1,714 Twp as % of County Population % 5.3% 5.7% 6.6% Charlevoix County 19, % 21, % 26, % 25,949 Source: U.S. Bureau of Census of Population and Housing The Township population as a percent of the Charlevoix County population has been increasing, the rate of growth in Marion Township has been outpacing some of the other portions of the County, see Table 2-2 above. As is the case in communities throughout northwest lower Michigan, population growth is attributed, in large part, to an in-migration of new residents. Per Household Population The 2010 Census reported Marion Township s average household size as 2.67 persons, which is down from 2.76 in Charlevoix County and State of Michigan per household populations were reported as 2.36 and 2.49 persons respectively. The 2010 figures indicate the number of households in the Township, County, and State has increased since 2000, while the number of persons per household has decreased. This decrease in per household population is attributed to lower birth rates, higher divorce rates, an increase in the number of single-parent families, a greater number of single-person households, and longer life expectancy. Marion Township Master Plan Update II D - 1 Distribution Draft: December 2014

42 Age Groups Table 2-3 presents a breakdown of age groups within township, county and state populations, and a comparison between 2000 and The age distribution of the Township population is quite similar to that of the County and the State, although the Township has a higher percent of the population in the school children. The mature family and senior citizens age groups have increased as a percent of the total Township population. Age Group Table 2-3 Age Distribution Township, County, State Marion Township Charlevoix County State of Michigan years 6.6% 5.0% 6.5% 5.3% 6.8% 6.0% 5-17 years 24.8% 21.7% 19.4% 16.8% 19.3% 17.7% years 5.0% 5.3% 6.5% 6.3% 9.4% 9.9% years 28.2% 24.4% 27.4% % 24.7% years 26.1% 31.1% 25.2% 32.1% 22.4% 27.9% % 12.5% 14.9% 18.6% 12.3% 13.8% TOTALS 100% 100% 99.9% 100.1% 100% 100% Median Age Note: Age categories cover varying numbers of years. Due to rounding, percent totals may not equal 100 percent. Source: U.S. Bureau of Census School age (5-17 years), family forming (25-44 years), and mature family (45-64 years) age groups represent 21.7, 24.4, and 31.1 percent of the Township's population respectively, and over 77% of the population overall as of the 2010 Census. The 0 to 4 year, young adult, and retirees and seniors age groups represent 5.0, 5.3, and 12.5% of the population, respectively. Charlevoix County School age, family forming, and mature family age groups represent 16.8, 21.0, and 32.1 percent of the county's 2010 population respectively, and 69.9 percent of the population overall. The 0 to 4 year, young adult, and retirees and seniors age groups represent 5.3, 6.3, and 18.6 percent of the population, respectively. Marion Township Master Plan Update II D - 2 Distribution Draft: December 2014

43 State of Michigan School age, family forming, and mature family age groups represent 17.7, 24.7, and 27.9 percent of the Michigan's population respectively, and 70.3 percent of the 2010 population overall. The 0 to 4 year, young adult, and retirees and seniors age groups represent 6.0, 9.9, and 13.8 percent of the population, respectively. Income, Education and Employment Income statistics reflect information from the Census Bureau s American Community Survey Table 2-4 compares the income statistics for the Township, Charlevoix County and the State of Michigan. According to Estimates from the Census Bureau, Marion Township has 3.0 percent below the poverty level, compared to 9.3 percent of the population in the County and 11.7 percent for the State. Table 2-4 Income Statistics 2010 Governmental Unit Median Household Income Per Capita Income Marion Township 56,000 26,842 Charlevoix County 47,177 27,487 State of Michigan 48,471 25,547 Source: U.S. Bureau of Census American Community Survey Educational attainment is tracked by the U.S. Census. Statistics from the Survey indicate that 92.8 percent of the Township residents are high school graduates or higher. This level is slightly higher that of the County (91.6%) and above the state wide level (88.7%). Township residents with bachelor s degree or higher comprise 21.4 percent of the Township population, which is lower than the County percentage of 25.4, and the state percentage of 25.5 percent. Michigan Department of Technology, Management & Budget publishes labor force comparisons at the county and state level but no longer keep these figures at the township level. Employment data on the civilian labor force is presented below in Table 2-5, comparing Charlevoix County and the State of Michigan for the years 2009, 2011 and Marion Township Master Plan Update II D - 3 Distribution Draft: December 2014

44 Table 2-5 Civilian Labor Force Comparisons Charlevoix County and State of Michigan Charlevoix County State of Michigan* Labor Force 13,567 12,792 12,845 4,858 4,680 4,707 Employed 11,610 11,255 11,428 4,204 4,192 4,294 Unemployed 1,957 1,537 1, Unemployment Rate Note: * units in 1000 s Source: Michigan Department of Technology, Management and Budget Housing and Property Values Number & Type of Dwelling Units Survey data indicates there were 831 dwelling units in Marion Township. Five hundred forty six units were single family homes, 78 were mobile homes, and 7 were listed as attached dwelling units, such as duplexes and apartments. Ninety-seven (97) units were listed as seasonal or second homes. This figure represents approximately 12.5 percent of the Township's housing stock. Median Housing Value According to the Survey, the median value of homes in Marion Township was $149,800 (up from $117,500 in 2000). The median housing values for Charlevoix County and Michigan were $154,400 and $128,600 respectively. This information, while collected by the US Census Bureau is subjectively provided by the general population regarding what he or she thinks is the value of his or her house, and should be used with caution. It is speculated, that some people may intentionally underestimate the value due to concerns that accurate reporting might raise their taxes. Age of Housing Stock Table 2-6 illustrates residential construction activity, and indicates the age of Marion Township s housing stock. Property Values Property values can also be analyzed by reviewing State Equalized Value (SEV) figures. By law, SEV, which constitutes a community s tax base, is equal to approximately one half of the true market value of real property and certain taxable personal properties. Table 2-7 shows the Marion Township Master Plan Update II D - 4 Distribution Draft: December 2014

45 Township SEV by property class for the years 2010, 2012 and The total SEV for the Township in recent years is down from a high of $112,220,482 in 2008 to the 2014 level of $81,098,300, a decrease of 27%. Table 2-6 Construction Activity Period of Construction Number of Homes Built Before Source: U.S. Bureau of Census. Table 2-7 Marion Township State Equalization Valuation by Property Class Property Class 2010 SEV Percent 2012 SEV Percent 2014 SEV Percent Agriculture Commercial Industrial Residential Timber Cutover Developmental Total Real Property Personal Property Total SEV 13,333, ,724, ,470, ,496, ,989, ,556, , , , ,763, ,329, ,239, ,272, ,577, ,898, ,269, ,125, ,199, ,541, ,703, ,098, Source: Charlevoix County Equalization Department Marion Township Master Plan Update II D - 5 Distribution Draft: December 2014

46 As seen in the table 2-7 above, the majority (greater than 75%) of the Township tax base was derived from residential property in each of the years reviewed and the percentage has remained fairly consistent between 75.1 and 77.9 percent. Table 2-8 Marion Township Number of parcels by Property Class Property Class Agricultural Commercial Industrial Residential 1,045 1,048 1,043 Timber Cutover Developmental Total Parcels 1,350 1,355 1,356 Source: Charlevoix County Equalization Department According to the annual Charlevoix County Analysis for Equalization reports for 2010, 2012 and 2014 and shown in table 2-8 above, the Township has experienced only slight changes in the number of parcels in each category. Marion Township Master Plan Update II D - 6 Distribution Draft: December 2014

47 E. Services, Facilities & Transportation Water and Sewage Disposal Systems Marion Township does not have a public drinking water system, although some businesses in limited portion of the Township (Loeb Rd) are served by public water from Charlevoix Township. Consequently, most Township residents rely on private on-site wells for domestic drinking water. All private drinking water wells are regulated by the County Health Department. A sewer extends from the northern Township border at Marion Center Road south to the high school. This sewer may significantly influence the type and pace of development in Marion Township. At present local residents primarily rely on private, on-site septic systems, which are also regulated by the County Health Department. Two important determinants for siting a septic system are soil suitability and depth to bedrock. The Natural Resources portion of this section addresses the geology and soils of the Township, and Figure 2-5 shows areas with septic limitations. Solid Waste Marion Township is served by a number of private solid waste haulers. The Township organizes an annual spring drop off day, where large items can be taken to a designated location for disposal. Other Public Utilities Electric power is provided to the Township by the City of Charlevoix and Great Lakes Energy. Natural gas service, provided by the DTE Energy (formerly MichCon), is available in limited portions of the Township, including along US-31, Marion Center Road south to Veenstra Road, along Loeb Road, along M-66 and approximately the northern most one-half mile of Wickersham. Additionally, Consumers Energy, Great Lakes Energy and Wolverine Power each maintain a transmission line, which traverses a portion of the Township. Satellite and/or cable television services are available in the Township. While Marion Township residents and businesses have access to relatively high speed internet service from various providers, the cost of high speed internet services continues to be an issue. Police, Fire and Emergency Medical Service Police protection is provided by the Charlevoix County s Sheriff s Department, located in the City of Charlevoix. The Michigan State Police also supplements the County services. The Marion Township contracts annually with Charlevoix Township to provide fire protection and with the City of Charlevoix for emergency medical ambulance service. Hospitals offering primary care to Township residents are located in Charlevoix, Petoskey, and Traverse City. Marion Township Master Plan Update II E - 1 Distribution Draft: December 2014

48 A 911 emergency response system is available in Marion Township, provided by CCE-911 Central Dispatch. Schools Marion Township is primarily served by the Charlevoix School District, although one property in the Township is in the Ellsworth School District. The Charlevoix Middle/High School is located on Marion Center Road in Marion Township, opened fall of In Charlevoix at the old Middle School, the school district also operates the Round Lake Educational Center an alternative education program, as well as a non-traditional high school program combining online and classroom courses with a focus on arts. Head Start early childhood education programs are also available in Charlevoix. Marion Township is also served by St. Mary s School, (K-6) and Northwest Academy (Pre-K- 12), a charter school. Post high school education is available locally at North Central Michigan College (NCMC) in Petoskey, offering two-year associates degrees and one-year certificate programs. NCMC also offers bachelors and masters programs in a variety of subject areas through joint agreements with other 4-year colleges and universities in the State. Northwestern Michigan College (NWMC), a two-year institution, is located in Traverse City and is noted for strong nursing and maritime programs. In addition, NWMC has joint arrangements with Ferris State University, Central Michigan University, Michigan State University, Eastern Michigan University, Michigan Technology University, Lake Superior State University, University of Michigan, and Wayne State University to offer several bachelor or masters degree programs. NWMC has an enrollment of approximately 3,000 full time students and is increasingly being used by area students. Recreation Inventory of existing Marion Township public lands and recreation facilities include: Township owned property on E. Twin Lake State owned property located on McCracken Road at the southern border of the Township. Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) with two (2) boat launches (one on Adams Lake and one on Nowland) Belvedere Golf Course (private) facilities include 18 holes and a private restaurant and clubhouse. Church of God operates private campground at Loeb and Veenstra Crooked Tree Girl Scouts property on Marion Center Road Municipal, State, and Federal Facilities Marion Township Master Plan Update II E - 2 Distribution Draft: December 2014

49 The historic Marion Township Hall is located on Marion Center Road. The Marion Township Hall is adequately meeting the Township needs at this time. The Township also owns and maintains the Township Cemetery. Transportation and Road Maintenance The only two state routes through the Township are US-31 and M-66. M-66 traverses the northeast corner of the Township and US-31 passes through the very northwest corner of the Township. These are the only two roads in the Township under the jurisdiction of the Michigan Department of Transportation. The main County Roads traversing Marion Township are Marion Center Road and Barnard Road, which both run primarily north/south, and Ferry Road which runs east/west. The primary road system consists of miles. The remainder of the public roads are county local, some of which are seasonal in places. The local road system is miles in length. The Charlevoix County Road Commission provides road maintenance services on public roads in the Township and snow removal for all county primary and the non-seasonal portions of the county local roads. The Charlevoix County Transit Authority provides an on call dial-a-ride bus service within Charlevoix County. For transportation needs beyond the County boundaries the local transit authority coordinates with the similar transportation services in adjacent Counties. Additionally, a six county health related regional transit system, call the Health Ride, was implemented early The six county area includes Charlevoix, Benzie, Charlevoix, Grand Traverse, Kalkaska, and Leelanau Counties. This is an on-demand van service for medical appointments within the six county region, and coordinated through the Office of Transportation Services (OTS) in Traverse City. A portion of a designated national bicycle route, US Bicycle Route 35 (USBR 35) is traverses Marion Township on Barnard Road. USBR 35 runs from Sault Ste Marie, Michigan to Mississippi. The most northern part of USBR 35, the Michigan section runs from Sault Ste Marie on the border with Ontario to New Buffalo (near Chicago). Marion Township Master Plan Update II E - 3 Distribution Draft: December 2014

50 F Community Survey A community property owner survey was developed and analyzed during the 2014/2015 Master Plan update process. The findings from the 2014 survey were reviewed by the Planning Commission and compared with the results of the 1993 survey for Banks, Marion and Norwood Townships. The findings of the two surveys were quite similar. The 2014 survey findings are included as Appendix A. Marion Township Master Plan Update II F - 1 Distribution Draft: December 2014

51 Section III: Community Goals and Policies Community Goals The purpose of this chapter is to set forth the Township's goals and policies to guide future development. Community participation and input was a critical component in developing these goals and policies. In analyzing the data compiled in the earlier chapters, it is very clear that Marion Township is located in an extremely environmentally sensitive area; therefore uncontrolled development could dramatically alter the character of the Township. However, by encouraging new development to conform to community-based standards and guidelines, both the rural character and the natural resources of the Township can be preserved to the fullest possible extent. In developing community goals and policies, it is important to analyze existing community characteristics, such as social and economic features, environmental resources, available services and facilities, and existing land use. In addition to examining existing characteristics, another important tool in the development of community goals and policies is to identify community assets and problem areas. By combining the outcomes of the working session discussions, the 2014 property owner survey, and plan research efforts, the Township Planning Commission, with guidance from the planning consultant, was able to develop and update the following set of goals and policies: Marion Township Master Plan Update III - 1 Distribution Draft: December 2014

52 PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GOAL: Maintain an ecologically sound balance between human activities and the environment to retain and enhance the Township s quiet, scenic and rural character. POLICIES: 1. Encourage creative design and planning techniques which produce visual harmony while preserving special features and protecting vital natural resources. 2. Encourage planned land uses in coordination with public utility, facility, and service improvement programs. 3. Encourage the preservation and protection of scenic views of hills, valleys, farms, lakes and streams. 4. Guide development in a manner that is consistent with the natural limitations of the land to maintain the Township s rural character. 5. Consider how the Township s planning policies, zoning ordinance, ordinance amendments and re-zonings may impact adjacent municipalities. 6. Pursue efforts to address blight issues, in order to maintain the area s highly valued scenic character. Marion Township Master Plan Update III - 2 Distribution Draft: December 2014

53 NATURAL ENVIRONMENT & WATERFRONT GOAL: Protect and preserve the natural resources, including the waterfront areas. POLICIES: 1. Encourage a land use pattern that is oriented to and respects the natural features and water resources of the area. 2. Evaluate the environmental impact of all new development. 3. Protect land resources and water quality related to our lakes, streams and wetlands. 4. Encourage the continued natural use of wetlands as groundwater recharge and stormwater holding areas. 5. Identify and protect desirable open space and scenic vistas. 6. Protect lake and river shorelines. 7. Establish regulations and standards necessary to protect and preserve the quality of the air from degradation due to fumes, odors, smoke, dust and other pollutants. 8. Establish regulations and standards to protect the community against high noise levels and exterior lighting glare. Marion Township Master Plan Update III - 3 Distribution Draft: December 2014

54 AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & OPEN SPACE GOAL: Recognize the importance of agricultural lands within Marion Township, and protect the economic viability of the agricultural and forestry operations wherever possible. POLICIES: 1. Provide opportunities for landowners to capture the development value of farmland or forestland without creating scattered developments. 2. Allow for low-density residential and recreational use on lands which are not designated as prime or unique for farming and/or forestry purposes. 3. Discourage the fragmentation of prime and unique agricultural land and prime forestlands into parcels too small to be economically used or managed for agriculture or timber production. 4. Provide methods of preserving farmland and forestland by allowing other compatible income producing uses, such as alternative energy systems or cellular communication towers. Marion Township Master Plan Update III - 4 Distribution Draft: December 2014

55 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT & HOUSING GOAL: Retain the community s rural, scenic character as exhibited by its low density residential development, while providing for suitable housing opportunities for the varying economic, lifestyle and family stage needs of the community. POLICIES: 1. Explore alternative development measures to reduce housing costs, reduce traffic congestion, and provide in-home or close to home employment opportunities. 2. Encourage the development of housing to meet the needs of all household types and income groups. 3. Encourage the maintenance of the existing housing stock and residential neighborhoods in good repair, appearance, usefulness and safety. 4. Protect the residential neighborhoods from intrusion of incompatible uses. 5. Encourage cluster developments with open space for new single-family housing. Marion Township Master Plan Update III - 5 Distribution Draft: December 2014

56 INFRASTRUCTURE, PUBLIC SERVICES & TRANSPORTATION GOAL: Improve and maintain the Township's transportation systems, community facilities, programs and public utilities to be consistent with the community s needs and ability to finance improvements in the most cost effective manner. POLICIES: 1. Encourage the efficient use of existing roadways and infrastructure. 2. Work cooperatively with the Charlevoix County Road Commission to maintain a safe, effective and efficient road network in the Township. 3. Plan for safe access and circulation of vehicles as well as pedestrians. 4. Expansion of sewer and water service in the Township shall be consistent with the planned intensity of land use for that area, scheduled when affordable and implemented when necessary to meet an identified need. 5. Encourage the placement of utilities underground for new developments. 6. Plan utility improvements to coincide with development, where possible. 7. Continue to contract with neighboring municipalities to provide fire and emergency services consistent with public needs. 8. The Township will encourage the use of new technology that may be developed, which could replace the individual septic system and consequently may not require expansion of the municipal sewer system. 9. Pursue the expansion of high speed internet and wireless communication services within the Township to provide residents and businesses with more affordable options. 10. Work cooperatively with other local units of governments to explore opportunities for a separate non-motorized trail through the Township to provide safe alternatives for pedestrian and bicycle travel, including a route to the high school. Marion Township Master Plan Update III - 6 Distribution Draft: December 2014

57 COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GOAL: Encourage a diversified economy, which supports a wide variety of business and industries to strengthen the local tax base, while striving to preserve the natural environment and rural character of the Township as feasible. POLICIES: 1. Promote a varied business environment. 2. Concentrate commercial development in designated commercial areas. 3. Recognize the importance of the tourist industry to the local economy. 4. Develop innovative planning and zoning techniques, such as clustering and/or shared parking, to regulate linear or strip commercial development. 5. Maintain greenbelt buffer and landscape regulations. 6. Encourage shared highway access along South M Reduce the visual impact of signs and billboards, and address traffic safety by controlling the size, number, illumination, and configuration of signs. 8. Encourage the re-use of existing facilities where appropriate and consistent with future land use plan. 9. Allow for residences in commercial areas 10. Allow home occupations compatible with existing residential areas. 11. Ensure that industrial developments take place in an environmentally sensitive manner and are harmonious with the surrounding area. 12. Encourage light industries, which do not pollute the air, soil or water nor offend because of noise, odor, or visual impact, to locate in designated industrial areas. 13. Encourage alternative energy production and use within the Township. Marion Township Master Plan Update III - 7 Distribution Draft: December 2014

58 Section IV: Future Land Use Plan At present, Marion Township is primarily an agricultural and rural residential community. Forests cover steeply sloped hillsides while wetland vegetation and lowland woods are found in the lower areas. Lakeshore living is available along the shores of many inland lakes including Lake Charlevoix. While active agricultural uses have declined from historic levels, the many active farms which remain are highly valued by the local residents, according to the Marion Township 2014 Property Owner Survey. Through land use planning and land use controls, Marion Township intends to ensure that existing rural residential, agricultural, and recreational uses can continue, and reasonable growth can be accommodated with minimal land use conflicts or negative environmental impacts. Based on the social, economic and environmental characteristics of the Township, four (4) general categories of land use have been identified to serve existing and future development needs. These categories are listed below: Resource Preserve and Low Density Residential Moderate Density Residential Industrial and Commercial Public and Quasi-Public Resource Preserve and Low Density Residential Resource Preserve and Low Density Residential land use category has been designated consistent with the Township's goal to recognize the importance of agricultural and forest lands. Marion Township recognizes that the presence of forested and agricultural land contributes significantly to the scenic and rural character valued by the Township residents. The Resource Preserve and Low Density Residential area designation is intended to encourage the continued forestry and agricultural uses of areas on prime soils. The designated area comprises the majority of the Township (see Figure 4-1). To preserve forestry and agricultural uses, it is recommended that non-agriculturally related residential uses be allowed only at a low density within the Resource Preserve and Low Density Residential category, due to the risk of groundwater contamination. While the designation of Resource Preserve and Low Density Residential land use category will not prevent the conversion of farmland and forestland to other uses, it will help to control the scale and rate of conversion and direct attention to areas where farmland conversion may be an issue. There are a number of ways in which the agricultural conversion issue could be addressed prior to development. The Township Zoning Ordinance could, for example, allow non-agricultural uses as a special condition use. Special condition use status would require site plan review by the Planning Commission in the agricultural areas for certain non-agricultural development. During site plan review, a density bonus could be allowed if the proposed residential development is clustered. The areas designated for Resource Preserve and Low Density Residential use on the Future Land Use Map, Figure 4-1, do not cover all of the active farms in the Township, but rather identify areas where agriculture and forestry operations are still the dominant uses, and consequently can be more readily protected. Marion Township Master Plan Update IV-1 Distribution Draft: December 2014

59 Marion Township Master Plan Update IV-2 Distribution Draft: December 2014

60 Figure 4-2 MARION TOWNSHIP FUTURE LAND USE & AREAS OF AGRICULTURAL IMPORTANCE Marion Township Master Plan Update IV-3 Distribution Draft: December 2014

61 The Township will encourage methods that accommodate the needs of preserving farmlands, farming, open space, natural resources and rural character of the Township. The methods include innovative zoning provisions that allow for the preservation or conservation of essential natural resources, farmland or open space. Additional methods which other communities have employed or are investigating to help protect and preserve agricultural land include the Purchase of Development Rights (PDR), Transfer of Development Rights (TDR), Agricultural Security Areas (ASA), clustering requirements for non-agricultural uses and tax breaks or incentives for continuing agricultural use. It is recommended that these alternatives be investigated for possible application in Marion Township, as a way to balance economic rights with agricultural preservation goals. It is important to recognize where active agriculture exists in the Township. Figure 4-2 overlays the active farmlands and prime agricultural soils information on the future land use category Resource Preserve/Low Density Residential. These areas are considered the primary targeted areas for farmland preservation efforts. Moderate Density Residential The Moderate Density Residential future land use category is intended to direct future residential growth to specific areas of the Township. The areas designated residential use are located primarily in the northern and eastern portions of the Township. Within these areas, the Township Zoning Ordinance should establish distinct residential districts to specify where low or moderate density residential, such as smaller lot residential development will be allowed. The Zoning Ordinance will also specify where higher density residential uses, such as apartments, townhouses, condominiums, or manufactured home developments will be allowed. The designated moderate density residential areas should be retained for low to moderate density residential use during the present planning period, since only a limited portion of the Township is currently served by sewer and water. Additionally, low density residential use is more compatible with the adjacent Resource Preserve and Low Density Residential land use. It is also important to note that under state law, manufactured homes are allowed in any residential area if the structure meets all requirements set for site-built homes. Additionally, a manufactured home development would be compatible with the multiple-family portion of the residential area. Industrial and Commercial Limited industrial and Commercial areas are identified in the northwestern portion of the Township, partially along US-31, and along M-66 in the northeastern portion of the township. These areas are designed to accommodate existing sand and gravel extraction operations, minor expansion of these operations or reuse for other industrial purposes. The Future Land Use plan provides for expansion of commercial activities along M-66. Public and Quasi-Public The Public and Quasi-Public category is designed to provide protection to existing recreation property, areas planned for future recreation use, or other natural resources, while allowing for Marion Township Master Plan Update IV-4 Distribution Draft: December 2014

62 very limited and low intensity recreation development to occur, as well as low density residential uses consistent with recreational and conservation uses. The Public and Quasi-Public category includes the Belvedere Golf Course property at the northern boundary of the Township, as well as the Charlevoix High School on Marion Center Road. Other Land Use Considerations Public Service Public services were considered in the development of this Future Land Use plan, however no distinct public services category is designated. As discussed in the Community Services portion of Section II, the existing facilities are adequately meeting the Township s needs. It is anticipated that additional public services would be compatible with many of the proposed land use areas and could be allowed in the associated zoning districts either by right or by special approval depending on the use and the district. Scenic Corridors Marion Township is fortunate to have roadways that traverse significant scenic corridors. These corridors contribute to the township s character and identify by affording views of farmland and woodlands, and significant scenic vistas from the township s higher elevations. Development along scenic corridors should be consistent with the objectives, guidelines, and policies established in this plan. Steep slopes Marion Township has an abundance of moderate to steeply sloped land distributed throughout the Township, as seen in Figure 2-8. In order to protect the environmentally sensitive nature of these sloped areas, development standards for areas with steep slopes should be incorporated into the zoning ordinance and apply to development in any zoning district. Clustered Residential Due to the physical development constraints of the Township and the community concern about the protection of rural character, it is recommended that the clustering of residential uses be allowed and encouraged. The Township should allow for site condominium projects and Planned Unit Development (PUD) projects as a means of allowing for development on the less sensitive land while allowing the more sensitive land to be protected as open space within the development. Marion Township Master Plan Update IV-5 Distribution Draft: December 2014

63 Section V: Plan Adoption & Implementation Draft Plan Circulated for Comments The draft Marion Township Master Plan 2014/2015 Update was transmitted to the Township Board for review and comment in December The Township Board approved the draft plan for distribution on December 15, Following the Board s approval for distribution the proposed plan was distributed to the adjacent Townships (Banks, Charlevoix, Eveline, Hayes, Norwood and South Arm), as well as to Antrim and Charlevoix Counties on December 18, 2014 for review and comment. comments were received. Public Hearing A public hearing on the proposed Master Plan-2014/2015 Update, for Marion Township as required by the Michigan Planning Enabling Act, as amended, was held on. The legally required public hearing notice was published in the Petoskey News Review on as well as on the Township website. A copy of the public hearing notice is reproduced at the end of this chapter. During the review period, the draft plan was available for review on the Township s website, at the Township office, or by contacting the Marion Township Clerk. The purpose of the public hearing was to present the proposed Master Plan to accept comments from the public. In addition to the Planning Commission members, and residents and/or business owners of the township attended the public hearing. Minutes from the Public Hearing are provided at the end of this chapter. The public hearing began with a brief explanation of the planning process. Plan development included several Planning Commission and steering committee workshop meetings, and public input sessions. During the hearing, maps of existing land use, color coded resource, and proposed future land use recommendations were presented. Plan Adoption At a Planning Commission meeting following the public hearing on the Planning Commission took action to formally adopt the Marion Township Master Plan 2014/2015 Update, including all the associated maps by resolution on. Per the Michigan Planning Enabling Act, as amended, on the Township Board asserted the right to approve or reject the plan. The Township Board formally adopted the plan on. Legal Transmittals Michigan planning law requires that the adopted Master Plan be transmitted to the Township Board, as well as to the adjacent Townships and the County Planning Commission. Copies of these transmittal letters appear at the end of this chapter. Marion Township Master Plan Update V - 1 Distribution Draft: December 2014

64 Plan Implementation A Master Plan is developed to provide a vision of the community's future. It is designed to serve as a tool for decision making on future development proposals. A Master Plan will also act as a guide for future public investment and service decisions, such as the local budget, grant applications, road standards development, community group activities, tax incentive decisions, and administration of utilities and services. According to the Michigan Zoning Enabling Act, comprehensive planning is the legal basis for the development of a zoning ordinance. Section 203 of the Act states: "The zoning ordinance shall be based on a plan designed to promote the public health, safety and general welfare, to encourage the use of lands in accordance with their character and adaptability, to limit the improper use of land, to conserve natural resources and energy, to meet the needs of the state's residents for food, fiber, and other natural resources, places of residence, recreation, industry, trade, service, and other uses of land, to insure that uses of the land shall be situated in appropriate locations and relationships, to avoid the overcrowding of population; to provide adequate light and air; to lessen congestion of the public roads and streets, to reduce hazards to life and property; to facilitate adequate provision for a system of transportation, sewage disposal, safe and adequate water supply, education, recreation, and other public requirements, and to conserve the expenditure of funds for public improvements and services to conform with the most advantageous use of land resources, and properties." Zoning The Zoning Ordinance is the most important tool for implementing the Master Plan. Zoning is the authority to regulate private use of land by creating land use zones and applying development standards in various zoning districts. Marion Township is covered by the Marion Township Zoning Ordinance regulating land use activities. In accordance with the Michigan Planning Enabling Act, Table 5-1, shows the relationship between the Future Land Use Categories as described in Chapter 4 and the zoning districts as described and regulated in the Marion Township Zoning Ordinance. Table 5-1 Marion Township FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORIES AS RELATED TO ZONING DISTRICTS Future Land Use Zoning District Resource Preserve and Low Density Agricultural A & R-1 Residential Single Family Residential Single Family Residential R-1,R-2 Moderate Density Residential Mixed Residential & MH Mobile Home Park Industrial and Commercial C-1, C-2 & I-1 Public and Quasi-Public Any All Districts Community Service Commercial General Commercial Industrial The current ordinance was adopted on January 17, 2005 and was last amended on September 26, The Zoning Ordinance should now be reviewed to ensure the Ordinance is consistent Marion Township Master Plan Update V - 2 Distribution Draft: December 2014

65 with the goals and the Future Land Use as presented in this Master Plan. Marion Township intends to update the Zoning Ordinance consistent with the Township s vision for the future and provide development options to better meet the goals of this plan. Grants and Capital Improvement Plan The Master Plan can also be used as a guide for future public investment and service decisions, such as the local budget, grant applications and administration of utilities and services. Many communities find it beneficial to prioritize and budget for capital improvement projects, such as infrastructure improvements, park improvements, etc. A Capital Improvements Program (CIP) is one tool which is often used to establish a prioritized schedule for all anticipated capital improvement projects in the community. A CIP includes cost estimates and sources for financing for each project, therefore can serve as both a budgetary and policy document to aid in the implementation of a community's goals defined in the Master Plan. Marion Township Notice of Public Hearing Marion Township Public Input Flyer Marion Township Planning Commission Public Hearing - Minutes Marion Township Planning Commission Resolution Marion Township Board Resolution to Approve or Reject and to Distribute Marion Township Board Meeting Minutes Marion Township Board Resolution to Adopt Copy of transmittal of adopted plan to adjacent Townships and Counties Marion Township Master Plan Update V - 3 Distribution Draft: December 2014

66 INITIALLY ADOPTED MAY 2008 UPDATED DECEMBER 2014 TOWNSHIP Master Plan DRAFT NORWOOD TOWNSHIP BOARD OF TRUSTEES NORWOOD TOWNSHIP PLANNING COMMISSION NORWOOD TOWNSHIP CHARLEVOIX COUNTY MICHIGAN Page 1 of 37

67 Norwood Township Master Plan Charlevoix County, Michigan Table of Contents Table of Contents ADOPTED BY: The Norwood Township Planning Commission DATE, 2008 UPDATED BY: The Norwood Township Planning Commission DATE, 2014 ACCEPTED BY: The Norwood Township Board Of Trustees DATE, 2015 PREPARED BY: The Norwood Township Planning Commission David Vermeesch, Chair David Kolka, Vice-Chair Doug Warner, Secretary, Board of Trustees Representative Robert Harig Marty Swanson The Norwood Township Board Of Trustees Frank Hamilton, Supervisor Dana Pajtas, Clerk Lynn Smolenyak, Treasurer Mike Spillis, Trustee Doug Warner, Trustee Norwood Township Staff Bob Dutcher, Zoning Administrator Shari Jones, Recording Secretary Leslie Meyers, Planner Design Courtesy Notionfront Photography Courtesy Norwood Area Historical Society, Babs Young, Bill Dietrich, Paul Vermeesch, Ray Bier, Leslie Meyers Section 1 Introduction... 4 Section 2 Background Studies Summary... 8 Section 3 Goals and Polices...15 Section 4 Public Input Summary...19 Section 5 Future Land Use Plan...21 Section 6 Thoroughfare Plan Section 7 Environmental Profile & Natural Features Plan Appendix A Community Survey Summary Appendix B Public Hearing Notice and Minutes...37 Page 2 of 37

68 Norwood Township Master Plan Charlevoix County, Michigan Winter surfing on Lake Michigan, Norwood Township Park. Nearly 99% of 2014 Township survey respondents consider the Township s natural resources (beach, park, scenic views, open space, lakes, rivers, streams, woodlots, wetlands and water recharge areas) to be an asset to the community. TOWNSHIP Page 3 of 37

69 Norwood Township Master Plan Charlevoix County, Michigan Section 1 Introduction Section 1 Introduction This document is an update to the Norwood Township Master Plan Charlevoix County, Michigan that was adopted in Conditions in the Township, the surrounding area, and Michigan Planning law have changed since the adoption of the 2008 Plan. The Planning Commission determined that rather than affirming the 2008 Plan, it was important to consider the very different economic challenges and population the community now faces. This new 2014 Master Plan needs to have development policies that reflect not just the current land uses, but also potentially dynamic future land uses in the Township. What is a Master Plan? This Master Plan is a comprehensive long range (20 years) guide for Norwood Township s growth and development. This Master Plan includes analysis, recommendations and proposals for the Township s demographics, economy, housing, transportation, community facilities and land uses. Norwood Township It is based on public input, the survey, existing development, physical characteristics, and social and economic conditions. This plan provides an outline for development for Township Officials and for those residents, developers, and business people interested in living, locating and/or working in the community. This 2014 Norwood Township Master Plan Charlevoix County, Michigan is not a zoning document, therefore the recommendations of the plan are to guide decision-making, not to regulate property. The Master Plan is a document that presents a long-range statement of general goals and policies aimed at coordinated development with the Township. The Norwood Township Zoning Ordinance remains the authority in all Township zoning matters. The Planning Commission and the Township Board ultimately will refine and modify the Zoning Ordinance to implement Master Plan policies. All the people involved with and affected by the Master Plan s policies should understand that implementation should happen over the 20 years the Plan considers. Also, the Planning Commission and the Township Board will make sure implementation is appropriate and timely when they do consider ordinances and policy changes. This Master Plan addresses three primary topics: Township history, current conditions and our plans for the future. Where does the Township get authority to prepare a Master Plan? The Township derives its authority for the preparation of a Master Plan from the Michigan Planning Enabling Act of 2008, P.A. 33 of 2008, as amended. Section 33 of the Act states: 1. A master plan shall address land use and infrastructure issues and may project 20 years or more into the future. A master plan shall include maps, plats, charts, and descriptive, explanatory, and other related matter and shall show the planning commission s recommendations for the physical development of the planning jurisdiction. 2. A master plan shall also include those of the following subjects that reasonably can be considered as pertinent to the future development of the planning jurisdiction: a.) A land use plan that consists in part of a classification and allocation of land for agriculture, residences, commerce, industry, recreation, ways and grounds, public buildings, schools, soil conservation, forests, woodlots, open space, wildlife refuges, and other uses and purposes. b.) The general location, character, and extent of streets, railroads, airports, bicycle paths, pedestrian ways, bridges, waterways, and waterfront developments, sanitary sewers and water supply systems; facilities for flood prevention, drainage, pollution prevention, and maintenance of water levels; and public utilities and structures; c.) Recommendations as to the general character, extent, and layout of redevelopment or rehabilitation of blighted areas; and the removal, relocation, widening, narrowing, vacating, abandonment, change of use, or extension of streets, grounds, open spaces, buildings, utilities, or other facilities; d.) Zoning plan for various zoning districts controlling the height, area, bulk, location, and use of buildings and premises. The zoning plan shall include an explanation of how the land use categories on the future land use map relate to the districts on the zoning map; e.) Recommendations for implementing any of the master plan s proposals. Page 4 of 37

70 Norwood Township Master Plan Charlevoix County, Michigan Section 1 Introduction How does Norwood Township use this Master Plan? The Plan serves many functions and is to be used in a variety of ways: The Plan is a general statement of the Township s goals and policies and provides a single, comprehensive view of the Norwood Township s desires for the future. The Plan serves as an aid in daily decision-making. Goals and policies outlined in the Plan guide the Planning Commission and the Township Board in their deliberations on zoning, subdivision approvals, capital improvements, and other matters relating to land use and development. The policy orientation of this Plan provides decision-makers with a framework and basis for decisions while recognizing the dynamic character of Norwood Township. The variables upon which this Plan is based will likely change over time. However, adherence to the goals and policies will provide a stable, long-term basis for decision making. The Plan provides the statutory basis upon which zoning decisions are based. The Michigan Zoning Enabling Act of 2006, P.A. 110 as amended, requires that the Zoning Ordinance be based upon a plan designed to promote the public health, safety and general welfare. The Plan attempts to coordinate public improvements and private developments. An outcome of the Plan should be that public investments such as infrastructure improvements will be located in areas identified in the Plan as having the greatest benefit to the Township and its residents. The Plan is an educational tool and gives citizens, property owners, developers and adjacent communities a clear indication of the Township s direction for the future. In summation, the Norwood Township Master Plan Charlevoix County, Michigan is a document which sets forth an agenda for the achievement of goals and policies for the entire Township. It is a long-range (20 year) statement of general goals and policies aimed at the unified and coordinated development of the Township. As such, it provides the basis for zoning and land use decisions. BOARDS COMMISSIONS, AND ADMINISTRATION The Township has a number of official bodies associated with planning and development regulation. A description of each body and its function in relation to planning follows: Township Board The Township Board is the chief governing body of the Township and consists of the Supervisor, Clerk, Treasurer and two trustees. All Board members are elected for concurrent four year terms. State statute requires that the Board approve rezoning requests, zoning map and text amendments and subdivision plats. The Norwood Township Board also has a policy that requires it to adopt the Master Plan developed by the Planning Commission. Planning Commission In accordance with planning and zoning enabling statutes, the Township has established a five member Planning Commission. These members are appointed to serve three year staggered terms. One member must be a member of the Township Board. The Planning Commission s main responsibility is to develop the Master Plan for adoption by the Township Board. By Ordinance, the Township Board grants the Planning Commission authority to also approve special land uses, most site plans and general development. Zoning Board of Appeals The Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) consists of three members appointed to three year staggered terms. One member is a member is a member of the Planning Commission. The ZBA ensures that the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance can be more fully and equitably achieved, that a means be provided in the application of the Ordinance, that reasonable flexibility be provided in the application of the Ordinance and that the public health, safety and welfare is protected. The ZBA bases a part of their decision making from the Master Plan. Administration Township functions relating to zoning, planning and economic development are performed by the Zoning Administrator and Planner. The Zoning Administrator responds to general questions from the public; processes site plans, rezoning requests and special land uses; performs zoning inspections; issues land use permits; addresses code enforcement. The Planner reviews site plans, rezoning requests and special land uses. Both provide support staff to the Township Board, Planning Commission, Zoning Board of Appeals and Township Committees. All Township Officials and Staff serve in a quarter time, or less capacity. Detailed contact information is posted at Township Hall and on their website, Page 5 of 37

71 Norwood Township Master Plan Charlevoix County, Michigan Section 1 Introduction Early Norwood Township resident Roy Stafford at the Norwood Village Schoolhouse c In the 2014 Township survey, 84% of respondents said the historic buildings of the Village proper are an asset to the community. TOWNSHIP Page 6 of 37

72 Norwood Township Master Plan Charlevoix County, Michigan Section 1 Introduction In the 2014 Township survey, 84% of respondents said the historic buildings of the Village proper are an asset to the community. TOWNSHIP Page 7 of 37

73 Norwood Township Master Plan Charlevoix County, Michigan Section 2 Background Studies Summary Section 2 Background Studies Summary The Background Studies portion of the Master Plan discusses Norwood Township s location, heritage, past trends, current conditions and future projections. These elements are important to illustrate the context from where the Master Plan process begins. This chapter summarizes significant findings from the planners research into the background topics. Location Norwood Township is located in Northwest Michigan in Charlevoix County. Norwood Township contains just over 24 square miles and includes over 7 miles of Lake Michigan shoreline. The unincorporated village of Norwood is in the southwest corner of Township on the shores of Grand Traverse Bay. The Township Hall is located within Norwood village. Further, the Township is bisected by US-31, a major north-south state arterial. Heritage Norwood got its start in 1867 when Orvis Wood, Lucius Pearl and Orwin Adams built a massive lumber shipping dock and sawmill on the Lake Michigan shore. The village lies on a bluff overlooking the mouth of Lake Michigan s Grand Traverse Bay. The bay itself got its name from its relative location to the Township. Before the lumbermen perhaps for thousands of years Native Americans launched canoes from this shore to reach the peninsula on the western horizon. They called it the Great Crossing. Early French traders here translated the daring seven mile paddle as le Grande Traverse. From 1867 until the turn of the century, millions of board-feet of hardwood were loaded onto schooners and steamers bound for growing urban Lake Michigan ports. Much of the Norwood timber sailed to rebuild Chicago after the disastrous fire of By 1890 Norwood reached its population peak of 400. However, the sawmill burned in 1901 amidst a declining industry, and the port never recovered. Norwood remained a farming community, as well as a north woods summer destination for Chicagoans and others. Vacationers continued to come by steamship, and in 1915 by automobile via the new West Michigan Pike. Today dock pilings from 1867 are still visible beneath the water. The original 1915 auto pike still connects the village to main roads. Many examples of nineteenth century architecture are found throughout the community, establishing an ideal historic context and identity. There are many period original homes and three community buildings. The original Schoolhouse, Methodist Church and Township Hall are all actively used today. Mining operations in Norwood Township are an important part of the community s history and future. St. Mary s Cement currently owns the Charlevoix quarry and associated production facility, which has operated since It is one of the largest cement operations in Michigan and one of the largest employers in the area. Over a million tons of materials are extracted from the quarry each year. St. Mary s Cement, the current owner and operator of the quarry, publicly released plans that they would like to swap land with the adjacent Fisherman s Island State Park to increase the contiguous quarry area. Pewangoing Quarry, also known as Chert Mine, in Norwood Township is on the National Register of Historic Places. It was a major source of Eastport flint, used widely throughout the Midwest by Paleoindian and later peoples. Population and Housing Characteristics Another very important component in the comprehensive planning process is the understanding a community s people, particularly their social and economic characteristics. This section explains the current and historic population changes, age distribution, housing characteristics and employment data for Norwood Township. Much of this information is best represented in graphs. We compare Township data to the County wide data when we can identify important similar or opposite trends. Map 1 RELATIVE LOCATION Legend Norwood Township Charlevoix County State of Michigan RELATIVE LOCATION Page 8 of 37

74 Norwood Township Master Plan Charlevoix County, Michigan Section 2 Background Studies Summary Population and Age Distribution Past Master Plans attempted to predict Norwood Township s population growth in order to join the need for future land uses and community services. In the 1990 s, the Northwest Michigan Council of Governments (NWMCOG) projected the Township would reach a population of 1365 by the year Northern Michigan s economic and demographic profile, similar to many rural areas across the country, does not suggest that there will be anything more than slow growth over the next generation. Our research and our premonitions lead us to believe that although different segments of the population may grow significantly, the overall number of people and households, along with the land necessary to develop in order to maintain them, will not change dramatically over the horizon of this Master Plan. According to Charlene Schlueter, demographer for NWMCOG, Michigan has experienced a downward streak for the past ten years and will experience this trend for the next ten years or so. The economic downturn that plagued Michigan from , and the associated hangover the state still suffers from today, necessitates that the Township address an approach that considers population growth stagnation. The most recent US Census estimate, from July 1, 2013, puts the Township s population at 728, an increase of 5 people from the 2010 Census. Chart 1 shows population form decennial Censuses. The 2010 Census shows us that the median age of a Norwood resident is The median age in 2000 was Chart 2 shows the change in age distribution in years over the past 20 years. The population s age distribution and median age suggest a community composed of middle aging+ households, likely without children. This conclusion is most important for future capital programming. Ultimately, amenities like parks and libraries, while universally accessible, should be tailored to the growing share of the Township s population over 35. Housing and Households Data for housing comes from both the Township and the US Census Bureau. The Township estimates that 92% of its housing stock is comprised of single-family detached homes. In addition, 130 single family homes are seasonal which represents over 20% of the Township s housing stock. Table 1 demonstrates that household size is relatively stagnant. Households with children are decreasing, while households with individuals over 65 years age have doubled. While there will be some new building permits produced, it is most likely that new units will replace older ones and not create much development pressure data was gleaned from the 2012 American Community Survey. Table 1 HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS Total Housing Units Seasonal Housing Units Households (w/ age > 65 yrs) Households (w/ age < 18 yrs) Average Household Size Economic Base Most of our residents are employed outside the Township with close proximity to the Cities of Charlevoix, Petoskey, East Jordan and Boyne, as well as the Village of Elk Rapids. US 31 provides easy access from Norwood to these population and employment centers. Norwood is considered a bedroom community. The largest employment sector is within the Township is recreation/tourism based. The Township s median household income is $59,500. Chart 1 POPULATION Chart 2 AGE COHORTS Page 9 of 37

75 Norwood Township Master Plan Charlevoix County, Michigan Section 2 Background Studies Summary According to the 2012 American Community Survey, there are 375 workers over 16 that live in the Township. The vast majority of these workers commute by themselves to jobs outside the community. However, 6% of workers have home based businesses, and we expect that number to continue to grow. The top three industries for residents employment are: 1. Educational services, and health care and social assistance 2. Manufacturing 3. Arts, entertainment, and recreation, and accommodation and food services The state equalized value (SEV) for real property in the Township shrunk by 25% since Residential property carries the majority of the tax burden with 86.66% of total SEV. Agricultural constitutes 10.33%, commercial 1.07%, and industrial 1.94%. These classifications of SEV are displayed in Chart 3. Estimating demand is an essential part of planning for commercial growth. However, the ability of the Township to generate economic land use opportunities is weakened by lack of common commercially essential utilities such as high speed internet, municipal water, natural gas, and competing opportunities in neighboring communities. Further, there is limited interest in promoting additional commercial retail and service growth. The Township wants to focus on enhancing its existing agriculture and tourism economic engines. Community Facilities and Services Township Hall Township Hall has been located at Lake Street since Renovations have been limited as the Hall does not have running water or sanitary facilities. The Hall serves as the meeting room for most Township meetings and elections are held there. Township Hall does not offer office hours. Emergency Services Fire protection services are contracted with Charlevoix Township and Banks Township. EMS protection are contracted with the City of Charlevoix Norwood Township property owners are assessed for these services. Mutual Aid agreements are in place with both Charlevoix and Banks Townships. Police protection is provided by the Charlevoix County Sheriff Department and a limited state police presence. Sewer and Water Municipal water and/or sewer service within the Township is extremely limited. With the exception of Island View s privately maintained community water system, all parcels are served by individual wells and on-site septic systems. Utilities Electricity and non- DSL land line phone service is readily available. Norwood Officials are actively working to encourage cost-effective internet access. There are no short-term plans for natural gas extensions and the Township actively communicates with the gas company to anticipate upgrades and maintenance. Education The Charlevoix Public School District provides traditional learning in addition to three charter schools and the Charlevoix-Emmet Intermediate School District. Parks and Recreation The Township enjoys an abundance of public recreational facilities: Fisherman s Island State Park which covers over 2600 acres, 5 miles of Lake Michigan Shoreline, camping and hiking. Fisherman s Island and the adjacent mainland became a Michigan State Park in The area is still referred to as Bell s Bay Park by locals. Norwood Township Park boasts 20 acres, 1000 feet of Lake Michigan, pit toilets, picnic tables and grills. Norwood Township Park was deeded to the Township by the Department of Conservation of the State of Michigan (today s MDNR) on October 17, Cemetery The Norwood Township Cemetery is owned and maintained by the Township. Chart 3 REAL PROPERTY In 2014 a widely supported charitable effort raised private community funds to install this new cemetary gate and fence. Page 10 of 37

76 Norwood Township Master Plan Charlevoix County, Michigan Section 2 Background Studies Summary The predominate land use in the Township is farming. Agriculture encompasses approximately 2800 acres of land or 24% of the Township s area. These lands are actively farmed, producing field crops such as corn and soy. The farm fields provide scenic views as well as an economic base for the Township. TOWNSHIP Page 11 of 37

77 Norwood Township Master Plan Charlevoix County, Michigan Section 2 Background Studies Summary Transportation/Traffic There are private and public roads within the Township. Adjacent/abutting land owners are responsible for maintenance of over 25 miles of private roads in Norwood. The Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) and the Charlevoix County Road Commission share the responsibility for operating, repairing, and maintaining all public roads. MDOT is responsible for maintenance and improvement for US-31. The remainder of the Township s public roads are under the jurisdiction of the Road Commission. The Road Commission maintains about 12 miles of gravel and 14 miles of paved roads, according to the Michigan Geographic Framework File. US-31 is the community s major travel corridor and is heavily traveled throughout the year. The Township s commercial activity is dependent on access to US-31. Natural resource extraction, agriculture, and recreation/tourism all rely on the two-lane, concrete arterial. Resurfacing and other maintenance activities on US-31 can cause significant traffic disruptions for those that live, work, and recreate in Norwood Township. It is important to note that the County Road Commission levies a 1 mill tax and the Township levies a 1 mill tax (for 2 mills total) to pay for road repairs. The Township residents voted to collect the 1 mill tax and the Road Commission coordinates improvements and repairs with the Township to efficiently spend Norwood s 1 mill funding on roads within the Township boundaries. Township elected officials and Township residents feel that county wide funding from property taxes and gas taxes is not spent frequently within the Township. The Road Commission should work more diligently to return funding to the community for fixing roads, particularly in light of the 2014/15 increases to state collected road taxes. The Township could develop an 5-year spending program for road improvements using the locally generated 1 mill levy. EXISTING LAND USE The foundation of any planning study is an understanding of the existing land uses within the community. Knowledge of existing land development patterns and site conditions furnishes the basic information and which future residential, commercial, industrial and public land use decisions can be made. Currently there are 441 households, 130 of which are not year-round, one destination oriented commercial area, two active mining operations and several areas of active farming in the Township. Norwood Township is comprised of 11,700 acres. 2,226 acres are publicly owned, allowing the remaining approximately 9,474 acres for private purposes. Much of the privately owned land has significant terrain, with slopes exceeding 30% or contains wetlands. Several hundred acres of privately owned land is dedicated to conservation easements. A general overview of existing land uses in the Townships follows: Active Farming The predominate land use in the Township is farming. Agriculture encompasses approximately 2800 acres of land or 24% of the Township s area. These lands are actively farmed, producing field crops such as corn and soy. The farm fields provide scenic views as well as an economic base for the Township. There are also many opportunities for cash crops such as fruits and gourds because of the Township s unique microclimate. Scattered Residential These homes sites range from two to forty acres in size. Median home market value is $200,000, according to the 2012 American Community Survey. Residential Cluster/Concentrations These homes either were planned as part of a formal subdivision process or were built to enjoy a shared amenity, such as Lake Michigan or Harwood Lake. They range from 1/2 acre to one acre in size. They are all single family residences. In the 2014 Township Survey, of farmers who manage large farmlands, more than 75% said they intended to keep their farms in production beyond the next 10 years. Page 12 of 37

78 Norwood Township Master Plan Charlevoix County, Michigan Section 2 Background Studies Summary The Village Although this area is in the western portion of the Township and is not incorporated, it has a village layout and character with grid streets and homes close together. This area is known as the Village of Norwood. The Village, platted in 1867, retains the feeling of an earlier age. Its white clapboard homes are situated along streets lined with mature maples as well as the original church, schoolhouse and Township Hall. It is similar to an historic New England village. During the late decades of the nineteenth century, both summer cottages and farms homes were added to the village while still other structures were built during the twentieth century. As a result, Norwood Village has a diversity of architectural forms that creates a charming village in a quiet rural environment. The village is one of Michigan s few remaining nineteenth century rural towns and a treasure worth preserving. Industrial Located further west is a portion of St. Mary s limestone cement quarry operation, which is part of the cement manufacturing process. On the east side of US-31, at the north end of the Township, is Manthei Development Corporation s redi-mix cement operation. Lakeshore The shoreline along Lake Michigan is approximately 2/3 publicly owned. The natural resource value of Michigan s Great Lakes and the unique legal protections that accompany public access and use of the shoreline necessitates a unique approach to land use planning. Commercial Although there are a few scattered businesses along US-31, the main commercial area is in the north-central area of the Township. On the west side of US-31, a small commercial area serves the population that becomes slightly denser towards Charlevoix. Page 13 of 37

79 Norwood Township Master Plan Charlevoix County, Michigan Section 2 Background Studies Summary The St. Mary s Challenger passes close to shore in Norwood Township, headed to the deep water terminal port at St. Mary s cement plant in nearby Charlevoix Township. TOWNSHIP Page 14 of 37

80 Norwood Township Master Plan Charlevoix County, Michigan Section 3 Goals and Policies Section 3 Goals and Policies A. OPEN SPACE PRESERVATION Retain open space as Norwood Township s defining characteristic. People travelling through Norwood Township enjoy the view of a mosaic of undeveloped landscape. This landscape is composed of forest lands, active farm fields and cleared fields. People living in Norwood Township are able to enjoy these views daily on state owned and privately owned open spaces. The predominance of open space reinforces the Township s rural character and makes this place special. Open spaces and minimal development are the main reasons why people live in Norwood Township. The community wants to preserve the rural character of the Township that are defined by undeveloped and agricultural areas; therefore, efforts should preserve and connect open spaces. Preserving the Townships character can be achieved by: 1. Developing zoning incentives or Land Trusts that encourage development on private properties without disrupting continuous open spaces. 2. Investigating grant opportunities and partnerships with land conservancies so the Township can obtain high priority open space areas. 3. Conserve open space and agricultural land through encouraging the purchase of development rights. 4. Require landscape restoration to improve mined areas to a natural and undisturbed condition. B. PROTECT VIEW CORRIDORS If there is any one experience that Norwood Township residents associate with home, it is the magnificent views. From many locations in the Township, one has unobstructed views of forest lands, fields and the horizon over Lake Michigan. These view corridors inspire awe when traveling along US 31 and are the basis for Norwood s reputation as one of the most beautiful communities of our state. The view corridors are critical in preserving Norwood Township s character. Unfortunately, it only takes one poorly placed or designed structure to disrupt a view corridor. Visually polluting structures could be cell towers, wind towers, billboards, conventional strip mall development, or even a gaudy sign. It is the intent of the Planning Commission to protect the Township s scenic vistas by: 1. Defining what makes view corridors important and then mapping those viewsheds that meet the criteria. 2. Working with landowners to develop designs that will minimize the visual impacts of a structure, such as placing buildings within wooded areas. 3. Limiting the number and size of signs along roadways. 4. Promoting access management (sharing driveways, cross access easements, and the use of internal roads) to minimize the number of driveways. 5. Exploring methods of tree preservation and protection through establishing a woodlands ordinance. 6. Collaborating with interested land groups and investigating grant opportunities to obtain development rights and easements for view corridors. Investigate Cost for View corridors. 7. Developing a co-location cellular tower ordinance that strongly encourages the co-location of antennas on existing structures prior to building new freestanding towers. If a new tower must be built, the Township should have the tools in place to ensure it harmonizes with the surrounding landscape to the greatest extent possible. 8. New technologies for renewable energy systems make solar panels and wind turbines more attractive for both commercial applications and individual homeowners. The Township should consider regulations that allow use of these technologies without creating visual pollution. Page 15 of 37

81 Norwood Township Master Plan Charlevoix County, Michigan Section 3 Goals and Policies C. CONTROL COMMERCIAL GROWTH Norwood Township is not a shopping destination and does not have the infrastructure to develop any commercial or retail centers, although there is infrastructure in close proximity along US 31 north of the Township. Residents have not expressed a desire to develop additional commercial activities because they are provided in the nearby towns and are adequate to serve their shopping needs. Norwood Township is primarily a residential community and the people that live there want to keep it that way. Commercial and industrial growth can be controlled by: 1. Reviewing the zoning ordinance to ensure that an appropriate amount of land is zoned for commercial and industrial uses, considering regional needs. 2. Developing zoning and design techniques to ensure commercial and industrial use buildings and structures are compatible with Norwood s character (promote more compact development than strip development. 3. Allowing for home based businesses that are in character with the community. 4. Regulating the impacts that occur as a result of commercial and industrial growth, such as lighting, signage, parking, etc. 5. Allowing any franchised or trademarked architecture only when used with materials and embellishments that fit with the Township s character. 6. Encourage the development of home-based businesses that do not impact the character of the community. 7. Facilitate the development of technologies that are not visually intrusive to the Township s rural fabric. D. HIGHLIGHT AND PRESERVE THE VILLAGE OF NORWOOD S HISTORICAL CHARACTER The unincorporated village of Norwood is a jewel in Northern Michigan s crown and reminds residents and visitors alike of a much earlier era. The village was founded over 125 years ago and has changed in only small ways since then. The village streets are narrow and lay out in a simple grid. The lots are close together, with homes intermixed with public buildings - church, schoolhouse and the Township Hall. There is very little parking for the church and Hall, because they were planned and built for people to walk to them from their homes. The village streets are lined with ancient maple trees that provide a canopy over all. Although homes represent a variety of styles, a good collection of housing dating from the post-civil war era are built in the vernacular style of the country farm homes of that period. Homes and yards are well maintained, providing a clean, neat and charming scene. Inappropriate development or intense land uses would significantly detract from the character of the settlement. The Village can be preserved by: 1. Working with the Norwood Area Historical Society to explain the significance of the village with appropriate signage and interpretive opportunities. 2. Work with property owners to develop a natural buffer area between the existing structures in the village of Norwood and any new construction on adjacent property. This buffer should focus on preserving the existing trees and use primarily native species of vegetation. 3. Working with the people who live in the village to develop a historic preservation district. Such a designation could make federal and state tax credits available to property owners that repair their property consistent with period construction. 4. Limiting the width of roads. The village of Norwood area should have roads appropriate for on- street parking. The Township should encourage the Charlevoix County Road Commission to implement context appropriate road design standards for the village of Norwood. 5. Developing a heritage tree program to protect and replace street trees. 6. Minimizing parking lots sizes and use a common-sense approach to establishing parking areas. 7. Improving Norwood Community Park with accessible structures and maintaining it in a fashion that encourages family friendly gatherings and community activities. E. PRESERVE AND ENHANCE EXISTING FARM OPERATIONS Although agriculture is not the dominant land use in Norwood Township, its prominence may increase in the future. Agricultural activity is vital to the rural character of the Township and Northern Michigan. Page 16 of 37

82 Norwood Township Master Plan Charlevoix County, Michigan Section 3 Goals and Policies If agriculture is not stabilized and protected, Norwood Township could suffer a form of gentrification where development pressures increase and the community s character is altered into something less rural and charming. When a farm field or orchard is developed it is usually no longer used for agriculture production. Farmland preservation programs, like the Charlevoix County Farmland and Open Space program can assist in maintaining these areas. These lands provide open space, as well as jobs for Township residents. Although it is unlikely that the Township will face significant development pressures in the short-term because of relatively stable population, long-range stewardship of agricultural lands is important. Agricultural potential can be preserved by: 1. Working with farmers to create ways to maintain the large amount of farmlands, while allowing for some development (such as cluster developments). 2. Establish special approval use standards for agricultural accessory uses that make sense where proposed yet respect and enhance Norwood Township s overall community character. Agri-Culture and home-based businesses are the Township s best opportunities for economic activity in the foreseeable future. It is appropriate for a two-step approach where the US-31 corridor has more intense commercial accessory uses to agriculture than other less developed parts of the Township. For example, a corn maze would not fit well in Norwood Village because of parking and intensity. 3. Minimizing conflicting land uses next to farmlands. Require natural buffers for non-agricultural uses when built on adjacent lands. 4. Considering a purchase of development rights program, other tax incentives or payment programs to protect farmland. 5. Development of an off-site signage standards for commercial uses accessory to agriculture. Such signs should mesh with the Township s rural character but do not encourage a proliferation of visually polluting signs. The Township could work to establish a wayfinding system that points out local attractions and activities. F. PROACTIVELY GUIDE LAND USES AND GROWTH The Planning Commission should manage and control growth so it won t control the Township. Identify existing land use patterns and infrastructure needs when developing land use guidelines and regulations. Use this information to develop densities, intensities and development designs that are appropriate for Norwood. This can be done by: 1. Using natural features and topography to distinguish between land uses. 2. Encouraging neighborhood designs in developments (such as parks, open spaces, and walking trails). 3. Providing incentives to create the type of developments that are appropriate for Norwood Township. Appropriate lot sizes through standard splits are an example of how to preserve large swaths of interior agriculture and open spaces. 4. Developing ordinances that are easy to read, follow, understand and are realistic. Graphics and examples can be included in the Ordinances. The Township does not need overlay zoning ordinances that create confusion and unnecessary layers of regulation. Norwood is a practical community and regulating land uses should use common sense. 5. Natural resource extraction and mining can have very serious consequences for all of Norwood Township, especially its rural, agricultural character. These very serious consequences can include the impact on existing land uses near the property, reduction of property values near the property, the impact on pedestrian and traffic safety near the property and along the proposed hauling route, the impact on other identifiable health, safety and welfare interests in the Township, [or] the overall public interest. The Township should develop tools to avoid or mitigate negative impacts associated with natural resource extraction and mining. This approach is consistent with the zoning and general law ordinances the Township establishes to eliminate, reduce, or mitigate the negative impacts of other functions like agriculture or commercial land uses. 6. Vigorously, uniformly, and fairly enforce the Township Zoning Ordinance. Example of a locally-scaled wayfinding system that provides off-site directions to attractions and destinations. Page 17 of 37

83 Norwood Township Master Plan Charlevoix County, Michigan Section 3 Goals and Policies Whiskey Creek. In the 2014 Township Survey, 85% of respondents supported special efforts to protect the Township s natural resources. TOWNSHIP Page 18 of 37

84 Norwood Township Master Plan Charlevoix County, Michigan Section 4 Township Survey and Public Input Summary Section 4 TOWNSHIP SURVEY AND PUBLIC INPUT SUMMARY Norwood Township has a strong history of active community involvement. Norwood Township residents are engaged whether it is discussing the expansion of mining operations, improving roads, or improving Norwood Township Park, the people of Norwood are engaged. The Planning Commission began this planning process by creating a SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) analysis for the Township. This process was implemented at a Planning Commission meeting and included a group tour of the Township. While a Township Survey had been conducted in 2005 for the previous Master Plan, the drastic economic downturn from influenced the Planning Commission to poll the residents again. Postcards were sent to all unique property owners (totaling 534) encouraging them to take the on- line survey or request a paper copy. The Township received 168 responses to the survey, provided for a 95+/- statistically significance to the results. Interested residents, property owners and other parties were keep abreast of the planning process via the Township s news. There were several key points brought up in response to the survey, and a range of statements both positive and negative. Highlights of the responses included strong support for the Township s rural character, descriptive statements about supporting the community s need for broadband access, and promising encouragement for developing the Township Park through grant applications. A summary of the Township Survey is included in Appendix A. The Township Planning Commission held a Formal Public Hearing for the adoption of this Plan on XXXX, The formal notice of the public hearing and the minutes from that public hearing are attached in Appendix B. For over 50 years Norwood Township residents have gathered annually at the Norwood Lakeside Cemetary to honor veterans on Memorial Day. Page 19 of 37

85 Norwood Township Master Plan Charlevoix County, Michigan Section 4 Township Survey and Public Input Summary Some elevations in Norwood Township rise to 300 feet above Lake Michigan, opening to 50-mile sunset views. TOWNSHIP Page 20 of 37

86 4th Old Dixie Beatty Block Norwood Township Master Plan Charlevoix County, Michigan Section 5 Future Land Use Plan Section 5 Future Land Use Plan The Future Land Use Plan serves as a general guide to the Township s desired future land use patterns and as a graphic representation of the Township s goals and policies. In general, this Plan was developed after careful consideration of the following features in each area and the surrounding properties: Natural features, including streams, ponds, lakes, wetlands, woodlands, steep slopes, soils, wildlife habitats, and other features that help define the natural capability of the land to support various land use densities; Existing development patterns and trends in the Township; Capacity of the Township s roadway system; Northwest Michigan Health Department s policy for septic systems; Residents expressed needs through the community survey; and Desired future land use and character. The Future Land Use Plan not only reflects the goals and policies of this Master Plan, but also assumes that land will be developed, redeveloped, or remain undeveloped using the other regulatory tools the Township has at its disposal. Tools such as the Zoning Ordinance provide guidance for many elements of a development. The Future Land Use Plan map is a representation of the future as far off as 20 years from now. Readers are cautioned to review other elements of the Master Plan, such as changes which may have occurred since the Master Plan was developed, and the conditions which existed at the time the Future Land Use Plan map and other elements of the Master Plan were prepared. Since zoning shall be based on a plan, as stated in the Michigan Zoning Enabling Act, all Zoning Ordinance changes in Norwood Township should be consistent with the policies established in this Master Plan. If they are not compatible, then the Zoning Ordinance should be changed to match the Master Plan descriptions over time and in a logical fashion. If any Zoning Map change is approved by the Township Board, it is vital that the change match both this Future Land Use Plan and the other policies in this document. If it doesn t, then it could violate the Michigan Zoning Enabling Act, putting not just that rezoning, but the entire Ordinance at risk. The Master Plan should be reviewed and revised, if necessary, prior to substantial zoning changes. Lake Shore Lake Michigan 2nd Whiskey Creek Center Norwood Lake Shore Whiskey Creek Gennett Norwood Faculak 31 Witmere Swanson Valley US 31 Old Orchard Barnard Gennet Parsons Clipperview Inw ood Creek Inwood Creek Beck 31 Ferry Cedarview Spayde LEGEND Heise McGeach Creek Paddock Barnard Creek Agri-Culture Agri-Culture Concentration Single Family Neighborhood Rural Residential Village Proper Recreation/Conservation Limited Commercial Mineral Industrial Resources Map 2 FUTURE LAND USE The future land uses shown on this map are intended to show relative locations and should not be used as a strict, scaled measure. The future land use map is one tool provided in this Master Plan to guide land use decisions. The plan in its entirety establishes the community context for those decisions Page 21 of 37

87 Norwood Township Master Plan Charlevoix County, Michigan Section 5 Future Land Use Plan FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORIES Agri-Culture This Master Plan strongly encourages a creative agricultural resources element coined Agri-Culture. The concept of Agri-Culture allows for agritourism and cultural accessory uses in Norwood Township. These accessory uses, while maintaining the rural character and preserving farmland in the Township, should be allowed when in harmony with the health, safety and welfare of the citizens. All of these Agri-Culture accessory uses should enhance the fabric of the community and have a logical relationship to the principal land use on each property. Agri- Culture presents a unique opportunity to combine aspects of tourism, agriculture and cultural opportunities for financial, educational and social benefits to tourists, producers and the broader community. Agri-Culture provides the Township with the potential to increase its local tax base and provide new and innovative employment opportunities for residents. In addition, Agri-Culture provides educational opportunities to the public, helps preserve agricultural lands and allows the development of businesses that might otherwise be outsourced to other communities or eliminated altogether. There are three general levels of these Agri-Culture uses. First, typical accessory uses like home offices would be allowed by-right after an administrative review. A second, more intense tier, would require development of some zoning standards and should be approved through a site plan review. A third, most intense use set of standards would permit some specialized agriculturally-oriented industries to be developed on agricultural or low density residential zoned properties in accordance with special use approval standards that make sure uses are not developed in a manner that negatively impact surrounding properties. Agri-Culture Concentration would represent a potential concentration of agritourism style primary uses (by-right). Comparatively there are many active traditional farms in Norwood Township. The hilly terrain and amazing microclimate in this area are conducive for wineries and fruit orchards. The intent of this Agri-Culture classification is to maintain and promote existing traditional farming operations to continue and flourish by protecting them from encroachment by incompatible uses. This Agri-Cultural classification includes active farms and land uniquely suited to traditional agricultural practices. These are the parcels where these is active farming and where it is likely to continue. The recommended future land uses are primarily agricultural operations, not residential development. The Township wants to promote these uses including dairy, beef, and crop farming in addition to agriculture-oriented accessory uses such as farm markets, U-pick operations, nurseries, corn mazes, hayrides, and other customary, ancillary, and incidental uses. The overall residential density should be one unit per five (5) acres; however, individual lot sizes may be smaller when the development is clustered in order to protect interior open spaces and agricultural lands. To encourage clustered developments, the Township should consider implementing a bonus density alternative for standard lot splits or large-lot single family condominium subdivisions. Rural Residential People move to rural areas such as Norwood Township to own a larger lot or property than is possible in urban areas. This can mean five acre, ten acre, or even larger lots. The desire for large- lot rural residential development is common in northern Michigan. Sometimes Townships struggle with the negative fiscal impacts of providing services such as emergency operations, schools, road plowing at a greater distance. Another negative impact of uncoordinated large-lot development is increasing the number and length of roads, thereby adding impervious surfaces and generating more stormwater runoff that is difficult to treat and causes erosion. Lastly, large-lots push development further away from populated areas. Conversely, the hilly topography in Norwood Township is not conducive for high-density development. In some instances, a five acre parcel may only have 10,000 square feet suitable for development. An overall density that does not exceed one (1) unit for every three (3) acres is appropriate for areas with steep slopes and other physical constraints for structures. In some instances, cluster development (building the majority of the residences on a portion of the development parcel) may be best suited for this area. These cluster developments should be reviewed as a standard site plan as opposed going through a more intensive review process. Small farm animals in Norwood Township. Page 22 of 37

88 Norwood Township Master Plan Charlevoix County, Michigan Section 5 Future Land Use Plan The overall residential density in this planned land use should be one (1) unit per two (2) acres; however, individual lots sizes may be smaller when the development is clustered. To encourage clustered developments, a bonus density program should be implemented. Village Proper The village of Norwood is a location that has a distinct sense of place. When a person arrives in the village, they immediately know they are in a special place unique from the surrounding areas in the Township. This is a village that was designed prior to the automobile and it continues to have this feel. The village is comprised of homes built from the 1800 s to the present. This area also has the original church, schoolhouse and Township Hall. The roads are narrow and lined with large, mature maple trees. There are no parking lots in this area; vehicles are parked along the street. This Master Plan recommends establishing a specific zoning district that preserves the character of the village of Norwood and does not make any existing development legally nonconforming. Any new development in the Village should be compatible with the existing character of the village (e.g. narrow tree-lined roads in a grid pattern. Boundaries for the village of Norwood should be established through the Zoning District Map. Single-Family Neighborhood This land use area is comprised of single-family homes and it is the intent of this Master Plan to provide for livable and desirable neighborhoods for current and future residents. The primary use should be standard single-family homes. The increasing availability of computer internet connections allows people to work from home. Also, homebusinesses that have minimal impact on surrounding neighbors should be encouraged to diversify job opportunities and stimulate year- round local economic opportunities. The overall residential density shall be one (1) unit per (1) acre; however, individual lot sizes may be smaller when the development is clustered. The Township should implement a bonus density program to promote clustered developments. Clustered developments help preserve the Township s rural character while still meeting the housing needs for future residents. Recreation/Conservation Land designated for Recreation/Conservation is intended to protect, preserve and enhance unique and vital natural features and provide areas for parks, recreation, and open spaces which preserve and enhance the rural character of the Township while, at the same time, broadening recreation and conservation opportunities in appropriate areas. Both public and private recreational/conservation lands are included in this category. The backbone of the area s economy is its lakes and streams, so protecting them is good for commerce and environmental stewardship. Some locations in northern Michigan have allowed development along their natural resource corridors that negatively impact scenic views and the environment. Norwood Township, through this Master Plan, desires to keep these areas in their natural state. Most of the Lake Michigan shoreline is already in public ownership, but some of it is privately owned. Intermittent segments of a regional trail system (beginning in Harbor Springs and ending in Eastport) exist in this area. The Master Plan seeks to maintain and complete these connections. Limited Commercial The main commercial operation in the Township is a small shopping center. These businesses generally serve northern Michigan and are not oriented to Norwood Township s population. They do provide jobs and an economic base. These businesses should continue to exist but not greatly expand. Any expansion should be done westwards from the existing shopping center, and future commercial principal uses should be limited to furnishing goods and services for the Township s economic market area. This Master Plan does not promote strip-style development along the US 31 corridor. Mineral Industrial Resources The citizen survey reflects a desire to have no further industrial development in the Township. Therefore, this Master Plan limits industrial uses to presently-zoned mining and industrial resource properties. This Master Plan also recognizes that mining and drilling are specifically permitted uses in Michigan s Zoning Enabling Act and that zoning or other controls on these uses should be to mitigate the very serious consequences of these uses. Apple Orchards in Norwood Township c In 1897 Norwood Township pioneer and statesman William Harris introduced a bill to the State Legislature which recognized the Apple Blossom as the State Flower. Agri-inspired pottery from the Norwood Township Bier Pottery Studio. Page 23 of 37

89 Norwood Township Master Plan Charlevoix County, Michigan Section 5 Future Land Use Plan Beachcombing the Lake Michigan shore at Norwood Township Park. Petoskey Stones and chert abound for the persistent. In the 2014 Township survey, 71% of respondents said they visited the Norwood Township Park at least once in the last year. TOWNSHIP Page 24 of 37

90 4th Old Dixie Beatty Block Norwood Township Master Plan Charlevoix County, Michigan Section 6 Thoroughfare Plan Section 6 Thoroughfare Plan Norwood Township does not maintain any of their roads, like most Michigan Townships, the roads are owned and operated by the County Road Commission. The Charlevoix County Road Commission is funded by a portion of Michigan s fuel excise taxes and a county-wide milage. The exception to this is US 31, which is under the Michigan Department of Transportation s (MDOT) jurisdiction. US 31 is the main travel route through the Township. According to MDOT, approximately 8,000 vehicles travel on US 31 in Norwood Township per day. About 4% of this traffic is from commercial trucks. Barnard and Ferry Roads are important east-west roads for local access. Gennett Road connects the Village of Norwood to US 31. According to the results of the community survey developed for this Master Plan, the issue of paving gravel roads is complex and does not have an easy answer. Feedback from the survey included comments that traffic is increasing, widening roads would change the rural character of the community, the existing paved roads are not maintained well, and that the Road Commission did not prioritize investments well. US Bicycle Route 35 In 2012, a 500-mile route from Saulte Ste Marie in Michigan s Upper Peninsula to the Indiana line just east of New Buffalo was established as USBR 35. Research and jurisdictional support for USBR 35 along the Lake Michigan shoreline were completed in late The route was developed by a committee of city managers, administrators, and planners from communities along Lake Michigan who conducted a series of public meetings through the fall of The committee secured resolutions of support from all affected road agencies, and the DOT fieldreviewed the route. In Norwood Township, the route follows Barnard Road and US 31. Lake Shore Lake Michigan Lake 2nd Center Norwood Lake Shore Whiskey Creek Gennett Norwood Faculak 31 Witmere Swanson Turkey Run Old US 31 US 31 Old Orchard Barnard Gennett Parsons Clipperview In wood Creek Inwood Creek Harwood Lake Ferry Beck 31 Spayde Cedarview McGeach Creek Heise Paddock Legend Barnard Functional Classification Thoroughfare Collector Local Private US Bicycle Route 35 Norwood Township Map 3 TOWNSHIP ROADS FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION Page 25 of 37

91 Norwood Township Master Plan Charlevoix County, Michigan Section 6 Thoroughfare Plan ROAD FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS Thoroughfares These roads have a planned right-of-way of 120 to and are intended to carry high volumes of through traffic both within the Township and to or from the surrounding region. Major thoroughfares also can provide access to larger abutting properties and large commercial or business areas, such as shopping centers or industrial parks. Collector Roads These roads have a planned right-of-way of 86 and have three purposes. First, they collect traffic from local roads and distribute that traffic to local destinations or major thoroughfares. Second, they funnel through traffic from major thoroughfares to local destinations. Third, collector streets can provide internal circulation and access to shopping centers and industrial parks. Local Roads These roads have a planned right-of-way UP TO 66 and may have a developed footprint as small as 22 wide. They provide access to adjacent land uses, such as residential neighborhoods. Generally, these roads carry relatively small volumes of traffic. Specific recommendations for implementing transportation improvements in this Master Plan include: The Township should work with the Road Commission to develop context appropriate guidelines so that road improvements maintain the character of the community. Roads in Norwood Village and roads that have scenic views are the priority for establishing such guidelines. Norwood Township should work with the Road Commission to ensure an equitable return of funding that residents pay in the county-wide millage. It is important that some capital maintenance occurs to slow the deterioration of local roads in Norwood Township. If any roads are repaired or paved, priority should be given to more heavily traveled routes like Barnard Road, Richardson Road, and Norwood Road. The community should stay actively engaged in the planning for a regional trail connector between Traverse City and Charlevoix. This long-term project aims to link the eastern end of the TART Trail in Acme with the Little Traverse Wheelway trail, which starts in Charlevoix. Tentative plans are for a connector trail that would run through Elk Rapids and Eastport. US Bicycle Route 35 was identified with signage through the Township in Page 26 of 37

92 Norwood Township Master Plan Charlevoix County, Michigan Section 6 Thoroughfare Plan Norwood Township has a rich history of artisans and craftsmen. Thirty years ago the historic Hilton Schoolhouse was transformed into the landmark Bier Art Gallery and Pottery Studio on US 31. TOWNSHIP Page 27 of 37

93 4th Old Dixie Beatty Block Norwood Township Master Plan Charlevoix County, Michigan Section 7 Environmental Profile and Natural Features Plan Section 7 Environmental Profile and Natural Features Plan NATURAL FEATURES Lakes, streams, hills, wetlands, drainage systems, and vegetation provide Norwood Township with a highly varied landscape and significant local natural resources. The Township is located within a hilly zone of glacial moraines and gently undulating plains, and enjoys the rivers, lakes, and wetlands that are characteristic of this type of glacially formed landscape. The Township is located within the Grand Traverse Bay Watershed. Extensive wetland systems are significantly present throughout the Township. The rolling wooded hillsides, lakes, wetlands, and relatively undisturbed areas of the Township have provided the rural atmosphere that has drawn many people to Norwood. We note that along with the typical natural features present, the glaciers left large deposits of sand and gravel throughout the Township. Additionally, an examination of aerial photography over Norwood Township shows long properties and land formations running from north to south. Township leaders are challenged by the task of balancing protections for property owners against mitigating the negative impacts of mining and resource extraction activities. The Michigan Legislature tasked local communities with finding this sensitive balance between industry, environment, and sense of community. Lake Michigan Whiskey Creek Lake Shore Whiskey Creek Faculak Witmere Swanson Valley US 31 Old Orchard Clipperview Inw ood Creek 31 Ferry Cedarview Spayde Heise McGeach Creek Paddock Barnard Creek Legend Rivers and Streams DEQ Wetlands Inventory Norwood Township Woodlands Map 4 NATURAL FEATURES COMPOSITE Woodlands identified by staff from satellite imagery data copyrighted by DigitalGlobe Road, Hydrography, and Political Boundary data from Michigan State Framework. Center Norwood Norwood 31 Barnard Inwood Creek Beck Lake Shore 2nd Gennett Gennett Parsons Harwood Lake Page 28 of 37

94 4th Old Dixie Beatty Block Norwood Township Master Plan Charlevoix County, Michigan Section 7 Environmental Profile and Natural Features Plan Woodlands We established wooded areas across the Township by examining aerial photography. Not surprisingly, many of these woodlands correspond to wetlands. Forested wetlands (wetlands where trees are the dominant plant species) are particularly valuable because they take a longer time to mature. Clipperview Cedarview Block Heise Map 5 WOODLANDS Woodlands identified by staff from satellite imagery data copyrighted by DigitalGlobe Road, Hydrography, and Political Boundary data from Michigan State Framework. Wetlands This classification is for lands that are perceived to have wetland qualities, such as containing standing water or have always been considered wet. The majority of these areas follow Inwood, McGeach and Whiskey Creeks and correspond to the wetland boundary provided by the Michigan Resource Information System. The wetland areas shown on the map were not surveyed prior to being drawn - they are shown for generalized land use planning purposes. Wetlands serve many purposes in the Township. They provide habitat for a wide variety of plant and animal life, function as natural stormwater retention and filtration systems, and have an important role in the groundwater recharge cycle. Significant Views Norwood Township has many spectacular vantage points. These include views of Lake Michigan, the rolling topography, open areas, forest areas and farmlands. The Township should work to identify and prioritize viewsheds. Topography Rolling topography contributes to Norwood Township s scenic beauty, recreation opportunities, and economic base. The same rolling topography is generally unsuited to intensive development. Lake Shore Lake 2nd Lake Michigan Center Norwood Lake Shore Norwood Faculak 31 US 31 Barnard Gennet t Witmere Swanson Turkey Run Old US 31 Old Orchard Gennet Vratinina Parsons Harwood Lake Ferry Beck 31 Spayde Legend Paddock Barnard Norwood Township Woodlands Page 29 of 37

95 4th Old Dixie Beatty Block Lake Shore 4th Old Dixie Valley Beatty Sunset Block Norwood Township Master Plan Charlevoix County, Michigan Section 7 Environmental Profile and Natural Features Plan Map 6 WETLANDS MDEQ Wetlands Inventory. Lake Shore Witmere Swanson Old US 31 Vratinina Clipperview 31 Cedarview Block Heise Paddock Lake Shore Swanson Witmere Old US 31 I nwood Creek Vratinina Clipperview 31 Cedarview McGeach Creek Heise Paddock Map 7 WATER FEATURES These maps are not intended to be used to determine the specific locations and jurisdictional boundaries of wetland areas subject to regulation under Part 303, Wetlands Protection, of the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act, 1994 PA 451, as amended. Only an on-site evaluation performed by the MDEQ in accordance with Part 303 shall be used for jurisdictional determinations. A permit is required from the MDEQ to conduct certain activities in wetlands regulated under Part 303. Lake Michigan US 31 Ferry Spayde Barnard Lake Michigan US 31 Ferry Spayde Barnard Creek Faculak Old Orchard Legend DEQ Final Wetlands Inventory Norwood Township Whiskey Creek Faculak Schmidt Old Orchard Legend Water Features Norwood Township Norwood Norwood 31 Barnard Beck Norwood Norwood 31 Barnard Inwood Creek Beck Lake Shore Lake 2nd Center Gennett t Turkey Run Gennet Parsons Lake Shore Lake 2nd Center Gennett Gennett Knollcrest Turkey Run Parsons Clover Hill Harwood Lake Page 30 of 37

96 Norwood Township Master Plan Charlevoix County, Michigan Section 7 Environmental Profile and Natural Features Plan Specific recommendations for protecting Norwood Township s important natural features in this Master Plan include: Identifying important viewsheds that are important to the Township s character and have significance to the region s heritage. Norwood Township should continue to work with the various state agencies involved with potential land exchanges between the state park and St. Mary s. Determine if there is impetus in the community to protect woodlands and tree stands from overdevelopment. This should be differentiated from forestry and agriculture activities. Typical practices for woodlands protections do involve overlay zoning districts. The Township should continue to work with the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality to ensure that protected wetlands remain considered during the development review process. If there are champion trees, which are old and large examples of specific species, then they should be documented. These trees may be very valuable components of viewsheds or other protected areas. The Township should develop tools to avoid or mitigate negative impacts associated with natural resource extraction and mining. This approach is consistent with the zoning and general law ordinances the Township establishes to eliminate, reduce, or mitigate the negative impacts of other functions like agriculture or commercial land uses. Coastal ice caves on Lake Michigan, near the Norwood Township Park. Page 31 of 37

97 Norwood Township Master Plan Charlevoix County, Michigan Section 7 Environmental Profile and Natural Features Plan Seven miles of northwest-facing coastline uniquely exposes Norwood Township to Lake Michigan s unparalleled beauty and unpredictable fury. TOWNSHIP Page 32 of 37

98 Norwood Township Master Plan Charlevoix County, Michigan Appendix A 2014 Community Survey Summary Appendix A 2014 Community Survey Summary Seventy-five percent of the respondents are year-round residents and have lived in the Township for more than ten years. By far the majority of respondents were over 45 years old. A summary is as follows: The majority of respondents stated they live in Norwood Township due to the rural atmosphere, country living, peacefulness/privacy and scenic views. Nearly 99% of respondents consider the Township s natural resources (beach, park, scenic views, open space, lakes, rivers, streams, woodlots, wetlands, water recharge areas) to be an asset to the community. They believe these resources should be protected with appropriate regulations. 71% of the respondents believe the Village is valuable and should be protected. The majority of respondents support lot sizes of less than 5 acres, where appropriate. Dense residential developments are not favored. Less than 25% of the respondents farm their land, but there are several significantly sized farms. The majority of respondents believe that the number of commercial businesses in the Township is about the right size and character of the community. They do support additional commercial development with appropriate land use regulations. The super majority said industrial development should be discouraged with many land use restrictions. The super majority of respondents support elected officials working to bring internet access to Norwood Township, however, are not necessarily in favor of public funding. Most of the respondents believe the roads are in fair to good condition. The majority support improvements to roads and Norwood Township Park using creative funding mechanisms, not additional taxes. The majority of respondents either don t think that fire protection, policing, or ambulance services are important or that there was even a debate about the sufficiency of those services. SPECIFIC RESPONSES TO INDIVIDUAL SURVEY QUESTIONS The remainder of this section lists the individual survey questions and their responses. Many of the questions gave the respondents an opportunity for individual comments and this section summarizes those comments in cases where there are several similar comments. Which of the following are reasons that you live in Norwood Township? The top 3 responses to this question were peacefulness and privacy, country living, and rural atmosphere. The bottom 3 responses from residents were living close to work, affordable housing, and quality of schools. These responses seem reasonable given that there are few employment opportunities in the Township, the average household income is around 30% of average housing values, and the age cohort with the most responses to the survey was over 45. Please check the choice below that best describes how you feel about the rate of residential growth in Norwood Township. Over 70% of the respondents indicated that the residential rate of growth in the Township was just right. Only 3% of the survey respondents felt residential growth was happening much too slowly. Which density (for single family homes) do you think is appropriate for future development in Norwood Township? The majority of respondents indicated that the preferred residential density was 1 house per 3 acres. The least preferred residential density selected was 1 house per 1/2 acre. Individual comments about this question were supportive of varied lot sizes as long as natural features and open spaces were preserved. What types of residential development would you like to see? The choice selected with the most responses was low density single family homes on smaller lots in a manner that preserves open spaces. The least favored response was multiple family and/or attached condominiums. Comments included in the responses focused on preserving open space, making sure there were adequate services to support different residential densities, and limiting denser developments unless there were trade-offs that preserved Township character. In general, do you feel that the right of the Township to regulate land uses should come before the rights of the property landowner? The majority of the responses was that each case must be considered individually. The least preferred response was that the Township s ability to regulate land should come first. Which best describes how you view the number of commercial (retail and services) businesses in Norwood Township? The most selected response was that the number of commercial businesses was about right for the size and character of the community. The lowest response was that there was too much. Where would you like to see future commercial (retail and services) growth located to serve the citizens of Norwood Township? The intersection of US-31 and Heide Road, the intersection of US-31 and Richardson Road, and the Village of Norwood were preferred for commercial growth. However, nearly 44% of the respondents expressed that they did not want anymore commercial development in the Township. Specific comments about the locations mentioned a context appropriate convenience market close to the village. What type of new retail/service would you like to see in Norwood Township? The top three responses were a farm market, a food service/produce/general store, and an art gallery or studio. The lowest response was a strip mall. Nearly 31% of respondents said they didn t want more retail/service. A common theme through many of the individual responses is that any new commercial establishments should respect the appearance of the community and have reasonable hours of operation. Page 33 of 37

99 Norwood Township Master Plan Charlevoix County, Michigan Appendix A 2014 Community Survey Summary Please check the response that best describes how you feel about a small shopping center (4-6 stores) located in the Township. Only about 20% of respondents indicated that they would be in favor of a small shopping center. Please check the response that identifies the village or city that you conduct most of your business. The top three responses to this question were Charlevoix, Petosky, and Traverse City. Individual comments support these responses. In general, commercial (retail and services) development in the Township should be: The largest response was allowed with appropriate land use regulations (44%) while the smallest response was highly promoted with few land use restrictions (4%). Would you like to see more employment/job opportunities created in the Township? Responses were mixed on this question, with the largest choice being neutral. The remaining responses were slightly biased towards being in favor of opportunities, however we will infer from the rest of the survey that any new developments would need to respect the overall context of the community. In general, industrial development in the Township should be: The largest response to this question was discouraged with may land use restrictions (53%). The smallest response was highly promoted with few land use restrictions. The comments for this question focused on appropriate regulations and green industry. In general, mining operations in the Township should be: The largest response to this question was that mining should be discouraged with many land use restrictions (62%). Comments related to this question focused on keeping mining operations in the existing designated district. If there were going to be industrial development in the Township, where would it be located? Although 66% of the respondents indicated opposition to industrial development, 26% indicated a preference for the north quadrant. Comments for this question generally supported siting any new developments adjacent to existing developments. Do you consider the Township s natural resources (beach, park, scenic views, open space, lakes, rivers, streams, woodlots, wetlands, water recharge areas) to be an asset to the community? Almost 99% of respondents indicated that they felt these features were community assets. Do you feel that the Township should enact special measures to protect these natural resources? 85% of respondents supported special efforts to protect the natural resources. Individual comments suggested that residents would like to better understand what these special measures could entail. Do you consider the historic buildings of Norwood Village to be an asset to the community? 84% of the respondents agreed with this statement. Only 5% opposed the statement. Do you feel that the Township should enact special measures to preserve the Village and surrounding area? 71 % of respondents support special measures to protect the village while about 14% of respondents opposed the concept. How many acres do you farm or lease in the Norwood Township? Of the respondents that answered the question that they do farm, about 50% farm 40 acres or less while about 18% farm more than 100 acres. If you presently farm 40 acres or more in Norwood Township, how long do you plan to keep this land in agricultural production? More than 75% of respondents indicated that they were keeping their large farmlands in production longer than 10 years. How many times have you, your family and/or guest(s) used the Township Park on Lake Michigan in the past 12 months? 71% of respondents used the Township Park at least once over the past 12 months. Would you support improvement of Township Park on Lake Michigan? This question discusses different alternatives for funding park improvements. Of the 71% that answered the question positively, the majority (52%) supported other means like outside grants and funding, 13% for funding with special assessments, and only 7% would support increased taxes for park improvements. This question, along with question 24, focus on specific Township Park improvements that are very valuable for developing a new Township Parks and Recreation Plan. This Parks and Recreation Plan is a key implementation recommendation from this 2014 Master Plan. Do you support the Elk Rapids to Charlevoix Trail? Only 13% of respondents do not support the trail concept. The other respondents were almost evenly split between supporting the trail concept and not being aware of it. How many members of your household are employed outside the home? 29 of the respondents skipped this question, but 66 indicated no members of the household worked outside the home, 29 had 1 worker, 39 had 2 workers, and 9 had more than 2 workers. If you live in the Township, how far do you and each employed member of your household drive (one way) to work? About 19% of respondents more than 20 miles from home while about 18% work 5-10 miles from home. These responses are consistent with answers to earlier questions about travel habits. 36% indicate they are retired. 23% of respondents state that they work from home, which is much greater than the results of the 2012 American Community Survey. Check the roads typically used by members of your household on the way to and from work. The three top roads indicated by respondents were US-31, Norwood Road, and Barnard Road. The three least indicated were Parson s Road, Beatty Road, and Warner Road. Do you feel there is a traffic congestion problem on Township Roads? 95% of respondents did not think there is a congestion problem on Township Roads. How would you describe the condition of the roads in the Township? 75% of respondents selected that the Township Roads were in good or fair condition. Would you support an additional millage to pave gravel roads in the Township? Almost half of the respondents selected no for this question. Comments on this question suggested a better accountability from the Road Commission for the existing funding sent to the County. If you have been a Township resident five or more years, please rate how you feel the following categories have changed in the last five years: The majority of respondents selected that road conditions have state the same or gotten worse. The majority of respondents selected that privacy has stayed the same or gotten worse. The majority of respondents think crime has stayed the same. The majority of respondents think traffic has stayed the same or gotten worse. The majority of respondents indicated that the natural environment has stayed the same or improved. In your opinion, what do you consider needs more protection by the Township? (Please rank your top 5 choices in order of importance, assigning 5 to the most important) Average Rating Scenic Views 4.05 Open space 3.24 Forestry 2.87 Agriculture 2.76 Norwood Village 2.59 Many of the comments focused on protecting personal property rights and that each of these topics were somewhat equal. Identifying scenic views is an important implementation step for this 2014 Master Plan. Page 34 of 37

100 Norwood Township Master Plan Charlevoix County, Michigan Appendix A 2014 Community Survey Summary Should your elected officials actively work to bring internet access to the Township? Would you support a property tax millage to improve Ambulance Services in the Township? Are you a registered voter? 92%of responses stated yes and 8% stated no. Is there anything else that you would like to suggest to the Township Planning Commission? 78% of respondents answered this question yes, and the majority of comments were favorable to the prospect. Would you support a tax millage or other funding mechanism to pay for improved internet service? The response to this question was very similar to the previous question about fire protection. Responses were split 35% yes, 47% no, and 18% undecided. Would you support a property tax millage to improve Public Safety in the Township? What is your age? comments Suggestions for the Planning Commission were varied from praise to criticism. Some comments include negative responses on the proposed land swap, positive responses for the protection of natural resources, and support for the introduction of broadband internet service to the Township. Although respondents were favorable to the previous question, they were not supportive of using a millage to fund such improvements (47%). Would you support a property tax millage for purchasing additional park land? In general, comments to this question suggest more information is needed, but 58% of respondents said No. The Purchase of Development Rights is the voluntary sale of the right to develop property by the landowner to a government agency or land trust. The government agency or land trust acquiring development rights typically restricts future uses of the land to farming, recreation or open space. Would you support a property tax millage for purchasing development rights? Comments for this question were mixed, however, almost 41 percent of respondents answered no. Would you support a property tax millage to improve fire protection in the Township? Many of the comments were unaware fire protection was an issue. Responses were split 37% yes, 34% no, and 18% undecided. Responses were split 20% yes, 47% no, and 18% undecided. Which of the following best describes your residential status in Norwood Township? 75% of respondents are year-round residents while 22% are seasonal residents. How long have you owned property in Norwood Township? Almost 75% of respondents have owned property in Norwood Township more than 10 years. Less than 10 percent of the respondents have owned property for less than 5 years. What type of property do you own in Norwood Township? Commercial 0.0% Residential < 2 acres 30.30% Residential 2 to 5 acres 20.61% Residential 5 to 10 acres 15.15% Residential > 10 acres 17.58% Farm 40 acres or greater 10.91% Multifamily 0.0% Waterfront 25.45% Industrial 0.61% Renter 2.42% Notably, owners of small lots responded to the survey in the greatest number. 90% of survey respondents that answered question 45 indicated they were over 45. The remaining three questions were open ended questions listed below, followed by the number of responses. We try to mention comments that were repeated multiple times. In your own words, what characteristics would make Norwood Township an exceptional place to live five (5) years from now? 132 comments The historic quaintness and simple rural character are mentioned repeatedly in the comments. Keeping the Township growing at a sensible and moderate pace are also mentioned. In your own words, what characteristics might hinder Norwood Township from being an exceptional place to live five (5) years from now? 131 comments Industry, additional mining, and urban/suburban style development are repeated throughout the comments for this question as characteristics that will hinder Norwood Township from being an exceptional place to live 5 years from now. Page 35 of 37

101 Norwood Township Master Plan Charlevoix County, Michigan Appendix A 2014 Community Survey Summary In the 2014 Township Survey when asked about protecting resources, residents said open space preservation and senic view preservation were their top priorities. TOWNSHIP Page 36 of 37

102 Norwood Township Master Plan Charlevoix County, Michigan Appendix B Public Hearing Notice and Minutes Appendix B Public Hearing Notice and Minutes Page 37 of 37

103 Marion Township Master Plan 2014/2015 Update Norwood Township Master Plan 2014 Update Staff Reviews by Antrim County Administration / Planning Department Janet Koch, Associate Planner The proposed Marion Township and Norwood Township Master Plans have been reviewed; staff comments are below. Both townships are in Charlevoix County and lie directly north of Antrim County s Banks Township. (See map at bottom of page 3.) Per state statute, proposed master plans are sent to adjacent townships and counties. The plan review s primary responsibility, according to the Michigan Planning Enabling Act, P.A. 33 of 2008 as amended, is to state if the proposed master plan is considered to be inconsistent with municipalities adjacent to Banks Township, and if it is considered to be inconsistent with Antrim County s master plan. More specifically, guidelines from the Michigan Association of Planning recommend that the following topics be considered while reviewing a master plan: Border Issues Issues of greater than local concern Comparison with local plan contents Comparison with county/regional plan contents Comparison to other relevant adopted plans (i.e., historic preservation plan, local wetland protection plan, TIF or brownfield redevelopment plan, etc.) Comparison to various implementation strategies. Per the Planning Enabling Act, a county s comments to a township or village regarding their proposed master plans are advisory only. Staff Comments for the Marion Township Master Plan (see maps on pages 4 & 5) As is typical, the classifications in the future land use plans used by Marion Township, Antrim County, and Banks Township are similar, but different. The Marion Township future land use adjacent to Banks Township is classified as Resource Preserve/Low Density Residential, which is described as intended to encourage the continued forestry and agricultural uses of areas on prime soils. The Banks Township future land uses that are adjacent to Marion Township are classified as either Recreation/Conservation or Forest/Agricultural. (Please see definitions on the following pages.) Antrim County s Master Plan designates the part of Banks Township that is adjacent to Marion Township as Rural County, with a band of Public Recreation along Marion and Skinner Creeks. (Please see definitions on the following pages.) The goals of Marion Township s master plan (pages III-1 through III-7) include retaining and enhancing the township s rural character, preserving the township s natural resources, protecting agricultural operations, providing housing that retains the community s rural character, improving the township s transportation systems, and encouraging a diversified economy. All of these goals are very similar to the guiding principles listed in the Antrim County Master Plan. Staff sees no major conflicts between Antrim County s Master Plan and the proposed Marion Township Master Plan. Page 1

104 Staff Comments for the Norwood Township Master Plan (see maps on pages 4 & 5) The future use land use plan for the portion of Norwood Township that borders Banks Township is classified as Rural Residential and Single Family Neighborhood. (See definitions below.) While these are not precisely aligned with the Banks Township Master Plan s future land use classes of Recreation/Conservation, Residential, and Forest/Agricultural, they are not necessarily incompatible uses, either. Similarly, the Antrim County s Master Plan designates the areas adjacent to Norwood Township as Public Recreation, Rural County, and Agricultural Preservation. Rural Residential (Norwood Twp.) The overall residential density in this planned land use should be one unit per two acres; however, individual lots sizes may be smaller when the development is clustered. Single Family Neighborhood (Norwood Twp.) The overall residential density shall be one unit per acre; however, individual lot sizes may be smaller when the development is clustered. Recreation/Conservation (Banks Twp.) The Recreation/Conservation category is designed to accommodate existing recreation property, areas for future recreation use, or other sensitive resource areas. This land use category will allow for low intensity recreation development, as well as low density residential uses consistent with recreational and conservation uses. Residential (Banks Twp.) Designated residential areas should be retained for low density residential use during the present planning period, since the Township is not currently served by sewer and water. Additionally, low density residential use is more compatible with the adjacent Recreation/Conservation and Forest/Agricultural land uses. Forest/Agricultural (Banks Twp.) The Forest/Agricultural area designation is intended to encourage the continued forestry and agricultural uses of areas on prime soils while the designation of Forest/Agricultural land use category will not prevent the conversion of farmland and forestland to other uses, it will help to control the scale and rate of conversion and direct attention to areas where farmland conversion may be an issue. Public Recreation (Antrim County) These are the publicly owned lands that offer recreation, wildlife habitat, and visual beauty. These lands are owned by the state, county or township. It is projected that these areas will remain in public ownership. If there is a change, it is desired that the properties will transfer from one government entity to another. If a property is privately obtained, the road and infrastructure services should be studied to ensure any future use of the property will be appropriate. Rural Country (Antrim County) People living in Antrim County tend to enjoy a relaxed, rustic lifestyle. People living here take pleasure in having larger size properties and limited infrastructure services such as well and septic. Broadband connections are encouraged to allow for more people to work from home. The plan for this area is to retain rural characteristics and allow individuals to continue their standard of living. Agricultural Preservation (Antrim County) The intent of this classification is to identify the areas that are actively farmed or have characteristics that make them suitable for farming. This identification is to maintain, promote, and encourage existing operations and protect them from incompatible uses. These areas should focus on agricultural operations rather than residential development. The primary uses of lands in area Page 2

105 should focus on agricultural activities including crops, horticulture, fruit growing, forestry, ranching, beekeeping, poultry and egg production, animal breeding, stabling, kenneling, milk production and similar uses, and the associated storage relating to these uses and activities permitted by the Michigan Right to Farm Act. The goals and policies of Norwood Township s proposed master plan are more detailed than Antrim County s more general guiding principles, however, this is to be expected when comparing a township plan to a county plan. Norwood Township s goals and policies seem to be written with preservation foremost in mind. Open space, view corridors, existing farm operations, and the village of Norwood are all cited as areas to be preserved. One goal, however, that is critical to Antrim County s Master Plan but is absent from the proposed Norwood Township Master Plan is the protection of water quality and other natural resources. Since the township s 2014 Community Survey states that nearly 99% of respondents consider the township s natural resources an asset to the community, this seems an odd absence. However, the township s future land use plan includes a Recreation/Conservation classification. A significant portion of the township is classified as Recreation/Conservation, whose intention is to protect, preserve and enhance unique and vital natural features. Staff sees no major conflicts between Antrim County s Master Plan and the proposed Marion Township Master Plan. Norwood Twp. Marion Twp. Antrim Co. Banks Twp. Page 3

106 Norwood Township Marion Township Future Land Use Future Land Use Banks Township Future Land Use

107 Norwood Township Marion Township Future Land Use Future Land Use Antrim County Future Land Uses in northern Banks Township