FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/31/ :25 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/31/2017

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/31/ :25 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/31/2017"

Transcription

1 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK x THE CITY OF NEW YORK, - against - Plaintiff, FC 42ND STREET ASSOCIATES, L.P., Defendant x Index No. /2017 Date of Filing: May 31, 2017: E-Filed Case SUMMONS Plaintiff designates the County of New York as the place of trial. The bases of Venue are CPLR 503(a) and 507. Plaintiff resides at City Hall, New York, New York TO THE ABOVE NAMED DEFENDANT: YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED to answer the complaint in this action and to serve a copy of your answer, or, if the complaint is not served with this summons, to serve a notice of appearance, on the Plaintiffs attorneys within 20 days after service of this summons, exclusive of the day of service (or within 30 days after the service is complete if this summons is not personally delivered to you within the State of New York); and in case of your failure to appear or answer, judgment will be taken against you by default for the relief demanded in the complaint. Dated: New York, New York May 31, 2017 CARTER LEDY ARD & MILBURN LLP Defendant's Address: 1 Metrotech Center, 23rd Floor Brooklyn, NY \.,p /I (~-~ 1 By: ~g,. (.j, ~ fvl~f. '.::\ e A. Ohliger, Esq. ~ 2 Wall Street New York, New York Ohliger@clm.com (212) (212) (facsimile) Attorneys for Plaintiff, The City of New York of 12

2 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ){ THE CITY OF NEW YORK, against Plaintiff, Inde){ No. / E-Filed Case COMPLAINT FC 42ND STREET ASSOCIATES, L.P., Defendant ){ Plaintiff, THE CITY OF NEW YORK (the "City"), by its attorneys Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLP, respectfully alleges as follows: SUMMARY OF ACTION 1. This is an action for a declaratory judgment, pursuant to New York Civil Practice Law and Rules ("CPLR") 3001, seeking judicial construction of the term "Fair Market Value" as that term is used in a certain ground lease dated December 13, 1996 (as amended to date, the "Ground Lease"). 2. In determining the value of certain land, on which the "Base Rent" for the upcoming "2 11 ct Rental Period" 1 of the Ground Lease will be based, the defendant would have the appraisers take into consideration the e){isting subleases and actual rents being paid by some or all of the defendant's sublessees. The City's position is that the Ground Lease contains no such direction and that any valuation must value the Land and the New 42 Land without consideration of e){isting subleases, and that in arriving at a Fair Market Value for the Land and the New 42 Land, the appraisers must consider current market conditions, including market rents. This, and 1 Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein have the meaning set forth in the Ground Lease. 2 of 12

3 other disagreements between the parties, produce ground rent calculations by each party that differ by as much as a factor of ten. Accordingly, a justiciable controversy exists between the parties necessitating a judicial declaration of the correct meaning of the relevant terms of the Ground Lease. THE PARTIES 3. The City is a municipal corporation, organized and existing under the laws of the State ofnew York. 4. Defendant FC 42"d Street Associates, L.P. ("FC" or "Tenant") is a New York limited partnership. VENUE 5. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to CPLR 503(a) and 507, because at least one of the parties resides in this County, and the land that is the subject of this action is located in Manhattan, between 41 st and d Streets and Seventh and Eighth Avenues. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 6. The leased propetiy is pati of the decades-long project (the "42"d Street Project") sponsored by the City and New York State Urban Development Corporation, d/b/a Empire State Development ("ESD") to rehabilitate and renew the Times Square area. The d Street Project area runs generally from to 43rd Street between Broadway and Eighth Avenue. 7. Forest City Ratner Companies was selected as the developer of the property described in the Ground Lease and the New 42 Lease (defined below), and FC was formed by it as the entity to serve as the tenant under the Ground Lease and the New 42 Lease. As set fotih in those leases, the goals of the d Street Project included "(i) elimination of the blight, physical decay, crime and frightening street life that have characterized the West 42"d Street area; (ii) of 12

4 preservation and restoration of the area's extraordinary theaters and the revitalization of the 42nd Street Project area as a theater and entertainment center serving tourists and all New Yorkers; (iii) development of the 42nd Street Project area's commercial and retail potential, fostering a lively, healthy street ambience and supporting the City's policy of fostering an environment that encourages the expansion of the midtown Manhattan office area..." The Ground Lease was entered into on December 13, 1996 by and between 42nd St. Development Project, Inc. ("42 DP"), a subsidiary of ESD, as landlord, and FC, as tenant. A true and correct copy of the Ground Lease (excluding the voluminous schedules and exhibits and later amendments not relevant to the current controversy), is annexed hereto as Exhibit A and expressly made part of this Complaint. 9. The City is the successor-in-interest to the rights of the Landlord under the Ground Lease. 10. Simultaneously with the execution of the Ground Lease, FC, as tenant, entered into a parallel separate ground sublease with The New 42nd Street, Inc. ("New 42"), as landlord (the "New 42 Lease"). New 42 was the ground tenant under a Master Lease with 42DP, also dated December 13, The Master Lease concerned itself with the rehabilitation of the various theaters in Times Square. The New 42 Lease demised to FC the land on which the Liberty Theater and Empire Theater were located, being Block 1013, Lots 49 and 50 (the "New 42 Land"). 2 Ground Lease, Exhibit A, at I of 12

5 11. The Ground Lease demised to FC the Property 3, meaning the Land (consisting of Block 1013, Lots 45, 46, 50, 49, 53, 55, 57, and 12) and the Improvements located thereon. However, during the term of the New 42 Lease, the Land does not include the New 42 Land. 12. The term of the Ground Lease is 99 years, expiring December 12, There are 'ten separate Rental Periods during the term. The paities are currently in the I st Rental Period, which nms for a period of20 years from the Rent Commencement Date, and will expire September 14, The 2"d Rental Period runs for fifteen years from the end of the!st Rental Period. FC SUBLEASES 13. On the same day that FC entered into the Ground Lease and the New 42 Lease, it also entered into a sublease (the "Tussauds Lease") with The Tussauds Group Limited ("Tussauds"). FC had, several months previously, entered a sublease (the "AMC Lease") with Americai1 Multi-Cinema, Inc. ("AMC"), that sublease to become effective after the Ground Lease was entered into. 14. The Tussauds Lease has an initial term of 25 years, with various options to renew for up to an additional 74 years. The AMC Lease has an initial term of20 years, with various options to renew for up to an additional 24 years. 15. The Project, as built, consists of approximately 312,000 leasable square feet The Tussauds and AMC Leases comprise approximately two-thirds of the leasable space at the site. There are approximately eight other spaces that comprise the balai1ce of the leasable space. 3 Ground Lease, 2.0 I (b ), Exhibit A at of 12

6 GROUND LEASE RENT RE-SET 16. To determine the Base Rent under the Ground Lease for the 2"d Rental Period, the Ground Lease requires that the Fair Market Value of the Land and the New 42 Land be determined. The Base Rent under the Ground Lease is "equal to ten percent (I 0%) of the Allocable Share of the Fair Market Value of the Land and the New 42 Land, determined as of the end of the 1 51 Rental Period...". 4 The parties have previously determined that the Allocable Share of the Land is 78.95% and the Allocable Share of the New 42 Land is 21.05%. What is in dispute is the meaning of Fair Market Value. 17. Section 3.0l(c)(vi) of the Ground Lease states that "'Fair Market Value' means (A) with respect to the 2"d Rental Period and the 3rd Rental Period, the most probable price in terms of money which a conveyance of the fee simple interest in the Land and the New 42 Land would bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale considering that the Land and New 42 Land enjoys the benefits and rights accorded by, and is subject to the restrictions and limitations on the development and use of the Land and the New 42 Land contained in, this Lease, including DUO;..." 5 (emphasis supplied). I 8. "DUO" refers to the Design, Use, and Operating Requirements that are set fo1ih in Schedules C through I of the Ground Lease. In terms of potential impact on Fair Market Value, the most significant restrictions appear in Schedule F (Display and Signage Requirements); Schedule G (Use and Operating Requirements); and Schedule H (Architectural Requirements). 4 Ground Lease 3.0 I (a)(ii), Exhibit A at Ground Lease at of 12

7 19. Schedule F contains detailed requirements concerning signage, most particularly requirements for illuminated signage, which must stay lit until 1 :00 a.m., seven days per week. 20. Schedule G has restrictions on the uses that are permitted. "From the tenth (1 oth) anniversary of the achievement of Full Operating Condition up to the twentieth (20t1 1 ) anniversary of the achievement of Full Operating Condition, at least fifty (50) percent of the Gross Leasable Area of the Project shall be occupied for uses consistent with one or more of the Permitted Entertainment Uses. The balance of the Gross Leasable Area of the Project may be occupied for uses consistent with one or more of the Permitted Non-Entertainment Uses... After the twentieth (20t 11 ) anniversary of the achievement of Full Operating Condition, all uses permitted in this area by the New York City Zoning Resolution shall be permitted in the Project." 21. Exhibit 1 to Schedule G contains a list of Permitted Entertainment Uses. Examples include music clubs, comedy clubs, interactive theme exhibitions, and movie theaters. Exhibit 2 to Schedule G contains a list of Permitted Non-Entertainment Uses. Examples include athletic good stores, clothing stores, gift shops, luggage stores, record stores, and shoe stores, as well as any use permitted by Exhibit Schedule H contains Architectural Requirements. "The purpose of the requirements in this section is to indicate the maximum Gross Floor Area permitted and the minimum retail space and frontage required at street level to ensure a lively street environment." Schedule H contains certain height and setback restrictions, but the most significant restriction is a limitation on the Gross Floor Area: "The maximum gross floor area shall be as follows: American Multi-Cinema 169,300; Other: 159,075; Subtotal 328,375." Given that the land area of the site is approximately 60,896 square feet, this limitation amounts to a Floor Area Ratio of 12

8 ("FAR") 6 of less than 5.5. Were it not for the 42"d Street Project, the site would be governed by the Special Midtown Theater Sub-district regulations of the Zoning Resolution, under which the Land and the New 42 Land would be considered partly within a C6-6.5 zoning district, which has a base commercial FAR of 10.0 and partly within a C6-7 zoning district, which has a base commercial FAR of Thus, the Land and the New 42 Land are limited to development equal to less than half of what would otherwise be permitted under the Zoning Resolution. 23. New York City Economic Development Corporation ("EDC"), as agent for the City, has had the Land and the New 42 Land appraised in accordance with the straightforward definition of Fair Market Value contained in the Ground Lease, and the value conclusion was in excess of $342 million. 24. By contrast, FC has communicated to EDC its belief that the land value is only about $27.24 million. 25. Discussions with FC over the last year have failed to bridge the gap. There is a fundamental disagreement between the parties concerning the proper legal construction of the term Fair Market Value, as used in the Ground Lease. 26. The Ground Lease contains numerous references to AMC and Tussauds and their respective leases. FC relies on these numerous references to support its position that any appraisal of the Fair Market Value of the Land and the New 42 Land must take into account the actual rents due under the AMC and Tussauds Leases (and possibly rents under all existing leases). 6 Generally speaking, FAR is the primary determinant of the size of a building that may be constructed on a property. For example, the owner of a property containing 10,000 square feet of land, whose property is zoned to permit a maximum FAR of 5.0, may build a structure with up to 50,000 square feet of floor area. There may be other restrictions (e.g., height and setback) which, by affecting a building's design, may indirectly limit the size ofa building, but, subject to those other restrictions, FAR determines the maximum permitted floor area of 12

9 27. However, FC's position is in direct contravention of the Ground Lease, which precludes consideration of the existing subleases to AMC, Tussauds, and the other subtenants. The Ground Lease requires that the Land and the New 42 Land be valued without the Improvements and without consideration of any existing subleases. 28. Fair Market Value is defined as "the most probable price in terms of money which a conveyance of the fee simple interest in the Land and the New 42 Land would bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale...". As defined in the Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, a fee simple estate is "[a]bsolute ownership unencumbered by any other interest or estate, subject only to the limitations imposed by the governmental powers of taxation, eminent domain, police power, and escheat." This is to be distinguished from a "leased fee," which is a property encumbered by one or more leases. According to the Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, a "leased fee" or "leased fee estate" is "the ownership interest held by the lessor, which includes the right to receive the contract rent specified in the lease plus the reversionary right when the lease expires. " However, the Ground Lease does place one restriction on the valuation of the fee simple interest. It requires the parties' appraisers to "consider[] that the Land and New 42 Land... is subject to the restrictions and limitations on the development and use of the Land and the New 42 Land contained in, this Lease, including DUO;..." (emphasis supplied). 31. The restrictions and limitations on development in the Ground Lease include those noted previously contained in Schedule H, most significantly a limitation on the amount of 7 Appraisal Institute, Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal (6'" Edition 2015) at Id. at of 12

10 square footage that can be developed. In addition, there are certain requirements for retail frontage, and there are streetwall, height and setback limitations. 32. Restrictions and limitations on use are contained in Atticle 7 of the Ground Lease and Schedule G, primarily the requirement that ce1tain portions of the Property be used for Permitted Entertainment Uses and Permitted Non-Entertainment Uses. 33. FC's position that the rent to be paid under the AMC and Tussauds Leases needs to be taken into account is not supported in any way by the requirement that "restrictions and limitations on the development and use of the Land and the New 42 Land" be considered in determining Fair Market Value. 34. The essence of what the Ground Lease provides is that in calculating Fair Market Value of the vacant land, the appraiser must recognize that the Ground Lease includes limits on the size of any development to be constructed on the Land and the New 42 Land, and requires that the uses be primarily entertainment uses (at least for the first 20 years after achieving Full Operating Condition). 35. This dispute presents a question of the legal interpretation of the Ground Lease. Valuation is the proper province of appraisers, while contract interpretation is not. An appraiser, who would otherwise be appointed under the Ground Lease to determine Fair Market Value, is not competent to construe the legal meaning of the terms of the Ground Lease. The parties need to know what to instruct their appraisers in order for them to properly prepare appraisals that comport with the definition of Fair Market Value of 12

11 36. Resolution of this matter of contract interpretation is necessary in order for the determination of Fair Market Value to proceed expeditiously and in accordance with the Ground Lease. WHEREFORE, the City respectfully requests that this Court issue a judgment: 1. declaring that, in determining the Fair Market Value of the Land and the New 42 Land for the 2 11 d Rental Period, the AMC Lease, the Tussauds Lease, and FC's other subleases shall be disregarded; and 2. granting the City such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. Dated: New York, New York May 31, 2017 CARTER LEDY ARD & MILBURN LLP,, '/' () Ii!,' By: de u. ~ u~ 53 ~ " Lee A. Obliger, Esq. 2 Wall Street New York, New York Ohliger@clm.com (212) (212) (facsimile) Attorneys for Plaintiff, The City of New York - I 0-11 of 12

12 EXHIBIT LIST Exhibit A Agreement of Lease by and between 4znu Street Development Project, Inc., Landlord, and FC 42nd Street Associates, L.P., Tenant, dated December 13, 1996 ("Agreement of Lease") of 12

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/18/ :12 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 4 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/18/2014

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/18/ :12 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 4 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/18/2014 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/18/2014 11:12 PM INDEX NO. 160162/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 4 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/18/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------X

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/11/ :03 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/11/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/11/ :03 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/11/2016 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/11/2016 01:03 PM INDEX NO. 651304/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/11/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

More information

Case 6:18-cv CJS Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 6:18-cv CJS Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case 6:18-cv-06416-CJS Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ORTHO-CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS, INC., v. Plaintiff, MAZUMA CAPITAL CORP, Civil Action

More information

FILED: ERIE COUNTY CLERK 02/26/2014 INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/26/2014

FILED: ERIE COUNTY CLERK 02/26/2014 INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/26/2014 FILED: ERIE COUNTY CLERK 02/26/2014 INDEX NO. 802023/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/26/2014 STATE OF NEW YORK SUPREME COURT ERIE COUNTY ROBERT FAHNING and ANNE FAHNING, THOMAS BURKE and NANCY

More information

1. This is an action to challenge the Property Appraiser's assessment in. Plaintiff, UNIVERSAL CITY DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LTD., a

1. This is an action to challenge the Property Appraiser's assessment in. Plaintiff, UNIVERSAL CITY DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LTD., a Filing' # 4146t062 E-Filed 05 I t3 12016 l2:1 8 : 39 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OB THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA UNIVERSAL CITY DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LTD., a Florida limited

More information

8:19-cv LSC-CRZ Doc # 1 Filed: 01/30/19 Page 1 of 11 - Page ID # 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

8:19-cv LSC-CRZ Doc # 1 Filed: 01/30/19 Page 1 of 11 - Page ID # 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA 8:19-cv-00045-LSC-CRZ Doc # 1 Filed: 01/30/19 Page 1 of 11 - Page ID # 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA LAREDO RIDGE WIND, LLC; BROKEN BOW WIND, LLC, and CROFTON BLUFFS

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/15/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/15/2016. Index No. [type in Index No]

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/15/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/15/2016. Index No. [type in Index No] FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/15/2016 05:04 PM INDEX NO. 656542/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/15/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF New York LMN 55 Corporation and 14th

More information

6 Model Leasehold Mortgagee Protections (Maximum) TABLE OF CONTENTS I. DEFINITIONS LOSSES AND LOSS PROCEEDS A. Prompt Notice B. Casualty C.

6 Model Leasehold Mortgagee Protections (Maximum) TABLE OF CONTENTS I. DEFINITIONS LOSSES AND LOSS PROCEEDS A. Prompt Notice B. Casualty C. 6 Model Leasehold Mortgagee Protections (Maximum) TABLE OF CONTENTS I. DEFINITIONS II. LOSSES AND LOSS PROCEEDS A. Prompt Notice B. Casualty C. Substantial Condemnation D. Insubstantial Condemnation E.

More information

COMPLAINT. Introductory Statement. 1. This lawsuit arises from a new Providence zoning ordinance that prohibits more

COMPLAINT. Introductory Statement. 1. This lawsuit arises from a new Providence zoning ordinance that prohibits more STATE OF RHODE ISLAND PROVIDENCE, S.C. SUPERIOR COURT FEDERAL HILL CAPITAL, LLC, CHRISTOPHER MUSACCHIO, ALEJANDRO AMAYA, WILLIAM SMITH, AND COREY KOSSIN, Plaintiffs, v. C.A. No. PC-2016- CITY OF PROVIDENCE

More information

Case 2:13-cv BCW Document 2 Filed 09/03/13 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:13-cv BCW Document 2 Filed 09/03/13 Page 1 of 9 Case 2:13-cv-00810-BCW Document 2 Filed 09/03/13 Page 1 of 9 Peggy Hunt (Utah State Bar No. 6060) Chris Martinez (Utah State Bar No. 11152) Nathan S. Seim (Utah State Bar No. 12654) DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/27/2014 INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/27/2014

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/27/2014 INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/27/2014 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/27/2014 INDEX NO. 650973/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/27/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK 122 EAST 58TH FUNDING LLC, -against-

More information

ARIZONA TAX COURT TX /18/2006 HONORABLE MARK W. ARMSTRONG

ARIZONA TAX COURT TX /18/2006 HONORABLE MARK W. ARMSTRONG HONORABLE MARK W. ARMSTRONG CLERK OF THE COURT L. Slaughter Deputy FILED: CAMELBACK ESPLANADE ASSOCIATION, THE JIM L WRIGHT v. MARICOPA COUNTY JERRY A FRIES PAUL J MOONEY PAUL MOORE UNDER ADVISEMENT RULING

More information

FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 04/15/ :57 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 70 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/15/2015 EXHIBIT 1

FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 04/15/ :57 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 70 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/15/2015 EXHIBIT 1 FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 04/15/2015 03:57 PM INDEX NO. 702126/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 70 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/15/2015 EXHIBIT 1 FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 03/06/2015 09:49 AM INDEX NO. 702126/2015 NYSCEF

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/22/ :25 PM INDEX NO /2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/22/2018

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/22/ :25 PM INDEX NO /2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/22/2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Index No: COUNTY OF NEW YORK Plaintiff designates East New York United Capital Real Estate Development Corp., County as the place of trial The basis of the venue

More information

CAUSE NO. V. KARNES COUNTY, TEXAS. Defendants. JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION COME NOW JOHN JOSEPH FOSTER, INDIVIDUALLY; AND KELLY

CAUSE NO. V. KARNES COUNTY, TEXAS. Defendants. JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION COME NOW JOHN JOSEPH FOSTER, INDIVIDUALLY; AND KELLY CAUSE NO. JOHN JOSEPH FOSTER, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF INDIVIDUALLY; AND KELLY RUTH HAILEY FOSTER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE IN THE IRA HAILEY AND MARY RUTH HAILEY TRUST Plaintiffs, V. KARNES

More information

LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT APPRAISER PRESENTATION. November 2017

LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT APPRAISER PRESENTATION. November 2017 LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT APPRAISER PRESENTATION November 2017 SPECIAL BENEFIT STUDY WHY? A special benefit study is a tool consistently used with LID projects. Municipality retains an expert consultant

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/11/ /29/ :03 11:10 PM AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/29/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/11/ /29/ :03 11:10 PM AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/29/2016 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/11/2016 04/29/2016 01:03 11:10 PM AM INDEX NO. 651304/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/29/2016 03/11/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/26/2012 INDEX NO /2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/26/2012 EXHIBIT A

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/26/2012 INDEX NO /2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/26/2012 EXHIBIT A FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/26/2012 INDEX NO. 652061/2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 27-1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/26/2012 EXHIBIT A 'FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY..t.ERK 07/27/20111 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 INDEX NO. 652052/2011

More information

WATERFRONT LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT OVERVIEW. November 2017

WATERFRONT LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT OVERVIEW. November 2017 WATERFRONT LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT OVERVIEW November 2017 LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT Funding tool by which property owners financially contribute to a project that will increase the value of their property

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/06/ :20 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 47 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/06/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/06/ :20 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 47 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/06/2016 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/06/2016 09:20 AM INDEX NO. 654914/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 47 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/06/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------

More information

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 08/11/ :43 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2015

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 08/11/ :43 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2015 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 08/11/2015 02:43 PM INDEX NO. 509893/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS ---------------~-----------------------------------------------------)(

More information

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 08/11/ :43 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2015

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 08/11/ :43 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2015 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 08/11/2015 02:43 PM INDEX NO. 509893/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS -------~---------------------------------------------------------------)(.

More information

Plaintiff, SUMMONS WITH VERIFIED COMPLAINT. Nassau County is designated by -against- Plaintiff as the place of trial

Plaintiff, SUMMONS WITH VERIFIED COMPLAINT. Nassau County is designated by -against- Plaintiff as the place of trial SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NASSAU X GALASSO LANGIONE & BOTTER, LLP, (formerly Index No.: 07/010038 known as GALASSO LANGIONE, LLP) as Escrow Agent for STEPHEN BARON on SIGNATURE BANK

More information

If It s Property Tax Exempt, Tax It Anyway!

If It s Property Tax Exempt, Tax It Anyway! If It s Property Tax Exempt, Tax It Anyway! How Local Jurisdictions Tax Publicly Owned Properties Cutchin Powell Principal Ryan, LLC Washington, DC cutchin.powell@ryan.com Colin Fraser Associate Greenberg

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/22/2012 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/22/2012

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/22/2012 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/22/2012 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/22/2012 INDEX NO. 651762/2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/22/2012 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ----------------------X Index No. /12

More information

, J.S.C. J.S.C., at a motion term of Part -7. of this Court, to be held in and for the County of New PRESENT: HON. BORN TO BUILD LLC, Index No.

, J.S.C. J.S.C., at a motion term of Part -7. of this Court, to be held in and for the County of New PRESENT: HON. BORN TO BUILD LLC, Index No. DON711512011, of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, held in and for the County of New York, at the courthouse located at 60 Centre Street, New York, New York, on the day of July, 2011. At a Term,

More information

NNN Investment Offering Auction 122 Harper Ave. Carolina Beach, NC Hampton INN

NNN Investment Offering Auction 122 Harper Ave. Carolina Beach, NC Hampton INN NNN Investment Offering Auction 122 Harper Ave. Carolina Beach, NC Hampton INN 122 HARPER AVE. PHOTO LOG LOOKING NE AT SITE LOOKING SW AT SITE LOOKING WEST AT SITE LOOKING NORTH AT SITE PDF Created with

More information

MANDATORY RENT DEPOSITS?; TENANTS USE DELAYING TACTICS TO GAIN EDGE IN CURRENT SYSTEM 1

MANDATORY RENT DEPOSITS?; TENANTS USE DELAYING TACTICS TO GAIN EDGE IN CURRENT SYSTEM 1 New York Law Journal March 11, 1996 MANDATORY RENT DEPOSITS?; TENANTS USE DELAYING TACTICS TO GAIN EDGE IN CURRENT SYSTEM 1 Probably the most hotly debated area of landlord-tenant litigation involves the

More information

CHAPTER 286. (Senate Bill 396)

CHAPTER 286. (Senate Bill 396) CHAPTER 286 (Senate Bill 396) AN ACT concerning Ground Rents Remedy Remedies for Nonpayment of Ground Rent FOR the purpose of repealing applying provisions of law authorizing a landlord under a ground

More information

Plaintiff, Case No.: COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Miami-Dade County (the County ) sues Defendants Miami Marlins, L.P. (the

Plaintiff, Case No.: COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Miami-Dade County (the County ) sues Defendants Miami Marlins, L.P. (the IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA COMPLEX LITIGATION DIVISION MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, vs. Plaintiff, Case

More information

ISSUES RELATING TO COMMERCIAL LEASING. U.S.A., ALABAMA Maynard, Cooper & Gale, P.C.

ISSUES RELATING TO COMMERCIAL LEASING. U.S.A., ALABAMA Maynard, Cooper & Gale, P.C. ISSUES RELATING TO COMMERCIAL LEASING U.S.A., ALABAMA Maynard, Cooper & Gale, P.C. CONTACT INFORMATION Robert R. Sexton Maynard, Cooper & Gale, P.C. 1901 Sixth Avenue North 2400 Regions/Harbert Plaza Birmingham,

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2004 ALLISON M. COSTELLO, ETC., Appellant, v. Case No. 5D02-3117 THE CURTIS BUILDING PARTNERSHIP, Appellee. Opinion filed

More information

Filing # E-Filed 09/10/ :56:35 PM

Filing # E-Filed 09/10/ :56:35 PM Filing # 31928359 E-Filed 09/10/2015 05:56:35 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA GRE PROPERTIES SHERIDAN HILLS, LLC CASE NO.: v. Plaintiff, BURKE

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/29/ :33 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/29/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/29/ :33 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/29/2016 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/29/2016 02:33 PM INDEX NO. 157154/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/29/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK WILLIAM ATKINSON and JESSICA

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/12/ /30/ :39 06:55 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 136 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/12/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/12/ /30/ :39 06:55 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 136 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/12/2016 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/12/2016 10/30/2017 03:39 06:55 PM INDEX NO. 656279/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 136 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/12/2016 10/30/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. CASE NO. 5D

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. CASE NO. 5D IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2007 LEESBURG COMMUNITY CANCER CENTER, ETC., Appellant, v. CASE NO. 5D06-2457 LEESBURG REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC., ETC.,

More information

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Purchase and Sale Agreement

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Purchase and Sale Agreement CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Purchase and Sale Agreement This Purchase and Sale Agreement (this "Agreement") is made and entered into as of the date of the last signature below ("Effective Date") by and between

More information

[Cite as Maggiore v. Kovach, 101 Ohio St.3d 184, 2004-Ohio-722.]

[Cite as Maggiore v. Kovach, 101 Ohio St.3d 184, 2004-Ohio-722.] [Cite as Maggiore v. Kovach, 101 Ohio St.3d 184, 2004-Ohio-722.] MAGGIORE, APPELLEE, v. KOVACH, D.B.A. ALL TUNE & LUBE, APPELLANT. [Cite as Maggiore v. Kovach, 101 Ohio St.3d 184, 2004-Ohio-722.] Landlords

More information

DISCLAIMER: Copyright: 2014

DISCLAIMER: Copyright: 2014 DISCLAIMER: This publication is intended for EDUCATIONAL purposes only. The information contained herein is subject to change with no notice, and while a great deal of care has been taken to provide accurate

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/18/2010 INDEX NO /2010 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/18/2010

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/18/2010 INDEX NO /2010 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/18/2010 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/18/2010 INDEX NO. 651303/2010 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/18/2010 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK FREDERICK GOLDMAN, INC., Plaintiff,

More information

BACKGROUND. Earnest money dispute. Should the money be released to the seller? Why should the

BACKGROUND. Earnest money dispute. Should the money be released to the seller? Why should the GUIDE TO EARNEST MONEY INTERPLEADING DEPOSITS BACKGROUND Earnest money dispute. Should the money be released to the seller? Why should the REALTOR be the one who has to decide? Indeed, the following constitutes

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2004 GEORGE T. BLACK, GLORIA D. BLACK, ET AL, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D03-2306 ORANGE COUNTY, ETC., Appellee. Opinion filed

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION INDIAN PINES VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,

More information

SUBLEASING CONSENT APPLICATION AND CHECKLIST

SUBLEASING CONSENT APPLICATION AND CHECKLIST Control #: SUBLEASING CONSENT APPLICATION AND CHECKLIST TO NYCIDA LESSEE: To sublease your facility, you must obtain NYCIDA s prior written consent for the sublease in question. For each requested sublease-consent,

More information

APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Winnebago County: DANIEL J. BISSETT, Judge. Affirmed. Before Neubauer, P.J., Reilly and Gundrum, JJ.

APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Winnebago County: DANIEL J. BISSETT, Judge. Affirmed. Before Neubauer, P.J., Reilly and Gundrum, JJ. COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 17, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appeals NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE POINTE ORLANDO DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a California general partnership, Plaintiff, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COLINTY, FLORIDA CASENo. 20tT-CA-4318-O DIVISION: V;

More information

PLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts.

PLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts. PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to May 30, 2009. It is intended for information and reference purposes only. This

More information

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 12/07/ :02 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 68 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/07/2017

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 12/07/ :02 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 68 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/07/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS OBIGOR, LLC, Index No. 507843/2017 Plaintiff, -against- BARBARA GORDON, RUDOLF KATS, d/b/a COLUMBIA CAPITAL CO., NEW YORK CITY ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL

More information

l. In this action, the Property Appraiser seeks to reverse a decision of the Miami-

l. In this action, the Property Appraiser seeks to reverse a decision of the Miami- Filing # 75429003 E-Filed 0712412018 02:21:30 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE I lth JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION CASENO. 20r8-024994-CA-01 PEDRO J.

More information

Commercial Sub-Lease Agreement

Commercial Sub-Lease Agreement Commercial Sub-Lease Agreement THIS SUBLEASE AGREEMENT is entered into on, 20 by and between, a [STATE] [CORPORATION, PARTNERSHIP, SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP, ETC.] ("SUBLESSOR ), with an address of, and, a [STATE]

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/31/ :34 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 70 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/31/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/31/ :34 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 70 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/31/2016 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/31/2016 04:34 PM INDEX NO. 653549/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 70 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/31/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------x

More information

Present: Kinser, C.J., Lemons, Goodwyn, Millette, and Mims, JJ.

Present: Kinser, C.J., Lemons, Goodwyn, Millette, and Mims, JJ. Present: Kinser, C.J., Lemons, Goodwyn, Millette, and Mims, JJ. MCCARTHY HOLDINGS LLC OPINION BY v. Record No. 101031 JUSTICE S. BERNARD GOODWYN September 16, 2011 VINCENT W. BURGHER, III FROM THE CIRCUIT

More information

NOTICE OF PETITION. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that upon the annexed petition of Mercedes Casado, Paul Hertgen and

NOTICE OF PETITION. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that upon the annexed petition of Mercedes Casado, Paul Hertgen and SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK--IAS PART ---------------------------------------------------------------------X In the Matter of the Application of Mercedes Casado, Paul Hertgen,

More information

CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO.

CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. Electronically Filed 08/20/2013 09:39:44 AM ET IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. CARLOS LOPEZ-CANTERA, as Property Appraiser

More information

Casanas v Carlei Group, LLC 2014 NY Slip Op 30287(U) January 28, 2014 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /12 Judge: Donna M.

Casanas v Carlei Group, LLC 2014 NY Slip Op 30287(U) January 28, 2014 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /12 Judge: Donna M. Casanas v Carlei Group, LLC 2014 NY Slip Op 30287(U) January 28, 2014 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 101057/12 Judge: Donna M. Mills Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op

More information

Staff Analysis and Economic Impact Statement

Staff Analysis and Economic Impact Statement Staff Analysis and Economic Impact Statement Measure: SR 13 REFERENCE: ACTION: Sponsor: Subject: Finance and Tax Committee Just Valuation of Property 1. FTC 2. TBRC Favorable Pre-meeting Date: March 13,

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MADISON COUNTY, ALABAMA. CARL E. FALLIN, SR., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) CITY OF HUNTSVILLE, ) ) Defendant.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MADISON COUNTY, ALABAMA. CARL E. FALLIN, SR., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) CITY OF HUNTSVILLE, ) ) Defendant. ELECTRONICALLY FILED 10/22/2014 3:44 PM 47-CV-2014-902167.00 CIRCUIT COURT OF MADISON COUNTY, ALABAMA JANE C. SMITH, CLERK IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MADISON COUNTY, ALABAMA CARL E. FALLIN, SR., ) ) Plaintiff,

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/23/ :08 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/23/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/23/ :08 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/23/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK COUNTY - ------------------ In the Matter of the Application of, X FOUNTAIN HOUSE HOUSING, INC., AND F.H. COMMUNITY LIVING PROGRAM, INC. VERIFIED PETITION

More information

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR JOHNSON COUNTY. This consent decree is made and entered into by the Plaintiff and Defendant in the

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR JOHNSON COUNTY. This consent decree is made and entered into by the Plaintiff and Defendant in the IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR JOHNSON COUNTY ) JUSTIN MIGLIORE, ) CASE NO. CVCV077514 Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) CONSENT DECREE ) APTS. DOWNTOWN, INC. ) Defendant. ) I. INTRODUCTION This consent decree

More information

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON UP 229 I. INTRODUCTION. Idaho Power Company ( Idaho Power or the Company ), in accordance with the

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON UP 229 I. INTRODUCTION. Idaho Power Company ( Idaho Power or the Company ), in accordance with the BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON UP In the Matter of IDAHO POWER COMPANY Requests Approval of the Sale of the Boise Bench Transmission Substation Property and The State Street Office Property

More information

GREATER ATLANTIC LEGAL SERVICES, INC.

GREATER ATLANTIC LEGAL SERVICES, INC. GREATER ATLANTIC LEGAL SERVICES, INC. CHANCERY ABSTRACT MONRO HOLDINGS, LLC, vs. Plaintiff, JAYSON, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION d/b/a Rivera Motor Inn; STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Defendants, SUPERIOR COURT

More information

DISPOSSESSORY AND DISTRESS WARRANTS. by Scott I. Zucker, Esq. Weissmann & Zucker, P.C.

DISPOSSESSORY AND DISTRESS WARRANTS. by Scott I. Zucker, Esq. Weissmann & Zucker, P.C. DISPOSSESSORY AND DISTRESS WARRANTS by Scott I. Zucker, Esq. Weissmann & Zucker, P.C. There are two general procedures for the removal of a tenant and its property from leased space, whether it is residential

More information

Case 9:13-cv RNS Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/01/2013 Page 1 of 15

Case 9:13-cv RNS Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/01/2013 Page 1 of 15 Case 9:13-cv-80184-RNS Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/01/2013 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MICHAEL C. MCINTYRE and CAROL G. MCINTYRE, v. Plaintiffs,

More information

EXEMPT FROM CLERK S FEE PURSUANT TO VIRGINIA CODE SECTION EXEMPT FROM RECORDATION TAXES PURSUANT TO VIRGINIA CODE SECTION

EXEMPT FROM CLERK S FEE PURSUANT TO VIRGINIA CODE SECTION EXEMPT FROM RECORDATION TAXES PURSUANT TO VIRGINIA CODE SECTION Tax Map Parcel Number: 56-A-104 EXEMPT FROM CLERK S FEE PURSUANT TO VIRGINIA CODE SECTION 17.1-266 EXEMPT FROM RECORDATION TAXES PURSUANT TO VIRGINIA CODE SECTION 58.1-811.E GROUND LEASE THIS GROUND LEASE,

More information

CHAPTER 5 RESIDENTIAL LAND LEASES FOR LEASEHOLD MORTGAGES

CHAPTER 5 RESIDENTIAL LAND LEASES FOR LEASEHOLD MORTGAGES TITLE 18 HOUSING CHAPTER 5 RESIDENTIAL LAND LEASES FOR LEASEHOLD MORTGAGES Legislative History: The Residential Land Leases for Leasehold Mortgages was enacted and codified as 18 T.O.C. Chapter 5 by Resolution

More information

S 0543 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

S 0543 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D ======== LC001 ======== 01 -- S 0 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY JANUARY SESSION, A.D. 01 A N A C T RELATING TO BUSINESSES AND PROFESSIONS - REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL MANAGEMENT COMPANIES

More information

Horrigan Dev. LLC v Drozd 2017 NY Slip Op 30270(U) February 3, 2017 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: /2013 Judge: Sylvia G.

Horrigan Dev. LLC v Drozd 2017 NY Slip Op 30270(U) February 3, 2017 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: /2013 Judge: Sylvia G. Horrigan Dev. LLC v Drozd 2017 NY Slip Op 30270(U) February 3, 2017 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 503433/2013 Judge: Sylvia G. Ash Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip

More information

Senate Bill No. 301 Senator Smith

Senate Bill No. 301 Senator Smith Senate Bill No. 301 Senator Smith CHAPTER... AN ACT relating to taxation; requiring a county treasurer to assign a tax lien against a parcel of real property located within the county if an assignment

More information

POKAGON BAND OF POTAWATOMI INDIANS RESIDENTIAL LEASING ACT. Table of Contents

POKAGON BAND OF POTAWATOMI INDIANS RESIDENTIAL LEASING ACT. Table of Contents POKAGON BAND OF POTAWATOMI INDIANS RESIDENTIAL LEASING ACT Table of Contents CHAPTER 1... 2 Section 1.01 Short Title... 2 Section 1.02 Authority... 2 Section 1.03 Purpose... 2 Section 1.04 Applicability...

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 3 November 2015

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 3 November 2015 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA14-1222 Filed: 3 November 2015 Buncombe County, No. 13 CVS 3992 THE RESIDENCES AT BILTMORE CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Plaintiff, v. POWER DEVELOPMENT,

More information

Plaintiff, ; IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF TI{E llth JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MIAMI- DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA

Plaintiff, ; IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF TI{E llth JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MIAMI- DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA Filing # 59493056 E-Filed O7l25l2OL7 03:51:07 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF TI{E llth JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MIAMI- DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION CASE NO. CC-AVENTURA INC. d/bia

More information

CIVIL CASES COUNTY COURT

CIVIL CASES COUNTY COURT CIVIL CASES COUNTY COURT Small Claims (SC Cases) All matters involving claims up to and including $5,000 in damages exclusive of interest costs and attorney fees. Civil Claims (CC Cases) All matters involving

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, MISSOURI

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, MISSOURI IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, MISSOURI U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE, SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS TRUSTEE SUCCESSOR-BY-MERGER TO LASALLE Case No. BANK NATIONAL

More information

Case 2:12-cv BSJ Document 1429 Filed 11/13/18 Page 1 of 17

Case 2:12-cv BSJ Document 1429 Filed 11/13/18 Page 1 of 17 Case 2:12-cv-00591-BSJ Document 1429 Filed 11/13/18 Page 1 of 17 Peggy Hunt (Utah State Bar No. 6060) John J. Wiest (Utah State Bar No. 15767) DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 111 South Main Street, 21st Floor Salt

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA, INC., d/b/a DUKE ENERGY, a Florida corporation; and SEMINOLE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., a Florida

More information

Wayne County Title Agency, Inc. 141 E. Liberty Street Wooster, OH Phone Fax

Wayne County Title Agency, Inc. 141 E. Liberty Street Wooster, OH Phone Fax Wayne County Title Agency, Inc. 141 E. Liberty Street Wooster, OH 44691-4345 Phone 330-262-2916 Fax 330-263-1738 STANDARD CONDITIONS OF ACCEPTANCE OF ESCROW File No.: Premises The undersigned parties agree

More information

MORTGAGE. THIS INSTRUMENT ( Mortgage )

MORTGAGE. THIS INSTRUMENT ( Mortgage ) MORTGAGE THIS INSTRUMENT ( Mortgage ) WITNESSES That and, whose address is (individually, collectively, jointly, and severally, Mortgagor ), in consideration of One Dollar ($1) and other good and valuable

More information

KALISPEL RESOLUTION NO $~ Kalispel Tribe of Indians P.O. Box 39 Usk, WA RESOLUTION

KALISPEL RESOLUTION NO $~ Kalispel Tribe of Indians P.O. Box 39 Usk, WA RESOLUTION rx ~ ~~~~T "~Ci~ ~._. TRIBE OF INDIANS / '~~~ ~ KALISPEL RESOLUTION NO.2011- $~ Kalispel Tribe of Indians P.O. Box 39 Usk, WA 99180 (509) 445-1147 (509) 445-1705 fax www.kalispeltribe.com RESOLUTION WHEREAS,

More information

Case 2:12-cv BSJ Document 772 Filed 09/30/14 Page 1 of 14

Case 2:12-cv BSJ Document 772 Filed 09/30/14 Page 1 of 14 Case 2:12-cv-00591-BSJ Document 772 Filed 09/30/14 Page 1 of 14 Peggy Hunt (Utah State Bar No. 6060) Chris Martinez (Utah State Bar No. 11152) Sarah Goldberg (Utah State Bar No. 13222) DORSEY & WHITNEY

More information

Standing on Shaky Ground

Standing on Shaky Ground 2016 CLM Annual Conference April 6-8, 2016 Orlando, FL Standing on Shaky Ground As a general prerequisite to bringing an action, one must having standing to sue. Properly understood, Standing to sue is

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC DISTRICT COURT CASE NO.: 3d TRIAL COURT CASE NO MARIA T.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC DISTRICT COURT CASE NO.: 3d TRIAL COURT CASE NO MARIA T. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC07-1526 DISTRICT COURT CASE NO.: 3d06-1873 TRIAL COURT CASE NO. 05-15150 MARIA T. THORNHILL Plaintiff / Petitioner Vs. ADMIRAL FARRAGUT CONDOMINIUM APARTMENTS

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/02/ :22 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 71 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/02/2017 Motion Sequence No.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/02/ :22 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 71 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/02/2017 Motion Sequence No. FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/02/2017 0622 PM INDEX NO. 655408/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 71 RECEIVED NYSCEF 10/02/2017 Motion Sequence No. 001 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------

More information

Pass-Through Liabilities and Federal Tax Treatment: Resolving Complex Issues

Pass-Through Liabilities and Federal Tax Treatment: Resolving Complex Issues Presenting a live 110-minute teleconference with interactive Q&A Pass-Through Liabilities and Federal Tax Treatment: Resolving Complex Issues Reporting Liabilities for General or Limited Partnerships and

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/27/ :12 PM INDEX NO /2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/27/2018

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/27/ :12 PM INDEX NO /2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/27/2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------X : In the Matter of the Application of THE VESTRY OF ST. BARTHOLOMEW'S CHURCH IN THE

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JASPER COUNTY, MISSOURI CIRCUIT DIVISION AT JOPLIN

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JASPER COUNTY, MISSOURI CIRCUIT DIVISION AT JOPLIN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JASPER COUNTY, MISSOURI CIRCUIT DIVISION AT JOPLIN CITY OF JOPLIN, MISSOURI, Plaintiff, v. Case No. WLD SUAREZ, LLC, PRO BASEBALL MANAGEMENT, LLC, CHARTER SPORTS, LLC, JOPLIN BLASTERS,

More information

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida Supreme Court of Florida No. SC01-1459 PER CURIAM. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, vs. LUIS SUAREZ and LILIA SUAREZ, Respondents. [December 12, 2002] We have for review the decision in Allstate

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC LEESBURG COMMUNITY CANCER CENTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, d/b/a INTERCOMMUNITY CANCER CENTER,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC LEESBURG COMMUNITY CANCER CENTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, d/b/a INTERCOMMUNITY CANCER CENTER, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC08-315 LEESBURG COMMUNITY CANCER CENTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, d/b/a INTERCOMMUNITY CANCER CENTER, Appellant/Petitioner, vs. LEESBURG REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC.,

More information

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida Supreme Court of Florida No. SC06-2461 DOUGLAS K. RABORN, et al., Appellants, vs. DEBORAH C. MENOTTE, etc., Appellee. [January 10, 2008] BELL, J. We have for review two questions of Florida law certified

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CONSOLIDATED MULTIPLE ) LISTING SERVICE, INC., ) ) Defendant.

More information

SALEM MUNICIPAL AIRPORT MCNARY FIELD. Airport Lease Policy

SALEM MUNICIPAL AIRPORT MCNARY FIELD. Airport Lease Policy SALEM MUNICIPAL AIRPORT MCNARY FIELD Airport Lease Policy Adopted: May 22, 2013 Table of Contents 110-001-010 Introduction... 4 110-001-020 Effective Date... 5 110-001-030 Definitions... 5 110-001-040

More information

Assignments Pro Tanto, And Why To Avoid Them

Assignments Pro Tanto, And Why To Avoid Them Assignments Pro Tanto, And Why To Avoid Them Thomas C. Barbuti Sublease? Assignment? Assignment pro tanto? Maybe a sublease or an assignment, but an assignment pro tanto is an invitation to fracture occupancy

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA 2 ND DCA CASE NO FSC CASE NO ROB TURNER, as Hillsborough County Property Appraiser. Appellant, vs.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA 2 ND DCA CASE NO FSC CASE NO ROB TURNER, as Hillsborough County Property Appraiser. Appellant, vs. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA 2 ND DCA CASE NO. 07-1411 FSC CASE NO. 08-540 ROB TURNER, as Hillsborough County Property Appraiser Appellant, vs. FLORIDA STATE FAIR AUTHORITY Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA LEWIS Y. and BETTY T. WARD, et al., Petitioner, v. GREGORY S. BROWN, Property Appraiser of Santa Rosa County, et al., Case Nos. SC05-1765, SC05-1766 1st DCA Case No. 1D04-1629

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC10-90 / SC10-91 (Consolidated) (Lower Tribunal Case No. s 3D08-944, )

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC10-90 / SC10-91 (Consolidated) (Lower Tribunal Case No. s 3D08-944, ) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC10-90 / SC10-91 (Consolidated) (Lower Tribunal Case No. s 3D08-944, 03-14195) JOEL W. ROBBINS (Miami-Dade County Property Appraiser); IAN YORTY (Miami-Dade County

More information

Filing # E-Filed 09/28/ :37:26 PM 18-CA-9531

Filing # E-Filed 09/28/ :37:26 PM 18-CA-9531 Filing # 78610997 E-Filed 09/28/2018 03:37:26 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION SHELL POINT MARINA, LLC, a Florida limited

More information

Introduction to Leases:

Introduction to Leases: Introduction to Leases: Essential Fundamentals for Searching and Examining Leasehold Estates Presented by Mel Platt Vice-President & Sr. Commercial Underwriter Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company

More information

Hotel Carlyle Owners Corp. v Schwartz 2014 NY Slip Op 30458(U) February 25, 2014 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: /12 Judge: Ellen M.

Hotel Carlyle Owners Corp. v Schwartz 2014 NY Slip Op 30458(U) February 25, 2014 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: /12 Judge: Ellen M. Hotel Carlyle Owners Corp. v Schwartz 2014 NY Slip Op 30458(U) February 25, 2014 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: 157070/12 Judge: Ellen M. Coin Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip

More information

ORDINANCE NO. Part 12 Tenant Protection Ordinance. This Part shall be known as the Tenant Protection Ordinance.

ORDINANCE NO. Part 12 Tenant Protection Ordinance. This Part shall be known as the Tenant Protection Ordinance. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE SAN JOSE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD A PART 12 TO CHAPTER 17.23 REGARDING TENANT PROTECTION AND LIMITING CAUSES FOR EVICTION FOR CERTAIN

More information

Residential Ground Lease

Residential Ground Lease Residential Ground Lease THIS RESIDENTIAL GROUND LEASE (the "Lease") is made and entered into this day of,, by and between Tribe (the "Tribe" or "Lessor") and (the "Lessee"). WITNESSETH: 1. Secretarial

More information

Summary of Sub SB 172 Modifying Ohio laws governing land reutilization programs and property tax foreclosures of abandoned lands

Summary of Sub SB 172 Modifying Ohio laws governing land reutilization programs and property tax foreclosures of abandoned lands 317.32 319.54 321.261 323.131 323.25 323.28 323.47 323.65(D) and generally 323.65(E) repealed 323.65(F)(2)(d) 323.65(J) 323.69(A) This amendment moves the existing recording fee exemption for instruments

More information