Ending the Bay Area Housing Crisis A Pathway for CASA

Transcription

1 Ending the Bay Area Housing Crisis A Pathway for CASA The Bay Area is in a moment of extreme housing crisis, and we have the opportunity to take bold steps that match the scale of this crisis or fail if we do not. High housing costs and low wages are driving low-income communities and residents of color from their homes throughout the Bay 1 2 Area; more than half of our residents have considered moving out of the region because of housing costs. This crisis hits some neighborhoods, low-income families, people of color, LGBTQ+ youth, seniors on fixed incomes, and other communities 3 especially hard, creating a new era of regional racial resegregation and impeding fair housing. Displacement separates people from their jobs and schools, forces low-income transit riders to switch to polluting cars, adds to congestion and impossible commutes, contributes to homelessness, creates health problems, and destroys community networks. The Metropolitan Transportation Commission's recently adopted Plan Bay Area 2040 is projected to exacerbate this situation, exposing 4 approximately 107,000 additional households to displacement risk. It is up to CASA and strategies included in Plan Bay Area s Action Plan to stem this tide. MTC s fix it first approach provides a model for how we should approach housing prioritize investments that address immediate concerns by protecting current residents, and then invest in future needs by preserving existing housing and producing new affordable housing. Stories of Displacement I've seen many families receive evictions and have to move to places where they don't know. This is especially impacting seniors and children. Our children are being uprooted and having to move from schools and leave their friends behind. - Reyna Gonzalez, a leader with Faith in Action Bay Area whose son and young granddaughters were forced to leave their community due to rising housing costs (2016 MTC/ABAG Regional Forum on Housing and Displacement). 1 San Francisco and San Mateo County data is based on ACS data; Alameda and Santa Clara County data is based on ACS data. All data has been adjusted for inflation. See the 2014 reports by the California Housing Partnership Corporation: How San Francisco County s Housing Market is Failing to Meet the Needs of Low-Income Families ; How Alameda County s Housing Market is Failing to Meet the Needs of Low-Income Families ; How San Mateo County s Housing Market is Failing to Meet the Needs of Low-Income Families ; and How Santa Clara County s Housing Market is Failing to Meet the Needs of Low-Income Families. 2 UC Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies. Release # : Half say housing affordability an extremely serious problem in their area. Majority have considered moving because of high housing costs, 25% out of state. Available at: 3 Urban Habitat s Race, Inequality, and the Resegregation of the Bay Area policy brief (November 2016) 4 MTC and ABAG estimate that 160,000 lower-income households living in priority development areas, transit priority areas, and high-opportunity areas are at risk of displacement, and that by 2040, 267,000 such households will be at risk. MTC/ABAG, Final Environmental Impact Report, at 2-410, 2-415, (July 2017), available at 1

2 "We know the history of segregation in our country and we see it now another cycle of segregation, moving people of color, particularly blacks, out of the city. - Theola Polk, a member leader with East Bay Housing Organizations who moved to Oakland to escape segregation in Arkansas (2016 MTC/ABAG Regional Forum on Housing and Displacement). Solutions That Keep People in Their Homes and Plan for The Future CASA presents an opportunity to create a new story for the Bay Area, a future where our region is characterized by equity, diversity and opportunity, and stable and affordable housing is a fundamental right. To do this, CASA must develop actionable political consensus around the 3 Ps Tenant Protections, Housing Preservation, and Affordable Housing Production. CASA should formally adopt, and pursue, the following goals: First, Protect People from Displacement Committing to strong tenant protections before moving on to other strategies is critical to stop the hemorrhaging of our communities and stem the tide of displaced people and families. 5 Protection Goal: Protect more than 450,000 low-income renter households 6 How? $400 million/year and adoption of incentives and requirements. 5 Zuk estimates that 311,476 low-income renter households live in neighborhoods that are at risk of gentrification or displacement, undergoing displacement, or in advanced gentrification or exclusion. Zuk estimates 669,211 low-income renter households in the nine-county region. More detail available at MTC and ABAG estimate that 160,000 lower-income households living in priority development areas, transit priority areas, and high-opportunity areas are at risk of displacement. MTC/ABAG, Final Environmental Impact Report, at 2-410, 2-415, (July 2017), available at 6 This number is a conservative estimate of the cost to provide legal counsel (approximately $60 million per year); rent control, just cause, and anti-harassment protections (approximately $92 million per year); tenant counseling, education, and outreach (approximately $25 million per year); relocation assistance (approximately $176 million per year); and rental assistance (approximately $35 million per year). Calculation based on data from cities of Oakland, San Francisco, Fremont, Alameda, Union City, and New York City, and Alameda County, the U.S. Census Bureau, and UC Berkeley s Urban Displacement Project. 2

3 Next, Preserve and Produce Affordable Housing Preservation and production are necessary strategies but take a long time to implement. We need to stop displacement of families and communities now. 7 Preservation Goal: Take 26,500 homes occupied by and affordable to low-income renters off the speculative market. 8 How? $500 million/year for 10 years and adoption of incentives and requirements. 9 Production Goal: Meet the region s need for 13,000 new affordable homes per year 10 How? $1.4 billion per year and adoption of incentives and requirements. 7 Miriam Zuk from UC Berkeley s Urban Displacement Project estimates that 166,500 low-income renter households in the Bay Area are not rent-burdened, and that the Bay Area has approximately 100,000 subsidized units, leaving approximately 66,500 units to be acquired, rehabbed, and preserved as affordable, drawing on American Community Survey data and subsidized housing data from HUD, TCAC, and USDA via California Housing Partnership Corporation. 8 Generating $5 billion, or $500 million per year for 10 years, would produce approximately $75,000 per unit, a very conservative estimate for the gap financing needed for acquisition and rehab. 9 The RHNA for for very low-, low- and moderate-income is 109,040, or 13,630 per year. The RHNA for very low- and low-income is 75,620, or 9,452 per year. ABAG, Regional Housing Need Plan: San Francisco Bay Area , at 5, available at 10 MTC and ABAG estimate a $1.4 billion gap for low- and moderate-income housing. MTC/ABAG, Plan Bay Area (adopted July 26, 2017), available at The San Francisco Foundation found a $1.45 billion gap for very low- and low-income housing. The San Francisco Foundation, Funding Affordable Housing Near Transit in the Bay Area, at 6 (May 2017), available at 3

4 Big Ideas for Tenant Protection Policies to help protect 800,000 low-income renters at-risk of displacement. Action Ideas Action supports which Key Goal? Time Frame for Implementation What will it take to get this action implemented? Measurable Outcomes Rating Scale Ideas should be big, high-impact ideas that can move the needle on the Bay Area housing crisis, and are within CASA s ability to influence or directly act upon. (Details may go in attachments, or via links) List more than one if applicable Protection Production Preservation Short-Term 0-2 years Med-Term 2-5 years Long-Term 5-10 years 1. Legislation 2. Regional Funding 3. Statewide Funding 6. Pilots & spreading Best-Practices 7. Other Add achievable outcomes if known. Reasonable guesses OK! 1 = Strongly Agree 2 = Agree but with reservations 3 = Neutral or Abstain 4 = Disagree, but will go along 5 = Strongly Disagree (circle one) 1. Adopt rent control and just cause protections for all Bay Area renter households: Rent stabilization prevents mass displacement by helping tenants stay and invest in their 11 communities. While nearly half of Bay Area neighborhoods are affected by gentrification, displacement, and exclusion, or at risk of these occurring, only nine Bay Area cities are covered Protection Short-Term 1. Legislation Protect all renter households: 1,192,000 households total 11 Tenants Together, Communities Thrive With Rent Control: A Guide for California Cities (2017) 4

5 by rent control/rent stabilization laws Repeal Costa-Hawkins: Costa-Hawkins severely undermines the ability of local jurisdictions to protect their residents by limiting rent control to multi-family buildings and buildings built before 1995, and allowing rents to skyrocket whenever tenants move (vacancy de-control). 3. Adopt right to free legal counsel for all low-income tenants facing eviction: Many low-income tenants lose their homes simply because they cannot afford the cost of legal counsel. Investing in legal counsel has been shown to save money by keeping 13 families from homelessness. Protection Short-Term 1. Legislation Protection Short Term 2/3. Local/Regional/State Funding Up to 459,000 Households (Currently Ineligible for Rent Control due to Costa Hawkins), if combined with Action Idea #1 (Universal Rent Control and Just Cause Eviction). Protect 24,000 Households a Year 4. Adopt universal relocation assistance and temporary rental assistance for low-income tenants: Relocation expenses, health emergencies, and other unexpected expenses sometimes make it Protection Short Term 1. Legislation 2/3. Local/Regional/State Funding Relocation Assistance for 20,000 Households Per Year 12 UC Berkeley Urban Displacement Project, Rent Control Policy Brief (2016), available at Richmond and Mountain View have passed policies since publication. 13 The New York Bar Association. The Financial Cost and Benefits of Establishing a Right to Counsel in Eviction Proceedings Under Intro 214-A. This study found that establishing a right to counsel would keep more than 5,000 families from homelessness every year, and save between $144 and $320 million annually. Available at: 5

6 impossible for many families to make rent. 5. Fund, implement, enforce, and educate tenants about new protections: Tenant protection policies need strong implementation, enforcement, and outreach efforts in order to be effective especially in communities that may not speak English, or among people who face deportation, discrimination, and other barriers. 6. Condition transportation and infrastructure funding to localities on adoption and implementation of strong tenant protection policies: MTC/ABAG have already created a successful program using transportation dollars to incentivize housing performance and have committed to exploring other opportunities in the Plan Bay Area Action Plan. Protection Short Term 1. Legislation 2. Regional Funding Protection Short Term 7. Reform Ellis Act Protection Short Term 1. Legislation 8. Prohibit discrimination based on Protection Short Term 1. Legislation Section 8, immigration status, or criminal history 9. Penalize real estate speculation (e.g., flipping and holding property Protection Short Term 1. Legislation Rental Assistance for 7,000 Households Per Year Tenant Counseling, Education and Outreach for 311,000 Households We can expect results similar or better than local jurisdiction compliance based on MTC s OBAG program depending on the strength of guidance. 6

7 empty for investment) through anti-speculation taxes or policies 10. Increase the minimum wage Protection Short Term 1. Legislation 11. Adopt anti-harrassment Protection Short Term 1. Legislation protections 12. Adopt proactive and Protection Short Term tenant-protective code enforcement 13. Adopt right of return for tenants displaced by construction or demolition 14. Strengthen fair housing laws and adopt affirmatively furthering fair housing obligation at the state level (AB 686) 15. Amend state law to require an anti-displacement strategy as part of local Housing Elements Protection Short Term 1. Legislation Protection Short Term 1. Legislation Protection Short Term 1. Legislation 7

8 Big Ideas for Affordable Housing Preservation Policies to help take 66,500 homes occupied by and affordable to low-income renters off the speculative market. Action Ideas Action supports which Key Goal? Time Frame for Implementation What will it take to get this action implemented? Measurable Outcomes Rating Scale Ideas should be big, high-impact ideas that can move the needle on the Bay Area housing crisis, and are within CASA s ability to influence or directly act upon. (Details may go in attachments, or via links) List more than one if applicable Protection Preservation Production Short-Term 0-2 years Med-Term 2-5 years Long-Term 5-10 years 1. Legislation 2. Regional Funding 3. Statewide Funding 6. Pilots & spreading Best-Practices 7. Other Add achievable outcomes if known. Reasonable guesses OK! 1 = Strongly Agree 2 = Agree but with reservations 3 = Neutral or Abstain 4 = Disagree, but will go along 5 = Strongly Disagree (circle one) 1. Provide funding for acquisition and rehabilitation of housing occupied by, and still affordable to, low-income renters to take such housing off the speculative market: Nearly half of Bay Area neighborhoods are affected by gentrification, displacement, and exclusion, or at risk of these occurring. Preserving housing that is still affordable helps current tenants stay in their communities. As part of this, create a regional rapid-approval acquisition fund similar to TOAH to Preservation Med-Term 2. Regional Funding 3. Statewide Funding Generate $500 million/year for 10 years to take 66,500 homes occupied by and affordable to low-income renters off the speculative market. 8

9 facilitate the rapid acquisition of existing housing that is currently affordable. Pre-qualify developers and other borrower entities so that funding can be approved and closed fast enough to compete in the market. 2. Condition transportation and infrastructure funding to localities on adoption and implementation of strong preservation policies and programs: MTC/ABAG have already created a successful program using transportation dollars to incentivize housing performance and have committed to exploring other opportunities in the Plan Bay Area Action Plan. 3. Adopt 1-for-1 replacement requirements for any loss or conversion of existing rental housing: Examples include demolition, condominium conversion, SRO conversion, mobile home parks, and Ellis Act. Replacement housing should not count towards inclusionary requirements or other affordable housing requirements. Preservation Short-Term Preservation Short-Term 1. Legislation We can expect results similar or better than local jurisdiction compliance based on MTC s OBAG program depending on the strength of guidance. 4. Support community ownership property models (e.g., community land trusts) through dedicated funding 5. Limit unhosted short-term rentals in every jurisdiction: Unhosted Preservation Short Term 2. Regional Funding 3. Statewide Funding Preservation Short-Term 1. Legislation All jurisdictions adopt an 9

10 short-term rentals remove housing from the regular rental market, further exacerbating the shortage of affordable housing. 6. All jurisdictions adopt first right of refusal for nonprofits and tenants to purchase naturally occurring affordable housing (with funding strategy): Gives nonprofits and tenants (with right to assign) a first right to purchase on any sale of a non-condo multi-family residential building for the purposes of creating permanently affordable, deed-restricted housing. Preservation Short-Term 1. Legislation 2. Regional Funding 3. Statewide Funding ordinance limiting unhosted short-term rentals. 10

11 Big Ideas for Affordable Housing Production Policies to help keep people in place through the increased production of affordable housing, access to good 14 jobs, and local adoption of anti-displacement policies. Action Ideas Action supports which Key Goal? Time Frame for Implementation What will it take to get this action implemented? Measurable Outcomes Rating Scale Ideas should be big, high-impact ideas that can move the needle on the Bay Area housing crisis, and are within CASA s ability to influence or directly act upon. (Details may go in attachments, or via links) List more than one if applicable Protection Preservation Production Short-Term 0-2 years Med-Term 2-5 years Long-Term 5-10 years 1. Legislation 2. Regional Funding 3. Statewide Funding 6. Pilots & spreading Best-Pract 7. Other Add achievable outcomes if known. Reasonable guesses OK! 1 = Strongly Agree 2 = Agree but with reservations 3 = Neutral or Abstain 4 = Disagree, but will go along 5 = Strongly Disagree (circle one) 1. Generate funding for production of new affordable housing, with a particular emphasis on housing affordable to very-low and low-income households Production Med-Term 1. Legislation: Lower the voter approval threshold for new housing ballot measures to 55% 2. Regional funding: a) Require that all new major regional transportation funding sources (such as the regional mega-measure) provide substantial direct funding to affordable housing especially Generate $1.4 billion/year for the Bay Area to produce 13,000 new affordable homes per year. 14 Submitted in partnership with NPH. 11

12 transit-oriented affordable housing b) Create regional source(s) of funding (could be funded through a regional jobs-housing linkage fee, transfer taxes on high-end properties above a certain value, regional tax on vacant land, a regional parcel tax similar to Measure AA, regional ballot measure) c) Adopt measures to encourage all local jurisdictions to incentivize and fund affordable housing (e.g., a local housing impact fee, commercial linkage fee, rentals gross receipts tax, or tax on second homes/pieds-a-terre, housing overlay zones) d) Create a ~$1 billion regional affordable housing catalyst and innovation fund with participation of local tech corporations (acquisition, tax credit equity and soft debt) 3. Statewide Funding: a) Build on the success of SB 2 and create a permanent source of state-level funding that generates Redevelopment-level funds for the state each year ($1 billion+ per year); 12

13 2. Condition transportation and infrastructure funding to localities on adoption and implementation of strong affordable housing production policies and programs: MTC/ABAG have already created a successful program using transportation dollars to incentivize housing performance and have committed to exploring other opportunities in the Plan Bay Area Action Plan. 3. Use existing funding innovatively by creating a Regional Infill Infrastructure Bank funded by using Bay Area Toll Authority s (BATA) hard reserves to write down costs associated with housing development b) Secure affordable housing funding for operating subsidies and services to reach extremely low-income households, including low-wage workers and people on fixed incomes;) Production Short-Term a) Provide additional transportation, infrastructure, and school funding to jurisdictions that produce more affordable units b) Condition transportation funding on building more affordable units and being in compliance with all relevant state laws including having the appropriate zoning and density in place for housing sites c) Create financial disincentives (loss of transportation funds, parks funding, etc.) for jurisdictions that have denied affordable housing permit applications as measured by required annual housing element progress reports through AB 879. Production Med-Term 2. Regional Funding: Advocate for MTC to create the I-bank and simultaneously advocate for a 50% match from the California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank now that AB We can expect results similar or better than local jurisdiction compliance based on MTC s OBAG program depending on the strength of guidance. 13

14 for 100% affordable housing projects and mixed-income projects 56 has made housing infrastructure as a permitted use. 4. Adopt rental housing inclusionary zoning ordinances or impact fees in every jurisdiction based on which measure will produce the most units at the deepest level of affordability with access to opportunity: AB 1505 now permits inclusionary zoning on rental housing, but localities still have to adopt it. Production Short-Term : a) Condition receipt of regional transportation funding on adopting inclusionary zoning requirements so that all cities are competing on even footing. Every jurisdiction adopts an inclusionary zoning ordinance for rental housing or a housing impact fee, creating thousands of new 15 affordable units. 5. CASA recommendations should move forward only if based on evaluation of whether they facilitate meeting RHNA objectives for very-low, low-, or moderate income households and further the goal of achieving a Jobs-Housing Fit by affordability levels proportional to the expected jobs growth by worker wages and income. Production Short-Term 1. Legislation : Establish state and regional incentives and disincentives to promote more balanced approval of housing at appropriate income levels relative to jobs created (jobs-housing fit): a) Establish priority for state and regional transportation funding for jurisdictions that are making measurable progress towards improving their jobs-housing fit b) Consider loss of eligibility for regional transportation funding/projects if a jurisdiction has a jobs-to-housing ratio beyond #. 15 In San Jose alone, for example, it s estimated that the city lost out on the creation of 2,400 new affordable homes due to the Palmer decision. Ron Gonzales & David Kramer, Inclusionary Housing Law Will Create More Affordable Units, The Mercury News, Aug. 31, 2017, 14

15 6. Use public land for affordable housing: All local jurisdictions, other public agencies (e.g., school districts, special districts, etc.) and transit agencies prioritize affordable housing when selling or leasing public land. Strengthen the Surplus Land Act to prioritize public land for affordable housing. Refer to detailed recommendations on this topic as developed by the GCC Public Lands Working Group and presented on 12/13. Production Short-Term 1. Legislation 7. Promote local, regional, and state programs to make it more difficult for landholders to keep and hold vacant and underutilized land. Production Short-Term 1. Legislation 8. Reform RHNA through state legislation to make sure it takes into account jobs-housing balance and fair access to communities of opportunity 9. Promote land value recapture to use the incremental land value generated by zoning and height changes, and parking reductions to fund affordable housing Production Short-Term 1. Legislation Production Short-Term 1. Regional funding 15

16 10. Adopt a new update to MTC s TOD Policy (Resolution 3434) that provides a comprehensive and inclusive vision for growth in the Bay Area and sets new baseline standards for eligibility for new major transportation investments to promote the 3Ps. 11. Require labor harmony and card check neutrality for jobs sited on affordable housing development that utilizes public lands or subsidies and jobs sited on any housing or mixed-use development including housing or hotels that utilizes public lands or subsidies 12. State, regional, and local affordable housing funding maintains prevailing wage and apprentice hiring ratios and includes targeted hiring provisions for disadvantaged community members. Include requirements for prevailing wage, skilled and trained workforce, apprentice hiring, and targeted hiring provisions on streamlined developments (that are not 100% affordable housing). 13. On large-scale commercial or mixed-use developments, require Community Benefits Agreements that pay prevailing wage, hire apprentices, target disadvantaged and local Production Short-Term 5. Regulatory Reform Production Short-Term 1. Legislation Production Short-Term 1. Legislation Production Short-Term 7. Other 16

17 workers for constructions jobs and provide labor harmony and card check neutrality for operations jobs, include affordable housing, and provide other community-identified needs. 14. Use specific plans to streamline the approval process by linking density, height and parking reductions to provision of affordable housing Production Short-Term 1. Legislation This document was prepared by a number of organizations in collaboration with the 6 Wins for Social Equity Network and The San Francisco Foundation. For questions, please reach out to Lynsey Gaudioso ( lgaudioso@publicadvocates.org ) or Mashael Majid ( mashael@urbanhabitat.org ). 17