Conceptual Review Agenda

Transcription

1 Conceptual Review Agenda Schedule for 06/18/12 to 06/18/ Conference Room A Monday, June 18, 2012 Time Project Name Applicant Info Project Description Planner 10:15 McClelland's Creek Filing 3 - Replat Andy Reese andy@northernengineering.com This project proposes to resubdivide 11 platted single-family lots and a common open space into 9 larger single-family lots and a common open space by eliminating an alley access. The property is an internal block in the McClelland's Creek Subdivision. The property is zoned Low Density Mixed-Use Neighborhood (L-M-N) in which platting single-family is permitted subject to an administrative review (Type I). The project is located with the boudary of the Fossil Creek Reservoir Area Plan. Courtney Levingston Agenda as of 06/08/12 at 3:31 pm Page 1 of 1

2 McClelland's Creek F3 Replat Mountain Vista Vine 287 Lemay Shields Taft Hill Horsetooth Timberline Mulberry Prospect Drake Aerial Site Map Eclipse Ln Douglas 1 «V U Cinquefoil Ln 287 Vicinity Map Cosmos Ln 25 Kechter Rd Harmony _ ^ Trilby Wild Elm Way Zach Elementary Big Canyon Dr Zoning Map Full Moon Dr Eclipse Ln Oak Shadow Way Northern Lights Dr 1 inch = 17,493 feet Cosmos Ln Kechter Rd E County Road 36 Zach Elementary Big Canyon Dr Wild Elm Way LMN Oak Sha d ow W ay High Desert Pl r Rock Dove Dr D Copper Spring Dr ts gh Northern L i 1 inch = 600 feet These map products and all underlying data are developed for use by the City of Fort Collins for its internal purposes only, and were not designed or intended for general use by members of the public. The City makes no representation or warranty as to its accuracy, timeliness, or completeness, and in particular, its accuracy in labeling or displaying dimensions, contours, property boundaries, or placement of location of any map features thereon. THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS MAKES NO WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR WARRANTY FOR FITNESS OF USE FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, WITH RESPECT TO THESE MAP PRODUCTS OR THE UNDERLYING DATA. Any users of these map products, map applications, or data, accepts same AS IS, WITH ALL FAULTS, and assumes all responsibility of the use thereof, and further covenants and agrees to hold the City harmless from and against all damage, loss, or liability arising from any use of this map product, in consideration of the City's having made this information available. Independent verification of all data contained herein should be obtained by any users of these products, or underlying data. The City disclaims, and shall not be held liable for any and all damage, loss, or liability, whether direct, indirect, or consequential, which arises or may arise from these map products or the use thereof by any person or entity. 1 inch = 200 feet

3 Development Review Guide STEP 2 of 8 CONCEPTUAL REVIEW: APPLICATION General Information All proposed development projects begin with Conceptual Review. Anyone with a development idea can schedule a Conceptual Review meeting to get feedback on prospective development ideas. At this stage, the development idea does not need to be finalized or professionally presented. However, a sketch plan and this application must be submitted to City Staff prior to the Conceptual Review meeting. The more information you are able to provide, the better feedback you are likely to get from the meeting. Please be aware that any information submitted may be considered a public record, available for review by anyone who requests it, including the media. Conceptual Reviews are scheduled on three Monday mornings per month on a first come, first served basis. One 45 meeting is allocated per applicant and only three conceptual reviews are done each Monday morning. Conceptual Review is a free service. Complete applications and sketch plans must be submitted to City Staff no later than 5 pm, two Tuesdays prior to the meeting date. Application materials must be ed to currentplanning@fcgov.com. If you do not have access to , other accommodations can be made upon request. At Conceptual Review, you will meet with Staff from a number of City departments, such as Community Development and Neighborhood Services (Zoning, Current Planning, and Development Review Engineering), Light and Power, Stormwater, Water/Waste Water, Advance Planning (Long Range Planning and Transportation Planning) and Poudre Fire Authority. Comments are offered by staff to assist you in preparing the detailed components of the project application. There is no approval or denial of development proposals associated with Conceptual Review. At the meeting you will be presented with a letter from staff, summarizing comments on your proposal. *BOLDED ITEMS ARE REQUIRED* *The more info provided, the more detailed your comments from staff will be.* Contact Name(s) and Role(s) (Please identify whether Consultant or Owner, etc) Business Name (if applicable) Your Mailing Address Phone Number Address Site Address or Description (parcel # if no address) Description of Proposal (attach additional sheets if necessary) Proposed Use Existing Use Total Building Square Footage S.F. Number of Stories Lot Dimensions Age of any Existing Structures Info available on Larimer County s Website: If any structures are 50+ years old, good quality, color photos of all sides of the structure are required for conceptual. Is your property in a Flood Plain? Yes No If yes, then at what risk is it? Info available on FC Maps: Click Floodplains tab and zoom to property. Increase in Impervious Area S.F. (Approximate amount of additional building, pavement, or etc. that will cover existing bare ground to be added to the site) Suggested items for the Sketch Plan: Property location and boundaries, surrounding land uses, proposed use(s), existing and proposed improvements (buildings, landscaping, parking/drive areas, water treatment/detention, drainage), existing natural features (water bodies, wetlands, large trees, wildlife, canals, irrigation ditches), utility line locations (if known), photographs (helpful but not required). Things to consider when making a proposal: How does the site drain now? Will it change? If so, what will change? Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 N College Ave Fort Collins, CO

4 Re: McClelland s Creek Third Filing, Replat of Block 2 Conceptual Review May 29, 2012 Project Description: McClelland s Creek Third Filing is located at the corner of Kechter Road and Strauss Cabin Road. The project was approved and recorded in December 2010, and is comprised of 138 single family lots. Construction is currently underway on the first phase of the project. The current proposal is to remove 2 of the existing 11 lots that currently comprise Block 2, as well as the alley access from Big Canyon Drive. The remaining lots would absorb and equally distribute the additional area between them. Existing Lots 10 and 11 would remain unchanged, as would the Common Area, Lot B. The changes to the lot configuration would have some impacts on the previously approved Utility Plans. In particular, the utility service locations would need to be modified to align with the new lot layouts, and the approved grading plan would need to be modified to reflect the changes as well. No additional changes to the utility plans will be needed. Due to the decrease in impervious area, drainage from the block will decrease with this proposal. The previously approved drainage patterns and routing will still be followed. Outstanding issues/questions: At this time, clarification on which city process will be required is requested. Section of the Land Use Code identifies instances in which a minor amendment to an existing PDP is appropriate. We feel that our project certainly meets the requirements of Sections 1a-1f, and 2a-2e. However, Paragraph A of this section specifically prohibits the use of Minor Amendments in a replat. As such, it would appear that a Type 1 review is the most likely path. With that being said, the project is currently under construction, with major earthwork activities nearly completed. Pipe installation will begin very soon, if it hasn t already started. In the interest of constructing the utility services once, thereby ensuring that backfill is placed uniformly, and that there is no need to remove or abandon unneeded services or to affect the roadways once they are constructed, we hope that there is an avenue that will allow for a quicker review process than generally associated with a replat. We would greatly appreciate your consideration of the construction realities vs. the likely public input you would receive (or lack thereof) as you deliberate on the need for public hearings, neighborhood meetings, and other requirements typically required. While these efforts are almost always needed and beneficial to everyone involved, in this instance they will likely do nothing more than lengthen the review process. Thank you for your time and consideration. We look forward to meeting with you to discuss this proposal in more detail. Sincerely, Andy Reese Northern Engineering Project Engineer

5

6

7

8

9