FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/05/ :48 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 79 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/05/2018
|
|
- Wesley Wilfred White
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK x : IMPALA RETAIL OWNER, LLC, : Index No.: /2017 : Plaintiff : : ANSWER TO - against - : AMENDED : COMPLAINT THE IMPALA CONDOMINIUM and THE BOARD OF : MANAGERS OF THE IMPALA CONDOMINIUM, : : Defendants. : x "Impala" Defendants the Impala Condominium (the "Impala") and the Board of Managers "Board" (the "Board") of the Impala Condominium (the Impala and the Board are, collectively, "Defendants" "Defendants"), by their undersigned attorneys, Marcus Rosenberg & Diamond LLP ("MRD"), upon information and belief, as their answer to the December 22, 2017 amended complaint (the (" "Amended Complaint") of plaintiff Impala Retail Owner, LLC ("Retail Owner" Owner"): 1. Deny knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the allegations in paragraphs 1 and 6 thereof. 2. Deny the allegations in paragraph 2 thereof, except admit that the Impala is a condominium created and existing under the laws of the State of New York for the property and building located at 404 East 76th Street, also known as 1456 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York Building" (the "Codominium Building"). 3. Deny the allegations in paragraph 3 thereof, except admit that the Board is elected by the Impala's owners to operate the Condominium Building and the Impala's affairs and business. 1 of 12
2 4. Deny the allegations in paragraph 4 thereof, except admit that venue is appropriate in New York County. 5. Deny the allegations in paragraph 5 thereof, except admit that: the Impala and the Condominium Building are subject to the Declaration of Impala Condominium (the "Declaration" "Declaration"), the offering plan accepted for filing by the New York Department of Law (the Plan" "Offering Plan"); and the Condminium Building originally contained approximately 180 residential units (the "Residential Units") and 4 non-residential units (the "Non-Residential Units"; Units" the Residential Units and Non-Residential Units are, collectively, the "Impala Units"). 6. Deny the allegations in paragraphs 8 through 18, 24, 27, 28, 31, 35, 42 through 44, 51, 52, 54 and 55 thereof, except refer to the documents therein described for their contents and terms and expressly deny that such documents are accurate, effective and enforceable and expressly allege that Retail Owner remains bound by the statements made in paragraph 12 and the "wherefore" clause of the original complaint, which were false and fraudulent misrepresntations, frivolously made to deceive and mislead the Court. 7. Deny the allegations in paragraphs 7, 19 through 23, 25, 29, 30, 32, 33, 37 through 40 and 46 through 49 thereof and expressly allege that the frivolous and baseless statements therein are false and fraudulent misrepresentations and were made with the intent of deceiving and misleading the Court. 8. Deny the allegations in paragraph 36 thereof, except reassert the statements previously made by Defendants. 9. Responding to the allegations in paragraph 26 thereof, repeat the responses herein to paragraphs 1 through 25 thereof, 2 2 of 12
3 10. Responding to the allegations in paragraph 34 thereof, repeat the responses herein to paragraphs 1 through 33 thereof. 11. Responding to the allegations in paragraph 41 thereof, repeat the responses herein to paragraphs 1 through 40 thereof. 12. Responding to the allegations in paragraph 45 thereof, repeat the responses herein to paragraphs 1 through 44 thereof. 13. Responding to the allegations in paragraph 50 thereof, repeat the responses herein to paragraphs 1 through 49 thereof. 14. Responding to the allegations in paragraph 53 thereof, repeat the responses herein to paragraphs 1 through 52 thereof. AS AND FOR DEFENDANTS' FIRST ADDITIONAL DEFENSE 15. Defendants repeat all prior statements. 16. Plaintiff's claims are barred by the doctrines of laches, waiver and estoppel. AS AND FOR DEFENDANTS' SECOND ADDITIONAL DEFENSE 17. Defendants repeat all prior statements. 18. Plaintiff's claims are barred by the Statute of Frauds. AS AND FOR DEFENDANTS' THIRD ADDITIONAL DEFENSE 19. Defendants repeat all prior statements. 20. Plaintiff s claims are barred by its failure to have satisfied conditions precedent to its asserted claims. AS AND FOR DEFENDANTS' FOURTH ADDITIONAL DEFENSE 21. Defendants repeat all prior statements. 22. Plaintiff s claims are barred by the doctrine of unclean hands. 3 3 of 12
4 AS AND FOR DEFENDANTS' FIRST COUNTERCLAIM 23. Plaintiff, Retail Owner is a subsidiary or affiliate of RFR, an international real estate developer and operator with more than $10 Billion in assets ; and an affiliate of Impala (" Sponsor" Associates L.P., ("Sponsor"), which: constructed the 31 story Condominium Building with ground Unit" floor retail space, including one such retail space (the "Retail Unit") that included a professional office unit, a laundry unit and a garage unit, all with street addresses at 1456 First Avenue and 404 East 76th Street, New York, New York; and was the named sponsor for the sale of the original 181 Residential Units of the Condominium Building, retaining or transferring to affiliates, the Non- Residential Units, including the Retail Unit. 24. Impala was established pursuant to Article 9-B of the Real Property Law and the Declaration, drafted by Greenstein Starr Gerstein & Rinaldi L.L.P., the predecessor to Starr Associates" Associates LLP ("Starr Associates"), executed by Sponsor, and recorded on October 3, The Board is an unincorporated association authorized and empowered by Article 9-B of the Real Property Law, the Declaration and the Condominium's By-Laws (the "By- Laws" Laws") to: govern the affairs of the Condominium; serve as agent of all Unit owners (the "Unit Owners" Owners"); "have all of the powers and duties necessary for, or incident to, the administration of the affairs of the Condominium"; "enforce by legal means the terms, covenants and conditions contained in the Condominium Documents and to bring or defend against any proceedings that may be instituted on behalf of, or against, the Unit Owners"; and "levy and authorize collection of fines against Unit Owners for violations of the Rules and Regulations and these By-Laws". 26. Prior to the recording of the Condominium Declaration or the sale of the Residential Units, Sponsor or related entities claim that a September 18, 2001 "Declaration of ' of 12
5 Easements, Obligations and Restrictions" Declaration" (the "Easement Declaration") was executed and recorded. 27. The Easement Declaration purports to provide certain easements, rights and Building" remedies to an adjacent century-old four story tenement building (the "Tenement Building") at 400 East 76th street and 1460 First Avenue, claimed to be owned by Retail Owner and a building at 411 East 75th Street, thereafter conveyed to an affiliate of Memorial Sloan Kettering Hospital (the "75th Street Building" Building"). 28. Without notice to the Condominium, Retail Owner claims to have executed a June 21, 2017 agreement of lease, as landlord, with MSH 1456 LLC, an affiliate of Manhattan Lease" Schoolhouse, as tenant (the "Schoolhouse Lease"). 29. The copy of the Schoolhouse Lease provided by Retail Owner states, inter alia: Paragraph 1(B)(ii) and Lease Information Summary Section V - an extension of the Minimum Rent Abatement Period equal to Retail Owner's delay in satisfying Commencement Date Conditions within 90 days of full execution of the Lease (but subject to Manhattan Schoolhouse timely providing plans and applications, including those to amend the Certificate of Occupancy ("CO") to permit the use as a "private children's school for daycare and preschool, with auxiliary office.... ". Paragraph 7(D)(ii) - Landlord shall not be responsible for any failure or interruption of any services that may be appurtenant to or supplied to the Premises by the Condominium Board and no failure to furnish or interruption of any such services shall give rise to any (i) abatement, diminution or reduction in Minimum Rent or Additional Rent payable pursuant to this Lease; (ii) constructive eviction, whether in whole or in part, or (iii) liability on the part of Landlord. Paragraph 21 â Tenant waives any right to rescind this Lease under Section 223-a of the New York Real Property 5 5 of 12
6 Law or any successor statute of similar import then in force and further waives the right to recover any damages which may result from Landlord's failure to deliver possession of the Premises on the date set forth herein for the commencement of the Term. 30. Schedule B to the Schoolhouse Lease describes work to be performed by Retail Owner, including: installation of a "fully operational, code-compliant fire sprinkler system" and a "new fire alarm system"; and delivery of a copy of "any ACP-5 certificate obtained by" Retail Owner in connection with its work. 31. In mid-august 2017, Defendants first learned that Retail Owner had commenced demolition within the Retail Unit and the Tenement Building, including demolition of portions of the Condominium's common element exterior wall separating the Condominium's Building from the Tenement Building, without providing any prior notice to, or obtaining consent of, the Condominium Board which work caused damage to the Impala in an amount believed to exceed $5,000,000, the full amount of which will be established at trial. 32. As noted in an August 14, ed letter from Defendants' attorneys to Retail Owner's attorney, Defendants: asserted then that Retail Owner did not have the right to demolish any part of the Condominium's common element exterior wall; and requested that copies of all plans of the work and 81 documents, including any from the Impala or DOB, authorizing the work, be provided. 33. On August 15, 2017, Retail Owner's attorney provided copies of some plans "Applications" and some self-certified applications (the "Applications") including: Form PW3, which states as "Description of Work": "Demolish and construct interior partitions, ceilings and doors", with the Work not to include Fire Alarm or Sprinkler. Form PW1, describing the job as Alteration Type 2, with no Fire Alarm or Sprinkler work or any change in use or occupancy. 6 6 of 12
7 Form PW1B, Schedule B, "Plumbing Sprinkler, Standpipe", describing the work solely as "remove 1 sink, 1 water closet and 1 1st floor." lav on the New York City Department of Buildings ("DOB") Work Permit, numbers AL: and OT, both of which AUTHORIZED." state, in bold type, "CONCRETE WORK NOT 34. Each Application states: "The scope of work is exempt from the asbestos requirement... " 35. Each Application has a check in the box. "No" for: "[M]ajor change to exits"; "Change in occupancy/use"; and "Change is inconsistent with current certificate of occupancy" 36. Sponsor's DOB applications were executed by Daniel Jaramillo, expressly on behalf of Sponsor, as owner, on October 7, 2016, more than 7 months prior to the execution of the Schoolhouse Lease, and more than 10 months prior to the commencement of any work on the Retail Unit and adjoining Tenement Building. 37. Retail Owner's foregoing actions violated its obligations to the Impala, pursuant to the Impala's rules and governing documents. 38. Pursuant to Section 8(e) of the Easement Declaration2, Retail Owner is obligated to pay to Impala 115% of all out-of-pocket costs and expenses incurred in connection with Retail Owner's actions, including, without limitation, the costs of this litigation, which was wrongfully commenced by Retail Owner, including attorneys' fees, in an amount believed to exceed $200,000, the full amount of which will be established at trial. 2 Plaintiff does not agree, but expressly objects to and denies the Retail Owner's claim that the Easement Declaration is effective as against the Impala or its Residential Unit Owners or otherwise grants the rights claimed by Retail Owner. 7 7 of 12
8 AS AND FOR DEFENDANTS' SECOND COUNTERCLAIM 39. The Easement Declaration was not included in the Offering Plan and not otherwise provided to purchasers of the Residential Units. 40. The terms of the Easement Declaration are materially different from those described in the Offering Plan. 41. The Offering Plan's material misrepresentations of and failure to disclose the terms of the Easement Declaration violated the Martin Act (New York General Business Law 352-e) and the rules and regulations of the Office of the New York State Attorney General. 42. By reason of the above-stated material misrepresentations, omisions and violations of applicable law, rules and regulations, a judgment should issue declaring that the Easement Declaration is null and void and without any force or effect with respect to Defendants, including the Impala's Residential Unit Owners. AS AND FOR DEFENDANTS' THIRD COUNTERCLAIM 43. On September 27, 2017, Retail Owner electronically filed the Complaint and, on September 29, 2017, presented a proposed order to show cause (the "First OSC") to bring on a motion for a preliminary injunction, with a request for issuance of a temporary restraining order ("TRO"), restraining Defendants from "interfering with plaintiff's easement over and free access to the Common Facilities." 44. Upon presentation of the proposed First OSC, before Defendants had an opportunity to submit any papers in opposition, Justice Saliann Scarpulla issued the First OSC, containing a TRO stating: "ORDERED that, pending the hearing and plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, the condominium, the Board and their officers, directors, nominees, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, successors, assigns, affiliates, or other entities under their 8 8 of 12
9 control or acting in concert with them, are restrained from interfering with plaintiff's easement over and free access to the Common Facilities and it is ORDERED that, sufficient cause therefore having been alleged, personal service of a copy of this Order, and the papers upon which it is based along with service of the summons and complaint, upon the managing agent, AKAM Associates, Inc., 260 Madison Avenue, is further 12th Floor, New York, New York 10016, by e-filing and it ORDERED that, answering papers, if any, shall be served upon the attorneys for plaintiff, by October 13, 2007 by e-filing plus movant to file a $200,000 bond in five business days and condo inspect." board may The OSC also expressly required Retail Owner to post an undertaking in the amount of $200,000 within five business days. 45. Apparently, the $200,000 undertaking was filed on October 5, On October 6, 2017, the Department of Environmental Protection, based on inspections of the Retail Unit, and a sampling and testing of material, confirmed the presence of friable asbestos-containing material in the Tenement Building and issued a stop work order. 47. Contrary to Retail Owner's claims, the Easement Declaration did not, and does not, provide to Retail Owner an "easement over and free access to the Common Facilities", as repeatedly represented by Andrea Roschelle, Retail Owner's attorney, and Retail Owner to the Court in seeking both the issuance of the TRO and the First OSC and October 1, 2017 second order to the show cause (the "Second OSC"), which brought on a motion for an order holding the Impala, MRD and David Rosenberg in contempt of court. 48. On January 30, 2018, Retail Owner electronically filed and on January 31, 2018, presented to the Court yet another proposed order to show cause (the "Third OSC") to bring on a motion for a preliminary injunction, with a request for issuance of TRO restraining 9 9 of 12
10 "Defendants from interfering with plaintiffs ability to tie-in the fire alarm system located in the Premises to the fire alarm panel located in the lobby of the Condominium Building; and (ii) directed defendants to provide plaintiff and its contractors (including the Condominium's Fire Alarm Vendor) with free access to the basement and to the lobby of the Condominium Building to connect wires to the Condominium's fire alarm panel." 49. Over the Impala's attorneys' strenuous objections at oral argument, and before the Impala was permitted to submit any written opposition to the Third OSC and the TRO requested therein, the Court granted the TRO sought in the Third OSC. 50. By its express terms, the sole beneficiary of the Easement Declaration is the 75* 75 Street Property Owner. 51. For the reasons set forth in the opposition to the First OSC and Second OSC submitted by the Impala and MRD, and at oral argument on the Third OSC, Retail Owner is not entitled to the relief sought in the First, Second or the Third OSC. 52. Retail Owner's commencement of this action and the filing of the First Second and Third OSC constitute baseless and frivolous abuses of judicial process, which are sanctionable by this Court. 53. Retail Owner and its attorneys, Starr Associates, in a gross and wanton abuse of: this Court's authority; and the rights of the Impala, its residents and its attorneys, frivolously has sought and obtained two TROs through vexacious, unwarranted and frivolous motion practice. 54. Rule 130 (22 NYGRR ) authorizes the Court to "award to any party or attorney in any civil action or proceeding before the court...costs in the form of reimbursement for actual expenses reasonably incurred and reasonable attorneys' fees, resulting of 12
11 from frivolous conduct...and impose such financial sanctions against either an attorney or a party to the litigation or against both. 55. Plaintiff's violation of the the Easement Declaration entitles the Impala and the Board to recover 115% of all damages and expenses incurred in defending this action and against the First, Second and Third OSC, including, without limitation, attorneys' fees. WHEREFORE, defendants Impala Condominium and the Board of Managers of the Impala Condominium demand judgment: a) against Retail Owner, dismissing the Complaint in its entirety; b) against Retail Owner for all damages incurred by the destruction of the Impala in an amount to be determined at trial but believed to exceed $5,000,000; c) against Retail Owner, Starr Associates LLP and Andrea Roschelle, Esq. directing an immediate hearing to fix the amount of sanctions and compensation due to Defendants for violations of 22 NYGRR ; d) against Retail Owner granting Defendants 115% of all damages and expenses incurred as a result of the transactions and occurences set forth herein and of this action, the First OSC, Second OSC and Third OSC and all future proceedings; e) declaring that the Easement Declaration is null and void and without any force or effect with respect to Defendants and the Impala's Residential Unit Owners; and f) granting to Defendants such other and further relief as may be appropriate for the.actions to date and any further actions by Retail Owner or its representatives, attorneys or agents with repsect to the transactions and occurences described herein of 12
12 Dated: New York, New York February 5, 2018 MARCUS ROSENBERG & DIAMOND LLP '- -R~---'c' David Rosenberg Michael T. Contos 488 Madison Avenue New York, New York of 12
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/29/ :33 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/29/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/29/2016 02:33 PM INDEX NO. 157154/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/29/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK WILLIAM ATKINSON and JESSICA
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/18/ :12 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 4 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/18/2014
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/18/2014 11:12 PM INDEX NO. 160162/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 4 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/18/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/12/ /30/ :39 06:55 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 136 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/12/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/12/2016 10/30/2017 03:39 06:55 PM INDEX NO. 656279/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 136 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/12/2016 10/30/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK
More informationKSS Sales Proposal Terms & Conditions
KSS Sales Proposal Terms & Conditions These Sales Proposal Terms and Conditions apply to the accompanying sales proposal and are incorporated therein as if stated therein in their entirety. As used herein,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/22/2012 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/22/2012
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/22/2012 INDEX NO. 651762/2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/22/2012 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ----------------------X Index No. /12
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/22/ :25 PM INDEX NO /2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/22/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Index No: COUNTY OF NEW YORK Plaintiff designates East New York United Capital Real Estate Development Corp., County as the place of trial The basis of the venue
More informationBuyer s Initials Seller s Initials DRAFT G. SHORT SALE APPROVAL CONTINGENCY
G. SHORT SALE APPROVAL CONTINGENCY 1. Approval of Seller s Lender(s) and Requirements for Seller s Approval of Short Sale. This Contract is contingent upon: (a) Seller s lender(s) and all other lien holder(s)
More informationDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MUNICIPAL REGULATIONS TITLE 14 HOUSING CHAPTER 1 ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MUNICIPAL REGULATIONS TITLE 14 HOUSING CHAPTER 1 ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT SECTION 101. CIVIL ENFORCEMENT POLICY 101.1 The maintenance of leased or rental habitations in violation
More informationSample. Rider Clauses to Contract of Sale Seller
Rider Clauses to Contract of Sale Seller 1. In the event of any inconsistency or conflict between the terms and provisions of this Rider and those contained in the printed portion of the Contract of Sale
More information78th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. House Bill 4001
th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY-- Regular Session House Bill 00 Sponsored by Representatives KENY-GUYER, KOTEK, Senators ROSENBAUM, DEMBROW; Representatives BARNHART, FREDERICK, HOLVEY, HOYLE, NATHANSON,
More informationANNUAL VOLUNTEER LAWYER SEMINAR UNIFORM RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD/TENANT ACT
ANNUAL VOLUNTEER LAWYER SEMINAR UNIFORM RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD/TENANT ACT John Lee, Esquire Solo Practitioner Friday, October 21, 2011 2:30 3:30 PM Radisson Admiral Semmes Hotel THE UNIFORM RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD
More informationLegally Described as: Lot(s) - in BROOKHAVEN ESTATES PLAT 1, pursuant to the Plat thereof (the, Property ).
LOT PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR BROOKHAVEN ESTATES PLAT 1 SUBDIVISION Buyer(s) First, Middle, Last or Full Company Name Current Address PRINT NAMES OF BUYERS AS THEY ARE TO APPEAR ON DEED (WITH MIDDLE INITIALS,
More informationDo not trespass or disturb the homeowner or occupant! It is a crime to trespass on the Property. All properties are sold as-is, where-is.
Do not trespass or disturb the homeowner or occupant! It is a crime to trespass on the Property. All properties are sold as-is, where-is. There are no contingencies. Binding Auction Agreement The property
More information(a) A housing crisis exists in the city of Chicago due to the lack of adequate, safe, sanitary, and affordable housing.
Chapter 5-10: Good Cause for Eviction Section 1. Title, Purposes, and Scope. This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the Good Cause for Eviction Ordinance and shall be liberally construed and applied
More informationNorth Carolina General Statutes
North Carolina General Statutes Chapter 42A. Vacation Rental Act. Article 1. Vacation Rentals. 42A-1. Title. This Chapter shall be known as the North Carolina Vacation Rental Act. (1999-420, s. 1.) 42A-2.
More informationMunicipality of Anchorage PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT FOR LOT 17, NEVILLA PARK SUBDIVISION
Municipality of Anchorage PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT FOR LOT 17, NEVILLA PARK SUBDIVISION THIS AGREEMENT dated, 2016, by and between the MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE, an Alaska municipal corporation, whose
More informationSTATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS RHODE ISLAND CONTRACTORS REGISTRATION LICENSING BOARD Department of Administration HOME INSPECTORS LICENSING LAW CHAPTER 65.1 [Effective July 1, 2013] 5-65.1-1
More informationFILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 04/15/ :57 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 70 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/15/2015 EXHIBIT 1
FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 04/15/2015 03:57 PM INDEX NO. 702126/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 70 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/15/2015 EXHIBIT 1 FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 03/06/2015 09:49 AM INDEX NO. 702126/2015 NYSCEF
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/31/ :34 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 70 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/31/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/31/2016 04:34 PM INDEX NO. 653549/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 70 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/31/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------x
More informationPlaintiff, SUMMONS WITH VERIFIED COMPLAINT. Nassau County is designated by -against- Plaintiff as the place of trial
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NASSAU X GALASSO LANGIONE & BOTTER, LLP, (formerly Index No.: 07/010038 known as GALASSO LANGIONE, LLP) as Escrow Agent for STEPHEN BARON on SIGNATURE BANK
More informationBowery Residents' Comm., Inc. v 127 W. 25th LLC 2011 NY Slip Op 33971(U) November 2, 2011 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /11
Bowery Residents' Comm., Inc. v 127 W. 25th LLC 2011 NY Slip Op 33971(U) November 2, 2011 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 650358/11 Judge: Joan A. Madden Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationUNOFFICIAL FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY Official Code of Georgia Annotated (2017)
O.C.G.A. TITLE 44 Chapter 3 Article 6 GEORGIA CODE Copyright 2017 by The State of Georgia All rights reserved. *** Current Through the 2017 Regular Session *** TITLE 44. PROPERTY CHAPTER 3. REGULATION
More informationDistrict of Columbia Housing Code Provisions Disclosure
To: Tenant From: TYLER WAGNER Landlord Date: Re: Housing Code Provisions for 4202 GARRISON STREET N.W, WASHINGTON, DC 20016 ( Premises ) Included below, please find Landlord's disclosure of the District
More informationSTATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS HOME INSPECTORS LICENSING LAW TITLE 5 CHAPTER 65.1 Department of Administration BUILDING CODE COMMISSION CONTRACTORS REGISTRATION BOARD One Capitol Hill
More informationLease & Property Management Disputes
Lease & Property Management Disputes EXPERIENCE Represented property management company in dispute brought by tenant over failure to disclose mold remediation in unit prior to lease execution. Represented
More informationPURCHASE AGREEMENT ACCORDINGLY, FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, RECEIPT OF WHICH IS HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGED, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
PURCHASE AGREEMENT JOHN THOMAS BUILDING, 325 EAST 3 RD AVENUE, ANCHORAGE AK THIS AGREEMENT dated, 2013, by and between the MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE, an Alaska municipal corporation, whose mailing address
More informationACQUISITION AGREEMENT
Quint & Thimmig LLP ACQUISITION AGREEMENT by and between the CITY OF ALAMEDA, CALIFORNIA and CATELLUS ALAMEDA DEVELOPMENT, LLC dated as of 1, 2013 relating to: City of Alameda Community Facilities District
More informationKimball, Tirey & St. John LLP
Kimball, Tirey & St. John LLP Security Deposit Law for California Residential Landlords July, 2015 California law regarding residential security deposits is found at California Civil Code 1950.5, attached
More information30 Thompson Street, New York, NY
30 Thompson Street, New York, NY SoHo Boutique Development Site For Sale FOR SALE Asking Price: $13,450,000 Property Information Block / Lot 476 / 56 Lot Size (Approx.) 29 x 94 Lot Area (Approx.) 2,726
More informationGENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2013 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 331
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2013 SESSION LAW 2013-202 HOUSE BILL 331 AN ACT TO STABILIZE TITLES AND TO PROVIDE A UNIFORM PROCEDURE TO ENFORCE CLAIMS OF LIEN SECURING SUMS DUE CONDOMINIUM
More informationPAYMENT IN LIEU OF TAXES AGREEMENT
PAYMENT IN LIEU OF TAXES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this the day of, 2014, by and among MOUNDSVILLE POWER, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ( Moundsville Power ), THE COUNTY
More informationMunicipality of Anchorage PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT FOR HLB Parcel C in Chugiak, Alaska
Municipality of Anchorage PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT FOR HLB Parcel 1-007-C in Chugiak, Alaska THIS AGREEMENT dated, 2017, by and between the MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE, an Alaska municipal corporation,
More information, J.S.C. J.S.C., at a motion term of Part -7. of this Court, to be held in and for the County of New PRESENT: HON. BORN TO BUILD LLC, Index No.
DON711512011, of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, held in and for the County of New York, at the courthouse located at 60 Centre Street, New York, New York, on the day of July, 2011. At a Term,
More informationThe place in the state where the principle office of the Corporation is to be located is the City of Streetsboro, Portage County, Ohio.
Following are edited paragraphs of the Association governing documents showing the changes to be voted on at the 2012 Annual Meeting on June 10, 2012. Copies of the actual changes are available from the
More informationJUSTICE COURT, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA. Name: ) ) CASE NO.: Landlord, ) DEPT. NO.: ) -vs- ) ) Name: ) Address: ) ) Phone: ) )
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 JUSTICE COURT, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA Name: CASE NO.: Landlord, DEPT. NO.: -vs- Name: Address: Phone: of the Complaint. of the Complaint. Tenant. TENANT S ANSWER TO COMPLAINT FOR UNLAWFUL
More informationBILL TOPIC: "Residential Tenants Health & Safety Act"
LLS NO. 19-0008.01 Richard Sweetman x4333 Jackson and Weissman, First Regular Session Seventy-second General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO HOUSE SPONSORSHIP SENATE SPONSORSHIP Williams A. and Bridges, DRAFT
More informationPRINT NAMES OF BUYERS AS ARE THEY ARE TO APPEAR ON DEED (WITH MIDDLE INITIALS, ETC.)
Diamond Development, LLC 309 E. 1st Street Ankeny, IA 50021 LOT PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR PINE VIEW ESTATES PLAT 3 SUBDIVISION Buyer(s) First, Middle, Last or Full Company Name Social Security #/Federal ID#
More informationNOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT ROBERT BLINN, Appellant, v. Case No. 2D14-1636 FLORIDA POWER &
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 47C Article 4 1
Article 4. Protection of Purchasers. 47C-4-101. Applicability; waiver. (a) This Article applies to all units subject to this chapter, except as provided in subsection (b) or as modified or waived by agreement
More informationSubscription Agreement
Subscription Agreement This Subscription Agreement (the Agreement ) is made and entered into by and between the Cambria Somerset Association of REALTORS (the MLS ), and an individual real estate agent,
More informationBroker Download DATA ACCESS AGREEMENT
Broker Download DATA ACCESS AGREEMENT Smart MLS, Inc 860 North Main Street Ext. Wallingford, CT 06492 203-697-1006 203-697-1064 (fax) SmartMLS.com Data Access Agreement v1.0 1 BROKER DOWNLOAD DATA ACCESS
More informationTITLE 27 LEASEHOLD MORTGAGE OF TRIBAL TRUST LAND TABLE OF CONTENTS. CHAPTER General Purpose Statement Purpose 1
TITLE 27 LEASEHOLD MORTGAGE OF TRIBAL TRUST LAND TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 27.01 General Purpose Statement 27.0101 Purpose 1 CHAPTER 27.02 Definitions 27.0201 Definitions 1 CHAPTER 27.03 Priority 27.0301
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO Village of Silverton, Ohio : CASE NO. an Ohio municipal corporation 6943 Montgomery Road : (Judge ) Silverton, Ohio 45236 : and : JRA MVG Silverton Land,
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 12/23/ :52 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/23/2016
FILED KINGS COUNTY CLERK 12/23/2016 0552 PM INDEX NO. 512380/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF 12/23/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS ---------------------------------------------------------
More informationTHE EVICTION ACTION. Bruce E. Gudin
THE EVICTION ACTION Bruce E. Gudin BRUCE E. GUDIN, ESQ. LEVY EHRLICH & PETRIELLO, P.C. 60 PARK PLACE, SUITE 1016 NEWARK, NJ 07102-5504 TEL. 973-643-0040 X-104 FAX. 973-596-1781 WWW.LEP-Lawyers.com THE
More informationTENANT S ESTOPPEL CERTIFICATE
Loan No.: TENANT S ESTOPPEL CERTIFICATE To: Union Bank ( Bank ) 145 S. State College Blvd., Suite 600 Brea, CA 92821 Re: Address (Suite #) California, ( the Premises ) The undersigned hereby certifies
More informationEXHIBIT A AGREEMENT FOR SALE OF IMPROVEMENT TO REAL PROPERTY AND BILL OF SALE
EXHIBIT A AGREEMENT FOR SALE OF IMPROVEMENT TO REAL PROPERTY AND BILL OF SALE This Agreement to buy and sell improvement to real property to be moved by Buyer and Bill of Sale is between Seller (also referred
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2004 ALLISON M. COSTELLO, ETC., Appellant, v. Case No. 5D02-3117 THE CURTIS BUILDING PARTNERSHIP, Appellee. Opinion filed
More informationAMENDED AND RESTATED BY-LAWS OF TUCKAWAY SHORES HOMEOWNER S ASSOCIATION, INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I NAME AND LOCATION...1
AMENDED AND RESTATED BY-LAWS OF TUCKAWAY SHORES HOMEOWNER S ASSOCIATION, INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I NAME AND LOCATION...1 ARTICLE II DEFINITIONS...1 ARTICLE III MEETINGS OF MEMBERS...2 ARTICLE IV
More information2012 IL App (2d) No Opinion filed January 18, 2012 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT
No. 2-11-0060 Opinion filed January 18, 2012 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT MARJORIE C. HAHN, Successor Trustee to ) Appeal from the Circuit Court Robert C. Hahn, Trustee Under Trust
More informationTitle 14: COURT PROCEDURE -- CIVIL
Title 14: COURT PROCEDURE -- CIVIL Chapter 710-A: SECURITY DEPOSITS ON RESIDENTIAL RENTAL UNITS Table of Contents Part 7. PARTICULAR PROCEEDINGS... Section 6031. DEFINITIONS... 3 Section 6032. MAXIMUM
More informationPRESERVATION AND CONSERVATION RESTRICTION
PRESERVATION AND CONSERVATION RESTRICTION THIS PRESERVATION AND CONSERVATION RESTRICTION ( Deed Restriction ) is made as of the day of, 2017, by and between the City of Tucson, a municipal corporation
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, STATE OF FLORIDA, vs. Plaintiff, ROBERT J. VITALE,
More informationLieberman v 244 E. 86th St., LLC 2014 NY Slip Op 32836(U) October 30, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2013 Judge: Anil C.
Lieberman v 244 E. 86th St., LLC 2014 NY Slip Op 32836(U) October 30, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 156370/2013 Judge: Anil C. Singh Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013
More informationORDINANCE NO.:
ORDINANCE NO.: 2015-099 Amending the 1998 Code of Ordinances of the City of Columbia, South Carolina, Chapter 5, Buildings and Building Regulations, Article VIII, Absentee Landlord Regulation Program BE
More informationAMENDED FINAL PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT
AMENDED FINAL PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT THIS PURCHASE AGREEMENT (the Agreement ) is dated for reference the 6th day of September, 2012 (the Effective Date ) and supersedes all other agreements made between
More informationJurist Co., Inc. v 175 Varick St. LLC 2006 NY Slip Op 30756(U) September 8, 2006 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /05 Judge:
Jurist Co., Inc. v 175 Varick St. LLC 2006 NY Slip Op 30756(U) September 8, 2006 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 104701/05 Judge: Barbara R. Kapnick Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationDISPOSSESSORY AND DISTRESS WARRANTS. by Scott I. Zucker, Esq. Weissmann & Zucker, P.C.
DISPOSSESSORY AND DISTRESS WARRANTS by Scott I. Zucker, Esq. Weissmann & Zucker, P.C. There are two general procedures for the removal of a tenant and its property from leased space, whether it is residential
More informationASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF LEASE AND CONSENT OF LANDLORD
ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF LEASE AND CONSENT OF LANDLORD This and Consent of Landlord ( Assignment ) is made and entered into effective as of March 30, 2016 by and among Craig Allen Bowles ( Assignor
More informationTRUST, INDEMNITY AND SECURITY AGREEMENT WITH DEPOSIT OF FUNDS TO PROTECT AND SECURE AGAINST EXCEPTIONS TO TITLE
TRUST, INDEMNITY AND SECURITY AGREEMENT WITH DEPOSIT OF FUNDS TO PROTECT AND SECURE AGAINST EXCEPTIONS TO TITLE Trust Indemnity and Security Agreement No. Whereas, the Chicago Title Insurance Company,
More informationUNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C FORM 8-K
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event
More informationNOTICE OF REGULATED WATER UTILITY SALE, TRANSFER, OR MERGER
NOTICE OF REGULATED WATER UTILITY SALE, TRANSFER, OR MERGER 11/03/17 Squaw Creek Canyon Development PO Box 760 Sisters, OR 97759 Telephone: 541-549-6261 Emergency: 541-771-6162 Squaw Creek Canyon Development
More informationCase 3:10-cv MO Document 123 Filed 08/02/11 Page 1 of 9 Page ID#: 1439
Case 3:10-cv-00523-MO Document 123 Filed 08/02/11 Page 1 of 9 Page ID#: 1439 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION JON CHARLES BEYER and SHELLEY RENEE BEYER,
More informationCase 2:17-cv JHS Document 1 Filed 03/15/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA COMPLAINT
Case 2:17-cv-01139-JHS Document 1 Filed 03/15/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA GERRELL MARTIN and CURTIS SAMPSON, Plaintiffs, vs. LEVYLAW, LLC and BART E. LEVY,
More informationThe proposed Equity Investment terms are as outlined on Exhibit A attached hereto.
[Sponsor] [Address] [date], 2012 Re: Equity Investment [property] Dear [Principal]: This letter outlines the basic terms and conditions upon which Stage Capital, LLC (with its successors, Investor ), or
More informationOakwood Care Ctr., Inc. v Oakwood Operating Co., LLC 2010 NY Slip Op 32638(U) September 20, 2010 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number:
Oakwood Care Ctr., Inc. v Oakwood Operating Co., LLC 2010 NY Slip Op 32638(U) September 20, 2010 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 15823/07 Judge: Elizabeth H. Emerson Republished from New York
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 42A 1
Chapter 42A. Vacation Rental Act. Article 1. Vacation Rentals. 42A-1. Title. This Chapter shall be known as the North Carolina Vacation Rental Act. (1999-420, s. 1.) 42A-2. Purpose and scope of act. The
More informationNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. BENJORAY, INC., v. Plaintiff-Respondent, ACADEMY HOUSE CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER,
More informationFlorida Senate SB 734
By Senator Baxley 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 A bill to be entitled An act relating to homeowners associations; amending s. 718.509, F.S.; revising the
More informationSouth Carolina General Assembly 119th Session,
South Carolina General Assembly 1th Session, - S. STATUS INFORMATION General Bill Sponsors: Senator Jackson Document Path: l:\s-res\dj\00home.kmm.dj.docx Introduced in the Senate on January, Currently
More informationGrant Agreement - End Grant for the «1» Project
Metropolitan Council Municipal Publicly Owned Infrastructure Inflow/Infiltration Grant Program Grant Agreement - End Grant for the «1» Project Funded by the State of Minnesota General Obligation Bond Proceeds
More informationSpecimen Complaint to Establish Easement Rights 1
Specimen Complaint to Establish Easement Rights 1 [Case Caption] COMPLAINT NATURE OF CLAIM This is an action brought by property owners to establish their rights, title, or interest to use the beach in
More informationARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS
ARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS SECTION 100 TITLE This Ordinance shall be known and cited as the "Rice Township Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance." SECTION 101 AUTHORITY Rice Township is empowered
More informationCHAPTER 14 REAL PROPERTY PRACTICE
CHAPTER 14 REAL PROPERTY PRACTICE PART I. BASIC REAL ESTATE ACQUISITION DOCUMENTS AND SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR SHORT SALES AND DISTRESSED PROPERTIES. A. The Listing Agreement. 1. (14.1.1) General Purpose.
More informationCITY AND COUNTY OF BROOMFIELD SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR (PROPERTY NAME - ALL CAPS)
CITY AND COUNTY OF BROOMFIELD SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR (PROPERTY NAME - ALL CAPS) THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of, 20, by and between The CITY AND COUNTY OF BROOMFIELD, a
More informationTitle 14: COURT PROCEDURE -- CIVIL
Title 14: COURT PROCEDURE -- CIVIL Chapter 709: ENTRY AND DETAINER Table of Contents Part 7. PARTICULAR PROCEEDINGS... Subchapter 1. RESIDENTIAL LANDLORDS AND TENANTS... 3 Section 6000. DEFINITIONS...
More information[Hodges v. Sasil Corp., 189 N.J. 210, 221 (2007).]
By: NON-PAYMENT OF RENT LANDLORD-TENANT PRACTICE TIPS Alexander G. Fisher, Esq. Mauro, Savo, Camerino, Grant & Schalk, P.A. Michael P. O Grodnick, Esq. Mauro, Savo, Camerino, Grant & Schalk, P.A. 1. An
More informationMEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT FOR THE TRANSFER OF TITLE TO REAL PROPERTY City of Lompoc & Lompoc Healthcare District. Recitals
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT FOR THE TRANSFER OF TITLE TO REAL PROPERTY City of Lompoc & Lompoc Healthcare District Recitals A. Lompoc Healthcare District (hereinafter "LHD") is the owner of that land in Lompoc,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/06/ :20 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 47 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/06/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/06/2016 09:20 AM INDEX NO. 654914/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 47 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/06/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------
More informationASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT. by and between
ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT by and between DEVELOPMENT SPECIALISTS, INC., an Illinois Corporation Solely in Its Capacity as the Assignee for the Benefit of Creditors of Kagi, a California Corporation and
More informationCommon Interest Ownership Act Key Points
Common Interest Ownership Act Key Points Declaration A common interest community may be created only by recording a declaration executed in the same manner as a deed. In a cooperative, it is created by
More informationBYLAWS OF PRAIRIE PATHWAYS II CONDOMINIUM OWNER S ASSOCIATION, INC.
BYLAWS OF PRAIRIE PATHWAYS II CONDOMINIUM OWNER S ASSOCIATION, INC. ARTICLE I: Plan of Administration Condominium Unit Ownership / Description of Real Property Certain property located in the Village of
More informationAssignment of Leases and Rents
Assignment of Leases and Rents This ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES AND RENTS (this Assignment ) is given as of the day of, 20 by ( Assignor ) to ( Assignee ). RECITALS A. Assignor is the owner of the real property
More informationSENATE SPONSORSHIP. Judiciary. Bill Summary
Second Regular Session Sixty-sixth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO REVISED This Version Includes All Amendments Adopted on Second Reading in the Second House LLS NO. 0-00.0 Ed DeCecco HOUSE BILL 0-
More informationForman Fifth LLC v Hong Shik Kim 2010 NY Slip Op 32287(U) June 7, 2010 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 21456/2009 Judge: Patricia P.
Forman Fifth LLC v Hong Shik Kim 2010 NY Slip Op 32287(U) June 7, 2010 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 21456/2009 Judge: Patricia P. Satterfield Republished from New York State Unified Court
More informationVACANT LAND SALES CONTRACT
VACANT LAND SALES CONTRACT 1. Mutual Covenants. DAVID L. ANDERSON and SUSAN B. ANDERSON ( ANDERSON ), MICHAEL D. UNZICKER and CHRISTY J. UNZICKER ( UNZICKER ), and DARIN S. HOFFMIRE and JANE ANN HOFFMIRE
More informationCHAPTER 711 CONDOMINIUM ACT
711.01 711.02 711.03 711.04 711.05 711.06 711.07 711.08 711.09 711.10 711.11 711.12 711.121 Short title. Purpose; cumulative. Definitions. Condominium parcels; appurtenances; possession and enjoyment.
More informationLEASE AGREEMENT WITNESSETH:
LEASE AGREEMENT THE STATE OF ALABAMA HOUSTON COUNTY This lease executed in Houston County, Alabama, on this the day of, 201, by and between HOUSTON COUNTY, ALABAMA, BY AND THROUGH THE HOUSTON COUNTY COMMISSION,
More informationv. Record No OPINION BY JUSTICE BARBARA MILANO KEENAN BOUNDARY ASSOCIATION, INC. January 13, 2006
PRESENT: All the Justices RALPH WHITE, ET AL. v. Record No. 050417 OPINION BY JUSTICE BARBARA MILANO KEENAN BOUNDARY ASSOCIATION, INC. January 13, 2006 FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF WILLIAMSBURG
More informationPROPERTY EXCHANGE AGREEMENT
PROPERTY EXCHANGE AGREEMENT This Property Exchange Agreement is effective this day of, 2015, between the City of Star, Idaho, a municipal corporation (the City ); DBSI Pristine Meadows, LLC, an Idaho limited
More informationCertificate of Ratification and Promulgation of Community Association Violation Enforcement Policy for the Northlake Estates HOA, Inc.
AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: Judd A. Austin, Jr., Esq. Henry Oddo Austin & Fletcher, P.C. 1700 Pacific Avenue Suite 2700 Dallas, Texas 75201 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DENTON Certificate of Ratification and
More informationESCROW AGREEMENT. Vyas Realty Law (o) (f) 1100 Navaho Dr. (Suite 105) Raleigh, NC
ESCROW AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into on the date set forth on the signature page attached hereto by and among DIY Tiny, Inc. (the Company ) and Vyas Realty Law (the Escrow Agent ). Collectively,
More informationHousing Assistance Payments Contract (HAP Contract) Section 8 Tenant-Based Assistance Housing Choice Voucher Program
Housing Assistance Payments Contract (HAP Contract) Section 8 Tenant-Based Assistance Housing Choice Voucher Program Part B of HAP Contract: Body of Contract 1. Purpose a. This is a HAP contract between
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. INLET VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. and 40 N.E. PLANTATION ROAD #306, LLC, Appellees.
More informationOFFICE LEASE. By Richard R. Goldberg Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll, LLP Philadelphia, Pennsylvania All Rights Reserved 1999 AGREEMENT OF LEASE
OFFICE LEASE By Richard R. Goldberg Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll, LLP Philadelphia, Pennsylvania All Rights Reserved 1999 AGREEMENT OF LEASE THIS AGREEMENT OF LEASE is made this day of 199_ by and
More information11 Prime Walk-Up Apartment Buildings 299 Residential Units 2 Retail Stores ASKING PRICE: $73,000,000
The East Side/Village Portfolio 104 East 7th Street 438-440 East 13th Street 234-238 East 33rd Street 101 MacDougal Street 410 East 64th Street 319-321 East 78th Street 223 East 82nd Street 310 East 83rd
More informationReferral Partnership Program
Referral Partnership Program In states with REC programs, it is essential that installers and integrators have the tools and knowledge to provide services covering the registration, monetization and management
More informationMaine State Housing Authority Owner of Contract Unit****
MAINE STATE HOUSING AUTHORITY STABILITY THROUGH ENGAGEMENT PROGRAM/TENANT BASED RENTAL ASSISTANCE (STEP/TBRA) RENTAL ASSISTANCE PAYMENT CONTRACT The Stability Through Engagement Program/Tenant Based Rental
More informationMOHAVE COUNTY JUSTICE COURT
MOHAVE COUNTY JUSTICE COURT If you want to file an EVICTION (Complaint & Summons Tenant Eviction) MOHAVE COUNTY JUSTICE COURT AN EVICTION (Forcible Detainer/Special Detainer) action is filed for alleged
More informationPlaintiff, Case No.: COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Miami-Dade County (the County ) sues Defendants Miami Marlins, L.P. (the
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA COMPLEX LITIGATION DIVISION MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, vs. Plaintiff, Case
More information