BARRY CARD 8:00 PM. To PRESENT A REPORT ON AN APPLICATION BY KERWOOD WIND INC. TO ONTARIO ENERGY BOARD.
|
|
- Elaine Gallagher
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 BARRY CARD 8:00 PM To PRESENT A REPORT ON AN APPLICATION BY KERWOOD WIND INC. TO ONTARIO ENERGY BOARD.
2 Barry R. Card BARRIS I I R & SOI R 11 OR Certified Spceialu:l - Municipal law I cut (itivernmenli Planning I And K._ t I kvelopinent I aw 5(4( 1(11)(ilAsi001) ( RI St:FM"! I.( I IN I \R10 N6.I 112 Il..1.1:1'110N1 ( i 1 I AC'SIMII I. 0) (51 Internet Address. corditfirwrogers runt January 13, 2014 Report Number One Public Agenda Application by Kerwood Wind, Inc. to Ontario Energy Board Mayor and Members of Council Township oladelaide Metcalfe Recommendation: I,egal Counsel recommends that this report he received in public session. A second report providing confidential advice and recommendations with respect to the matter should he considered in camera. Background: Kerwood Wind, Inc. (the "proponent'') has been in discussions with the Council, staff, the Municipality's engineering consultant and legal counsel for several months. concerning proposed activity related to the development or its "Kerwood - wind project. The proponent seeks various permissions and approvals, including the location of its electrical infrastructure, road improvements, access driveways and related issues, such as permission to cut down trees. At Kerwood's request, these permissions and approvals were to have been granted in a single document. to he known as a "Road Use Agreement-. Prior to Kerwood's request, the Municipality had adopted a template for such approvals. Kerwood did not find this template satisfactory and has proposed its own preferred Road Ilse Agreement wording. I reviewed one iteration of Kerwood's wording with the Council in open session on November 13, 201 I was instructed at that time to return to Council with a revised agreement, in final form, once the critical "Schedules- were in final form. I have been advised by staff and the engineer that these schedules are still not in final form. Kerwood reports the following: *Schedule A (approved plans) were discussed many times, but in its current form was discussed with the Township Engineer on December 13th *Schedule B (Decommissioning Report Text) was provided December 19th during these discussions, but is consistent with the report text that has been in the Township's hands since the spring of 2012 when we made our REA submission 1
3 Schedule C (Haul route) was provided on November 1st Schedule D (Entrance Location Drawings) is comprised of data that was provided to the Township from July 3rd through July 31st, and approved November 7th Schedule E (Permitted Road Work) was provided December 19th Schedule F (Emergency Service providers) was provided December 19th Schedule G (Drainage Services Guidelines) is a Township document, but was provided to us November 15th Discussions between the Municipality and Kerwood have continued since the last report to the Council. Kerwood requested a pre-release version of the evolving agreement. That was sent to Kerwood as a without prejudice draft on December On the evening of December , I received a copy ()Ian application made by Kerwood under Section 41 of the Electricity Act. The Clerk has a copy of this material, which is too lengthy to he included with this report, however it can be accessed by the public at: &sortd1=rs_dateregistered&rows=200 Section 41 of the Electricity Act Wind Farm developers have been found to fall within the provisions of Section 41 Electricity of the Act. and this provides them with access to the Ontario Energy Board tbr electrical infrastructure placement approval. Section 41 (excerpts here) says: Public streets and highways 41. (1) A transmitter or distributor may over. under or 00 any public street or highway, construct or install such structures, equipment and other facilities as it considers necessary JO,- the purpose of its transmission or distribution system, including poles and lines c. 15, Sched. A, s. 41 (1). No consent required (5) The exercise of powers under subsections (1), (2) and (3) does not require the consent of the owner of or any other person having an interest in the street or highway c. 15. Sched. A, s. 41 (5). Location (9) The location of structures, equipment. or facilities con.structed or installed under subsection (1) shall he agreed on by the transmitter or distributor and the owner of the.street or highway, and in case of disagreement shall he determined by the Board c. 15 S'ched. /1 v. 41 (9). The right to apply to the OM arises under subsection (9). The condition precedent to the application in is: the case of a disagreement". 2
4 Section 41 also deals with the subject of damages: Notice, compensation, etc. (7) Ifa transmitter or distributor exerciser a power of entry under this section. it shall. (a) provide reasonable notice of the entry to the miner or other person having authority over the street or highway; (b) in so far as is practicable. restore the street or highway to its original condition: and (c) provide compensation for any damages caused by the entry. (emphasis added) The OEB has no jurisdiction to deal with damages. The Alleged Dispute As far as 1 know, at the date of the application, there was no disagreement concerning the location of the infrastructure. The validity of the application. as it stands. is fairly in question for this reason. It should be noted that the 0111 does not have the power to impose a road use agreement, covering aspects of the request for permission which go beyond the scope of the legislation. Kerwood says this in its application: 5. In accordance with Section 41(9) of the Electricity Act. Kerwood, as the distributor and the lbwriship, as the owner fare Road Allowances. are required only to agree on the exact location of the Distribution System within the Road Allowances. which location all he sh determined by the Board in the event of a disagreement. The material filed in support of the application might reasonably be expected to identify the nature of the disagreement regarding location, however, it does not appear to do I have that. asked the proponent's legal counsel for particulars of the disagreement. Nothing has been provided. The material, at Exhibit B, tab 5 contains a chronology prepared by Kerwood. This is the relevant entry, which appears on schedule 1 at page (emphasis added): On December 13, 2013, Kerwood met with Township engineering stuff lo discuss, among 5 other things, drawings of. the proposed routing of the Distribution System within the Road 6 Allowances (in particular those drawings included at Exhibit B. Tab 4, Schedule I, 7 Appendix 13). with the expectation that these drawings would he included as a schedule to (( a. final form of Road (Ise Agreement. The Township engineers did not raise any concerns 9 with the drawings. In other words, a mere 10 days before Kerwood applied to the O1.?11, it had formed the opinion that there were no salient issues between the parties regarding the location of the electrical infrastructure. As an aside, the same chronology contains this linal entry: On the afternoon of Decenzber 20, 2013, the Townships solicitor sent Kerwood a substantially revised Road Use Agreement (see Appendix GG hereto for a copy of this agreement), which included several provisions that had not previously been discussed by the parties, and several unreasonable conditions, that have not brought the parties closer to reaching an agreement on the location of the Distribution System. 3
5 The problem that is identified here has no legitimate connection to the location of the electrical infrastructure. I spoke with the consulting engineer on Friday. January and was advised of certain technical deficiencies with the drawings. I have asked the engineer to provide a list of these deficiencies for distribution to staff and Kerwood. They do not pertain to the location issue. Essentially, the continuing issue with respect to the drawings has to do with detail. Given that Kerwood recognizes the need to identify the -exact location" which it proposes for the electrical infrastructure, the absence of precision on that score cannot have come as a surprise to Kerwood. In any event, Kerwood did not at any material time request approval of its electrical infrastructure plans in isolation from the proposed agreement. It has at all times preferred and proposed the agreement approach. Kerwood's Application to the OEB A review of the material discloses many (irrelevant) aspects of negotiations between the parties concerning the road use agreement but a lack of precision regarding the dispute about the location of infrastructure. Instead, it says (emphasis added): However; the Township has effectively refused, for approximately one-and-a-halfyears, to engage Kerwood in meaningful discussions on where in the Road Allowances the Distribution System will be located. Instead, the "township has insisted on conducting a series of. public meetings regarding installation of collector lines and developing a set of generic Road Use Agreements that are not specific to the Project' Despite KerwoodS efforts to provide increasingly detailed maps and engineering diagrams of the proposed Distribution System, the Township is now effectively refusing to have meaningful discussions with Kerwood regarding the location of the Distribution System or any proposed Road Use Agreement. The result of these events, which are described in further detail in Exhibit B, Tab 5 cchedule I, is a fundamental inability of the parties to reach an agreement regarding the location of the Distribution System in the Road Allowances. 8. Because Kerwood and the Township cannot reach an agreement with respect to the location of the Distribution System within the Road Allowances, the Applicant requests that the Board issue an order or orders, pursuant to Section 41(9) of the Electricity Act. establishing the location of the Distribution System within the Road Allowances. all as set out in Exhibit B, Mb 6, Schedule I. 9. Kerwood requests that the Board expedite its hearing of this application in accordance with Sections 2.01 and 7.01 of the Board's Rules of Practice and Procedure because (i) the only person directly affected by this application is the Township as the sole owner of the Road Allowances, and (ii) Kerwood received a REA for the Project on August 1, 2013, and its project schedule requires Distribution System construction to commence by March I am not aware of any request by Kerwood. outside the scope of the road use agreement negotiations, for approval of any particular plan showing only the location of the proposed infrastructure. The Written Evidence Presented by Kerwood 4
6 Kerwood is proposing that its application be considered in writing, rather than by means of a more conventional oral hearing process. The Board's Rules require written evidence. The material available on-line includes this material. A summary of the pre-filed evidence has been provided by Kerwood. In this summary. Kerwood asserts the following: PROPOSED ROAD USE AGREEVIENT The only outstanding issue with respect to KerwoodS use oldie Road Allowances is the exact location of the Distribution System within the Road Allowances. In this regard. Kerwood sought to negotiate a Road Use Agreement with the Township (the"proposed Agreement'', see Exhibit B, Tab -I, Schedule I. Appendix A), even though Kerwood is not aware of any statutory obligation to enter into such an agreement. However the Township has effectively refused, for approximately one-and-a-hall years, to engage Kerwood in meciningfid discussions on where in the Road Allowances the Distribution System will he located. Instead, the Thwnship has insisted on conducting a series of public meetings regarding installation of collector lines and developing a set of generic Road Use Agreements that are not specific to the Project. Despite Kerwoocl's efforts to provide increasingly detailed maps and engineering diagrams of the proposed Distribution :System, the lownship is now effectively relitsing to have meaningful discussions with Kern out( regarding the location of the Distribution System or any proposed Road Use Agreement. The result of these events, which are described in further detail in Exhibit 13, Rib 5 S'chedule I, is a fundamental inability of the parties to reach an agreement regatding the location ofrthe Distribution,S'v,s tem in the Road Allowances. This is what Kerwood has to say about the Municipality's position on the road use agreement: POTENTIAL lit4pa('ts Kerwood has attempted to ensure that the Township would not be prejudiced by the location of Distribution System within the Road Allowances (see Exhibit 13. Tab 7, Schedule 1). Under the Proposed Agreement, Kerwood would have provided certain benefits and protections to the Township in respect of the construction, installation, Operation, maintenance and decommissioning of the Distribution System (see Exhibit 13, itch Schedule I, Appendix A) For example, Kerwoocl would have undertaken the work at its own expense in accordance with good engineering practices, and used reasonable cfforts to avoid unnecessary adverse impacts on the public use of the Road Allowances. Kerwood would have also repaired the surface -any of Road Allowances and any municipal works damaged in the course of the work. Iforeover, Kerwood has conducted a detailed siting process and developed comprehensive mitigation measures jor the Project s environmental impacts. In contrast, the Thwriship:v. fail ore to enter into a Road Use Agreement could prejudice Kerwoocl For example, such failure is a potential source of delay in the development of the Project that can result in increased equipment storage, lost revenue, liquidated damages and other payments under the Project's feed-in tariff contract, and other costs.. Notably, it is the failure of the Municipality to enter into the form - agreement I desired by Kerwood that may cause these adverse impacts. I'hesc are Kerwood's own words. The chronology concludes as follows: 5
7 Effectively, the Township has refused for approximately one-and-a-half years. to meaningfully engage Kerwood in discussions on where in the Road Allowances the Distribution System will he located. instead, the Township has insisted on conducting a series of public meetings regarding installation of collector and developing a set of generic Road Use Agreements that are not.specific to the Project. Despite KerwoodS efforts to provide increasingly detailed maps and engineering diagrams of the proposed Distribution System, the Township is still effectively refusing to engage in nieuningfid discussions with Kerwood regarding the location of the Distribution System or any proposed Road Use Agreement. Contrary to its statutory obligation, the Township has repeatedly failed to negotiate with Kerwood and as a result, the parties have been unable to reach an agreement regarding the locution of the Distribution System within the Road Allowances. I disagree with this conclusion and will be recommending that the Municipality's response deal with it Schedule B includes copies of resolutions and other documents which have no discernible connection to the Section 41 application. These documents have evidently been included in the application for some other purpose. The last document in the package, appendix -, "G(.1 is my last draft of the proposed road use agreement. This was sent on a without prejudice basis. Its inclusion in the application is both improper and irrelevant, however, that document contains these words: 3.3 Permission Granted The Municipality approves and authorizes the fliwk identified 017 Schedules A. D and E. Finalization of the agreement was subject to agreement on other matters. In contrast to this fact, Kerwood says at Exhibit B. Tab 7, Schedule 1 (emphasis added): Page 2 of 2 decommissioning of the Distribution System / (see Exhibit B. "lab 4. Schedule I. Appendix A). For example, Kerwood would have undertaken the work at its own expense in accordance with good engineering practices. and used reasonable efforts to avoid unneces.sarti adverse impacts on the public use of the Road Allowances. Kerwooci would have also repaired the surface of Road Allowances or any municipal works damaged in the course of the work. AS a condition of its REA, Kerwood is required, at the end of the Project S usefiil life, to decommission the Project in accordance with the Ri,A and the requirements of the Ministry of the Environment. Given these measures, the Township faces no.significant prejudice regarding KerwoodS proposed location of the Distribution,System within the Road Allowances. However, should the Township continue to refuse to agree to the location of the Distribution System within the Road Allowances, Kerwood could be prejudiced. For example, the Townships constructive refusal to agree to a location for the Distribution System within the Road Allowances (which has given rise to the present Application) could result in increased equipment storage, lost revenue, liquidated damages' and other payments under the Project :s feed-in tariff contract. and other costs. Order Requested by Kerwood Although it might be concluded Irom the application and summary that the Section 41 application ha 6
8 been taken in aid of negotiations concerning the road use arrangement, over which the OEB does not have jurisdiction, the order which the application requests is within the Board's jurisdiction: ORDER SOUGHT Kerwood therefore applies to the Board pursuant to Section 41(9) of' the Electricity Act jor an order or orders establishing the locution of the Distribution System within the Road Allowances. all substantially in accordance with Kerwood 's plans as set out in E.vhibit B. Tali 6. Schedule 1 (Proposed Location of Distribution System Within Road Allowances). The "plans" referred to are found towards the end of the pdf material, at page 299 of 309 in part 2 of the application: 6.0 PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM WITHIN THE ROAD ALLOWANCES Given that Kerwood and the Thwaship cannot agree to the location of the Distribution System within the Road Allowances, Kerwood requests that the Board issue 41,7 order pur.s uant to,s'ection 41(9) of the Electricity Act determining such location as follows: The Distribution System shall generally he located in the Road Allowances listed on ahibit 13, Tab 6, Schedule 1, Appendix A, and a, ' close as reasonably possible to the relevant locations shown on the maps included in Exhibit R, Tab 4. Schedule 1. Appendix B. Where practicable, and where it meets all applicable engineering, enrinmmental and health and safety standards, the Distribution System lines shall he located as close as possible to the abutting property line. As set out above, Kerwood :s proposal for Distribution,SYstem installation would generally he confined to a narrow strip that is as close to the right of way limit (i.e. the abutting property line) as possible without damaging any fence lines or other property markers. Furthermore, Kerwood:c proposal allows for limited to deviate from this corridor to meet applicable engineering, environmental and health and safety standards, or where it is not practicable to Ibilow the corridor in ct particular area. Because there are no plans showing the electrical infrastructure in isolation from the other permissions Kerwood had sought from the municipality, the requested order would refer to a list of affected road segments (which begins at page 301 of the same tab) and also to mapping, found Exhibit at B. Tab 4. Schedule 1,.Appendix B. That can he viewed at page in the first part of the application. The provenance of the drawing displayed on my computer is uncertain. It is referred "Distribution to as System Mapping" and shows areas of road desired work. rather than what is present (example. page 156 of 325 in part 1), which the Board would not he able to approve. There was no date on the drawing. 1 have requested clarification of the proponent's request re the mapping. Summary Kerwood has elected to bypass the Council and is proceeding under Section 41 of Electricity the Ac!. Kerwood cites a "constructive" refusal of it. plans for the electrical infrastructure as its reason for proceeding via Section 41. It is implicit from that statement that no refusal has actually taken place. The OEB has the power to approve the location of the electrical infrastructure which Kerwood proposes, however, the location of the proposed electrical infrastructure has not been materially in dispute. Kerwood's drawings respecting location and specifications had not been presented in final form for approval on their own before the Section 41 application was commenced. The parties had not 7
9 joined issue on such drawings. The application gives no particulars of a dispute concerning "location.' and none are known. It was the language of the proposed road use agreement that was in dispute. These facts may be a barrier to consideration of the application by the MB. If the Section 41 application does proceed. arrangements concerning the proposed location of the electrical infrastructure will be settled through that process. The road use agreement will not be settled by the OFB. No road use agreement is required under the Kerwood considers such an agreement advisable, it can (as in this case) propose same. Neither party can require the other to enter into a road use agreement. Neither party can dictate the terms of such an agreement. In the absence of an agreement, municipal permissions must be obtained with respect to road improvements. Municipal damages are recoverable under the legislation, by action where necessary. The Section 41 process mandates the consideration of the electrical infrastructure plans separate and apart from other wind project issues. Those plans will be the locus olour response. I will respond to the application in accordance with the Board's Rules and report to the Council from time to time as the matter proceeds. _--- YourK very truly. BRC:jmh Barry R. (lard 8
IN THE MATTER OF the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998, S.O. 1998, c.15, (Schedule B);
Ontario Energy Board Commission de l énergie de l Ontario EB-2013-0040 EB-2013-0041 IN THE MATTER OF the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998, S.O. 1998, c.15, (Schedule B); AND IN THE MATTER OF an application
More informationMEMORANDUM THE RIGHTS OF LAND OWNERS IN RELATION TO THOSE OF HOLDERS OF RIGHTS IN TERMS OF THE MINERAL AND PETROLEUM RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT
MEMORANDUM THE RIGHTS OF LAND OWNERS IN RELATION TO THOSE OF HOLDERS OF RIGHTS IN TERMS OF THE MINERAL AND PETROLEUM RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT Land owners and lawful occupiers of land (jointly referred
More informationCOUNCIL ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING DOCKET NO. COAH THE HILLS DEVELOPMENT CO., ) Plaintiff ) v. ) TOWNSHIP OF BERNARDS, ) Defendant, )
COUNCIL ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING DOCKET NO. COAH 87-9 THE HILLS DEVELOPMENT CO., ) Plaintiff ) v. ) TOWNSHIP OF BERNARDS, ) Defendant, ) Civil Action OPINION This matter was brought to Council on Affordable
More informationIN RE CLINTON TOWNSHIP, ) NEW JERSEY COUNCIL HUNTERDON COUNTY ) ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING
IN RE CLINTON TOWNSHIP, ) NEW JERSEY COUNCIL HUNTERDON COUNTY ) ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING ) ) OPINION This matter arises as a result of an Order to Show Cause issued by the New Jersey Council on Affordable
More informationSTANDARDS OF BUSINESS PRACTICE OF THE CANADIAN REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATION AND INTERPRETATIONS
STANDARDS OF BUSINESS PRACTICE OF THE CANADIAN REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATION AND INTERPRETATIONS ARTICLE 1 The Member shall endeavour to be informed regarding the essential facts which affect current market
More informationThe Corporation of the TOWN OF MILTON
Report to: From: Mayor Krantz and Members of Council Troy McHarg, Town Clerk Date: February 23, 2009 Report No. ES-012-09 Subject: Ninth Line Corridor Boundary Adjustment Proposal by Mississauga RECOMMENDATION:
More informationReport on Inspection of KBL, LLP (Headquartered in New York, New York) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
1666 K Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 207-9100 Facsimile: (202) 862-8433 www.pcaobus.org Report on 2014 (Headquartered in New York, New York) Issued by the Public Company Accounting
More informationNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS Code of Ethics Video Series. Case Interpretations Related to Article 17
Case Interpretations Related to Article 17 Note: The following information is reprinted from the current NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS Code of Ethics and Arbitration Manual. Case #17-1: Obligation to
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Simpson & Ors v Jackson [2014] QSC 191 PARTIES: FILE NO: 5346 of 2014 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING COURT: CHERYL DIANN SIMPSON (plaintiff) TERRY STEPHEN SIMPSON
More informationRequest for Proposals WASTE AND ORGANICS COLLECTION SERVICES RFP# ANM
Village of Anmore Request for Proposals WASTE AND ORGANICS COLLECTION SERVICES RFP# ANM2014-02 Date Issued: March 10, 2014 Closing Date: April 2, 2014 Submission Location: Village of Anmore 2697 Sunnyside
More informationGeneral business terms and conditions for the purchase of goods
General business terms and conditions for the purchase of goods Introductory provisions 1. These General Business Terms and Conditions for the purchase of goods announced on the below mentioned day (hereinafter
More informationAttn: Her Worship Mayor Marolyn Morrison and Members of Council. Agenda Item no. 12 (RB 6), Report No. DP
1 FIRST CANADIAN PLACE 100 KING STREET WEST SUITE 5600 TORONTO, ONTARIO M5X 1C9 February 14, 2012 Refer to: amber@amberstewartlaw.com T: 416.479.5452 F: 416.644.8801 AMBERSTEWARTLAW.COM Delivered by email
More informationConditions of Purchase FISCHER GmbH & Co. KG Lagertechnik + Regalsysteme, Stutensee
Conditions of Purchase FISCHER GmbH & Co. KG Lagertechnik + Regalsysteme, Stutensee 1. General 1.1. We only conduct purchases in accordance with the following conditions. Deviating conditions on the part
More informationPLANNING & BUILDING REGULATIONS
SCANDIA-HUS FACT SHEET NO. 10 PLANNING & BUILDING REGULATIONS DATE: 1 ST JANUARY 2018 ISSUE NO: 4 THE PLANNING SYSTEM Scandia-Hus will, as part of the service, handle all aspects of design, planning and
More informationLONG RANGE PLANNING ISSUE PAPER NO Updating the Standards of CDC Section (Infill)
LONG RANGE PLANNING ISSUE PAPER NO. 2017-01 For Presentation at the January 24, 2017 Board Work Session Issue The Washington County Committee for Community Involvement (CCI) submitted a 2016 Long Range
More informationDispute Resolution Services
Dispute Resolution Services Page: 1 Residential Tenancy Branch Office of Housing and Construction Standards DECISION Dispute Codes RR, MNDC, FF Introduction This hearing dealt with the tenants Application
More informationOff-the-plan contracts for residential property. Submission of the Law Society of New South Wales
Off-the-plan contracts for residential property Submission of the Law Society of New South Wales 1. Is there a separate mandatory disclosure regime needed for off-the-plan contracts? Yes, there is a need
More informationGENERAL CONDITIONS OF PURCHASE
1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 Seller shall mean the company selling the Product to the Buyer. 1.2 Buyer shall mean KAEFER Energy AS, reg. no. 910 608 193. 1.3 Contract shall mean the Purchase Order together with
More informationTOWNSHIP OF LANARK HIGHLANDS POLICY FOR THE STOPPING UP, CLOSURE AND SALE OF ROADS POLICY STATEMENT
TOWNSHIP OF LANARK HIGHLANDS POLICY FOR THE STOPPING UP, CLOSURE AND SALE OF ROADS Approval Date: POLICY STATEMENT The Municipal Act provides that the Council of a municipality may pass by-laws for stopping
More informationGUIDANCE FOR LANDOWNERS AND OCCUPIERS ON CONTRIBUTIONS TOWARDS PROFESSIONAL COSTS
GUIDANCE FOR LANDOWNERS AND OCCUPIERS ON CONTRIBUTIONS TOWARDS PROFESSIONAL COSTS In order to meet the growing demand for reliable electricity supplies, we at Northern Powergrid are continually working
More informationYour guide to application for a vesting order based on title by adverse possession
Your guide to application for a vesting order based on title by adverse possession The following is a general guide only to the procedures to follow when applying for ownership of a parcel of land by means
More informationDispute Resolution Services
Dispute Resolution Services Page: 1 Residential Tenancy Branch Office of Housing and Construction Standards A matter regarding SPECTACLE LAKE MOBILE HOME PARK and [tenant name suppressed to protect privacy]
More informationStandard for the acquisition of land under the Public Works Act 1981 LINZS15005
Standard for the acquisition of land under the Public Works Act 1981 LINZS15005 Version date: 20 February 2014 Table of contents Terms and definitions... 5 Foreword... 6 Introduction... 6 Purpose... 6
More informationGroup Company A together with its subsidiaries
HKEX LISTING DECISION HKEX-LD43-3 (First Quarter of 2005, updated in November 2011, August, November and December 2012, November 2013, April 2014, August 2015, and February and April 2018) Name of Parties
More informationAttachment 2 Civil Engineering
A. Phase 1, Programming and Schematic Design: The CONSULTANT shall for each project: 1. Ascertain the project s requirements through a meeting with the COUNTY, and a review of an existing schematic layout
More informationReal Estate Agents Act (Professional Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2012
Real Estate Agents Act (Professional Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2012 Contents 1 Title 1 2 Commencement 1 3 Scope and objectives 1 4 Interpretation 1 5 Standards of professional competence 1 6 Standards
More informationSTANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF PURCHASE. 1. Interpretation
STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF PURCHASE 1. Interpretation 1.1 In these Conditions: Buyer means New World First Bus Services Limited/Citybus Limited. Conditions means these Standard Terms and Conditions
More informationOffer-back under the Public Works Act - a re-appraisal?
Property, real estate & construction 05 August 2008 Offer-back under the Public Works Act - a re-appraisal? The owners of land held under the Public Works Act 1981 (PWA) may have greater security of investment
More informationAgenda Item # Page # By-law No
4- Agenda Item # Page # Bill No. By-law No A By-law to authorize a Lease Agreement between The Corporation of the City of London and the Thames Valley District School Board, for the Thames Valley District
More informationThe parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:
Exhibit 2.4(c) Escrow Agreement ESCROW AGREEMENT This Escrow Agreement, dated as of, 199_ (the "Closing Date"), among, a corporation ("Buyer"),, an individual resident in, ("A"), and, an individual resident
More informationLOCAL GOVERNMENT PROMPT PAYMENT ACT
LOCAL GOVERNMENT PROMPT PAYMENT ACT 218.70 Popular name. 218.71 Purpose and policy. 218.72 Definitions. 218.73 Timely payment for nonconstruction services. 218.735 Timely payment for purchases of construction
More informationARIZONA TAX COURT TX /18/2006 HONORABLE MARK W. ARMSTRONG
HONORABLE MARK W. ARMSTRONG CLERK OF THE COURT L. Slaughter Deputy FILED: CAMELBACK ESPLANADE ASSOCIATION, THE JIM L WRIGHT v. MARICOPA COUNTY JERRY A FRIES PAUL J MOONEY PAUL MOORE UNDER ADVISEMENT RULING
More informationSincerity Among Landlords & Tenants
Sincerity Among Landlords & Tenants By Mark Alexander, founder of "The Landlords Union" Several people who are looking to rent a property want to stay for the long term, especially when they have children
More informationReport on Inspection of Schneider Downs & Co., Inc. (Headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
1666 K Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 207-9100 Facsimile: (202) 862-8433 www.pcaobus.org Report on 2016 (Headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) Issued by the Public Company Accounting
More informationReport on Inspection of Ferlita, Walsh, Gonzalez & Rodriguez, P.A. (Headquartered in Tampa, Florida) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
1666 K Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 207-9100 Facsimile: (202) 862-8433 www.pcaobus.org Report on 2017 Gonzalez & Rodriguez, P.A. (Headquartered in Tampa, Florida) Issued by the Public
More informationIMPORTANT INFORMATION BEFORE FILING AN ETHICS COMPLAINT Many ethics complaints result from misunderstanding or a failure in communication.
IMPORTANT INFORMATION BEFORE FILING AN ETHICS COMPLAINT Many ethics complaints result from misunderstanding or a failure in communication. Before filing an ethics complaint, make reasonable efforts to
More informationDispute Resolution Services
Page: 1 DECISION Dispute Codes MND, MNDC, MNSD, FF Introduction This matter dealt with an application by the Landlord for compensation for repair expenses, for a lease break fee, to recover the filing
More informationPLANNING BOARD APPLICATION
Township of Bethlehem 405 Mine Road Asbury, New Jersey 08802 Date of Application: Township Application Number: An application is hereby made for: N.J.S.A. 40:55D-70(a) Appeal or (b) interpretation N.J.S.A.
More informationShare the. Sunshine. Your Solar Energy Agreement (VIC) Premium Feed-in Terms and Conditions
Share the Sunshine Your Solar Energy Agreement (VIC) Premium Feed-in Terms and Conditions Contents 1 Sale and purchase of Feed-in Electricity 3 2 Qualifying conditions 3 3 Commencement, term and termination
More informationDispute Resolution Services
Dispute Resolution Services Page: 1 Residential Tenancy Branch Office of Housing and Construction Standards A matter regarding Vancouver Kiwanis Senior Citizens Housing Society and [tenant name suppressed
More informationThis matter having been opened to the Council on Affordable Housing by. applicant Borough of Oceanport, on a motion to exclude from consideration for
NEW JERSEY COUNCIL ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING DOCKET NO. IN THE MATTER OF THE ) Civil Action BOROUGH OF OCEANPORT ) ORDER This matter having been opened to the Council on Affordable Housing by applicant Borough
More informationAudit of City Lease Administration
July 22, 2009 Audit of City Lease Administration Sam M. McCall, Ph.D., CPA, CGFM, CIA, CGAP City Auditor HIGHLIGHTS Highlights of City Auditor Report #0917, a report to the City Commission and City management
More informationPART 8. TEXAS APPRAISER LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION BOARD
TITLE 22. EXAMINING BOARDS PART 8. TEXAS APPRAISER LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION BOARD CHAPTER 153. RULES RELATING TO PROVISIONS OF THE TEXAS APPRAISER LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION ACT 22 TAC 153.20 The Texas
More informationJAMES M. RAMSEY, JR., ET AL. OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE CLEO E. POWELL APRIL 16, 2015 COMMISSIONER OF HIGHWAYS
PRESENT: All the Justices JAMES M. RAMSEY, JR., ET AL. OPINION BY v. Record No. 140929 JUSTICE CLEO E. POWELL APRIL 16, 2015 COMMISSIONER OF HIGHWAYS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
More informationStatement Of Critical Dates Delayed Closing Warranty
Freehold Form (Firm Closing Date) Property Statement Of Critical Dates Delayed Closing Warranty This Statement of Critical Dates forms part of the Addendum to which it is attached, which in turn forms
More informationDispute Resolution Services
Dispute Resolution Services Office of Housing and Construction Standards. File No: 799277 In the matter of the Residential Tenancy Act, SBC 2002, c. 78, as amended Between Tenant(s), Applicant(s) And Landlord(s),
More informationMEDIATION AND ARBITRATION BOARD Under the Petroleum and Natural Gas Act #114, Avenue Fort St. John, BC V1J 2B3
MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION BOARD Under the Petroleum and Natural Gas Act #114, 10142-101 Avenue Fort St. John, BC V1J 2B3 Date: December 13, 2001 File No. 1458 BEFORE THE BOARD: Board Order No. 347ARR IN
More informationOntario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario
Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario ISSUE DATE: May 25, 2016 CASE NO(S).: PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 45(12) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as
More informationReport on Inspection of Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP (Headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
1666 K Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 207-9100 Facsimile: (202) 862-8433 www.pcaobus.org Report on 2015 (Headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina) Issued by the Public Company Accounting
More informationCity of Hays Request for Proposals
City of Hays Request for Proposals Sewer Camera Date of Issue: Proposal Due Date July 9, 2008 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION...3 2. RULES OF PREPARATION...3 3. INQUIRIES...3 4. SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS...3
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE Municipal Government Act being Chapter M-26 of the Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 (Act).
IN THE MATTER OF THE Municipal Government Act being Chapter M-26 of the Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 (Act). AND IN THE MATTER OF an application by the Town of Viking, in the Province of Alberta, to
More informationDispute Resolution Services
Dispute Resolution Services Page: 1 Residential Tenancy Branch Ministry of Public Safety and Solicitor General DECISION Dispute Codes MNDC & FF Introduction These hearings dealt with the tenant s application
More informationEXCLUSIVITY OR OPTION AGREEMENT SALE OF [ NAME OF PROPERTY] DATED THE [ ] DAY OF [ MONTH ] relating to. between [PARTY 1] and
DATED THE [ ] DAY OF [ MONTH ] 2015 ------------ EXCLUSIVITY OR OPTION AGREEMENT relating to SALE OF [ NAME OF PROPERTY] between [PARTY 1] and [PARTY 2] CONTENTS CLAUSE 1. Interpretation 1 2. Seller's
More informationAttachment 10 Structural Engineering
A. Phase 1, Preliminary Design: The CONSULTANT shall: Attachment 10 Structural Engineering 1. Ascertain the requirements for each project through a meeting with the Capital Projects Division Manager or
More informationMandatory Requirement for Certification Bodies in Assessing Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) in New Planting Procedures
Mandatory Requirement for Certification Bodies in Assessing Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) in New Planting Procedures February 2018 Document Name: Mandatory Requirement for Certification Bodies
More information[Letterhead of Landlord] OFFICE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO LEASE Version. [Date of agreement]
[Letterhead of Landlord] OFFICE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO LEASE Version [Date of agreement] [Name and address of broker] Re: [Insert address of subject space, including floor(s) if applicable] Gentlemen and Ladies:
More informationEXTRACTS FROM MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MAMARONECK, COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER, STATE OF NEW YORK
EXTRACTS FROM MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MAMARONECK, COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER, STATE OF NEW YORK (Refunding Bond Resolution, 2019) A regular meeting of the Board of Trustees
More informationStatement Of Critical Dates Delayed Closing Warranty
Freehold Form (Tentative Closing Date) Statement Of Critical Dates Delayed Closing Warranty Property This Statement of Critical Dates forms part of the Addendum to which it is attached, which in turn forms
More informationTOWN OF AURORA SUBDIVISION AND/OR CONDOMINIUM APPLICATION GUIDE
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Phone: 905-727-3123 ext. 4226 Fax 905-726-4736 Email: planning@aurora.ca Town of Aurora 100 John West Way Box 1000, Aurora, ON L4G 6J1 www.aurora.ca February, 2014 TABLE
More informationRules for the independent resolution of tenancy deposit disputes. 1st Edition, 1st April 2016
Rules for the independent resolution of tenancy deposit disputes 1st Edition, 1st April 2016 Contents Introduction Page 4 Dispute resolution by TDS Custodial Page 4 How adjudication works Page 4 Key adjudication
More informationReport on Inspection of Bongiovanni & Associates, CPA's (Headquartered in Cornelius, North Carolina) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
1666 K Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 207-9100 Facsimile: (202) 862-8433 www.pcaobus.org Report on 2013 Inspection of Bongiovanni & Associates, CPA's (Headquartered in Cornelius, North
More informationBorowski v. STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, Wis: Court of Appeals, 1st...
Page 1 of 5 JOHN BOROWSKI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Appeal No. 2013AP537. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District I. Filed: December 27, 2013. Before
More informationStandard conditions of Eesti Energia AS gas contract for household consumer Valid from 19 April 2018
1. GENERAL PROVISIONS 1.1 Eesti Energia AS (hereinafter the Seller or Party) sells natural gas (hereinafter gas) to household consumers (hereinafter Buyer or Party; Seller and Buyer together: Parties)
More informationOUTLINE OF LEGAL REQUIREMENTS FOR COMMON INTEREST ASSOCIATION TRANSITIONS
PERLSTEIN & McCRACKEN, LLC ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW 10 WATERSIDE DRIVE, SUITE 303 FARMINGTON, CT 06032 TELEPHONE (860) 677-2177 FACSIMILE (860) 677-0019 I. INTRODUCTION OUTLINE OF LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
More informationLETTER TO COMPANY - DRAFT CITY OF LONDON LAW SOCIETY LAND LAW COMMITTEE CERTIFICATE OF TITLE (7 TH EDITION 2016 UPDATE)
LETTER TO COMPANY - DRAFT CITY OF LONDON LAW SOCIETY LAND LAW COMMITTEE CERTIFICATE OF TITLE (7 TH EDITION 2016 UPDATE) This is the first of two letters which may be sent by the solicitors giving the Certificate
More informationAttachment 8 Mechanical Engineering
A. Phase 1, Preliminary Design: The CONSULTANT shall: 1. Ascertain the requirements for each project through a meeting with the Capital Projects Division Manager or his/her designated representative and
More informationTHE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF NORTH FRONTENAC BY-LAW #123-13
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF NORTH FRONTENAC BY-LAW #123-13 Being a By-law to Adopt an Assumption of Unmaintained Municipal Roads and Private Lanes Policy and Minimum Road Construction Standards
More informationProposal to Restructure
~ Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Date: November 10,2008 Country: Ukraine Project Name: Rural Land Titling and Cadastre
More informationCity of Toronto Act, 2006 Public Notice
Re: LS23.1 City of Toronto Act, 2006 Public Notice Municipal Licensing and Standards is proposing that the Council of the City of Toronto establish a new municipal code chapter for short-term rentals.
More informationIC Chapter 10. Leasing and Lease-Purchasing Structures
IC 36-1-10 Chapter 10. Leasing and Lease-Purchasing Structures IC 36-1-10-1 Application of chapter Sec. 1. (a) Except as provided in subsection (b), this chapter applies to: (1) political subdivisions
More informationDISTRIBUTOR ESCROW AGREEMENT
Danish Escrow Institute Danish Technological Institute Tel.: +45 72 20 14 11 Fax: +45 72 20 10 19 E-mail: escrow@teknologisk.dk DDI 10XXX DISTRIBUTOR ESCROW AGREEMENT BETWEEN NAME ADDRESS VAT-number (Hereinafter
More informationMultifamily Housing Revenue Bond Rules
Multifamily Housing Revenue Bond Rules 12.1. General. (a) Authority. The rules in this chapter apply to the issuance of multifamily housing revenue bonds ("Bonds") by the Texas Department of Housing and
More informationTHE NEW ZEALAND STOCK & STATION AGENT S ASSOCIATION. In these Conditions of Sale unless the context otherwise requires:
Terms of trade Auction Terms and Conditions THE NEW ZEALAND STOCK & STATION AGENT S ASSOCIATION CONDITIONS OF SALE The conditions of sale set out below shall be binding upon both Vendor and Purchaser in
More informationTERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE As is 1. ALL ASSETS ARE SOLD AS IS, WHERE IS AND WITH ALL FAULTS. ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES INCLUDING THOSE AS TO THE NATURE, QUALITY, QUANTITY, VALUE OR CONDITION
More informationLandowner's rights. When the Crown requires your land for a public work. April 2010
Landowner's rights When the Crown requires your land for a public work April 2010 Image Goes HERE Landowner's rights when the Crown requires your land for a public work Land Information New Zealand April
More informationTown of Bristol Rhode Island
Town of Bristol Rhode Island Subdivision & Development Review Regulations Adopted by the Planning Board September 27, 1995 (March 2017) Formatted: Highlight Formatted: Font: 12 pt Table of Contents TABLE
More informationNGFA Secondary Rail Freight Trading Rules (Affreightment)
NGFA Secondary Rail Freight Trading Rules Adopted March 20, 2007 Amended March 31, 2009 Amended March 05, 2010 Amended March 15, 2011 Amended March 19, 2013 Table of Rules Preamble Rule 1. Trade Rule 2.
More informationGuide Note 15 Assumptions and Hypothetical Conditions
Guide Note 15 Assumptions and Hypothetical Conditions Introduction Appraisal and review opinions are often premised on certain stated conditions. These include assumptions (general, and special or extraordinary)
More informationSAMPLE DOCUMENT - DO NOT RELY UPON FOR INSURANCE COVERAGE
Policy of Insurance for SAMPLE First mortgage: SAMPLE Assurance LAWPRO 1 250 Yonge Street Suite 3101 Toronto, Ontario M5B 2L7 416-598-5899 1-800-410-1013 1 Assurance LAWPRO is a registered name used in
More informationReport on Inspection of Wolf & Company, P.C. (Headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
1666 K Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 207-9100 Facsimile: (202) 862-8433 www.pcaobus.org Report on 2013 (Headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts) Issued by the Public Company Accounting
More informationCOMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS APPEALS COURT. TRUSTEES OF THOMAS GRAVES LANDING CONDOMINIUM TRUST & another 1. vs. PAUL GARGANO & another.
NOTICE: Summary decisions issued by the Appeals Court pursuant to its rule 1:28, as amended by 73 Mass. App. Ct. 1001 (2009), are primarily directed to the parties and, therefore, may not fully address
More informationStatement of Critical Dates Delayed Closing Warranty
Property Statement of Critical Dates Delayed Closing Warranty This Statement of Critical Dates forms part of the Addendum to which it is attached, which in turn forms part of the agreement of purchase
More informationTenant Improvement Program (TIP) Design Review
Tenant Improvement Program (TIP) Design Review Process Guidelines 100% Draft Dated 2.1.2011 Tenant Improvement Program Design Review (TIPDR) - Draft 2.1.2011 Page 1 of 11 INTRODUCTION The success of San
More informationThis new legislation has important practical implications for both Buyers and Sellers of real estate in the ACT.
Real Estate in the A.C.T. Tips for Sellers & Buyers The legal position with respect to buying and selling real estate in the ACT has undergone significant changes since 1 July 2004 when the ACT Government
More informationNumber Same. This document provides procedural direction to implement Policy PL Onshore Windpower Development on Crown Land.
Ministry of Natural Resources Subject ONSHORE WINDPOWER DEVELOPMENT ON CROWN LAND NON-COMPETITIVE APPLICATION Procedure PL 4.10.04 Compiled by Renewable Energy Program Replaces Directive Title Same Number
More informationRecommended Rules Of Practice Respecting Real Property Reports
Recommended Rules Of Practice Respecting Real Property Reports As Endorsed By Unanimous Consent Of The Canadian Bar Association Alberta Branch Real Property Sections: South Alberta, April 9, 2003 North
More informationCALL FOR TENDER. Demolition and Removal of Vacant House, Foundation, and Decommissioning of Septic System. Tender AP
CALL FOR TENDER Demolition and Removal of Vacant House, Foundation, and Decommissioning of Septic System Tender AP-2015-001 Issue Date: December 10, 2015 Closing Date: Contact: December 21, 2015 at 3:00
More informationTERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE (DOCUMENT REFERENCE KJMTCS02)
1. Definitions TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE (DOCUMENT REFERENCE KJMTCS02) The "Buyer" means the Account Applicant or person who buys or agrees to buy Goods from the Seller. The "Seller" means KJM DESIGN
More informationLeasehold Management Policy
Author(s): Simon McCracken and Liz Evans Leasehold Management Policy Approved by: The Board Date: 3 rd December 2015 Date Published: 1 st January 2016 Version: Live 3.0 Review Date: December 2019 Contents
More informationWelcome to the Easement Webinar Call-In Number for audio: Conference Code:
Welcome to the Easement Webinar Call-In Number for audio: 1.866.422.4457 Conference Code: 2113365039 Easement Issues Ellen Kreifels BLANKENAU WILMOTH JARECKE LLP ellen@nebenergylaw.com christina@aqualawyers.com
More informationConfirmation of Purchase Order/Terms and Conditions of Sale 1. ACCEPTANCE OF ORDER: Natel Engineering Co., Inc. or it s Powercube division ( Natel or
1. ACCEPTANCE OF ORDER: Natel Engineering Co., Inc. or it s Powercube division ( Natel or we ) acknowledges receipt of your ( Buyer s ) purchase order ( Order ) for the goods and/or services listed on
More informationINTERROGATORIES OF THE CORPORATION THE COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX
EB-2013-0040 EB-2013-0041 ONTARIO ENERGY BOARD THE MATTER OF the Ontario Energy Board Act 1998, S.O. 1998, c. 15, (Schedule B); AND IN THE MATTER OF an application by Bornish Wind, LP, Kerwood Wind, Inc.
More informationReport on Inspection of Hoberman & Lesser, CPA's, LLP (Headquartered in New York, New York) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
1666 K Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 207-9100 Facsimile: (202) 862-8433 www.pcaobus.org Report on 2017 Inspection of Hoberman & Lesser, CPA's, LLP (Headquartered in New York, New York)
More informationGeneral Terms and Conditions of Sale and Delivery of BRUAG AG
General Terms and Conditions of Sale and Delivery of BRUAG AG 1. General a) BRUAG AG, Bahnhofstrasse 8, CH-8594 Güttingen (hereinafter BRUAG ) provides its deliveries and services on the basis of these
More informationChanges of Ownership Manual DISCLAIMER
Who Can Be an Owner? DISCLAIMER The materials in this training manual are for demonstration purposes only. The forms are subject to change at any time without notice. Use of outdated forms may result in
More informationRESIDENTIAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT for
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT for (Property Address) 1 This PROPERTY MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement"), entered into this day of 2,, by and between 3 ("Owner") of the property described below
More informationTownship of Salisbury Lehigh County, Pennsylvania REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS PROFESSIONAL FINANCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE AUDITING SERVICES
Township of Salisbury Lehigh County, Pennsylvania REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS PROFESSIONAL FINANCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE AUDITING SERVICES Township of Salisbury 2900 South Pike Avenue Allentown, PA 18103 (610)
More informationRESOLUTION NUMBER 2017-
RESOLUTION NUMBER 2017- RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORLANDO, FLORIDA, DETERMINING THE NECESSITY OF ACQUIRING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY ALONG BOGGY CREEK ROAD FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING
More informationTHE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GRAVENHURST BY-LAW 2017-
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GRAVENHURST BY-LAW 2017- A By-law to adopt a Ontario Municipal Board Order for Zoning By-law Application (ZA 48-2010) (OMB Case No. PL110213) WHEREAS a Zoning Amendment Application
More informationRules for the Independent Resolution of Tenancy Deposit Disputes
Who should read this? Key Documents Tenants Agents Landlords Rules for the Independent Resolution of Tenancy Deposit Disputes 7th Edition, revised 20th March 2018 Effective from 2nd April 2018 Contents
More information