Indexed As: Terasen Gas Inc. v. Utzig Holdings (B.C.) Ltd. British Columbia Court of Appeal Newbury, Frankel and Garson, JJ.A. November 7, 2012.
|
|
- Buddy Robertson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Terasen Gas Inc. (respondent/plaintiff) v. Utzig Holdings (B.C.) Ltd. (appellant/defendant) and Alpha Manufacturing Inc., Burns Development Ltd., Burns Developments (1993) Ltd. (defendants) (CA037878, CA038453; 2012 BCCA 444) Indexed As: Terasen Gas Inc. v. Utzig Holdings (B.C.) Ltd. British Columbia Court of Appeal Newbury, Frankel and Garson, JJ.A. November 7, Summary: Utzig Holdings (B.C.) Ltd. owned a portion of a large peat bog (Burns Bog). Terasen (formerly BC Gas), a supplier and distributor of natural gas had statutory rights of way (Land Title Act) over the bog for a natural gas pipeline, pursuant to 1961 and 1981 rights of way agreements granted by Utzig's predecessor. In 1988, Utzig agreed to permit a neighbouring landowner, Alpha Manufacturing Inc. (AMI), to conduct a landfill operation on its property. In October 10, 1993, Utzig agreed to sell the property to AMI et al. (purchasers) under an agreement for sale (AFS) and the purchasers took possession. The AFS made no reference to the rights of way agreements. The AFS was in registrable form, but never registered. Further, the AFS was never completed because the purchaser failed to pay the entire purchase price when due. Accordingly, the property remained registered in the name of Utzig at all material times. In 1995, Terasen commenced an action against Utzig, claiming that the pipeline was damaged or put at risk by the landfill operations and that Utzig breached covenants in the pipeline rights of way agreements or permitted the creation of an actionable nuisance. The British Columbia Supreme Court, in a decision reported [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 90, ruled that Utzig had breached the covenants in the statutory right of way agreements both before and after entering into the AFS in October In the alternative, the court held that Utzig had committed the tort of nuisance, but only in the period prior to the execution of the AFS. Utzig appealed, arguing that the trial judge erred: (a) in finding that Utzig was bound by the covenants in the statutory rights of way after October 10, 1993 when the AFS was entered into; (b) in finding that Utzig, if bound by the covenants, breached the covenants both in the pre- and post- AFS periods; and (c) in holding that Utzig was liable for a nuisance created on the lands prior to October 10, The British Columbia Court of Appeal court held that Utzig was bound by the covenants in the statutory rights of way agreements even after the AFS was entered into. However, the court allowed the appeal to the extent of restricting Utzig's breach of the covenants to the period prior to October 10, The court also allowed the appeal respecting the alternate claim in nuisance and dismissed that claim in its entirety. Garson, J.A., dissenting in part, agreed that Utzig was bound by the covenants, but differed with the majority on whether Utzig breached the covenants. Real Property - Topic 65 General principles - Definitions - Owner defined - Utzig owned property subject to
2 statutory rights of way agreements (Land Title Act (LTA)) respecting natural gas pipelines owned by Terasen - Utzig allowed a neighbouring property owner (AMI) to use its property as a landfill - Thereafter, Utzig executed an agreement for sale (AFS) in favour of AMI et al. (purchasers), which made no reference to the rights of way agreements (October 10, 1993) - The purchasers took possession - The AFS was never registered or completed - Utzig remained the registered owner - In 1995, Terasen sued Utzig, alleging breaches of the covenants in the rights of way agreements - At issue was whether Utzig was bound by the covenants after executing the AFS - The British Columbia Court of Appeal held that because of the wording of the rights of way, the only way in which Utzig might cease to be bound was to show that it "ceased to be the owner of the land" (LTA, s. 218) - Under the LTA "owner" meant registered owner - Regardless of whether AMI acquired an equitable or proprietary interest, or even "'ownership", Utzig would remain the legal, and registered, owner in the eyes of equity until title passed - Thus, Utzig never ceased to be a registered owner and remained bound by the statutory rights of way even after entering the AFS - See paragraphs 22 to 38. Real Property - Topic 132 General principles - Covenants that run with land - What constitute - [See Real Property - Topic 65]. Real Property - Topic 7220 Easements, licences and prescriptive rights - Interference or obstruction - Interference with right of way - Utzig owned property subject to statutory rights of way agreements (Land Title Act (LTA)) respecting natural gas pipelines owned by Terasen - Utzig allowed a neighbouring property owner (AMI) to use its property as a landfill - On October 10, 1993, Utzig executed an agreement for sale (AFS) in favour of AMI et al. (purchasers), without reference to the right of way agreements - The purchasers took possession; however, Utzig remained the registered owner - In 1995, Terasen sued Utzig, alleging breaches of the covenants in the rights of way agreements by permitting AMI to do acts that might interfere with Terasen's pipelines - The British Columbia Court of Appeal held that Utzig remained bound by and was in breach of those covenants prior to October 10, Up until then, Utzig retained sufficient authority over the subject property that it should be regarded as having "permitted" AMI to do acts that might have interfered with the pipeline - After October 13, 1993, having sold the property under the AFS, Utzig was no longer in a position to "permit", or withhold permission for, AMI's activities - Once land was sold, the new owner was responsible for new breaches of the terms of instruments (such as rights of way or restrictive covenants) that were registered against the land - See paragraphs 39 to 56. Real Property - Topic Title, registration of instruments, etc. - Land titles system - Registration - Effect of failure to register - [See Real Property - Topic 65]. Sale of Land - Topic 4504 Restrictive or positive covenants - General principles - Covenant which binds or runs with the land - What constitutes - [See Real Property - Topic 65].
3 Sale of Land - Topic Restrictive or positive covenants - General principles - Covenant that runs with the land - When vendor liable for breach of covenant by purchaser - [See Real Property - Topic 7220]. Sale of Land - Topic 4517 Restrictive or positive covenants - General principles - Breach of covenant - What constitutes - [See Real Property - Topic 7220]. Torts - Topic 1414 Nuisance - Injury to property - Neighbouring owners - Interference with right of way - Utzig owned property subject to statutory rights of way agreements (Land Title Act (LTA)) respecting natural gas pipelines owned by Terasen - Utzig allowed a neighbouring property owner (AMI) to use its property as a landfill - On October 10, 1993, Utzig executed an agreement for sale (AFS) in favour of AMI et al. (purchasers), without reference to the right of way agreements - The purchasers took possession; however, Utzig remained the registered owner - In 1995, Terasen sued Utzig, alleging nuisance (i.e., up until October 10, 1993, Utzig was responsible for the landfill activities conducted on the land with its consent which substantially interfered with Terasen's use of its rights of way) - The British Columbia Court of Appeal rejected the nuisance claim - There was a lack of clear evidence that Terasen's enjoyment of the pipelines was substantially interfered with prior to October See paragraphs 57 to 63. Cases Noticed: Hounsome v. Vancouver Power Co. (1914), 49 S.C.R. 430, refd to. [para. 17]. Banfai et al. v. Formula Fun Centre Inc. et al. (1984), 51 O.R.(2d) 361 (H.C.), refd to. [para. 17]. Martin Commercial Fueling Inc. v. Virtanen et al., [1994] 2 W.W.R. 348 (S.C.), affd. [1997] 5 W.W.R 330; 90 B.C.A.C. 161; 147 W.A.C. 161; 144 D.L.R.(4th) 290 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 27]. Rayner v. Preston (1881), 18 Ch. D. 1, refd to. [para. 28]. Jellett v. Wilkie (1896), 26 S.C.R. 282, refd to. [para. 30]. Gregg v. Palmer, [1932] 3 D.L.R. 640 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 30]. Davidson v. Davidson, [1946] S.C.R. 115, refd to. [para. 30]. Leisitkow v. Ritchot (Municipality), [1923] 3 D.L.R. 153 (Man. C.A.), refd to. [para. 32]. Rempel and Junghanns, Re, [1957] B.C.J. No. 8 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 33]. Progressive Services Ltd. v. Burnaby (District) (1970), 14 D.L.R.(3d) 552 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 33]. Jackson v. North Vancouver (Corporation of) (1914), 16 D.L.R. 400 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 33]. Berton v. Alliance Economic Investment Co., [1922] 1 K.B. 742, refd to. [para. 43]. Lewis (A.) & Co. (Westminster) Ltd. v. Bell Property Trust Ltd., [1940] Ch. 345, refd to. [para. 44]. Wilson v. Twamley, [1904] 2 K.B. 99 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 45]. Sefton v. Tophams Ltd., [1965] 3 W.W.R. 523 (C.A.), affd. [1966] 2 W.L.R. 814; [1967]
4 1 A.C. 50 (H.L.), refd to. [paras. 47, 48]. Royal Anne Hotel Co. v. Ashcroft (Village), [1979] B.C.J. No (C.A.), refd to. [para. 58]. St. Pierre v. Ontario (Minister of Transportation and Communications), [1987] 1 S.C.R. 906; 75 N.R. 291; 22 O.A.C. 63, refd to. [para. 58]. T.H. Critelli Ltd. v. Lincoln Trust and Savings Co. et al. (1978), 86 D.L.R.(3d) 724 (Ont. H.C.), refd to. [para. 60]. Pugliese et al. v. National Capital Commission et al. (1977), 17 O.R.(2d) 129 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 60]. Lysaght v. Edwards ( ), L.R. 2 Ch. D. 499, refd to. [para. 67]. Rayner v. Preston (1881), 18 Ch. D. 1 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 67]. R. v. Caledonian Insurance Co., [1924] S.C.R. 207; [1924] 2 D.L.R. 649, refd to. [para. 67]. Berton v. Alliance Economic Investment Co., [1922] 1 K.B. 742 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 70]. Statutes Noticed: Land Title Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 250, sect. 1, sect. 218 [para. 23]. Authors and Works Noticed: Canadian Encyclopaedic Digest (3rd Ed. 2009), generally [para. 17]. Di Castri, Victor, The Law of Vendor and Purchaser (3rd Ed. 1988), 696 [para. 23]. Harpum, Charles, Megarry & Wade: The Law of Real Property (6th Ed. 2000), generally [para. 67]; p [para. 23]. Keeton, G.W., and Sheridan, L.A, The Law of Trusts (10th Ed. 1974), generally [para. 29]. Linden, Allen M., and Feldthusen, Bruce, Canadian Tort Law, generally [para. 17]. Street, Law of Torts (5th Ed. 1972), p. 215 [para. 58]. Counsel: M.A. Clemens, Q.C., and P. Senkpiel, for the appellant; D.R. Urquhart and S. Hamilton, for the respondent Terasen Gas Inc.; No one appeared on behalf of Alpha Manufacturing Inc., Burns Development Inc., or Burns Developments (1993) Ltd. This appeal was heard in Vancouver, B.C., on September 10, 2012, before Newbury, Frankel and Garson, JJ.A., of the British Columbia Court of Appeal. The decision of the court was delivered on November 7, 2012, and the following opinions were filed: Newbury, J.A. (Frankel, J.A., concurring) - see paragraphs 1 to 64; Garson, J.A., dissenting in part - see paragraphs 65 to 79. Editor: Elizabeth M.A. Turgeon Appeal allowed in part.
5 Real Property - Topic 132 General principles - Covenants that run with land - What constitute - Utzig owned property subject to statutory rights of way agreements (Land Title Act (LTA)) respecting natural gas pipelines owned by Terasen - Utzig allowed a neighbouring property owner (AMI) to use its property as a landfill - Thereafter, Utzig executed an agreement for sale (AFS) in favour of AMI et al. (purchasers), which made no reference to the rights of way agreements (October 10, 1993) - The purchasers took possession - The AFS was never registered or completed - Utzig remained the registered owner - In 1995, Terasen sued Utzig, alleging breaches of the covenants in the rights of way agreements - At issue was whether Utzig was bound by the covenants after executing the AFS - The British Columbia Court of Appeal held that because of the wording of the rights of way, the only way in which Utzig might cease to be bound was to show that it "ceased to be the owner of the land" (LTA, s. 218) - Under the LTA "owner" meant registered owner - Regardless of whether AMI acquired an equitable or proprietary interest, or even "'ownership", Utzig would remain the legal, and registered, owner in the eyes of equity until title passed - Thus, Utzig never ceased to be a registered owner and remained bound by the statutory rights of way even after entering the AFS - See paragraphs 22 to 38. Real Property - Topic Title, registration of instruments, etc. - Land titles system - Registration - Effect of failure to register - Utzig owned property subject to statutory rights of way agreements (Land Title Act (LTA)) respecting natural gas pipelines owned by Terasen - Utzig allowed a neighbouring property owner (AMI) to use its property as a landfill - Thereafter, Utzig executed an agreement for sale (AFS) in favour of AMI et al. (purchasers), which made no reference to the rights of way agreements (October 10, 1993) - The purchasers took possession - The AFS was never registered or completed - Utzig remained the registered owner - In 1995, Terasen sued Utzig, alleging breaches of the covenants in the rights of way agreements - At issue was whether Utzig was bound by the covenants after executing the AFS - The British Columbia Court of Appeal held that because of the wording of the rights of way, the only way in which Utzig might cease to be bound was to show that it "ceased to be the owner of the land" (LTA, s. 218) - Under the LTA "owner" meant registered owner - Regardless of whether AMI acquired an equitable or proprietary interest, or even "'ownership", Utzig would remain the legal, and registered, owner in the eyes of equity until title passed - Thus, Utzig never ceased to be a registered owner and remained bound by the statutory rights of way even after entering the AFS - See paragraphs 22 to 38. Sale of Land - Topic 4504 Restrictive or positive covenants - General principles - Covenant which binds or runs with the land - What constitutes - Utzig owned property subject to statutory rights of way agreements (Land Title Act (LTA)) respecting natural gas pipelines owned by Terasen - Utzig allowed a neighbouring property owner (AMI) to use its property as a landfill - Thereafter, Utzig executed an agreement for sale (AFS) in favour of AMI et al. (purchasers), which made no reference to the rights of way agreements (October 10, 1993) - The purchasers took possession - The AFS was never registered or completed -
6 Utzig remained the registered owner - In 1995, Terasen sued Utzig, alleging breaches of the covenants in the rights of way agreements - At issue was whether Utzig was bound by the covenants after executing the AFS - The British Columbia Court of Appeal held that because of the wording of the rights of way, the only way in which Utzig might cease to be bound was to show that it "ceased to be the owner of the land" (LTA, s. 218) - Under the LTA "owner" meant registered owner - Regardless of whether AMI acquired an equitable or proprietary interest, or even "'ownership", Utzig would remain the legal, and registered, owner in the eyes of equity until title passed - Thus, Utzig never ceased to be a registered owner and remained bound by the statutory rights of way even after entering the AFS - See paragraphs 22 to 38. Sale of Land - Topic Restrictive or positive covenants - General principles - Covenant that runs with the land - When vendor liable for breach of covenant by purchaser - Utzig owned property subject to statutory rights of way agreements (Land Title Act (LTA)) respecting natural gas pipelines owned by Terasen - Utzig allowed a neighbouring property owner (AMI) to use its property as a landfill - On October 10, 1993, Utzig executed an agreement for sale (AFS) in favour of AMI et al. (purchasers), without reference to the right of way agreements - The purchasers took possession; however, Utzig remained the registered owner - In 1995, Terasen sued Utzig, alleging breaches of the covenants in the rights of way agreements by permitting AMI to do acts that might interfere with Terasen's pipelines - The British Columbia Court of Appeal held that Utzig remained bound by and was in breach of those covenants prior to October 10, Up until then, Utzig retained sufficient authority over the subject property that it should be regarded as having "permitted" AMI to do acts that might have interfered with the pipeline - After October 13, 1993, having sold the property under the AFS, Utzig was no longer in a position to "permit", or withhold permission for, AMI's activities - Once land was sold, the new owner was responsible for new breaches of the terms of instruments (such as rights of way or restrictive covenants) that were registered against the land - See paragraphs 39 to 56. Sale of Land - Topic 4517 Restrictive or positive covenants - General principles - Breach of covenant - What constitutes - Utzig owned property subject to statutory rights of way agreements (Land Title Act (LTA)) respecting natural gas pipelines owned by Terasen - Utzig allowed a neighbouring property owner (AMI) to use its property as a landfill - On October 10, 1993, Utzig executed an agreement for sale (AFS) in favour of AMI et al. (purchasers), without reference to the right of way agreements - The purchasers took possession; however, Utzig remained the registered owner - In 1995, Terasen sued Utzig, alleging breaches of the covenants in the rights of way agreements by permitting AMI to do acts that might interfere with Terasen's pipelines - The British Columbia Court of Appeal held that Utzig remained bound by and was in breach of those covenants prior to October 10, Up until then, Utzig retained sufficient authority over the subject property that it should be regarded as having "permitted" AMI to do acts that might have interfered with the pipeline - After October 13, 1993, having sold the property under the AFS, Utzig was no longer in a position to "permit", or withhold permission for, AMI's activities - Once
7 land was sold, the new owner was responsible for new breaches of the terms of instruments (such as rights of way or restrictive covenants) that were registered against the land - See paragraphs 39 to 56.
Case Name: B.C. Ltd. v. Anmore (Village)
Page 1 Case Name: 618061 B.C. Ltd. v. Anmore (Village) Between 618061 B.C. Ltd., Appellant (Petitioner), and The Village of Anmore and Anmore Woods Ltd., Respondents (Respondents) [2008] B.C.J. No. 925
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JACKSON COUNTY
[Cite as Watson v. Neff, 2009-Ohio-2062.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JACKSON COUNTY Jeffrey S. Watson, Trustee, : : Plaintiff-Appellant, : : Case No. 08CA12 v. : : DECISION
More informationan Indian Band on his own behalf and on behalf of all members of-the Opetchesaht Plaintiffs (Respondents) HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA
' J?&'OD0 &!; ci P,(:. i/ :,,.;.,,. -. Vancouver Registry LC: 92-0911 Victoria Registry COURT 03 APPEAL And : And : an Indian Band on his own behalf and on behalf of all members of-the Opetchesaht Plaintiffs
More informationCED Overview of the Law
Perpetuities and Accumulations Notes for I-II.1-3: Introduction; the Rule Against Perpetuities I: Introduction FN1. Waters, Law of Trusts in Canada (1974), pp. 261-2; see also Aldercrest Developments Ltd.
More informationROYAL BANK REALTY INC. ASSESSOR OF AREA BURNABY-NEW WESTMINSTER. Supreme Court of British Columbia (A902670) Vancouver Registry
The following version is for informational purposes only, for the official version see: http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/ for Stated Cases see also: http://www.assessmentappeal.bc.ca/ for PAAB Decisions SC
More informationTERMINAL CITY CLUB TOWER ASSESSOR OF AREA 09 - VANCOUVER. SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (L022040) Vancouver Registry
The following version is for informational purposes only, for the official version see: http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/ for Stated Cases see also: http://www.assessmentappeal.bc.ca/ for Property Assessment
More informationPublisher s Note 2019 Release 3 Previous release was
Publisher s Note 2019 Release 3 Previous release was 2019 2 From Your Library: Lamont Real Estate Conveyancing This 2nd edition of Donald Lamont s classic work on real estate practice covers the various
More informationCITATION: Sertari Pty Ltd v Nirimba Developments Pty Ltd [2007] NSWCA 324
NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CITATION: Sertari Pty Ltd v Nirimba Developments Pty Ltd [2007] NSWCA 324 FILE NUMBER(S): 40202 of 2007 HEARING DATE(S): 30 July 2007 JUDGMENT DATE: 15 November 2007 PARTIES:
More informationASSESSOR OF AREA 05 - PORT ALBERNI MCDONALD S RESTAURANTS OF CANADA LTD. SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA ( ) Victoria Registry
The following version is for informational purposes only, for the official version see: http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/ for Stated Cases see also: http://www.assessmentappeal.bc.ca/ for Property Assessment
More informationHSBC plc v Dyche, HSBC plc v Collelldevall [2009] EWHC 2954 High Court
UNLOCKING LAND LAW Update August 2011 Thompson v Foy [2010] 1 P & CR 16 High Court Issues: Actual occupation; priority under Land Registration Act 2002; undue influence and proprietary estoppel Facts:
More informationEASEMENTS OVER COMMON LAND AND VILLAGE GREENS
Legal Topic Note LTN 57 April 2011 EASEMENTS OVER COMMON LAND AND VILLAGE GREENS Introduction 1. This topic is complex. The difficulties stem from the fact that the courts have been required to grapple
More informationCommonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals
RENDERED: JANUARY 8, 2016; 10:00 A.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2014-CA-000767-MR RUTH C. DEHART APPELLANT APPEAL FROM GRAVES CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE DENNIS R.
More informationIndexed as: Osoyoos Indian Band v. Oliver (Town)
Page 1 Indexed as: Osoyoos Indian Band v. Oliver (Town) Osoyoos Indian Band, appellant; v. The Town of Oliver and Her Majesty The Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia, respondents, and The
More informationAn easement is an incorporeal hereditament, an interest which does not give the owner right to physical possession.
Easement An easement is a right which the owner of land (known as dominant tenement) has over another land (servient tenement) to compel the owner of servient tenement to allow something to be done on
More informationLONDON LIFE INSURANCE CO. ASSESSOR OF AREA 9 -- VANCOUVER. Supreme Court of British Columbia (A872713) Vancouver Registry
The following version is for informational purposes only, for the official version see: http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/ for Stated Cases see also: http://www.assessmentappeal.bc.ca/ for PAAB Decisions SC
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PAUL MARINO and LINDA MARINO, Plaintiffs-Appellants, UNPUBLISHED June 19, 2001 v No. 215764 Wayne Circuit Court GRAYHAVEN ESTATES LTD., LLC, LC No. 98-813922-CH GRAYHAVEN-LENOX
More informationReal Property Law Notes
Real Property Law Notes PART I: THE CREATION AND ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY INTERESTS IN LAND... 3 1 An Introduction to Real Property Law... 3 2 An Introduction to the Torrens System of Land Title... 3 2.1
More informationFrom: The City of Langford
C1-8 Re: Sustainable Services Ltd. Geothermal Energy System Status as a Public Utility under the Utilities Commission Act ~ Project No. 3698884 RESPONSE TO THE BRITISH COLUMBIA UTILITIES COMMISSION S REQUEST
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2002
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2002 SAND LAKE SHOPPES FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D01-1534 SAND LAKE COURTYARDS, L.C., ET AL.,
More informationNO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 1996
NO. 95-519 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 1996 A.C. WARNACK, Trustee of the A.C. WARNACK TRUST; and KENNETH R. MCDONALD, v. Plaintiffs, Appellants and Cross-Respondents, THE CONEEN FAMILY
More informationPREVENTING THE ACQUISITION OF A RIGHT OF LIGHT BY A CONSENT WITHIN SECTION 3 PRESCRIPTION ACT 1832 HOW CAN IT BE DONE AND WHAT PITFALLS ARE THERE?
PREVENTING THE ACQUISITION OF A RIGHT OF LIGHT BY A CONSENT WITHIN SECTION 3 PRESCRIPTION ACT 1832 HOW CAN IT BE DONE AND WHAT PITFALLS ARE THERE? By Andrew Francis, Barrister Serle Court, 6 New Square,
More informationRegis Property v. Dudley
Osgoode Hall Law Journal Volume 2, Number 1 (April 1960) Article 15 Regis Property v. Dudley Robert M. Kernerman Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj Commentary
More informationBOUNDARY LAW: AN UPDATE
BOUNDARY LAW: AN UPDATE Presented by Izaak de Rijcke Association of British Columbia Land Surveyors April 5, 2017 VIEW FROM MARINE DRIVE IN WEST VANCOUVER From Google Maps, Google Inc., 2017 All Rights
More informationWilliam S. Graessle of William S. Graessle, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellees. In this eminent domain action, the JEA appeals a final order awarding
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA JEA, A BODY POLITIC AND CORPORATE OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN. COLONIAL HOMES AND COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES LIMITED Formerly called BALMAIN PARK LIMITED AND
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL No. 47 OF 2007 BETWEEN COLONIAL HOMES AND COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES LIMITED Formerly called BALMAIN PARK LIMITED AND APPELLANT KASSINATH
More informationSUPREME COURT OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND KEL-MAC INCORPORATED. Before: The Honourable Justice Benjamin B. Taylor
SUPREME COURT OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND Citation: Kel-Mac v. Town of Stratford 2009 PESC 04 Date: 20090226 Docket: S1-GS-22841 Registry: Charlottetown BETWEEN: KEL-MAC INCORPORATED APPLICANT AND: TOWN OF
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE August 15, 2007 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE August 15, 2007 Session JUDITH ANN FORD v. JAMES W. ROBERTS, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Hamilton County No. 01-0846 Howell N. Peoples, Chancellor
More informationPROPERTY LAW SUMMARY LAWSKOOL.CO.UK LAWSKOOL PTY LTD
PROPERTY LAW SUMMARY LAWSKOOL.CO.UK LAWSKOOL PTY LTD CONTENTS DEFINITIONS OF PROPERTY 4 BASIC DEFINITION OF PROPERTY 4 PROPERTY ABOVE LAND 4 Higher stratum of airspace 4 Lower stratum of airspace 4 Guidelines
More informationNo February 26, P.2d Kermitt L. Waters, and James Leavitt, Las Vegas, for Appellants.
Printed on: 10/20/01 Page # 1 114 Nev. 137, 137 (1998) Argier v. Nevada Power Co. DAVID ARGIER, TOM ARGIER, NEVCAN DEVELOPMENT, LTD., and CANEV DEVELOPMENT, LTD., Appellants, v. NEVADA POWER COMPANY, a
More informationNorgard v. Anmore (Village) Page 2 [1] THE COURT: This is an application pursuant to the Judicial Review Procedure Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 241 for a re
Citation: Between: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Norgard v. Anmore (Village), 2007 BCSC 1571 Gary Norgard and Sharon Norgard Date: 20071012 Docket: S070896 Registry: Vancouver Petitioners BCSC
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS WILLIAM KULINSKI, RONALD KULINSKI, and RUSSELL KULINSKI, UNPUBLISHED December 9, 2014 Plaintiffs-Appellees, v No. 318091 Lenawee Circuit Court ILENE KULINSKI, LC No.
More informationConverting the Communal Aboriginal Interest into Private Property
Converting the Communal Aboriginal Interest into Private Property Sarnia, Osoyoos, the Nisga a Treaty and Other Recent Developments JACK WOODWARD The Communal Aboriginal Interest in Aboriginal Title Delgamuukw
More information16 O.R. (3d) 83. [1993] O.J. No Action No. C Court of Appeal for Ontario, Tarnopolsky**, Krever and Arbour JJ.A.
Page 1 1 of 1 DOCUMENT Re Regional Assessment Commissioner, Region No. 3 et al. and Graham et al. * [Indexed as: Ontario Regional Assessment Commissioner, Region No. 3 v. Graham] 16 O.R. (3d) 83 [1993]
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: JACQUELYN THOMPSON WILLIAM F. THOMPSON Indianapolis, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEES: BRIAN L. OAKS Kokomo, Indiana LAWRENCE R. MURRELL Kokomo, Indiana IN THE COURT
More informationDISTRICT OF SECHELT. Emerson Clustered Residential Development - Housing Agreement Bylaw No. 534, 2014
DISTRICT OF SECHELT Emerson Clustered Residential Development - Housing Agreement Bylaw A bylaw to enter into a Housing Agreement under Section 905 of the Local Government Act WHEREAS: A. The owners of
More informationPRESCRIPTIVE RIGHTS AND POSSESSORY TITLE UNDER LAND TITLES CONVERSION. Mitchell Leitman 1
PRESCRIPTIVE RIGHTS AND POSSESSORY TITLE UNDER LAND TITLES CONVERSION Mitchell Leitman 1 Possessory Title And Prescriptive Rights: Legal Basis The Real Property Limitations Act (the RPLA ) 2 provides,
More informationPLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts.
PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to May 30, 2009. It is intended for information and reference purposes only. This
More informationIN THE SMALL CLAIMS COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Alderwood Village v. Uwins, 2018 NSSM 40 ALDERWOOD VILLAGE. -and
IN THE SMALL CLAIMS COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Alderwood Village v. Uwins, 2018 NSSM 40 Claim No: SCCH 474615 BETWEEN: ALDERWOOD VILLAGE -and Appellant/ Landlord MICHELLE UWINS Respondent/ Tenant Date
More informationJUDGMENT AFFIRMED. Division VI Opinion by: JUDGE GRAHAM Dailey and Russel, JJ., concur. Announced: May 17, 2007
COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS Court of Appeals No.: 06CA0604 Larimer County District Court No. 05CV614 Honorable James H. Hiatt, Judge Alan Copeland and Nicole Copeland, Plaintiffs Appellees, v. Stephen R.
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS GREGG MAYES, Personal Representative of the Estate of WALTER MAYES, UNPUBLISHED November 29, 2011 Plaintiff-Appellant, V No. 298355 Ingham Circuit Court LEONARD CHARLES
More informationv. Record No OPINION BY JUSTICE BARBARA MILANO KEENAN September 18, 2009 MICHAEL D. DELORE, ET AL.
PRESENT: All the Justices HENRY ANDERSON, JR., ET AL. v. Record No. 082416 OPINION BY JUSTICE BARBARA MILANO KEENAN September 18, 2009 MICHAEL D. DELORE, ET AL. FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BEDFORD COUNTY
More informationThe central concerns of property law
2 The central concerns of property law Introduction We saw in the previous chapter that property encompasses not only ownership but also a wide range of other rights. In this chapter, an attempt will be
More informationSubstantive requirements of the easement What are the bundle must the grantor intended to invest in the grantee for the easement to be created?
Two types of easements Positive easements o Concept: A positive easement allows the owner of the dominant land the right to do something on the servient land Examples: the right to enter into the land
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO
[Cite as Treinen v. Kollasch-Schlueter, 179 Ohio App.3d 527, 2008-Ohio-5986.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO TREINEN ET AL., : APPEAL NO. C-070634 TRIAL
More informationGas Gathering Agreements: The Treatment of GGAs as Executory Contracts in Bankruptcy
Gas Gathering Agreements: The Treatment of GGAs as Executory Contracts in Bankruptcy Ellen Conley April 4, 2016 Midstream Agreements in Bankruptcy In re Sabine Oil & Gas Corporation In re Quicksilver Resources
More informationBARBARA BEACH OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE DONALD W. LEMONS FEBRUARY 27, 2014 JAY TURIM, TRUSTEE, ET AL.
PRESENT: All the Justices BARBARA BEACH OPINION BY v. Record No. 130682 JUSTICE DONALD W. LEMONS FEBRUARY 27, 2014 JAY TURIM, TRUSTEE, ET AL. FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA Lisa B. Kemler,
More informationHong Kong Bar Association's comments on Land Titles Ordinance Draft Amendment Bill ( version)
Hong Kong Bar Association's comments on Land Titles Ordinance Draft Amendment Bill (16-6-06 version) Introduction The Bar refers to the letter dated 10 th July 2006 from the Land Registrar whereby the
More informationHM COURTS AND TRIBUNALS SERVICE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY TRIBUNAL SERVICE LEASEHOLD VALUATION TRIBUNAL MAN/00CVLAC/2012/0022
Z HM COURTS AND TRIBUNALS SERVICE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY TRIBUNAL SERVICE LEASEHOLD VALUATION TRIBUNAL MAN/00CVLAC/2012/0022 An application under Schedule 11 Paragraph 5 of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: PARTIES: Wirkus v The Body Corporate for Goldieslie Park Community Titles Scheme No 20924 [2010] QSC 397 MICHELLE WIRKUS (Plaintiff) FILE NO: BS 7976 of 2008 DIVISION:
More informationHigh Court: Charges Over Building Agreements Are Valid and Enforceable
High Court: Charges Over Building Agreements Are Valid and Enforceable On 16 March 2011, the Singapore High Court upheld a fixed charge over a building agreement. Such charges are a common feature in Singapore
More informationAssessment Appeals Committee
Assessment Appeals Committee DETERMINATION OF AN APPEAL UNDER Section 16 of The Municipal Board Act and Section 216 of The Cities Act Appeal Number: AAC 2016-0034 Date and Location: February 16, 2017 Saskatoon,
More informationNo. S ~~~~~.~ ~ ~~~-~~; Vancouver Registry
_":_~ to ~~ E~ ~ ~ ~ r c~ ~~ ~;-r~ ~~ i ~ ~3 ~ i T 15 F~i C C~ ~~ l~ r.~ ~ 16a ' vr~.r~cc~uvr~-~ f~,~~~`a~~~ No. S144265 ~~~~~.~ ~ ~~~-~~; Vancouver Registry ~~,~>a ~ ~ F~~ ~~ IN TH SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH
More informationLESLIE EMMANUEL (Personal Representative of Leopold Allan Emmanuel, deceased) LENNARD EMMANUEL and ACE ENGINEERING LIMITED
COMMONWEALTH OF DOMINICA DOMHCV2009/0281 BETWEEN: LESLIE EMMANUEL (Personal Representative of Leopold Allan Emmanuel, deceased) LENNARD EMMANUEL and ACE ENGINEERING LIMITED ANTHONY LEBLANC Claimant Defendants
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT FOUR ARROWS INVESTMENTS 68 (PTY) LTD
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT Reportable Case No: 20470/2014 In the matter between: FOUR ARROWS INVESTMENTS 68 (PTY) LTD APPELLANT And ABIGAIL CONSTRUCTION CC THE REGISTRAR OF DEEDS,
More informationContracting purchasers before completion: their interest and its limits
Contracting purchasers before completion: their interest and its limits Daniel Gatty Introduction Property lawyers know that a purchaser of land obtains an equitable interest in that land as soon as contracts
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA. ** CASE NO. 3D Appellant, ** vs. ** LOWER WESLEY WHITE, individually,
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JANUARY TERM, 2005 INDIA AMERICA TRADING CO., INC., a Florida
More informationAnnex A STRATA TITLE LAW DIFC LAW NO. 5 OF Amended and Restated
Annex A STRATA TITLE LAW DIFC LAW NO. 5 OF 2007 Amended and Restated CONTENTS PART 1: GENERAL 1 1. Title... 1 2. Legislative Authority... 1 3. Application of this Law... 1 4. Purpose of this Law... 1 5.
More informationBefore: THE PRESIDENT OF THE QUEEN'S BENCH {SIR ANTHONY MAY) LORD JUSTICE JACOB MR JUSTICE LEWISON. Between: VANDAL FOOTWEAR LTD.
Case No: Al/2009/0846 Neutral Citation Number:!20091 EWCA Civ 1478 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM THE TECHNOLOGY AND CONSTRUCTION COURT QBD (HIS HONOUR
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC06-2461 DOUGLAS K. RABORN, et al., Appellants, vs. DEBORAH C. MENOTTE, etc., Appellee. [January 10, 2008] BELL, J. We have for review two questions of Florida law certified
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS ROBERT LITTLE and BARBARA LITTLE, Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants- Appellants, UNPUBLISHED March 23, 2006 v No. 257781 Oakland Circuit Court THOMAS TRIVAN, DARLENE TRIVAN,
More informationEasements in lieu of Subdivision
Easements in lieu of Subdivision By Edward L. Wilson September 30, 2006 This paper was prepared for a Lorman Education Services Conference in May, 2006 This is a general overview of the subject matter
More informationAssessment Appeals Committee
Assessment Appeals Committee DETERMINATION OF AN APPEAL UNDER Section 16 of The Municipal Board Act and Section 246 of The Municipalities Act Appeal Number: AAC 2015-0115 Date and Location: February 23,
More informationLabour Law -- Picketing on Shopping Centres
Osgoode Hall Law School of York University Osgoode Digital Commons Articles & Book Chapters Faculty Scholarship 1965 Labour Law -- Picketing on Shopping Centres Harry W. Arthurs Osgoode Hall Law School
More informationDispute Resolution Services
Dispute Resolution Services Page: 1 Residential Tenancy Branch Office of Housing and Construction Standards DECISION Dispute Codes RR, MNDC, FF Introduction This hearing dealt with the tenants Application
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 13, 2012 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 13, 2012 Session BARRY RUSSELL, ET AL. v. HENDERSONVILLE UTILITY DISTRICT Appeal from the Chancery Court for Sumner County No. 2010C120 Tom E.
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT MARKETING ACT SBC 2004, Chapter BC LTD. -AND- BINDER SINGH LALLI
IN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT MARKETING ACT SBC 2004, Chapter 41 732433 BC LTD. -AND- BINDER SINGH LALLI ORDER UNDER SECTIONS 30(1) and 32(1) REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT MARKETING ACT Upon reviewing
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Pennsylvania Venture Capital, Inc., : Appellant : : No. 1199 C.D. 2012 v. : : Argued: December 12, 2012 The Planning Commission of the City : of Bethlehem and
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS E. RICHARD RANDOLPH and BETTY J. RANDOLPH, Plaintiffs-Appellants, FOR PUBLICATION October 3, 2006 9:00 a.m. v No. 259943 Newaygo Circuit Court CLARENCE E. REISIG, MONICA
More informationWORDS & PHRASES: "pre-existing interest" -Section 4 National Land Code (Penang and Malacca Titles) Act 1963.
YAP CHIEW GUAN v. THE TRUSTEE OF THE ESTATE OF YEAP CHOR EE, DECEASED HIGH COURT MALAYA, PENANG DATO' ABDUL HAMID BIN HAJI MOHAMAD J CIVIL APPEAL NO. 16-4-86 20 APRIL 1995 [1995] 4 CLJ 422 LAND LAW: Mortgage
More informationA GUIDE FOR DIRECTORS AND MEMBERS: TERMINATION OF MEMBERSHIP AND OCCUPANCY RIGHTS IN ALBERTA HOUSING COOPERATIVES
A GUIDE FOR DIRECTORS AND MEMBERS: TERMINATION OF MEMBERSHIP AND OCCUPANCY RIGHTS IN ALBERTA HOUSING COOPERATIVES Brian P Kaliel, Q.C. Miller Thomson LLP 2700 Commerce Place 10155-102 Street Edmonton,
More informationWilliam S. Henry of Burke Blue Hutchison Walters & Smith, P.A., Panama City, for Appellants.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA RICHARD KJELLANDER AND KC KJELLANDER, v. Appellants, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF
More informationNATURAL LEGACIES: Your Education Guide to Conservation in BC
NATURAL LEGACIES: Your Education Guide to Conservation in BC Subsurface Rights and Conservation Covenants in B.C. Prepared by Sam Harrison Pro Bono Students Canada, University of Victoria Chapter For the
More informationTenure confusion: are shared ownership lessees assured tenants, long lessees or both? TRISTAN SALTER Five Paper October 2018
Tenure confusion: are shared ownership lessees assured tenants, long lessees or both? TRISTAN SALTER Five Paper October 2018 This article seeks to re-examine the case of Richardson v Midland Heart [2008]
More informationDaniel M. Schwarz of Cole Scott & Kissane, P.A., Plantation, for Appellants.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA SILVER BEACH TOWERS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., SILVER BEACH TOWERS EAST CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., and SILVER BEACH TOWERS WEST
More informationBOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF STAFFORD COUNTY, ET AL. OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE S. BERNARD GOODWYN JUNE 4, 2009 CRUCIBLE, INC.
PRESENT: All the Justices BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF STAFFORD COUNTY, ET AL. OPINION BY v. Record No. 081743 JUSTICE S. BERNARD GOODWYN JUNE 4, 2009 CRUCIBLE, INC. FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF STAFFORD COUNTY
More informationGuide to Selling Property In British Columbia
Guide to Selling Property In British Columbia What s inside? This e-guide is intended to assist home owners to understand the legal costs and closing adjustments when selling their homes. It also addresses
More informationORLANDO CASTILLO BETWEEN: ORLANDO CASTILLO CLAIMANT RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE A.D.2000 ACTION NO: 136 OF 2000 BETWEEN: BENNY S ENTERPRISES LIMITED AND ORLANDO CASTILLO CLAIMANT DEFENDANT AND ACTION NO. 162 OF 2000 BETWEEN: ORLANDO CASTILLO CLAIMANT
More informationPROPERTY LAW LAW 231 SECTION Professor Karin Mickelson Office: Room 340; Tel.: ;
PROPERTY LAW LAW 231 SECTION 1 2016-2017 Professor Karin Mickelson Office: Room 340; Tel.: 822-6165; Email: mickelson@allard.ubc.ca This course introduces the common law concept of property and explores
More informationMichael Anthony Shaw and Joseph D. Steadman, Jr., of Jones Walker LLP, Miami, for Appellant.
WHITNEY BANK, a Mississippi state chartered bank, formerly known as HANCOCK BANK, a Mississippi state chartered bank, as assignee of the FDIC as receiver for PEOPLES FIRST COMMUNITY BANK, a Florida banking
More informationEquestleader.com, Inc., recovered a judgment for civil trespass damages
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT RANDALL GUNNING, individually, CASTLE CONSULTING I LTD., INC.,
More informationDate: October 7, 2014 File No.: SS-RZ
STAFF REPORT Date: October 7, 2014 File No.: SS-RZ-2013.3 To: From: Salt Spring Island Local Trust Committee for October 16, 2014 Meeting Stefan Cermak, Island Planner, Salt Spring Island Team Re: Application
More informationNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. BENJORAY, INC., v. Plaintiff-Respondent, ACADEMY HOUSE CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER,
More informationThese related appeals concern the rights of certain sign companies to. construct billboards in areas formerly located in unincorporated Fulton
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: June 13, 2011 S11A0023. FULTON COUNTY et al. v. ACTION OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, JV et al. S11A0101. CITY OF SANDY SPRINGS et al. v. ACTION OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, JV et
More informationPCLL CONVERSION EXAMINATION JUNE 2018
PCLL CONVERSION EXAMINATION JUNE 2018 Title of Paper : Hong Kong Land Law Date : 21 June 2018 Time : 2:30 p.m. 2:45 p.m. (Reading Time) 2:45 p.m. 4:15 p.m. Instructions 1. Write your candidate number on
More informationLAW REFORM COMMISSION OF BRITISH COLUMBIA REPORT ON FLOATING CHARGES ON LAND LRC 103
LAW REFORM COMMISSION OF BRITISH COLUMBIA REPORT ON FLOATING CHARGES ON LAND LRC 103 JANUARY 1989 The Law Reform Commission of British Columbia was established by the Law Reform Commission Act in 1969
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Appellants :
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Amos S. Lapp and Emma S. Lapp, : : Appellants : : v. : No. 1845 C.D. 2016 : ARGUED: June 5, 2017 Lancaster County Agricultural Preserve : Board : BEFORE: HONORABLE
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HOCKING COUNTY APPEARANCES:
[Cite as Esteph v. Grumm, 175 Ohio App.3d 516, 2008-Ohio-1121.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HOCKING COUNTY Esteph et al., : Case No. 07CA6 Appellees, : v. : DECISION AND JUDGMENT
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT BARBARA L. BARNEY, ERNEST W. BARNEY, ET AL., Appellants, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION
More informationLender Communiqué. New Condominium Act and Case Law Update
Lender Communiqué New Condominium Act and Case Law Update By: Leor Margulies, Partner As most of you are aware, the new Condominium Act received royal assent on December 17, 1998 and will be proclaimed
More informationHighway Access Alternatives
Highway Access Alternatives Tim Jowett, Deputy Registrar Approving Officers Workshop May 16, 2017 2017 2017 Land Land Title Title and and Survey Survey Authority Authority of of British British Columbia
More informationSCHEDULE U : EASEMENT FOR PARKING TERMS OF INSTRUMENT PART 2
SCHEDULE U : EASEMENT FOR PARKING [attach Land Title Act Form C General Filing Instrument Part 1] TERMS OF INSTRUMENT PART 2 This Easement dated for reference the day of,. BETWEEN: AND AND WHEREAS: bcimc
More informationDISTRICT OF SQUAMISH GOVERNMENT ROAD (ELEMENTS 2) HOUSING BYLAW, NO. 2036, 2008
DISTRICT OF SQUAMISH 39887 GOVERNMENT ROAD (ELEMENTS 2) HOUSING BYLAW, NO. 2036, 2008 WHEREAS pursuant to section 905 of the Local Government Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 323, as amended, Council may, by bylaw,
More informationEQUITY IN THE ASSESSMENT WORLD
EQUITY IN THE ASSESSMENT WORLD Institute of Municipal Assessors 55 th Annual Conference Niagara Falls June 7, 2011 Jeff G. Cowan WeirFoulds LLP I. Introduction Ad valorem system in principle Objective
More informationADDENDUM A TO CONTRACT OF PURCHASE AND SALE
ADDENDUM A TO CONTRACT OF PURCHASE AND SALE The following terms replace, modify, and where applicable override the terms of the attached contract of purchase and sale, and any modifications, amendments,
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2008
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2008 Opinion filed September 3, 2008. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D08-516 Lower Tribunal No.
More informationPERPETUITY ACT. Published by Quickscribe Services Ltd.
PDF Version [Printer-friendly - ideal for printing entire document] PERPETUITY ACT Published by Quickscribe Services Ltd. Updated To: [includes 2016 Bill 18, c. 5 amendments (effective March 10, 2016)]
More informationDispute Resolution Services
Dispute Resolution Services Page: 1 Dispute Codes: MNR, MND, MNDC, FF Introduction Residential Tenancy Branch Office of Housing and Construction Standards DECISION This hearing dealt with an application
More informationPRESENTED: September 18 th, 2006 FILE: Bylaw No. 1991, 2007 FROM: Planning Department
DISTRICT OF SQUAMISH REPORT TO: Council FOR: Regular PRESENTED: September 18 th, 2006 FILE: 2006-19 Bylaw No. 1991, 2007 FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: Housing Agreement Bylaw No. 1991, 2007 37841
More informationBRITISH COLUMBIA. Leases of Unsubdivided Land LAW INSTITUTE. and. The Top Line Case. Consultation Paper on. October 2004
BRITISH COLUMBIA Consultation Paper on LAW INSTITUTE 1822 East Mall University of British Columbia Vancouver, British Columbia Canada V6T 1Z1 Voice: (604) 822 0142 Fax: (604) 822 0144 E-mail: bcli@bcli.org
More informationAIRCRAFT TIE-DOWN LEASE AGREEMENT
AIRCRAFT TIE-DOWN LEASE AGREEMENT This Aircraft Tie-Down Lease Agreement (the "Lease ) is made and entered into by and between the EASTERN WEST VIRGINIA REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY ("Lessor"), 170 Aviation
More information