Value Fluctuations in a Real Estate Investment Financed with Debt
|
|
- Andrea Ruth Richard
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Working Draft of New Case Study 4A Value Fluctuations in a Real Estate Investment Financed with Debt (which will be added to AICPA Accounting and Valuation Guide Valuation of Portfolio Company Investments of Venture Capital and Private Equity Funds and Other Investment Companies) Released December 17, 2018 Prepared by the PE/VC Task Force Comments should be sent by January 14, 2019 to Yelena Mishkevich at yelena.mishkevich@aicpa-cima.com 1
2 2018 American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. All rights reserved. Permission is granted to make copies of this work provided that such copies are for personal, intraorganizational, or educational use only and are not sold or disseminated and provided further that each copy bears the following credit line: 2018 American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. All rights reserved. Used with permission. 2
3 Case Study 4A Value Fluctuations in a Real Estate Investment Financed with Debt Note: This case study is provided to demonstrate concepts discussed in the preceding chapters of this guide and is not intended to establish requirements, best practices or safe harbors. It was developed from a real-world situation, which was complex and involved numerous nuances that needed to be evaluated when estimating the fair value of the investment. However, this case study reflects only the high-level approach that the fund would have considered in reaching its valuation conclusions and does not show the calculations or the support for each assumption. The specific facts and circumstances of each individual situation should be carefully considered when performing an actual valuation, and professional judgment should be exercised in evaluating those facts and weighing various alternatives. This case study summarizes the key considerations that were encountered by the fund manager(s) described in the example. The judgments that were made in this case were specific to those facts, not all of which are highlighted herein. See the preamble in paragraphs C for a more detailed description of the purpose of the case studies and factors to consider when reading the case studies. Case Study 4 Prestige Worldwide LLP real estate fund Type of Security Equity Interest Industry Real Estate Primary Concepts Illustrated Various considerations around off-market debt when measuring the fair value of equity (chapters 4 and 6) Debt and equity valuation in a simple capital structure (chapter 5) Value of mortgage debt for the purpose of valuing equity (chapter 6) Additional Concepts Illustrated Transaction costs (chapter 12) The primary purpose of this case study is to illustrate real estate specific valuation considerations as well as the impact of mortgage debt valuation on the equity value of a real estate investment. Specifically, the following example shows an investment in a real estate asset, from the initial acquisition of the property prior to stabilization and the eventual sale of the property after the initial lease-up period (that is, upon reaching stabilization). The example illustrates the way that changes in the fair value of a mortgage note can have an impact on the equity value of an investment in real estate. Finally, the example shows the impact of transaction costs on the initial acquisition as well as on the realized value at exit. 3
4 NOTE: The example assumes that Prestige Worldwide LLP follows the guidance in FASB ASC 946, Financial Services Investment Companies. Initial Transaction and Calibration on December 31, 2X07 C.04A.01 C.04A.02 C.04A.03 Prestige Worldwide LLP (Prestige) was a $100 billion alternative investment fund with platforms including credit, private equity, and real estate. Prestige qualified as an investment company under FASB ASC 946, Financial Services Investment Companies. Prestige typically made its investments through investment holding companies that were not consolidated. Accordingly, Prestige carried its real estate investments at fair value in accordance with FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement. 1 Prestige s strategy was to invest in non-stabilized assets and then to engage in a capital improvement and leasing program designed to reposition the asset within the market and attract new tenants paying higher rents. The investment horizon of market participants investing in such assets typically spans three to eight years but is highly dependent on lease-up velocity and the transaction market. Prestige s typical time horizon was consistent with other market participants in this segment. In late 2X07, Prestige identified an office property, known as Catalina Square (Catalina), for purchase near the business center of a suburban submarket outside of a major US city. Prestige believed that this asset fit within its investment mandate. Catalina was a 4-story, 100,000 rentable square foot mid-rise Class B office property. After completing its underwriting process, Prestige purchased Catalina on December 10, 2X07 for $14,000,000, or $140 per square foot. Prestige considered its operating projections for the asset and used a discounted cash flow analysis when assessing the value at the transaction date. The investment featured a goingin capitalization rate of 9.50%. The asset was 68% occupied upon acquisition, with lease renewal options within the next 18 months for several tenants. Prestige 1 Certain real estate funds are not in the scope of FASB ASC 946. For these funds, the investment is typically reported on a gross basis with the property as an asset of the fund, and the mortgage debt is reported as a liability of the fund. Further, certain of these funds elect to report the mortgage debt at fair value, using the fair value option in FASB ASC 825, Financial Instruments. The principles illustrated in this case study may also be useful in assessing the fair value of the mortgage debt for funds that elect the fair value option for the mortgage debt liability (where the unit of account is the debt liability). Note that the fair value of the mortgage debt reported as a liability of the fund most often would be measured from the perspective of a market participant (lender) that holds the identical item as an asset. Please see paragraphs 16.16L of FASB ASC for further guidance on valuing a debt liability as a separate unit of account. For funds that are not in the scope of FASB ASC 946, where the units of account are the total asset (the property) and separately the debt liability (the mortgage debt), the net equity position would not be the appropriate unit of account for valuation purposes. Therefore, the fund would not report the fair value of the net equity position using a value of debt for the purpose of valuing equity that is different from the fair value of debt. The fair value of debt would be estimated using a market participant (lender) perspective. See paragraphs for a discussion of the principles to consider in estimating the fair value of debt. 4
5 incurred transaction costs of 1.5%, or $210,000, capitalized as part of the initial investment, for a total invested capital of $14,210,000, less financing. C.04A.04 C.04A.05 To finance the acquisition, Prestige formed a holding company for Catalina and obtained a non-recourse mortgage loan for the holding company in the amount of $10,500,000 (par) from a regional bank at a fixed rate of 3.10%. The original principal balance represented a 75% loan-to-value (LTV) ratio and was to be amortized over 360 months from origination. The note was pre-payable at 101% of par during a lockout period of 60 months, and pre-payable without penalty thereafter. The note had a 10-year term and matured on December 31, 2X17, with the unamortized balance payable at that time. The loan agreement permitted the note to be assumed by a third party; that is, the note did not include a change of control provision that would require pre-payment upon a change of control of the holding company. Prestige determined its unit of account was its equity investment in the holding company, which was a pass-through entity for income tax purposes. Prestige further determined, consistent with the approach used when analyzing the investment and with the approach that market participants would typically use to value such investments, that the two primary inputs in valuing the equity investment in the holding company would be the fair value of the property held by the holding company and the value of the mortgage debt that a market participant would subtract from the property value for the purpose of valuing equity (see paragraphs for additional discussion). As of December 31, 2X07, Prestige valued its interest in the equity of the holding company at $3,500,000 (purchase price of $14,000,000 less the value of the debt $10,500,000) based on a view that a market participant would pay the same amount for the property that Prestige paid in its recent transaction, excluding transaction costs. In assessing the value of the debt to use in estimating the fair value of the equity in the holding company, Prestige determined that the fair value of the mortgage debt was unchanged from origination given the recent nature of the transaction coupled with no significant changes in property-level or market metrics. Prestige s initial fair value assessment of their equity interest was $3,500,000 (total initial equity investment of $3,710,000, less transaction costs, resulting in an initial fair value equal to 94% of cost). (This situation illustrates the impact of transaction costs on fair value at the first measurement date after the transaction close, which is discussed in further detail in chapter 12.) Valuation at June 30, 2X08 C.04A.06 During the first two quarters of 2X08, Prestige s leasing team had some significant successes in re-tenanting Catalina. Several new 10-year leases were negotiated and signed with tenants agreeing to occupy spaces ranging from 1,000 square feet to 4,600 square feet. No leases expired and no tenants vacated during the first two quarters of 2X08. As of June 30, 2X08, physical occupancy had increased to 88% with the addition of the new tenants, which was in-line with the market vacancy rate 5
6 of 12% in the submarket. Catalina had achieved stabilization several months ahead of the lease-up plan contemplated in Prestige s underwriting analysis and projections. C.04A.07 As a result of the recent leasing activity at Catalina, Prestige now projected that net operating income (NOI) would be higher than it was projected to be as of the previous measurement date. Further, in its assessment of the risk profile of Catalina, Prestige noted that although several lease expirations for large tenants still loomed on the horizon, the risk profile of the asset had been reduced somewhat by the boost in occupancy. On the other hand, transactions for office properties in the submarket indicated that capitalization rates and return requirements had increased relative to the previous measurement date. Prestige considered these factors and estimated that the gross asset value of Catalina had increased to $14,750,000 (or $ per square foot) at June 30, 2X08 based on the results of a discounted cash flow analysis. The fair value was supported by several recent transactions involving similar office properties that traded at prices ranging from $135 to $158 per square foot. C.04A.08 The mortgage note commenced amortization in January 2X08, and by June 30, 2X08 had an outstanding principal balance of $10,393,041. Market lending spreads and credit market conditions had not changed since origination, nor had there been any significant changes in the asset quality. Therefore, Prestige concluded that a market participant would estimate the value of the mortgage debt for the purpose of valuing their equity interest as equal to the outstanding principal balance. C.04A.09 As of June 30, 2X08, the fair value of Prestige s equity in Catalina was $4,356,959, calculated by deducting the value of the mortgage debt for the purpose of valuing equity (which was equal to the outstanding principal balance) from the gross property value. Valuation at December 31, 2X09 C.04A.10 C.04A.11 Subsequent to the initial success that Prestige had in attracting new tenants to Catalina, it was unable to persuade two large tenants to remain in the building when the leases reached the end of their terms. One tenant was lured away by an attractive tenant improvement allowance at a newly constructed office asset that came to market nearby during the second quarter 2X09. The other tenant informed Prestige that it was consolidating headcount in another location closer to the central business district of the nearby city under a new office of the future concept and would no longer need space at Catalina or elsewhere in the submarket. As a result of the loss of these two major tenants, physical occupancy at Catalina had dropped to 60% by the fourth quarter of 2X09. As part of the December 31, 2X09 measurement, Prestige valued its unit of account (the equity investment in the holding company) considering the fair value of the property less the value of the mortgage debt for the purpose of valuing equity. To estimate the fair value of the property, Prestige updated its projections to reflect 6
7 the loss of the two tenants, for which it previously had assumed a high probability of renewal. Based on analyzing past history and considering current market conditions, Prestige expected to incur nine months of vacancy in the two empty suites before it would be able to begin collecting rent from new tenants. Broader market conditions had not changed significantly over this period and, therefore, Prestige made no major changes to the other key valuation assumptions. As a result, Prestige revised its estimate of the gross property value to $12,750,000. C.04A.12 C.04A.13 In estimating the value of the mortgage debt for the purpose of valuing equity, Prestige noted that the debt was assumable, and considered whether market participants transacting in the equity would benefit from assuming the debt, leaving the debt in place following a change in control of the equity of the holding company. Over the last year and a half, Catalina s cash flow had been sufficient to service principal and interest payments on the mortgage note, which had been amortized to $10,062,048. However, Prestige estimated that the deterioration of the occupancy at the collateral and the resulting increase in the LTV ratio to over 80% had impacted the credit risk of the lender s position. While market lending conditions had remained relatively stable since the note was originated, Prestige estimated that a buyer of the equity would not be able to obtain new debt at this leverage, and that given the decline in the value of the property, the coupon for the debt was below the market yield. Therefore, it would be advantageous for the buyer of the equity to assume the debt. To estimate the value of the mortgage debt for the purpose of valuing equity, Prestige estimated based on current market conditions that lenders investing in the debt would demand an additional spread of 50 bps for a similar loan as of December 31, 2X09. Because the remaining term of the debt was only eight years, Prestige considered this remaining term of the debt in assessing the benefit that market participants would realize from the below-market coupon; a buyer who wanted a mortgage for a longer term would not be able to maintain the below market coupon for the period beyond the maturity of the current mortgage, but instead would need to refinance or renegotiate the mortgage at that date. Using an all-in market rate of 3.60% to discount the eight years of remaining cash flows under the mortgage note resulted in a fair value of $9,744,834, or 96.85% of par. At December 31, 2X09, Prestige estimated that the fair value of its equity in Catalina was equal to $3,005,166, calculated as the gross property value of $12,750,000 minus the debt value of $9,744,834, considering the benefit that market participants transacting in the equity would realize from the below-market debt coupon as discussed in the previous paragraph. Prestige noted that the total decline in the property value of 13.56% relative to the initial investment impacted both the debt, which declined by 6.24%, and the equity, which declined by 31.03%. Although the now below-market interest rate on the mortgage note provided some benefit to Prestige s equity interest over the remaining term of the mortgage, this benefit provided only a partial offset to the decline in the total equity value driven by the reduction in the gross property value. 7
8 Valuation at December 31, 2X10 C.04A.14 C.04A.15 C.04A.16 Over the next several quarters, Prestige was able to locate tenants to backfill the two suites that had been vacated during the last year. Prestige combined the two large suites with some existing vacant space and demised this area into five smaller spaces, with tenants moving into each of these suites at various times during 2X10. These new tenants increased occupancy to 92% by the start of the fourth quarter of 2X10. Each of these new leases featured 10-year terms, triple net expense reimbursements, and 2% annual base rent escalations. The weighted average lease term across all tenants in Catalina was approximately 8.4 years. Transaction volume in the submarket had recently been growing, and several nearby office properties had traded at capitalization rates below 9.00% (below the going-in rate of 9.50% at which Prestige had acquired Catalina, pointing to an increase in prices for office properties). Believing that these recent developments indicated that it was likely that the fund would be able to sell Catalina at a price that would achieve its target return, Prestige engaged a broker to provide a range of preliminary price opinions and commence a marketing program for the investment. Beginning in December 2X10, Prestige s broker, McCauley & Associates (McCauley), distributed an offering memorandum to various market participants, including a group of REITs and private equity groups. After receiving several preliminary indications of interest, McCauley opened a data room and conducted several tours of Catalina for potential investors. A call for highest and best offers was made, which resulted in three different bids that Prestige weighed in consultation with its broker team. Prestige ultimately selected the bid tendered by SAF Capital (SAF), which was the highest offer price ($15,400,000). Additional factors swayed Prestige in favor of the SAF bid, such as their reputation for deal execution and a 21-day due diligence contingency period that was several weeks shorter than the other two bids. In the SAF term sheet, Prestige learned that SAF s investment team had underwritten to a year 1 NOI projection of $1,386,000, which implied a going-in capitalization rate of 9.00%. Prestige s internal NOI projections for Catalina in 2X11 now stood at $1,364,000, which it believed was slightly different from SAF s projections based on the probability of renewal attributed to a tenant with a lease expiration in mid-2x11. SAF was unwilling to disclose its underwriting model and the derivation of its NOI projections. Prestige and SAF retained their lawyers to draft a purchase and sale agreement that was executed on December 30, 2X10, with the closing scheduled for January 24, 2X11. SAF deposited $1,000,000 in escrow as earnest money, which was refundable until the close of the due diligence period on January 20, 2X11. Prestige uploaded a more detailed set of materials to the data room including all leases, surveys, title documents, and engineering and environmental reports. At December 31, 2X10, Prestige again estimated the fair value of its equity in Catalina by subtracting the fair value of the mortgage debt from the gross fair value of the property. In estimating the fair value of the mortgage debt, Prestige believed that market participants would no longer require an additional spread of 50 bps on the market rate used to discount the note payments. The credit position had 8
9 improved significantly to around 65% LTV based on the recent offer of $15,400,000. Moreover, credit market conditions had loosened over the past several quarters with index rates falling approximately 25 bps. A survey of market participants investing in mortgage debt (including third-party lenders as well as Prestige s observations from similar transactions into which it had recently entered) and published data sources indicated that lending spreads for similar instruments with the same remaining maturity had also contracted slightly by approximately 10 bps. As a result of the improvements in collateral quality and the changes in index rates and lending spreads, Prestige concluded that the appropriate market interest rate to apply to the cash flows on the mortgage note over the remaining term was 2.75%, 35 bps below the 3.10% coupon. C.04A.17 At this point, the mortgage note had been amortized to a par value of $9,832,690. The application of a market interest rate of 2.75% in Prestige s discounted cash flow model yielded a net present value for the note of $10,032,949, or 102% of par. Given that the loan was still within the 5-year lockout period, it remained subject to a 1% prepayment penalty. Prestige, therefore, concluded in this case that the value of the mortgage debt for the purpose of valuing the equity in Catalina was equal to the pre-payable balance (101% of par or $9,931,017), since it would be optimal for a market participant investing in the equity to prepay the note and refinance at the lower market rate of interest rather than continue to pay an above-market rate. For further discussion of prepayment penalties, see the Time Horizon for the Investment section in paragraphs C.04A.18 Prestige then estimated the gross property value for the asset in light of the sale contract it had just executed. The sale price had been negotiated at $15,400,000 and Prestige s exclusive broker arrangement with McCauley indicated that a broker fee of 1.5% of the gross sale price would be paid by Prestige upon closing. Prestige also anticipated that other administrative and legal costs would accumulate and total approximately 0.50% of the sale price. Prestige used the gross sale price of $15,400,000 as the starting point for the estimation of fair value, which properly did not deduct the 2.00% in transaction costs it expected to pay. Prestige then considered the contingency provisions in the purchase and sale agreement and other risk factors. In particular, Prestige was aware that in its term sheet, SAF had projected a higher NOI than Prestige did, which could change after the buyer delved deeper into the operations of the property during the due diligence period. Until the earnest money deposit was no longer refundable after the close of the due diligence period, SAF could back out of the deal without financial consequence other than the time and expenses it had invested to date. Despite these concerns, Prestige was confident that SAF wanted to close the transaction as planned, and, therefore, assigned a probability of 85% to that outcome. The other two bids received during the highest-and-best round were for $14,900,000 and $15,100,000, which Prestige considered to be the next best alternative to the SAF deal. Prestige therefore estimated the fair value of Catalina to be $15,340,000, which was the weighted average of the SAF deal (85% probability) and the average of the two other bids ($15,000,000 at a 15% probability). 9
10 C.04A.19 Prestige deducted the value of the mortgage debt for the purpose of valuing equity of $9,931,017 (101% of par) from its estimate of the fair value of the gross asset value of Catalina ($15,340,000) to arrive at an equity fair value as of December 31, 2X10 of $5,408,983. Task Force Observations C.04A.20 Estimating the fair value of real estate investments requires consideration of several nuances, including: Assessing the appropriate unit of account (see chapter 4) Assessing the value of debt that a market participant would use for the purpose of valuing equity (see chapter 6) Considering transaction costs when estimating fair value (see chapter 12) Using appropriate market participant-based valuation methodologies (see chapters 3 and 5) Calibration (see chapter 10) Assessing the appropriate unit of account C.04A.21 The unit of account illustrated in this case is the equity interest in the office building. The fair value of that equity interest, consistent with an assumed sale of the equity interest on the measurement date, is impacted by the fair value of the building unencumbered by debt and the value of debt that a market participant would use for the purpose of valuing equity. Assessing the value of debt that a market participant would use for the purpose of valuing equity C.04A.22 Assessing the value of debt that a market participant would use for the purpose of valuing equity requires judgment. This case illustrates that based on specific facts and circumstances the value of debt for the purpose of valuing equity may be equal to par value or to the payoff amount for the mortgage, or may be less than par or greater than par. In this case study, since the mortgage was assumable, the value of debt for the purpose of valuing equity was equal to the fair value, capturing the benefit (or cost) that market participants would realize from a below (or above) market coupon over the expected remaining term of the mortgage (through maturity or through the expected prepayment date, if any). If the mortgage was not assumable, the fair value of the mortgage would be an input that market participants would consider in estimating the value of equity, adjusted for the implicit restriction on the equity position associated with the inability to transfer the debt. 10
11 Considering transaction costs when estimating fair value C.04A.23 As noted in chapter 12, fair value excludes transaction costs. This case study highlights the impact of transaction costs at entry, which resulted in an initial fair value less than the invested capital. This case study also illustrates the measurement of fair value near an exit transaction, considering the risks of that transaction as well as the proper exclusion of transaction costs at exit. Using appropriate market participant-based valuation methodologies C.04A.24 The value of an unencumbered real estate investment is determined using appropriate market participant assumptions. As outlined in this case, market participants would typically consider comparable market transactions when available, as well as either a discounted cash flow approach or applying a market capitalization rate to net operating income. It is also possible that properties that have reached stabilization may revert back to a non-stabilized basis, depending on the facts and circumstances associated with the property. Calibration C.04A.25 As discussed in chapter 10, calibration ensures that the assumptions used in the valuation model are consistent with the transaction on the initial investment date. To estimate the fair value of the investment at future measurement dates, these assumptions would be updated to reflect the changes in the property and the changes in the markets between periods. Conclusions C.04A.26 C.04A.27 This case study is focused on real estate funds that apply investment company accounting in accordance with FASB ASC 946. The unit of account in this case study is the equity interest in the real-estate investment held by the fund. Certain real estate funds are not in the scope of FASB ASC 946. For those funds, the entire property is typically reported as an asset of the fund, and the mortgage debt is reported as a liability of the fund. Further, certain of these funds elect to report the mortgage debt at fair value, using the fair value option in FASB ASC 825. The principles illustrated in this case study may also be useful in assessing the fair value of the mortgage debt for such funds. 11
Front Yard Residential Corporation Reports Third Quarter 2018 Results
Front Yard Residential Corporation Reports Third Quarter 2018 Results November 7, 2018 CHRISTIANSTED, U.S. Virgin Islands, Nov. 07, 2018 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Front Yard Residential Corporation ( Front Yard
More informationAchieved record annual revenues of $110.0 million for 2018, representing an increase of 5.8%
Clipper Realty Inc. Announces Fourth Quarter and Full-Year 2018 Results Reports Record Annual Revenues, Record Annual Income from Operations and Record Quarterly and Annual Adjusted Funds from Operations
More informationDefinitions. CPI is a lease in which base rent is adjusted based on changes in a consumer price index.
Annualized Rental Income is rental revenue under our leases on Operating Properties on a straight-line basis, which includes the effect of rent escalations and any tenant concessions, such as free rent,
More informationProposed New Accounting Standards For Leases
Relationships backed by performance. Proposed New Accounting Standards For Leases Doug Richardson Live Seminar 9:00am 10:30am June 21 2012 Overview and Background Leases serve a vital role in many entities
More informationCenter for Plain English Accounting AICPA s National A&A Resource Center available exclusively to PCPS members
REPORT February 22, 2017 Center for Plain English Accounting AICPA s National A&A Resource Center available exclusively to PCPS members ASU 2017-04: Goodwill Simplifications Implementation Considerations
More informationCC HOLDINGS GS V LLC INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. Consolidated Financial Statements Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Consolidated Financial Statements Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 Report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Independent Auditors...................................
More informationThe joint leases project change is coming
No. 2010-4 18 June 2010 Technical Line Technical guidance on standards and practice issues The joint leases project change is coming What you need to know The proposed changes to the accounting for leases
More informationUNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, DC FORM 8-K/A
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, DC 20549 FORM 8-K/A CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event
More informationHighwoods Reports Third Quarter 2017 Results
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Ref: 17-20 Contact: Brendan Maiorana Senior Vice President, Finance and Investor Relations 919-431-1529 Highwoods Reports Third Quarter 2017 Results $0.55 Net Income per Share $0.86
More informationLease Accounting: Are you prepared?
Lease Accounting: Are you prepared? In this paper, Savills Studley describes the importance of being prepared for the financial reporting changes for leases under the new FASB standards. For most companies,
More informationCore Value Add Opportunistic
Equity Investment Styles Core Value Add Opportunistic Leverage up to 50% up to 65% 65% up to? Target Returns 8% - 12% 12% - 18% >18% Target above 20% Return Source Mostly income Some appreciation Mostly
More informationHighwoods Reports Third Quarter 2015 Results
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Ref: 15-22 Contact: Mark Mulhern Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 919-875-6682 Reports Third Quarter 2015 Results $0.77 FFO per Share (Including $0.01 per Share of
More informationHighwoods Reports Third Quarter 2018 Results
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Ref: 18-18 Contact: Brendan Maiorana Senior Vice President, Finance and Investor Relations 919-431-1529 Highwoods Reports Third Quarter 2018 Results $0.32 Net Income per Share $0.86
More informationUNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q ý QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the Quarterly Period Ended
More informationSelect Income REIT Announces Third Quarter 2017 Results
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Christopher Ranjitkar, Director, Investor Relations (617) 796-8320 Select Income REIT Announces Third Quarter 2017 Results Third Quarter Net Income of $0.35 Per Share Third
More informationPS Business Parks, Inc. Reports Results for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2017
News Release PS Business Parks, Inc. 701 Western Avenue Glendale, CA 91201-2349 psbusinessparks.com For Release: Immediately Date: April 25, 2017 Contact: Edward A. Stokx (818) 244-8080, Ext. 1649 PS Business
More informationRe: FASB Exposure Draft, Proposed Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, "Business Combinations, a replacement of FASB Statement No.
Letter of Comment No: lo%" File Reference: 1204-001 October 28, 2005 Mr. Robert Herz Chairman Financial Accounting Standards Board 40 I Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116 File Reference No.
More informationU.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT WASHINGTON, DC
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT WASHINGTON, DC 20410-8000 ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR HOUSING- FEDERAL HOUSING COMMISSIONER Special Attention of: All Multifamily Hub and Program Center Directors
More informationDCT INDUSTRIAL TRUST REPORTS FOURTH QUARTER AND FULL-YEAR 2017 RESULTS. Net Earnings of $0.22 per Diluted Share in Q4; $1.11 per Diluted Share in 2017
Press Release FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: DCT INDUSTRIAL TRUST REPORTS FOURTH QUARTER AND FULL-YEAR 2017 RESULTS Net Earnings of $0.22 per Diluted Share in Q4; $1.11 per Diluted Share in 2017 FFO, as adjusted,
More informationFASB s 2013 Proposal on Accounting for Leases
FASB s 2013 Proposal on Accounting for Leases Frequently Asked Questions September 2013 The project on lease accounting is a joint project of the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board.
More informationThe New Lease Accounting Standard. Hunter Mink, CPA, CCIFP Brian Rosenberg, CPA, MBA
The New Lease Accounting Standard Hunter Mink, CPA, CCIFP Brian Rosenberg, CPA, MBA 1 Agenda Introduction Lease Identification and Classification Lessee Accounting Other Considerations Disclosures Impact
More informationLease Accounting and Loan Covenants: What is the Impact?
Lease Accounting and Loan Covenants: What is the Impact? Monday June 26, 2017 9:15 AM 10:30 AM Presented by: Charlie Shannon Partner Moss Adams LLP 8750 N. Central Expressway, Suite 300 Dallas, TX 75231
More informationCONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Dundee Real Estate Investment Trust Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited) June 30, December 31, (in thousands of dollars) Note 2004 2003 Assets Rental properties 3,4
More informationHighwoods Reports Second Quarter 2018 Results
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Ref: 18-14 Contact: Brendan Maiorana Senior Vice President, Finance and Investor Relations 919-431-1529 Highwoods Reports Second Quarter 2018 Results $0.49 Net Income per Share $0.87
More informationFOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE GLOBAL NET LEASE ANNOUNCES OPERATING RESULTS FOR THIRD QUARTER 2018 New York, November 7, 2018 Global Net Lease, Inc. (NYSE: GNL) ( GNL or the Company ), a real estate investment
More informationFIRST INDUSTRIAL REALTY TRUST REPORTS FIRST QUARTER 2018 RESULTS
First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. 311 South Wacker Drive Suite 3900 Chicago, IL 60606 312/344-4300 FAX: 312/922-9851 MEDIA RELEASE FIRST INDUSTRIAL REALTY TRUST REPORTS FIRST QUARTER 2018 RESULTS Occupancy
More informationFOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE American Finance Trust Announces Second Quarter Operating Results New York, August 9, - American Finance Trust, Inc. (Nasdaq: AFIN) ( AFIN or the Company ), a real estate investment
More informationPS Business Parks, Inc. Reports Results for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2018
News Release PS Business Parks, Inc. 701 Western Avenue Glendale, CA 91201-2349 psbusinessparks.com For Release: Immediately Date: October 23, 2018 Contact: Jeff Hedges (818) 244-8080, Ext. 1649 PS Business
More informationFront Yard Residential Corporation Announces Transformative Acquisition and Reports Second Quarter 2018 Results
Front Yard Residential Corporation Announces Transformative Acquisition and Reports Second Quarter 2018 Results August 9, 2018 CHRISTIANSTED, U.S. Virgin Islands, Aug. 09, 2018 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Front
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY A GUIDE TO ACCOUNTING FOR BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A GUIDE TO ACCOUNTING FOR BUSINESS COMBINATIONS This Executive Summary is part of RSM US LLP s A Guide to Accounting for Business Combinations and should be read in conjunction with that
More informationroots The Substance of the Standard Contents Changes to the Accounting for Goodwill for Private Companies
The Substance of the Standard MAYER HOFFMAN MCCANN P.C. AN INDEPENDENT CPA FIRM TM A publication of the Professional Standards Group February 2014 Changes to the Accounting for Goodwill for Private Companies
More informationNew leases standard ASC 842 Lessee - operating leases. Itai Gotlieb, Partner, Professional Practice July 2017
ASC 842 Lessee - operating leases Itai Gotlieb, Partner, Professional Practice July 2017 Overview Under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 842, Leases, lessees recognize assets and liabilities for
More informationClipper Realty Inc. Announces Third Quarter 2018 Results Reports Record Revenues, Income From Operations and Adjusted Funds From Operations
Clipper Realty Inc. Announces Third Quarter 2018 Results Reports Record Revenues, Income From Operations and Adjusted Funds From Operations NEW YORK, November 1, 2018 /Business Wire/ -- Clipper Realty
More informationAnalysing lessee financial statements and Non-GAAP performance measures
February 2019 IFRS Foundation The Essentials Issue No. 5 Analysing lessee financial statements and Non-GAAP performance measures Introduction Investors and company managers generally view free cash flow
More informationReal Estate Syndication Income 19,451 NOTE
Real Estate Syndication Income 19,451 Section 10,500 Statement of Position 92-1 Accounting for Real Estate Syndication Income February 6, 1992 NOTE Statements of Position of the Accounting Standards Division
More informationFOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE GLOBAL NET LEASE ANNOUNCES OPERATING RESULTS FOR SECOND QUARTER 2018 New York, August 8, 2018 Global Net Lease, Inc. (NYSE: GNL) ( GNL or the Company ), a real estate investment trust
More informationCarter Validus Mission Critical REIT, Inc. Reports Second Quarter 2016 Results
Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT, Inc. Reports Second Quarter 2016 Results TAMPA, FL (September 1, 2016) - Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT, Inc. (the Company ) announced today its operating results
More informationLAPACO PAPER PRODUCTS LTD.
LAPACO PAPER PRODUCTS LTD. 5200 J.A. Bombardier Street Longueuil, Quebec TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Photographs & Location Maps 1 Project Summary 2 The Location 3 Lapaco Paper Products Ltd. 4 Investment
More informationReal Estate & REIT Modeling: Quiz Questions Module 1 Accounting, Overview & Key Metrics
Real Estate & REIT Modeling: Quiz Questions Module 1 Accounting, Overview & Key Metrics 1. How are REITs different from normal companies? a. Unlike normal companies, REITs are not required to pay income
More informationLeases (Topic 842) Proposed Accounting Standards Update. Narrow-Scope Improvements for Lessors
Proposed Accounting Standards Update Issued: August 13, 2018 Comments Due: September 12, 2018 Leases (Topic 842) Narrow-Scope Improvements for Lessors The Board issued this Exposure Draft to solicit public
More informationTechnical Corrections and Improvements to Recently Issued Standards
Two Proposed Accounting Standards Updates Issued: September 27, 2017 Comments Due: November 13, 2017 Technical Corrections and Improvements to Recently Issued Standards I. Accounting Standards Update No.
More informationA New Lease on Life: The GASB s New Accounting for Leases
Tuesday, May 23, 2017 2:00 3:15PM A New Lease on Life: The GASB s New Accounting for Leases MODERATOR Frances Lee Deputy Chief Financial Officer San Francisco Public Utilities Commission SPEAKERS Stephen
More informationLease-Versus-Buy. By Steven R. Price, CCIM
Lease-Versus-Buy Cost Analysis By Steven R. Price, CCIM Steven R. Price, CCIM, Benson Price Commercial, Colorado Springs, Colorado, has a national tenant representation and consulting practice. He was
More informationHighwoods Properties Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2011 Results
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Ref: 12-06 Contact: Tabitha Zane Vice President, Investor Relations 919-431-1529 Highwoods Properties Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2011 Results $0.70 FFO per Share for Fourth
More informationBoard Meeting Handout ACCOUNTING FOR CONTINGENCIES September 6, 2007
PURPOSE Board Meeting Handout ACCOUNTING FOR CONTINGENCIES September 6, 2007 At today s meeting, the Board will discuss whether to add to its technical agenda a project considering whether to revise the
More informationORIGINAL PRONOUNCEMENTS
Financial Accounting Standards Board ORIGINAL PRONOUNCEMENTS AS AMENDED FASB Technical Bulletin No. 88-1 Issues Relating to Accounting for Leases: Time Pattern of the Physical Use of the Property in an
More informationBrixmor Residual Holding LLC and Subsidiaries Years Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 With Report of Independent Auditors
C ONSOLIDATED F INANCIAL S TATEMENTS Brixmor Residual Holding LLC and Subsidiaries Years Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 With Report of Independent Auditors Ernst & Young LLP 1403-1211259 Consolidated
More informationEDGEFRONT REALTY CORP. MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS For the three-month period ended March 31, 2013
EDGEFRONT REALTY CORP. MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS For the three-month period ended March 31, 2013 May 30, 2013 MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS The following management s discussion and analysis
More informationEITF ABSTRACTS. [Nullified by FIN 46 and FIN 46(R) for entities within the scope of FIN 46 or FIN 46(R)]
EITF ABSTRACTS Issue No. 90-15 Title: Impact of Nonsubstantive Lessors, Residual Value Guarantees, and Other Provisions in Leasing Transactions [Nullified by FIN 46 and FIN 46(R) for entities within the
More informationProposed Accounting Standards Update (Revised), Topic 842: Leases; issued May 16, 2013.
Financial Accounting Standards Board Technical Director - File Reference No. 2013-270 Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 - PO Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116 August 23, 2013 Re: Proposed
More informationExtra Space Storage Inc. Reports 2018 Fourth Quarter and Year-End Results
Extra Space Storage Inc. Reports 2018 Fourth Quarter and Year-End Results February 20, 2019 SALT LAKE CITY, Feb. 20, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- Extra Space Storage Inc. (NYSE: EXR) (the "Company"), a leading
More information2018 Accounting & Auditing Update P R E S E N T E D B Y : D A N I E L L E Z I M M E R M A N & A N D R E A S A R T I N
2018 Accounting & Auditing Update P R E S E N T E D B Y : D A N I E L L E Z I M M E R M A N & A N D R E A S A R T I N AGENDA Leases FASB & GASB Revenue Recognition FASB 2 FASB ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic
More informationDREAM GLOBAL ANNOUNCES FOURTH QUARTER RESULTS, 24% ANNUAL NET ASSET VALUE GROWTH AND OVER 6% FOURTH QUARTER COMPARATIVE NOI GROWTH
DREAM GLOBAL ANNOUNCES FOURTH QUARTER RESULTS, 24% ANNUAL NET ASSET VALUE GROWTH AND OVER 6% FOURTH QUARTER COMPARATIVE NOI GROWTH TORONTO, FEBRUARY 20, 2019 DREAM GLOBAL REIT (TSX:DRG.UN, FRA:DRG) (or
More informationLeaseCalcs: The Great Wall
LeaseCalcs: The Great Wall Marc A. Maiona June 22, 2016 The Great Wall: Companies reporting under IFRS are about to hit the wall due to new lease accounting standards. Every company that reports under
More informationRetail Acquisition Example
Property Information Retail Acquisition Example Project Assumptions Acquisition Assumptions Property Name Retail Acquisition Example Project Type Acquisition Location Austin, TX Acquisition Cost $1,800,000
More information17 CFR Ch. II ( Edition)
229.1110 trustee s removal, replacement or resignation, as well as how the expenses associated with changing from one trustee to another trustee will be paid. Instruction to Item 1109. If multiple trustees
More informationLeases: Overview of the new guidance
Leases: Overview of the new guidance Prepared by: Richard Stuart, Partner, National Professional Standards Group, RSM US LLP richard.stuart@rsmus.com, +1 203 905 5027 March 2, 2016 Introduction On February
More informationPS Business Parks, Inc. Reports Results for the Quarter and Year Ended December 31, 2018
News Release PS Business Parks, Inc. 701 Western Avenue Glendale, CA 91201-2349 psbusinessparks.com For Release: Immediately Date: February 20, 2019 Contact: Jeff Hedges (818) 244-8080, Ext. 1649 PS Business
More informationExtra Space Storage Inc. Reports 2017 Fourth Quarter and Year-End Results
Extra Space Storage Inc. Reports 2017 Fourth Quarter and Year-End Results February 20, 2018 SALT LAKE CITY, Feb. 20, 2018 /PRNewswire/ -- Extra Space Storage Inc. (NYSE: EXR) (the "Company"), a leading
More informationUsing the Work of an Auditor s Specialist: Auditing Interpretations of Section 620
Using the Work of an Auditor s Specialist 767 AU-C Section 9620 Using the Work of an Auditor s Specialist: Auditing Interpretations of Section 620 Interpretation No. 1, "The Use of Legal Interpretations
More informationTechnical Line FASB final guidance
No. 2016-11 14 April 2016 Technical Line FASB final guidance How the FASB s new leases standard will affect real estate entities In this issue: Overview... 1 Key considerations... 2 Scope and scope exceptions...
More informationIndustrial Income Trust Inc.
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event
More informationWP Glimcher Reports Second Quarter 2016 Results
NEWS RELEASE WP Glimcher Reports Second Quarter 2016 Results COLUMBUS, OH August 3, 2016 WP Glimcher Inc. (NYSE: WPG) today reported financial and operating results for the second quarter ended June 30,
More informationTechnical Line FASB final guidance
No. 2017-17 29 June 2017 Technical Line FASB final guidance How the new revenue standard affects operating real estate entities In this issue: Overview... 1 Real estate sales... 2 Property management services...
More informationFIRST INDUSTRIAL REALTY TRUST REPORTS FIRST QUARTER 2019 RESULTS
First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. 1 North Wacker Drive Suite 4200 Chicago, IL 60606 312/344-4300 MEDIA RELEASE FIRST INDUSTRIAL REALTY TRUST REPORTS FIRST QUARTER 2019 RESULTS Signed 1.8 Million Square
More informationSenior Housing Properties Trust Announces Fourth Quarter and Year End 2017 Results
Senior Housing Properties Trust NEWS RELEASE Senior Housing Properties Trust Announces Fourth Quarter and Year End 2017 Results 2/27/2018 NEWTON, Mass.--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Senior Housing Properties Trust
More informationCorporate Presentation
October 2018 Corporate Presentation (NYSE: SAFE) Forward-Looking Statements and Other Matters This release may contain forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact
More informationMountain Equipment Co-operative
Mountain Equipment Co-operative Consolidated Financial Statements, and December 28, 2009 April 11, 2012 Independent Auditor s Report To the Members of Mountain Equipment Co-operative We have audited the
More informationALLIED PROPERTIES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST. Financial Statements. Year Ended December 31, 2004
ALLIED PROPERTIES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST Financial Statements Year Ended December 31, 2004 Auditors' Report To the Unitholders of Allied Properties Real Estate Investment Trust We have audited the
More informationLeases. Asset to be abandoned or subleased Supplement to KPMG s Handbook, Leases US GAAP. June kpmg.com/us/frv
Leases Asset to be abandoned or subleased Supplement to KPMG s Handbook, Leases US GAAP June 2018 kpmg.com/us/frv Contents Foreword... 1 About this publication... 2 1. The concepts... 3 Q&A 1.1: Has a
More informationGEORGIA ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY VENTURES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2017 AND 2016
GEORGIA ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY VENTURES, INC. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS YEARS ENDED with INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT 3-4 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
More informationThe Financial Accounting Standards Board
V A L U A T I O N How the New Leases Standard May Impact Business Valuations By Judith H. O Dell, CPA, CVA The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued the 485 page Leases Standard (Topic 842) in February,
More informationTopic 842 Technical Corrections Summary of Comments Received
Contact(s) David Hoyer Co-Author Ext. 462 Andy Bologna Co-Author Ext. 356 Thomas Faineteau Co-Author Ext. 362 Chris Roberge Co-Author Ext. 274 Amy Park Co-Author Ext. 476 Shayne Kuhaneck Assistant Director
More informationGlendale, California - PS Business Parks, Inc. (AMEX: PSB), reported operating results for the fourth quarter and the year ending December 31, 2001.
News Release PS Business Parks, Inc. 701 Western Avenue P.O. Box 25050 Glendale, CA 91221-5050 www.psbusinessparks.com For Release: Immediately Date: January 30, 2002 Contact: Mr. Jack Corrigan (818) 244-8080,
More informationTechnical Line FASB final guidance
No. 2016-09 14 April 2016 Technical Line FASB final guidance How the FASB s new leases standard will affect health care entities In this issue: Overview... 1 Key considerations... 3 Scope and scope exceptions...
More informationHighwoods Properties Reports Third Quarter Results. $0.58 FFO per Diluted Share (Excluding Debt Extinguishment Loss and Property Acquisition Costs)
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Ref: 10-28 Contact: Tabitha Zane Vice President, Investor Relations 919-431-1529 Highwoods Properties Reports Third Quarter Results $0.58 FFO per Diluted Share (Excluding Debt Extinguishment
More informationIFRS - 3. Business Combinations. By:
IFRS - 3 Business Combinations Objective 1. The purpose of this IFRS is to specify to disclose financial information by an entity when carrying out a business combination. In particular, specifies that
More informationEITF Issue No EITF Issue No Working Group Report No. 1, p. 1
EITF Issue No. 03-9 The views in this report are not Generally Accepted Accounting Principles until a consensus is reached and it is FASB Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 03-9 Title: Interaction of
More informationEITF ABSTRACTS. Title: Accounting for Changes That Result in a Transferor Regaining Control of Financial Assets Sold
EITF ABSTRACTS Title: Accounting for Changes That Result in a Transferor Regaining Control of Financial Assets Sold Issue No. 02-9 Dates Discussed: September 11 12, 2002; November 21, 2002; January 23,
More informationIFRS INTERPRETATIONS COMMITTEE - AGENDA DECISIONS (JANUARY AND MARCH 2018)
IFRS INTERPRETATIONS COMMITTEE - AGENDA DECISIONS (JANUARY AND MARCH 2018) INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING BULLETIN 2018/01 Background This Bulletin summarises issues that the IFRS Interpretations Committee
More informationOur Objectives. Our Strategy
2005 Third Quarter Report» Management s Discussion and Analysis Management s Discussion and Analysis This Management s Discussion and Analysis has been dated as at November 3, 2005. All dollar amounts
More informationPerry Farm Development Co.
(a not-for-profit corporation) Consolidated Financial Report December 31, 2010 Contents Report Letter 1 Consolidated Financial Statements Balance Sheet 2 Statement of Operations 3 Statement of Changes
More informationChapter 3 Business Valuation Report
CHAPTER 3: BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT Chapter 3 Business Valuation Report A1. Pre-IPO Valuation Need Company Restructuring and Financing It is not unusual that companies undergo series of restructuring
More informationImpact of lease accounting changes to corporate real estate
Impact of lease accounting changes to corporate real estate Overview In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued its long-awaited revision to lease accounting Accounting Standards
More informationEdison Electric Institute and American Gas Association New Lease Standard
Edison Electric Institute and American Gas Association New Lease Standard May 16, 2016 Disclaimer The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances
More informationShawnee Landing TIF Project. City of Shawnee, Kansas. Need For Assistance Analysis
Shawnee Landing TIF Project City of Shawnee, Kansas Need For Assistance Analysis December 17, 2014 Table of Contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 1 2 PURPOSE... 2 3 THE PROJECT... 3 4 ASSISTANCE REQUEST... 7
More informationExecutive Summary. New leases standard Lessees
Executive Summary December 2018 The new leases standard focuses on increased transparency and comparability providing financial statement users with more information about an entity s leasing activities.
More informationLease Accounting Standard Update ASU Presented by: Nicholas Hoefel, CPA Manager, Audit Services Group
Lease Accounting Standard Update ASU 2016-02 Presented by: Nicholas Hoefel, CPA Manager, Audit Services Group 1 Overview Introduction Background and current environment Effective dates and transition Key
More informationEN Official Journal of the European Union L 320/373
29.11.2008 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 320/373 INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARD 3 Business combinations OBJECTIVE 1 The objective of this IFRS is to specify the financial reporting
More informationALLIED PROPERTIES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST. Financial Statements. For the Period Ended March 31, 2004
Financial Statements For the Period Ended March 31, 2004 BALANCE SHEET At March 31, 2004 INDEX Page Balance Sheet 1 Statement of Unitholders' Equity 2 Statement of Earnings 3 Statement of Cash Flows 4
More informationMONITORDAILY SPECIAL REPORT. Lease Accounting Project Update as of May 25, 2011 Prepared by Bill Bosco, Leasing 101
MONITORDAILY SPECIAL REPORT Lease Accounting Project Update as of May 25, 2011 Prepared by Bill Bosco, Leasing 101 The high volume of comment letters (780+) and numerous outreach meetings had common criticisms
More informationTechnical Line SEC staff guidance
No. 2013-20 Updated 27 August 2015 Technical Line SEC staff guidance How to apply S-X Rule 3-14 to real estate acquisitions In this issue: Overview... 1 Applicability of Rule 3-14... 2 Measuring significance...
More informationRisk Management Insights
Risk Management Insights Appraisal Review Part II: Income Capitalization Approach George Mann, Managing Director and Chief Appraiser, Collateral Evaluation Services, Inc.and Nikki Griffith, MAI, CCIM,
More informationPreparing for the new ASC 842 Leasing Standard Challenges and Solutions. August 24, 2017
Preparing for the new ASC 842 Leasing Standard Challenges and Solutions August 24, 2017 Learning objectives Define leasing implications related to recently revised FASB standard Differentiate between new
More informationMacquarie Mexican REIT
Macquarie Mexican REIT Fourth Quarter 2012 Results Presentation February 26, 2013 4Q12 Results Agenda 1. Overview Nick O Neil 2. Highlights & Portfolio Performance Jaime Lara 3. Financials Jaime Lara 2
More informationFive Oaks Investment Corp.
Five Oaks Investment Corp. Investor Presentation May 2018 Disclaimer & Name Change This presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933,
More information$450,000 $63,425 $39, % PURCHASE PRICE NET OPERATING INCOME ANNUAL CASH FLOW CAP RATE
Executive Summary Key Property Metrics $450,000 $63,425 $39,143 14.1% PURCHASE PRICE NET OPERATING INCOME ANNUAL CASH FLOW CAP RATE $70,000 $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 Annual Cash Flow Repairs, 8%
More informationEdison Loft Apartments: Raleigh, NC
Edison Loft Apartments: Raleigh, NC Ari Abramson: Vice President, Acquisitions Continental Realty Corporation Headquartered in Baltimore, MD Vertically-integrated owner/operator Dating back 58 years to
More informationJEA s Future Opportunities and Considerations
JEA s Future Opportunities and Considerations Michael Mace, Managing Director February 14, 2018 PFM Orlando, FL Charlotte, NC pfm.com PFM 1 Discussion Topics - Introduction - Scope of the Report - Utility
More informationSecurities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
10-Q 1 clpr20170630_10q.htm FORM 10-Q UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
More information