Draft Roosevelt Income Restricted Housing Analysis

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Draft Roosevelt Income Restricted Housing Analysis"

Transcription

1 APPENDIX F Draft Roosevelt Income Restricted Housing Analysis Prepared for: Presented by: Sound Transit May 5, 2016 C/o Jeff Lehman, KPFF th Avenue, Suite1600 Seattle, WA (206) Jeff.Lehman@kpff.com Kidder Mathews Michael George Blair Howe, CCIM 601 Union Street, Suite 4270 Seattle, WA mgearge@kiddermathews.com 1 kiddermathews.com

2 Table of Contents Executive Summary... 3 Introduction % LIHTC NonSenior Housing Scenario % LIHTC Senior Housing Scenario % LIHTC NonSenior Housing Scenario % LIHTC Senior Housing Scenario Appendix Nature of the Assignment The information supplied herein is from sources we deem reliable. It is provided without any representation, warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied as to its accuracy. Prospective Owner, Buyer or Tenant should conduct an independent investigation and verification of all matters deemed to be material, including, but not limited to, statements of value, income, and expenses. 1

3 Executive Summary Introduction The purpose of this study is to investigate the feasibility of developing an income restricted Transit Oriented Development (TOD) on Sound Transit s 53,000 square foot site adjacent to the future Roosevelt Station. The subject, labeled as Main Site in Exhibit 1, is located at 6600 Roosevelt Street in Seattle s Roosevelt Hill neighborhood. Exhibit 1: Roosevelt Site The study tests the feasibility of developing midrise, senior and nonsenior, 4% and 9% Low Income Housing Tax Credit projects on the site. Key Findings 4% LIHTC Scenario Development of a 115unit 4% LIHTC project at this site would require soft debt from public funders in an amount that is within the range of what other projects have received historically. It is worth noting however, that based on a sample of comparable projects, the amount of soft debt required is on the higher end of the funding range for projects without deeper income restrictions. A partial or full land donation would increase the ability of soft debt funders to leverage their resources. This would help a project built at this site compete for funding. Market rents in the subject s neighborhood are greater than levels affordable to households making 60% or less of Area Median Income (AMI). The site s location (not a DDA or QCT) does not allow it to qualify for a 130% tax credit basis boost. This limits the amount of Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) equity available to the project. 9% LIHTC Scenario Development of a 100unit 9% LIHTC project at this site would require soft debt from public funders in an amount that is within the range of what other projects have received historically. Seattle s Office of Housing, the key funder in Seattle, targets much of their 9% project soft debt funding toward projects with homeless units. It is worth noting however, that based on a sample of comparable projects, the amount of soft debt required is on the higher end of the funding range for projects not providing homeless services. Tax Credit equity is a critical component to 9% LIHTC projects. The current per project limit for 9% projects is about 16.8 million dollars, which is enough to fund a significant portion of 2

4 a project that includes 70 to 100 units. Accordingly, the analysis was limited to a 100unit project. 4% and 9% Scenario Due to limited funding availability (9% LIHTC project maximum limits and soft debt funder limits) both of these projects were sized below 120 units. Projects of this size can potentially be built on a 16,000 square foot site, which represents approximately 1/3 of the available land on the 53,000 square foot main site. Given the size of these projects, it may be possible to construct both a 9% and 4% project at this location. The subject s urban location and proximity to public transit are both positive attributes from a local funding and equity investor standpoint. This may benefit the project s ability to compete for funding and attract a tax credit investor. There are a number of proposed new and expanded funding sources for affordable housing programs on the horizon in Seattle. Combined they have the potential to greatly expand the pool of funding available to projects located on urban sites near public transportation. These programs were not accounted for in the analysis as it is unknown if they will come to fruition as currently envisioned. Conclusion This study concludes that both a 4% and 9% midrise LIHTC project may be financially feasible at this location. Given the large size of this site, one option is to build both a 4% and 9% project. Although the LIHTC projects tested appear to be reasonably well positioned to compete for soft debt there are a number of factors that cannot be tested including, changes in funding priorities, the strength of other projects competing at the time of the submittal, and the changing amount of funding available. The scenarios tested were at the higher end of the range of funding secured for similar projects historically. This could mean that funders like the Seattle Office of Housing may need more time to fund the project than they would for a project applying for less soft debt. A partial or full land donation would increase the ability of soft debt funders to leverage their resources, which would further help a project built at this site compete for funding and potentially reduce the amount of time needed to secure soft debt. 3

5 Introduction Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the feasibility of developing an income restricted (affordable) Transit Oriented Development (TOD) on Sound Transit s 6600 Roosevelt Street property located in Seattle s Roosevelt neighborhood. This study specifically explores the use of lowincome housing financing tools to develop the site and to promote affordable housing in proximity to high capacity transit. The lowincome housing financing models tested are those where feasibility does not depend on investment return and value, but on public priorities, community benefit, and underwriting for longterm financial sustainability. A prior Kidder Mathews feasibility study concluded that a marketrate development on this site is currently feasible using conventional financing. Subject Overview The subject is a 53,000 square foot site located on Roosevelt Street between NE 67th Ave and NE 66th Ave in Seattle s Roosevelt Hill Neighborhood. As shown in Exhibit 1, the rectangular shape of the site is well suited to accommodate development. The subject s zoning (NC3P85) allows for a maximum height of 85 feet. Its location within the Roosevelt Station Overlay exempts property from minimum parking requirements. Approach All scenarios anticipate high rates of transit ridership and low parking ratios. Assumptions about land costs, soft costs, and hard costs reference previous work and currently available information. The study tests the feasibility of developing midrise 4% and 9% Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) projects on the site. Both the 4% and 9% scenarios were tested as senior and nonsenior affordable housing projects. The midrise scenarios presented for this site are six stories tall, and include five stories of wood frame construction over a groundfloor concrete podium. Lowrise scenarios were not tested, as these would represent a significant underuse of the site given existing zoning and current market conditions. Highrise scenarios were not tested, as this type construction is not allowed under current zoning. Depending on the project s configuration the zoning code may require a limited amount of ground floor commercial space. The commercial component of this building could be treated separately and sold as a condominium interest; therefore, it is not accounted for in this analysis. Kidder Mathews earlier work concluded that the area s nongrocery retail rents are currently 25 to 30 NNN rents, slightly less than needed to support the cost of new construction. 4

6 Opportunities/Issues There are currently public funding sources targeting TOD projects that benefit lowincome households in Seattle. Additional funding for urban TOD projects is likely to increase given the number proposed new and expanded funding programs targeting this product type. The subject is located adjacent to the future Roosevelt light rail station. Market rents are currently at levels greater than households making 60% or less of Area Median Income (AMI) can afford. The size of this site may allow for two midsized projects to be constructed. Public Policy and Funding Priorities Locating affordable housing near transit resources gives lower income households access to employment and community amenities without the expense of a personal vehicle. Transportation accounts for a significant portion of household budgets. The cost of transportation is typically a proportionately greater burden on lower income households. A study by The Center for Housing Policy found that housing and transportation are the two largest expenses for most households. For households of all income levels, 27% of income goes for housing alone and another 20% goes to the cost of transportation. Building affordable transitoriented development promotes social equity. In 2009, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) created the Partnership for Sustainable Communities to help communities improve access to affordable housing, increase transportation options, and lower transportation costs while protecting the environment. The Partnership for Sustainable Communities established six livability principles that will act as a foundation for interagency coordination. An affordable housing project on the subject would be consistent with these livability principles. Locally, public funders now prioritize funding for TOD projects. TOD projects serving priority populations and that are consistent with other public policy goals will be most competitive for funding. The City of Seattle Office of Housing includes the funding of TOD as a program goal, with the intent to: Contribute to the development of sustainable, walkable neighborhoods, particularly near high capacity transit, giving Low Income residents access to transportation, services and economic opportunity. (City of Seattle Office of Housing, 2014 Housing Funding Policy). The Office of Housing and Seattle Department of Transportation have mapped these corridors throughout the city. The subject site is located within a high capacity transit corridor. Potential New and Expanded Funding Programs There are a number of proposed new and expanded funding programs targeting affordable transit oriented development in Seattle. These programs were not accounted for in the analysis as it is unknown if they will pass as envisioned. Combined they have the potential to greatly expand the pool of funding available to projects located on urban sites near public transportation. The following is a list of five proposed new and/or expanded programs that could affect funding availability. The proposed Housing Affordability and Livability (HALA) legislation includes at least two programs that could significantly affect the amount of funding available. 5

7 1) The Affordable Housing Impact Mitigation Program would directly fund the construction of new affordable housing by requiring developers to pay a fee on all new commercial development. The required contribution to affordable housing would range from 5 to 17 per gross square foot, based on the location of the commercial development. 2) The Mandatory Housing Affordability program for new multifamily developments would require five to eight percent of units to be affordable for residents earning up to 60% AMI for 50 years. As an alternative to onsite units, developers could pay a fee to construct new affordable housing offsite. The Seattle Office of Housing (OH) is the largest source of soft debt for 4% LIHTC projects in Seattle. In a typical year, approximately 75% of OH s funding comes from the Seattle Housing Levy. Currently, there is about 6 million per year in levy funding available for projects targeting households making above 30% AMI. The current levy expires in The mayor is proposing to double the next levy, which would increase the amount of funding available to projects targeting households above 30% AMI to 11.5 million annually over the next seven years. Up to 45 million in King County WorkforceHousing Bonds backed by the local hotel tax could be available over the next six years. This funding source will target projects located within a halfmile of a transit station, although only a portion of the total funding will be available to projects located in Seattle. Legislators authorized Sound Transit to go to the voters for expansion of light rail. This funding package includes an affordable housing fund aimed at creating affordable housing near light rail stations. This provision gives Sound Transit the authority to contribute 20 million over five years to a revolving loan fund. The Growing Transit Communities Partnership has developed a proposed Regional Equitable Development Initiative (REDI) fund. The REDI Fund is a coalition of public entities in the region is working together to identify commitments for public catalyst ( seed ) investments, with a target of achieving a 5 million public investment from local, regional, and state sources, an amount that would leverage an additional 20 million in foundation and private capital. Once established through formal agreements among investors, the REDI Fund would provide a rolling source of loans for property acquisition to ensure opportunities for equitable TOD. 6

8 4% LIHTC NonSenior Housing Scenario Feasibility Analysis The 4% LIHTC scenario presented in Exhibit 2 may be financially feasible in the current funding environment. This scenario uses taxexempt bond financing, and would qualify for a noncompetitive allocation of 4% Low Income Housing Tax Credits on all 115 units. Rents are restricted at 60% AMI for all units. The subject is not located in a HUD designated Difficult Development Area or Qualified Census Tract. This means that it does not qualify for as much tax credit equity as projects that are located in one of these designated areas. This ultimately increases the amount of hard and soft debt needed support the project. Exhibit 2: 4% NonSenior LIHTC Scenario Project Description Number of Units 115 Project Type NonSenior/ 4% LIHTC Building Type Midrise Sources Total Per Unit Tax Exempt Bonds 10,350,000 90,000 4% LIHTC Equity 9,109,893 79,216 Soft Debt 13,458, ,028 Deferred Dev Fee 1,720,658 14,962 Total 34,638, ,206 Uses Total Per Unit Acquisition 4,261,325 37,055 Construction 22,505, ,703 Soft Costs, Financing & Other 7,871,575 68,448 Total 34,638, ,206 As shown in Exhibit 2, soft debt in the amount of 13.5 million from sources such as the City of Seattle, King County, or others is required. This amount is on the higher end of the Project Performance Total Net Operating Income 714,040 Debt Service 592,749 DCR 1.20 range of historic funding levels for projects without deeper income restrictions, or special population targeting. A partial or full land donation would increase the ability of soft debt funders to leverage their resources, which would further help a project compete for funding. This scenario also assumes a deferred developer fee of 1.7 million, which is repaid from operating revenue over a 12 year period. The transitoriented nature of this project could also help it compete for future funding, as there are a number of proposals to create new programs and to expand existing programs targeting the development of affordable TOD projects in Seattle. It is unknown how much new funding will be available through these programs as they are still being developed. More detail related to this scenario is presented in Appendix A. 7

9 4% LIHTC Senior Housing Scenario Feasibility Analysis The 4% Senior LIHTC scenario presented in Exhibit 3 may be financially feasible in the current funding environment. This scenario uses taxexempt bond financing, and would qualify for a noncompetitive allocation of 4% Low Income Housing Tax Credits on all 116 units. Rents are restricted at 60% AMI for all units. The subject is not located in a HUD designated Difficult Development Area or Qualified Census Tract. This means that it does not qualify for as much tax credit equity as projects that are located in one of these designated areas. This ultimately increases the amount of hard and soft debt needed support the project. As shown in Exhibit 3, soft debt in the amount of 13.0 million from sources such as the City of Seattle, King County, Exhibit 3: Project Description Number of Units Project Type Building Type 4% Senior LIHTC Scenario 116 units Senior/ 4% LIHTC Midrise Sources Total Per Unit Tax Exempt Bonds 10,750,000 92,672 4% LIHTC Equity 9,069,476 78,185 Soft Debt 12,985, ,945 Deferred Dev Fee 1,706,930 14,715 Total 34,511, ,517 Uses Total Per Unit Acquisition 4,261,325 36,736 Construction 22,399, ,100 Soft Costs, Financing & Other 7,851,067 67,682 Total 34,511, ,517 Project Performance Total Net Operating Income 739,007 Debt Service 615,657 DCR 1.20 or others is required. This amount is on the higher end of the range of historic funding levels for projects without deeper income restrictions. A partial or full land donation would increase the ability of soft debt funders to leverage their resources, which would further help a project compete for funding. This scenario also assumes a deferred developer fee of 1.7 million, which is repaid from operating revenue over an 11year period. The transitoriented nature of this project could also help it compete for future funding, as there are a number of proposals to create new programs and to expand existing programs targeting the development of affordable TOD projects in Seattle. It is unknown how much new funding will be available through these programs as they are still being developed. More detail related to this scenario is presented in Appendix B. 8

10 9% LIHTC NonSenior Housing Scenario Feasibility Analysis The 9% LIHTC scenario presented in Exhibit 4 may be financially feasible in the current funding environment. This scenario relies on a combination of permanent financing and soft debt, and is structured to compete for an allocation of 9% tax credits. To be competitive for 9% tax credits, the proposed project must serve two targeted populations. In this scenario, 20% of the units contain 3bedrooms for large families and 20% of the units are designed to accommodate people with disabilities. 50% of the units are restricted at 30% AMI, 25% are restricted at 40% AMI, and the remaining 25% are restricted at 60% AMI. Exhibit 4: 9% NonSenior LIHTC Scenario Project Description Number of Units 96 Project Type NonSenior/ 9% LIHTC Building Type Midrise Sources Total Per Unit Perm Loan 4,375,000 45,573 9% LIHTC Equity 16,343, ,249 Soft Debt 9,060,367 94,379 Deferred Dev Fee 493,477 5,140 Total 30,272, ,342 Uses Total Per Unit Acquisition 4,261,325 44,389 Construction 20,004, ,384 Soft Costs, Financing & Other 6,006,565 62,568 Total 30,272, ,342 As shown in Exhibit 4, soft debt in the amount of 9.1 million from sources such as the City of Seattle, King County, the Housing Trust Fund or others is required. This amount is on Project Performance Total Net Operating Income 254,258 Debt Service 221,040 DCR 1.15 the higher end of the range of historic funding levels for projects without homeless services. A partial or full land donation would increase the ability of soft debt funders to leverage their resources which would further help a project built at this site compete for funding. This scenario also assumes a deferred developer fee of 493,000, which is repaid from operating revenue over a 15year period. It is worth noting that this is a longer payback period than most deferred fee payment schedules found in the comparable property set used to ground truth this analysis. More detail related to this scenario is presented in Appendix C. 9

11 9% LIHTC Senior Housing Scenario Feasibility Analysis The 9% Senior LIHTC scenario presented in Exhibit 5 may be financially feasible in the current funding environment. This scenario relies on a combination of permanent financing and soft debt, and is structured to compete for an allocation of 9% tax credits. To be competitive for 9% tax credits, 100% of the units are targeted at seniors and 20% of the units are designed to accommodate people with disabilities. 50% of the units are restricted at 30% AMI, 25% are restricted at 40% AMI, and the remaining 25% are restricted at 60% AMI. As shown in Exhibit 5, soft debt in the amount of 9.9 million from sources such as the City of Seattle, King County, the Housing Trust Fund or others is required. This amount is on the higher end of the range of historic Exhibit 5: Project Description Number of Units Project Type Building Type 9% Senior LIHTC Scenario 100 units Senior/ 9% LIHTC Midrise Sources Total Per Unit Perm Loan 4,175,000 41,750 9% LIHTC Equity 16,343, ,439 Soft Debt 9,905,389 99,054 Deferred Dev Fee 452,613 4,526 Total 30,876, ,769 Uses Total Per Unit Acquisition 4,261,325 42,613 Construction 20,539, ,395 Soft Costs, Financing & Other 6,076,169 60,762 Total 30,876, ,769 Project Performance Total Net Operating Income 243,491 Debt Service 210,936 DCR 1.15 funding levels for projects without homeless services. A partial or full land donation would increase the ability of soft debt funders to leverage their resources which would further help a project built at this site compete for funding. This scenario also assumes a deferred developer fee of 450,000, which is repaid from operating revenue over a 15year period. It is worth noting that this is a longer payback period than most deferred fee payment schedules found in the comparable property set used to ground truth this analysis. More detail related to this scenario is presented in Appendix D. 10

12 Appendix Appendix A 4% NonSenior Scenario Assumptions Appendix B 4% Senior Scenario Assumptions Appendix C 9% NonSenior Scenario Assumptions Appendix D 9%Senior Scenario Assumptions Appendix E Combined Pro Forma Assumptions Summary 11

13 Appendix A 4% LIHTC NonSenior Scenario 12

14 Budget Total Residential Project Cost R E S I D E N T I A L Eligible Basis Acquisition New Construction/ Rehab Acquisition Costs: Land 4,241,325 Existing Structures Liens Closing, Title & Recording Costs 20,000 Extension payment Other: SUBTOTAL 4,261,325 Construction: Demolition New Building 19,438,983 19,438,983 Rehabilitation Contractor Profit Contractor Overhead New Construction Contingency 1,064,284 1,064,284 Rehab Contingency Accessory Building Site Work / Infrastructure Off site Infrastructure Environmental Abatement (Building) Environmental Abatement (Land) Sales Tax 1,952,560 1,952,560 Bond Premium Equipment and Furnishings 50,000 50,000 SUBTOTAL 22,505,828 22,505,828 Soft Costs: Buyer's Appraisal 16,000 Market Study 16,000 16,000 Architect 1,800,466 1,800,466 Engineering Environmental Assessment 10,000 10,000 Geotechnical Study Boundary & Topographic Survey 10,000 10,000 Legal Real Estate 25,000 25,000 Developer Fee 3,006,465 3,006,465 Project Management / Dev Consultant Fees Other Consultants: 250, ,000 Contingency 93,873 93,873 SUBTOTAL 5,227,805 5,211,805 PreDevelopment / Bridge Financing *Bridge Loan Fees *Bridge Loan Interest SUBTOTAL Construction Financing Construction Loan Fees 187, ,239 Construction Loan Expenses (Appraisal, 3rd Party Rpts) Construction Loan Legal 20,000 20,000 Construction Period Interest 561, ,718 Leaseup Period Interest SUBTOTAL 768, ,958 Permanent Financing Permanent Loan Fees Permanent Loan Expenses (Appraisal, 3rd Party Rpts) Permanent Loan Legal LIHTC Fees 93,511 *LIHTC Legal (Syndication/Organizational) 75,000 *LIHTC Owners Title Policy 30,000 State HTF Fees #### SUBTOTAL 198,511 Capitalized Reserves *Operating Reserves 231, *Replacement Reserves 198, *Other Reserves: SUBTOTAL 430,463 Other Development Costs Real Estate Tax 10,000 10,000 Insurance 80,000 80,000 Relocation Bidding Costs Permits, Fees & Hookups 575, ,000 Impact/Mitigation Fees Development Period Utilities *Nonprofit Donation 20,000 Accounting/Audit 15,000 15,000 Marketing/Leasing Expenses 250,600 *Carrying Costs at Rent up/ Lease Up Reserve SUBTOTAL 950, ,000 Bond Related Costs of Issuance (4% Tax Credit/Bond Projects Only) Issuer Fees & Related Expenses 50,000 Bond Counsel 55,000 Trustee Fees & Expenses 3,000 Underwriter Fees & Counsel 187,239 Placement Agent Fees & Counsel Borrower's Counsel Bond Related Rating Agency SUBTOTAL 295,239 TOTALS: 34,638,729 29,166,590 13

15 Unit Size (Number of Bedrooms % of Median Income Served Number of Units PROJECT RENTS Maximum Allowable Tax Credit Rents Utility Allowance Net Maximum Tax Credit Rents Annual Gross Rental Income 0 60% , % 40 1, , % 23 1, , ,020 Totals 115 1,343,508 FINANCING Permanent Financing Sources Tax Exempt Bonds Soft Debt (Fed/State/Local) Deferred Development Fee Total Permanent Sources Excluding Equity Expected LIHTC Equity Total Permanent Sources Amount Interest Loan Amortization Rate Term Period 10,350, % ,458,177 TBD TBD TBD 1,720, % ,528,835 9,109,893 34,638,728 Repayment Structure (e.g. deferred, cash flow only, Must pay Payment deferred 20 years Cash flow only 14

16 OPERATING PRO FORMA REVENUES Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15 Residential Income Inflation Factor Annual Gross Rental Income 2.50% per year 1,343,508 1,377,096 1,411,523 1,446,811 1,482,981 1,520,056 1,558,057 1,597,009 1,636,934 1,677,857 1,719,804 1,762,799 1,806,869 1,852,041 1,898,342 Other: Laundry 10,350 10,609 10,874 11,146 11,424 11,710 12,003 12,303 12,610 12,926 13,249 13,580 13,920 14,268 14,624 Other: Total Residential Income = 1,353,858 1,387,704 1,422,397 1,457,957 1,494,406 1,531,766 1,570,060 1,609,312 1,649,545 1,690,783 1,733,053 1,776,379 1,820,788 1,866,308 1,912,966 Less Residential Vacancy 5.00% per year 67,693 69,385 71,120 72,898 74,720 76,588 78,503 80,466 82,477 84,539 86,653 88,819 91,039 93,315 95,648 EFFECTIVE GROSS INCOME (EGI) 6,496 = 1,286,165 1,318,319 1,351,277 1,385,059 1,419,686 1,455,178 1,491,557 1,528,846 1,567,067 1,606,244 1,646,400 1,687,560 1,729,749 1,772,993 1,817,318 EXPENSES Inflation Factor Operating Expenses 3.50% Cost Per Unit Management Onsite , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,227 Management Offsite ,000 71,415 73,915 76,502 79,179 81,950 84,819 87,787 90,860 94,040 97, , , , ,690 Accounting ,000 23,805 24,638 25,501 26,393 27,317 28,273 29,262 30,287 31,347 32,444 33,579 34,755 35,971 37,230 Legal Services ,000 23,805 24,638 25,501 26,393 27,317 28,273 29,262 30,287 31,347 32,444 33,579 34,755 35,971 37,230 Insurance ,500 35,708 36,957 38,251 39,590 40,975 42,409 43,894 45,430 47,020 48,666 50,369 52,132 53,956 55,845 Real Estate Taxes ,250 41,659 43,117 44,626 46,188 47,804 49,478 51,209 53,002 54,857 56,777 58,764 60,821 62,949 65,152 Marketing ,125 20,829 21,558 22,313 23,094 23,902 24,739 25,605 26,501 27,428 28,388 29,382 30,410 31,475 32,576 Security ,500 11,903 12,319 12,750 13,197 13,658 14,136 14,631 15,143 15,673 16,222 16,790 17,377 17,985 18,615 Maintenance and janitorial ,750 77,366 80,074 82,877 85,777 88,780 91,887 95,103 98, , , , , , ,997 Decorating/Turnover ,500 11,903 12,319 12,750 13,197 13,658 14,136 14,631 15,143 15,673 16,222 16,790 17,377 17,985 18,615 Contract Repairs Landscaping 75 8,625 8,927 9,239 9,563 9,897 10,244 10,602 29,262 30,287 31,347 32,444 33,579 34,755 35,971 37,230 Pest Control Fire Safety Elevator ,500 11,903 12,319 12,750 13,197 13,658 14,136 14,631 15,143 15,673 16,222 16,790 17,377 17,985 18,615 Water & Sewer ,200 80,937 83,770 86,702 89,736 92,877 96,128 99, , , , , , , ,582 Garbage Removal ,125 20,829 21,558 22,313 23,094 23,902 24,739 25,605 26,501 27,428 28,388 29,382 30,410 31,475 32,576 Electric 50 5,750 5,951 6,160 6,375 6,598 6,829 7,068 7,316 7,572 7,837 8,111 8,395 8,689 8,993 9,307 Oil/Gas/Other Telephone Monitoring 45 5,175 5,356 5,544 5,738 5,938 6,146 6,361 6,584 6,814 7,053 7,300 7,555 7,820 8,093 8,377 Total Residential Operating Expenses 4, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,866 Capitalized Capitalized Portion Replacement Reserve 231, ,125 20,829 21,558 22,313 23,094 23,902 24,739 25,605 26,501 27,428 28,388 29,382 30,410 31,475 32,576 Operating Reserve 198, ,250 17,854 18,479 19,125 19,795 20,488 21,205 21,947 22,715 23,510 24,333 25,184 26,066 26,978 27,922 Total Reserves 37,375 38,683 40,037 41,438 42,889 44,390 45,943 47,551 49,216 50,938 52,721 54,566 56,476 58,453 60,499 TOTAL PROJECT EXPENSES = 572, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,364 NET OPERATING INCOME (EGI Total Expenses) = 714, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,953 Debt Service on Loan Amount Bonds 10,350, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , TOTAL DEBT SERVICE = 592, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,749 Projected Gross Cash Flow = 121, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,204 Debt Coverage Ratio (DCR) Deferred Developer Payment 103, , , , , , , , , , ,385 71, Deferred Developer Balance 1,617,561 1,504,153 1,380,348 1,246,061 1,101, , , , , ,375 71, Net Cash Flow (Before soft debt) 18,194 20,013 21,848 23,698 25,561 27,439 29,328 28,486 30,301 32,123 33, , , , ,204 15

17 Appendix B 4% LIHTC Senior Scenario 16

18 Budget Total Residential Project Cost R E S I D E N T I A L Eligible Basis Acquisition New Construction/ Rehab Acquisition Costs: Land 4,241,325 Existing Structures Liens Closing, Title & Recording Costs 20,000 Extension payment Other: SUBTOTAL 4,261,325 Construction: Demolition New Building 19,347,003 19,347,003 Rehabilitation Contractor Profit Contractor Overhead New Construction Contingency 1,059,248 1,059,248 Rehab Contingency Accessory Building Site Work / Infrastructure Off site Infrastructure Environmental Abatement (Building) Environmental Abatement (Land) Sales Tax 1,943,344 1,943,344 Bond Premium Equipment and Furnishings 50,000 50,000 SUBTOTAL 22,399,595 22,399,595 Soft Costs: Buyer's Appraisal 16,000 Market Study 16,000 16,000 Architect 1,791,968 1,791,968 Engineering Environmental Assessment 10,000 10,000 Geotechnical Study Boundary & Topographic Survey 10,000 10,000 Legal Real Estate 25,000 25,000 Developer Fee 2,989,980 2,989,980 Project Management / Dev Consultant Fees Other Consultants: 250, ,000 Contingency 93,448 93,448 SUBTOTAL 5,202,396 5,186,396 PreDevelopment / Bridge Financing *Bridge Loan Fees *Bridge Loan Interest SUBTOTAL Construction Financing Construction Loan Fees 186, ,550 Construction Loan Expenses (Appraisal, 3rd Party Rpts) Construction Loan Legal 20,000 20,000 Construction Period Interest 559, ,650 Leaseup Period Interest SUBTOTAL 766, ,200 Permanent Financing Permanent Loan Fees Permanent Loan Expenses (Appraisal, 3rd Party Rpts) Permanent Loan Legal LIHTC Fees 93,115 *LIHTC Legal (Syndication/Organizational) 75,000 *LIHTC Owners Title Policy 30,000 State HTF Fees #### SUBTOTAL 198,115 Capitalized Reserves *Operating Reserves 233, *Replacement Reserves 200, *Other Reserves: SUBTOTAL 434,206 Other Development Costs Real Estate Tax 10,000 10,000 Insurance 80,000 80,000 Relocation Bidding Costs Permits, Fees & Hookups 580, ,000 Impact/Mitigation Fees Development Period Utilities *Nonprofit Donation 20,000 Accounting/Audit 15,000 15,000 Marketing/Leasing Expenses 250,600 *Carrying Costs at Rent up/ Lease Up Reserve SUBTOTAL 955, ,000 Bond Related Costs of Issuance (4% Tax Credit/Bond Projects Only) Issuer Fees & Related Expenses 50,000 Bond Counsel 55,000 Trustee Fees & Expenses 3,000 Underwriter Fees & Counsel 186,550 Placement Agent Fees & Counsel Borrower's Counsel Bond Related Rating Agency SUBTOTAL 294,550 TOTALS: 34,511,988 29,037,191 17

19 Unit Size (Number of Bedrooms % of Median Income Served Number of Units PROJECT RENTS Maximum Allowable Tax Credit Rents Utility Allowance Net Maximum Tax Credit Rents Annual Gross Rental Income 0 60% , % 38 1, , % 17 1, , ,580 Totals 116 1,335,252 FINANCING Permanent Financing Sources Tax Exempt Bonds Soft Debt (Fed/State/Local) Deferred Development Fee Total Permanent Sources Excluding Equity Expected LIHTC Equity Total Permanent Sources Amount Interest Loan Amortization Rate Term Period 10,750, % ,985,581 TBD TBD TBD 1,706, % ,442,511 9,069,476 34,511,987 Repayment Structure (e.g. deferred, cash flow only, Must pay Payment deferred 20 years Cash flow only 18

20 OPERATING PRO FORMA REVENUES Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15 Residential Income Inflation Factor Annual Gross Rental Income 2.50% per year 1,335,252 1,368,633 1,402,849 1,437,920 1,473,868 1,510,715 1,548,483 1,587,195 1,626,875 1,667,547 1,709,235 1,751,966 1,795,765 1,840,660 1,886,676 Other: Laundry 10,440 10,701 10,969 11,243 11,524 11,812 12,107 12,410 12,720 13,038 13,364 13,698 14,041 14,392 14,751 Other: Total Residential Income = 1,345,692 1,379,334 1,413,818 1,449,163 1,485,392 1,522,527 1,560,590 1,599,605 1,639,595 1,680,585 1,722,600 1,765,665 1,809,806 1,855,051 1,901,428 Less Residential Vacancy 5.00% per year 67,285 68,967 70,691 72,458 74,270 76,126 78,030 79,980 81,980 84,029 86,130 88,283 90,490 92,753 95,071 EFFECTIVE GROSS INCOME (EGI) 6,457 = 1,278,407 1,310,368 1,343,127 1,376,705 1,411,123 1,446,401 1,482,561 1,519,625 1,557,615 1,596,556 1,636,470 1,677,381 1,719,316 1,762,299 1,806,356 EXPENSES Inflation Factor Operating Expenses 3.50% Cost Per Unit Management Onsite , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,603 Management Offsite ,600 72,036 74,557 77,167 79,868 82,663 85,556 88,551 91,650 94,858 98, , , , ,661 Accounting ,200 24,012 24,852 25,722 26,623 27,554 28,519 29,517 30,550 31,619 32,726 33,871 35,057 36,284 37,554 Legal Services ,200 24,012 24,852 25,722 26,623 27,554 28,519 29,517 30,550 31,619 32,726 33,871 35,057 36,284 37,554 Insurance ,800 36,018 37,279 38,583 39,934 41,331 42,778 44,275 45,825 47,429 49,089 50,807 52,585 54,426 56,331 Real Estate Taxes 25 2,900 3,002 3,107 3,215 3,328 3,444 3,565 3,690 3,819 3,952 4,091 4,234 4,382 4,535 4,694 Marketing ,300 21,011 21,746 22,507 23,295 24,110 24,954 25,827 26,731 27,667 28,635 29,637 30,675 31,748 32,859 Security ,600 12,006 12,426 12,861 13,311 13,777 14,259 14,758 15,275 15,810 16,363 16,936 17,528 18,142 18,777 Maintenance and janitorial ,400 78,039 80,770 83,597 86,523 89,552 92,686 95,930 99, , , , , , ,050 Decorating/Turnover ,600 12,006 12,426 12,861 13,311 13,777 14,259 14,758 15,275 15,810 16,363 16,936 17,528 18,142 18,777 Contract Repairs Landscaping 75 8,700 9,005 9,320 9,646 9,983 10,333 10,695 29,517 30,550 31,619 32,726 33,871 35,057 36,284 37,554 Pest Control Fire Safety Elevator ,600 12,006 12,426 12,861 13,311 13,777 14,259 14,758 15,275 15,810 16,363 16,936 17,528 18,142 18,777 Water & Sewer ,880 81,641 84,498 87,456 90,517 93,685 96, , , , , , , , ,683 Garbage Removal ,300 21,011 21,746 22,507 23,295 24,110 24,954 25,827 26,731 27,667 28,635 29,637 30,675 31,748 32,859 Electric 50 5,800 6,003 6,213 6,431 6,656 6,889 7,130 7,379 7,637 7,905 8,181 8,468 8,764 9,071 9,388 Oil/Gas/Other Telephone Monitoring 45 5,220 5,403 5,592 5,788 5,990 6,200 6,417 6,641 6,874 7,114 7,363 7,621 7,888 8,164 8,450 Total Residential Operating Expenses 4, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,570 Capitalized Capitalized Portion Replacement Reserve 233, ,300 21,011 21,746 22,507 23,295 24,110 24,954 25,827 26,731 27,667 28,635 29,637 30,675 31,748 32,859 Operating Reserve 200, ,400 18,009 18,639 19,292 19,967 20,666 21,389 22,138 22,912 23,714 24,544 25,403 26,293 27,213 28,165 Total Reserves 37,700 39,020 40,385 41,799 43,262 44,776 46,343 47,965 49,644 51,381 53,180 55,041 56,967 58,961 61,025 TOTAL PROJECT EXPENSES = 539, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,595 NET OPERATING INCOME (EGI Total Expenses) = 739, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,761 Debt Service on Loan Amount Bonds 10,750, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , TOTAL DEBT SERVICE = 615, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,657 Projected Gross Cash Flow = 123, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,104 Debt Coverage Ratio (DCR) Deferred Developer Payment 104, , , , , , , , , , , Deferred Developer Balance 1,602,082 1,486,116 1,358,913 1,220,358 1,070, , , , , , Net Cash Flow (Before soft debt) 18,503 20,465 22,448 24,451 26,474 28,516 30,576 29,888 31,887 33,898 46, , , , ,104 19

21 Appendix C 9% LIHTC NonSenior Scenario 20

22 Budget Acquisition Costs: Land 4,241,325 Existing Structures Liens Closing, Title & Recording Costs 20,000 20,000 Extension payment Other: Construction: SUBTOTAL 4,261,325 20,000 Demolition New Building 17,273,585 17,273,585 Rehabilitation Contractor Profit Contractor Overhead New Construction Contingency 945, ,729 Rehab Contingency Accessory Building Site Work / Infrastructure Off site Infrastructure Environmental Abatement (Building) Environmental Abatement (Land) Sales Tax 1,735,585 1,735,585 Bond Premium Equipment and Furnishings 50,000 50,000 Other: Soft Costs: SUBTOTAL 20,004,899 20,004,899 Buyer's Appraisal 16,000 Market Study 16,000 16,000 Architect 1,600,392 1,600,392 Engineering Environmental Assessment 10,000 10,000 Geotechnical Study Boundary & Topographic Survey 10,000 10,000 Legal Real Estate 25,000 25,000 Developer Fee 1,702,729 1,702,729 Project Management / Dev Consultant Fees Other Consultants 196, ,000 Soft Cost Contingency 178, ,806 Other: PreDevelopment / Bridge Financing Bridge Loan Fees Bridge Loan Interest Construction Financing SUBTOTAL 3,754,927 3,738,927 SUBTOTAL Construction Loan Fees 165, ,332 Construction Loan Expenses 10,000 10,000 Construction Loan Legal 20,000 20,000 Construction Period Interest 495, ,996 Leaseup Period Interest 110,520 Permanent Financing Permanent Loan Fees 54,688 Permanent Loan Expenses Permanent Loan Legal LIHTC Fees 164,360 LIHTC Legal 70,000 LIHTC Owners Title Policy 25,000 State HTF Fees Other: Capitalized Reserves Operating Reserves 193,493 Replacement Reserves 165,851 Other: Other Development Costs R E S I D E N T I A L Eligible Basis Total Residential Project Cost Acquisition New Construction / Rehab SUBTOTAL 801, ,328 SUBTOTAL 314,047 SUBTOTAL 359,343 Real Estate Tax 10,000 10,000 Insurance 50,400 Relocation Bidding Costs Permits, Fees & Hookups 480, ,000 Impact/Mitigation Fees Development Period Utilities Nonprofit Donation 25,000 Accounting/Audit 15,000 15,000 Marketing/Leasing Expenses 196,000 Carrying Costs at Rent up/ Lease Up Reserve SUBTOTAL 776, ,000 TOTALS: 30,272,789 20,000 24,940,154 21

23 % of Median Income Served #Units / Beds Unit Size Avg Unit Square Footage Tenant Paid Monthly Rent PROJECT RENTS Tenant Paid Utilities Sum of Tenant Paid Rent and Utilities Annual Gross Rental Income 30% 22 Studio ,784 30% 16 1 BR ,088 30% 10 3 BR ,280 40% 11 Studio ,616 40% 8 1 BR ,672 40% 5 3 BR ,620 60% 11 Studio ,064 60% 8 1 BR ,008 92,928 60% 5 3 BR 980 1, ,398 77,580 Total ,632 FINANCING Permanent Financing Sources Hard Debt Soft Debt (Fed/State/Local) Deferred Development Fee Amount Interest Rate Loan Term Amortization Period 4,375, % ,060,367 TBD TBD TBD 493, % Repayment Structure (e.g. deferred, cash flow only, Must pay Payment deferred 20 years Cash flow only Total Permanent Sources Excluding Equity Expected LIHTC Equity Total Permanent Sources 13,928,844 16,343,945 30,272,789 22

24 REVENUES Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15 Residential Income Escalator Annual Gross Tenant Paid Rental Income 2.5% 751, , , , , , , , , , , ,206 1,010,861 1,036,133 1,062,036 Annual Gross Rental Subsidy Income 0.0% Total Annual Operating Subsidy Sources Other Source: Laundry 2.5% 8,640 8,856 9,077 9,304 9,537 9,775 10,020 10,270 10,527 10,790 11,060 11,336 11,620 11,910 12,208 Other Source: 0.0% Total Residential Income = 760, , , , , , , , , , , ,543 1,022,481 1,048,043 1,074,244 Total Annual Service Funding Total NonResidential Income TOTAL PROJECT INCOME = 760, , , , , , , , , , , ,543 1,022,481 1,048,043 1,074,244 Annual % Less Annual Residential Vacancy 5.0% (38,014) (38,964) (39,938) (40,936) (41,960) (43,009) (44,084) (45,186) (46,316) (47,474) (48,661) (49,877) (51,124) (52,402) (53,712) Less Annual NonResidential Vacancy 0.0% EFFECTIVE GROSS INCOME (EGI) = 722, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,641 1,020,532 EXPENSES Operating Expenses Expenses Per Unit Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15 Escalator (Y1) Management Onsite 3.5% ,200 94,392 97, , , , , , , , , , , , ,625 Management Offsite 3.5% ,600 59,616 61,703 63,862 66,097 68,411 70,805 73,283 75,848 78,503 81,250 84,094 87,038 90,084 93,237 Accounting 3.5% ,200 19,872 20,568 21,287 22,032 22,804 23,602 24,428 25,283 26,168 27,083 28,031 29,013 30,028 31,079 Legal Services 3.5% ,200 19,872 20,568 21,287 22,032 22,804 23,602 24,428 25,283 26,168 27,083 28,031 29,013 30,028 31,079 Insurance 3.5% ,800 29,808 30,851 31,931 33,049 34,205 35,403 36,642 37,924 39,251 40,625 42,047 43,519 45,042 46,618 Real Estate Taxes 3.5% 25 2,400 2,484 2,571 2,661 2,754 2,850 2,950 3,053 3,160 3,271 3,385 3,504 3,627 3,753 3,885 Marketing 3.5% ,200 19,872 20,568 21,287 22,032 22,804 23,602 24,428 25,283 26,168 27,083 28,031 29,013 30,028 31,079 Security 3.5% 100 9,600 9,936 10,284 10,644 11,016 11,402 11,801 12,214 12,641 13,084 13,542 14,016 14,506 15,014 15,539 Maintenance and janitorial 3.5% ,200 69,552 71,986 74,506 77,114 79,813 82,606 85,497 88,490 91,587 94,792 98, , , ,776 Decorating/Turnover 3.5% 100 9,600 9,936 10,284 10,644 11,016 11,402 11,801 12,214 12,641 13,084 13,542 14,016 14,506 15,014 15,539 Contract Repairs 3.5% Landscaping 3.5% 100 9,600 9,936 10,284 10,644 11,016 11,402 11,801 12,214 12,641 13,084 13,542 14,016 14,506 15,014 15,539 Pest Control 3.5% Fire Safety 3.5% Elevator 3.5% 100 9,600 9,936 10,284 10,644 11,016 11,402 11,801 12,214 12,641 13,084 13,542 14,016 14,506 15,014 15,539 Water & Sewer 3.5% ,280 67,565 69,930 72,377 74,910 77,532 80,246 83,054 85,961 88,970 92,084 95,307 98, , ,668 Garbage Removal 3.5% ,200 19,872 20,568 21,287 22,032 22,804 23,602 24,428 25,283 26,168 27,083 28,031 29,013 30,028 31,079 Electric 3.5% 50 4,800 4,968 5,142 5,322 5,508 5,701 5,900 6,107 6,321 6,542 6,771 7,008 7,253 7,507 7,770 Oil/Gas/Other 3.5% Telephone 3.5% Other 3.5% 45 4,320 4,471 4,628 4,790 4,957 5,131 5,310 5,496 5,689 5,888 6,094 6,307 6,528 6,756 6,993 Total Residential Operating Expenses , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,046 Escalator Replacement Reserve 3.5% 193, ,800 17,388 17,997 18,626 19,278 19,953 20,651 21,374 22,122 22,897 23,698 24,527 25,386 26,274 27,194 Operating Reserve 3.5% 165, ,400 14,904 15,426 15,966 16,524 17,103 17,701 18,321 18,962 19,626 20,313 21,024 21,759 22,521 23,309 Total Reserves ,200 32,292 33,422 34,592 35,803 37,056 38,353 39,695 41,084 42,522 44,011 45,551 47,145 48,795 50,503 Service Expenses 3.5% NonResidential Expenses 0.0% TOTAL PROJECT EXPENSES = 468, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,549 NET OPERATING INCOME (EGI Total Expenses) = 254, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,983 DEBT SERVICE Hard Debt Loan Amount Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15 Lender 1 4,375, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,040 Lender Lender Total Hard Debt Service 221, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,040 Debt Coverage Ratio (Hard Debt) Gross Cash Flow 33,218 34,895 36,449 37,873 39,157 40,292 41,267 42,071 42,695 43,126 43,351 43,360 43,137 42,669 41,943 Deferred Developer Payment 28,235 29,660 30,982 32,192 33,284 34,248 35,077 35,761 36,291 36,657 36,849 36,856 36,666 36,269 14,452 Deferred Developer Balance 465, , , , , , , , , , ,243 87,387 50,721 14,452 0 Net Cash Flow (Before soft debt) 4,983 5,234 5,467 5,681 5,874 6,044 6,190 6,311 6,404 6,469 6,503 6,504 6,471 6,400 27,491 23

25 Appendix D 9% LIHTC Senior Scenario 24

26 Budget Acquisition Costs: Land 4,241,325 Existing Structures Liens Closing, Title & Recording Costs 20,000 20,000 Extension payment Other: Construction: SUBTOTAL 4,261,325 20,000 Demolition New Building 17,736,421 17,736,421 Rehabilitation Contractor Profit Contractor Overhead New Construction Contingency 971, ,069 Rehab Contingency Accessory Building Site Work / Infrastructure Off site Infrastructure Environmental Abatement (Building) Environmental Abatement (Land) Sales Tax 1,781,962 1,781,962 Bond Premium Equipment and Furnishings 50,000 50,000 Other: Soft Costs: SUBTOTAL 20,539,452 20,539,452 Buyer's Appraisal 16,000 Market Study 16,000 16,000 Architect 1,643,156 1,643,156 Engineering Environmental Assessment 10,000 10,000 Geotechnical Study Boundary & Topographic Survey 10,000 10,000 Legal Real Estate 25,000 25,000 Developer Fee 1,677,596 1,677,596 Project Management / Dev Consultant Fees Other Consultants 200, ,000 Soft Cost Contingency 179, ,888 Other: PreDevelopment / Bridge Financing Bridge Loan Fees Bridge Loan Interest Construction Financing SUBTOTAL 3,777,640 3,761,640 SUBTOTAL Construction Loan Fees 168, ,675 Construction Loan Expenses 10,000 10,000 Construction Loan Legal 20,000 20,000 Construction Period Interest 506, ,024 Leaseup Period Interest 105,468 Permanent Financing Permanent Loan Fees 52,188 Permanent Loan Expenses Permanent Loan Legal LIHTC Fees 164,360 LIHTC Legal 70,000 LIHTC Owners Title Policy 25,000 State HTF Fees Other: Capitalized Reserves Operating Reserves 201,555 Replacement Reserves 172,761 Other: Other Development Costs R E S I D E N T I A L Eligible Basis Total Residential Project Cost Acquisition New Construction / Rehab SUBTOTAL 810, ,699 SUBTOTAL 311,547 SUBTOTAL 374,316 Real Estate Tax 10,000 10,000 Insurance 52,500 Relocation Bidding Costs Permits, Fees & Hookups 500, ,000 Impact/Mitigation Fees Development Period Utilities Nonprofit Donation 25,000 Accounting/Audit 15,000 15,000 Marketing/Leasing Expenses 200,000 Carrying Costs at Rent up/ Lease Up Reserve SUBTOTAL 802, ,000 TOTALS: 30,876,946 20,000 25,530,791 25

UNIT INFORMATION (Complete the yellow-shaded areas) Gross monthly rent per. # of baths

UNIT INFORMATION (Complete the yellow-shaded areas) Gross monthly rent per. # of baths Project Name: Project #: UNIT INFORMATION (Complete the yellowshaded areas) Residential Finished Sq. Ft. per unit* Gross monthly rent per Less tenant paid Net monthly rent per # of bedrooms per unit #

More information

CITY OF TACOMA HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2012 APPLICATION SUPPLEMENTAL FORM

CITY OF TACOMA HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2012 APPLICATION SUPPLEMENTAL FORM CITY OF TACOMA HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2012 APPLICATION SUPPLEMENTAL FORM I. DEVELOPMENT PROJECT INFORMATION (Acquisition, New Construction or Rehabilitation only) A. Permanent Capital Funding

More information

Low Income Housing Tax Credits 101 (and a little beyond 101) James Lehnhoff, Municipal Advisor

Low Income Housing Tax Credits 101 (and a little beyond 101) James Lehnhoff, Municipal Advisor Low Income Housing Tax Credits 101 (and a little beyond 101) James Lehnhoff, Municipal Advisor 9/29/2017 1 Affordable Housing Need What is Affordable? Overview Why do affordable housing projects need financial

More information

2019 9% Competitive Housing Credit Application

2019 9% Competitive Housing Credit Application 2019 9% Competitive Housing Credit Application Application Checklist This checklist includes all the items from the CFA application and the LIHTC Addendum that are required for the 2019 9% Application

More information

Housing Consortium of Everett and Snohomish County 2013 Affordable Housing 101. Paul Purcell President, Beacon Development Group

Housing Consortium of Everett and Snohomish County 2013 Affordable Housing 101. Paul Purcell President, Beacon Development Group Housing Consortium of Everett and Snohomish County 2013 Affordable Housing 101 Paul Purcell President, Beacon Development Group Session Outline 1. What is affordable housing? How is it defined? Who does

More information

Request for Proposals Wake County Affordable Housing Development Program for Tax Credit Developments

Request for Proposals Wake County Affordable Housing Development Program for Tax Credit Developments 2015 Request for Proposals Wake County Affordable Housing Development Program for Tax Credit Developments 1) STATEMENT OF PURPOSE AND PROGRAM SUMMARY Wake County s Department of Housing and Community Revitalization

More information

Tax Credits 101. Wednesday, November 7 10:45am 12:00pm

Tax Credits 101. Wednesday, November 7 10:45am 12:00pm Tax Credits 101 Wednesday, November 7 10:45am 12:00pm Today s Panel Kevin Clark Ohio Housing Finance Agency (OHFA) Brian Graney Ohio Capital Corporation for Housing Meg Manley PIRHL, LLC Tim Swiney Wallick

More information

AFFORDABLE HOUSING 101. Jimmy McCune - OCCH Tim Swiney Wallick Communities Roy Lowenstein Lowenstein Development

AFFORDABLE HOUSING 101. Jimmy McCune - OCCH Tim Swiney Wallick Communities Roy Lowenstein Lowenstein Development AFFORDABLE HOUSING 101 Jimmy McCune - OCCH Tim Swiney Wallick Communities Roy Lowenstein Lowenstein Development Affordability in Housing Defined Generally refers to housing affordable to those who earn

More information

NYS HOME Local Program Small Rental Development Initiative Pro forma Budget Workbook Instructions

NYS HOME Local Program Small Rental Development Initiative Pro forma Budget Workbook Instructions NYS HOME Local Program Small Rental Development Initiative Pro forma Budget Workbook Instructions I. Overview This Excel Workbook consists of 6 worksheets: 1) Project Summary 2) HOME Limits 3) Units &

More information

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Planning and Development

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Planning and Development U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Planning and Development Special Attention of: Notice: CPD 98-1 All Secretary's Representatives All State/Area Coordinators Issued: January 22,

More information

National Housing Trust Fund. Alissa Ice Missouri Housing Development Commission

National Housing Trust Fund. Alissa Ice Missouri Housing Development Commission National Housing Trust Fund Alissa Ice Missouri Housing Development Commission Purpose The National Housing Trust Fund (HTF) is a new affordable housing production program that will complement existing

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of September 24, 2016

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of September 24, 2016 ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of September 24, 2016 DATE: September 20, 2016 SUBJECT: Allocation of Fiscal Year 2017 Affordable Housing Investment Fund (AHIF) loan funds for

More information

EXHIBIT E LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS

EXHIBIT E LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS EXHIBIT E LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS A. Application for Tax Credit Reservation or Tax-Exempt Bond Conditional Commitment shall Include: 1. Complete application form (current

More information

Housing 101: Getting Started Development Finance Basics

Housing 101: Getting Started Development Finance Basics Housing 101: Getting Started Development Finance Basics 23 rd Annual Statewide Housing Conference February 26, 2014 1 Challenges to Developing Affordable Housing Costs the same to develop whether rents

More information

REPORT. DATE ISSUED: December 19, 2014 REPORT NO: HCR Chair and Members of the San Diego Housing Commission For the Agenda of January 16, 2015

REPORT. DATE ISSUED: December 19, 2014 REPORT NO: HCR Chair and Members of the San Diego Housing Commission For the Agenda of January 16, 2015 REPORT DATE ISSUED: December 19, 2014 REPORT NO: HCR15-008 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: Chair and Members of the San Diego Housing Commission For the Agenda of January 16, 2015 COUNCIL DISTRICT: 9 REQUESTED ACTION

More information

Affordable Housing Gap and Economic Analysis

Affordable Housing Gap and Economic Analysis Affordable Housing Gap and Economic Analysis Town of Chapel Hill April 4, 2017 DAVID PAUL ROSEN & ASSOCIATES D EVELOPMENT, FINANCE AND POLICY ADVISORS Town of Chapel Hill PREPARED FOR: Town of Chapel Hill

More information

INTRODUCTION TO FEDERAL LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDITS. 1. Applicable Percentage

INTRODUCTION TO FEDERAL LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDITS. 1. Applicable Percentage INTRODUCTION TO FEDERAL LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDITS I. THE TAX CREDIT GENERALLY a. Established under the Tax Reform Act of 1986. Essentially an effort to partially privatize the affordable housing industry.

More information

CHAPTER V: IMPLEMENTING THE PLAN

CHAPTER V: IMPLEMENTING THE PLAN CHAPTER V: IMPLEMENTING THE PLAN A range of resources is available to fund the improvements included in the Action Plan. These resources include existing commitments of County funding, redevelopment-related

More information

REPORT TO THE HOUSING AUTHORITY

REPORT TO THE HOUSING AUTHORITY REPORT TO THE HOUSING AUTHORITY DATE ISSUED: October 12, 2012 REPORT NO: HAR12-043 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: Chair and Members of the Housing Authority of the City of San Diego For the Agenda of November 27,

More information

MASS HOUSING PRO FORMA LINE ITEM EXPLANATIONS 132 Unit Project. The Residences at West Union

MASS HOUSING PRO FORMA LINE ITEM EXPLANATIONS 132 Unit Project. The Residences at West Union MASS HOUSING PRO FORMA LINE ITEM EXPLANATIONS 132 Unit Project The Residences at West Union Page 5 Affordable Unit Rates: The affordable unit rental rates listed on page 5 of the pro forma list projected

More information

National Housing Trust Fund Allocation Plan

National Housing Trust Fund Allocation Plan National Housing Trust Fund Allocation Plan FINAL PENDING APPROVAL OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Fostering the Development of Strong, Equitable Neighborhoods Brian Kenner Deputy

More information

RHODE ISLAND HOUSING Application for Letter of Eligibility

RHODE ISLAND HOUSING Application for Letter of Eligibility RHODE ISLAND HOUSING Application for Letter of Eligibility GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Name of Development: 2. Address of Site: Plat, Lot(s) 3. City/Town: Zip Code: 4. Development Entity: Name of Principal:

More information

REPORT. DATE ISSUED: February 3, 2006 ITEM 103. Loan to San Diego Youth and Community Services for Transitional Housing (Council District 3)

REPORT. DATE ISSUED: February 3, 2006 ITEM 103. Loan to San Diego Youth and Community Services for Transitional Housing (Council District 3) 1625 Newton Avenue San Diego, California 92113-1038 619/231 9400 FAX: 619/544 9193 www.sdhc.net REPORT DATE ISSUED: February 3, 2006 ITEM 103 REPORT NO.: HCR06-11 For the Agenda of February 10, 2006 SUBJECT:

More information

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY HOUSING COMMISSION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SHEET

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY HOUSING COMMISSION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SHEET ITEM 106 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY HOUSING COMMISSION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SHEET DATE: June 16, 2017 COUNCIL DISTRICT(S): 3 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: Real Estate Division CONTACT/PHONE NUMBER: Ted Miyahara (619) 578-7548

More information

DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT

DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT WASHINGTON COUNTY CDA SELF-SCORING WORKSHEET 2020 LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT PROGRAM Development Name Address/City Owner Name MINIMUM THRESHOLD REQUIREMENTS All Round 1 applicants for 9% LIHTC must

More information

Shawnee Landing TIF Project. City of Shawnee, Kansas. Need For Assistance Analysis

Shawnee Landing TIF Project. City of Shawnee, Kansas. Need For Assistance Analysis Shawnee Landing TIF Project City of Shawnee, Kansas Need For Assistance Analysis December 17, 2014 Table of Contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 1 2 PURPOSE... 2 3 THE PROJECT... 3 4 ASSISTANCE REQUEST... 7

More information

DISABILITY HOUSING NETWORK LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT DEVELOPMENT

DISABILITY HOUSING NETWORK LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT DEVELOPMENT DISABILITY HOUSING NETWORK LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT DEVELOPMENT OCTOBER 24, 2012 OHIO CAPITAL CORPORATION FOR HOUSING OCCH s mission is: to cause the construction, rehabilitation, and preservation

More information

Housing Program Application (HOME & HTF) County of Bucks, Pennsylvania Housing Services

Housing Program Application (HOME & HTF) County of Bucks, Pennsylvania Housing Services Housing Program Application (HOME & HTF) County of Bucks, Pennsylvania Housing Services Since 1989, Housing Services has been the comprehensive provider of funding for community development, housing and

More information

REVISED REPORT TO THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SAN DIEGO

REVISED REPORT TO THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SAN DIEGO REVISED REPORT TO THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SAN DIEGO DATE ISSUED: October 3, 2016 REPORT NO: HAR16-035 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: Chair and Members of the Housing Authority of the City of San Diego For the Agenda

More information

FUNDING SOURCES FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN HANCOCK COUNTY, MAINE

FUNDING SOURCES FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN HANCOCK COUNTY, MAINE FUNDING SOURCES FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN HANCOCK COUNTY, MAINE March 2013 Prepared by: Hancock County Planning Commission, 395 State Street Ellsworth, ME 04605 www.hcpcme.org voice: 207-667-7131 Fax:

More information

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PARTNERSHIP INFORMATION PARTNERSHIP NAME: GENERAL PARTNER: GUARANTOR: PROPERTY INFORMATION

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PARTNERSHIP INFORMATION PARTNERSHIP NAME: GENERAL PARTNER: GUARANTOR: PROPERTY INFORMATION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PARTNERSHIP INFORMATION PARTNERSHIP NAME: GENERAL PARTNER: GUARANTOR: PROPERTY INFORMATION PROPERTY NAME: PROPERTY LOCATION: PROPERTY TYPE Rural Urban Suburban CONSTRUCTION TYPE: New

More information

Project Address: 721 Blake Avenue (Manor I) and 661 Bennett Avenue (Manor II), Glenwood Springs, CO 81601

Project Address: 721 Blake Avenue (Manor I) and 661 Bennett Avenue (Manor II), Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Project Name: The Manors I and II Project Address: 721 Blake Avenue (Manor I) and 661 Bennett Avenue (Manor II), Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Description of the project as proposed; detailed type of construction;

More information

Barnstable County HOME Consortium. Rental Housing Development Project Underwriting, Subsidy Layering, and Risk Analysis Evaluation

Barnstable County HOME Consortium. Rental Housing Development Project Underwriting, Subsidy Layering, and Risk Analysis Evaluation Barnstable County HOME Consortium Rental Housing Development Project Underwriting, Subsidy Layering, and Risk Analysis Evaluation Policies and Guidelines March 19, 2015 Overview of the Application and

More information

HOME Program Basic Facts

HOME Program Basic Facts HOME Program Basic Facts WHAT IS HOME? HOME is short for "HOME Investment Partnership Program", which became law in 1990. HOME provides an annual formula-based federal grant to the City of San Diego for

More information

MANUFACTURED HOME PARK LOAN PROGRAM TERM SHEET

MANUFACTURED HOME PARK LOAN PROGRAM TERM SHEET MANUFACTURED HOME PARK LOAN PROGRAM TERM SHEET Description: The Manufactured Home Park Loan Program provides permanent financing for the acquisition of mobile home parks (MHPs) by organizations interested

More information

CITY OF GAINESVILLE APPLICATION FOR TAD FINANCING

CITY OF GAINESVILLE APPLICATION FOR TAD FINANCING CITY OF GAINESVILLE APPLICATION FOR TAD FINANCING For the Guidelines for Evaluating Requests, Refer to the Midtown TAD Policies & Procedures (Resolution BR-2009-08) FOR STAFF USE ONLY: Date Application

More information

NSP Rental Basics: A Primer on Using Rental Projects to Meet NSP Obligation and 25% Set-Aside Requirement. About this Tool

NSP Rental Basics: A Primer on Using Rental Projects to Meet NSP Obligation and 25% Set-Aside Requirement. About this Tool NSP Rental Basics: A Primer on Using Rental Projects to Meet NSP Obligation and 25% Set-Aside Requirement About this Tool Description: This tool is intended for NSP grantees and their partners seeking

More information

MEMORANDUM ADDENDUM. Dan Moye, Economic Development Corporation of Kansas City, Missouri

MEMORANDUM ADDENDUM. Dan Moye, Economic Development Corporation of Kansas City, Missouri MEMORANDUM ADDENDUM TO: FROM: Dan Moye, Economic Development Corporation of Kansas City, Missouri Fran Lefor Rood, SB Friedman Development Advisors Direct: (312) 424-4253; Email: frood@sbfriedman.com DATE:

More information

National Housing Trust Fund Implementation. Virginia Housing Alliance

National Housing Trust Fund Implementation. Virginia Housing Alliance National Housing Trust Fund Implementation Virginia Housing Alliance June 16, 2016 Ed Gramlich National Low Income Housing Coalition 1 What Is the National Housing Trust Fund? National Housing Trust Fund

More information

Housing Trust Fund Developer Advisory Group. Options and Considerations Related to the HTF Operating Assistance and Operating Assistance Reserves

Housing Trust Fund Developer Advisory Group. Options and Considerations Related to the HTF Operating Assistance and Operating Assistance Reserves Housing Trust Fund Developer Advisory Group Options and Considerations Related to the HTF Operating Assistance and Operating Assistance Reserves The national HTF Developers Advisory Group (http://bit.ly/1sj1uop)

More information

AFFORDABLE HOUSING 101 SUBSIDIZED HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AND FINANCING OVERVIEW. September 18, 2017 Housing Subcommittee

AFFORDABLE HOUSING 101 SUBSIDIZED HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AND FINANCING OVERVIEW. September 18, 2017 Housing Subcommittee 1 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 101 SUBSIDIZED HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AND FINANCING OVERVIEW September 18, 2017 Housing Subcommittee Developing Subsidized Housing 2 The process and requirements of developing subsidized

More information

PENNSYLVANIA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY (2019 UNDERWRITING APPLICATION)

PENNSYLVANIA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY (2019 UNDERWRITING APPLICATION) DEVELOPMENT COST LIMITS The development costs, fees, and expenses contained herein are the maximum amounts that may be included in total development cost and, if applicable, the Tax Credit eligible basis

More information

DATE: TO OWNER: Washington State Housing Finance Commission Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Program 1000 Second Avenue Suite 2700 Seattle WA

DATE: TO OWNER: Washington State Housing Finance Commission Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Program 1000 Second Avenue Suite 2700 Seattle WA INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT on CARRYOVER ALLOCATION BASIS PURSUANT TO IRS SECTION 42 (h)(1)(e)(ii) and AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT (ARRA) EXCHANGE PROGRAM 30% TEST PURSUANT

More information

Rental Construction Financing Initiative

Rental Construction Financing Initiative Rental Construction Financing Initiative REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION The following checklist provides the minimum information and documentation required prior to the submission when the application is selected

More information

Opening Doors to Affordable Mixed-Use Development

Opening Doors to Affordable Mixed-Use Development Opening Doors to Affordable Mixed-Use Development 1 Housing Colorado October 5, 2016 2 Session Objectives Learn: The Basics of Low-Income and Historic Tax Credits, including recent Colorado LIHTC program

More information

Housing Credit Modernization Becomes Law

Housing Credit Modernization Becomes Law Housing Credit Modernization Becomes Law July 30, 2008 President Bush today signed into law the most significant modernization of Low Income Housing Tax Credits since 1989, as part of the Housing and Economic

More information

City of Oakland Programs, Policies and New Initiatives for Housing

City of Oakland Programs, Policies and New Initiatives for Housing City of Oakland Programs, Policies and New Initiatives for Housing Land Use Policies General Plan Update In the late 1990s, the City revised its general plan land use and transportation element. This included

More information

OVERVIEW OF TAX-EXEMPT AFFORDABLE HOUSING BONDS

OVERVIEW OF TAX-EXEMPT AFFORDABLE HOUSING BONDS 1075 Peachtree Street, N.E. Suite 2500 Atlanta, GA 30309-3962 (404) 885-1500 Fax (404) 892-7056 www.seyfarth.com (404) 888-1883 direct danmcrae@mindspring.com dmcrae@seyfarth.com OVERVIEW OF TAX-EXEMPT

More information

Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development Commercial Space Underwriting Guidelines

Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development Commercial Space Underwriting Guidelines Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development Commercial Space Underwriting Guidelines A. Applicability Effective February 2, 2018 The following Commercial Space Underwriting Guidelines (Guidelines)

More information

NEBRASKA INVESTMENT FINANCE AUTHORITY LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT PROGRAM COST CERTIFICATION PROCEDURES MANUAL

NEBRASKA INVESTMENT FINANCE AUTHORITY LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT PROGRAM COST CERTIFICATION PROCEDURES MANUAL NEBRASKA INVESTMENT FINANCE AUTHORITY LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT PROGRAM COST CERTIFICATION PROCEDURES MANUAL Nebraska Investment Finance Authority ( NIFA ) Low Income Housing Tax Credit ( LIHTC ) Cost

More information

RFP REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL. for TAX CREDIT ADVISOR SERVICES. for BOULDER HOUSING PARTNERS. March 6, 2012 Requested Return: March 15, 2010

RFP REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL. for TAX CREDIT ADVISOR SERVICES. for BOULDER HOUSING PARTNERS. March 6, 2012 Requested Return: March 15, 2010 RFP 06-2012 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL for TAX CREDIT ADVISOR SERVICES for BOULDER HOUSING PARTNERS March 6, 2012 Requested Return: March 15, 2010 Boulder Housing Partners 4800 Broadway Boulder, CO 80304 (720)

More information

BRIDGING THE GAP: LEVERAGING ENERGY EFFICIENCY, FINANCING, AND UTILITY INCENTIVES FOR MODERATE REHAB PROJECTS

BRIDGING THE GAP: LEVERAGING ENERGY EFFICIENCY, FINANCING, AND UTILITY INCENTIVES FOR MODERATE REHAB PROJECTS BRIDGING THE GAP: LEVERAGING ENERGY EFFICIENCY, FINANCING, AND UTILITY INCENTIVES FOR MODERATE REHAB PROJECTS ACEEE ENERGY EFFICIENCY AS A RESOURCE SEPTEMBER 22, 2015 Mark Pignatelli, ICF International

More information

CHAPTER TAX CREDITS AND SUBSIDY LAYERING. The Table of Contents

CHAPTER TAX CREDITS AND SUBSIDY LAYERING. The Table of Contents UNIT 12.0 PRESERVATION CHAPTER 12.10 TAX CREDITS AND SUBSIDY LAYERING The Table of Contents 12.10.1 Purpose.. I-1 12.10.2 Applicability.. I-2 12.10.3 Definitions and Acronyms... I-2 12.10.4 LIHTC s and

More information

HOUSING INCENTIVE FUND ALLOCATION PLAN

HOUSING INCENTIVE FUND ALLOCATION PLAN 2013-15 HOUSING INCENTIVE FUND ALLOCATION PLAN North Dakota Housing Finance Agency 2624 Vermont Avenue PO Box 1535 Bismarck, ND 58502-1535 800/292-8621 or 701/328-8072 800/366-6888 (TTY) www.ndhfa.org

More information

CHICAGO LOW-INCOME HOUSING TRUST FUND MAUI Program Guide and Application (Capital Investment)

CHICAGO LOW-INCOME HOUSING TRUST FUND MAUI Program Guide and Application (Capital Investment) 2019 MAUI Capital Investment Application CHICAGO LOW-INCOME HOUSING TRUST FUND MAUI Program Guide and Application (Capital Investment) (Rev. 12-31-18) Chicago Low-Income Housing Trust Fund Since 1989,

More information

2017 Uniform Multifamily Application Templates

2017 Uniform Multifamily Application Templates 2017 Uniform Multifamily Application Templates 221 East 11 th Street Austin, TX 78701 Table of Contents Template Overview... 3 Using the Templates... 4 Public Notification Template... 5 Twice the State

More information

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY HOUSING COMMISSION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SHEET. MEETING DATE: October 6, 2017

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY HOUSING COMMISSION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SHEET. MEETING DATE: October 6, 2017 ITEM 101 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY HOUSING COMMISSION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATE: October 6, 2017 HCR17-043 SUBJECT: Disposition of Town & Country Apartments and Final Bond Authorization and related

More information

STATE OF HAWAII LOW-INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT PROGRAM 2018/2019 QUALIFIED ALLOCATION PLAN. Table of Contents. I. Introduction... 2

STATE OF HAWAII LOW-INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT PROGRAM 2018/2019 QUALIFIED ALLOCATION PLAN. Table of Contents. I. Introduction... 2 STATE OF HAWAII LOW-INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT PROGRAM 2018/2019 QUALIFIED ALLOCATION PLAN Table of Contents I. Introduction... 2 II. Application and Award Process... 3 III. Selection Criteria... 4 A. Policy:...

More information

Glossary of Terms Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Program

Glossary of Terms Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Program Glossary of Terms 2017 Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Program AMGI: Area Median Gross Income as defined by HUD. AMI: Area Median Income as defined by HUD. BIN: The state credit agency assigns a Building

More information

4 Unit Investment Property 329 N 2nd St W Missoula, MT 59802

4 Unit Investment Property 329 N 2nd St W Missoula, MT 59802 Property Report 4 Unit Investment Property Presented by: Ink Realty Group 148 South Ave W Missoula, MT 59801 Office: 406-728-8270 Mobile: Fax: 406-728-2315 All data is from sources deemed reliable but

More information

Construction. Required Documentation From Owner/Developer

Construction. Required Documentation From Owner/Developer 3: 1.1.1 Demonstrated development and management capacity of owner/operator and professional development/ management team throughout all phases of the project (e.g. project vision, site selection, feasibility;

More information

Atlanta BeltLine REGIONAL SYMPOISUM ON IMPLEMENTING TRANSIT PLANS

Atlanta BeltLine REGIONAL SYMPOISUM ON IMPLEMENTING TRANSIT PLANS Atlanta BeltLine REGIONAL SYMPOISUM ON IMPLEMENTING TRANSIT PLANS October 26, 2012 Historic Fourth Ward Park ATLANTA RAILROAD LEGACY ATLANTA BELTLINE TRANSIT I 20 Westside Reservoir Park Enota Park Maddox

More information

Funding Strategies for. Developing and Operating Extremely Low Income Housing

Funding Strategies for. Developing and Operating Extremely Low Income Housing Funding Strategies for Developing and Operating Extremely Low Income Housing NLIHC Senior Advisor Ed Gramlich NLIHC COO Paul Kealey Former Homes for America President and CEO Nancy Rase Community Frameworks

More information

HOME Investment Partnership Program Project Development Funds. Application

HOME Investment Partnership Program Project Development Funds. Application City of Spartanburg Neighborhood Services 145 West Broad Street Spartanburg, South Carolina 29306 HOME Investment Partnership Program Project Development Funds Application Applicant Name: Project Name:

More information

REPORT. San Diego Square Apartments Final Financing Authorization

REPORT. San Diego Square Apartments Final Financing Authorization REPORT DATE ISSUED: September 17, 2014 REPORT NO: HCR14-072 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: Chair and Members of the San Diego Housing Commission For the Agenda of October 10, 2014 San Diego Square Apartments Final

More information

Funding Strategies for. Developing and Operating Extremely Low Income Housing

Funding Strategies for. Developing and Operating Extremely Low Income Housing Funding Strategies for Developing and Operating Extremely Low Income Housing 1 NLIHC Senior Advisor Ed Gramlich NLIHC COO Paul Kealey Supportive Housing Network of NY Member Services Coordinator Steve

More information

Agenda. District of Columbia Housing Finance Agency Before Stimulus and Current Market Conditions. DCHFA Deal Types DCHFA Team

Agenda. District of Columbia Housing Finance Agency Before Stimulus and Current Market Conditions. DCHFA Deal Types DCHFA Team Doing Business with the NEW DCHFA Harry D. Sewell, Executive Director May 25, 2010 Agenda Before Stimulus and Current Market Conditions New Issue Bond Program DCHFA Deal Types DCHFA Team Getting Started

More information

REPORT TO THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO

REPORT TO THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO ITEM 2 REPORT TO THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO DATE ISSUED: March 20, 2018 REPORT NO: HAR18-014 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: Chair and Members of the Housing Authority of the City of San Diego

More information

The documents listed below must be attached to the Loan Application when submitted to our office.

The documents listed below must be attached to the Loan Application when submitted to our office. NSP MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION PROCESS Submission of Application The documents listed below must be attached to the Loan Application when submitted to our office. Applications will not be processed

More information

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY HOUSING COMMISSION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SHEET

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY HOUSING COMMISSION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SHEET ITEM 106 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY HOUSING COMMISSION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SHEET DATE: July 28, 2017 SUBJECT: Preliminary Bond Authorization for Civita II Family Apartments COUNCIL DISTRICT(S): 7 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT:

More information

Multifamily Finance Division Frequently Asked Questions 4% Housing Tax Credit Developments financed with Private Activity Bonds

Multifamily Finance Division Frequently Asked Questions 4% Housing Tax Credit Developments financed with Private Activity Bonds Multifamily Finance Division Frequently Asked Questions 4% Housing Tax Credit Developments financed with Private Activity Bonds 1. What is a Private Activity Bond? What is a Housing Tax Credit? These are

More information

NOTICE OF FUNDING AVAILABILITY

NOTICE OF FUNDING AVAILABILITY Mayor s Office of Housing and Community Development City and County of San Francisco London N. Breed Mayor Kate Hartley Director NOTICE OF FUNDING AVAILABILITY The Downtown Neighborhoods Preservation Fund

More information

REPORT. DATE ISSUED: March 5, 2014 REPORT NO: HCR Chair and Members of the San Diego Housing Commission For the Agenda of March 14, 2014

REPORT. DATE ISSUED: March 5, 2014 REPORT NO: HCR Chair and Members of the San Diego Housing Commission For the Agenda of March 14, 2014 REPORT DATE ISSUED: March 5, 2014 REPORT NO: HCR14010 ATTENTION: Chair and Members of the San Diego Housing Commission For the Agenda of March 14, 2014 SUBJECT: Loan Recommendation for Veterans Village

More information

City Of Oakland HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

City Of Oakland HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Guidelines for Site Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Naturally Occurring Affordable Housing (NOAH) Preservation Program The purpose of the Site Acquisition,

More information

E. D. Hovee & Company, LLC

E. D. Hovee & Company, LLC E. D. Hovee & Company, LLC Economic and Development Services MEMORANDUM To: From: Subject: Jason Robertson, Barney & Worth, Inc. Eric Hovee Downtown Olympia Action Plan Development Opportunity Site Prototype

More information

Affordable Rental Housing in Chapel Hill Challenges and Opportunities. Presented to Mayor s Affordable Housing Task Force June 6, 2013

Affordable Rental Housing in Chapel Hill Challenges and Opportunities. Presented to Mayor s Affordable Housing Task Force June 6, 2013 Affordable Rental Housing in Chapel Hill Challenges and Opportunities Presented to Mayor s Affordable Housing Task Force June 6, 2013 1 Challenges High Barriers to Entry Land costs Entitlement costs Development

More information

RENTAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM GUIDELINES

RENTAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM GUIDELINES RENTAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM GUIDELINES SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION Applications from non-profit organizations, housing authorities, for profit entities, and municipalities in cooperation with any of

More information

2016 Vermont National Housing Trust Fund Allocation Plan

2016 Vermont National Housing Trust Fund Allocation Plan 2016 Vermont National Housing Trust Fund Allocation Plan Overview The National Housing Trust Fund (HTF) is a new federal affordable housing production program that will complement existing Federal, State,

More information

This document is available via in a Microsoft Word format upon request. LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT PROGRAM APPLICATION

This document is available via  in a Microsoft Word format upon request. LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT PROGRAM APPLICATION This document is available via e-mail in a Microsoft Word format upon request. Development Name: LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT PROGRAM APPLICATION DELAWARE STATE HOUSING AUTHORITY STATE OF DELAWARE Part

More information

MECKLENBURG MANOR APARTMENTSs A 51 UNIT MULTI-FAMILY INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY 719 EAST FERRELL STREET, SOUTH HILL, VIRGINIA 23970

MECKLENBURG MANOR APARTMENTSs A 51 UNIT MULTI-FAMILY INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY 719 EAST FERRELL STREET, SOUTH HILL, VIRGINIA 23970 :: A CBRE RICHMOND MULTI-HOUSING OPPORTUNITY MECKLENBURG MANOR APARTMENTSs A 51 UNIT MULTI-FAMILY INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY 719 EAST FERRELL STREET, SOUTH HILL, VIRGINIA 23970 Part of the CBRE affiliate network

More information

REVISED COMMUNITY LEVERAGING ASSISTANCE INITIATIVE MORTGAGE (ReCLAIM) Pilot Phase of Program

REVISED COMMUNITY LEVERAGING ASSISTANCE INITIATIVE MORTGAGE (ReCLAIM) Pilot Phase of Program REVISED COMMUNITY LEVERAGING ASSISTANCE INITIATIVE MORTGAGE (ReCLAIM) Pilot Phase of Program Program Overview and Request for Proposals (RFP) September 2014 The Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency (PHFA)

More information

Ashland Transit Triangle:

Ashland Transit Triangle: Ashland Transit Triangle: Strategic Approach to Implementation Fregonese Associates Inc. 12/19/16 Phase I of the Transit Triangle Study Conducted in the Fall of 2015 Tasks Completed: Market analysis Initial

More information

Affordable Housing in New York City. Globes Real Estate Conference April Mathew M. Wambua HPD Commissioner

Affordable Housing in New York City. Globes Real Estate Conference April Mathew M. Wambua HPD Commissioner Affordable Housing in New York City Globes Real Estate Conference April 2013 Mathew M. Wambua HPD Commissioner 1 Agenda Introduction The Need for Affordable Housing in NYC Responding to NYC s Affordable

More information

Rail~Volution Transit Oriented Development and Affordable Housing: Does Life Really Have to be So Hard? September 10, 2005

Rail~Volution Transit Oriented Development and Affordable Housing: Does Life Really Have to be So Hard? September 10, 2005 Rail~Volution 2005 Transit Oriented Development and Affordable Housing: Does Life Really Have to be So Hard? September 10, 2005 Robert M. Ruzzo Presented. Deputy by Robert Director M.. Ruzzo, MassHousing

More information

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS/PROPOSALS

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS/PROPOSALS REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS/PROPOSALS HOME/CHDO PROGRAM RENTAL NEW CONSTRUCTION AND/OR ACQUISITION/ REHABILITATION HOME RFP No. 2015-01 September 10, 2015 HOME Program Request for Qualifications/Proposals

More information

Request for Proposals (RFP) Affordable Housing Development Opportunity within the City of Temecula Temecula, California

Request for Proposals (RFP) Affordable Housing Development Opportunity within the City of Temecula Temecula, California February 16, 2016 To: Re: Interested Developers Request for Proposals (RFP) Affordable Housing Development Opportunity within the City of Temecula Temecula, California Greetings: The City of Temecula as

More information

II. NEBRASKA INVESTMENT FINANCE AUTHORITY (NIFA) LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT PROGRAM ALLOCATION PLAN

II. NEBRASKA INVESTMENT FINANCE AUTHORITY (NIFA) LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT PROGRAM ALLOCATION PLAN II. NEBRASKA INVESTMENT FINANCE AUTHORITY (NIFA) LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT PROGRAM ALLOCATION PLAN 2004 LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT PROGRAM 2004 Allocation Plan Table of Contents Page Available Low

More information

Exclusively Offering. $4,660,000 Alder Terrace Apartments. 202 Baltimore Street, Longview, WA 98632

Exclusively Offering. $4,660,000 Alder Terrace Apartments. 202 Baltimore Street, Longview, WA 98632 Exclusively Offering $4,660,000 Alder Terrace Apartments 202 Baltimore Street, Longview, WA 98632 Chris Roewe Partner/Broker 360.556.5101 cell 360.501-5500 office 208 Vine Street, Kelso, WA 98626 chrisroewe@hotmail.com

More information

MOTION NO. M Roosevelt Station Central TOD Site Property Transaction Agreements PROPOSED ACTION

MOTION NO. M Roosevelt Station Central TOD Site Property Transaction Agreements PROPOSED ACTION MOTION NO. M2017-143 Roosevelt Station Central TOD Site Property Transaction Agreements MEETING: DATE: TYPE OF ACTION: STAFF CONTACT: Board 11/16/2017 Final Action Don Billen, Acting Executive Director,

More information

Analysis Prepared by David L. Sjoquist and Robert J. Eger III

Analysis Prepared by David L. Sjoquist and Robert J. Eger III GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY ANDREW YOUNG SCHOOL OF POLICY STUDIES FISCAL RESEARCH CENTER DECEMBER 1, 2006 SUBJECT: Estimated Effects of Population Growth on Atlanta Public School s Revenue and Expenditures

More information

will not unbalance the ratio of debt to equity.

will not unbalance the ratio of debt to equity. paragraph 2-12-3. c.) and prime commercial paper. All these restrictions are designed to assure that debt proceeds (including Title VII funds disbursed from escrow), equity contributions and operating

More information

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CLACKAMAS COUNTY (HACC) S. GAIN ST., OREGON CIYT, OR PROJECT-SPECIFIC APPLICATION FOR SECTION 108 LOAN GUARANTEE FROM

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CLACKAMAS COUNTY (HACC) S. GAIN ST., OREGON CIYT, OR PROJECT-SPECIFIC APPLICATION FOR SECTION 108 LOAN GUARANTEE FROM HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CLACKAMAS COUNTY (HACC) 13900 S. GAIN ST., OREGON CIYT, OR PROJECT-SPECIFIC APPLICATION FOR SECTION 108 LOAN GUARANTEE FROM U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT FOR ARBOR

More information

APPENDIX 1 THRESHOLD CRITERIA. To be considered for financing resources, Applications must meet the Threshold requirements described below.

APPENDIX 1 THRESHOLD CRITERIA. To be considered for financing resources, Applications must meet the Threshold requirements described below. APPENDIX 1 THRESHOLD CRITERIA To be considered for financing resources, Applications must meet the Threshold requirements described below. 1. Project Feasibility, Viability Analysis and Conformance Rent

More information

Arlington County Affordable Housing Implementation Framework. September 2015

Arlington County Affordable Housing Implementation Framework. September 2015 Arlington County Affordable Housing Implementation Framework September 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 2 Existing Tools 4 Financing Strategies 4 Land Use and Regulatory Strategies 9 Services 14 Potential

More information

REPORT TO THE HOUSING AUTHORITY

REPORT TO THE HOUSING AUTHORITY REPORT TO THE HOUSING AUTHORITY DATE ISSUED: May 4, 2015 REPORT NO: HAR15-015 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: Chair and Members of the Housing Authority of the City of San Diego For the Agenda of June 16, 2015 Final

More information

Arlington County Affordable Housing Implementation Framework. DRAFT 8.0 August 2015

Arlington County Affordable Housing Implementation Framework. DRAFT 8.0 August 2015 Arlington County Affordable Housing Implementation Framework DRAFT 8.0 August 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 2 Existing Tools 4 Financing Strategies 4 Land Use and Regulatory Strategies 9 Services

More information

MOTION NO. M Capitol Hill Site D Agreement with Seattle Central College and Capitol Hill Housing

MOTION NO. M Capitol Hill Site D Agreement with Seattle Central College and Capitol Hill Housing MOTION NO. M2017-145 Capitol Hill Site D Agreement with Seattle Central College and Capitol Hill Housing MEETING: DATE: TYPE OF ACTION: STAFF CONTACT: Board 11/16/2017 Final Action Don Billen, Acting Deputy

More information

The New Housing Market and its Effect on Infrastructure Financing Capacity

The New Housing Market and its Effect on Infrastructure Financing Capacity The New Housing Market and its Effect on Infrastructure Financing Capacity Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. NIFR 2009 November 6, 2009 1 Presentation Overview Housing Market Trends New Home Pricing Trends

More information

Housing Assistance in Minnesota

Housing Assistance in Minnesota Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Housing in Minnesota Program Assessment October 1, 2002 - September 30, 2003 Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Housing In Minnesota l\1innesotl Housing Finaru:e Agency Contentsoontents...

More information

PRELIMINARY PROJECT PLAN AND REINVESTMENT ZONE FINANCING PLAN FOR PROPOSED TAX INCREMENT REINVESTMENT ZONE NO. 1, CITY OF OAK RIDGE NORTH

PRELIMINARY PROJECT PLAN AND REINVESTMENT ZONE FINANCING PLAN FOR PROPOSED TAX INCREMENT REINVESTMENT ZONE NO. 1, CITY OF OAK RIDGE NORTH PRELIMINARY PROJECT PLAN AND REINVESTMENT ZONE FINANCING PLAN FOR PROPOSED TAX INCREMENT REINVESTMENT ZONE NO. 1, CITY OF OAK RIDGE NORTH DECEMBER 15, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Overview 1.1 Background...

More information