CONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT. August 9, 2017 (Agenda)
|
|
- Daniela Martin
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 LAFCO CONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT North Peak Equestrian Center Annexation to Contra Costa Water District PROPONENT Contra Costa Water District by Resolution No adopted February 15, 2017 SYNOPSIS DISCUSSION The applicant proposes to annex acres (APN ) located at 1550 Castle Rock Road in the unincorporated Walnut Creek area (Attachment 1). Annexation will bring the property and a portion of road right-of-way into the service boundary of CCWD, and will allow for the extension of municipal water service to the equestrian center property. The area proposed for annexation is outside the County s Urban Limit Line (ULL). Government Code sets forth factors that the Commission must consider in evaluating a proposed boundary change as discussed below. In the Commission s review, no single factor is determinative. In reaching a decision, each is to be evaluated within the context of the overall proposal. 1. Consistency with the Sphere of Influence (SOI) of Any Local Agency: In July 2017, the Commission amended the SOI for CCWD to coincide with the proposed annexation. Thus, the area proposed for annexation is within CCWD s SOI. 2. Land Use, Planning and Zoning - Present and Future: The subject property has been used for public equestrian activities since 1985, and is the largest horse stable in Contra Costa County, currently boarding up to 150 horses on a year-round basis. The equestrian center supports classes for children and community events. The property is developed with a total of 11 large buildings (119,000 square feet), a number of smaller structures and related facilities including a covered arena, outdoor arena, covered round pen, open round pen, 148 stalls with six barns and a mare motel, large turn outs, office, small single wide trailer to house staff, parking for trailers, a single family residential home where a caretaker resides, along with two other structures. The County land use designations include Agricultural (General Plan) and Agricultural A-2 (zoning). The project site is bounded on the east by land designated as agricultural, on the west by the Diablo Foothills Regional Park, on the north by residential, and on the south by the Castle Rock Park staging area. The proposed annexation will have no effect on the land uses. 3. The Effect on Maintaining the Physical and Economic Integrity of Agricultural Lands and Open Space Lands: There are no proposed land use changes associated with the annexation; the subject area will remain an equestrian center. No portion of the subject area is subject to a Williamson Act contract. 4. Topography, Natural Features and Drainage Basins: The subject property is generally flat. Little Pine Creek runs to the east and Diablo Foothills/ Castle Rock Regional Park characterized by hilly ranch and park lands surround the site.
2 5. Population: Executive Officer s Report LAFCO Page 2 No development is proposed in conjunction with the annexation, and no population increase will result from this proposal. 6. Fair Share of Regional Housing: In its review of a proposal, LAFCO must consider the extent to which the proposal will assist the receiving entity in achieving its fair share of the regional housing needs as determined by the regional council of governments. Regional housing needs are determined by the State Department of Housing and Community Development; the councils of government throughout the State allocate to each jurisdiction a fair share of the regional housing needs. In Contra Costa County, the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) determines each city s fair share of regional housing needs. Each jurisdiction is required, in turn, to incorporate its fair share of the regional housing needs into the housing element of its General Plan. In July 2013, ABAG adopted the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) Plan for the San Francisco Bay Area. The proposed annexation will have no effect on regional housing, as no development is proposed. 7. Governmental Services and Controls - Need, Cost, Adequacy and Availability: Whenever a local agency submits a resolution of application for a change of organization or reorganization, the local agency shall also submit a plan for providing services within the affected territory (Gov. Code 56653). The plan shall include all of the following information and any additional information required by the Commission or the Executive Officer: (1) An enumeration and description of the services to be extended to the affected territory. (2) The level and range of those services. (3) An indication of when those services can feasibly be extended to the affected territory. (4) An indication of any improvement or upgrading of structures, roads, sewer or water facilities, or other conditions the local agency would impose or require within the affected territory if the change of organization or reorganization is completed. (5) Information with respect to how those services will be financed. The subject property receives municipal services from a number of public agencies including Contra Costa County and Contra Costa County Fire Protection District. An on-site septic system serves the property. The proposal before the Commission is to annex the property to CCWD for the provision of municipal water service. Municipal water service is needed to support the equestrian center due to an unreliable ground water system currently serving the property. No other changes to services are proposed. Since 1985, a groundwater system has been used to serve the property. The groundwater system supplies all water uses on site including public consumption, public restrooms, equine consumption and bathing, and dust control. The equestrian center has several large capacity water tanks that allow it to regulate supply depending on the needs of the horses and as temperatures vary. A caretaker lives onsite to ensure security. On warm days, water consumption can be as high as 3,000 5,000 gallons per day. Until the onset of the extended drought in 2012, the equestrian center relied on its groundwater system to meet water demands at the site. The groundwater system is no longer able to provide the
3 Executive Officer s Report LAFCO Page 3 necessary quantity or quality of water needed by the equestrian center. When no groundwater is available, the equestrian center has resorted to obtaining trucked water from CCWD. In June 2016, Contra Costa Environmental Health (CCEH) conducted a survey of the subject property and water system and found that the water system meets the statutory definition of a public water system and therefore must be permitted. In a letter dated October 10, 2016 (Attachment 2), CCEH concluded that the equestrian center would likely not be able to obtain a permit due to the lack of a reliable and safe water supply from the on-site wells or cistern, and that CCWD is the only available option that would resolve the water supply and water quality issues at the property. The District s service area extends beyond the equestrian center to provide water service to East Bay Regional Park District s Castle Rock staging area at the base of Mount Diablo. CCWD reports that there is an existing treated water distribution pipeline approximately 800 feet from the subject property. To obtain water from CCWD, a 2-inch water line would need to be extended from the terminus of the existing 8-inch water line within Castle Rock Road to the property, approximately 800 feet. In addition, a water meter, backflow device and one inch service line would be needed. Should LAFCO approve the annexation, CCWD will work with the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) to obtain Central Valley Project (CVP) contract inclusion, which is required before the District can deliver CVP water to the property. 8. Timely Availability of Water and Related Issues: Pursuant to the CKH, LAFCO must consider the timely and available supply of water in conjunction with a boundary change proposal. Contra Costa LAFCO policies state that any proposal for a change of organization that includes the provision of water service shall include information relating to water supply, storage, treatment, distribution, and waste recovery; as well as adequacy of services, facilities, and improvements to be provided and financed by the agency responsible for the provision of such services, facilities and improvements. The proposal before the Commission includes annexation of the subject property to CCWD. CCWD s boundary encompasses 220+ square miles in central and eastern Contra Costa County. CCWD s untreated water service area includes Antioch, Bay Point, Oakley, Pittsburg, and portions of Brentwood and Martinez. The District s treated water service area includes Clayton, Clyde, Concord, Pacheco, Port Costa, and parts of Martinez, Pleasant Hill, and Walnut Creek. CCWD also treats and delivers water to the City of Brentwood, Golden State Water Company (Bay Point), Diablo Water District (Oakley), and the City of Antioch. CCWD serves approximately 500,000 (61,085 water connections). The primary sources of water are the USBR CVP and delta diversions. One of CCWD s prerequisites for service, including annexation, is inclusion in the CVP service area. The CVP inclusion review is a separate process, and requires specific environmental documents. The City, the landowners and CCWD will work together to complete the CVP process. The District s Plan for Services provides for a water meter, backflow device, one inch service line, an 800 foot mainline extension on Castle Rock Road, and a 700 foot service line on the equestrian center property. Based on the existing land use, the maximum demand for service is approximately 10,000 gallons of water per day. CCWD has the capacity to serve the property; the 5/8 inch meter is capable of providing 20 gallons per minute or almost 28,880 gallons per day.
4 9. Assessed Value, Tax Rates and Indebtedness: Executive Officer s Report LAFCO Page 4 The annexation area is within tax rate area The assessed value for the annexation area is $3,186,900 ( roll). The territory being annexed shall be liable for all authorized or existing taxes and bonded debt comparable to properties presently within the annexing agencies. 10. Environmental Impact of the Proposal: CCWD, as Lead Agency, has determined that the proposed SOI amendment and corresponding annexation are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections and 15319, as the service extension would serve only the existing facility. 11. Landowner Consent and Consent by Annexing Agency: According to County Elections, there are fewer than 12 registered voters in the subject area; thus, the area proposed for annexation is considered uninhabited. The applicant indicates that 100% of the affected landowners have provided written consent to the annexation. Thus, if the Commission approves the annexation, the Commission may waive the protest hearing (Gov. Code 56662). All landowners and registered voters within the proposal area and within 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the area have received notice of the LAFCO hearing. 12. Boundaries and Lines of Assessment: The annexation area is within the SOI of CCWD; a SOI amendment was approved by the Commission on July 12, 2017 to include the subject area. A map and legal description to implement the proposed boundary changes have been received and are subject to final approval by the County Surveyor. 13. Environmental Justice: LAFCO is required to consider the extent to which proposals will promote environmental justice. As defined by statute, environmental justice means the fair treatment of people of all races, cultures, and incomes with respect to the location of public facilities and the provision of public services. The proposed annexation is not expected to promote or discourage the fair treatment of minority or economically disadvantaged groups. 14. Disadvantaged Communities: In accordance with recent legislation (SB 244), local agencies and LAFCOs are required to plan for disadvantaged unincorporated communities (DUCs). Many of these communities lack basic infrastructure, including streets, sidewalks, storm drainage, clean drinking water, and adequate sewer service. LAFCO actions relating to Municipal Service Reviews, SOI reviews/ amendments, and annexations must take into consideration DUCs, and specifically the adequacy of public services, including sewer, water, and fire protection needs or deficiencies, to these communities. According to the County s Department of Conservation and Development, the annexation area does not meet the criteria of a DUC. 15. Comments from Affected Agencies/Other Interested Parties: To date, LAFCO has received no comments from affected agencies or other interested parties. 16. Regional Transportation and Regional Growth Plans: In its review of a proposal, LAFCO shall consider a regional transportation plan adopted pursuant to Section [Gov. Code section 56668(g)]. Further, the commission may consider the regional growth goals and policies established by a collaboration of elected officials only,
5 Executive Officer s Report LAFCO Page 5 formally representing their local jurisdictions in an official capacity on a regional or subregional basis (Gov. Code section ). Regarding these sections, LAFCO looks at consistency of the proposal with the regional transportation and other regional plans affecting the Bay Area. SB 375, a landmark state law, requires California s regions to adopt plans and policies to reduce the generation of greenhouse gases (GHG), primarily from transportation. To implement SB 375, in July 2013, ABAG and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) adopted Plan Bay Area as the Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy for the San Francisco Bay Area. Plan Bay Area focuses on where the region is expected to grow and how development patterns and the transportation network can work together to reduce GHG emissions. The Plan s key goals are to reduce GHG emissions by specified amounts; and to plan sufficient housing for the region s projected population over the next 25 years. The Plan Bay Area directs future development to infill areas within the existing urban footprint and focuses the majority of growth in self-identified Priority Development Areas (PDAs). PDAs include infill areas that are served by transit and are located close to other amenities, allowing for improved transit, bicycle and pedestrian access thereby reducing the amount of transportation related GHG generated. Plan Bay Area also aims to protect open space and agricultural land by directing 100% of the region s growth inside the year 2010 urban footprint, which means that all growth occurs as infill development or within established urban growth boundaries or urban limit lines. As the plan assumes that all urban growth boundaries/urban limit lines are held fixed through the year 2040, no sprawl-style development is expected to occur on the region s scenic or agricultural lands. Plan Bay Area also includes projections for the region s population, housing and job growth, and indicates that the region has the capacity to accommodate expected growth over the next 25 years without sprawling further into undeveloped land on the urban fringe. ABAG and MTC are in the process of updating the Plan Bay Area. The final Plan and EIR are expected to be approved this summer. The subject property is not designated as a Priority Conservation Area or a PDA, and the proposed annexation will have no impact on the regional plan. ALTERNATIVES FOR COMMISSION ACTION After consideration of this report and any testimony or additional materials that are submitted the Commission should consider taking one of the following actions: Option 1 Approve the annexation as proposed. A. Determine that the project is exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Sections and B. Adopt this report, approve LAFCO Resolution No (Attachment 2), and approve the proposal, to be known as the North Peak Equestrian Center Annexation to CCWD subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. The territory being annexed shall be liable for the continuation of any authorized or existing special taxes, assessments and charges comparable to properties presently within the annexing agencies.
6 Executive Officer s Report LAFCO Page 6 2. CCWD has delivered an executed indemnification agreement providing for the District to indemnify LAFCO against any expenses arising from any legal actions challenging the annexation. 3. Water service is conditional upon CCWD receiving acceptance for inclusion of the annexed areas from the USBR, pursuant to the requirements in CCWD s contract with USBR for supplemental water supply from the CVP. C. Find that the subject territory is uninhabited, the proposal has 100% landowner consent, and the conducting authority (protest) proceedings are hereby waived. Option 2 Accept this report and DENY the proposal. Option 3 If the Commission needs more information, CONTINUE this matter to a future meeting. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Option 1 Approve the annexation as proposed. LOU ANN TEXEIRA, EXECUTIVE OFFICER CONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION Attachments 1 Annexation Map 2 Letter dated October 10, 2016 from Contra Costa Environmental Health 3 Draft LAFCO Resolution c: Distribution
7 Pine Creek Rd LAFCO No No Peak Equestrian Center Annexation to CCWD P.H. CONCORD 680 WALNUT CREEK ÄÅ 24 Old Borges Ranch Rd Castle Rock Rd LAF. 680 Alamo North Gate Rd LAFCO Contra Costa Water District Contra Costa Water District SOI Parcels County Urban Limit Line Map created 07/13/2017 by Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development, GIS Group 30 Muir Road, Martinez, CA :59:41.791N 122:07:03.756W This map or dataset was created by the Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development with data from the Contra Costa County GIS Program. Some base data, primarily City Limits, is derived from the CA State Board of Equalization's tax rate areas. While obligated to use this data the County assumes no responsibility for its accuracy. This map contains copyrighted information and may not be altered. It may be reproduced in its current state if the source is cited. Users of this map agree to read and Feet ,000 2,000 accept the County of Contra Costa disclaimer of liability for geographic information.
8 Attachment
9 4-1.
10 RESOLUTION NO RESOLUTION OF THE CONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION MAKING DETERMINATIONS AND APPROVING NORTH PEAK EQUESTRIAN CENTER ANNEXATION TO CONTRA COSTA WATER DISTRICT WHEREAS, the North Peak Equestrian Center Annexation to Contra Costa Water District (CCWD) was filed with the Executive Officer of the Contra Costa Local Agency Formation Commission pursuant to the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act (Government Code et seq.); and WHEREAS, at the time and in the manner required by law the Executive Officer has given notice of the Commission s consideration of the North Peak Equestrian Center Annexation proposal; and WHEREAS, the Commission held a public hearing on August 9, 2017 to consider the North Peak Equestrian Center Annexation proposal; and WHEREAS, the Commission heard, discussed and considered all oral and written testimony related to this proposal including, but not limited to, the Executive Officer's report and recommendation, the environmental documents and determinations, Spheres of Influence and applicable General and Specific Plans. NOW, THEREFORE, the Contra Costa Local Agency Formation Commission DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER as follows: 1. Determine that the project is exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Sections and Said annexation is hereby approved. 3. The subject proposal is assigned the distinctive short-form designation: NORTH PEAK EQUESTRIAN CENTER ANNEXATION TO CONTRA COSTA WATER DISTRICT 4. The boundaries of the affected territory are found to be definite and certain as approved and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 5. Approval of the North Peak Equestrian Center Annexation is subject to the following: a. The territory being annexed shall be liable for the continuation of any authorized or existing special taxes, assessments and charges comparable to properties presently within the annexing agencies. b. The CCWD has delivered an executed indemnification agreement between CCWD and Contra Costa LAFCO providing for CCWD to indemnify LAFCO against any expenses arising from any legal actions challenging the North Peak Equestrian Center Annexation. c. Water service is conditional upon CCWD receiving acceptance for inclusion of the annexed area from the United States Bureau of Reclamation, pursuant to the requirements in CCWD s contract with USBR for supplemental water supply from the Central Valley Project. 6. The territory proposed for annexation is uninhabited, the proposal has 100% landowner consent, and the conducting authority (protest) proceedings are hereby waived.
11 Contra Costa LAFCO Resolution No All subsequent proceedings in connection with the North Peak Equestrian Center Annexation shall be conducted only in compliance with the approved boundary set forth in the attachments and any terms and conditions specified in this resolution. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 9 th day of August 2017, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTENTIONS: ABSENT: DONALD A. BLUBAUGH, CHAIR, CONTRA COSTA LAFCO I hereby certify that this is a correct copy of a resolution passed and adopted by this Commission on the date stated. Dated: August 9, 2017 Lou Ann Texeira, Executive Officer
CONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT. September 15, 2010 (Agenda)
CONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT : Northeast Area Annexation to Delta Diablo Sanitation District (DDSD) PROPONENT: City of Pittsburg Resolution No. 09-11357 adopted
More informationCONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT. January 8, 2014 (Agenda)
CONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT : Rodeo Marina Annexation to Rodeo Sanitary District (RSD) PROPONENT: RSD by Resolution No. 2011-01 adopted April 12, 2011 ACREAGE
More informationCONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT August 12, 2015 (Agenda)
CONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT PROPONENTS ACREAGE & LOCATION Laurel Place/Pleasant View Annexation to the City of Concord Curt Blomstrand, Lenox Homes landowner/petitioner
More informationCONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT. May 12, 2010 (Agenda)
CONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT LAFCO 10-01: Annexation 174 to Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (CCCSD) PROPONENT: CCCSD by Resolution No. 2009-027 adopted
More informationCONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT. February 12, 2014 (Agenda)
CONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT PROPONENT Northeast Antioch Reorganization Area 2A - Annexations to the City of Antioch and Delta Diablo Sanitation District (DDSD)
More informationCONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT. April 9, 2014 (Agenda)
CONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT PROPONENT Northeast Antioch Reorganization Area 2A - Annexations to the City of Antioch and Delta Diablo Sanitation District (DDSD)
More informationLAFCO APPLICATION NO LINDE CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION TO KEYES COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
EXECUTIVE OFFICER S AGENDA REPORT MARCH 27, 2019 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LAFCO Commissioners Javier Camarena, Assistant Executive Officer LAFCO APPLICATION NO. 2019-01 LINDE CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION TO KEYES
More informationLOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA *************************************************************************
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA Wednesday, May 23, 2007 9:00 a.m. Room 381B Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street, Los Angeles 90012 *************************************************************************
More informationRESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, a map showing the location of such territory is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein by this reference; and
RD:VMT :JMD RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE ORDERING THE REORGANIZATION OF CERTAIN UNINHABITED AND UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS STORY NO. 66, SUBJECT TO LIABILITY
More informationBUTTE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) EXECUTIVE OFFICER S REPORT. LAFCo File City of Chico Extension of Services 16 Mayfair Drive
Agenda Item 4.2 BUTTE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) EXECUTIVE OFFICER S REPORT TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Local Agency Formation Commission Stephen Lucas, Executive Officer LAFCo File 19-03 DATE: December
More informationBUTTE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) EXECUTIVE OFFICER S REPORT. LAFCo File City of Chico Extension of Services 716 Oak Lawn Avenue
Agenda Item 4.4 BUTTE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) EXECUTIVE OFFICER S REPORT TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Local Agency Formation Commission Stephen Betts, Deputy Executive Officer LAFCo File 15-21
More informationBUTTE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) EXECUTIVE OFFICER S REPORT. LAFCo File City of Chico Extension of Services 624 Oak Lawn Avenue
Agenda Item 5.2 BUTTE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) EXECUTIVE OFFICER S REPORT TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Local Agency Formation Commission Stephen Betts, Deputy Executive Officer LAFCo File 18-12
More informationLOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AGENDA. Wednesday, October 13, :00 a.m.
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Wednesday, October 13, 2004 9:00 a.m. Board of Supervisors Hearing Room, Room 381B Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street, Los
More informationLAFCO FILE 4-R-14: Dissolution of County Service Area No. 17 (California Valley).
LAFCO FILE 4-R-14: Dissolution of County Service Area No. 17 (California Valley). DATE: November 20, 2014 RECOMMENDATION 1. Recommended Action on the Environmental Determination for the Dissolution: It
More informationMemorandum /14/17. FROM: Harry Freitas TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. DATE: February 9, 2017 SUBJECT: SEE BELOW. Date.
---------3/14/17 COUNCIL AGENDA: 02/28/17 ITEM: -------- 3 4.1 CITY OF SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: SEE BELOW Memorandum FROM: Harry Freitas DATE: February
More informationBUTTE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) EXECUTIVE OFFICER S REPORT. LAFCo File City of Chico Extension of Services 1212 Glenwood Avenue
Agenda Item 4.3 BUTTE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) EXECUTIVE OFFICER S REPORT TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Local Agency Formation Commission Stephen Lucas, Executive Officer LAFCo File 19-05 City of
More informationFresno Local Agency Formation Commission Change of Organization/Reorganization Application
Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission Change of Organization/Reorganization Application Not for use with update/revision to sphere of influence, city incorporation, or district formation. Contact LAFCo
More informationFebruary 14, 2018 (Agenda) Contra Costa Local Agency Formation Commission 651 Pine Street, Sixth Floor Martinez, CA 94553
February 14, 2018 (Agenda) Contra Costa Local Agency Formation Commission 651 Pine Street, Sixth Floor Martinez, CA 94553 Request to Transfer Principal County Responsibility from Alameda LAFCO to Contra
More informationFresno Local Agency Formation Commission Change of Organization/Reorganization Application
Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission Change of Organization/Reorganization Application Not for use with update/revision to sphere of influence, city incorporation, or district formation. Contact LAFCo
More informationFILING REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTING APPLICATIONS
S T A N I S L A U S L A F C O Stanislaus Local Agency Formation Commission 1010 10th Street, 3 rd Floor Modesto, CA 95354 (209) 525-7660 FAX (209) 525-7643 www.stanislauslafco.org FILING REQUIREMENTS FOR
More informationFresno Local Agency Formation Commission Change of Organization/Reorganization Application
Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission Change of Organization/Reorganization Application Not for use with update/revision to sphere of influence, city incorporation, or district formation. Contact LAFCo
More informationSTANDARDS FOR EVALUATING PROPOSALS
STANDARDS FOR EVALUATING PROPOSALS Amended by Resolution No. 2011-1; February 2, 2011 Pursuant to Government Code Section 56375, Santa Cruz LAFCO has established standards for the evaluation of proposals.
More informationRD:JVP:JMD 01/10//2017 RESOLUTION NO.
01/10//2017 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE INITIATING REORGANIZATION PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNEXATION AND DETACHMENT OF CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS STORY
More informationAGENDA ITEM 6B. MEETING: March 21, 2018
MEETING: March 21, 2018 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM 6B Humboldt LAFCo Commissioners Colette Metz, Administrator Humboldt Community Services District Extension of Water and Wastewater Services Outside
More informationItem 4c. May 10, 2017
Item 4c May 10, 2017 To: From: LAFCo Commissioners Martha Poyatos, Executive Officer Subject: LAFCo File 17-05 Proposed Annexation of 160 Fawn Lane, Portola Valley (APN 077-223-050) to West Bay Sanitary
More informationc) the land area does not exceed 150 acres.
The City of Rialto updated this FAQ to address many of the questions that arose during the Community Meeting on April 10, 2017 and at the Planning Commission meeting on April 12, 2017. It also incorporates
More informationDESCRIPTION OF UNINCORPORATED ISLANDS
DESCRIPTION OF UNINCORPORATED ISLANDS The list of islands was compiled by the Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development at the request of LAFCO staff. The map was prepared using the
More informationSan Luis Obispo Local Agency Formation Commission
San Luis Obispo Local Agency Formation Commission Serving the Area of San Luis Obispo County Since 1963 www.slolafco.com Policies and Procedures Update January 2016 1 San Luis Obispo Local Agency Formation
More informationTO: MEMBERS, FORMATION COMMISSION FROM: DAVID CHURCH, EXECUTIVE OFFICER (DC)
LAFCO - San Luis Obispo - Local Agency Formation Commission SLO LAFCO - Serving the Area of San Luis Obispo County COMMISSIONERS Chairman MARSHALL OCHYLSKI Special District Member TO: MEMBERS, FORMATION
More informationMEMORANDUM CITY COUNCIL TERESA MCCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ROBIN DICKERSON, CITY ENGINEER
MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: BY: CITY COUNCIL TERESA MCCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ROBIN DICKERSON, CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTIONS ACCEPTING EASEMENTS AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS;
More informationCounty and related Memorandum of Understanding MOU
July 12 2016 TO Mayor and Town Council FROM Joseph Calabrigo Town Manager SUBJECT DEIR for Tassajara Parks project in unincorporated Contra Costa County and related Memorandum of Understanding MOU The
More informationBrendan Vieg, Principal Planner ( ;
* CITy,HICO City Council Agenda Report Meeting Date: July 5, 2017 TO: City Council FROM: Brendan Vieg, Principal Planner (879-6806; brendan.vieg@chicoca.gov) RE Esplanade Annexation District No. 29 (ANX
More informationSolano Local Agency Formation Commission 3700 Hilborn Rd. Ste. 600 Fairfield, California (707) FAX: (707)
Solano Local Agency Formation Commission 3700 Hilborn Rd. Ste. 600 Fairfield, California 94534 (707) 439-3897 FAX: (707) 438-1788 LAFCO Staff Report February 11, 2013 Report of the Executive Officer required
More informationRESOLUTION NO
RESOLUTION NO. 2014- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF NAPA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING CEQA FINDINGS FOR ADOPTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, DESIGN GUIDELINES, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
More informationCOUNTY OF SONOMA PERMIT AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 2550 Ventura Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA (707) FAX (707)
COUNTY OF SONOMA PERMIT AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 2550 Ventura Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA 95403 (707) 565-1900 FAX (707) 565-1103 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: December 15, 2009 at 2:05 p.m. Board of Supervisors
More informationCONTRA COSTA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, :00 P.M.
Conservation and Development Agenda Item # 3 Contra Costa County CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 2013-7:00 P.M. MANDATORY REFERRAL ACQUISITION OF 90(+/-) ACRES OF LAND, ASSESSOR
More informationRESOLUTION NO. (ANNEXATION AREA NO. 2)
RD:EEH:LCP 4-6-16 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE TO ANNEX TERRITORY INTO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 8 (COMMUNICATIONS HILL) AND TO AUTHORIZE THE
More informationCOUNTY OF SONOMA PERMIT AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 2550 Ventura Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA (707) FAX (707)
COUNTY OF SONOMA PERMIT AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 2550 Ventura Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA 95403 (707) 565-1900 FAX (707) 565-1103 DATE: TO: FROM: December 15, 2009 at 2:05 p.m. Board of Supervisors
More informationEXHIBIT A. City of Corpus Christi Annexation Guidelines
City of Corpus Christi Annexation Guidelines Purpose: The purpose of this document is to describe the City of Corpus Christi s Annexation Guidelines. The Annexation Guidelines provide the guidance and
More informationCalifornia Office 2001 N Street Suite 110 Sacramento, CA VIA
California Office 2001 N Street Suite 110 Sacramento, CA 95811 VIA EMAIL June 20, 2016 Mary Piepho, Chair, Contra Costa County LAFCO 651 Pine Street, 6th Floor Martinez, California 94553 Re: Comments to
More informationDATE: September 27, Property Owner. City of Petaluma Planning Division. Lomas Annexation 2016, FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
DATE: September 27, 2016 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Property Owner City of Petaluma Planning Division Lomas Annexation 2016, FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Why am I receiving this? The Lomas Annexation is follow-up
More informationPublic Facilities and Finance Element
This Element of the General Plan addresses the following public facilities issues: Water Service, including both potable (drinkable) and non-potable water delivery. Sewer Service, and Financing and construction
More informationCOUNTY OF SONOMA PERMIT AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 2550 Ventura Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA (707) FAX (707)
COUNTY OF SONOMA PERMIT AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 2550 Ventura Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA 95403 (707) 565-1900 FAX (707) 565-1103 MEMO Date:, 1:05 p.m. To: Sonoma County Planning Commission From:
More informationPUBLIC HEARING ITEM LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT FOR MEETING OF: OCTOBER 2, 2017
PUIC HEARING ITEM LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT FOR MEETING OF: OCTOBER 2, 2017 8A 8B Proposals Adoption of an Amendment to the Sphere of Influence for the San iego County
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO
Exhibit A PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2014-566 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CALABASAS RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF FILE NO. 140000288, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS
More information7-1. Finance and Insurance Committee. Board of Directors. 7/11/2017 Board Meeting. Subject. Executive Summary. Details
Board of Directors Finance and Insurance Committee 7/11/2017 Board Meeting Subject Adopt CEQA determination and adopt resolution for annexation of the 51st Fringe Area Annexation to Western Municipal Water
More informationThe Town has an agreement with Santa Clara County that requires annexation of any property
ZpW M F MEETING DATE: 09/ 02/ 14 j I ITEM NO. 0ssni COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT DATE: AUGUST 19, 2014 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL GREG LARSON, TOWN MANAGER ADOPT A RESOLUTION SETTING THE DATE FOR
More informationRESOLUTION NO. R2010-
RESOLUTION NO. R2010- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MANTECA CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF APPLICATION TO THE SAN JOAQUIN LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF REORGANIZATION, INCLUDING
More informationRESOLUTION 5607 (10) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lompoc as follows:
RESOLUTION 5607 (10) A Resolution of the Council of the City of Lompoc County of Santa Barbara, State of California, Approving County Of Santa Barbara Resolution Of Intention, Consenting To Participation
More informationCITY OF ESCONDIDO ANNEXATION GUIDE
CITY OF ESCONDIDO ANNEXATION GUIDE A. PURPOSE The purpose of this document is to provide information on the process and procedure of annexation to the City of Escondido and to answer basic questions regarding
More informationAGENDA ITEM #4.G. TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS Staff Report to the City Council. February 15, 2018
:, j - ~ ' \ ' AGENDA TEM #4.G TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HLLS Staff Report to the City Council February 15, 2018 SUBJECT: ADOPT A RESOLUTON MAKNG DETERMNATONS AND APPROVNG THE REORGANZATON OF AN UNNHABTED TERRTORY
More informationPLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ALBANY, COUNTY
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 0-0 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ALBANY, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP TO CREATE A PARCEL AT
More informationTHE MARIN COUNTY HOUSING ELEMENT AND TAM VALLEY
THE MARIN COUNTY HOUSING ELEMENT AND TAM VALLEY The Marin County Community Development Agency is currently working toward completion of the Housing Element of the County s general plan (the Marin Countywide
More informationCITY COUNCIL SUMMARY REPORT. Agenda No. (,.J Key Words: Southwest Dixon, General Plan, Specific Plan Rezone Meeting Date: May 18, 2016
SUMMARY REPORT Agenda No. (,.J Key Words: Southwest Dixon, General Plan, Specific Plan Rezone Meeting Date: May 18, 2016 CITY COUNCIL PREPARED BY: Kristen Maze, Community Development Director.fU"._,./.JA
More informationVolume I, Part III. GENERAL PROPOSAL POLICIES. 1. General Policies
1. General Policies 1.1. All proposals for consideration by the Commission are to be submitted on LAFCo application forms (See Section Appendix B, Application Forms)( 56652). 1.2. Applications shall be
More informationProposition 218 Notification NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS OF PUBLIC HEARING ON HILLSIDE ZONE ADDITIONAL SEWER RATE. Name Address City, State, Zip
100 East Sunnyoaks Ave. Campbell, CA 95008 Regarding APN Number: APN #, Street, City Proposition 218 Notification NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS OF PUBLIC HEARING ON HILLSIDE ZONE ADDITIONAL SEWER RATE Name
More informationPDA Investment & Growth Strategy
PDA Investment & Growth Strategy 2014 Update Adopted The preparation of this report has been financed through a grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration.
More informationMayor and City Council, as and constituting The Board of Contra Costa County Sanitation District No. 6 (Board)
City Council Agenda July 1, 2015 Date: June 18, 2015 To: From: Subject: Mayor and City Council, as and constituting The Board of Contra Costa County Sanitation District No. 6 (Board) Tim Tucker, City Engineer
More informationCITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM NO. 8.13 AGENDA TITLE: Adopt resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an agricultural lease with Mahon Ranch for the property located at
More informationCONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT. April 21, 2010 (Agenda)
CONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT LAFCO 09-13: Annexation 173B (Danville) to Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (CCCSD) PROPONENT: CCCSD by Resolution No. 2009-104
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission DATE: November 9, 2016 FROM: PREPARED BY: SUBJECT: Bruce Buckingham, Community Development Director Bruce Buckingham, Community Development Director
More informationPlanning Commission Staff Report August 6, 2015
Commission Staff Report August 6, 2015 Project: Capital Reserve Map File: EG-14-008A Request: Tentative Parcel Map Location: 8423 Elk Grove Blvd. APN: 116-0070-014 Staff: Christopher Jordan, AICP Sarah
More informationWEST VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT SEWER SERVICE FACT SHEET
WEST VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT SEWER SERVICE FACT SHEET Who is West Valley Sanitation District? We are a special purpose district originally formed in 1948 as County Sanitation District No. 4 under the
More informationCommunity Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA Napa (707)
Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA 94559-0660 Napa (707) 257-9530 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JUNE 16, 2016 AGENDA ITEM # 6.B. 16-0056-EXT;
More informationEL DORADO LAFCO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
EL DORADO LAFCO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION AGENDA OF APRIL 27, 2011 REGULAR MEETING TO: FROM: PREPARED BY: AGENDA ITEM #4: Ron Briggs, Chair, and Members of the El Dorado County Local Agency Formation
More informationStaff Report. Victoria Walker, Director of Community and Economic Development
7.a Staff Report Date: July 11, 2017 To: From: Reviewed by: Prepared by: Subject: City Council Valerie J. Barone, City Manager Victoria Walker, Director of Community and Economic Development John Montagh,
More information[Disposition and Development Agreement - Seawall Lot 337 Associates, LLC - Mission Rock Project]
AMENDED IN COMMITTEE FILE NO. 00 // RESOLUTION NO. - 1 [Disposition and Development Agreement - Seawall Lot Associates, LLC - Mission Rock Project] Resolution approving a Disposition and Development Agreement
More informationWHITEHAWK RANCH MUTUAL WATER COMPANY
1. The Development WHITEHAWK RANCH MUTUAL WATER COMPANY (Offering Circular) WHITEHAWK RANCH is located in Eastern Plumas County, 230 miles from San Francisco and 150 miles from Sacramento via Interstate
More informationSonoma Local Agency Formation Commission 575 Adminstration Drive Room 104A Santa Rosa, CA sonomalafco.org
575 Adminstration Drive Room 104A Santa Rosa, CA 95403 707-565-2577 sonomalafco.org 1. NOTICE OF INTENT TO CIRCULATE A PETITION If the proposal includes parcels owned by parties other than the applicant,
More informationFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Moraga Stormwater Fee Measure Ballot Procedure
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Moraga Stormwater Fee Measure Ballot Procedure 1) What is the Stormwater Fee Measure? The Moraga Stormwater Fee Measure is a mailed ballot measure for property owners that, if
More information4.2 LAND USE INTRODUCTION
4.2 LAND USE INTRODUCTION This section of the EIR addresses potential impacts from the Fresno County General Plan Update on land use in two general areas: land use compatibility and plan consistency. Under
More informationCity of Lafayette Staff Report
City of Lafayette Staff Report For: City Council By: Donna Feehan, Public Works Services Administrative Analyst Date Written: May 13,2013 Meeting Date: May 28, 2013 Subject: Residential Lighting District
More informationDevelopment Program Report for the Alamo Area of Benefit
Julia R. Bueren, Director Deputy Directors Brian M. Balbas, Chief Mike Carlson Stephen Kowalewski Carrie Ricci Joe Yee ADOPTED BY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON Development Program Report for the Alamo October,
More informationADOPT RESOLUTIONS OF SUPPORT AND OPPOSITION FOR UPCOMING BALLOT MEASURES
G-7 STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: September 25, 2018 TO: FROM: City Council Regan M. Candelario, City Manager Laura McDowall, Management Analyst II 922 Machin Avenue Novato, CA 94945 415/ 899-8900 FAX 415/
More informationTOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS StaffReport to the City Council
AGENDA ITEM #5.B TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS StaffReport to the City Council July 31, 2012 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION TO ANNEX THE UNINCORPORATED LA LOMA AREA, CONSISTING OF ONE (1) PARCEL (8.10 ACRES)
More informationREPORT TO THE SHASTA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
REPORT TO THE SHASTA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION PROJECT IDENTIFICATION: REGULAR AGENDA GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GPA18-0003 AND ZONE AMENDMENT ZA18-0004 AREA 3 - SOUTHWEST PALO CEDRO: GILBERT DRIVE CONTINUED
More informationGUIDELINES FOR THE PERMITTING PROCESS NONPUBLIC WATER SYSTEM NONPUBLIC WATER SYSTEM DEFINED PERMIT PROCESSING FEES
GUIDELINES FOR THE PERMITTING PROCESS NONPUBLIC WATER SYSTEM The following information is intended to guide the prospective water system applicant through the process required for the Nonpublic Water Supply
More informationStaff Report. Victoria Walker, Director of Community and Economic Development
10.c Staff Report Date: April 25, 2017 To: From: Reviewed by: Prepared by: Subject: City Council Valerie J. Barone, City Manager Victoria Walker, Director of Community and Economic Development John Montagh,
More informationCITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Approved by City Manager: CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT DATE: DECEMBER 2, 2013 TO: FROM: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS TOM BARTLETT, A.I.C.P., CITY PLANNER SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION TO INITIATE
More informationMARIN COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RESOLUTION
MARIN COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION DENYING THE LUCAS VALLEY ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION APPEAL AND SUSTAINING THE PLANNING COMMISSION S DECISION TO CERTIFY THE GRADY RANCH PRECISE
More informationORDINANCE NO
ORDINANCE NO. 2014-160 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MENIFEE, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING SECTION 10.35 OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY LAND USE ORDINANCE NO. 460.152 AS ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF MENIFEE
More informationRESOLUTION NO
ITEM 4 ATTACHMENT B RESOLUTION NO. 2014-1412 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALABASAS APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE WEST AGOURA ROAD TERRITORY IN CONFORMANCE WITH
More informationMOUNTAIN HOUSE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT To provide responsive service to our growing community that exceeds expectations at a fair value
MOUNTAIN HOUSE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT To provide responsive service to our growing community that exceeds expectations at a fair value STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: Approval of Shea Homes Annexation
More informationNew Home Tax Disclosure Report
New Home Tax Disclosure Report This report satisfies the seller s obligation, pursuant to Civil Code Section 1102.6b, to disclose all special tax and/or assessment districts affecting the subject property
More informationSANTA CLARA COUNTY RHNA SUBREGION TASK FORCE GUIDING PRINCIPLES - May 2018
SANTA CLARA COUNTY RHNA SUBREGION TASK FORCE GUIDING PRINCIPLES - May 2018 Attachment A Vision For Santa Clara County and its cities to work collaboratively to produce more housing in the Region. have
More informationWOODLAND AREA GENERAL PLAN URBAN DEVELOPMENT POLICY
APPENDIX A WOODLAND AREA GENERAL PLAN URBAN DEVELOPMENT POLICY The following text indicates proposed amendments to the Woodland Area General Plan Urban Development Policy currently adopted and included
More informationCommunity Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)
Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA 94559-0660 (707) 257-9530 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MARCH 3, 2016 AGENDA ITEM # 7.B. File No. 15-0158
More informationTOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS StaffReport to the City Council
AGENDA ITEM #5.A TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS StaffReport to the City Council July 31,2012 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION TO UNINCORPORATED OLIVE TREE HILL AREA, TWENTY FIVE PARCELS (31.7 ACRES) OF DEVELOPED
More informationLAFCO APPLICATION NO SHACKELFORD CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION TO THE CITY OF MODESTO
EECUTIVE OFFICER S AGENDA REPORT FEBRUARY 22, 2012 LAFCO APPLICATION NO. 2011-07 SHACKELFORD CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION TO THE CITY OF MODESTO PROPOSAL A request to annex approximately 145 acres known as the
More informationOhlone College Mission Blvd Mixed-Use Project OFFERING MEMORANDUM
Mission Blvd Mixed-Use Project OFFERING MEMORANDUM TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS THE DEVELOPMENT OFFERING THE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT APPROACH FREMONT OVERVIEW MAPS AND PHOTOS P.
More informationORDINANCE NO. XXXX. WHEREAS, the proposed Rezone has been processed pursuant to Section , Title 9 of the Municipal Code; and
ORDINANCE NO. XXXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN ADDENDUM TO THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADOPTED FOR THE 2014-2021 GENERAL PLAN HOUSING
More informationPatrick C. Jackson 600 N. Darwood Avenue San Dimas, California 91773
Patrick C. Jackson 600 N. Darwood Avenue San Dimas, California 91773 Board of Directors of the San Bernardino County Fire Protection District Service Zone FP-5 Expansion Protest 157 W. 5 th Street, 2 nd
More informationORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER RE: INCLUSIONARY HOUSING
ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER 17.47 RE: INCLUSIONARY HOUSING The City Council of the City of Daly City, DOES ORDAIN as follows:
More informationAGREEMENT TO SETTLE LITIGATION RELATING TO THE DOUGHERTY VALLEY GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, SPECIFIC PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
AGREEMENT TO SETTLE LITIGATION RELATING TO THE DOUGHERTY VALLEY GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, SPECIFIC PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Town of Danville, et al. v. County of Contra Costa, et al. Case No.
More information3 Resolution approving and authorizing the acquisition of one permanent surface access
FILE NO. 180439 RESOLUTION NO. 166-18 1 [Real Property Acquisition - Easements from Lake Merced Golf Club - Regional Groundwater Storage and Recovery Project, San Mateo County - $66,465 ] 2 3 Resolution
More informationMemo to the Planning Commission JULY 12TH, 2018
Memo to the Planning Commission JULY 12TH, 2018 Topic: California State Senate Bill 828 and State Assembly Bill 1771 Staff Contacts: Joshua Switzky, Land Use & Housing Program Manager, Citywide Division
More information5.I iii ******#* FROM: 2. Provide comments to staff and recommend edits to the Resolution, as necessary, and adopt the Resolution as amended; or
THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY CORTE MADERA TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT REPORT DATE: June 12,2017 MEETING DATE: June 20, 2011 TO FROM: SUBJECT: TO\ryN MANAGER, MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE TOWN COUNCIL ADAM
More informationRESOLUTION NO. FILE NO. T15-058
RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE APPROVING A VESTING TENTATIVE MAP, SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS, TO MERGE FOUR PARCELS INTO ONE PARCEL AND RESUBDIVIDE THE ONE PARCEL INTO NO
More informationEL DORADO LAFCO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
EL DORADO LAFCO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AGENDA OF MAY 24, 2006 TO: FROM: PREPARED BY: AGENDA ITEM #5: PROPONENT(S): Ted Long, Chairman, and Members of the El Dorado County Local
More informationRESOLUTION NO
RESOLUTION NO. 074532 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA * * * * * * RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING RATES FOR AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING IMPACT FEE PROGRAM FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL AND NON-RESIDENTIAL
More information