Page 2 of 93. Planning Commission Meeting Jun. 04, 2018 F. ADJOURNMENT

Transcription

1 A. ROLL CALL B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Planning Commission AGENDA Monday, June 4, :30 PM C. CONSENT ITEMS Items listed under the Consent Items have been distributed to each member of the Planning Commission for review and study. The items conform to City requirements and staff has discussed conditions of approval with the applicant who is in agreement. These items are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion of the Commission with no separate discussion. If separate discussion is requested on an item, from either the Planning Commission or from the public, that item may be removed from the Consent Items and discussed immediately following the Consent Items. 1. Approve the minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of May 21, Planning Page # SP ; site plan approval for Continental Cast Stone to allow an expansion of their existing outdoor material storage area. The request is submitted by ASM Engineering for Maglicon LLC, property owner. SP Continental Storage Area Staff Report SP Attachments SP Map D. NEW BUSINESS 1. SP ; site plan approval for construction of a replacement electrical substation in Block of W. 63rd Street. The application is filed by Professional Engineering Consultants for Westar Energy, property owner. SP Gleason Substation Staff Report SP Gleason Substation Attachments SP Map DISCUSSION ITEM: proposed amendments to Chapter and related to the R-1 Overlay District. R-1 Overlay Staff Report R-1 Overlay Expansion Text Revisions R-1 Overlay Map E. OTHER BUSINESS

2 Page 2 of 93 Planning Commission Meeting Jun. 04, 2018 F. ADJOURNMENT

3 Page 3 of 93 Page 1 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 CITY OF SHAWNEE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, :30 P.M. PLANNING COMMISSIONERS PRESENT Commissioner Randy Braley Commissioner Dennis Busby Commissioner John Montgomery Commissioner Kathy Peterson Commissioner Brian Roth Commissioner John Smith Commissioner Les Smith Commissioner Alan Willoughby Commissioner Steven Wise STAFF PRESENT Community Dvlpmt. Dir. Chaffee Planning Mark Zielsdorf Planning Doug Allmon COMMISSIONER ABSENT Commissioner Bruce Bienhoff Commissioner Rusty Mudgett A. ROLL CALL (Planning Commission Meeting Called to Order at 7:31 p.m.) CHAIRMAN BUSBY: This first part is audience participation. Good evening. AUDIENCE: Good evening. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: That s good. Good. Thank you. Welcome to the May 21, 2018, meeting of the Shawnee Planning Commission. We ll start with roll call. Commissioner Montgomery. COMMISSIONER MONTGOMERY: Here. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Commissioner Roth. COMMISSIONER ROTH: Here. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Commissioner Peterson. COMMISSIONER PETERSON: Here. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Commissioner Willoughby.

4 Page 4 of 93 Page 2 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 COMMISSIONER WILLOUGHBY: Here. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Commissioner Bienhoff is absent. Commissioner Busby is here. Commissioner Wise. COMMISSIONER WISE: Here. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Commissioner Braley. COMMISSIONER BRALEY: Here. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Commissioner Les Smith. COMMISSIONER L. SMITH: Here. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Commissioner Mudgett is absent. Commissioner John Smith. COMMISSIONER J. SMITH: Here. B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Please join me in reciting the Pledge of Allegiance. (Pledge of Allegiance) C. CONSENT ITEMS 1. Approve the minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of May 7, SP ; site plan approval for an 8,322 square addition onto the Mill Creek Community Church located at 7825 Gleason Road. The application is filed by Mantel Teter Architects for Mill Creek Community Church, owner. 3. SUP ; review of a special use permit issued to Kansas City Power and Light to construct a 158-foot monopole communications tower at West 51st Street in the KCP&L Park. 4. SUP ; review of a special use permit issued to Carrie Seckar for the operation of Dandelions and Mud Puddles, a commercial child care facility for up to 185 children in the CN (Commercial Neighborhood) zoning district. The facility is located at W. 63rd Street. The application is filed by Carrie Seckar, business owner. 5. SUP ; review of a special use permit issued to Holloway Investments to operate a Pressure Car Wash, located at West 75th Terrace. 6. SUP ; review of a special use permit issued to American Tower (formerly Verizon Wireless) to construct a 150-foot monopole communications tower, located at 6803 Hedge Lane Terrace 7. SUP ; review of a special use permit issued to Little Monkey Bizness, LLC, for the operation of an indoor recreation facility in the CN (Commercial Neighborhood) zoning district, located at Shawnee Mission Parkway.

5 Page 5 of 93 Page 3 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, SUP ; review of a special use permit issued to Brookdale Sweet Life at Rosehill, LLC, for the operation of an elder care facility in the PO (Professional Office) zoning district, with up to 150 persons, located at Johnson Drive. The most recent addition to the building was completed in fall 2005, and in 2005 the special use permit was amended to increase the number of persons residing at the facility from 144 to SUP ; review of a special use permit issued to Hope Lutheran Church to operate a School Age Childcare Program with up to 120 children at the Hope Lutheran Church, located at 6308 Quivira Road. 10. SUP ; review of a special use permit issued to Grace Christian Fellowship Church to operate an all-day preschool program at the church, located at 7230 Quivira Road. The special use permit was originally issued in May CHAIRMAN BUSBY: The Consent Agenda. Items 1 through 10 are listed under the Consent Items Agenda. Unless there is a request to remove one of these items from the Consent Agenda, the items will be approved in one motion. Is there a request to remove any of the items from the Consent Agenda? If not, is there a motion to approve the Consent Agenda? Commissioner John Smith. COMMISSIONER J. SMITH: Mr. Chairman, I move that we approve the items under the Consent Agenda, Items 1 through 10. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Very good. Is there a second? Commissioner Willoughby. COMMISSIONER WILLOUGHBY: I second it. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: There s a motion and a second to approve the Consent Agenda Items 1 through 10 subject to staff recommendations. All in favor say aye. COMMISSIONERS: Aye. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Opposed nay. Motion carried. Thank you. [Therefore, the motion was made by Commissioner J. Smith and seconded by Commissioner Willoughby to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. The motion carried 9-0.] CHAIRMAN BUSBY: If you re here for the items that were in the Consent Agenda, you re free to leave now. D. NEW BUSINESS 1. SUP ; SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST TO OPERATE A USED MOTOR VEHICLE SALES LOT AT 6801 HEDGE LANE TERRACE. THE REQUEST IS SUBMITTED BY FRANK HECH ON BEHALF OF CAR CITY WHOLESALE, BUSINESS OWNER.

6 Page 6 of 93 Page 4 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 CHAIRMAN BUSBY: The next items are New Business. The first item is a Public Hearing for SUP ; Special Use Permit request to operate a used motor vehicle sales lot at 6801 Hedge Lane Terrace. The request is submitted by Frank Hech on behalf of Car City Wholesale, business owner. Doug. MR. ALLMON: Good evening. Doug Allmon, Planning staff. SPECIAL USE PERMIT REVIEW The applicant requests approval to operate a used motor vehicle sales lot at 6801 Hedge Lane Terrace. The property is zoned CH (Commercial Highway). Automobile sales are allowed in the CH district upon approval of a special use permit. Property to the south is zoned PI (Planned Industrial) and contains the City's Fire Station No. 73. Right-of-way for 67th Street is located to the north, while the on-ramp to K-7 Highway is located to the east. Property to the west across Hedge Lane Terrace is forested vacant land that is zoned AG (Agricultural). The building was constructed in 1996 and was most recently operated as Nachbar Automotive until they outgrew the facility and relocated their operation to Bonner Springs. The applicant intends to lease the site. The rear warehouse portion of the building will be used to detail and service the vehicle fleet prior to sale. The facility has spaces to accommodate 50 cars for sale that will be parked to the west of the building in the improved parking lot. This is in addition to the few vehicles that could be displayed inside the building. The business model focuses on sales of late model cars that are 5 years old or less. On rare occasions when older model cars are taken in trade as part of a sale, they will be taken directly to the auction and will not remain on site. In addition, the site provides parking for 11 customers, including 2 ADA spaces. Employee parking is provided to the south and east of the existing building. The number of spaces provided is more than adequate for a car lot of this size. The previous dealership had issues with auto delivery drivers parking on the unimproved side, and sometimes middle, of Hedge Lane Terrace when delivering vehicles to the site. Staff has explained this to the new owner and they have agreed they will have drivers navigate onto their property to offload the inventory. If this becomes an issue over time, the dealership also has an off-site storage yard in Missouri where deliveries will be made and then driven to the dealership.

7 Page 7 of 93 Page 5 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 All signage, including temporary signage, shall meet requirements of SMC Sign permits shall be obtained from the Planning Division prior to installation. Approval of the special use permit should cause no detrimental effect upon surrounding properties and should not jeopardize the welfare of adjacent persons or properties. The site is buffered by adjacent rights-of-way, and a forested area to the west. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of SUP , special use permit for Car City Wholesale, a used motor vehicle sales lot located at 6801 Hedge Lane, subject to the following conditions: 1. For-sale vehicle inventory outside the building shall be limited to 50 cars. All vehicles shall be parked on hard surface areas of the site. At no time shall customers, delivery vehicles or vehicle inventory be allowed to park on Hedge Lane Terrace. In the event vehicle delivery to the site becomes an issue, the owner will have deliveries made at their Missouri storage lot for individual transfer to the dealership; 2. Primary inventory at the dealership shall be five years old or newer. Cars taken in trade that are more than ten (10) years old shall not be kept at the dealership; 3. All signage, including any temporary signs, shall meet requirements of SMC 5.64 and permits shall be obtained prior to installation. No balloons, pennants, flags or other attention attracting devices shall be permitted to be attached to the cars; 4. The business owner shall obtain a business license from the City Clerk's office prior to opening the auto dealership; and 5. The special use permit shall be subject to review in one (1) year from the date of approval. That concludes our short report. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Thank you, Doug. Is the applicant present? MR. REYNOLDS: Yes. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Would you come forward and state your name and address up at the microphone up here?

8 Page 8 of 93 Page 6 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 MR. REYNOLDS: Sure. You want the address of the business or my personal address? CHAIRMAN BUSBY: It doesn t matter. Either one is fine. MR. REYNOLDS: My name is Matt Reynolds. The business address is 6801 Hedge Lane Terrace, Shawnee, Kansas CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Terrific. Have you read the staff report and are you in agreement with the conditions of approval? MR. REYNOLDS: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Very fine. Thank you. Does the Planning Commission have any questions for the applicant or staff? Commissioner Braley. COMMISSIONER BRALEY: Yeah. Thank you. Mr. Reynolds, I wonder if we could talk through a little bit about the delivery because I know staff has talked to you about the challenges we had with the previous owner. And I think that was just a reflection of how successful their business was at the time, which was great. MR. REYNOLDS: Right. COMMISSIONER BRALEY: I m encouraged that you re going to occupy this facility and it s not going to sit vacant. But I guess, you know, in the conversations we had previously, it just didn t seem like it got better. And I wonder is that, well, talk through the relationship you have with the delivery drivers. Are they aware prior to arrival what the situation is and what the requirements are? MR. REYNOLDS: They are. As a matter of fact, our company right now is doing over a hundred vehicles a month anyway with all of those being dropped and picked up at Mannheim. So, if the drivers decide they have an issue getting into our lot, we ll just stay with that program. COMMISSIONER BRALEY: Okay. MR. REYNOLDS: Obviously we want to get them straight to our lot so we can post them and get them ready. But if it becomes for them we ve already prepared to handle it that way. COMMISSIONER BRALEY: Okay. MR. REYNOLDS: And then we ll just transport them ourselves.

9 Page 9 of 93 Page 7 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 COMMISSIONER BRALEY: Okay. Because I want restate, you know, because we do have the fire station there and there were numerous occasions where even they weren t even parked on the shoulder, they were parked in a lane with a car being unloaded. If those fire trucks need to get -- MR. REYNOLDS: Right. COMMISSIONER BRALEY: -- to a call, I don t want that to delay them being able to do their job. MR. REYNOLDS: We don t either, sir. COMMISSIONER BRALEY: Okay. And then we have sort of a sight issue with that hill crest that kind of comes through. MR. REYNOLDS: I ve noticed that. COMMISSIONER BRALEY: Again, coming over that hill and you re surprised with a delivery. So, I just want to make sure, okay, you re on top of it. We re not going to have an issue with it. MR. REYNOLDS: We re on the same page. COMMISSIONER BRALEY: Okay. Excellent. And it s nice that you do have an alternative plan so that, you know, if that does become an issue we ll make sure you follow through and have those delivered there. MR. REYNOLDS: Perfect. COMMISSIONER BRALEY: Great. Thank you. Welcome to the neighborhood. MR. REYNOLDS: Thank you. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Any other questions for applicant or staff? Commissioner Peterson. COMMISSIONER PETERSON: I read in the staff report that you are going to be revamping the current parking lot, is that correct, or something similar? MR. REYNOLDS: I don t think so. I think it was already done by Nachbar who had it previously. COMMISSIONER PETERSON: Did I misread something?

10 Page 10 of 93 Page 8 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 MR. REYNOLDS: If we were going to do anything, it would probably be down the road and we would probably take that grassy area out of the middle and make it pavement so we could park vehicles there. COMMISSIONER PETERSON: I may have misread something. MR. ALLMON: I don t remember that being in the staff report. But if it was, it may have been left over from the Nachbar. COMMISSIONER PETERSON: I may have misread something. MR. ALLMON: I believe they did actually go in -- MR. REYNOLDS: They did. MR. ALLMON: They did not mill and overlay. They did a top coat and re-striped the lot as part of their occupancy about a year and a half ago. COMMISSIONER PETERSON: All right. Well, thank you very much and welcome to the neighborhood. MR. REYNOLDS: Thank you. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Any other questions for applicant or staff? If not, thank you, Mr. Reynolds. And we re in a public hearing on the matter if anyone wishes to address the Commission. If not, then we re in Planning Commission discussion. Commissioner Braley. COMMISSIONER BRALEY: Yeah. Thank you. I just want to say that I was satisfied with the response that I got from Mr. Reynolds concerning the delivery. I want to be encouraged and optimistic that everything is going to be great at that facility and you ll be as successful as the previous owner and another great business will grow here in Shawnee. So, thank you. MR. REYNOLDS: We re excited as well. I do have one question. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Yes. MR. REYNOLDS: One of the things stated on here was vehicles ten years or older. We do a lot of high end cars and sometimes the people purchasing those cars trade in a very old, very expensive show car like a Corvette or, you know, Stingrays and stuff like that that s worth grand. You re not referring to those types of cars when you say ten years or older, are you?

11 Page 11 of 93 Page 9 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 MR. ALLMON: One thing that you have the option to do, I m sure that s a very rare occasion. MR. REYNOLDS: Yeah. It s rare. MR. ALLMON: You have the display inside the building. MR. REYNOLDS: Just keep in there. MR. ALLMON: But what you put inside the building on display, we honestly don t -- MR. REYNOLDS: Perfect. Okay. MR. ALLMON: [Inaudible; talking over one another.] MR. REYNOLDS: Just wanted to make sure we didn t overstep our boundaries. Okay. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Very good. Thank you. MR. REYNOLDS: Uh-huh. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Any other Commission discussion? If not, I ll entertain a motion. Commissioner Wise. COMMISSIONER WISE: I make a motion to approve SUP ; Special Use Permit for Car City Wholesale Automotive, used motor vehicle sales lot at 6801 Hedge Lane Terrace per staff recommendations. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Thank you. Is there a second? Commissioner Roth. COMMISSIONER ROTH: Second. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: There s a motion and a second to approve SUP ; Special Use Permit request to operate a used motor vehicle sales lot at 6801 Hedge Lane Terrace. Request submitted by Frank Hech on behalf of Car City Wholesaler. All in favor say aye. COMMISSIONERS: Aye. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Opposed nay. Motion carried. Thank you. MR. REYNOLDS: Thank you.

12 Page 12 of 93 Page 10 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 [Therefore, the motion was made by Commissioner Wise and seconded by Commissioner Roth to approve SUP ; Special use Permit request to operate a used motor vehicle sales lot at 6801 Hedge Lane Terrace. The motion carried 9-0.] 2. SUP ; SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR FLEET LEARNING STATION, A COMMERCIAL CHILDCARE CENTER AT 5416 MARTINDALE STREET. THE APPLICATION IS FILED BY ROBERT WILKIN, BUSINESS OWNER. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Item 2, Doug. Public Hearing for SUP , special use permit request for Forst Learning Station, a commercial childcare center at 5416 Martindale Street. The application is filed by Robert Wilkin, owner. Doug. MR. ALLMON: Again, Doug Allmon, Planning Staff. SPECIAL USE PERMIT REVIEW The applicant requests a special use permit to allow operation of a childcare facility with up to 179 children at 5416 Martindale Road. The property is zoned PI (Planned Industrial) and is platted as part of the Millwood Business Park. Child care centers are allowed in industrial business parks with approval of a special use permit. The proposed location was previously used as a KinderCare daycare facility that closed after several years of operation. The childcare facility will operate from 6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. The facility will operate Monday through Friday, and will care for children between the ages of 6 weeks to twelve years old. The property is located on the west side of Martindale, just north of Johnson Drive. Properties to the north, east and west are also zoned PI and are also part of the business park. Parcels to the south are zoned a combination of PI and CN (Commercial Neighborhood). The owner is in the process of making application for their childcare license with the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE). The license will not be issued by the State until completion of final plan review by the State Fire Marshal. To comply with State requirements, the facility has a large fenced play area that is located to the west of the existing building. The applicant has met and discussed the project with the City Fire Marshal, and has received their Local Jurisdiction Approval notice from the City Fire Marshal. The owner shall obtain all required State licenses and Fire inspections prior to issuance of a business license for the facility, and a copy of the permanent State

13 Page 13 of 93 Page 11 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 license shall be provided to the Community Development Department once it is issued. The character of the area will not be changed by use of the property as a childcare facility. Duplexes to the west are buffered by approximately 275 feet of open space. Because the facility is in a stand-alone building, the existing driveway approaches and parking lot are set up for convenient drop-off and pickup of children at the front of the building. Approval of the special use permit should have little, if any, detrimental effect upon surrounding properties. The outdoor play area is fenced and until just recently the building was used as a child care facility without incident or complaints. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of SUP , special use permit for the Fleet Early Learning Station, a childcare facility to be located at 5416 Martindale, subject to the following conditions: 1. The childcare facility will operate primarily from 6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. The number of children present at the center shall not exceed 179 at any one time. If the permanent license issued by the State reflects a lesser number, then the maximum capacity shall be lowered to the number allowed by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE); 2. The owner shall obtain and maintain a valid business license from the City Clerk's office while the facility is in operation; 3. Wall signage is only allowed on the east building elevation. Wall signage may not project above the primary roof line. Any signage installed shall meet requirements of SMC Chapter A sign permit shall be obtained from the Planning Division prior to installation of signage on the building; 4. The owner shall obtain all required State licenses and fire inspections prior to issuance of a business license. All fire safety improvements required by the Shawnee Fire Department shall be completed prior to issuance of a business license or opening of the facility to the public. A copy of the permanent State license and subsequent annual fire inspection reports shall be submitted to the Planning Division once they are obtained; and 5. Review of the new special use permit in one (1) year.

14 Page 14 of 93 Page 12 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Thank you, Doug. Is the applicant present? Yes. If you d come forward and identify yourself. MR. THOMPSON: My name is Jim Thompson. I am actually the broker for Mr. Wilkin. He is on his way back from Springfield right this minute and was hoping to be here, but unfortunately not. The two ladies in the back, one is Mr. Wilkin s wife who is joint owner, and daughter who will be running the Fleet Learning Station. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Are you comfortable in answering the question of whether you read the staff report and are in agreement with the conditions of approval? MR. THOMPSON: I did and they are. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Very fine. Thank you. Does the Planning Commission have any questions for the applicant or staff? Commissioner John Smith. COMMISSIONER J. SMITH: The building sets off from Johnson Drive a bit there. Are you satisfied with the signage being limited to the building part? MR. THOMPSON: Yes. Currently there is a sign at the street on Johnson Drive. There will be a monument sign in front of the building as well as a sign on the building, which is consistent with previous usage. COMMISSIONER J. SMITH: There he is. MR. THOMPSON: Mr. Wilkin is here. MR. WILKIN: Sorry about that. Thank you. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Mr. Wilkin, if you d state your name and address we d appreciate it. MR. WILKIN: Robert James Wilkin, (Address Omitted), Overland Park, Kansas. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Very fine. Are there any other questions for applicant or staff on this matter? Commissioner Braley. COMMISSIONER BRALEY: Mr. Chairman, I ll start out with the question for staff. On the Number 1 condition you use the word operate primarily from 6:30 to 6:30. MR. ALLMON: That s just a general boilerplate condition. Obviously if a child s parents are late picking them up we can t say that they re kicked out or closed. But in general, they close at 6:30. There are some occasions may not be there till 6:30.

15 Page 15 of 93 Page 13 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 COMMISSIONER BRALEY: Okay. MR. ALLMON: And so we just say generally. There is no proposal to do Saturday daycare or nighttime daycare or anything like that in this instance. COMMISSIONER BRALEY: Okay. Well, that was going to be my next question for Mr. Wilkin then. I know occasionally during the holidays they might do a parent night out, some daycares, so that you can get some shopping done and things like that. Is that going to be a part of your plan to potentially offer that periodically? MR. WILKIN: Periodically, yes. COMMISSIONER BRALEY: Okay. Then question to staff, is that still okay within this condition for them to do? MR. ALLMON: You d have to modify the condition. We weren t aware that they were going to have those type of once-in-awhile activities. COMMISSIONER BRALEY: Okay. MR. ALLMON: You could either handle it through changing the condition or they re also allowed two special event permits per year that would be in the special use permit. So, if they think it s going to happen twice we could handle it that way. MR. WILKIN: Okay. COMMISSIONER BRALEY: Then what would be your response? Do you know how many evenings you might offer as far as parent night out going beyond the 6:30 hours and what days those might occur? UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: We d just do one around the holiday, Christmas time. And we ve always [inaudible; talking off mic.] COMMISSIONER BRALEY: Okay. So, it s not going to be many nights, it ll be one. Okay. MR. ALLMON: I would just leave the SUP as it is. COMMISSIONER BRALEY: Okay. MR. ALLMON: And if they decide they want to do one or two we could handle it through a special use permit. COMMISSIONER BRALEY: Okay. Good. Thank you.

16 Page 16 of 93 Page 14 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Thank you. Any other questions for applicant or staff? Question, Doug. Then if they re going to have these late nights, then they will get another special use permit? MR. ALLMON: No. There s two distinguishing type of permits. One is a special use permit that they re going through that is a public hearing -- CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Right. MR. ALLMON: -- and notification of surrounding property owners. There s an administratively approved permit that s known as a special event permit that s for up to two times a year for a profitable or a normal event. And then they can have up to two more non-profit special events per year. And what we do is review those permits at the staff level. If they re going to have tents, we make sure that the Fire Marshal does a review to make sure that the exiting and those sort of things are set up appropriately. But they are really just kind of one or two-time a year. And it s like a tent sale at Harbor Freight, it requires a special event permit. That s a good example. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Thank you, Doug. Any other questions for applicant or staff? Commissioner John Smith. COMMISSIONER J. SMITH: I may be going a little beyond our purview, but having that many children in one place, do you have limited area to the facility or what type of security do you have? UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: We do have [inaudible; talking off mic]. Because we re licensed for 179 doesn t mean that we have that many at one time. I do hold a license myself that allows me to have that many children in my care through KDHE. We ll have a security front door [inaudible] at all times plus we ll have [inaudible]. COMMISSIONER J. SMITH: Okay. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Any other questions for applicant or staff? I will make a note here. I believe the state has requirements for age groups and how many people have to be there and you re aware of that and in compliance with that? UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: Absolutely. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Terrific. If not, then since this is a public hearing, is there anyone from the audience that wishes to address the Commission on this? If not, then we re in Commission discussion. Would someone care to make a motion? COMMISSIONER L. SMITH: Mr. Chairman.

17 Page 17 of 93 Page 15 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Commissioner Les Smith. COMMISSIONER L. SMITH: I move that we approve the Special Use Permit for Fleet Early Learning Station, a commercial childcare facility at 5416 Martindale Street, subject to the conditions in the staff report. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Is there a second? Commissioner Braley. COMMISSIONER BRALEY: Yes. I ll second that motion. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Good. There s a motion and a second to approve SUP ; Special Use Permit request for Forst Learing Station, a commercial childcare facility at 5416 Martindale Street. All in favor say aye. COMMISSIONERS: Aye. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Opposed nay. Motion carried. Thank you. MR. WILKIN: Thank you very much. [Therefore, the motion was made by Commissioner L. Smith and seconded by Commissioner Braley to approve SUP , Special Use Permit request for Forst Learing Station, a commercial childcare facility at 5416 Martindale Street. The motion carried 9-0.] 3. SUP ; SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR A STAND- ALONE ITM AT THE STAG S CREEK DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT SHAWNEE MISSION PARKWAY. THE APPLICATION IS FILED BY GENERATOR STUDIOS FOR THE ACADEMY BANK, ITM OWNER. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Item 3 is a Public Hearing for SUP , special use permit request for a stand-alone ITM at Stag's Creek, located at Shawnee Mission Parkway. The application is filed by Generator Studios for Academy Bank, owner. Doug. MR. ALLMON: Good evening. Doug Allmon again, Planning staff. Just to orient you where we re talking about, the ITM unit is located in this little bubble of island right here at the corner of the Stagg s Creek office building. SPECIAL USE PERMIT REVIEW The applicant requests special use permit approval for a stand-alone ITM adjacent to the west side of the new Stag s Creek office building. The property is

18 Page 18 of 93 Page 16 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 zoned CH-O (Commercial Highway-Overlay), and the CH-O zoning district allows placement of a freestanding ATM with approval of a special use permit. Properties in all surrounding directions adjacent to the ITM are zoned CH-O. A newly improved drainage channel is located to the north. The Stag s Creek office building is located to the east. An open drainage channel and self-storage facility are located to the west, and the Shawnee Mission Parkway frontage road is located to the south. The location of the ITM pad and drive lane was approved with the site plan for the Stag s Creek office project. The special use permit is required now because the bank will not be occupying tenant space in the office building. The lane has been constructed so that it is offset from the main one-way (north to south) drive aisle, so it does not interfere with regular traffic flow. The ITM lane is equipped with a simple canopy to provide weather protection for customers that is similar to the canopy design shown at the time of original site plan approval. This design includes a flat metal canopy and base constructed of white architectural panels. This matches the white architectural panels that are on the exterior of the adjacent office building. Minimal ITM identification and directional signage is included as allowed by code. Because the ITM does not block the primary drive lane, clearance is not required for emergency vehicles. Height of the ITM canopy is approximately 12 feet from finished grade to the canopy roof. The character of the area will not be changed by installation of the ITM. The ITM is located adjacent to a six-lane arterial road, and other banking facilities and ATM machines are located in the general vicinity. Approval of the special use permit should have little, if any, detrimental effect upon surrounding properties. The site has previously been developed with commercial and office uses and residential areas to the north are feet away. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of SUP , special use permit for the Academy Bank ITM located at Shawnee Mission Parkway, subject the following conditions: 1. The ITM and canopy shall be constructed as shown on submitted drawings; 2. The owner shall obtain and maintain a valid business license from the City Clerk s office while the ITM is in operation; 3. Identification and directional signage on the ITM shall match the submitted drawings;

19 Page 19 of 93 Page 17 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, All required permits shall be obtained the from the building codes division prior to installation of the ITM and canopy; and 5. Review of the special use permit in one (1) year. That completes our report. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Thank you, Doug. Is the applicant present? If you d come forward and state your name and address, please. MR. KRESS: Mike Kress, (Address Omitted), Kansas City, Missouri. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Thank you. Have you read the staff report and are you in agreement with the conditions of approval? MR. KRESS: I am. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Thank you. Does the Planning Commission have any questions for the applicant or staff? Commissioner Peterson? COMMISSIONER PETERSON: My question is for staff. If you go back to that last picture that was up, I don t know if you can pull that up or Doug has to go do that. I just have a question. If you could -- it s got to scoot the other way. MR. ALLMON: There it is. COMMISSIONER PETERSON: No. Other left. Okay. That s the one we re talking about, right? MR. ALLMON: Yes. COMMISSIONER PETERSON: If you go directly beneath it there s a very similar drawing and I m just curious what that is. Because it appears as if there is going to be two islands. MR. ALLMON: There is a potential for two there. A site plan was approved that showed two ATMs. COMMISSIONER PETERSON: But there is not one there at this moment? MR. ALLMON: Correct. There may be an application for a second standalone. I think the intent was originally that they were going to get a bank tenant for that. And obviously they would have needed a drive-thru teller lane. They went to the risk of

20 Page 20 of 93 Page 18 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 building the building without having it leased and so they were kind of guessing. But it set up and it s out of the way. At least it s not a traffic concern for staff. COMMISSIONER PETERSON: Okay. Thanks. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Thank you. Commissioner Wise. COMMISSIONER WISE: I have a question for staff. On those islands, have those actually been constructed for the curbs for the way you see them in the plan now? MR. ALLMON: Yes. On that engineered plan they are in place. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Any other questions for the applicant or staff? If not, thank you. Thank you, Mr. Kress. Since this is a public hearing is there anyone who wishes to speak on this matter? Seeing none, then we are in Planning Commission discussion. No further discussion. Would someone care to make a motion? Commissioner Montgomery. COMMISSIONER MONTGOMERY: I make a motion that we approve SUP ; Special Use Permit request for a standalone ITM at the Stagg s Creek development located at Shawnee Mission Parkway with -- CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Is there a second on the motion? COMMISSIONER MONTGOMERY: -- per staff recommendations. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Oh, sorry. Commissioner Willoughby. COMMISSIONER WILLOUGHBY: I ll second it. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: There s a motion and a second to approve SUP ; Special Use Permit request for a standalone ITM at the Stagg s Creek located at Shawnee Mission Parkway, application by Generator Studios for Academy Bank. All in favor say aye. COMMISSIONERS: Aye. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Opposed nay. Motion carried. Thank you. [Therefore, the motion was made by Commissioner Montgomery and seconded by Commissioner Willoughby to approve SUP ; Special Use Permit request for a standalone ITM at the Stagg's Creek located at Shawnee Mission Parkway, application by Generator Studios for Academy Bank. The motion carried 9-0.]

21 Page 21 of 93 Page 19 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, PUD ; REZONING FROM PUDMR (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MIXED RESIDENTIAL) AND PUDMX (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MIXED USE) TO PUDMR (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MIXED RESIDENTIAL), AND PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL FOR VETERANS PARK SENIOR COMMUNITY, A SENIOR RESIDENTIAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, LOCATED APPROXIMATELY IN THE BLOCKS OF PFLUMM ROAD. THE APPLICATION IS FILED BY SCHLAGEL & ASSOCIATES FOR VETERANS PARK SENIOR VILLAGE, LLC, DEVELOPER. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Item 4, Public Hearing PUD , rezoning from PUDMR (Planned Unit Development Mixed Residential) and PUDMX (Planned Unit Development Mixed Use) to PUDMR (Planned Unit Development Mixed Residential), and preliminary development plan approval for Veteran's Park Senior Community, a senior residential housing development, located approximately the blocks of Pflumm Road. The application is filed by Schlagel and Associates for Veterans Park Senior Village, LLC, developer. My apologies for getting it wrong, gentlemen. Mark. (Off Record Talking) MR. ZIELSDORF: Good evening. Mark Zielsdorf with the Planning staff. REZONING FACTORS The subject property is located west of Pflumm Road and north of 62nd Street. The property was zoned in August of 2014 to a combination of PUDMX and PUDMR for the Cobblestone planned unit development project. Cobblestone was approved to include patio homes, senior living, apartments and office/retail space. The property owner decided not to move forward with the proposed development. In 2015, another developer proposed to rezone all the property to PUDMR for 312 market rate apartments units in 14 buildings. The Governing Body ultimately denied the rezoning request. Within any Planned Unit Development, the property zoning is tied to the specific uses and building configurations shown on the plan. Therefore, the zoning and development plan of the original Cobblestone project is still in place. The current owner/applicant is requesting to rezone the acres from PUDMR & PUDMX to PUDMR for the construction of an independent senior residential development that includes 61 attached villa units in 30 buildings and 236 apartment units in 5 buildings. Other structures shown on the plan include a community clubhouse with a pool and five small covered parking garages to serve the apartment buildings.

22 Page 22 of 93 Page 20 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 The majority of surrounding property in all directions is zoned R-1 (Single Family Residential) and DU (Duplex). Property to the north is zoned R-1 and developed with the City's Civic Centre Campus that includes Pflumm-Bichelmeyer Park, the Civic Centre, the Soetaert Aquatic Center, the Veterans Tribute and the Johnson County Library. Properties between Pflumm Road and the proposed development are zoned PUDMX from the previous rezoning and contain duplexes and one single-family home, while properties east of Pflumm Road are developed with residential duplexes on property zoned DU. Property to the southeast is zoned R-1 and developed with a church and an AT&T transmission facility. Sixty-second (62nd) Street is adjacent to the south, with properties south of 62nd Street zoned R-1 and DU and developed with single-family homes and residential duplexes. A Hy-Vee grocery is located south of 62nd Street beyond the AT&T facility. With the exception of a single 1.1 acre parcel that is zoned AG (Agricultural), property to the west is zoned R-1 and contains homes in the Widmer Woods subdivision, two single-family homes, a vacant tract of land and right-of-way for Widmer Road. The Land Use Guide of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area as appropriate for a combination of medium density residential (MDR) and office/commercial uses to reflect the previously approved Cobblestone plan. Approximately acres of the site are designated as medium density residential, while the remaining 2.64 acres are shown as office/commercial. The applicant is proposing a planned mixed residential development consisting of 297 residential dwelling units on acres. This yields an overall density of 10.4 dwelling units per acre. This is well below the dwelling units per acre threshold suggested as an appropriate density for senior residential developments within the comprehensive plan. Primary access to the site is provided by the extension of 61st Street west of Pflumm. Sixty-first (61st) Street will curve to the south to become Park Street and intersect with 62nd Street. Summit Street will run parallel to Park Street between 61st and 62nd Streets. Commercial drives will provide access to the apartment buildings and the clubhouse/pool facility while individual residential drives will serve the attached villa units in this area. Previous development proposals on this parcel did require traffic impact studies due to different proposed land uses that generated higher rates of traffic. A traffic impact study was not required as part of this development since it proposes fewer traffic intense land uses than previous developments and will generate less than 100 vehicles in any peak hour. This development is not expected to have significant traffic impacts to the surrounding roadway network. Access is adequate for circulation and public safety purposes.

23 Page 23 of 93 Page 21 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 The rezoning itself should have little, if any, detrimental effect on surrounding properties. The development will be restricted, by the developer, to market rate independent senior residents that generally create significantly less traffic compared to traditional multi-family developments. The proposed development is also within walking distance to nearby recreational uses that are desirable to the senior community including the City's Civic Centre, aquatic center, parkland, and the public county library. A grocery store and additional retail shops and services are located a short distance to the south. The site's proposed detention requirements provide an approximately 5-acre tract at the northwest corner of the site that will contain a wet bottom detention basin providing a buffer to the adjacent properties within Widmer Woods to the northwest. The PUDMR zoning district also requires a peripheral boundary-building setback of at least 30 feet from all property lines. Widmer Road will continue to terminate in a temporary cul-de-sac as part of this development, and the proposed street network will not be connected to the existing Widmer Woods subdivision. Denial of the request would not appear to benefit the health and welfare of the community. This development proposal provides a market-rate, senior apartment housing option for new and existing residents of Shawnee on an in-fill piece of ground. PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW And to kind of go over the site plan: The applicant proposes to construct a senior residential housing development. The development consists of 61 attached villa units in 30 buildings and 236 apartment units in 5 buildings. The attached villa units will be maintenance provided and will be marketed to "empty nesters" 55 years of age or older. The units will range from 1,558 square feet to 2,300 square feet, each containing two bedrooms, two baths, and two-car garages. All homes will have basements and some of them will be walkouts. The units will be for sale as a condominium type ownership with the developer providing all services and maintenance until such time that a home's association can be formed and the rights transferred. The developer has indicated that the apartments will be restricted to family units with the head of household of age 62 years of age or older. The apartment buildings will be three to four stories in height. The largest building near the clubhouse and open space tract will include underground parking containing 51 parking stalls. The living units will be a mix of one and two bedroom units ranging in size from 720 square feet to 1,080 square feet. Each unit will have full kitchens and outside patios or decks. Each building will have an elevator and

24 Page 24 of 93 Page 22 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 common areas. The properties will be professionally managed and offered at market rate to independent seniors. All building, grounds, open space, and amenity facilities will be maintained by a single community homeowner association that will include both the villa owners and the apartment buildings owner. A large, 5.2 acre, tract will be located in the northwest corner of the project that will contain a pond to provide wet bottom detention for stormwater management of the entire site. The existing pond will be enlarged, re-graded and reestablished with native vegetation. This area will provide aesthetic open space for the residents. The tract will also contain a clubhouse with a pool, patio area, and small parking lot. This tract will be owned and maintained by the developer and eventually a homes association. The plan also includes a sidewalk extension to the north on Tract B to connect with the existing trail improvements located within Pflumm-Bichelmeyer Park. This will allow residents a pedestrian connection to the Civic Centre Complex that includes the Civic Centre, Aquatic Center, Veteran's Tribute and the Johnson County Library. All the buildings will be constructed of durable building materials, including stone and brick veneer, cementitious lap siding, cementitious panel with a stuccofinished face, architectural fiberglass shingles and architectural standing seam metal roof. There will be five separate apartment buildings. The largest one will be an L-shaped four-story building containing 68 units and a fifth lower level for an underground parking structure for 51 parking stalls. Three of the buildings will have an identical rectangular footprint. These three buildings will be four stories in height and contain 52 units each. The fifth building will be a smaller, square shaped, three-story building containing 12 units. And just to point this out on the plan. This is the largest one that will have the underground parking. These are the three rectangular-shaped ones. And then this is the smaller square in there. All five buildings will have the same architectural design elements and color palettes. The height of the buildings range in height from 54 feet to approximately 68 feet as measured from average grade elevation to the roof peak. The buildings contain an abundant amount if stone and brick veneer on all four sides of each building. The remainder of the elevation consists of cementitious lap siding and cementitious panel siding. Each elevation uses multiple offset vertical balcony towers with column details and a mix of building materials and color to create a quality aesthetically pleasing design. The color palette includes the use of variegated grayish beige stone veneer, a dark reddish

25 Page 25 of 93 Page 23 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 brown brick veneer, and charcoal gray, olive green, brown, taupe, beige, and light beige paint colors. And I don t know if you can see them, but the applicant has provided some material samples down here in front of the podium. The attached villas are single story in design with basements. All of the villas are of a similar design, but with gabled roof and hip roof variations. All roofs are covered with an architectural fiberglass shingle, slate gray in color. The front elevations consist mostly of variegated grayish beige stone veneer with beige colored stucco panels. With the conversations I had with the architect today, they have indicated that the villa units here will be actual real stucco on all four elevations, not the cementitious panels. So, for the attached villa units, they will be this stone and then actual real stucco on all four elevations. The clubhouse is single-story in design with a full basement. It uses the same palette of durable building materials and colors as the apartment buildings. The hip roof has varying roof lines and pitches. The main part of the roof is covered with an architectural fiberglass shingle that is slate grey in color. And the taller vertical portions of the building are covered with a standing seam metal roof that is charcoal in color. All four elevations contain a combination of brick and stone veneer and the cementitious stucco panels with numerous windows. The brick is carried around all four walls of the structure as a wainscot with cementitious stucco panels above. Vertical design elements of stone veneer provide accent and interest on each elevation. (Drawings show to the Commissioners) And next to is the architectural elevation of the small five single-story garages that will be in front of some of the apartment units. Area requirements have been met. The PUDMR rezoning request contains acres and provides land area of 4,200 square feet for each dwelling unit, which is more than double the minimum 2,000 square foot area that the Planning Commission may consider for senior communities. All bulk requirements have been satisfied with a preliminary development plan. All structures are set back a minimum of 30 feet from the subdivision property lines, which meets the peripheral boundary setback requirements. This district requires a minimum building setback of 20 feet from the public right-of-way. The applicant has exceeded that by providing a 25-foot front setback on the preliminary plan.

26 Page 26 of 93 Page 24 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 In addition to that, the distance between the curb and the front garage doors is 36½ feet to allow vehicles to park in there without getting into the street. All buildings meet the setback requirements with the exception of one instance where the applicant is requesting the Planning Commission consider a 5-foot deviation. This request is for a minimum 15-foot setback from the right of way for Summit Street to the end of Apartment Building No. 2 as shown on the plan. This is the part right here. They re asking for instead of a 20-foot setback, they re asking for a 15-foot setback just on that [inaudible] right there. And the reason they re needing that is because they re kind of compressed in there with space this foot wide gas pipeline that runs in there. Staff is comfortable with this 5-foot deviation and believes that it does not detract from the intent of the setback requirements. All buildings are separated by more than 20 feet as required. The height of the five apartment building types range for 54 feet to 68 feet from average finished grade to the ridge cap, and the PUDMR district allows the building height to be approved at the discretion of the Planning Commission. Trash disposal for the attached villas will be handled by standard residential curbside pick-up service. Trash generated by the apartment tenants will be collected internally by the management company and taken to a central interior building service area within each building. A trash dumpster will be temporarily moved outside for weekly pickup. No exterior trash enclosures are proposed for this development. The buildings air-handling and mechanical units will be fully enclosed within the building, so no ground-mounted equipment is proposed. The multi-family amenity policy suggests that multi-family developments over 200 dwelling units provide four amenities, including at least two Type "A" amenities as listed in the policy. The applicant is providing a clubhouse, which will be operated as a community center with social events, card groups, continuing education classes, fitness classes and video entertainment. The clubhouse will have a full basement that will double as a community shelter in the event of severe weather. There will also be a swimming pool and pool deck, outdoor dining area, and patio overlooking the passive open space of the wet bottom detention pond and the native area. In addition, a sidewalk extension will connect with the existing trail improvements located within Pflumm-Bichelmeyer Park to the north. This will allow the senior community residents access via a pedestrian connection to public recreational amenities that include the City's Civic Centre, the Aquatic Center, Veterans Park, and the Johnson County

27 Page 27 of 93 Page 25 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 Library. Staff is of the opinion these are the appropriate type of amenities for a senior living facility and are in conformance with the multi-family amenity policy. The plan does not indicate the use of any subdivision monument signage. However, if monument signage is desired it could be located on private property at the entrances to the development provided they are located and constructed in accordance with the requirements of SMC The applicant has provided a landscape plan for the development. The plan shows a combination of deciduous and evergreen trees spread throughout the site. In total, 291 trees and 59 shrubs are being added to the site to meet street tree, parking lot and open space tree requirements. The plan provides a variety of deciduous and evergreen tree species to satisfy the species mix requirement of the ordinance. Additional shrub and perennial plantings will be added around the building foundations as part of a final landscape plan that will be provided with the final development plan. Age restricted housing, or senior housing, that is generally defined as housing for persons 55 years of age and older, requires 1.3 parking spaces per dwelling unit. The required number of on-site parking stalls, for the 236 total apartment units, is 307 parking stalls. The plan provides for 352 total parking stalls, including 35 garage stalls, 51 underground stalls, and 266 surface stalls, thus exceeding the number of required parking stalls. Information on private site lighting, including parking lot lighting, has not been provided at this preliminary plan stage, although parking lot lighting is not required with the development. To touch on traffic again: The City of Shawnee requires a traffic impact study when a proposed development generates 100 vehicle trips during the AM or PM peak period according to the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Trip Generation Manual. Developments generating less than 100 trips in the peak hour are unlikely to have a large enough impact on the surrounding roadway network to warrant an in-depth study. The developer's traffic engineer submitted a memo that used Trip Generation Manual methodology to estimate the total number of generated trips for this development. The memo showed that Veterans Park is expected to generate approximately 60 trips in the AM peak hour and 80 trips in the evening peak hour. The City's Traffic Engineer concurs with this analysis. A traffic impact study was not required as part of this development since the anticipated vehicle trips are below the 100 vehicle peak hour threshold. And as an example, previous developments on this parcel did require traffic impact studies due to different land uses that generated higher traffic rates. For

28 Page 28 of 93 Page 26 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 example, Cobblestone Court was expected to generate approximately 215 vehicles in the AM peak hour and 365 vehicles in the PM peak hour. However, 53 to 68 percent of these trips were generated by retail or office uses, which are not present as part of this development. Additionally, Cobblestone had standard multi-family apartments, which generate traffic than the proposed Veterans Park senior attached housing. In summary, since Veterans Park has fewer traffic intense land uses than previous developments and will generate less than 100 vehicles in any peak hour, therefore, a traffic impact study was not required. This development is not expected to have significant traffic impacts to the surrounding roadway network. The conceptual street layout shown for this development on the preliminary development plan is generally acceptable. Likewise, the proposed centerline grades and vertical curves shown on the preliminary street plan-profile sheets are generally acceptable. Instead of permanently improving the Widmer Road cul-de-sac and constructing a fire access drive, the Veterans Park developer has proposed to dedicate 30 feet of right-of-way for the possible future extension of Widmer Road south to 62nd Street. While neither Widmer Road nor the access drive would be constructed at this time, the issue of providing access to the homes in Timber Oaks and Widmer Woods subdivisions would remain unchanged. The development site adjoins the north side of 62nd Street. The street along the frontage of the development site is an unimproved ditch section roadway. As such, the Veterans Park developer is responsible for improving the north half of the street to minor residential standards. The sidewalk along 62 nd Street will be extended along the entire north side of the street. Streetlights will not be required on 62 nd as there are existing streetlights on the south side of the street. Proposed 61st Street will be constructed to local residential street standards modified to accommodate an eastbound left-turn lane at Pflumm Road. This segment of the roadway will be 40 feet wide, while the remainder of the roadway will be 27 feet wide. All other internal streets shall be design to local residential street standards.

29 Page 29 of 93 Page 27 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 The conceptual design for the proposed commercial driveway approaches shown on the preliminary development plan appear to be in substantial compliance with City standards. The applicant has submitted a preliminary storm drainage study showing a conceptual grading plan, a drainage system, a drainage area map, and a drainage table summarizing the hydrologic and hydraulic analysis for the development. The study is substantially complete and adequate for the purposes of reviewing the preliminary development plan. The applicant is required to provide adequate drainage for the improvements on 62nd Street. The conceptual plan for the improvements is sufficient. The channel located downstream of the proposed detention basin appears to be undersized based on field survey information obtained by the engineer. As part of the final design, the applicant will be required to address these downstream inadequacies. Options could include, but are not limited to: reconstructing the channel to increase capacity, enclosing the channel to convey the 1 percent annual chance storm, or over-detaining upstream runoff to reduce the release rate from the development. The applicant is responsible for working with the downstream landowners where the channel is located to reach an agreeable solution for both parties and that is also acceptable to the City. At a minimum, it appears that at least the first three lots located immediately downstream of this proposed development will be impacted. The solution most feasible for correcting the problem will likely be the construction of a storm sewer with adequate capacity to convey the 1 percent annual storm. This development is subject to the provisions of SMC, Chapter 11.08, Stormwater Management, which pertains to the City's stormwater utility regulations. The applicant is responsible for preparing an impervious area plan in accordance with Shawnee Design and Construction Manual. This development is subject to the provisions of SMC, Chapter 11.16, Stormwater Treatment, which pertains to the implementation of Stormwater Treatment Facilities. The applicant is proposing the use of an existing on-site pond as the main source of stormwater treatment. The pond will be retrofitted as needed to meet the requirements of a wet detention basin as required by the APWA BMP Manual. In addition to the pond, native grasses will be planted and/or restored, and a large proprietary unit will be installed to pre-treat the runoff before it enters the pond.

30 Page 30 of 93 Page 28 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 All stormwater treatment facilities required for this development shall be designed in accordance with Shawnee Design and Construction Manual. This development is subject to the provisions of SMC, Chapter 11.24, Stormwater Detention, which pertains to the construction and maintenance of onsite stormwater detention facilities. The applicant has submitted a preliminary stormwater detention study showing a conceptual layout of the detention facility, a drainage area map, and estimated storage volumes and allowable release rates. The preliminary study is substantially complete and adequate for reviewing the development. A majority of the development will be routed to a detention facility located at the northwest corner of the site. Due to the grade and drainage patterns, a small portion of the site will be directly released. The applicant will be required to overdetain the run-off routed through the basin to ensure the cumulative postdevelopment release rates do not exceed the cumulative pre-development release rates. This subdivision is subject to the provisions of Shawnee Municipal Code (SMC) 12.14, Park and Recreational Land Use Fund. Open space fees in the amount of $400 per residential unit will be due at the time the final plat is recorded, or prior to issuance of a building permit. This development is also subject to the provisions of SMC, Chapter 12.26, Excise Tax on Platting Real Property. The estimated excise tax for this development is $268,400 calculated based on an area of roughly 1,248,372 square feet, at the current rate of $0.215 per square foot. The developer may enter into an Excise Tax Abatement Agreement with the City that would allow for the suspension, partial or in full, for the excise tax due, provided the final plat is approved and recorded prior to expiration of the suspension of the excise tax policy as set by the City. This agreement between the property owner and the City will be created, agreed upon, and executed prior to obtaining the Mayor's signature on the recording copy of the final plat. RECOMMENDATION As far as staff s recommendation, staff is supportive of the project and the efforts the developer has made in creating a quality senior living option for new and existing residents of Shawnee on an in-fill piece of ground with minimum impact to the surrounding neighborhoods.

31 Page 31 of 93 Page 29 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 Staff recommends approval of PUD , preliminary development plan and rezoning from PUDMX (Planned Unit Development Mixed Use) and PUDMR (Planned Unit Development Mixed Residential) to PUDMR (Planned Unit Development Mixed Residential) for Veterans Park Senior Community, a senior residential community containing 297 attached villa and apartment dwelling units, located approximately within the 6000 to 6100 Block of Pflumm Road, subject to the following conditions: 1. Publication of the rezoning ordinance; 2. All bulk regulations of the PUDMR zoning district, including the thirty-foot peripheral boundary. A 15-foot setback from the Summit Street right-of-way line will be permitted for the west end of Building No. 2 as shown on the plan due to space constraints from the gas pipelines in the area; 3. The buildings shall be constructed as depicted on the submitted building elevations, including architectural elements, building materials, and colors. Any deviations from the general layout or architectural design shall require the area to be rezoned again. Final site plans and plats for each phase will be submitted for Planning Commission approval prior to construction. No building permit for the project shall be issued until a final subdivision plat has been approved by the City and recorded at the Johnson County Office of Records and Tax Administration; 4. The site improvements shall be constructed as depicted on the submitted development plans and project amenities shall be provided as detailed in the staff report; 5. No certificate of occupancy shall be issued until all parking lots for the complex are constructed, striped and marked with ADA signage; 6. All landscaping as depicted on the landscape plan shall be planted prior to issuance of a final Certificate of Occupancy, and all disturbed areas shall be sodded. A final landscape plan for each apartment building shall be submitted with the final development plan showing foundation plantings and the addition of missing landscaped islands within the parking lot as indicated in the staff report; 7. The off-site sidewalk connection to the City Park shall be completed prior to issuance of a final certificate of occupancy; 8. If provided, any monument signs shall conform to SMC 5.64, and a sign permit shall be obtained from the Planning Department prior to installation; 9. All utilities shall be placed underground;

32 Page 32 of 93 Page 30 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, The street improvements required for this development shall be designed according to the standards in the Shawnee Design and Construction Manual and as detailed within the staff report; 11. The applicant is responsible for improving the north half of 62nd Street as detailed within the staff report; 12. The east 30 feet of right-of-way for Widmer Road shall be dedicated on the final plat for this development; 13. The applicant is responsible for submitting street improvement plans to Development Services for review and acceptance prior to preparing the signature copies of the final plat; 14. The applicant is required to install the commercial driveway approaches in accordance with the standards in the Shawnee Design and Construction Manual and as detailed within the staff report; 15. The public street lighting system required shall be designed in accordance with the Shawnee Design and Construction Manual and as detailed within the staff report; 16. The storm drainage improvements required for this development shall be designed in accordance with Shawnee Design and Construction Manual, Division 2300, Storm Drainage, and as detailed within the staff report. This includes offsite downstream channel improvements; 17. This development is subject to the provisions of SMC, Chapter 11.08, Stormwater Management, which pertains to the City's stormwater utility regulations; 18. The applicant is responsible for preparing an impervious area plan in accordance with the Shawnee Design and Construction Manual, Division 2300, Storm Drainage; 19. This development is subject to the provisions of SMC, Chapter 11.16, Stormwater Treatment, which pertains to the implementation of Stormwater Treatment Facilities and as detailed within the staff report; 20. This development is subject to the provisions of SMC, Chapter 11.24, Stormwater Detention, which pertains to the construction and maintenance of onsite stormwater detention facilities;

33 Page 33 of 93 Page 31 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, This stormwater detention facility is required to be as built and certified by the Engineer prior to a certificate of occupancy for any of the buildings. The as-built shall be prepared in accordance with the Shawnee Design and Construction Manual; 22. This development is subject to the provisions of SMC, Chapter 11.20, Land Disturbance Activity, which pertains to site grading and erosion control measures; 23. The applicant or landowner is responsible for obtaining a land disturbance permit as required by Codes Administration prior to undertaking any land disturbance or construction activities on the development site; 24. The applicant is responsible for scheduling a pre-design meeting with the Development Engineer prior to preparing the subdivision improvement plans and the individual site civil plans. The final plans for this development must be submitted for review and acceptance by the City prior to the issuance of a public improvement permit or building permit; 25. All private and public improvements for this development shall be constructed according to the applicable standards in the Shawnee Design and Construction Manual. A public improvement permit will be required for all public street, storm, and streetlight improvements; 26. The applicant is required to provide construction phasing plans for the development. Additionally the applicant is required to provide traffic control and signage during construction; 27. All fire hydrants with compliant fire-flows, and fire lanes as required by the Fire Department, shall be approved prior to issuance of a building permit. Minimum fire-flow and flow duration shall be as specified in Table B105.1 of the International Fire Code. Fire-flow is measured at a 20 psi residual pressure; 28. Open space fees in the amount of $400 per residential unit ($118,800) shall be paid prior to issuance of a building permit(s); 29. The provisions of the excise tax shall be satisfied prior to the Mayor signing the recording copies of the final plat. The developer may enter into a developer's agreement with the City that would allow for the suspension, partial or in full, of the excise tax provided the final plat is approved and recorded prior to expiration of the suspension of the excise tax as set by the City. This agreement between the property owner and the City shall be created, agreed upon, and executed prior to obtaining the Mayor's signature on the recording copy of the final plat;

34 Page 34 of 93 Page 32 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, The applicant is responsible for obtaining all such permits as may be required by all Federal, State, and Local agencies, including but not limited to the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE), Kansas Division of Water Resources (DWR), and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE.) That concludes staff s presentation. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Mark, thank you. MR. ZIELSDORF: Sure. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: And you did very well. That was about 40 minutes of it. I m impressed. Thank you very much. Is the applicant present? If you ll come forward and state your name and address, please, sir. MR. McCROY: I m William McCroy, (Address Omitted). CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Thank you. Have you read the staff report and are you in agreement with the conditions of approval? MR. McCROY: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Thank you very much. Does the Planning Commission have any questions for the applicant or staff? Commissioner Willoughby. COMMISSIONER WILLOUGHBY: At what point a date or a percentage of completion does the maintenance, the required maintenance, requirements for maintenance pass from the developer to the homeowners association? MR. McCROY: Generally it s at 80 percent. COMMISSIONER WILLOUGHBY: Eighty percent. Okay. My second question is the 30-foot right-of-way, is that on the west side of the present Widmer Road or on the east side? MR. McCROY: That s on the east side. COMMISSIONER WILLOUGHBY: Okay. Because it states on the west side. MR. McCROY: There is already on the west side. COMMISSIONER WILLOUGHBY: Twenty-foot, right. MR. McCROY: There is not on the east side.

35 Page 35 of 93 Page 33 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 COMMISSIONER WILLOUGHBY: Uh-huh. Okay. Thank you. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Any other questions for applicant or staff? Commissioner John Smith. COMMISSIONER J. SMITH: Your transfer to 80 percent to a homeowners association, will your, you know, this is a large development. Will your covenants or requirements allow the management or the homeowners association to engage a management company to manage this for the homeowners association? MR. McCROY: Of course. However, it s not really economically feasible since we have as part of our partnership a very strong property management group, Weigand Omega that manages the apartments which we keep. So, it s more economical generally for them to keep Weigand for the homeowners, or for the condo association. COMMISSIONER J. SMITH: Okay. Thank you. MR. McCROY: There s only 60 units. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Any other questions for applicant or staff? Commissioner Peterson. COMMISSIONER PETERSON: Actually I have several. First of all, I know that you meet the requirements based on the guidelines for parking. If you just walk back the math with me we re talking 236 apartments. Sixty percent of those are two bedroom? MR. McCROY: That is correct. COMMISSIONER PETERSON: And those are head of household being 62 years of age? MR. McCROY: Fifty-five. COMMISSIONER PETERSON: No. That s the villas I thought. MR. McCROY: No. It s all 55 and older. COMMISSIONER PETERSON: Oh. Because it s not in what I was reading. That s okay. My point is 60 percent of that, are you expecting me to quit driving when I move in there or that I have to ride with my husband, which would be a really bad idea. MR. McCROY: No, ma am. Generally there are 1¼ spaces per unit. We re doing this very same design in other cities. And we ve actually over-parked this particular --

36 Page 36 of 93 Page 34 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 COMMISSIONER PETERSON: Because one of my concerns is that you don t have any place for like if I was to come visit somebody there, like my grandmother moved in there. MR. McCROY: Well, yes, ma am. There s plenty of additional spaces. COMMISSIONER PETERSON: Because others that I ve seen have not. And I understand that -- MR. McCROY: Yeah. COMMISSIONER PETERSON: -- we re driving a little longer, so we just need to make certain. MR. McCROY: So, we have here our site planning architect, our architect from J. Price Architecture, and a representative of Weigand Omega. And certainly they can answer those questions. Am I correct? Right? UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: [Inaudible; talking off mic] MR. McCROY: Parking. Her question is -- COMMISSIONER PETERSON: I know we meet the standard. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Sir, if you d come up to the microphone and state your name and address. Thank you. MR. DAIGLE: Yes. Good evening. My name is Ed Daigle and I am a representative of Weigand Omega in Wichita. That s where our corporate office is. COMMISSIONER PETERSON: Great. No. My concern is I know that we meet the standards set out by the guideline. I was just curious what your feelings were on that because people are living older, being active longer. And so are we going to be short on parking? Or what are you seeing as an industry trend? MR. DAIGLE: That s typically not a problem. Because a lot of the seniors have gotten to the point where they re not able to drive. And you still have, even with people visiting, typically those numbers that Jay is talking about it s not a problem. It s typically more than enough in most cases for everybody to park. COMMISSIONER PETERSON: Number 2 question, follow-up. I know this is a pre-plat, it s not a final plan. I was curious if you could point to where they think the sidewalk will connect with the community sidewalk as well as what are your plans for walkability within the campus?

37 Page 37 of 93 Page 35 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 MR. McCROY: There are sidewalks throughout. COMMISSIONER PETERSON: One side? Both sides? Where? MR. McCROY: Both sides. COMMISSIONER PETERSON: Okay. MR. FOSTER: Dan Foster with Schlagel and Associates. That sidewalk connection is right here on the west side of it, a small building. COMMISSIONER PETERSON: Okay. MR. FOSTER: And then as Jay mentioned, we have sidewalks on both sides throughout the attached villa side and then we ve got just a single sidewalk on the park side along this portion of 61 st Street. COMMISSIONER PETERSON: Are there crosswalks or any way for -- because that could potentially be a very busy street and we re talking about elderly that shouldn t drive and they probably shouldn t be crossing four lanes of traffic. MR. FOSTER: Yeah. So, we have a crosswalk right here between this 12-unit and this larger building where there these two drives intersect 61 st Street because that s kind of a pseudo-intersection. And then we ve also got a crosswalk at Summit Street that connects over next to the clubhouse. And so again, the reason why we put that sidewalk is it s on the parks side and it s on the side of the clubhouse. So, everybody crosses over at those intersections and they can get to the clubhouse or to the park or to the other city-provided facilities. COMMISSIONER PETERSON: Thank you. MR. McCROY: And that s a big thing. Because on all the previous properties that I ve developed you go back and ask people what works in your unit, what doesn t work. COMMISSIONER PETERSON: Right. MR. McCROY: You know, what are those amenities that you really want to have. COMMISSIONER PETERSON: Uh-huh. MR. McCROY: And time over time the response is walking. COMMISSIONER PETERSON: Great.

38 Page 38 of 93 Page 36 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 MR. McCROY: So, a walkable community. One of the things that really, well, first of all, this site is in my backyard. My house is right there. And everybody in the development group, Pat Reagan, Pat McAnany, Mike Richmeyer, we all have strong associations to this area and to that site. But the walkability is a big thing to us. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Thank you. Any other questions for applicant or staff? Commissioner Roth. COMMISSIONER ROTH: Yeah. I just had a few questions here and this is probably a combination of staff and -- are we doing anything on Widmer Road? Is that being extended or is that completely off the -- MR. McCROY: We asked that question. And we had a committee meeting of the whole to ask whether yes or no and the City Council unanimously said that we would not have to put it in at this time. UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: [Inaudible; talking off mic] COMMISSIONER ROTH: The second question I had, there s a building, I can t tell if it s Building 5 or 6. It says it s three stories maybe. It s right on the west side, northwest side. MR. McCROY: The Chicago three flat? COMMISSIONER ROTH: Yeah. So -- MR. McCROY: Yeah. COMMISSIONER ROTH: I m just concerned. So, we have the three residential properties right behind there. What s that elevation look like facing it? Are they going -- is it up? Is it pretty flat right there? I m just curious of what -- MR. McCROY: Exactly like a Chicago three flat. UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: No. He s talking about grade. COMMISSIONER ROTH: Grade elevations. Yeah. I m sorry. So, for those neighbors or those that are living there, what s their view going to look like? Is it a three-story apartment complex or is it elevated at all? MR. FOSTER: No. The grade drops off. COMMISSIONER ROTH: Okay.

39 Page 39 of 93 Page 37 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 MR. FOSTER: So, everything basically slopes from east to west towards the pond. COMMISSIONER ROTH: Okay. MR. FOSTER: So, that grade actually comes down. COMMISSIONER ROTH: So, it ll be a little lower there. MR. FOSTER: So, that first story is going to be a little lower. And then in addition to that if you notice on the landscape plan we provided a pretty solid mass of evergreen trees and shrubs along that to help buffer that. And we re 30 feet away as well, which is -- COMMISSIONER ROTH: Perfect. MR. McCROY: And it s real good-looking too. COMMISSIONER ROTH: And the last question I had is there was a comment about the downstream landowners and working with the landowners on this downstream. What s that entail and what s that? I mean, this is a lot of open area and now it s going to be paved and a lot of stormwater run-off. How does it get addressed? MR. McCROY: There s already a lot of run-off. MR. FOSTER: So, do you want me to answer. COMMISSIONER ROTH: So, there s more because of the -- it s pavement now versus grass. I mean, we all know pavement creates more run-off, so. MR. FOSTER: So, in the previous Cobblestone, approved Cobblestone development, there was quite a bit of study done on this particular area. And one of the things that came out of that was that we were going to redesign or redo that pond to bring it up to current standards, but we re also over-detaining there. So, we re providing additional detention within that pond that goes above and beyond what we re required to do. Typically under the code we re required to release at the same amount that it s releasing today. So, that s the first step is that we are actually releasing at a lower rate than what is today. COMMISSIONER ROTH: Okay. MR. FOSTER: The second thing -- MR. McCROY: It s going to be bigger and deeper.

40 Page 40 of 93 Page 38 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 MR. FOSTER: Yeah. The second thing is, is that as part of the construction, we kind of went back and forth because that channel is really only about a foot deep and only like five or six-feet wide. I mean it s nothing. It should have been a lot bigger and deeper or a pipe put there. So, after going through on the Cobblestone development, the best approach that came out was that we would go ahead and extend the pipe through a public drainage easement that s across the back of there. We tried to place the pipe in the least obtrusive place in those back yards so that we weren t, you know, just taking out every single tree and everything that was back there. Part of that requirement is, is that we have to basically replace everything that s in that back yard, in those back yards today, have to be replaced when we re done back to that same condition. So, that s kind of what we re looking at or near as we can get it. So, I know there s a rock-lined channel on one of those, so we ll have to do a rock-lined channel. I know the guy. We had spoken to him when we were doing the Cobblestone. He spent many of his own personal hours out there building that thing. And I can appreciate that because I ve been there and done that. But we will rebuild that back. I know that somebody has got a little bridge over a portion of it, so we ll be preserving that bridge and putting that back and restoring all that back. COMMISSIONER ROTH: So, what does that commitment, how does that tie -- how did it get tied on a commitment to rebuilding what s there and is it getting documented on what s there and how it should go and getting the residents buy-in on that as well? COMMISSIONER FOSTER: That ll be part of the conditions of the final development plan when it comes through. But it will also be noted as part of the engineering plan that Development Services will approve before they issue the permits. COMMISSIONER ROTH: Thanks. That s all I have. MR. SCHLAGEL: The staff has been pretty clear about that all the way through the process. Even on this project we re required to do that, so. MR. McCROY: We were committed to it from the beginning. We re putting about $600,000 into that pond, so. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Any other questions for applicant or staff? Commissioner Braley. COMMISSIONER BRALEY: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. It s a short one. I notice, and I know this is preliminary that we re approving. But in your perspective rendering it shows a path kind of leading through the utility easement. It kind of looks like it s connecting to the apartments and parking lots, is that just in the rendering? Is that intended to be in the final that there s going to be some sort of path connection through that easement?

41 Page 41 of 93 Page 39 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 MR. FOSTER: That would be idea. I mean our thought is that would be utilized for like a dog park or some passive things like that. That s a question that we have to ask the gas company or the pipeline company because they -- in the past, they ve allowed that. I can tell you on a more recent project they ve been very -- a lot stricter about any kind of pavement paralleling the gas pipeline or any kind of use like that. They ve been -- they have some new folks over there that are really less flexible about the rules. And so, you know, where we re crossing is pretty must it s got to be as close to a 90-degree crossing and that s really all that we get. We ve got a project approved and went to them and we basically are going back through the process again in a different city to redo that because the gas pipeline company would not allow us to do the crossing that we had. COMMISSIONER BRALEY: Great. Thank you. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Any other questions? Commissioner Les Smith. COMMISSIONER L. SMITH: Thanks, Mr. Chairman. Mark, could we just get clarification because we do have a contradiction on the age. Not that it matters I don t think one way or another for the project, but I would just like to have things neat and clean. Because we do have 55 years on the villa units and 62 years on the apartments. If we d just get that cleaned up. MR. ZIELSDORF: Mark Zielsdorf, Planning staff. Yeah. The information that was provided to us by the applicant had indicated the two different ages. The 55 and older was for the villas. And then the apartment units were shown to be head of household 62 years of age and older. Now, if that has changed that s news to us as of this evening. MR. McCROY: It s really a financing issue. COMMISSIONER L. SMITH: I don t care because I meet both of them. So, it s 55 across the board. Is that your intent? MR. McCROY: Yes, sir. COMMISSIONER L. SMITH: Okay. Thank you. MR. McCROY: Yeah. It opens up a broader market. It does eliminate certain kinds of financing. But the broader market. Really what we re going for is you get them when they re moving into the villas, then sorry, guys. Statistically the guy dies off. The woman already has a relationship with other residents. She doesn t want to be in a freestanding unit. She moves into the apartments. You know, so.

42 Page 42 of 93 Page 40 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 COMMISSIONER L. SMITH: I just wanted to have it cleaned up before you got to the Council. That s all. MR. McCROY: Yes. No. We saw that. COMMISSIONER L. SMITH: Okay. MR. McCROY: And that s, and all fairness to Mark. That s a very recent development. COMMISSIONER L. SMITH: Okay. Very good. Thanks, Mark. COMMISSIONER L. SMITH: All right. I m finished. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Any other questions for applicant or staff? Commissioner Peterson. COMMISSIONER PETERSON: Yeah. At one point in -- I don t know if it s staff or if it s you guys. At one point in time in here it noticed -- it said you ll start building with the apartments. I m assuming that would be the clubhouse area and maybe the big L one. Because you want numbers in there first or whatever. But if you were going to break this into phases, what would they be? MR. McCROY: Well, they -- COMMISSIONER PETERSON: Would it be all the apartments first? MR. McCROY: Right now I believe we re sitting on approximately 54 expressions of interest for the 60 villas that we ve got. COMMISSIONER PETERSON: I mean [inaudible]. MR. McCROY: So, where would you start? They re a for sale product. COMMISSIONER PETERSON: Yes. Well done. MR. McCROY: And from an economic point of view, you can bring in the infrastructure and build the clubhouse and do the villas where the apartments you re talking, you know, 230 units at $163,000 delivered cost per unit. You re north of 35 million bucks. So, it takes a little bit of work to borrow that kind of money. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Any other questions for staff or applicant? So that I m not confused because sometimes I get confused, both of them are age-restricted to 55 and older?

43 Page 43 of 93 Page 41 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 MR. McCROY: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Okay. Because in the notes it said more or less want to be 55 and older. MR. McCROY: No, no. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: So, if they re all 55 and older. MR. McCROY: Yes. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Terrific. Thank you very much. Another question for you is, at present with what we ve seen there seems to be a lack of amenities in the apartment buildings. I presume those will come in later? MR. McCROY: Oh, well, in terms of the amenities it s really in the final site plan. You know, you ve got the clubhouse. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Correct. MR. McCROY: And that s part of -- that s really where their amenities are, the pool, the exercise room, the outdoor dining area. We generally design a bocce ball court in that area. A putting green. And the pool they do, you know, they have classes in the clubhouse. Weigand is very aggressive about the community aspect of that. So, they do like CPR and water aerobics. Hopefully not together at the same time. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: So, in the apartments, in the common areas, you will have more amenities in there that so far you have not described? MR. McCROY: In the buildings themselves? CHAIRMAN BUSBY: In the apartments. Because I m looking at -- you re talking about apartments with 55 and older, which is generally people that really don t want to mow their lawn and they don t mind walking. But there s no description of amenities in the apartment buildings. And so I m wondering what your thoughts are on that. MR. McCROY: Generally there is seating areas, you know, with gathering points, card tables, that sort of thing. But generally we try to get them out of the buildings. We try to get them to the clubhouse, to get them community. The whole thing here is we don t want -- how we re different. We re not an institutional living setting. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Correct.

44 Page 44 of 93 Page 42 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 MR. McCROY: As soon as you re institutionalized you begin dying. And as soon as you separate couples from one another, they both begin dying. So, what we re striving for, and Weigand has a senior side, Omega senior properties. In the clubhouse we have an office for in-home healthcare. So, they go and they take these services on an a la carte basis. But the whole idea is to create this community of activities. We have a bus at each of the locations. And they go and, you know, do stuff. You know, like go to the Royals and the Chiefs and Oak Park Mall and that sort of thing. So, it s really -- the clubhouse becomes the focal point. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: And I m guess I m -- and I understand the clubhouse. But I m referring to your common rooms in your apartments. Because no matter what January and February in Shawnee says, I don t want to walk to a doggone clubhouse. So, that s what I m wondering what your plans are within the apartment buildings. MR. McCROY: Right. They have sitting areas and card tables and that sort of thing. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Very fine. Very fine. Thank you. Any other questions for applicant or staff? I don t mind making a couple comments to these gentlemen here. I ve been up here awhile, so I ve been through the Vantage deal. And I m guessing you ve had multiple sessions with the neighbors up there. MR. McCROY: I ve found over time that it s best to go into the public and tell them what you want to do. And if you ve got good design practices. That s why you shouldn t put apartments up against Widmer Woods. Like I say, that s my back yard. So, laying out a plan that s well designed in the first place and telling people what you re going to do and getting their feedback beforehand that s the way to go. Involving people like Mr. Reagan in your development team that know the public that you re dealing with. And having been here and heard the issues that were created by prior attempts and addressing those issues beforehand instead of cramming in a whole bunch of units, it s a park. That s why I called it Veterans Park. And making it more park-like, that s important. And when people see that it s quality and see that you really care they care as well. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Thank you. Any other questions for staff or applicant? If not, then this is a public hearing. Does anybody from the public wish to address this matter? If you d come forward and state your name and address, please, sir. MR. ZIELSDORF: Chairman Busby, if we could ask each person that comes up and speak, there s a pad of paper and a pen there, if they could just jot down their name and address. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: You want written legibly I presume? MR. ZIELSDORF: Correct.

45 Page 45 of 93 Page 43 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Very good. No scribbling now. Public Comment: MR. CHALK: I m Roger Chalk. I live at (Address Omitted). You know, one of the things that they said here something about the fact that in reading the report from staff was that nothing was going to be detrimental to the neighbors. Well, I think they ought to build a pen and put the coyotes in it so when the sirens go off we could hear the coyotes. We all see the deer that are going to be gone. The foxes left earlier, so we can t see those. But anyway, just kidding. I have had the pleasure of visiting with this team Monday and I had some concerns and they answered them for me. Now, as you guys know I live adjacent. The piece that was labeled agriculture for the zoning that s me. Okay. On the west side of this property. They have indicated -- my concerns were water drainage. They answered them. My concerns were loss of tress. They answered them. And I really appreciate it. I want to say that as I ve been opposed to several of the other projects, not the Cobblestone one. And some of you that have been on this board before have heard me, and I m not opposed to this. I think it s good. I think we re going to be A-Okay. I really appreciate the fact that it s going to be for people like me. Okay. However, one other thing that I want to say and it s very simple and I ve been saying it all along and here it popped up again. Mark didn t read this little part on page 9 when he was reading about Widmer Road, which as most of you know it dead-ends at my place on both sides. And would I like to see Widmer Road developed? Well, from the edge of my property going south to 62 nd Street that would be wonderful. But I don t want to see, and when they had this committee meeting in February, the second week in February, they said that there would be -- if they connected Widmer Road through there would be 1,200 cars per day going down through Widmer Road. I enjoy the fact today that there are zero going past my house. How many of you people have been down Widmer Road to my house? Anybody? Two of you? I would invite the rest of you at some point in time to come down Widmer Road, stop, see if I m home and we ll have a cup of coffee. Okay. Therefore, when they bring up the fact that the Chalk property could be developed is amazing. You would see that we would have to have a cave in order to develop anything. My house sits here and then the little portion of property that is vacant, you take 30 feet out of it and you re up against a bank. So, it s ridiculous in these reports to continue to say that the Chalk property could have some kind of development. The Dudley property coming down the hill, possibly the first three lots could be developed. But if you see the ravine that s off and down in there and the way that the water goes through down in there you d have to be a genius of a developer to get the rest of those lots developed. Widmer Road is noneconomically able to be developed for anybody. I wish it were for me. But that s the way it is. But like I said, I m through. Come see me and you ll understand what I m talking about. Thank you very much.

46 Page 46 of 93 Page 44 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Thank you, Mr. Chalk. Does anyone else from the case care to talk on this matter? Please come forward. And if you ll state your name and address and write your name and address on the little sheet of paper there. MS. LARKIN: My name is Sharon Larkin. I m coming for my mom. She lives at (Address Omitted). I just had some questions like he did where you guys said there was not going to be any upset to the surrounding neighborhood. She lives on the south side of 62 nd and she s on the corner of 62 nd and Widmer. Her concern was, I know the last developments that were coming through, she had something about, well, and I came to the last meeting they were going to develop Widmer going down to 63 rd Street. Is that still true? No. So, they re not going to touch that at all? UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: [Inaudible; talking off mic.] MS. LARKIN: Okay. Okay. That was her concern. Another concern is there is some houses there on the -- I think three houses that are still septic. Is that going to be any issue as far as with sewers or anything like that? Okay. So, nothing on the south side of 62 nd at all. Okay. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: From the engineers and the staff all shaking their head no, then I would say that means no, it won t be an issue. MR. ZIELSDORF: There would be no improvements on the south half of 62 nd Street. MS. LARKIN: Okay. Because they were going to take out like her tree and put down -- MR. ZIELSDORF: And that plan has all changed. With this development, they re just doing improvements to the north half of 62 nd Street. MS. LARKIN: That s what it sounded like, but I thought I m going to verify this to make sure. Okay. That s all I had. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Very fine. Thank you. Does anybody else from the audience care to weigh in on this matter? Please. If you d come forward and state your name, address and write legibly on the sheet of paper. MR. GRIMM: Hi. My name is Brandon Grimm and I live at (Address Omitted). And while I m not a property owner, my great-grandpa was John Bichelmeyer who owned this property up through 2004 when he passed away. I have lived adjacent to it almost my entire life. And for one, as Roger Chalk said, I do wonder about the coyotes and the deer that I regularly see and hear at night, what they re going to do. And also, yes, the foxes haven t been seen in quite some time. One of the things that I wanted to mention was that -- one of the things that several property owners campaigned against in the last round was the height of the buildings. And I m not sure if that was specific exactly

47 Page 47 of 93 Page 45 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 to that location, but it s still a concern for someone like myself who very much enjoys the views that have graced the City of Shawnee for quite some time, especially in the afternoons. The sunsets are quite nice. Another thing related to the traffic on Pflumm Road and surrounding areas. I know that I was in disagreement along with some others in the last rounds that any of the traffic studies that were referenced were adequate or even done at the right time of year especially when you have -- when you take into consideration the high schoolers that go up and down Pflumm Road. I m concerned about any increase in traffic along Pflumm Road. I can just barely remember when Pflumm was still a two-lane up through Shawnee Mission Parkway and Johnson Drive there. And any increase, I already have to cross the road just to get my mail. Because when they widened in the early 90s, they moved the mailboxes. And I tell you what. It s a pain. It s a chore. I ve seen many an accident, witnessed many an accident there. Seen very harmful accidents there. I ve been involved in an accident on Pflumm Road before when someone came out and cut me off. It s already -- the traffic situation at Shawnee Mission Parkway and Pflumm is already incredibly bad. You see people run lights all the time. You have people that come off of 63 rd Street, come off of 67 th Street, don t obey the traffic laws there. I wonder what you re going to do when you have an increase in the traffic going to that area. Thank you. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Thank you. Does anybody else from the audience care to weigh in on this matter? If not, then we re in Commission discussion. COMMISSIONER L. SMITH: Mr. Chairman. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Commissioner Les Smith. COMMISSIONER L. SMITH: Just for the record, Mr. Chalk. You are welcome to have coyotes that I hear in the middle of the night every night. And I would come see you if you d offer something a little bit better than coffee. The third thing is, yes, you ve been opposed for various reasons in the past and I just think it s commendable for you to stand up and say, hey, this is going to be okay for us. That s good. That s all. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Thank you. Any other? Commissioner Wise? COMMISSIONER WISE: I d just like to I guess state my interest in this development. I think it s a better fit for the area with lower -- less traffic impact. I think it s a solid design. So, I just appreciate somebody taking an interest in this property. I do realize there is some impact that can t be helped. But it just feels like a good fit and a good design for the location. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Thank you. And if I could add one thing to it is every time I go by that property I think of John and Mary living up there. And I think that s a really nice field out there. That ought to be easy to development except for the damn gas lines going down the middle of it. And then it becomes that it s hard to fit stuff on this that

48 Page 48 of 93 Page 46 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 makes sense. It also has to make sense financially. It has to make sense that, if you will, the community accepts it and believes that that is the -- as good as we can probably get on a project on a piece of land that s really kind of difficult to deal with. So, I d add that in. Commissioner Willoughby, did you have something? COMMISSIONER WILLOUGHBY: No. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Is there anybody else since we re in Commission discussion? Anybody else? Commissioner John Smith. COMMISSIONER J. SMITH: Well, I wasn t here and never heard of the earlier iterations that were offered. But this appears to me to be a well thought out plan. Now, although it s preliminary there s a lot of things to follow, but I appreciate the work that has gone into this. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Thank you. Anyone else? Care to make a motion, Mr. Willoughby? COMMISSIONER WILLOUGHBY: Yes, sir. I move for approval of PUD ; rezoning from PUDMR (Planned Unit Development Mixed Residential) and PUDMX (Planned Unit Development Mixed Use) to PUDMR (Planned Unit Development Mixed Residential), and preliminary development plan approval for Veteran's Park Senior Community, a senior residential housing development, located approximately in the blocks of Pflumm Road per staff s recommendations. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Thank you. Is there a second on the matter? COMMISSIONER L. SMITH: Second. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Commissioner Les Smith. Thank you for the second. MR. ZIELSDORF: Chairman Busby. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Yes. MR. ZIELSDORF: May I interject just a minute? CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Please, Mark. MR. ZIELSDORF: Subject to staff conditions. Based on some comments we had tonight there are two -- staff would recommend revising two of those conditions. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Please.

49 Page 49 of 93 Page 47 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 MR. ZIELSDORF: One would be Condition 3 where we visited -- talked about doing real -- true stucco on the villas as opposed to the panel. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Uh-huh. MR. ZIELSDORF: And then on Condition 12 that the -- it should say east 30 feet instead of west 30 feet. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Thank you for those additions and corrections. As that s been part of when the motion was made, then I don t think we have to redo the motion. That s just considered a part of it now, or would you prefer to have it redone. Commissioner Willoughby. COMMISSIONER WILLOUGHBY: One question. What about the 55 and 62? Do we clarify that? MR. ZIELSDORF: That s actually not within the conditions of approval. COMMISSIONER WILLOUGHBY: Okay. So, I ll amend my motion to include the two changes. COMMISSIONER L. SMITH: And the second concurs. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: And the second concurs. Okay. So, we have a motion and a second for passing of PUD , rezoning from PUDMR (Planned Unit Development Mixed Residential) and PUDMX (Planned Unit Development Mixed Use) to PUDMR (Planned Unit Development Mixed Residential), and preliminary development plan approval for Veteran's Park Senior Community, a senior residential housing development, located at blocks of Pflumm Road, subject to staff recommendations and the two included notations we ve just added. All in favor say aye. COMMISSIONERS: Aye. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Opposed nay. Motion carried. Thank you. And I d like to compliment staff too. I know staff has worked an incredible amount of time on this project and it s good to see it come to fruition, at least our part. [Therefore, the motion was made by Commissioner Willoughby and seconded by Commissioner L. Smith to approve PUD , rezoning from PUDMR (Planned Unit Development Mixed Residential) and PUDMX (Planned Unit Development Mixed Use) to PUDMR (Planned Unit Development Mixed Residential), and preliminary development plan approval for Veteran's Park Senior Community, a senior residential housing development, located approximately in the blocks of Pflumm Road, per staff recommendations noting changes to Condition 3 to use true stucco on the villas and Condition 12 to read the east 30 feet. The motion carried 9-0.]

50 Page 50 of 93 Page 48 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, REVIEW OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Next on the agenda is review of the Capital Improvement Plan. Paul. MR. CHAFFEE: State Statutes require that the Planning Commission annually review and approve the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Comments and suggestions made by the Planning Commission are forwarded to the Governing Body prior to their adoption. The draft Plan indicates projects that have recently been completed, but are not bonded, as well as projects that are under construction or have been continued from the 2018 Plan. The Plan also includes the current year projects, as well as the six-year proposed projects. And just to remind you all that there are a number of factors affect the positioning of projects over the next six years. While development patterns play a large role, the ability of the City to finance the projects is actually the controlling factor. During the past year, staff and the Governing Body have continued to review the list of projects to be included in the Capital Improvement Plan. And additionally, the Governing Body has begun a prioritization process to assist in determining the desires of the project to be undertaken over an extended period of time. The projects listed are those that will be able to be bonded with funds collected through the mill levy to accommodate bond and interest payments, or use special funds directed for specific types of improvements. Some street projects receive State and/or Federal dollars. These dollars are allocated for specific years and therefore, the project must be undertaken at that time or the project cannot occur. Additional funding comes from the County Assistance Road System, which is commonly known as the CARS program, for the maintenance and new improvements. Additional funding, which is the SIP program, is now available through the 3/8 city cent sales tax approved by voters. And if you remember, two-thirds of it goes to general maintenance. And then we also have dedicated a third of those costs to going in and improve some ditch-section roads. And you ll see those for the first time. We ve collected enough money that you re going to see those projects starting to occur. Funding for stormwater projects come from the City s Parks and Pipes sales tax, as well as the County s SMAC, which is the Stormwater Management Advisory Council funding. Projects to be undertaken from the collection of the City s stormwater fee, which funds the stormwater utility, are also in the CIP. Parks funding comes from a variety of sources such as Federal and State grants, Parks and Pipes sales tax, special funds and the Land Use Recreation Fund. And the Land Use Recreation Fund was one of the items that was mentioned in the last project review on Veterans Park where there s a

51 Page 51 of 93 Page 49 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 $400 fee that s collected at the time the building permit is issued for each unit in a specific building or $400 for like a single-family residence. We ve provided you with a larger chart that indicates the projects to be undertaken in each year. Like previous year s plans, the sixth year of the Plan contains a few specific projects. It should be noted that most of the projects included in the CIP are stormwater, park development and street maintenance related. The CIP specifically addresses street maintenance program projects that are anticipated to be funded in part with CARS funding from the county and money from the Economic Development Fund comes from annual payments made by Waste Management as part of an agreement to extend the life of the Johnson County Landfill. The street projects include: Johnson Drive between Martindale Road and I-435 Nieman Road Improvements between 55th and Shawnee Mission Parkway 43rd Street between Frisbie and K-7 Highway That s one of the Economic Development Projects. Lackman Road between 63rd Street and the south city limits 75th Street Corridor Improvements (Switzer to Quivira) I-435 and Johnson Drive Interchange Improvements Monticello Road- SHAWNEE MISSION Parkway to 71st Street (Phase 1) Monticello Road- 71st Street to 79th Street (Phase 2) Midland Drive between Shawnee Mission Parkway to I-435 Midland Drive between Elmridge to Lackman Road Other street improvements identified that will use either federal or local funds include: Flint- Johnson Drive to 62nd Terrace Our first SIP project that s currently underway between Johnson Drive to 62 nd. We ll use Community Development Block Grant Funds for 59th Terrace - King to Barton. We have the 53rd Street improvements -Roberts to Woodsonia. And that s the road that will run along the north side of the newly approved fire station. So, it ll connect Woodsonia Road and Roberts inside the commercial development. And back to the CDBG projects: King Street- 59th Terrace to 60th Street 60th Street- Flint to Nieman 59th Street- King to Barton

52 Page 52 of 93 Page 50 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 So, we re looking at doing improvements sort at the southwest of City Hall up here. And then a second SIP project is Goddard - 55 th Street to Johnson Drive. And then our third SIP project is Monrovia - 55 th to Johnson Drive. The CIP also includes a variety of stormwater and drainage improvements. One that s currently underway is the Nieman Corridor North, which is west of Flint to west of Nieman. And that s the project that s currently underway. It s the one that is in the area where the old Discounts Smokes building was located and it goes up to Flint Street and ties into the Flint project. Other stormwater activities specifically listed in the CIP are: 6329 Halsey Culvert Replacement. And that s a culvert that s on the south side of Hope Lutheran Church there at Quivira Road. Seven Hills Lake Culvert Replacement. Seven Hills is on 75 th Street, Blackfish Parkway between Quivira and Pflumm. Johnson Drive and Widmer Culvert Repair and Lining Renner Road Pipe under Shawnee Mission Parkway Those are two older pipes that are beginning to see some disintegration. Several park projects are included: Shawnee Scout Park- Shawnee Mission Parkway east of Nieman. That s a park that will develop out of the Nieman Now! Project just east of the Commerce Bank where the old Ethio Mart building used to be. Shawnee Town Chevy Dealership and Murphy Service Station in 2018 Shawnee Town Dr. Sullivan s House in th and Belmont Park Development. We purchased that ground about years ago and we re looking to develop it. East Riverside Park (area east of K-7). That s the Shawnee Sand and Gravel property that s on the east side of K-7 north of 43 rd Street. Also listed in the CIP are several Fire Department related projects, including: Construction of Fire Station #74 Frank C. Goode Public Works Service Center Parking Structure which is underway and almost completed. Fiber Master Plan Build Out

53 Page 53 of 93 Page 51 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 The past five years the Planning Commission recommended the Governing Body consider sidewalk placement on 71st Street between Gleason and Clare on the CIP due to the development of Erfurt Park. Overall, the total cost of all projects in the Plan is $169,757,441. The total cost of the projects in the years is $136,085,445. RECOMMENDATION Upon review of the Capital Improvement Plan, the Planning Commission shall forward any comments to the Governing Body and approve the Plan as presented. That concludes staff s presentation. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Any questions for staff on this item? I have a couple questions, Paul. MR. CHAFFEE: Uh-huh. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: And I m just guessing, so tell me because I know little about this. MR. CHAFFEE: Okay. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: But your total cost for street maintenance for 2018 is $5.4 million? MR. CHAFFEE: Yes. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Then it goes to $6 million then to $7 million-plus, then back down and back up. I m presuming those are projections and that s based off sales tax? MR. CHAFFEE: Those are projections based off sales tax as well as collection of the special sales tax that we have Parks, Pipes and Pavement. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Okay. So, it s just interesting that one year we decided -- somebody decided we were going to have a bit of a recession in I ll mark my calendar accordingly then. The other question, stormwater management. MR. CHAFFEE: Uh-huh. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: We have one project this year, Nieman Corridor. And after that there are none, no funds from the county. Is that because we have to apply -- MR. CHAFFEE: Correct.

54 Page 54 of 93 Page 52 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 CHAIRMAN BUSBY: -- to get them? So, those could be added in and it would change the figures around for next year? MR. CHAFFEE: Those will add in as we develop projects and send them in for funding. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Thank you. Any other questions for staff? Commissioner Wise. COMMISSIONER WISE: I have a question. It mentions on your Johnson Drive and I- 435 signalization, what does that involve? MR. CHAFFEE: We re looking at signalizing the ramps that are at that intersection. They re just getting to become a problem for us. As we ve had more development out to the west there seems to be more traffic headed that way than there generally is going east. So, we just needed to do something to resolve that issue. And then also we re anticipating -- we have a TIF district over on the Hodgkin property, so we anticipate some development happening there. And then of course we have the proposed mixed use that we anticipate on the east side south of Johnson Drive. So, just get those signals in place so we can manage our traffic better at that location. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Commissioner John Smith. COMMISSIONER J. SMITH: I would second the Johnson Drive and 435. I drive that coming down here and it s really getting difficult to get from 435 onto Johnson Drive. I wanted to ask you though about Monticello. The new library that s being built, the people that access that from Monticello that s two lane and there s no sidewalks. Is there any chance of that being pushed up on this? MR. CHAFFEE: The Governing Body is taking a look at trying to use some funding sources that we currently have to put some crosswalks at that location there at Hilltop and Shawnee Mission Parkway. COMMISSIONER J. SMITH: Does that also involve -- isn t there a gas line down there somewhere that they have to be moved? MR. CHAFFEE: All the easements and everything related to the Monticello Road project has been taken care of. COMMISSIONER J. SMITH: Thank you. MR. CHAFFEE: What actually happened with Monticello Road, in 2007, we were looking at doing the improvements at that time. We had acquired all the easements that we needed and negotiated with Southern Star the work that needed to be done. And some of it was done. Then the economy took a hit and I guess thank goodness we really hadn t issued the bonds for that project. So, this is one that just takes a minor

55 Page 55 of 93 Page 53 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 review of the plans that we already have drawn before it can go, so we don t have that long drawn out process of the project design. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Commissioner Braley. COMMISSIONER BRALEY: Yeah. So, I guess here we are again a year later and I have to again express my disappointment that the City can t seem to find the way to understand why it s important for residents to be able to walk to Erfurt Park. It s just beyond me. So again, I m going to vocalize my disappointment in my respect that that can t seem to get on our five-year plan to at least get a sidewalk. I ve had many real estate agents that live in our area and approach me and say, Randy, do you realize that our walkability index is a zero? I can see the park, but yet, I still get a walkability index of zero. That s important to real estate agents selling houses in the area. It adds money to the value of the homes. So again, that s my disappointment. Thank you. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Any other questions or statements for the staff? If not, is there a motion to approve the CIP with any additions? Commissioner Roth. I guess I should back up here and say, do you, Commissioner Braley, do you propose that we vote on that being added to it? Or do we have to vote on it or do we just add it as part of the remarks? MR. CHAFFEE: You can do it as part of your recommendation. You can recommend approval of what you see plus any other project that you have. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Commissioner Braley, would you like to make this motion? COMMISSIONER BRALEY: Yes, I would. All right. Hang on. Let me calm down here a little bit. I d like a motion to approve the Capital Improvement Plan with the addition of adding a sidewalk along 71 st Street between Clare and Gleason for access to Erfurt Park. Thank you. There s a motion. Is there a second on the motion? Commissioner Wise. COMMISSIONER WISE: I ll second the motion. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: There s a motion and a second to approve the CIP Plan with the addition of a sidewalk on 71 st Street. All in favor say aye. COMMISSIONERS: Aye. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Opposed nay. Motion carried. Thank you. [Therefore, the motion was made by Commissioner Braley and seconded by Commissioner Wise to approve the Capital Improvement Plan with the addition of a sidewalk along 71st Street between Clare and Gleason for access to Erfurt Park. The motion carried 9-0.]

56 Page 56 of 93 Page 54 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 E. OTHER BUSINESS 1. INFORMATIONAL ITEM: WaterOne will be constructing a new 3 million gallon elevated water tank at the western Public Works Service Center. The new tank will be constructed at the extreme southwest corner of the storage yard, to the south and west of the existing salt barn. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Now, we re into other business. Doug, you re back with us again. MR. ALLMON: This will be very short. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Would you write your name legibly too. MR. ALLMON: This is an informational item, so no action is required. This is regarding construction of a new water tower by WaterOne. So, in partnership with the City, WaterOne will be constructing a new 3 million gallon elevated water tank at the western Public Works Service Center. The new tank will be constructed at the extreme southwest corner of the storage yard, to the south and west of the existing salt barn. The subject property is zoned PI (Planned Industrial). Properties to the north and east are also zoned PI and contain the sanitary landfill. Properties to the south and west are zoned AG (Agricultural) and are shown as being appropriate for warehouse and light industrial development. I do have a photo. This isn t the actual tower obviously. This is one at their WaterOne office. It s somewhat representative of what we will have on our property once it s completed. The concrete base of the tower is located 65 feet from the south and west property lines. The overall height of the 3 million gallon tank will be approximately 110 feet. The concrete pedestal height and diameter will be approximately 35 feet and 64 feet, respectively. The steel bowl height and diameter will be approximately 75 feet and 155 feet, respectively. Upon completion, the water tower will be similar in appearance to existing towers located at Renner Road and Metcalf Avenue. And those photographs are in your packet. As part of the location agreement with the City, WaterOne will be constructing new material storage bins and a street sweeper discharge facility in the maintenance yard.

57 Page 57 of 93 Page 55 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 Also because new water lines will need to be installed to supply the tower, WaterOne will also be providing cable conduit during this installation to allow City fiber optic to extend westward over to Woodland Drive. And we have some very patient staff members from WaterOne who are here to answer any questions that you might have about operation, the impact the surrounding area in terms of pressurization and water provision. So, I m going to turn it over to them. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Thank you, Doug. MS. WIRTH: Good evening. My name is Michelle Wirth. I m the Director of Production for WaterOne. (Address Omitted). I have Eric Arner, our general counsel, also the Director of Legal and Audit here with me. And then Jim Winger is our consultant with Black & Veatch, who has worked on the design itself and can provide additional details as well as requested. This particular tank here, I just want to clarify a little bit. The picture, the photo that you have is of our Renner elevated tank at our administration office at Renner. And that tank in particular is a 2 million tank. The height itself is 213 feet to the overflow. The pedestal diameter is 46 feet. And the bowl diameter is 89.5 feet. So, in regards to what the tank at the other site will look like, this particular tank is twice as tall as the tank that s proposed. The bowl on the new tank will be 25 percent lighter and the pedestal will be 40 percent lighter. So, it will be shorter and rounder in diameter. And so I just wanted to give some perspective there. I do have some photos of what that might look like if you re interested in seeing that. I would have to load it. Okay. And I have some handouts if you -- I have some handouts here too. Now, let s see if technology works. (Off Record Talking) MS. WIRTH: So, the photos that are listed here are on page 15 of your packet. And the one that is most similar to what we will be building is the upper left corner, which is Belton, Missouri. So, you can see that in Belton. It s a 3 million gallon tank with 113 foot to the overflow. And what we were talking about is 110 feet to the overflow, so similar. It s got an 111-foot diameter. And the diameter that we re talking about is approximately 115 feet in diameter. And then the pedestal diameter is 60 feet and our pedestal diameter for the new tank will be 64 feet. And so I think that gives good perspective as far as, you know, there s trees in front of this particular property as well and there is the service center there. So, I think that will give you a good understanding of what it might look like. The other ones that are pictured are Topeka, Kansas is a 3 million gallon tank. Again, it s height is 111 feet. So, very close to what we re proposing. The other two are Mesquite, Texas and Carrollton, Texas, both 3 million gallon tanks as well similarly sized in diameter.

58 Page 58 of 93 Page 56 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 Any questions? CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Any questions? MS. WIRTH: I had a lot of information in your packet, so I m happy to go through anything you d like me to go through. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Commissioner Peterson. COMMISSIONER PETERSON: [Inaudible; talking off mic.] CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Of course. COMMISSIONER PETERSON: [Inaudible; talking off mic.] MS. WIRTH: Sure. COMMISSIONER PETERSON: [Inaudible; talking off mic.] MS. WIRTH: Okay. So, just to give you a little discussion about tank elevations and tank heights and kind of what it means with pressure. So, you can see on this particular drawing shows kind of where Stump Park would be and then how high a tank might be which is not really structurally realistic. But it gives you an idea of as to the water level equals the pressure in the tank and it needs to be at that altitude to get the pressure throughout the system. So, that s why we build elevated tanks. And at this particular site, the Public Works site, what s nice about is it s already a very high elevation. So, that s that 985 elevation for the ground elevation, so then the tank isn t quite as tall. So, that s why the pictures previously show kind of a smaller height. It s rounder. But again, that s the 110 feet that we re discussing. It gives the same water pressure as if it would be at Stump Park and 270 feet talk. So, that s very important. Our typical pressure, our service level goals are anywhere between 40 psi to 125 psi. So, at the higher ground elevations that are within that service area, it would be between 48 and 60 psi. And as you go lower ground elevations the pressure actually goes up. So, that would be between 104 and 125 psi in those areas. So, it really depends on where the house is and where the ground level elevation is as to what pressure you receive. But the importance is that we want to maintain the pressure within those ranges and we want to ensure that we have fire flow in particular for the area and that we re able to service the area on those peak hours. We re continuing to see an increase, and in particular in this area on those high use times, 4 a.m. to 6 a.m., this time of the year when sprinklers kick on. And in the evening when people come home and they re also out watering. So, that is extremely important for us to maintain those service levels. And that s why we re providing this tank in this particular area to serve our customers and your citizens.

59 Page 59 of 93 Page 57 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Any other questions for the -- MS. WIRTH: So, the elevated versus underground, sorry. The elevated tank is actually a greener solution. It s quieter. It s less cost of ownership for us in that there s no mechanical equipment or systems required. It also again provides emergency storage for fire conditions. And then it doesn t have the need for any generator capacity or pumping units. So, if the power goes out we still have that water available during a power outage. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Terrific. So, your pumps will pump it full. But if the power goes out we ll still have it because of the elevation. MS. WIRTH: Correct. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Okay. MS. WIRTH: Because it will already be up in the air and be available for that pressure. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: I have a question for you. In west Shawnee west of K-7, do I remember that there have been some issues with water pressure out there? Does this water tower service that area after 2022? UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: [Inaudible; talking off mic.] MS. WIRTH: Okay. So, I m actually going to have Jim come up and talk a little bit about our master plan and some of that area. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: So, we have had water issues out there, but they ve got to dig up and put new pipes in before it s solved. Is that what I m understanding? MR. ALLMON: For some of the larger homes that were constructed out west they had to fire suppression sprinkler systems because the water delivery, and I don t want to pretend to be the Fire Marshal. But the water delivery through the hydrant wasn t enough gallons per minute to satisfy fire codes. And that was based on water delivery I think more than pressure. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Very fine. Thank you, Doug. MR. WIRTH: Okay. So, the far west of the northwest RPA would be served by the tank. So, that s the reduced pressure zone. So, that s like the Kansas River, correct? So, past that point this tank would not serve. So, your Mize Road and 83 rd, is that where you were talking? That s kind of like the -- yeah. So, there are some restrictions with lines and service lines out there. And we are continuing to look at that with our master plan and we ll continue to make adjustments. Just like you have a capital

60 Page 60 of 93 Page 58 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 improvement plan, we also have a master plan to ensure that we re continuing to upgrade and look at that. But typically development pays for itself. So, you know, just like in our city where if there s an extension or there is additional development or services required that would then upgrade the line. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: So, can you tell me then when -- where it is on your capital improvement plan because this is going to take until 2022 for this one to be done. If we re experiencing water issues that are attributable to Johnson County Water District out in the Mize area, then can you tell us where that one might sit on your capital improvement plan? MS. WIRTH: Jim Winger, Black & Veatch. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Oh, okay. MR. WINGER: My name is Jim Winger from Black & Veatch. Certainly you can t address localized areas where many of the water mains are undersized by raising the elevation [inaudible] because you would subject a lot of your constituents to excessively high pressures. So, the focus needs to be on up-sizing those mains. You know, at this point in time there is a lot of what we saw as excess pressure in a lot of the northern part of what s called the Northwest RPA. So, I would like to maybe get some more specific information if you could share that where these complaints are with regards to low pressure. Now, we can focus on that area and take a look at that a little closer. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Good. MR. ALLMON: We can have our Fire Marshal talk to them. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Terrific. The City staff will take that. That was more curious for me that it does take time to do these. So, I m wondering, okay, six years from now maybe it might be addressed. Terrific. Any other questions for the -- I have one more. I love your pictures on page 15. You know what the one you re showing us doesn t have? MS. WIRTH: What? CHAIRMAN BUSBY: The name of Shawnee on the thing. Who the hell cares about Johnson County Water? Are we able? MS. WIRTH: WaterOne. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: And is it something that staff would consider to put Shawnee on it? I mean, realistically you re going to see this from 435.

61 Page 61 of 93 Page 59 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 MS. WIRTH: Is it green or blue? MR. CHAFFEE: [Inaudible; talking off mic.] CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Well, I would certainly hope we have the City of Shawnee spelled out on there because I grew up in small town America and that s how you knew where you were. You look up at the water tower. MS. WIRTH: It s like a like a landmark, isn t it? Yes. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: You knew. MS. WIRTH: What I would say is I ll let Eric speak to it in just a moment. But our agreement does allow for that. We are receiving bids on this Wednesday the 23 rd on the tank itself and we ll have a better understanding of the logo cost and have made provisions for that should the City wish to do so. And it would have to be a joint effort between WaterOne and the City and a joint agreement as to what is to be put on the tank. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: So, you re saying it s complicated? MS. WIRTH: Well, I m just saying that the provisions are available within the contract. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Thank you. Commissioner John Smith. COMMISSIONER J. SMITH: Yeah. A quick question. I noticed part of Johnson Drive is blocked off out there. Is that part of -- and they re putting a water line in. Is that part of this project or is that something different? MS. WIRTH: Johnson Drive. I guess there s - there s no part of Johnson Drive that is removed. What is showing in the pictures are actually our waterline easements and where the water lines will go. Yes. There is a city project to I think do a mill and overlay and some storm drainage in there and we are coordinating with the City on that because part of our pipeline will be placed along Johnson Drive. And we have some additional easements that we re also obtaining for that water line to serve the tank. So, I know that we are coordinating that between WaterOne and the City at this time. COMMISSIONER J. SMITH: Now, you have one lane of Johnson Drive going west that s blocked off. And it looks like you ran waterline along that west of the Public Works facility there. MS. WIRTH: I know there is storm sewer that s being done.

62 Page 62 of 93 Page 60 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 21, 2018 MR. ALLMON: You may be seeing a concrete pipe being laid to replace corrugated metal pipe that s failed in that area. It s one of our stormwater basically correction projects. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Another question? Thank you. Thank you very much for your presentation. And I hope Shawnee gets to be on the side of that. Of course what I think is really not that damn important I know. F. ADJOURNMENT CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Does anybody -- does any of the Commission have anything for staff? Does staff have anything for us wonderful Commissioners who are sitting up here? We re at a standoff then. COMMISSIONER WILLOUGHBY: I move for adjournment. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Commissioner Willoughby, would you like to say something? COMMISSIONER WILLOUGHBY: I move for adjournment. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Is there a second? COMMISSIONER MONTGOMERY: Second that. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Commissioner Montgomery there s a second from. Everyone in favor of adjourning, please say aye. COMMISSIONERS: Aye. CHAIRMAN BUSBY: Opposed nay. Motion carried. Thank you all. [Therefore, the motion was made by Commissioner Willoughby and seconded by Commissioner Montgomery to adjourn. The motion carried 9-0.] (Shawnee Planning Commission Meeting adjourned at 9:45 p.m.)

63 Page 63 of 93 Agenda Item #C.2. City of Shawnee TO: PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: JUNE 4, 2018 FROM: SUBJECT: PLANNING STAFF SP ; SITE PLAN CONTINENTAL CAST STONE STORAGE EXPANSION WEST 83 RD STREET ASM ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS FOR MAGLICON LLC, OWNER This is a consent item. The applicant requests site plan approval for Continental Cast Stone to allow an expansion of their existing outdoor material storage area. The request is submitted by ASM Engineering for Maglicon LLC, property owner. SITE PLAN REVIEW 1. The subject property is zoned PI (Planned Industrial) and is part of the Continental Business Park. The cast stone manufacturing facility was constructed in 2002, and the site was improved with a detention basin to control stormwater runoff at that time. The site lies approximately 400 to 500 feet south of 83 rd Street, and sits to the south of two multi-tenant office/warehouse buildings located on property zoned CH (Commercial Highway). These buildings are also part of the Continental Business Park. Properties to the east, west and south of the site are zoned PI and contain other office/warehouse and manufacturing uses. Because the business park slopes significantly from north to south, the site is not visible from 83 rd Street. 2. A portion of the site to the south and east of the manufacturing building has always been used for outdoor storage of product and materials. The area is surrounded by a 6-foot tall solid board fence to further conceal its view. Over time, the outdoor storage space expanded beyond the limits of the originally laid hard surface area. The new facility owner intends to remedy this by paving a new and expanded storage area. This will be accomplished by modifying the existing detention basin. This will allow a total hard surface storage area that will measure approximately 320 feet long by 230 feet wide. Total hard surface storage will be approximately 62,550 square feet after modification of the detention basin and construction of the improvements. Staff is supportive of the request because it will correct a non-conforming storage area. 3. This development is subject to the provisions of SMC, Chapter 11.24, Stormwater Detention, which pertains to the construction and maintenance of on-site stormwater detention facilities. As some of the proposed storage area will be located over portions of the existing detention facility, the applicant is required to construct new facilities that have capacity to detain the existing site runoff and have additional capacity to detain the

64 Page 64 of 93 Agenda Item #C.2. PLANNING COMMISSION RE: SP ; CONTINENTAL CAST STONE STORAGE AREA; W. 83 RD STREET JUNE 4, 2018 PAGE 2 runoff being generated by the parking lot addition. The applicant has submitted a preliminary stormwater management study, which is adequate for reviewing the site plan. The following design issues were noted: a. The stormwater detention calculations that were previously prepared by Schlagel & Associates in 2001 are required to be updated to reflect the new detention facility layout. The drainage area maps, release rates, stage storage table, etc. will need to be updated to reflect the new site lay-out. b. A separate plan sheet is required for the detention calculations, drainage area map, and detailed plan view showing the stage storage elevation and overflow spillway. c. The detention facility required for this development shall be designed in accordance with Shawnee Design Manual, Division 2600, Storm Drainage. The required improvements are as follows: A detention basin is required to have sufficient capacity to store the postdevelopment runoff that exceeds the pre-development allowable release rate for a 1 percent (100-year return period) design storm. The discharge from a detention facility will not exceed the maximum allowable release rate for the 50, 10, 4, and 1 percent (2-, 10-, 25- and 100- year return period) design storms. d. The applicant is responsible for submitting final stormwater detention plans as an integral part of the site civil plans. The design issues discussed above and any additional issues discovered during the review of the site civil plans must be resolved prior to plan approval. e. The licensed engineer responsible for the design of the detention facility must certify to the City that the facility was constructed in accordance with the approved plans. The certification must be submitted and approved prior to the use of the private site civil infrastructure. A field survey of the facilities verifying as-built elevations and dimensions shall be completed and as-built drawings prepared showing both design values (crossed-out) and as-built values. The drawings shall be signed and sealed by the engineer, and include the following certification language: I certify an as-built field survey has been completed and the stormwater detention facilities shown hereon have been constructed in accordance with the approved plans. 4. The storm drainage improvements required for this development shall be designed in accordance with Shawnee Design and Construction Manual. a. The enclosed and open components of the drainage system shall be designed to convey the stormwater runoff from a 4 percent (25-year return period) design storm. The overflow components designed to convey the runoff from a 1 percent (100-year return period) design storm.

65 Page 65 of 93 Agenda Item #C.2. PLANNING COMMISSION RE: SP ; CONTINENTAL CAST STONE STORAGE AREA; W. 83 RD STREET JUNE 4, 2018 PAGE 3 b. The applicant has submitted a preliminary storm drainage study showing a conceptual grading plan, a drainage system, a drainage area map, and a drainage table summarizing the hydrologic and hydraulic analysis for the site. The study is substantially complete and adequate for the purposes of reviewing the site plan. c. The applicant is responsible for submitting final storm drainage plans as an integral part of the site civil plans. The design issues discussed above and any additional issues discovered during the review of the site civil plans must be resolved prior to the start of construction of the hard-surface storage area. 5. This development is subject to the provisions of SMC, Chapter 11.08, Stormwater Management, which pertains to the City s stormwater utility regulations. a. The applicant is responsible for preparing an impervious area plan in accordance with Shawnee Design and Construction Manual, Division 2600, Storm Drainage, using coordinates based in the Kansas North State Plane Coordinate System of 1983, North Zone (NAD-83). The plan must accurately depict the limits of all parcels that comprise the development site and indicate the applicable Johnson County parcel identification numbers. Use crosshatching for existing impervious areas and halftone shading for proposed impervious areas. All existing and proposed impervious areas must be summarized in a table by parcel number including the proposed total impervious area per each parcel. b. The applicant is responsible for submitting the impervious area plan as an integral part of the site civil plans for review and acceptance by the City Engineer. Once the plan is accepted, the applicant is responsible for submitting a separate printed copy and an electronic copy in AutoCAD format prior to the issuance of a building permit. 6. This project is not subject to the provisions of SMC, Chapter 11.16, Stormwater Treatment, which pertains to the implementation of Stormwater Treatment Facilities (STF) to preserve and enhance the quality of stormwater runoff. 7. The applicant is responsible for scheduling a pre-design meeting with the Development Engineer prior to preparing the final site civil plans, which must show all proposed site improvements. The final site civil plans for this development must be submitted for review and acceptance by the City Engineer prior to the start of construction on the hardsurface storage area. 8. This development is subject to the provisions of SMC, Chapter 11.20, Land Disturbance Activity, which pertains to site grading and erosion control measures. a. The applicant (landowner) is responsible for obtaining a land disturbance permit as required by Codes Administration prior to undertaking any land disturbance or construction activities on the development site. b. Prior to the issuance of a land disturbance permit for development sites greater than one acre, the applicant is responsible for submitting separate land

66 Page 66 of 93 Agenda Item #C.2. PLANNING COMMISSION RE: SP ; CONTINENTAL CAST STONE STORAGE AREA; W. 83 RD STREET JUNE 4, 2018 PAGE 4 disturbance plans for review and acceptance by Code Administration. The site grading and erosion control measures depicted on those plans must be prepared in accordance with SMC, Chapter 15.04, International Building Code, the Shawnee Design and Construction Manual, and all other applicable policies statements and administrative rules. c. The applicant is responsible for submitting a site-specific Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan prepared in accordance with SMC, Chapter 15.04, International Building Code, the Shawnee Design and Construction Manual, and in compliance with the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) General Permit for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit (NPDES) program for stormwater runoff from construction activities. d. For development sites greater than one acre, the applicant is responsible for submitting a Notice of Intent (NOI) for Storm Water Runoff from Construction Activities and obtaining such permits as required by KDHE prior to undertaking any land disturbance or construction activities on the development site. The applicant must submit to the City a copy of the NOI prior to the issuance by the City of a Land Disturbance Permit for the development site. e. The applicant is responsible for obtaining such permits as may be required by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) for grading activities covered by Section 401 (Water Quality Certification), Section 402 (Wetlands), and Section 404 (Waters of the United States) of the Clean Water Act. 9. All site improvements for this development shall be constructed according to the applicable standards in the Shawnee Design and Construction Manual. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of SP , site plan for an expanded hard surface storage area at the Continental Cast Stone facility, located at W. 83 rd Street, subject to the following conditions: 1. The improvements shall be constructed as shown on the submitted site plan. All storage areas shall be constructed of either asphalt, concrete or paver brick; 2. This development is subject to the provisions of SMC, Chapter 11.24, Stormwater Detention, which pertains to the construction and maintenance of on-site stormwater detention facilities as detailed in the staff report; 3. The storm drainage improvements required for this development shall be designed in accordance with Shawnee Design and Construction Manual as detailed in the staff report;

67 Page 67 of 93 Agenda Item #C.2. PLANNING COMMISSION RE: SP ; CONTINENTAL CAST STONE STORAGE AREA; W. 83 RD STREET JUNE 4, 2018 PAGE 5 4. The applicant is responsible for preparing an impervious area plan in accordance with Shawnee Design and Construction Manual, Division 2600, Storm Drainage, as detailed in the staff report; 5. The applicant is responsible for scheduling a pre-design meeting with the Development Engineer prior to preparing the final site civil plans, which must show all proposed site improvements. The final site civil plans for this development must be submitted for review and acceptance by the City Engineer prior to construction of the hard-surface storage area; 6. The applicant (landowner) is responsible for obtaining a land disturbance permit as required by Codes Administration prior to undertaking any land disturbance or construction activities on the development site as detailed in the staff report; and 7. All site improvements for this development shall be constructed according to the applicable standards in the Shawnee Design and Construction Manual.

68 Page 68 of 93 Agenda Item #C.2.

69 Page 69 of 93 Agenda Item #C.2. uumxmuxvn vmvutoov-i,i'm.l.-z. s".u'e i3?a."u.?n NV'Id J.N3WdO' El/\3C] DNU_S X3 CINOANOLLNI-ILECI m a ('9

70 ' Page 70 of 93 Agenda Item #C.2. L3 m\u::pqm Iwwni 4 DUNN! n u ; MM! NA )FlNili (',o«.rau G

71 Page 71 of 93 Agenda Item #C.2. um. wv wow mnnumwoo? Flu awn 'n-«mus v-umvu um m m SNO J.V1?.'.TlVD '9 NISVEI NO.LNEl.L':lCIG:-lSOdO)ld I xmo AllowableRelease Rats C100

72 MCCOY ST! Page 72 of 93 Agenda Item #C.2. RE AG MONTICELLO RD W 83RD ST CH PI Location SP Continental Cast Stone W. 83rd St. ASM Engineering Consultants µ Feet

73 Page 73 of 93 Agenda Item #D.1. City of Shawnee TO: PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: JUNE 4, 2018 FROM: SUBJECT: PLANNING STAFF SP ; SITE PLAN WESTAR GLEASON SUBSTATION BLOCK OF W. 63 RD STREET PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS FOR WESTAR ENERGY, OWNER This item is eligible for consent, but staff will provide a brief presentation on the project. The applicant requests site plan approval for construction of a replacement electrical substation in Block of W. 63 rd Street. The application is filed by Professional Engineering Consultants for Westar Energy, property owner. SITE PLAN REVIEW 1. The applicant requests site plan approval for construction of an electrical substation for Westar Energy. The subject property is located in the Block of W. 63 rd Street and is zoned AG (Agricultural). Electrical regulating substations are a permitted use within the AG zoning district. 2. The subject property is made up of several unplatted parcels that contain acres in total. The substation compound will be approximately 4.1 acres in size, and the remaining ground will be held until easement locations for incoming and outgoing transmission lines are determined. Once these easement locations are finalized, the surrounding vacant ground can be placed back on the market for development. The future Land Use Guide shows these surrounding areas as being appropriate for development of low density residential uses. 3. Surrounding zoning to the north, east and west is also AG, with the exception of one 2.5 acre parcel to the north that is zoned RE (Residential Estates) and contains a single-family home. Other AG areas to the north have been developed with scattered single family homes and outbuildings on larger lots. The existing Pentagon substation that will dismantled after this substation is brought online is located directly to the east. Property to the west is vacant pastureland. Property to the south is zoned PUDMR (Planned Unit Development Mixed Residential) and contains a portion of the Shawnee Golf and Country Club golf course and is approved for the construction of attached townhomes. 4. All bulk requirements have been met. The perimeter wall around the substation is set back several hundred feet from adjacent streets. As required by the zoning ordinance, the wall

74 Page 74 of 93 Agenda Item #D.1. PLANNING COMMISSION RE: SP ; GLEASON ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION; BLOCK OF W. 63 RD STREET JUNE 4, 2018 PAGE 2 for the substation is set back more than 100 feet from the north and south property lines, exceeding the 50-foot buffer requirement adjacent to existing residential areas. 5. The street improvements required for this development shall be designed in accordance with the standards of the Shawnee Design and Construction Manual, Division 2200 Streets and all applicable Standard Details. There are no permanent public street improvements required as part of this project. Any ditch regrading necessary to accommodate the driveway shall be reviewed and approved prior to issuance of a site development permit. a. The commercial driveway approach for this development shall be designed in accordance with the Shawnee Design and Construction Manual. A 1:10 blow-up of the commercial driveway approach shall be included in the site civil plans that meets the requirements of the Standard Driveway for a non-curbed street. The blow-up shall include flow arrows indicating direction of flow, dimensions, elevations, and other pertinent information. b. All driveway approaches will be designed according to the standards in the Shawnee Manual of Technical Specifications and Design Criteria. c. The owner shall be responsible for dedication of any right-of-way necessary for future street improvements adjacent to their property. This right-of-way deed of dedication for Clare Road, Gleason, and W. 63 rd Street shall be completed and recorded prior to use of the of the electrical substation by Westar Energies. In addition to right-of-way, temporary construction easements (a minimum of 30 feet in width) shall also be provided until such time as the adjacent roads are improved. 6. The compound for the substation will be enclosed by a solid masonry wall that will be approximately nine (9) feet in height. The beige, precast concrete wall will be constructed with a pressed stacked stone finish. This is similar to the wall that surrounds the Monticello substation at 8250 McCoy. The gate to the compound will be constructed of black steel with iron pickets. As proposed, the masonry wall is an attractive alternative as compared to chain link or solid cedar fencing that is typically used to enclose a substation. Equipment pads planned for the site will include an rectangular electrical buss and switching arrays that are 22 to 27 in height. Each array is outfitted with a transformer that is approximately 25 in height. Each array will be anchored with a steel dead-end pole. The poles will project above the security wall approximately 60 feet, which is typical for an electrical substation. Two small equipment enclosures provide service to each array. Because of the height of the security wall, the enclosures will not be visible from outside the wall. The area inside the wall measures approximately 385 by 465 and will be surfaced with compacted gravel. The service driveway that connects to W. 63 rd Street will be constructed of a hard surface of either asphalt or concrete.

75 Page 75 of 93 Agenda Item #D.1. PLANNING COMMISSION RE: SP ; GLEASON ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION; BLOCK OF W. 63 RD STREET JUNE 4, 2018 PAGE 3 7. To enhance site security, wallpacks will be placed on the interior wall of the facility at 120- foot intervals to provide low-level lighting within the compound. Because of the height of the exterior security wall, these wallpacks will only be visible inside the compound. 8. Mature stands of trees exist along property lines and other areas of the site that will not be disturbed by the project. This includes a solid tree row along the south side of the property that abuts the golf course and townhome development. Because the solid security wall is decorative and attractive, landscaping is not required around its perimeter to screen the base of the substation. This will also keep trees from growing into the electrical transmission lines that feed in and out of the substation. Additional landscaping along the west side of Gleason and the south side of W. 63 rd Street will be provided as part of the project. Nine (9) ornamental trees are shown on along Gleason that will enhance the view of the former Paragon site once it is dismantled and returned to a natural, native state. Twelve (12) ornamental trees are shown along W. 63 rd Street. A variety of ornamental species will be provided including Redbuds, Crabapples and Choke Cherry trees. All trees are proposed to be 2-inch caliper, which exceeds the minimum plant size requirement of the ordinance. All disturbed areas along the private driveway, and around the screen wall shall be sodded in accordance with SMC The storm drainage improvements required for this development shall be designed in accordance with Shawnee Design and Construction Manual. a. The enclosed and open components of the drainage system shall be designed to convey the stormwater runoff from a 4 percent (25-year return period) design storm. The overflow components designed to convey the runoff from a 1 percent (100- year return period) design storm. b. The applicant has submitted a preliminary storm drainage study showing a conceptual grading plan, a drainage system, a drainage area map, and a drainage table summarizing the hydrologic and hydraulic analysis for the site. The study is substantially complete and adequate for the purposes of reviewing the site plan. The following design issues were noted: A complete hydrologic and hydraulic drainage table will need to be prepared according to the standards of the Shawnee Design and Construction Manual for the site civil plans. A plan and profile of the proposed public and private storm sewers must be included as part of the final storm drainage plans prepared for the site civil plans. The applicant is responsible for providing public drainage easements for any portion of the public storm system that is located outside of a public street rightof-way. c. The applicant is responsible for submitting final storm drainage plans as an integral part of the site civil plans. The design issues discussed above and any additional

76 Page 76 of 93 Agenda Item #D.1. PLANNING COMMISSION RE: SP ; GLEASON ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION; BLOCK OF W. 63 RD STREET JUNE 4, 2018 PAGE 4 issues discovered during the review of the site civil plans must be resolved prior to the issuance of a public improvement permit or a building permit. 11. This development is subject to the provisions of SMC, Chapter 11.24, Stormwater Detention, which pertains to the construction and maintenance of on-site stormwater detention facilities. The Engineer provided a stormwater management letter stating that there are no known downstream flooding concerns as defined by the Shawnee Design and Construction Manual. Since detention is not required, the applicant is responsible for paying the stormwater detention fee in lieu of providing on-site detention. The fee is required to be paid to the City prior to the issuance of the Public Improvement Permit. 12. This development is subject to the provisions of SMC, Chapter 11.08, Stormwater Management, which pertains to the City s stormwater utility regulations. a. The applicant is responsible for preparing an impervious area plan in accordance with Shawnee Design and Construction Manual, Division 2600, Storm Drainage, using coordinates based in the Kansas North State Plane Coordinate System of 1983, North Zone (NAD-83). The plan must accurately depict the limits of all parcels that comprise the development site and indicate the applicable Johnson County parcel identification numbers. Use crosshatching for existing impervious areas and halftone shading for proposed impervious areas. All existing and proposed impervious areas must be summarized in a table by parcel number including the proposed total impervious area per each parcel. b. The applicant is responsible for submitting the impervious area plan as an integral part of the site civil plans for review and acceptance by the Development Engineer. Once the plan is accepted, the applicant is responsible for submitting a separate printed copy and an electronic copy in AutoCAD format prior to the issuance of a building permit. 13. This project is subject to the provisions of SMC, Chapter 11.16, Stormwater Treatment, which pertains to the implementation of Stormwater Treatment Facilities (STF) to preserve and enhance the quality of stormwater runoff. a. The lot is required to meet a minimum Level of Service (LOS) based on the Shawnee Design and Construction Manual. The applicant is proposing the preservation and reestablishment if needed of native vegetation to meet the required LOS. b. The applicant is responsible for meeting with the Development Engineer to discuss any applicable issues prior to preparing a Final Stormwater Treatment Facility Report, which must be submitted for review and acceptance prior to the issuance of a public improvement permit or a building permit. c. All STFs required for this project shall be designed in accordance with the Shawnee Design and Construction Manual. The applicant s consulting engineer is responsible for certifying that both the design and construction of such facilities

77 Page 77 of 93 Agenda Item #D.1. PLANNING COMMISSION RE: SP ; GLEASON ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION; BLOCK OF W. 63 RD STREET JUNE 4, 2018 PAGE 5 complies with all applicable regulations. Additionally, at the discretion of the City Engineer, a Third Party inspector might be required to inspect the construction of the STFs. The applicant would be responsible for the cost of any third party inspections that might be required. d. The applicant is required to execute and record with the Johnson County Register of Deeds the City s standard form entitled Declaration of Stormwater Treatment Facility Maintenance Restrictions and Covenants prior to the building permit and/or public improvement permit being issued. This project is required to have its own covenant recorded at the County. e. The applicant s consulting engineer is responsible for preparing an as-built certification of each STF, which requires City acceptance prior, to the City issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the buildings on this site. 14. This development is subject to the provisions of SMC, Chapter 11.20, Land Disturbance Activity, which pertains to site grading and erosion control measures. a. The applicant (landowner) is responsible for obtaining a land disturbance permit as required by Codes Administration prior to undertaking any land disturbance or construction activities on the development site. b. Prior to the issuance of a land disturbance permit for development sites greater than one acre, the applicant is responsible for submitting separate land disturbance plans for review and acceptance by Code Administration. The site grading and erosion control measures depicted on those plans must be prepared in accordance with SMC, Chapter 15.04, International Building Code, the Shawnee Design and Construction Manual, and all other applicable policies statements and administrative rules. c. The applicant is responsible for submitting a site-specific Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan prepared in accordance with SMC, Chapter 15.04, International Building Code, the Shawnee Design and Construction Manual, and in compliance with the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) General Permit for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit (NPDES) program for stormwater runoff from construction activities. d. For development sites greater than one acre, the applicant is responsible for submitting a Notice of Intent (NOI) for Storm Water Runoff from Construction Activities and obtaining such permits as required by KDHE prior to undertaking any land disturbance or construction activities on the development site. The applicant must submit to the City a copy of the NOI prior to the issuance by the City of a Land Disturbance Permit for the development site. e. The applicant is responsible for obtaining such permits as may be required by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) for grading activities covered by Section

78 Page 78 of 93 Agenda Item #D.1. PLANNING COMMISSION RE: SP ; GLEASON ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION; BLOCK OF W. 63 RD STREET JUNE 4, 2018 PAGE (Water Quality Certification), Section 402 (Wetlands), and Section 404 (Waters of the United States) of the Clean Water Act. 15. The applicant is responsible for scheduling a pre-design meeting with the Development Engineer prior to preparing the final site civil plans, which must show all proposed site improvements. The final site civil plans for this development must be submitted for review and acceptance by the City prior to issuance a public improvement permit or building permit. 16. All site improvements for this development shall be constructed according to the applicable standards in the Shawnee Design and Construction Manual. No certificate of occupancy for the building shall be issued prior to the completion, inspection, and acceptance of all required site improvements. A Public Improvement Permit is required for all public street, storm and streetlight improvements. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of SP , site plan for the Westar Gleason Electric Substation, to be located in the Block of W. 63 rd Street, subject to the following conditions: 1. The substation, including the decorative concrete wall, shall be constructed as depicted on submitted site plans; 2. The commercial driveway approach for this development shall be designed in accordance with the Shawnee Design and Construction Manual as detailed in the staff report; 3. The private service drive shall be constructed of a hard, dustless surface of either asphalt or concrete; 4. All landscaping shall be planted prior to final inspection of the perimeter wall. All disturbed areas adjacent to the driveway and screen wall shall be sodded in accordance with Shawnee Municipal Code (SMC) 17.57; 5. The owner shall be responsible for dedication of any right-of-way necessary for future street improvements adjacent to their property. In addition to right-of-way, temporary construction easements (a minimum of 30 feet in width) shall also be provided until such time as the adjacent roads are improved; 6. The storm drainage improvements required for this development shall be designed in accordance with Shawnee Design and Construction Manual as detailed in the staff report; 7. The applicant is responsible for paying the stormwater detention fee in lieu of providing on-site detention. The fee is required to be paid to the City prior to the issuance of the Public Improvement Permit;

79 Page 79 of 93 Agenda Item #D.1. PLANNING COMMISSION RE: SP ; GLEASON ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION; BLOCK OF W. 63 RD STREET JUNE 4, 2018 PAGE 7 8. The applicant is responsible for preparing an impervious area plan in accordance with Shawnee Design and Construction Manual, Division 2600, Storm Drainage, as detailed in the staff report; 9. This project is subject to the provisions of SMC, Chapter 11.16, Stormwater Treatment, which pertains to the implementation of Stormwater Treatment Facilities (STF) to preserve and enhance the quality of stormwater runoff. Treatment shall be provided as detailed in the staff report; 10. The applicant (landowner) is responsible for obtaining a land disturbance permit as required by Codes Administration prior to undertaking any land disturbance or construction activities on the development site; 11. The applicant is responsible for scheduling a pre-design meeting with the Development Engineer prior to preparing the final site civil plans, which must show all proposed site improvements. The final site civil plans for this development must be submitted for review and acceptance by the City prior to issuance a public improvement permit or building permit; and 12. All site improvements for this development shall be constructed according to the applicable standards in the Shawnee Design and Construction Manual. No certificate of occupancy for the building shall be issued prior to the completion, inspection, and acceptance of all required site improvements. A Public Improvement Permit is required for all public street, storm and streetlight improvements.

80 Page 80 of 93 Agenda Item #D.1. Ea E2 E! E I n_<2._._z_u_> smmuxxxxom zop?wmam zow?._._o S i ~._ubv.l.u.e-hurl: Inn!-_ Wig. I " 'I- II:!:! g%,!:i El N E; : I. H E k g :3 g ~~%:%u :i% t.:!! M E ~ I Ew 3l!.[l ::[ ' t ; i.a,,;= e:g n g 32$ H -s :5 i xl:! i:5! ~~!:~! g...: * E: ii 3% 153 3%; ;!: ; :,: E ; g L *t. : :1 :,E.!; xvi ;,:s~.g5:.!; 5 $!g g_ : s=%!.5i!:! E! }% n,1 q~: M; i?si?gie? % liai us ~:i ip %i:! :!i a ti 5. ' H *5 la?»~=i' Iim? E 5!3'-! HI i E! i}.52.. ng 35:;. ; :.g:;" ;',:;?? II it E

81 Page 81 of 93 Agenda Item #D.1. Z<n_n_.Em:ao._m>uo m»m<z_:_._mmn_ zo_.:?mm5m zow<m._o TR S &u. E U.E.mF me.%hm...eua~ Ekhiw

82 EL nn Page 82 of 93 Agenda Item #D.1. xxam.ons=.e WWP:

83 Page 83 of 93 Agenda Item #D.1..l..\u nltibzr..\:l:...r {Hi i%

84 Page 84 of 93 Agenda Item #D.1. iii _H_.-. g E mwsmmdzm Emznzzam._$EC...,,

85 Page 85 of 93 Agenda Item #D.1. _..4u.. zom<m_._o 1/ /. 1l~1

86 BARTH RD GLEASON RD Page 86 of 93 Agenda Item #D.1. RS Location W 63RD ST RE AG! PUDMR W 65TH ST R-1 SP Gleason Substation Block of W. 63rd St. Westar Energy µ Feet

87 Page 87 of 93 Agenda Item #D.2. City of Shawnee TO: PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: JUNE 4, 2018 FROM: SUBJECT: PLANNING STAFF DISCUSSION ITEM TEXT AMENDMENTS EXPANSION OF R-1 OVERLAY DISTRICT The Planning Commission recommended on July 2018 that amendments to the R-1 section of the zoning regulations be amended to create an R-1 Overlay district. The purpose of the overlay district is to provide single family residential infill opportunities in the older parts of the community where the lot width is less than 150 feet in width and a residential structure has been built toward one end of the lot. The purpose is also to encourage infill development of new single family developments in the area that are compatible with existing single family developments on properties that would otherwise remain undeveloped or underdeveloped. The R-1 zoning district requires 75 feet of frontage and 9,000 square feet of lot area. The overlay district that was created requires a lot frontage of 45 feet and a lot area of 4,250 square feet. Many lots in the proposed overlay area are less than 150 feet in frontage, but the house has been constructed on one end of the lot, leaving a large portion of the lot open. The overlay district would potentially allow these lots to be split. Creation of an overlay district requires a rezoning, notification of surrounding property owners, and the elevation of the proposed single family home to be approved. The use of the overlay is expected to provide single family homes at an affordable price, and at the same time fit into the existing neighborhood. The overlay also provides the opportunity to provide a more efficient provision of services. The current area that a rezoning could be considered for a single family overlay zoning is bounded by 55 th Street on the north, the east city limits on the east, Shawnee Mission Parkway on the south, and Quivira Road on the west. The proposed text amendment would include three additional areas for consideration of the R-1 Overlay. These areas contain lots with similar features as those in the existing area where an R-1 Overlay can be considered. These areas are as follows and are indicated on an attached map: 47 th Street on the north, Nieman Road on the east, 55 th Street on the south and Quivira Road on the west. 55 th Street on the north, Quivira Road on the east, Johnson Drive on the south, and both sides of Long Avenue on the west.

88 Page 88 of 93 Agenda Item #D.2. PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION ITEM RE: TEXT AMENDMENTS R-1 OVERLAY JUNE 4, 2018 PAGE 2 Shawnee Mission Parkway on the north, Ballentine on the east, 67 th Street on the south, and Nieman Road on the west. Since the architecture of the homes in these areas are different than those in the original area, the architecture to be considered should not be limited to cottage style, but rather to be consistent with existing homes. A proposed draft of the amendments is provided. RECOMMENDATION If the Planning Commission determines the proposed amendments to Chapter and related to the R-1 Overlay are appropriate, staff recommends the Planning Commission authorize publication of a Notice of Public Hearing to be held at the Planning Commission meeting on July 16, 2018.

89 Page 89 of 93 Agenda Item #D.2. CHAPTER USE REGULATIONS-R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT Sections: STATEMENT OF INTENT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL OVERLAY USES PERMITTED BY RIGHT AND BY SPECIAL USE PERMIT OF THE GOVERNING BODY PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES ADDITIONAL USE REGULATIONS HEIGHT AND AREA REGULATIONS HEIGHT, AREA REGULATIONS AND DESIGN ELEMENTS IN THE R-1 OVERLAY STATEMENT OF INTENT. The intent of the R-1 (Single Family Residential) zoning district is to provide for standard low- density residential developments and other compatible uses in areas where adequate public services exist for such development and such development is appropriate given the surrounding land uses and neighborhood SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL OVERLAY-R-1(O) In order to create an opportunity to provide increased single family residential density in the area bounded by 55 th Street, the east City limits, Shawnee Mission Parkway and Quivira Road, a single family overlay district is hereby created. Design elements found in Section E(3) shall apply to this area. The areas contained in the following descriptions may also be considered for the single family overlay district subject to Section E(3), with the exception that porch areas and cottage style design may not be required as the home design in these areas should be consistent in architectural style with the surrounding homes. These areas are as follows: west of Nieman Road, south of 47 th Street, east of Quivira, and north of 55 th Street; the area south of 55 th Street, along both sides of Long Avenue, north of Johnson Drive and west of Quivira; and the area south of Shawnee Mission Parkway,east of Nieman Road, north of 67 th Street, and west of Ballentine. The purpose of the overlay district is to provide an opportunity to divide existing lots with the potential for infill development that would not otherwise meet the R-1 zoning district height and area regulations, and/or to develop new infill subdivisions that are compatible in design with the existing

90 Page 90 of 93 Agenda Item #D.2. surrounding neighborhood. Properties developed using the overlay will require rezoning and subdivision approval. The underlying zoning of the R-1 overlay remains R USES PERMITTED BY RIGHT AND BY SPECIAL USE PERMIT OF THE GOVERNING BODY. In the R-1 zoning district, the uses permitted by right and allowed by special use permit are listed in Chapter 17.51, Table of General Uses PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES. In the R-1 district, permitted accessory uses shall be as follows: A. Keeping not more than one transient boarder or roomer; B. Accessory loading; C. Accessory parking; D. The following private structures: garages, tool sheds, tennis courts, swimming pools, recreational structures and other similar structures; provided conditions outlined in Section (F) and (G) are met; E. Storing not more than one of the following: unoccupied camper, trailer or boat; F. Home occupations, as allowed by Chapter 17.66; G. Temporary structures for storage of equipment and materials used in conjunction with construction of a lawfully authorized nonresidential use located on the property not to exceed two years ADDITIONAL USE REGULATIONS. In the R-1 district, additional use regulations shall be as follows: A. Distance requirements for the keeping and sheltering of animals and storage of other odor or dust producing substance shall be as prescribed in SMC B. No smokestack utilized in agricultural operations shall exceed the height regulations authorized in this title. C. Public utility rights-of-way, substations, pumping stations, and municipal and civic buildings, shall be housed in structures that harmonize with the character of the neighborhood, and where adjoining residential zones shall have a buffer of fifty feet except that the Planning Commission may reduce the width of buffer areas where local conditions deem such reduction to be reasonable. Buffer areas shall be adequately screened in accordance with Chapter and shall be subject to performance standards procedure and site plan approval by the Planning Commission. D. In addition to the particular requirements listed for any use by special permit, the Governing Body may require, where reasonable or appropriate, fences and other safety devices, landscaping, screening, access roads and

91 Page 91 of 93 Agenda Item #D.2. buffer areas as required. E. Buffer areas of fifty feet shall be required for special permit uses, with the exception of home occupations requiring a special permit; however, the Governing Body may reduce the width of buffer areas where local conditions and substitute protection for neighboring properties is reasonably indicated. Buffer areas shall always be landscaped, screened and maintained in harmony with the landscaping and natural growth in the neighborhood. F. Tool sheds, utility sheds, playhouses and greenhouses that are not considered permanent structures under the currently adopted building code are permitted, provided they are located in the rear yards, and are not located closer than five feet of any side yard or rear plot line, or within any platted building setback line. These structures shall be located at least fifteen feet from the principal building. Refer to Section C for maximum size requirements for accessory structures. G. Private tennis courts, swimming pools and similar private recreational structures shall be located in the rear yard and shall not be located within any platted building setback, and shall be a minimum of ten feet from all other plot lines. Outdoor lighting fixtures shall be set back from plot lines a distance equal to the height of the light fixture pole and shall provide directional shielding to prevent any direct illumination of adjoining properties. H. Day care homes and group day care homes shall complete fire safety inspections prior to requesting a special use permit. Additionally, the required play areas shall be fenced HEIGHT AND AREA REGULATIONS. A. Maximum height: The maximum height requirement in the R-1 district is forty-five feet in height, with a maximum of three stories in height. B. Minimum lot area. The minimum lot area in the R-1 district is nine thousand square feet for all uses. C. Minimum lot width: seventy-five feet along a public or platted private street. D. Minimum yard setback requirements: 1. Front yard: thirty feet. See Section (B) for front yard setbacks in subdivisions included in the infill regulations. 2. Rear yard: thirty feet for single-family residential uses, and forty feet for other permitted or special uses (excluding home occupations). 3. Side yard: the total of the two side yards must equal twenty percent of the total lot width, measured at the property line when this measurement meets or exceeds the minimum lot width required in the zoning district or at the platted building line on curves and cul-de-sacs where that line is used to meet the minimum lot width requirement. However, no side yard shall be less than seven feet.

92 Page 92 of 93 Agenda Item #D HEIGHT, AREA REGULATIONS, AND DESIGN ELEMENTS IN THE R-1 OVERLAY. A. Maximum height: The maximum height requirement in the R-1 Overlay is forty-five feet in height, with a maximum of three stories in height. B. Minimum lot area. The minimum lot area in the R-1 Overlay is four thousand two hundred fifty square feet for all uses. C. Minimum lot width: Forty-five feet along a public or platted private street. D. Minimum yard requirements: 1. Front yard: Fifteen feet, or no less than the average along the block. 2. Rear yard: twenty feet for single-family residential uses, and ten feet for detached garages. If a detached garage is not provided, one accessory structure meeting the bulk requirements of may be allowed. 3. Side yard: Five feet, unless a wider utility easement exists. 4. Corner lots. The front setback on both streets shall be fifteen feet. E. Minimum house size: The Planning Commission when considering a request to rezone property to the R-1 Overlay district, may reduce the house size to 900 square feet when it can be shown that existing homes in the vicinity are less than the 1,100 square foot size required in F. Design Requirements: 1. The Planning Commission shall approve the specific exterior design of the single family homes to be constructed in the R-1 Overlay District at the time of the public hearing to rezone the property. A modification to the approved elevation must be approved by the Planning Commission during a public hearing upon notification of surrounding property owners. 2. Each single family residence shall provide a covered front porch area at least five feet in width. 3. Each residence and porch shall include varied rooflines and peaks, reminiscent of bungalow, Cape Cod and cottage style homes, except as noted in Fencing in the front yard shall be limited to wrought iron (or similar) or spaced picket fencing, no taller than four feet in height. 5. A tree preservation plan is required as part of the request to rezone the property. 6. Consideration will be given for subdivisions of ten (10) or more lots to provide common open space with an amenity. 7. Consideration will be given in favor of barrier free (ADA accessible) homes.

93 QUIVIRA DR PFLUMM RD PFLUMM RD ROSEHILL RD LONG AVE LONG AVE QUIVIRA RD QUIVIRA RD FLINT ST Page 93 of 93 Agenda Item #D.2. W 47TH ST W 49TH ST W 49TH TER W 51ST ST NIEMAN RD SWITZER RD R-1 Overlay W 55TH ST NOLAND RD JOHNSON DR W 61ST ST BALLENTINE ST Existing Opportunity for R-1 Overlay Zoning WIDMER RD FLINT ST GODDARD ST Proposed Additional Area MIDLAND DR W 65TH ST W 67TH ST NIEMAN RD µ ,700 3,400 Feet