Conduct a hearing on the appeal, consider all evidence and testimony, and take one of the following actions:
|
|
- Milo Lamb
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 AGENDA ITEM #4.A TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS Staff Report to the City Council SUBJECT: FROM: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF A CONDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR A NEW 3,511 SQUARE FOOT, TWO-STORY SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING WITH A 1,398 SQUARE FOOT BASEMENT ON A.359 ACRE LOT AND SETBACK VARIAN CE REQUESTS; LANDS OF KDCI DEVELOPMENT, LLC; DEERFIELD DRIVE; FILE # ZP-SD CDP-VAR. Suzanne Avila, AICP, Planning DirectorSA APPROVED: Carl Cahill, City Manager C.C., RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Conduct a hearing on the appeal, consider all evidence and testimony, and take one of the following actions: 1. Uphold the appeal and approve the Conditional Development Permit, Site Development Permit and Variances, as originally submitted to the Planning Commission; 2. Uphold the appeal and approve the Conditional Development Permit, Site Development Permit and Variances for parking and vehicle back-up area in the side yard setback, as revised 3. Deny the appeal and uphold the Planning Commission's decision; or 4. Remand the revised project back to the Planning Commission for their review. Further, staff recommends that the City Council direct staff to prepare a resolution of findings consistent with the City Council's determination. BACKGROUND On March 7, 2014, the Town's Consulting Surveyor, Cyrus Kianpour, approved a Certificate of Compliance which was recorded on March 13, 2014 recognizing two legal parcels of.37 and.35 acres on lands identified as Assessor Parcel Number (APN) and (see Attachment 4 - the subject parcel is identified on Exhibit "C" of the document). One parcel is at the comer of Burke and Deerfield (former address of Burke Road) and the other is an interior lot directly abutting the comer lot and fronting on Deerfield Drive. The certificate confirms that the parcels comply with the Subdivision Map Act and local ordinances. Further, the certificate states: "The parcels described herein may be sold, leased
2 Lands of KDCI Development LLC Page2 or financed without further compliance with the Subdivision Map Act or any local ordinance enacted pursuant thereto." The applicant owns both properties, however, the current proposal is to develop only the interior lot at this time. On February 5, 2015, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed project for a new 3,511 square foot, two-story dwelling with variances to allow encroachments into the side and rear setbacks for roof eaves, a chimney, required parking, back-up area and a rear patio. Additional background information and details on the original proposal are included in the February 5, 2015 Planning Commission staff report with attachments (Attachment 5). Staffs initial recommendation was to approve the project as conditioned with variances only for the parking, back-up area and the rear patio. At the hearing, the Commission heard from six surrounding residents on Deerfield Drive and received s and letters from other residents. Their concerns centered on the bulk and mass of the proposed dwelling, the number of variances requested, driveway access, and visual impacts. In addition, several residents stated that the two lots should be merged as the existing parcels are substantially below the one-acre minimum required for new parcels and that developing the lots individually results in a development density that is not compatible with the neighborhood. The Planning Commission discussed the issues and determined that the requested number of variances was excessive. Concerns were also raised about the lack of neighborhood support, the desire of the neighbors to have the lots merged to limit development to one house, and whether or not the proposed structure was compatible with surrounding properties. The applicant stated that the design could be modified to eliminate the need for variances on the roof eaves and the chimney and requested guidance from the Planning Commission on potential design changes. The Planning Commission, upon further discussion, was split on the issue of suggesting design changes and eventually voted 4-1 to deny the application. The minutes of the meeting are included in Attachment 6 and the plan set reviewed by the Commission is included as Attachment 7. On February 13, 2015, the applicant appealed the Planning Commission denial to the City Council. DISCUSSION Revised Project Design Based on the discussion at the Planning Commission meeting, the applicant has chosen to redesign the new dwelling to eliminate the variances for the roof eaves, chimney and rear patio area. This has resulted in the following revised project data:
3 Lands of KDCI Development LLC March31, 2015 Page3 Area Maximum (sq.ft.) Development 5,690 Floor 3,590 Basement (exempt) Total area of dwelling with basement and garage Previous Design (sq.ft.) 5,689 3,511 (1,398) 4,909 Revised Change Remaining Areas Design (sq.ft.) under Revised (sq.ft.) Plan (sq.ft.) 5, , (1,251) , The redesign retains the parking in the side yard setback and encroachment of the vehicle backup area within 10 feet of the property line, although the distance from the property line has increased from four (4) feet to five feet four inches (5'4). The maximum building height has been reduced by one foot, the second floor has been set back on the front elevation, exterior materials were changed from siding to shingles, and the driveway location was shifted to provide additional landscape screening from the street and avoid aligning the new driveway with a driveway across the street. The revised site plan and elevations are included in Attachment 8 which also includes a proposed schematic landscape plan (see Sheet Al.l in the revised plan set). Parcel Merger Issue The Planning Commission report included a discussion on the lot merger requirements in the Town's Municipal Code. In order to address concerns raised at the Planning Commission hearing, staff consulted with the City Attorney regarding the validity of the Town's Merger Ordinance and whether or not the parcels can be merged under the State Subdivision Map Act. On the first issue, the Attorney's office has determined that the Town's Merger Ordinance does not conform to or implement the procedures outlined in Section of the Subdivision Map Act (see Attachment 9). Furthermore, the Municipal Code cites a state code section that has been repealed. Under the preemption doctrine, local laws that are in conflict with state laws are void. Therefore, since the Town's Merger Ordinance does not conform to the merger requirements in the Map Act, the Merger Ordinance is void and cannot be enforced. Regarding the second issue, under Section , a local agency may, by ordinance, provide for the merger of contiguous parcels held by the same owner if the parcels meet two basic criteria and one or more of seven listed conditions. In the attorney's opinion, it is unlikely that the parcels are eligible for merger because on the current facts, it appears that the parcels likely do not satisfy any of the seven conditions listed. Therefore, even if the Town developed a merger ordinance in accordance with the Map Act, the parcels in question would not be eligible.
4 Page4 Neighborhood Compatibility In order to evaluate the proposed project and its compatibility with surrounding residences, staff reviewed the Town's records for variances on properties along Deerfield Drive and on several substandard properties along Burke and Fremont Roads. A map showing the location of these properties is included as Attachment 10. The following table provides a summary of those findings: Surrounding Properties with Approved Variances Address Net Lot Existing or Overall Size of Variance Granted Size/LUF New Dwelling incl. Residence garage acres New 2,988 sq.ft Parking in side yard Burke.453 LUF setback and increase m MFA NIA Existing/ 1,567 sq.ft Guest Cottage m Burke Addition side yard setback acres New 3,917 sq.ft Allow for a 20 foot Deerfield.4LUF side yard setback for dwelling acres Existing/Room 3,271 sq.ft Expansion over Deerfield.37 LUF Addition maximum allowed building coverage and 4 foot encroachment into side yard acres Existing/Room 3,920 sq.ft Exceed maximum Deerfield.31 LUF Addition MFAandMDA acres New 3,267 sq.ft Parking in the side Deerfield.33 LUF yard setback acres Existing/Room 3,172 sq.ft Exceed maximum Deerfield.43 LUF Addition MFAandMDA acres New 4,365 sq.ft Parking in the side Fremont.397 LUF yard setback Revised Project acres New 3,214 sq.ft. Request for parking and Deerfield.359 LUF back-up area in side yard setback; request for roof eaves and chimney in side yard, patio in rear yard Of the 12 properties on Deerfield Drive, five have been granted some type of variance over the past 30 years. With regard to variances granted on new dwellings in the area, the two most
5 March31,2015 Page 5 most recent occurred in 2005, for parking in the side yard setback. It is possible to construct a dwelling with required parking on the subject site without the need for any variance. However, the City Council could find that a setback variance for the required parking and back-up area is necessary due to the substantial reduction in the development area that results from the strict application of the 30 foot side and rear yard setbacks on the.359 acre lot. In addition, the proposed project with the parking and back-up area encroachments results in a design that the City Council could find is more architecturally compatible with the neighborhood and could be screened from the street. Furthermore, the Council could find that the garage and parking along the easterly portion of the lot will not have a detrimental impact on surrounding residents because the improvements abut property owned by the applicant and any new structure on that abutting lot will be designed to address that impact. With regard to the size of the structure, the previous table includes the lot sizes, Lot Unit Factor and the total square footage of the structure including the garage (basements were excluded). Based on the data collected from the actual building plans, the proposed dwelling is within the range of home sizes in the surrounding area with the average floor area of the Deerfield Drive homes on the list being 3,509 square feet, approximately 300 square feet less than the proposed dwelling on the subject lot. Conditional Development Permit and Variance Findings To approve a Conditional Development Pennit (CDP), the following four findings must be made: 1. The site for the proposed development is adequate in size, shape and topography to accommodate the proposed intensity of development, including all structures, yards, open spaces, parking, landscaping, walls and fences, and such other features as may be required by this chapter. 2. The size and design of the proposed structures create a proper balance, unity and harmonious appearance in relation to the size, shape and topography of the site and in relation to the surrounding neighborhood; 3. The rural character of the site has been preserved as much as feasible by minimizing vegetation and tree removal, excessive and unsightly grading and alteration of natural land forms. 4. The proposed development is in compliance with all regulations and policies set forth in the Site Development ordinance. To approve a Variance, the following four findings must be made: 1. That, because of exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of the provisions of this title is found to deprive such property of
6 Page6 privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification; 2. That upon the granting of the variance, the intent and purpose of the applicable sections of this title will still be served and the recipient of the variance will not be granted special privileges not enjoyed by other surrounding property owners; 3. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property, improvements or uses within the immediate vicinity and within the same zoning district; 4. That the variance will not authorize a use or activity which is not otherwise expressly authorized by the zoning district regulations governing the parcel or property. CONCLUSION In summary, the Deerfield Drive neighborhood is a mix of one and two-story homes that were originally built in the 1940s, the majority of which have been remodeled or replaced with new dwellings that are larger than the previous home. A majority of the properties are less than half an acre in size with an LUF of.5 or lower. As shown in the table above, five of the properties have received CDP and Variance approvals over the past 30 years for reduced setbacks, parking in the setback, and/or increases in MF A and MDA. The proposed request for a new residence is below the maximum floor area and development area, is similar in size to surrounding homes, and meets all other development standards with the exception of setbacks for parking and vehicle back-up. The City Council could find that the proposed development has: (1) adequate area to provide screening, and (2) is compatible with the existing development pattern in the area. In evaluating the variance findings #1 and #2, the City Council could consider the fact that the lot area is substantially less than the one acre minimum and the imposition of the same setbacks and zoning standards could deprive the property owner of certain privileges, including a substantial reduction in the property's buildable area, reduced patio and outdoor recreation areas, and limitations on the siting of the dwelling and parking areas. Furthermore, the City Council could find that the development of the property would not be detrimental to public welfare or surrounding properties because the parking and back-up encroachments can be screened by landscaping and will not be significantly visible to existing residents. In evaluating variance finding #4, the City Council could determine that the finding is met because the requested variance is not for a use or activity that is not permitted in the zone district. PUBLIC COMMENTS As of the writing of the staff report, the Town has received several s from residents in the Deerfield Drive neighborhood related to the existing sewer agreement (which includes
7 Page 7 the subject lot) and there have been requests to view the revised plans. Copies of letters and s are included under Attachment 11. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this project. ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE (CEQA) The proposed single family residence is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act per Section 15303(a) - construction of a new single family residence where public services are available in a residential zone. ATTACHMENTS 1. Conditional Development Permit Findings 2. Variance Findings 3. Recommended Conditions of Approval 4. February 5, 2015 Planning Commission Staff Report and attachments 5. Recorded Certificate of Compliance 6. Excerpt of Minutes from February 5, 2015 Planning Commission meeting 7. Original Plan Set provided to the Planning Commission for February 5, 2015 hearing 8. Revised Plan Set dated "Received March 20, 2015" and stamped "REVISION" 9. California State Government Code Sections Map of Variance Approvals in the Surrounding Neighborhood 11. Correspondence from the Public Report Prepared by: Steve Padovan, Consultant Planner
TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS January 11, 2018 Staff Report to the Planning Commission
ITEM #3.2 TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS Staff Report to the Planning Commission SUBJECT: FROM: REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMITS FOR A NEW 2,831 SQUARE FOOT, TWO
More informationAttachment 11. <Enrique J. 1\fein. Suzanne Avila. To Mayor Corrigan, City Council of Los Altos Hills.
Attachment Suzanne Avila Cc: Enrique J. Klein < t> Wednesday, March 25, 205 2:36 PM Courtenay Corrigan Steven Mattas; Suzanne Avila; Carl Cahill Building Permit Application for new construction on 25608
More informationCity of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report
City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report TO: Zoning Administrator FROM: Reviewed by: Sergio Klotz, AICP, Assistant Development Services DirctJ. o ~ Prepared by: Laura Stokes, Housing Coordinator I Assistant
More informationAttachment 4. February 5, TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS StaffRep01i to the Planning Commission
Attachment 4 TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HLLS StaffRep01i to the Planning Commission February 5, 2015 SUBJECT: CONDTONAL DEVELOPMENT PERMT AND STE DEVELOPMENT PERMT FOR A NEW 3,511 SQUARE FOOT, TWO-STORY SNGLE FAMLY
More informationPLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT
PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: Hearing Officer SUBJECT: Minor Variance #11876 LOCATION: APPLICANT: ZONING DESIGNATION: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: CASE PLANNER: STAFF
More informationCOUNTY OF SAN MATEO PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: October 20, 2016 TO: FROM: Zoning Hearing Officer Planning Staff SUBJECT: Consideration of a Non-Conforming Use Permit, pursuant to Sections 6135
More informationAGENDA CITY OF EL MONTE MODIFICATION COMMITTEE TUESDAY OCTOBER 23, :00 P.M. CITY HALL WEST CONFERENCE ROOM A VALLEY BOULEVARD
AGENDA CITY OF EL MONTE MODIFICATION COMMITTEE TUESDAY OCTOBER 23, 2018 CITY OF EL MONTE MODIFICATION COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON AMY WONG CITY PLANNER JASON C. MIKAELIAN CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL TODD MORRIS
More informationAll items include discussion and possible action to approve, modify, deny, or continue unless marked otherwise.
Storey County Planning Commission Meeting Agenda Thursday, October 6, 2016 6:00 p.m. Storey County Courthouse, District Courtroom 26 South B Street, Virginia City, Nevada Larry Prater Chairman Virgil Bucchianeri
More informationMONTEREY COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
MONTEREY COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR Meeting: June 28, 2007 Time: 1:45pm Agenda Item No.: 4 Project Description: Combined Development Permit including after-the-fact permits to allow a 138 square foot
More informationEL DORADO COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT VARIANCE
EL DORADO COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT Agenda of: August 6, 2008 Item No.: Staff: 4.a. Thomas A. Lloyd VARIANCE FILE NUMBER: V 08-0007 APPLICANT: AGENT: REQUEST: LOCATION:
More informationZoning Administrator. Agenda Item
Zoning Administrator Agenda Item June 12, 2013 TO: THRU: FROM: Rick Otto Zoning Administrator Leslie Aranda Roseberry Planning Manager Chad Ortlieb Senior Planner SUBJECT PUBLIC HEARING: VARIANCE NO. VAR
More informationEL DORADO COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT VARIANCE
EL DORADO COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT Agenda of: August 6, 2008 Item No.: Staff: 4.d. Robert Peters VARIANCE FILE NUMBER: V08-0004 APPLICANT: Joseph and Ingrid Herrick
More informationAGENDA COMMITTEE OPENING OF. use. given the. by staff. CHAIRPERSON DALLAS BAKER CITY PLANNER OFFICIAL TODD MORRIS CHIEF BUILDING
AGENDA CITY OF EL MONTE MODIFICATION COMMITTEE CITY OF EL MONTE MODIFICATION COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON DALLAS BAKER PLANNING COMMISSION CITY PLANNER JASON C. MIKAELIAN CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL TODD MORRIS TUESDAY,
More informationTOWN OF SAN ANSELMO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. For the meeting of January 11, Agenda Item 6C. Zone X (Minimal Flood Hazard Area)
TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT For the meeting of January 11, 2016 Agenda Item 6C Owner/Applicant: Daniel and Jacqueline Olson Project Address: 321 Greenfield Avenue Assessor s Parcel
More informationSANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT January 11, 2008
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT January 11, 2008 PROJECT: Gerrity Parking in Side Setback and Gerrity Student Housing Addition HEARINGDATE: January 28, 2008 STAFF/PHONE: J. Ritterbeck,
More informationEL DORADO COUNTY PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT VARIANCE
EL DORADO COUNTY PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT Agenda of: April 18,2018 Item No.: Staff: 5.a. Emma Carrico VARIANCE FILE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: V17-0003/La
More informationA G E N D A CITY OF BUENA PARK ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
A G E N D A CITY OF BUENA PARK ZONING ADMINISTRATOR December 13, 2017 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE ROOM 3:00 p.m. Members of the public who wish to discuss an item should fill out a speaker identification
More informationStaff findings of consistency with the Land Development Regulations and the Comprehensive Plan follow: Request One
City of Panama City Board of Adjustment January 22, 2018 Staff findings of consistency with the Land Development Regulations and the Comprehensive Plan follow: Request One Owner/ Applicant: Michael & Sharon
More informationWALNUT CREEK DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. AGENDA: July 6, 2016 ITEM 4b.
WALNUT CREEK DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Attachment 3 AGENDA: July 6, 2016 ITEM 4b. ORIGINATED BY: COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING PROJECT NAME APPLICATION TYPE APPLICATION
More informationRESOLUTION NO
RESOLUTION NO. 2005- A RESOLUTION OF THE MARIN COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS DENYING THE PETER PAPPAS APPEAL AND SUSTAINING THE PLANNING COMMISSION S ACTION BY DENYING THE PAPPAS DESIGN REVIEW CLEARANCE
More informationA G E N D A CITY OF BUENA PARK ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
A G E N D A CITY OF BUENA PARK ZONING ADMINISTRATOR September 2, 2016 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE ROOM 10:00 a.m. Members of the public who wish to discuss an item should fill out a speaker identification
More informationPlanning Commission Report
çbev~rly~rly Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL (310) 458-1140 FAX. (310) 858-5986 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: March 27, 2014 Subject: 1801 Angelo
More informationSANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT August 30, 2007
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT August 30, 2007 PROJECT: Detrana Entry Gates HEARING DATE: October 22, 2007 STAFF/PHONE: Sarah Clark, (805) 568-2059 GENERAL INFORMATION Case No.:
More informationPlanning Commission Report
~BER~9 Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 458-1140 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: April 10, 2014 Subject: 1801 Angelo
More informationPlanning Department 168 North Edwards Street Post Office Drawer L Independence, California 93526
Planning Department 168 North Edwards Street Post Office Drawer L Independence, California 93526 Phone: (760) 878-0263 FAX: (760) 878-0382 E-Mail: inyoplanning@ Inyocounty.us AGENDA ITEM NO.: 7 (Action
More informationDEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT BRIEFING For Meeting Scheduled for December 15, 2010 Agenda Item C2
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT BRIEFING For Meeting Scheduled for December 15, 2010 Agenda Item C2 REQUEST: Front setback and expansion of nonconforming structure to allow construction
More informationCITY OF BLACK DIAMOND
CITY OF BLACK DIAMOND January 21, 2016 CITY OF BLACK DIAMOND STAFF REPORT PAIGE SETBACK VARIANCE FILE NO.: PLN15-0055 I. APPLICATION INFORMATION Applicant: Jeffery D. Pike 31827 Thomas Rd. SE Auburn, WA
More informationCITY OF CUDAHY CALIFORNIA Incorporated November 10, 1960 P.O. Box Santa Ana Street Cudahy, California
CITY OF CUDAHY CALIFORNIA Incorporated November 10, 1960 P.O. Box 1007 5220 Santa Ana Street Cudahy, California 90201-6024 PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING APPLICATION FOR MAJOR PROJECTS Appeal Change of Zone
More informationCity of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report
City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Zoning Administrator Ll j Charles View, Development Services Directo&J Prepared by: Laura Stokes, Housing Coordinator I Assistant Planne(.;('7"
More informationMONTEREY COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
MONTEREY COUNTY PLANNING AND BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT COASTAL OFFICE, 2620 1 ST AVENUE, MARINA, CA 93933 (831) 883-7500, main line / (831) 384-3261, facsimile SCOTT HENNESSY, DIRECTOR MONTEREY COUNTY
More informationRavenna Township. Dakota County, Minnesota. Variance Application. Please Print or Type All Information
Variance Application Return this completed application to the office of the clerk on or before A $550.00 fee is required before a Public Hearing date is issued. For Township Use Only Case Number: Date
More informationCHAPTER 14 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS
9-14-1 9-14-1 CHAPTER 14 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS SECTION: 9-14-1: Purpose 9-14-2: Governing Provisions 9-14-3: Minimum Area 9-14-4: Uses Permitted 9-14-5: Common Open Space 9-14-6: Utility Requirements
More informationPlanning Commission Report
cjly City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (370) 858-5966 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: April 28, 2016 Subject: Project
More informationATTACHMENT B-2. City of Pleasant Hill. March 11, Tamara Smith 291 Boyd Road Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
ATTACHMENT B-2 March 11, 2015 Tamara Smith 291 Boyd Road Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 City of Pleasant Hill RE: Appeal of Variance Application No. PLN 14-0307 (Associated with Minor Subdivision No. PLN 14-0307
More informationSTAFF REPORT. To: Planning Commission Meeting date: May 11, 2016 Item: VN Prepared by: Marc Jordan
# 12 ) VN-02-16 K & G ENTERPRISES VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT To: Planning Commission Meeting date: May 11, 2016 Item: VN-02-16 Prepared by: Marc Jordan GENERAL INFORMATION: Applicant: Property
More informationPLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT KELVIN PARKER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER/ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
DATE: JUNE 21, 2017 PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT TO: FROM: BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS KELVIN PARKER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER/ZONING ADMINISTRATOR SUBJECT: APPEAL OF HEARING OFFICER S
More informationADMINISTRATIVE HEARING STAFF REPORT
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING STAFF REPORT Providence Place Apartments Utility Box No. 2 Conditional Use Petition PLNPCM2011-00426 309 East 100 South September 22, 2011 Planning and Zoning Division Department
More informationAGENDA ITEM #4.E. TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS Staff Report to the City Council. February 15, 2018
AGENDA ITEM #4.E TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS Staff Report to the City Council February 15, 2018 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR A TIME EXTENSION TO THE EXPIRATION DATE FOR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
More informationNYE COUNTY, NV PAHRUMP REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING JUNE 14, 2017
NYE COUNTY, NV PAHRUMP REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING JUNE 14, 2017 Staff Report Agenda Item No. 11 CASE DESCRIPTION(S): LOCATION: APN NUMBER(S): 039-585-14 For Possible Action WV-2017-000047:
More informationChapter DENSITY AND OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS
Chapter 19.52 DENSITY AND OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS Sections: 19.52.010 Lot coverage Requirements generally. 19.52.020 Measurement of lot coverage. 19.52.030 Lot coverage R-15 zone. 19.52.040 Lot coverage
More informationNapa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter
Agenda Date: 9/20/2017 Agenda Placement: 8C Napa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter TO: FROM: Napa County Planning Commission Charlene Gallina for David Morrison - Director Planning, Building
More informationTOWN OF SAN ANSELMO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. For the meeting of December 7, Agenda Item 5A
TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT For the meeting of December 7, 2015 Agenda Item 5A Owner: Samantha Lyman & Doug Penman Design Professional: Daniel Castor, Castor Architecture Project
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA Board of Zoning Appeals Agenda Item V-11349-18-UP-2: Meeting of March 21, 2018 DATE: March 16, 2018 APPLICANT: LOCATION: ZONING: LOT AREA: GLUP DESIGNATION: Gregory and Sarah
More informationSTAFF REPORT #
STAFF REPORT #15-6000-0001 VARIANCE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: May 21, 2015 1. APPLICATION: An application submitted by requesting a variance to allow for a front yard setback reduction to twenty
More informationCity of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Joel Rojas, Development Services Director ~ )P
10/17/2017 F1b TO: FROM: SUBMITTED BY: City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council ~n Siegel, City Manager Joel Rojas, Development Services Director ~ )P PREPARED
More informationCity of Piedmont COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
City of Piedmont COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT DATE: May 15, 2017 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mayor and Council Paul Benoit, City Administrator Consideration of the 2 nd Reading of Ordinance 731 N.S. - Amending Division
More informationCity of Imperial Planning Commission and Traffic Commission
Staff Report Agenda Item No. D-1 To: From: City of Imperial Planning Commission and Traffic Commission Lisa Tylenda, Planner Date: September 21, 2017 Subject: Variance #V1702 Advertisement signs & flags
More informationARTICLE 24 SITE PLAN REVIEW
ARTICLE 24 SITE PLAN REVIEW 24.1 PURPOSE: The intent of these Ordinance provisions is to provide for consultation and cooperation between the land developer and the Township Planning Commission in order
More informationTown of Scarborough, Maine
Town of Scarborough, Maine Miscellaneous Appeal INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR ALL APPEALS Before any appeal can be processed, the following material must be submitted to the Code Enforcement Office: 1. A fee
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA Board of Zoning Appeals Agenda Item V-11354-18-VA-2: Meeting of April 16, 2018 DATE: April 13, 2018 APPLICANT: LOCATION: ZONING: LOT AREA: GLUP DESIGNATION: Roger Ramia of Rush
More informationPacket for New Home Construction
Architectural Control Committee (ACC) Packet for New Home Construction As of: 1 February 2018 Questions, - email acc@elkinslake.net or Call 936-295-8181 or visit an ACC meeting Introduction and Welcome
More informationZoning Variances. Overview of
Overview of Zoning Variances City of Bishop Planning Department Purpose: Each zoning classification indicates specific development standards such as setbacks or parking requirements. There are occasions,
More informationCity Council 1-15-08- Exhibit A Mansionization Code Amendments Recommended by Planning Commission 11-14-07 INCREASE OPEN SPACE AND SETBACKS Section 10.12.030 and A.12.030 Property Development Regulations:
More informationB. The Plan is in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan.
ARTICLE 17 PLANNING UNIT DEVELOPMENT 17.01 INTENT The purpose of this Section is to permit the creation of new Planned Unit Developments, permitted as Conditional Uses where maximum variations of design
More informationHOW TO APPLY FOR A USE PERMIT
HOW TO APPLY FOR A USE PERMIT MENDOCINO COUNTY PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES What is the purpose of a use permit? Throughout the County, people use their properties in many different ways. They build
More informationCHAPTER NONCONFORMITIES.
- i CHAPTER. - NONCONFORMITIES. Sec. -. - Intent. Sec. -2. - Development as a matter of right. Sec. -3. - Nonconforming development. Sec. -. - Vested rights. Sec. -. - Hardship relief; Variances. 2 3 admin.
More informationTyrone Planning Commission Agenda
Tyrone Planning Commission Agenda October 26, 2017 7:00 PM I. Call to Order II. Approval of Agenda Tyrone Planning Commission Will James Chairman Jeff Duncan Vice-Chairman Marlon Davis Commissioner David
More informationSTAFF REPORT VARIANCE FROM LDC CHAPTER 17, SECTION 15(d)(1)(a) CASE NO
STAFF REPORT VARIANCE FROM LDC CHAPTER 17, SECTION 15(d)(1)(a) CASE NO. 16-90000010 REQUEST: OWNER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: RECOMMENDATION: Variance from the Land Development Code (LDC) to allow a minimum
More informationVICINITY MAP. Board of Adjustment File No.: VAR & VAR January 9, 2014 Page 2 of 11 ATTACHMENTS
Board of Adjustment File No.: VAR2013 0024 & VAR2013 0025 January 9, 2014 Page 2 of 11 VICINITY MAP ATTACHMENTS Attachment A Applicant s Letter Attachment B Site Plan Attachment C Elevation Drawings Board
More informationPLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DOÑA ANA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Doña Ana County Government Center 845 N. Motel Blvd. Las Cruces, New Mexico 88007 Telephone: (575) 647-7350 MEETING DATE:
More informationPlanning Commission Report
çbe~rly Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: March 13, 2014 Subject: 9521 Sunset
More informationVARIANCE (Revised 03/11)
EL DORADO COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES 2850 Fairlane Court, Placerville CA 95667 (530) 621-5355 fax: (530) 642-0508 http://www.edcgov.us/planning VARIANCE (Revised 03/11) PURPOSE Each zone district establishes
More informationPlanning Division staff will not accept incomplete application packages or poor quality graphics.
ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION ZONE VARIANCE APPLICATION ZONE CHANGE AND ZONE VARIANCE APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS Number of Copies Application Form 1 Project Information Questionnaire 1 Assessor s Parcel Map (with
More informationREPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento
REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814-2671 www.cityofsacramento.org 9 PUBLIC HEARING December 10, 2015 To: Members of the Planning and Design Commission
More informationINSTRUCTIONAL PACKET FOR VARIANCES
Community Development Department Counter Hours: 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon Monday through Thursday (Please Call to Verify Counter Hours) Address: 1110 West Capitol Avenue, 2 nd Floor West Sacramento, CA 95691
More informationATTACHMENT 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
ATTACHMENT 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ~BEVERLY~RLY Planning C Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (010) 285-1141 FA)(. (310) 858-5966 mmission Report
More information1.0 REQUEST. SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR Coastal Zone Staff Report for Vincent New Single-Family Dwelling & Septic System
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR Coastal Zone Staff Report for Vincent New Single-Family Dwelling & Septic System Hearing Date: February 26, 2007 Supervisorial District: First Staff Report Date:
More informationPALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION ZONING COMMISSION VARIANCE STAFF REPORT 06/07/2012
PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION ZONING COMMISSION VARIANCE STAFF REPORT 06/07/2012 APPLICATION NO. CODE SECTION REQUIRED PROPOSED VARIANCE ZV-2009-03300 Variance
More informationA DJUSTMENTS. A. Zoning Permits Required: Use Permit to construct a dwelling unit, as required by BMC Section 23D
Z O N I N G A DJUSTMENTS B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD ACTION AUGUST 14, 2008 2421 Ninth Street Use Permit 05-10000084 to construct a two-story 1,766 sq. ft., detached dwelling unit at the
More informationPC RESOLUTION NO. 15~11-10~01 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP)
PC RESOLUTION NO. 15~11-10~01 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 15-005 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A MUSIC EDUCATION FACILITY IN EXISTING
More informationBoard of Adjustment File No.: VAR February 24, 2014 Page 2 of 7 VICINITY MAP ATTACHMENTS
Board of Adjustment File No.: VAR2014 0004 February 24, 2014 Page 2 of 7 VICINITY MAP ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Variance application Attachment B: As-built Attachment C: 1999 Plat Attachment D: Front of
More informationCITY OF GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
CITY OF GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO ORDINANCE NO. 4778 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF THE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE (TITLE 21 OF THE GRAND JUNCTION MUNICIPAL CODE) REGARDING ADMINISTRATION AND
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
106 William Avenue PC Meeting: 8/26/14 Agenda Item: 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATE: August 26, 2014 RE: DR/FAR 14-26, Geoffrey Butler, Applicant; House Properties 77 LLP, Property Owner; 106 William
More informationPlease be advised that the Town does not enforce private covenants or deed restrictions. I. SUBJECT ADDRESS: Zoning District. Palm Beach County:
ZONING APPLICATION TOWN OF PALM BEACH () This application includes requests for: Site Plan Review Special Exception Variance TO BE HEARD BY THE TOWN COUNCIL ON AFTER 9:30 A.M., IN THE TOWN OF PALM BEACH
More informationCity of Harrisburg Variance and Special Exception Application
City of Harrisburg Variance and Special Exception Application Note: The Planning Bureau will review all applications for completeness; incomplete applications may cause a delay in processing. Contact Ben
More informationCity of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 of 3
City of Fayetteville, Arkansas 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 Legislation Text File #: 2018-0144, Version: 1 ADM 18-6094 (AMEND UDC 164.19/ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS): AN
More informationIntroduction. Background DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. Planning Division. m e m o r a n d u m TO: The Urbana Zoning Board of Appeals
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Planning Division m e m o r a n d u m TO: FROM: The Urbana Zoning Board of Appeals Christopher Marx, AICP, Planner I DATE: March 16, 218 SUBJECT: ZBA Case ZBA-218-C-2:
More informationCITY OF PALMDALE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. CC
CITY OF PALMDALE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. CC 2011-118 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALMDALE, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL
More informationMINNETONKA PLANNING COMMISSION June 2, A conditional use permit for 2,328 square feet of accessory structures at 4915 Highland Road
MINNETONKA PLANNING COMMISSION June 2, 2016 Brief Description A conditional use permit for 2,328 square feet of accessory structures at Recommendation Recommend the city council adopt the resolution approving
More informationKETCHUM PLANNING AND ZONING
IN RE: ) Barrow Variance and ) Fence Design Review ) KETCHUM PLANNING AND ZONING ) COMMISSION - FINDINGS OF FACT, ) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION Permit Number: 13-122 ) BACKGROUND FACTS OWNER: Strada
More informationDEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA SUBDIVISION REPORT DOCKET NO: SUMMARY NO: COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2 - Paul D. Johnston COUNCIL AT LARGE: A - Chris Roberts B - Cynthia Lee-Sheng ADVERTISING
More informationPlanning Department 168 North Edwards Street Post Office Drawer L Independence, California 93526
Planning Department 168 North Edwards Street Post Office Drawer L Independence, California 93526 Phone: (760) 878-0263 FAX: (760) 8782-2712 E-Mail: inyoplanning@inyocounty.us AGENDA ITEM NO.: 4 (Action
More informationBOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, PANEL A PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES DALLAS CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS TUESDAY, APRIL 21, 2015
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, PANEL A PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES DALLAS CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS TUESDAY, APRIL 21, 2015 MEMBERS PRESENT AT BRIEFING: MEMBERS ABSENT FROM BRIEFING: Clint Nolen, Vice Chair, Larry
More informationPALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION ZONING COMMISSION VARIANCE STAFF REPORT 07/05/2012
PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION ZONING COMMISSION VARIANCE STAFF REPORT 07/05/2012 APPLICATION NO. CODE SECTION REQUIRED PROPOSED VARIANCE ZV-2012-00690 3.D.1.A
More informationBOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AGENDA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT 970.668.4200 0037 Peak One Dr. PO Box 5660 www.summitcountyco.gov Frisco, CO 80443 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AGENDA January 17, 2018-5:30p.m. Buffalo Mountain Room County Commons 0037 Peak
More informationSPECIAL USE FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (P.U.D.), REZONING, and COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION PACKET
SPECIAL USE FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (P.U.D.), REZONING, and COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION PACKET VILLAGE OF HANOVER PARK DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Village of Hanover Park Department of Community
More informationBoard of Adjustments Staff Brief
Town of Chino Valley Development Services Department 1982 N. Voss Drive #203 Chino Valley, AZ 86323 928-636-4427 www.chinoaz.net Board of Adjustments Staff Brief Date: August 25, 2014 Agenda Item: VAR14-002
More informationPLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOODS. Conditional Use
Staff Report PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOODS To: From: Salt Lake City Planning Commission Maryann Pickering, Principal Planner (801) 535-7660 Date: July 27, 2016 Re: Church
More informationPROPOSED FINDINGS FOR ZONE VARIANCE APPLICATION FOR LEGALIZATION OF THIRD DWELLING UNIT
PROPOSED FINDINGS FOR ZONE VARIANCE APPLICATION FOR LEGALIZATION OF THIRD DWELLING UNIT (PURSUANT TO LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 12.27) FOR 1100-1102 S. STEARNS DRIVE, LOS ANGELES, CA 90035 Pursuant
More informationCITY OF PISMO BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT
DATE: March 22, 2016 CITY OF PISMO BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Jan Di Leo, Planner (805) 773-7088 jdileo@pismobeach.org THROUGH:
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA Board of Zoning Appeals Agenda Item V-11250-17-UP-2: Meeting of April 19, 2017 DATE: April 14, 2017 APPLICANT: LOCATION: ZONING: LOT AREA: GLUP DESIGNATION: Robert and Tania
More informationCity of Placerville Planning Commission AGENDA REPORT ITEM 6.2
Placerville, a Unique Historical Past Forging into a Golden Future City of Placerville Planning Commission AGENDA REPORT ITEM 6.2 MEETING DATE: APPLICATION & NO: 996 Thompson Way - Site Plan Review 2015-07
More information1101 Washington Avenue Fredericksburg, VA 22401
1 Board of Supervisors Robert Bob Thomas, Jr., Chairman Laura A. Sellers, Vice Chairman Meg Bohmke Jack R. Cavalier Wendy E. Maurer Paul V. Milde, III Gary F. Snellings December 14, 2016 C. Douglas Barnes
More informationCITRUS HEIGHTS COMMUNITY SPECIAL PLANNING AREA
CITRUS HEIGHTS COMMUNITY SPECIAL PLANNING AREA 501-90. INTENT. It is the intent of the Board of Supervisors in adopting this Special Planning Area Ordinance to allow development on the property described
More informationLetter of Determination
Letter of Determination REVISED June 5, 2014 Jeremy Paul Quickdraw Permit Consulting 1325 California Street San Francisco CA 94109 Site Address: 260 Laussat Street Assessor s Block/Lot: 0860/031 Zoning
More informationBOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AGENDA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT 970.668.4200 0037 Peak One Dr. PO Box 5660 www.summitcountyco.gov Frisco, CO 80443 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AGENDA January 18, 2017-5:30p.m. Buffalo Mountain Room County Commons 0037 Peak
More informationCOUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA ZONING ADMINISTRATOR REPORT
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA ZONING ADMINISTRATOR REPORT For the Agenda of: May 4, 2016 To: From: Subject: Supervisorial District(s): Zoning Administrator Department of Community Development PLNP2015-00222.
More information7.20 Article 7.20 Nonconformities
Article Nonconformities.01 Intent It is the intent of this ordinance to permit legal nonconforming lots, structures, or uses to continue until they are removed but not to encourage their survival. For
More informationCHAPTER 21.11: NONCONFORMITIES...1
0 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER.: NONCONFORMITIES.....0 General Provisions... A. Purpose... B. Authority to Continue... C. Determination of Nonconformity Status... D. Nonconformities Created Through Government
More informationCHAPTER 10: SPECIAL PERMITS
ARTICLE 1: PERMITS GENERALLY 110-01. Application CHAPTER 10: SPECIAL PERMITS Application for a variance, conditional use permit, lot reduction permit, special development permit, exception, or mobilehome
More information