MARCH 6, :00 A.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 4 TH FLOOR CITY HALL. Ron Chatha, Vice-Chair Robert Crouch Desiree Doerfler Richard Nurse

Transcription

1 Agenda Committee of Adjustment MARCH 6, :00 A.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 4 TH FLOOR CITY HALL MEMBERS: STAFF: Mario Russo, Chair Ron Chatha, Vice-Chair Robert Crouch Desiree Doerfler Richard Nurse Matt Kavanaugh, Development Planner Larysa Dubicki, Development Planner David Vanderberg, Central Area Planner Amanda Dickie, Plans Examiner, Zoning Elizabeth Corazzola, Manager, Zoning and Sign By-Law Services Jeanie Myers, Secretary-Treasurer ADOPTION OF MINUTES: Minutes of meeting held February 13, 2018 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST UNDER THE MUNICIPAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST ACT: WITHDRAWALS/DEFERRALS: (1) NEW CONSENT APPLICATIONS B FERCAP HOLDINGS INC. LOTS 6, 7, AND 8, PLAN 43M AND 91 DELTA PARK BLVD. WARD 8 The purpose of the application is to request consent to sever a parcel of land currently having a total area of approximately 2.47 hectares (6.10 acres) comprising two lots that have merged on title. The severed lot has a frontage of approximately metres ( ft.) and an area of approximately 0.77 hectares (1.90 acres). The effect of the application is to re-establish a former boundary line between 81 Delta Park Boulevard and 91 Delta Park Boulevard to reinstate two separate lots Page 1 of 5

2 NEW MINOR VARIANCE APPLICATIONS (2) A QUEEN STREET EAST INC. PART OF BLK. A, B AND R, PLAN QUEEN STREET EAST, UNITS WARD 1 (3) 1. To permit a Place of Commercial Recreation (Virtual Reality Experience Centre) whereas the by-law does not permit the proposed use. A WOODHALL PARK HOLDING CORPORATION PT. OF LOT 12, CONC. 1 WHS KENNEDY ROAD NORTH WARD 2 The applicant is proposing a two-storey addition to the existing building and is requesting the following variance: (4) 1. To permit a gross floor area of 4,700 square metres whereas the by-law permits a maximum gross floor area of 3,900 square metres. A SOOKLALL DEONARAIN LOT 287, PLAN DRAYTON CRESCENT WARD 7 The applicant is requesting the following variances: 1. To permit an existing open roofed porch to encroach into the required rear yard by 3.79m (12.43ft) resulting in a setback of 4.58m (15.03 ft.) to the rear lot line, whereas the by-law permits an open roofed porch to encroach up to 1.8m (5.91ft) into the required rear yard, resulting in a rear yard setback of 6.97m (22.83 ft.); 2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 1.73m (5.68 ft.) to an existing open roofed porch whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 1.8m (5.91 ft.); Page 2 of 5

3 3. To permit an existing lot coverage of 35% (excluding accessory structures) whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 30% (excluding permitted accessory structures) 4. To permit an existing accessory structure in the exterior side yard whereas the by-law does not permit an accessory structure in the exterior side yard; 5. To permit an existing driveway width of 11.7m (38.39 ft.) whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 6.71m (22.0 ft.). (5) A TIAGO MAIA LOT 241, PLAN HARPER ROAD WARD 3 (6) 1. To permit an existing fence in the front yard having a maximum height of 1.8m (5.90 ft.) whereas the by-law permits a fence in the front yard to a maximum height of 1.0m (3.28 ft.). A PRITPAL GREWAL, YADVINDERPAL GREWAL BLOCK 161, PLAN 43M-1429 HARBANS GREWAL, RANBIR GREWAL 18 RANKIN COURT WARD To permit a front yard setback of 5.32m (17.45 ft.) to a proposed garage addition whereas the bylaw requires a minimum front yard setback of 6.0m (19.68 ft.) to the front of the garage; 2. To permit a rear yard setback of 5.42m (17.78 ft.) to a proposed one-storey addition whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard setback of 6.0m (19.68 ft.) Page 3 of 5

4 (7) A AJAY BAWA AND BALJIT BAWA PT. OF BLK. E, PLAN M-117 PTS. 10, 10A, PLAN 43R JULIETTE SQUARE WARD 8 (8) 1. To vary Schedule C, Section 130 of the by-law to permit a below grade entrance in an interior side yard, outside the building envelope identified on Schedule C whereas the by-law requires that all buildings and structures be constructed in accordance with Schedule C, Section 130; 2. To permit an accessory structure having a setback of 0.4m (1.31 ft.) to the west property line and 0.0m to the south property line whereas the by-law requires a minimum setback of 0.6m (1.97 ft.) to all lot lines. A RANVIR CHATHA PT. OF BLK. 404, PLAN 43M-1505 PTS. 1, 3 TO 5, & 9, PLAN 43R AIRPORT ROAD WARD 10 (9) 1. To permit 25% of the floor area of the dwelling to be used as a home occupation (Travel Agency) whereas the by-law permits a maximum of 15% of the floor area of the dwelling to be used as a home occupation. A NOEL AND KRISTY MUSCAT LOT 69, PLAN 43M DELLS CRESCENT WARD 6 1. To permit an existing exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in the required interior side yard whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below grade in the required interior side yard; Page 4 of 5

5 (10) Committee of Adjustment Agenda 2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.61m (2.0 ft.) to the exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance and a combined total of 1.27m (4.17 ft.) for both interior side yards whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6m (1.97 ft.) interior side yard setback provided the combined total of the interior side yards on an interior lot is not less than 1.8m (5.90 ft.); 3. To permit an existing driveway width of 7.32m (24.02 ft.) whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 6.71m (22.0 ft.); 4. To permit 0.549m (1.80 ft.) of permeable landscaping adjacent to the side property line whereas the by-law requires a minimum of 0.6m (1.97 ft.) permeable landscaping adjacent to the side property line. A NIROSHANA DE SILVA AND LILANI LOT 235, PLAN 43M-817 DE SILVA 20 ATKINS CIRCLE WARD 5 (11) 1. To permit the front of an above grade door located on the side wall to have a minimum distance of 1.14m (3.74 ft.) to an interior side lot line whereas the by-law requires a minimum distance of 1.2m (3.94 ft.) to an interior side lot line; 2. To permit steps to the side door entrance having a setback of 0.6m (1.97 ft.) to the side lot line whereas the by-law requires a minimum setback of 0.9m (2.95 ft.) to the steps; 3. To permit an accessory structure having a setback of 0.4m (1.31 ft.) whereas the by-law requires a minimum setback of 0.6m (1.97 ft.) to all lot lines. A SANCHIT SURI AND SIYA SURI LOT 223, PLAN KINGSMERE CRESCENT WARD 5 1. To permit lot coverage of 33.7% whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 30%; 2. To permit an existing accessory structure (shed) having a side yard setback of 0.20m (0.66 ft.) whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 0.6m (1.97 ft.) Page 5 of 5