BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY
|
|
- Evelyn Lambert
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Cathy Wolfe District One Diane Oberquell District Two Robert N. Macleod District Three HEARING EXAMINER BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY In the Matter of the Application of ) NO ) Eric Russell, ) Russell and Associates ) FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, ) AND DECISION For a Reasonable Use Exception ) ) SUMMARY OF DECISION A Reasonable Use Exception (RUEX) to reduce a Class II wetland buffer from 200 feet to 50 feet in order to construct a single-family residence is GRANTED, subject to conditions. SUMMARY OF RECORD Request Eric Russell (Applicant) requests approval of a RUEX to reduce a Class II wetland buffer from 200 feet to 50 feet in order to construct a single-family residence on property located at Meadow Court SE, in Yelm, Washington. Hearing Date The held an open record public hearing on the request on August 21, Testimony At the open record public hearing, the following individuals presented testimony under oath: Kim Pawlawski, Thurston County Development Services, Associate Planner Eric Russell, Applicant Exhibits At the open record public hearing, the following exhibits were admitted into the record: EXHIBIT 1 Development Services Planning & Environmental Section Report with the following Attachments: Attachment a Notice of Public Hearing 2000 Lakeridge Drive SW, Olympia, Washington (360) /FAX (360)
2 Attachment b Reasonable Use Exception Application, received April 27, 2006 Attachment c Zoning Map and Assessor Data for Parcel Attachment d Site Plan dated May 16, 2006 Attachment e Wetland Mitigation Plans prepared by Russell & Associates, dated March 21 and April 26, 2006 Attachment f Photos of Subject Parcel, taken July 21, 2006 Attachment g Aerial Photos of Site Attachment h Plat Map of Clearwood Division 18, dated April 1974 Attachment i Critical Area and Buffer Notice Attachment j s from John Ward, Thurston County Environmental Health, dated May 2 and May 17, 2006 Attachment k Letter from the Washington State Department of Ecology, dated May 18, 2006 EXHIBIT 2 Site Plan (11x17), dated May 16, 2006 (enlarged copy of Exhibit 1, Attachment d) Upon consideration of the testimony and exhibits submitted at the open record public hearing the Hearing Examiner enters the following Findings and Conclusions: FINDINGS 1. The Applicant seeks approval of a RUEX to reduce a Class II wetland buffer from 200 feet to 50 feet in order to construct a single-family residence on property located at Meadow Court SE, in Yelm, Washington. 1 The subject property is Lot 2 of the Clearwood Division 18 plat, approved in April Proposed development would include a driveway, a septic system, and a single-family residence. Exhibit 1, Staff Report, pages 1-2; Exhibit 1, Attachment b, Application. 2. The site is an irregular shaped parcel surrounded by undeveloped parcels to the north, south, and west, and a cul-de-sac, Meadow Court SE, to the east. The property was once used as a summer recreation area. Two small sheds were installed along the west boundary of the site, which are accessed by an existing driveway. The property is vegetated by mature second growth conifers and scattered shrubs. Topographically, there is a ridge in the south-central portion of the site from which the land slopes downward to the north and south. Exhibit 1, Attachment e, Wetland Report. 1 The subject property is known as Clearwood Division 18 Lot 2, Tax Parcel # , also known as a portion of Section 31, Township 16 North, Range 3 East, W.M. Exhibit 1, Attachment b, Application. Russell RUEX, No page 2 of 8
3 3. The 0.31-acre subject property is within a Rural Residential Two Dwelling Units per Acre (RR 2/1) zone. Exhibit 1, Staff Report, page 2. The intent of the RR 2/1 district is to encourage development that enhances and preserves the semi-rural residential character of areas that contain large or scattered areas having moderate physical limitations for development and are in the path of urban development, but do not currently have services required for urban-level development. TCC Permitted uses in the RR 2/1 zone include agriculture, single- and two-family residential development, and home occupations. TCC The Thurston County Critical Areas Ordinance (CAO), enacted in 1994, defines residential development in the RR 2/1 zone as high intensity development and requires a 200-foot buffer between Class II wetlands and high intensity uses. Exhibit 1, Staff Report, pages 2-4; TCC , Table There has not been any alteration of the lot configuration since the parcel recording in The Applicant purchased the site in March 2006 for $28, and has not altered it. Exhibit 1, Staff Report, pages 4, 6; Exhibit 1, Attachment e, page 4; Testimony of Ms. Pawlawski. 6. A Category II wetland, greater than ten acres in area, extends along the north and west sides of the site. The Applicant submitted a wetland delineation report, prepared by Russell & Associates, indicating that the wetland extends into a small area in the northern tip of the irregularly shaped site. The 200-foot buffer required for Category II wetlands by the CAO encumbers the entire subject property. Exhibit 1, Staff Report, pages 2-4; Exhibit 1, Attachment d; Exhibit 1, Attachment e, Wetland Report; Exhibit 2. If the CAO-required 200- foot buffer were applied to Lot 2, no development of the property would be possible. Testimony of Ms. Pawlawski. 7. The Applicant s preliminary site plan depicts a varying width, no-disturb buffer adjacent to the wetland that is 50 feet wide at its narrowest point. The site plan depicts the proposed residence as being set back 58 feet from northern part of the wetland and approximately 80 feet from the western part of the wetland. Exhibit 2. As proposed, the northern one-third and the southwestern tip of the site would contain the reduced wetland buffer. The Applicant proposes to place the single-family residence, driveway, and septic system in the southcentral portion of the lot, as far upland from the wetland edge as possible. An eight-foot building setback would be retained between the proposed northern buffer edge and the building envelope to provide room for equipment during construction of the residence. The site plan depicts a total of 3,052 square feet of the site developed with a 1,800 square foot residence, a 900 square foot new driveway, and a 360 square foot septic system. The existing dirt driveway would be abandoned within the proposed northern wetland buffer area. Exhibit 2, Site Plan; Testimony of Mr. Russell; Exhibit 1, Attachment e, Wetland Report and Addendum. 8. The Applicant submitted a proposed mitigation plan to address unavoidable impacts to the wetland buffer that would result from development of the site. Proposed mitigation includes Russell RUEX, No page 3 of 8
4 constructing a split rail wood fence along the edge of the reduced buffer at both its northern and western crossings of the site. Three aluminum wetland signs would be posted on the north buffer fence and two buffer signs would be posted on the west buffer fence, each facing the residence. Also, to mitigate the impacts of buffer reduction, the Applicant proposes to scarify the existing dirt driveway within the proposed north wetland buffer and plant it with 24 one-gallon native Douglas fir and western red cedar trees. Exhibit 1, Attachment e, Wetland Report Addendum, dated April 26, 2006; Testimony of Mr. Russell. 9. Thurston County Environmental Health Division reviewed the Applicant s proposed preliminary site plan and recommended RUEX approval. The Applicant s preliminary septic design was approved. Exhibit 1, Attachment j. 10. The Water Quality Division of the Department of Ecology submitted comments on the proposed RUEX requesting mitigation measures that require the Applicant to identify and field-mark the buffer prior to clearing or grading activities and prevent sediment-laden discharge to waters of the state. Exhibit 1, Attachment k. 11. Although the CAO criteria for reasonable use exception ordinance, in effect at the time of application, require the County to make a determination regarding reasonable economic use of property, the code does not define the term reasonable economic use. County Staff identified recreation, open space, and support facilities as potential economic uses of the site. However, because of the size of the parcel and its location within a single-family residential subdivision, Staff opined that none of the three potential uses can be considered reasonable economic uses. The RR 2/1 zoning designation, the 1974 subdivision approval, and the January 2006 approval of an RUEX on the adjacent lot to the south reducing the wetland buffer to 50 feet (RUEX No ) support the Applicant s contention that the property was zoned and platted to allow residential construction on the parcel. Testimony of Ms. Pawlawski; Exhibit 1, Staff Report, page Based on the purchase price, County Staff agreed that the Applicant intended residential development of the site at time of purchase and that construction of a single-family home would be the minimum development possible for a reasonable economic use of the property. While passive recreation or open space would be allowed, given the lot s size and location within a residential subdivision, neither constitutes a viable economic use of the property. Conditions of approval would be necessary to ensure that no disturbance, permanent or temporary, is allowed to occur within the reduced wetland buffer. Testimony of Ms. Pawlawski; Exhibit 1, Staff Report, pages In order to avoid intrusion into the wetland buffer, the proposed building envelope must be clearly marked prior to the start of construction. To prevent future residential uses from encroaching into the critical area, the edge of the buffer must be identified and permanently marked on-site with fencing and signage. County Staff recommended that the minimum number of trees be removed from the site to establish the building envelope and that minimal fill be imported for site preparation. With these recommended conditions, Staff determined that the proposed RUEX would not negatively impact public health, safety, or welfare. Testimony of Ms. Pawlawski; Exhibit 1, Staff Report, page 5. Russell RUEX, No page 4 of 8
5 14. The proposed project is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). Exhibit 1, Staff Report, page 2; Washington Administrative Code (WAC) Written notice of the public hearing was sent to all property owners within 500 feet of the site and posted on site on August Notice was published in The Olympian on August 11, Exhibit 1, Staff Report, page 2; Exhibit 1, Attachment a. CONCLUSIONS Jurisdiction The Hearing Examiner is granted jurisdiction to hear and decide applications for Reasonable Use Exceptions pursuant to Chapter of the Revised Code of Washington and Chapters 2.06 and of the Thurston County Code. Criteria for Review Critical Area Impacts: Review standards--mitigating critical area impacts. A. Impacts to critical areas are best reduced through avoiding the activity altogether; thus avoidance shall be the primary means to achieve the requirements of this chapter. B. Unavoidable impacts to critical areas often can and should be minimized by sensitive site design and deliberate actions during construction and implementation. Reasonable use Exception: Pursuant to TCC (C), the Hearing Examiner shall grant a reasonable use exception if: 1. No other reasonable economic use of the property as a whole is permitted by this chapter; 2. No reasonable economic use with less impact on the critical area or buffer is possible; 3. The requested use or activity will not result in any damage to other property and will not threaten the public health, safety or welfare on or off the development proposal site; 4. Any alteration to a critical area is the minimum necessary to allow for reasonable economic use of the property; and 5. The inability of the Applicant to derive reasonable use of the property is not the result of actions by the applicant in subdividing the property or adjusting a boundary line thereby creating the undevelopable condition after the effective date of this chapter. Russell RUEX, No page 5 of 8
6 Conclusions Based on Findings 1. No other reasonable economic use of the property as a whole is possible. Because the entire subject property is encumbered by the Class II wetland and associated buffer, reasonable economic uses are limited. While passive open or recreation space is a possible use, it is not a reasonable economic use for the property due to the size of the parcel and its location within a residential subdivision. With conditions of approval demarking the wetland buffer and ensuring compliance with the required setbacks, single-family residential development is the only reasonable economic use of the property. Findings Nos. 6, 11, and No reasonable economic use with less impact on the buffer is possible. The applicable Thurston County standard requires consideration of a reasonable economic use. While passive open space or recreational use could have less impact on the buffer, they are not reasonable economic uses given the size and location of the parcel. The only viable economic use identified in the record is residential development. Findings Nos. 11 and With conditions, the requested use would not threaten the public health, safety, or welfare on or off the development proposal site. The Applicant s preliminary septic system design has received approval from the Thurston County Health Department. Final on-site septic design would be required to comply with all County septic setback and other design standards. Conditions of approval would ensure that the unavoidable impacts to the wetland buffer would be minimized through sensitive site design and deliberate actions during construction, consistent with TCC (B), including wood fencing and signage to mark the buffer edge, limiting fill, limiting tree removal to the minimum necessary, and buffer enhancement in the location of the existing dirt driveway. With these conditions, the proposed development would not cause harm to public health, safety, and welfare. Findings Nos. 8, 9, 10, and The proposed alteration to the critical area is the minimum necessary to allow for reasonable economic use of the property. Due to the size of the subject property and the limited upland area, few changes to the preliminary site plan are possible. With conditions to protect the wetland buffer edge and ensure compliance with the required septic setback, the proposed residence will alter the critical area to the minimum extent necessary to allow for reasonable economic use of the property. Findings Nos. 11, 12, and The inability of the Applicant to derive other reasonable economic use of the property is not the result of the Applicant s actions. The subject property has not been part of a subdivision or boundary line adjustment since before the adoption of the Critical Areas Ordinance in The Applicant has not altered the site. Findings Nos. 1, 2, and 5. DECISION The request for approval of a RUEX to reduce a Class II wetland buffer from 200 feet to 50 feet in order to construct a single-family residence on property located at Meadow Court SE, in Yelm, Washington is GRANTED subject to the following conditions: Russell RUEX, No page 6 of 8
7 1. Prior to or in conjunction with building permit issuance, all applicable regulations and requirements of the Thurston County Environmental Health Division, Thurston County Roads and Transportation Services Department and the Thurston County Development Services Department shall be met. 2. Prior to building permit issuance, the Applicant shall record with the Thurston County Auditor: a) a document similar to the Critical Area and Buffer Notice (Exhibit 1, Attachment h); and b) a site plan showing the wetlands and associated buffers. The Applicant shall also record the Hearing Examiner Decision for the purpose of providing public awareness of the permit and these conditions. 3. Wetlands, marshes, bogs, and swamps are designated as critical areas per the Thurston County Critical Areas Ordinance, TCC As a condition of approval, the following note must be recorded with the Critical Area and Buffer Notice: Wetlands are designated as critical areas in Thurston County. Due to the importance of these wetlands for wildlife habitat, pollution control, ground water recharge and flood water storage, no clearing, filling, grading or other construction activities shall be allowed within the wetland or buffer area except where exempted by and when prior authorization is obtained from Thurston County Development Services, Planning and Environmental Section. 4. Structures or land clearing that are not incidental to the preparation of the home site shall be permitted on the property. The Applicant shall mark the trees that must be removed and County Staff shall verify that the vegetation clearing satisfies the conditions of the permit. 5. A wetland mitigation plan has been prepared and submitted in accordance with TCC to enhance the existing buffer and reduce the impacts of activities associated with a single-family residence, on-site septic system, and driveway installation. To ensure installation and survival of the plantings, this plan is subject to monitoring by Development Services Staff for three years after it has been installed. The three year period shall commence upon notice to the Development Services Staff that all of the plantings have been installed. 6. A permanent fence (low, split rail, non-barbed wire or wood farm fencing) shall be erected at the intersection of the reduced buffer edge and the developed portion of the lot before any clearing or construction can occur. County Staff must inspect and approve this fence before and after construction. The permanent fence may be constructed in sections with gaps not to exceed 10 feet. It shall not be totally solid or made of barbed wire. All construction materials shall be stored outside of the wetland buffer areas. The permanent fence is to provide the clearing limits during construction and provide a physical definition of the buffer locations that is to be preserved. The fence shall be constructed to allow wildlife to pass through the area. The edges of the buffers must be accurately located prior to installation. Assistance Russell RUEX, No page 7 of 8
8 from a wetland biologist may be required to determine where the location of the buffer edges. The portion of the subject property between the fence and the northern property line shall be replanted consistent with the wetland mitigation plan. 7. The perimeter of the wetland buffer on the upland must be marked with five permanent metal face signs along the buffer boundary, as identified on the preliminary site plan (Exhibit 2). A template for these signs can be obtained from the Thurston County Development Services Department. The signs must be a minimum of 9 by 18 of heavy gauge aluminum affixed to 4 by 4 pressure-treated wood posts. The signs must be placed approximately 4 feet above the ground surface and face the residence. The signs must be installed prior to approval of the final inspection of the single-family residence. 8. The septic drainfield shall be constructed so that vegetation removal is minimized. Erosion and sediment control devices shall be installed prior to any construction activity or clearing of property to prevent upland sediments from flowing off the property into the wetland. 9. Future removal of trees within the wetland and associated buffer must be reviewed by Thurston County Development Services Department Staff at the time of the proposed removal. This includes the identification of the tree(s) as hazardous which will require a certified arborist to determine whether the tree(s) present a hazard to surrounding structures. The review may also include requirements for additional mitigation and replanting to replace the function and value of the tree(s) proposed for removal. DECIDED this 6 th day of September James M. Driscoll \\Tcbldg1d\VOL1\apps\track\Planning\Amanda Save File\Reasonable Use Exception XI\Decisions\ decision.russell.doc Russell RUEX, No page 8 of 8
BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY
BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY In the Matter of the Application of ) ) NO. RUEX 010274 Harry and Charlotte Hawkins ) ) FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS For Approval of a Reasonable Use Exception
More informationBEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Cathy Wolfe District One Diane Oberquell District Two Robert N. Macleod District Three HEARING EXAMINER BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY In the Matter of the Application
More informationBEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Cathy Wolfe District One Diane Oberquell District Two Robert N. Macleod District Three HEARING EXAMINER BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY In the Matter of the Application
More informationBEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY
BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY In the Matter of the Application of ) No. PLAT/PRRD 020003 ) Frog Hollow Division 2 Kenosha Limited Partnership ) ) FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS For Approval of
More informationCITY OF FERNDALE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF FERNDALE HEARING EXAMINER RE: Planned Unit Development ) 16001-PUD Preliminary Plat ) 16018-SE Plat Variance ) 16002-VAR Application by ) ) MD General, L.L.C. ) FINDINGS OF FACT, Malloy Heights
More informationBEFORE THE SKAGIT COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION
BEFORE THE SKAGIT COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION Applicant: Representative: File Nos: Requests: Location: Donald Hansen & Brooke Ghen 2026 Cliff Drive, Suite 157 Santa Barbara,
More informationBEFORE THE HEARINGS EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY
BEFORE THE HEARINGS EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY In the Matter of the Application of ) NO. SUPT 020642 ) T-Mobile ) FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS ) AND DECISION For Approval of a Special Use Permit ) ) SUMMARY
More informationDRAFT FOR PUBLIC HEARING (rev. March, 2016)
Chapter 200. ZONING Article VI. Conservation/Cluster Subdivisions 200-45. Intent and Purpose These provisions are intended to: A. Guide the future growth and development of the community consistent with
More informationKitsap County Department of Community Development
Kitsap County Department of Community Development Staff Report and Recommendation Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment Process for 2018 George s Corner LAMIRD Boundary Adjustment Report Date 7/16/2018 Hearing
More informationBEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY
BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY In the Matter of the Application of ) ) NO. RUEX 000832 Lowell Trana ) ) FINDINGS OF FACTS, For Approval of a Reasonable Use Exception ) CONCLUSIONS, ) AND
More informationCHAPTER 6 CHESAPEAKE BAY PRESERVATION AREAS AND STREAM PROTECTION AREAS
CHAPTER 6 CHESAPEAKE BAY PRESERVATION AREAS AND STREAM PROTECTION AREAS 6.1 INTRODUCTION Virginia s Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area (CBPA) Designation and Management Regulations (9VAC10-20 et seq.) require
More informationBEFORE THE HEARINGS EXAMINER FOR THE CITY OF BREMERTON
BEFORE THE HEARINGS EXAMINER FOR THE CITY OF BREMERTON In the Matter of the Application of ) NO. PL03-0017 ) Rainier Vista Bill Bakker ) ) FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS For Approval of a Preliminary Plat. ) AND
More information4. If any perennial surface water passes through or along the property lines of the acreage, a minimum of 200 feet or frontage should be required.
b. Provide adequate acreage for appropriate productive use of rural residential land, such as small numbers of livestock, large gardens, etc. 3. Minimum of 200 feet of frontage on an improved county or
More informationBEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY
BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY In the Matter of the Application of ) NO. PLAT/PRRD/VARI 961411 ) Intercontinental Investments Inc. ) FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS ) AND DECISION for a Preliminary
More informationThurston County Planning Department PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT. AMENDMENTS TO THE CRITICAL AREAS REGULATIONS Chapter /18/2011 GENERAL PROVISIONS
Thurston County Planning Department PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO THE CRITICAL AREAS REGULATIONS Chapter 24.01 11/18/2011 Chapter 24.01 GENERAL PROVISIONS GENERAL PROVISIONS Sections: 24.01.005 Short
More informationThurston County Planning Department BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO THE CRITICAL AREAS REGULATIONS. Chapter 24.
Thurston County Planning Department BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO THE CRITICAL AREAS REGULATIONS Chapter 24.01 GENERAL PROVISIONS Chapter 24.01 6/4/2012 GENERAL PROVISIONS
More informationMINUTE ORDER BONNER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES AUGUST 6, 2015
MINUTE ORDER BONNER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES AUGUST 6, 2015 CALL TO ORDER: Chair Cary Kelly called the Bonner County Commissioners hearing to order at 1:00 p.m. in the 3rd floor meeting
More informationA. Maintenance. All legally established, nonconforming structures can be maintained (e.g., painting and repairs);
Chapter 24.50 NONCONFORMING USES, STRUCTURES AND LOTS Sections: 24.50.010 Nonconforming uses, structures, and lots Purpose. 24.50.020 Nonconforming uses, structures, and lots Alteration or expansion of
More informationSUBURBAN AND URBAN RESIDENTIAL LAND USE
SUBURBAN AND URBAN RESIDENTIAL LAND USE GOAL 1 DISCOURAGE URBAN AND SUBURBAN DEVELOPMENT OUTSIDE INCORPORATED AREAS IN WHITMAN COUNTY, EXCEPT WITHIN DESIGNATED UNINCORPORATED COMMUNITIES, AND THOSE AREAS
More informationBEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Cathy Wolfe District One Diane Oberquell District Two Robert N. Macleod District Three HEARING EXAMINER BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY In the Matter of the Application
More informationKitsap County Hearing Examiner
January 25, 2016 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, 619 DIVISION ST, MS-36 PORT ORCHARD, WA 98366 http://www.kitsapgov.com/dcd/lu_env/he/ (360) 337-5777 NOTICE OF HEARING EXAMINER DECISION To: Interested Parties
More informationCity Hall 555 Israel Road SW Tumwater, WA 98501-6515 Phone: 360-754-5855 Fax: 360-754-4126 NOTICE OF APPLICATION TUM-14-0536 & TUM-14-0538 July 14, 2014 Project: Herburger Wetland Reasonable Use Exceptions.
More informationNOTICE OF DECISION BEFORE THE SKAGIT COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER State Route 9 Sedro Woolley, WA 98284
NOTICE OF DECISION BEFORE THE SKAGIT COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER Applicants: Request: Location: Land Use Designation: Summary of Proposal: SEPA Compliance: Public Hearing: Patrick and Kelli Bever 5723 State
More informationLarimer County Planning Dept. Procedural Guide for 1041 PERMITS
- Larimer County Planning Dept. Procedural Guide for 1041 PERMITS PLEASE NOTE: A PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THIS APPLICATION. PURPOSE: State Statutes allow local governments
More informationKitsap County Department of Community Development. Administrative Staff Report
Kitsap County Department of Community Development Administrative Staff Report Report Date: Application Complete Date: March 15, 2018 Application Submittal Date: March 12, 2018 Project Name: Nikki Lee Salon
More informationEXHIBIT D. Planned Unit Development Written Description April 13, 2016 Rouen Cove Phase II PUD
1 EXHIBIT D Planned Unit Development Written Description April 13, 2016 Rouen Cove Phase II PUD Development # 8986.001 Developer: Curtis L. Hart Hart Resources LLC 8051 Tara Lane Jacksonville, Florida
More informationDOUGLAS COUNTY ZONING RESOLUTION Section 4 LRR - Large Rural Residential District 3/10/99. -Section Contents-
SECTION 4 LRR LARGE RURAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT -Section Contents- 401 Intent... 4-2 402 Principal Uses... 4-2 403 Accessory Uses... 4-3 404 Uses Permitted by Special Review... 4-4 405 Land Dedication...
More informationPLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1800 Continental Place Mount Vernon, WA Inspections Office Fax 360.
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1800 Continental Place Mount Vernon, WA 98273 Inspections 360.416.1330 Office 360.416-1320 Fax 360.416-1340 Date Received: Administrative Setback Reduction Checklist Pursuant
More informationGWINNETT COUNTY CSO CONSERVATION SUBDIVISION OVERLAY DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS
GWINNETT COUNTY CSO CONSERVATION SUBDIVISION OVERLAY DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS Section 1316. CSO Conservation Subdivision Overlay District. 1. Purposes. The purposes of this overlay district are as follows:
More informationWalton County Planning and Development Services
Walton County Planning and Development Services 31 Coastal Centre Boulevard, Suite 100 47 N 6 th Street Santa Rosa Beach, Florida 32459 DeFuniak Springs, Florida 32433 Phone 850-267-1955 Phone 850-892-8157
More information19.12 CLUSTER RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
Chapter 19.12 CLUSTER RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Adopted 12/22/2003; Ordinance #0061970). Amended 7/3/17, Ordinance #079100. Section 19.12.010 - Declaration of Intent. The Cluster Residential District provides
More informationLABEL PLEASE NOTE: ALL APPLICATIONS AND SITE PLANS MUST BE COMPLETED IN BLACK OR BLUE INK ONLY Intake by:
STAFF USE ONLY Thurston County Resource Stewardship 2000 Lakeridge Dr. S.W. Olympia, WA 98502 (360)786-5490 / (360)754-2939 (Fax) TDD Line (360) 754-2933 Email: permit@co.thurston.wa.us Supplemental Application
More informationInstructions to the Applicant
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Lake of the Woods County Land and Water Planning Office 206 8 th Avenue Southeast, Suite #290 Baudette MN 56623-2867 www.co.lake-of-the-woods.mn.us Phone: (218) 634-1945
More informationApplicant s Agent Lisa Murphy, Esq. Staff Planner PJ Scully. Lot Recordation 12/01/1972 Map Book 94, Page 33 GPIN
Property Owner and Applicant Address 3925 Shore Drive Public Hearing September 24, 2018 City Council District Bayside Agenda Item 6 Variance Request Encroachment into the Resource Protection Area (RPA)
More informationSTAFF REPORT and INFORMATION FOR THE HEARING EXAMINER. Project: Westphal Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
KITSAP COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 614 DIVISION STREET MS-36, PORT ORCHARD WASHINGTON 98366-4682 LARRY KEETON, DIRECTOR (360) 337-7181 FAX (360) 337-4925 HOME PAGE - www.kitsapgov.com STAFF
More informationSINGLE-FAMILY WETLAND CERTIFICATION PROCESS
SINGLE-FAMILY WETLAND CERTIFICATION PROCESS Listed below is a step-by-step process for expediting wetland reviews for single-family development. It is called the Single-Family Certification Process. It
More informationBEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Creating Solutions for Our Future Cathy Wolfe District One Sandra Romero District Two Karen Valenzuela District Three HEARING EXAMINER BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY
More informationSANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT February 15, 2013
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT February 15, 2013 PROJECT: Galbraith Lot Line Adjustment HEARING DATE: March 4, 2013 STAFF/PHONE: J. Ritterbeck, (805) 568-3509 GENERAL INFORMATION
More informationStaff Report. Conditional Use Permit: Williams Tree and Stump Removal. Application Number: Tax Parcel Numbers:
Pierce County Department of Planning and Land Services, 2401 South 35th Street, Tacoma, WA (253) 798-7037 Staff Report Conditional Use Permit: Williams Tree and Stump Removal Application Number: 836154
More informationTOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: December 6, 2011
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: December 6, 2011 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Matt Michels, Senior Planner mmichels@orovalleyaz.gov; tel. 229-4822 Public Hearing: Rancho de
More informationBY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AN ACT TO BE ENTITLED
BY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ORDINANCE NO. AN ACT TO BE ENTITLED AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE PASCO COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, ARTICLE 700, BY REPEALING EXISTING SECTION 702, ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE
More informationFinnerty, Shawn & Lori Water Front Setback
BONNER COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FOR NOVEMBER 2, 2017 Project Name: Finnerty, Shawn & Lori Water Front Setback File Number, Type: FILE #V492-17, Variance Request
More informationFinnerty, Shawn & Lori Water Front Setback
BONNER COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS STAFF REPORT FOR JANUARY 10, 2018 Project Name: Finnerty, Shawn & Lori Water Front Setback File Number, Type: FILE #V492-17, Variance Request
More informationLake on October 5, 2010 with the intention of working with Thurston County, the City of Tumwater, and other interested parties on surrounding areas
ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE EXTENDING INTERIM REGULATIONS THAT AMENDED THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP FOR THURSTON COUNTY, WASHINGTON FOR THE KEN LAKE AREA IN THE UNINCORPORATED CITY OF OLYMPIA URBAN GROWTH AREA.
More informationBRISTOL CONSERVATION COMMISSION INLAND WETLANDS AGENCY FORM IW-1 (Application for a Wetlands Permit)
APPLICATION NO. BRISTOL CONSERVATION COMMISSION INLAND WETLANDS AGENCY FORM IW-1 (Application for a Wetlands Permit) DATE FILED: APPROVED: DENIED: 1. APPLICANT: Name: Signature: Address: City: State: Zip
More informationBEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY
BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY In the Matter of the Application of ) NO. SUPT 000439 ) Southwest Washington ) FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS Soccer Association ) AND DECISION ) For Approval of
More informationPlanning Department Oconee County, Georgia
Planning Department Oconee County, Georgia STAFF REPORT REZONE CASE #: 6985 DATE: October 31, 2016 STAFF REPORT BY: Andrew C. Stern, Planner APPLICANT NAME: Williams & Associates, Land Planners PC PROPERTY
More informationZONING PERMIT APPLICATION
ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: FILE NO. 120 DAY EXPIRATION Purpose: Some types of land use activities listed in the Lake County Zoning Ordinance are allowed to occur with a minimal
More informationOpen Space Model Ordinance
Open Space Model Ordinance Section I. Background Open space development has numerous environmental and community benefits, including: 1) Reduces the impervious cover in a development. Impervious cover
More informationTOWN OF WHITBY REPORT RECOMMENDATION REPORT
TOWN OF WHITBY REPORT RECOMMENDATION REPORT REPORT TO: Planning and Development Committee REPORT NO: PL 4-08 DATE OF MEETING: January 21, 2008 FILE NO(S): MI-01-07 (SW- 2002-03) PREPARED BY: Planning Department
More informationANDOVER CODE. Checklist #5 Preliminary Site Plan Conditional Use
ANDOVER CODE Checklist #5 Preliminary Site Plan Conditional Use Applicant: Block Lot File No. This checklist is for general reference only. Further information may be required by the reviewing authority.
More informationLAND USE APPLICATION
LAND USE APPLICATION File Name: File No(s).: Receipt No.: Receipt Date: Received By: Amount.: $ Instructions for Applicants Please read and follow all instructions on your application carefully. If you
More informationSECTION 4: PRELIMINARY PLAT
SECTION 4: PRELIMINARY PLAT After the completion of the sketch plan process, if submitted, the owner or developer shall file with the City an application for preliminary plat. The preliminary plat stage
More informationAPPLICATION PROCEDURE
ANTRIM PLANNING BOARD P. O. Box 517 Antrim, New Hampshire 03440 Phone: 603-588-6785 FAX: 603-588-2969 APPLICATION FORM AND CHECKLIST FOR MINOR OR MAJOR SITE PLAN REVIEW File Date Received By APPLICATION
More informationHERON LANDING SUBDIVISION
HERON LANDING SUBDIVISION Engineering Comments: Per FEMA guidelines, any development greater than 5 acres in size or subdivision 50 lots in size, requires a flood study. Width of drainage easement to be
More informationBONNER COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISION STAFF REPORT APRIL 19, 2018
BONNER COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISION STAFF REPORT APRIL 19, 2018 Project Name: File Number,Type: Request: Legal Description: Location: Parcel Size: Parcel # Applicant: Project
More informationDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST. To initiate the application, the applicant shall submit to the Administrative Officer:
DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST To initiate the application, the applicant shall submit to the Administrative Officer: 1. Sixteen (16) copies of the Project Review Application Form, printed double-sided;
More informationLetter of Intent May 2017 (Revised November 2017)
THE BEACH AT WOODMOOR LETTER OF INTENT MAY 2017 (REVISED NOVEMBER 2017) OWNER/APPLICANT: CONSULTANT: Lake Woodmoor Holdings LLC N.E.S. Inc. 1755 Telstar Drive, Suite 211 619 North Cascade Avenue Colorado
More informationWHATCOM COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER
WHATCOM COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER RE: SHORELINE VARIANCE ) SHV2009-0006 Application for ) ) Delcia Dinnetz ) FINDINGS OF FACT, ) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, ) AND DECISION SUMMARY OF APPLICATION AND DECISION Application:
More informationLAND USE APPLICATION - ADMINISTRATIVE Property Line Adjustment Review (Ministerial No Notice)
LAND MANAGEMENT DIVISION Date Received: LAND USE APPLICATION - ADMINISTRATIVE Property Line Adjustment Review (Ministerial No Notice) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 3050 N. DELTA HWY, EUGENE OR 97408 Planning:
More informationDiamond Falls Subdivision PROPOSED YELLOWSTONE COUNTY BOARD OF PLANNING FINDINGS OF FACT
Diamond Falls Subdivision PROPOSED YELLOWSTONE COUNTY BOARD OF PLANNING FINDINGS OF FACT The City/County Planning Staff has prepared the Findings of Fact for the Diamond Falls Subdivision. These findings
More informationBOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 Tel: 360.379.4450 Fax: 360.379.4451 Web: www.co.jefferson.wa.us/communitydevelopment E-mail: dcd@co.jefferson.wa.us BOUNDARY
More informationKitsap County Department of Community Development. Administrative Staff Report - Revised
Kitsap County Department of Community Development Administrative Staff Report - Revised Report Date: August 21, 2018 Application Submittal Date: March 21, 2018 Application Complete Date: April 5, 2018
More informationARTICLE XI - CONSERVATION SUBDIVISIONS
ARTICLE XI - CONSERVATION SUBDIVISIONS Section 1101: Purpose and Intent. This Article is intended to provide for residential subdivisions that are designed based first and foremost on the preservation
More informationChapter CLUSTER RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Adopted 12/22/2003; Ordinance # )
Chapter 19.12 CLUSTER RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Adopted 12/22/2003; Ordinance #0061970) Section 19.12.010 - Declaration of Intent. The Cluster Residential District provides minimum standards for specified
More informationTown of Falmouth s Four Step Design Process for Subdivisions in the Resource Conservation Zoning Overlay District
Town of Falmouth s Four Step Design Process for Subdivisions in the Resource Conservation Zoning Overlay District All subdivisions shall be designed in accordance with the following four-step process.
More informationBEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Creating Solutions for Our Future Cathy Wolfe District One Sandra Romero District Two Bud Blake District Three HEARING EXAMINER BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY In the
More informationLand Use. Existing Land Use
8 Land Use 8.1 Land Use Chapter Purpose and Contents This element includes a brief summary of existing land use conditions and trends followed by a series of goals, objectives, and recommendations to guide
More informationFRESHWATER WETLANDS PROTECTION IN NEW JERSEY Tools for Municipal Action
FRESHWATER WETLANDS PROTECTION IN NEW JERSEY Tools for Municipal Action The Freshwater Wetlands Protection Act INTENT OF FRESHWATER WETLANDS LAW The New Jersey legislature passed the Freshwater Wetlands
More informationIRS FORM 8283 SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENT DONATION OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT
Name(s) shown on income tax return Identifying Number Robert T. Landowner 021-34-1234 Susan B. Landowner 083-23-5555 IRS FORM 8283 SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENT DONATION OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT On November 12,
More informationWASCO COUNTY PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPLICATION
WASCO COUNTY PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPLICATION DETAILED SPECIFIC WRITTEN REQUEST File Number: SDV- Number of Proposed Lots & their Dimensions: PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAN REQUIREMENTS The approval of
More informationREPRESENTATIVE: Julie & Brad Nicodemus Black Squirrel Road Colorado Springs, CO 80809
COMMISSIONERS: DARRYL GLENN (PRESIDENT) MARK WALLER (PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE) STAN VANDERWERF LONGINOS GONZALEZ PEGGY LITTLETON PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CRAIG DOSSEY, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
More informationBEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Cathy Wolfe District One Diane Oberquell District Two Robert N. Macleod District Three HEARING EXAMINER BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY In the Matter of the Request
More informationSTAFF REPORT FOR COASTAL DEVELOPMENT CDP# STANDARD PERMIT June 11, 2013 CPA-1. Victor Suarez Fern Drive Mendocino, CA 95460
CPA-1 OWNER/APPLICANT: REQUEST: ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: RECOMMENDATION: LOCATION: APPEALABLE AREA: PERMIT TYPE: TOTAL ACREAGE: GENERAL PLAN: Victor Suarez 45130 Fern Drive Mendocino, CA 95460 Construct
More informationArticle 7: Residential Land Use and Development Requirements
Article 7: Residential Land Use and Section 701: Statement of Intent (A) (B) (C) The intent of Article 7 is to develop certain land use and development requirements for the residential uses within Cumru
More informationARTICLE FIVE FINAL DRAFT
ARTICLE FIVE 021218 FINAL DRAFT Sec. 503.6 Open Space Preservation Option Open Space Preservation Option Open Space Preservation developments may be approved in the AR, R-1, R-2 and R-3 zoning districts,
More informationNapa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter
Agenda Date: 9/20/2017 Agenda Placement: 8C Napa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter TO: FROM: Napa County Planning Commission Charlene Gallina for David Morrison - Director Planning, Building
More informationCHAFFEE COUNTY LAND USE CODE
CHAFFEE COUNTY LAND USE CODE CHAPTER 2 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 2.1 GENERAL 2.1.1 Subdivision Approval: Residential development approved under these regulations shall be designed and constructed
More informationEasement Program Guidelines for Water Resources and Stream Work
Easement Program Guidelines for Water Resources and Stream Work The following guidelines are established by the Easement Committee to create standards for reviewing requests by landowners to conduct stream
More informationARTICLE VII. NONCONFORMITIES. Section 700. Purpose.
ARTICLE VII. NONCONFORMITIES. Section 700. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to regulate and limit the development and continued existence of legal uses, structures, lots, and signs established either
More informationResidential Project Convenience Facilities
Standards for Specific Land Uses 35.42.220 E. Findings. The review authority shall approve a Land Use Permit in compliance with Subsection 35.82.110.E (Findings required for approval) or a Conditional
More informationInitial Project Review
Pierce County Department of Planning and Land Services, 2401 South 35th Street, Tacoma, WA (253) 798-7037 Initial Project Review Major Amendment to Preliminary Plat: Hawks Ridge Division 1 Application
More informationRENITA HURDSMAN BEAR RIVER STATE PARK LAND EXCHANGE PROPOSAL
DETAILED ANALYSIS RENITA HURDSMAN BEAR RIVER STATE PARK LAND EXCHANGE PROPOSAL June 1, 2006 Prepared by the Office of State Lands and Investments Herschler Building, 3W 122 West 25 th Street Cheyenne,
More informationCover Letter with Narrative Statement
Cover Letter with Narrative Statement March 31, 2017 rev July 27, 2017 RE: Rushton Pointe Residential Planned Unit Development Application for Public Hearing for RPUD Rezone PL2015 000 0306 Mr. Eric Johnson,
More informationEasement Program Guidelines for Locating Towers and Communication Devices
Easement Program Guidelines for Locating Towers and Communication Devices The following guidelines are established by the Easement Committee to create standards for reviewing requests by landowners to
More informationDISTRICT COUNCIL FOR PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY, MARYLAND OFFICE OF ZONING HEARING EXAMINER SPECIAL EXCEPTION 4658 DECISION
DISTRICT COUNCIL FOR PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY, MARYLAND OFFICE OF ZONING HEARING EXAMINER SPECIAL EXCEPTION 4658 DECISION Application: Three Chair Barber Shop Applicants: Danta L. & Felicia B. Wright/Fort
More informationCITY OF MERCER ISLAND COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 9611 SE 36TH STREET MERCER ISLAND, WA PHONE:
CITY OF MERCER ISLAND COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 9611 SE 36TH STREET MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 PHONE: 206.275.7605 www.mercergov.org WEEKLY BULLETIN FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS 3. IF I OBJECT TO THE
More informationParkland-Spanaway-Midland LUAC - Agenda
1. 6:30 P.M. Parkland-Spanaway-Midland LUAC - Agenda Documents: 8 2 17 PSMAC Agenda.pdf 2. Parkland-Spanaway-Midland LUAC Initial Project Review Documents: Lincoln Court PP IPR PSMAC-RJ.pdf Department
More informationPlat Alteration request of Barkley North LLC re 3400 Sussex Drive (aka Village on the Green Division #5 Tract B) 08/26/2015
Hearing Examiner Summary and Decision Hearing Examiner No. Planning No. Incident No. Filing Date City Contact Hearing Date Description Decision Date Decision Summary HE-15-PL-022 SUB2015-00019 06/22/2015
More informationCONSERVATION EASEMENT INCLUDING MITIGATION
After recording return to: GRANTOR: GRANTEE: GRANTEE (Trustee): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: TAX PARCEL I.D. #: REFERENCE # s: WHATCOM COUNTY N/A CONSERVATION EASEMENT INCLUDING MITIGATION This grant of a conservation
More informationPRELIMINARY PLAN CHECKLIST Major Land Development Projects. To initiate the application, the applicant shall submit to the Administrative Officer:
PRELIMINARY PLAN CHECKLIST Major Land Development Projects To initiate the application, the applicant shall submit to the Administrative Officer: 1. The application review fee, as established by the South
More informationKitsap County Department of Community Development. Notice of Administrative Decision
Kitsap County Department of Community Development Notice of Administrative Decision Date: March 27, 2018 To: Tammy Mabry, tammystattoostudio@gmail.com Interested Parties and Parties of Record RE: Permit
More informationBEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR CITY OF VANCOUVER
BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR CITY OF VANCOUVER In the Matter of the Application of ) NO. PRJ-151162/LUP-53608 ) ) Irina Leschuk, DL Design Group, Inc., ) 136th Avenue Subdivision On behalf of Omega
More informationAPPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL OF A SKETCH PLAN with checklist
Prior to filing any application for SUBDIVISION approval, the applicant shall request in writing that the zoning administrator schedule a pre-submission conference. APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING BOARD TOWN
More informationKitsap County Department of Community Development. Staff Report
Kitsap County Department of Community Development Staff Report Report Date: Application Complete Date: August 14, 2017 Application Submittal Date: August 14, 2017 To: Hercules & Laura Hubbell, laura@allcountyoperations.com
More informationMINUTE ORDER. BONNER COUNTY PLANNING and ZONING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES APRIL 7, 2016
MINUTE ORDER BONNER COUNTY PLANNING and ZONING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES APRIL 7, 2016 CALL TO ORDER: Acting Chair Hall called the Bonner County Planning and Zoning Commission hearing to order
More informationMEMORANDUM. Critical Areas Ordinance Density Requirements
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Creating Solutions for Our Future Cathy Wolfe District One Sandra Romero District Two Karen Valenzuela District Three PLANNING DEPARTMENT Scott Clark Director MEMORANDUM TO: FROM:
More informationKitsap County Department of Community Development. Staff Report and Administrative Decision
Kitsap County Department of Community Development Report Date: Staff Report and Administrative Decision Application Complete Date: March 19, 2018 Application Submittal Date: March 19, 2018 To: Seth Hanson,
More informationTOWNSHIP OF MENDHAM Ord. No
ORDINANCE SUPPLEMENTING THE LAND USE ORDINANCE OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MENDHAM BY A NEW CHAPTER XXIVA ESTABLISHING THE REQUIREMENT OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT AND AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING SAID ORDINANCE WITH
More informationCONDOMINIUM REGULATIONS
ARTICLE 37 CONDOMINIUM REGULATIONS SECTION 37.01. Purpose The purpose of this Article is to regulate projects that divide real property under a contractual arrangement known as a condominium. New and conversion
More information