The Honorable L. J. DeWald, County Counsel of the County of Placer, has requested an opinion on the following questions:
|
|
- Rosemary Walsh
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA Opinion No. CV Op. Atty Gen. Cal. 466 November 3, 1978 SYLLABUS: [*1] COUNTY RESPONSIBILITY FOR PUBLIC ROADS A county may accept an offer of dedication of roads for public use without accepting the responsibility of maintenance if the acceptance precedes the roads becoming part of a county highway system, and, while approving subdivision, may accept dedication of roads, requiring that the association of subdivision parcel owners maintain the roads if the acceptance is made before the roads become part of the county highway system. A non exclusive easement for road and utility purposes obtained by a private individual and appurtenant to his land may not be dedicated to a county for public use if the original grant of the easement did not consider public use. However, under the same conditions, a non exclusive easement for road and utility purposes may be dedicated to a county for public use if the original grant of the easement was for "public road and utility purposes" or for "public and private purposes." OPINION BY: EVELLE J. YOUNGER, Attorney General (Rodney Lilyquist, Jr., Deputy) OPINION: Requested by: COUNTY COUNSEL, PLACER COUNTY The Honorable L. J. DeWald, County Counsel of the County of Placer, has requested an opinion on the following questions: 1. May [*2] a county accept an offer of dedication of roads for public use without accepting the responsibility of their maintenance? 2. In the process of subdivision approval, may a county accept an offer of dedication of roads and require that the roads be maintained by the association of the subdivision parcel owners? 3. May a non exclusive easement for road and utility purposes obtained by a private individual and appurtenant to his land be dedicated to a county for public use if the original grant of the easement was not expressly for public use? 4. May a non exclusive easement for road and utility purposes obtained by a private individual and appurtenant to his land be dedicated to a county for public use if the original grant of the easement was for "public road and utility purposes" or for "public and private purposes"? The conclusions are:
2 1. A county may accept an offer of dedication of roads for public use without accepting the responsibility of their maintenance prior to the roads becoming part of the county highway system. 2. In the process of subdivision approval, a county may accept an offer of dedication of roads and require that the roads be maintained by the association [*3] of subdivision parcel owners prior to the roads becoming part of the county highway system. 3. A non exclusive easement for road and utility purposes obtained by a private individual and appurtenant to his land may not be dedicated to a county for public use if the original grant of the easement did not contemplate public use. 4. A non exclusive easement for road and utility purposes obtained by a private individual and appurtenant to his land may be dedicated to a county for public use if the original grant of the easement was for "public road and utility purposes" or for "public and private purposes." ANALYSIS The Subdivision Map Act (Gov ) (hereinafter referred to as the Act) is a part of the enabling statutory scheme for local supervision of subdivision developments. In general terms, it requires a land subdivider to file, to get approval of, and to record a subdivision map with the local governing body; anyone who offers to sell or lease any part of a subdivision without complying with the Act is subject to criminal sanctions. (Bright v. Board of Supervisors (1977) 6 Cal. App. 3d 191, ; 61 Ops. Cal. Atty. Gen. 114, 115 (1978); [*4] Comment, Review of Selected 1974 California California Legislation (1975) 6 Pacific L.J. 125, ; Comment, Forced Dedication as a Condition to Subdivision Approval (1971) 9 San Diego L.Rev. 112, 112.) With certain exceptions, the specific requirements of the Act placed upon a subdivider are: (1) to design the subdivision in conformity with the local general or specific plans, (2) to construct public purpose improvements such as streets and sewers, and (3) to donate land or money for public facilities such as schools and parks. (Gov , ; 3 Witkin, Summary of Cal. Law (8th ed. 1973), Real 22 24, pp ; 2 Orden's Revised Cal. Real Property Law , pp ; Comment, Land Development and the Environment: The Subdivision Map Act (1974) 5 Pacific L.J. 55, ) The four questions presented for analysis concern proposed subdivisions in a rural county in which the units of land are to be divided into large parcel sizes of three acres or more. Constructing roads that meet county highway standards in such low density subdivisions is relatively expensive and not as necessary as in subdivisions with smaller [*5] parcel sizes. Roads that do not meet county highway standards, however, require greater maintenance. While the county might allow roads of lesser construction standards in such subdivisions, it would prefer that maintenance of the roads not be the responsibility of the county but that the roads be subject to public use rather than private control. The formation of a special road maintenance district (Sts. & Hy ) is considered too expensive an alternative by the county in some situations. The first two questions involve the issue of whether the county or private individuals may be required to maintain roads dedicated for public use, while the last two questions involve the types of roads and utility easements that may be accepted for subdivision approval.
3 A "dedication" is the application of private real property to a public use. (3 Miller & Starr, Current Law of Cal. Real Estate 20.1, p. 454; 10 Hagman & Maxwell, Cal. Real Estate Practice , p. 361:4; 1 Ogden, 4.10, p. 125; 3 Witkin, 70, p ) A dedication may be accomplished by statutory means (generally, complying with the provisions of the Act) or by nonstatutory, [*6] common law methods. (People v. Rio Nido Co. (1938) 29 Cal. App. 2d 486, 492; 3 Miller, 20.01, pp ; 10 Higman, (2), p. 361:6; 1 Ogden, 4.10, pp ) Both an offer and an acceptance are required to effectuate a dedication; the offer may be accepted by a formal resolution of the governing body that has jurisdiction over the property or by informal public use or other governmental action. (3 Miller, 20.17, pp ; 10 Hagman, (1)(4), pp. 361:36 41.) The significance of accepting an offer of dedication is that the property is thereafter held in trust for public use; the property is no longer subject to private control. (10 Hagman, (3), p. 361:6.) It does not follow, however, that property open to public use must be maintained by the governing body that accepted the offer of dedication. Although a road is a "public street" and subject to "public control," it need not necessarily be maintained by the local governing entity. All roads over which the public has a right to travel, whether express or prescriptive, are "public" roads. "Public" roads, however, are [*7] not "county" roads until accepted as such by appropriate resolution of the board of supervisors. (Sts. & Hy. 941; 45 Ops. Cal. Atty. Gen. 98, 100 (1965).) The general rule is that a county may not use county road funds for maintaining "public" roads other than "county" roads. (45 Ops. Cal. Atty. Gen. supra, 98, 100; 7 Ops. Cal. Atty. Gen. 174, 177 (1946); 4 Ops. Cal. Atty. Gen. 112, (1944).) Accordingly, a county has no statutory duty to maintain public roads that have not been accepted into the county highway system by resolution of the board of supervisors. (County of Kern v. Edgemont Dev. Corp. (1963) 222 Cal. App. 2d 874, ) The distinction between "public" roads and "county" roads is made exceedingly clear by Streets and Highways Code section 941, the second paragraph of which states: "No public... road shall become a county highway until and unless the board of supervisors, by appropriate resolution, has caused said road to be accepted into the county road system; nor shall any county be held liable for failure to maintain any road unless and until it has been accepted into the county road system by resolution of the board of supervisors." [*8] n1 n1 Streets and Highways section 1806 provides similar treatment for city streets. Consequently, a two step procedure is required for imposing upon a county the responsibility of maintaining roads dedicated to public use. First, the offer of dedication is accepted, making them "public roads"; second, if the roadsgenerally meet county highway construction standards, the appropriate resolution is passed, accepting the roads into the county highway system and thus the responsibility for their maintenance. (See Benitez v. City and County of San Francisco (1978) 77 Cal. App. 3d 918, ; County of Kern v. Edgemont Dev. Corp., supra, 222 Cal. App. 2d 874, 879; 59 Ops. Cal. Atty. Gen. 329, 336 (1976); 47 Ops. Cal. Atty. Gen. 191, 193 (1966); 4 Miller, 24.54, pp ; 10 Hagman, (5), p. 361:41.)
4 The conclusion to the first question, therefore, is that a county may accept an offer of dedication of roads for public use without accepting the responsibility of their maintenance prior to the roads becoming part of the county highway system by passage of the appropriate resolution. The second question presented concerns the [*9] authority of the county under the Act to require the maintenance of public roads by private individuals prior to the roads meeting county highway construction standards and becoming part of the county highway system. The Act provides that "there may be imposed by local ordinance a requirement of dedication or irrevocable offer of dedication of real property within the subdivision for streets, alleys, including access rights and abutter's rights, drainage, public utility easements and other public easements." (Gov ) The offer of dedication is made by a certificate on the final subdivision map, and the offer is formally accepted at the same time as the final map is approved by the local entity. (Gov , ; 9 Hagman, (1), p. 291:31.) When a local entity accepts an offer of dedication of roads under the Act, such streets are no longer private but become "public streets subject to public control as to their opening, continued use or closure." (47 Ops. Cal. Atty. Gen., supra, 191, 194.) As previously discussed, the significance of accepting an offer of dedication, whether under the Act or otherwise, is that the property becomes [*10] subject to public use; such acceptance does not necessarily resolve the issues of "ownership" or responsibility for maintenance. The Act refers only to acceptance "for public use in conformity with the terms of the offer of dedication." (Gov ) As was stated in County of Kern v. Edgemont Dev. Corp., supra, 222 Cal. App. 2d 874, : "There is nothing in the statutes which imposes an obligation on the County to... improve, repair, maintain... the streets shown on the subdivision map until the County, in its discretion, by action of its board of supervisors, should determine to accept such streets as part of the county road system. (Sts. & Hy. 941.)" Since the Act does not specify that subdivision roads must meet county highway standards n2 or that a county must accept responsibility for maintaining all roads accepted for public use, we must look to general principles concerning the reasonableness of requiring the parcel owners to maintain such roads. n2 Highways that "are necessary to public convenience" must generally meet county highway standards and the maintained by the county. (Sts. & Hy. 941.) In the questions presented, however, the roads contemplated are in sparsely populated subdivisions and thus may not be "necessary to public convenience." (See Sts. & Hy. 969; 20 Ops. Cal. Atty. Gen. 202, 223 (1952); 18 Ops. Cal. Atty. Gen. 284, 285 (1952); 7 Ops. Cal. Atty. Gen.,supra, 174, 177.) [*11] In general terms, a local entity may impose conditions for approving a subdivision that are reasonably related to and in furtherance of the purposes and requirements of the Act. (Associated Home Builders, Inc. v. City of Walnut Creek (1971) 4 Cal. 3d 633, 638; Ayres v. City Council of Los Angeles (1949) 34 Cal. 2d 31, 37 38; Kelber v. City of Upland (1957) 155 Cal. App. 2d 631, 636.) It is now settled that a subdivider may be required by the count to maintain roads dedicated for public use until they meet county highway standards and become part of the county highway system; such a
5 condition for approval of the subdivision is reasonable and proper. (County of Kern v. Edgemont Dev. Corp., supra, 222 Cal. App. 2d 874, 879; 47 Ops. Cal. Atty. Gen., supra, 191, 194.) Similarly, we believe that the approval of a subdivision may be conditioned upon the maintenance of the subdivision roads by the association of the subdivision parcel owners prior to the roads meeting county highway standards and becoming part of the county highway system. These individuals succeed to the interests of the subdivider and would be the principal beneficiaries and [*12] users of the subdivision roads.presumably, the purchase price of each subdivision parcel will reflect the lesser cost of constructing such roads, and the resulting obligation of the association for maintaining the roads will be considered by each prospective purchaser.we can find no significant distinction between the subdivider and the association members that would require a different result; in either event, the purchasers of the parcels will ultimately bear the costs of such maintenance. Since not all subdivision roads must meet county highway standards and a county may nevertheless require such compliance, it follows that a county should be able to demand maintenance of such substandard roads from either the subdivider or his successors in interest until the roads are properly constructed. This procedure provides planning flexibility without undue hardship being placed upon the subdivider, parcel owners, or the public at large. The conclusion to the second question, therefore, is that as a condition of approval of a subdivision, a county may require that the association of the subdivision parcel owners maintain the subdivision roads dedicated for public use until the roads [*13] meet county highway construction standards and become part of the county highway system. The third and fourth questions concern whether a non exclusive, appurtenant easement for road and utility purposes may be dedicated by the subdivider to the county for public use if the original grant of the easement to the subdivider did not (see question three) or did (see question four) contemplate public use. Generally speaking, an "easement" is that which allows the use of one's property by another, it is "nonexclusive" if it is not restricted to named users, and it is "appurtenant" if it is an incident to the use of the property and not personal to the holder; an appurtenant easement is transferable only with its dominant tenement. (Ogden, 13.7, 13.40, pp. 541, 568; 3 Miller, 18.1, 18.5, 18.51, pp. 243, 254, 358; 10 Hagman, (1), , pp. 343:9, 343:14.) It is fundamental that the transfer of an appurtenant easement may not materially change the character of the easement contemplated in the original grant. While a minor alteration in the use of an easement is permitted as long as the change is one of degree, the imposition of a new [*14] or additional burden upon the easement is prohibited. All uses must be incidental to the original grant and consistent with its purpose. (Code Civ. 806; Whalen v. Ruiz (1953) 40 Cal. 2d 294, 302; Pacific Gas & Electric v. Hacienda Mobile Home Park (1975) 45 Cal. App. 3d 519, 526; Atchison, T. & S.F. Ry. Co. v. Abar (1969) 275 Cal. App. 2d 456, ; Norris v. State (1968) 261 Cal. App. 2d 41, 46 47; Wall v. Rudolph (1961) 198 Cal. App. 2d 684, 686, ) In questions three and four, a subdivider has obtained an easement over the land of another property owner for the purpose of creating roads and utilities lines to the subdivision. It is clear from the foregoing principles that the original grant of the easement to the subdivider must contemplate public
6 use of the easement in order that the subdivider may dedicate the easement to the county for public purposes. The conclusion to the third question, therefore, is that a non exclusive easement for road and utility purposes obtained by a private individual and appurtenant to his land may generally not be dedicated to a county for public use in the absence of express language [*15] in the original grant of the easement indicating that it is for public use. Without such an indication, the change from a private use to a public use would be prohibited as the imposition of a new and additional burden upon the easement. The conclusion to the fourth question, on the other hand, is that such an easement may be dedicated to the county for public use if the original grant to the subdivider was for "public road and utility purposes" or "public and private purposes." Public use under these circumstances would be contemplated and in keeping with the original grant of the easement.
OPINION BY: [*1] DANIEL E. LUNGREN, Attorney General (ANTHONY S. Da VIGO, Deputy Attorney General)
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA No. 94 304 77 Op. Atty Gen. Cal. 185 July 21, 1994 OPINION BY: [*1] DANIEL E. LUNGREN, Attorney General (ANTHONY S. Da VIGO, Deputy Attorney General) OPINION:
More informationOPINION BY: [*1] JOHN K. VAN DE KAMP, Attorney General (Rodney O. Lilyquist, Deputy)
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA Opinion No. 90 102 73 Op. Atty Gen. Cal. 312 October 25, 1990 OPINION BY: [*1] JOHN K. VAN DE KAMP, Attorney General (Rodney O. Lilyquist, Deputy) OPINION Requested
More informationARTICLE III GENERAL PROCEDURES, MINOR PLANS AND FEE SCHEDULES
ARTICLE III GENERAL PROCEDURES, MINOR PLANS AND FEE SCHEDULES 301. Prior to Submission a. Copies of this Ordinance shall be available on request, at cost, for the use of any person who desires information
More informationORDINANCE NO
ORDINANCE NO. 2014-160 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MENIFEE, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING SECTION 10.35 OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY LAND USE ORDINANCE NO. 460.152 AS ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF MENIFEE
More informationJH:SRF:JMG:brf AGENDA DRAFT 4/06/2016 ESCROW AGREEMENT
23090-12 JH:SRF:JMG:brf AGENDA DRAFT 4/06/2016 ESCROW AGREEMENT THIS ESCROW AGREEMENT (the Agreement ) is dated as of May 1, 2016, and is entered into by and between the MT. DIABLO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
More informationARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS
ARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS SECTION 100 TITLE This Ordinance shall be known and cited as the "Rice Township Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance." SECTION 101 AUTHORITY Rice Township is empowered
More informationLAW OFFICES TESLER & SANDMANN MEMORANDUM
LAW OFFICES TESLER & SANDMANN PETER B. SANDMANN PAULINE H. TESLER CERTIFIED FAMILY LAW SPECIALIST STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Gary Friedman, President Peter B. Sandmann SUBJECT: 341 Sunset
More informationGOVERNMENT CODE - GOV
GOVERNMENT CODE - GOV TITLE 7. PLANNING AND LAND USE [65000 66499.58] ( Heading of Title 7 amended by Stats. 1974, Ch. 1536. ) DIVISION 2. SUBDIVISIONS [66410 66499.38] ( Division 2 added by Stats. 1974,
More informationCITY OF BEVERLY HILLS Department of Public Works and Transportation Civil Engineering Division FINAL MAP SUBMITTAL PROCESS Transmitted
CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS Department of Public Works and Transportation Civil Engineering Division FINAL MAP SUBMITTAL PROCESS Transmitted From To* Planning Department Civil Engineering Division RKA Consulting
More informationCOUNTY SUBDIVISION REGULATION IN TEXAS CHANGING TIMES BY: J. GREG HUDSON INTRODUCTION
COUNTY SUBDIVISION REGULATION IN TEXAS CHANGING TIMES BY: J. GREG HUDSON INTRODUCTION With the return of the "building boom" in Texas during the late 1990 s, county officials have been faced with numerous
More informationB. The Plan is in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan.
ARTICLE 17 PLANNING UNIT DEVELOPMENT 17.01 INTENT The purpose of this Section is to permit the creation of new Planned Unit Developments, permitted as Conditional Uses where maximum variations of design
More informationc. elimination as encumbrance 1) express release 2) review of specific facts with underwriter (general description)
TITLE ISSUES IN EASEMENTS AND CCR S I Easements (the Company ) insures, as of Date of Policy and, to the extent stated in Covered Risks 9 and 10, after Date of Policy, against loss or damage, not exceeding
More informationReprinted in part from Volume 24, Number 4, March 2014 (Article starting on page 319 in the actual issue) ARTICLE
MILLER & STARR REAL ESTATE NEWSALERT Reprinted in part from Volume 24, Number 4, March 2014 (Article starting on page 319 in the actual issue) ARTICLE SEPARATE BUT NOT EQUAL: THE NEW COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL
More informationARIZONA TAX COURT TX /18/2006 HONORABLE MARK W. ARMSTRONG
HONORABLE MARK W. ARMSTRONG CLERK OF THE COURT L. Slaughter Deputy FILED: CAMELBACK ESPLANADE ASSOCIATION, THE JIM L WRIGHT v. MARICOPA COUNTY JERRY A FRIES PAUL J MOONEY PAUL MOORE UNDER ADVISEMENT RULING
More informationELK RAPIDS TOWNSHIP ANTRIM COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO
ELK RAPIDS TOWNSHIP ANTRIM COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO. 3-2011 AN ORDINANCE TO REPLACE THE SUBDIVISION CONTROL ORDINANCE WITH A NEW SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE, IN ACCORD WITH THE LAND DIVISION
More informationCITY OF LAFAYETTE ENGINEER S REPORT LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT NO (RESIDENTIAL LIGHTING) FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018
CITY OF LAFAYETTE ENGINEER S REPORT LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1979-2 (RESIDENTIAL LIGHTING) FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018 INTENT MEETING: APRIL 10, 2017 PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 22, 2017 27368 Via Industria
More informationCertiorari not Applied for COUNSEL
1 SANDOVAL COUNTY BD. OF COMM'RS V. RUIZ, 1995-NMCA-023, 119 N.M. 586, 893 P.2d 482 (Ct. App. 1995) SANDOVAL COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, Plaintiff, vs. BEN RUIZ and MARGARET RUIZ, his wife, Defendants-Appellees,
More informationProposition 218 Notification NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS OF PUBLIC HEARING ON HILLSIDE ZONE ADDITIONAL SEWER RATE. Name Address City, State, Zip
100 East Sunnyoaks Ave. Campbell, CA 95008 Regarding APN Number: APN #, Street, City Proposition 218 Notification NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS OF PUBLIC HEARING ON HILLSIDE ZONE ADDITIONAL SEWER RATE Name
More informationAPPENDIX C-1 DEVELOPING FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR PLANNING AND ZONING
APPENDIX C-1 DEVELOPING FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR PLANNING AND ZONING Amended: 9/2011; 9/2014; Page! i DEVELOPING FINDINGS OF FACT, AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Developing the following information
More informationCONSENT ACTION BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF VENETO IN MIRAMAR CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.
CONSENT ACTION BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF VENETO IN MIRAMAR CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. The undersigned, being all of the members of the Board of Directors of Veneto in Miramar Condominium Association,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC LOWER COURT CASE NO. 3D PRIME WEST, INC. and PRIME WEST CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC 05-1697 LOWER COURT CASE NO. 3D04-471 PRIME WEST, INC. and PRIME WEST CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Petitioners, v. LORENZO CAMARGO and ANA CAMARGO, his wife;
More informationOrdinance Page 1
ORDINANCE NO. 671 (AS AMENDED THROUGH 671.20) AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 671 ESTABLISHING CONSOLIDATED FEES FOR LAND USE AND RELATED FUNCTIONS The Board of Supervisors
More informationAMENDED IN COMMITTEE 7/13/17 RESOLUTION NO
FILE NO. 170574 AMENDED IN COMMITTEE 7/13/17 RESOLUTION NO. 304-17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 [Real Property Lease Amendment and Restatement - Pomeroy Recreation
More informationROAD USE AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF (WIND FARM NAME) WIND FARM
ROAD USE AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF (WIND FARM NAME) WIND FARM THIS ROAD USE AGREEMENT (this Agreement ), dated this day of, 20, between the BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF UNION COUNTY, IOWA,
More informationHONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL TITO HAES, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER/PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
CONSENT ITEM D-16 TO: FROM: VIA: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL TITO HAES, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER/PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR JAMES MAKSHANOFF, CITY MANAGER DATE: JUNE 16, 2014 SUBJECT: RESOLUTIONS
More informationRATE STUDY IMPACT FEES PARKS
RATE STUDY FOR IMPACT FEES FOR PARKS CITY OF KENMORE, WASHINGTON May 15, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary................................................... 1 1. Statutory Basis and Methodology
More informationTOWN OF WATERVILLE VALLEY NEW HAMPSHIRE SITE PLAN REVIEW REGULATIONS
TOWN OF WATERVILLE VALLEY NEW HAMPSHIRE Effective date March 17, 1981 Revised March 16, 1982 Revised March 13, 1986 Revised March 10, 1987 Revised March 14, 2013 Revised March 8, 2016 TOWN OF WATERVILLE
More informationBRADFORD W. BAILEY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY HARDIN COUNTY, OHIO
ASSISTANTS COLLEEN P. LIMERICK RYAN A. ZERBY SIOBHONNE K. WARD MARIA SANTO INVESTIGATOR DAVID HOLBROOK BRADFORD W. BAILEY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY HARDIN COUNTY, OHIO www.hardincountyprosecutor.com ONE COURTHOUSE
More informationThis division may be cited as the Subdivision Map Act.
CALIFORNIA CODES GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66410-66413.5 66410. This division may be cited as the Subdivision Map Act. 66411. Regulation and control of the design and improvement of subdivisions are vested
More informationPatrick C. Jackson 600 N. Darwood Avenue San Dimas, California 91773
Patrick C. Jackson 600 N. Darwood Avenue San Dimas, California 91773 Board of Directors of the San Bernardino County Fire Protection District Service Zone FP-5 Expansion Protest 157 W. 5 th Street, 2 nd
More informationMITIGATION AGREEMENTS UNDER S.B. 1094
WHAT IS A MITIGATION AGREEMENT? A written agreement between the project proponent and the entity qualified to hold the property and the endowment pursuant to this chapter, which is submitted to the state
More informationWEST VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT SEWER SERVICE FACT SHEET
WEST VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT SEWER SERVICE FACT SHEET Who is West Valley Sanitation District? We are a special purpose district originally formed in 1948 as County Sanitation District No. 4 under the
More informationORDINANCE NO. 7,562 N.S. AMENDING BERKELEY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION AFFORDABLE HOUSING MITIGATION FEE
Page 1 of 5 ORDINANCE NO. 7,562 N.S. AMENDING BERKELEY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 22.20.065 AFFORDABLE HOUSING MITIGATION FEE BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Berkeley as follows: Section 1. That
More informationORDINANCE NO OA
ORDINANCE NO. 2013 11-OA AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWNSHIP OF BERKELEY, COUNTY OF OCEAN, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AMENDING THE TOWNSHIP CODE OF THE TOWNSHIP OF BERKELEY, SO AS TO CREATE ARTICLE XX, ENTITLED VOLUNTARY
More informationRULE NO. 21 MIDDLE RIO GRANDE CONSERVANCY DISTRICT RULES AND PROCEDURES GOVERNING DISPOSITION OF DISTRICT REAL PROPERTY (LAND SALES POLICY)
RULE NO. 21 MIDDLE RIO GRANDE CONSERVANCY DISTRICT RULES AND PROCEDURES GOVERNING DISPOSITION OF DISTRICT REAL PROPERTY (LAND SALES POLICY) I. STATEMENT OF POLICY It is the policy of the Middle Rio Grande
More informationAugust 12, Thank you for your correspondence of May 29, BACKGROUND
Counties: Planning and Zoning: Subdivision Regulations: Fees: County may not prevent recording of all land conveyance documents that do not comply with county land use controls and fee requirements. Minn.
More informationCircuit Court, D. California. October 6, 1880.
161 v.4, no.3-11 GROGAN V. THE TOWN OF HAYWARD. Circuit Court, D. California. October 6, 1880. 1. DEDICATION OF LAND FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES DEFINITION. A dedication of land for public purposes is simply a
More informationBrief Summary of Drainage Law. November 2011
Brief Summary of Drainage Law November 2011 This document is general information distributed by the State of South Dakota. Nothing in this document should be considered legal advice as to any specific
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 106 Article 61 1
Article 61. Agricultural Development and Preservation of Farmland. Part 1. General Provisions. 106-735. Short title, purpose, and administration. (a) This Article shall be known as "The Agricultural Development
More informationASSEMBLY, No. 266 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2018 SESSION
ASSEMBLY, No. STATE OF NEW JERSEY th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 0 SESSION Sponsored by: Assemblyman SEAN T. KEAN District 0 (Monmouth and Ocean) Assemblyman EDWARD H. THOMSON District
More informationRESOLUTION NUMBER 2017-
RESOLUTION NUMBER 2017- RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORLANDO, FLORIDA, DETERMINING THE NECESSITY OF ACQUIRING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY ALONG BOGGY CREEK ROAD FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING
More informationORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF PORT ARANSAS, TEXAS, BY ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER
ORDINANCE NO. 2008-09 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF PORT ARANSAS, TEXAS, BY ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER TWENTY-SIX CONCERNING IMPACT FEES FOR ROADWAY FACILITIES; INCORPORATING
More informationLincolnton, NC Code of Ordinances CHAPTER 53: WATER AND SEWER EXTENSIONS AND AVAILABILITY CHARGES
Lincolnton, NC Code of Ordinances CHAPTER 53: WATER AND SEWER EXTENSIONS AND AVAILABILITY CHARGES Section 53.01 General principles of water and sewer line extension 53.02 Explanation of terms and requirements
More informationNew Home Tax Disclosure Report
New Home Tax Disclosure Report This report satisfies the seller s obligation, pursuant to Civil Code Section 1102.6b, to disclose all special tax and/or assessment districts affecting the subject property
More informationCharter Township of Bedford 115 S. ULDRIKS DRIVE BATTLE CREEK, MICHIGAN 49037
Charter Township of Bedford 115 S. ULDRIKS DRIVE BATTLE CREEK, MICHIGAN 49037 ORDINANCE NO. 05-11-17-26 OF 2017 AN ORDINANCE TO PROVIDE FOR THE OPERATION OF THE SANITARY SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM WITHIN BEDFORD
More informationDEERING'S CALIFORNIA CODES ANNOTATED Copyright (c) 2010 by Matthew Bender & Company, Inc. a member of the LexisNexis Group. All rights reserved.
Page 1 LEXSTAT CAL GOVT CODE 65852.2 DEERING'S CALIFORNIA CODES ANNOTATED Copyright (c) 2010 by Matthew Bender & Company, Inc. a member of the LexisNexis Group. All rights reserved. *** THIS DOCUMENT IS
More informationCSA #9 NORTHBRIDGE, CALIFORNIA, as Seller. and. CALIFORNIA STATEWIDE COMMUNITIES DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, as Purchaser PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT
CSA #9 NORTHBRIDGE, CALIFORNIA, as Seller and CALIFORNIA STATEWIDE COMMUNITIES DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, as Purchaser PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT Dated as of November 1, 2009 E-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.
More informationMAINTENANCE AND INDEMNITY AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO SEAGATE VILLAGE COMMUNITY ASSOCIAITON S DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: Jeffrey A. French, Esq. (SBN 174968) GREEN BRYANT & FRENCH, LLP 402 W. Broadway, Suite 1950 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: (619) 239-7900 Fax No.: (619)
More informationORDINANCE NO: BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENVILLE, TEXAS:
ORDINANCE NO: AN ORDINANCE GRANTING TO ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION, A TEXAS AND VIRGINIA CORPORATION, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, A FRANCHISE TO CONSTRUCT, MAINTAIN, AND OPERATE PIPELINES AND EQUIPMENT IN
More informationFebruary 8, Chris Noury, City Attorney City of North Myrtle Beach 1018 Second A venue South North Myrtle Beach, SC Dear Mr.
ALAN WILSON ATTORNEY G ENERAL Chris Noury, City Attorney City of North Myrtle Beach 1018 Second A venue South North Myrtle Beach, SC 29582 Dear Mr. Noury: We received your letter requesting an opinion
More informationWOODLAND AREA GENERAL PLAN URBAN DEVELOPMENT POLICY
APPENDIX A WOODLAND AREA GENERAL PLAN URBAN DEVELOPMENT POLICY The following text indicates proposed amendments to the Woodland Area General Plan Urban Development Policy currently adopted and included
More informationSUBDIVISION REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 14 SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS 14-100 Provisions 14-200 Preliminary Plat 14-300 Final Plat 14-400 Replat 14-500 Minor Subdivision 14-600 Administrative Replat 14-700 Vacation of Roadways, Public Easements,
More informationREPORT OF SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CFD (Rosetta Canyon Public Improvements) Fiscal Year
REPORT OF SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CFD 2004-3 (Rosetta Canyon Public Improvements) Fiscal Year 2006-07 Submitted to: City of Lake Elsinore Riverside County,
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 116 Article 21B 1
Article 21B. The Centennial Campus, the Horace Williams Campus, and the Millenial Campuses Financing Act. 116-198.31. Purpose of Article. The purpose of this Article is to authorize the Board of Governors
More informationCONSERVATION EASEMENTS and CONDEMNATION - WHICH ONE WINS? By Christian F. Torgrimson, Esq. luhpursleyfriese PTORGRIMSON
CONSERVATION EASEMENTS and CONDEMNATION - WHICH ONE WINS? By Christian F. Torgrimson, Esq. luhpursleyfriese PTORGRIMSON Georgia Land Title Association, LLC, an affiliate of the Southeast Land Title Association
More informationHonorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Submitted by: Jane Micallef, Director, Department of Health, Housing & Community Services
Office of the City Manager ACTION CALENDAR October 16, 2012 To: From: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Christine Daniel, City Manager Submitted by: Jane Micallef, Director, Department of
More informationPUD Ordinance - Caravelle Village #7 of 1995
PUD Ordinance - Caravelle Village #7 of 1995 CASCADE CHARTER TOWNSHIP Ordinance #17 of 1995 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CASCADE CHARTER TOWNSHIP ZONING ORDINANE AND ZONING MAP TO ESTABLISH THE CARAVELLE
More informationFlorida Attorney General Advisory Legal Opinion
Florida Attorney General Advisory Legal Opinion Number: AGO 2012-18 Date: May 17, 2012 Subject: Value Adjustment Board member, resignation Mr. Monroe D. Kiar 6191 Southwest 45th Street Suite 6151A Davie,
More informationOctober 8, APPEARANCES: For Complainant Woolsey Well Service, L.P. and J & C Operating Co. Dick Marshall Rick Woolsey PROPOSAL FOR DECISION
OIL AND GAS DOCKET NO. 09-0249222 COMMISSION CALLED HEARING ON THE COMPLAINT OF WOOLSEY WELL SERVICE, L.P. AND J & C OPERATING CO. REGARDING THE VALIDITY OF THE PERMITS ISSUED FOR RSK-STAR LEASE, WELL
More informationEASEMENTS - INSURING
EASEMENTS - INSURING I. If the easement has been insured previously by the Company, skip to step VII. II. III. Consider an additional premium for the easement examination. SCHEDULE A - Verify that the
More informationEXHIBIT B COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO (NORTH VINEYARD STATION NO. 1)
EXHIBIT B COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2005-2 (NORTH VINEYARD STATION NO. 1) AMENDED RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX A Special Tax applicable to each Assessor
More informationCity of Lafayette Staff Report
City of Lafayette Staff Report For: City Council By: Donna Feehan, Public Works Services Administrative Analyst Date Written: May 13,2013 Meeting Date: May 28, 2013 Subject: Residential Lighting District
More informationESCROW AGREEMENT. by and among HARBOR DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES. and. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee and as Escrow Agent
NP Draft 6/25/14 ESCROW AGREEMENT by and among HARBOR DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee and as Escrow Agent Dated 1, 2014 relating to: Harbor Department
More informationAMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS RESTRICTIONS AND EASEMENTS FOR CITRUS HILLS FIRST AND SECOND ADDITION
AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS RESTRICTIONS AND EASEMENTS FOR CITRUS HILLS FIRST AND SECOND ADDITION Recorded 8/15/96, Book 1145, Pages 1852-1878 This is a restatement
More informationCONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT August 12, 2015 (Agenda)
CONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT PROPONENTS ACREAGE & LOCATION Laurel Place/Pleasant View Annexation to the City of Concord Curt Blomstrand, Lenox Homes landowner/petitioner
More informationGENERAL ASSIGNMENT RECITALS
GENERAL ASSIGNMENT This General Assignment is made as of the 30th day of April, 2018, by Bluesmart Inc., a Delaware corporation, with offices at 729 Minna Street, San Francisco, CA 94103, hereinafter referred
More informationDECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR SANDY RIDGE, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION
DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR SANDY RIDGE, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION THIS DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR SANDY RIDGE, A RESIDENTIAL
More informationCHAPTER 22 SUBDIVISION AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
CHAPTER 22 SUBDIVISION AND LAND DEVELOPMENT 22-101. Title 22-102. Legislative Intent Part 1 General Provisions 22-201. Development Permits Part 2 Administration 22-301. Fee Schedule Part 3 Fee Schedule
More informationCase 2:18-bk ER Doc 1361 Filed 01/25/19 Entered 01/25/19 15:02:05 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
Main Document Page of 0 0 PETER J. BENVENUTTI (S.B. NO. 0) JANE KIM (S.B. NO. ) KELLER & BENVENUTTI LLP 0 California Street, Suite 00 San Francisco, California 0 Telephone: () - Facsimile: (0) - pbenvenutti@kellerbenvenutti.com
More informationReport on. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. Issued by the. July 2, 2015 PCAOB RELEASE NO
1666 K Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 207-9100 Facsimile: (202) 862-8433 www.pcaobus.org Report on 2014 Inspection of Squar, Milner, Peterson, Miranda & Williamson, Certified Public
More informationAuthority of Commissioners Court
-County Roads- A primer for newly elected officials By Robert T. Bob Bass Allison, Bass & Magee, LLP Austin, Texas 78701 1/6/15 1 Authority of Commissioners Court Make and enforce all reasonable and necessary
More informationChapter 25 ESCROW FEE REQUIREMENTS
Chapter 25 ESCROW FEE REQUIREMENTS 25.01 Escrow Deposit and Reimbursement Agreement Required 25.02 Payment of Fees 25.03 Approvals and Ordinances 25.04 Refunds 25.01 ESCROW DEPOSIT AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
More informationAGREEMENT TO NEGOTIATE EXCLUSIVELY WITH FOLLIS- CLIFFORD ALTADENA LLC TO DEVELOP A BUSINESS PARK COMPLEX IN THE WEST ALTADENA PROJECT AREA
July 16, 2002 Honorable Board of Commissioners Community Development Commission County of Los Angeles 383 Hahn Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Commissioners:
More informationI. PARCEL MAP STATEMENTS II. FINAL MAP STATEMENTS III. GENERAL NOTES ON PARCEL/FINAL MAPS FOR CONDOMINIUMS IV. RECORD OF SURVEY STATEMENTS
These statements are compiled for the convenience of the reader and are not meant to redefine or conflict with applicable California State Law. In the event of a conflict, the applicable law shall prevail.
More information1 of 1 DOCUMENT. JOHN E. SCRUBY et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. VINTAGE GRAPEVINE, INC., Defendant and Appellant. No. A
Page 1 1 of 1 DOCUMENT JOHN E. SCRUBY et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. VINTAGE GRAPEVINE, INC., Defendant and Appellant. No. A066177. COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVI-
More informationMemorandum: October 13, 2008 REVISED To: Trowbridge Township Planning Commission From: P. Hudson, AICP Re: Suggested New Ordinance
1 Memorandum: October 13, 2008 REVISED 2-11-09 To: Trowbridge Township Planning Commission From: P. Hudson, AICP Re: Suggested New Ordinance Because of changes in both the Michigan Planning Enabling Act
More informationATTACHMENT B GRANT DEED. This deed is in satisfaction of the Eminent Domain Action Case No. GRANT DEED
GRANT DEED RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: County of Orange County Executive Office CEO Real Estate 333 W. Santa Ana Blvd. Bldg. 10 Santa Ana, California 92701 AND MAIL TAX STATEMENTS
More informationP.F. WOOD, APPELLANT, V. C. MANDRILLA, RESPONDENT. SAC. NO SUPREME COURT
Supreme Court of California,Department Two. 167 Cal. 607 {Cal. 1914) WOOD V. MANDRILLA P.F. WOOD, APPELLANT, V. C. MANDRILLA, RESPONDENT. SAC. NO. 2089. SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA,DEPARTMENT TWO. APRIL
More informationSUBJECT: AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 13 DATE: June 5, 2017 OF THE SAN JOSE MUNICIPAL CODE
COUNCIL AGENDA: 06/27/17 ITEM: 4.5 CITY OF cr SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY Memorandum TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: Barry Ng Rosalynn Hughey SUBJECT: AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 13 DATE: June
More informationDrafting Easement Agreements Practical Considerations & Potential Pitfalls
Drafting Easement Agreements Practical Considerations & Potential Pitfalls Paul G. Carey Dickenson, Peatman & Fogarty 1455 First Street, Suite 301 Napa, California 94559 (707) 252-7122 pcarey@dpf-law.com
More informationSTATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) AGREEMENT ) OF COUNTY OF RICHLAND ) PURCHASE AND SALE
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) AGREEMENT ) OF COUNTY OF RICHLAND ) PURCHASE AND SALE THIS AGREEMENT (the Agreement ) executed the day of, 2010 (the Effective Date ), by and between COLUMBIA VENTURE, LLC, a
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JACKSON COUNTY
[Cite as Watson v. Neff, 2009-Ohio-2062.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JACKSON COUNTY Jeffrey S. Watson, Trustee, : : Plaintiff-Appellant, : : Case No. 08CA12 v. : : DECISION
More informationTitle 32: PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS
Title 32: PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS Chapter 3-A: ARCHITECTS, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS AND INTERIOR DESIGNERS Table of Contents Subchapter 1. BOARD OF LICENSURE... 3 Section 210. DEFINITIONS... 3 Section
More informationSCHOOL FINANCE: IMPACT FEES and a COUPLE OF OTHER THINGS. First Things. How Do We Pay? What Are We Talking About? How Do We Pay?
SCHOOL FINANCE: IMPACT FEES and a COUPLE OF OTHER THINGS Theodore B. DuBose Haynsworth Sinkler Boyd, P.A. Presented to: SC School Boards Association 2016 School Law Conference Charleston, South Carolina
More informationSANTA BARBARA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report for Flood Control Easement Quitclaim
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report for Flood Control Easement Quitclaim Deputy Director: Steve Chase Staff Report Date: March 10, 2006 Division: Development Review South Case No.: 06GOV-00000-00004
More informationEasements, Covenants and Profits à Prendre Executive Summary
Easements, Covenants and Profits à Prendre Executive Summary Consultation Paper No 186 (Summary) 28 March 2008 EASEMENTS, COVENANTS AND PROFITS À PRENDRE: A CONSULTATION PAPER EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 This
More informationPrecondemnation Procedures: Acquiring Right of Way in a New World October 9, Presented by David Graeler and Brad Kuhn
Precondemnation Procedures: Acquiring Right of Way in a New World October 9, 2015 Presented by David Graeler and Brad Kuhn Pre-Litigation Phases Project Planning Engineering / Design Appraisal Offer /
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2005 ST. JOHNS/ST. AUGUSTINE, COMMITTEE, ETC., Petitioner, v. Case No. 5D04-3519 CITY OF ST. AUGUSTINE, FLORIDA, ETC., ET
More informationPACIFIC COAST TITLE COMPANY
PACIFIC COAST TITLE COMPANY ESCROW FEES AND CHARGES FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA EFFECTIVE: August 15, 2012 (Unless Otherwise State Herein) Table of Contents Part I Escrow Rates General Rules... 1 A. Minimum
More informationFIRST AMENDED DEED RESTRICTION
RECORDED AT THE POLK COUNTY COURTHOUSE IN VOLUME 349, PAGES 850 TO 854 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF POLK FIRST AMENDED DEED RESTRICTION WHEREAS, the undersigned DON E. WARFIELD, and C. L. CONNER, CO- TRUSTEES,
More informationDEED OF TRUST PUBLIC TRUSTEE
DEED OF TRUST PUBLIC TRUSTEE THIS DEED OF TRUST is a conveyance in trust of real property to the Public Trustee of the county in Colorado in which the Property described below is located. It has been signed
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. 17-CA-02 Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance. Jon Biggs, Community Development Director
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: May 3, 2018 Subject: Prepared by: Initiated by: 17-CA-02 Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance Jon Biggs, Community Development Director City Council Attachments:
More informationTRUCKEE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ORDINANCE
TRUCKEE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ORDINANCE 01-2017 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TRUCKEE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT LEVYING SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2017-01
More informationCity of Edwardsville, Kansas Special Benefit District Policy
City of Edwardsville, Kansas Special Benefit District Policy Date Adopted: September 12, 2011 Section 1. Objective The objective is to establish a policy to finance public streets, sanitary sewers, water
More informationEVALUATIVE CRITERIA FOR COMPLIANCE: UNFUNDED MANDATES CONTROL ACT. Appendix B:
EVALUATIVE CRITERIA FOR COMPLIANCE: UNFUNDED MANDATES CONTROL ACT Appendix B: Evaluative Criteria for Compliance: Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as Amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement,
More informationDECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS AND STORMWATER CONTROL FACILITY EASEMENT AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS AND STORMWATER CONTROL FACILITY EASEMENT AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT THIS STORMWATER CONTROL FACILITY EASEMENT AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is made and
More informationGENERAL ASSIGNMENT RECITALS
GENERAL ASSIGNMENT This General Assignment (the General Assignment ) is made as of the 6th day of December, 2016, by Pebble Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation, with offices at 900 Middlefield Road,
More informationHOLDING TANK AGREEMENT
MUNII\9602(4)\020328\1\11 03-19-07 WITH FINANCIAL SECURITY Prepared By: Return To: Parcel ID # Morgan, Hallgren, Crosswell & Kane, P.C. 700 N. Duke St. P. O. Box 4686 Lancaster, PA 17604-4686 (717)-299-5251
More informationSECTION WATER SYSTEM EXTENSION
SECTION 10.00 WATER SYSTEM EXTENSION 10.01 General Statement: The Board shall make or cause to be made such extension, or replacements, to the water transmission and distribution system of the Board as
More informationOregon Statutes Relevant to Quiet Water Home Owners Association
Oregon Statutes Relevant to Quiet Water Home Owners Association 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 PLANNED COMMUNITIES (General Provisions).0 Definitions for ORS.0 to.. As used in ORS.0 to.: (1) Assessment means any
More information