PUD Text Amendment Department of Community Development Staff Report January 20, 2015 City Council, 3 rd Reading
|
|
- Toby Fields
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 John W. Weingardt, President C. Pete Peterson, Vice President Scott A. Faultless Stuart F. Easley David C. George Michael L. Colby Eric C. Moeller TOWN JUDGE Daniel E. Henke CLERK-TREASURER Linda Gaye Cordell TOWN MANAGER Scott A. Fadness PUD Text Amendment Department of Community Development Staff Report January 20, 2015 City Council, 3 rd Reading Petition Number: Petitioner: Subject Site Address: Action Request: Current Zoning: Current Land Use: Approximate Acreage: Project Manager: Exhibits: 2-TA-14 Northwest Corner 116 th & Olio (Kroger) PUD Text Amendment The Kroger Co. Northwest corner of 116 th Street and Olio Road Request to approve an ordinance amending the Northwest Corner 116 th & Olio PUD, located at the northwest corner of 116 th Street and Olio Road, to accommodate a new Kroger grocery store 3 rd Reading on Ordinance #110514B PUD-C, R2 Commercial, vacant land, single-family residential acres currently; Amendment to expand PUD to acres Adam Zaklikowski, AICP Planner II - Maps (Aerial and Zoning) - Plan Commission Meeting Minutes November and December Petitioner s Packet - Ordinance #110514B (New PUD ordinance) Ordinance #070605D (Existing, redlined) Ordinance #080601F (Existing, redlined) - Traffic Impact Study - Zoning Commitments PETITION OVERVIEW: The Kroger Company desires to construct a larger grocery store near the northwest corner of 116 th Street and Olio Road. In order to accommodate a larger store, multiple sections of the existing Planned Unit Development (PUD) document (approved 2001, amended 2005) must be altered. The new store would have a footprint of approximately 119,500 SF (123,600 SF total size, includes a 4,100 SF 2 nd floor management office area). The larger store would be located behind the current store, to the west, on a portion of property owned by Taylor Woods, LLC (5.97 acres). The existing 65,000 SF store would be Page 1 of 8
2 demolished. An adjacent property, owned by North Shore Woods, LLC (0.88 acres) would contain a portion of the detention pond. As part of this project, the Town is also reviewing an Annexation, Rezone (from R2 to PUD-C), and a Primary Plat. This petition seeks to incorporate land (to be rezoned via separate action) into the Northwest Corner, 116 th Street and Olio Road PUD. PETITION HISTORY: A PUD Text Amendment request was originally presented to the Town Council on March 3, However, Town Council did not conduct 1 st Reading for the requested Annexation, Rezone, and PUD Text Amendment because of concerns with the size of the new Kroger store. First Reading was conducted by the Town Council on November 5, The item appeared before the Plan Commission on November 12, The item was discussed extensively (see Public Comments section on page 6) and was continued to the December 9, 2014 Plan Commission Meeting so that a traffic study could be completed for the project. Please refer to Traffic Study comments section on page 6 for a summary. At the December 9 th meeting, there was further discussion and the Plan Commission issued a favorable recommendation (7-2 vote) to the Town Council with conditions. Please refer to the Plan Commission Comments section on page 8 for a summary. The Town Council conducted 2 nd Reading on December 15, PETITION SPECIFICS / STAFF ANALYSIS: Below is a listing of the proposed amended development standards of the PUD. Please refer to the attached Ordinance #110514B for the specific language proposed. Also attached are the existing 2001 and 2005 ordinances with the proposed changes redlined for reference. 1. Section 3(B) The petitioner seeks to amend the maximum size allowed for the anchor tenant only (Kroger) from 65,000 SF to 125,000 SF. They desire to amend the maximum square footage allowed for retail in Parcel A from 90,000 SF to 160,000 SF. 2. Section 3(C) The petitioner seeks to amend the extent of the commercial area from 1,000 feet of the center of the intersection at 116 th Street and Olio Road to 1,400 feet. This is necessary because the new store would be further west of the intersection than 1,000 feet. 3. Section 3(I) On November 12 th, the Plan Commission expressed concern about the drive-thru attached to the new Kroger. To clarify, there is no current prohibition on drive-thrus (fast food and drive-in restaurants are prohibited, but not drive-thrus). The petitioner seeks to add a provision clearly allowing two drive-thru lanes and a bypass lane adjacent to the Kroger for pharmacy and bank uses only (note, a bank is not anticipated in the store at this time but Kroger desires to have the flexibility to have a drivethru for it in the event one is placed inside the store in the future). Three drive thru lanes were shown on the Concept Site Plan previously. 4. Section 4(A)(4) The petitioner seeks to increase the height limitation from 35 feet to 40 feet. The majority of the building is proposed to be 29 feet tall. However, the gable peaks, which were added to the design to enhance aesthetics, would feature a roofline midpoint of approximately 40 feet. Since the Page 2 of 8
3 November 12 th Plan Commission meeting, the language was clarified to state that only parapet walls and pitched roofs shall be allowed up to the 40 maximum height; otherwise, the building must be no more than 35 maximum height. Also, it was clarified that the maximum square footage of the 2 nd story of the Kroger store be no more than 10,000 SF. At the December 9 th meeting, Plan Commission expressed a desire to allow the height increase for only the anchor tenant (Kroger), which was added as a condition. This has also been reflected in the PUD text. 5. Section 4(B)(7)(e) Staff seeks a prohibition regarding the use of standing seam metal roofs for the new building. This will allow for shingled roofs instead, which will complement the remainder of the existing site. 6. Section 4(B)(9)(a)(10) The petitioner seeks to add allowances for roll up doors (which are intended to contain glass windows) to be placed on the front of the building. This is to allow for seasonal sales near the front of the building. 7. Section 4(B)(10)(f) The petitioner had shown a trail along the rear of the site. However, after the November 12 th Plan Commission meeting, staff expressed concern that this trail was not in an optimal location for pedestrians (view of loading docks). Staff felt it more appropriate to simply provide a connection from 116 th Street/detention pond area to the front of the store, and northward to 118 th Street. Kroger has updated the concept plan to reflect this change. The language in the ordinance allows for the exact location to be determined during the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) process. 8. Section 4(B)(10)(g) The petitioner had proposed a reflection area near the planned detention pond at the southwest corner of the site. After the November 12 th Plan Commission meeting, staff sought to document in the PUD the specific items that will be provided per the Plan Commission s recommendation. Thus, this new provision states that 1.) a pedestrian path be provided around the perimeter of the pond, 2.) a decorative water fountain be provided, 3.) a 20 diameter brick paved element be provided for the area, and 4.) enhanced landscaping to provide visual interest and screening. 9. Section 4(B)(11) At the November 12 th Plan Commission meeting, some individuals from the public expressed concern about noise from deliveries. The existing PUD prohibits trash removal, service vehicles, deliveries, parking lot sweepers, etc. (except snow removal) from operating between midnight and 6:00 a.m. In response to the concerns, at staff s request, the petitioner expanded the prohibited hours from 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. This change has been made to the ordinance. 10. Section 4(B)(12) The petitioner stated at the November 12 th Plan Commission meeting that the B Shops building cannot be acquired and demolished, and therefore must stay. Since this is the case, staff desired to add a provision to the PUD formally requiring four-sided architecture. The architectural style, materials, color and design of the front elevation shall be applied to all elevations of the structure. This was based on language in the current Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). 11. Section 4(C)(1) Staff seeks to prohibit exposed raceways on wall signage, which will enhance aesthetics of any new signage. 12. Section 4(E)(1) Since the November 12 th Plan Commission meeting, staff sought to address the landscaping requirements applicable to the project. The current language in the PUD defaults to a Town Zoning Ordinance in effect before the current UDO. Since many standards regarding the number of trees and shrubs have increased as a result of the newer UDO, staff sought to clarify that the current Page 3 of 8
4 UDO landscaping standards shall apply to the new development. In the event of a conflict between the existing PUD standards and the UDO standards, the most restrictive or highest standard shall prevail. 13. Section 4(E)(5) At the request of staff, landscaped peninsulas and islands were placed throughout the parking area. Staff wanted to ensure that these items remain in the project design. Therefore, since the November 12 th Plan Commission meeting, an item was added to require that each row of parking greater than 5 spaces shall incorporate at least one center landscaped island or peninsula, minimum dimension 10 x 20, and shall contain a tree. This will ensure a suitable break-up of the large asphalt parking lot. Square Footage At the March 3 rd 1 st Reading, members of the Town Council expressed concerns with the size of the new store and felt that an increase from the existing 65,000 SF store to a 123,000 SF store would make the complex incompatible with a neighborhood oriented commercial area. Kroger has not changed the size of the store since the initial request but they point out that it is much smaller than a Meijer (225,000 SF), Walmart (190,000 SF), and Target (174,000). They state that the new store is intended to have additional offerings, such as patio furniture, but it is not intended to be a superstore akin to a Meijer, Walmart, or Target. Below is a table provided by Kroger which displays the allocation of the floor space, both existing and proposed: Parking Staff initially expressed concern about the sizable addition of surface parking. In response, Kroger reduced the amount of parking. They added additional landscaped islands and a main drive aisle down the center of the project from the Olio Road entrance to the front of the store, which improves vehicular flow. After the November 12 th Plan Commission meeting, at staff s request, the petitioner added a sidewalk and a landscaped median along the boulevard entrance. Some parking along the north side of the boulevard was moved to the north side of the new building. Staff will continue to work with the petitioner on the parking layout as part of Page 4 of 8
5 the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) process during the Improvement Location Permit (ILP) review. Below is a breakdown of the parking calculations, per the concept site plan: Existing Proposed (Feb 2014) Proposed (Sep 2014) Parking Spaces Parking Ratio 4.41 spaces per 1,000 SF 4.69 spaces per 1,000 SF 3.94 spaces per 1,000 SF At 1 st Reading on November 5 th, Councilman David George recommended demolition of the B-Shops building and reconstruction of an L-shaped building to the south. This would open up the parking area and create less of an awkward site layout. Staff had suggested a similar proposal previously. However, at the Plan Commission meeting on November 12 th, Kroger indicated that this was not possible because they do not own the B-Shops. Architecture Staff initially expressed concern about the architecture of the new Kroger store. The original design for the new store was a prototype. However, the revised design features some pitched roofs, and more articulation with more variety and color of materials. Staff expressed concern about the view of the rear of the existing B-shops building to the south of the current store, which would remain. Kroger has presented some renderings of possible upgrades to this building which appear to include new paint, awnings on rear doors, and a masonry screen wall. At staff s request, a provision was added to the PUD requiring four-sided architecture, which would apply to both the existing Shops B building and the new Kroger store. The PUD Committee will need to review and approve the architecture of the new Kroger (in addition to the site plan, landscaping and lighting features, upon successful completion of addressing staff comments during the ILP review). Project Access, 118 th Street Kroger originally planned a secondary driveway to the south of the new building providing an additional access point to 116 th Street. In its place is now a detention pond and a reflection area. Vehicular access to 118 th Street was previously removed by the petitioner in December, at staff s request, because it would cause unnecessary cut-through traffic onto a quiet single-family residential street. However, at the December 9 th Plan Commission hearing, a resident on 118 th Street (Mr. Bruce Brown) requested that the driveway be placed back on the plan because he desires his property to be commercial in the future. As a result, the Plan Commission added a condition stating that Kroger provide a full access connection if all property owners on 118 th Street agree in writing. Since 2 nd Reading on December 15, Kroger placed the driveway back on the plan and placed bollards that could be removed in the future which would enable access. Staff believes that placing a gap in the berm and landscaping for this purpose is not necessary and would diminish its effectiveness, but staff understands the willingness to meet the request of Mr. Brown (and Mr. Rice, another resident who supports the driveway). Staff prefers that the driveway be moved westward near the rear of the store as it would align with an undeveloped property to the north. At 2 nd Reading, Council members expressed concern about the uncertainty of the future plan for 118 th Street. At a subsequent meeting with the project team associated with the Lutheran Church, a planned project to the west, they desired to have the road terminate into their parking lot. This would provide secondary access to their project. 118 th Street bending down to 116 th Street does not solve traffic problems by providing more options, but rather would simply serve as an unnecessary cut-through. If the 118 th Street connector provided access to Grey Eagle, for example, thus eliminating trips onto the main arterial roads, then this is when a connection like that makes sense. Thus, having the road terminate at the church property is acceptable to the Engineering Department. Page 5 of 8
6 Traffic & Circulation Kroger officials have stated that the increase in traffic resulting from a new store would be minimal because the larger store is meant to increase product selection to existing customers. Projected numbers have been documented in a traffic study; see Traffic Study below. Olio Road and 116 th Street are currently 4-lane Primary Thoroughfares, the widest arterials constructed in Fishers. Therefore, the roadways could handle any additional traffic emanating from this new store. Olio Road in this area is under the maintenance jurisdiction of the Hamilton County Highway Department. Any potential traffic signals must be approved by that agency. Traffic Study At the Plan Commission meeting, a number of individuals from the public expressed concern about the potential increase in traffic resulting from a larger Kroger store. In response, the Plan Commission required that a traffic study be conducted. A&F Engineering produced a Traffic Impact Study on December 1. The traffic study did not take into account Kroger s position that there would be little additional traffic, rather it used industry standard traffic projections for grocery stores. In the report, they make the following conclusions: The amount of newly generated traffic volumes from the proposed expansion is minimal and will not impact the surrounding roadway system in a negative manner. The existing 116 th Street and Olio Road intersection will continue to operate at the same level of service (LOS C) after the proposed expansion. The intersection delay will increase by approximately 2% over the existing delay. An (evening) peak hour signal warrant is met under existing traffic volumes and conditions for the Olio Road access point. However, as stated, this intersection is under the control of the Hamilton County Highway Department. They have indicated that they do not support a signal at this location at this time because it will negatively impact traffic flow along Olio Road. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Staff has received some remonstrance to the request, as well as letters of support. Any new letters or s received since the December 15 th 2 nd Reading will be forwarded to the City Council prior to the January 20 th meeting. Below is a listing of the major concerns raised in letters or s and at the various public meetings Concerns voiced by Kroger opposition (staff responses are below): - Concerns that big box retailer goes against the neighborhood feel that is desired in the area o As population growth has occurred in the nearby area, there is a demand for a larger store. Improving the parking lot design and the architecture of the store will be beneficial. - Concerns over the potential for increased traffic on already congested intersection, already high traffic streets, especially at peak o The traffic study has shown that 116 th Street and Olio Road can handle the additional traffic. The study has also shown that the intersection delays resulting from the new project are minimal. - Concerns over increased semi-truck traffic for deliveries of additional products proposed Page 6 of 8
7 o Kroger presented information that more deliveries are not anticipated and that the same number of trucks will be making deliveries as today, but will simply carry more product. - Concern that expansion is too close to school zones, where increased traffic is more problematic o Refer to traffic study. Staff has discussed the project with officials of the school district. - Believe that already there is plenty of other shopping options available o From a land use perspective, the enlarged store is consistent with the existing auto-oriented suburban commercial uses in the area. Additionally, testimony from residents in the area has shown a need for a larger store. - Concern over negative impact to existing homes o The enhanced berming, landscaping, and fencing will aid in buffering. - Concern over negative impact of additional light and noise on surrounding neighborhood o The enhanced berming, landscaping, and fencing will aid in buffering. Additionally, cut-off light fixtures will be utilized and truck delivery hours have been limited. - Concern that this change is setting a precedent that may lead to further commercial expansion o The project to the west is zoned R2 and is anticipated to be developed into a church. Any commercial development to the west or north would need to be rezoned. All rezones require staff review, public comment, a Plan Commission recommendation, and a City Council decision. - Concern over the impact on 118 th Street properties; The lots on 118 th Street should be commercial o 118 th Street is currently a viable single-family residential street which is well-buffered from the Kroger property. The street is not highly desirable for commercial land use because it does not front a major road. If the property owners submit a request for rezone, staff will review and advise the Plan Commission and Council. - Concern that the project will have a negative impact on property values o Effective buffering and development standards will help to maintain surrounding property values. - A restrictive covenant should be established to preserve the buffering and open spaces shown on the concept site plan o This has been incorporated into the zoning commitments. - The berm to be established should never be moved again o The berm has been incorporated into the zoning commitments as open space. If a developer ever wanted to change the commitments, they would need to go through a public hearing process. - This project creates an orphaned outlot (Farr Property) o Kroger is not interested in purchasing the Farr Property. It is likely that, at some point, a developer will propose to develop the site into a commercial project similar to the Moore Dentistry site. The property would need to be rezoned to commercial. - Kroger should provide water and sewer lines to the residents on 118 th Street o Sewer stubs already exist from the Kroger site to the north, to the southern edge of the 118 th Street right-of-way. The property owners would need to annex into the City and they would need to pay for hookups. Water line stubs would be provided from the site to the southern edge of the 118 th Street right-of-way to allow for a future connection. Page 7 of 8
8 Those in favor: - Want convenient access to their products more shopping options close by - Want expanded products and like quality of products feel traffic will not be significantly impacted Kroger conducted three separate Neighborhood Meetings to explain the project and solicit feedback. The meetings were conducted at Hamilton Southeastern High School on October 4 th, October 9 th, and October 13 th. Staff attended two of the three meetings. PLAN COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Plan Commission issued a positive recommendation at their meeting on December 9, 2014 subject to the following favorable commitments. These commitments are also reflected in the attached Zoning Commitments document: 1. The maximum 40 height limit is restricted to the Kroger (anchor tenant) only and shall not apply to any other buildings in the center. 2. If there is a need for a traffic signal to be installed at the full access point onto Olio Road or at 118 th /Olio, Kroger will agree to fund the signal. 3. If there is agreement among property owners along 118 th Street to have ingress/egress into the shopping center, Kroger will agree to provide the full access (by removing the bollards). 4. A commitment will be crafted to require green space to be identified and be part of the ordinance. STAFF COMMENTS: Kroger has worked with staff to address comments related to site layout, pedestrian and vehicular access, parking, landscaping, and architecture. Staff believes that the site plan has been significantly improved since its original design, as has the architecture and site amenities. Staff will continue to work with Kroger to enhance the project further as part of the Improvement Location Permit (ILP) process and Planned Unit Development (PUD) Committee process. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council conduct 3 rd Reading and approve the ordinance. Page 8 of 8
ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF FISHERS, INDIANA 2006
ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF FISHERS, INDIANA 2006 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF FISHERS, INDIANA 2006. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
More informationDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT THE PARK AT 5 TH
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT ARB Meeting Date: July 3, 2018 Item #: _PZ2018-293_ THE PARK AT 5 TH Request: Site Address: Project Name: Parcel Number: Applicant: Proposed Development: Current Zoning:
More informationCITY PLAN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CITY PLAN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Request for a Change of Zoning and Preliminary Development Plan FROM: Mara Perry, Director of Planning & Development MEETING DATE: November 6, 2017 PETITION:
More information4 June 11, 2014 Public Hearing
4 June 11, 2014 Public Hearing APPLICANT: FRANKLIN JOHNSTON MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C. PROPERTY OWNER: TRUSTEES OF FIRST LYNNHAVEN BAPTIST CHURCH STAFF PLANNER: Stephen J. White REQUEST: Change of
More informationHamilton County Regional Planning Commission
Hamilton County Regional Planning Commission March 1, 2012 Colerain Township Staff Report Zone Map Amendment: Case No.: ZA2012-01 Joseph Toyota Prepared By: Amy Bancroft, Land Use Planner ACTION REQUESTED:
More informationSPECIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
SPECIAL ZONING DISTRICTS 5.01 5.99 RESERVED 5.100 PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS: Purpose: This district is intended to accommodate unified design of residential, commercial, office, professional services, retail
More informationM-43 CORRIDOR OVERLAY ZONE
ARTICLE 26.00 M-43 CORRIDOR OVERLAY ZONE Section 26.01 Findings A primary function of the M-43 state highway is to move traffic through the Township and to points beyond. As the primary east-west arterial
More information9. REZONING NO Vicinity of the northwest corner of 143 rd Street and Metcalf Avenue
9. REZONING NO. 2002-15 Vicinity of the northwest corner of 143 rd Street and Metcalf Avenue 1. APPLICANT: Andrew Schlagel is the applicant for this request. 2. REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant is requesting
More informationMEMORANDUM. DATE: August 31, Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Patrick Klaers, City Administrator. Matthew Bachler, Associate Planner
NEW BUSINESS 8B MEMORANDUM DATE: August 31, 2015 TO: FROM: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Patrick Klaers, City Administrator Matthew Bachler, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case #15-016 Applicant:
More informationCity of Peachtree City. Annexation Review Process
City of Peachtree City Annexation Review Process Page 1 Annexation Review Process Step One: Initial annexation information The following information is to be completed by the property owner and/ or their
More informationPlanned Residence District (PR) To review a plan to construct 11 single family homes on approximately 4.01 acres.
STAFF REPORT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Village Green Municipal Building, Council Chambers 47 Hall Street Wednesday, March 13, 2019 7:00 P.M. 1. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW Applicant: Romanelli and
More informationSection 1: US 19 Overlay District
Section 1: US 19 Overlay District Section 1.1 Intent and Purpose The purpose of the US Highway 19 Overlay District is to manage access to land development along US Highway 19 in a manner that preserves
More informationCover Letter with Narrative Statement
Cover Letter with Narrative Statement March 31, 2017 rev July 27, 2017 RE: Rushton Pointe Residential Planned Unit Development Application for Public Hearing for RPUD Rezone PL2015 000 0306 Mr. Eric Johnson,
More informationM E M O R A N D U M. Meeting Date: October 23, Item No. F-1. Planning and Zoning Commission. Daniel Turner, Planner I
M E M O R A N D U M Meeting Date: October 23, 2017 Item No. F-1 To: From: Subject: Planning and Zoning Commission Daniel Turner, Planner I PUBLIC HEARING: Consider a recommendation of a of Planned Development
More informationSUBJECT: Application for Planned Unit Development and Rezoning 1725 Winnetka Road
TO: FROM: CHAIRMAN BILL VASELOPULOS AND MEMBERS OF THE PLAN & ZONING COMMISSION STEVE GUTIERREZ DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MEETING DATE: September 5, 2017 SUBJECT: Application for Planned Unit Development
More informationTHE AREA PLAN COMMISSION OF ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, IN AGENDA
THE AREA PLAN COMMISSION OF ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, IN AGENDA Tuesday, June 20, 2017 Fourth-Floor Council Chambers 3:30 p.m. County-City Building, South Bend, IN PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Rezonings: A. A combined
More informationNew Millennium Senior Living Communities, LLC
Applicant Property Owners Baylake Limited Partnership, W. Heywood Fralin 2012 Revocable Trust, W. Heywood Fralin Irrevocable Children s Trust, & Karen Holly Waldron Trust Public Hearing August 9, 2017
More information9 February 9, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT / PROPERTY OWNER:
9 February 9, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT / PROPERTY OWNER: KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I REQUEST: Conditional Use Permit (Automobile Service Station) STAFF PLANNER: Leslie Bonilla ADDRESS / DESCRIPTION:
More informationSTAFF REPORT. Guttman Development Group, LLC. PUD-R (Residential Planned Unit Development Plan)
P a g e 1 STAFF REPORT CASE: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ZONED: REQUEST: ZC09-2017 Guttman Development Group, LLC 4990 Wilmington Pike PUD-R (Residential Planned Unit Development Plan) A Major Change to an Approved
More informationCity of Harrisburg Variance and Special Exception Application
City of Harrisburg Variance and Special Exception Application Note: The Planning Bureau will review all applications for completeness; incomplete applications may cause a delay in processing. Contact Ben
More informationTHE AREA PLAN COMMISSION OF ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, IN AGENDA
THE AREA PLAN COMMISSION OF ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, IN AGENDA Tuesday, January 17, 2017 Fourth-Floor Council Chambers 3:30 p.m. County-City Building, South Bend, IN EXECUTIVE SESSION: A. Election of Officers
More informationJanuary 7, Sarah Smith Community Development Director City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN Dear Ms. Smith,
January 7, 2019 Sarah Smith Community Development Director City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Dear Ms. Smith, We are pleased to present the enclosed concept plan and requisite attachments
More informationVillage of Glenview Plan Commission
Village of Glenview Plan Commission STAFF REPORT May 13, 2014 TO: Chairman and Plan Commissioners CASE #: P2014-037 FROM: Community Development Department CASE MANAGER: Tony Repp, Planner SUBJECT: Final
More informationMEMORANDUM. DATE: November 9, 2016 PC Agenda Item 3.C
MEMORANDUM DATE: November 9, 2016 PC Agenda Item 3.C TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Planning Commission Eric Zweber, AICP, Interim City Planner Planning Case #16-029 Public Hearing Required Applicant: Bremer Bank,
More informationMedical Marijuana Special Exception Use Information
Medical Marijuana Special Exception Use Information The Special Exception Use information below is a modified version of the Unified Development Code. It clarifies the current section 5:104 Special Exceptions
More informationContributing Authors:
chapter 10 Site/Development Plan Review Contributing Authors: Jackie Turner, AICP, LEED AP and Robert Thompson, AICP - Current Authors Robert S. Cowell, Jr., AICP - Previous Author In this chapter... Introduction
More informationPLANNING UNIT REPORT DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT of April 24, 2006
PLANNING UNIT REPORT DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT of RE: I.D. # 03279: Zoning Map Amendment I.D. 3179 to Rezone from PUD- SIP to Amended PUD-SIP 1. Requested Actions: Approval of a request to
More informationPLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (East), PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (West) STAFF REPORT Date: September 18, 2014
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (East), PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (West) STAFF REPORT Date: September 18, 2014 DEVELOPMENT NAME LOCATION McGowin Park, LLC PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (East) 1401 Satchel Paige Drive
More informationCity of Walker Planning Commission Regular Meeting November 16, 2011
City of Regular Meeting November 16, 2011 Members Present: Vice-chair C. Rypma, A. Parent, C. Gornowich, D. Brown, T. Schweitzer, T. Korfhage and T. Byle Absent: Chairman J. Hickey Also Present: Planning
More informationZONING AMENDMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: November 3, 2016
ZONING AMENDMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: November 3, 2016 APPLICANT NAME SUBDIVISION NAME David Shumer 5955 Airport Subdivision CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT District 6 5955 Airport Boulevard, 754 Linlen
More informationPRIMUS TRACT MOUNT PLEASANT, SOUTH CAROLINA
DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES FOR PRIMUS TRACT MOUNT PLEASANT, SOUTH CAROLINA Date February 18, 2015 PLANNING COMMISSION SUBMITTAL Owner/Developer: American Star Development SC, LLC P.O. Box 211 Sullivans Island,
More informationDeerfield Township Community Development Department
STAFF REVIEW Deerfield Township Community Development Department To: From: Hayfaa Wadih, AICP Lois McKnight, AICP Meeting Date: October 20, 2014 Continued from October 13, 2014 Re: Major PUD Modification
More information3 NOVEMBER 9, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT:
REQUEST: Conditional Change of Zoning (B-2 & I-1 to Conditional A-18) 3 NOVEMBER 9, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT: S.L. NUSBAUM REALTY COMPANY PROPERTY OWNER: USF PROPCO II, LLC STAFF PLANNER: Leslie Bonilla
More informationVILLAGE OF ORLAND PARK
14700 Ravinia Avenue Orland Park, IL 60462 www.orlandpark.org Ordinance No: File Number: 2016-0865 ORDINANCE REZONING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM E-1 ESTATE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO COR MIXED USE DISTRICT
More information1. Multi-family dwellings, including town homes, apartments, or condominiums.
Sec. 4-6.67 Planned Unit Development (PUD-M). a. Definition. A planned multi-family zoning district of three acres or more, consisting of townhouses, apartments, condominiums, single-family detached, single-family
More informationCONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
APPLICATION NUMBER: CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW CDP15-0002 APPLICATION (PROJECT) NAME: 211 MIDLAND PLANNED DISTRICT APPLICANT: PROPERTY OWNER NAME: Onofrio Serra 12218 McKelvey Road, Maryland Heights,
More informationPLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT STANDARDS. Cadence Site
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT STANDARDS Cadence Site A Planned Development District 1. Statement of General Facts, Conditions and Objectives Property Size: Approximately 57.51 Acres York County Tax Map
More informationCASTLES OF CALEDON URBAN DESIGN REPORT
CASTLES OF CALEDON URBAN DESIGN REPORT PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CALEDON, ONTARIO 10 JULY, 2015 TABLE CONTENTS: 1.0 DEVELOPMENT 4.0 CONCLUSION 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Castles of Caledon- Urban Design
More informationGlades County Staff Report and Recommendation Unified Staff Report for Small Scale Plan Amendment and Rezoning
Glades County Staff Report and Recommendation Unified Staff Report for Small Scale Plan Amendment and Rezoning CASE NUMBERS: COMP17-02 and RZ17-02 DATE of STAFF REPORT: May 1, 2017 CASE TYPE: Application
More informationDevelopment Plan DP13-3 (Arlington Lofts) Planning and Zoning Meeting Date: Document Being Considered: Ordinance
Staff Report Development Plan DP13-3 (Arlington Lofts) Planning and Zoning Meeting Date: 6-19-13 Document Being Considered: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION Following the public hearing, consider Development Plan
More informationPlanning Department Oconee County, Georgia
Planning Department Oconee County, Georgia STAFF REPORT REZONE CASE #: 6985 DATE: October 31, 2016 STAFF REPORT BY: Andrew C. Stern, Planner APPLICANT NAME: Williams & Associates, Land Planners PC PROPERTY
More information1. Roll Call. 2. Minutes a. September 24, 2018 Special Joint Meeting with Clay County Planning Commission. 3. Adoption of the Agenda
1. Roll Call City of Vermillion Planning Commission Agenda 5:30 p.m. Regular Meeting Tuesday, October 9, 2018 City Council Chambers 2 nd Floor City Hall 25 Center Street Vermillion, SD 57069 2. Minutes
More informationAPPLICANT NAME SUBDIVISION NAME DEVELOPMENT NAME LOCATION. CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT Council District 4 PRESENT ZONING PROPOSED ZONING
SUBDIVISION, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PLANNING APPROVAL, ZONING AMENDMENT, & SIDEWALK WAIVER REQUEST STAFF REPORT Date: February 17, 2010 APPLICANT NAME SUBDIVISION NAME DEVELOPMENT NAME LOCATION David
More informationDraft Model Access Management Overlay Ordinance
Draft Model Access Management Overlay Ordinance This model was developed using the City of Hutchinson and the Trunk Highway 7 corridor. The basic provisions of this model may be adopted by any jurisdiction
More informationLINCOLN COUNTY PLANNING & INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT
LINCOLN COUNTY PLANNING & INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 302 NORTH ACADEMY STREET, SUITE A, LINCOLNTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28092 704-736-8440 OFFICE 704-736-8434 INSPECTION REQUEST LINE 704-732-9010 FAX To: Board
More informationJefferson County. Case RZ. Presenter: Alan Tiefenbach. Planning and Zoning Division
Green Gables Official Development Plan Case 11-119319RZ Presenter: Alan Tiefenbach Proposal Rezone from Agricultural-Two (A-2) to Planned Development (PD) 225,000 square feet of commercial uses, including
More informationBOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT Date: December 5, 2016
# 13 ZON2016-02207 BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT Date: December 5, 2016 CASE NUMBER 6076 APPLICANT NAME LOCATION VARIANCE REQUEST Lyle Machinery Co. 4370 Rangeline Road North side of Halls Mill
More informationMIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THIS MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (hereinafter "Agreement") made and entered into this day of, 2007, pursuant to Section 205-30 of the Zoning Ordinances of the City of
More informationCity of Brooklyn Park Planning Commission Staff Report
City of Brooklyn Park Planning Commission Staff Report Agenda Item: 6D Meeting Date: August 9, 2017 Originating Agenda Section: Public Hearing Department: Community Development Resolution: X Ordinance:
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of September 18, 2004 DATE: August 19, 2004 SUBJECTS: A. GP-297-04-1 GENERAL LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT from Service Commercial (Personal and business
More informationAlso present were Bill Mann, Senior Planner and Senior Secretary Amber Lehman.
held Monday, August 26, 2013, at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 11 North 3 rd Street, Jacksonville Beach, Florida Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Chairman Greg Sutton. Roll Call Greg
More informationDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT DRESDEN DRIVE TOWNHOMES DCI
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: September 13, 2018 Item #: PZ2018-319 STAFF REPORT DRESDEN DRIVE TOWNHOMES DCI Request: Project Name: Development of Community Compact (DCI) and six concurrent
More informationIntroduction. Background DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. Planning Division. m e m o r a n d u m TO: The Urbana Zoning Board of Appeals
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Planning Division m e m o r a n d u m TO: FROM: The Urbana Zoning Board of Appeals Christopher Marx, AICP, Planner I DATE: March 16, 218 SUBJECT: ZBA Case ZBA-218-C-2:
More informationRequest Conditional Use Permits (Craft Brewery, Assembly Use & Open-Air Market) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Robert Davis
Applicant Property Owner Weathersby Properties, LLC Public Hearing January 9, 2019 City Council Election District Bayside Agenda Item 4 Request Conditional Use Permits (Craft Brewery, Assembly Use & Open-Air
More informationRezoning Petition Final Staff Analysis May 21, 2018
Rezoning Petition 2017-182 Final Staff Analysis May 21, 2018 REQUEST LOCATION Current Zoning: R-3 (single family) and no zoning (current NC State right-of-way) Proposed Zoning: B-2(CD) (general business,
More informationPALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION
PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION Application No.: CA-2012-00688 Control No.: 2011-00552 Applicant: Garry Bernardo Owners: Garry Bernardo Agent: Frogner Consulting,
More informationPLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: November 17, 2016
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: November 17, 2016 DEVELOPMENT NAME SUBDIVISION NAME LOCATION Autonation Ford of Mobile Autonation Ford of Mobile Subdivision 901, 909, and 925
More informationPLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA MEMORANDUM
To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: John Hilgers, Planning Director Anna Bertanzetti, Principal Planner Meeting Date Agenda Category Agenda Item # June 23, 2014 Commission Business 4.a 1. Public Hearing
More informationREPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MAY 18, 2017
BEL REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE 2016-805 TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MAY 18, 2017 The Planning and Development Department hereby forwards to
More informationCITY OF TYLER CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CITY OF TYLER CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Agenda Number: Z-2 Date: January 23, 2019 Subject: PD18-035 FAIR NANCY WOOD (2801 AND 2835 SOUTH BROADWAY AVENUE) Request that the City Council consider approving
More informationWithin PUD-LU districts, the following provisions shall apply:
Sec. 8-3047. Development standards in PUD-LU zoning districts. Within PUD-LU districts, the following provisions shall apply: (a) (b) (c) Definition: planned unit development-limited use (PUD-LU). The
More informationCondominium Unit Requirements.
ARTICLE 19 CONDOMINIUM REGULATIONS Section 19.01 Purpose. The purpose of this Article is to regulate projects that divide real property under a contractual arrangement known as a condominium. New and conversion
More informationCITY OF SANTA ROSA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 10, 2015 APPLICANT FILE NUMBER MJP
ITEM NO. 9 CITY OF SANTA ROSA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 10, 2015 PROJECT TITLE Yogurt Time Center ADDRESS/LOCATION 3093 Marlow Road ASSESSOR S PARCEL
More informationCITY OF NAPLES STAFF REPORT
Meeting of 05/13/15 Conditional Use Petition 15-CU3 CITY OF NAPLES STAFF REPORT To: Planning Advisory Board From: Planning Department Subject: Conditional Use Petition 15-CU3 Petitioner: Hazelden Betty
More informationRequest Conditional Rezoning (R-7.5 Residential to Conditional A-18 Apartment) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Jimmy McNamara
Applicants Property Owners Baker Villas, LLC; Ocean Rental Properties, LLC; James Edward Sollner; & Linda Susan Sollner Public Hearing November 8, 2017 City Council Election District Kempsville Agenda
More informationPLANNING ANALYSIS ZONING CASE 18-TOD-Z-026 NAK S CROSSING PUD AMENDMENT. GC-3-A (General Commercial) GC-3-A (General Commercial)
PLANNING ANALYSIS ZONING CASE 18-TOD-Z-026 NAK S CROSSING PUD AMENDMENT GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant/Owner: Current Zoning: Bruce Nakfoor PUD/TOD (Planned Unit Development/Transit Oriented Development
More informationLincoln County Board of Commissioner s Agenda Item Cover Sheet
Lincoln County Board of Commissioner s Agenda Item Cover Sheet Board Meeting Date: Agenda Item Type: Consent Agenda: Public Hearing: Regular Agenda: Presentation Time (est): Submitting Person: Phone Number/Ext:
More informationVillage of Glenview Plan Commission
Village of Glenview Plan Commission STAFF REPORT October 14, 2014 TO: Chairman and Plan Commissioners CASE #: P2014-074 FROM: Community Development Department CASE MANAGER: Michelle House, Planner SUBJECT:
More informationConditional Use Permit case no. CU 14-06: Bristol Village Partners, LLC
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT August 7, 2014 Conditional Use Permit case no. CU 14-06: Bristol Village Partners, LLC CASE DESCRIPTION: LOCATION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: EXISTING LAND USE: ZONING:
More informationUnderstanding the Conditional Use Process
Understanding the Conditional Use Process The purpose of this document is to explain the process of applying for and obtaining a conditional use permit in the rural unincorporated towns of Dane County.
More informationRC ; Reclassification The Garrison at Stafford Proffer Amendment (formerly Stafford Village Center)
Board of Supervisors Robert Bob Thomas, Jr., Chairman Laura A. Sellers, Vice Chairman Meg Bohmke Jack R. Cavalier Wendy E. Maurer Paul V. Milde, III Gary F. Snellings Anthony J. Romanello, ICMA CM County
More informationReference: Planned Unit Development Rezone PL Collier County Resource Recovery Business Park Sufficiency Response No. 2
Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200, Naples, FL 34105 August 16, 2016 File: 215613052 Attention: Eric Johnson Principal Planner Collier County Growth Management Division Zoning
More informationFinancial Impact Statement There are no immediate financial impacts associated with the adoption of this report.
STAFF REPORT Planning and Development Department Subject: Application by RYC Property to rezone a portion of lands on John Murray Dr. and Megan Lynn Dr. from R2 to R3 and to enter into a Development Agreement
More informationDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DRESDEN HEIGHTS PHASE II DCI
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Meeting Date: January 10, 2019 Item #: PZ2019-393 Project Name: Applicant and Owner: Proposed Development: Requests: STAFF REPORT DRESDEN HEIGHTS PHASE II DCI Dresden Heights Phase
More informationCONDOMINIUM REGULATIONS
ARTICLE 37 CONDOMINIUM REGULATIONS SECTION 37.01. Purpose The purpose of this Article is to regulate projects that divide real property under a contractual arrangement known as a condominium. New and conversion
More information7 August 14, 2013 Public Hearing
7 August 14, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT & OWNER: STAFF PLANNER: Stephen J. White REQUEST: Conditional Use Permit (motor vehicle sales) ADDRESS / DESCRIPTION: 4717 Hollis Road / 4740 Shore Drive GPIN:
More informationRezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis April 17, 2017
Rezoning Petition 2017-041 Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis April 17, 2017 REQUEST Current Zoning: R-5 (single family residential), R-22MF (multifamily residential), and I-1 (light industrial) Proposed Zoning:
More informationR E S O L U T I O N. Residential 384,918 sq. ft. To be demolished Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0 0.7
R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, the Prince George s County Planning Board has reviewed DPLS-417, Kiplinger Property, Phase I, Expedited Transit-Oriented Development Project, requesting a reduction in the
More informationReport to the Plan Commission February 20, 2012
Report to the Plan Commission Legistar ID #24620 & 25091 6002 Cottage Grove Road, 5901-5939 Sharpsburg Drive and 857 Jupiter Drive et al PUD Rezoning Preliminary Plat Requested Actions: ID 24620 Approval
More informationMINUTES BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT On ONE ST. PETERS CENTRE BLVD., ST PETERS, MO MEETING OF May 20, :00 P.M.
MINUTES BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT On ONE ST. PETERS CENTRE BLVD., ST PETERS, MO 63376 MEETING OF May 20, 2015 6:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Dan Meyer called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. ATTENDANCE Those
More informationChapter 22 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT.
Chapter 22 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. Sec. 22.1 INTENT. The use of land and the construction and use of buildings and other structures as Planned Unit Developments in Georgetown Township may be established
More informationCHAPTER 14 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS
9-14-1 9-14-1 CHAPTER 14 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS SECTION: 9-14-1: Purpose 9-14-2: Governing Provisions 9-14-3: Minimum Area 9-14-4: Uses Permitted 9-14-5: Common Open Space 9-14-6: Utility Requirements
More informationPLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD)
SECTION 38.01. ARTICLE 38 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) Purpose The purpose of this Article is to implement the provisions of the Michigan Zoning Enabling Act, Public Act 110 of 2006, as amended, authorizing
More information1. Cuyler-Brownsville planned neighborhood conservation (P-N-C) districtphase I (section ). (2) Single-family semiattached dwellings;
Sec. 8-3035. Planned unit development multifamily (PUD-M). A. Purpose. The PUD-M district is intended to allow a variety of residential development including single-family residential, two-family residential,
More informationThe following regulations shall apply in the R-E District:
"R-E" RESIDENTIAL ESTATE DISTRICT (8/06) The following regulations shall apply in the R-E District: 1. Uses Permitted: The following uses are permitted. A Zoning Certificate may be required as provided
More informationRequests Conditional Use Permits (Craft Brewery & Open-Air Market) Staff Recommendations Approval of Craft Brewery Denial of Open-Air Market
Applicant Property Owner ACT Partners Public Hearing February 8, 2017 City Council Election District Lynnhaven Agenda Item 1 Requests Conditional Use Permits (Craft Brewery & Open-Air Market) Staff Recommendations
More informationRECOMMENDATION Following the public hearing, consider Zoning Case PD14-16, with a Development Plan.
Staff Report Zoning Case PD14-16 (Helzer Tract) Planning and Zoning Meeting Date: 12-17-14 Document Being Considered: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION Following the public hearing, consider Zoning Case PD14-16,
More informationAppendix J - Planned Unit Development (PUD)
Appendix J - Planned Unit Development (PUD) Intent and Purpose The purpose of the PUD is: 1. To provide development that is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and promote the goals and objectives
More information1 February 8, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT: ERNEST D. PARRISH
REQUEST: Conditional Use Permit (Truck and Trailer Rental) 1 February 8, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT: ERNEST D. PARRISH PROPERTY OWNER: ACT B LYNNHAVEN COLONY SHOPS STAFF PLANNER: Faith Christie ADDRESS
More informationPLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA MEMORANDUM
City and County of Broomfield, Colorado PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA MEMORANDUM To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: John Hilgers, Planning Director Anna Bertanzetti, Principal Planner Meeting
More informationARTICLE 14 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) DISTRICT
ARTICLE 14 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) DISTRICT Section 14.01 Intent. It is the intent of this Article to allow the use of the planned unit development (PUD) process, as authorized by the Michigan Zoning
More informationMINUTES OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CITY OF HAYDEN, KOOTENAI COUNTY, IDAHO. September 17, 2018
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CITY OF HAYDEN, KOOTENAI COUNTY, IDAHO September 17, 2018 Regular Meeting: 5:00 PM Council Chambers Hayden City Hall, 8930 N. Government Way, Hayden, ID 83835
More informationGlades County Staff Report and Recommendation REZONING
Glades County Staff Report and Recommendation REZONING CASE NUMBER: RZ15-01 DATE: October 2, 2015 CASE TYPE: Application for Rezoning REQUEST: J.J. Wiggins Memorial Trust is requesting a rezoning of 22.1±
More informationThe Miramar Santa Monica
The Miramar Santa Monica Project Description The Santa Monica Miramar Hotel (the Miramar or the Hotel ) has been an institution in the City of Santa Monica since originally opening on the site in 1920.
More informationExhibit D. Tallow Ridge PUD. Written Description. Date: January 5, E. City Development Number:
Exhibit D Tallow Ridge PUD Written Description Date: January 5, 2016 I. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY A. Current Land Use Designation: RR B. Current Zoning District: PUD C. Requested Zoning District:
More information11/15/2017 taxcommissioner.dekalbcountyga.gov/taxcommissioner/tcdisplay.asp Print this page for your records Contact Us Online Payments are for 2017 Only For additional assistance, contact (404) 298-4000.
More informationSUBDIVISION, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, ZONING AMENDMENT, & SIDEWALK WAIVER STAFF REPORT Date: July 19, 2018
SUBDIVISION, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, ZONING AMENDMENT, & SIDEWALK WAIVER STAFF REPORT Date: July 19, 2018 NAME SUBDIVISION NAME LOCATION West Mobile Properties, LLC U.S. Machine Subdivision 556, 566,
More informationRezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis December 4, 2018
Rezoning Petition 2018-108 Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis December 4, 2018 REQUEST Current Zoning: I-1 (light industrial) Proposed Zoning: R-22MF(CD) (multi-family residential, conditional) LOCATION Approximately
More informationREVISED # Federal Drive Milestones Therapy Project Review for Planning and Zoning Commission
REVISED #2012-111 394 Federal Drive Milestones Therapy Project Review for Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Date: November 7, 2012 and November 19, 2012 Request: Location: Acreage: Existing Zoning:
More informationINDIANA AV NORFOLK SOUTHERN R/R
HOSKINS DR MOTOR RD 75 S 260 260 79 INDIANA AV NORFOLK SOUTHERN R/R October 22, 2003 Jimmy L. Norwood, Jr. and Jennifer Norwood 35 Motor Road Winston-Salem, NC 27105 RE: ZONING MAP AMENDMENT W-2656 Dear
More information