Urban Planning and Land Use

Transcription

1 Urban Planning and Land Use 701 North 7 th Street, Room 423 Phone: (913) Kansas City, Kansas Fax: (913) planninginfo@wycokck.org To: From: City Planning Commission City Staff Date: June 12, 2017 Re: Petition #SP GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Jon Corbin Status of Applicant: Representative KVC Foundation, Inc Brenner Drive Kansas City, KS Requested Action: Special Use Permit Date of Application: April 28, 2017 Purpose: To use a temporary trailer for storage Property Location: 4300 Brenner Drive Existing Zoning: R-1 Single Family District #SP June 12,

2 Existing Surrounding Zoning: North: AG Agricultural District, Union Pacific Railway, and Missouri River South: R-1 Single Family District East: R-1 Single Family District West: R-1 Single Family and AG Agricultural Districts Existing Uses: North: South: East: West: Railroad use Undeveloped parcels Undeveloped parcels Undeveloped parcels and large lot residences Total Tract Size: acres Master Plan Designation: The City-Wide Master Plan classifies this property for agricultural use. Major Street Plan: The City-Wide Master Plan classifies Brenner Drive as a local street. Advertisement: The Wyandotte Echo May 18, 2017 Letters to Property Owner May 18, 2017 Public Hearing: June 12, 2017 Public Opposition: A nearby property owner called to express opposition. PROPOSAL Detailed Outline of Requested Action: The applicant, Jon Corbin of KVC Foundation, Inc., is seeking approval for the use of a temporary trailer as auxiliary storage until construction can begin on an addition to the facility. City Ordinance Requirements: through FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED 1. The Character of the Neighborhood. The area is rural in nature. 2. The zoning and uses of properties nearby and the proposed use s expected compatibility with them. The zoning and their uses are set out above; because the trailer is to be temporary and screened from view, compatibility should not be an issue. #SP June 12,

3 3. The suitability of the property for the uses to which it has been restricted. Will removal of the restrictions detrimentally affect nearby property. The property is suitable for the proposed use and the removal of the restrictions will not detrimentally affect nearby properties. 4. The length of time the property has remained vacant as zoned. The property is not vacant. 5. The degree of conformance of the proposed use to the Master Plan. Special use permits are not addressed in the Master Plan. 6. Whether the proposed use will result in increasing the amount of vehicular traffic to the point where it exceeds the capacity of the street network to accommodate it. The proposed use will not result in increasing the amount of vehicular traffic to the point where it exceeds the capacity of the street network to accommodate it. 7. Whether the proposed use is reasonably necessary for the convenience and welfare of the public and will not substantially or permanently injure the appropriate use, visual quality, or marketability of adjoining property. The proposed use is reasonably necessary for the applicant and will not substantially injure the appropriate use, visual quality, or marketability of adjoining property. 8. Whether the noise, vibration, dust, or illumination that would normally be associated with such use is of such duration and intensity as to create problems for near-by property. The proposed use will not create problems for near-by properties. 9. Whether the proposed use will pollute the air, land or water. The proposed use will not pollute the air, land or water. 10. Whether the use would damage or destroy an irreplaceable natural resource. This is not applicable. #SP June 12,

4 11. The relative gain to the public health, safety, and welfare as compared to the hardship imposed on the individual landowner or landowners. The relative gain to the public health, safety, and welfare as compared to the hardship imposed on the landowners is minimal. 12. Whether the proposed use would result in overcrowding of land or cause undue concentrations of population. This is not applicable. PREVIOUS ACTIONS 1984: Indefinite Special Use Permit for youth inpatient psychiatric treatment center NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on May 25, 2017; two people were in attendance. KEY ISSUES Length of Use STAFF COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS Urban Planning and Land Use Comments: 1. How long are you planning to utilize this trailer on the site? Applicant Response: We don t want the trailer to be permanent but we need it for the short term (5 years) while we evaluate our capacity to expand our current facility or acquire additional buildings in the area. 2. Are there plans to build a permanent structure for this use? What is the time frame on those plans? Applicant Response: The hospital will need time to raise money to fund any future expansions. The intent is to remove the trailer when a future expansion is designed and built. Since it is dependent on fundraising, there is no guarantee that 5 years will be enough. In that case, we would reapply for an extension to the special use permit should circumstances dictate such action. Staff recommends an approval time period of two (2) years initially as prescribed by code. If approved, trailer shall remain screened from view. #SP June 12,

5 Public Works Comments: A) Items that require plan revision or additional documentation before engineering can recommend approval: 1) Provide a cross section showing the existing sidewalk, proposed storage trailer, and proposed steps with handrail. Indicate the width of the proposed steps on the cross section, and show the step location on the site plan, sheet A02. 2) Although minimal work is proposed, add erosion control notes that meet UG standards and criteria. B) Items that are conditions of approval (stipulations): 1) None C) Comments that are not critical to engineering s recommendations for this specific submittal, but may be helpful in preparing future documents: 1) None STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Planning Commission make the findings contained within the staff report related to Factors to be Considered, and Key Issues and recommend APPROVAL of Petition #SP subject to all comments and suggestions outlined in this staff report. ATTACHMENTS Zoning map Aerial image Site plan REVIEW OF INFORMATION AND SCHEDULE Action Planning Commission Unified Government Commission Public Hearing June 12, 2017 June 29, 2012 Vacation STAFF CONTACT: Jamie Hickey jhickey@wycokck.org MOTIONS I move the Kansas City, Kansas City Planning Commission RECOMMEND APPROVAL of Petition #SP to the Unified Government Board of Commissioners as meeting all the requirements of the City Code and being in the interest of the public health, safety and welfare subject to such modifications as are necessary to resolve to the satisfaction of City Staff all comments contained in the Staff Report; and the following additional requirements: 1. ; 2. ; And 3. _. #SP June 12,

6 OR I move the Kansas City, Kansas City Planning Commission RECOMMEND DENIAL of Petition #SP , to the Unified Government Board of Commissioners as it is not in compliance with the City Ordinances and as it will not promote the public health, safety and welfare of the City of Kansas City, Kansas; and other such reasons that have been mentioned. #SP June 12,

7 #SP June 12,

8 #SP June 12,

9 #SP June 12,

10 #SP June 12,

11 #SP June 12,