TOWN OF WINTER PARK PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, January 8, :00 AM A G E N D A

Transcription

1 TOWN OF WNTER PARK PLANNNG COMMSSON Tuesday, January 8, :00 AM A G E N D A. Meeting Call to Order.. V. Roll Call of Commission Members Town Hall Meeting (time for anyone from the public to speak about items not on the agenda) Approval of December 11, 2018 minutes V. Conflicts of nterest V. NEW BUSNESS: A. Election of Chairman and Vice Chairman (yearly) B. Adoption of Winter Park Town Plan (magine Winter Park) C. Waldron Minor Subdivision D. Design Review - 39 Alpine Way, Hermes V. Staff Update

2 . The Meeting was called to order at 8:00am. TOWN OF WNTER PARK PLANNNG COMMSSON Tuesday, December 11, :00 AM Minutes.. V. Roll Call indicated present: Brad Holzwarth, Mike Davlin, Jonathan Larson, Doug Robbins, Roger Kish, and George Stevens. Town Hall Meeting No comments received. Commissioner Robbins moved and Commissioner Davlin seconded a motion to approve minutes from November 13, 2018 and November 27, Motion Carried 6-0. V. Conflicts of nterest- No comments were received. V. NEW BUSNESS: A. Roam Preliminary Plat Planner Owen presented the Staff Report as follows: Project Update- Since the last Planning Commission meeting on October 23, 2018 much has been done on the Preliminary Plat for the Roam Development. Staff organized several meetings to facilitate conversations around the identified concerns brought up at that October 23 meeting, and commissioned a roundabout study: Meeting with Town Engineers Meeting with Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) and Engineers Meeting with Agencies and Utilities Roundabout Study Complete Meeting with Town Staff for Roundabout Discussion Through all of these meetings, substantial progress has been made on addressing the comments made by the agencies, the Town and CDOT. However, due to the significant amount of work needed before a second submission to Planning Commission is made, and the need to incorporate roundabout designs, the applicant has requested that the full Preliminary Plat submission be continued until the January 22 regular meeting of Planning Commission. This is to allow enough time for all comments to be addressed and fully updated plans to be submitted and reviewed. Therefore, at this meeting, staff would like to present an overview of the progress made and discuss the results of the roundabout study. The full Roam Preliminary Plat submission will be made on January 22, 2019 if Planning Commission approves. Roundabout Study Update- n response to the last meeting with Planning Commission

3 and comments regarding the south entrance to the Roam development turning into a roundabout and perhaps changing location, staff commissioned a roundabout study to give more technical feedback on the ideal option that will be both physically, technically, and financially feasible to implement. The roundabout study is complete and is attached for your review. The main takeaway from a traffic generation standpoint is that three options for roundabout design have been presented, and all three are capable of handling expected traffic volumes at peak period (Saturday evening) without impacting level of service. After reviewing the Roundabout Study, staff is in favor of Design C which places the roundabout at the south entrance to the Roam development (currently proposed as a full movement intersection with a traffic signal). This option is the most favorable for several reasons. First, is the limited amount of vehicular crossings across the Fraser River Trail which will stay in its current alignment in addition to the new leg that will be added through Roam. Second, is the ability to maintain the existing retaining wall which would be a considerable extra cost to move or alter in any way. Third, is the alignment itself being centered on the road and being fully circular instead of oblong. This allows people to anticipate where lanes are, even if they are covered in snow, and would most likely create less confusion as it is designed as the average person would expect a roundabout to look like. Fourth, this last option is the most effective at creating an entryway feature, since it is located at the main entrance to what will become a significant section of Downtown with the Roam Development. Having the roundabout at Village Drive would make it so a visitor would drive past several new commercial areas in Roam before arriving at the entryway to town. Fifth, is that option C does not disturb the current location of the bus stop at Village Drive and would easily allow for a pedestrian refuge at the median to accommodate any visitors crossing Highway 40 to use the bus stop. Sixth, is that this alignment of the roundabout does not impact the annexation or development agreement the town currently has with Roam as it does not change alignment of their entrance or affect their previously granted development areas. Seventh, is that the additional land required on the west side to accommodate the roundabout in option C is owned by Roam and they are supportive of that land being used for that purpose. On the diagram, this is the area labeled grading impacts. Planning Commission is invited to discuss the results of the roundabout study and meeting notes from the Utility and Agency meeting, and to consider continuance of the full Preliminary Plat submission until January 22, Planning Commission held discussion- Commissioner Kish asked if this proposed roundabout location would be considered a major entrance to the development since he felt that density should be associated with the roundabout.

4 Discussion was had regarding moving the retaining wall, how expensive it is and why CDOT would not want to have anyone move it. Commissioners wanted to know if anyone had discussed these possibilities with Beavers Condos? Yes, Planning Director Shockey stated that the Town Manager has talked to HOA and that they are aware this conversation is happening. Commissioner Stevens stated a preference for Option B. Discussion was had around the fact that Option B required acquiring and putting the roundabout on what is now county land, verses working with Roam to place a roundabout where they have land and are willing to give the land. Commissioner Davlin pointed out that some of the location ideas are nice, but finance plays an important part as well and the option that is likely to be the most financially feasible is Option C. Commissioner Holzwarth was concerned about what would make the easiest access to town from roam and helping with traffic. Discussion was had around the idea that adding a second option through town by opening up Roam to dlewild could help with traffic. After looking at the full buildout of Roam, Commissioner Kish felt that there will be adequate density near the roundabout so it could actually be a real entrance to town. Discussion was had about where funding for the roundabout will be coming from. The funds will be split up between the Developer, the Town, and hopefully a CDOT grant. Commissioner Kish brought up the idea of having a separated pedestrian crossing for the Fraser River Trail that would go under the Roam entrance. This would allow for a safer crossing of the space. n a straw poll of where commissioners felt on the three options Commissioner Stevens would like more information from the Beavers HOA, and would like to see cost options if possible for option B. The other five commissioners were comfortable with option C. Commissioner Davlin moved and Commissioner Stevens seconded a motion to continue the Preliminary Plat until Jan 22, Motion carried 6-0. B. Adoption of Winter Park Town Plan (magine Winter Park) Community Development Director Shockey gave the Staff Report outlining the Colorado Revised Statues regarding adoption of a master plan and where the process is now: Staff has completed the final draft of the magine Winter Park Town Plan including an Executive Summary. The Planning Commission will need to review the plan at a public hearing on January 8, 2019 and adopt it as the official master plan for the Town of

5 Winter Park. Before the final public hearing, staff would like the Planning Commission to review the plan and provide feedback, so the plan is in final form for adoption in January. The Town Council will review the plan on December 18 and provide feedback as well. The Town Council does not approve the master plan, they only accept it. As required by state statue, the Commission is required to adopt the master plan. Community Development Director Shockey gave a presentation on the Master Plan including all updates to the plan. Staff Recommendation - The Commission should direct staff to publish notice in the Middle Park Times newspaper of the public hearing set for January 8, 2019 in compliance with C.R.S Commissioner Stevens commented that the title picture for the Executive Summary had too much similarity with the iconic Steamboat barn pictures. All other Commissioners were pleased with the edits and the final adoption drafts. Commissioner Robbins moved and Commissioner Davlin seconded a motion directing staff to schedule public hearing on Jan 8, Motion carried 6-0. V. Staff Update This is the last Planning Commission meeting of the year. James presented the downtown plan ideas that were presented to Town Council in a workshop on December 4. A Planning Refresher Workshop is being hosted by DOLA on Wednesday, January 16 from 5-7pm in Granby. All are welcome to attend. Gondola update - on schedule and should open before Christmas. Upon a previously adopted motion, the meeting was adjourned at 9:43am.

6 TO FROM THRU DATE RE Planning Commission James Shockey, Community Development Director Keith Riesberg, Town Manager January 8, 2019 magine Winter Park Adoption C.R.S t is the duty of the commission to make and adopt a master plan for the physical development of the municipality, including any areas outside its boundaries, subject to the approval of the governmental body having jurisdiction thereof, which in the commission's judgment bear relation to the planning of such municipality. The master plan of a municipality shall be an advisory document to guide land development decisions; however, the plan or any part thereof may be made binding by inclusion in the municipality's adopted subdivision, zoning, platting, planned unit development, or other similar land development regulations after satisfying notice, due process, and hearing requirements for legislative or quasi-judicial processes as appropriate. When a commission decides to adopt a master plan, the commission shall conduct public hearings, after notice of such public hearings has been published in a newspaper of general circulation in the municipality in a manner sufficient to notify the public of the time, place, and nature of the public hearing, prior to final adoption of a master plan in order to encourage public participation in and awareness of the development of such plan and shall accept and consider oral and written public comments throughout the process of developing the plan. Final Adoption The Town Council reviewed the plan at a public hearing on December 18, The Council approved Resolution 1669, Series 2018, a resolution approving the Town Plan and recommending the Planning Commission formally adopt the Town Plan as the official master plan for the Town of Winter Park. A public notice was published in the Sky-Hi News on December 20, 2018 providing notice of this hearing. No comments have been received. The Executive Summary can be reviewed here magine Winter Park Executive Summary The Full Plan can be reviewed here magine Winter Park Chapters 1-7 Recommended Motion Staff recommends the Planning adopt Resolution , a resolution approving the magine Winter Park Town Plan as the official master plan for the Town of Winter Park in compliance with C.R.S The resolution will be provided to the Commission as a table-setting ahead of the meeting.

7 TO FROM THRU DATE RE Planning Commission Mara Owen, Planner James Shockey, Community Development Director January 8, 2019 Minor Subdivision Adolf s on the Fraser General nformation: The applicant, Janice L. Waldron, is proposing to divide the 5.79 acre parcel known as 1008 Winter Park Drive into two parcels. The property is currently vacant besides the Adolf s Building which is used as a ski shop at this time. The applicant is proposing to divide the parcel into two along the centerline of Timberline Drive. The parcels will then be marketed for sale, leaving the eventual development of the parcels to future owners. No development work is anticipated at this time. Outlot A has been created to accommodate Winter Park Drive, and the applicant is proposing to convey Outlot A to the Town of Winter Park. Since this plat is only subdividing one lot into two lots, the application can be processed as a Minor Subdivision. 5% Land Dedication: The Town Code ( ) requires either the dedication, reservation or conveyance of areas suitable for public purposes such as parks, flood channels, scenic areas and greenbelts of up to five percent (5%) of the total area of the subdivision, or a payment in lieu of such dedication. The applicant has proposed reserving acres or 21.97% of the total area for Open Space as defined in the Winter Park Town Code. n addition, the applicant is proposing the dedication of.324 acres, or 5.41% of the total area for Right of Way (Outlot A) to be conveyed to the Town of Winter Park for Winter Park Drive. School mpact Fee None are due at this time, but any future development will be subject to them at time of final condominium andor townhome plat at the rate of acres per multifamily dwelling unit unless that calculation is updated prior to development occurring on the site. Review Agency Comments: Town Engineer The Town engineer has reviewed the minor subdivision and recommends that the Town modifies the existing access easement along Trademark Drive to resolve stormwater issues in the area which would

8 affect any future development on the site, as well as all existing development. Please see attached letter for more detail. Mountain Parks Electric After reviewing the proposed minor subdivision, Mountain Parks Electric has several major concerns with the location of existing utilities in that area, specifically an existing switchgear that may be located in the road easement shown on the plat. Please see the attached letter and diagram for more details. Winter Park Water and Sanitation The water district requests that the 10 utility easement that connects to the existing 20 utility easement be brought up to their current standards which state that Any easements or rights -of-way shall have a minimum width of 20 feet for one utility and 30 feet for two utilities. Please see attached document for documentation of their current standards. Adjacent Property Owner Comments: Staff sent notice to adjacent property owners on December 31, No comments have been received as of but comments are expected either in person or as a table setting from Trademark Condominiums at the meeting. Plat: Staff has prepared a red-marked print for the proposed Final Plat. 1. Prior to recordation, the applicant shall revise the Final Plat in conformance with the redmarked print dated December 28, Prior to recordation applicant shall make the following plat changes: a. Add bearing between Lots 1 and Lot 2 for the distance b. Suggest adding the distance for the S E bearing c. Add legend for set monuments on Sheet 2, or call out SEE NOTE 10 on just one of the solid circles d. Add as-survey legal description on the cover sheet (since this is a new plat) e. The legal description on the Owner s Cert must match the legal on the title exactly. f. Per Kendra Carberry, Notes 1 and 3 must be removed and Note 9 requires clarification. g. Per Kendra Carberry, please provide a note addressing what Outlot A is supposed to be doing. h. ndicate where all existing roads lie on the plat, not only the easements, and indicate any changes being proposed to either. Recommendation: Staff recommends the Commission provide a favorable recommendation of approval to the Town Council for the Final Plat of Adolf s on the Fraser with the following conditions to be met andor provided prior to recording: 1. The applicant shall revise the submitted plans and documents in conformance with the official redmarked print dated December 28, The applicant shall make the following plat changes: a. Add bearing between Lots 1 and Lot 2 for the distance

9 b. Suggest adding the distance for the S E bearing c. Add legend for set monuments on Sheet 2, or call out SEE NOTE 10 on just one of the solid circles d. Add as-survey legal description on the cover sheet (since this is a new plat) e. The legal description on the Owner s Cert must match the legal on the title exactly. f. Per Kendra Carberry, Notes 1 and 3 must be removed and Note 9 requires clarification. g. Per Kendra Carberry, please provide a note addressing what Outlot A is supposed to be doing. h. ndicate where all existing roads lie on the plat, not only the easements, and indicate any changes being proposed to either. 3. The applicant shall work with Town Staff and the Town engineer modify the existing access easement within Trademark Drive to allow for the construction and maintenance of underground utilities and stormwater drainage. 4. The applicant shall work with Mountain Parks Electric to resolve concerns regarding utilities within the subdivision and the alignment of Trademark Drive. 5. The applicant shall revise the plat to bring the 10 wide utility easement into conformance with the Winter Park Water and Sanitation District s Standard of a 20 easement. 6. A Certificate of Taxes, shown to be paid in full from the County Treasurer, shall be provided for the subject property prior to the recording of any Final Plat. 7. A Statement of Authority shall be provided for each party that signs the Final Plat. 8. f there is a lien holder, a ratification and confirmation of the plat shall be provided. 9. A digital file of the approved plat must be submitted. The digital file shall be in a format acceptable to the Town's System. Requirements for digital submittal can be obtained from the Town's Planning Department. 10. An executed Final Plat Mylar and other supporting documents, as well as recording fees, be provided.

10

11

12

13

14

15 January 3, 2019 Mara Owen Town Planner Town of Winter Park 50 Vasquez Road Winter Park, Colorado Via RE: Adolf s on the River Final Plat Review JVA Job# c Dear Mara: JVA nc. received Final Plat submittal documents, dated December 5, 2018, regarding the above referenced project. We have reviewed the documents and have the following comments to provide. 1. t is recommended for the Town to modify the existing access easement within Trademark Drive to allow for the construction and maintenance of underground utilities. We feel it is in the best interest of the Town to have the capability to extend the existing public underground storm sewer within Winter Park Drive to the Fraser River along this alignment. 2. The opportunity to obtain additional necessary accessutilitydrainage easements should be assessed at the time of site development. Please feel free to contact us with any questions, comments, or concerns you may have. Sincerely, JVA, NCORPORATED By: Cooper Karsh, P.E., CFM Senior Project Engineer

16 From: To: Subject: Date: Attachments: Jean Johnston Mara Owen RE: Old Town Thursday, January 03, :41:15 AM image006.png image007.png FBlogo20x20_f385a67c-d933-45ab-89b5-afca2eff55b1.png twitter20x20_4b90b8ef-da46-4b7b-814e-87a8b9a2dc73.png Adolf"s on the Fraser.pdf Hi Mara, MPE is concerned about an existing switchgear that may be located in the road easement shown on the proposed plat. There is some confusion with the location of the current road versus where the road was originally platted to be. tried to contact the surveyor but have not heard back from him. t would be helpful to know where the switchgear is in relation to everything shown on the proposed plat. This may require more surveying. t will not be easy to move this piece of equipment. There are a lot of conductors that would need to be re-routed to move it. This would cause lengthy outages to many meters during the process of moving it. Some questions we have include: s the existing road in the platted easement? f not, are there plans to move the road into the platted easement? s the owner willing to record a new road easement that matches the location of the existing road? Please let me know how these discussions proceed. am available to answer any questions can. Thanks, Jean Click here to take our quick online survey for chance to win a $50 bill credit!

17 40 This map is to be used for reference purposes only. Mountain Parks Electric, nc. makes no warranty as to its completeness or accuracy for either electric facilities or land base features Large Electric switchgear Existing Underground primary power lines shown as red and yellow dashed lines Existing Underground and overhead secondary power lines shown as solid and dashed blue lines Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNESAirbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRD, GN, and the GS User Community 49955

18

19

20

21 TOWP Redlined Plat Must match legal description on the title exactly. Town Council (capitalized) Town Council (capitalized) Please clarify this note

22

23 TO FROM THRU DATE RE Planning Commission Joan Evans, Planning and Building Technician James Shockey, Community Development Director January 8, 2019 Design Review 39 Alpine Way, Lot 8, Hideaway Village South 1 Applicant: John & Tamara Hermes Zoning: R-1 Architectural: This is a single-family home that has a building footprint square footage of 3,783 with a garage. Homeowner s Association Review: Hideaway Village South does not have an HOA. Proposed Material & Color: Please see attached materials board and elevations for the material list. Exterior Lighting: The applicant states the fixtures will comply with Town guidelines and are dark sky compliant. Prior to building permit issuance, cut sheets will need to be provided for exterior fixtures that state they comply with Town guidelines and are dark sky compliant. Building Height: Building height complies with Town standards. The midpoint building height is 35 which is permitted based on the building height definition. Parking: Adequate parking has been provided in compliance with Town standards. The design includes a garage plus exterior parking. LandscapingRevegetation: A landscape plan was submitted. No site clearing shall be permitted until staff has verified the Pre-Disturbance Checklist has been implemented on the site. Any disturbed areas on the site shall be revegetated with an appropriate seed mix per the Single Family Duplex Deposit Agreement. Site Plan and Building Elevations: Staff is satisfied with the overall design. Setbacks: The structure is located within required setbacks; which include the 30 water quality setback.

24 Coverage: Building coverage is 31% building to open space. nspection: A site inspection of the property has not been performed by staff. No site clearing shall be permitted until staff has verified the Pre-Disturbance Checklist has been implemented on the site. Driveway: The driveway has been designed with a 5% grade at the entrance, then goes to 9.6 % and becomes 2% approaching the garage door which is in compliance with Town Standards. Once the driveway is completed it will need to be verified that it is seven (7) feet from the property line. A stabilized construction entrance shall be installed prior to ground disturbance. Erosion Control Drainage: The erosion and drainage plan complies with Town standards. Approved drainage and erosion control shall be in place prior to and throughout site preparation and construction and through successful revegetation. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the singlefamily design for Lot 8, Hideaway Village South Subdivision with the following conditions: No site clearing shall be permitted until staff has verified the Pre-Disturbance Checklist has been implemented on the site. Any disturbed areas on the site shall be revegetated with an appropriate seed mix per the Single Family Duplex Deposit Agreement. A stabilized construction entrance shall be installed prior to ground disturbance. Approved drainage and erosion control shall be in place prior to and throughout site preparation and construction and through successful revegetation. Prior to building permit issuance, cut sheets will need to be provided for exterior fixtures that state they comply with Town guidelines and are dark sky compliant. Required Permits: Building Permit Single Family Duplex Deposit Agreement Driveway Permit

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33 '-5" 2 EL. RDGE: 25'-3 34" 7 EL. SECOND FLOOR: 10'-2 34" (TOP OF SUBFLOOR) NOTE: COMPLETE SET OF PLANS TO BE ENGNEERED & STAMPED BY STATE LCENSED ENGNEER ALL DMENSONS TO BE VERFED ON STE BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR ALL DMENSONS ARE CONSTRUCTON TME DMENSONS T S THE SOLE RESPONSBLTY OF THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO CHECK & VERFY ALL DMENSONS & SPECFCATONS ON THS SET OF PLANS BEFORE STARTNG CONSTRUCTON ALL LOG DAMETER SZE TO BE MEASURED AT MD SPAN BULDER S RESPONSBLE FOR COMPLYNG WTH ALL LOCAL BULDNG CODES AND PRACTCES GROUND LEVEL EL. GARAGE FLOOR: 1'-9" (TOP OF SLAB) EL. FRST FLOOR: 0" (BOTTOM OF LOG WALL) 10 FRONT ELEVATON EL. BASEMENT: -11'-1 38" (TOP OF CONC. SLAB) CONSTRUCTON MATERALS ASPHALT SHNGLES CEDAR SDNG FNSH LOG WALL CONSTRUCTON B D E F G 4 1 VENTED RDGE CAP EL. RDGE: ' EL. RDGE: 25'-3 34" DESCRPTON: CHMNEY LOG BEAM WNDOW UNT AS PER SCHEDULE 2 EAST MD PONT: ' WEST MD PONT: ' DATE: REVSON: NOV.2618 ENG. REV. 2 REV. 3 7 LOG PURLN STONE VENEER W CONC. CAP LOG POST ROCK VENEER 16'-7 716" EL. SECOND FLOOR: 10'-2 34" (TOP OF SUBFLOOR) 25.31' 14" = 1'-0" SCALE: OCT. 16, 2018 DATE: G.C. DRAWN BY: C.C. CHECKED BY: EL. GARAGE FLOOR: 1'-9" (TOP OF SLAB) PROPOSED WALL (BY OTHERS) TOW= BOW= '-0" RGHT ELEVATON GARAGE: ' FRST FLOOR: 0" ' BASEMENT: ' EXSTNG GRADE: ' 35.00' EL. FRST FLOOR: 0" (BOTTOM OF LOG WALL) 11.11' EL. BASEMENT: -11'-1 38" (TOP OF CONC. SLAB) JEREMAH JOHNSON LOG HOMES LOG BULDER : Hermes ELEVATONS CLENT : TTLE: PROPOSED WALL (BY OTHERS) TOW= BOW= PROPOSED WALL (BY OTHERS) TOW= BOW= A-2 19

34 EL. RDGE: 25'-3 34" 9'-5 916" 4'-8 34" 4'-8 34" midpoint EL. SECOND FLOOR: 10'-2 34" (TOP OF SUBFLOOR) ' " ' " 8' " 16'-9 916" CONSTRUCTON MATERALS ASPHALT SHNGLES CEDAR SDNG FNSH LOG WALL CONSTRUCTON CHMNEY LOG BEAM NOTE: COMPLETE SET OF PLANS TO BE ENGNEERED & STAMPED BY STATE LCENSED ENGNEER ALL DMENSONS TO BE VERFED ON STE BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR ALL DMENSONS ARE CONSTRUCTON TME DMENSONS T S THE SOLE RESPONSBLTY OF THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO CHECK & VERFY ALL DMENSONS & SPECFCATONS ON THS SET OF PLANS BEFORE STARTNG CONSTRUCTON ALL LOG DAMETER SZE TO BE MEASURED AT MD SPAN BULDER S RESPONSBLE FOR COMPLYNG WTH ALL LOCAL BULDNG CODES AND PRACTCES 6 WNDOW UNT AS PER SCHEDULE EL. FRST FLOOR: 0" (BOTTOM OF LOG WALL) 7 LOG PURLN 8 STONE VENEER W CONC. CAP 9 LOG POST 10 ROCK VENEER EL. BASEMENT: -11'-1 38" (TOP OF CONC. SLAB) REV. 2 DESCRPTON: SCALE: DATE: DRAWN BY: C.C. CHECKED BY: LOG BULDER : CLENT : TTLE: 19 A-3 REVSON: ENG. DATE: 8 10 BACK ELEVATON CONC. FTG'S TO BE BELOW LOCAL FROST LNE REV. 3 NOV.2618 GROUND LEVEL H G F E 4 D 1 C B A VENTED RDGE CAP EL. RDGE: 25'-3 34" 9 2 EL. SECOND FLOOR: 10'-2 34" (TOP OF SUBFLOOR) 14" = 1'-0" OCT. 16, 2018 G.C EL. GARAGE FLOOR: 1'-9" (TOP OF SLAB) EL. FRST FLOOR: 0" (BOTTOM OF LOG WALL) EL. BASEMENT: -11'-1 38" (TOP OF CONC. SLAB) JEREMAH JOHNSON LOG HOMES Hermes ELEVATONS LEFT ELEVATON

35 GRADNG, EROSON AND SEDMENT CONTROL PLAN AND PRVATE ACCESS DRVEWAY PLAN LEGEND 7560' EXSTNG CONTOURS -:>, S :_- 0 DESGN CONTOURS TEMPORARY S.EED MX LAND USE STE BOUNDARY FF RH k. J hi NOTES: FNSHED GRADE SPOT ELEVATON. 2. FNSHED FLOOR 3. RDGE HEGHT 4. @D -: ;0 ssa :,>> >",;. :_:1. )' e PUBESCENT WHEATGRASS LUNA 1. NO DSTURBANCE, GRADNG, OR REMOVAL OF SGNFCANT NATURAL FEATURES AND VEGETATON WLL OCCUR BEYOND THE "LMT OF DSTURBANCE" LNE, AS SHOWN ON THS PLAN. 2. THE "LMTS OF DSTURBANCE" LNE SHALL BE DELNEATED PROR TO CONSTRUCTON WTH FLAGS, ROPNG, FOUR FOOT (4') TALL ORANGE CONSTRUCTON FENCNG, OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE MEANS. PROPOSED DECK BASS OF BEARNGS: ASSUMED S51 "02'49"E, ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF LOT 7, MONUMENTED AS SHOWN, DERVED WTH GPSRTK ELEVATON DATUM: NAVDB8 (GROUND) PLEASE REFERENCE SURVEY BY ROCKY MOUNTAN SURVEYS, NC. CONSTRUCTON EQUPMENT & MATERAL STORAGE RETANNG WALL NOTES: VEHCLE TRACKNG CONTROL 1. RETANNG WALL MADE OF NATURAL STONES BOULDERS. EROSON CONTROL BLANKET "LMTS OF DSTURBANCE" 2. RETANNG WALL RALNG TO BE PROVDED, DESGNED BY OTHERS. SEED AND MULCH 3. RETANNG WALL WLL HAVE THE REQURED LANDSCAPNG VEGETATON: a.) (1) 5 GALLON SHRUB EVERY 4' b.) (1) 6' EVERGREEN TREE EVERY 15' SLT FENCESTRAW WADDLE 4. WETLANDS NOT TO BE DSTURBED STABLZED STAGNG AREA PORTABLE RESTROOM CONCRETE WASH AREA 6' EVERGREEN TREES 5 GALLON SHRUBS PROPOSED RESDENCE & GARAGE 1911 SQ FT DECK 588 SQ FT PORCH 51 SQ FT OVERHANGS 1233 SQ FT TOTAL BULDNG AREA FROM ABOVE TEMS 3783 SQ FT PROPOSED DRVEWAY & SDEWALK 1162 SQ FT 31% LOT SZE 15,756 SQ FT SLOPES GREATER THAN 25% YES DSTURBANCE N SLOPES >25% YES \<>< GENERAL CONSTRUCTON NOTES Feet ''.... ', ' x V r,,,<v \ \ c, _ { l.. \ J' ' id'. 6\ \ ,_ aa.3 PROVDE POSTVE DRANAGE AWAY, FROM FOUNDATON 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSBLE FOR THE LOCATON OF ALL EXSTNG UTLTES AND SHOULD NOT RELY SOLELY ON THESE CONSTRUCTON PLANS FOR UTLTY LOCATONS. DAMAGE TO ANY EXSTNG UTLTES S THE RESPONSBLTY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFNE HS OPERATONS TO THE CONSTRUCTON LMTS OF THE PROJECT AND N NO WAY SHALL ENCROACHMENT OCCUR ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTES UNLESS LEGAL EASEMENTS ARE OBTANED. ALL FLL AND CUT SLOPES SHALL BE SETBACK FROM THE PROPERTY LNE N ACCORDANCE WTH ALL APPLCABLE BULDNG CODES. THE CONTRACTOR WLL BE HELD RESPONSBLE FOR ANY AGREEMENTS NECESSARY OR DAMAGE CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTON ACTVTES TO PUBLC OR PRVATE PROPERTY, NCLUDNG UTLTES ENGNEERNG ANDOR ENGNEER WAVES ANY AND ALL RESPONSBLTY AND S NOT LABLE FOR PROBLEMS WHCH ARSE FROM FALURE TO FOLLOW THESE PLANS, SPECFCATONS AND THE DESGN NTENT THEY CONVEY FOR PROBLEMS WHCH ARSE FROM OTHERS' FALURE TO OBTAN ANDOR FOLLOW 285 ENGNEERNG ANDOR ENGNEER'S GUDANCE WTH RESPECT TO ANY ERRORS, OMSSONS, NCONSSTENCES, AMBGUTES OR CONFLCTS. 6. THE CONSTRUCTON SURVEYOR SHALL VERFY PROPOSED GRADES AND NVERT ELEVATONS, FLOW LNES, ALGNMENTS, SETBACKS AND TOPOGRAPHY PROR TO CONSTRUCTON. 7. THE LANDOWNER AND CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSBLE FOR AND VERFY, PROR TO CONSTRUCTON, PERMT SSUANCE, STE CONDTONS, SETBACKS, PROPERTY LNES, BULDNG LOCATON, DMENSONS, MATERALS, QUANTTES, ELEVATONS AND GRADE FNSHES. ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WTH APPLCABLE GOVERNNG CODES AND MANUFACTURER SPECFCATONS. PROJECT CONTACTS: PROPERTY OWNER: JOHN HERMES 1001 W YNDHAM LAKES DRVE ODESSA, FLORDA (813) PROPERTY LNE (TYPCAL) \ rz5; 'v. PROPOSED o THE LANDOWNER ANDOR CONTRACTOR S RESPONSBLE FOR OBTANNG A PERMT FOR STORMWATER DSCHARGES ASSOCATED WTH CONSTRUCTON ACTVTY FROM THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLC HEALTH AND ENVRONMENT, AT LEAST 10 DAYS PROR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTON ACTVTES FOR LAND DSTURBANCE AREAS OF ONE ACRE OR GREATER. THE PERMT MUST BE KEPT CURRENT THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTON DURATON. THE STORMWATER VOLUME CAPACTY OF DETENTON PONDS MUST BE RESTORED AND STORM SEWER LNES WLL BE CLEANED UPON COMPLETON OF THE PROJECT. THE LANDOWNERCONTRACTOR ARE RESPONSBLE FOR THE REMOVAL OF ALL SEDMENT AND DEBRS FROM DRANAGE STRUCTURES AND OTHER PUBLC FACLTES. 10. THE LANDOWNERCONTRACTOR S RESPONSBLE FOR CONTROLLNG WASTE SUCH AS, DSCARDED BULDNG MATERALS, CONCRETE TRUCK WASHOUT, CHEMCALS, LTTER, AND SANTARY WASTE, AS APPLCABLE. N ADDTON, SPLL PREVENTON AND CONTANMENT BMP'S FOR CONSTRUCTON MATERALS, WASTE, AND FUEL MUST BE PROVDED AS APPLCABLE \\ 1:s-, \' ', 'f9 'll' 't,> o,;.,- '-".,,, ; 1 1 'x'o 'li!oj -- --(A; "0o,,v 1,, FF GARAGE ELEV ' DR VEWAY f \ '3 PROPOSED WALL T.0.W= B.O.W.= CLENT: JOHN HERMES, ' Revisions \ ' \ '\ 11.-S93& ) 's;,_<6 ') 1 COUNTY COMMENTS No. Revisionssue Date \. ',. PROPOSED WATER LNE r.., PROPOSED SEWER LNE,, CONSTRUCTON EQUPMENT AND MATERAL STORAGE 20' PJ,'VED...,... PROPERTY ADDRESS: 39 ALPNE WAY WNTER PARK, COLORADO LANDSCAPNG: (1) 5 GALLON SHRUB EVERY 4' (1) 6' EVERGREEN TREE EVERY 15' TYPCAL A9 & -- _, -.,,... PARKNG PROVDED WTHN THE GARAGE \... J, PARCEL D: LMTS OF DSTURBANCE , O' SDE SETBACK <1> PROJECT NUMBER: d FF MAN ELEV ' FF LOWER ELEV ', ' '.::::,., PROPOSED WALL T.0.W= B.0.W.= ' FROM AS N HWL SETBACK _,.. _. PROPOSED EDGE OF FOOTNG PROPOSED WALL T.0.W = 8916 B.O.W. = ,... PROPOSED 140 LF NATURAL STO NE BOULDER RETANNG WALL AND RALNG PROVDED AND DESGNED BY OTHER ' PROPOSED EDGE, OF FOUNDATON NATURAL STON E BOULDER RETANNG WALL AND RALNG PROVDED AND DESGNED BY OTHER _., '\ 0 PROPOSED EDGE OF ROOF EAVE (TYPCAL) PROPOSED DECK MAN LEVEL -,,,,..: '. t ---, -- TOWN OF WNTER PARK COMMUNTY DEVELOPMENT: 50 VASQUEZ ROAD P.O. BOX 3327 WNT!sli PARK, COLORADO PHONE: (970) FAX: (970) PROPOSED WALL T.0.W = 8916 B.O.W. = \ '<... '2as SURVEYOR: ROCKY MOUNTAN SURVEYS, NC. LCENSED LAND SURVEYORS P.O. BOX 552 WNTER PARK, COLORADO ARCHTECT: JEREMAH JOHNSON LOG HOMES 1501 CO RD 308 DUMONT, CO (303) \ LOT 8 aplot. \ 1 ::,, oo, <)-oo, o'\:<'.,. - LMTS OF DSTURBANCE r<;,_,<::),..- 2.;> "111 ALL EXSTNG TOPOGRAPHC SURVEY DATA SHOWN ON THESE PLANS HAS BEEN OBTANED AND CERTFED BY OTHERS. 285 ENGNEERNG ANDOR ENGNEER HAS UNDERTAKEN NO FELD VERFCATON OF THS TOPOGRAPHY NFORMATON, AND MAKES NO REPRESENTATON PERTANNG THERETO, AND ASSUMES NO RESPONSBLTY OR LABLTY THEREFOR OF THS TOPOGRAPHY. 12. ALL FLL ONSTE SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95% DENSTY OF STANDARD PROCTOR. 1 LANDSCAPNG:,....Jo (1) 5 GALLON SHRUB EVERY 4' (1) 6' EVERGREEN TREE EVERY 15' WETLANDS NOT TO BE DSTURBED.,_,..,PROPOSED DECK PER (TYPCAL)., PROPOSED EDGE OF ROOF EA VE (TYPCAL) MAXMUM CUT AND FLL SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 2 FOOT HORZONTAL: 1 FOOT VERTCAL (2:1). 1\ ,;:¾-;f'.,-.,-,,.. "" 1,...,, ENGNEERNG ANDOR ENGNEER S TO BE NOTFED PROR TO ANY PLAN CHANGES OR ON-STE DESGN MODFCATONS. 9. \ 285 ENGNEERNG P.O. BOX 1048 CONFER, CO PROJECT STE: LOT 8 HDEAWAY VLLAGE, SOUTH #1 39 ALPNE WAY WNTER PARK, COLORADO Qr 9f' PROPERTY LNE (TYPCAL) i\.,, <v.::,..p...,_'\ '20,( )..... PROPERTY LNE. (TYPCAL) "... N,,<v ALL PROPERTY CORNERS TO BE STAKED WTH WOODEN STAKES AND FLAGGNG PROR TO CONSTRUCTON ' PLATTED PEDESTRAN EASEMENT 290 SQ FT % COVERAGE TO OPEN SPACE 8 The Dpp1ied seed shall not le covered by a oil,iclrness grester than 0.5'' in depth. Seeding shall 1ake place OT all disturbed areas and stockpiles expected to remain dormant for a period greater than 30 days. To provide temporary erosion control prior to seed application. utilize surface roughening (on the contour or perpendicular to prevailing wincls) and apply mulch. Seed shall be planted with drill seodini; cqu.,prnent, whenever po»ible. Areas that require broadc!l$1 seeding shall mulched 11r1d llltkified, PROPOSED FOUNDATON DRAN STATSTCAL NVENTORY SNOW STORAGE ( 25%) MANCHAR PROTECTON NOTES: PROPOSED WALL.... SMOOTH BROOME PROPOSED SWALE PROPOSED PATO APPLCA TJON RA TE (LBSAC 8 VARETY SPECES RRGATED RECLA[MATJON BULDNG SETBACK %OF MX DRY LAND NON- WATERLNE 89 5 F.G. PREPARED FOR: JOHN HERMES 1001 WYNDHAM LAKES DRVE ODESSA, FLORDA ALL DSTURBED AREAS DURNG CONSTRUCTON THAT REQURE REVEGETATON SHALL RECEVE A MNMUM OF FOUR NCHES (4") OF TOP SOL REPLACEMENT OR AN APPROVED DESGN FROM A LANDSCAPE ARCHTECT. THE FOLLOWNG SEEED MX S RECOMMENDED BY THE GRAND COUNTY NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATON SERVCE AND SHALL BE MPLEMENTED ON ALL STES DSTURBNG SOL: FOUNDATON DRAN DAYLGHT PROPERTY LNE TO BE CLEARLY MARKED PROR TO EXCAVATON TO PREVENT ACCDENTAL GRADNG ACROSS LOT O' SDE SETBAC), ---,,,. L J... -.Jo':, - _V J_fr ;,, (TYPCAL) \. l n \ pv \, C1 R=45',,,,,,, C A=71 Y 'i.2'!:; '64.04',:;5552 4S:'W EXSTNG POWER LNE PROPERTY,, PROPOSED POWER LNE _,,, 1 1 EXSTNG CURB STOP "',,,,j' Project EXSTNG CURB STOP, \,', Oote Scale SHOWN Sheet... C-1 '