Developing NSP Projects with Habitat Organizations
|
|
- Polly Wilkins
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Developing NSP Projects with Habitat Organizations January 17, 2012 HUD Community Planning and Development
2 Speakers and Q and A Format Speakers John Laswick, HUD Njeri Santana, HUD Hunter Kurtz, HUD Marsha Tonkovich, ICF Tera Doak, Habitat for Humanity How to ask questions Change status in Live Meeting from green to purple Press *1 to ask a question through Premiere Conference Provide Name and Organization If question already answered, press *2 to remove from queue Change status back to green after question answered 2
3 Agenda Presentation on key topics: Brief description of Habitat approach to developing homes Options for funding Habitat with NSP Implementing NSP rules in Habitat projects organized around common questions Will do one half of presentation (approximately one hour) & take some questions, complete presentation & then take more questions Will do polls throughout 3
4 Typical Habitat Homebuyer Project Approach Many approaches used by local Habitat Affiliates Most common model: Public, private or foundation construction financing Remainder of construction financing comes from donations, volunteer labor, other programs Homebuyer participates and provides sweat equity Once complete, unit sold to low income buyer with 100% Habitat mortgage Closing cost assistance in some projects (more later) 4
5 Typical Habitat Homebuyer Project Approach (cont) Land may be acquired or donated Project may be rehabilitation or new construction May be in-fill housing or part of subdivision Some Habitat affiliates have: Used private mortgage financing for the buyer Allowed other forms of soft second mortgages Required a small downpayment 5
6 Using NSP $$ to Fund Habitats Funds may come from two different sources: NSP 1-3 $$ provided to state or local grantee; grantee funds Habitat to create units NSP2 $$ provided to Habitat International; HHI funds local affiliates Must have written agreement between grantee and Habitat spelling out obligations and requirements For more info see Policy Alert January 12,
7 Common question #1: What role do Habitats play? Regardless of funding approach, key question when funding Habitat is role: Habitat affiliate may be designated as a subrecipient or a developer, depending on role and local program decision If assistance only to buyers and Habitat administers = subrecipient If assistance for acquisition/construction, Habitat may be subrecipient or developer Habitat must have site control Determined by grantee in written agreement 7
8 Common question #1: What role do Habitats play (cont)? If Habitat is subrecipient: Can get admin assistance, activity delivery costs but: Must comply with Part 84 and OMB circulars, including procurement A-133 may apply depending on expenditure level NSP portion of income is program income Cannot earn developer fee or profit on this project 8
9 Common question #1: What role do Habitats play (cont)? If Habitat is developer: Can earn reasonable developer fee but: No activity delivery costs or admin assistance Can charge actual, eligible soft costs of project (more later) Profits earned and retained from home sales not program income but must be reasonable (more later) Habitat can be a subrecipient for some activities and developer for others Agreements must clearly spell out requirements See policy alert dated 11/16/11 for more info: SubrecipientsContractors.pdf 9
10 Subrecipient Developer Neither Both Poll: If you are a grantee what role did you assign to your Habitats? If you are a Habitat, what are you considered? 10
11 Poll: If you are or have a Habitat subrecipient, what has been most confusing about those requirements? Establishing the proper level of admin or activity delivery assistance Tracking or determining program income Other financial management such as procurement, financial systems or records Complying with NSP rules on eligible costs, units or households Long term monitoring and compliance, including affordability period 11
12 Poll: If you are or have a Habitat developer, what has been most confusing about those requirements? Finding or acquiring eligible units/land Determining the reasonable level of developer fee Complying with cross-cutting federal requirements like environmental review or Section 3 Managing the construction, including inspections, standards, energy efficiency etc Funding or qualifying eligible buyers, including meeting the low income set aside Implementing resale/recapture 12
13 Common question #2: Where must Habitat units be located? Habitat projects must be located in area of greatest need identified by grantee in Action Plan Grantee may choose to amend Action Plan if new target areas appropriate Available target areas should be defined in agreements with Habitat subrecipients/developers Funded activity types must also be described in Action Plan 13
14 Common question #3: What properties and NSP activities are eligible for Habitat? Only three possible property types can be acquired or redeveloped by Habitat under NSP: Foreclosed Abandoned Vacant All five eligible NSP uses are possible but: If Habitat is developer, Habitat cannot provide NSP downpayment or closing cost assistance to those buyers 14
15 Common question #4: What rules apply to Habitat s acquisition of property? Several acquisition requirements apply: If foreclosed: Must do appraisal no more than 60 days before final offer Must buy at 1% discount Tenants must receive tenant protection notice & may be covered by URA Property owner must receive voluntary sale notice Must also comply with environmental rules before purchasing 15
16 Common question #5: How can the grantee structure Habitat NSP assistance? Many options for investing in Habitat units: Grantee acquires foreclosed, abandoned, vacant land/units and donates to Habitat Provide funds to Habitat for acquisition Lend construction financing and get repaid at sale Grant construction assistance and remain in deal as homebuyer subsidy Provide mortgage, 50% downpayment, closing cost assistance to buyer 16
17 Common question #5: How can the grantee structure Habitat NSP assistance (cont)? Given Habitat model of 100% homebuyer mortgage, must evaluate total debt before committing NSP $$ NSP does not allow any property to have total debt that exceeds value Example: Property value: $100,000 Habitat mortgage: $100,000 $3,000 in FHLB closing cost loan Closing costs would need to be a grant OR Habitat would need to reduce its mortgage to $97,000 and have second loan of $3,000 for closing costs 17
18 Poll: How does your grantee provide NSP assistance to Habitats? Construction loan repaid to the grantee Construction grant Donated land/units Acquisition assistance Homebuyer downpayment or closing cost Homebuyer mortgage Other 18
19 Common question #6: What property standards apply to Habitat units? NSP imposes mandatory safety, quality, and habitability standards Must comply with local codes, laws, requirements NSP2 and NSP3 also mandatory green rehabilitation and new construction standards Must meet Energy Star standards Grantee may impose additional requirements Grantee must review Habitat work specifications and inspect units in order to ensure compliance 19
20 Common question #7: How does the Habitat sweat equity approach to construction affect NSP? Sweat equity is allowed but: Final unit must still comply with local codes, laws, requirements May affect timeliness of program NSP imposes strict expenditure deadlines In some grantees, Habitat construction approach has resulted in delays Grantees need to work with Habitat affiliate to manage and track deadlines 20
21 Common question #8: What cross cutting federal rules apply to Habitat projects? Several key other federal requirements may apply to Habitat NSP projects: Environmental review URA and tenant protections Lead based paint Fair housing and equal opportunity, including Section 504 handicapped access requirements and possibly Section 3 Applicability depends on project Under NSP3 must also comply with vicinity hiring requirement 21
22 Common question #9: What income caps apply to Habitat buyers? Depends on agreement with grantee: NSP caps at 120% AMI Many Habitats cap at 80% AMI Many Habitat projects are used by grantees to reach low income targeting requirements These buyers must be 50% of AMI or less Habitat or grantee must document income of buyer using grantee s chosen methodology 22
23 Common question #10: What admin and activity delivery costs are eligible? If Habitat is subrecipient: Grantee can elect to pay for some admin costs (capped) such as: Public information/outreach Fair Housing compliance Monitoring of projects/programs Can also charge activity delivery costs such as: Appraisals Work specifications Construction inspections and oversight Underwriting Relocation, environmental reviews, etc. Assess all costs for eligibility, reasonableness & tie to NSP Timesheets required for labor costs 23
24 Common question #10: What admin and activity delivery costs are eligible (cont)? Habitat developers cannot charge activity delivery Can charge actual project costs soft costs such as: Appraisal Market study Permits Architectural Builder s general requirements or overhead Assess all costs for eligibility, reasonableness 24
25 Common question #11: What rules apply to the sale of a Habitat unit? Homebuyer purchase price must be affordable as defined in grantee Action Plan Sale to assisted household cannot exceed Habitat cost to acquire, redevelop, rehab Can include direct and activity delivery costs Can also include cost of donated professional services and materials Sweat equity & non skilled labor not counted Donated materials counted at fair market value Cannot include maintenance costs in sale price, unless rehab done 25
26 Common question #12: What affordability period rules apply to Habitat units? Triggered for all Habitat projects funded with NSP, regardless of whether affiliate imposes other Habitat affordability requirements Written NSP agreement with homebuyer specifies length of affordability period Agreement may be between buyer & Habitat or buyer & grantee Agreement must enable grantee to enforce affordability restrictions Grantees or Habitats can require longer affordability periods 26
27 Common question #12: What affordability period rules apply to Habitat units (cont)? HOME rules are safe harbor Can use alternate approach but must get HUD approval HOME affordability periods are minimums NSP grantees can set longer terms For each homebuyer program, UP FRONT, grantee or Habitat must select compliance approach during period of affordability Two options: Resale or recapture Cannot mix recapture and resale; must choose one or other If no Direct Subsidy to homebuyer, grantee or Habitat must select Resale 27
28 Common question #12: What affordability period rules apply to Habitat units (cont)? Resale Affordability period based on total NSP investment If there is resale requirement, when home is sold: New buyer must be income eligible Home must be affordable to new buyer New buyer must occupy house as principal residence Original buyer must receive a fair return Remaining resale restrictions apply to new buyer 28
29 Common question #12: What affordability period rules apply to Habitat units (cont)? Recapture Affordability period based on direct homebuyer subsidy, does not include development subsidy If NSP construction financing remains in deal & rolls over to permanent mortgage, that is part of direct homebuyer subsidy If sale during affordability period, homebuyer may sell home: To any willing buyer At any price At any time Grantee or Habitat must collect part or all of NSP assistance from the net sale proceeds (if sufficient) 29
30 Resale Recapture Other Poll: What affordability mechanism do you use for Habitat projects? 30
31 Common question #13: How do the program income rules apply to Habitats? Depends on whether Habitat is subrecipient or developer Program income must be tracked, reported & used before requesting additional NSP funds from grantee PI is funds received back to grantee/subrecipients due to NSP investment Grantee may allow Habitat to keep PI or require it be returned PI must be used in accordance with all NSP rules Receipt in DRGR 31
32 Common question #13: How do the program income rules apply to Habitats (cont)? For sales proceeds: If subrecipient, NSP portion is program income Example: NSP portion of TDC $50,000; Habitat portion of TDC $150,000 25% of the sales proceeds to Habitat are NSP program income subject to all NSP rules If developer, not program income but grantee must decide what is reasonable 32
33 Common question #13: How do the program income rules apply to Habitats (cont)? For homebuyer mortgage payments: If subrecipient, NSP portion is program income Example: NSP portion of mortgage $40,000; Habitat portion of mortgage $60,000 40% of the mortgage payments are NSP program income subject to all NSP rules If developer, not program income but grantee must decide what is reasonable 33
34 Common question #13: How do the program income rules apply to Habitats (cont)? For recaptured funds earned during affordability period sale, answer is the same whether Habitat is developer or subrecipient Recaptured funds must be used for other eligible NSP uses Grantee determines what happens to these funds & spells out in written agreement with Habitat Habitat to re-use for NSP-eligible projects Habitat to repay grantee Regardless, receipt and use of these funds must be tracked & reported 34
35 Common question #13: How do the program income rules apply to Habitats (cont)? Important that grantee written agreement with Habitat be explicit about: Whether Habitat is subrecipient or developer What happens to initial sales proceeds? (Program income? Who keeps? How can be used?) What happens to homebuyer loan repayments (Program income? Who keeps? How can be used?) What happens to net sales proceeds if sell during affordability period (Who keeps recaptured funds? How can be used?) Required tracking and reporting provisions for NSP $$$ 35
36 Common question #14: What documentation & reporting is required for Habitat affiliates? Should be described in agreement with grantee but must include items such as: Expenditures and use of NSP draws Unit quality inspections Income documentation of buyers Tracking of program income (if applicable) Verification of affordability period compliance Grantee likely to require periodic reporting of unit status, households assisted, program results 36
37 Poll: What type of future webinars are needed? Financial management/program income/drgr Accessing credit & creating partnerships with lenders Other federal requirements (Davis Bacon/URA/LBP/enviro review/fair Housing etc) Affordability period requirements (resale/recap, rental etc) Construction management Underwriting Marketing/advertising/sales of units 37
38 NSP Resource Exchange Links NSP Resource Exchange Search the Resource Library Search the FAQs View All Training Materials on the Learning Center Submit a Policy Question via Ask A Question Request Technical Assistance Connect with NSP Join the Listserv Visit the NSP Flickr Gallery Visit the NSP YouTube Channel
39 Please Give Us Your Feedback Answer a few short questions Link: 39
Rental Housing Compliance for the NSP Development & Affordability Period May 17, 2011
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Rental Housing Compliance for the NSP Development & Affordability Period May 17, 2011 Speakers and Format Speakers David Noguera, HUD Virginia Sardone,
More informationNeighborhood Stabilization Program
Neighborhood Stabilization Program Neighborhood Stabilization Program What is the Neighborhood Stabilization Program? NSP was funded in 3 rounds to provide assistance to state and local governments to
More informationDifferences, Procurement and
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Developers and Subrecipients: Differences, Procurement and Other Rules July 24, 2012 2:00 PM EDT Community Planning and Development Purpose of Webinar To
More informationGuidance for Habitat for Humanity Affiliates January 12, 2011
January 12, 2011 Community Planning and Development NSP Policy Alert! Guidance for Habitat for Humanity Affiliates January 12, 2011 Overview Habitat for Humanity utilizes a unique development model to
More informationNSP Closeout Webinar
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development NSP Closeout: Special Topics and Post-Closeout Considerations NSP Closeout Webinar 05/01/2014 Community Planning and Development Moderators Presenters-
More informationScattered Site Rental Management
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Scattered Site Rental Management April 5 th, 2012 2:00 4:00 P.M. Community Planning and Development Moderator and Presenters Moderator: Kent Buhl, KB Consulting
More informationReviewed and Approved
Action Plan Grantee: Grant: Prince William County, VA B-08-UN-51-0002 LOCCS Authorized Amount: Grant Award Amount: $ 4,134,611.98 $ 4,134,611.98 Status: Reviewed and Approved Estimated PI/RL Funds: $ 43,900.00
More informationNSP Spring Cleaning. Documenting Compliance For Closeout. May 29, 2018
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development NSP Spring Cleaning Documenting Compliance For Closeout May 29, 2018 Community Planning and Development Today s Presenters - John Laswick, HUD - Njeri Santana-Carter,
More informationReviewed and Approved
Action Plan Grantee: Grant: Houston, TX B-11-MN-48-0400 LOCCS Authorized Amount: Grant Award Amount: $ 3,389,035.00 $ 3,389,035.00 Status: Reviewed and Approved Estimated PI/RL Funds: $ 1,250,664.11 Total
More informationColorado s National Housing Trust Fund Program Update. Housing Colorado NOW! 2017 Annual Training Conference
Colorado s National Housing Trust Fund Program Update Housing Colorado NOW! 2017 Annual Training Conference October 11, 2017 DIVISION OF HOUSING SPEAKERS Kim Snetzinger Lead Asset Manager Wayne McClary
More informationNSP Land Bank Webinar
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development NSP Land Bank Webinar June 3, 2014 2:00 PM EDT Community Planning and Development Presenters and Q&A Format Presenters Bill Whitney, Cuyahoga County Land
More informationU.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. HUD Webinar. Multifamily Property Management June 14, Community Planning and Development
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development HUD Webinar Multifamily Property Management June 14, 2011 Community Planning and Development Presenters Sandra Abramson, President, Tem-Pro-Tech, Inc. Ken
More informationReviewed and Approved
Action Plan Grantee: Grant: Orange County, FL B-11-UN-12-0012 LOCCS Authorized Amount: Grant Award Amount: $ 11,551,158.00 $ 11,551,158.00 Status: Reviewed and Approved Estimated PI/RL Funds: $ 11,700,000.00
More informationNSP Rental Basics: A Primer on Using Rental Projects to Meet NSP Obligation and 25% Set-Aside Requirement. About this Tool
NSP Rental Basics: A Primer on Using Rental Projects to Meet NSP Obligation and 25% Set-Aside Requirement About this Tool Description: This tool is intended for NSP grantees and their partners seeking
More informationOverview. Five Eligible NSP Uses. Meeting the 25% Set-Aside for Low-Income Persons
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Meeting the 25% Set-Aside for Low-Income Persons Neighborhood Stabilization Program Neighborhood Stabilization Program Eligible uses Program activities
More informationICF INTERNATIONAL, INC. January 5, :00 pm ET
Page 1 ICF INTERNATIONAL, INC. January 5, 2012 2:00 pm ET Operator: Good day and welcome to the HUD Resale Recapture and Habitat Organization conference. Today's call is being recorded. If you would like
More informationManaging NSP2 Programs For Success. Key Success Factors in NSP1. Typical NSP1 Market Strategies. Lessons Learned from NSP1
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Managing NSP2 Programs For Success Lessons Learned from NSP1 Neighborhood Stabilization Neighborhood Program 2 Stabilization Program 2 Key Success Factors
More informationNeighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) A Briefing To The Housing Committee November 17, 2008
Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) A Briefing To The Housing Committee November 17, 2008 KEY FOCUS AREA: ECONOMIC VIBRANCY Purpose: To provide an overview of the Housing & Economic Recovery Act of
More informationQuestion and Answers June 24, 2010
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development NSP Open Forum Question and Answers June 24, 2010 Community Planning and Development Moderators and Q and A Format Moderators David Noguera, HUD David.A.Noguera@hud.gov
More informationLease-purchase and NSP
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Lease-purchase and NSP What practitioners are saying 1 Introduction Sponsored by HUD Speakers: David Cramer, TDA Donna Majors, CVC Keysha Cuyler, CVC William
More informationUsing NSP to Preserve Affordability. March 22, 2011
Using NSP to Preserve Affordability March 22, 2011 1 Using NSP to Preserve Affordability March 22, 2011 10 a.m. Pacific/ 1 p.m. Eastern Presenters Ron Whitman, Pima County Community Land Trust Staci Horwitz,
More informationApril 1, 2013 thru June 30, 2013 Performance Report
Grantee: Prince William County, VA Grant: B-08-UN-51-0002 April 1, 2013 thru June 30, 2013 Performance Report 1 Grant Number: B-08-UN-51-0002 Grantee Name: Prince William County, VA Grant Amount: Estimated
More informationIssues with Developers
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development HUD Webinar Issues with Developers October 11 th, 2011 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Planning and Development Presenters Host
More informationJanuary 1, 2016 thru March 31, 2016 Performance Report
Grantee: Grant: Clark County, NV B-08-UN-32-0001 January 1, 2016 thru March 31, 2016 Performance Report 1 Grant Number: B-08-UN-32-0001 Grantee Name: Clark County, NV Grant Award Amount: $29,666,798.00
More informationApril 1, 2010 thru June 30, 2010 Performance Report
Grantee: Long Beach, CA Grant: B-09-CN-CA-0045 April 1, 2010 thru June 30, 2010 Performance Report Grant Number: B-09-CN-CA-0045 Grantee Name: Long Beach, CA Grant Amount: $22,249,980.00 Grant Status:
More informationDemolition and Disposition
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development NSP Webinar Demolition and Disposition December 18, 2012 2:00 P.M. EST Community Planning and Development Moderator and Panel Kent Buhl, Moderator KB Consulting
More informationApril 1, 2016 thru June 30, 2016 Performance Report
Grantee: Grant: Sarasota County, FL B-11-UN-12-0017 April 1, 2016 thru June 30, 2016 Performance Report 1 Grant Number: B-11-UN-12-0017 Grantee Name: Sarasota County, FL Grant Award Amount: $3,949,541.00
More informationU.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Meeting the 25% Set-Aside for Low-Income Persons
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Meeting the 25% Set-Aside for Low-Income Persons Neighborhood Stabilization Program Neighborhood Stabilization Program Overview Eligible uses Program activities
More informationTHE NSP SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT
THE NSP SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT Jurisdiction(s): City of Sterling Heights (identify lead entity in case of joint agreements) Jurisdiction Web Address: (URL where NSP Substantial Amendment materials are posted)
More informationApril 1, 2012 thru June 30, 2012 Performance Report
Grantee: Elyria, OH Grant: B-08-MN-39-0007 April 1, 2012 thru June 30, 2012 Performance Report 1 Grant Number: B-08-MN-39-0007 Grantee Name: Elyria, OH Grant Amount: $2,468,215.00 Estimated PI/RL Funds:
More informationOctober 1, 2012 thru December 31, 2012 Performance Report
Grantee: Pinellas County, FL Grant: B-11-UN-12-0015 October 1, 2012 thru December 31, 2012 Performance Report 1 Grant Number: B-11-UN-12-0015 Grantee Name: Pinellas County, FL Grant Amount: $4,697,519.00
More informationApril 1, 2016 thru June 30, 2016 Performance Report
Grantee: Grant: Orange County, FL B-11-UN-12-0012 April 1, 2016 thru June 30, 2016 Performance Report 1 Grant Number: B-11-UN-12-0012 Grantee Name: Orange County, FL Grant Award Amount: $11,551,158.00
More informationSection IV: HOME Narratives
Section IV: HOME Narratives IV. HOME NARRATIVES (AP-90) A. INTRODUCTION Los Angeles County is an Urban County-participating jurisdiction for HUD s HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) Program. It receives
More informationJanuary 1, 2013 thru March 31, 2013 Performance Report
Grantee: Pinellas County, FL Grant: B-11-UN-12-0015 January 1, 2013 thru March 31, 2013 Performance Report 1 Grant Number: B-11-UN-12-0015 Grantee Name: Pinellas County, FL Grant Amount: $4,697,519.00
More informationNSP Project Feasibility Analysis Template: Instruction Manual
NSP Project Feasibility Analysis Template: Instruction Manual About this Tool Description: This tool provides tab-by-tab instructions for using the NSP Project Feasibility Analysis Template, a workbook
More informationApril 1, 2011 thru June 30, 2011 Performance Report
Grantee: Pomona, CA Grant: B-11-MN-06-0516 April 1, 2011 thru June 30, 2011 Performance Report 1 Grant Number: B-11-MN-06-0516 Grantee Name: Pomona, CA Grant Amount: $1,235,629.00 Estimated PI/RL Funds:
More informationReviewed and Approved
Action Plan Grantee: Grant:, FL B-11-UN-12-0011 LOCCS Authorized Amount: Grant Award Amount: $ 4,589,714.00 $ 4,589,714.00 Status: Reviewed and Approved Estimated PI/RL Funds: $ 2,500,000.00 Total Budget:
More informationJanuary 1, 2012 thru March 31, 2012 Performance Report
Grantee: Compton, CA Grant: B-08-MN-06-0505 January 1, 2012 thru March 31, 2012 Performance Report 1 Grant Number: B-08-MN-06-0505 Grantee Name: Compton, CA Grant Amount: $3,242,817.00 Estimated PI/RL
More informationKane County Foreclosure Redevelopment Program
Kane County Foreclosure Redevelopment Program HOME Investment Partnership Program Neighborhood Stabilization Program 2014 Request for Qualifications Kane County Office of Community Reinvestment 719 South
More information1. Participant Eligibility. Participants must be first time homebuyers, m eet certain income requirements and complete a homebuyer education class.
NSP-3 Homebuyer Assistance Program Updated 2/25/2013 This program is made available through Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP-3) funding provided to the City of Chandler (CITY). NEWTOWN is administering
More informationJanuary 1, 2012 thru March 31, 2012 Performance Report
Grantee: Elyria, OH Grant: B-08-MN-39-0007 January 1, 2012 thru March 31, 2012 Performance Report 1 Grant Number: B-08-MN-39-0007 Grantee Name: Elyria, OH Grant Amount: $2,468,215.00 Estimated PI/RL Funds:
More informationForeclosures Part 2:
April 22, 2009 Sensible Land Use Foreclosures Part 2: Brooklyn Park Foreclosure Initiatives Robert Schreier Director of Community Development City of Brooklyn Park (763) 493-8060 Overview 1. Foreclosures
More informationB-11-MN April 1, 2014 thru June 30, 2014 Performance Report. Community Development Systems Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting System (DRGR)
Grantee: Grant: Pomona, CA B-11-MN-06-0516 April 1, 2014 thru June 30, 2014 Performance Report 1 Grant Number: B-11-MN-06-0516 Grantee Name: Pomona, CA Grant Award Amount: $1,235,629.00 LOCCS Authorized
More informationJuly 1, 2013 thru September 30, 2013 Performance Report
Grantee: Broward County, FL Grant: B-08-UN-12-0002 July 1, 2013 thru September 30, 2013 Performance Report 1 Grant Number: B-08-UN-12-0002 Grantee Name: Broward County, FL LOCCS Authorized Amount: $17,767,589.00
More informationDisposition Strategies
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Planning and Development NSP Problem Solving Clinic i 2012 Disposition Strategies Workshop Disposition Strategies Agenda A. Disposition Definition
More informationJune 26, :00 4:00pm
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development The National First Look Program and Beyond: Comprehensive Strategies for Accessing Property June 26, 2012 2:00 4:00pm Presenters Moderator: Jennie Vertrees,
More informationNSP DEVELOPER ARRESALE PROGRAM PROCEDURES
NSP DEVELOPER ARRESALE PROGRAM PROCEDURES HERA 2301(c)(3)(B) purchase and rehabilitate homes and residential properties that have been abandoned or foreclosed upon, in order to sell, rent, or redevelop
More informationReviewed and Approved
Action Plan Grantee: Grant: Grand Rapids, MI B-08-MN-26-0006 LOCCS Authorized Amount: Grant Award Amount: $ 6,187,686.00 $ 6,187,686.00 Status: Reviewed and Approved Estimated PI/RL Funds: $ 1,203,715.00
More informationKane County Foreclosure Redevelopment Program
Kane County Foreclosure Redevelopment Program HOME Investment Partnership Program Neighborhood Stabilization Program 2011 Request for Qualifications Kane County Office of Community Reinvestment 719 South
More informationB-08-MN October 1, 2015 thru December 31, 2015 Performance. Community Development Systems Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting System (DRGR)
Grantee: Grant: Pomona, CA B-08-MN-06-0516 October 1, 2015 thru December 31, 2015 Performance 1 Grant Number: B-08-MN-06-0516 Grantee Name: Pomona, CA Grant Award Amount: $3,530,825.00 LOCCS Authorized
More informationJuly 1, 2015 thru September 30, 2015 Performance Report
Grantee: Grant: Brevard County, FL B-08-UN-12-0001 July 1, 2015 thru September 30, 2015 Performance Report 1 Grant Number: B-08-UN-12-0001 Grantee Name: Brevard County, FL Grant Award Amount: $5,269,667.00
More informationJuly 1, 2017 thru September 30, 2017 Performance Report
Grantee: Grant: Pinellas County, FL B-11-UN-12-0015 July 1, 2017 thru September 30, 2017 Performance Report 1 Grant Number: B-11-UN-12-0015 Grantee Name: Pinellas County, FL Grant Award Amount: $4,697,519.00
More informationCommunity Housing Development Organization (CHDO) Manual. Policies Requirements for Certification Requirements for Recertification
Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO) Manual Policies Requirements for Certification Requirements for Recertification Kentucky Housing Corporation 1231 Louisville Road Frankfort, KY 40601 (502)
More informationGrantee: Broward County, FL Grant: B-08-UN April 1, 2012 thru June 30, 2012 Performance Report
Grantee: Broward County, FL Grant: B-08-UN-12-0002 April 1, 2012 thru June 30, 2012 Performance Report 1 Grant Number: Obligation Date: Award Date: B-08-UN-12-0002 Grantee Name: Contract End Date: Review
More informationJuly 1, 2011 thru September 30, 2011 Performance Report
Grantee: Pinellas County, FL Grant: B-08-UN-12-0015 July 1, 2011 thru September 30, 2011 Performance Report 1 Grant Number: B-08-UN-12-0015 Grantee Name: Pinellas County, FL Grant Amount: $8,063,759.00
More informationReviewed and Approved
Action Plan Grantee: Grant: San Antonio, TX B-08-MN-48-0501 LOCCS Authorized Amount: Grant Award Amount: $ 8,635,899.00 $ 8,635,899.00 Status: Reviewed and Approved Estimated PI/RL Funds: $ 4,500,000.00
More informationDisposition & Land Banking
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development NSP Webinar Disposition & Land Banking February 27, 2018 2:00 P.M. EDT Community Planning and Development Today s Hosts HUD John Laswick Marilee Hansen
More informationPalm Beach County. Neighborhood Stabilization Program 2 Residential Redevelopment Grant Program
Palm Beach County Neighborhood Stabilization Program 2 Residential Redevelopment Grant Program Request for Proposals HCDNSP2.2011.1 Pre-Submittal Conference May 17, 2011 Statement of Purpose Soliciting
More informationNSP Closeout for Grantees
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Planning and Development NSP Problem Solving Clinic 2013 NSP Closeout for Grantees When can grantees close out? To close out, grantees must: Draw
More informationReviewed and Approved
Action Plan Grantee: Grant: Lakeland, FL B-11-MN-12-0013 LOCCS Authorized Amount: Grant Award Amount: $ 1,303,139.00 $ 1,303,139.00 Status: Reviewed and Approved Estimated PI/RL Funds: $ 578,484.85 Total
More informationReviewed and Approved
Action Plan Grantee: Grant: Idaho B-11-DN-16-0001 LOCCS Authorized Amount: Grant Award Amount: $ 5,000,000.00 $ 5,000,000.00 Status: Reviewed and Approved Estimated PI/RL Funds: $ 5,400,000.00 Total Budget:
More informationPO Box 1535 Bismarck ND Attn: Jennifer Henderson
1. NSP3 Grantee Information NSP3 Program Administrator Contact Information Name (Last, First) North Dakota Housing Finance Agency PO Box 1535 Bismarck ND 58502 1535 Attn: Jennifer Henderson Email Address
More informationOctober 1, 2011 thru December 31, 2011 Performance Report
Grantee: State of Illinois Grant: B-11-DN-17-0001 October 1, 2011 thru December 31, 2011 Performance Report 1 Grant Number: B-11-DN-17-0001 Grantee Name: State of Illinois Grant Amount: Estimated PI/RL
More informationHOME Investment Partnerships Program FAQs
HOME Investment Partnerships Program FAQs Last Updated: August 10, 2016 Description: This document contains the HOME Investment Partnerships Program FAQs posted on the HUD Exchange website (https://www.hudexchange.info/home/).
More informationGrantee: Broward County, FL Grant: B-08-UN April 1, 2011 thru June 30, 2011 Performance Report
Grantee: Broward County, FL Grant: B-08-UN-12-0002 April 1, 2011 thru June 30, 2011 Performance Report 1 Grant Number: B-08-UN-12-0002 Grantee Name: Broward County, FL Grant Amount: $17,767,589.00 Grant
More informationChapter 9-Uniform Relocation Voluntary Sales Disclosure Environmental Review. Applicability
-Uniform Relocation Voluntary Sales Disclosure Environmental Review CONTENTS Applicability... 1 Acquisition of Real Property... 2 Establishing Value of Land... 2 Market Value... 2 Voluntary Sale Disclosure...
More informationNCB CAPITAL IMPACT. Preserving Affordability of NSP Funded Foreclosed Properties
NCB CAPITAL IMPACT Preserving Affordability of NSP Funded Foreclosed Properties Preserving Affordability of NSP Funded Foreclosed Properties CREATED FOR NCB CAPITAL IMPACT BY HEATHER GOULD AND BARBARA
More information2013 HOME PROGRAM FINAL RULE HOMEOWNERSHIP, REHABILITATION, & PROPERTY STANDARDS
2013 HOME PROGRAM FINAL RULE HOMEOWNERSHIP, REHABILITATION, & PROPERTY STANDARDS Agenda Homeownership Projects Rehabilitation Projects Property Standards Wrap Up Homeownership Projects Homeownership Value
More informationJuly 1, 2011 thru September 30, 2011 Performance Report
Grantee: Moreno Valley, CA Grant: B-08-MN-06-0513 July 1, 2011 thru September 30, 2011 Performance Report 1 Grant Number: B-08-MN-06-0513 Grantee Name: Moreno Valley, CA Grant Amount: $11,390,116.00 Grant
More informationApril 1, 2013 thru June 30, 2013 Performance Report
Grantee: Pinellas County, FL Grant: B-08-UN-12-0015 April 1, 2013 thru June 30, 2013 Performance Report 1 Grant Number: B-08-UN-12-0015 Grantee Name: Pinellas County, FL Grant Amount: $8,063,759.00 Estimated
More informationNeighborhood Stabilization Program Closeout Checklist
Attachment: C Neighborhood Stabilization Program Closeout Checklist For the purposes of expediting the grant closeout process, HUD asks that applicants submit the following checklist. Jurisdiction Name
More informationJanuary 1, 2012 thru March 31, 2012 Performance Report
Grantee: Oakland, CA Grant: B-11-MN-06-0005 January 1, 2012 thru March 31, 2012 Performance Report 1 Grant Number: B-11-MN-06-0005 Grantee Name: Oakland, CA Grant Amount: $2,070,087.00 Estimated PI/RL
More informationJanuary 1, 2015 thru March 31, 2015 Performance Report
Grantee: Grant: Broward County, FL B-08-UN-12-0002 January 1, 2015 thru March 31, 2015 Performance Report 1 Grant Number: B-08-UN-12-0002 Grantee Name: Broward County, FL Grant Award Amount: $17,767,589.00
More informationGuidance on Amendment Procedures Updated April 3, 2014
April 3, 2014 Community Planning and Development NSP Policy Alert! Guidance on Amendment Procedures Updated April 3, 2014 Note: The Guidance on Amendment Procedures was revised April 3, 2014 to reflect
More informationApril 1, 2018 thru June 30, 2018 Performance Report
Grantee: Grant:, AZ B-11-UN-04-0503 April 1, 2018 thru June 30, 2018 Performance Report 1 Grant Number: B-11-UN-04-0503 Grantee Name:, AZ Grant Award Amount: $1,990,744.00 LOCCS Authorized Amount: $1,990,744.00
More informationJuly 1, 2011 thru September 30, 2011 Performance Report
Grantee: Hammond, IN Grant: B-08-MN-18-0006 July 1, 2011 thru September 30, 2011 Performance Report 1 Grant Number: B-08-MN-18-0006 Grantee Name: Hammond, IN Grant Amount: $3,860,473.00 Estimated PI/RL
More informationApril 1, 2011 thru June 30, 2011 Performance Report
Grantee: Moreno Valley, CA Grant: B-08-MN-06-0513 April 1, 2011 thru June 30, 2011 Performance Report 1 Grant Number: B-08-MN-06-0513 Grantee Name: Moreno Valley, CA Grant Amount: $11,390,116.00 Grant
More informationOct 1, 2011 thru Dec 31, 2011 Performance Report
Page 1 of 7 Oct 1, 2011 thru Dec 31, 2011 Performance Report Grant Number: B-11-MN-06-0511 Grantee Name: Long Beach, CA Grant Amount: $1,567,935.00 Estimated PI/RL Funds: $1,693,370.00 Obligation Date:
More informationB-08-MN April 1, 2017 thru June 30, 2017 Performance Report. Community Development Systems Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting System (DRGR)
Grantee: Grant: Anaheim, CA B-08-MN-06-0501 April 1, 2017 thru June 30, 2017 Performance Report 1 Grant Number: B-08-MN-06-0501 Grantee Name: Anaheim, CA Grant Award Amount: $2,653,455.00 LOCCS Authorized
More informationNSP Substantial Amendment
NSP Substantial Amendment, Florida (Duval County) August, 2010 (v12) Table of Contents Application for Federal Assistance (SF-424 Forms)... 3 A. Areas of Greatest Need... 4 Percentage of Foreclosures...
More informationJanuary 1, 2010 thru March 31, 2010 Performance Report
Grantee: Wyoming State Program Grant: B-08-DN-56-0001 January 1, 2010 thru March 31, 2010 Performance Report Grant Number: B-08-DN-56-0001 Grantee Name: Wyoming State Program Grant : $19,600,000.00 Grant
More informationJuly 1, 2018 thru September 30, 2018 Performance Report
Grantee: Grant: Illinois B-11-DN-17-0001 July 1, 2018 thru September 30, 2018 Performance Report 1 Grant Number: B-11-DN-17-0001 Grantee Name: Illinois Grant Award Amount: $5,000,000.00 LOCCS Authorized
More informationHOME and NSP. A Guide for Successfully and Effectively Combining Funding Sources
HOME and NSP A Guide for Successfully and Effectively Combining Funding Sources Contents Introduction...1 Purpose of this Guidebook... 1 Reasons to Combine HOME and NSP... 1 Background on HOME and NSP...
More informationJanuary 1, 2016 thru March 31, 2016 Performance Report
Grantee: Grant: Henderson, NV B-08-MN-32-0001 January 1, 2016 thru March 31, 2016 Performance Report 1 Grant Number: B-08-MN-32-0001 Grantee Name: Henderson, NV Grant Award Amount: $3,205,044.00 LOCCS
More informationReviewed and Approved
Action Plan Grantee: Grant: Pembroke Pines, FL B-11-MN-12-0022 LOCCS Authorized Amount: Grant Award Amount: $ 2,330,542.00 $ 2,330,542.00 Status: Reviewed and Approved Estimated PI/RL Funds: $ 587,359.64
More informationB-11-MN April 1, 2018 thru June 30, 2018 Performance Report. Community Development Systems Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting System (DRGR)
Grantee: Grant: Stockton, CA B-11-MN-06-0009 April 1, 2018 thru June 30, 2018 Performance Report 1 Grant Number: B-11-MN-06-0009 Grantee Name: Stockton, CA Grant Award Amount: $4,280,994.00 LOCCS Authorized
More informationReviewed and Approved
Action Plan Grantee: Grant: Gwinnett County, GA B-11-UN-13-0005 LOCCS Authorized Amount: Grant Award Amount: $ 2,065,581.00 $ 2,065,581.00 Status: Reviewed and Approved Estimated PI/RL Funds: $ 1,789,875.94
More informationOctober 1, 2010 thru December 31, 2010 Performance Report
Grantee: Moreno Valley, CA Grant: B-08-MN-06-0513 October 1, 2010 thru December 31, 2010 Performance Report 1 Grant Number: B-08-MN-06-0513 Grantee Name: Moreno Valley, CA Grant Amount: $11,390,116.00
More informationReviewed and Approved
Action Plan Grantee: Grant: Orange County, NY B-08-UN-36-0102 LOCCS Authorized Amount: Grant Award Amount: $ 2,163,744.00 $ 2,163,744.00 Status: Reviewed and Approved Estimated PI/RL Funds: Total Budget:
More informationOctober 1, 2014 thru December 31, 2014 Performance Report
Grantee: Grant: Cincinnati OH B-08-MN-39-0003 October 1 2014 thru December 31 2014 Performance Report 1 Grant Number: B-08-MN-39-0003 Grantee Name: Cincinnati OH Grant Award Amount: $8361592.00 LOCCS Authorized
More informationJanuary 1, 2016 thru March 31, 2016 Performance Report
Grantee: Grant: Rialto, CA B-08-MN-06-0518 January 1, 2016 thru March 31, 2016 Performance Report 1 Grant Number: B-08-MN-06-0518 Grantee Name: Rialto, CA Grant Award Amount: $5,461,574.00 LOCCS Authorized
More informationB-08-MN April 1, 2016 thru June 30, 2016 Performance Report. Community Development Systems Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting System (DRGR)
Grantee: Grant: Savannah, GA B-08-MN-13-0004 April 1, 2016 thru June 30, 2016 Performance Report 1 Grant Number: B-08-MN-13-0004 Grantee Name: Savannah, GA Grant Award Amount: $2,038,631.00 Obligation
More informationIntroduction & Overview
INTRODUCTION... 2 OVERVIEW... 2 HOME Program Activities... 3 National Housing Trust Fund Program-Overview... 3 HTF- Specific Rental Housing Activities... 3 Neighborhood Stabilization Program... 4 Substantial
More informationB-08-UN April 1, 2015 thru June 30, 2015 Performance Report. Community Development Systems Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting System (DRGR)
Grantee: Grant: Lee County, FL B-08-UN-12-0009 April 1, 2015 thru June 30, 2015 Performance Report 1 Grant Number: B-08-UN-12-0009 Grantee Name: Lee County, FL Grant Award Amount: $18,243,867.00 LOCCS
More informationHousing Trust Fund Developer Advisory Group. Options and Considerations Related to the HTF Operating Assistance and Operating Assistance Reserves
Housing Trust Fund Developer Advisory Group Options and Considerations Related to the HTF Operating Assistance and Operating Assistance Reserves The national HTF Developers Advisory Group (http://bit.ly/1sj1uop)
More informationJanuary 1, 2015 thru March 31, 2015 Performance Report
Grantee: Grant: West Palm Beach, FL B-08-MN-12-0030 January 1, 2015 thru March 31, 2015 Performance Report 1 Grant Number: B-08-MN-12-0030 Grantee Name: West Palm Beach, FL Grant Award Amount: $4,349,546.00
More informationJanuary 1, 2017 thru March 31, 2017 Performance Report
Grantee: Grant: Rialto, CA B-08-MN-06-0518 January 1, 2017 thru March 31, 2017 Performance Report 1 Grant Number: B-08-MN-06-0518 Grantee Name: Rialto, CA Grant Award Amount: $5,461,574.00 LOCCS Authorized
More informationQ&A September 23, 2011, 9 a.m. NSP III Multi Family Workshop City of Miami, City Hall, Commission Chambers
Q&A September 23, 2011, 9 a.m. NSP III Multi Family Workshop City of Miami, City Hall, Commission Chambers Question 1: Is this NSP for a property that is in foreclosure currently or a property that had
More informationApril 1, 2014 thru June 30, 2014 Performance Report
Grantee: Grant: Prince Georges County, MD B-11-UN-24-0002 April 1, 2014 thru June 30, 2014 Performance Report 1 Grant Number: B-11-UN-24-0002 Grantee Name: Prince Georges County, MD Grant Award Amount:
More informationOctober 1, 2009 thru December 31, 2009 Performance Report
Grantee: Lancaster, CA Grant: B-08-MN-06-0510 October 1, 2009 thru December 31, 2009 Performance Report Grant Number: B-08-MN-06-0510 Grantee Name: Lancaster, CA Grant Amount: $6,983,533.00 Grant Status:
More information