DECISION OF THE SASKATCHEWAN REAL ESTATE COMMISSION AND CONSENT ORDER IN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE ACT, C. R-1.3 AND IN THE MATTER OF JANET LUTZ
|
|
- Rebecca Nichols
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 DECISION OF THE SASKATCHEWAN REAL ESTATE COMMISSION AND CONSENT ORDER Lutz (Re), 2019 SKREC 4 Date: January 11, 2019 Commission File: IN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE ACT, C. R-1.3 AND IN THE MATTER OF JANET LUTZ Before: A Saskatchewan Real Estate Commission Hearing Committee comprised of the following: Jeffrey P. Reimer - Chairperson Al Myers Dave Hepburn CHARGE and ADMISSION OF MISCONDUCT: [1] The registrant is charged with and is admitting to professional misconduct as follows: Count 1: That, contrary to section 39(1)(c) of The Real Estate Act, Ms. Lutz breached section 58(1)(b)(ii) of the Act by drafting an offer to purchase that inaccurately names the seller. LEGISLATION: [2] Section 39(1)(c) of The Real Estate Act states: Professional misconduct is a question of fact, but any matter, conduct or thing, whether or not disgraceful or dishonourable, is professional misconduct within the meaning of this Act, if it is a breach of this Act, the regulations or the bylaws or any terms or restrictions to which the registration is subject. Decision and Consent Order SREC #
2 [3] Section 58(1)(b)(ii) of the Act states: FACTS: An offer to purchase obtained by a registrant is to clearly show, prior to execution by the buyer, the names and addresses of the buyer and seller; [4] In accordance with subsection 9(4) of The Real Estate Regulations ( the Regulations ), the Hearing Committee accepts Janet Lutz s Statement of Facts and Admissions, which includes the following relevant points: [5] Ms. Lutz has been continuously registered under the provisions of The Real Estate Brokers Act, The Real Estate Brokers Act, 1987, and The Real Estate Act in the Province of Saskatchewan with the Superintendent of Insurance Records and the Saskatchewan Real Estate Commission since December 5, [6] Ms. Lutz has taken the following real estate courses: Principles of Real Property Law; Principles of Mortgage Financing; Principles of Real Estate Appraisal; Real Estate Office Management; and Working Within the Real Estate Act. [7] Ms. Lutz has completed the continuing professional development seminars each registration year since [8] Ms. Lutz is presently registered under the provisions of The Real Estate Act as a broker with Keystone Realty & Financial Services Inc. O/A Re/Max Keystone Realty. [9] On August 19, 2013, the Joint Corporation became the registered owner of the Property. [10] Partner A and Partner B each held 50% of the shares of the Joint Corporation. [11] In March of 2014, the Buyer began planning her move to the City. [12] Ms. Lutz was assisting the Buyer in her purchase of a house. [13] Although the Property was not officially on the market, Partner A advised Ms. Lutz that the Property was available for sale if she were able to find a buyer. [14] In April of 2014, Ms. Lutz showed the Property to the Buyer. [15] On April 21, 2014, the Buyer wrote an offer to purchase the Property from the Joint Corporation. Her offer was accepted. Decision and Consent Order SREC #
3 [16] The Buyer s purchase of the Property did not proceed at this time as she was unable to obtain financing. [17] In June of 2014, the Buyer sold her home and was once again looking for a property in the City. [18] The Buyer asked Ms. Lutz if the Property was still available and Ms. Lutz advised her that it was. [19] Partner A told Ms. Lutz that he and Partner B had agreed to dissolve the Joint Corporation and split the corporate assets. [20] Partner A told Ms. Lutz that he would get the Property and Partner B would get another property owned by the Joint Corporation. [21] Partner A was the sole shareholder and director of Corporation A. [22] Partner B was the sole shareholder and director of Corporation B. [23] Partner A suggested that the offer be completed in the name of Corporation A, as the sale could not be completed until the title was transferred to his corporation. [24] Partner A believed that the dissolution of the Joint Corporation and the splitting of the corporate assets would be complete on or before July 31, [25] Ms. Lutz told the Buyer that Partner A and Partner B were in the midst of winding up the Joint Corporation and that Partner A believed it would be done by August 1, [26] On or about July 11, 2014, the Buyer wrote an offer to purchase the Property from Corporation A. [27] Corporation A did not own the Property on July 11, [28] On or about July 14, 2014, Partner A wrote a Counter Offer to the Buyer on behalf of Corporation A. [29] There was a second version of the offer to purchase completed on or about July 14, [30] Ms. Lutz believes the Buyer was aware that her purchase of the Property was conditional upon the transfer of title to Corporation A. [31] Neither the Offer nor the Counter Offer made the transaction subject to the successful transfer of title to Corporation A. Decision and Consent Order SREC #
4 [32] To the best of Ms. Lutz s knowledge, Corporation A is not and has never been the registered owner of the Property. [33] Ms. Lutz never spoke to Partner B about the sale of the Property. REASONS: [34] The Investigation Committee and Ms. Lutz considered the following as relevant in agreeing to the within consent order: Mitigating Factors [35] Ms. Lutz was co-operative with the investigation. [36] There was no evidence of consumer harm. Aggravating Factors [37] Ms. Lutz is registered as a broker. As registrants with additional training and experience who are expected to supervise the actions of all registrants and employees of their brokerage, brokers are held to a higher standard of behaviour. [38] Ms. Lutz was acting as a limited dual agent for the sellers and the complainant buyer. Registrants in limited dual agency must be especially diligent when completing documents, as there is no other registrant involved in the transaction to notice or correct any errors. Previous Sanction History [39] Ms. Lutz has a previous sanction history. [40] In Lutz (Re) (file # A), Ms. Lutz was issued a $500 fine and a letter of reprimand and ordered to pay $500 in costs for breaching s. 58(1)(b)(iv) of the Act by writing an offer to purchase that failed to clearly state to whom a deposit obtained in a transaction was to be disbursed. Prior Decisions & Other Considerations [41] In May of 2012, the Appeals Committee of the Real Estate Council of Ontario rendered a decision In the Matter of Suzette Thompson ( Thompson ). The Appeals Committee in Thompson set out a series of factors to be considered when determining the appropriate sanction for a registrant found in breach of the legislation. The factors are as follows: 1. The nature and gravity of the breaches of the Code of Ethics. 2. The role of the offending member in the breaches. 3. Whether the offending member suffered or gained as a result of the breaches. Decision and Consent Order SREC #
5 4. The impact of the breaches on complainants or others. 5. The need for specific deterrence to protect the public. 6. The need for general deterrence to protect the public. 7. The need to maintain the public s confidence in the integrity of the profession. 8. The degree to which the breaches are regarded as being outside the range of acceptable conduct. 9. The range of sanction in similar cases. [42] These factors are reasonable considerations and can offer guidance to members of a Hearing Committee tasked with crafting an appropriate sanction for a registrant found to have committed professional misconduct. These factors have been consistently applied in Saskatchewan Real Estate Commission consent orders since September The nature and gravity of the breaches of the Code of Ethics. [43] Ms. Lutz drafted an offer to purchase that inaccurately named the seller. Ms. Lutz had been advised that the Property was going to change hands from one corporate owner to another as part of the dissolution of the original corporate owner. On this basis, she wrote an offer that named the corporation she believed would come to own the Property at some point in the future as the seller. 2. The role of the offending member in the breaches. [44] Ms. Lutz was the only registrant involved in her breach of the legislation. 3. Whether the offending member suffered or gained as a result of the breaches. [45] There is no evidence to show that Ms. Lutz gained any benefits or suffered any losses as a result of the breach. 4. The impact of the breaches on complainants or others. [46] There is no evidence of consumer harm arising out of Ms. Lutz s breach of the legislation, but proceeding with a transaction on the basis of documents that include inaccurate information carries a significant risk of harm. 5. The need for specific deterrence to protect the public. [47] Ms. Lutz must be made aware that documents she drafts must include only accurate information. 6. The need for general deterrence to protect the public. [48] Registrants must be made aware that all documents they draft in the course of a trade in real estate must include only accurate information. 7. The need to maintain the public s confidence in the integrity of the profession. [49] Members of the public must be reassured that the documents they receive from registrants in the course of a trade in real estate include only accurate information. Decision and Consent Order SREC #
6 8. The degree to which the breaches are regarded as being outside the range of acceptable conduct. [50] Ms. Lutz s conduct falls below the standard expected of registrants, but it was not egregious. 9. The range of sanction in similar cases. A. What is an appropriate sanction for Ms. Lutz s breach of s. 58(1)(b)(ii)? [51] There is only one previous decision dealing with section 58(1)(b)(ii), however, there are several other decisions dealing with breaches of other subclauses of 58(1)(b). [52] In Morrison (Re), 2017 SKREC 1 (file # ) ( Morrison ), Justin Morrison was issued an order of reprimand and a $750 fine for breaching s. 58(1)(b)(ii) of the Act by drafting an offer that failed to show, prior to execution by the buyer, the names of both sellers on the offer to purchase. The offer to purchase named Seller A as the sole seller when, in fact, the property was owned by Seller A and Seller B. Both Seller A and Seller B signed the contract as sellers. [53] Despite the fact that Mr. Morrison was the buyer, he first signed the offer as per agent on the first buyer signature line and signed as a witness to both signature lines, even though the second buyer signature line was blank. Mr. Morrison then signed as a buyer on the second buyer signature line and his assistant signed as witness beside his witness signature for the second buyer line. [54] Mr. Morrison had no sanction history at the time of the transaction and he was co-operative with the investigation. He signed a Statement of Facts and Admissions acknowledging his mistake. The listing for the property only included the name of one of the two owners and both owners of the property did sign the offer to purchase as sellers. [55] Mr. Morrison was a party to the transaction. It is even more important for a registrant to be diligent in completing paperwork when he or she is personally involved in the transaction. [56] Ms. Lutz s breach of s. 58(1)(b)(ii) is more serious than that of the registrant in Morrison. Although Mr. Morrison s breach was aggravated by the fact that he was personally involved in the transaction, Ms. Lutz s breach is more serious because she is registered as a broker, she was involved in the transaction as a limited dual agent, and she has a previous sanction history. [57] In Ehmann (Re), 2008 SKREC 7 (file # ) ( Ehmann ), Paul Ehmann was issued a letter of reprimand and a $3,500 fine and ordered to complete educational upgrading for breaching s. 58(1)(b)(iv) of the Act by preparing an offer to purchase that did not properly set out the price to be paid or the appropriate terms and conditions. The documents did not include Mr. Ehmann s Decision and Consent Order SREC #
7 name or the name of his brokerage. The conditions on the offer were not clear, the offer did not clearly set out the manner of payment of the purchase price and no written amendments were ever made to the agreement to reflect any changes in the matters agreed to between the parties. [58] There was no evidence of a benefit to Mr. Ehmann. [59] Mr. Ehmann s actions created a situation of risk to himself and to the complainant. The Hearing Committee was very troubled by the significant lack of appropriate documentation. The fact that Mr. Ehmann was acting on his own behalf in purchasing a property from the complainant was also concerning. Mr. Ehmann was registered as a broker. [60] It was noted that Mr. Ehmann had two previous sanctions from 2005 and 2006 that involved similar offences. While the matters involved in the 2008 hearing predated the previous sanctions and so did not warrant a significant addition to the fines, it was clear to the Committee that the registrant s actions showed a lack of professional completion of documentation. The Committee stated that members of the public are relying on the trained and educated registrant to do what is best for them and that the lack of clarity and completeness in the documents Mr. Ehmann prepared were significant, which created a situation of uncertainty and confusion as to what the actual agreement was between the parties. The Hearing Committee reiterated the necessity of all registrants to ensure paperwork and documentation is completed in an appropriate and professional manner in every circumstance. [61] Ms. Lutz s breach of s. 58 is less serious than that of the registrant in Ehmann. The documentation prepared by Mr. Ehmann was lacking in several vital pieces of information and he was personally involved in the transaction. [62] In Renaud (Re), (file # ) ( Renaud ), Jeré Renaud was issued an order of reprimand and a $500 fine for breaching s. 58(1)(b)(iv) of the Act by drafting an offer to purchase that indicated that a $500 deposit had been received by the brokerage when, in fact, neither Mr. Renaud nor the brokerage had received a deposit. The buyers and sellers had agreed that the buyers $500 security deposit that was being held by the sellers would be used as the deposit on the buyers offer to purchase the property. The buyers did not complete their purchase of the property. [63] Mr. Renaud had no previous sanction history, was co-operative with the investigation and acknowledged his mistake. There was no evidence of consumer harm and none of the parties involved in the transaction was of the belief that Mr. Renaud held the deposit. There was no evidence showing that Mr. Renaud intended to mislead the buyer or seller. [64] Mr. Renaud was registered as a broker at the time of the violation. Decision and Consent Order SREC #
8 [65] The Hearing Committee noted that the disciplinary actions would serve as a specific deterrent to Mr. Renaud to ensure that he clearly states the terms and conditions on an offer to purchase and that the document indicates what is actually occurring with the handling of the deposit. The Committee stated that registrants must be aware that they must conduct their trades in real estate in compliance with real estate legislation regardless of what a consumer may request. [66] Ms. Lutz s breach of s. 58 is more serious than that of the registrant in Renaud. Mr. Renaud did not have a previous sanction history. While both parties to the transaction in Renaud were aware that Mr. Renaud s brokerage was not holding the deposit, there is no evidence proving that Ms. Lutz s buyer client was aware that the corporate seller named on the offer to purchase was not the legal owner of the property. [67] The decision in Renaud was issued prior to a significant expansion that occurred in the Saskatchewan real estate market in 2008 that drastically increased property values and the commissions registrants could expect to earn on trades in real estate. Sanctions ordered against registrants must keep pace with the impact the changing real estate market and inflation have had on property values or the Commission runs the risk of fines becoming a cost of doing business. [68] An order of reprimand and a $1,250 fine are appropriate sanctions for Ms. Lutz s breach of section 58(1)(b)(ii). [69] As Ms. Lutz has agreed to sign this consent order, there will be no order as to costs. CONSENT ORDER: [70] In accordance with The Real Estate Act, its Regulations, and the Commission Bylaws, and with the consent of Janet Lutz, and the Investigation Committee of the Saskatchewan Real Estate Commission, the Hearing Committee hereby orders: [71] With respect to Count 1, the charge of professional misconduct contrary to section 39(1)(c) of The Real Estate Act for breach of s. 58(1)(b)(ii) of the Act: a. Janet Lutz shall receive an order of reprimand for the violation of s. 58(1)(b)(ii) of the Act; b. Janet Lutz shall, within 30 days of the date of this order, pay to the Saskatchewan Real Estate Commission a $1, fine for the said violation of the Act; and c. Janet Lutz s registration shall be suspended if she fails to make payment as set out above. [72] There shall be no order as to costs. Decision and Consent Order SREC #
9 Dated at Regina this 11 th day of January Jeffrey P. Reimer, Jeffrey P. Reimer, Chairperson Decision and Consent Order SREC #
DECISION OF THE SASKATCHEWAN REAL ESTATE COMMISSION AND CONSENT ORDER
DECISION OF THE SASKATCHEWAN REAL ESTATE COMMISSION AND CONSENT ORDER Hamilton (Re), 2019 SKREC 3 Date: January 11, 2019 Commission File: 2013-09A IN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE ACT, C. R-1.3 AND IN
More informationDECISION OF THE SASKATCHEWAN REAL ESTATE COMMISSION AND CONSENT ORDER
DECISION OF THE SASKATCHEWAN REAL ESTATE COMMISSION AND CONSENT ORDER Hastings (Re), 2018 SKREC 15 Date: September 5, 2018 Commission File: 2015-22 IN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE ACT, C. R-1.3 AND IN
More informationDECISION OF THE SASKATCHEWAN REAL ESTATE COMMISSION AND CONSENT ORDER
DECISION OF THE SASKATCHEWAN REAL ESTATE COMMISSION AND CONSENT ORDER Elenko (Re), 2019 SKREC 2 Date: January 11, 2019 Commission File: 2016-34 IN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE ACT, C. R-1.3 AND IN THE
More informationDECISION OF THE SASKATCHEWAN REAL ESTATE COMMISSION AND CONSENT ORDER
DECISION OF THE SASKATCHEWAN REAL ESTATE COMMISSION AND CONSENT ORDER Dominguez (Re), 2018 SKREC 6 Date: August 17, 2018 Commission File: 2013-09B IN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE ACT, C. R-1.3 AND IN
More informationDECISION OF THE SASKATCHEWAN REAL ESTATE COMMISSION AND CONSENT ORDER
DECISION OF THE SASKATCHEWAN REAL ESTATE COMMISSION AND CONSENT ORDER Lautermilch (Re), 2019 SKREC 7 Date: January 28, 2019 Commission File: 2018-26 IN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE ACT, C. R-1.3 AND IN
More informationDECISION OF THE SASKATCHEWAN REAL ESTATE COMMISSION AND CONSENT ORDER
DECISION OF THE SASKATCHEWAN REAL ESTATE COMMISSION AND CONSENT ORDER Cawkwell (Re), 2017 SKREC 12 Date: November 1, 2017 Commission File: 2016-79 IN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE ACT, C. R-1.3 AND IN
More informationDECISION OF THE SASKATCHEWAN REAL ESTATE COMMISSION AND CONSENT ORDER IN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE ACT, C. R-1.3 AND IN THE MATTER OF DAWN FOORD
Foord (Re), 2015 SKREC 6 DECISION OF THE SASKATCHEWAN REAL ESTATE COMMISSION AND CONSENT ORDER Date: July 20, 2015 Commission File: 2011-23 IN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE ACT, C. R-1.3 AND IN THE MATTER
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE ACT, C. R-1.3 AND IN THE MATTER OF WILLIAM BARKAIE
IN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE ACT, C. R-1.3 AND IN THE MATTER OF WILLIAM BARKAIE DECISION OF THE SASKATCHEWAN REAL ESTATE COMMISSION AND CONSENT ORDER Commission File: #2012-41 Before: A Saskatchewan
More informationIN THE MATTER OF. THE REAL ESTATE ACT, Cs R-l.3 AND IN THE MATTER OF DAN TORWALT
IN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE ACT, Cs R-l.3 AND IN THE MATTER OF DAN TORWALT DECISION OF THE SASKATCHEWAN REAL ESTATE COMMISSION Commission File: #2009-51 Before: A Saskatchewan Real Estate Commission
More informationAND. IN THE MATTER OF VAl'mA SHAW DECISION OF THE. SASKATCHEWAN REAL ESTATE COlVIMISSION. Commission File: #
IJ.~ THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE ACT, C. R-l.3 AND IN THE MATTER OF VAl'mA SHAW DECISION OF THE SASKATCHEWAN REAL ESTATE COlVIMISSION Commission File: #2012-45 Before: A Saskatchewan Real Estate Commission
More informationIN THE MATTER OF. THE REAL ESTATE ACT, C. R-l.3 AND IN THE MATTER OF REGINALD KOTLAR DECISION OF THE SASKATCHEWAN REAL ESTATE COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE ACT, C. R-l.3 AND IN THE MATTER OF REGINALD KOTLAR DECISION OF THE SASKATCHEWAN REAL ESTATE COMMISSION Commission File: #2009-02 Before: Appearances: A Saskatchewan Real
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE ACT, C. R-1.3 IN THE MATTER OF ELAINE ELDER
IN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE ACT, C. R-1.3 AND IN THE MATTER OF ELAINE ELDER DECISION OF THE SASKATCHEWAN REAL ESTATE COMMISSION Commission File: #2010-13 Before: A Saskatchewan Real Estate Commission
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE ACT, C. R-1.3 AND IN THE MATTER OF KATHERINE CROWE DECISION OF THE SASKATCHEWAN REAL ESTATE COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE ACT, C. R-1.3 AND IN THE MATTER OF KATHERINE CROWE DECISION OF THE SASKATCHEWAN REAL ESTATE COMMISSION Commission File: #2008-05 Before: A Saskatchewan Real Estate Commission
More informationReal Estate Council of Ontario DISCIPLINE DECISION
Real Estate Council of Ontario DISCIPLINE DECISION IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING HELD PURSUANT TO THE REAL ESTATE AND BUSINESS BROKERS ACT, 2002, S.O. 2002, c. 30, Sch. C BETWEEN: REGISTRAR UNDER
More informationTHE REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF ALBERTA. AND IN THE MATTER OF the conduct of SUNDI ALINE CLARK, currently registered with Redline Real Estate Group Inc.
THE REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF ALBERTA IN THE MATTER OF a Hearing under Section 39(1)(b)(i), s.41 and s.47(1) of the REAL ESTATE ACT, R.S.A. 2000, c.r-5 (the Act ) AND IN THE MATTER OF the conduct of SUNDI
More informationTHE REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF BRITISH COLUMBIA. IN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE SERVICES ACT S.B.C. 2004, c. 42 as amended AND IN THE MATTER OF
THE REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF BRITISH COLUMBIA IN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE SERVICES ACT S.B.C. 2004, c. 42 as amended AND IN THE MATTER OF PATRICK SHIU-MING LEUNG (030422) CONSENT ORDER File # 13-258;
More informationOctober 10, 2018 November 13, Case Summaries. Letters of Reprimand. Administrative Penalties. Hearing Panel Decisions. Lifetime Withdrawal
Case Summaries October 10, 2018 November 13, 2018 Letters of Reprimand Administrative Penalties Hearing Panel Decisions Lifetime Withdrawal 1 Case Summaries Welcome to the Case Summaries monthly magazine.
More informationReal Estate Council of Ontario DISCIPLINE DECISION
Real Estate Council of Ontario DISCIPLINE DECISION IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING HELD PURSUANT TO THE REAL ESTATE AND BUSINESS BROKERS ACT, 2002, S.O. 2002, c. 30, Sch. C BETWEEN: REGISTRAR UNDER
More informationReal Estate Agents Act (Professional Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2012
Real Estate Agents Act (Professional Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2012 Contents 1 Title 1 2 Commencement 1 3 Scope and objectives 1 4 Interpretation 1 5 Standards of professional competence 1 6 Standards
More informationReal Estate Council of Ontario DISCIPLINE DECISION
Real Estate Council of Ontario DISCIPLINE DECISION IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING HELD PURSUANT TO THE REAL ESTATE AND BUSINESS BROKERS ACT, 2002, S.O. 2002, c. 30, Sch. C BETWEEN: REGISTRAR UNDER
More informationTHE REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF BRITISH COLUMBIA. IN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE SERVICES ACT S.B.C. 2004, c. 42 as amended AND IN THE MATTER OF
File # 14-411 THE REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF BRITISH COLUMBIA IN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE SERVICES ACT S.B.C. 2004, c. 42 as amended AND IN THE MATTER OF MARIA FERNANDA ARCILA BARAHONA CONSENT ORDER RESPONDENT:
More informationReal Estate Council of Ontario DISCIPLINE DECISION
Real Estate Council of Ontario DISCIPLINE DECISION IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING HELD PURSUANT TO THE REAL ESTATE AND BUSINESS BROKERS ACT, 2002, S.O. 2002, c. 30, Sch. C BETWEEN: REGISTRAR UNDER
More informationReal Estate Council of Ontario DISCIPLINE DECISION
Real Estate Council of Ontario BETWEEN: DISCIPLINE DECISION IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING HELD PURSUANT TO BY-LAW NO. 10 OF THE REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF ONTARIO MANAGER OF COMPLAINTS, COMPLIANCE
More informationTHE REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF BRITISH COLUMBIA. IN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE SERVICES ACT S.B.C. 2004, c. 42 as amended AND IN THE MATTER OF
File # 15-538 THE REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF BRITISH COLUMBIA IN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE SERVICES ACT S.B.C. 2004, c. 42 as amended AND IN THE MATTER OF CHEN (MORNING) YU 160007 AND MORNING YU PERSONAL
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE SERVICES ACT S.B.C. 2004, c. 42 AND IN THE MATTER OF JOSEPH (JOE) TIMOTHY HACKETT. And
File # 11-094 IN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE SERVICES ACT S.B.C. 2004, c. 42 AND IN THE MATTER OF JOSEPH (JOE) TIMOTHY HACKETT And TEAMWORK PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LTD. CONSENT ORDER RESPONDENTS: Joseph
More informationDISCIPLINE DECISION IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING HELD PURSUANT TO BY-LAW NO. 10 OF THE REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF ONTARIO
Real Estate Council of Ontario BETWEEN: DISCIPLINE DECISION IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING HELD PURSUANT TO BY-LAW NO. 10 OF THE REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF ONTARIO MANAGER OF COMPLAINTS, COMPLIANCE
More informationIMPORTANT INFORMATION BEFORE FILING AN ETHICS COMPLAINT Many ethics complaints result from misunderstanding or a failure in communication.
IMPORTANT INFORMATION BEFORE FILING AN ETHICS COMPLAINT Many ethics complaints result from misunderstanding or a failure in communication. Before filing an ethics complaint, make reasonable efforts to
More informationALABAMA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 790 X 3 DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS
Real Estate Commission Chapter 790 X 3 ALABAMA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 790 X 3 DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS 790 X 3.01 Change Of Address 790 X 3.02 Returned Check Fee
More informationIN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING HELD PURSUANT TO BY-LAW NO. 10 OF THE REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF ONTARIO JAMES OSMAR
IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING HELD PURSUANT TO BY-LAW NO. 10 OF THE REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF ONTARIO JAMES OSMAR Respondent DATE OF DECISION: May 28, 2004 FINDINGS: In violation of Rule 1(5), 20,
More informationFiling an Ethics Complaint. Procedures and FORM #E-1
Filing an Ethics Complaint Background Procedures and FORM #E-1 Boards and associations of REALTORS are responsible for enforcing the REALTOR Code of Ethics. The Code of Ethics imposes duties above and
More informationReal Estate Council of Alberta. An introduction 1
Real Estate Council of Alberta An introduction 1 2 Real Estate Council of Alberta - An introduction Welcome At the heart of Alberta s real estate industry is an organization where people work cooperatively
More informationReal Estate Council Of Ontario. Regulatory Digest
Real Estate Council Of Ontario Regulatory Digest Issue 2: July September 2013 The Real Estate Council of Ontario (RECO) administers and enforces the Real Estate and Business Brokers Act, 2002 (REBBA 2002)
More informationGUI DE T O COM PL AI N T S : IN D UST R Y P R O FE SS ION ALS
GUI DE T O COM PL AI N T S : IN D UST R Y P R O FE SS ION ALS This guide provides consumers with information on the Real Estate Council of Alberta (RECA) complaint process, including how to make a complaint,
More informationReal Estate Council of Ontario DISCIPLINE DECISION
Real Estate Council of Ontario DISCIPLINE DECISION IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING HELD PURSUANT TO THE REAL ESTATE AND BUSINESS BROKERS ACT, 2002, S.O. 2002, c. 30, Sch. C BETWEEN: REGISTRAR UNDER
More informationLICENSING LAWS IN THE US
LICENSING LAWS IN THE US NANCY SUVARNAMANI Appropriate RE Licensing Law for Thailand, Bangkok, Thailand on July 7, 2018 Nancy Suvarnamani, ABR, CDPE, CIPS, CRB, CRS, RSPS, TRC nancy@century21sgr.com 2017-2018
More informationLesson Eight: Clarifying Agency Relationships
Lesson Eight: Clarifying Agency Relationships Lesson Topics This lesson focuses on the following topics: Agency Relationships Disclosure Policy Understanding the Broker s Office Policy Lesson Learning
More informationSeptember 5, 2018 October 9, Case Summaries. Letters of Reprimand. Administrative Penalties. Hearing Panel Decision
Case Summaries September 5, 2018 October 9, 2018 Letters of Reprimand Administrative Penalties Hearing Panel Decision 1 Case Summaries Welcome to the Case Summaries monthly magazine - available on the
More informationBRITISH COLUMBIA IN THE MATTER OF THE MORTGAGE BROKERS ACT R.S.B.C C AND-
BRITISH COLUMBIA IN THE MATTER OF THE MORTGAGE BROKERS ACT R.S.B.C. 1996 C. 313 -AND- JUSTIN PHU PHAM -AND- VERICO JP ELITE MORTGAGE INC. dba JP ELITE MORTGAGE CEASE AND DESIST ORDER (Pursuant to sections
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE SERVICES ACT S.B.C. 2004, c. 42 as amended AND IN THE MATTER OF HONG (EDWARD) CHEN (153738) AND
File #15-832 IN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE SERVICES ACT S.B.C. 2004, c. 42 as amended AND IN THE MATTER OF HONG (EDWARD) CHEN (153738) AND EDWARD CHEN PERSONAL REAL ESTATE CORPORATION (153738PC) CONSENT
More informationSTANDARDS OF BUSINESS PRACTICE OF THE CANADIAN REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATION AND INTERPRETATIONS
STANDARDS OF BUSINESS PRACTICE OF THE CANADIAN REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATION AND INTERPRETATIONS ARTICLE 1 The Member shall endeavour to be informed regarding the essential facts which affect current market
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE SERVICES ACT S.B.C. 2004, c. 42 AND IN THE MATTER OF JOHNNY KWAI-LOK LAN MILENA BERNINI CARELLA AND
File # 10-252 IN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE SERVICES ACT S.B.C. 2004, c. 42 AND IN THE MATTER OF JOHNNY KWAI-LOK LAN MILENA BERNINI CARELLA AND ASCENT REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION CONSENT ORDER
More informationPlace of Birth Date of Birth Address
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT New Jersey Referral Real Estate, LLC 100 Canal Pointe Blvd Suite 120 Princeton, NJ 08540 609-987-8889 An Affiliate of Keller Williams Princeton Realty Revised June 2014
More informationAgency Duties. Objectives. Upon completion of this section the student should be able to:
Agency Duties Objectives Upon completion of this section the student should be able to: 1. Demonstrate how to create a dual agency relationship by separately entering into an agency agreement with both
More informationOmbudsman Toronto Enquiry Report. Enquiry into the City of Toronto's Handling of a Building Permit for Construction of a House.
Ombudsman Toronto Enquiry Report Enquiry into the City of Toronto's Handling of a Building Permit for Construction of a House May 15, 2018 Complaint Summary 1. Mr. L complained to Ombudsman Toronto. He
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE SERVICES ACT S.B.C. 2004, c. 42 as amended AND IN THE MATTER OF CATHERINE MICHELLE MCGRATH CONSENT ORDER
File # 15-564 RESPONDENT: IN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE SERVICES ACT S.B.C. 2004, c. 42 as amended AND IN THE MATTER OF CATHERINE MICHELLE MCGRATH 160382 CONSENT ORDER Catherine Michelle McGrath, Representative,
More informationProfessional Standards Complaint Form
Professional Standards Complaint Form General Information Please Read Before Signing 1. Please read and complete the RAHB Professional Standards Complaint Form and email it to the Professional Standards
More informationEXCLUSIVE BUYER REPRESENTATION AGREEMENT (BUYER AGENCY)
EXCLUSIVE BUYER REPRESENTATION AGREEMENT (BUYER AGENCY) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 Broker/Firm: A Buyer's Best Choice
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE SERVICES ACT S.B.C. 2004, c. 42 AND IN THE MATTER OF TANYA LILLIAN PIEKARSKI (131606) CONSENT ORDER
File # 12-315 IN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE SERVICES ACT S.B.C. 2004, c. 42 AND IN THE MATTER OF TANYA LILLIAN PIEKARSKI (131606) CONSENT ORDER RESPONDENT: Tanya Lillian Piekarski,, Cornerstone Properties
More informationChapter 2 Summary. License Law Rules and Regulations
Issuing a License for Individuals If the applicant has submitted all of the appropriate paperwork and fees, his/her broker will receive both a license and a pocket card. Licensees must carry their pocket
More informationReal Estate Council of Ontario DISCIPLINE DECISION
Real Estate Council of Ontario DISCIPLINE DECISION IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING HELD PURSUANT TO THE REAL ESTATE AND BUSINESS BROKERS ACT, 2002, S.O. 2002, c. 30, Sch. C BETWEEN: REGISTRAR UNDER
More informationHOME VALUE PROTECTION PROGRAM AND COOPERATION AGREEMENT. WHEREAS, the New York Attorney General s Office (the Attorney General s
HOME VALUE PROTECTION PROGRAM AND COOPERATION AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the New York Attorney General s Office (the Attorney General s Office or the Office ) has been conducting an investigation into conflicts
More informationCOMMERCIAL PURCHASE CONTRACT
COMMERCIAL PURCHASE CONTRACT This form was developed by the Alberta Real Estate Association for the use of its members and may not be altered electronically by any person. Others who use this document
More informationSTATE OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INSURANCE
STATE OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INSURANCE OFFICE OF LEGAL COUNSEL Davy Crockett Tower, 500 James Robertson Parkway NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE 37243 (615) 741-3072 fax 615-532-4750 MEMORANDUM TO:
More informationNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS Code of Ethics Video Series. Article 4 and Related Case Interpretations
Article 4 and Related Case Interpretations Article 4 REALTORS shall not acquire an interest in or buy or present offers from themselves, any member of their immediate families, their firms or any member
More information789 DOS 09 COMPLAINT FINDINGS OF FACT
789 DOS 09 STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF STATE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ----------------------------------------X In the Matter of the Complaint of DEPARTMENT OF STATE DIVISION OF LICENSING
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE SERVICES ACT S.B.C. 2004, c. 42 AND IN THE MATTER OF JASON RUSSEL MIDDLETON CONSENT ORDER
File # 12-149 RESPONDENT: IN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE SERVICES ACT S.B.C. 2004, c. 42 AND IN THE MATTER OF JASON RUSSEL MIDDLETON CONSENT ORDER Jason Russel Middleton, Managing Broker, Cornerstone
More informationFOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
Condominium Property Act CONDOMINIUM PROPERTY AMENDMENT REGULATION 1 The Condominium Property Regulation (AR 168/2000) is amended by this Regulation. 2 Section 1 is amended (a) in subsection (1) by adding
More informationMULTIPLE LISTING CONTRACT
PAGE 1 of 5 PAGES MULTIPLE LISTING CONTRACT MULTIPLE LISTING SERVICE MLS OFFICE USE ONLY DATE LISTING MLS NO BETWEEN: OWNER(S) ( SELLER ) OWNER(S) ( SELLER ) UNIT CITY PROV PC TELEPHONE NUMBER CELL NUMBER
More informationEstate Agency Act (No. 53 of 16 June 1989)
KREDITTILSYNET The Financial Supervisory Authority of Norway Translation as of January 2005 Translated by Government Authorised Translator Peter Thomas This translation is for information purposes only.
More informationGUIDELINES FOR COMPLETING THE OFFER TO PURCHASE AND CONTRACT VACANT LOT/LAND (Form 12-T)
GUIDELINES FOR COMPLETING THE OFFER TO PURCHASE AND CONTRACT VACANT LOT/LAND (Form 12-T) INTRODUCTION: These guidelines are provided to assist Broker and attorneys who are completing the Offer to Purchase
More informationReal Estate Council of Ontario
For office use only Date recieved Real Estate Council of Ontario 3300 Bloor St. W. West Tower, Suite 1200 Toronto, Ontario M8X 2X2 Tel: 416-207-4800 Toll Free: 1-800-245-6910 Fax: 416-207-4820 E-mail:
More informationKRS 324A A.150 Definitions for KRS 324A.150 to 324A.164. Effective: June 25, 2013
KRS 324A.150 324A.150 Definitions for KRS 324A.150 to 324A.164 Effective: June 25, 2013 As used in KRS 324A.150 to 324A.164, unless the context otherwise requires: (1) Appraisal management company means
More informationP.F. COLLINS CUSTOMS BROKER LIMITED CONTINUOUS GENERAL AGENCY AGREEMENT AND POWER OF ATTORNEY WITH POWER TO APPOINT A SUB-AGENT
P.F. COLLINS CUSTOMS BROKER LIMITED CONTINUOUS GENERAL AGENCY AGREEMENT AND POWER OF ATTORNEY WITH POWER TO APPOINT A SUB-AGENT ( Agency Agreement and Power of Attorney ) Client Name Enter Business Number
More informationTHE REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF BRITISH COLUMBIA. IN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE SERVICES ACT S.B.C. 2004, c. 42 as amended AND IN THE MATTER OF
File # 16-137 THE REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF BRITISH COLUMBIA IN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE SERVICES ACT S.B.C. 2004, c. 42 as amended AND IN THE MATTER OF MOHAMMED FAIAJ (KEVIN) KHAN (169284) CONSENT ORDER
More informationPART 2.7 DEPARTMENT OF GOVERNMENT SERVICES REAL ESTATE REGULATION
PART 2.7 DEPARTMENT OF GOVERNMENT SERVICES REAL ESTATE REGULATION Executive Summary The Financial Services Regulation Division (the Division) within the Consumer and Commercial Affairs Branch of the Department
More informationAssignment of Agreement of Purchase and Sale
Form 150 for use in the Province of Ontario Assignment of Agreement of Purchase and Sale Condominium DISCLAIMER: The Ontario Real Estate Association ( OREA ) owns certain standardized forms that are commonly
More informationAGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE *
. The information in this document does not constitute a legal opinion and should not be considered as such. Its content is given on an information basis only. In each case, we advise you to consult a
More informationRESIDENTIAL MEASUREMENT STANDARD
RESIDENTIAL MEASUREMENT STANDARD Purpose: This bulletin describes the Residential Measurement Standard (RMS) in Alberta, which licensed real estate professionals must use when measuring residential properties.
More informationA GUIDE TO ADVERTISING
A GUIDE TO ADVERTISING Contents 1 Introduction 1 Application 2 Minimum Requirements for Advertisements 2 a) Identification of registrants 3 b) Identification of individuals 3 c) Identification of brokerage
More informationVIRGINIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS EXCLUSIVE AUTHORIZATION TO SELL
VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS EXCLUSIVE AUTHORIZATION TO SELL OWNER AUTHORIZATION REGARDING INTERNET Internet advertising is one of the ways information concerning real property offered for sale is
More informationThe Real Estate Regulations
1 The Real Estate Regulations being Chapter R-1.3 Reg 1 (effective January 1, 1997) as amended by Saskatchewan Regulations 6/1999, 60/2005 and 21/2017. NOTE: This consolidation is not official. Amendments
More informationArbitration - Mandatory or Voluntary?
Arbitration - Mandatory or Voluntary? Obligation to Arbitrate The obligation of REALTORS to arbitrate flows from Article 17 of the Code of Ethics. Article 17 of the Code establishes: In the event of a
More informationBYLAWS OF ASSOCIATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, INC.
BYLAWS OF ASSOCIATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, INC. BYLAWS OF ASSOCIATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, INC.... 1 ARTICLE I NAME... 1 ARTICLE II PURPOSE... 1 ARTICLE III - MEMBERSHIP... 1 ARTICLE IV PRIVILEGES AND
More informationTHE REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF ALBERTA
THE REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF ALBERTA Case: 008549 Process: Section 83 of the Real Estate Act Industry Member: Samantha Myles Authorization: Unauthorized Document: ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY Penalty: $25,000.00
More informationRULE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF REAL ESTATE. Real Estate Services Act ANNOTATED VERSION
RULE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF REAL ESTATE Real Estate Services Act ANNOTATED VERSION The Office of the Superintendent of Real Estate is requesting feedback on proposed amendments to the Real Estate Rules
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION ACT, 1990 AND IN THE MATTER OF SUSAN RAULT, A LAWYER OF WATROUS, SASKATCHEWAN AGREED STATEMENT OF FACTS
CANADA ) PROVINCE OF SASKATCHEWAN ) TO WIT ) IN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION ACT, 1990 AND IN THE MATTER OF SUSAN RAULT, A LAWYER OF WATROUS, SASKATCHEWAN AGREED STATEMENT OF FACTS The Law Society
More informationChapter Three. After completing this chapter, you should be able to
Chapter Three Rules of the Florida Real Estate Commission After completing this chapter, you should be able to Identify two new registration categories authorized under F.S. 475; Recite the requirements
More informationBuyer s Disclosure Statement. Buyer(s) name(s): Property address:
Buyer s Disclosure Statement Buyer(s) name(s): Property address: LEGAL REQUIREMENTS: The Statute of Frauds requires that all contracts for the sale of real property in Florida must be in writing and signed
More informationTHE REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF BRITISH COLUMBIA. IN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE SERVICES ACT S.B.C. 2004, c. 42 as amended AND IN THE MATTER OF
File #16-217 THE REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF BRITISH COLUMBIA IN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE SERVICES ACT S.B.C. 2004, c. 42 as amended AND IN THE MATTER OF HAO (LANDON) YAN (168639) CONSENT ORDER RESPONDENT:
More informationEXCLUSIVE LISTING CONTRACT (NOT A MULTIPLE LISTING CONTRACT) ( Seller )
Page 1 of 7 EXCLUSIVE LISTING CONTRACT (NOT A MULTIPLE LISTING CONTRACT) BETWEEN: Multifamily Real Estate Services Corporation 119 W Pender St, Suite 104 Vancouver, BC, V6B 1S5 P: (778) 235 9293 ( Listing
More informationGOLDEN ISLES ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS CIRCLE OF EXCELLENCE RULES & REGULATIONS Revised November 16, 1999 Amended 10/25/00 Amended 02/23/01 Amended
GOLDEN ISLES ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS CIRCLE OF EXCELLENCE RULES & REGULATIONS Revised November 16, 1999 Amended 10/25/00 Amended 02/23/01 Amended 06/13/01 Amended 02/21/02 Amended 01/07 Amended 08/19/10
More informationReal Estate Council Of Ontario. Regulatory Digest
Real Estate Council Of Ontario Regulatory Digest Issue 3: October December 2013 The Real Estate Council of Ontario (RECO) administers and enforces the Real Estate and Business Brokers Act, 2002 (REBBA
More informationCHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Nuts & Bolts of Title Insurance CHART: Relevant Ethics Opinions, Guidelines & Authorized Practice Opinions Regarding The Real Estate Closing Process in North Carolina NOTE:
More informationReal Estate Council of Ontario 3300 Bloor St W. West Tower, Suite 1200 Toronto, ON M8X 2X2
Real Estate Council of Ontario 3300 Bloor St W. West Tower, Suite 1200 Toronto, ON M8X 2X2 Tel: 416-207-4800 Toll Free: 1-800-245-6910 Fax: 416-207-4820 E-mail: registration@reco.on.ca Website: www.reco.on.ca
More informationVACANT LAND PURCHASE AGREEMENT
VACANT LAND PURCHASE AGREEMENT OFFER, RECEIPT AND ACCEPTANCE 1. BUYER: The undersigned offers to buy the 2. PROPERTY: Located at, 3. City, Ohio, Zip Code. 4. Permanent Parcel No., and further described
More informationNON-EXCLUSIVE BUYER BROKERAGE AGREEMENT
NON-EXCLUSIVE BUYER BROKERAGE AGREEMENT Georgia REALTORS State law prohibits Broker from representing Buyer as a client without first entering into a written agreement with Buyer under O.C.G.A. 10-6A-1
More informationSuite West Pender Street Vancouver, BC, Canada V6C 2T8. TEL: I TOLL-FREE: l I FAX: IN THE MATTER OF
REAL ESTATE COUNCL OF BRTSH COLUMBA Suite 900-750 West Pender Street Vancouver, BC, Canada V6C 2T8 TEL: 604 683 9664 TOLL-FREE: l 877 683 9664 FAX: 604 683 9017 File# 12-537 N THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE
More informationTHE REGISTER. In This Issue... Don t forget! CPD 2017/18 deadline is Thursday, May 31. The Register
Saskatchewan Real Estate Commission THE REGISTER SREC Newsletter May 2018 In This Issue... In each issue of The Register we try to focus on trending issues in the real estate industry of Saskatchewan as
More informationDECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2011] NZREADT 39 READT 013/11 IN THE MATTER OF BETWEEN an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 LB AND QB Appellants AND THE REAL ESTATE
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT MARKETING ACT SBC 2004, Chapter BC LTD. -AND- BINDER SINGH LALLI
IN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT MARKETING ACT SBC 2004, Chapter 41 732433 BC LTD. -AND- BINDER SINGH LALLI ORDER UNDER SECTIONS 30(1) and 32(1) REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT MARKETING ACT Upon reviewing
More informationChapter 21. Earnest Money Procedures for Licensees INTRODUCTION
Chapter 21 Earnest Money Procedures for Licensees INTRODUCTION This chapter discusses the practices and the procedures that licensees must follow in handling earnest money. This discussion of earnest money
More informationRegulation of the Architect Profession within Australia An Overview. February Architects Accreditation Council of Australia 2017.
Regulation of the Architect Profession within Australia An Overview February 2015 Page 1 Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Registration Requirements for Individuals 4 2.1 Types or Divisions of Registration
More informationSC REAL ESTATE COMMISSION.
SC REAL ESTATE COMMISSION www.llronline.com/pol/rec Jurisdiction The Commission regulates and enforces the Real Estate Licensing Practice Act (S.C. Code Title 40 Chapter 57) and the Timeshare Act (S.C.
More information400 DOS 11. The Complainant was represented by Senior Attorney Linda Cleary, Esq. COMPLAINT
400 DOS 11 STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF STATE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ------------------------------------------------X In the matter of the Complaint of DEPARTMENT OF STATE DIVISION OF LICENSING
More informationI. LICENSING & TRANSITION
Summary of the Proposed General Regulation under the Condominium Management Services Act, 2015 Notice This is a summary of the key elements of the draft general regulation proposed to be made under the
More informationDISCIPLINE DECISION IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING HELD PURSUANT TO BY-LAW NO. 10 OF THE REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF ONTARIO
Real Estate Council of Ontario BETWEEN: DISCIPLINE DECISION IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING HELD PURSUANT TO BY-LAW NO. 10 OF THE REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF ONTARIO MANAGER OF COMPLAINTS, COMPLIANCE
More informationPresented by Jeff Foo, FIEA, CIPS,CRS,TRS President, Institute of Estate Agents, Singapore
Overview of real estate licensing regulations in Singapore Presented by Jeff Foo, FIEA, CIPS,CRS,TRS President, Institute of Estate Agents, Singapore In Singapore today, the real estate agency business
More informationAGRICULTURAL PURCHASE CONTRACT
AGRICULTURAL PURCHASE CONTRACT This form was developed by the Alberta Real Estate Association for the use of its members and may not be altered electronically by any person. Others who use this document
More informationROGER K. SHERRILL, R.E. TUTOR, ALL TRUE NEVADA LAW
1 ROGER K. SHERRILL, R.E. TUTOR, ALL TRUE NEVADA LAW The Division CANNOT step in and take control of a broker s trust account without a court order. They must pursue an injunction by court action. Salespersons
More information