Current Students 4. Enrollment Trends

Transcription

1 Current Students 4 The first step in projecting future student population is locating each current student on a computer generated map. PASA has geo coded each student using a latitude longitude coordinate corresponding to his or her address. The data file used for this analysis was downloaded from the District s database in September, 212 and contained 46,839 EE 12 th grade students. Of those, 36 students had addresses that were out of the District, that were not street addresses, or were otherwise unmatchable. PASA also needed to understand where areas of growth and decline have recently occurred within the District boundaries. The redistribution of students within existing homes in K.I.S.D. is one driving force of enrollment change in this District, so it is important that PASA understands which neighborhoods are gaining and losing students. To accomplish this task, PASA also analyzed datasets from the Fall, 21 and the Fall, 211. Enrollment Trends Resident Students by Planning Unit The first set of maps in this chapter shows the total number of students currently living in each Planning Unit. Also shown are the percent and absolute change in students living in each Planning Unit between September, 211 and September, 212. The purple and cyan colors on the map represent planning units that have lost students, or have stayed stationary in the last year. Resident Students by Attendance Zone This data is also shown at the attendance zone level on the next maps in the chapter. Kreinhop, Roth, Kohrville, Hassler, Brill, Kaiser, Klenk, McDougle, Epps Island, Eiland, and Nitsch all lost student population in the last year. Mueller gained 56 students, while Kuehnle gained 52. All of the intermediate schools gained student population, while Klein Collins and Klein Forest both lost student population. Changes in ethnicity of the student population and free and reduced lunch status at the elementary school level are also shown in this chapter. Several of the schools lost student population that was qualified for Free and Reduced Lunch students. This occurred in the midst of continued statewide increase in Free and Reduced Lunch student population. Population and Survey Analysts October, 212: Page 235

2 Resident Students by Subdivision and Apartment Complex This year, the most significant net growth of new students added to occurred in actively building subdivisions (668 added students over the past year), while built out subdivisions lost 123 students. The number of students living in apartments and mobile home parks also increased with apartments netting 128 additional students and mobile home parks adding 126 students. Resident Students in Fall Resident Students in Fall Added Students Fall 21 to Fall 211 Resident Students in Fall Added Students Fall 211 to Fall 212 Type of development Actual Change Percent Change 212 Actual Change Percent Change Apartments 3,128 3, % 3, MHP 1,356 1, , % Subdivisions - built-out 35,182 34, , % Subdivisions - actively building 4,884 5, % 6, % Apartments MHP Subdivisions - built-out Subdivisions - actively building Percent of Growth Fall 21 to Fall Percent of Growth Fall 211 to Fall % 1 18% % 8 The actively growing subdivisions that added the most students this year included Northcrest Village (55 added students), Auburn Lakes Reserve (47 students), Ashford Grove (46 students), The Chancel (43 students) and Memorial Springs (4 added students). Some of the homebuyers for the lowest valued new housing units are being assisted via non profits to provide the down payments, thus encouraging the rapid build out of these subdivisions where a zero down payment is advertised. These active subdivisions had a net gain of 668 additional students this school year, with a gain from Fall, 21 to Fall, 211 of 57 students. The older, built out subdivisions both added and lost students. Slightly more subdivisions lost students than gained students, and the net was a decrease in student population. The largest losers were: Northcliffe Manor ( 52), Willowood ( 44), Forest North ( 33) and Champion Forest ( 3). Memorial Northwest gained 85 students, after losing 74 the previous years, and Cypresswood gained 36, after losing 24 the year before. Population and Survey Analysts October, 212: Page 236

3 Current Geo-coded Grade Students, September FM Beltway Louetta Road FM Population and Survey Analysts October, 212: Page 237

4 Absolute and Percent Change in Geo-coded Grade Students, September 211 to September % % 3 38% 13 3% 72 49% % 55 9% % 26 13% % 33 13% 1 2% % % 23 3% -13 FM % -1-9% % % 2 % 17% 4-21 % -3 2% % % -11 7% 22% 13% -9% % 9 3% % -1 % % 3 % % 22% % 31 43% 5 2% -6 % % -11 % % % % -11 % Beltway 8 4 8% % -3 % % % % % % % -2 2% % 7% 3% % % % % 25 8% 1 % % % % Population and Survey Analysts October, 212: Page % 6 2% -12-3

5 Current Geo-coded Grade Students, September 212 Metzler 869 Northampton 766 Kohrville 976 Blackshear 88 Schultz 872 Frank 933 Hassler 699 Dowdell Rd. FM 292 Spring-Cypress Road Mueller 77 Benignus 934 Ehrhardt 629 Theiss 648 Kuehnle 652 Zwink 811 Spring Gully Roth 729 Benfer 78 Kreinhop 757 Haude 724 Cypress Creek Lemm 573 Krahn 897 Cypress C Brill 68 reek Mittelstadt 87 Greenwood Forest 725 Kaiser 837 Klenk 855 McDougle 694 Epps Island 852 Eiland 619 W. Montgomery Road Nitsch 792 W. Gulf Bank Rd. Population and Survey Analysts October, 212: Page 239

6 Absolute and Percent Change in Geo-coded Grade Students, September 211 to September 212 Metzler 45 Northampton 33 Kohrville -14 Blackshear 73 Schultz 33 Frank 46 Hassler Dowdell Rd. FM 292 Theiss 33 Mueller 56 9% Benignus 37 Ehrhardt 2 % Kuehnle 52 9% Benfer 9 Zwink 18 2% Kreinhop -1 Roth -7 Lemm Haude % Krahn 24 3% Brill -16 Cypress Cr eek Mittelstadt 91 13% FM 196 Greenwood Forest 36 Kaiser Klenk -15 McDougle Epps Island -3 Eiland -68 W. Montgomery Road Nitsch Population and Survey Analysts October, 212: Page 24

7 Current Geo-coded 6th-8th Grade Students, September 212 Hildebrandt 1,1 FM 292 Krimmel 1,37 FM 292 Schindewolf 1,295 Boudreaux Road Ulrich 1,9 Doerre 1,238 Louetta Road Spring Gully Strack 1,148 Cypresswood Drive Cypress Creek Champion Forest Drive Kleb 1,339 Stuebner Airline Rd. Cypress C reek Wunderlich Rd. Veterans Memorial Dr. Wunderlich 1,539 Greens Bayou Beltway 8 N. Houston-Rosslyn Rd. Klein 1,31 W. Montgomery Road W. Gulf Bank Rd. Population and Survey Analysts October, 212: Page 241

8 Absolute and Percent Change in Geo-coded 6th-8th Grade Students, September 211 to September 212 Hildebrandt 77 8% FM 292 Krimmel 41 Stuebner Airline Rd. Schindewolf 15 Ulrich 6 Doerre 45 Louetta Road Spring Gully Strack 45 Cypresswood Drive Cypress Creek Champion Forest Drive Kleb 54 Stuebner Airline Rd. Wunderlich Rd. Cypress C reek FM 196 Wunderlich 42 3% Greens Bayou Beltway 8 N. Houston-Rosslyn Rd. Klein 8 7% W. Montgomery Road W. Gulf Bank Rd. Population and Survey Analysts October, 212: Page 242

9 Current Geo-coded 9th12th Grade Students, September 212 Northcrest Dr. FM 292 Klein Oak 3,269 Boudreaux Road FM 292 FM 292 Klein Collins 3,521 Ella Boulevard Spring-Cypress Road Klein 3,839 Louetta Road Spring Gully Cypress Creek Louetta Road Cypresswood Drive Stuebner Airline Rd. Wunderlich Rd. Veterans Memorial Dr. Klein Forest 3,516 Beltway 8 N. Houston-Rosslyn Rd. Antoine Drive W. Montgomery Road W. Gulf Bank Rd. Population and Survey Analysts October, 212: Page 243

10 Absolute and Percent Change in Geo-coded 9th12th Grade Students, September 211 to September 212 Northcrest Dr. Boudreaux Road FM 292 Klein Oak 117 FM 292 Klein Collins -4 Ella Boulevard Spring-Cypress Road Louetta Road Klein 13 % Cypresswood Drive Stuebner Airline Rd. Wunderlich Rd. Louetta Road Spring Gully FM 196 Klein Forest -12 % Cypress Creek Greens Bayou Beltway 8 N. Houston-Rosslyn Rd. Antoine Drive W. Montgomery Road W. Gulf Bank Rd. Population and Survey Analysts October, 212: Page 244

11 Absolute and Percent Change in Geo-coded African-American Grade Students, September 211 to September 212 Metzler 11 1 Northampton -2-8% Kohrville Blackshear 24 2 Schultz 4 Frank 12 13% Hassler -5-2 Dowdell Rd. FM 292 Theiss -4 - Mueller 13 1 Benignus 1 2% Ehrhardt 6 Kuehnle 5 9% Benfer 5 Zwink -1 Kreinhop 6 7% Roth -2 Lemm Haude 7 13% 17 37% Krahn 1 13% Brill 5 8% Cypress Cr eek Mittelstadt 38 2% FM 196 Greenwood Forest 6 Kaiser -11-9% Klenk -4 McDougle -4-2 Epps Island -2 Eiland % W. Montgomery Road Nitsch -34-8% Population and Survey Analysts October, 212: Page 245

12 Absolute and Percent Change in Geo-coded Hispanic Grade Students, September 211 to September 212 Metzler 34 1 Northampton 25 12% Kohrville 22 Blackshear 1 Schultz 44 1 Frank % Hassler -4 Dowdell Rd. FM 292 Theiss 3 3% Mueller 11 Benignus 7 Ehrhardt 19 12% Kuehnle 45 38% Benfer 5 2% Zwink Kreinhop -9 Roth 7 3% Lemm Haude 14 9% 5 Krahn 12 Brill Cypress Cr eek Mittelstadt 19 9% FM 196 Greenwood Forest 32 9% Kaiser -49-7% Klenk 1 % McDougle -44-9% Epps Island -16 Eiland -3 - W. Montgomery Road Nitsch -6 Population and Survey Analysts October, 212: Page 246

13 Absolute and Percent Change in Geo-coded "Other" Grade Students, September 211 to September 212 Metzler % Northampton 1 2% Kohrville -21 Blackshear 39 Schultz -15 Frank 34 Hassler -25 Dowdell Rd. FM 292 Theiss 34 8% Mueller 32 Benignus 29 Ehrhardt Kuehnle 2 % Benfer -1 % Zwink 54 1 Kreinhop -7 Roth -12 Lemm Haude 6 18 Krahn 2 % Brill -3 Cypress Cr eek Mittelstadt 34 1 FM 196 Greenwood Forest -2 Kaiser 17 3 Klenk -12 McDougle 1 Epps Island % Eiland % W. Montgomery Road Nitsch -5-8% Population and Survey Analysts October, 212: Page 247

14 Absolute and Percent Change in Geo-coded Free and Reduced Lunch Grade Students, September 211 to September 212 Metzler -6 Northampton % Kohrville -7 Blackshear 13 Schultz 22 7% Frank 1 Hassler -3 Dowdell Rd. FM 292 Theiss Mueller -7 Benignus 8 Ehrhardt -18-7% Kuehnle 4 Benfer -11 Zwink 25 7% Kreinhop -7 Roth -11 Lemm Haude 7-1 Krahn 4 Brill -6 Cypress Cr eek Mittelstadt 14 FM 196 Greenwood Forest 1 2% Kaiser Klenk -38-7% McDougle Epps Island -5-7% Eiland W. Montgomery Road Nitsch -55-8% Population and Survey Analysts October, 212: Page 248

15 Student Trends by Development All Developments, Sorted Alphabetically (212), Klein ISD Fall 211 to 212: existing, built-out subdivisions lost 123 students, active subdivisions gained 668 Students, apartments gained 128 students, and MHPs gained 126 students Fall 21 Fall 211 Fall 212 Fall 21 to Fall 211 Fall 211 to Fall 212 Fall 21 to Fall 212 Neighorhood Code Name Class Phase MPC Avg Yr Blt EE-12 EE-5 EE-12 EE-5 EE-12 EE-5 Abs. Chg. Pct. Chg. Abs. Chg. Pct. Chg. Abs. Chg. Pct. Chg. Abs. Chg. Pct. Chg. Abs. Chg. Pct. Chg. Abs. Chg. Pct. Chg. 15C Subdivision Existing Windrose % % 15C Subdivision Existing Windrose % % 5G Subdivision Existing Gleannloch Farms % % 5G Subdivision Existing Gleannloch Farms % % % % 15C Subdivision Existing Windrose % % G Subdivision Existing Gleannloch Farms % 2 2% % -3-7 % 3D Albury Manor Subdivision Existing % % 1 2% 3C, 5A Albury Trails Estates Subdivision Developing % 14 28% A Applewood Village Apartment Existing % % % 5C Arbors Subdivision Developing Gleannloch Farms % I Arbors Subdivision Existing Windrose % % A Ash Creek Subdivision Existing % % I Ashford Grove Subdivision Developing % 6 3% % 24 3% % 3 1 5I Ashford Place Subdivision Developing % 26 2% 16 23% % 1D Auburn Lakes Estates Subdivision Developing Auburn Lakes % % 7 117% B Auburn Lakes Pines Subdivision Developing Auburn Lakes % 1 2% % 34 42% 2 3 1B Auburn Lakes Reserve Subdivision Developing Auburn Lakes % 47 58% B Auburn Lakes Retreat Subdivision Developing Auburn Lakes % 2 2% -6-12% % 1B Auburn Lakes Retreat Sec. 4 Subdivision Developing Auburn Lakes 4 % % 4 % 4 % 15I Auburn Ridge Subdivision Existing Windrose % % % 1 33% % 1 33% 1A Augusta Creek Estates Subdivision Developing Augusta Pines % % 4 57% % -1-1A Augusta Creek Pointe Subdivision Developing Augusta Pines % 2 Augusta Meadows Apartment Existing % % A Augusta Pines Subdivision Developing Augusta Pines % -6-27% H Azalea Estates Subdivision Existing % % -3-27% 67B Azalea Village Subdivision Existing % -7-37% -5-38% F Bainbridge Estates Subdivision Existing % % 1 3% A, 55D Bammel Oaks Estates Subdivision Existing % % -7-12% -6-23% 6C Bella Serra Subdivision Existing % % 5 8% 14 12% C Bending Bough Subdivision Existing % % 1 3% -1-7% 47 Big Cypress Hill Ests. Subdivision Developing % -1-33% Blue Creek Subdivision Existing % 5B Boudreaux Garden MHP Existing % % 9 28% 9 69% 45 Brandonwood Subdivision Existing % -1-17% % 4 67% 31D Brandywine Pines Subdivision Existing % A Brentwood Lakes Subdivision Existing % % 4 59 Briar Park Apartment Existing % -5-13% 2 3% -6-18% 4 7% % 14 Bridgestone Subdivision Existing % B Bridgestone Lakes Subdivision Existing % % Bridgestone Ranch Subdivision Existing % 7 17% 2 2 % 15E Bridgestone West Subdivision Existing % % 46 Bridgewater Landing Condo Existing % % % 47 Brookfield Apartment Existing % % 13 48% 34C, 34A, 31B Candlelight Hills Subdivision Existing % 5 7% C, 34A Candlelight Park Estates Subdivision Existing % -5-23% -5-8% % 53, 54A Capistrano Villas Subdivision Existing % % -3-9% -1-18% A Cedar Creek Forest MHP MHP Existing % 7 19% 1 2% -3-7% H Cedar Oaks Subdivision Existing % 3 % -4-12% 4 7% -1 6 Cedar Pointe Apartment Existing % -4-7% A, 43B, 22 Champion Forest Subdivision Existing A Champion Forest Apartment Existing % -3-17% % -5-33% 2 8% B Champion Lake Estates Subdivision Developing % % 47 Champion Oaks Apartment Existing % 2 7% 11 23% % Champion Pines Condo Existing % % % % 55A Champion Point Village Subdivision Existing % 23B Champion Springs Subdivision Existing % B Champion Springs Village Subdivision Existing % % -7-18% B Champion Woods Subdivision Existing % % -1-2 % -1-2 % 25 Champion Woods Estates Subdivision Developing % % % 55B Champions Crossing Subdivision Existing % % % B Champions Point Grove Subdivision Existing % % -3-7% 47 Champions Terrace Subdivision Existing % 1 3% % 23C Champions Trail Subdivision Existing % -1-8% % 5 38% Population and Survey Analysts October, 212: Page 249

16 Student Trends by Development All Developments, Sorted Alphabetically (212), Klein ISD Fall 211 to 212: existing, built-out subdivisions lost 123 students, active subdivisions gained 668 Students, apartments gained 128 students, and MHPs gained 126 students Fall 21 to Fall 211 Fall 211 to Fall 212 Fall 21 to Fall 212 Fall 21 Fall 211 Fall 212 Neighorhood Code Name Class Phase MPC Avg Yr Blt EE-12 EE-5 EE-12 EE-5 EE-12 EE-5 Abs. Chg. Pct. Chg. Abs. Chg. Pct. Chg. Abs. Chg. Pct. Chg. Abs. Chg. Pct. Chg. Abs. Chg. Pct. Chg. Abs. Chg. Pct. Chg. 55A Champions Valley TH's Subdivision Existing % 18 62% % 15 5 Champions Village Apartment Existing % % B, 2B Charterwood Subdivision Existing % 18 3% 1 % 43 7% 11 3% 65 Cherie Cove Subdivision Existing % -5-18% % Chesapeake Village Condo Existing % -4-13% -2-13% % 23B Colony Creek Village Subdivision Existing % B Copper Falls Subdivision Existing % -1-8% % A Cottage Gardens Subdivision Developing % Cottages of Champion Forest Apartment Existing % % 13 32% 26 Cottages of Cypresswood Apartment Existing % % % -6-19% % -6-19% 3C Country Club Greens Subdivision Developing % A Country Lake Estates Subdivision Developing % 1 3% % 43 3% 1D Courts Subdivision Existing Auburn Lakes % % % % 1A Coventry Subdivision Existing % A Covington Bridge Subdivision Existing % 6B Creekside Place Subdivision Existing % -6-8% % 1C Creekwood Acres Subdivision Existing % % -7-13B Cricket Hill Estates MHP Existing % A Cutten Green Subdivision Existing % % % 45 Cypress Creek Manor Subdivision Existing % 4 67% 2 12% % 2 12% 4 67% 33A Cypress Forest Estates Subdivision Existing % % % 33A Cypress Forest Lakes Subdivision Developing % 39 Cypress Trace Subdivision Developing % 5 18% 1 2% % % 38A Cypress Villas Subdivision Existing % A, 35B Cypressdale Subdivision Existing % 11 3% 11 7% 38B Cypresswood Apartment Existing % 3 3% 9 29% 3 23% 16 67% 6 34D, 36, 37B, 34B, 35A, 31C Cypresswood Subdivision Existing % A Cypresswood Forest Subdivision Existing % E Cypresswood Glen Subdivision Existing % -4-7% 3 2% 5 9% % 31E Cypresswood Glen Estates Subdivision Existing % -6-18% 36 Cypresswood Place Subdivision Existing % 2 67% B Devonshire Woods Subdivision Existing % F Dove Manor Subdivision Existing Gleannloch Farms % 8 7% 22 9% 12 9% 41 19% B, 11A Dove Meadows Subdivision Existing A Duplexes Subdivision Existing % % I Eagle Bend Subdivision Existing Windrose % -8-18% % -1-22% 15I Eaglewood Subdivision Existing Windrose % 1 3% % 2 2% Edinburg Estates Subdivision Existing % -5-29% % -5-18% B, 33A, 32C Enchanted Oaks Subdivision Existing E Estates at Creeks End Subdivision Existing % 5 19% % % 3C Estates at Subdivision Developing % % 13 57% 6 38% 22 Estates of Windbrush Subdivision Existing % -4-19% -6-9% 1 38B Falcon Ridge Apartment Existing % -5-23% % % B Falls at Champion Forest Subdivision Developing % B, 3C Farmette Meadows Subdivision Existing % -1-8% -3-7% 3 27% % 26 Fawn River Garden Homes Subdivision Existing % -1-33% % 9B Five Oaks MHP Existing % % 61 23% Forest North Subdivision Existing % 16 8% -33-7% % 1 Forest Ridge Subdivision Existing % 9 9% 1 2% 27 32% , 51 Fountainhead Subdivision Existing % -2-1 % % 9D Fox Hollow Subdivision Existing % -4 - % % 9D Fox Hollow South Subdivision Existing % 8 5 1B Future Auburn Lakes Subdivision Developing Auburn Lakes 11 4 % % Garden City Park Subdivision Existing % -8-12% F Gleannfield Subdivision Existing Gleannloch Farms % 11 8% 16 7% 12 8% % 5F Gleannmanor Subdivision Existing Gleannloch Farms % 2 2% 7 3 3% 23A, 19B Glenloch Subdivision Existing % % 5 18A Glenn Haven Estates Subdivision Existing % 1D Goodwin Trailer Park MHP Existing % -1-33% % -3 15H Gosling Pines Subdivision Developing % % 19 22% 11A Greengate Acres Subdivision Existing % % % I Greens Subdivision Existing Windrose % % % % 1D Greens of Northampton Estates Subdivision Existing % % Population and Survey Analysts October, 212: Page 25

17 Student Trends by Development All Developments, Sorted Alphabetically (212), Klein ISD Fall 211 to 212: existing, built-out subdivisions lost 123 students, active subdivisions gained 668 Students, apartments gained 128 students, and MHPs gained 126 students Fall 21 to Fall 211 Fall 211 to Fall 212 Fall 21 to Fall 212 Fall 21 Fall 211 Fall 212 Neighorhood Code Name Class Phase MPC Avg Yr Blt EE-12 EE-5 EE-12 EE-5 EE-12 EE-5 Abs. Chg. Pct. Chg. Abs. Chg. Pct. Chg. Abs. Chg. Pct. Chg. Abs. Chg. Pct. Chg. Abs. Chg. Pct. Chg. Abs. Chg. Pct. Chg. 49, 54B, 5, 53, 51, 54A Greenwood Forest Subdivision Existing % 18 8% 14 3% 6 2% 51 Greenwood Forest Apartment Existing % 14 23% C Hamill Ranch Subdivision Developing % % 7A Hampton Oaks Subdivision Existing % -1-7% % 1 7% 11C Hannover Village Subdivision Existing % A Haven Lake Estates Subdivision Existing % % % % -2-5F Havenwood Subdivision Developing Gleannloch Farms % % 4 8% 2 5C Highlands Subdivision Existing Gleannloch Farms % % 4 % 4 % 5C Hillcrest Subdivision Existing Gleannloch Farms % 9 3% -14-9% 1 % % 4D Hollow Glen Subdivision Existing % -4-17% % 5H Homestead Oaks Subdivision Existing % % 7 37% , 48 Huntwick Forest Subdivision Existing % % 1 2% -1-1 % 48 Huntwick Parc Subdivision Existing % % E Hydies Crossing Subdivision Existing % -6-13% % 4 22% 5E Inverness Subdivision Developing % 26 13% 12 12% B Inway of Northampton Subdivision Existing % % -4 67A Inwood Court Subdivision Existing % 67A Inwood Meadows Apartment Existing % 4 8% % -4-19% 1 2% 66, 65, 67A Inwood North Subdivision Existing % 1 2% B Inwood Northwest Subdivision Existing % % -29-9% Inwood West Subdivision Existing % % % -16-8% 11 3% -16-8% 2 Klein Meadows Subdivision Existing % 2 2% 3 % A Kleinbrook Subdivision Developing A Kleinbrook Subdivision Existing % 2 2% -17-7% % 43A Kleinwood Subdivision Existing % Lafone Estates Subdivision Existing % 2 2% % 1 33% 7 7% 3 3% 5C Lake Estates Subdivision Existing Gleannloch Farms % % % 6C Lakes at Avalon Village Subdivision Developing % % % % 5H Lakes at Gleannloch Subdivision Existing % 4 17% 1 2 % 33B Lakes of Cypress Forest Subdivision Developing % 8 22% 21 27% 6 13% 32 48% 14 38% 22 Lakes of Sterling Gate Subdivision Developing % -4-67% % Lexington at Champions Apartment Existing I Links Subdivision Existing Windrose % 2 2% -3-27% B Lodge at Cypresswood Apartment Existing % 1 3% -8-12% -4-13% 2 3% -3 1A Londonderry Subdivision Existing % % C Louetta Glen Subdivision Existing % 1 9% 5 12% 3 3% -5 32A Louetta Lakes Subdivision Existing % 32A Louetta Woods Subdivision Existing % % 1 16 Lyndhurst Village Subdivision Existing % 1 8% -1 % % 1 8% 42 Lyons Court Condo Existing % 1 3% % 2B Majestic Oaks Subdivision Existing % % C Manor Estates Subdivision Existing Gleannloch Farms % -2 % -9-19% 2 2% % 46 Marble Gate Court Subdivision Existing % % B Meadow Hill Run Subdivision Existing A, 2A, 19B Memorial Chase Subdivision Existing % 7 2% -1 2 % -15-7% 19C, 23B Memorial Creek Subdivision Existing % % % A Memorial Creek Estates Subdivision Existing % -1-13% 4 2% % 17, 25, 24B, 18B, 24A, 18A Memorial Northwest Subdivision Existing % B Memorial Springs Subdivision Developing % 28 9% A MHP MHP Existing % % E Middlecreek Village Subdivision Existing % 42 Mill Creek Apartment Existing % % 14 29% 6B Miramar Lake Subdivision Existing % % Misty Valley Patio Homes Subdivision Existing % 1 13% % 2 29% 1 33% 46 Mittlestedt Champion Apts Apartment Existing A Mossy Oaks Subdivision Existing % % % -4-17% 12A Normandy Forest Subdivision Existing % 8-2 % -1-5F North Lake at Gleannloch Farms Subdivision Developing Gleannloch Farms % % A, 8B Northampton Subdivision Existing % -19 7A Northampton Estates Subdivision Existing % -5-9% % 7A Northampton Forest Subdivision Existing % -6-17% 2 2% % 52A Northcliffe Subdivision Existing % % 56B Northcliffe Manor Subdivision Existing % % % Population and Survey Analysts October, 212: Page 251

18 Student Trends by Development All Developments, Sorted Alphabetically (212), Klein ISD Fall 211 to 212: existing, built-out subdivisions lost 123 students, active subdivisions gained 668 Students, apartments gained 128 students, and MHPs gained 126 students Fall 21 to Fall 211 Fall 211 to Fall 212 Fall 21 to Fall 212 Fall 21 Fall 211 Fall 212 Neighorhood Code Name Class Phase MPC Avg Yr Blt EE-12 EE-5 EE-12 EE-5 EE-12 EE-5 Abs. Chg. Pct. Chg. Abs. Chg. Pct. Chg. Abs. Chg. Pct. Chg. Abs. Chg. Pct. Chg. Abs. Chg. Pct. Chg. Abs. Chg. Pct. Chg. 15A Northcrest Village Subdivision Developing % 12 12% 55 27% % 5 5D Northern Point Subdivision Existing % 7 3% 13 3% 8 3% % 4A Northpoint East Subdivision Existing % % Northwest Green Subdivision Existing % -9-12% -1-7% % 63C Northwest Park Colony Subdivision Developing % 16 59% 7 58% % 38B, 38A Northwood Farms Subdivision Existing B Northwood Park Subdivision Existing % % 37A Oak Falls Apartment Existing % % 13 33% 32B Oaks of Devonshire Subdivision Existing % -1 3C Oaks of Subdivision Existing % 1 % 1 % 2 2% 39 Oaks of Terranova West Subdivision Existing % % % -1-7% 41A Oaks of Wimbledon Apartment Existing % 6 19% 17 2% % 26 Oakwood Glen Apartment Existing % -5-4 % -2-33% -6-27% , 28A, 27A Oakwood Glen Subdivision Existing % 8 2% % 17 Oakwood Glen West Subdivision Existing % % % 8A Oakwood Village Subdivision Existing % % % % 48 Old Bridge Lake Subdivision Existing % I Orchards Subdivision Existing Windrose % -5-8% % A Paloma Creek Subdivision Developing % % 8 2% 13B Park at Meadow Hill Run Subdivision Developing % 6 19% 14 22% 1 3% 18 3% 7 23% 63C Park at Willowbrook Apartment Existing % % % % 3A Pine Trace Village Subdivision Developing % 15 17% 9 9% 4A Pinecrest Forest Subdivision Existing % % D Pinewood Place MHP Existing % A Preserve at Northampton Subdivision Developing % Primrose at Heritage Park - Sr Apartment Existing Princeton Place Subdivision Developing % % 28 53% 15I, 15C Promenade Subdivision Existing Windrose % % -9-8% 48 Providence at Champions Apartment Existing % B, 63A Recreation Farms Subdivision Existing % % -3 13A Rhodes Landing Subdivision Existing % % 19 3% 4D Rodgers Addition Subdivision Existing % 2 % -2-33% 2 17% % 68 Rosslyn Heights Apartment Existing % Saddlebrook Ranch Subdivision Developing % % % 2C San Cierra Apartment Existing % % % 49 Sendera Apartment Existing % 7 18% 24 29% 15 33% 39 57% 22 58% 15F Senterra Lakes Subdivision Developing % 6 18% 24 49% Seton Chase Apartment Existing % A Shadow Creek Estates Subdivision Developing Augusta Pines % % 1 56A Smoketree Apartment Existing % 4 17% % % -3-13% 15I Sorrento Village Apartment Developing C Southern Legacy Homes Subdivision Developing % % % -3-7 % 29B Court Subdivision Existing % % B, 27B Forest Subdivision Existing % % % 5 29A, 3C Oaks Subdivision Existing % % -4 3C Oaks PH Subdivision Existing % % % -2 % 32D Spring Landing Subdivision Existing % % % 9C Spring Oaks MHP Existing % 12 3% % 1 333% 26 Spring Oaks Apartment Existing % % % 9D Spring Stuebner Estates Subdivision Existing % -3-1 % % 6B, 6C Spring Terrace Subdivision Developing % 15 7% -1 % % 11 6B Spring Village Estates Subdivision Developing % D Springbrook Subdivision Existing % 17 3% 5 2% 45 9% Sterling Gate Estates Subdivision Existing % % D, 7A Sterling Ridge at Northampton Subdivision Existing % 1 17% -1-7% -2-29% -1-7% -1-17% 15F Stone Forest Subdivision Existing % 1 13% % 44A Stonegate Court Subdivision Existing % % D Stoneleigh Cypress Pointe Apartment Existing % 12 3% 6 29% 2 % 3A Stoneleigh on Spring Cypress Apartment Existing % -2 % % 3A Stoneleigh on the Lake Apartment Existing % -2-9% % 3 1 4F Stonepine Subdivision Existing % 16 2 % % A Stratford at Subdivision Developing % -1-33% -3-27% % -2-67% 3A Suburban Ranches Subdivision Existing % % % Population and Survey Analysts October, 212: Page 252

19 Student Trends by Development All Developments, Sorted Alphabetically (212), Klein ISD Fall 211 to 212: existing, built-out subdivisions lost 123 students, active subdivisions gained 668 Students, apartments gained 128 students, and MHPs gained 126 students Fall 21 to Fall 211 Fall 211 to Fall 212 Fall 21 to Fall 212 Fall 21 Fall 211 Fall 212 Neighorhood Code Name Class Phase MPC Avg Yr Blt EE-12 EE-5 EE-12 EE-5 EE-12 EE-5 Abs. Chg. Pct. Chg. Abs. Chg. Pct. Chg. Abs. Chg. Pct. Chg. Abs. Chg. Pct. Chg. Abs. Chg. Pct. Chg. Abs. Chg. Pct. Chg. 5A Sugarberry Place MHP Existing % 18 13% 38A Terranova Subdivision Existing Terranova West Subdivision Existing Terravista Subdivision Developing % 8 29% Terravista Estates Subdivision Developing % 4 % 1 13% 7 88% F, 5C The Bluff Subdivision Existing Gleannloch Farms % 16-9 % A The Chancel Subdivision Developing % % % 39 13% 5C The Gardens Subdivision Existing Gleannloch Farms % A The Gardens Subdivision Developing Augusta Pines 3 2 % % A The Greens Subdivision Developing Augusta Pines % % A The Legends Subdivision Developing Augusta Pines % C The Manor Subdivision Existing Gleannloch Farms % % % 41A The Park at Cypresswood Subdivision Existing % -2-33% % % -4-67% 31D The Park at Cypresswood Glen Subdivision Developing % -8-27% % 2 29% 1A The Preserve Subdivision Developing Augusta Pines % B The Ravinia Apartment Existing % -5-7% % 3 1 5H The Retreat Subdivision Developing Gleannloch Farms % % 5C The Ridge Subdivision Existing Gleannloch Farms % % -14-8% % 5C The Woods Subdivision Existing Gleannloch Farms % % C Thicket at Cypresswood Subdivision Existing % % 4A Three Lakes Subdivision Existing % 4A Three Lakes East Subdivision Existing % TH's Subdivision Existing % -1-17% 6 67% % 1 17% 52B Timber Meadow Subdivision Existing % % 1A Timbercrest Village MHP Existing % % % 3C Timberdale Subdivision Existing % % % 1 67A Timbers of Inwood Forest Apartment Existing % 18 29% -11-8% -1-12% 11 9% 8 13% 1A Timberwilde MHP Existing % % 21B Tivoli Apartment Existing % % % Tomball RV Park MHP Existing % 8 2% 2 1A Toscana at Augusta Pines Subdivision Developing Augusta Pines % A Traces Subdivision Existing % % 2 Traditions Subdivision Existing % % % -1-19% -1 6B Trailwood Estates Subdivision Existing % 1 33% -2-1 % -4-27% 1 33% 15I Trellises Subdivision Existing Windrose % % % -3-9% -1-8% 46 Trophy Club Condo Existing % % % 5 29% 3A Twin Falls Subdivision Developing % 1 3% 1 8% % 39 Villa Nova Subdivision Developing % % % 1 % 1D Village Subdivision Existing Auburn Lakes % 5 38A Villages at Louetta Apartment Existing % 2 3% 12 8% E, 15F Villages of Bridgestone Subdivision Existing % 4 1 % 1 3% 11 17% 5 17% 65 Villages of Inwood Apartment Existing % -9-33% 3 9% -5-28% % 15F Villages of Senterra Lakes Subdivision Developing % % 16 34B Villas at Candlelight Park Subdivision Existing % % 26 Villas of Oakwood Glen Subdivision Existing % 6 2 7% 5 42% % 21B Vintage Lakes Subdivision Developing % % % -4-67% 2B Vintage Park Apartment Existing % % % 2B Vintage Royale Subdivision Developing % % 16 8% 8 8% 3E Waldenwood Subdivision Existing % 1 2% 5 42% 5 83% 7 7% 6 12% 46 Waterman Crossing Condo Existing % % 31G Weldon Forest Subdivision Existing % % 4D Whisper Meadow Subdivision Existing % 2 9% -3 - % 1 2% 2 9% 51 Willow Bend Apartment Existing % % -12 3A Manor Subdivision Existing % 1 28% 6 43% % 6B Willow Dell Subdivision Existing % A Willow Estates Subdivision Developing % -2-22% % 4F Willow Falls Subdivision Developing % A Willow Forest Subdivision Existing % % -11-8% 5A Willow Glen Subdivision Existing % % -1-33% % 1 6A Willow Oaks MHP Existing % % 12 12% 12 23% 2 2% % 6C Willow Trace Subdivision Developing % 8 2% 22 22% 14 29% C Willowbrook Crossing Apartment Existing % 13 19% 12 13% A Willowcreek Stables Subdivision Existing % -1-33% -3-13% % % Population and Survey Analysts October, 212: Page 253

20 Student Trends by Development All Developments, Sorted Alphabetically (212), Klein ISD Fall 211 to 212: existing, built-out subdivisions lost 123 students, active subdivisions gained 668 Students, apartments gained 128 students, and MHPs gained 126 students Fall 21 to Fall 211 Fall 211 to Fall 212 Fall 21 to Fall 212 Fall 21 Fall 211 Fall 212 Neighorhood Code Name Class Phase MPC Avg Yr Blt EE-12 EE-5 EE-12 EE-5 EE-12 EE-5 Abs. Chg. Pct. Chg. Abs. Chg. Pct. Chg. Abs. Chg. Pct. Chg. Abs. Chg. Pct. Chg. Abs. Chg. Pct. Chg. Abs. Chg. Pct. Chg. 17 Willowick Forest Subdivision Existing % % -3-12% , 62A Willowood Subdivision Existing % C Willowood Gardens Condos Condo Existing % % -9-12% -7-19% % -7-19% 41A Wimbledon Apartment Existing % % 41A Wimbledon Center Court Subdivision Existing % 1 2% % 4 2% 2 2% 41A Wimbledon Champions Subdivision Developing % % B Wimbledon Champions Estates Subdivision Developing % -3-13% % -2-33% 41B Wimbledon Champions Parks Subdivision Developing % % 8 17% 4 27% 2 Wimbledon Country Subdivision Existing % % A, 4 Wimbledon Esates & Raquet Club Subdivision Existing % -24-7% Wimbledon Falls Subdivision Developing % % 41A Wimbledon Forest Subdivision Existing % -7-27% A Wimbledon Park Subdivision Existing % -2-12% % % 41A Wimbledon Pines Condo Existing % A Windsor Forest Subdivision Existing % % -6-19% % 21B Woodbend Pines Subdivision Existing % % 8 53% Woodbriar Apartment Existing % 1 143% 12 43% % 28A Woodbriar Place Subdivision Existing % Woodglen Village Apartment Existing % -15-7% -1-8% 1D, 1B Woods of Northampton Subdivision Existing Auburn Lakes % % -25-3C Woods of Oaks Subdivision Existing % % 2 67% 4 29% -1-17% 46 Woods of Wimbledon Subdivision Existing % Totals 44,55 2,655 45,39 2,883 45,838 21, % 299 1,288 3% 527 3% Population and Survey Analysts October, 212: Page 254