TRADITIONAL CITY ACTIVITY CENTER AND MIXED USE CORRIDOR DISTRICT LDC AMENDMENTS

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "TRADITIONAL CITY ACTIVITY CENTER AND MIXED USE CORRIDOR DISTRICT LDC AMENDMENTS"

Transcription

1 Januar y 15, 2019 Staff Report to the Municipal Planning Board Applicant C A S E # L D C I t e m # 4 TRADITIONAL CITY ACTIVITY CENTER AND MIXED USE CORRIDOR DISTRICT LDC AMENDMENTS City of Orlando Requested Action 1. Amend LDC Figure 1B, 1C, 2B, Zoning Table Footnotes and Sections , to address setbacks for lots with multiple frontages, minimum floor to area (FAR) ratio and to consolidate portions of the Traditional City Design Standards to eliminate redundancies Project Description This is a City initiated Land Development Code amendment to amend LDC Figure 1B, 1C, 2B, Zoning Table Footnotes and Sections , to address setbacks for lots with multiple frontages, minimum floor to area (FAR) ratio and to consolidate portions of the Traditional City Design Standards to eliminate redundancies. The specific sections proposed for amendments are listed below; 1. Amend LDC Figure 1B (Table of Zoning District Regulations Inside [and Outside of] the Traditional City ( T City) - MXD-1; MXD-2; O-1; O-2; MU-1; MU-2 2. Amend LDC Figure 1C - (Table of Zoning District Regulations Inside [and Outside of] the Traditional City) - AC-N; AC-1; AC-2; AC-3; AC-3A; IC; IG; IP; H; P; C 3. Amend LDC Figure 2B - (Table of allowable uses in zoning districts Inside [and Outside of] the Traditional City) - R-1S; R-2A; R-2B; R-3A; R-3B; R-3C; R-3D; MXD-1; MXD-2; O-1; O-2; O-3; MU-1; MU-2; AC-N; AC-1; AC-2; AC-3; AC-3A; IC; IG; IP; P; H; C 4. Amend LDC Zoning Table Footnotes 5. Amend LDC Sec Amend LDC Part 6 Traditional City Design Standards, Design Standards in MU-1t and MU-2t Mixed Use Corridor Districts, Sections Amend LDC Part 6 Traditional City Design Standards, Design Standards in Activity Center District, Sections Analys is Background The MU-2, AC-1, AC-2, AC-3 and AC-3A zoning districts have minimum floor area ratio (FAR) requirements within the Traditional City area, as well as maximum front, street side and side setbacks. The purpose of Traditional City (Activity Center District and Mixed Use Corridor District) standards and the intent of these standards is to create an urban streetscape lined with buildings. However, there are instances where businesses only require a small building, such as an urban gas station, and instances where lots have multiple frontages. In these cases, the businesses state they struggle to meet the minimum FAR and the maximum building setbacks and are unable to make a viable project. Below are some specific issues that these amendments address. Project Planner Michelle Beamon Robinson, AICP Updated: January 4, 2019 The minimum FAR is too high for fast food restaurants and gas stations: While these projects have been able to take advantage of the Reduction in Required Minimum Intensity (fka the Transportation Linkage Fee), it is still too high in some cases, and businesses would be required to construct a building larger than they need. The maximum setbacks are hard to meet for corner lots and three sided lots: For corner lots, the building must be located fronting the streets. The minimum building frontage per street is 45-50, with 70% of the building meeting the maximum

2 Page 2 setback. As such, sites are unable to meet the maximum side setback while accommodating a drive aisle and parking. For three sided lots, sites are unable to meet the maximum street side setback on the third frontage as the third frontage would normally be the rear elevation accommodating the back of house and the take out window area. Allowing these concessions will allow the front elevations to take priority. The Mixed Use Corridor District and the Activity Center Districts sections of code are confusing. These sections of code are similar but have some differences such as in the way main streets are identified and how drive throughs are dealt with. Since these districts are very similar, they should have the same development standards. It is difficult to determine which side is the primary frontage. For sites with multiple frontages it is difficult which would be determined the primary frontage because the code states that it s the narrow side of the lot but people perceive it as facing the busiest street. There are no specific design standards for gas stations. While gas stations are needed in the Traditional City, this autocentric type of business is contradictory to the Traditional City intent. Before World War II, when the Traditional City was developed, gas stations were small and typically had one or two pumps. Large gas stations with multiple pumps are a newer development pattern and should be located outside of the Traditional City. This proposal allows for gas stations but limits the scale so that they are compatible with other development. Therefore, design criteria is needed to allow for urban types of gas stations that are more pedestrian friendly, contribute to the urban form, do not cover an entire block face and are not clustered in one place. There are no requirements for utilizing the Reduction in Required Minimum Intensity (fka Transportation Linkage Fee) other than the small fee. If developers need the flexibility to obtain a reduced minimum intensity, this concession should come with additional design standards and a fee that is more comparable to the impact that these types of uses have. Recommendations Staff has found that the standards can be amended to address the concerns of auto-oriented businesses while still meeting the intent of the Traditional City by prioritizing the urban environment with buildings fronting the street and keeping vehicle use areas are secondary or hidden from the street frontage in order to promote pedestrian activity. Below is a summary of the proposed code amendments. 1. Combine Design Standards in MU-1/t and MU-2/t Mixed Use Corridor District ( ) and Design Standards in Activity Center Districts ( ) into one section, eliminating redundancies and confusion. 2. Update the Transportation Linkage Fee section and rename it to Reduction in Required Minimum Intensity. 3. Add design standards in order to qualify for a reduction in required minimum intensity. 4. Change the way the fee is calculated to tie it to transportation impact fees, see example IV on page Add a section on determining building frontage and setbacks for three sided lots. 6. Allow an exemption on the maximum side setback for corner lots if it is due to site design constraints of accommodating vehicular access and parking. 7. Increase the required primary façade transparency from 15% to 30%, include a requirement of 15% for the secondary street frontage and exempt any third or fourth frontage from transparency requirements. 8. Add a section on auto service stations (aka gas stations) requiring the pumps be located to the rear or side of the building, limit each station to 4 gas pumps (may be dual sided for a total of 8 fueling stations) and not allow more than one gas station per block face. 9. Add a section on design requirements for industrial uses in the Traditional City. 10. Require non-industrial uses in industrial areas in the Traditional City to follow the same design standards for commercial buildings in activity centers. On the following pages there are examples of a gas station and a corner lot illustrate the issues discussed above.

3 Page 3 Example: Gas Station Current Code (building size and setbacks in red) Proposed Code Amendment The red box is the minimum size of the building. There is not enough room for the canopy. Hinders circulation. Limits parking.

4 Page 4 4 Example: Drive Through Current Code (building size and setbacks in red) Proposed Code Amendment The red box is the minimum size of the building. Not a useable building shape Cannot accommodate a drive through. Hinders circulation and access to the site.

5 Page 5 5 Example: Traditional City Appropriate Gas Station This is the 7-11 at the intersection of Fern Creek Avenue and Colonial Drive. The gas station is appropriate for the Traditional City area because the building is pulled up to the street, framing the corner and providing direct pedestrian access to the store, a street wall is present to block the vehicular use area, there is one curb cut per street frontage and there are only 4 fuel positions

6 Page 6 6 Example: A Gas Station not Appropriate for the Traditional City This is the RaceTrac at the intersection of S. Orange Avenue. This is not appropriate for the Traditional City because the building is placed on the back of the site, forcing pedestrians to walk through the vehicular use area, there is a large sign, and there are 10 fueling station, which overpower the design.

7 Page 7 7 Financial Considerations The proposed amendments allowed for an additional minimum intensity reduction as well as a change to how the fee is calculated. The amendments tie the fee for the reduction to the transportation impact feeas opposed to the construction cost; this creates an increased fee amount for the applicant. However, in the example below, it is shown that the transportation impact fee itself is lower since the project is smaller as well as the total fee is lower with the proposed code amendments. This higher fee for the reduction in minimum FAR is justified since these types of projects are more auto oriented and are putting more of a strain on the transportation system. Table 1 A gas station within the MU-2 zoning district. The site is 0.50 acres with an estimated $500,000 construction cost. Today s Code Proposed Code Amendments Minimum FAR Minimum FAR with the Total Reduction Allowed Total Building Size 5,445 sq. ft. 2,178 sq. ft. Number of Fuel Positions 6 4 (maximum) Transportation Impact Fee $5,142 per fuel station and $30,794/1,000 sq. ft. Fee for the Reduction $15,000 $198,515 $87,637 (1% of the Construction Cost for every 0.05 FAR reduction) $105,164 (20% of the Transportation Impact Fee for every 0.05 FAR reduction) Total Fee $213,515 $192,801

8 Page 8 8 Proposed LDC Amendments The proposed LDC amendments are contained in Exhibit A of this staff report. Findings In review of the proposed LDC amendments, it is found that: 1. The proposed Land Development Code amendments are consistent with State Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 187, Florida Statutes). 2. The proposed Land Development Code amendments are consistent with the East Central Florida Strategic Policy Plan. 3. The proposed Land Development Code amendments are consistent with the provisions of Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes. 4. The proposed Land Development Code amendments are consistent with the objectives and policies of the City s adopted Growth Management Plan (GMP); particularly Policy S.13.4 and S The proposed Land Development Code amendments are consistent with the purpose and intent of the requirements of the Land Development Code. 6. The proposed Land Development Code amendments are compatible with the surrounding development pattern. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the proposed amendments, contained in Exhibit A, to the City of Orlando Land Development Code. Review/Approval Process Next Steps 1. MPB minutes scheduled for review and approval by City Council. 2. Forward to City Attorney s Office for legal review 3. 1st reading of the LDC Ordinance 4. 2nd reading of the LDC Ordinance

9 Exhibit A Zoning tables, LDC Figure 1B (Table of Zoning District Regulations Inside [and Outside of] the Traditional City ( T City) - MXD-1; MXD-2; O-1; O-2; MU-1; MU-2 and LDC Figure 1C - (Table of Zoning District Regulations Inside [and Outside of] the Traditional City) - AC-N; AC-1; AC-2; AC- 3; AC-3A; IC; IG; IP; H; P; C Side yard - Maximum MU-1 MU-2 AC-N AC-1 AC-2 AC-3 25 (38) 25 (38) 25 (6)(38) 30 (6)(38) 30 (6)(38) 30 (6)(38) Zoning tables, LDC Figure 2B - (Table of allowable uses in zoning districts Inside [and Outside of] the Traditional City) - R-1S; R-2A; R-2B; R-3A; R-3B; R-3C; R-3D; MXD-1; MXD-2; O-1; O-2; O-3; MU-1; MU-2; AC-N; AC-1; AC-2; AC-3; AC-3A; IC; IG; IP; P; H; C Drive-In Facilities and Pedestrian Walk-Up Facilities Parking/Principal Use (37) Zoning tables, Footnotes: 6. When frontage in one block face is located partly in a commercial or R-3D district and partly in another residential or office district, the front yard and street side yard requirements of office or other residential district shall apply within the commercial or R-3D district for a distance of 150 ft. or to the nearest side street or other natural barrier (whichever is the shortest distance). The front half of this setback may not be used for signs and entire setback may not be used for vehicular use areas except when the office or residential district street side yard allows a vehicular use area to be located closer to the property line. 20. Minimum and maximum setbacks from streets are contained in Chapter 62, Section , Designation of Streets in Mixed Use Corridor Districts and in Activity Centers and Sec Building Standards. Section , Designation of Streets in AC-t Activity Center Districts and Streetwall Requirements. 37. Parking as a principal use shall be located no closer than a 1760 feet radius from any other principal use parking 38. Development on corner lots may be exempt from the maximum side setbacks due to design restrictions of accommodating drive aisles and parking between the building and the side yard. This exemption may be granted through a Planning Official Determination during the site plan process. Commented [MTR1]: Moved from C. REDUCTION IN REQUIRED MINIMUM INTENSITYTRANSPORTATION LINKAGE INCENTIVE Sec Reduction in Required Minimum Intensity Availability of Reductions. 1

10 The minimum intensity standards set forth in Figure 1 may be reduced by the Planning Official for permitted and conditional uses only, in exchange for a contribution by the developer to the City of Orlando Trust Fund for Alternative Transportation in the Traditional City. Incentive Available. District Minimum FAR Available Reduction Additional Reduction for Eating & Drinking Establishments and Gas Stations Available Reduction Incentive FAR Wwith Reduction Incentive Additional Reduction Incentive Eating & Drinking Establishments Eating & Drinking Establishments FAR Wwith Add'l Available and Additional Reduction Incentive AC = 0.10 AC = 0.10 AC = 0.10 MU = 0.10 General Procedure. Full details of the operation and procedure for issuance of the Reduction in Required Minimum Intensity incentive are described below, except for the following: (a) The contributions shall be used to construct bicycle, pedestrian and transit improvements within the Traditional City. (b) The developer, at his/her option, may dedicate a portion of the building site acceptable to the City for the development of transit improvements. The assessed value of the dedicated land, as shown on the most recent certified tax roll of the Orange County Property Appraiser, may be deducted from the total cost of the contribution. (c) The amount of contribution shall be one twenty percent (120%) of the transportation impact fee construction cost for every 0.05 FAR reduction or portion thereof. (d) Criteria for approval of a reduction in minimum intensity. The reduction in minimum intensity may be granted when an applicant presents clear and convincing evidence that the proposed design, intensity and use(s) will result in a superior development that is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and achieves the criteria for approval 2

11 provided in this section. The following design enhancements represent options for creating a superior development. While not a strict point-based system, a development that meets a greater number of these enhancements is eligible for a greater reduction than a development that meets only one or two enhancements. If improvements to the streetscape or other public property is part of a selected option, then such improvements must be maintained by the property owner or owners of the subject development unless appropriate maintenance obligations are accepted by the City. i. Streetscape treatments that exceeds the minimum standards normally required of the development s location. ii. Landscaping that exceeds by at least 10% the minimum number of points required by Part 2H, Chapter 60 of this Code. iii. At least one additional mobility strategy than the minimum number of strategies required by Section of this Code. iv. Site design and building materials that exceed the minimum environmental sustainability requirements in place at the time of development. Such enhancements should consider energy efficiency, stormwater design, solar or other renewable energy sources, recycling, and sustainable materials options, all of which should be judged against the best-available technology and any relevant and generally accepted environmental certification programs. v. Superior architectural design, including all of the following, where applicable: 1. Buildings on corner lots and buildings that terminate views must incorporate additional height or other features that emphasize their prominent location. 2. In mixed-use buildings, the ground floor must be differentiated from upper floors through the use of architectural treatments. 3. The primary building entrance must be a prominent feature that is defined and articulated with pediments, pilasters, columns, porticoes, porches, overhangs, railings, or other architecturally compatible elements. 4. Transparent windows must comprise more than 30% of the primary and secondary street facing elevations. 5. Use of durable, high-quality materials that are appropriate for the climate, such as stone, steel, glass, precast concrete, or masonry. Such materials and associated architectural features must wrap around all sides of the building that are visible from the public realm. Traditional stucco may be appropriate in a historic context or for a Mediterraneanstyle building. Buildings incorporating EIFS (Exterior Insulation Finishing System) or other faux-stucco finish for more than 10% of a street-facing façade do not meet this enhancement option. vi. Underground utilities, if currently aboveground. vii. An architecturally enhanced street wall surrounding the parking area with a trellis or other architectural features. viii. Another enhancement not otherwise required by code that is proposed by the applicant and approved as part of the master plan or planned development 3

12 zoning district. Examples might include a publicly accessible park or plaza, public art or a premium transit stop. ix. For eating and drinking establishments, the following site design standards must be met to qualify for the additional incentive: 1. Maximum number of parking spaces permitted is 12:1000 sf GFA; 2. Cross-access easements and/or shared parking agreements are required where the City deems them necessary; 3. All Traditional City design standards are incorporated into the site design; 4. Pole signs are prohibited; 5. Transit stops and/or shelters are required where determined reasonably necessary by the City, in cooperation with Lynx; 6. If an eating and drinking establishment is abutting a Class I or II use (shown in Figure 6: Land Use Intensity Table, Chapter 58) and includes a drive-in facility, a 5 ft. minimum height masonry wall, located 5 ft. from the property line, shall be provided as part of the required buffer area; in addition, the landscaping requirements of Chapter 60, Section , shall be provided between the wall and the abutting property. (e) The reduction in required minimum intensity must be applied through a Master Plan application, a Planning Official determination, or a similar type of application. Traditional City, Design Standards in MU-1t and MU-2t Mixed Use Corridor District and in Activity Centers The following standards shall apply to all uses except one and two family dwellings in mixed use corridor districts and activity center districts in the Traditional City. Sec Designation of Streets in Mixed Use Corridor Districts and Activity Centers. Commented [MTR2]: Was in Design Standards in Activity Center Districts section, prior to Sec I. Designation of Streets in Mixed Use Corridor Districts Purpose. Development in Traditional City mixed-use corridor districts shall be pedestrianoriented with buildings close to and oriented to the street and vehicular use areas located to the side or rear of buildings. Certain design standards in this section apply only to the parts of a building oriented toward a street. All streets in these districts are designated either Main Streets or Town Streets as follows: (a) Main Streets. The following list of streets shall be designated as Main Streets. The setback for lots adjacent to Main Streets shall be a maximum of 5 feet subject to (c) below. DESIGNATED MU-t MAIN STREETS Commented [MTR3]: Was in and consolidated. Commented [MTR4]: Updated the streets list. Combined with with minor amendments and alphabetized. Edgewater Drive from Clayton Street to Harvard Street. Orange Avenue from Yale Street to Alden Avenue. Parramore Avenue from Robinson Street to Jefferson Street. 4

13 All streets within the AC-3At district. Amelia Street. Central Boulevard from Garland Avenue to Rosalind Avenue. Court Avenue. East Colonial Drive. E. Church Street from S. Orange Avenue to Rosalind Avenue. East Princeton Street East Washington Street. Edgewater Drive. Garland Avenue between Church Street and Central Boulevard. Jackson Street from Orange Avenue to Rosalind Avenue. Jefferson Street from Garland Avenue to Palmetto Avenue. Livingston Street from Garland Avenue to Rosalind Avenue. Magnolia Avenue from Amelia Street to South Street. Mills Avenue. North Orange Avenue. Palmetto Avenue. Parramore Avenue. Pine Street from Garland Avenue to Rosalind Avenue. Robinson Street from Garland Avenue to Rosalind Avenue. Robinson Street from Glenwood Avenue to N. Primrose Drive. State Lane. South Orange Avenue. Wall Street. West Church Street. West Central Boulevard. West Par Street. West Princeton Street. 5

14 West Smith Street. (b) Town Streets. All streets not designated Main Streets shall be designated Town Streets. The setback for lots adjacent to town Streets shall be a maximum of 15 feet subject to (c) below. (c) Building Setbacks. For new construction, substantial enlargement or substantial improvements, a minimum of 70% of the front building wall shall meet the maximum, setback. Porches, colonnades, marquees, overhangs or similar overhead structures parallel to the street may be counted toward the 70% front building wall at the required setback. Commented [MTR5]: Moved to section Sec Building OrientationStandards. Upon substantial enlargement, substantial improvement or new construction, all principal structures shall be oriented toward the street by incorporating the following into the building frontage that faces that street: (a) Building Setbacks. For new construction, substantial enlargement or substantial improvements, a minimum of 70% of the front building wall shall meet the maximum setback. Porches, colonnades, marquees, overhangs or similar overhead structures parallel to the street may be counted toward the 70% front building wall at the required setback, but not more than 20% of the required 70%. (b) Building Frontage. i. Determining frontage. 1. The primary frontage is the narrow side of a corner lot. 2. The secondary frontage is the long side of a corner lot. 3. Other frontages. If a property is fronting three streets, the primary frontage shall be the narrow side of the lot facing an arterial street (if one is present) and the secondary street shall be the long side of the lot. The third street frontage shall also be a secondary street with street side setbacks, however, the third street frontage shall be exempt from the maximum setback. 4. In cases of uncertainty, such as when a secondary frontage faces a main street the Zoning Official can consider an alternative standard. ii. The building must account for 60% of the lot frontage on the primary street frontage. If there is more than one street frontage, this requirement only applies to one of the frontages. iii. At least one public entrance of all principal structures shall be oriented toward either the Main or Town Street. Vehicular openings such as those for garages and carports shall not constitute a public entrances. iv. The ground floor building wall facing the street(s) shall contain a minimum of 1530% of transparent materials, located between 3 and 7 feet measured from ground level, and 15% of transparent materials on the secondary frontage, located between 3 and 7 feet measured from ground level; unless otherwise approved by the Zoning Official. Transparency minimums are not required on any third or fourth frontage. Reflective glass and glass block are not permitted Commented [MTR6]: Consolidation, moved from and

15 as transparent materials. Transparent materials on walls not parallel or approximately parallel to the street and on doors shall not be counted toward the minimum transparency requirement. (c) Building Design & Materials. i. No one particular style is dictated over another; however, architecture should be authentic to the style employed. ii. Buildings must provide a base, middle, and top pattern with materials finished and wrapped on all facades. Materials must be durable and wrapped on all facades. The base must be constructed out of materials, such as brick, stone, pre-cast material, or similar, not stucco or EIFS. Sec Reserved. Sec Streetwall and Vehicular Use Areas Commented [MTR7]: Moved from Purpose. The purpose of the streetwall is to complete the continuation of building walls along a street. A streetwall is not to be used in lieu of meeting the maximum setback requirements from streets. Upon substantial enlargement, substantial improvement or new construction for principal buildings the following standards shall apply; which are located within the required maximum setback from a street, if the side yard setback is greater than 0, a streetwall shall extend from the principal building facade along that portion of the frontage line that is not devoted to vehicular or pedestrian access. (a) Vehicular use areas must be screened by a streetwall. Breaks may be permitted in the streetwall to provide pedestrian access to the site and for the purpose of tree protection. (b) Parking facilities shall be permitted at the rear or interior side of the principal structure. Commented [MTR8]: Moved from Commented [MTR9]: Moved from (c) All standards of Chapter 58 (Fences and Walls) shall apply except as follows: i. Chain link and wood fences shall be prohibited. ii. The streetwall shall be a minimum of 3 and a maximum of 5 in height. Walls greater than 3 in height above grade shall be no more than 50% solid. iii. The streetwall shall be located within the required maximum setback from a street. iv. A streetwall shall not be required along the recessed part of a building which has at least 70% of the front wall meeting the required maximum setback from a Main or Town Street. Sec Outdoor Eating Areas for Restaurants. The Zoning Official may increase the maximum setback from Main or Town Streets to not more than 20 feet for eating and drinking establishments to accommodate outdoor eating areas in the front yard. A streetwall, when provided for restaurant outdoor eating areas located between the 7

16 principal building and the street, shall conform to the standards of Chapter 58 (Fences and Walls) and Chapter 62. Sec Reserved Vehicular Use Areas. Commented [MTR10]: Combined with street wall section Upon substantial enlargement, substantial improvement or new construction, the following standards shall apply: (a) Parking facilities shall be permitted only to the rear of the principal structure, except for large-scale retailers. (b) A streetwall shall be required along the street perimeter of surface parking lots. The streetwall shall be in lieu of the requirements of Chapter 60 (Perimeter Parking Lot Landscaping) for landscaping adjacent to street right-of-way. Breaks may be permitted in the streetwall to provide pedestrian access to the site and for the purpose of tree protection. Commented [MTR11]: Moved above to Commented [MTR12]: Deleted, redundant. Commented [MTR13]: Moved to Sec Pedestrian-Related Design Features. Direct pedestrian access shall be provided from the principal entrance of the building to the sidewalk on the closest public right-of-way. Pedestrian access shall be provided from the rear parking facilities to the ground floor uses, either through rear building entrances, pedestrian ways along the perimeter of buildings, or by pedestrian throughways which connect the rear parking lots to the sidewalks along the front lot linefront Street. Pedestrian throughways may be exterior and located between buildings or may be incorporated into the interior design of a structure. Pedestrian throughways shall be a minimum of 5 feet wide. Commented [MTR14]: Clarification. For through lots, each lot shall have pedestrian access to both rights-of-way. Sec Reserved Automotive Service Stations. The building must meet the maximum street setbacks. The fuel pump canopy does not count as part of the building for the purposes of determining building frontage, FAR and maximum setbacks. a. The gas pumps must be located to the side or rear of the building. b. A maximum of 4 fuel positions (may be dual sided for a total of 8 fueling pumps) per gas station is allowed. c. Only one curbcut per street frontage is allowed. d. The fuel canopy must have similar architecture to the building. The fuel canopy must meet the minimum building setbacks and is exempt from the maximum setbacks. e. No more than one gas station is allowed per block face. f. Appearance review by a Determination application is required for all auto service stations. Commented [MTR15]: Moved from Section , was only for AC districts. Commented [MTR16]: ITE term ties to transportation impact fee calculation. Sec Reserved Drive-in Facilities. 8

17 For all lots, the take-out windows shall be located on side or rear of building. Midblock Sites. a. Drive-in curbcuts and driveways shall be a maximum width of 12 feet for one-way with exit to rear access drive except where the block face across the street is zoned as a residential zoning district. In such cases, two-way access to the frontage street with no rear access shall be permitted, with a maximum driveway width of 24 feet. Corner Sites. a. Drive-in curbcuts and driveways shall be a maximum width of 12 feet one way in. b. Parking shall be accessed only via a side street/shared access drive. c. Take-out windows shall not face the street side. Commented [MTR17]: Moved from , was for AC districts only. Sec Reserved Sec Temporary Vacant Lots. Lots vacant for a period of more than six (6) months shall install either a CPTED style wall, fence, or a series of bollards along the perimeter of the site and restore the area to a sodded state. a wall, solid fence, berm or hedge along any adjacent public street or walk. Height of the wall, fence, berm or hedge shall be a minimum of three (3) feet and a maximum of five (5) feet above grade. Traditional City, Design Standards in Activity Center Districts The following standards shall apply to all uses except one and two family dwellings in activity center districts in the Traditional City. Commented [MTR18]: Moved to Section Sec Building Orientation. Building Orientation. Upon substantial enlargement, substantial improvement or new construction, all principal structures shall be oriented toward the street lot by incorporating the following into the building frontage that faces that street: (a) At least one public entrance of all principal structures shall be oriented towards either the Main or Town street. Vehicular openings such as those for garages and carports shall not constitute public entrances. (b) The ground floor building wall facing the street shall contain a minimum of 15% of transparent materials, located between 3 and 7 feet measured from ground level. Reflective glass and glass block are not permitted as transparent materials. Transparent materials on walls not parallel or approximately parallel to the street and on doors shall not be counted toward the minimum transparency requirement. Commented [MTR19]: Deleted, covered in Section

18 Sec Designation of Streets in AC-t Activity Center Districts and Streetwall Requirements. DESIGNATION OF STREETS Purpose. Development in Traditional City activity center districts shall be pedestrian oriented with buildings close to and oriented to the street and vehicular use areas located to the side or rear of buildings. Certain design standards in this section apply only to the parts of a building oriented toward a street. All streets in these districts are designated either Main Streets or Town Streets. (a) Main Streets. The following list of streets shall be designated as Main Streets. The setback for lots adjacent to Main Streets shall be a maximum of 5 feet subject to (c) below, except for Large-Scale Retailers on sites with a minimum of 2 contiguous acres, a maximum of 3.5 contiguous acres, and up to 300 linear feet of street frontage which shall have no required maximum setback. DESIGNATED AC-t MAIN STREETS Amelia Street from Garland Avenue to Rosalind Avenue. Commented [MTR20]: Moved to Section II Commented [MTR21]: Moved to Section II Central Boulevard from Garland Avenue to Rosalind Avenue. Church Street from Terry Avenue to Rosalind Avenue. Colonial Drive from Hyer Avenue to Shine Avenue. Court Avenue. Commented [MTR22]: Moved to Section II Edgewater Drive from Bryn Mawr Street to Harvard Street. Garland Avenue between Church Street and Central Boulevard. Jackson Street from Orange Avenue to Rosalind Avenue. Jefferson Street from Garland Avenue to Palmetto Avenue. Livingston Street from Garland Avenue to Rosalind Avenue. Magnolia Avenue from Amelia Street to South Street. Commented [MTR23]: Moved to Section II Mills Avenue from Park Lake Street to Concord Street. Orange Avenue from Princeton Street to Yale Street. Orange Avenue from Amelia Street to South Street. Palmetto Avenue. Commented [MTR24]: Moved to Section II Parramore Avenue from Church Street to Anderson Street. Pine Street from Garland Avenue to Rosalind Avenue. 10

19 Robinson Street from Garland Avenue to Rosalind Avenue. Robinson Street from Glenwood Avenue to Graham Avenue. Commented [MTR25]: Moved to Section II South Street from Bryan Avenue to Rosalind Avenue. State Lane. Wall Street. Commented [MTR26]: Moved to Section II Washington Street from Garland Avenue to Rosalind Avenue. Washington Street from Summerlin Avenue to Hyer Avenue. (b) Town Streets. All streets not designated Main Streets shall be designated Town Streets. The setback for lots adjacent to Town Streets shall be a maximum of 15 feet subject to (c) below, except for Large-Scale Retailers on sites with a minimum of 2 contiguous acres, a maximum of 3.5 contiguous acres, and up to 300 linear feet of street frontage which shall have no maximum setback requirements. (c) Building Setbacks. For new construction, substantial enlargement or substantial improvements, a minimum of 70% of the front building wall shall meet the maximum setback. Porches, colonnades, marquees, overhangs or similar overhead structures parallel to the street may be counted toward the 70% front building wall at the required setback. Streetwall. The purpose of the streetwall is to complete the continuation of building walls along a street. A streetwall is not to be used in lieu of meeting the maximum setback requirements from streets. Commented [MTR27]: Deleted. Redundant. Commented [MTR28]: Moved to Section a. Upon substantial enlargement, substantial improvement or new construction for principal buildings which are located within the required maximum setback from a street, if the side yard setback is greater than 0, a streetwall shall extend from the principal building facade and extend along that portion of the frontage line that is not devoted to vehicular or pedestrian access. All standards of Chapter 58 (Fences and Walls) shall apply except as follows: (a) Chain link and wood fences shall be prohibited. (b) The streetwall shall be a minimum of 3 and a maximum of 5 in height. Walls greater than 3 in height above grade shall be no more than 50% solid. (c) The streetwall shall be located within the required maximum setback from a street. (d) A streetwall shall not be required along the recessed part of a building which has at least 70% of the front wall meeting the required maximum setback from a Main or Town Street. Upon substantial enlargement, substantial improvement or new construction for principal buildings which front on major thoroughfares and that exceed the required maximum front yard setback, a wall shall be constructed between the principal building and the front lot lines along that portion of the frontage line that is not devoted to vehicular or 11

20 pedestrian access. All standards of Chapter 58 (Fences and Walls) shall apply except as follows: (a) Chain link and wood fences shall be prohibited. (b) The wall shall be a minimum of 3 and a maximum of 5 in height. Walls greater than 3 in height above grade shall be no more than 50% solid. (c) The wall shall be located within the required maximum front yard setback. Commented [MTR29]: Combined with streetwall section Front Yard Setbacks. The required front yard setback for lots fronting on the following roads within activity centers in the Traditional City shall be a minimum of 0 ft. and a maximum of 5 ft.: West Central Boulevard. Parramore Avenue. All streets within the AC-3At district. Mills Avenue. North Orange Avenue. Edgewater Drive. Smith Street. West Church Street. South Orange Avenue. East Colonial Drive. East Washington Street. West Par Street. Princeton Street. Preston Street. ft. The minimum front yard setback on all other streets within the Activity Centers shall be 0 Sec Outdoor Eating Areas for Restaurants. The Zoning Official may increase the maximum setback from Main or Town streets to not more than 20 feet for eating and drinking establishments to accommodate outdoor eating areas in the front yard. A streetwall, when provided for restaurant outdoor eating areas located between the principal building and the street, shall conform to the standards of Chapter 58 (Fences and Walls) and Chapter 62. Commented [MTR30]: Moved to Section a, main street section. Commented [MTR31]: Deleted. This is covered in the zoning tables. Commented [MTR32]: Redundant, Section

21 Sec Vehicular Use Areas. Upon substantial enlargement, substantial improvement or new construction, the following standards shall apply: (a) Parking facilities shall be permitted only to the rear or side of the principal structure except for large-scale retailers. (b) A streetwall shall be required along the street perimeter of surface parking lots. The streetwall shall be in lieu of the requirements of Chapter 60 (Perimeter Parking Lot Landscaping) for landscaping adjacent to the right-of-way. Breaks may be permitted in the streetwall to provide pedestrian access to the site and for the purpose of tree protection. Commented [MTR33]: Redundant with Section Sec Pedestrian-Related Design Features. Direct pedestrian access shall be provided from the principal entrance of the building to the sidewalk on the closest public right-of-way. Pedestrian access shall be provided from the rear parking facilities to the ground floor uses, either through rear building entrances, pedestrian ways along the perimeter of buildings, or by pedestrian throughways which connect the rear parking lots to the sidewalks along the front lot line. Pedestrian throughways may be exterior and located between buildings or may be incorporated into the interior design of a structure. Pedestrian throughways shall be a minimum of 5 feet wide. For through lots, each lot shall have pedestrian access to both rights-of-way. Commented [MTR34]: Redundant with Section Sec Parking Lot Landscaping. A wall shall be required along the street perimeter of surface parking lots which front on a major thoroughfare. All standards of Chapter 58 (Fences and Walls) shall apply except as follows: (a) The wall shall be a minimum of 3 feet and a maximum of 5 feet in height. (b) Walls greater than 3 feet in height above grade shall be no more than 50% solid. (c) For structures which front on a thoroughfare street a wall shall be constructed with a minimum setback of 0 feet and a maximum setback of 5 feet from the property line. (d) Chain link and wooden fences shall be prohibited. (e) The wall shall be in lieu of the requirements of Chapter 61 for landscaping adjacent to street right-of-way. Sec Auto Service Stations. (a) The front yard setback for the building facade or edge of fuel pump canopy shall be a minimum 0 feet and a maximum 5 feet. (b) There shall be no maximum side yard setback. Commented [MTR35]: Deleted, covered by street wall section Commented [MTR36]: Moved to Section Commented [MTR37]: Deleted. Covered in Section for setbacks

22 (c) For properties that front on a major thoroughfare, a wall shall be required between vehicular use areas and the adjacent right-of-way. All standards of Chapter 58 (Fences and Walls) shall apply except as follows: 1. Chain link and wood fences shall be prohibited. 2. The wall shall be built within 0 3 feet of right-of-way. 3. The wall shall be 3 feet in height above grade except as provided in Chapter 61(Street Corner Visibility). 4. The wall shall be in lieu of the requirements of Chapter 61 for landscaping adjacent to street right-of-way. Commented [MTR38]: Moved to Section Sec Drive-in Facilities. Midblock Sites. (a) There shall be a maximum 5 feet front yard setback. (b) Drive-in curbcuts and driveways shall be a maximum width of 12 feet for one-way with exit to rear access drive except where the block face across the street is zoned as a residential zoning district. In such cases, two-way access to the frontage street with no rear access shall be permitted, with a maximum driveway width of 24 feet. (c) Take-out windows shall be located on side or rear of building. Commented [MTR39]: Moved to Section Commented [MTR40]: Moved to Section Corner Sites. (a) There shall be a maximum 5 feet front yard setback. (b) Drive-in curbcuts and driveways shall be a maximum width of 12 feet one way in. (c) Take-out windows shall be located on side or rear of building. (d) Parking shall be accessed only via a side street/shared access drive. Commented [MTR41]: Moved to Section Commented [MTR42]: Moved to Section Sec Parking as a Principal Use. (a) Parking as a principal use shall be a conditional use. (b) Parking as a principal use shall be located no closer than a 1760 feet radius from any other principal use parking. Commented [MTR43]: Deleted. Covered in the zoning tables Commented [MTR44]: Moved to zoning tables Sec Outdoor Recreation. Outdoor recreation shall be a prohibited use in Traditional City AC districts. Sec Temporary Vacant Lots. Lots vacant for a period of more than six (6) months shall install a wall, solid fence, berm or hedge along any adjacent public street or walk. Height of the wall, fence, berm or hedge shall be a minimum of three (3) feet and a maximum of five (5) feet above grade. Commented [MTR45]: Deleted. Covered in the zoning tables Commented [MTR46]: Redundant Section

23 Chapter 62 HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN Part 8. - DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR TRADITIONAL CITY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS Purpose. The purpose of the design standards is to ensure buildings built in any industrial district adds to community character. Key areas of opportunity for attaining quality design in industrial projects include: minimizing and screening loading areas and outdoor storage. These standards shall apply to all industrial districts within the Traditional City. This shall apply to new construction, substantial enlargements and substantial improvements Building Design Standards for Industrial Buildings in Traditional City (a) One pedestrian entrance must face a right of way. (b) Buildings shall provide a base, middle, and top expressed with materials finished and wrapped on all facades facing a right of way. (c) Not more than 60 linear feet of the principal building façade(s) shall be unarticulated by architectural details. Such details may include windows, canopies, awnings, changes in parapet height, material changes, projections, recesses, or similar features. (d) Walls and/or fences adjacent to the right of way must provide a minimum of 3 feet landscape buffer, which may be planted with, climbing vines, hedges, or similar living plant material. (e) Materials such as chain link or barbed wire fences are strongly discouraged along street frontages. (f) Loading facilities shall not be visible from the ROW unless property screened and authorized by the Zoning Official Building Design Standards for Office and Other Non-Industrial Uses in Traditional City (a) Office and other non-industrial uses located in an industrial district, upon substantial enlargement, substantial improvement or new construction, must comply with section for building design standards. 15

P ERSONAL STORAGE C ONDITIONAL USE STANDARDS L AND DEVELOMPENT CODE AMENDMENT

P ERSONAL STORAGE C ONDITIONAL USE STANDARDS L AND DEVELOMPENT CODE AMENDMENT April 18, 2017 Staff Report to the Municipal Planning Board LDC2017-00149 I TEM #7 P ERSONAL STORAGE C ONDITIONAL USE STANDARDS L AND DEVELOMPENT CODE AMENDMENT S UMMARY Owner N/A Applicant City of Orlando

More information

Composition of traditional residential corridors.

Composition of traditional residential corridors. Page 1 of 7 St. Petersburg, Florida, Code of Ordinances >> PART II - ST. PETERSBURG CITY CODE >> Chapter 16 - LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS >> SECTION 16.20.060. CORRIDOR RESIDENTIAL TRADITIONAL DISTRICTS

More information

Appendix1,Page1. Urban Design Guidelines. Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses. DRAFT September 2017

Appendix1,Page1. Urban Design Guidelines. Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses. DRAFT September 2017 Appendix1,Page1 Urban Design Guidelines DRAFT September 2017 Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses Appendix1,Page2 Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose 1 1.2 Urban Design Objectives 1 1.3 Building

More information

LDC AMENDMENT TOWNHOMES

LDC AMENDMENT TOWNHOMES Staff Report to the Municipal Planning Board May 15, 2018 L D C 2 0 1 8-10002 I T E M # 11 LDC AMENDMENT TOWNHOMES Applicant City of Orlando Project Planner Elisabeth Dang, AICP Updated: May 3, 2018 Description

More information

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS IN THE SOUTHEAST SECTOR

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS IN THE SOUTHEAST SECTOR February 19, 2019 Staff Report to the Municipal Planning Board LDC2018-10020 Item #11 S U M M A R Y Applicant The City of Orlando ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS IN THE SOUTHEAST SECTOR Applicant s Request Update

More information

COMMISSION ACTION FORM SUBJECT: ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT FOR LINCOLN WAY CORRIDOR PLAN DOWNTOWN GATEWAY COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT STANDARDS

COMMISSION ACTION FORM SUBJECT: ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT FOR LINCOLN WAY CORRIDOR PLAN DOWNTOWN GATEWAY COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT STANDARDS ITEM #: 7 DATE: _02-07-18 COMMISSION ACTION FORM SUBJECT: ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT FOR LINCOLN WAY CORRIDOR PLAN DOWNTOWN GATEWAY COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT STANDARDS BACKGROUND: The Downtown Gateway area

More information

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPES: APPROPRIATE ZONES AND DENSITIES 2-1

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPES: APPROPRIATE ZONES AND DENSITIES 2-1 2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPES: APPROPRIATE ZONES AND DENSITIES 2-1 This Chapter presents the development standards for residential projects. Section 2.1 discusses

More information

Article 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

Article 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT Article 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT this page left intentionally blank Contents ARTICLE 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT DIVISION 3.1 NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT DESCRIPTION...3.1-1 Section 3.1.1

More information

Chapter 17-2 Residential Districts

Chapter 17-2 Residential Districts Chapter 17-2 Residential Districts 17-2-0100 District Descriptions...2-1 17-2-0200 Allowed Uses...2-2 17-2-0300 Bulk and Density Standards...2-5 17-2-0400 Character Standards...2-18 17-2-0500 Townhouse

More information

Goal 1 - Retain and enhance Cherry Creek North s unique physical character.

Goal 1 - Retain and enhance Cherry Creek North s unique physical character. Introduction This document summarizes the proposed new zoning for the area of roughly bordered by University Boulevard, Steele Street, 3rd Avenue, and 1st Avenue. It provides a high-level review of the

More information

Cover Letter with Narrative Statement

Cover Letter with Narrative Statement Cover Letter with Narrative Statement March 31, 2017 rev July 27, 2017 RE: Rushton Pointe Residential Planned Unit Development Application for Public Hearing for RPUD Rezone PL2015 000 0306 Mr. Eric Johnson,

More information

4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR

4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR 4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL MIXED-USE PROJECTS This chapter presents standards for residential mixed-use projects in the Ashland-Cherryland Business District and the Castro Valley Central Business

More information

ARTICLE 10 SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS

ARTICLE 10 SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS ARTICLE 10 SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS Sec. 29.1000. SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS. (1) Purpose. Each Special Purpose District will appear on the City's Zoning Map as a Base Zone. The Special Purpose Districts

More information

BYLAW NO. 15/026 A BYLAW OF THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WOOD BUFFALO TO AMEND THE LAND USE BYLAW NO. 99/059

BYLAW NO. 15/026 A BYLAW OF THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WOOD BUFFALO TO AMEND THE LAND USE BYLAW NO. 99/059 Attachment 2 BYLAW NO. 15/026 A BYLAW OF THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WOOD BUFFALO TO AMEND THE LAND USE BYLAW NO. 99/059 WHEREAS Section 639 of the Municipal Government Act requires every municipality

More information

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis April 17, 2017

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis April 17, 2017 Rezoning Petition 2017-041 Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis April 17, 2017 REQUEST Current Zoning: R-5 (single family residential), R-22MF (multifamily residential), and I-1 (light industrial) Proposed Zoning:

More information

the conditions contained in their respective Orders until January 1, 2025, at the discretion of the Director of Planning, Property and Development.

the conditions contained in their respective Orders until January 1, 2025, at the discretion of the Director of Planning, Property and Development. Part 4: Use Regulations Temporary Uses and Structures Purpose the conditions contained in their respective Orders until January 1, 2025, at the discretion of the Director of Planning, Property and Development.

More information

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS. By Palmisano

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS. By Palmisano AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS By Palmisano Amending Title 20, Chapter 520 of the Minneapolis Code of Ordinances relating to Zoning Code: Introductory Provisions. The City Council of the City

More information

City of Reno October 30, 2012 Draft Midtown Zoning Text Amendments 1

City of Reno October 30, 2012 Draft Midtown Zoning Text Amendments 1 Section 18.08.405 Regional Center and Transit Corridor Overlay Districts (i) SVTC South Virginia Street Transit Corridor Overlay Zoning District. (1) Applicability. This Section 18.08.405(l)'s standards

More information

CHAPTER 29 ARTICLE 8. 20,000 sf 30,000 sf 100,000 sf (with approval by Special Use Permit according to Sec

CHAPTER 29 ARTICLE 8. 20,000 sf 30,000 sf 100,000 sf (with approval by Special Use Permit according to Sec CHAPTER 29 ARTICLE 8 (3) Zone Development Standards. The zone development standards for the NC Zone are set forth in Table 29.81(3) below: Table 29.81(3) Neighborhood Commercial (NC) Zone Development Standards

More information

VERTICAL MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT (Urban Village)

VERTICAL MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT (Urban Village) VERTICAL MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT (Urban Village) Overall Goal Statement Vertical Mixed Use (Urban Villages) have similar goals to Horizontal Mixed Use except densities are usually higher and projects frequently

More information

Figure 5-1, Land Use Plan, establishes the boundaries of each land use districts in the Boronda Community

Figure 5-1, Land Use Plan, establishes the boundaries of each land use districts in the Boronda Community APPENDIX A DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS This Appendix provides development standards and regulations for the majority of the land use districts within the Community of Boronda. This section describes the allowed

More information

Chapter CC COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL ZONES REGULATIONS

Chapter CC COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL ZONES REGULATIONS Effective April 14, 2011 Chapter 17.35 CC COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL ZONES REGULATIONS SECTIONS: 17.35.010 Title, Intent, and Description 17.35.020 Required Design Review Process 17.35.030 Permitted and Conditionally

More information

ARTICLE 5. COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE DISTRICTS 5.1 PURPOSE STATEMENTS 5.2 USES 5.3 DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS 5.4 DESIGN STANDARDS 5.5 DK DISTRICT STANDARDS 5

ARTICLE 5. COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE DISTRICTS 5.1 PURPOSE STATEMENTS 5.2 USES 5.3 DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS 5.4 DESIGN STANDARDS 5.5 DK DISTRICT STANDARDS 5 ARTICLE 5. COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE DISTRICTS 5.1 PURPOSE STATEMENTS 5.2 USES 5.3 DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS 5.4 DESIGN STANDARDS 5.5 DK DISTRICT STANDARDS 5.6 CU DISTRICT STANDARDS 5.7 SW DISTRICT STANDARDS THE

More information

8.5.1 R1, Single Detached Residential District

8.5.1 R1, Single Detached Residential District 8.5.1 R1, Single Detached Residential District The purpose of this district is to provide for residential development in the form of single detached dwellings. Dwelling, Single Detached Home Business,

More information

Plan Dutch Village Road

Plan Dutch Village Road Plan Dutch Village Road Objective: The lands around Dutch Village Road are a minor commercial area that services the larger Fairview community. Maintaining the vibrancy of the area by planning for redevelopment

More information

May 23, 2017 Staff Report to the Board of Zoning Ad justment. C AS E # VAR I t e m #1. Location Map. Subject

May 23, 2017 Staff Report to the Board of Zoning Ad justment. C AS E # VAR I t e m #1. Location Map. Subject May 23, 2017 Staff Report to the Board of Zoning Ad justment C AS E # VAR 2 0 1 7-00031 I t e m #1 U N I T E D R E N TA L S O R L A N D O Location Map S U M M A R Y Owner Herbert R. Matthews, Jr. Applicant

More information

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT STANDARDS. Cadence Site

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT STANDARDS. Cadence Site PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT STANDARDS Cadence Site A Planned Development District 1. Statement of General Facts, Conditions and Objectives Property Size: Approximately 57.51 Acres York County Tax Map

More information

PD No. 15 Authorized Hearing Steering Committee Meeting #11

PD No. 15 Authorized Hearing Steering Committee Meeting #11 PD No. 15 Authorized Hearing Steering Committee Meeting #11 January 7, 2019 Andrew Ruegg, Senior Planner Sustainable Development and Construction City of Dallas Staff Recommendation Steering committee

More information

PD No. 15 Authorized Hearing

PD No. 15 Authorized Hearing PD No. 15 Authorized Hearing Community Meeting No. 2 February 19, 2019 6:30 p.m. Hyer Elementary School Cafetorium 8385 Durham St Andrew Ruegg Senior Planner PD No. 15 Authorized Hearing On September 7,

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Chapters and Sections

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Chapters and Sections TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapters and Sections Chapter 9.02 Permits and Approvals [Addition]... 1 9.02.090 Administrative variances.... 1 Chapter [New]... 1 9.07.091 Purpose and Intent... 1 9.07.092 Applicability...

More information

BOROUGH OF HOPATCONG ORDINANCE No

BOROUGH OF HOPATCONG ORDINANCE No BOROUGH OF HOPATCONG ORDINANCE No. 10-2014 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOROUGH OF HOPATCONG, SUSSEX COUNTY, NEW JERSEY TO ADOPT A FORM BASED CODE AS AN OVERLAY DISTRICT AFFECTING PORTIONS OF THE B-1 AND R-1 ZONING

More information

Coding For Places People Love Main Street Corridor District

Coding For Places People Love Main Street Corridor District Coding For Places People Love Main Street Corridor District 1) Scope a) District boundaries are assigned according to the District Boundary Map. b) The Primary Retail Corridor is assigned according to

More information

Article 6. GENERAL URBAN (G-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

Article 6. GENERAL URBAN (G-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT Article 6. GENERAL URBAN (G-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT this page left intentionally blank Contents ARTICLE 6. GENERAL URBAN (G-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT DIVISION 6.1 NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT DESCRIPTION...6.1-1 Section

More information

DRAFT -- PROPOSED EXPANSION AND REVISIONS TO DIVISION 24. SPECIAL DISTRICT--COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY NEIGHBORHOODS DISTRICT

DRAFT -- PROPOSED EXPANSION AND REVISIONS TO DIVISION 24. SPECIAL DISTRICT--COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY NEIGHBORHOODS DISTRICT DRAFT -- PROPOSED EXPANSION AND REVISIONS TO DIVISION 24. SPECIAL DISTRICT--COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY NEIGHBORHOODS DISTRICT Sec. 28-831. Purpose. The college and university neighborhoods district purposes

More information

The Philadelphia Code

The Philadelphia Code 1 of 6 10/9/2014 10:06 AM The Philadelphia Code 14-507. /CDO, Central Delaware Riverfront Overlay District. 187 (1) Purpose. The Central Delaware Riverfront Overlay District is intended to connect the

More information

INTRODUCTION TO HOUSING LDC AMENDMENTS

INTRODUCTION TO HOUSING LDC AMENDMENTS INTRODUCTION TO HOUSING LDC AMENDMENTS August 6, 2018 BACKGROUND The City is participating in a regional affordable housing initiative Staff presented the City s overall strategy at the March 2018 MPB

More information

Montreal Road District Secondary Plan [Amendment #127, October 9, 2013]

Montreal Road District Secondary Plan [Amendment #127, October 9, 2013] [Amendment #127, October 9, 2013] 1.0 General The following policies are applicable to the Montreal Road District as set out in Schedule 1. 1.1 District Objectives The objective of this Plan is to guide

More information

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda -Public Hearing Item

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda -Public Hearing Item PDP-13-00518 Item No. 3B- 1 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda -Public Hearing Item PC Staff Report 2/24/14 ITEM NO. 3B PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR HERE @ KANSAS; 1101 INDIANA ST (SLD) PDP-13-00518:

More information

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT LAWRENCE TO BRYN MAWR MODERNIZATION

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT LAWRENCE TO BRYN MAWR MODERNIZATION TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT LAWRENCE TO BRYN MAWR MODERNIZATION March 2018- FINAL DRAFT SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS This report

More information

DAVIDSON PLANNING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS AFTER SEPTEMBER 2009 SECTION 9

DAVIDSON PLANNING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS AFTER SEPTEMBER 2009 SECTION 9 AMENDMENT ADOPTED 6/12/2012 Section 9.1.3.3.1 Wall Murals Entire Section Added: 9.1.3.3.1 Wall Murals DAVIDSON PLANNING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS AFTER SEPTEMBER 2009 SECTION 9 Exterior wall murals are only

More information

. \. structure. portion of a. yard setback. in height. for that. above 45 ft. structure above. 20-ft. front. 2, additional.

. \. structure. portion of a. yard setback. in height. for that. above 45 ft. structure above. 20-ft. front. 2, additional. Z089-254(RB) E-1 REGULATIONS Front Yard YARD, LOT, AND SPACE 00. \.,, Max.-6Oft. Mm. 15 ft. maximum front yard right-of-ways other way is dedicated existing Ft. Worth ft. from Ft. Worth Ave. or rights

More information

Residence-3. Residence-2. Residence-2. Residence-2. Residence-2. Residence-2. Residence-2/Patio Home. Residence-2

Residence-3. Residence-2. Residence-2. Residence-2. Residence-2. Residence-2. Residence-2/Patio Home. Residence-2 Contents Planned Development-1-Patio Home Planned Development-2-Multifamily Residence-3 Planned Development-3-Patio Home Planned Development-4-Multifamily Residence-3 Planned Development-5-Multifamily

More information

Chapter DOWNTOWN ZONING DISTRICTS

Chapter DOWNTOWN ZONING DISTRICTS Chapter 20.14 Sections: 20.14.010 Purpose of the Downtown Zoning Districts 20.14.020 Land Use Regulations for Downtown Zoning Districts 20.14.030 Development Standards for Downtown Zoning Districts 20.14.010

More information

ARTICLE 909. PD 909. PD 909 was established by Ordinance No , passed by the Dallas City Council on April 23, (Ord.

ARTICLE 909. PD 909. PD 909 was established by Ordinance No , passed by the Dallas City Council on April 23, (Ord. ARTICLE 909. PD 909. SEC. 51P-909.101. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY. PD 909 was established by Ordinance No. 29330, passed by the Dallas City Council on April 23, 2014. (Ord. SEC. 51P-909.102. PROPERTY LOCATION

More information

Part 4.0 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS

Part 4.0 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS M A I N S T R E E T N O R T H Part 4.0 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS 4.1 Districts 4.2 Permitted and Prohibited Uses, Standards and Standard Specific Criteria and Other General Provisions 4.3 DPS REGULATIONS

More information

PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT PREMIER AUTO SERVICES, INC. VARIANCES

PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT PREMIER AUTO SERVICES, INC. VARIANCES PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: February 14, 2019 Item #: PZ2019-402 STAFF REPORT PREMIER AUTO SERVICES, INC. VARIANCES Project Name: Premier Auto Services, Inc. Applicant:

More information

ARTICLE IV: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

ARTICLE IV: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ARTICLE IV: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IV-53 409 PRIVATE STREETS A private street means any way that provides ingress to, or egress from, property by means of vehicles or other means, or that provides travel

More information

SECTION 9 RESIDENTIAL R5 ZONE

SECTION 9 RESIDENTIAL R5 ZONE SECTION 9 RESIDENTIAL R5 ZONE 9.1 GENERAL PURPOSE OF THE R5 ZONE This R5 Zone provides for and regulates medium density residential development in the form of cluster townhouses. Different intensities

More information

An ordinance amending Section of the Los Angeles Municipal Code by amending the Zoning map.

An ordinance amending Section of the Los Angeles Municipal Code by amending the Zoning map. ORDINANCE NO. An ordinance amending Section 12.04 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code by amending the Zoning map. THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 12.04 of the

More information

From Policy to Reality

From Policy to Reality From Policy to Reality Updated ^ Model Ordinances for Sustainable Development 2000 Environmental Quality Board 2008 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Funded by a Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Sustainable

More information

SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2016

SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2016 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2016 (Amending the Sugar House Master Plan, amending the zoning ordinance to create the SC and SE Form Based Special Purpose Corridor districts, and amending the zoning

More information

50 and 52 Finch Avenue East - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

50 and 52 Finch Avenue East - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 50 and 52 Finch Avenue East - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report Date: August 16, 2016 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: North York

More information

ARTICLE 887. PD 887. Valley View - Galleria Area Special Purpose District

ARTICLE 887. PD 887. Valley View - Galleria Area Special Purpose District ARTICLE 887. PD 887. Valley View - Galleria Area Special Purpose District SEC. 51P-887.101. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY. PD 887 was established by Ordinance No. 29032, passed by the Dallas City Council on June

More information

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT EASTSIDE CHAMBLEE LINK DCI

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT EASTSIDE CHAMBLEE LINK DCI DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Public Hearing Date: April 12, 2018 Item #: PZ-2018-248 STAFF REPORT EASTSIDE CHAMBLEE LINK DCI Request: Development of Community Compact (DCI), ten concurrent variances,

More information

FOR SALE > MULTIFAMILY/COMMERCIAL REDEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY

FOR SALE > MULTIFAMILY/COMMERCIAL REDEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY FOR SALE > MULTIFAMILY/COMMERCIAL REDEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY 2220 W. Cary Street RICHMOND, VA 23220 CURRENT PROPERTY ILLUSTRATION CONCEPTUAL ONLY (NOT PROPOSED) Property Information Zoning: R-63, Multifamily

More information

ACCESSORY STRUCTURES L D C I TEM #6 S U M M A RY A N A LY S I S

ACCESSORY STRUCTURES L D C I TEM #6 S U M M A RY A N A LY S I S Staff Report to the Municipal Planning Board August 18, 2015 L D C 2 0 1 5-0 0 2 5 3 I TEM #6 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES S U M M A RY Owner N/A Applicant City of Orlando Project Planner Elisabeth Dang, AICP

More information

ARTICLE V SIGN REGULATIONS

ARTICLE V SIGN REGULATIONS ARTICLE V SIGN REGULATIONS Section 5-1. Purpose The purpose of this Article is to protect the dual interest of the public and the advertiser. The regulations herein are designed to protect public safety

More information

Urban Design Brief. Proposed Medical / Dental Office 1444 Adelaide Street North. Vireo Health Facility Ltd.

Urban Design Brief. Proposed Medical / Dental Office 1444 Adelaide Street North. Vireo Health Facility Ltd. Urban Design Brief Proposed Medical / Dental Office Vireo Health Facility Ltd. November 27, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. INTRODUCTION... 1 SECTION 1 LAND USE PLANNING CONTEXT... 1 1.1 The Subject Lands...

More information

Table of Contents ARTICLE 5A CHARACTER-BASED ZONING 1

Table of Contents ARTICLE 5A CHARACTER-BASED ZONING 1 Table of Contents ARTICLE 5A CHARACTER-BASED ZONING 1 SECTION 10.5A10 GENERAL... 1 10.5A11 Purpose and Intent... 1 10.5A12 Applicability... 1 10.5A13 Compliance with Regulating Plan... 1 10.5A14 Relationship

More information

ARTICLE 4: SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT, USE AND SETBACK REGULATIONS

ARTICLE 4: SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT, USE AND SETBACK REGULATIONS Page 1 of 48 City of Hollywood Zoning and Land Development Regulations 4.6.I Beach Community Redevelopment Districts. 1. Purpose. To establish development standards for the Beach Community Redevelopment

More information

Urban Design Brief Dundas Street. London Affordable Housing Foundation. November Zelinka Priamo Ltd.

Urban Design Brief Dundas Street. London Affordable Housing Foundation. November Zelinka Priamo Ltd. Urban Design Brief 1039-1047 Dundas Street London Affordable Housing Foundation November 2017 Zelinka Priamo Ltd. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. INTRODUCTION... 3 SECTION 1 LAND USE PLANNING CONTEXT... 3 1.1

More information

CHAPTER MFR 22 Multi-Family Residential

CHAPTER MFR 22 Multi-Family Residential CHAPTER 19.28 MFR 22 Multi-Family Residential Sections: 19.28.010 PURPOSE 19.28.020 PERMITTED USES 19.28.030 USES SUBJECT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 19.28.040 PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES 19.28.050 PROHIBITED

More information

Rezoning Petition Zoning Committee Recommendation June 29, 2017

Rezoning Petition Zoning Committee Recommendation June 29, 2017 Rezoning Petition 2017-076 Zoning Committee Recommendation June 29, 2017 REQUEST Current Zoning: MUDD-O (mixed use development, optional) and R-4 (single family residential) Proposed Zoning: UR-2(CD) (urban

More information

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ORDINANCE NO. 184271 An ordinance amending Ordinance No. 173,749, the Vermont/Western Transit Oriented District Specific Plan (Station Neighborhood Area Plan) to create a new Subarea F. THE PEOPLE OF THE

More information

RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS The residential district standards have been revised to reflect on-the-ground development conditions, while continuing to respect the use patterns established

More information

4 LAND USE 4.1 OBJECTIVES

4 LAND USE 4.1 OBJECTIVES 4 LAND USE The Land Use Element of the Specific Plan establishes objectives, policies, and standards for the distribution, location and extent of land uses to be permitted in the Central Larkspur Specific

More information

COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS (Amended 11/13/14) Part I. C-1 Restricted Commercial District

COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS (Amended 11/13/14) Part I. C-1 Restricted Commercial District ARTICLE XI. COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS (Amended 11/13/14) Part I. C-1 Restricted Commercial District Section 152: Purpose This district is designed to accommodate commercial uses which act as a transition

More information

PARRAMORE OAKS FRAMEWORK PLANNED DEVELOPMENT

PARRAMORE OAKS FRAMEWORK PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PARRAMORE OAKS FRAMEWORK PLANNED DEVELOPMENT Presented by Mark Cechman, AICP Paul S. Lewis, FAICP Review Process Pre- Application meeting August 11, 2016 Attended by representatives of: City Planning Transportation

More information

FENCE ORDINANCE. THE CITY OF MADISON Madison, Mississippi. Effective October 21, 2008

FENCE ORDINANCE. THE CITY OF MADISON Madison, Mississippi. Effective October 21, 2008 FENCE ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MADISON Madison, Mississippi Effective October 21, 2008 AN ORDINANCE REGULATING AND CONTROLLING THE SIZE, LOCATION, CHARACTER, APPEARANCE, PURPOSE, CONTENT AND OTHER PERTINENT

More information

Washington County, Minnesota Ordinances

Washington County, Minnesota Ordinances Washington County, Minnesota Ordinances Ordinance No. 153 Text Amendment to the Washington County Development Code - Chapter One, Section 2 and Chapter Two, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, of the Development Code

More information

LDC AMENDMENT BONUSES FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING

LDC AMENDMENT BONUSES FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING Staff Report to the Municipal Planning Board May 15, 2018 LDC AMENDMENT BONUSES FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING L D C 2 0 1 8-10005 I T E M #14 Photo of City View or Lexington Court Amelia Court at Creative Village

More information

Urban Design Brief (Richmond) Corp. 1631, 1635, 1639, 1643 and 1649 Richmond Street City of London

Urban Design Brief (Richmond) Corp. 1631, 1635, 1639, 1643 and 1649 Richmond Street City of London Urban Design Brief 1635 (Richmond) Corp. 1631, 1635, 1639, 1643 and 1649 Richmond Street City of London Site Plan Control Application Holding Provision Application April 1, 2015 Prepared for: Rise Real

More information

Plan Area and Current Facilities

Plan Area and Current Facilities Plan Area and Current Facilities The Plan Area is bounded by South Delaware Street to the east and Concar Drive to the south (Figure 2.01). Parallel to Concar Drive on the south, SR 92 rises above grade

More information

ARTICLE 3: RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

ARTICLE 3: RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS ARTICLE 3: RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS SECTION 2.3.010 DISTRICTS 1) Purpose Roseburg s residential Zoning Districts are primarily intended to create, maintain and promote a variety of housing opportunities for

More information

DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY. Port Credit Local Area Plan Built Form Guidelines and Standards DRAFT For Discussion Purposes

DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY. Port Credit Local Area Plan Built Form Guidelines and Standards DRAFT For Discussion Purposes Port Credit Local Area Plan Built Form Guidelines and Standards DRAFT For Discussion Purposes 1 Local Area Plan - Project Alignment Overview Directions Report, October 2008 (General Summary Of Selected

More information

PLANNING BOARD REPORT PORTLAND, MAINE

PLANNING BOARD REPORT PORTLAND, MAINE PLANNING BOARD REPORT PORTLAND, MAINE India Newbury Residences Subdivision & Conditional Use Review 2016-096 India Newbury Residences, LLC Submitted to: Portland Planning Board Date: May 20, 2016 Public

More information

CHAPTER 8. REVISION HISTORY

CHAPTER 8. REVISION HISTORY CHAPTER 8. REVISION HISTORY CHAPTER 8. RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS Ordinance # Plan Commission Town Council Approval Date Adoption Date Description 2002-14 09-24-02 11-14-02 Adoption of Chapter 8. 2010-20 09-27-10

More information

Division 3: Zoning ( Zoning added by O N.S.; effective )

Division 3: Zoning ( Zoning added by O N.S.; effective ) Article 12: Mid-City Communities Planned District ( Mid-City Communities Planned District added 3-27-2007 by O-19598 N.S.; effective 4-26-2007.) Division 3: Zoning ( Zoning added 3-27-2007 by O-19598 N.S.;

More information

SECTION 822 "R-1-A" AND "R-1-AH" - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

SECTION 822 R-1-A AND R-1-AH - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS SECTION 822 "R-1-A" AND "R-1-AH" - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS The "R-1-A" and "R-1-AH" Districts are intended to provide for the development of single family residential homes at urban standards

More information

17.13 RH HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL ZONES REGULATIONS SECTIONS:

17.13 RH HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL ZONES REGULATIONS SECTIONS: Effective April 14, 2011 Chapter 17.13 RH HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL ZONES REGULATIONS SECTIONS: 17.13.010 Title, Intent, and Description 17.13.020 Required Design Review Process 17.13.030 Permitted and Conditionally

More information

May 12, Chapter RH HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL ZONES REGULATIONS Sections:

May 12, Chapter RH HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL ZONES REGULATIONS Sections: May 12, 2017 Chapter 17.13 RH HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL ZONES REGULATIONS Sections: 17.13.010 Title, intent, and description. 17.13.020 Required design review process. 17.13.030 Permitted and conditionally

More information

Section 1. Appendix A, "Zoning" of the Code of the City of Charlotte is hereby amended as follows:

Section 1. Appendix A, Zoning of the Code of the City of Charlotte is hereby amended as follows: Petition No. 2009-078 Petitioner: Charlotte-Mecklenburg Planning Commission ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A OF THE CITY CODE ZONING ORDINANCE Revised 12-10-09 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY

More information

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: November 17, 2016

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: November 17, 2016 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: November 17, 2016 DEVELOPMENT NAME SUBDIVISION NAME LOCATION Autonation Ford of Mobile Autonation Ford of Mobile Subdivision 901, 909, and 925

More information

Paseo de la Riviera. August 12, 2015

Paseo de la Riviera. August 12, 2015 Paseo de la Riviera August 12, 2015 1 2 3 Existing Future Land Use Map Existing Zoning Map 4 5 6 7 Review Timeline 1 2 3 4 5 Development Review Committee: 10.31.14 Zoning Code Text, Future Land Use Map,

More information

Chapter CN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER COMMERCIAL ZONES REGULATIONS

Chapter CN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER COMMERCIAL ZONES REGULATIONS Chapter 17.33 - CN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER COMMERCIAL ZONES REGULATIONS Sections: 17.33.010 - Title, intent, and description. 17.33.020 - Required design review process. 17.33.030 - Permitted and conditionally

More information

Control % of fourplex additions on a particular street. Should locate to a site where there are other large buildings

Control % of fourplex additions on a particular street. Should locate to a site where there are other large buildings Fourplex Ensure privacy of adjacent back yards window Location on the edge of neighbourhood is more Consistent design to blend in with existing street placement: minimal overlook Closer to arterial road

More information

The demolition required for the project came before the Landmark Preservation Commission (LPC) on November 3, 2016, where no action was taken.

The demolition required for the project came before the Landmark Preservation Commission (LPC) on November 3, 2016, where no action was taken. D E S I G N R E V I E W C O M M I T T E E S t a f f R e p o r t 2072 ADDISON STREET PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW For Committee Discussion/ Majority Recommendation JULY 20, 2017 Design Review #DRCP2016-0002

More information

THE CITY OF RAYMORE, MISSOURI Single-Family Residential Zoning Districts

THE CITY OF RAYMORE, MISSOURI Single-Family Residential Zoning Districts THE CITY OF RAYMORE, MISSOURI Single-Family Residential Zoning Districts REGULATIONS COMMON TO ALL DISTRICTS: Uses permitted in each district include detached single-family dwellings, manufactured homes

More information

ATLANTA ZONING ORDINANCE UPDATE

ATLANTA ZONING ORDINANCE UPDATE CITY OF ATLANTA ZONING ORDINANCE QUICK FIXES In 2015 the City of Atlanta selected a team of consultants to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the City s Zoning Ordinance, including a review of the ability

More information

Table of Contents ARTICLE 5A CHARACTER-BASED ZONING 1

Table of Contents ARTICLE 5A CHARACTER-BASED ZONING 1 Table of Contents ARTICLE 5A CHARACTER-BASED ZONING 1 SECTION 10.5A10 GENERAL... 1 10.5A11 Purpose and Intent... 1 10.5A12 Applicability... 1 10.5A13 Compliance with Regulating Plan... 1 10.5A14 Relationship

More information

CHARLOTTE CODE. PART 1: PURPOSE AND PART 2: MIXED USE DISTRICTS (MX-1, MX-2, and MX-3) CHAPTER 11:

CHARLOTTE CODE. PART 1: PURPOSE AND PART 2: MIXED USE DISTRICTS (MX-1, MX-2, and MX-3) CHAPTER 11: PART 1: PURPOSE AND PART 2: MIXED USE DISTRICTS (MX-1, MX-2, and MX-3) Section 11.101. Purpose. CHAPTER 11: CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICTS PART 1: PURPOSE The Conditional Zoning Districts allow for the establishment

More information

City of Fraser Residential Zoning District

City of Fraser Residential Zoning District City of Fraser Residential Zoning District The one-family districts are established to provide principally for one-family dwellings at varying densities. The specific interest of these districts is to

More information

City of Valdosta Land Development Regulations

City of Valdosta Land Development Regulations Chapter 214 Standards Applying to All Districts Section 214-1 Dimensional Standards of Zoning Districts Dimensional standards for zoning districts are summarized in Tables 1, 2 and 3. See Chapter 6 for

More information

Appendix C Built Form Guidelines

Appendix C Built Form Guidelines Appendix C Built Form Guidelines VAUGHAN METROPOLITAN CENTRE DRAFT SECONDARY PLAN CREATING A NEW DOWNTOWN 93 C.1 > BUILT FORM GUIDELINES The following annotated axonometric diagrams illustrate many of

More information

Appearance Review Board Staff Report

Appearance Review Board Staff Report Appearance Review Board Staff Report November 15, 2018 ARB2018-10038 Applicant Agenda Item 1 336 N. Orange Ave. Orange & Robinson Apartments Courtesy Review Brooks Stickler Kimley-Horn Owner Carol Brinati,

More information

Introduction. Background DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. Planning Division. m e m o r a n d u m TO: The Urbana Zoning Board of Appeals

Introduction. Background DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. Planning Division. m e m o r a n d u m TO: The Urbana Zoning Board of Appeals DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Planning Division m e m o r a n d u m TO: FROM: The Urbana Zoning Board of Appeals Christopher Marx, AICP, Planner I DATE: March 16, 218 SUBJECT: ZBA Case ZBA-218-C-2:

More information

New Zoning Ordinance Program

New Zoning Ordinance Program City of Goleta New Zoning Ordinance Program Module 3: Regulations Applying to Multiple Districts General Site Regulations Landscaping Parking and Loading June 09, 2014 New Zoning Ordinance Program By:

More information

No principal structure shall be located any closer to any. street or property line than the required minimum setback as

No principal structure shall be located any closer to any. street or property line than the required minimum setback as ARTICLE V Yard and Setback Regulations 1. General requirements. No principal structure shall be located any closer to any street or property line than the required minimum setback as set forth in Article

More information

ARTICLE 877. PD 877. PD 877 was established by Ordinance No , passed by the Dallas City Council on February 27, (Ord.

ARTICLE 877. PD 877. PD 877 was established by Ordinance No , passed by the Dallas City Council on February 27, (Ord. ARTICLE 877. PD 877. SEC. 51P-877.101. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY. PD 877 was established by Ordinance No. 28934, passed by the Dallas City Council on February 27, 2013. (Ord. 28934) SEC. 51P-877.102. PROPERTY

More information

3.1. OBJECTIVES FOR RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS GENERAL OBJECTIVES FOR ALL RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATIONS

3.1. OBJECTIVES FOR RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS GENERAL OBJECTIVES FOR ALL RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATIONS 3. RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS INTRODUCTION The Residential land use designations provide for housing and other land uses that are integral to, and supportive of, a residential environment. Housing

More information