Yankton County Planning Commission March 14, 2017
|
|
- Melanie Freeman
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The monthly meeting of the Yankton County Planning Commission was called to order by Chairperson Carll Kretsinger at 6:00 p.m. on. Members present at call to order: Klimisch, Guthmiller, Williams, Sylliaasen, Welch, Bodenstedt, Gudahl, Kretsinger, Pietila, and Schultz. Members absent: Becker, Kotalik and Kettering. Action 31417A: Moved by Bodenstedt, second by Williams to approve the February 14, 2017 as written. By voice vote, all members present voted aye. Motion carried. Action 31417B: Moved by Schultz, second by Klimisch to approve the February 27, 2017 Planning Commission minutes, with corrections. By voice vote, all members present voted aye. Motion carried. Brian McGinnis facilitated a Comprehensive Plan discussion on Chapter VII Economy Policy recommendations. The discussion on Chapter VII Economy planning challenges and policy recommendation was focused on the policy to limit Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations in Yankton County. The planning commission discussed the implications of permitting large scale operations in our rural areas. A suggestion to replace #6 Protect the quality of life for county residents establishing limitations on concentrated animal feeding operations regarding maximum size and minimum setbacks; Encourage growth in agriculture industry by maintaining environmental regulations and promoting best management practices in agriculture. Planning Commission discussion to have both statements in the Comprehensive Plan. An extended conversation regarding the advantages / disadvantages of large scale agriculture in Yankton County. Mr. Klimisch stated the Conditional Use Permit from SDN, LLC regarding the thirty (30) and fifty (50) foot poles received objections from some commissioners. Other comments stated excluding #6 and it is a repetition of #4. Other comments were quality of life issues and the importance of this factor in Yankton County. Some members state the CAFO will ruin our quality of life in Yankton County. A process to facilitate neighbor cooperation is an option for regulations. Family farms are increasing in size and need the ability to expand to remain competitive. Current regulations with maximum animal units does control large scale agriculture in Yankton County. Mr. McGinnis states too much is given to #6 and the statement does not eliminate large scale agriculture. The Planning Commission needs to understand property rights and quality of life. Planning Commission discussion stated promotion of the three top strengths in Yankton County, Agriculture, Tourism and Manufacturing. Agriculture drives the local economy and expansion is critical to future growth. Regarding Yankton diverse economy, policy statements are important to establish regulations for implementation. Mr. Kretsinger requested comments from the audience. Jim Petrik stated he does not forecast Yankton County as a large attraction for many CAFO operations. The best option is to allow expansion of existing family operations. 1
2 Tom Gilmore discussed medical impacts CAFO s will bring to Yankton County. In reference to medical journals, E. coli, salmonella and other infectious diseases can occur around CAFO s. Mr. Gilmore favors best management practices and does not favor any changes to the Comprehensive Plan. Pam Epp stated medical issues are not confined to CAFO s. Many of these issues appear in many industries and all industries are diligent about proper sanitation procedures to limit these issues. Ron Heine stated his operation has experienced no medical issues at his family farm operation. He stated the regulations are beneficial to reduce environmental issues and health issues. Cheri Loest stated quality of life is important and the regional casino concept is focusing on the quality of life in Yankton County. She wants the commission to keep the quality of life statement. Guy Larson stated everything is same as fifteen (15) years age, the county is not interested in CAFO s. Mr. Larson stated the citizens will request a public vote on any changes to the Comprehensive Plan and / or Zoning Ordinance. Dick Weydert stated limitations on Agriculture is demoralizing for growth and the lack of growth over the last fifteen (15) years is the evidence. Nate Hicks states he refutes the thought Agriculture is leaving Yankton County. He states the CAFO s will limit new producers and the proposed CAFO operations are too expensive for beginning farmers. Greg Loest states a marriage of statements as outlined will cause no harm. #6 Protect the quality of life for county residents by establishing limitations on concentrated animal feeding operations regarding maximum size and minimum setbacks; Encourage growth in agriculture industry by maintaining environmental regulations and promoting best management practices in agriculture. John Kramer states quality of life is subjective and agriculture producers need multiple income sources to be competitive in the current environment. Marilyn Huntley asked about the zoning process and public hearing process. Wes Chambers stated his experience is family farm operations are building the 2400 head pork facilities to provide pork for the new slaughtering facility in Sioux City, IA. Dave Husby stated the last pork production facility in Yankton County was Mike Sherman stated as livestock equipment business, eighty-five (85%) percent of his business is in northeast Nebraska. In Cedar County, NE there are twenty-two (22) functioning dairies. Jessica Goeken stated quality of life is important and agriculture needs a chance to expand and prosper. Debra Bodenstedt stated the Yankton County citizen have clearly stated no new taxes. The CAFO and Agriculture growth can help with this issue. Chairman Carll Kretsinger requested a motion regarding the Comprehensive Plan statements. Motion 31417C: Moved by Schultz, second by Klimisch to leave #6 Protect the quality of life for county residents by establishing limitations on concentrated animal feeding operations regarding maximum size and minimum setbacks; as presented and add #11 Encourage growth in agriculture industry by maintaining environmental regulations and promoting best management practices in agriculture. By roll call vote, two (2) members present voted aye, eight (8) members present voted nay. Motion failed 2
3 Motion 31417D: Moved by Bodenstedt, second by Williams to change statement to #6 Protect the quality of life for county residents and encourage growth in agriculture industry by maintaining environmental regulations and promoting best management practices in agriculture. By roll call vote, eight (8) members present voted aye, two (2) members present voted nay. Motion carried. Preliminary Plat considerations: Ryken / Knodel Lots 1, 2, 3 & 4, Tract A, Law Overlook Subdivision, SW1/4, SE1/4, S7 and NE1/4, S18, S7&18- T93N-R56W, hereinafter referred to as Utica South Township, County of Yankton, State of South Dakota. The E911 address is TBA Dew Drop In Lane, Yankton, SD. Action 31417E: Moved by Klimisch, second by Bodenstedt to recommend approval of the preliminary plat. Said property is legally described as: Lots 1, 2, 3 & 4, Tract A, Law Overlook Subdivision, SW1/4, SE1/4, S7 and NE1/4, S18, S7&18-T93N-R56W, hereinafter referred to as Utica South Township, County of Yankton, State of South Dakota. The E911 address is TBA Dew Drop In Lane, Yankton, SD. By roll call vote, all members present voted aye. Motion carried. Plat Considerations: Ken Mertens Lot 1, Leona s Addition, NW1/4, S17-T93N-R56W, hereinafter referred to as Utica South Township, County of Yankton, State of South Dakota. The E911 address is 103 Marina Bluffs Court, Yankton, SD. Action 31417F: Moved by Bodenstedt, second by Sylliaasen to recommend approval of the plat. Said property is legally described as: Lot 1, Leona s Addition, NW1/4, S17-T93N-R56W, hereinafter referred to as Utica South Township, County of Yankton, State of South Dakota. The E911 address is 103 Marina Bluffs Court, Yankton, SD. By roll call vote, all members present voted aye. Motion carried. 3 Baycliffe Estates Lot 26, Baycliffe Estates, W1/2, S12.91 Acres, S1/2, SW1/4, Section 7 and W1/2, W1/2, Section 18, North SD Hwy 52, exc Tramps 7 th & exc Lots 1 2 of Parcel A, B & C, McVay Addition, S7 & 8-T93N-R56W, hereinafter referred to as Utica South Township, County of Yankton, State of South Dakota. The E911 address is TBA Baycliffe Drive, Yankton, SD. Action 31417G: Moved by Schultz, second by Pietila to recommend approval of the plat. Said property is legally described as: Lot 26, Baycliffe Estates, W1/2, S12.91 Acres, S1/2, SW1/4, Section 7 and W1/2, W1/2, Section 18, North SD Hwy 52, exc Tramps 7 th & exc Lots 1 2 of Parcel A, B & C, McVay Addition, S7 & 8-T93N-R56W, hereinafter referred to as Utica South Township, County of Yankton, State of South Dakota. The E911 address is TBA Baycliffe Drive, Yankton, SD. By roll call vote, all members present voted aye. Motion carried.
4 Kaiser Plat Lot 2, Dan Kaiser Addition, NW1/4, SE1/4, S14-T93N-R57W, hereinafter referred to as Ziskov South Township, County of Yankton, State of South Dakota. The E911 address is TBA Hidden Hollows Drive, Yankton, SD. Action 31417H: Moved by Pietila, second by Klimisch to recommend approval of the plat. Said property is legally described as: Lot 2, Dan Kaiser Addition, NW1/4, SE1/4, S14-T93N-R57W, hereinafter referred to as Ziskov South Township, County of Yankton, State of South Dakota. The E911 address is TBA Hidden Hollows Drive, Yankton, SD. By roll call vote, all members present voted aye. Motion carried. Ryken/Knodel Plat Lot 2, Tract A, Law Overlook Subdivision, SW1/4, SE1/4, S7 & NE1/4, S18, S7&S18-T93N- R56W, hereinafter referred to as Utica South Township, County of Yankton, State of South Dakota. The E911 address is TBA Dew Drop In Lane, Yankton, SD. Action 31417I: Moved by Schultz, second by Bodenstedt to recommend approval of the plat. Said property is legally described as: Lot 2, Tract A, Law Overlook Subdivision, SW1/4, SE1/4, S7 & NE1/4, S18, S7&S18-T93N-R56W, hereinafter referred to as Utica South Township, County of Yankton, State of South Dakota. The E911 address is TBA Dew Drop In Lane, Yankton, SD. By roll call vote, all members present voted aye. Motion carried. This was the time and place for discussion with Jarod Schrempp. Applicant is requesting a variance to build an accessory structure before the principal structure (residential) in a Low Density Rural Residential District (R-1) in Yankton County and a variance of Maximum Accessory Structure Size from 2,000 square feet to 2,520 square feet in a Low Density Rural Residential District (R-1) in Yankton County. Said property is legally described as E521.75, E1/2, SW1/4, exc Lot 11, Block 2, Kingsley Knolls & exc Lots A & B, Kingsley Knolls, S7-T93N-R56W, hereinafter referred to as Utica South Township, County of Yankton, State of South Dakota. The E911 address is TBA Kaiser Road, Yankton, SD. The Zoning Administrator stated the applicant requests an accessory structure before the principal structure. This is a Conditional Use Permit issue not a variance. Variances pertain to area and size while Conditional Use Permits create controlled conditions that would not be appropriate throughout the district. Jared Schrempp request to build the accessory structure 520 square feet larger than the Low Density Rural Residential District requirement. Mr. Schrempp will build the principal structure in five (5) to eight (8) years. The property is over five (5) acres with sufficient space for the accessory structure and principal structure. The Planning Commission discussed the application and clarified the variance and CUP distinction. The property is sufficient size to properly site the structures. The time period for building the principal structure was discussed and a condition of five (5) years was requested. No other comments, positive or negative, were received by the Zoning Administrator or presented at the public hearing. 4 Yankton County Planning Commission
5 Meeting date: CONDITIONAL USE Article 18, Section 1805 FINDINGS OF FACT Applicant: Jared Schrempp Parcel Number: Legal description: E521.75, E1/2, SW1/4, exc Lot 11, Block 2, Kingsley Knolls & exc Lots A & B, Kingsley Knolls, S7-T93N-R56W Physical Address: TBA Kaiser Road, Yankton, SD 5 1. The applicant specifically cited the section of the zoning ordinance under which the conditional use is sought and has stated the grounds on which it is requested; Applicant requested CUP under Article 6, Section 607 to build an accessory structure before the principal structure (residential) in a Low Density Rural Residential District (R-1) in Yankton County 2. Notice of public hearing was given, as in Section 1803 (3-5); The applicant mailed letters of notification to property owners within a one-quarter mile radius of the proposed variance on March 3, 2017 (supported by affidavit), a legal notice was published on March 4, 2017 in the Yankton Daily Press and Dakotan and a notification sign was placed on the property on March 6, The public hearing shall be held. Any party may appear in person, or by agent or attorney; A public meeting was held at 7:45 pm on in the Yankton County Government Center County Commission chambers. The Zoning Administrator stated the applicant requests an accessory structure before the principal structure. This is a Conditional Use Permit issue not a variance. Variances pertain to area and size while Conditional Use Permits create controlled conditions that would not be appropriate throughout the district. Jared Schrempp request to build the accessory structure 520 square feet larger than the Low Density Rural Residential District requirement. Mr. Schrempp will build the principal structure in five (5) to eight (8) years. The property is over five (5) acres with sufficient space for the accessory structure and principal structure. The Planning Commission discussed the application and clarified the variance and CUP distinction. The property is sufficient size to properly site the structures. The time period for building the principal structure was discussed and a condition of five (5) years was requested. No other comments, positive or negative, were received by the Zoning Administrator or presented at the public hearing. 4. The Planning Commission shall make a finding and recommendation that it is empowered under the section of this Ordinance described in the application, to include: A. Recommend granting of the conditional use; B. Recommend granting with conditions; or
6 The commission recommends granting of the conditional use permit with conditions stated in the following findings C. Recommend denial of the conditional use. 5. Before any conditional use is decided, the Planning Commission shall make written findings certifying compliance with the specific rules governing individual conditional uses and that satisfactory provision and arrangement has been made concerning the following, where applicable: A. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe; The applicant has shown sufficient access to property with established roadway (Kaiser Road). B. Off right-of-way parking and loading areas where required; with particular attention to the items in (A) above and economic, noise, glare or odor effects of the conditional use on adjoining properties and properties generally in the district; All off right-of-way parking is in compliance required by Article 6. C. Refuse and service areas, with particular reference to the items in (A) and (B) above; Refuse and service areas are in compliance with Article 6. D. Utilities, with reference to locations, availability, and compatibility; Utilities are currently available and will be in operational condition E. Screening and buffering with reference to type, dimensions, and character; Screening and buffering are provided permanent relief as stated in Article 6. F. Signs, if any, and proposed exterior lighting with reference to glare, traffic safety, economic effect and compatibility and harmony with properties in the district; All signage will conform to Article 14, Yankton County Zoning Ordinance G. Required yards and other open spaces; Yards and open spaces are sufficient. General compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district and that the granting of the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest. The use is compatible with adjacent properties and the granting of a Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the public interest. The condition is to build the principal structure before March, 2022 (five years). Yankton County Planning Commission Meeting date: VARIANCE Article 18, Section 1807 FINDINGS OF FACT Applicant: Jared Schrempp 6
7 Parcel Number: Legal description: E521.75, E1/2, SW1/4, exc Lot 11, Block 2, Kingsley Knolls & exc Lots A & B, Kingsley Knolls, S7-T93N-R56W Physical Address: TBA Kaiser Road, Yankton, SD 7 1. No such variance shall be recommended for approval by the Planning Commission unless it finds: A. The strict application of the ordinance would produce undue hardship; The residential property is sufficient size to properly site an accessory structure. B. Such hardship is not shared generally by other properties in the same zoning district and the same vicinity; The hardship can be shared by other properties but is limited to properties with larger lot size of five (5) acres. C. The authorization of such variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and the character of the district will not be changed by the grant of the variance; The granting of a variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property nor the character of the district. D. The granting of such variance is based upon reasons of demonstrable and exceptional hardship as distinguished from variations for purposed of convenience, profit, and caprice. No convenience, profit or caprice was shown. 2. No variance shall be recommended for approval unless the Planning Commission finds the condition or situation of the property concerning or the intended use of the property concerned, or the intended use of the property is not of so general or recurring a nature as to make reasonably practicable the formulation of a general regulation to be adopted as an amendment of this ordinance. The requested variance can be recurring with special circumstances discussed in the findings. 3. A recommendation of approval concerning a variance from the terms of this ordinance shall not be founded by the Planning Commission unless and until: A. A written application for a variance is submitted demonstrating that special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings, in the same district; The property is demonstrating special conditions or circumstances regarding lot size. B. The literal interpretation of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this ordinance; Previous variances of Maximum Accessory Size requirement have been granted in Yankton County. C. The special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant; The special conditions and circumstances are not a result of the applicant. D. The granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this ordinance to other lands, structure, or buildings in the same district. Variance requests of this type (Maximum Accessory Size requirement) have been recommended previously by the Planning Commission. 4. No nonconforming use of neighboring lands, structures, or buildings in the same district, and no permitted or nonconforming use of lands, structures, or buildings in other districts
8 shall be considered grounds for the issuance of a variance. No nonconforming uses of neighboring lands, structures, or buildings in this district, and no permitted or nonconforming use of lands, structures, or buildings in other districts were considered. 5. Notice of public hearing shall be given, as in Section 1803 (3-5). The applicant mailed letters of notification to property owners within a one-quarter mile radius of the proposed variance on March 3, 2017 (supported by affidavit), a legal notice was published on March 4, 2017 in the Yankton Daily Press and Dakotan and a notification sign was placed on the property on March 6, The public hearing shall be held. Any party may appear in person or by agent or by attorney. A public meeting was held at 7:45 pm on in the Yankton County Government Center County Commission chambers. The Zoning Administrator stated the applicant requests an accessory structure before the principal structure. This is a Conditional Use Permit issue not a variance. Variances pertain to area and size while Conditional Use Permits create controlled conditions that would not be appropriate throughout the district. Jared Schrempp request to build the accessory structure 520 square feet larger than the Low Density Rural Residential District requirement. Mr. Schrempp will build the principal structure in five (5) to eight (8) years. The property is over five (5) acres with sufficient space for the accessory structure and principal structure. The Planning Commission discussed the application and clarified the variance and CUP distinction. The property is sufficient size to properly site the structures. The time period for building the principal structure was discussed and a condition of five (5) years was requested. No other comments, positive or negative, were received by the Zoning Administrator or presented at the public hearing. 7. The Planning Commission shall make findings that the requirements of this Section have been met by the applicant for a variance; the Commission shall further make a finding that the reasons set forth in the application justify the recommendations of granting the variance, and the variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure; the Planning Commission shall further make a finding that the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this ordinance, and will not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. The Planning Commission further finds that the reasons set forth in the application and hearing satisfy all requirements for this variance request. 6. In recommending approval of any variance, the Planning Commission may prescribe appropriate conditions and safeguards in conformity with this ordinance. The Planning Commission approves this request. 7. Under no circumstances shall the Planning Commission recommend granting a variance to allow a use not permissible under the terms of this ordinance in the district involved, or any use expressly or by implication prohibited by the terms of this ordinance in said district. The variance request of Maximum Accessory Size Requirement is approved. 8 Motion 31417J: Moved by Klimisch, second by Schultz a Conditional Use Permit to build an accessory structure before the principal structure (residential before March 2022) in a Low Density Rural Residential District (R-1) in Yankton County and a variance of Maximum Accessory
9 Structure Size from 2,000 square feet to 2,520 square feet in a Low Density Rural Residential District (R-1) in Yankton County. Said property is legally described as E521.75, E1/2, SW1/4, exc Lot 11, Block 2, Kingsley Knolls & exc Lots A & B, Kingsley Knolls, S7-T93N-R56W, hereinafter referred to as Utica South Township, County of Yankton, State of South Dakota. The E911 address is TBA Kaiser Road, Yankton, SD. By roll call vote: Seven (7) members present voted aye, three (3) members present voted nay. Motion carried. This was the time and place for discussion with PCi Roads, LLC. Applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to operate a Temporary Construction Service in a Commercial District (C) in Yankton County. Said property is legally described as Lot 1, Dakota Rail Park Subdivision, exc Lot H31, S21T94N-R56W, hereinafter referred to as Utica North Township, County of Yankton, State of South Dakota. The E911 address is th Avenue, Yankton, SD. Joe Miessen, representing PCi Roads, Inc. stated the company is the contractor for the NAPA Junction construction project in The request is to locate a portable concrete plant and appropriate aggregate materials on the NAPA Junction property. The operation will be fifteen (15) to twenty (20) days in mid-june, The roads will receive dust control and hours of operation will be daylight (12 to 15 hours) hours only. Some materials will be stockpiled during the next few months. The Planning Commission discussed the application and determined the request meets the requirements for a temporary construction service permit. No other comments, positive or negative, were received by the Zoning Administrator or presented at the public hearing. Yankton County Planning Commission Meeting Date: CONDITIONAL USE Article 18, Section 1805 FINDINGS OF FACT Applicant: PCi Roads Parcel Number: Legal description: Lot 1, Dakota Rail Park Subdivision, exc Lot H31, S21T94N-R56W Physical Address: th Avenue, Yankton, SD The applicant specifically cited the section of the zoning ordinance under which the conditional use is sought and has stated the grounds on which it is requested; Applicant requested CUP under Article 10, Section 1007 (8), (9) required for temporary concrete batch plant.
10 2. Notice of public hearing was given according to state and county law; The applicant mailed notifications letters to all owners of real property one-quarter mile buffer on March 2, 2017, 10 days prior to the PC hearing as supported by the affidavit. Legal notification was published on March 4, 2017, 10 days before the Planning Commission meeting. The property was posted on March 6, The public hearing shall be held. Any party may appear in person, or by agent or attorney; A public hearing was held at 7:55 pm on. Joe Miessen, representing PCi Roads, Inc. stated the company is the contractor for the NAPA Road construction project in The request is to locate a portable concrete plant and appropriate aggregate materials on the property. The operation will be fifteen (15) to twenty (20) days in mid-june, The roads will receive dust control and hours of operation will be daylight (12 to 15 hours) hours only. Some materials will be stockpiled during the next few months. The Planning Commission discussed the application and determined the request meets the requirements for a temporary construction service permit. No other comments, positive or negative, were received by the Zoning Administrator or presented at the public hearing. 4. The Planning Commission shall make a finding and recommendation that it is empowered under the section of this ordinance described in the application to include: A. Recommend granting of the conditional use; B. Recommend granting with conditions; The Planning Commission recommends approval of the conditional use permit with conditions as stated in the findings. C. Recommend denial of the conditional use. 5. Before any conditional use is decided, the Planning Commission shall make written findings certifying compliance with the specific rules governing individual conditional uses and that satisfactory provision and arrangement has been made concerning the following, where applicable: A. Ingress and egress to property and structures thereon will not be negatively impacted; The ingress and egress is established with existing roads and NAPA Road. B. Off right-of-way parking and loading areas are not required nor will noise, glare or odor affect adjoining properties in the district; The applicant will provide sufficient dust control, operate in daylight hours and manage noise levels during operation. C. Refuse and service areas are required; The applicant will provide sufficient refuse containers during the CUP time period D. Utilities are available and compatible; All utilities are available and compatible E. Screening and buffering are not required; The area is large enough and sufficient buffers are present to be compatible in the neighborhood. F. Exterior lighting will not cause glare nor affect traffic safety and is compatible with properties in the district; The hours of operation will be daylight only, no exterior lighting permitted. G. Yards and open spaces have been met or exceeded; The area is large enough and sufficient buffers are present to be compatible in the neighborhood. 10
11 H. The use is compatible with adjacent properties and the granting of a conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest; The temporary construction site will begin June, 2017 and terminate July, 2017, with haul routes dominantly NAPA Road with minor activity on other roads during road paving process. Motion 31417K: Moved by Bodenstedt, second by Sylliaasen to recommend approval of a Conditional Use Permit, pursuant to Article 18, Section 1805 of the Yankton County Zoning Ordinance, based on Finding of Facts dated, to provide Temporary Construction Services in a Commercial District (C) in Yankton County. Said property is legally described as Lot 1, Dakota Rail Park Subdivision, exc Lot H31, S21T94N-R56W, hereinafter referred to as Utica North Township, County of Yankton, State of South Dakota. The E911 address is th Avenue, Yankton, SD. By roll call vote, all members present voted aye. Motion carried. This was the time and place for discussion with Marquardt Family Trust. Applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to build a Class D 2400 head pork (finisher swine over 55 pounds) production barn (960 animal units) in an Agriculture District (AG) in Yankton County. The applicant is requesting a variance of Minimum Property Line Setback requirement of 660 feet to 350 feet in an existing parcel in an Agriculture District (AG) in Yankton County. Said property is legally described as Tract A, SW1/4, S28-T95N-R57W, hereinafter referred to as Lesterville Township, County of Yankton, State of South Dakota. The E911 address is nd Street, Lesterville, SD. Dave Husby, representing Marquardt Family Trust, stated the operation requests to place a single swine production barn for 2400 head finisher swine over 55 lbs. facility (960 animal units) on an existing parcel with two (2) production barns currently producing 1200 head finisher swine (960 animal units). The current operation was established before the zoning regulations were implemented in Yankton County. The parcel is located in the southeast corner of the production property and requests a variance of 310 feet to locate the facility in the existing parcel. Mr. Husby states the parcel is currently screened with trees on the west and north side with plans to add a tree screen on the east side of the parcel. In regards to facility management the location of the proposed barn inside the screened area is beneficial for water, electricity, loading / unloading and odor mitigation. The neighboring property connected to the 660 foot setback requirement has an abandoned farmstead and pasture ground. The pork operation operates under a Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) General Permit SDG and has a Best Management Practices Plan and Nutrient Management Plan for a 2400 head pork production facility (960 animal units). Mr. Husby stated the operation experienced a manure application late fall 2016 which was improperly applied. The situation was brought to the Yankton County Zoning Administrator attention and the Marquardt Family Trust personnel took immediate action to cease the application. The Planning Commission requested more information regarding this application and Dan Klimisch wanted to follow the possibility of stream contamination from this application. The Zoning Administrator stated from his observation the quantity of manure was insufficient to cause runoff pollution in the waterway. The Planning Commission asked about where the manure is 11
12 applied and clarified the DENR is responsible for the Nutrient Management Plan regulations to properly apply all manure. Dennis Bloch stated the original pork barn was next door to his mother s place in the 1990 s. He requests the pork barns not be built at all or at a minimum 660 foot setback as stated in the zoning ordinance. He feels the odor from pork production facilities will reduce land values. Troy Bloch stated the pork facility will cause lower land values and many court cases have resulted to resolve conflicts. The farmstead to the east is abandoned with no residence currently and the Bloch s do not live in the buffer area (1,320 feet). Kristi Schultz and Dan Klimisch requested the letters from the area citizens be read into the record. The Planning Commission requested the letters be part of the application packet for the Board of Adjustment. Wiatt Tesch stated he is a resident in the area and does not approve of the site location for the pork barn facility. Mr. Tesch is concerned with the current management practices and current ownership. He is not in favor of production facility ownership by nonresidents who do not actually farm the property. If the pork barn is to be built, Tesch s would choose option to locate the barn in the parcel. Doug Marquardt stated they believe the family business is important to quality of life and will conduct business in proper manner. The family business is involved in many operations and projects and feels they are good neighbors. The family business will do all the practices necessary to mitigate odor and visual aspects. The Planning Commission discussed the agriculture aspect of Yankton County. The variance will reoccur because the site is not meeting current regulations and any replacements will be required to receive a variance. The Planning Commission requested the construction plans and location plans with the DENR permits with Management Plan and Nutrient Management Plan. The request is to locate the barn in the parcel with the other barns. The discussion became disruptive and concerns which are not relative to the application. Technology improvements can help mitigate odors and proper visual screening. The pork production barn located outside the parcel will be in the open area and many management issues will be present. A request to correct the animal units in the application to 2400 head and total animal units to 960. Comments were received with letters from Paul and Debra Dummer and Troy Bloch, were received by the Zoning Administrator and no other comments were presented at the public hearing. Enclosed in BOA packet is Dummer letter, Bloch letter and eight (8) page handout from Troy Bloch. Yankton County Planning Commission Meeting date: Section 519 Animal Feeding Operation Performance Standards Animal Feeding Operations are considered conditional uses and shall comply with the Conditional Use Process, all applicable state and federal requirements, and the applicable requirements as defined in this section: Class A (5,000 10,000) Class B (3,000 4,999) Section 519(1,2,3,4,5,6,7(a),8(a),9,10,11,12,13) Section 519(1,2,3,4,5,6,7(b),8(b),9,10,11,12,13) 12
13 Class C (2,000 2,999) Section 519(1,2,3,4,5,7(c),8(c),9,10,11,12,13) Class D (1,000 1,999 ) Section 519(1,2,3,4,5,7(d),8(d),9,10,11,12,13) This is presently a Class E operation. The facility will be 4200 head feeder swine. The expansion results in 1920 animal units, a Class D operation. Class E ( ) Section 519(2,3,4*,5,7(e),8(e),9,10,11,12,13) Class F (1 299) NA *If required by state law 1. Animal Feeding Operations shall submit animal waste management system plans and specifications for review and approval prior to construction, and a Notice of Completion for a Certificate of Compliance, after construction, to the South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources or as amended by the State of South Dakota or the South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources. The facility is currently permitted by South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources. (SDG ). The DENR contact is Pete Adair, Natural Resources Engineer. 2. Prior to construction, such facilities shall obtain a Storm Water Permit for Construction Activities from the South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources. The Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan required by the permit must be developed and implemented upon the start of construction. The facility is currently permitted by South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources. The Best Management Plan and Nutrient Management Plan is monitored by the DENR and will be a performance standard for Conditional Use Permit. 3. Animal confinement and waste facilities shall comply with the following facility setback requirements: A. Public Wells 1,000 feet B. Private Wells 250 feet C. Private Wells (Operator s) 150 feet D. Lakes, Rivers, Streams Classified as a Public Drinking Water Supply 1,000 feet E. Lakes, Rivers, Streams Classified as Fisheries 1,000 feet F. Designated 100 Year Flood Plain PROHIBITED The facility meets each of the requirements and the Marquardt Family Trust, September, 2002, engineering report provides compliance reports. The expansion will require updated plans submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. Applicants must present a nutrient management plan to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources for approval and/or certification. Examples of such management shall include at least: A. Proposed maintenance of waste facilities; The Marquardt Family Trust facilities will meet all DENR requirements. B. Land application process and/or methods; The application and methods are stated in the Marquardt Family Trust Nutrient Management Plan. The expansion will require a revised plan from DENR before issuance of a building permit. C. Legal description and map, including documented proof of area to be utilized for 13
14 nutrient application; and Marquardt Family Trust Nutrient Management Plan, September, 2002, engineering report provides all required information to meet DENR regulations. The expansion will require a revised plan from DENR before issuance of a building permit. D. All CAFO s are required to obtain a South Dakota State General Permit that outlines the manure management practices that an operator must follow to prevent water pollution and protect public health. The facility is currently permitted by South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources. (SDG ). The DENR contact is Peter Adair, natural Resources Engineer, Feedlot Program. 5. New animal feeding operations, new CAFO s and waste facilities shall be setback six hundred and sixty six (660) feet from a property line delineating a change in ownership and three hundred and thirty (330) feet from a right-a-way line. Additionally, the applicant shall locate the operation ¼ of a mile or 1,320 feet from neighboring residential dwellings. The Planning Commission and/or Board of Adjustment may mandate setbacks greater than those required herein to further the intent of the Zoning Ordinance while protecting the public health, safety, and welfare. The facility is currently permitted by South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources. (SDG ). The DENR contact is Peter Adair, Natural Resources Engineer. The facility location in the parcel with other structures will require a variance of 310 feet. 6. New Class A and B Animal Feeding Operations shall be prohibited from locating within the area bounded by the City of Yankton, 431 st Avenue, the Missouri River, and South Dakota Highway 50. This is an existing facility and operates as a non-conforming legal use and Conditional Use Permit. The proposed site is outside the described area and a Class D operation. 7. New animal confinement and waste facilities shall be located no closer than the following regulations prescribe from any Class I incorporated municipality or residentially zoned area bounded by the City of Yankton, 431 st Avenue, the Missouri River and South of South Dakota Highway 50: A. Class A 4 miles B. Class B 2 miles C. Class C 1 mile D. Class D 2,640 feet This is an existing facility and operates as a non-conforming legal use and Conditional Use Permit. The proposed site is outside the described area and is a Class D operation. E. Class E 2,640 feet New animal confinement and waste facilities shall be located no closer than ½ mile from any Class II or III incorporated municipality, active church, or established R2 or R3 residential area as shown on the Official Zoning Map. New animal confinement and waste facilities shall be located no closer than the following regulations prescribe from a residential dwelling; one dwelling unit is allowed on the facility site. The owner(s) of an animal feeding operation and/or residential dwelling may request the required setback be
15 lessened or waived in accordance with the variance procedures as detailed herein. Residential waiver request forms are obtainable from the Zoning Administrator. This waiver would run with the land and be filed with the Yankton County Register of Deeds. A. Class A 2 miles B. Class B 1.25 miles C. Class C 2,640 feet D. Class D 1,320 feet This is an existing facility and operates as a non-conforming legal use and Conditional Use Permit. The proposed site is a Class D operation outside the described buffer area. E. Class E 1,320 feet 9. Animal waste shall be transported no further than five miles from the point of origination by equipment designed for direct application. Animal waste hauled within non-application or transportation equipment shall not be restricted as to distance. Both methods of transportation must comply with federal, state, and local load limits on roads, bridges, and other similar structures. Marquardt Family Trust Nutrient Management Plan, September 2002, engineering report provides all required information to meet DENR regulations. 10. Animal Feeding Operations shall prepare a facility management plan. The plan shall be designed to dispose of dead animals, manure, and wastewater in such a manner as to control odors or flies. The County Planning Commission and Board of Adjustment will review the need for control measures on a site-specific basis, taking into consideration prevailing wind direction and topography. The following procedures to control flies and odors shall be addressed in a management control plan: A. An operational plan for manure collection, storage, treatment, and use shall be kept updated and implemented; Marquardt Family Trust Nutrient Management Plan, September 2002, engineering report provides all required information to meet DENR regulations. B. The methods utilized to dispose of dead animals shall be identified. The Marquardt Family Trust Best Management Practices September 2002, engineering report and all documentation reports are submitted and meet DENR requirements. All rendering service will be South Dakota certified operations. C. A screening and/or buffering section to include the planting of trees and shrubs of adequate size to control wind movement and dispersion of odors generated by the facility; The facility currently utilizes screen / buffering and will continue to maintain the buffers. The applicant has proposed to increase the trees buffers to the east side of the property and improve the existing tree screens. 15 D. A storm water management section shall provide adequate slopes and drainage to divert storm water from confinement areas, while providing for drainage of water from said
16 area, thereby assisting in maintaining dryer confinement areas to reduce odor production. The facility is a pit storage system and will meet all requirements in the Marquardt Family Trust Best Management Practices September 2002, engineering report. The facility will be verified by DENR. E. A solid manure storage plan detailing the number and size of containment areas and methods of controlling drainage to minimize odor production; The facility is a pit storage system and will meet all requirements in the Marquardt Family Trust Best Management Practices September 2002, engineering report. The facility will be verified by DENR. F. A description of the method and timeframe for removal of manure from open pens to minimize odor production; The facility maintains and monitors all methods and timeframes as specified in the Marquardt Family Trust Nutrient Management Plan and Best Management Plan Animal Waste Management System Engineering Report. The facility will be verified by DENR. G. The applicability, economics, and effect of Industry Best Management Practices shall be covered; Industry Best Management Practices are specified in the Marquardt Family Trust Nutrient Management Plan and Best Management Plan Engineering Report. The facility will be verified by DENR. H. A notification section should be formulated by the applicant. It is to include the names, addresses, and phone numbers of all occupied residences and public gathering places, within one-half (1/2) mile of applicant s manure application fields. The preferred hauling and application process shall be detailed and include timetables of probable application periods. Application of manure on weekends, holidays, and evenings during the warmer seasons shall be avoided whenever possible. Complaints could lead to having to give 48 hour notice in advance of manure applications. Annual notification advising of an upcoming 30 day window should be given. The facility maintains and monitors all methods and timeframes as specified in the Marquardt Family Trust Nutrient Management Plan and Best Management Plan Engineering Report. The facility will be verified by DENR. I. A review of weather conditions shall be included reviewing the effect of climate upon manure application. This section shall also include the preferred times and conditions for application to mitigate the potential effects upon neighboring properties while outlining the least advantageous climatic conditions. The facility maintains and monitors all methods and timeframes as specified in the Marquardt Family Trust Nutrient Management Plan and Best Management Plan Engineering Report. The facility will be verified by DENR Manure generated from Animal Feeding Operations shall comply with the following manure application setback requirements if it is injected or incorporated within twentyfour (24) hours:
17 A. Public Wells 1,000 feet B. Private Wells 250 feet C. Private Wells (Operator s) 150 feet D. Lakes, Rivers, Streams Classified as a Public Drinking Water Supply 1,000 feet E. Lakes, Rivers and Streams Classified as Fisheries 200 feet F. All Public Road Right-of-ways 10 feet G. Incorporated Communities 660 feet H. A Residence other than the Operators 100 feet The facility maintains and monitors all methods and timeframes as specified in the Marquardt Family Trust Nutrient Management Plan and Best Management Plan Engineering Report. The facility will be verified by DENR. 12. Manure generated from Animal Feeding Operations shall comply with the following manure application setback requirements if it is irrigated or surface applied: A. Public Wells 1,000feet B. Private Wells 250feet C. Private Wells(Operator s) 150feet D. Lakes, Rivers, Steams Classified as a Public Drinking Water Supply 1,000feet E. Lakes, Rivers and Streams Classified as Fisheries 660 feet F. All Public Road Right-of-ways (Surface Applied) 10 feet G. All Public Road Right-of-ways (Irrigated Application) 100 feet H. Incorporated Communities (Surface Applied) 1,000 feet I. Incorporated Communities (Irrigated Application) 2,640 feet J. A Residence other than the Operators (Surface Applied) 330 feet K. A Residence other than the Operators (Irrigated Application) 750 feet The facility maintains and monitors all methods and timeframes as specified in the Marquardt Family Trust Nutrient Management Plan and Best Management Plan Engineering Report. The facility will be verified by DENR. 13. If irrigation is used for removal of liquid manure, dewatering a lagoon (gray water) basin, or any type of liquid manure holding pit, these rules apply: 17 A. Drops must be used on systems that disperse the liquid no higher than 18 off the ground if no crop is actively growing on the field. Drop down nozzles will be required on lagoon dispersal with irrigation system. B. If a crop is actively growing on the field, the liquid must then be dispersed below the crop canopy. Drop down nozzles will be required on lagoon dispersal with irrigation system. C. No runoff or diffused spray from the system onto neighboring property or public rightof-way will be allowed. The application of water through the irrigation will not allow runoff of spray onto neighboring property or public Right of Way. This includes water from the drain tile located on the applicant property. D. No irrigation of liquid on frozen ground or over FSA designated wetlands.
18 The applicant will not irrigate on frozen ground or wetlands. E. No big gun type irrigation systems shall be used for liquid manure or dewatering lagoons or other manure containment systems. No big gum system will be used for irrigation using lagoon water. Yankton County Planning Commission Meeting date: CONDITIONAL USE Article 18, Section 1805 FINDINGS OF FACT Applicant: Marquardt Family Trust Parcel Number: Legal description: Tract A, SW1/4, S28-T95N-R57W Physical Address: nd Street, Lesterville, SD 8. The applicant specifically cited the section of the zoning ordinance under which the conditional use is sought and has stated the grounds on which it is requested; Applicant requested CUP under Article 5, Section 519 to establish a 2400 head (960 animal unit) pork production facility in an Agriculture District (AG) in Yankton County. 9. Notice of public hearing was given, as in Section 1803 (3-5); The applicant mailed letters of notification to property owners within a one-half mile radius of the proposed variance on March 2, 2017 (supported by affidavit), a legal notice was published on March 4, 2017 in the Yankton Daily Press and Dakotan and a notification sign was placed on the property on March 6, The public hearing shall be held. Any party may appear in person, or by agent or attorney; A public meeting was held at 8:05 pm on in the Yankton County Government Center County Commission chambers. Dave Husby, representing Marquardt Family Trust, stated the operation requests a Conditional Use Permit to place a single swine production facility for 2400 head finisher swine over 55 lbs. facility (960 animal units) on an existing parcel with two (2) production facilities currently producing 1200 head finisher swine (960 animal units). The current operation was established with one barn before the zoning regulations were implemented in Yankton County. The second barn was permitted with a Conditional Use Permit from Yankton County on October 8, The parcel is located in the southeast corner of the production property and requests a variance of 310 feet to locate the facility in the existing parcel. The neighboring property connected to the 660 foot setback requirement has an abandoned farmstead and pasture ground. Mr. Husby states the parcel is currently screened with trees on the west and north side with plans to add a tree screen on the 18
Yankton County Planning Commission April 12, 2016
The monthly meeting of the Yankton County Planning Commission was called to order by Zoning Administrator Patrick Garrity at 7:00 p.m. on. Members present at call to order: Gudahl, Sylliaasen, Kettering,
More informationUnderstanding the Conditional Use Process
Understanding the Conditional Use Process The purpose of this document is to explain the process of applying for and obtaining a conditional use permit in the rural unincorporated towns of Dane County.
More informationARTICLE VII. NONCONFORMITIES. Section 700. Purpose.
ARTICLE VII. NONCONFORMITIES. Section 700. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to regulate and limit the development and continued existence of legal uses, structures, lots, and signs established either
More informationDESOTO COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT
DESOTO COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT REQUEST: PROPERTY OWNER: APPLICANT: AGENT: SE 2014-02 Felix & Maria Zapata Felix & Maria Zapata Same N/A PROPERTY: 35-38-24-0116-0010-0090 TOTAL
More informationSpecial Use Permit - Planned Unit Development Checklist. Property Address:
Special Use Permit - Planned Unit Development Checklist Special Use Permit Number. Parcel Code/s #28-11- - - Property Address: Applicant: ARTICLE VIII Ordinance Reference - Section 8.1.2 Permit Procedures:
More informationSANDOVAL COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DECEMBER 10, 2015 PUBLIC HEARING
SANDOVAL COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DECEMBER 10, 2015 PUBLIC HEARING To: Sandoval County Planning and Zoning Commission From: Sandoval County Planning and Zoning Division Staff Date: December
More informationARTICLE 5 AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT (AG)
ARTICLE 5 AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT (AG) Section 501 Intent The intent of Agricultural Districts (AG) is to protect agricultural lands and lands consisting of natural growth from incompatible land uses in
More informationPlease be advised that the Town does not enforce private covenants or deed restrictions. I. SUBJECT ADDRESS: Zoning District. Palm Beach County:
ZONING APPLICATION TOWN OF PALM BEACH () This application includes requests for: Site Plan Review Special Exception Variance TO BE HEARD BY THE TOWN COUNCIL ON AFTER 9:30 A.M., IN THE TOWN OF PALM BEACH
More informationAttached is a Clinton Township Zoning Permit Application and requirements for issuance of a permit.
To Whom It May Concern: Attached is a Clinton Township Zoning Permit Application and requirements for issuance of a permit. The fee for the permit application is $75.00, which shall be made payable to
More informationARTICLE 24 SITE PLAN REVIEW
ARTICLE 24 SITE PLAN REVIEW 24.1 PURPOSE: The intent of these Ordinance provisions is to provide for consultation and cooperation between the land developer and the Township Planning Commission in order
More informationCodington County Planning Commission/Board of Adjustment Minutes January 16, 2018 The Codington County Planning Commission/Board of Adjustment met
Codington County Planning Commission/Board of Adjustment Minutes January 16, 2018 The Codington County Planning Commission/Board of Adjustment met for their monthly meeting on January 16, 2018 at the Codington
More informationITEM 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A motion was made by Larson and seconded by Sogn to approve the Minutes for November 18, The motion was unanimous.
MINUTES LINCOLN COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION December 16, 2013 7:00 P.M. Regular Meeting, Commissioners Meeting Room Lincoln County Courthouse ROLL CALL The regular meeting of the Lincoln County
More informationUPPER MOUNT BETHEL TOWNSHIP NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
UPPER MOUNT BETHEL TOWNSHIP NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA JOINDER DEED / LOT CONSOLIDATION TOWNSHIP REVIEW PROCESS When accepting proposed Joinder Deeds / Lot Consolidations, review the Joinder Deed
More informationARTICLE PERMISSIVE USES. A building or premises shall be permitted to be used for the following purposes in the A-1 Agricultural District:
ARTICLE 3.00 A-1 AGRICULTURAL SECTIONS: 3.01 Intent 3.02 Permissive Uses 3.03 Permitted Special Uses 3.04 Conditional Uses 3.05 Accessory Uses 3.06 Parking Regulations 3.07 Sign Regulations 3.08 Density,
More informationCITY OF CUDAHY CALIFORNIA Incorporated November 10, 1960 P.O. Box Santa Ana Street Cudahy, California
CITY OF CUDAHY CALIFORNIA Incorporated November 10, 1960 P.O. Box 1007 5220 Santa Ana Street Cudahy, California 90201-6024 PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING APPLICATION FOR MAJOR PROJECTS Appeal Change of Zone
More informationARTICLE 15 - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
Section 15.1 - Intent. ARTICLE 15 - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT A PUD, or Planned Unit Development, is not a District per se, but rather a set of standards that may be applied to a development type. The Planned
More informationCHAPTER 10 ENCLOSED AND TOTALLY CONFINED POULTRY CAFO OPERATIONS
9-10-1 9-10-1 CHAPTER 10 ENCLOSED AND TOTALLY CONFINED POULTRY CAFO OPERATIONS SECTION: 9-10-1: Applicability 9-10-2: Procedure 9-10-3: Definitions 9-10-4: Zones Allowed 9-10-5: Development Density 9-10-6:
More informationSTAFF REPORT. City of Ormond Beach Department of Planning. Exception for Outdoor Activity
STAFF REPORT City of Ormond Beach Department of Planning DATE: March 7, 2019 SUBJECT: Lucky s Market, 101 East Granada Boulevard: Special Exception for Outdoor Activity APPLICANT: Wendy L. Petrillo-Rundle,
More informationDEPARTMENT OF PLANNING Application for Variances, Special Exceptions through the Board of Adjustment
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING Application for Variances, Special Exceptions through the Board of Adjustment Dear Applicant: To assist you in completing this application and providing the Board with sufficient
More informationThe following regulations shall apply in the R-E District:
"R-E" RESIDENTIAL ESTATE DISTRICT (8/06) The following regulations shall apply in the R-E District: 1. Uses Permitted: The following uses are permitted. A Zoning Certificate may be required as provided
More informationHUERFANO COUNTY SIGN REGULATIONS SECTION 14.00
TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 14.01 SIGN CODE... 14-1 14.01.01 Intent and Purpose... 14-1 14.02 GENERAL PROVISIONS... 14-1 14.02.01 Title... 14-1 14.02.02 Repeal... 14-1 14.02.03 Scope and Applicability
More informationCHAPTER 14 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS
9-14-1 9-14-1 CHAPTER 14 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS SECTION: 9-14-1: Purpose 9-14-2: Governing Provisions 9-14-3: Minimum Area 9-14-4: Uses Permitted 9-14-5: Common Open Space 9-14-6: Utility Requirements
More informationExtractive Industrial Regulatory Ordinance No. 21 revised Dec. 28, 2010 EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIAL REGULATORY ORDINANCE TYRONE TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN
40.101 Sec. 1. TITLE. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIAL REGULATORY ORDINANCE TYRONE TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN ord. no. 21 eff. May 12, 1979, revised Dec. 28, 2010 This ordinance shall be known and cited as the Tyrone Township
More informationEXTRA-TERRITORIAL ZONING AUTHORITY
EXTRA-TERRITORIAL ZONING AUTHORITY DOÑA ANA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Doña Ana County Government Complex 845 North Motel Boulevard Las Cruces, New Mexico 88007 Office: (575) 647-7237 MEETING
More informationIndependence Township Planning Commission. Richard K. Carlisle, AICP. DATE: November 30, Millstone Golden, LLC Special Land Use
TO: FROM: Independence Township Planning Commission Richard K. Carlisle, AICP DATE: RE: I have received the subject special land use request and support materials for a dog kennel. The site is 3.03 acres
More informationThis Ordinance is adopted under the authority and provisions of the General Statutes of North Carolina, Article 6, Chapter 153A 121.
Section 74, Regulations Governing Manufactured Home Parks 1. Purpose The purpose of these regulations to be known and cited as the Madison County Manufactured Home Park Ordinance is to regulate and guide
More information-Section Contents Intent Household Pets Poultry, Fowl, and Small Livestock (noncommercial)...
SECTION 24 ANIMALS -Section Contents- INTENT 2401 Intent... 24-2 HOUSEHOLD PETS 2402 Household Pets... 24-2 POULTRY, FOWL AND SMALL LIVESTOCK 2403 Poultry, Fowl, and Small Livestock (noncommercial)...
More informationPREAMBLE. That the Gratiot County Zoning Ordinance be amended as follows:
Amendment of Gratiot County Zoning Ordinance AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE GRATIOT COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEMS AND SOLAR FARMS FOR THE COUNTY-ZONED TOWNSHIPS OF ELBA, HAMILTON,
More informationARTICLE XI CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS
ARTICLE XI CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS 11.1 Purpose. The City of Hailey recognizes that certain uses possess unique and special characteristics with respect to their location, design, size, method of operation,
More informationARTICLE (SM) SURFACE MINING ZONE. 2. To allow the development and use of mineral and aggregate resources;
ARTICLE 15.00 (SM) SURFACE MINING ZONE 15.01 PURPOSE The purposes of the Surface Mining Zone are: 1. To implement the policies of the Comprehensive Plan; 2. To allow the development and use of mineral
More informationMINUTES OF THE MINNEHAHA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION April 24, 2017
MINUTES OF THE MINNEHAHA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION April 24, 2017 A meeting of the Planning Commission was held on April 24, 2017 at 7:00 p.m. in the Commission Room of the Minnehaha County Administration
More informationPaw Paw Township Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes May 16, 2018
Paw Paw Township Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes May 16, 2018 Chairman Arbanas called the Paw Paw Township Zoning Board of Appeals meeting to order at 7:06 P.M. on May 16, 2018 at the Township Hall. PRESENT:
More information13-2 SUBDIVISION PLANS AND PLATS REQUIRED EXCEPTIONS Subdivision Plats Required To be Recorded
ARTICLE XIII SUBDIVISIONS 13-1 INTENT AND PURPOSE 13-1-1 Intent: It is the intent of the County Commission through the adoption of this Article to more fully avail itself of the power granted under 17-27-601
More informationMINUTES OF THE MINNEHAHA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION February 22, 2016
MINUTES OF THE MINNEHAHA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION February 22, 2016 A meeting of the Planning Commission was held on February 22, at 7:00 p.m. in the Commission Room of the Minnehaha County Administration
More informationCity of Harrisburg Variance and Special Exception Application
City of Harrisburg Variance and Special Exception Application Note: The Planning Bureau will review all applications for completeness; incomplete applications may cause a delay in processing. Contact Ben
More informationOrdinance No SECTION SIX: Chapter of the City of Zanesville' s Planning and Zoning Code is amended to read as follows:
SECTION SIX: Chapter 1115.02 of the City of Zanesville' s Planning and Zoning Code is 1115.02 APPROVAL PROCESS. Variances shall be approved only in conformance with the approval process provided in Chapter
More informationADMINISTRATIVE HEARING STAFF REPORT
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING STAFF REPORT Providence Place Apartments Utility Box No. 2 Conditional Use Petition PLNPCM2011-00426 309 East 100 South September 22, 2011 Planning and Zoning Division Department
More informationa. To insure compatible relationships between land use activities;
PART B SECTION VIII INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICTS Article 1 Planned Institutional District 1. Purpose and Intent: It is the purpose and intent of this district to permit and encourage the orderly, cooperative
More informationUrban Planning and Land Use
Urban Planning and Land Use 701 North 7 th Street, Room 423 Phone: (913) 573-5750 Kansas City, Kansas 66101 Fax: (913) 573-5796 Email: planninginfo@wycokck.org www.wycokck.org/planning To: From: City Planning
More informationCHAPTER 3 PRELIMINARY PLAT
10-3-1 10-3-3 SECTION: CHAPTER 3 PRELIMINARY PLAT 10-3-1: Consultation 10-3-2: Filing 10-3-3: Requirements 10-3-4: Approval 10-3-5: Time Limitation 10-3-6: Grading Limitation 10-3-1: CONSULTATION: Each
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COUNTY OF BERRIEN ORONOKO CHARTER TOWNSHIP PRIVATE ROAD ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO. 65
STATE OF MICHIGAN COUNTY OF BERRIEN ORONOKO CHARTER TOWNSHIP PRIVATE ROAD ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO. 65 AN ORDINANCE TO REQUIRE THAT ALL LOTS OR PARCELS OF LAND WHICH DO NOT ABUT PUBLIC STREETS ABUT A PRIVATE
More informationMINNEHAHA COUNTY ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT JULY 23, 2018 MEETING MINUTES. MINUTES OF THE MINNEHAHA COUNTY ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT July 23, 2018
MINUTES OF THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT July 23, 2018 A meeting of the Zoning Board of Adjustment was held on July 23, at 7:48 p.m. in the Commission Room of the Minnehaha County Administration Building.
More informationChris & Pam King RV Park - Staff Report Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Zone Change/Conditional Use Permit
Planning and Zoning Commission Chris & Pam King RV Park - Staff Report Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Zone Change/Conditional Use Permit Applicant would like to construct a 20 unit RV Park on an approximate
More informationSUBJECT: Application for Planned Unit Development and Rezoning 1725 Winnetka Road
TO: FROM: CHAIRMAN BILL VASELOPULOS AND MEMBERS OF THE PLAN & ZONING COMMISSION STEVE GUTIERREZ DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MEETING DATE: September 5, 2017 SUBJECT: Application for Planned Unit Development
More informationChapter 15: Non-Conformities
Chapter 15: Non-Conformities Section 15.1 Purpose... 15-2 Section 15.2 Non-Conforming Vacant Lots... 15-2 Section 15.3 Non-Conforming Buildings or Structures... 15-3 Section 15.4 Non-Conforming Uses...
More informationI. Requirements for All Applications. C D W
108-16.1. Application checklists. Checklist for Required Submissions to the Planning Board or Zoning Board of Adjustment of Monroe Township All required submissions are to be made to the Administrative
More informationARTICLE SINGLE FAMILY SITE CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
ARTICLE 28.00 SINGLE FAMILY SITE CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Section 28.01 PURPOSE The purpose of this Article is to recognize that conventional single family developments, traditionally developed
More informationARTICLE 7: PLOT PLANS AND SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS AND REVIEW
ARTICLE 7: PLOT PLANS AND SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS AND REVIEW Section 7.0 - Purpose The purpose of this article is to specify the documents and/or drawings required for a Site Plan Review or a Plot Plan
More informationARTICLE 7 R-1 ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
ARTICLE 7 R-1 ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT SECTION 700 STATEMENT OF PURPOSE This district classification is designed to be the most restrictive of the residential districts intended to encourage an
More informationDRAFT PARK COUNTY US HIGHWAY 89 SOUTH EAST RIVER ROAD OLD YELLOWSTONE TRAIL ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS
Formatting: Changes recommended by the Board and accepted by the County Commission are formatted in RED: Changes made by the Park County Commission are formatted in YELLOW highlight: and changes made by
More informationHenry County Code of Ordinances Title 15: Land Usage; also referred to as the Development Code and the Zoning Ordinance Chapter 150: Zoning
Henry County Code of Ordinances Title 15: Land Usage; also referred to as the Development Code and the Zoning Ordinance Chapter 150: Zoning An Amendment to Title 15, Chapter 150, Section 150.005: Note:
More informationCodington County Planning Commission/Board of Adjustment Minutes August 15, 2016 The Codington County Planning Commission/Board of Adjustment met for
Codington County Planning Commission/Board of Adjustment Minutes August 15, 2016 The Codington County Planning Commission/Board of Adjustment met for their monthly meeting on August 15, 2016 at the Codington
More informationChapter Sidewalk Construction and Improvement Standards
Chapter 19.22 Sidewalk Construction and Improvement Standards 19.22.010 Intent and policy. 19.22.020 Construction of this chapter, statement of purpose, fundamental principle. 19.22.030 Simultaneous construction
More informationREQUEST FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION FOR MANUFACTURED HOMES IN THE AR-1 & R-5 DISTRICT APPLICATION NO.
REQUEST FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION FOR MANUFACTURED HOMES IN THE AR-1 & R-5 DISTRICT APPLICATION NO. AGENT/DEVELOPER INFORMATION (If not owner) Name: Address: City: PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name: Address:
More informationKLICKITAT COUNTY CODE Chapter RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARKS
KLICKITAT COUNTY CODE Chapter 22.08 - RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARKS 22.08.010 - Applicability. Every recreational park in the unincorporated area of the county shall be located, constructed, altered, expanded
More informationGC General Commercial District
Section 712. GC General Commercial District 712.1 Intent of District. It is the intent of this section that the GC Zoning District be developed and reserved for general business purposes. The regulations
More informationSalem Township Zoning Ordinance Page 50-1 ARTICLE 50.0: PUD PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
Salem Township Zoning Ordinance Page 50-1 ARTICLE 50.0 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Section 50.01 Purpose The provisions of this Article provide enabling authority and standards for the submission, review,
More informationAGENDA. 2. Review of Agenda by the Board and Addition of items of New Business to the Agenda for Consideration by the Board
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT/APPEALS REGULAR MEETING October 24, 2013 7:00 P.M. Town Board Chambers, 301 Walnut Street, Windsor, CO 80550 The Town of Windsor will make reasonable accommodations for access to Town
More information3. Section is entitled Accessory Buildings ; limited applicability/regulation.
MEMORANDUM DATE: October 9, 2017 TO: FROM: RE: Chairperson Hetzel, PC Commissioners, and Interim Administrator Meyer Cynthia Smith Strack, Community Development Director 6.1 Discussion: Detached Accessory
More information** If your lot does not meet the requirements above, please read Sec below
Sec. 13-1-60 Zoning District Dimensional Requirements. For the Zoning Dept To Issue a Land Use Permit The Following Dimensions are Required. Minimum Side and Rear Yards s Lakes Classification Minimum Class
More informationZONING HEARING BOARD APPLICANTS
ZONING HEARING BOARD APPLICANTS All applications to the Manheim Township Zoning Hearing Board shall include all of the following information. 1. One (1) application form (no copies needed), signed by the
More information(b) The location of principal and accessory buildings on the lot and the relationship of each structure to the other.
ARTICLE XIX SITE PLAN Sec. 20-1900 Site Plan Review Procedure - Intent The site plan review procedures are instituted to provide an opportunity for the Township Planning Commission to review the proposed
More informationMINUTES OF THE LINCOLN COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION June 18, 2018 COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: Tyler Klatt, Ron Albers, Darrel Sogn,
MINUTES OF THE LINCOLN COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION June 18, 2018 COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: Tyler Klatt, Ron Albers, Darrel Sogn, Monty Derousseau, Stacey Namminga, Jim Schmidt STAFF PRESENT:
More informationARTICLE V AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION AND RURAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
ARTICLE V AP AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION AND RURAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Section 500. PURPOSE It is the purpose of the AP, Agricultural Preservation and Rural Residential District, to foster the preservation
More information1. Roll Call. 2. Minutes a. September 24, 2018 Special Joint Meeting with Clay County Planning Commission. 3. Adoption of the Agenda
1. Roll Call City of Vermillion Planning Commission Agenda 5:30 p.m. Regular Meeting Tuesday, October 9, 2018 City Council Chambers 2 nd Floor City Hall 25 Center Street Vermillion, SD 57069 2. Minutes
More informationREPRESENTATIVE: Julie & Brad Nicodemus Black Squirrel Road Colorado Springs, CO 80809
COMMISSIONERS: DARRYL GLENN (PRESIDENT) MARK WALLER (PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE) STAN VANDERWERF LONGINOS GONZALEZ PEGGY LITTLETON PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CRAIG DOSSEY, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
More informationCHAPTER VII R-2 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
CHAPTER VII R-2 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT SECTION 7.01 DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE. This Zoning District is intended for low density residential uses together with required recreational, religious and
More informationConditional Use Permit Basin Electric Squaw Gap Communication Tower
Conditional Use Permit Basin Electric Squaw Gap Communication Tower Conditional Use Permit for the removal of two existing Application: communication towers and the construction of one, 290 tall selfsupporting,
More informationThis is a conditional use permit request to establish a commercial wind energy conversion system.
Public Works 600 Scott Boulevard South Hutchinson, Kansas 67505 620-694-2976 Road & Bridge Planning & Zoning Noxious Weed Utilities Date: March 28, 2019 To: From: Reno County Planning Commission Russ Ewy,
More informationConditional Use Application
Conditional Use Application City of St. Pete Beach Community Development Department 155 Corey Avenue St. Pete Beach, Florida 33706 (727) 367-2735 www.stpetebeach.org Case Number: PROPERTY OWNER: Name:
More informationBEAR CREEK TOWNSHIP EMMET COUNTY, MICHIGAN. PRIVATE ROAD ORDINANCE Ordinance No. 11A-99. (to replace prior Private Road Ordinance No.
BEAR CREEK TOWNSHIP EMMET COUNTY, MICHIGAN PRIVATE ROAD ORDINANCE Ordinance No. 11A-99 (to replace prior Private Road Ordinance No. 11-99) An Ordinance to protect the health, safety, and general welfare
More informationELK RAPIDS TOWNSHIP ANTRIM COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO
ELK RAPIDS TOWNSHIP ANTRIM COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO. 3-2011 AN ORDINANCE TO REPLACE THE SUBDIVISION CONTROL ORDINANCE WITH A NEW SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE, IN ACCORD WITH THE LAND DIVISION
More informationORDINANCE NO. 41. PRIVATE ROAD ORDINANCE As Amended Through April 10, 2008
ORDINANCE NO. 41 PRIVATE ROAD ORDINANCE As Amended Through April 10, 2008 An Ordinance to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the inhabitants of Port Sheldon Township. The Township of Port
More informationDRAFT Resolution File No.: CU
DRAFT Resolution A RESOLUTION OF THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GRANTING COMPOST USA OF THE TREASURE COAST, LLC CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPROVAL FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A BIOSOLIDS
More informationChapter 210 CONDITIONAL USES
Chapter 210 CONDITIONAL USES 210.01 Purpose 210.02 Authorization 210.03 Process Type 210.04 Determination of Major or Minor Conditional Use Review 210.05 Approval Criteria 210.06 Conditions of Approval
More informationCharter Township of Plymouth Zoning Ordinance No. 99 Page 208 Article 21: Residential Unit Developments Amendments: ARTICLE XXI
Charter Township of Plymouth Zoning Ordinance No. 99 Page 208 ARTICLE XXI RESIDENTIAL UNIT DEVELOPMENTS PURPOSE The purpose of the Residential Unit Development (RUD) is to permit two (2) optional methods
More informationCounty Planning and Zoning Statutes
County Planning and Zoning Statutes (By Topic) The Nebraska Association of County Officials (NACO) staff frequently responds to questions each year pertaining to county planning and zoning related issues.
More informationC HAPTER 15: N ONCONFORMITIES
SECTION 15.1: PURPOSE AND APPLICABILITY The purpose of this Chapter is to regulate and limit the continued existence of uses and structures established prior to the effective date of this Code (or any
More informationWaseca County Planning and Zoning Office
Waseca County Planning and Zoning Office 300 North State Street Waseca, Minnesota 56093 Phone: 507-835-0650 Fax: 507-837-5310 Form no. PZ 081009 Web Site: www.co.waseca.mn.us FEES: 1) CUP FEE- $400.00
More informationBoard of Zoning Adjustments Staff Report Monthly Meeting Monday, February 15, 2016
Board of Zoning Adjustments Staff Report Monthly Meeting Monday, February 15, 2016 Docket Number: BZA010-16 Prepared by: Brittany DesRocher Applicant or Agent: Canal@Camp Apartments, LLC Property Location:
More informationConditional Use Permit / Standard Subdivision Application
Conditional Use Permit / Standard Subdivision Application Name of Proposed Subdivision: Total Area (Acres) Is Proposed Subdivision to be built in phases? Number of Lots If yes, how many phases? Applicant/Owner
More informationARTICLE VI. SPECIAL EXCEPTION REGULATIONS
ARTICLE VI. SPECIAL EXCEPTION REGULATIONS SECTION 601. GENERAL DESCRIPTION Special exceptions are deemed to be permitted uses in their respective districts, subject to the satisfaction of the requirements
More informationProject File #: VA Project Name: Beauperthuy Variance Parcel Nos.: , , , ,
COMMISSIONERS: DARRYL GLENN (PRESIDENT) MARK WALLER (PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE) STAN VANDERWERF LONGINOS GONZALEZ PEGGY LITTLETON PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CRAIG DOSSEY, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
More informationBoard of Zoning Adjustments Staff Report Monthly Meeting Monday, June 13, 2016
Board of Zoning Adjustments Staff Report Monthly Meeting Monday, June 13, 2016 Docket Number: BZA 043-16 Prepared by: Valerie McMillan Applicant or Agent: Roger Whatley Property Location: 3727 Constance
More informationSpecial Use Permit Application to Allow Short Term Rental
Planning & Community Development Department Planning Division 550 Landa St. New Braunfels, Tx 78130 (830) 221-4050 www.nbtexas.org CC/Cash/Check No.: Amount Recd. $ Receipt No.: Case No.: Submittal date
More informationMINUTES OF THE MINNEHAHA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION January 25, 2016
MINUTES OF THE MINNEHAHA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION January 25, 2016 A meeting of the Planning Commission was held on January 25, at 7:00 p.m. in the Commission Room of the Minnehaha County Administration
More informationCITY OF DECATUR, TEXAS Development Services 1601 S. State Street Decatur, TX (940) voice (940) fax
Call to Order ITEM 1: ITEM 2: ITEM 3: ITEM 4: CITY OF DECATUR, TEXAS Development Services 1601 S. State Street Decatur, TX 76234 (940) 393-0250 voice (940) 626-4629 fax AGENDA (Zoning) Board of Adjustment
More informationJOINT PLANNING BOARD APPLICATION FORM
JOINT PLANNING BOARD APPLICATION FORM TOWNSHIP OF RIVER VALE 406 RIVERVALE ROAD RIVER VALE, NJ 07675 The application, with supporting documentation, must be filed with the Administrative Officer to the
More informationB. The Plan is in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan.
ARTICLE 17 PLANNING UNIT DEVELOPMENT 17.01 INTENT The purpose of this Section is to permit the creation of new Planned Unit Developments, permitted as Conditional Uses where maximum variations of design
More informationARTICLE 14 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) DISTRICT
ARTICLE 14 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) DISTRICT Section 14.01 Intent. It is the intent of this Article to allow the use of the planned unit development (PUD) process, as authorized by the Michigan Zoning
More informationMINUTES OF THE JOINT MEETING MINNEHAHA COUNTY & SIOUX FALLS PLANNING COMMISSIONS June 22, 2015
MINUTES OF THE JOINT MEETING MINNEHAHA COUNTY & SIOUX FALLS PLANNING COMMISSIONS June 22, 2015 A joint meeting of the County and City Planning Commissions was held on June 22, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. in the
More informationSPECIAL USE FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (P.U.D.), REZONING, and COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION PACKET
SPECIAL USE FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (P.U.D.), REZONING, and COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION PACKET VILLAGE OF HANOVER PARK DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Village of Hanover Park Department of Community
More informationPLANNING DEPARTMENT Application for a Type 2 Use through the Board of Adjustment & Appeals
PLANNING DEPARTMENT Application for a Type 2 Use through the Board of Adjustment & Appeals Dear Applicant: Type 2 uses (formerly called Special Exceptions) are uses that may be approved if certain criteria
More informationMINUTES OF THE MINNEHAHA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION July 27, 2015
MINUTES OF THE MINNEHAHA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION July 27, 2015 A meeting of the Planning Commission was held on July 27, at 7:00 p.m. in the Commission Room of the Minnehaha County Administration Building.
More informationMULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE TOWN OF SIDNEY, MAINE
MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE TOWN OF SIDNEY, MAINE I. GENERAL A. Title B. Purpose C. Administration D. Scope II. DEFINITIONS A. Building Height B. Dwelling Unit C. Family D. Multi-Unit
More informationO-I (Office-Institutional) and AG-1(Agricultural)
PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 3503 and 3505 Bethany Bend DISTRICT, LAND LOTS 2/1 973 and 974 OVERLAY DISTRICT State Route 9 PETITION NUMBERS EXISTING ZONING O-I (Office-Institutional) and AG-1(Agricultural)
More informationCODINGTON COUNTY/CITY OF WATERTOWN JOINT BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
FEBRUARY 2018 CODINGTON COUNTY/CITY OF WATERTOWN JOINT PLANNING COMMISSION/ JOINT BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT CODINGTON COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT TUESDAY FEBRUARY 27, 2018 12:30
More informationMedical Marijuana Special Exception Use Information
Medical Marijuana Special Exception Use Information The Special Exception Use information below is a modified version of the Unified Development Code. It clarifies the current section 5:104 Special Exceptions
More information4-1 TITLE 6 MOBILE HOME AND RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARKS 4-3
4-1 TITLE 6 MOBILE HOME AND RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARKS 4-3 Chapter 4 RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARKS Sec. 4-1: Sec. 4-2: Sec. 4-3: Sec. 4-4: Sec. 4-5: Sec. 4-6: Sec. 4-7: Sec. 4-8: Sec. 4-9: Sec. 4-10: Sec.
More informationStaff Report. Conditional Use Permit: Williams Tree and Stump Removal. Application Number: Tax Parcel Numbers:
Pierce County Department of Planning and Land Services, 2401 South 35th Street, Tacoma, WA (253) 798-7037 Staff Report Conditional Use Permit: Williams Tree and Stump Removal Application Number: 836154
More information