THE THIRTIETH MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF GREATER SUDBURY COUNCILLOR LYNNE REYNOLDS PRESIDING

Transcription

1 THE THIRTIETH MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF GREATER SUDBURY Committee Room C-11 Tuesday, June 8, 2005 Tom Davies Square Commencement: 4:30 p.m. Adjournment: 8:15 p.m. COUNCILLOR LYNNE REYNOLDS PRESIDING Present Staff Declarations of Pecuniary Intere Councillors Bradley, Dupuis D. Braney, Assets Manager & Property Negotiator / Appraiser; B. Lautenbach, Director of Planning Services; A. Haché, Deputy City Clerk; F. Bortolussi, Planning Committee Secretary None declared. In Camera Recommendation # : Dupuis-Bradley: That we move In Camera to deal wi property matters in accordance wi Article 15.5 of e City of Greater Sudbury Procedure By-law and e Municipal Act, 2001, s.239(2)(f). Recess Reconvene At 4:58 p.m., e Planning Committee recessed. At 5:37 p.m., e Planning Committee reconvened in e Council Chamber for e regular meeting. COUNCILLOR RUSS THOMPSON PRESIDING Present Staff News Media Councillors Bradley, Dupuis, Reynolds B. Lautenbach, Director of Planning Services; A. Potvin, Manager of Development Approvals; G. Clausen, City Engineer; A. Haché, Deputy City Clerk; M. Burtch, Licensing & Assessment Clerk; F. Bortolussi, Planning Committee Secretary MCTV; Sudbury Star, Norern Life PC - June 7, 2005 (30 ) - 1 -

2 Declarations of Pecuniary Intere None declared MATTERS ARISING FROM THE IN CAMERA SESSION Rise and Report Councillor Reynolds reported e Committee met in closed session to deal wi property matters and e following recommendations emanated erefrom: Gift of Land to Recommendation # : City, Harbour Park Subdivision Bradley-Dupuis: THAT part of Parcel 2734, S.E.S., measuring 0.74 Beel Lake acres in size, be transferred to e City of Greater Sudbury and at Council pass a By-law auorizing e execution of e documents required to complete e transfer of land; AND FURTHER THAT a tax receipt be provided to e owner representing full compensation for e land. Sale of Surplus Recommendation # : Land, Percy Street, Val Caron Dupuis-Bradley: THAT part of Parcel 33606, S.E.S., Percy Street, Val Caron, measuring 0.81 acres in size, be sold to Yvon Henry pursuant to e procedures governing e disposal of limited marketability property set out in e City s Property By-law; AND THAT Council pass a By-law auorizing e execution of e documents required to complete e transaction. Order of Agenda As e applicant for Public Hearing #1 was not present, e Committee agreed to deal wi e remaining agenda items at is time and return to Public Hearing #1 when e applicant arrived. PC - June 7, 2005 (30 ) - 2 -

3 PUBLIC HEARINGS APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO A DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION TO PERMIT THREE ADDITIONAL SINGLE RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND, FURTHER, TO REMOVE AN "H", HOLDING SYMBOL PERTAINING TO BY-LAW Z WITH RESPECT TO LANDS ABUTTING RAMSEY LAKE ROAD, SUDBURY, VYTIS LANDS (KAGAWONG) LTD. The Planning Committee meeting was adjourned and e Public Hearing was opened to deal wi e following application. Report dated May 30, 2005, was received from e Director of Planning Services and e General Manager of Grow and Development regarding an application for an amendment to a draft Plan of Subdivision to permit ree additional single residential lots and, furer, to remove an "H", Holding Symbol pertaining to By-law Z wi respect to lands abutting Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, Vytis Lands (Kagawong) Ltd. Denis Michel, Elgin Street, Sudbury, Counsel for e applicant, was present. The Director of Planning Services outlined e application to e Committee. Denis Michel indicated at e applicant is satisfied wi e recommendations of Staff. Margaret Sun, Bedford Court, Sudbury, indicated at she did file an appeal wi e Ontario Municipal Board appealing e passage of By-law Z as she was concerned wi e effect development of Lots 8 to 11 would have on e lake. She furer indicated at la Friday she widrew her appeal to e Ontario Municipal Board. She widrew e appeal because she felt e challenges of development on problematic soil were reconsidered and conditions would be imposed to insure ere would be no impact on Beel Lake and Ramsey Lake. Ms. Sun asked about e bore hole on e border of Lots 8 and 9 which revealed e presence of gasoline. She queioned why e fir bore hole was 2.29m in dep and e second was only 1m in dep. The geotechnical engineer explained at what e fir bore hole revealed was only an odour of gasoline. Also, as e upper fill materials were identified as e area of concern, e second bore hole was at a dep of 1m and e results of e te were acceptable for development. Ms. Sun asked if e foundation of e building on Lot 10 would be anchored on bedrock. She is concerned about e soil and e measures taken wi respect to e condition of e soil and potential movement. She feels an engineer should on site at e time of conruction of e foundation. PC - June 7, 2005 (30 ) - 3 -

4 PUBLIC HEARINGS (cont d) APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO A DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION TO PERMIT THREE ADDITIONAL SINGLE RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND, FURTHER, TO REMOVE AN "H", HOLDING SYMBOL PERTAINING TO BY-LAW Z WITH RESPECT TO LANDS ABUTTING RAMSEY LAKE ROAD, SUDBURY, VYTIS LANDS (KAGAWONG) LTD. (cont d) The Director of Planning Services indicated at, as well as e property being subject to a site plan control agreement, one of e conditions is e requirement of an engineer s seal for e foundations. The geotechnical engineer indicated at e residence on Lot 10 will be built on bedrock. Wi respect to Lots 8 and 11, he expects e exiing grades will be maintained as much as possible and e ructures would be on rip footing in accordance wi e Ontario Building Code. Ms. Sun asked if anying was being done to protect e fish. The Committee was advised at e conditions to be set by e City as to what design of ponds will be required is ill under review. Also, e Director of Planning Services indicated at a condition of e draft plan of approval is a orm water management plan will have to be filed to e satisfaction of Planning Services, Fisheries Canada and Nickel Dirict Conservation Auority. Craig Ticalo, Hillsdale Crescent, Sudbury, indicated he is present on behalf of two prospective purchasers. He asked what is planned for Lots 8 and 10. He is in favour of e proposal but is concerned wi e intended use of Lot 9 which is being dedicated to e City. Bo of his clients expressed concern at it will be used for a public park as ey want tranquillity. Since is lot is in e primary flood plain, he urged e Planning Committee to deal wi is land only as wetland. He does not feel a public park is feasible and feels at e be use for Lots 9 and Block 20 is to keep em as wetland or conservation areas. Mr. Michel explained at Lot 9 and Block 20 have been dedicated to e City so e City now has control of e use of e property. The Director of Planning Services indicated at e intent is to support e wetlands and to protect e flood plain. The Chair asked wheer ere was anyone else in e audience who wished to speak in favour or again is application and seeing none: The Public Hearing concerning is matter was closed and e Planning Committee resumed in order to discuss and vote on e application. PC - June 7, 2005 (30 ) - 4 -

5 PUBLIC HEARINGS (cont d) APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO A DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION TO PERMIT THREE ADDITIONAL SINGLE RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND, FURTHER, TO REMOVE AN "H", HOLDING SYMBOL PERTAINING TO BY-LAW Z WITH RESPECT TO LANDS ABUTTING RAMSEY LAKE ROAD, SUDBURY, VYTIS LANDS (KAGAWONG) LTD. (cont d) The following recommendations were presented: Recommendation # : Reynolds-Dupuis: THAT e reque by Vytis Lands (Kagawong) Ltd. to remove e H, Holding Symbol pertaining to By-law Z being an amendment to By-law Z, being e Comprehensive Zoning By-law for e (former) City of Sudbury in order to permit development of e subject lands described as P.I.N being Part of Part 1 and all of Parts 2 to 7 inclusive, Plan 53R in Lot 2, Concession 2, Township of McKim be approved subject to e following condition: 1. A by-law undertaking e removal of e H, symbol shall only be considered by Council when By-law Z has come into effect. CONCURRING MEMBERS: Councillors Bradley, Dupuis, Reynolds, Thompson Recommendation # : Reynolds-Bradley: THAT e reque by Vytis Lands (Kagawong) Ltd. to amend e conditions of draft approval wi respect to e Draft Plan of Subdivision of P.I.N being Part of Part 1 and all of Parts 2 to 7 inclusive, Plan 53R in Lot 2, Concession 2, Township of McKim, File # 780-6/04002 be approved as follows: 1. By deleting condition # By deleting condition #11 and replacing it wi e following: #11. That e owner dedicate Block 20 for public park purposes to e satisfaction of e Director of Leisure, Community and Volunteer Services. 3. By deleting condition #13. PC - June 7, 2005 (30 ) - 5 -

6 PUBLIC HEARINGS (cont d) APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO A DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION TO PERMIT THREE ADDITIONAL SINGLE RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND, FURTHER, TO REMOVE AN "H", HOLDING SYMBOL PERTAINING TO BY-LAW Z WITH RESPECT TO LANDS ABUTTING RAMSEY LAKE ROAD, SUDBURY, VYTIS LANDS (KAGAWONG) LTD. (cont d) Recommendation # (cont d) 4. By deleting condition #16 and replacing it wi e following: #16. Wi respect to Lots 1 to 8 inclusive, and Lots 10 to 18 inclusive, e owner shall, to e satisfaction of e Chief Building Official, undertake at foundations for ructures will be designed by and bear e seal of a professional ructural engineer based on a geotechnical engineer s field review and report for e excavation and engineered fill placement. The design will address bearing capacity issues, fro cover weeping tile, and differential consolidation of subsoil rata if any is anticipated, including excavation design such as shoring should e location of adjacent exiing ructures warrant. 5. By deleting condition #19 and replacing it wi e following: #19. That Lots 9 and 19 be eliminated from e draft plan. The lands delineated as being Lot 9 on e draft plan shall be dedicated to e City of Greater Sudbury to e satisfaction of e Director of Legal Services/City Solicitor. 6. By adding e following condition: #24. That e owner undertake to provide a community mailbox on Ramsey Lake Road adjacent to Lot 1 to e satisfaction of Canada Po. CONCURRING MEMBERS: Councillors Bradley, Dupuis, Reynolds, Thompson PC - June 7, 2005 (30 ) - 6 -

7 DELEGATIONS Subdivision Report dated May 27, 2005, was received from e General Referral Reque Manager of Grow and Development regarding Subdivision for Consent Referral Reque for Consent Applications B22/2005 to B24/2005, Applications, Treeview Road, Sudbury, A. & S. Kangas. Treeview Road, Sudbury A. Kangas, Treeview Road, Sudbury, ated he is satisfied wi e A. & S. Kangas Staff report except for e requirement to undertake a Noise Impact Study. He feels at if e houses are built wi triple-glazed windows, it will solve any noise problem as well as help wi temperature control. The Director of Planning Services indicated is is a referral because e applicant has made several severance applications on is property in e pa. He ated at e only concern was at two of e proposed lots and a portion of e oers will be close to e by-pass and will need special treatment for noise. A condition of e consent approval will be at e applicant is to provide a udy, which does not have to be extensive, on appropriate means to deal wi noise. Recommendation # : Dupuis-Reynolds: THAT Consent Applications B0022/2005, B0023/2005 & B0024/2005 wi respect to part of Parcels 2967 and S.E.S. being Parts 1 to 4 inclusive, Plan 53R in Lot 7, Concession 5, Township of Broder be permitted to proceed by way of e consent process. Order of Agenda The Committee noted at e applicant for Public Hearing #1 was in attendance and agreed to hold e public hearing at is time. PUBLIC HEARINGS APPLICATION FOR REZONING TO PERMIT A 242 UNIT RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX, BANCROFT DRIVE WEST OF MOONLIGHT BEACH ROAD, SUDBURY, ONTARIO INC. & AZ DEVELOPMENTS INC. (AGENT: DOUG SIMMONS) The Planning Committee meeting was adjourned and e Public Hearing was opened to deal wi e following application. PC - June 7, 2005 (30 ) - 7 -

8 PUBLIC HEARINGS (cont d) APPLICATION FOR REZONING TO PERMIT A 242 UNIT RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX, BANCROFT DRIVE WEST OF MOONLIGHT BEACH ROAD, SUDBURY, ONTARIO INC. & AZ DEVELOPMENTS INC. (AGENT: DOUG SIMMONS) (cont d) Report dated May 31, 2005, was received from e Director of Planning Services and e General Manager of Grow and Development regarding an application for rezoning to permit a 242 unit residential complex, Bancroft Drive we of Moonlight Beach Road, Sudbury, Ontario Inc. & AZ Developments Inc. (Agent: Doug Simmons). Petition dated May 31, 2005 objecting to e proposed development was received. Petition dated June 7, 2005 objecting to e proposed development was received at e meeting. Doug Simmons, Wemount Avenue, Sudbury, agent for e applicant, was present. Recess Reconvene At 7:03 p.m., e Planning Committee recessed. At 7:10 p.m., e Planning Committee reconvened. The Director of Planning Services outlined e application to e Committee. Doug Simmons ated e proposed development has a density lower an allowed by R1" and R2" zoning. He indicated at all buildings will be one orey and e proposal is in response to market needs. Zeke Kanhai, Bancroft Drive, Sudbury ated he was making a submission on behalf of himself and 21 oer residents of Bancroft Drive in e vicinity of e proposed development. He feels a 242 rental residential complex, on 49.4 acres of land beside busy railway tracks, creates a real potential for a ghetto-like development. He feels e atement at e rental units could potentially be converted to condominium units is meaningless. He asked what e projected population density would be; what e projected population breakdown by age groups would be; and how would e social characteriics of e development impact e peaceful nature of e exiing community. He also wondered about e details of e recreational facilities. He indicated e area residents feel ere will be a significant number of young children and teenagers and asked what plans were made to address eir needs and eir safety in living in such close proximity to busy railway tracks. He does not feel e development will attract high end tenants because of e busy railway tracks. He furer asked what e City would do to enforce fulfilment of e promises made by e developer if e PC - June 7, 2005 (30 ) - 8 -

9 PUBLIC HEARINGS (cont d) APPLICATION FOR REZONING TO PERMIT A 242 UNIT RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX, BANCROFT DRIVE WEST OF MOONLIGHT BEACH ROAD, SUDBURY, ONTARIO INC. & AZ DEVELOPMENTS INC. (AGENT: DOUG SIMMONS) (cont d) developer failed to keep such promises. He also feels e development will devalue e real eate value of e exiing homes. He ated e area residents rongly oppose e development and urged e Committee not to approve e application. He furer indicated at many residents did not receive e notice of e public meeting for area residents held on May 31, 2005 and at e notice given by e City was too short to give e residents a democratic opportunity to give eir input. He presented e Committee wi a petition signed by 22 residents of Bancroft Drive ating he would have had more signatures if he had more time. Doug Simmons indicated e development is being built in such a fashion at it can be converted into a condominium development. It is not being done as a condominium development now as it takes time. He indicated all e units will have two bedrooms and erefore not designed for family use. There will be no ree or four bedroom units. Mo of e target market will be empty neers and young couples. The Director of Planning Services indicated at in terms of people-zone, e City has no control. There are some designs at can channel in one direction or anoer. Wi respect to e buffers/berms at e railway tracks, e City can control is by way of e Site Plan Control Agreement which will be regiered on title to e property. The City also has control over e passing of e zoning by-law. Wi respect to e public meeting for e residents, Mr. Simmons indicated at notices were hand delivered to area residents and notice was in e newspaper. He furer indicated at approximately 50 people attended e meeting. Councillor Reynolds, Ward Councillor, indicated at she and Councillor Gasparini, e oer Ward Councillor, did offer to assi e developer in having e meeting. She advised at 150 flyers, which is more an normal, were delivered by hand and people were asked to inform eir neighbours. Ron Therrien, Bancroft Drive, Sudbury indicated at currently no one walks along e railway tracks. If a berm is built, ere will be many walkers. He also asked how e sound will be opped by e berm as at some places e track is ten to fifteen feet and at oers it is flat. He also asked about sidewalks on Bancroft Drive. The Director of Planning Services indicated at a series of noise udies have been conducted and recommend 2.5m to 3.5m berm along e sou property PC - June 7, 2005 (30 ) - 9 -

10 PUBLIC HEARINGS (cont d) APPLICATION FOR REZONING TO PERMIT A 242 UNIT RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX, BANCROFT DRIVE WEST OF MOONLIGHT BEACH ROAD, SUDBURY, ONTARIO INC. & AZ DEVELOPMENTS INC. (AGENT: DOUG SIMMONS) (cont d) line. This is one of many measures. He furer indicated at e recommendation of e consultants is at e buildings be bricked and have a force air heating syem wi air conditioning. The City Engineer indicated at a condition of approval is at e developer contribute 50% of e co of sidewalks on Bancroft Drive between Levesque Street and Moonlight Avenue. Michel Legault, Bancroft Drive, Sudbury indicated at his concern at e moment is e high amount of traffic on Bancroft Drive. He indicated ey have to keep eir windows closed at peak traffic times. Adding anoer 1,400 cars daily will double e noise. The developer had dealt wi e buffer for e tracks but what about a buffer for e traffic. His concerns are noise and traffic because of children. Mr. Legault asked if ere will be enough to entertain e children moving into e development to prevent em from getting bored and causing vandalism. The Director of Planning Services indicated ere will be a traffic impact udy done. Wi respect to traffic noise, he indicated is is a difficult issue and ere will be a recommendation for air conditioning to mitigate noise. However, traffic noise has not been factored in. The road has e capability of handling e amount of traffic generated by e proposed development. Mr. Simmons indicated at e development will have a swimming pool, tennis courts, bocce courts and a trail syem to Moonlight Beach along wi a recreational building. However, he does not anticipate teenagers but empty neers and young couples wi small children. Councillor Reynolds indicated she is in favour of e development. There was a information meeting which many attended and many support is project. This will be a gated community geared to affluent seniors and professional young adults. There will also be e benefit of increased tax assessment. There should be no fear of negative impact on property value in e area as e new development will increase e value of exiing properties. She added at e builder is extremely responsible wi a feel for aesetics and landscaping. The Chair asked wheer ere was anyone else in e audience who wished to speak in favour or again is application and seeing none: PC - June 7, 2005 (30 )

11 PUBLIC HEARINGS (cont d) APPLICATION FOR REZONING TO PERMIT A 242 UNIT RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX, BANCROFT DRIVE WEST OF MOONLIGHT BEACH ROAD, SUDBURY, ONTARIO INC. & AZ DEVELOPMENTS INC. (AGENT: DOUG SIMMONS) (cont d) The Public Hearing concerning is matter was closed and e Planning Committee resumed in order to discuss and vote on e application. The following recommendation was presented: Recommendation # : Reynolds-Dupuis: THAT e application by AZ Developments Inc. and Ontario Inc. to amend By-law Z being e Zoning By-law for e former City of Sudbury by changing e zoning classification of Parts 1 to 7, Plan 53R , being Parcel S.E.S. and part of Parcel S.E.S. in Lots 9 and 10, Concession 3, Neelon Township from "R1", Single Residential and "R2", Double Residential, as e case may be, to "R4-Special", Multiple Residential Special be approved subject to e following: 1. That prior to e passing of an amending by-law e applicant enter into a Site Plan Control Agreement wi e City for e whole of e subject property. 2. That if necessary, e amending by-law shall be tailored to e Site Plan Control Agreement. 3. That e amending by-law will require a minimum setback of 30m from e sou lot line for all residential buildings; will permit a maximum of 242 dwelling units; and will rerict residential building height to a maximum of 10m. 4. That prior to e passing of an amending by-law e applicant undertake a traffic impact analysis to determine what road improvements are made necessary by e proposed development and enter into an agreement wi e City to participate in e co of e recommended improvements to e satisfaction of e General Manager of Infraructure and Emergency Services. 5. That, among oer matters, e Site Plan Control Agreement deal wi e dedication of an easement over e trail and e Technical Services Section comments of e aff report dated May 31, That e recommendations of e Noise Impact Study, 1990, prepared by Vibron Limited, and updated by e Noise and Vibration Assessment, PC - June 7, 2005 (30 )

12 PUBLIC HEARINGS (cont d) APPLICATION FOR REZONING TO PERMIT A 242 UNIT RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX, BANCROFT DRIVE WEST OF MOONLIGHT BEACH ROAD, SUDBURY, ONTARIO INC. & AZ DEVELOPMENTS INC. (AGENT: DOUG SIMMONS) (cont d) Recommendation # (cont d): 2005, prepared by e Hunt Engineering Group be incorporated into e Site Plan Control Agreement as outlined in e Planning Considerations section of e aff report dated May 31, CONCURRING MEMBERS: Councillors Dupuis, Reynolds, Thompson NON-CONCURRING MEMBERS: Councillor Bradley PART I - CONSENT AGENDA The following recommendation was presented to adopt Items C-1 to C-7 contained in Part 1 of e Consent Agenda: Recommendation # : Reynolds-Dupuis: THAT Items C-1 to C-7 contained in Part 1, Consent Agenda, be adopted. ROUTINE MANAGEMENT REPORTS Item C-1 Poitras Municipal Drain Report dated June 1, 2005, was received from e General Manager of Infraructure and Emergency Services regarding Poitras Municipal Drain. Recommendation # : Dupuis-Reynolds: THAT e City of Greater Sudbury accept e petition for a Municipal Drainage works submitted for lands wiin e area described as Lots 11 and 12, Concession 2, in e Township of Capreol, which was filed wi e City Clerk on e 2 nd day of June, 2005; PC - June 7, 2005 (30 )

13 PART I - CONSENT AGENDA (cont d) ROUTINE MANAGEMENT REPORTS (cont d) Item C-1 Poitras Municipal Drain Recommendation # (cont d): AND THAT e City of Greater Sudbury appoint e engineering firm of K. Smart Associates Limited as e drainage engineer for is project. Item C-2 Declaration of Surplus Land, Edward Avenue, Conion Report dated June 1, 2005, was received from e General Manager of Infraructure and Emergency Services regarding e declaration of surplus land, PIN , Edward Avenue, Conion. Recommendation # : Reynolds-Dupuis: THAT e property municipally described as Edward Avenue, Conion, legally described as part of P.I.N (LT), formerly Parcel S.E.S., part of Block A on Plan M-36, being part of Part 6 on Plan SR-34, Township of Neelon, City of Greater Sudbury be declared surplus to e City s needs and be offered for sale to e abutting owners pursuant to e procedures governing e disposal of limited marketability property as set out in By-law ; AND THAT e said property be sold as is. Item C-3 Report dated June 1, 2005, was received from e General Declaration of Manager of Infraructure and Emergency Services regarding e Surplus Land, declaration of surplus land, 119 Graham Road, Whitefish. 119 Graham Road, Whitefish Recommendation # : Dupuis-Reynolds: THAT e property municipally described as 119 Graham Road, Whitefish, legally described as Parcel S.W.S., being Lot 7 on Plan M-245, part of Lot 12, Concession 2, Township of Graham, be declared surplus to e City s needs and be offered for sale to e general public pursuant to e procedures governing e disposal of full marketability property as set out in By-law ; AND THAT e said property be sold as is. PC - June 7, 2005 (30 )

14 PART I - CONSENT AGENDA (cont d) ROUTINE MANAGEMENT REPORTS (cont d) Item C-4 Report dated June 1, 2005, was received from e General Declaration of Manager of Infraructure and Emergency Services regarding e Surplus Land, declaration of surplus land, 365 Leonard Street, Chelmsford. 365 Leonard Street, Chelmsford Recommendation # : Reynolds-Dupuis: THAT e property municipally described as 365 Leonard Street, Chelmsford legally described as P.I.N (LT), formerly Parcel S.W.S., Lot 42, Plan M-421, Township of Balfour, City of Greater Sudbury, be declared surplus to e City s needs and be offered for sale to e general public pursuant to e procedures governing e disposal of full marketability property as set out in By-law ; AND THAT e said property be sold as is. Item C-5 Declaration of Surplus Land, Maple Street. Azilda Report dated June 1, 2005, was received from e General Manager of Infraructure and Emergency Services regarding e declaration of surplus land, PIN (LT), Maple Street, Azilda. Recommendation # : Dupuis-Reynolds: THAT e property municipally described as Maple Street, Azilda, legally described as P.I.N , formerly Parcel S.W.S., being Part 2 on Plan 53R-12622, part of Lot 3, Concession 1, Township of Rayside, be declared surplus to e City s needs and be offered for sale to e general public pursuant to e procedures governing e disposal of full marketability property as set out in By-law ; and THAT e said property be sold as is. Item C-6 Report dated June 1, 2005, was received from e General Tax Sale Property Manager of Infraructure and Emergency Services regarding e Matter, Veing of tax sale property matter, veing of vacant land, PIN Vacant Land, (LT), Panache Lake Road, Walden. Panache Lake Road, Walden PC - June 7, 2005 (30 )

15 PART I - CONSENT AGENDA (cont d) ROUTINE MANAGEMENT REPORTS (cont d) Item C-6 Recommendation # : Tax Sale Property Matter, Veing of Reynolds-Dupuis: THAT e Council for e City of Greater Vacant Land, Sudbury pass a By-law regarding e property municipally Panache Lake described as Panache Lake Road, Walden, legally described as Road, Walden P.I.N (LT) formerly Parcel S.W.S., being Part 5 (cont d) on Plan SR-643, part of Lot 4, Concession 3, Township of Louise, City of Greater Sudbury auorizing; 1) a tax write off, including penalties for e subject property; and 2) e veing of e subject property. Item C-7 Report dated June 1, 2005, was received from e General Declaration of Manager of Infraructure and Emergency Services regarding e Surplus Land, declaration of surplus land, 31 Young Street, Capreol. 31 Young Street, Capreol Recommendation # : Dupuis-Reynolds: THAT e property municipally described as 31 Young Street, Capreol, legally described as P.I.N (LT), Lot 104, Plan M-65 and P.I.N (LT), part of Lot 103, Plan M-65, being Part 1 on SR-923, Township of Capreol, be declared surplus to e City s needs and be offered for sale to e general public pursuant to e procedures governing e disposal of full marketability property as set out in By-law ; AND THAT e said property be sold as is. PC - June 7, 2005 (30 )

16 PART II - REGULAR AGENDA REFERRED AND DEFERRED MATTERS Item R-1 Applications for Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning, We Paris Street, Sudbury Report dated May 31, 2005, was received from e General Manager of Grow and Development regarding a decision by e Planning Committee following a public hearing wi regard to applications for Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning by Dalron Conruction Ltd. to permit 348 dwelling units in a variety of housing types, we of Paris Street, Sudbury, Dalron Conruction Limited. Recommendation # : Reynolds-Bradley: A. THAT e application by Dalron Conruction Limited to amend e Sudbury Secondary Plan on a site specific basis from Low Density Residential Dirict to Medium Density Residential Dirict in order to permit development which among oer housing types may be comprised of multiple dwellings up to six oreys in height wi respect to ose lands described as being P.I.N , being Parcel S.E.S. in Lot 6, Concession 1, Township of McKim be recommended for approval subject to e following condition: 1. Prior to e adoption of is official plan amendment e owner shall provide evidence at municipal sanitary sewer, municipal water pressure and fire flow exis in e City infraructure to service e subject lands to e satisfaction of e General Manager of Infraructure and Emergency Services. and furer, B. THAT e application by Dalron Conruction Limited to amend e Sudbury Secondary Plan on a site specific basis wi respect to Conceptual Road Linkages in e Sou End - Map G by eliminating e conceptual roads linkage for Caswell Drive, which traverses e subject property, being ose lands described as P.I.N , being Parcel S.E.S. in Lot 6, Concession 1, Township of McKim be approved. and furer, PC - June 7, 2005 (30 )

17 PART II - REGULAR AGENDA REFERRED AND DEFERRED MATTERS Item R-1 Recommendation # : Applications for Official Plan C. That e application by Dalron Conruction Limited to Amendment and amend By-law Z being e Comprehensive Zoning Rezoning, We By-law for e (former) City of Sudbury from "FD", Future of Paris Street, Sudbury (cont d) Development to "R4-Special", Special Multiple Residential in order to permit, in addition to e uses permitted in an "R4" zone, semi-detached or duplex dwellings, and furer to permit a maximum residential building height of six (6) oreys wi respect to ose lands described as P.I.N , being Parcel S.E.S. in Lot 6, Concession 1, be deferred pending e submission of an application for a draft plan of subdivision in conformity wi e Sudbury Secondary Plan as amended wi regard to Recommendations A. and B. above. The draft plan of subdivision which is to be prepared for ese lands shall provide for e weerly conruction of Marttila Drive, as a collector roadway, from Paris Street to e weerly limit of e fir phase of is development, described as Site Plan Souwind Condominiums in e aff report of May 9, Provisions shall be made for e signalization of Marttila Drive at Paris Street on a co shared basis, and e eablishment of an appropriate roadway turn-around at e we limit Phase One. Furer, is draft plan of subdivision will provide for e dedication of Marttila Drive, as a public road right-of-way, from Phase One of is development to e weerly limits of e subject property. The balance of ese lands shall be developed as a single phase of subdivision, and will require e conruction of Marttila Drive as a public collector road to e we limits of e subject property. Adjournment Recommendation # : Reynolds-Dupuis: That we do now adjourn. Time: 8:15 p.m. DEPUTY CITY CLERK COUNCILLOR RUSS THOMPSON PC - June 7, 2005 (30 )