IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JASPER COUNTY, MISSOURI CIRCUIT DIVISION AT JOPLIN
|
|
- Irene Dean
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JASPER COUNTY, MISSOURI CIRCUIT DIVISION AT JOPLIN CITY OF JOPLIN, MISSOURI, Plaintiff, v. Case No. WLD SUAREZ, LLC, PRO BASEBALL MANAGEMENT, LLC, CHARTER SPORTS, LLC, JOPLIN BLASTERS, LLC, OSCAR SUAREZ, GABRIEL SUAREZ, and SHAWN SUAREZ Serve at: Registered Agent Cyndy Jackson 1507 Lampman Ct. Cheyenne, WY Registered Agent Cyndy Jackson 1507 Lampman Ct. Cheyenne, WY Registered Agent Anthony Panasuk 768 Fairplay Ct. Aurora, CO Registered Agent Gabriel Oscar Suarez 407 South Pennsylvania Ave Joplin, MO Oscar Suarez 1776 N. Scottsdale Rd. #442 Scottsdale, AZ Gabriel Suarez 1776 N. Scottsdale Rd. #442 Scottsdale, AZ Shawn Suarez 1776 N. Scottsdale Rd. #442 16AO-CC
2 Scottsdale, AZ Defendants. PETITION COMES NOW the City of Joplin, by and through its attorney of record, Jordan L. Paul, and for its Petition states: ALLEGATIONS COMMON TO ALL COUNTS Jurisdiction and Venue 1. That the Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Mo. Const. Art. V That the Court has personal jurisdiction over all parties pursuant to RSMo (1, (2, (3, and (4. 3. That the Court is an appropriate venue pursuant to RSMo , and by agreement of the parties pursuant to Section 21 of the WLD lease agreement, Section 21 of the Pro Baseball lease agreement, Section 17 of the parking agreement, and Section 25 of the Blasters lease agreement, attached hereto as Exhibits 1, 2, 3, and 4. Parties 4. That the City of Joplin ( Joplin is a Missouri municipal corporation with its principal place of business located at 602 S. Main St., Joplin, Jasper County, Missouri. 5. That WLD Suarez, LLC ( WLD is a Wyoming Limited Liability Company with its principal places of business located in Phoenix, Maricopa County, Arizona. 6. That Pro Baseball Management, LLC ( Pro Baseball is a Wyoming Limited Liability Company with its principal place of business located in Phoenix, Maricopa County, Arizona. 7. That Charter Sports, LLC ( Charter is a Colorado Limited Liability Company with its principal place of business located in Aurora, Arapahoe County, Colorado. 2
3 8. That the Joplin Blasters, LLC ( Blasters is a Missouri Limited Liability Company with its principal place of business located in Jasper County, Missouri. 9. That Oscar Suarez is a resident of the State of Missouri with his principal place of residence located at 2530 S. Iowa Ave., Jasper County, Missouri. 10. That Gabriel Suarez is a resident of the State of Arizona with his principal place of residence located in Scottsdale, Maricopa County, Arizona. 11. That Shawn Suarez is a resident of the State of Arizona with his principal place of residence located in Scottsdale, Maricopa County, Arizona 12. That, upon information and belief, Oscar, Gabriel, and/or Shawn Suarez are and were at all times referenced herein the sole member(s of WLD Suarez, LLC. 13. That, upon information and belief, Oscar, Gabriel and/or Shawn Suarez are and were at all times referenced herein the sole member(s of Pro Baseball Management, LLC. 14. That, upon information and belief, Oscar, Gabriel and/or Shawn Suarez are and were at all times referenced herein the sole member(s of Charter Sports, LLC. 15. That, upon information and belief, Oscar, Gabriel, and/or Shawn Suarez are and were at all times referenced herein the sole member(s of the Joplin Blasters, LLC. The WLD Lease Agreement 16. That on January 21, 2014, WLD and Joplin entered into a twenty (20 year lease agreement for the lease of the land and improvements known as Joe Becker Baseball Stadium from May 1 to September 10 of each year ( WLD lease agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit That, pursuant to the WLD lease agreement, Joplin agreed to lease to WLD the land and improvements known as Joe Becker Baseball Stadium. 3
4 18. That, pursuant to the WLD lease agreement, WLD agreed that it would pay annual rent in the sum of One Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150, per year, payable in quarterly installments of Thirty Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($37, due on the first day of each quarter for the calendar year, for a total of Three Million Dollars ($3,000, over a twenty (20 year term. 19. That, in reliance on the representations made by Defendants, Joplin expended Four Million Seven Hundred Twenty Three Thousand Seven Hundred Four Dollars ($4,723, on Joe Becker Baseball Stadium. 20. That WLD has never made a lease payment. The Pro Baseball Lease Agreement 21. That on May 5, 2014, Pro Baseball and Joplin entered into a twenty (20 year lease agreement for the lease of the land and improvements known as Joe Becker Baseball Stadium from May 1 to September 10 of each year ( Pro Baseball lease agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit That, pursuant to the Pro Baseball lease agreement, Joplin agreed to lease to Pro Baseball the land and improvements known as Joe Becker Baseball Stadium. 23. That, pursuant to the Pro Baseball lease agreement, Pro Baseball agreed that it would pay annual rent in the sum of One Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150, per year, payable in quarterly installments of Thirty Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($37, due on the first day of each quarter for the calendar year, for a total of Three Million Dollars ($3,000, over a twenty (20 year term. 24. That, in reliance on the representations made by Defendants, Joplin expended Four Million Seven Hundred Twenty Three Thousand Seven Hundred Four Dollars 4
5 ($4,723, on Joe Becker Baseball Stadium. 25. That Pro Baseball has not made a lease payment since July 1, The Parking Agreement 26. That on August 18, 2014, Charter and Joplin entered into an Agreement for Construction of Parking Improvements For Joe Becker Stadium and Nearby Areas ( parking agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit That, pursuant to the parking agreement, Joplin agreed to make improvements to the City-owned lots and Charter lots that will include grading and chipping and sealing the lots suitable for parking purposes. 28. That, pursuant to the parking agreement, Charter agreed that it would indemnify Joplin from and against any loss, cost, claim, damage, liability, and expense (including reasonable attorneys fees and costs resulting, directly or indirectly, from the operation of its baseball franchise at the Stadium and its obligations under the parking agreement. The Blasters Lease Agreement 29. That on January 14, 2016, the Blasters and Joplin entered into an amended five (5 year lease agreement for the lease of the land and improvements known as Joe Becker Baseball Stadium from May 1 to September 30 of each year ( Blasters lease agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit That, pursuant to the Blasters lease agreement, Joplin agreed to lease to Blasters the land and improvements known as Joe Becker Baseball Stadium. 31. That, pursuant to the lease agreement, Blasters agreed that it would pay annual rent in the sum of Seventy Five Thousand Dollars ($75, per year, payable: $15, on May 1 st, $15, on June 1 st, $15, on July 1 st, $15, on August 1 st, and 5
6 $15, on September 1 st of each year, for a total of Three Hundred Seventy Five Thousand Dollars ($375, over a five (5 year term. 25. That Blasters has not made a lease payment since August 2, COUNT I BREACH OF CONTRACT As to WLD Suarez, LLC 26. That Plaintiff incorporates by reference each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 25 as though fully set forth herein. 27. That Joplin and WLD have a contract, the terms of which are described in the WLD lease agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit That Joplin performed its obligations under the terms of the contract by leasing to WLD the land and improvements known as Joe Becker Baseball Stadium. 29. That WLD failed to perform its obligations under the contract by failing to pay annual rent in the sum of One Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150, per year, payable in quarterly installments of Thirty Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($37, due on the first day of each quarter for the calendar year, for a total of Three Million Dollars ($3,000, over a twenty (20 year term. Specifically, WLD has never made a lease payment. 30. That Joplin has been damaged as a result of WLD s breach of contract, namely, it has lost Three Million Dollars ($3,000, in lease payments over the remaining term of the lease agreement. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff City of Joplin prays under Count I for judgment against Defendant WLD Suarez, LLC in an amount in excess of Three Million Dollars ($3,000,000.00; for prejudgment and postjudgment interest; for attorney s fees and costs; and for such other relief as the Court deems just and proper. COUNT II FRAUD 6
7 As to WLD Suarez, LLC 31. That Plaintiff incorporates by reference each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 30 as though fully set forth herein. 32. That WLD represented to Joplin that it would pay annual rent in the sum of One Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150, per year, payable in quarterly installments of Thirty Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($37, due on the first day of each quarter for the calendar year, for a total of Three Million Dollars ($3,000, for a term of at least twenty (20 years ( the representation. 33. That WLD s representation was false. 34. That WLD s representation was material. 35. That WLD knew that its material representation was false. 36. That WLD intended that Joplin should act on its false, material representation. 37. That Joplin did not know that WLD s material representation was false. 38. That Joplin relied on WLD s material representation being true. Specifically, Joplin expended Joplin expended Four Million Seven Hundred Twenty Three Thousand Seven Hundred Four Dollars ($4,723, on Joe Becker Baseball Stadium. 39. That Joplin had a right to rely on WLD s material representation being true. 40. That WLD s false, material representation proximately caused injury to Joplin, namely the loss of Four Million Seven Hundred Twenty Three Thousand Seven Hundred Four Dollars ($4,723, expended on Joe Becker Stadium. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff City of Joplin prays under Count II for judgment against Defendant WLD Suarez, LLC an amount in excess of Four Million Seven Hundred Twenty Three Thousand Seven Hundred Four Dollars ($4,723,704.00; for punitive damages in an amount 7
8 sufficient to deter Defendant and other similarly-situated individuals from engaging in like conduct; for prejudgment and postjudgment interest; for attorney s fees and costs; and for such other relief as the Court deems just and proper. COUNT III BREACH OF CONTRACT As to Pro Baseball Management, LLC 41. That Plaintiff incorporates by reference each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 40 as though fully set forth herein. 42. That Joplin and Pro Baseball have a contract, the terms of which are described in the Pro Baseball lease agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit That Joplin performed its obligations under the terms of the contract by leasing to Pro Baseball the land and improvements known as Joe Becker Baseball Stadium. 44. That Pro Baseball failed to perform its obligations under the contract by failing to pay annual rent in the sum of One Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150, per year, payable in quarterly installments of Thirty Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($37, due on the first day of each quarter for the calendar year, for a total of Three Million Dollars ($3,000, over a twenty (20 year term. Specifically, Pro Baseball has not made a lease payment since July 1, That Joplin has been damaged as a result of Pro Baseball s breach of contract, namely, it has lost Two Million Nine Hundred Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($2,925, in lease payments over the remaining term of the lease agreement. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff City of Joplin prays under Count III for judgment against Defendant Pro Baseball Management, LLC in an amount in excess of Two Million Nine Hundred Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($2,925,000.00; for prejudgment and postjudgment interest; for attorney s fees and costs; and for such other relief as the Court deems just and proper. 8
9 COUNT IV FRAUD As to Pro Baseball Management, LLC 46. That Plaintiff incorporates by reference each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 45 as though fully set forth herein. 47. That Pro Baseball represented to Joplin that it would pay annual rent in the sum of One Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150, per year, payable in quarterly installments of Thirty Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($37, due on the first day of each quarter for the calendar year, for a total of Three Million Dollars ($3,000, for a term of at least twenty (20 years ( the representation. 48. That Pro Baseball s representation was false. 49. That Pro Baseball s representation was material. 50. That Pro Baseball knew that its material representation was false. 51. That Pro Baseball intended that Joplin should act on its false, material representation. 52. That Joplin did not know that Pro Baseball s material representation was false. 53. That Joplin relied on Pro Baseball s material representation being true. Specifically, Joplin expended Joplin expended Four Million Seven Hundred Twenty Three Thousand Seven Hundred Four Dollars ($4,723, on Joe Becker Baseball Stadium. 54. That Joplin had a right to rely on Pro Baseball s material representation being true. 55. That Pro Baseball s false, material representation proximately caused injury to Joplin, namely the loss of Four Million Seven Hundred Twenty Three Thousand Seven Hundred Four Dollars ($4,723, expended on Joe Becker Stadium. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff City of Joplin prays under Count II for judgment against Defendant Pro Baseball Management, LLC an amount in excess of Four Million Seven Hundred 9
10 Twenty Three Thousand Seven Hundred Four Dollars ($4,723,704.00; for punitive damages in an amount sufficient to deter Defendant and other similarly-situated individuals from engaging in like conduct; for prejudgment and postjudgment interest; for attorney s fees and costs; and for such other relief as the Court deems just and proper. COUNT V BREACH OF CONTRACT As to Charter Sports, LLC 56. That Plaintiff incorporates by reference each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 55 as though fully set forth herein. 57. That Joplin and Charter have a contract, the terms of which are described in the parking agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit That Joplin performed its obligations under the terms of the contract by making improvements to the City-owned lots and Charter lots that included grading and chipping and sealing the lots suitable for parking purposes. 59. That Charter failed to perform its obligations under the terms of the contract by failing to indemnify Joplin from its loss, cost, claim, damage, liability, or expense (including reasonable attorneys fees and costs of at least Four Million Seven Hundred Twenty Three Thousand Seven Hundred Four Dollars ($4,723, relating to WLD Suarez, LLC; at least Four Million Seven Hundred Twenty Three Thousand Seven Hundred Four Dollars ($4,723, relating to Pro Baseball Management, LLC; and at least Three Hundred Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($315, relating to Joplin Blasters, LLC, resulting, directly or indirectly, from the operation of its baseball franchise at the Stadium and its obligations under the parking agreement. 60. That Joplin has been damaged as a result of Charters breach of contract, namely, it has not been indemnified in the amount of at least Four Million Seven Hundred Twenty Three 10
11 Thousand Seven Hundred Four Dollars ($4,723, relating to WLD Suarez, LLC; in the amount of at least Four Million Seven Hundred Twenty Three Thousand Seven Hundred Four Dollars ($4,723, relating to Pro Baseball Management, LLC; and at least Three Hundred Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($315, relating to Joplin Blasters, LLC. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff City of Joplin prays under Count V for judgment against Defendant Charter Sports, LLC in an amount coextensive to any liability of Defendants WLD Suarez, LLC, Pro Baseball Management, LLC, Charter Sports, LLC, and Joplin Blasters, LLC; for prejudgment and postjudgment interest; for attorney s fees and costs; and for such other relief as the Court deems just and proper. COUNT VI TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER & PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION PURSUANT TO RSMO. CHAPTER 526 & RULE As to Charter Sports, LLC 61. That Plaintiff incorporates by reference each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 60 as though fully set forth herein. 62. That Joplin and Charter have a contract, the terms of which are described in the parking agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit That the agreement described in paragraph 62 herein includes provisions regarding certain property owned by Charter near Joe Becker Baseball Stadium, highlighted in blue on the map attached hereto as Exhibit That the agreement described in paragraph 62 provides that Joplin and Charter will co-develop the property highlighted in blue and red on Exhibit 5 in order to construct and maintain parking lots to serve Joe Becker Baseball Stadium. 65. That, upon information and belief, Joplin believes that Charter intends to fence in and sod over certain property owned by Charter near Joe Becker Baseball Stadium. 11
12 66. That Charter s conduct would constitute a breach of the contract described in paragraph 62 herein, which provides that the property be used for parking lots to serve Joe Becker Baseball Stadium. 67. That Joplin will experience immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage in the absence of relief. 68. That Joplin has no adequate remedy at law. 69. That Joplin requests an injunction enjoining Charter and all other parties to this action, their officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and upon those persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of the order by personal service or otherwise, from altering in any way the parking space referenced in Exhibit 5. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff City of Joplin prays under Count VI for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction enjoining Defendant Charter Sports, LLC from altering in any way the parking space referenced in Exhibit 5; and for such further and other relief as the Court deems just and proper. COUNT VII BREACH OF CONTRACT As to Joplin Blasters, LLC 70. That Plaintiff incorporates by reference each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 69 as though fully set forth herein. 71. That Joplin and Blasters have a contract, the terms of which are described in the Blasters lease agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit That Joplin performed its obligations under the terms of the contract by leasing to the Blasters the land and improvements known as Joe Becker Base Baseball Stadium for the purpose of playing baseball, baseball practice, promotional events and ticket and merchandise sales. 12
13 73. That Blasters failed to perform its obligations under the terms of the contract by failing to pay annual rent in the sum of Seventy Five Thousand Dollars ($75, per year, payable: $15, on May 1 st, $15, on June 1 st, $15, on July 1 st, $15, on August 1 st, and $15, on September 1 st of each year, for a total of Three Hundred Seventy Five Thousand Dollars ($375, over a five-year term. 74. That Joplin has been damaged as a result of Blasters breach of contract, namely, it has lost $315, in lease payments. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff City of Joplin prays under Count VII for judgment against Defendant Joplin Blasters, LLC in an amount in excess of Three Hundred Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($315,000.00; for prejudgment and postjudgment interest; for attorney s fees and costs; and for such other relief as the Court deems just and proper. COUNT VIII PIERCING THE CORPORATE VEIL As to Oscar Suarez 75. That Plaintiff incorporates by reference each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 74 as though fully set forth herein. 76. That WLD Suarez, LLC ( WLD is a Wyoming Limited Liability Company with its principal places of business located in Phoenix, Maricopa County, Arizona. 77. That Pro Baseball Management, LLC ( Pro Baseball is a Wyoming Limited Liability Company with its principal place of business located in Phoenix, Maricopa County, Arizona. 78. That Charter Sports, LLC ( Charter is a Colorado Limited Liability Company with its principal place of business located in Aurora, Arapahoe County, Colorado. 79. That the Joplin Blasters, LLC ( Blasters is a Missouri Limited Liability Company authorized to do business in the State of Missouri with its principal place of business located in 13
14 Jasper County, Missouri. 80. That Oscar Suarez is and was at all times referenced herein the sole member of WLD, Pro Baseball, Charter, and Blasters. Oscar Suarez exercised complete domination, not only of finances, but of policy and business practice in respect to the transactions with Joplin so that WLD, Pro Baseball, Charter, and Blasters as to these transactions had at the time no separate mind, will, or existence of their own. 81. That this control was used by Oscar Suarez to commit fraud or wrong, to perpetrate the violation of a statutory or other positive legal duty, or dishonest and unjust act in contravention of Joplin's legal rights in that he: a. Intentionally failed to invest sufficient assets in WLD, Pro Baseball, Charter, and Blasters to meet their foreseeable financial obligations; b. Refused to invest sufficient funds into WLD, Pro Baseball, Charter, and Blasters so that they could meet their future financial obligations; c. Withdrew assets from WLD, Pro Baseball, Charter, and Blasters so that they had no assets to meet their future financial obligations; and d. Transferred assets from WLD, Pro Baseball, Charter, and Blasters with the intent to hinder, delay, and defraud their creditors. 82. That WLD, Pro Baseball, Charter, and Blasters have defaulted on their obligations under the WLD lease agreement, Pro Baseball lease agreement, parking agreement, and Blasters lease agreement, respectively, and there are no corporate assets with which to pay any obligations under these agreements. 83. That as a result of Oscar Suarez s control and manipulation of WLD, Pro Baseball, Charter, and Blasters, Joplin has suffered damages, specifically, Five Million Thirty Eight 14
15 Thousand Seven Hundred Four Dollars ($5,038, in the form of Four Million Seven Hundred Twenty Three Thousand Seven Hundred Four Dollars ($4,723, expended on Joe Becker Stadium in reliance on the false, material representations of WLD and/or Pro Baseball, and Three Hundred Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($315, in lease payments per the terms of the Blasters lease agreement. 84. That, accordingly, WLD, Pro Baseball, Charter, and Blasters legal forms should be disregarded to the extent that it would limit the liability of Oscar Suarez for the illegal, fraudulent, and unjust acts committed. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff City of Joplin prays under Count VIII for judgment against Defendant Oscar Suarez, individually, in an amount coextensive to any liability of Defendants WLD Suarez, LLC, Pro Baseball Management, LLC, Charter Sports, LLC, and Joplin Blasters, LLC; for attorney s fees and costs, and for such other relief as the Court deems just and proper. COUNT XI PIERCING THE CORPORATE VEIL As to Gabriel Suarez 85. That Plaintiff incorporates by reference each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 84 as though fully set forth herein. 86. That WLD Suarez, LLC ( WLD is a Wyoming Limited Liability Company with its principal places of business located in Phoenix, Maricopa County, Arizona. 87. That Pro Baseball Management, LLC ( Pro Baseball is a Wyoming Limited Liability Company with its principal place of business located in Phoenix, Maricopa County, Arizona. 88. That Charter Sports, LLC ( Charter is a Colorado Limited Liability Company with its principal place of business located in Aurora, Arapahoe County, Colorado. 89. That the Joplin Blasters, LLC ( Blasters is a Missouri Limited Liability Company 15
16 authorized to do business in the State of Missouri with its principal place of business located in Jasper County, Missouri. 90. That Gabriel Suarez is and was at all times referenced herein the sole member of WLD, Pro Baseball, Charter, and Blasters. Gabriel Suarez exercised complete domination, not only of finances, but of policy and business practice in respect to the transactions with Joplin so that WLD, Pro Baseball, Charter, and Blasters as to these transactions had at the time no separate mind, will, or existence of their own. 91. That this control was used by Gabriel Suarez to commit fraud or wrong, to perpetrate the violation of a statutory or other positive legal duty, or dishonest and unjust act in contravention of Joplin's legal rights in that he: a. Intentionally failed to invest sufficient assets in WLD, Pro Baseball, Charter, and Blasters to meet their foreseeable financial obligations; b. Refused to invest sufficient funds into WLD, Pro Baseball, Charter, and Blasters so that they could meet their future financial obligations; c. Withdrew assets from WLD, Pro Baseball, Charter, and Blasters so that they had no assets to meet their future financial obligations; and d. Transferred assets from WLD, Pro Baseball, Charter, and Blasters with the intent to hinder, delay, and defraud their creditors. 92. That WLD, Pro Baseball, Charter, and Blasters have defaulted on their obligations under the WLD lease agreement, Pro Baseball lease agreement, parking agreement, and Blasters lease agreement, respectively, and there are no corporate assets with which to pay any obligations under these agreements. 93. That as a result of Gabriel Suarez s control and manipulation of WLD, Pro 16
17 Baseball, Charter, and Blasters, Joplin has suffered damages, specifically, Five Million Thirty Eight Thousand Seven Hundred Four Dollars ($5,038, in the form of Four Million Seven Hundred Twenty Three Thousand Seven Hundred Four Dollars ($4,723, expended on Joe Becker Stadium in reliance on the false, material representations of WLD and/or Pro Baseball, and Three Hundred Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($315, in lease payments per the terms of the Blasters lease agreement. 94. That, accordingly, WLD, Pro Baseball, Charter, and Blasters legal forms should be disregarded to the extent that it would limit the liability of Oscar Suarez for the illegal, fraudulent, and unjust acts committed. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff City of Joplin prays under Count XI for judgment against Defendant Gabriel Suarez, individually, in an amount coextensive to any liability of Defendants WLD Suarez, LLC, Pro Baseball Management, LLC, Charter Sports, LLC, and Joplin Blasters, LLC; for attorney s fees and costs, and for such other relief as the Court deems just and proper. COUNT X PIERCING THE CORPORATE VEIL As to Shawn Suarez 95. That Plaintiff incorporates by reference each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 94 as though fully set forth herein. 96. That WLD Suarez, LLC ( WLD is a Wyoming Limited Liability Company with its principal places of business located in Phoenix, Maricopa County, Arizona. 97. That Pro Baseball Management, LLC ( Pro Baseball is a Wyoming Limited Liability Company with its principal place of business located in Phoenix, Maricopa County, Arizona. 98. That Charter Sports, LLC ( Charter is a Colorado Limited Liability Company with its principal place of business located in Aurora, Arapahoe County, Colorado. 17
18 99. That the Joplin Blasters, LLC ( Blasters is a Missouri Limited Liability Company authorized to do business in the State of Missouri with its principal place of business located in Jasper County, Missouri That Shawn Suarez is and was at all times referenced herein the sole member of WLD, Pro Baseball, Charter, and Blasters. Shawn Suarez exercised complete domination, not only of finances, but of policy and business practice in respect to the transactions with Joplin so that WLD, Pro Baseball, Charter, and Blasters as to these transactions had at the time no separate mind, will, or existence of their own That this control was used by Shawn Suarez to commit fraud or wrong, to perpetrate the violation of a statutory or other positive legal duty, or dishonest and unjust act in contravention of Joplin's legal rights in that he: a. Intentionally failed to invest sufficient assets in WLD, Pro Baseball, Charter, and Blasters to meet their foreseeable financial obligations; b. Refused to invest sufficient funds into WLD, Pro Baseball, Charter, and Blasters so that they could meet their future financial obligations; c. Withdrew assets from WLD, Pro Baseball, Charter, and Blasters so that they had no assets to meet their future financial obligations; and d. Transferred assets from WLD, Pro Baseball, Charter, and Blasters with the intent to hinder, delay, and defraud their creditors That WLD, Pro Baseball, Charter, and Blasters have defaulted on their obligations under the WLD lease agreement, Pro Baseball lease agreement, parking agreement, and Blasters lease agreement, respectively, and there are no corporate assets with which to pay any obligations under these agreements. 18
19 103. That as a result of Shawn Suarez s control and manipulation of WLD, Pro Baseball, Charter, and Blasters, Joplin has suffered damages, specifically, Five Million Thirty Eight Thousand Seven Hundred Four Dollars ($5,038, in the form of Four Million Seven Hundred Twenty Three Thousand Seven Hundred Four Dollars ($4,723, expended on Joe Becker Stadium in reliance on the false, material representations of WLD and/or Pro Baseball, and Three Hundred Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($315, in lease payments per the terms of the Blasters lease agreement That, accordingly, WLD, Pro Baseball, Charter, and Blasters legal forms should be disregarded to the extent that it would limit the liability of Shawn Suarez for the illegal, fraudulent, and unjust acts committed. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff City of Joplin prays under Count X for judgment against Defendant Shawn Suarez, individually, in an amount coextensive to any liability of Defendants WLD Suarez, LLC, Pro Baseball Management, LLC, Charter Sports, LLC, and Joplin Blasters, LLC; for attorney s fees and costs, and for such other relief as the Court deems just and proper. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Jordan L. Paul Jordan L. Paul MoBar# Assistant City Attorney City of Joplin 602 S. Main Street Joplin, MO ( X227 ( (fax JPaul@JoplinMo.org ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF CITY OF JOPLIN 19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-000-jls-kes Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 0 Troy S. Brown (Pro Hac Vice) tsbrown@morganlewis.com Evan Jacobs (Pro Hac Vice) evan.jacobs@morganlewis.com 0 Market Street Philadelphia,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MADISON COUNTY, ALABAMA. CARL E. FALLIN, SR., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) CITY OF HUNTSVILLE, ) ) Defendant.
ELECTRONICALLY FILED 10/22/2014 3:44 PM 47-CV-2014-902167.00 CIRCUIT COURT OF MADISON COUNTY, ALABAMA JANE C. SMITH, CLERK IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MADISON COUNTY, ALABAMA CARL E. FALLIN, SR., ) ) Plaintiff,
More informationPlaintiff, CASE NO. : COMPLAINT FOR TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION, AND OTHER STATUTORY RELIEF
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR POLK COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, vs. Plaintiff, CASE NO. : LAKELAND HOSPITALITY,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Plaintiff, vs. ABC RESTORATION, INC.
More informationCase 5:07-cv F Document 60 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Case 5:07-cv-00141-F Document 60 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA DIXIE AIRE TITLE SERVICES, INC., an Oklahoma corporation, Plaintiff,
More informationCOMPLAINT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, AND OTHER STATUTORY RELIEF. Plaintiff, STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, Plaintiff, vs. CASE NO. 05- THE GLOBAL HEALINGS
More information8:19-cv LSC-CRZ Doc # 1 Filed: 01/30/19 Page 1 of 11 - Page ID # 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
8:19-cv-00045-LSC-CRZ Doc # 1 Filed: 01/30/19 Page 1 of 11 - Page ID # 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA LAREDO RIDGE WIND, LLC; BROKEN BOW WIND, LLC, and CROFTON BLUFFS
More informationPlaintiff, SUMMONS WITH VERIFIED COMPLAINT. Nassau County is designated by -against- Plaintiff as the place of trial
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NASSAU X GALASSO LANGIONE & BOTTER, LLP, (formerly Index No.: 07/010038 known as GALASSO LANGIONE, LLP) as Escrow Agent for STEPHEN BARON on SIGNATURE BANK
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR POLK COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION DIVISION:
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR POLK COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Plaintiff, CASE NO. vs. DIVISION:
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Plaintiff, vs. CASE NO.: BAYMONT
More informationCase 9:15-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/19/2015 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 9:15-cv-81584-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/19/2015 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JAMES D. SALLAH, not individually, but solely in his
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, CASE NO. :
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, vs. Plaintiff, CASE NO. : OCALA INN
More informationCase 1:15-cv TWP-MJD Document 1 Filed 06/09/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1
Case 1:15-cv-00905-TWP-MJD Document 1 Filed 06/09/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA TERRE HAUTE DIVISION HIGHLAND TH, LLC and OVERSEAS LEASE GROUP,
More informationCase 6:18-cv CJS Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 6:18-cv-06416-CJS Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ORTHO-CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS, INC., v. Plaintiff, MAZUMA CAPITAL CORP, Civil Action
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO Village of Silverton, Ohio : CASE NO. an Ohio municipal corporation 6943 Montgomery Road : (Judge ) Silverton, Ohio 45236 : and : JRA MVG Silverton Land,
More informationRECErVED FOR FlUNG AMERICAN MARKETING GROUP, LLC.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, STATE OF FLORIDA, CASE NO. Plaintiff, 201tlCA \)\) 12~'xm
More informationFiling # E-Filed 09/10/ :56:35 PM
Filing # 31928359 E-Filed 09/10/2015 05:56:35 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA GRE PROPERTIES SHERIDAN HILLS, LLC CASE NO.: v. Plaintiff, BURKE
More informationPlaintiff, Case No.: COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Miami-Dade County (the County ) sues Defendants Miami Marlins, L.P. (the
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA COMPLEX LITIGATION DIVISION MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, vs. Plaintiff, Case
More informationIN THE FLORIDA FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA
Filing # 39299957 E-Filed 03/22/2016 10:50:35 AM S.J., Plaintiff, IN THE FLORIDA FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA v. Case No.: 2016 CA MALCOLM THOMAS and SCHOOL BOARD FOR ESCAMBIA
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, CASE NO. :
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, vs. Plaintiff, CASE NO. : SWIFTY STARS,
More informationCIVIL ACTION COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Wholesale Relators Supply Co., by and through its attorneys Margolis Edelstein,
MARGOLIS EDELSTEIN By: Jonathan S. Ziss, Esquire Identification No. 42437 By: Seth L. Laver, Esquire Identification No. 94518 Curtis Center - Fourth Floor 601 Walnut Street Philadelphia, PA 19106-3304
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, ) OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY ) GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF ) LEGAL AFFAIRS, ) ) ) CASE NO. Plaintiff, ) v. )
More informationIN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR JOHNSON COUNTY PHILIP AMOR, et al., CVCV75753
IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR JOHNSON COUNTY PHILIP AMOR, et al., CVCV75753 Plaintiffs, CONSENT DECREE vs. BRADFORD HOUSER, et al., Defendants I. INTRODUCTION This consent decree is made and entered
More informationCourthouse News Service
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA ~~ UNITED TEACHERS OF DADE, AFT, NEA, PEA, AFL-CIO and KAREN ARONOWITZ, citizen of Florida. ~!.~.-::1 ): -, Plaintiffs,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/29/ :33 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/29/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/29/2016 02:33 PM INDEX NO. 157154/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/29/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK WILLIAM ATKINSON and JESSICA
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 1 RENTBERRY INC., a Delaware corporation, and Delaney Wysingle, an individual, Plaintiffs, THE CITY OF SEATTLE, a Washington
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE. BERNARD K. CHEUNG and BEN WING PUN MOK. and
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: BERNARD K. CHEUNG and BEN WING PUN MOK PLAINTIFFS and (Court seal) KINGS LAND DEVELOPMENTS INC., HENRY LAM, LINDA LAM, JEFFREY P. BEBER, LEVITT, BEBER, EDDIE
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MADISON COUNTY, ALABAMA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MADISON COUNTY, ALABAMA ELECTRONICALLY FILED 3/18/2015 1:46 PM 47-CV-2014-902167.00 CIRCUIT COURT OF MADISON COUNTY, ALABAMA JANE C. SMITH, CLERK CARL E. FALLIN, SR., ) ) Plaintiff,
More informationCase 2:17-cv JHS Document 1 Filed 03/15/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA COMPLAINT
Case 2:17-cv-01139-JHS Document 1 Filed 03/15/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA GERRELL MARTIN and CURTIS SAMPSON, Plaintiffs, vs. LEVYLAW, LLC and BART E. LEVY,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR OSCEOLA COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR OSCEOLA COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, CASE NO. DIVISION: vs. Plaintiff,
More informationKRS 324A A.150 Definitions for KRS 324A.150 to 324A.164. Effective: June 25, 2013
KRS 324A.150 324A.150 Definitions for KRS 324A.150 to 324A.164 Effective: June 25, 2013 As used in KRS 324A.150 to 324A.164, unless the context otherwise requires: (1) Appraisal management company means
More information1. This is an action to challenge the Property Appraiser's assessment in. Plaintiff, UNIVERSAL CITY DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LTD., a
Filing' # 4146t062 E-Filed 05 I t3 12016 l2:1 8 : 39 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OB THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA UNIVERSAL CITY DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LTD., a Florida limited
More informationCase 2:13-cv BCW Document 2 Filed 09/03/13 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:13-cv-00810-BCW Document 2 Filed 09/03/13 Page 1 of 9 Peggy Hunt (Utah State Bar No. 6060) Chris Martinez (Utah State Bar No. 11152) Nathan S. Seim (Utah State Bar No. 12654) DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
More informationMOTION FOR TEMPORARY INJUNCTION. Plaintiff, State of Florida, Office of the Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs,
IN THE CIR11CUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. COMMERCE COMMERCIAL
More informationTSB Holdings, LLC (hereinafter referred to as TSB Holdings), a limited liability
TSB Holdings, LLC (hereinafter referred to as TSB Holdings), a limited liability corporation organized under the laws of Iowa, Iowa Secretary of State corporation # 372003, as a land holding and property
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION CHASE BARFIELD, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Jury Trial Demanded ) v. ) Case No. 2:11-cv-4321NKL ) SHO-ME POWER ELECTRIC
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/22/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/22/2013
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/22/2013 INDEX NO. 653655/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/22/2013 PARTIES 1. Plaintiff GCR Entertainment, LLC is a New York Limited Liability Company, with an
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 12/23/ :52 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/23/2016
FILED KINGS COUNTY CLERK 12/23/2016 0552 PM INDEX NO. 512380/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF 12/23/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS ---------------------------------------------------------
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CONSOLIDATED MULTIPLE ) LISTING SERVICE, INC., ) ) Defendant.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA THE TOWNSHIP OF NORTHAMPTON 55 Township Road Richboro, PA 18954 Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. ATC OUTDOOR DAS, LLC 116 Huntington
More informationFILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 04/15/ :57 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 70 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/15/2015 EXHIBIT 1
FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 04/15/2015 03:57 PM INDEX NO. 702126/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 70 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/15/2015 EXHIBIT 1 FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 03/06/2015 09:49 AM INDEX NO. 702126/2015 NYSCEF
More informationCABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE AND REGULATIONS
113.01 Definitions 113.09 Service Rules 113.02 Grant of Authority 113.10 Franchise Fee 113.03 Franchise Term 113.11 Use of Streets and Property 113.04 Franchise Territory 113.12 Indemnification and Insurance
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE KENT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE KENT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT 3830G, LLC, RUSTYRICHTER, AFORDABLE HOUSING COALITION, CHARLIE CURTIS, JEFF FORTUNA, JAMES KANE, DANIEL HIBMA, KEYSTONE REALTY GROUP, LLC, GREG MCKEE,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
POINTE ORLANDO DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a California general partnership, Plaintiff, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COLINTY, FLORIDA CASENo. 20tT-CA-4318-O DIVISION: V;
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiffs, CASE NO.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, STATE OF FLORIDA, and THE OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:16-cv-03297-ELR Document 1 Filed 08/31/16 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC, Plaintiff,
More information9/21/2018 4:08 PM 18CV42523 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No.
// :0 PM CV 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY 1 SHANA MAURER, individually and on behalf of other tenants, vs. Plaintiff, SYLVAN HIGHLANDS LLC, Defendant. 1. Case No.
More information2. Plaintiff is a Florida not-for-profit corporation properly registered with the Florida
Filing # 72083739 E-Filed 0511412018 l1:53:09 AM LAKE WALES RETIREMENT CENTE,R, TNC., vs. Plaintiff, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR POLK COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.?.Ð tß-c
More informationCase 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 07/31/15 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:15-cv-01238 Document 1 Filed 07/31/15 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TRUMP OLD POST OFFICE LLC, 1100 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, DC 20004 Plaintiff, v.
More informationCITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Purchase and Sale Agreement
CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Purchase and Sale Agreement This Purchase and Sale Agreement (this "Agreement") is made and entered into as of the date of the last signature below ("Effective Date") by and between
More informationCase 2:18-cv DGC Document 1 Filed 06/08/18 Page 1 of 17
Case :-cv-0-dgc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Brian Del Gatto Arizona Bar No. 0 Taylor H. Allin Arizona Bar No. 0 WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP E. Camelback Rd., Suite 00 Phoenix, AZ 0 P
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO CASE NO JUDGE
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO Joseph Giangrande 7257 Nobb Hill Drive Parma, Ohio 44130, CASE NO JUDGE Patricia Nowacki-Giangrande 7257 Nobb Hill Drive Parma, Ohio 44130, Plaintiffs,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, Plaintiff, vs. No. CLASSMATES, INC.
More informationDEVANCO FOODS EQUIPMENT LEASE AGREEMENT
DATE: DEVANCO FOODS EQUIPMENT LEASE AGREEMENT LESSEE FULL LEGAL NAME OF LESSEE: BUSINESS NAME: ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: BUSINESS PHONE: TAX I.D. #: DRIVER S LICENSE #: SOCIAL SECURITY #: EMERGENCY
More informationCOMPLAINT. Plaintiffs David Rechberger, et al. hereby complain and allege as follows: PARTIES
DISTRICT COURT, BOULDER COUNTY, COLORADO 1777 6th Street Boulder, CO 80302 (303) 441-3750 Plaintiffs: DAVID RECHBERGER, NICOLETTE MUNSON, ROLF MUNSON, LAUREL HYDE BONI, DINAH MCKAY, DONALD SHERWOOD, WILLIAM
More informationCOMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, RESTITUTION, CIVIL PENALTIES, AND OTHER STATUTORY RELIEF
Filing # 62263367 E-Filed 10/02/2017 02:04:38 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT
More information1. The Plaintiff, IA LODGING ORLANDO DOWNTOWN, LLC (hereinafter. 2. The Plaintiff is a Delaware limited liability company authorized to transact -1-
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA TA LODGING ORLANDO DOWNTOWN, LLC, Plaintiff, V. CASENO. dota- CA- a Saos-o RICK SINGH, as the Property Appraiser of
More informationWYOMING DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE CHAPTER 13 PROPERTY TAX APPRAISER EDUCATION AND CERTIFICATION
CHAPTER 13 PROPERTY TAX APPRAISER EDUCATION AND CERTIFICATION Section 1. Authority. These rules are promulgated by the Wyoming Department of Revenue under authority of W.S. 18-3-201, W.S. 18-3-204, and
More informationCONTRACT TO BUY AND SELL REAL ESTATE
CONTRACT TO BUY AND SELL REAL ESTATE THIS CONTRACT TO BUY AND SELL REAL ESTATE ( Contract ) is made and entered into as of April 9, 2018 (the Effective Date ) by and between the City of Pueblo, Colorado,
More informationTHE GLEN CLUB TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF MEMBERSHIP
THE GLEN CLUB TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF MEMBERSHIP 1. Applications for Membership are subject to the approval of Glenview Golf Course, L.L.C. ("The Glen Club " and sometimes hereinafter the Club ), which
More informationArkansas. Appraiser Licensing and Certification Board. Appraisal Management Company Statutes. Subchapter 1 General Provisions
Arkansas Appraiser Licensing and Certification Board Appraisal Management Company Statutes Subchapter 1 General Provisions 17-14-401. Title 17-14-408. Prohibited activities 17-14-402. Definitions 17-14-409.
More informationESCROW AGREEMENT. Recitals
ESCROW AGREEMENT THIS ESCROW AGREEMENT (the Agreement ) is made as of, 20 among Private Motorsports Group, LLC., ( Company ) an Arizona limited liability company and [ ], ( Member ) and Arizona Escrow
More informationLEASE AGREEMENT WITNESSETH:
LEASE AGREEMENT THE STATE OF ALABAMA HOUSTON COUNTY This lease executed in Houston County, Alabama, on this the day of, 201, by and between HOUSTON COUNTY, ALABAMA, BY AND THROUGH THE HOUSTON COUNTY COMMISSION,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/31/ :34 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 70 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/31/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/31/2016 04:34 PM INDEX NO. 653549/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 70 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/31/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------x
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND NORTHERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND NORTHERN DIVISION JOSIE D. CARTER : 3 Highhaven Place, Apartment TD White Marsh, Maryland 21236 : GLORIA A. JOHNSON : 1 Highhaven Place,
More informationFALCON FIELD AIRPORT AIRCRAFT TIEDOWN STORAGE AGREEMENT
FALCON FIELD AIRPORT AIRCRAFT TIEDOWN STORAGE AGREEMENT This AIRCRAFT TIEDOWN STORAGE AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is by and between the CITY OF MESA, a Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as the
More information1. The Plaintiff, LAKE V/ALES RETIREMENT CENTER, [NC., (hereinafter
LAKE WALES RETIREMENT CENTER, INC., IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR POLK COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. lol.t- C.4 - po I I sj v.' Plaintiff, MARSHA M. FAUX, as the Property Appraiser
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR CLAY COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR CLAY COUNTY, FLORIDA COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC. FOR THE BENEFIT OF WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP., Plaintiff, CIVIL DIVISION
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed December 27, 2017. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D16-2748 Lower Tribunal Nos. 13-4200 & 13-4203 940
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/12/ /30/ :39 06:55 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 136 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/12/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/12/2016 10/30/2017 03:39 06:55 PM INDEX NO. 656279/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 136 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/12/2016 10/30/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PAUL MARINO and LINDA MARINO, Plaintiffs-Appellants, UNPUBLISHED June 19, 2001 v No. 215764 Wayne Circuit Court GRAYHAVEN ESTATES LTD., LLC, LC No. 98-813922-CH GRAYHAVEN-LENOX
More informationINTERPLEADER COMPLAINT THE PARTIES
Case 2:12-cv-01387-RB Document 1 Filed 03/19/12 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SAMUEL T. FREEMAN & CO. V. Plaintiff, No. PETER HIAM, HELEN HIAM,
More informationAPPRAISAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY
STATE OF ARKANSAS APPRAISER LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION BOARD APPRAISAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY RULES AND REGULATIONS EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2010 1 Appraiser Licensing and Certification Board Appraisal Management
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/06/ :20 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 47 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/06/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/06/2016 09:20 AM INDEX NO. 654914/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 47 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/06/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------
More information1. The Plaintiff, PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES, [NC., 2. Plaintiff is a Florida not-for-profit corporation properly registered with the Florida
PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMI]NITIES, INC,, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. Aol'l - C h- oo 1t, 88 - A Plaintiff, RICK SINGH, as the Property
More informationESCROW AGREEMENT - MAINTENANCE
ESCROW AGREEMENT - MAINTENANCE This ESCROW AGREEMENT (the Agreement ) is made and entered into this day of,, by and between the City of O Fallon, Missouri, a Missouri municipal corporation (hereinafter
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, STATE OF FLORIDA, vs. Plaintiff, ROBERT J. VITALE,
More informationTOWN OF SPAFFORD LOCAL LAW
TOWN OF SPAFFORD LOCAL LAW 1-2017 A LOCAL LAW TO REPEAL LOCAL LAW 4-2016 AND REPLACE IT WITH THE FOLLOWING LANGUAGE AMENDING THE ZONING CODE OF THE TOWN OF SPAFFORD FOR THE PURPOSE OF REGULATING THE SHORT-TERM
More informationCOMMISSION AGENDA ;. 1<1. 1./ t1 llc
TO: FROM: The Honorable Chairman and Members of the Board of County Commissioners James L. Bennett, County Attorney ft/f3j COMMISSION AGENDA ;. 1
More informationEXCLUSIVE RENTAL MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
EXCLUSIVE RENTAL MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 1. PARTIES: This agreement between, the owner or legally appointed representative of the premises, hereafter called LANDLORD and Maximum Realty, Inc., whereby the
More informationCase 9:13-cv RNS Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/01/2013 Page 1 of 15
Case 9:13-cv-80184-RNS Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/01/2013 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MICHAEL C. MCINTYRE and CAROL G. MCINTYRE, v. Plaintiffs,
More informationAMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION ARIZONA BILTMORE ESTATES VILLAGE ASSOCIATION
AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF ARIZONA BILTMORE ESTATES VILLAGE ASSOCIATION WHEREAS, the Articles of Incorporation of ARIZONA BILTMORE ESTATES VILLAGE ASSOCIATION were filed with the
More information1. The Plaintifl, FGHP FUNDING WEST LP (hereinafter "Plaintiffl'), owns real
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR SEMINOLE COI.]NTY, FLORIDA FGHP FIINDING WEST LP, Plaintiff, DAVID JOHNSON, as the Property Appraiser of Seminole County, Florida; JOEL
More informationCase: 4:17-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 01/27/17 Page: 1 of 27 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
Case: 4:17-cv-00294 Doc. #: 1 Filed: 01/27/17 Page: 1 of 27 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI STEPHEN PENROSE, JAMES THOMAS, JOSEPH GUARDINO, and DANIEL
More informationPlaintiff, ; IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF TI{E llth JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MIAMI- DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA
Filing # 59493056 E-Filed O7l25l2OL7 03:51:07 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF TI{E llth JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MIAMI- DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION CASE NO. CC-AVENTURA INC. d/bia
More informationRESOLUTION NO
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-968 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALABASAS, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING CONDITIONS FOR THE APPROVAL OF A TRANSFER OF THE SARATOGA HILLS CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE FROM
More informationCase: 1:03-cv Document #: 894 Filed: 07/14/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:16961
Case: 1:03-cv-03904 Document #: 894 Filed: 07/14/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:16961 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,
More informationLOCAL LAW NO. 1 OF THE YEAR 2009 SHORT TERM TRANSIENT RENTAL REGULATIONS. BE IT ENACTED by the Town Board of the Town of Milford, as follows:
Draft: Revised 12/04/08 Changes in yellow LOCAL LAW NO. 1 OF THE YEAR 2009 SHORT TERM TRANSIENT RENTAL REGULATIONS BE IT ENACTED by the Town Board of the, as follows: SECTION 1 Purpose: With the increase
More informationEQUIPMENT LEASE AGREEMENT
EQUIPMENT LEASE AGREEMENT This (the Lease ) is made and effective as of, 2016 (the Effective Date ) by and between Greyhawk Video Solutions LLC (the Lessor ) and, (the Lessee ). The Lessor and the Lessee
More informationVillage of Morton Grove Façade Improvement Program PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT
Village of Morton Grove Façade Improvement Program PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT THIS PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT Agreement is entered into on this day of, 20 Effective Date, by and between the Village of Morton
More informationResidential Management Agreement
Residential Management Agreement This agreement is entered into between whose address is and shall be referred to as the Owner and Cheyenne Property Management Group, LLC, whose address is 716 Randall
More informationCOMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
MIDDLESEX, S.S. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL ACTION NO. JACK SPERANZA, STEVEN BRYANT, DOROTHY MARUSKA, ) VICKI HOLT, LEWIS HOLT, KATHERINE DLUGOLECKI, ) THADDEUS DLUGOLECKI, MAURA SHEA, SUSAN LAMPERT,
More informationREAL PROPERTY PURCHASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF RAPID CITY AND MAPLE GREEN LLC
Prepared by City Attorney s Office 300 Sixth Street Rapid City, SD 57701 (605) 394-4140 REAL PROPERTY PURCHASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF RAPID CITY AND MAPLE GREEN LLC This Agreement is made this day of,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, MISSOURI
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, MISSOURI U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE, SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS TRUSTEE SUCCESSOR-BY-MERGER TO LASALLE Case No. BANK NATIONAL
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA KRISTIN MORGAN CULLITON, vs. Plaintiff, Class Representation CASE NO. 2008 CA 012639 NC TAYLOR MORRISON SERVICES,
More informationUTILITY EASEMENT AGREEMENT
THIS INSTRUMENT PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO: Roy K. Payne, Esq. Chief Assistant City Attorney 400 S. Orange Avenue Orlando, FL 32801 Roy.Payne@CityofOrlando.Net UTILITY EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS UTILITY EASEMENT
More informationTHIS CONVEYANCE IS SUBJECT TO
Page 1 of 10 Return signed document to: Property Agent Real Property Section 115 S. Andrews Avenue, Room 326 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Formatted: Top: 1.19" Field Code Changed This instrument prepared
More informationNOW, THEREFORE in consideration of the promises contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:
AGREEMENT made on this 31 st day of December, 1983, between Fountain of the Sun Association (FOSCA), an Arizona corporation, the other horizontal property regimes and homeowner associations within the
More informationSHERWOOD FOREST AGREEMENT
SHERWOOD FOREST AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into by and between MHC OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, an Illinois limited partnership authorized to transact business in the State of
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2004 ALLISON M. COSTELLO, ETC., Appellant, v. Case No. 5D02-3117 THE CURTIS BUILDING PARTNERSHIP, Appellee. Opinion filed
More information