ORDINANCE NO. 't z. 51 AN ORDINA"ICE OF THE CITY OF ISSAQUAH,

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "ORDINANCE NO. 't z. 51 AN ORDINA"ICE OF THE CITY OF ISSAQUAH,"

Transcription

1 e e DLF/aaf 1011/98 R: I 0/22/98aaf R:4/20/99 R: 11/29/99 ORDINANCE NO. 't z. 51 AN ORDINA"ICE OF THE CITY OF ISSAQUAH, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING, LAND USE AND loning, PARK IMPACT FEES, SPECIFICALLY PROVIDING FOR THE IMPOSITON OF PARK IMPACT FEES, EXEMPTIONS, PROGRAM ELEMENTS, FEE CALCULATION, FEE ADJUSTMENTS, FEE ACCOUNTS, REFUNDS, AND A"I APPEALS PROCESS, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE A PARK IMPACT FEE RATE STUDY, AND ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 18. i 7 TO THE ISSAQUAH LAND USE CODE, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, RCW through , authorize local jurisdictions subject to the Growth Management Act to adopt and enforce ordinances for the imposition and collection of impact fees as pan of the financing of public facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the finds that adequate park facilities should be provided to serve the demand generated from new Development in the City; and WHEREAS, to ensure that adequate park facilities are available to accommodate expected growth when needed, the Council recognizes the cost of new park facilities must be shared by the public and private sectors, and a Proportionate Share of the expense of adequate park facilities necessitated by the impacts of new development should be borne by applicants JßT417256,()()( ': 1.' /90000: - 1 -

2 .. through thc imposition of park impact fccs as authorized by the Growth Managcmcnt Act and RCW 82.0, ; and WHEREAS, the measures adopted through this ordinance are dcsigned to meet these requirements. The measures are further designed to cnsure that Lcvels of Service for park facilities are not degraded below the standards adopted in the Comprehensive Plan by the approval of a Development Pemiit. WHEREAS, an organized framework must be adopted for the determination and analysis of the park impact fees to partialiy fund park facilities necessitated by new Development. and to aliow the imposition and coliection of those fecs by the City pursuant to the Growth Management Act and ali other applicable law; WHEREAS, the rates for Park Impact Fees are based on the Park Impact Fee Rate Study, completed by Henderson, Young and, dated November 22, 1999, and WHEREAS, the adopted a Comprehensive Plan in Ordinance 2061 pursuant to the requirements of the State Growth Management Act, which Comprehenseive Plan was amended concurrently with the adoption of this ordinance, and Level of Service standards are included in the Plan; NOW. THEREFORE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ISSAQCAH, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section i. Title 18 of the Issaquah Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding a new Chapter 18. I 7, entitled "Park Impact Fees," to read as foliows: Chapter Park Impact Fees Findings and Purpose Definitions Fec Imposed, Applicability ~JBT 41725fJ.()()( '; \:' Ji90000n: - 2-

3 , Exemptions Park Impact Fce Program Elemcnts Fce Calculation Mcthods Fee Collection Fee Adjustments Park Impact Fee Accounts and Refunds Processing Other Authority Appeals Findinl!s and Purpose. The City Council of the finds and detcrniines that growth and development activity in the City will create additional demand and need for Park Facilities in the City, and the Council finds that growth and development activity should pay a proportionate share of thc cost of such facilitics necdcd to serve the growth and developmcnt activity. Thercforc, pursuant to thc Growth Management Act (Chapter 36.70A RCW), and RCW 82, through RCW I 00, which authorize cities to impose and collect impact fees to partially fund public facilities to accommodate new growth, the Council adopts this chapter to impose Park Impact Fees for Park and Rccreational Facilities. Thc provisions of this chapter shall be libcrally construcd in order to carry out thc purposcs of the Council in establishing Park Impact Fees Definitions. I. Affordablc Housing: Housing is considered "affordable" to a family if it costs no more than thirty (30) pcrccnt of thc family's income. The income groups that are the focus of affordable housing are thc low and moderate income families. (a) Low Income group: A family earning bctween zcro (0) and fifty (50) pcrccnt of the King County Median Household Income. (b) Moderatc Income group: A family earning betwccn fifty (50) percent and eighty (80) pcrcent of the King County Median Household Income. "Median incomc" means the mcdian income for the Seattle MSA (King County), as most reccntly deterniined by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) undcr Scction 8(1)(3) of the United Statcs Housing Act of 1937, as amended, or if programs under said Scction 8(1)(3) are terminated, median income determined under the method used by thc Secretary prior to such termination. 2. Average Unfunded Cost: That portion of the average cost of facilities which the City cannot foreseeably finance from any and all public revenue sources available to it based on a PBT (XX';l :OOOIO_120013,'l)I)()Ooo: - 3 -

4 .. multi-year fiscal projection found in the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan, 3. Capital Facilities Element: That Capital Facilities Plan adopted by the City Council as part of the City's Comprehensive Plan, and its amendments. 4. Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan adopted by Ordinance No on April 17, 1995, including any adopted amendments. 5. Conditions of Approval: As they apply to Park Impact Fee evaluations, those conditions necessary to ensure that the proposed Development wil not cause the Level of Service for parks to fall below the standards adopted in the Comprehensive Plan, The Conditions of Approval shall be binding upon the approval of any pemiit application for which this chapter is applicable as described in Section 18, I Development: Any construction, reconstruction or expansion of a building. structure, or use, any change in use of a building or stnicture or any changes in the use of land, that requires review and approval of a Development Permit. 7. Development Permit: Includes, but is not limited to, a Building Permit, Administrative Site Development Permit, Site Development Permit, Short Plat Application, Preliminary Plat Application, or Project Rezone Applicaiion, or any written authorization from the City which authorizes the commencement of Development. 8. Director: The Director of the Planning Department, or hislher designee. 9. Financial Commitment: Any form of binding and enforceable financial obligation that is acceptable to the City, and provided to the City at the time of Development approval. 10. Park and Recreational Facilities: Those capital facilities identified as Park and Recreational Facilities in any of the following documents: a) the Capital Facilities Element of the City of Issaquah Comprehensive Plan; b) the Parks, Open Space and Recreation Element of the Comprehensive Plan; and c) the Parks Impact Fee Rate Study dated November 22, 1999, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated hercin by reference as if set forth in full. -:J81' D()( '; 1/ /1)00000: - 4-

5 Park Impact Fee: The payment of money imposcd upon development as a condition of approval of a Development Permit to pay for public facilities needed to serve new growth and development. and that is reasonably related to the new development that creates additional demand and need for facilities, that is a proportionate share of the costs of the facilities, and that is used for facilities that reasonably benefit the new development. "Park Impact Fee" does not include a reasonable permit or application fee. 12. Level of Service (LOS): The relationship between Park Facilities and service provision within the City, as specified in the City's Comprehensive Plan, 13. Proportionate Share: That portion of the cost of public facility improvements and facilities that are reasonably related to the service demands and needs of new Development. The proportionate share will be calculated by the meihods required by RCW , and as set forth in the Parks Impact Fee Rate Study attached hereto as Exhibit A. and hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth in full. 14. Service Area: The geographical area in which a defined set of Park Facilities provide service to Development within the area. For the purposcs of this ordinance the Service Area shall be the entire area within the city limits of Issaquah Fee imposed. ApplicabiItv. There is imposed, and shall be collected, from every person who applies for a Development Permit, a Park Impact Fee for each new dwelling unit proposed in the following amounts: Single Family Unit = $3, Multi-Family Unit = $2, The provisions of this chapter apply to all applications for Development Permits made on, and after the effective date of this ordinance Exemptions. The following Developments are exempt from the requirements of this chapter: i. Affordable Housing: An applicant proposing a Development of Affordable Housing, which includes low and moderate income, as defined in Section , shall not be assessed a Park Impact Fee as follows: pat'l f)()(': i ':0001 D. I : L - 5.

6 ~ - a) As a condition of receiving an exemption under this section, the owner shall execute and record in King County's real property title records a City-drafted lien, covenant, or other contractual provision against the property that provides that the proposed housing unit or Development will continue to be used for low or moderate income housing and remain affordable to those households for a penod of not less than 30 years. The lien, covenant, or other contractual provision shall run with the land and apply to subsequent owners and assigns in the event thai the housing unit(s) are exempted. b) Any claim or request for an exemption under this section shall be made no later than the time of application for a building permit. If a building permit is not required for the Development. then the claim shall be made when the first Development Permit is applied for. Any claim not made when required by this section shall be deemed waived. 2. Development Impact Fee Accessory Units: An applicant proposing the of an accessory unit shall not be assessed a Park 3. Change of Use: An applicant proposing a Development involving a change of use and/or structure that has no greater impact than the existing use shall not be assessed a Park Impact Fee. 4. City Proiects: An applicant proposing the Development of a City Project shall not be assessed a Park Impact Fee. 5. Home Occupations: An applicant proposing the Development of a Home Occupation shall not be assessed a Park Impact Fee. 6. Pending Development Pemiit: An applicant shall not be assesscd a Park Impact Fee if one or morc of the following has occurred: I) the City and applicant have signed a park mitigation agreemcnt for the Developmcnt at issue pnor to the effective date of this Ordinance; or 2) the applicant has already provided, or been required to provide as a condition of approval, park mitigation for the Developmcnt at issue pnor to the effectivc date of this Ordinance; or 3) the applicant has submitted a complete building permit application, as defined by the Land Use Code (lmc 18.02), prior to the effective date of this Ordinance; or 4) the applicant has already been assessed a Park Impact Fee for the same Development. 1)ßT4 I 7256_0()('~ i :' :900000: - 6-

7 Park Impact Fee Proiiram Elements. A. Thc City shall impose and collcct Park Impact Fees on every Development Pennit within the Service Area, except as provided in , Exemptions. B. Any Park Impact Fee imposed shall be reasonably related to the impact caused by the new Devclopment and shall not exceed a Proportionate Share of the cost of Park and Recreational Facilities that are reasonably related to the new Development. C. Thc Park Impact Fee imposed may include costs for Park and Recreational Facility improvements previously incurred by the City to the extent that new Dcvelopment will be served by the previously constructed improvements provided that such fee shall not be imposed to correct any system improvement deficiencies. D. The Park Impact Fee imposed for any Development shall be calculated and determined by the procedures established by this ordinance and based on the methods set forth in the Parks Impact Fcc Rate Study in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full E. In computing the fee applicable to a given Development, credit shall be given for the fair market value, measured at the time of dedication, for any dedication of land for, improvements to, or new construction of any Park and Recreational Facilities that are idcntified in the Capital Facilities Element and that arc required by the City as a condition of approving thc Development. F. Park Impact Fees shall be used for Park and Recreational Facilities that will reasonably benefit the new Development, and only those Park and Recreational Facilities addressed by the City's Capital Facilities Element of the Comprchensive Plan Fee Calculation Methods. All data and other information necessary to determine impact fee amounts will be madc available to the public upon request. Data such as park needs, and facility improvement projects and costs, and related fee schedules will be updated as necessary. Forms and procedures will be established administratively Fee Collection. At the time of application for a Building Permit, the Park Impact Fee shall be calculated based on the Park Impact Fee schedule established in the Park Impact Fee Rate Study in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by rcference as if set forth in full. No Building Permit shall be issued until the impact fee has bccn paid in full by the applicant, provided pbt'l i 7256_IX J( '; 1 :'QOO 1 1I ;llOfX)(X) L - 7-

8 .. that, payment of fees may be phased if the Building Permits for the Development are also phased. The Park Impact Fee shall be collected by the City, and maintained in a separate account, as required by Section Park Impact Fees may be paid under protest in order to obtain a Building Permit Fee Adjustments. A. Fees calculated by the City may be adjusted by the Director, in any of the following circumstances: 1. The applicant demonstrates that a Park Impact Fee assessment was improperly calculated; or 2, The applicant provides studies and data that. when considered, suggest that adjustment of the fee would be appropriate; or 3. Unusual circumstances exist which, when considered, suggest that imposition of the standard fee would be unfair. B. Any appeal of the decision of the City with regard to Park Impact Fee amounts shall follow the process for the appeal of the underlying Development Permit, as set forth in the Issaquah Land Use Code, and Section Park Impact Fee Accounts and Refunds. A. Park Impact Fee receipts shall be earmarked specifically and retained in a special interest bearing account established by the City solely for Park Impact Fees. All interest shall be retained in the account and expended for the purpose or purposes for which said fees were imposed. Annually, the City shall prepare a report on the source and amount of all Park Impact Fees collected, interest earncd, and the Park and Recreational Facilities that were financed in whole or in part by said fees. B. Park Impact Fees shall be expended by the City only in conformance with the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. C. Park Impact Fees shall be expended or encumbered by the City for a permissible use within six (6) years of receipt by the City, unless there exists an extraordinary or compelling reason for fees to be held longer than (6) years. Such extraordinary or compelling reasons shall be identificd in written findings by thc City. jjbt'll 7256.!))l',lmOO :900000: - 8 -

9 .. D. The current owner of property on which a Park Impact Fce has been paid may receive a refund of such fees if the City fails to expend or encumber the fees within six (6) years of receipt of the fees by the City on Park Facilities intended to benefit the Development for whieh said fees were paid. In determining whether Park Impact Fees have been encumbered, such fees shall be considered encumbered on a first in, first out basis. The City shall noti fy potential claimants by first-class mail deposited with the United States postal service at the last known address of the claimants. E. An owner's request for a refund must be submitted to the City in writing within one (1) year of the date the right to claim the refund arises or the date that notice is given, whichever date is laer. Any Park Impact Fees that are not expended or encumbered by the City in conforniance with the Capital Facilities Element within these time limitations, and for which no application for a refund has been made within this one (1) year period, shall bc retained and expended consistent with the provisions of this section. Refunds of Park Impact Fees shall include interest earned on such fees. F. Should the City seek to terminate any or all Park Impact Fcc requirements, all unexpended or unencumbered funds, including interest earned, shall be refunded pursuant to this section. Upon the finding that any or all fee requirements are to be tcrniinated, the City shall place notice of such termination and availability of refunds in a newspaper of general circulation at least two times and shall notify all potential claimants by first-class mail to the last known address of claimants. All funds available for refund shall be retained for a period of one (I) year. At the end of one (i) year, any remaining funds shall be retained by the City, and must be expended by the City consistent with the provisions of this chapter. The notice requirements set forth above shall not apply if there arc no unexpended or unencumbered balances within the account or accounts being terminated. G. An applicant may request and shall reccive a refund, including interest earned on the Park Impact Fees, when: 1. The applicant does not proceed to finalize the Development; and 2. No impact on the City has resulted. "Impact" shall be deemed to include cases where the City has expended or encumbered the Park Impact Fees in good faith prior to the application for refund. In the event that the City has expended or :mt417256, D()( '; 1 ((1001 o. i 2001.PJOOOOO: - 9-

10 .. cncumbered the fecs in good faith, no rcfund shall be forthcoming. However, within a period of three (3) years, the same or subsequent owner of the property proceeds with the same or substantially similar development activity, the owner shall be eligible for a credit. The owner must petition the City and provide receipts of Park Impact Fees paid by the owner for a Development of the same or substantially similar nature on the same property or some portion thereof. The City shall delennine whether to grant a credit, and such detenninations may bc appealed by following the procedures set forth in Section H. Interest due upon the refund of Park Impact Fees required by this chapter shall be calculatcd according to the average rate received by the City on invested funds throughout the period during which the fces were retained ProcessInl!. applicable Park Impact Fees Development Pennit. The City shall as a nonnal part detennine any of proccssing a Other Authoritv. Nothing in this ordinance is intended to limit the City's authority under thc State Environmental Policy Act or any other source Appeals. Any detennination of the Park Impact Fee amount, decision to approve, condition or deny a Development proposal based on the requircments of this chapter may be appealed according to the appcal procedure for the underlying Development Pemiit or approval involved, as set forth in thc Issaquah Land Use Code. An applicant of a Development Pennit may pay the Park Impact Fees imposed by this chapter under protcst in order to obtain thc approval for the Dcvelopment and/or Development Pennit. No appeal shall be pennitted unlcss and until thc Park Impact Fees at issue have been paid. ljbt do(', i / /90000 I - 10-

11 .. Section 2. Severability Clause. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 3. Effective Date Clause. This ordinance or a summary thereof consisting of the title shall be published in the offcial newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five (5) days after publication. J)~,1999. Passed by the City Council of the, the t, -r day of Approved by the Mayor of the the M~, APPROVED: l ý I " 1(".-'.1:': i),1 AVA FRISINGER, MAYOR l' z; day of ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: ~ t~ Cl Y CLERK, LINDA RUEHLE APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: BY~.~~ FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: /1-'1' rr I'/ - (. - 'f 7 (l. -is -'1'1 ljßt ix)(',i:'oou '900000f

12 e. EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. 2- ~~7 1?'i!C'r( ljbt IX)( ':1/ / : - 12-

13 .. Exhibit A to Ordinance No RATE STUDY FOR IMPACT FEES FOR PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES (1999 Inventory Level of Service) CITY OF ISSAQUAH, WASHINGTON Final Report '" November 22, 1999 r Heerson

14 .. TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''.".,,."..,."...".,,,..,,,,,,,,...,,,,.."....,,,,,,,.,."" Statutory Basis and Methodology"""""""""""."""."""""""."""""""""""".""".".."." 4 2, Level of Service Standard..""""".",,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,,..,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,,,,.,,...,,,,,,,,,,""""""'" i 2 3, Park and Recreational Facilily Needs ",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"""'"'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' 15 4, Impact Fees """""'"'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''',..".""".""."",...,19 Appendix A: Per Person Ratios for Parks and Recreational Facilities""""""""""",,2 i Appendix B: Costs of Parks and Recreational Faciiities"""".""""""""."",,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,23 Appendix C: Deficiency or Reserve Capacily of Parks and Recreation Facilities.25

15 .. Executive Summary The purpose of this study is to establish the rates for impact fees for parks and recreation facilities in the, Washington. Rates The rates for impact fees for park land and recreation facilities are: Type Dwellinçi Unit Impact Fee Single Family Multi-Family $3,147 $2,189 Impact Fees VS. Other Developer Contributions Impact fees are charges paid by new development to reimburse local governments for the capital cost of public facilities that are needed to serve new development and the people who occupy or use the new development. Throughout this study the term "developer" is used as a shorthand expression to describe anyone who Is obligated to pay impact fees, including builders, owners or developers. The impact fees that are described in this study do not Include any other forms of developer contributions or exactions, such as mitigation or voluntary payments authorized by SEPA (the State Environmental Policy Act, RCW 43,21C), system development charges for water and sewer authorized for utilities (RCW for municipalities, for sewer districts, and for water districts), local Improvement districts or other special assessment districts, linkage fees, or land donations or fees in lieu of land. ADJUSTMENTS FOR OTHER SOURCES OF REVENUE FOR PARK LAND AND RECREATION FACILITIES The Impact fees In this study recognize the existence of other sources of revenue that are available to pay for the capital cost of park land and recreation facilities, These other revenues are accounted for by adjustlng Q,e" reducing) the cost of capital Investment for parks and recreational facilities to account for the portion of costs that are paid by the other sources of revenue. CREDITS FOR OTHER CONTRIBUTIONS BY DEVELOPER A developer who contributes land, improvements or other assets may receive a.credlt' which reduces the amount of Impact fee that Is due, This credit is in additlon to the adjustment for other revenues described In the preceding paragraph, Henderson. 199 Inventory Level of Servce November 22, 199 Page 1

16 . Park Impact Fee Rate Study. WHO PAYS IMPACT FEES Impact fees are paid by new development. Impact fee rates for new development are based on the type of land use: residential. retail. office, commercial, industrial and other types of new construction, Due to the statutory requirement regarding the relationship between impact fees and the development that pays-and benefits from--the fees, only new residential development (Le" houses. apartments, mobile home parks, and other residential construction) is charged impact fees for parks and recreational facilities. Nonresidential new development is not charged park and recreational facilities impact fees, as explained In Chapter 1. SERVICE AREAS FOR IMPACT FEES Impact fees in some jurisdictions are collected and expended within senice areas that are smaller than the jurisdiction that is collecting the fees. Impact fees are not required to use senlce areas unless such 'zones" are necessary to establish the relationship between the fee and the development. Park land and recreation facilities impact fees are collected and expended throughout the boundaries of the because of the compact configuration of the City and the accessibility of its park system to all residences, TIMING OF PAYMENT OF IMPACT FEES Impact fees are usually collected at the time the local government issues a permit or order allowing land to be developed. in the impact fees are calculated at the time the an application is submitted for a building permit. Impact fees are collected at the time the building permit is issued. USES OF IMPACT FEE REVENUE Impact fee revenue wii be used for the capital cost of public facilties, Impact fees cannot be used for operating or maintenance expenses. The cost of public facilites that can be paid for by impact fees Include park and facilties planning, land.acqulsltion. site Improvements. necessary off-site improvements. construction, engineering. architectural, permitting. financing. and administrative expenses, applicable Impact fees or mitigation costs, and capital equipment pertaining to park land and recreation facilties. The public facilties that can be paid for by impact fees are "system Improvements" (which are typically outside the development "and designed to provide senice to senice areas wiin the communhy at large" as provided Ìl RCW (9)). as opposed to "project Improvements" (which are typically provided by the developer on-site witin the development or adjacent to the development "and designed to provide senlce for a particular development project and that are necessary for the use and convenience of the occupants or users of the project' as provided in RCW 82,02.050(6). Henderson, 199 Inventory Level of Service November Page 2

17 . Park Impact Fee Rate Study. EXPENDITURE REQUIREMENTS FOR IMPACT FEES Impact fees must be spent on capital projects contained In an adopted capital facilties plan, or they can be used to reimburse the government for the unused capacity of existing facilities, Impact fee payments that are not expended within 6 years must be refunded, In order to verify these two requirements, impact fee revenues must be deposited Into separate accounts of the government. and annual reports must describe revenue and expenditures, DEVELOPER OPTIONS A developer who is liable for impact fees has several options regarding impact fees. The developer can submit data and or/analysis to demonstrate that the Impacts of the proposed development are less than the impacts calculated in this rate study, The developer can appeal the impact fee calculation by the City of Issaquah, If the local government falls to expend the impact fee payments within 6 years of receipt of such payments, the developer can obtain a refund of the Impact fees. The developer can also obtain a refund if the development does not proceed and no Impacts are created. ORGANIZATION OF THE STUDY Chapter 1 summarizes the statutory basis for developing impact fees, discusses Issues, and presents the methodology and formulas for determining the amount of the impact fee. Chapter 2 describes and documents the level of service standard for the parks and recreational facilities which is measured by the amount of capital Investment per person. Chapter 3 documents the value of parks and recreational facilities that are needed to serve growth that Is forecast. in Issaquah, net of any existing reserves and/or any Cit investment In parks and recreational facilties. Chapter 4 documents the growth cost per person and calculates the impact fee per dwellng unit, Appendix A documents the per person ratios of park land and recreational facilties, Appendix B documents the cost per unit of capacity of park land and recreational facilties, Appendix C documents the need for park land and recreational facilities using categories specified In RCW 82,02.050(4). Henderson, 199 Inventory Level of Service November 22, 199 Page 3

18 . Park Impact Fee Rate Study _ 1. Statutory Basis and Methodology Local governments charge Impact fees for several reasons: 1) to obtain revenue to pa for some of the cost of new public facilities; 2) to implement a public policy that new development should poy a portion of the cost of facilities that It requires. and that existing development should not pay all of the cost of such facilities; and 3) to assure that adequate public facilities will be constructed to serve new development. This study of impact fees for park iand and recreation facilities for Issaquah, Washington describes the methodology that is used to develop the fees. presents the formulas, variables and data that are the basis for the fees. and documents the calculation of the fees. The methodology is designed to comply with the requirements of Washington State Law, STATUTORY BASIS FOR IMPACT FEES The Growth Management Act of 1990 created RCW 82, ,090 to authorizes local governments in Washington to charge impact fees. and provide specific requirements for impact fees. The impact fees that are described in this study are not mitigation payments authorized by the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). There are several important differences between impact fees and SEPA mitigations, Two aspects of Impact fees that are particularly noteworthy are: 1) the ability to charge for the cost of public facilities that are "system improvements" (I.e., that provide service to the community at large) as opposed to "project improvements" (which are "on-site" and provide service for a particular development); and 2) the abilit to charge small-scale development their proportionate share, whereas SEPA exempts small developments, The following synopsis of the most significant requirements of the law includes citations to the Revised Code of Washington as an aid to readers who wish to review the exact language of the statutes, TYPES OF PUBLIC FACILITIES Four types of public facilties can be the subject of Impact fees: 1) public streets and roads; 2) publicly owned parks, open space and recreation facilities; 3) school facilities; and 4) fire protection facilties On jurisdictions that are not part of a fire district). RCW (2) and (4), and RCW 82.02,09(7) Henderson, 199 Inventory Level of Servce November 22, 199 Page 4

19 . Park Impact Fee Rate Study. TYPES OF IMPROVEMENTS Impact fees can be spent on "system Improvements" (which are fypicafly outside the development). as opposed to "project improvements" (which are fypicafly provided by the developer on-site witin the development), RCW (3)(0) and RCW (6) and (9) BENEFIT TO DEVELOPMENT Impact fees must be limited to system improvements that are reasonably related to, and which wil benefit new development, RCW 82.02,050(3)(0) and (c), Local governments must establish reasonable service areas (one area. or more than one. as determined to be reasonable by the local government). and local governments must develop impact fee rate categories for various land uses, RCW (6) PROPORTIONATE SHARE Impact fees cannot exceed the development's proportionate share of system improvements that are reasonably related to the new development. The impact fee amount shall be based on a formula (or other method of calculating the fee) that determines the proportionate share. RCW 82.02,050(3)(b) and RCW (7) REDUCTIONS OF IMPACT FEE AMOUNTS Impact fees rates must be adjusted to account for other revenues that the development pays Of such payments are earmarked for or proratable to particular system improvements), RCW 82.02,050(7)(c) and (2) and RCW (7)(b) Impact fees may be credited for the value of dedicated land. Improvements or construction provided by the developer Of such facilities are In the adopted CFP and are required as a condition of development approval), RCW (3) EXEMPTIONS FROM IMPACT FEES Local governments have the discretion to provide exemptions from Impact fees for low-income housing and other "broad public purpose" development. but all such exemptions must be paid from pubflc funds (other than Impact fee accounts). RCW (2) DEVELOPER OPTIONS Developers who are flable for impact fees can submit data and or/analysis to demonstrate that the Impacts of the proposed development are less than the Impacts calculated In this rate study. RCW (5). Developers can pa Henderson, 199 Inventory Level of Service November Page 5

20 . Park Impact Fee Rate Study. impact fees under protest and appeal Impact fee calculations. RCW (4) and RCW (4) and (5). The developer can obtain a refund of the Impact fees If the local government falls to expend the Impact fee payments witin 6 years. or terminates the Impact fee requirement. or the developer does not proceed with the development (and creates no impacts), RCW CAPITAL FACILITIES PLANS Impact fees must be expended on public facilities In a capital facilities pian (CFP) element (or used to reimburse the government for the unused capacity of existing facilities), The CFP must conform with the Growth Management Act of and must identify existing deficiencies in facilty capacity for current development. capacity of existing facilities available for new development. and additional facility capaciiy needed for new deveiopment. RCW (4). RCW 82,02,060(7). and RCW 82.02,070(2) NEW VERSUS EXISTING FACILITIES Impact fees can be charged for new public facilities (RCW 82,02.060(1)(a)). and for the unused capacity of existing public facilities (RCW 82,02.060(7)) subject to the proportionate share limitation described above. ACCOUNTING REQUIREMENTS The locai government must separate the impact fees from other monies. expend the money on CFP projects within 6 years. and prepare annual reports of collections and expenditures. RCW 82.02,070(1)-(3) ISSUES RELATING TO IMPACT FEES Prior to calculating Impact fee rates, several Issues wil be addressed In order to determine the need for, and validiiy of such fees: responslblliy for public facliltles, the need for new revenue for additional park land and recreation facilties, the benefit of new park land and recreation facilities to new development. and low Income housing, RESPONSIBILITY FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES In general. local governments that are authoried to charge Impact fees are responsible for specific public facilties for which they may charge such fees, The Cliy of Issaquah Is legally and financially responsible for the parks and recreation facilities It owns and operates witin Its jurisdiction. In no case ma a local government charge impact fees for private facilities, but It ma charge impact fees for some public facilties that It does not administer If such facilties are "owned or operated by government entities" (RCW 82,02.09 (7). Thus. a cliy or Henderson. 199 Inventory Level of Servce November Page 6

21 . Park Impact Fee Rate Study - county ma charge Impact fees for parks and recreation facilties, and enter into an agreement wit school districts for the transfer, expenditure, and reporting of parks Impact fees for parks and recreational facilities at school sites, NEED FOR ADDITIONAL PARK LAND AND RECREATION FACILIIES The need for additional park land and recreation facilties is determined by using standards for levels of service for park land and recreation facilities to calculate the quantity of facilties that are required. The required quantity is then compared to the existing inventory to determine the need for additional land and facilities. The analysis of needed park land and recreation facilties must comply with the statutory requirements of identifying existing deficiency, reserve capacity and new capacity requirements for facilties. An analysis of the need for additional park land and recreation facilties is presented In Appendix A. NEED FOR NEW REVENUE FOR ADDITIONAL PARK LAND AND RECREATION FACILITIES The need for new revenue for park land and recreation facilities is demonstrated by comparing the cost of new facilties for the next 6 years to the existing sources of revenue for the same 6 years. The City's 6-year plan for park land and recreation facilties does not have enough revenues from other sources to pay needed costs without Impact fees, DETRMINING THE BENEFIT TO DEVELOPMENT The law Imposes three tests of the benefit provided to development by impact fees: 1) proportionate share, 2) reasonably related to need, and 3) reasonably related to expenditure (ReW (3)). 1. Proportionate Share. First, the "proportionate share" requirement means that Impact fees can be charged only for the portion of the cost of public facilties that is "reasonably related" to new development. In other words, Impact fees cannot be charged to pa for the cost of reducing or eliminating deficiencies In existing facilties. Second, there are several important implications of the proportionate share requirement that are not specifically addressed in the law, but which follow directly from the law: Costs of facilties that will be used by new development and existing users must be apportioned between the two groups in determining the amount of the fee, This can be accomplished In either of two ways: (1) by allocating the cost between new and existing users, or (2) calculating the cost per unit (I.e" acre of park land, etc,), and applying the cost only to new development when calculating Impact fees, Henderson. J 99 Inventory level of Servce Ci1y of Issaquah November 22, 199 Page 7

22 . Park Impact Fee Rate Study. Impact fees that recover the costs of existing unused capacity should be based on the government's actual cost rather than the replacement cost of the facilty. Carrying costs may be added to reflect the government's actual or Imputed Interest expense, The third aspect of the proportionate share requirement Is its relationship to the requirement to provide adjustments and credits to impact fees, where appropriate. These requirements ensure that the amount of the impact fee does not exceed the proportionate share,. The "adjustments" requirement reduces the impact fee to account for past and future payments of other revenues (If such payments are earmarked for or proratable to the system improvements that are needed to serve new growth),. The "credit" requirement reduces impact fees by the value of dedicated land, Improvements or construction provided by the developer (if such facilities are in the adopted CFP and are required as a condition of development approval). The law does not prohibit a local government from establishing reasonable requirements on determining credits. For example, the location of dedicated land and the quality and design of a donated public facilty can be required to conform to adopted local standards for such facilties. Without such adjustments and credits, the fee-paying development might pay more than its proportionate share, 2. Reasonably Related to Need. There are many ways to fulfill the requirement that Impact fees be "reasonably related" to the development's need for public facilties, Including personal use and use by others in the family or business enterprise (direct benefit), use by persons or organizations who provide goods or services to the fee-paying propert (Indirect benefi), and geographical proximity (presumed benefit), These measures of relatedness are Implemented by the following techniques:. Impact fees for park land and recreation facilities are charged to properties which benefit from new park land and recreation facilties. Park land and recreation facilties are provided by the Cit of Issaquah to all kinds of propert throughout the City regardless of the type of use of the propert. Impact fees for park land and recreation facilties, however, are only charged to residential development in the City, because the dominant stream of benefits redounds to the occupants and owners of dwellng units. As a matter of policy, the elects not to charge park Impact fees to non-residential properties. Henderson. 199 Inventory Level of Service November 22, 199 Page 8

23 . Park Impact Fee Rate Study. The relative needs of different types of growth are considered In establishing fee amounts (I.e.. single family dwellng units versus multi family dwellng units, etc.), Feepayers can pay a smaller fee if they demonstrate that their development will have less Impact than is presumed In the Impact fee schedule calculation for their propert classification, Such reduced needs must be permanent and enforceabie (I.e" via land use restrictions). Issaquah's parks and recreation facilities serve the entire City, therefore the impact fees for these parks and recreational facilities are based on a single district which encompasses the City and Urban Growth Management Area. 3. Reasonably Related to Expenditures. Two provisions of the law tend to reinforce the requirement that expenditures be "reasonably related" to the development that paid the Impact fee, First, the requirement that fee revenue must be earmarked for specific uses related to public faciiitíes ensures that expenditures are on identifiabie projects, the benefit of which can be demonstrated. Second, impact fee revenue must be expended within 6 years, thus requiring a timeliness to the benefit to the fee-payer. Low INCOME HOUSING A fundamental premise of Impact fees Is that growth should pay for its fair share of the public facilties that it needs, One possible drawback to Impact fees paid by residential development is the potential negative effect of the impact fees on the affordabllty of housing. The effect of an impact fee on the affordabilty of housing varies according to the cost of the house, The more expensive the house, the smaller the effect because the Impact fee (which Is the same for all dwelling units, regardless of cost) adds a smaller percentage to the cost of the house, Thus, the least effect Is on the highest price housing and the largest effect is on low-income housing. Any given impact fee will be a larger percentage of the cost of a low priced home, and the Inelasticity of Income of buyers of low income housing ma cause some to be priced out of the market if relief is not provided. The 's impact fee ordinance exempts low and moderate Income housing from impact fees. Henderson, 199 Inventory level of Service November 22, 199 Page 9

24 . Park Impact Fee Rate Study. Methodology and Relationship to Capital Facilties Plan Issaquah's parks and recreational facilties Impact fees are calculated using the following methodology: Costs are determined per unit of capacity of park and recreational facilty. Costs are from the list of projects in the City's Capital Improvement Plan for Park Land Development and Trails. The costs per unit of capacity are applied to standards for units of capacity per person (using the ratios of 1999 inventory to 1999 population) to determine the capital investment per person, The total investment per person is adjusted to reflect the availability of other sources of revenue to the City. Finally, the amount of the impact fee Is determined by charging each fee-paying development for the number of units of demand that it generates multiplied times the amount of the investment per person that is to be paid by growth. Calculation of Impact Fee Amounts Six formulas are used to determine the amount of impact fees for parks and recreational facilities that are required as a result of new development: 1. Pork and Recreation Capital Investment Per Person Capacity Average Per x Cost per = Person Facilty Capital Investment Per Person 2. Value Needed for Growth CapItal Forecast Investment x Population = per Person Growth Value Needed for Growth 3. Investment Needed for Growth Value Value of Investment Needed Existing = Needed for Growth Reserve for Growth Capacity 4. Investment to be Paid by Growth Investment City Investment Needed Investment = to be Paid for Growth for Growth by Growth Henderson, 199 Inventory Level of Servce November Page 10

25 . Park Impact Fee Rate Study. 5. Growth Cost Per Person Investment to be Paid by Growth.. Growth Population = Growth Cost per Person 6. Impact Fee Per Dwellng Unit Growth Cost Per Person Average x Persons per = Dwelling Unit Impact Fee Per Dwelling Unit Henderson. 199 Inventory Level of Servce November Page 11

26 . Pork Impact Fee Rate StUdY. 2. Level of Service Standard This chapter includes a description of the first formula and each variable that Is used In the formula, an explanation of the use of data in the formulas, and the calculation of the level of service standard for park land and recreational facilities, using formula 1. FORMULA 1: Park and Recreation Capital Investment Per Person The capital investment per person is calculated by multiplying the capacity of parks and recreational facilities times the average costs of those Items, Capacity Per Person x Average Cost per Facilty = Capital Investment Per Person There are two variables that require explanation: (A) capacity per person, and (B) the average cost of each type of park land and recreational facility. VARIABLE (A): CAPACITY PER PERSON Capacity is a measurement of the size or number of facilities of a certain type, such as number of acres of active parks, or number of soccer fields. The units of capacity per person were determined by dividing Issaquah's 1999 inventory of parks and recreational facilities by the City's 1999 population. Appendix A lists the 199 ratios, VARIABLE (B) COSTS OF PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES The 6-year CIP Projects and Financing Plan ( ) for Park Land Development and Trails Identifies capital projects required to maintain the CItys current inventory of park and recreational facilities, and to meet the growt demand based on the adopted standards for level of service. The CIP already distinguishes between capacity projects (I.e" additions to the CItys inventory) and non-capacity projects 0.e" repair, maintenance of the existing inventory of park and recreational facilities), 'Most of the additional capacity in park and recreational facilities wiil be provided by constructing new facilities, however some capacity ma be provided by expanding existing facilties. Throughout this study, any reference to new facilities Includes expansion of existing facilities as well as construction of new facilities. The costs in this study represent the costs of actual projects In the 6-year CIP, or if there are no CIP projects for a type of park or facilty, the cost is the actual cost Henderson. 199 Inventory Level of Service November Page 12

27 . Park Impact Fee Rate Study. paid for the land or facilities acquired previously by the City. Appendix B lists each type of park and recreational facilty. Its unit of capacit. cost per unit. and the source of the cost data. The cost of each new park includes land. design, landscaping, site improvements. some recreational facilties (e,g.. equipment or apparatus not separately listed in this study), and legal and administrative costs (which Includes contingency), The cost of recreational facilities includes design. site preparation. construction. and legal and administrative costs (which includes contingency). The cost of facilities does not include land if the facilties are customarily located at a park. If the facilty is usually located at any site other than a park. the cost includes land, The cost of new parks and recreation facilities in this rate study does not include any costs for interest or other financing. If borrowing is used to "front fund" the costs that wil be paid by impact fees. the carrying costs for financing can be added to the costs. and the impact fee can be recalculated to include such costs. CALCULATION OF PARK AND RECREATION CAPITAL INVESTMENT PER PERSON Table i (on the next page) lists the types of land and facilities that make up Issaquah's park system. For each component listed alphabetically in column 1. the ratio of capacity per person using the 199 ratios is listed In column 2. and the average cost per facility is listed In column 3. Finally. column 4 presents the calculated capital investment per person by multiplying the ratio by the average cost. Henderson. 199 Inventory Level of Servce City of Isaquah November Page 13

RATE STUDY IMPACT FEES PARKS

RATE STUDY IMPACT FEES PARKS RATE STUDY FOR IMPACT FEES FOR PARKS CITY OF KENMORE, WASHINGTON May 15, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary................................................... 1 1. Statutory Basis and Methodology

More information

RATE STUDY IMPACT FEES TRANSPORTATION

RATE STUDY IMPACT FEES TRANSPORTATION RATE STUDY FOR IMPACT FEES FOR TRANSPORTATION CITY OF SHORELINE, WASHINGTON April 24, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...1 1. STATUTORY BASIS AND METHODOLOGY...5 2. ROAD SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT COSTS

More information

RATE STUDY IMPACT FEES ROADS

RATE STUDY IMPACT FEES ROADS RATE STUDY FOR IMPACT FEES FOR ROADS CITY OF PUYALLUP, WASHINGTON November 8, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary............................................ 1 1. Statutory Basis and Methodology for

More information

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, this title is intended to implement and be consistent with the county comprehensive plan; and

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, this title is intended to implement and be consistent with the county comprehensive plan; and ORDINANCE 2005-015 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ADOPTING TITLE X, IMPACT FEES, AND AMENDING CODE SECTION 953, FAIR SHARE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS, OF THE

More information

ORDINANCE 93-7 "EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE"

ORDINANCE 93-7 EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE ORDINANCE 93-7 "EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE" AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE REGULATION OF THE USE AND DEVELOPMENT OF LAND IN HERNANDO COUNTY, FLORIDA; IMPOSING AN IMPACT FEE ON LAND DEVELOPMENT

More information

Information Only. WHEREAS, the collection of development fees will assist the Township in meeting its affordable housing obligations; and

Information Only. WHEREAS, the collection of development fees will assist the Township in meeting its affordable housing obligations; and ORDINANCE O-08-34 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE O-08-32 ENTITLED AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 90 OF THE CODE OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH HARRISON TO AMEND THE MANDATORY DEVELOPMENT FEE REQUIREMENTS TO

More information

Ordinance No Affordable Housing Ordinance Borough of Glen Ridge, Essex County

Ordinance No Affordable Housing Ordinance Borough of Glen Ridge, Essex County Ordinance No. 1705 Affordable Housing Ordinance Borough of Glen Ridge, Essex County CHAPTER 57 AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FEES 57-1.1 Findings and Purpose. a. The New Jersey Supreme Court, in Holmdel

More information

Public Portion: Mr. Bianchini opened the public portion. There being no comment, the public portion was closed. Resolutions:

Public Portion: Mr. Bianchini opened the public portion. There being no comment, the public portion was closed. Resolutions: GLOUCESTER TOWNSHIP SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 1, 2008 MUNICIPAL BUILDING, CHEWS LANDING NEW JERSEY Pledge Allegiance to the Flag Statement: Mr. Bianchini read a statement setting forth the time,

More information

Ordinance No. WHEREAS, in RCW the Legislature has authorized counties to adopt an ordinance imposing impact fees; and

Ordinance No. WHEREAS, in RCW the Legislature has authorized counties to adopt an ordinance imposing impact fees; and Ordinance No. AN ORDINANCE of Thurston County, Washington, adding Title 25 of the Thurston County Code to authorize transportation and parks impact fees. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Thurston

More information

Cabarrus County, NC Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance. Contents

Cabarrus County, NC Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance. Contents Contents Section 15. Adequate Public Facilities Standards.... 2 Section 15-1. Introduction.... 2 Section 15-2. How to Use this Chapter.... 3 Section 15-3. Basic Terms and Definitions... 4 Section 15-4.

More information

The City Council makes the following findings:

The City Council makes the following findings: 12/ 07/2015 ORIGINAL ORDINANCE NO. 2417 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY ADDING A NEW ARTICLE XVII (AFFORDABLE HOUSING IMPACT FEE) TO CHAPTER 18 OF THE REDWOOD CITY MUNICIPAL

More information

Impact Fees. Section 1 Purpose and Intent.

Impact Fees. Section 1 Purpose and Intent. Impact Fees 1 Purpose and Intent 2 Definitions 3 Establishment of Impact Fees 4 Documentation Required 5 Segregated Accounts Required 6 Time Within Which To Use Impact Fees 7 Payment of Impact Fees 8 Appeals

More information

(Res. No R003, ) NON-REGIONAL ROAD CAPITAL EXPANSION FEE [2] Footnotes: --- (2) Findings.

(Res. No R003, ) NON-REGIONAL ROAD CAPITAL EXPANSION FEE [2] Footnotes: --- (2) Findings. 9.5. - NON-REGIONAL ROAD CAPITAL EXPANSION FEE [2] Footnotes: --- (2) --- Editor's note Res. No. 12262006R003, adopted Dec. 26, 2006, deleted former 9.5, and enacted a new 9.5 as set out herein. The former

More information

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF PORT ARANSAS, TEXAS, BY ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF PORT ARANSAS, TEXAS, BY ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER ORDINANCE NO. 2008-09 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF PORT ARANSAS, TEXAS, BY ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER TWENTY-SIX CONCERNING IMPACT FEES FOR ROADWAY FACILITIES; INCORPORATING

More information

A. This ordinance shall not be effective until approved by COAH pursuant to NJAC 5:

A. This ordinance shall not be effective until approved by COAH pursuant to NJAC 5: CHAPTER 10 COAH (COUNCIL ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING) Section 10.1 - PURPOSE A. In Holmdel Builder s Association v Holmdel Township, 121 NJ 550 (1990), the New Jersey Supreme Court determined that mandatory

More information

ORDINANCE NO. C-590(E0916)

ORDINANCE NO. C-590(E0916) ORDINANCE NO. C-590(E0916) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES ORDINANCE NO. C-590(D0314) RELATING TO THE REGULATION OF THE USE AND DEVELOPMENT OF LAND IN THE INCORPORATED LIMITS

More information

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO ORDINANCE NO. 2014-160 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MENIFEE, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING SECTION 10.35 OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY LAND USE ORDINANCE NO. 460.152 AS ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF MENIFEE

More information

(Ord. No , 1, )

(Ord. No , 1, ) ARTICLE VIII. - EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM IMPACT FEE Sec. 70-291. - Short title. This article shall be known and cited as the "Sarasota County Educational System Impact Fee Ordinance." Sec. 70-292. - Findings.

More information

An ordinance adding Section and amending Section of the Los Angeles Municipal Code to establish an Affordable Housing Linkage Fee.

An ordinance adding Section and amending Section of the Los Angeles Municipal Code to establish an Affordable Housing Linkage Fee. ORDINANCE NO. An ordinance adding Section 19.18 and amending Section 16.02 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code to establish an Affordable Housing Linkage Fee. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Los

More information

ORDINANCE NO. THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO. THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ORDINANCE NO. An ordinance amending Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) Sections 12.21, 12.33,17.03, 17.12 and 17.58; deleting Sections 17.07 and 19.01 from the LAMC; and adding Section 19.17 to the LAMC

More information

CITY OF KENMORE, WA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES

CITY OF KENMORE, WA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES 314 CITY OF KENMORE, WA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES 18120 68 th Ave NE, Kenmore, WA 98028 425-398-8900 www.kenmorewa.gov In order to adequately review development proposals, city staff requests

More information

SOUTH DAVIS METRO FIRE AGENCY FIRE IMPACT FEE FACILITIES PLAN (IFFP) AND IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS (IFA)

SOUTH DAVIS METRO FIRE AGENCY FIRE IMPACT FEE FACILITIES PLAN (IFFP) AND IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS (IFA) SOUTH DAVIS METRO FIRE AGENCY FIRE IMPACT FEE FACILITIES PLAN (IFFP) AND IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS (IFA) JULY 2012 PREPARED BY LEWIS YOUNG ROBERTSON & BURNINGHAM, INC. IMPACT FEE FACILITIES PLAN AND IMPACT FEE

More information

CHAPTER CAPITAL FACILITIES, FEES, AND INCENTIVES RELATED TO FEES. B. Fire Combat and Rescue Service Impact Fee Study and Modifications

CHAPTER CAPITAL FACILITIES, FEES, AND INCENTIVES RELATED TO FEES. B. Fire Combat and Rescue Service Impact Fee Study and Modifications CHAPTER 1300. CAPITAL FACILITIES, FEES, AND INCENTIVES RELATED TO FEES SECTION 1302. IMPACT FEES 1302.6. Fire Combat and Rescue Service Impact Fees A. Intent and Purpose 1. To establish uniform fire combat

More information

Cedar Hammock Fire Control District

Cedar Hammock Fire Control District Cedar Hammock Fire Control District FY 2015 Fire/Rescue Impact Fee Study February 24, 2016 Prepared by: February 24, 2016 Mr. Jeff Hoyle Fire Chief 5200 26 th St W Bradenton, FL 34207 Re: FY 2015 Impact

More information

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA, ORDAINS that:

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA, ORDAINS that: CITY OF SAN MATEO ORDINANCE NO. 2016-8 ADDING CHAPTER 23.61, "AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMMERCIAL LINKAGE FEE" TO TITLE 23, OF THE SAN MATEO MUNICIPAL CODE WHEREAS, there is a shortage of affordable housing

More information

ARTICLE 18 PARK AND RECREATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES

ARTICLE 18 PARK AND RECREATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES ARTICLE 18 PARK AND RECREATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES Sec. 18-1. Legislative Findings. Sec. 18-2. Short Title and Applicability. Sec. 18-3. Intents and Purposes. Sec. 18-4. Rules of Construction. Sec.

More information

OAKLAND CITY COUNCIL

OAKLAND CITY COUNCIL REVISED 7/23/2002 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY OAKLAND CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 12442 C.M.S. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OAKLAND MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH A JOBS/HOUSING IMPACT

More information

Goals and Policies Concerning Use of MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES ACT OF 1982

Goals and Policies Concerning Use of MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES ACT OF 1982 Goals and Policies Concerning Use of MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES ACT OF 1982 Section TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 1 Policy & Goals 1 2 Definitions 2 3 Eligible Public Facilities 3 4 Value-to-Lien

More information

INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE ADMINISTRATIVE RULES AND REGULATIONS

INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE ADMINISTRATIVE RULES AND REGULATIONS INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE ADMINISTRATIVE RULES AND REGULATIONS Adopted December 9, 2008; Amended July 1, 2010; Amended November 10, 2010; Amended December 13, 2013; January 16, 2015 Adopted pursuant

More information

ARTICLE 1.18 AFFORDABLE HOUSING LINKAGE FEE

ARTICLE 1.18 AFFORDABLE HOUSING LINKAGE FEE Page 1-2/23/17 ORDINANCE NO. An ordinance adding Section 21.18 and amending Section 16.02 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code, as well as adding Section 5.578 of Chapter 172 of the Administrative Code, establishing

More information

Ada County Highway District Impact Fee Ordinance No. 231A Replacing the Ada County Highway District Impact Fee Ordinance No. 231

Ada County Highway District Impact Fee Ordinance No. 231A Replacing the Ada County Highway District Impact Fee Ordinance No. 231 Ada County Highway District Impact Fee Replacing the Ada County Highway District Impact Fee Ordinance No. 231 By the Board of Highway District Commissioners of Ada County, Idaho: Baker, Arnold, Hansen,

More information

DRAFT. Development Impact Fee Model Ordinance. Mount Pleasant, SC. Draft Document. City Explained, Inc. J. R. Wilburn and Associates, Inc.

DRAFT. Development Impact Fee Model Ordinance. Mount Pleasant, SC. Draft Document. City Explained, Inc. J. R. Wilburn and Associates, Inc. City Explained, Inc. J. R. Wilburn and Associates, Inc. Development Impact Fee Model Ordinance Mount Pleasant, SC Draft Document January 11, 2017 ARTICLE I. TITLE This ordinance shall be referred to as

More information

SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN CITY OF HASLET PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 2 SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN August 3, \ v

SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN CITY OF HASLET PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 2 SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN August 3, \ v SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN CITY OF HASLET PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 2 SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN August 3, 2015 CITY OF HASLET PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 2 SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN Table

More information

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1154

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1154 ORDINANCE NUMBER 1154 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2005-1 (PERRIS VALLEY VISTAS) OF THE CITY OF PERRIS AUTHORIZING

More information

City of Puyallup. Parks Impact Fee Study

City of Puyallup. Parks Impact Fee Study City of Puyallup Parks Impact Fee Study August 23, 2005 Prepared by Financial Consulting Solutions Group, Inc. 8201 164 th Avenue NE, Suite 300 Redmond, WA 98052 tel: (425) 867-1802 fax: (425) 867-1937

More information

ORDINANCE NO. 875 (AS AMENDED THROUGH 875

ORDINANCE NO. 875 (AS AMENDED THROUGH 875 ORDINANCE NO. 875 (AS AMENDED THROUGH 875.1) AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TO ESTABLISH A LOCAL DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION FEE FOR FUNDING THE PRESERVATION OF NATURAL ECOSYSTEMS IN ACCORDANCE WITH

More information

RECITALS. PPAB v3 PPAB v4

RECITALS. PPAB v3 PPAB v4 STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) AGREEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT COUNTY OF OCONEE ) FOR JOINT COUNTY INDUSTRIAL/BUSINESS ) PARK (OCONEE-PICKENS INDUSTRIAL COUNTY OF PICKENS ) PARK PROJECT MACKINAW) THIS AGREEMENT for

More information

Chapter 10 LAND AND PLANNING GROWTH MANAGEMENT

Chapter 10 LAND AND PLANNING GROWTH MANAGEMENT Chapter 10 LAND AND PLANNING GROWTH MANAGEMENT Article I. Growth Cap Quotas Sec. 10-1. Purpose. Sec. 10-2. Findings. Sec. 10-3. Issuance of residential building permits. Sec. 10-4. Growth cap quota. Sec.

More information

Glenbrook High School District #225

Glenbrook High School District #225 Glenbrook High School District #225 PROCEDURES FOR IMPLEMENTING BOARD POLICY: FEES FROM RESIDENTIAL REAL Page 1 of 6 pages Section A - Introduction 1. It is the policy of the Board of Education of District

More information

CAPE COD COMMISSION CHAPTER F

CAPE COD COMMISSION CHAPTER F CAPE COD COMMISSION CHAPTER F Impact Fee Enabling Regulations Barnstable County Ordinance 98-6 CHAPTER F - To adopt regulations for the Cape Cod Commission for the purpose of establishing Impact Fee Enabling

More information

DEPOSIT AGREEMENT GUARANTEEING SITE PLAN IMPROVEMENTS WITH CASH ESCROW

DEPOSIT AGREEMENT GUARANTEEING SITE PLAN IMPROVEMENTS WITH CASH ESCROW DEPOSIT AGREEMENT GUARANTEEING SITE PLAN IMPROVEMENTS WITH CASH ESCROW This Deposit Agreement Guaranteeing Site Plan Improvements with Cash Escrow (the Agreement ) is made and entered into as of the day

More information

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER RE: INCLUSIONARY HOUSING

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER RE: INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER 17.47 RE: INCLUSIONARY HOUSING The City Council of the City of Daly City, DOES ORDAIN as follows:

More information

Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations 1 Rules and Regulations CITY OF OAKLAND JOBS/HOUSING IMPACT FEE (Effective July 1, 2005) Authority cited: Ordinance No.12442 CMS, adopted on July 30, 2002. Codified in Chapter 15.68 of the Oakland Municipal

More information

Chapter CONCURRENCY

Chapter CONCURRENCY Chapter 20.180 CONCURRENCY Sections: 20.180.001 Purpose. 20.180.002 Authority. 20.180.003 Definitions 20.180.004 Exempt development. 20.180.005 Capacity evaluation required for a change in use. 20.180.006

More information

CITY OF OAKLAND IMPACT FEE ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS AND MANUAL

CITY OF OAKLAND IMPACT FEE ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS AND MANUAL CITY OF OAKLAND IMPACT FEE ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS AND MANUAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING, TRANSPORTATION & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS IMPACT FEES Adopted by City Administrator: August 9, 2017 City of Oakland Impact

More information

Jefferson County Impact fee Ordinance ORDINANCE NO.

Jefferson County Impact fee Ordinance ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE COUNTY CODE OF COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF IDAHO, BY ADOPTING A NEW TITLE 3, CHAPTER 5, JEFFERSON COUNTY CODE, TO BE KNOWN AS THE JEFFERSON COUNTY IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE;

More information

RESOLUTION NO

RESOLUTION NO RESOLUTION NO. 1435-18 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CHICO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT APPROVING A CHANGE IN STATUTORY SCHOOL FEES IMPOSED ON NEW RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION

More information

Grant Contract Specified Grants

Grant Contract Specified Grants State of California The Natural Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION Grant Contract Specified Grants GRANTEE City and County of San Francisco, Recreation and Parks Department GRANT PERFORMANCE

More information

NEIGHBORHOOD RESPONSIBILITY AGREEMENT FOR CANNABIS PROJECTS

NEIGHBORHOOD RESPONSIBILITY AGREEMENT FOR CANNABIS PROJECTS NEIGHBORHOOD RESPONSIBILITY AGREEMENT FOR CANNABIS PROJECTS This Agreement is made and entered into on, by and between ( Property Owner ), and the CITY OF SACRAMENTO, a municipal corporation ( City ).

More information

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, The City of Santa Clara is the Government entity responsible for providing public

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, The City of Santa Clara is the Government entity responsible for providing public RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING THE 2018-19 PARKLAND IN LIEU FEE SCHEDULE FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 ( DEVELOPMENT ) CHAPTER

More information

FINANCE DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M

FINANCE DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M FINANCE DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M TO: FROM: BY: Honorable Mayor and City Commission Ambreen Bhatty, City Manager Steven Chapman II, Finance Director DATE: June 25, 2013 SUBJECT: Solid Waste Assessment

More information

BILL H.3653: An Act Financing the Production and Preservation of Housing for Low and Moderate Income Residents

BILL H.3653: An Act Financing the Production and Preservation of Housing for Low and Moderate Income Residents BILL H.3653: An Act Financing the Production and Preservation of Housing for Low and Moderate Income Residents SECTION 2 Authorizes capital spending amounts and provides line item language describing permitted

More information

CALIFORNIA VINCENT P. BERTONI, AICP DAVID H. J. AMBROZ DIRECTOR PRESIDENT (213) RENEE DAKE WILSON. i, 4 if.-*" V. j H* .AV ERIC GARCETTI MAYOR

CALIFORNIA VINCENT P. BERTONI, AICP DAVID H. J. AMBROZ DIRECTOR PRESIDENT (213) RENEE DAKE WILSON. i, 4 if.-* V. j H* .AV ERIC GARCETTI MAYOR DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING City of Los Angeles CITY PLANNING COMMISSION CALIFORNIA EXECUTIVE OFFICES 200 N. Spring Street, Room 525 Los Angeles, CA 90012-4801 VINCENT P. BERTONI, AICP DAVID H. J. AMBROZ

More information

PROPOSED INCLUSIONARY ORDINANCE

PROPOSED INCLUSIONARY ORDINANCE PROPOSED INCLUSIONARY ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OXNARD AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND INCLUSIONARY HOUSING REQUIREMENTS BY REVISING AND RENUMBERING WHEREAS, it is

More information

Page 1 of 8 Highlands County, Florida, Code of Ordinances >> - CODE OF ORDINANCES >> Chapter 5.4 - HOUSING >> ARTICLE II. STATE HOUSING INITIATIVES PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM >> ARTICLE II. STATE HOUSING INITIATIVES

More information

ORDINANCE NO OA

ORDINANCE NO OA ORDINANCE NO. 2013 11-OA AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWNSHIP OF BERKELEY, COUNTY OF OCEAN, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AMENDING THE TOWNSHIP CODE OF THE TOWNSHIP OF BERKELEY, SO AS TO CREATE ARTICLE XX, ENTITLED VOLUNTARY

More information

F. There is a reasonable and rational relationship between the use of the TUMF and the type of development projects on which the fees are imposed,

F. There is a reasonable and rational relationship between the use of the TUMF and the type of development projects on which the fees are imposed, ORDINANCE NO. 824 (AS AMENDED THROUGH 824.15) AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE PROGRAM The Board of

More information

City of Merced Page 1

City of Merced Page 1 HOUSING SUCCESSOR ANNUAL REPORT REGARDING THE LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING ASSET FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016-17 PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 34176.1(f) FOR THE CITY OF MERCED

More information

CITY OF IRVINE HOUSING SUCCESSOR ANNUAL REPORT FOR LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING ASSET FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR

CITY OF IRVINE HOUSING SUCCESSOR ANNUAL REPORT FOR LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING ASSET FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR CITY OF IRVINE HOUSING SUCCESSOR ANNUAL REPORT FOR LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING ASSET FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017 The City of Irvine Housing Successor Annual Report (Report) for the Low and Moderate

More information

NC General Statutes - Chapter 153A Article 15 1

NC General Statutes - Chapter 153A Article 15 1 Article 15. Public Enterprises. Part 1. General Provisions. 153A-274. Public enterprise defined. As used in this Article, "public enterprise" includes: (1) Water supply and distribution systems. (2) Wastewater

More information

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION City and County of San Francisco RESOLUTION NO. 07-0100 Resolution adopting and imposing Schedule of Wastewater Rates to be paid by Users effective July 1, 2007 and July 1,

More information

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO Item 4 Attachment A ORDINANCE NO. 2017-346 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALABASAS, CALIFORNIA AMENDING CHAPTER 17.22 OF THE CALABASAS MUNICIPAL CODE, AFFORDABLE HOUSING, TO BRING INTO

More information

RESOLUTION NUMBER 3970

RESOLUTION NUMBER 3970 RESOLUTION NUMBER 3970 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHANGES TO THE FACILITIES AND SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN IMPROVEMENT AREA

More information

EXHIBIT G. Exhibit G - Page 1 RVPUB/MO/655751

EXHIBIT G. Exhibit G - Page 1 RVPUB/MO/655751 EXHIBIT G AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TO ESTABLISH A LOCAL DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION FEE FOR FUNDING THE PRESERVATION OF NATURAL ECOSYSTEMS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY

More information

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DOUGLAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Ordinance No. TLS

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DOUGLAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Ordinance No. TLS Interim Official Controls ) Open Space Standards ) BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DOUGLAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON Ordinance No. TLS 17-05-16 WHEREAS, this Board enacted Ordinance TLS 15-07-09B on March 24, 2015

More information

TOWN OF REDCLIFF BYLAW NO. 1829/2016

TOWN OF REDCLIFF BYLAW NO. 1829/2016 TOWN OF REDCLIFF BYLAW NO. 1829/2016 A BYLAW OF THE TOWN OF REDCLIFF, IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA, TO ESTABLISH OFF-SITE LEVIES FOR LAND THAT IS TO BE SUBDIVIDED OR DEVELOPED WITHIN THE TOWN OF REDCLIFF

More information

ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SPRING HILL MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTER 5, IMPACT FEE-PURPOSES AND ADMINISTRATION

ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SPRING HILL MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTER 5, IMPACT FEE-PURPOSES AND ADMINISTRATION ORDINANCE 15-04 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SPRING HILL MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTER 5, IMPACT FEE-PURPOSES AND ADMINISTRATION WHEREAS, the Board of Mayor and Aldermen for the City of Spring Hill may, pursuant to

More information

CITY OF CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA FIRE PROTECTION ASSESSMENT ORDINANCE FIRST READING JULY 29, 2009

CITY OF CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA FIRE PROTECTION ASSESSMENT ORDINANCE FIRST READING JULY 29, 2009 CITY OF CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA FIRE PROTECTION ASSESSMENT ORDINANCE FIRST READING JULY 29, 2009 SECOND READING AUGUST 25, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE ARTICLE I INTRODUCTION SECTION 1.01. DEFINITIONS....

More information

Multifamily Housing Revenue Bond Rules

Multifamily Housing Revenue Bond Rules Multifamily Housing Revenue Bond Rules 12.1. General. (a) Authority. The rules in this chapter apply to the issuance of multifamily housing revenue bonds ("Bonds") by the Texas Department of Housing and

More information

PROPERTY; PROVIDING FOR EXPENDITURE OF REVENUE; PROVIDING FOR REIMBURSEMENT

PROPERTY; PROVIDING FOR EXPENDITURE OF REVENUE; PROVIDING FOR REIMBURSEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 12- AN ORDINANCE OF MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA ESTABLISHING THE RAINBOW PARK UNITS 1 & 2 MUNICIPAL SERVICE BENEFIT UNIT FOR ROAD MAINTENANCE; PROVIDING FOR A PURPOSE; PROVIDING FOR THE POWERS

More information

1 ORDINANCE 4, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM 5 BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA AMENDING CHAPTER TAXATION.

1 ORDINANCE 4, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM 5 BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA AMENDING CHAPTER TAXATION. 1 ORDINANCE 4, 2013 2 3 4 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM 5 BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA AMENDING CHAPTER 66. 6 TAXATION. BY CREATING A NEW ARTICLE VI. ENTITLED 7 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AD

More information

Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund Housing Successor Report Year ended June 30, 2014

Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund Housing Successor Report Year ended June 30, 2014 Mayor s Office of Housing and Community Development City and County of San Francisco Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund Housing Successor Report Year ended June 30, 2014 1 Contents Introductory

More information

SUMTER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Managing Division / Dept: Office of Management & Budget

SUMTER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Managing Division / Dept: Office of Management & Budget SUMTER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SUBJECT: Public Hearing - Annual Assessment Resolution and Establishment of Fees for the Sumter County Fire District (MSBU). REQUESTED ACTION: Staff

More information

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING THE REVISED GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF BAYONNE THE, CHAPTER 33 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING THE REVISED GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF BAYONNE THE, CHAPTER 33 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING THE REVISED GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF BAYONNE THE, CHAPTER 33 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS WHEREAS, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:48-2, the Legislature

More information

ACQUISITION AGREEMENT

ACQUISITION AGREEMENT Quint & Thimmig LLP ACQUISITION AGREEMENT by and between the CITY OF ALAMEDA, CALIFORNIA and CATELLUS ALAMEDA DEVELOPMENT, LLC dated as of 1, 2013 relating to: City of Alameda Community Facilities District

More information

LIHPRHA, Pub. L. No , Title VI (1990), codified at 12 U.S.C et seq.

LIHPRHA, Pub. L. No , Title VI (1990), codified at 12 U.S.C et seq. LIHPRHA, Pub. L. No. 101-625, Title VI (1990), codified at 12 U.S.C. 4101 et seq. TITLE VI--PRESERVATION OF AFFORDABLE RENTAL HOUSING Subtitle A--Prepayment of Mortgages Insured Under National Housing

More information

THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAKE FOREST CITY CODE TO ESTABLISH A HOUSING TRUST FUND BOARD

THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAKE FOREST CITY CODE TO ESTABLISH A HOUSING TRUST FUND BOARD THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAKE FOREST CITY CODE TO ESTABLISH A HOUSING TRUST FUND BOARD WHEREAS, the State of Illinois has enacted the Affordable Housing and Appeal

More information

SCHOOL FINANCE: IMPACT FEES and a COUPLE OF OTHER THINGS. First Things. How Do We Pay? What Are We Talking About? How Do We Pay?

SCHOOL FINANCE: IMPACT FEES and a COUPLE OF OTHER THINGS. First Things. How Do We Pay? What Are We Talking About? How Do We Pay? SCHOOL FINANCE: IMPACT FEES and a COUPLE OF OTHER THINGS Theodore B. DuBose Haynsworth Sinkler Boyd, P.A. Presented to: SC School Boards Association 2016 School Law Conference Charleston, South Carolina

More information

RESOLUTION NUMBER 3968

RESOLUTION NUMBER 3968 RESOLUTION NUMBER 3968 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-1 (MAY FARMS)

More information

TRUCKEE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ORDINANCE

TRUCKEE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ORDINANCE TRUCKEE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ORDINANCE 01-2017 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TRUCKEE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT LEVYING SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2017-01

More information

NOTICE ORDINANCE NO Township of Neptune County of Monmouth

NOTICE ORDINANCE NO Township of Neptune County of Monmouth NOTICE ORDINANCE NO. 12-12 Township of Neptune County of Monmouth NOTICE is hereby given that at a regular meeting of the Township Committee of the Township of Neptune on the 24th day of May, 2012, the

More information

CITY OF MADISON, WISCONSIN

CITY OF MADISON, WISCONSIN CITY OF MADISON, WISCONSIN A SUBSTITUTE ORDINANCE Amending Secs. 4.09(13), 16.23(8)(f), 16.23(9)(e), 20.04(18)(a), 20.06, and 20.09 relating to the imposition and collection of subdivision service costs

More information

ORDINANCE NO HOLDING TANK ORDINANCE

ORDINANCE NO HOLDING TANK ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO. 2018 - HOLDING TANK ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE OF WEST NOTTINGHAM TOWNSHIP, CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, PROVIDING FOR AND REGULATING USE OF HOLDING TANKS IN WEST NOTTINGHAM TOWNSHIP, AND IMPOSING

More information

CITY OF MARGATE, FLORIDA PRELIMINARY RATE RESOLUTION

CITY OF MARGATE, FLORIDA PRELIMINARY RATE RESOLUTION CITY OF MARGATE, FLORIDA PRELIMINARY RATE RESOLUTION ADOPTED MAY 21, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SECTION 1. AUTHORITY.... 1 SECTION 2. PURPOSE AND DEFINITIONS.... 1 SECTION 3. PROVISION AND FUNDING OF

More information

ORDINANCE NO. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE:

ORDINANCE NO. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE SAN JOSE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD PART 11 TO CHAPTER 17.23 REGARDING WITHDRAWAL OF RENT STABILIZED BUILDINGS FROM THE RENTAL MARKET

More information

MARCH 19, Referred to Committee on Government Affairs

MARCH 19, Referred to Committee on Government Affairs A.B. ASSEMBLY BILL NO. ASSEMBLYMAN COLLINS MARCH, 0 Referred to Committee on Government Affairs SUMMARY Authorizes certain local governments to impose tax on nonresidential construction or require dedication

More information

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 212th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED JANUARY 4, 2007

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 212th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED JANUARY 4, 2007 ASSEMBLY, No. STATE OF NEW JERSEY th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED JANUARY, 00 Sponsored by: Assemblyman JOSEPH J. ROBERTS, JR. District (Camden and Gloucester) Assemblyman THOMAS P. GIBLIN District (Essex and

More information

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. 17-CA-02 Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance. Jon Biggs, Community Development Director

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. 17-CA-02 Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance. Jon Biggs, Community Development Director PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: May 3, 2018 Subject: Prepared by: Initiated by: 17-CA-02 Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance Jon Biggs, Community Development Director City Council Attachments:

More information

Contents Introductory Section... 3 Financial Section... 6 Required Information... 9

Contents Introductory Section... 3 Financial Section... 6 Required Information... 9 1 Contents Introductory Section... 3 Housing Successor - Mayor s Office of Housing and Community Development... 3 Housing Assets Transferred... 4 Financial Section... 6 Housing Asset Fund Balance Sheet...

More information

RESOLUTION NUMBER 3992

RESOLUTION NUMBER 3992 RESOLUTION NUMBER 3992 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS AUTHORIZING THE CHANGES TO THE SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-3 (ALDER) OF THE CITY OF PERRIS;

More information

ORDINANCE NO. 17- Housing Study Assessment and to develop recommended changes to the program; and

ORDINANCE NO. 17- Housing Study Assessment and to develop recommended changes to the program; and 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 ORDINANCE NO. 1- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA AMENDING LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, CHAPTER 1, ARTICLE II, DEFINITIONS ; AMENDING CHAPTER 1, ARTICLE V, HOUSING INITIATIVES,

More information

INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN

INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF FERNANDINA BEACH, FLORIDA AND THE TOWN OF CALLAHAN, FLORIDA AND THE TOWN OF HILLIARD, FLORIDA AND NASSAU COUNTY, FLORIDA AND THE SCHOOL BOARD OF NASSAU COUNTY,

More information

Inclusionary Affordable Housing Implementation & Monitoring Procedures

Inclusionary Affordable Housing Implementation & Monitoring Procedures Regulations pertaining to the City of San Diego s Inclusionary Housing Program ( Program ) are incorporated in San Diego Municipal Code ( SDMC ) Chapter 14, Article 2, Division 13 (the Inclusionary Regulations

More information

Public Improvement District (PID) Policy

Public Improvement District (PID) Policy Public Improvement District (PID) Policy OVERVIEW Public Improvement Districts ( PIDs ), per the Texas Local Government Code Chapter 372 ( the code or PID Act ), provide the City of Marble Falls ( the

More information

RECITALS. WHEREAS, the GMA requires counties to adopt county-wide planning policies in cooperation with cities within the County; and

RECITALS. WHEREAS, the GMA requires counties to adopt county-wide planning policies in cooperation with cities within the County; and AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A DEMONSTRATION PROJECT TO TRANSFER DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS FROM RURAL UNINCORPORATED KING COUNTY TO THE DENNY TRIANGLE IN DOWNTOWN SEATTLE This Agreement is

More information

Development Impact Fee Study

Development Impact Fee Study Development Impact Fee Study Prepared for: Tega Cay, South Carolina July 8, 2018 4701 Sangamore Road Suite S240 Bethesda, MD (301) 320-6900 www.tischlerbise.com [PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] Development

More information

JH:SRF:JMG:brf AGENDA DRAFT 4/06/2016 ESCROW AGREEMENT

JH:SRF:JMG:brf AGENDA DRAFT 4/06/2016 ESCROW AGREEMENT 23090-12 JH:SRF:JMG:brf AGENDA DRAFT 4/06/2016 ESCROW AGREEMENT THIS ESCROW AGREEMENT (the Agreement ) is dated as of May 1, 2016, and is entered into by and between the MT. DIABLO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

More information

Education Development Charges Policy Review Report. Wellington Catholic District School Board. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd.

Education Development Charges Policy Review Report. Wellington Catholic District School Board. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. Education Development Charges Policy Review Report Wellington Catholic District School Board April 10, 2019 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. 905-272-3600 info@watsonecon.ca Table of Contents Page 1.

More information

THE LONG BEACH COMMUNITY INVESTMENT COMPANY

THE LONG BEACH COMMUNITY INVESTMENT COMPANY HOUSING SUCCESSOR ANNUAL REPORT REGARDING THE LOW- AND MODERATE- INCOME HOUSING ASSET FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013-14 PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 34176.1(f) FOR THE LONG BEACH COMMUNITY

More information

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO Introduced by: Penrose Hollins Date of introduction: October 14, 2014 ORDINANCE NO. 14-109 TO AMEND CHAPTER 40 OF THE NEW CASTLE COUNTY CODE (ALSO KNOWN AS THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE OR UDC ), ARTICLE

More information