POYRAZ HEPP YESIL ENERJI ELEKTRIK URETIM SAN. TIC. A.S. REPORTING FORM FOR LAND ACQUISITION

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "POYRAZ HEPP YESIL ENERJI ELEKTRIK URETIM SAN. TIC. A.S. REPORTING FORM FOR LAND ACQUISITION"

Gordon Preston
5 years ago
Views:

1 POYRAZ HEPP YESIL ENERJI ELEKTRIK URETIM SAN. TIC. A.S. REPORTING FORM FOR LAND ACQUISITION RP762 v30

2 1. Information About Project Name &Location of Subproject Project Sponsor Project Cost Installed Generation Capacity Key Dates of Implementation General Information REPORTING FORM FOR LAND ACQUISITION YEŞİL ENERJİ ELEKTRİK ÜRETİM SAN. TİC. A.Ş. POYRAZ HEPP located in Andırın village, committed to Kahramanmaraş province. YEŞİL ENERJİ ELEKTRİK ÜRETİM SAN. TİC. A.Ş. 1,872,767 EURO 2unit*1.40 MW/unit=2.80 MW Permissions were taken from Ministry of Environment and Forest with the decision number 404 in 2009 and with the decision number 599 in2010. Andırın is the most wooded and greenery district of Kahramanmaraş. The area where the HEPP located is almost foresty. 86,676 m 2 was rented from Ministry of Environment and Forest. 10,300 m 2 was volunteer purchased and 100,000 TL was paid to the land users. There aren t any structure or productive assets on the used land. Poyraz HEPP is a run of the river station so no land will be submerged. The nearest location is 500 m. away to the HEPP. 2.Inventory of Land & Assets Acquired from Private Owners (completely volunteer purchased) Name of Owners/land user Given on Annex 1 Project Component: Area(s) / plots(s) acquired (ha) 10,300 m 2 Owner s/user s total land holding (ha); % taken for project. Land use: pasture, agriculture, residence, etc. Inventory of any structures or other fixed or productive assets (wells, fences, trees, field crops, etc) affected. Indicate if land was rented or informally used by another party. Indicate if non-owner users had assets, trees, crops, etc affected Indicate if land-based activity is primary source of income for owner or land user. Compensation paid. 29,500 m 2, 35 % was taken for project. Plot structure or other fixed or productive assets. Yes, however the remaining part of the land still belongs to the owners. 100,000 TL

3 Dates delivered Impact on income of owner. negative impact. 3.Inventory of Public, Community, or State Land Acquired Land parcels / plots acquired (ha). Land type / land use: Forest, commons for grazing, other. Ownership: State, community, other. Structures or other fixed assets. Compensation, land transfer, or other measures to mitigate impacts on land users. Specify measures and dates of delivery. 4.Public Awareness, Consultations, and Communication 86,676 m 2 Forest land. Ministry of Environment and Forest. Only irrigation canal. There is no land users. But compensations for trees, value of land usage-permission and guarantee amount were paid to Andırın Forest Management Directorate. Details are given on Annex 2. In order to exchange views and give information on the possible effects of the project a public meeting was arranged on12 May 2010 in Yeşilova village. Also during the consultation the owners of the land users were informed about areas that would be taken both from the private owners and government. There were no concerns raised at the meeting. Because the land users have no economical and social loss. 5.Status of Land Acquisition Completed Pending Court decision On-going Follow-up X 6.Other Measures or Assistance provided (beyond cash compensation) Beneficiary(s) Relocation assistance Alternative Land 4 people (sons of the old owner of the purchased plot). relocation assistance

4 Livelihood restoration measures Summary of impact addressed 4 people (sons) were employed in the construction of the HEPP. 4 people (sons) were employed in the construction of the HEPP. The existing irrigation canal was maintained. 7.Identification of Vulnerable People Beneficiary Method of identification Assistance or other measures provided. vulnerable people. 8.Grievance Redress Mechanism(s) made available for project-affected persons to register grievances or complaints. Were affected people made aware of grievance redress mechanism? If so, when and where? Was the grievance redress mechanism easy to access and free of cost to affected parties? Was an independent third party engaged in facilitating grievance redress. E.g.: community leaders, NGOs, or other mutually-respected independent parties. It was announced that project affected persons (if any) could register complaints to the construction site manager directly or by the village headman. Up to now no complaints were received. affected people. Yes. The village headman.

ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN CESE ELEKTRİK ÜRETİM AŞ

1. Information About Project Name &Location of Sub-project Project Sponsor Project Cost Installed Generation Capacity Key Dates of Implementation ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN CESE ELEKTRİK ÜRETİM