[2010] VSC (2004) 18 VPR 229
|
|
- Jeffery Wilkins
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 MOOT COURT 2017 PREPARED BY TIM RETROT VICTORIAN CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PLANNING PERMIT APPLICATION NO. TP418/2016 OUTLINE OF SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF LIONHEART HOMES VICTORIA STREET, SEDDON INTRODUCTION 1. For these submissions and in accordance with the Rules of the Moot Court 2017, the site, locality and planning controls are taken as read. 2. The application to allow the use and development of the review site for the purposes of a multi-storey, mixed-use building with a reduction of car parking was refused by Council on the following grounds: 1. Insufficient car parking; 2. Inconsistency with Clause on the basis of a poor transition in built form that does not respect the neighbourhood character of properties to the immediate east; 3. Second-floor footprint fails to provide equitable development rights for the property to the north. 3. The grounds of refusal have been addressed below. DOES THE PROPOSAL PROVIDE SUFFICIENT CAR PARKING? 4. The proposal incorporates a car share space (for use by occupants of offices and dwellings), 8 bicycle spaces and end of trip facilities. 5. The following is not in dispute: Clauses (Activity Centre Planning) and (Transport) of the Maribyrnong Planning Scheme promote sustainable transport practices in activity centres. The site is located in the Seddon Neighbourhood Activity Centre, which provides a wide range of services including independent grocery and supermarket stores, cafes, restaurants, a post office and other similar services. The Footscray Principal Activity Centre is located 1.3 kilometres walking distance to the north. The site is less than 300 metres from Middle Footscray Station to the north and 650 metres from Seddon Station to the south-east. There is also a bus route running along Victoria Street (with a bus stop at the site frontage) and multiple bus routes within 200 metres walking distance of the site. The site has immediate access to the Principal Bicycle Network (PBN), with bicycle lanes on Victoria Street and facilities on Albert, Charles, Walter and Pilgrim Streets linking to Footscray and other nearby activity centres. The above characteristics result in the site having a walkability score of 89 out of 100, which is classified as very walkable.
2 6. Based on the activity centre location and relevant policy, it is broadly accepted that there is support for car parking dispensation at the site the Tribunal is directed to Mr Minogue s evidence at paragraph and Council s Delegate Report at the first paragraph on page It is therefore the degree of dispensation that is in dispute based on the following: i. Whether the site is close enough to alternative transport services; and ii. Whether the limited on-street supply and onerous parking controls effectively discourage car usage by future occupants. Proximity to transport 8. Council s contends at page 11 of the Delegate Report that: the site is too far from fixed line public transport to cater for the demands of all users. 9. Clause (Liveable and Sustainable Communities) can assist in this regard. The clause outlines the following distances regarding compact and walkable communities for neighbourhoods: 400 metre street walking distance around each existing or proposed bus stop; 600 metres street walking distance around each existing or proposed tram stop; and 800 metres street walking distance around each existing or proposed railway station. 10. It is reiterated that the site is less than 300m from Middle Footscray Station and has a bus route running along Victoria Street (with a bus stop at the site frontage) and multiple bus routes within 200m walking distance of the site. 11. It is submitted that future occupants can elect not to drive to work or residents not to own a vehicle because the site is conveniently located to commuter transport. 12. This was supported by the Tribunal decision in Bardin Planning Co-ordination Pty v Maribyrnong City Council 1, which considered a proposal at 107 Victoria Street, Seddon (located approximately 60 metres to the south of the site). 13. The proposal was for a 3-storey building with ground-floor shop and two double-storey 2-bedroom dwellings above, with zero car parking. The statutory car parking requirement for the proposal was 19 spaces. 14. The Tribunal approved the proposal and accepted at para 21 that the site was: [21] suitably located to take advantage of existing alternative forms of public transport and is not dependent on having on-site or allocated car parking. On-street parking 15. Consistent with the views of Council and Mr Minogue, it is agreed that a key issue is whether the existing parking controls and lack of available on-street parking is sufficient to discourage car usage by future occupants. 1 [2004] VCAT 2276
3 16. Council acknowledge at page 11 of the Delegate Report that a reduction of car parking for dwellings is generally acceptable; however, contend that the proposed reduction of 14 car spaces associated with the office use is not able to be supported. 17. It is submitted that office workers will opt to choose alternative modes of transport for the following reasons: The development is located in an area where Resident Permit parking applies, with the primary alternative being parking restrictions ranging from 15 mins to 2 hours. With this in mind, it is submitted that Mr Minogue s assertion at paragraph that occupants could elect to move their car every few hours is not realistic. The car share enables hire on an as-needs basis for short trips to meetings or off-site locations during business hours. Evidence suggests that car shares are used by commercial businesses during the day and residential uses during the evening and weekends. The reduced provision of on-site car parking and the provision of 8 bicycle spaces including end-of-trip facilities. DOES THE PROPOSAL ALLOW FOR EQUITABLE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH? 18. Council acknowledge on page 12 of the Delegate Report that the setbacks at the northern interface, although non-compliant with Standard B17, are appropriate given the Mixed Use Zone (MUZ) and policy direction for the Seddon Neighbourhood Activity Centre. 19. Council suggest that Unit 2 could be reconfigured to improve the equitable development rights of the property to the north. 20. It is submitted that a more centralised core would enable a reconfiguration of the apartment from the current northerly orientation to an easterly orientation, which would allow for the equitable development of the adjoining property if the layout were mirrored. DOES THE PROPOSAL PROVIDE A SUITABLE RESPONSE TO THE RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER OF PROPERTIES TO THE IMMEDIATE EAST? 21. The matter for consideration is the competing policy objectives of urban consolidation envisaged by the MUZ and Seddon Neighbourhood Activity Centre versus the existing neighbourhood character of the adjoining residential zone. Council position 22. Council contend that, except for the eastern interface, the proposal generally presents an acceptable architectural and urban design outcome, and there is no dispute that the 3-storey height is appropriate for the site. 23. The eastern interface abuts a Neighbourhood Residential Zone and is subject to the requirements of Clause (MUZ Buildings on lots that abut another residential zone).
4 24. Council contend that the proposal is inconsistent with the clause because it fails to meet the Standards B17 and B19 at the eastern interface, and that the proposal is therefore highly unsuitable at this interface. 25. According to Council, a setback of 6.3 metres is required at the second floor, where 2 metres is proposed. Council contend that the increased setback would reduce the visual bulk as viewed from the adjoining dwelling provide a transition in built form along Austin Street. Objectives and Standards 26. Clause 55 specifies objectives that must be met and standards that should be met. 27. It is acknowledged that the proposal does not meet Standards B17 and B19, but it is submitted that the proposal meets Objectives B17 and B19, which are: B17: To ensure that the height and setback of a building from a boundary respects the existing or preferred neighbourhood character and limits the impact on the amenity of existing dwellings. B19: To allow adequate daylight into existing habitable room windows. 28. Whether these Objectives are reasonably met must be considered in the context of the competing expectations for growth and change in the MUZ and Neighbourhood Residential Zone (NRZ). 29. It is submitted that the appropriateness of the built form at the interface of the MUZ and NRZ needs to be assessed in the context of the strategic imperative for urban consolidation envisaged by the MUZ and Seddon Neighbourhood Activity Centre versus the desire to respect neighbourhood character of the NRZ. Urban consolidation versus neighbourhood character 30. We refer the Tribunal to recent Planning Scheme Amendments and Tribunal decisions that suggest support for the strategic imperative of urban consolidation over retention of neighbourhood character. 31. First, the zoning controls were amended in July 2013 via State-wide Planning Scheme Amendment VC100, which approved, inter alia, changes to the MUZ, including a new purpose encouraging housing at higher densities and greater as of right uses. 32. In conjunction with Amendments V8 and VC104, Amendment VC100 aims to sharpen the distinction between areas designated for increased densities and growth, such as activity centres, RGZ and MUZ areas and the GRZ and NRZ areas that surround these hubs. 33. Second, the strategic imperative recognised by the abovementioned amendments has been historically and repeatedly acknowledged by Tribunal, which has consistently confirmed the primacy of State and Metropolitan policy objectives and the important role that inner-city areas perform in accommodating future growth, while advising caution on placing too much weight on neighbourhood character considerations. 34. In NJJKT Pty Ltd v Whitehorse CC 2, the Tribunal expressed concerns at paragraph 12 that too often: [12] neighbourhood character considerations dominate the debate about particular projects while consolidation and affordability are reduced to a background hum in our thinking. 2 [2008] VCAT 1410
5 35. Development proposals, it was reasoned at para 13, are frequently overly restricted by local character policy objectives, which has resulted in a critical situation whereby: [13] the planning system has failed to deliver urban consolidation to meet the needs of our growing populations. Acceptable outcomes 36. It is in this context of competing objectives that planning must achieve an acceptable outcome. Any adverse implications must be considered on balance. 37. Indeed, the founding premise of the Decision Guidelines at Clause 65 is that decisions must be made based on whether the proposal will produce acceptable outcome. 38. In Rozen v Macedon Ranges 3, which is now well established in planning law and widely applied in consultation with Clause 65 of the Planning Scheme, Osborne J stated at para 171 that: [171] The test of acceptable outcomes stated in the clause is informed by the notions of net community benefit and sustainable development. An outcome may be acceptable despite some negative characteristics. An outcome may be acceptable because on balance it results in net community benefit despite achieving some only of potentially relevant planning objectives and impeding or running contrary to the achievement of others [Emphasis added] 39. In Knox City Council v Tulcany Pty Ltd 4 at para 234 it was observed that: [234] The planning scheme does not require an ideal outcome as a pre-requisite to a permit. If it did, very few, if any, permits for development would ever be granted and there would be difficult differences of opinion as to whether the outcomes were in fact ideal. The tribunal is entitled to grant a permit where it is satisfied that the permit will result in a reasonably acceptable outcome having regard to the matters relevant to its decision under the controls 40. It is submitted that the proposal provides an acceptable outcome because: CONCLUSION The Objectives B17 and B19 are reasonably met when considered in the context of the competing expectations for growth and change in the MUZ and NRZ. The area of the current Level 2 footprint can accommodate 4 one-bedroom apartments, which adds to the diversity of dwelling types and sizes, including housing affordability in the municipality. A quick review of the plans reveals that a setback of 6.3 metres (as requested by Council) at Level 2 would reduce the footprint to the extent that limits the proposal to accommodating two 2-bedroom apartments, which reduces housing stock and decreases the affordability of housing in the area (not to mention additional car parking considerations). 41. For the abovementioned reasons, it is respectfully submitted that the Application for Review should be allowed. 3 [2010] VSC (2004) 18 VPR 229
New Victorian Residential Zones 2013
Clause 1 Planning Page 1 of 35 Clause 1 is a town planning consultancy. We specialise in assisting property developers, architects and building designers meet the increasingly complex requirements of State
More informationFlinders Avenue, Lara Planning Scheme Amendment Combined Application for Rezoning and Multi-Lot Subdivision Reference : Decembe
143-179 Flinders Avenue, Lara Planning Scheme Amendment Combined Application for Rezoning and Multi-Lot Subdivision Reference: 14134-03 TGM Group Geelong Melbourne Ballarat 1/27-31 Myers Street (PO Box
More informationNew Residential Zones their application and implications. Elizabeth Lewis David Vorchheimer
New Residential Zones their application and implications Presented by Paul Buxton Elizabeth Lewis David Vorchheimer 14 June 2013 Outline Background / context MAC recommendations, Minister s response, work
More information32.07 RESIDENTIAL GROWTH ZONE
32.07 RESIDENTIAL GROWTH ZONE 29/08/2017 VC139 Shown on the planning scheme map as RGZ with a number (if shown). Purpose To implement the State Planning Policy Framework and the Local Planning Policy Framework,
More informationThe spatial distribution of parking policy and demand
ATRF 21 An analysis of the spatial distribution of parking supply policy and demand William Young 1, David Beaton 1 and Sutha Satgunarajah 1 1 Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University, Victoria,
More information32.07 RESIDENTIAL GROWTH ZONE. Shown on the planning scheme map as RGZ with a number (if shown). Purpose
32.07 RESIDENTIAL GROWTH ZONE Shown on the planning scheme map as RGZ with a number (if shown). Purpose To implement the State Planning Policy Framework and the Local Planning Policy Framework, including
More informationHOUSING ISSUES REPORT
HOUSING ISSUES REPORT 8, 12 & 14 HIGH PARK AVENUE AND 1908, 1910, 1914 & 1920 BLOOR STREET WEST CITY OF TORONTO PREPARED FOR: 619595 ONTARI O INC. February 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0
More information32.08 GENERAL RESIDENTIAL ZONE. Shown on the planning scheme map as GRZ, R1Z, R2Z or R3Z with a number (if shown). Purpose
32.08 GENERAL RESIDENTIAL ZONE Shown on the planning scheme map as GRZ, R1Z, R2Z or R3Z with a number (if shown). Purpose To implement the State Planning Policy Framework and the Local Planning Policy
More informationPromoting informed debate around infill housing in Australian cities
Promoting informed debate around infill housing in Australian cities 1 SGS has long been interested in promoting infill housing in Australian cities. This support reflects the recognised net benefits infill
More informationInfrastructure, Development and Enterprise Services
Staff Report To Service Area City Council Infrastructure, Development and Enterprise Services Date Monday, April 9, 2018 Subject Report Number Statutory Public Meeting 671 Victoria Road North Proposed
More informationCITY OF SUBIACO 1.SEP PUCE MATCH 1 SEP 2017
OF SUBIACO 1.SEP 1 7017 Our Ref 17-765 DC1C RECORDS 0 PUCE MATCH 8 September 2017 241 Rokeby Road SUBIACO WA 6008 Attention: David Milliken Manager Planning Services Dear David, DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
More informationLITTLE MOUNTAIN ADJACENT AREA REZONING POLICY
LITTLE MOUNTAIN ADJACENT AREA REZONING POLICY JANUARY 2013 CONTENTS 1.0 INTENT & PRINCIPLES...1 2.0 APPLICATION...2 3.0 HOUSING TYPES, HEIGHT & DENSITY POLICIES...3 3.1 LOW TO MID-RISE APARTMENT POLICIES...4
More informationRequirements for accepted development and assessment benchmarks for assessable development
9.3.10 Small Lot Housing Design Code 9.3.10.1 Application (1) This code applies to development identified as requiring assessment against the Small Lot Housing Design Code by the categories of development
More information21 August Mr Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom
21 August 2013 Mr Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Via online submission: www.ifrs.org Dear Hans ED 2013/6: Leases Thank
More informationLaying the Foundations
Laying the Foundations A Submission from the Community Housing Federation of Victoria Thank you for the opportunity to input into this important exercise in setting the objectives and identifying the needs
More informationPARKVILLE 1. PROPOSED REZONING
PARKVILLE 1. PROPOSED REZONING Parkville Gardens Estate and West Parkville North and South Parkville Summary table of proposed maximum building height and number of dwellings: Residential Growth Zone,
More informationPUBLIC HEARINGS. Variance 887 Grosvenor Avenue (River Heights - Fort Garry Ward) File DAV /2018C [c/r DCU /2018C]
Agenda Board of Adjustment June 13, 2018 PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No. 2 Variance 887 Grosvenor Avenue (River Heights - Fort Garry Ward) File DAV 124246/2018C [c/r DCU 124239/2018C] WINNIPEG PUBLIC SERVICE
More informationRule of corner may need to be flexible i.e. context school, park. With a clustered approach. Should row housing go where fourplexes are?
Fourplex Privacy Traffic issues by school (don t locate next to school) Highest density is furthest from park and school. Is this best? Family friendly (i.e. private green space, nicely designed, etc.)
More informationPlanning & Strategic Initiatives Committee
REPORT TO: DATE OF MEETING: February 2, 2015 SUBMITTED BY: Planning & Strategic Initiatives Committee Alain Pinard, Director of Planning PREPARED BY: Katie Anderl, Senior Planner, 519-741-2200 ext. 7987
More informationTown Planning Evidence Statement Instructed by Best Hooper Lawyers on behalf of Southern Rural Water
Town Planning Evidence Statement Instructed by Best Hooper Lawyers on behalf of Southern Rural Water Planning Panels Victoria Amendment C227 to the Wyndham Planning Scheme Statement prepared by John Glossop,
More informationDivision 5 Residential Low Density Zone: Assessment Criteria and Assessment Tables
Division 5 Residential Low Density Zone: Assessment Criteria and Assessment Tables 4.5.1 Residential Low Density Zone The provisions in this division relate to the Residential Low Density Zone as follows
More informationSCHEDULE 12 TO THE URBAN GROWTH ZONE. Shown on the planning scheme map as UGZ12. Kororoit Precinct Structure Plan
SCHEDULE 12 TO THE URBAN GROWTH ZONE Shown on the planning scheme map as UGZ12. Kororoit Precinct Structure Plan 1.0 The plan Map 1 below shows the future urban structure proposed in the Kororoit Precinct
More informationPLANNING SUBMISSION & CLAUSE 56 ASSESSMENT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF LAND 1525 POUND ROAD, CLYDE NORTH (LOT 2 PS F, SIENNA PARK ESTATE)
PLANNING SUBMISSION & CLAUSE 56 ASSESSMENT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF LAND 1525 POUND ROAD, CLYDE NORTH (LOT 2 PS 327975F, SIENNA PARK ESTATE) DFC (PROJECT MANAGEMENT) PTY LTD (A DENNIS FAMILY CORPORATION
More informationDECISION AND ORDER INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND. Decision Issue Date Tuesday, March 06, 2018
Court Services 40 Orchard View Blvd Telephone: 416-392-4697 Toronto Local Appeal Body Suite 211 Fax: 416-696-4307 Toronto, Ontario M4R 1B9 Email: tlab@toronto.ca Website: www.toronto.ca/tlab DECISION AND
More informationApril 3 rd, Monitoring the Infill Zoning Regulations. Review of Infill 1 and 2 and Proposed Changes
April 3 rd, 2018 Monitoring the Infill Zoning Regulations Review of Infill 1 and 2 and Proposed Changes Presentation Overview Background Monitoring Findings (Committee of Adjustment) Infill 1 Concerns
More informationI Harris. Melbourne. John Quirk, Member. Merits Review of Refusal
VICTORIAN CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT LIST VCAT REFERENCE NO. P382/2005 PERMIT APPLICATION NO. YR-2004/1272 CATCHWORDS 4 lot subdivision of large
More informationProperty Location: 2970 Bank Road
When? Where? Why? Tuesday, May 29, 2018, 7:00 pm Council Chambers, City Hall, 7 Victoria Street West Kamloops City Council will hold a Public Hearing to consider the following proposed amendments to City
More informationTHE EFFECT OF PROXIMITY TO PUBLIC TRANSIT ON PROPERTY VALUES
THE EFFECT OF PROXIMITY TO PUBLIC TRANSIT ON PROPERTY VALUES Public transit networks are essential to the functioning of a city. When purchasing a property, some buyers will try to get as close as possible
More informationNORTH LEEDS MATTER 2. Response to Leeds Sites and Allocations DPD Examination Inspector s Questions. August 2017
NORTH LEEDS MATTER 2 Response to Leeds Sites and Allocations DPD Examination Inspector s Questions August 2017 CLIENT: TAYLOR WIMPEY, ADEL REFERENCE NO: CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 TEST OF SOUNDNESS
More informationPaul D. Ralph, BES, RPP, MCIP, Commissioner, Development Services Department
Public Report To: From: Report Number: Development Services Committee Paul D. Ralph, BES, RPP, MCIP, Commissioner, Development Services Department DS-16-50 Date of Report: April 14, 2016 Date of Meeting:
More informationapply sustainability principles to all residential developments in Ardee;
3. Housing 3.1 Introduction Ardee is currently experiencing considerable pressure for residential development as improved road infrastructure, together with the availability of serviced land, makes the
More informationPAPAKAINGA DISTRICT WIDE ACTIVITY
SECTION 13.1 PAPAKAINGA DISTRICT WIDE ACTIVITY 13.1.1 INTRODUCTION The Resource Management Act 1991 introduced specific and new obligations for those exercising functions and powers under the Act to provide
More informationPROPOSED APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT 32 & 34 TENNYSON AVE TAKAPUNA INTEGRATED TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT
PROPOSED APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT 32 & 34 TENNYSON AVE TAKAPUNA INTEGRATED TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT Prepared by E.R Hebner 30 th November 2016 Z:\2015_Projects\15155-34 Tennyson Ave\doc\34 Tennyson Ave - Traffic
More informationDivision 6 Residential Medium Density Zone: Assessment Criteria and Assessment Tables
Division 6 Residential Medium Density Zone: Assessment Criteria and Assessment Tables 4.6.1 Residential Medium Density Zone The provisions in this division relate to the Residential Medium Density Zone
More informationGreater Shepparton Planning Scheme Amendment C188 Shepparton North Growth Area
Planning and Environment Act 1987 Panel Report Greater Shepparton Planning Scheme Amendment C188 Shepparton North Growth Area Front page 22 March 2017 Planning and Environment Act 1987 Panel Report pursuant
More informationAPPLICATION No. 17/01532/MNR APPLICATION DATE: 29/06/2017
COMMITTEE DATE: 11/10/2017 APPLICATION No. 17/01532/MNR APPLICATION DATE: 29/06/2017 ED: APP: TYPE: RIVERSIDE Full Planning Permission APPLICANT: Mr PROTHERO LOCATION: 49 DESPENSER STREET, RIVERSIDE, CARDIFF,
More informationSUBJECT: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications for 4853 Thomas Alton Boulevard
Page 1 of Report PB-100-16 SUBJECT: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications for 4853 Thomas Alton Boulevard TO: FROM: Development and Infrastructure Committee Planning and Building Department
More informationAssistant Director of Housing and Built Environment. 109 St Helens Park Road, Hastings, TN34 2JW
AGENDA ITEM NO: 6 (d) Report to: PLANNING COMMITTEE Date of Meeting: 10 October 2018 Report from: Assistant Director of Housing and Built Environment Application Address: Proposal: Application No: 109
More information16 Sevington Road London NW4 3SB
Location 16 Sevington Road London NW4 3SB Reference: 18/5641/FUL Received: 19th September 2018 Accepted: 19th September 2018 Ward: West Hendon Expiry 14th November 2018 Applicant: Proposal: Hussaini Conversion
More informationKororoit Precinct Structure Plan Statement of Evidence Mark Woodland November 2016
1 P a g e Contents 1.0 Introduction... 3 2.0 Expert Witness Statement... 4 3.0 Summary of Evidence... 6 4.0 Subject site and surrounding context... 9 4.1 Subject site... 9 4.3 Surrounding context... 9
More informationResponse: Greater flexibilities for change of use
11 October 2013 Response: Greater flexibilities for change of use 1. Executive summary 1.1 The National Housing Federation is the voice of affordable housing in England. We believe that everyone should
More informationDivision 16 Bundamba Racecourse Stables Area Zone: Assessment Criteria and Assessment Tables
Division 16 Bundamba Racecourse Stables Area Zone: Assessment Criteria and Assessment Tables 4.16.1 Bundamba Racecourse Stables Area Zone The provisions in this division relate to the Bundamba Racecourse
More informationDRAFT. 171, 173, 175 Greenbank Road Zoning Review. Planning Report
DRAFT 171, 173, 175 Greenbank Road Zoning Review Planning Report March 2013 Introduction and Scope of Work Meloshe and Associates Ltd was retained by the City of Ottawa s General Manager, Planning and
More informationMiscellaneous Report No. M2/17
Miscellaneous Report No. M2/17 Subject: Folder No: F2009/00315 Author: Introduction Impacts of the AHSEPP within suburbs of Randwick City Elena Sliogeris, Senior Environmental Planning Officer - Strategic
More informationRequest for Recommendation
Request for Recommendation Application for site specific rezoning in order to permit a four-storey multiple dwelling with 55 units in a C2, General Commercial zone, 6150, 6160, 6166 Highway 69 North &
More informationPLANNING RATIONALE. Site Conditions and Surrounding Context. June 25, 2013
PLANNING RATIONALE June 25, 2013 Ms. Hieu Nguyen Planner II Planning and Growth Management Portfolio 110 Laurier Avenue West, 4 th Floor Ottawa, ON K1P 1J1 Dear Ms. Nguyen, RE: Cash-in-Lieu of Parking
More informationREFORMED RESIDENTIAL ZONES IMPLEMENTATION REPORT. October 2013
REFORMED RESIDENTIAL ZONES IMPLEMENTATION REPORT October 2013 Reformed Residential Zones Implementation Report October 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION... 1 2. EXISTING STRATEGIES AND POLICIES...
More informationDCLG consultation on proposed changes to national planning policy
Summary DCLG consultation on proposed changes to national planning policy January 2016 1. Introduction DCLG is proposing changes to the national planning policy framework (NPPF) specifically on: Broadening
More informationH6 Residential Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings Zone
H6. Residential Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings Zone [CIV-2016-404-002333: Franco Belgiorno-Nettis]-Note: The properties affected by this appeal are identified on the Auckland Unitary Plan viewer.
More informationGuide to Private Water Schemes
Guide to Private Water Schemes This guide provides a summary of the background to private water schemes (syndicates), options for legal structures, types of schemes, and an overview about establishing
More informationP. H. Robinson Consulting Urban Planning, Consulting and Project Management
PLANNING RATIONALE REPORT FOR SITE PLAN AND DRAFT PLAN OF CONDOMINIUM APPLICATIONS 73-75 HARVEY STREET CITY OF OTTAWA PREPARED BY: P H ROBINSON CONSULTING AUGUST 2012 1 This report has been prepared on
More informationDescription: Change of use from job centre (A1) to 15 bedroom sui generis HMO (C4)
2018/0656 Applicant: Job Centre Plus, c/o Andrew Bailey Architects Description: Change of use from job centre (A1) to 15 bedroom sui generis HMO (C4) Site Address: Job Centre Plus, High Street, Goldthorpe,
More informationH5. Residential Mixed Housing Urban Zone
H5. Residential Mixed Housing Urban Zone [ENV-2016-AKL-000197: Robert Adams] Addition sought H5.1. Zone description The Residential Mixed Housing Urban Zone is a reasonably high-intensity zone enabling
More informationCITY OF KAMLOOPS BYLAW NO A BYLAW TO AMEND THE ZONING BYLAW OF THE CITY OF KAMLOOPS
67 68 CITY OF KAMLOOPS BYLAW NO. 5-1-2796 A BYLAW TO AMEND THE ZONING BYLAW OF THE CITY OF KAMLOOPS The Municipal Council of the City of Kamloops, in open meeting assembled, enacts as follows: 1. This
More informationSimon Court 2-4 Neeld Crescent London NW4 3RR
Location Simon Court 2-4 Neeld Crescent London NW4 3RR Reference: 17/1019/FUL Received: 20th February 2017 Accepted: 23rd February 2017 Ward: West Hendon Expiry 20th April 2017 Applicant: Proposal: Mr
More informationPlanning Justification Report
Planning Justification Report 103 and 105 Toronto Street Town of Markdale, Municipality of Grey Highlands Maverick Developments November 5, 2016 Zelinka Priamo Ltd. Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. 1.0
More informationRM-8 and RM-8N Districts Schedule
Districts Schedule 1 Intent The intent of this schedule is to encourage development of ground-oriented stacked townhouses or rowhouses, including courtyard rowhouses, while continuing to permit lower intensity
More informationSCHEDULE 32 TO CLAUSE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY
--/--/20-- Proposed GC81 SCHEDULE 32 TO CLAUSE 43.02 DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY Shown on the planning scheme map as DDO32. FISHERMANS BEND WIRRAWAY PRECINCT 1.0 Design objectives --/--/20-- Proposed
More informationPlanning Justification Report
Planning Justification Report 101 Kozlov Street, Barrie, Ont. Destaron Property Management Ltd. November 2015 Revised February 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT
More informationSydney Regional Environmental Plan No 28 Parramatta
New South Wales Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No 28 Parramatta under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 I, the Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning, make the following regional
More information2. The Purpose of the Estates Strategy
Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust Trust Board - December 2012 Estates Strategy 2012 to 2017 - Executive Summary 1. Purpose of the Report The purpose of this report is to advise the Trust Board
More informationSESSION ON COUNCIL'S SPECIFIC PROPOSALS TO INCREASE SUPPLY OF HOUSING LAND - GOLBORNE AND LOWTON
SESSION ON COUNCIL'S SPECIFIC PROPOSALS TO INCREASE SUPPLY OF HOUSING LAND - GOLBORNE AND LOWTON EPP reference: RES3-7261-JC-jc February 2013 1. EXPLANATION OF COUNCIL S PROPOSAL AND MODIFICATION REQUIRED
More informationPUBLIC HEARINGS. Variance 522 River Avenue and 99 Norquay Street (Fort Rouge-East Fort Garry Ward) File DAV /2013D [c/r DASZ 20/2013]
Agenda City Centre Community Committee July 9, 2013 PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No. 5 Variance 522 River Avenue and 99 Norquay Street (Fort Rouge-East Fort Garry Ward) File DAV 119579/2013D [c/r DASZ 20/2013]
More informationRT-8 District Schedule
District Schedule 1 Intent The intent of this Schedule is to encourage the retention and renovation of existing buildings which maintain an architectural style and building form consistent with the historical
More informationGlades County Staff Report and Recommendation Unified Staff Report for Small Scale Plan Amendment and Rezoning
Glades County Staff Report and Recommendation Unified Staff Report for Small Scale Plan Amendment and Rezoning CASE NUMBERS: COMP17-02 and RZ17-02 DATE of STAFF REPORT: May 1, 2017 CASE TYPE: Application
More informationSCHEDULE 31 TO CLAUSE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY
--/--/20-- Proposed GC81 SCHEDULE 31 TO CLAUSE 43.02 DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY Shown on the planning scheme map as DDO31. FISHERMANS BEND SANDRIDGE PRECINCT 1.0 Design objectives --/--/20-- Proposed
More informationRM-7, RM-7N and RM-7AN Districts Schedules
1 Intent Districts Schedules The intent of this schedule is to encourage development of ground-oriented stacked townhouses or rowhouses, while continuing to permit lower intensity development. In RM-7AN,
More informationHousing Opportunity Area 6
61 Housing Opportunity Area 6 Whitfords Station to Goollelal Drive proposed R-Code changes Features Connecting people to places Whitfords Station - a transport hub where train and bus services are well-integrated.
More informationMOTIVATIONAL MEMORANDUM: REMOVAL OF RESTRICTIONS AND SIMULTANEOUS REZONING. Erf 44 MELROSE ESTATE
MOTIVATIONAL MEMORANDUM: REMOVAL OF RESTRICTIONS AND SIMULTANEOUS REZONING Erf 44 MELROSE ESTATE Ground Floor Henley House Greenacres Office Park 13 Victory Road Victory Park 2195 P.O. Box 52287 Saxonwold
More information1 Cumbrian Gardens London NW2 1EB
Location 1 Cumbrian Gardens London NW2 1EB Reference: 16/0469/FUL Received: 25th January 2016 Accepted: 29th January 2016 Ward: Golders Green Expiry 25th March 2016 Applicant: Mr REZA FARD Proposal: Conversion
More informationAn Bord Pleanála. Inspector s Report. Single storey extension to rear at 26 Fitzroy Avenue, Drumcondra, Dublin 3.
An Bord Pleanála Inspector s Report Appeal Reference No. Development: Planning Application Planning Authority: PL29N.245590 Single storey extension to rear at 26 Fitzroy Avenue, Drumcondra, Dublin 3. Dublin
More informationOn: 20 April Report by: Director of Development and Housing Services. Heading: Paisley West End - Regeneration Masterplan. 1.
To: Council On: 20 April 2017 Report by: Director of Development and Housing Services Heading: Paisley West End - Regeneration Masterplan 1. Summary 1.1 This report sets out proposals for the regeneration
More informationRESIDENTIAL AND RECREATIONAL
Energy, Mines & Resources Land Management Branch 320-300 Main Street Whitehorse, Yukon Y1A 2B5 667-5215 Fax 667-3214 www.emr.gov.yk.ca RESIDENTIAL AND RECREATIONAL Lot Enlargement Policy OBJECTIVE To facilitate
More informationCASEY PLANNING SCHEME AMENDMENT C219
Who is the planning authority? Planning and Environment Act 1987 CASEY PLANNING SCHEME AMENDMENT C219 EXPLANATORY REPORT This amendment has been prepared by the, which is the planning authority for this
More informationSubmission Cover Sheet Fishermans Bend Planning Review Panel
Submission Cover Sheet Fishermans Bend Planning Review Panel 128 Full Name: Organisation: Affected property: Attachment 1: Attachment 2: Attachment 3: Comments: Request to be heard?: Precinct: General
More informationPREVENTING THE ACQUISITION OF A RIGHT OF LIGHT BY A CONSENT WITHIN SECTION 3 PRESCRIPTION ACT 1832 HOW CAN IT BE DONE AND WHAT PITFALLS ARE THERE?
PREVENTING THE ACQUISITION OF A RIGHT OF LIGHT BY A CONSENT WITHIN SECTION 3 PRESCRIPTION ACT 1832 HOW CAN IT BE DONE AND WHAT PITFALLS ARE THERE? By Andrew Francis, Barrister Serle Court, 6 New Square,
More informationSection 3. Administration
Administration 3.1 Authorities 3.1.1 Except as otherwise provided in this By-law, the Director of Planning, the City Building Inspector and the Director of Licenses and Inspections are authorized to: administer
More informationPLANNING REPORT. 33 Arkell Road City of Guelph. Prepared on behalf of OHM Arkell Inc. August 4, Project No. 1327
PLANNING REPORT 33 Arkell Road City of Guelph Prepared on behalf of OHM Arkell Inc. August 4, 2015 Project No. 1327 423 Woolwich Street, Suite 201, Guelph, Ontario, N1H 3X3 Phone (519) 836-7526 Fax (519)
More informationRM-11 and RM-11N Districts Schedule
Districts Schedule 1 Intent The intent of this Schedule is to permit medium density residential development primarily in the form of four-storey T -shaped apartments, and to foster compact, sustainable,
More informationPLANNING REPORT THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF COBOURG
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF COBOURG PLANNING REPORT TO: Planning & Sustainability Advisory Committee FROM: Desta McAdam, MCIP, RPP Planner I Development DATE OF MEETING: May 8 th, 2018. REPORT TITLE/SUBJECT:
More informationReviewing Mixed Use Proposals
MIXED USE ZONING Citizens Guide Supplement 1 Things to Consider in Reviewing Mixed Use Proposals Using an Overlay District vs. Changing Underlying Zoning To achieve well-planned mixed use development,
More informationPlanning Justification Report
Planning Justification Report Kellogg s Lands City of London E&E McLaughlin Ltd. June 14, 2017 Zelinka Priamo Ltd. Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. 1.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 3.0 4.0 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6
More informationParking Challenges and Trade-Offs
Parking Challenges and Trade-Offs What is the best way to balance competing interests and priorities while updating the City s off street parking regulations? Updating off street parking regulations can
More informationBylaw No , being "Official Community Plan Bylaw, 2016" Schedule "A" DRAFT
Bylaw No. 2600-2016, being "Official Community Plan Bylaw, 2016" Schedule "A" Urban Structure + Growth Plan Urban Structure Land use and growth management are among the most powerful policy tools at the
More information9.3.5 Dual occupancy code
9.3.5 Dual occupancy code 9.3.5.1 Application (1) This code applies to accepted development and assessable development identified as requiring assessment against the Dual occupancy 1 code by the tables
More informationSubmission to the Review of the Retirement Villages Act 1986
ACN 081 34227 ABN 36 081 348 227 Fitzroy Office 55 Johnston Street Fitzroy 3065 Ph: (03) 9419 5577 Fax: (03) 9416 0513 Submission to the Review of the Retirement Villages Act 1986 For further information
More informationEFRAG s Draft Letter to the European Commission Regarding Endorsement of Transfers of Investment Property
Regarding Endorsement of Transfers of Investment Property Olivier Guersent Director General, Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union European Commission 1049 Brussels [dd Month]
More informationPlan Dutch Village Road
Plan Dutch Village Road Objective: The lands around Dutch Village Road are a minor commercial area that services the larger Fairview community. Maintaining the vibrancy of the area by planning for redevelopment
More informationMissing Middle Housing Types Showcasing examples in Springfield, Oregon
Missing Middle Housing Types Showcasing examples in Springfield, Oregon MissingMiddleHousing.com is powered by Opticos Design Illustration 2015 Opticos Design, Inc. Missing Middle Housing Study Prepared
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE PLANNING AND COMPULSORY PURCHASE ACT 2004 AND IN THE MATTER OF BRAINTREE LOCAL PLAN GARDEN SETTLMENT PROPOSALS OPINION
IN THE MATTER OF THE PLANNING AND COMPULSORY PURCHASE ACT 2004 AND IN THE MATTER OF BRAINTREE LOCAL PLAN GARDEN SETTLMENT PROPOSALS OPINION 1. I am asked to advise Lightwood Strategic, who have an interest
More informationDivision 8 General Urban (T4) Zone: Assessment Criteria and Assessment Tables
Division 8 General Urban (T4) Zone: Assessment Criteria and Assessment Tables 15.8.1 General Urban (T4) Zone The provisions in this division relate to the General Urban (T4) Zone as follows overall outcomes
More informationRM-10 and RM-10N Districts Schedule
Districts Schedule 1 Intent The intent of this Schedule is to permit medium density residential development primarily in the form of 6-storey apartments, and to foster compact, sustainable, multi-family
More informationPUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT OF OFF-STREET PARKING PROPOSAL CITY OF OAKLAND PLANNING DEPARTMENT OCTOBER 2015
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT OF OFF-STREET PARKING PROPOSAL CITY OF OAKLAND PLANNING DEPARTMENT OCTOBER 2015 1. Downtown Parking Minimums Problem: The current regulations do not prescribe a minimum amount of required
More informationStrategic Property Consulting. Charlie Richmond 7-11 Judd Street Richmond. Prepared for Baracon Pty Ltd. 23rd April 2008
Strategic Property Consulting Market Overview and Commentary Proposed Residential Development Charlie Richmond 7-11 Judd Street Richmond Prepared for Baracon Pty Ltd 23rd April 2008 T257808:AR:LK Artist
More informationHigh Street Epping
Submission to Kaufland Stores in Victoria Advisory Committee (Epping) 592-694 High Street Epping Prepared by Akemi Traill, Senior Town Planner of Tract Consultants Pty Ltd 6 December 2018 1 Epping Hub
More informationSTAFF REPORT PLN December 9, 2013
Page: 1 TO: SUBJECT: PREPARED BY AND KEY CONTACT: SUBMITTED BY: GENERAL MANAGER APPROVAL: CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER APPROVAL: GENERAL COMMITTEE PROPOSED INTENSIFICATION NODE AND CORRIDOR ZONES A. SHAIKH,
More information3.1. OBJECTIVES FOR RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS GENERAL OBJECTIVES FOR ALL RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATIONS
3. RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS INTRODUCTION The Residential land use designations provide for housing and other land uses that are integral to, and supportive of, a residential environment. Housing
More informationUrban Design Brief Dundas Street. London Affordable Housing Foundation. November Zelinka Priamo Ltd.
Urban Design Brief 1039-1047 Dundas Street London Affordable Housing Foundation November 2017 Zelinka Priamo Ltd. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. INTRODUCTION... 3 SECTION 1 LAND USE PLANNING CONTEXT... 3 1.1
More informationCommunity Leadership Sub- Committee 13 October 2016
Community Leadership Sub- Committee 13 October 2016 Title Report of Wards Status Community Right to Bid: Templars Lawn Tennis Club, St Andrews Road, NW11 0PJ Susie Kemp, Director of Strategy, Innovation
More informationPierce County Comprehensive Plan Review
2015-2016 Pierce County Comprehensive Plan Review March 16, 2016 Introduction Planning and Management Policies Some of the policies governing both the planning and management of growth and change within
More information