PARKS AND RECREATION SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES METHODOLOGY UPDATE

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "PARKS AND RECREATION SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES METHODOLOGY UPDATE"

Transcription

1 PARKS AND RECREATION SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES METHODOLOGY UPDATE October 4, 2006 PO Box Portland, OR Don Ganer & Associates, Inc.

2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Board of Directors Gary Ross, President Lee Beyer, Vice-President Greg James, Director Danelle Ralston, Director Helen Wagner, Director Citizen Advisory Committee Lee Beyer, Willamalane Board of Directors Roy Burling, Willamalane Budget Committee Barbara Cerotsky, League of Women Voters of Lane County Roxie Cuellar, Home Builders Association of Lane County Dwight Dzierzek, Citizen at Large Dan Egan, Springfield Chamber of Commerce Blake Hastings, Realtor/Developer Christine Lundberg, Springfield City Council Jim Mayo, Friends of Willamalane Dennis Shine, Citizen-at-Large Chris Traver, Citizen-at-Large Staff Bob Keefer, Superintendent Pam Caples, Administrative Services Division Director Rebecca Gershow, Planner and Project Manager Greg Hyde, Planning and Development Manager Consultant Don Ganer and Associates, Inc. Willamalane PRD Parks & Recreation SDC Methodology Update Report page i

3 CONTENTS page 1.0 INTRODUCTION AUTHORITY AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION 3 A. Legislative Authority 3 B. Improvement fee and Reimbursement fee SDCs 3 C. Requirements and Options for Credits, Exemptions, and Discounts PARKS AND RECREATION SDC METHODOLOGY 6 A. Population Growth 6 B. Persons Per Dwelling Unit 7 C. Facility Needs 7 D. Facility Costs 8 E. Compliance/Administrative Costs 9 F. Total SDC-Eligible Costs PARKS AND RECREATION SDC RATES 11 A. Formula 4a: Improvements Cost Per Capita 11 B. Formula 4b: Improvements Cost Per Dwelling Unit 12 C. Formula 4c: SDC Debt Service Credit Per Dwelling Unit 12 D. Formula 4d: Total SDC Per Dwelling Unit 13 APPENDIX A: Parks SDC Capacity Improvement Projects APPENDIX B: Parks SDC Rates Comparison Willamalane PRD Parks & Recreation SDC Methodology Update Report page ii

4 TABLES TABLE 3.1: Projected Population Increase From New Development 6 ( ) TABLE 3.2: Average Number of Persons Per Dwelling Unit 7 TABLE 3.3: Facilities Required for Growth and Non-Growth Needs 8 TABLE 3.4: Facility Costs 9 TABLE 3.5: Compliance/Administrative Cost Estimates 9 TABLE 3.6: Total SDC-Eligible Costs 10 TABLE 4.1: Improvements Cost Per Capita 11 TABLE 4.2: Improvements Cost Per Dwelling Unit 12 TABLE 4.3: Debt Service Credit Per Dwelling Unit 13 TABLE 4.4: Total SDC Per Dwelling Unit 13 page Willamalane PRD Parks & Recreation SDC Methodology Update Report page iii

5 WILLAMALANE PARK & RECREATION DISTRICT Parks and Recreation System Development Charges Methodology Update 1.0 INTRODUCTION System Development Charges (SDCs) are one-time fees charged to new development to help pay a portion of the costs associated with building capital facilities to meet needs created by growth. SDCs are authorized for five types of capital facilities including transportation, water, sewer, stormwater, and parks and recreation. The District s current parks and recreation SDC methodology was prepared in The 1995 methodology was designed to calculate the cost to maintain the then existing Level of Service (e.g., units of facility per population). The cost to maintain the 1995 level of service was calculated at $2,023 (1995 dollars) per single family dwelling unit, and the Board of Directors opted to cap the fee at less than 50% of this amount so that it did not exceed $1,000 for a single family dwelling unit. In January 2006, the District engaged Don Ganer & Associates, Inc. to review the existing methodology and prepare an update to reflect the current costs of growth needs identified in the District s 2004 Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan. An ad hoc committee including one member of the Board of Directors, community members, and interested citizens was formed to review the consultant s work and make recommendations for consideration by the full Board of Directors. In addition to reviewing the SDC methodology, the committee considered several policy options including: Should the District consider adding a Parks SDC for non-residential development? Should the District include multiple SDC rate zones? Should the District adopt an inflation index to periodically adjust the SDC rates? The committee recommended, and the Board of Directors approved, exploring the SDC for nonresidential development and the inflation index. The committee recommended against multiple rate zones, and the Board of Directors agreed with their recommendation. A non-residential SDC option was developed for consideration by the committee. The committee recommended that the non-residential parks SDC option not be considered for adoption because it would have reduced the total SDC-eligible growth portion of costs while at the same time increasing complexity and administrative costs. Willamalane PRD Parks & Recreation SDC Methodology Update Report page 1

6 An inflation index will be included in the resolution by which this methodology is adopted by the Board of Directors. The index will be applied annually to the adopted SDC rates to reflect changes in the costs of acquisition and development of parks and recreation facilities. Annual application of an index to adjust the SDC rates will help prevent loss of value like that the District has experienced since the current parks SDC rates were adopted in Section 2.0 of this report presents authority and background information including (1) legislative authority for SDCs; (2) an explanation of improvement fee and reimbursement fee SDCs; (3) requirements and options for credits, exemptions and discounts; and (4) alternative methodology approaches. Section 3.0 presents the methodology used to update the Parks and Recreation SDCs, and section 4.0 presents the calculation of Parks and Recreation SDC Rates. A list of the SDC Capacity Improvement Projects that may be funded with SDC revenues are included in Appendix A. Willamalane PRD Parks & Recreation SDC Methodology Update Report page 2

7 2.0 AUTHORITY AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. Legislative Authority The source of authority for the adoption of SDCs is found both in state statute and in the District s own plenary authority to adopt this type of fee. While SDCs have been in use in Oregon since the mid-1970's, State legislation regarding SDCs was not adopted until 1989, when the Oregon Systems Development Act (ORS ) was passed. The purpose of this Act was to "...provide a uniform framework for the imposition of system development charges...". Legislative additions and modifications to the Act were made in 1993, 1999, 2001, and The Oregon SDC Act requires local governments that enact SDCs to: adopt SDCs by ordinance or resolution; develop a methodology outlining how the SDCs were developed; adopt a plan and project list to designate capital improvements that can be funded with improvement fee SDC revenues; provide credit against the amount of the SDC for the construction of certain "qualified public improvements"; separately account for and report receipt and expenditure of SDC revenues, and develop procedures for challenging expenditures; and use SDC revenues for capital improvements and compliance costs only - operations and maintenance uses are prohibited. B. Improvement fee and Reimbursement fee SDCs The Oregon Systems Development Act provides for the imposition of two types of SDCs: (1) "improvement fee SDCs, and (2) "reimbursement fee SDCs. "Improvement fee" SDCs may be charged for new capital improvements that will increase the capacity of the system in order to provide service to the new development. Revenues from "improvement fee" SDCs may be used for capacity-increasing capital improvements included in a required plan and list of projects that identifies the expected timing, cost, and growth-required percentage for each project. "Reimbursement fee" SDCs may be charged for the costs of existing capital facilities if "excess capacity is available to accommodate growth. Revenues from "reimbursement fees" may be used for any capital improvement project, including major repairs, upgrades, or renovations. Capital improvements to be funded with reimbursement fee SDCs do not need to increase capacity, but they must be included in the list of projects to be funded with SDC revenues. Willamalane PRD Parks & Recreation SDC Methodology Update Report page 3

8 C. Requirements and Options for Credits, Exemptions, and Discounts (1) Credits A credit is a reduction in the amount of the SDC for a specific development. The Oregon SDC Act requires that credit be allowed for the construction of any "qualified public improvement" that (1) is required as a condition of development approval, (2) is identified in the plan and list of projects on which improvement fee SDC revenues may be used, and (3) either is not located on or contiguous to property that is the subject of development approval, or is located on or contiguous to such property and is required to be built larger or with greater capacity than is necessary to meet the needs of the particular development project. The credit for a qualified public improvement may only be applied against an SDC for the same type of improvement (e.g., a parks improvement can only be used for a credit for a parks SDC), and may be granted only for the cost of that portion of an improvement which exceeds the minimum standard facility size or capacity needed to serve the particular project. For multi-phase projects, any excess credit may be applied against SDCs that accrue in subsequent phases of the original development project. In addition to these required credits, the District may, if it so chooses, provide a greater credit, establish a system providing for the transferability of credits, provide a credit for a capital improvement not identified in the District s plan and list of projects, or provide a share of the cost of an improvement by other means (i.e., partnerships, other District revenues, etc.). (2) Exemptions The District may "exempt" certain types of development, such as affordable housing from the requirement to pay parks SDCs. Unless an alternative source of funding for SDCs is identified, exemptions reduce SDC revenues and, therefore, increase the amounts that must come from other sources, such as property taxes. Willamalane PRD Parks & Recreation SDC Methodology Update Report page 4

9 (3) Discounts The District may "discount" the amount of the SDC by reducing the portion of growthrequired improvements to be funded with SDCs. A discount in the SDC may also be applied on a pro-rata basis to any identified deficiencies to be funded from non-sdc sources. For example, the District may decide to charge new development an SDC rate sufficient to pay for some types of facilities but not for others (i.e., neighborhood parks but not trails, etc.), or to pay only a percentage (i.e., 80%, 60%, etc.) of identified growth-required costs. The portion of growth-required costs that may be funded with SDCs must be identified in the District s SDC Capacity Improvements Project List. Because discounts reduce SDC revenues, they increase the amounts that must come from other sources, such as property taxes, in order to achieve or maintain adopted levels of service. Willamalane PRD Parks & Recreation SDC Methodology Update Report page 5

10 3.0 PARKS AND RECREATION SDC METHODOLOGY The District s 2004 Park & Recreation Comprehensive Plan includes projects designed to address both growth and non-growth needs within the District s planning area. The SDC Capacity Improvement Projects List (Appendix A) includes selected growth-related projects from this plan and identifies the growth-required percentage, the estimated cost, and the estimated project timing priority for each project through the year Projects include both acquisition and development components. The District provides a variety of park and recreational facilities and a wide-range of services, including aquatics, community athletics, special events, specialized recreation, and adult and senior programs. District parks, facilities, and services are important community resources benefiting both existing and future District residents. The District contributes to the quality of life in the Springfield area, enhancing the lives of the people who live there. The methodology used to update the District's Parks and Recreation SDCs establishes the required connection between the demands of growth and the SDC by analyzing the proportionate need of each type of facility for use by current and future residents. The SDCs to be paid by a development meet statutory requirements because they are based on the nature of the development and the extent of the impact of the development on the need for parks and recreation facilities for which they are charged. The Parks and Recreation SDCs are based on population, and the SDC rates are calculated based on the specific impact a development is expected to have on the District's population. A. Population Growth The Parks and Recreation SDCs are based on costs per "capita" (person) for each new person expected during the planning period. Table 3.1, below, shows projected population growth for the District through the year The population projection for 2022 is from the District s Comprehensive Plan. The population estimate for 2006 is based on the average annual increase in the District s population between 2000 (62,514) and 2022 (88,720), included in the District s Comprehensive Plan. TABLE 3.1 PROJECTED POPULATION INCREASE FROM NEW DEVELOPMENT ( ) Projected Estimated Projected = Increase 88,720 68,777 19,943 Willamalane PRD Parks & Recreation SDC Methodology Update Report page 6

11 B. Persons Per Dwelling Unit The Parks and Recreation SDC rates are based on costs per capita and are calculated based on the number of persons per dwelling unit. To determine the appropriate number of persons per dwelling unit, official U.S. Census data gathered for Springfield for the year 2000 was analyzed and adjusted to account for an expected decrease in persons per dwelling unit. An average annual decrease of approximately 0.26% per year is expected during the planning period, according to the Residential Lands Study adopted as part of the Eugene/Springfield Metro Area General Plan. The resulting calculations are displayed in Table 3.2, below. C. Facility Needs TABLE 3.2 AVERAGE NUMBER OF PERSONS PER DWELLING UNIT 2000 Census 2006 Adjusted Number of Persons Number of Persons Single Family Detached Dwelling Unit Single Family Attached Dwelling Unit Multi Family Dwelling Unit The District s Park & Recreation Comprehensive Plan is incorporated into this report by reference. The plan identifies projects designed to address growth and non-growth needs within the District s planning area. The SDC Capacity Improvement Projects List (Appendix A) includes selected growth-related projects from the plan and identifies the growth-required percentage, the estimated cost, and the estimated timing priority for each project. Table 3.3, page 8, presents a summary of facilities included in Appendix A, except for Neighborhood Parks. The Current Need is the proportionate share needed to provide facilities to current residents at the levels of service resulting from facilities planned for The Growth Need is the proportionate share needed to provide facilities to future residents at the levels of service resulting from facilities planned for The Deficiency (if any) is a non-growth need not eligible for SDC funding. Willamalane PRD Parks & Recreation SDC Methodology Update Report page 7

12 TABLE 3.3 FACILITIES REQUIRED FOR GROWTH AND NON-GROWTH NEEDS 2022 LOS Current Current Surplus or 2022 Planned Growth Facility Type (Units/1000) Inventory Need (Deficiency) Units Need Units Developed Community Parks (32.27) acres Developed Natural Area Parks (279.55) acres Developed Linear Parks (2.49) acres Developed Special Use Parks acres Sports Parks (1.85) acres Trails & Pathways 1, , , (20,382.57) 112, , linear feet Community/Recreation Centers , , (1,539.78) 50, , square feet Swim Centers 1, , , (34,130.73) 138, , square feet For Neighborhood Parks, an estimate of the growth-required portion (percentage) was developed for each project included in the SDC Capacity Improvement Projects List (Appendix A). Each estimate considered existing and projected development within the neighborhood park s service area. Improvement fee SDC revenues may be used only for growth needs, and may not be used for non-growth needs. There are deficiencies (non-growth needs) for Neighborhood Parks, Community Parks, Natural Area Parks, Linear Park, Sports Parks, Trails & Pathways, Community/Recreation Centers, and Swim Centers that must be funded from alternative, non-sdc revenues, such as the District general fund, bonds, or grants. D. Facility Costs The Parks SDC Capacity Improvement Projects List (Appendix A) identifies selected facilities needed to serve parks and recreation needs in the District planning area through the year Unit costs were used in most cases when developing cost estimates for the SDC Capacity Improvement Projects List. As most projects included in the list are highly generalized in nature, unit costs offer the best way to plan for the future, and to compare costs between different communities. In some cases however, like where recent cost estimates already existed, and/or where proposed development was known and unique to the site, site-specific cost estimates were used. Table 3.4, page 9, shows total facility costs, growth costs, and non-growth need costs. Willamalane PRD Parks & Recreation SDC Methodology Update Report page 8

13 TABLE 3.4 FACILITY COSTS Total Growth Non-Growth Facility Costs Facility Costs Need Costs Neighborhood Park Acquisition & Development (acres) $11,792,250 $8,145,263 $3,646,988 Community Park Acquisition & Development (acres) 9,329,425 4,770,227 4,559,198 Natural Area Park Acquisition & Development (acres) 5,431,000 2,679,741 2,751,259 Linear Park Acquisition & Development (acres) 372, , Special Use Park Acquisition & Development (acres) 1,987,632 1,987,632 0 Sports Park Acquisition & Development (acres) 1,725,900 1,420, ,484 Trails & Pathways Development (linear feet) 5,525,043 3,154,349 2,370,694 Community/Recreation Facilities Development (square feet) 2,800,000 2,464, ,000 Swim Centers Development (square feet) 5,600,000 2,676,800 2,923,200 Total All Facilities $44,563,450 $27,669,719 $16,893,731 E. Compliance/Administrative Costs The District incurs costs in the development and administration of the SDCs and may recoup a portion of those costs in accordance with ORS (5). Compliance/administrative costs during the planning period have been estimated as shown in Table 3.5, below: TABLE 3.5 COMPLIANCE/ADMINISTRATIVE COST ESTIMATES Compliance/Administrative Cost Total Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan & SDC Methodology Updates (3 X $220,000 for consulting and staff services) $660,000 Annual SDC-CIP Management, Accounting and Reporting Costs (approximately $36,410 per year for planning, financial reporting and staff services) $582,560 City of Springfield Collection Costs* ($100 per permit X 8,671 dwelling unit permits - estimate is based on 19,943 new residents at approx 2.3 persons per dwelling unit) $867,100 Total Estimated Compliance/Administrative Costs $2,109,660 *assumes collection cost for all future units at current cost of $100 for a single family dwelling unit. F. Total SDC-Eligible Costs The District s total SDC-eligible costs include growth costs (from Table 3.4, above) and compliance/administrative costs (from Table 3.5, above), less the existing SDC fund balance. The Total SDC-eligible costs are shown in Table 3.6, page 10. Willamalane PRD Parks & Recreation SDC Methodology Update Report page 9

14 TABLE 3.6 TOTAL SDC-ELIGIBLE COSTS Total SDC Eligible Costs Growth Facility Costs $27,669,719 PLUS: Compliance/Admin Costs $2,109,660 Sub-Total $29,779,379 MINUS: SDC Fund Balance* ($291,000) SDC-Eligible Costs $29,488,379 * Projected FY07 Beginning Fund Balance, from Willamalane FY07-11 CIP, adopted May 10, Willamalane PRD Parks & Recreation SDC Methodology Update Report page 10

15 4.0 PARKS AND RECREATION SDC RATES The District s Parks and Recreation SDC rates are calculated using a series of sequential formulas which, when completed, yield the total SDC rates for each new dwelling unit in the District. The formulas identify: a) the improvements cost per capita (Formula 4a, below), b) the improvements cost per dwelling unit (Formula 4b, page 12), c) the SDC debt service credit per dwelling unit (Formula 4c, page 13), and d) the total SDC per dwelling unit (Formula 4d, page 13). The SDC rate is an improvement fee only, and does not include a reimbursement fee component. A. Formula 4a: Improvements Cost Per Capita The improvements cost per capita is calculated by dividing the SDC-eligible costs (identified in Table 3.6, page 10) by the increase in population expected to be created by new development through 2020 (from Table 3.1, page 6). SDC Improvements 4a. Eligible Population = Cost Costs Increase Per Capita Table 4.1 presents the calculations of the improvements costs per capita. TABLE 4.1 IMPROVEMENTS COST PER CAPITA Improvements SDC Population Cost Eligible Costs Increase = Per Capita SDC-Eligible Costs $29,488,379 19,943 $1,479 Willamalane PRD Parks & Recreation SDC Methodology Update Report page 11

16 B. Formula 4b: Improvements Cost Per Dwelling Unit The improvements cost per dwelling unit is calculated by multiplying the average number of persons per dwelling unit (from Table 3.2, page 7) by the improvements cost per capita (from Table 4.1, page 11). Improvements Improvements 4b. Persons Per X Cost = Cost Per Dwelling Unit Per Capita Dwelling Unit The results of these calculations are displayed in Table 4.2, below. TABLE 4.2 IMPROVEMENTS COST PER DWELLING UNIT Average Improvements Improvements Persons Per X Cost = Cost Per Dwelling Unit Type Dwelling Unit Per Capita Dwelling Unit Single Family Detached 2.61 $1,479 $3,859 Single Family Attached 2.51 $1,479 $3,711 Multi-Family 1.98 $1,479 $2,928 C. Formula 4c: SDC Debt Service Credit Per Dwelling Unit Debt instruments will likely be used as a future source for funding improvements needed to address nongrowth capacity needs. A portion of funds used to repay these debts will come from property taxes paid by growth. A debt service credit has been calculated to account for the net present value of estimated future property tax payments for non-growth capacity needs. This credit is included in order to avoid charging growth twice; once through the SDC, and a second time through property tax payments for debt service. The credit amounts are based on the following assumptions: Two $8.0M G.O. bonds (issued in 2009 and 2017); 4.5% average annual increase in total District property valuation for millage rate calculation; 3.0% annual increase in assessed value for developed properties; 3.0% annual inflation (decrease in value of money); and estimated average 2006 valuations for new construction at $253,000* for single family detached dwelling units, $175,000 for single family attached dwelling units, and $100,000 for multi-family dwelling units. * based on 2005 and 2006 completed and pending sales through mid-june Willamalane PRD Parks & Recreation SDC Methodology Update Report page 12

17 Net Present Value of SDC Debt Service 4c. Future Tax Payments = Credit Per (years ) Dwelling Unit The net present value is calculated by first determining the estimated millage required for debt service for each year (2006 through 2037), based on the expected total assessed value of property for the District. The millage rate is multiplied by the expected assessed property value for each type of dwelling unit to determine the expected debt service payment for each year. The debt service payments for each year are then added together to calculate the total expected debt service payments for each type of dwelling unit. Finally, the total debt service payments are discounted to account for inflation, resulting in the net present value of these future debt service payments. The amount of this credit is shown in Table 4.3, below. TABLE 4.3 DEBT SERVICE CREDIT PER DWELLING UNIT Dwelling Unit Type Debt Service Credit Per Dwelling Unit Single Family Detached $980 Single Family Attached $678 Multi-Family $387 D. Formula 4d: Total SDC Per Dwelling Unit The Total SDC per dwelling unit is calculated by subtracting the debt service credit per dwelling unit (Table 4.3, above) from the improvements cost per dwelling unit (Table 4.2, page 12). Improvements SDC Debt Service Total 4d. Cost - Credit Per = SDC Per Per Dwelling Unit Dwelling Unit Dwelling Unit The results of these calculations are shown in Table 4.4, below. TABLE 4.4 TOTAL SDC PER DWELLING UNIT Improvements SDC Debt Service Total Cost Per - Credit Per = SDC Per Dwelling Unit Type Dwelling Unit Dwelling Unit Dwelling Unit Single Family Detached $3,859 ($980) $2,879 Single Family Attached $3,711 ($678) $3,033 Multi-Family $2,928 ($387) $2,540 Willamalane PRD Parks & Recreation SDC Methodology Update Report page 13

18 APPENDIX A WILLAMALANE PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT page 1 SUMMARY SHEET -- SDC CAPACITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS LIST 10/4/06 ADDITIONAL FACILITIES Neighborhood Parks (acres) Community Parks (acres) Natural Area Parks (acres) Linear Parks/Trails & Pathways (acres) Trails and Pathways (linear feet) 45, Special Use Parks (acres) Sports Parks (acres) Community Recreation Facilities (square feet) 12, Swim Centers (square feet) 65, TOTAL COSTS Neighborhood Parks (acres) $11,792,250 Community Parks (acres) $9,329,425 Natural Area Parks (acres) $5,431,000 Linear Parks/Trails & Pathways (acres) $372,200 Trails and Pathways (linear feet) $5,525,043 Special Use Parks (acres) $1,987,632 Sports Parks (acres) $1,725,900 Community Recreation Facilities (square feet) $2,800,000 Swim Centers (square feet) $5,600,000 TOTAL COSTS: $44,563,450 GROWTH COSTS Neighborhood Parks (acres) $8,145,263 (SDC-ELIGIBLE) Community Parks (acres) $4,770,227 Natural Area Parks (acres) $2,679,741 Linear Parks/Trails & Pathways (acres) $371,291 Trails and Pathways (linear feet) $3,154,349 Special Use Parks (acres) $1,987,632 Sports Parks (acres) $1,420,416 Community Recreation Facilities (square feet) $2,464,000 Swim Centers (square feet) $2,676,800 SDC-ELIGIBLE GROWTH COSTS: $27,669,719 NON-GROWTH COSTS Neighborhood Parks (acres) $3,646,988 (NOT SDC-ELIGIBLE) Community Parks (acres) $4,559,198 Natural Area Parks (acres) $2,751,259 Linear Parks (acres) $909 Trails (linear feet) $2,370,694 Special Use Parks (acres) $0 Sports Parks (acres) $305,484 Community Recreation Facilities (square feet) $336,000 Swim Centers (square feet) $2,923,200 NON-GROWTH COSTS: $16,893,731 PROJECT PRIORITIES Priority Code Priority Years Implemented H High approx H/M High/Medium M Medium approx M/L Medium/Low L Low approx

19 APPENDIX A WILLAMALANE PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT page 2 SDC - CAPACITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS LIST 10/4/06 A. Neighborhood Parks Estimated Growth- SDC-Eligible Project Project Required Timing Project Number Facility Action Cost ($) Portion (%) Growth Share ($) Priority 1.3 YOLANDA/BRIGGS/PIERCE SCHOOL PARK Develop Pierce Park site in coordination with adjacent Yolanda and Briggs schools acres = 5.55 Acquisition $0 0.00% $0 H 1.6 RIVERBEND AREA NEIGHBORHOOD PARK Acquire and develop a neighborhood park. Development $1,304, % $326,063 Total Cost $1,304,250 $326,063 acres = 5.00 Acquisition $625, % $562,500 M Development $1,175, % $1,057,500 Total Cost $1,800,000 $1,620, NORTH JASPER-NATRON AREA NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS Acquire and develop a neighborhood wetland park. acres = Acquisition $302, % $272,250 H Development $325, % $292,950 Total Cost $628,000 $565, SOUTH JASPER-NATRON AREA NEIGHBORHOOD PARK Acquire and develop a neighborhood park. acres = 5.00 Acquisition $625, % $625,000 M/L Development $1,175, % $1,175,000 Total Cost $1,800,000 $1,800, MOUNTAIN GATE AREA NEIGHBORHOOD PARK Acquire and develop a neighborhood park. acres = 2.50 Acquisition $312, % $281,250 H Development $547, % $492,750 Total Cost $860,000 $774, THURSTON HILLS AREA NEIGHBORHOOD PARK Acquire and develop a neighborhood park. acres = 5.00 Acquisition $625, % $562,500 M/L Development $1,175, % $1,057,500 Total Cost $1,800,000 $1,620, SOUTH JASPER ROAD AREA NEIGHBORHOOD PARK(S) Acquire and develop a neighborhood park. acres = 5.00 Acquisition $625, % $187,500 L Development $1,175, % $352,500 Total Cost $1,800,000 $540,000

20 APPENDIX A WILLAMALANE PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT page 3 SDC - CAPACITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS LIST 10/4/06 A. Neighborhood Parks, cont'd Estimated Growth- SDC-Eligible Project Project Required Timing Project Number Facility Action Cost ($) Portion (%) Growth Share ($) Priority 1.34 SOUTH 57TH STREET AREA NEIGHBORHOOD PARK Acquire and develop a neighborhood park. acres = 5.00 Acquisition $625, % $312,500 L Development $1,175, % $587,500 Total Cost $1,800,000 $900,000 Neighborhood Park Acquisition acres= $3,740,000 $2,803,500 Neighborhood Park Development acres= $8,052,250 $5,341,763

21 APPENDIX A WILLAMALANE PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT page 4 SDC - CAPACITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS LIST 10/4/06 B. Community Parks Estimated Growth- SDC-Eligible Project Project Number Facility Action 2.3 SOUTHEAST SPRINGFIELD AREA COMMUNITY PARK Acquire and develop a community park. Project Cost ($) Required Portion (%) Growth Share ($) Timing Priority acres = Acquisition $2,750, % $2,293,500 L 2.4 JACK B LIVELY MEMORIAL PARK DEVELOPMENT Develop approximately acres of undeveloped land at Lively Park. Development $3,630, % $1,343,100 Total Cost $6,380,000 $3,636,600 acres = Acquisition $0 0.00% $0 H Development $1,899, % $702,997 Total Cost $1,899,991 $702, ISLAND PARK DEVELOPMENT Develop approximately 0.53 acres of undeveloped land at Island Park. acres = 0.53 Acquisition $0 0.00% $0 M 8.19 ISLAND PARK EXPANSION Acquire and develop additional land to improve connection to downtown. Development $232, % $86,005 Total Cost $232,446 $86,005 acres = 0.73 Acquisition $91, % $76,103 L 8.20 WILLAMALANE PARK IMPROVEMENTS Develop approximately 2.0 acres of undeveloped land at Willamalane Park. Development $178, % $65,974 Total Cost $269,558 $142,076 acres = 2.00 Acquisition $0 0.00% $0 M Development $547, % $202,549 Total Cost $547,430 $202,549 Community Park Acquisition acres= $2,841,250 $2,369,603 Community Park Development acres= $6,488,175 $2,400,625

22 APPENDIX A WILLAMALANE PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT page 5 SDC - CAPACITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS LIST 10/4/06 C. Natural Area Parks Estimated Growth- SDC-Eligible Project Project Number Facility Action 3.1 WEYERHAUSER MCKENZIE NATURAL AREA PARK Develop a natural area park on jointly owned property. Project Cost ($) Required Portion (%) Growth Share ($) Timing Priority acres = Acquisition $0 0.00% $0 M Development $630, % $164,430 Total Cost $630,000 $164, GEORGIA-PACIFIC NATURAL AREA PARK Develop a natural area park on jointly owned property. acres = Acquisition $0 0.00% $0 M Development $362, % $94,613 Total Cost $362,500 $94, GEORGIA-PACIFIC NATURAL AREA PARK TRAILHEAD Acquire street frontage and develop access to natural area park. acres = 5.00 Acquisition $100, % $72,000 M 3.5 BOOTH-KELLY MILLPOND NATURAL AREA PARK Develop a natural area park through the Mill Pond restoration site and trailhead for Mill Race Path. Development $71, % $18,531 Total Cost $171,000 $90,531 acres = Acquisition $0 0.00% $0 H 3.6 AGNES STEWART NATURAL AREA PARK/MILL RACE TRAILHEAD Develop access to the Mill Race natural area and path at Agnes Stewart MS. Development $684, % $178,524 Total Cost $684,000 $178,524 acres = 3.00 Acquisition $0 0.00% $0 L 3.9a HERITAGE NATURAL AREA PARK Acquire and develop a natural area park on former Gray/Jaqua property, including ridgeline trail connections. Development $71, % $18,531 Total Cost $71,000 $18,531 acres = Acquisition $860, % $619,200 H/M Development $415, % $108,315 Total Cost $1,275,000 $727,515

23 APPENDIX A WILLAMALANE PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT page 6 SDC - CAPACITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS LIST 10/4/06 C. Natural Area Parks, cont'd Estimated Growth- SDC-Eligible Project Project Number Facility Action 3.10 MOUNTAIN GATE NATURAL AREA PARK Acquire and develop a natural area park including ridgeline trail connections. Project Cost ($) Required Portion (%) Growth Share ($) Timing Priority acres = Acquisition $1,790, % $1,288,800 H Development $447, % $116,798 Total Cost $2,237,500 $1,405,598 Natural Area Park Acquisition acres= $2,750,000 $1,980,000 Natural Area Park Development acres= $2,681,000 $699,741

24 APPENDIX A WILLAMALANE PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT page 7 SDC - CAPACITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS LIST 10/4/06 D. Linear Parks/Trails and Pathways Estimated Growth- SDC-Eligible Project Project Required Growth Share Timing Project Number Facility Action Cost ($) Portion (%) ($) Priority 4.1 EWEB BIKE PATH EXTENSION WEST Extend path west to Laura St. acres = 0.00 Acquisition $0 0.00% $0 L linear feet = Development $87, % $48, b MOE MOUNTAIN LINEAR PARK Acquire and develop linear park connecting EWEB Bike Path and 42nd St. Path Total Cost $87,715 $48,506 acres = Acquisition $200, % $150,200 M linear feet = Development $500, % $375, SCS CHANNEL PATH Develop a multi-use path through Guy Lee Park and along the SCS Channel Total Cost $700,000 $525,700 acres = 0.00 Acquisition $0 0.00% $0 M linear feet = Development $156, % $86, GAMEBIRD PARK PATH Develop a multi-use path between Flamingo Ave and N. Cloverleaf Loop Total Cost $156,479 $86,533 acres = 0.00 Acquisition $0 0.00% $0 L linear feet = Development $49, % $27, THURSTON HILLS RIDGELINE TRAIL Develop a ridgeline trail in the South Thurston Hills, connecting MountainGate and Heritage Natural Area Parks Total Cost $49,597 $27,427 acres = 4.06 Acquisition $81, % $44,904 M linear feet = Development $71, % $39, SOUTH BANK TRAIL A Acquire and develop multi-use path along Willamette River from I-5 to Springfield Bridge Total Cost $152,575 $84,374 acres = Acquisition $291, % $160,923 L linear feet = Development $686, % $379, UPPER MILL RACE PATH Acquire and develop multi-use path along the Mill Race between Agnes Stewart MS to Clearwater Park Total Cost $977,234 $540,410 acres = 0.00 Acquisition $0 0.00% $0 L linear feet = Development $529, % $292, MIDDLE FORK WILLAMETTE RIVER PATH Acquire and develop multi-use path along the Middle Fork Willamette River between Dorris Ranch and Clearwater Park Total Cost $529,538 $292,835 acres = 1.38 Acquisition $27, % $15,265 H linear feet = Development $2,444, % $1,351,590 Total Cost $2,471,709 $1,366,855

25 APPENDIX A WILLAMALANE PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT page 8 SDC - CAPACITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS LIST 10/4/06 D. Linear Parks/Trails and Pathways, cont'd Estimated Growth- SDC-Eligible Project Project Required Growth Share Timing Project Number Facility Action Cost ($) Portion (%) ($) Priority 4.23 SPRINGFIELD - MOUNT PISGAH CONNECTOR (BRIDGE) Acquire and develop a connection from Clearwater Park to HBRA (bridge only) acres = 0.00 Acquisition $0 0.00% $0 L linear feet = Development $1,000, % $553,000 Total Cost $1,000,000 $553,000 Linear Park/Trails & Pathways Acquisition acres = $372,200 $371,291 Linear Parks/Trails & linear Pathways Development feet = 45, $5,525,043 $3,154,349

26 APPENDIX A WILLAMALANE PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT page 9 SDC - CAPACITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS LIST 10/4/06 E. Special Use Parks/Sports Parks/Rec Facilities Project Number Facility Action Estimated Growth- SDC-Eligible Project Project Cost ($) Required Portion (%) Growth Share ($) Timing Priority 5.1 RUFF PARK SPECIAL USE PARK IMPROVEMENTS Develop approximately 1.4 acres of undeveloped land at Ruff Park acres= 1.40 Acquisition $0 0.00% $0 M 5.3 GLENWOOD RIVERFRONT SPECIAL USE PARK Acquire and develop a multi-use riverfront park in Glenwood Development $308, % $308,232 Total Cost $308,232 $308,232 acres= 5.00 Acquisition $500, % $500,000 L Development $825, % $825,000 Total Cost $1,325,000 $1,325,000 CLEARWATER PARK SPECIAL USE PARK 5.4 IMPROVEMENTS Develop undeveloped land at Clearwater Park acres= Acquisition $0 0.00% $0 M ND STREET SPORTS PARK IMPROVEMENTS Develop undeveloped land at 32nd Street Community Sports Park Development $354, % $354,400 Total Cost $354,400 $354,400 acres= Acquisition $0 0.00% $0 H Development $1,725, % $1,420,416 Total Cost $1,725,900 $1,420, NEW COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER PLAYGROUND Develop playground at new community center sq. ft.= Acquisition $25, % $22,000 H new OUTDOOR WATER PLAY FEATURE Expand Lively Park Swim Center to include outdoor water play feature Development $75, % $66,000 Total Cost $100,000 $88,000 sq. ft.= Acquisition $0 0.00% $0 H/M new FITNESS/MULTI-USE ADDITION Expand Lively Park Swim Center to include fitness/multiuse addition Development $5,600, % $2,676,800 Total Cost $5,600,000 $2,676,800 sq. ft.= Acquisition $0 0.00% $0 L Development $2,700, % $2,376,000 Total Cost $2,700,000 $2,376,000

27 APPENDIX B PARKS SDC RATES FOR SELECTED OREGON COMMUNITIES City or Parks District Single Family Multi-Family West Linn $8,029 $5,677 Gresham (Springwater Area) $7,299 $7,299 Sherwood $6,661 $4,999 Gresham (Pleasant Valley Area) $6,603 $6,603 North Plains $4,941 $4,941 Canby $4,725 $3,869 Happy Valley $4,222 $4,222 Tigard $4,023 $3,234 Tualatin $3,697 $3,697 Troutdale $3,600 $3,600 Bend Metro PRD (Bend) $3,199 $2,870 * Portland $3,053 $1,986 Tualatin Hills PRD (Beaverton) $2,981 $2,293 North Clackamas PRD (east of I-205) $2,860 $2,277 Lake Oswego $2,825 $2,888 Oregon City $2,839 $2,245 Hillsboro $2,685 $2,685 Medford $2,544 $1,769 North Clackamas PRD (west of I-205) $2,399 $1,996 Wilsonville $2,394 $1,820 * Gresham (current City Limits) $2,350 $2,350 ** Corvallis $2,075 $1,556 Forest Grove $2,000 $2,000 McMinnville $2,000 $2,000 Sandy $2,000 $1,334 Hood River Valley PRD $1,635 $1,169 Albany $1,500 $1,500 Chehalem PRD (Newberg) $1,471 $1,075 Woodburn $1,448 $1,556 *** Eugene $1,345 $1,345 Ashland $1,041 $815 *** Willamalane PRD (Springfield) $1,000 $692 * SDC Rates effective 07/01/06. ** Corvallis has adopted a methodolgy with rates of $4,893 per single family unit; $3,627 per multi-family *** Parks SDC methodologies and rates are currently being reviewed and updated.

Average Change Sale Price 07 v. 08 Clackamas $375,800-6% Columbia $230,700-9% Multnomah $331,400-1% Washington $317,100-5% Yamhill $270,700-5%

Average Change Sale Price 07 v. 08 Clackamas $375,800-6% Columbia $230,700-9% Multnomah $331,400-1% Washington $317,100-5% Yamhill $270,700-5% A Publication of RMLS, The Source for Real Estate Statistics in Your Community Residential Review: Metro, Oregon 29 Reporting Period Residential Highlights Although closed sales dragged to a new low in,

More information

Volusia County Public Information Presentation Thoroughfare Road Impact Fee

Volusia County Public Information Presentation Thoroughfare Road Impact Fee Volusia County Public Information Presentation Thoroughfare Road Impact Fee Volusia County Public Information Presentation Thoroughfare Road Impact Fee 1. Welcome and overview 2. Presentation summary:

More information

SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES

SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES L E A G U E O F O R E G O C I T I E S SYSTEM DEVELOPMET CHARGES SURVEY OF OREGO CITIES Executive Summary JUE 2001 Published by the League of Oregon Cities SDCs in Oregon Cities: Summary of Survey Results

More information

Closed Sales. Pending Sales

Closed Sales. Pending Sales A Publication of RMLS, The Source for Real Estate Statistics in Your Community Residential Review: Metro, Oregon January Residential Highlights While not quite as dramatic as last month, sales activity

More information

System Development Charges (SDC)

System Development Charges (SDC) 1. What is an SDC? System Development Charges (SDC) It is an abbreviation for the term System Development Charge. 2. So, what does that mean? System Development Charges (SDCs) are one-time charges assessed

More information

RATE STUDY IMPACT FEES PARKS

RATE STUDY IMPACT FEES PARKS RATE STUDY FOR IMPACT FEES FOR PARKS CITY OF KENMORE, WASHINGTON May 15, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary................................................... 1 1. Statutory Basis and Methodology

More information

Closed Sales. Pending Sales

Closed Sales. Pending Sales A Publication of RMLS, The Source for Real Estate Statistics in Your Community Residential Review: Metro, Oregon December 29 Reporting Period December Residential Highlights Sales activity in the met ro

More information

Average Sale Price. Closed Sales

Average Sale Price. Closed Sales A Publication of RMLS, The Source for Real Estate Statistics in Your Community Residential Review: Metro, Oregon 29 Reporting Period Residential Highlights metro area market activity continued to grow

More information

CHICO/CARD AREA PARK FEE NEXUS STUDY

CHICO/CARD AREA PARK FEE NEXUS STUDY REVISED FINAL REPORT CHICO/CARD AREA PARK FEE NEXUS STUDY Prepared for: City of Chico and Chico Area Recreation District (CARD) Prepared by: Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. December 2, 2003 EPS #12607

More information

POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018 IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.

POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018 IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018 IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2 JUNE 29, 2017 PREPARED FOR: Poway Unified School District Planning

More information

Development Impact Fee Study

Development Impact Fee Study Development Impact Fee Study Prepared for: Tega Cay, South Carolina July 8, 2018 4701 Sangamore Road Suite S240 Bethesda, MD (301) 320-6900 www.tischlerbise.com [PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] Development

More information

School Impact Fee Study and Capital Improvement Plan

School Impact Fee Study and Capital Improvement Plan and Capital Improvement Plan Prepared for: April 18, 2018 4701 Sangamore Road Suite S240 Bethesda, MD (301) 320-6900 www.tischlerbise.com [PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] School Impact Fee Study TABLE OF

More information

City of Palo Alto (ID # 3972) City Council Staff Report

City of Palo Alto (ID # 3972) City Council Staff Report City of Palo Alto (ID # 3972) City Council Staff Report Report Type: Consent Calendar Meeting Date: 8/5/2013 Summary Title: Establishing GO Bond Tax Levy Title: Adoption of Resolution Establishing Fiscal

More information

SMITHFIELD IMPACT FEE UPDATE 2015 TOWN OF SMITHFIELD, RHODE ISLAND

SMITHFIELD IMPACT FEE UPDATE 2015 TOWN OF SMITHFIELD, RHODE ISLAND SMITHFIELD IMPACT FEE UPDATE 2015 TOWN OF SMITHFIELD, RHODE ISLAND Submitted to: Town of Smithfield Department of Planning and Economic Development Prepared by: Mason & Associates, Inc. 771 Plainfield

More information

Average and Median Sale Prices

Average and Median Sale Prices A Publication of RMLS, The Source for Real Estate Statistics in Your Community Residential Review: Metro Portland, Oregon September 2017 Reporting Period September Residential Highlights Year to Date Summary

More information

RESIDENTIAL MARKET ANALYSIS

RESIDENTIAL MARKET ANALYSIS RESIDENTIAL MARKET ANALYSIS EVAN ABRAMOWITZ RMLS Student Fellow Master of Real Estate Development Graduate Student September existing-home sales declined modestly, but inventory continued to tighten and

More information

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 436

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 436 GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 SESSION LAW 2017-138 HOUSE BILL 436 AN ACT TO PROVIDE FOR UNIFORM AUTHORITY TO IMPLEMENT SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT FEES FOR PUBLIC WATER AND SEWER SYSTEMS IN NORTH

More information

DRAFT. Development Impact Fee Model Ordinance. Mount Pleasant, SC. Draft Document. City Explained, Inc. J. R. Wilburn and Associates, Inc.

DRAFT. Development Impact Fee Model Ordinance. Mount Pleasant, SC. Draft Document. City Explained, Inc. J. R. Wilburn and Associates, Inc. City Explained, Inc. J. R. Wilburn and Associates, Inc. Development Impact Fee Model Ordinance Mount Pleasant, SC Draft Document January 11, 2017 ARTICLE I. TITLE This ordinance shall be referred to as

More information

SPECIAL TAX AND BOND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT

SPECIAL TAX AND BOND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT SPECIAL TAX AND BOND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT FOR IMPROVEMENT AREA A OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 10 OF THE POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT November 14, 2003 SPECIAL TAX AND BOND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT

More information

Triple Creek Community Development District

Triple Creek Community Development District 1 Triple Creek Community Development District http://triplecreekcdd.com Adopted Budget for Fiscal Year 2018/2019 Presented by: Rizzetta & Company, Inc. 9428 Camden Field Parkway Riverview, Florida 33578

More information

Understanding Mississippi Property Taxes

Understanding Mississippi Property Taxes Understanding Mississippi Property Taxes Property tax revenues are a vital component of the budgets of Mississippi s local governments. Property tax revenues allow these governments to provide important

More information

Agenda Report

Agenda Report Agenda Report 2017-01-09-04 Date: December 29, 2016 To: From: Russ Axelrod, Mayor Members, West Linn City Council Ken Worcester, Parks and Recreation Director KW Through: Eileen Stein, City Manager Subject:

More information

Orange Water and Sewer Authority Water and Sewer System Development Fee Study

Orange Water and Sewer Authority Water and Sewer System Development Fee Study Orange Water and Sewer Authority Water and Sewer System Development Fee Study March 6, 2018 March 6, 2018 Mr. Stephen Winters Director of Finance and Customer Service 400 Jones Ferry Road Carrboro, NC

More information

Year to Date Summary. Average and Median Sale Prices

Year to Date Summary. Average and Median Sale Prices A Publication of RMLS, The Source for Real Estate Statistics in Your Community Residential Review: Metro Portland, Oregon September 2018 Reporting Period September Residential Highlights Cooler numbers

More information

Administration Report Fiscal Year 2016/2017. Hesperia Unified School District Community Facilities District No June 20, 2016.

Administration Report Fiscal Year 2016/2017. Hesperia Unified School District Community Facilities District No June 20, 2016. Administration Report Fiscal Year 2016/2017 Hesperia Unified School District Community Facilities District No. 2006-2 June 20, 2016 Prepared For: Hesperia Unified School District 15576 Main Street Hesperia,

More information

Cedar Hammock Fire Control District

Cedar Hammock Fire Control District Cedar Hammock Fire Control District FY 2015 Fire/Rescue Impact Fee Study February 24, 2016 Prepared by: February 24, 2016 Mr. Jeff Hoyle Fire Chief 5200 26 th St W Bradenton, FL 34207 Re: FY 2015 Impact

More information

REVENUE ESTIMATING CONFERENCE TAX: ISSUE:

REVENUE ESTIMATING CONFERENCE TAX: ISSUE: REVENUE ESTIMATING CONFERENCE TAX: Ad Valorem ISSUE: Millage rate cap of 13.5 mills (1.35%) on all real property BILL NUMBER(S): HB 385 SPONSOR(S): Rivera MONTH/YEAR COLLECTION IMPACT BEGINS: DATE OF ANALYSIS:

More information

MARKET AREA UPDATE Year: 2018 Report as of: 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q

MARKET AREA UPDATE Year: 2018 Report as of: 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q Market Area (City, State): Portland Metropolitan Area MARKET AREA UPDATE Year: 2018 Report as of: 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q Provided by (Company / Companies): BHHSNW Real Estate, Archibald Relocation, Coldwell Banker

More information

CITY OF PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA ANNUAL DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT FISCAL YEAR

CITY OF PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA ANNUAL DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT FISCAL YEAR Attachment 2 CITY OF PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA ANNUAL DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2013-14 Background City of Petaluma Annual Development Impact Fee Report Fiscal Year 2013-14 The Mitigation Fee

More information

City of Banks TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE. Methodology Report. February 2016 FCS GROUP. Prepared by:

City of Banks TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE. Methodology Report. February 2016 FCS GROUP. Prepared by: TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE Methodology Report February 2016 Prepared by: 4000 Kruse Way Place, Bldg 1, Ste 220 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 T: 503.841.6543 www.fcsgroup.com February 2016 page i

More information

SOUTH DAVIS METRO FIRE AGENCY FIRE IMPACT FEE FACILITIES PLAN (IFFP) AND IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS (IFA)

SOUTH DAVIS METRO FIRE AGENCY FIRE IMPACT FEE FACILITIES PLAN (IFFP) AND IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS (IFA) SOUTH DAVIS METRO FIRE AGENCY FIRE IMPACT FEE FACILITIES PLAN (IFFP) AND IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS (IFA) JULY 2012 PREPARED BY LEWIS YOUNG ROBERTSON & BURNINGHAM, INC. IMPACT FEE FACILITIES PLAN AND IMPACT FEE

More information

Community Facilities District Report. Jurupa Unified School District Community Facilities District No. 13. September 14, 2015

Community Facilities District Report. Jurupa Unified School District Community Facilities District No. 13. September 14, 2015 Community Facilities District Report Jurupa Unified School District Community Facilities District No. 13 September 14, 2015 Prepared For: Jurupa Unified School District 4850 Pedley Road Jurupa Valley,

More information

Development Program Report for the Bethel Island Area of Benefit

Development Program Report for the Bethel Island Area of Benefit Julia R. Bueren, Director Deputy Directors R. Mitch Avalon Brian M. Balbas Stephen Kowalewski Stephen Silveira ADOPTED BY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON Development Program Report for the Bethel Island August,

More information

KEVIN A CRONIN, AICP, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR

KEVIN A CRONIN, AICP, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR October 14, 2016 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: ASTORIA PLANNING COMMISSION KEVIN A CRONIN, AICP, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR AMENDMENT REQUEST (A16-02) BY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE

More information

City of Puyallup. Parks Impact Fee Study

City of Puyallup. Parks Impact Fee Study City of Puyallup Parks Impact Fee Study August 23, 2005 Prepared by Financial Consulting Solutions Group, Inc. 8201 164 th Avenue NE, Suite 300 Redmond, WA 98052 tel: (425) 867-1802 fax: (425) 867-1937

More information

BEFORE THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS FOR MARION COUNTY, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. This matter came before the Marion County Board of

BEFORE THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS FOR MARION COUNTY, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. This matter came before the Marion County Board of BEFORE THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS FOR MARION COUNTY, OREGON In the matter of adopting a resolution establishing transportation system development charges within the unincorporated urban growth boundary

More information

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, this title is intended to implement and be consistent with the county comprehensive plan; and

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, this title is intended to implement and be consistent with the county comprehensive plan; and ORDINANCE 2005-015 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ADOPTING TITLE X, IMPACT FEES, AND AMENDING CODE SECTION 953, FAIR SHARE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS, OF THE

More information

SPECIAL TAX AND BOND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT

SPECIAL TAX AND BOND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT SPECIAL TAX AND BOND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT FOR IMPROVEMENT AREA A OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 6 OF THE POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT November 14, 2003 SPECIAL TAX AND BOND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT

More information

MINI STORAGE UMPQUA MINI STORAGE SELF-STORAGE OFFERING MEMORANDUM. 292 Weyerhaeuser Drive N. Roseburg, Oregon INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY

MINI STORAGE UMPQUA MINI STORAGE SELF-STORAGE OFFERING MEMORANDUM. 292 Weyerhaeuser Drive N. Roseburg, Oregon INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY OFFERING MEMORANDUM OFFERING MEMORANDUM STOW-AWAY UMPQUA MINI STORAGE MINI STORAGE 292 Weyerhaeuser Drive N. 801 EAST MAIN STREET Roseburg, Oregon 97470 MOLALLA, OREGON 97038 SELF-STORAGE INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY

More information

MARCH 19, Referred to Committee on Government Affairs

MARCH 19, Referred to Committee on Government Affairs A.B. ASSEMBLY BILL NO. ASSEMBLYMAN COLLINS MARCH, 0 Referred to Committee on Government Affairs SUMMARY Authorizes certain local governments to impose tax on nonresidential construction or require dedication

More information

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN IMPACT FEE SERVICE AREA NUMBER 1 UPDATED FEE SCHEDULE, 2016

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN IMPACT FEE SERVICE AREA NUMBER 1 UPDATED FEE SCHEDULE, 2016 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN IMPACT FEE SERVICE AREA NUMBER 1 UPDATED FEE SCHEDULE, 2016 Prepared by: House Moran Consulting, Inc. and The City of Sparks Community Services Department October, 2016 (DRAFT

More information

HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS

HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS NGAN NGUYEN Oregon Association of Realtors Student Fellow & Certificate of Real Estate Development Graduate Student National housing market statistics reflect a decreasing prices

More information

RESIDENTIAL MARKET ANALYSIS

RESIDENTIAL MARKET ANALYSIS RESIDENTIAL MARKET ANALYSIS EVAN ABRAMOWITZ Joseph Bernard Investment Real Estate Oregon Association of Realtors Student Fellow Masters of Real Estate Development Graduate Student National housing market

More information

Development Program Report for the Alamo Area of Benefit

Development Program Report for the Alamo Area of Benefit Julia R. Bueren, Director Deputy Directors Brian M. Balbas, Chief Mike Carlson Stephen Kowalewski Carrie Ricci Joe Yee ADOPTED BY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON Development Program Report for the Alamo October,

More information

Research Report #6-07 LEGISLATIVE REVENUE OFFICE.

Research Report #6-07 LEGISLATIVE REVENUE OFFICE. HOUSING AFFORDABILITY IN OREGON Research Report #6-07 LEGISLATIVE REVENUE OFFICE http://www.leg.state.or.us/comm/lro/home.htm STATE OF OREGON LEGISLATIVE REVENUE OFFICE H-197 State Capitol Building Salem,

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of November 17, 2012

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of November 17, 2012 ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of November 17, 2012 DATE: November 9, 2012 SUBJECT: Approval of an Agreement of Sale Between BREOF Thomas REO, LLC and the County Board of Arlington

More information

4. Parks and Recreation Fee Facility Needs and Cost Estimates Fee Calculation Nexus Findings 24

4. Parks and Recreation Fee Facility Needs and Cost Estimates Fee Calculation Nexus Findings 24 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE 1. Introduction and Summary of Calculated Fees 1 1.1 Background and Study Objectives 1 1.2 Organization of the Report 2 1.3 Calculated Development Impact Fees 2 2. Fee Methodology

More information

HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS

HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS EVAN ABRAMOWITZ Joseph Bernard Investment Real Estate Oregon Association of Realtors Student Fellow & Masters of Real Estate Development Graduate Student National housing market

More information

MARKET ACTION. Year-to-Date Trends

MARKET ACTION. Year-to-Date Trends KET ACTION A Publication of RMLS, The Source for Real Estate Statistics in Your Community MONTH IN REVIEW: Metro Portland, Oregon August Residential Highlights The real estate market in the Portland, Oregon

More information

ATTACHMENT TO PERMIT FOR PRIVATE CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. Instructions, Requirements and Information on Applying for:

ATTACHMENT TO PERMIT FOR PRIVATE CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. Instructions, Requirements and Information on Applying for: ATTACHMENT TO PERMIT FOR PRIVATE CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS Instructions, Requirements and Information on Applying for: SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE CREDITS, CITY PARTICIPATION IN OVERSIZING COSTS,

More information

EXHIBIT A. City of Corpus Christi Annexation Guidelines

EXHIBIT A. City of Corpus Christi Annexation Guidelines City of Corpus Christi Annexation Guidelines Purpose: The purpose of this document is to describe the City of Corpus Christi s Annexation Guidelines. The Annexation Guidelines provide the guidance and

More information

Impact Fee Funding Criteria Checklist

Impact Fee Funding Criteria Checklist Project Name: Date: Description: Impact Fee Funding Criteria Checklist Total Project Cost $ IFAC Funding Request $ In accordance with Chapter 15.66, Missoula Municipal Code. Impact fees collected pursuant

More information

RIVER DANCE RV PARK ANNEXATION AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT REPORT TOWN OF GYPSUM - SEPTEMBER RPI Consulting LLC.

RIVER DANCE RV PARK ANNEXATION AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT REPORT TOWN OF GYPSUM - SEPTEMBER RPI Consulting LLC. RIVER DANCE RV PARK ANNEXATION AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT REPORT TOWN OF GYPSUM - SEPTEMBER 2017 RPI Consulting LLC Durango, Colorado TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents 2 Introduction 3 Summary of Findings

More information

Proposed Development Fees. Hendersonville, TN January 14, 2018

Proposed Development Fees. Hendersonville, TN January 14, 2018 Proposed Development Fees Hendersonville, TN January 14, 2018 o Impact fees o Fiscal impact analysis o Economic impact analysis o Infrastructure finance o Market feasibility 2 Impact Fee Fundamentals o

More information

SCHOOL FINANCE: IMPACT FEES and a COUPLE OF OTHER THINGS. First Things. How Do We Pay? What Are We Talking About? How Do We Pay?

SCHOOL FINANCE: IMPACT FEES and a COUPLE OF OTHER THINGS. First Things. How Do We Pay? What Are We Talking About? How Do We Pay? SCHOOL FINANCE: IMPACT FEES and a COUPLE OF OTHER THINGS Theodore B. DuBose Haynsworth Sinkler Boyd, P.A. Presented to: SC School Boards Association 2016 School Law Conference Charleston, South Carolina

More information

FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT POLICIES NUMBER 614 EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES IMPACT FEE

FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT POLICIES NUMBER 614 EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES IMPACT FEE EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES IMPACT FEE Section 614-1. Authority; interpretation In accordance with County of Volusia Ordinance 2008-04, this policy shall exercise the authority delegated to the school board

More information

FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Proposed Abington Terrace Development Abington Township, Montgomery County

FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Proposed Abington Terrace Development Abington Township, Montgomery County FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Proposed Abington Terrace Development Abington Township, Montgomery County November 9, 2018 Prepared for: BET Investments 200 Dryden Road, Suite 2000 Dresher, PA 19025 Prepared by:

More information

RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT FOR CASITAS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO (OJAI)

RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT FOR CASITAS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO (OJAI) RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT FOR CASITAS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2013-1 (OJAI) A Special Tax shall be levied on all Assessor s Parcels of Taxable Property in Casitas

More information

Metposite tm Installations

Metposite tm Installations Metposite tm Installations Verne Duncan Elem Elementary School South Meadows Middle School 14871 SE 172nd Ave 4690 SE Davis Happy Valley, OR 97015 Hillsboro, OR 97123 Installer: Robert Lloyd Sheet Metal

More information

PROPERTY ASSESSMENT AND TAXATION

PROPERTY ASSESSMENT AND TAXATION History of the Community and Service Area Structure Juneau's existing City and Borough concept was adopted in 1970 with the unification of the Cities of Juneau and Douglas and the Greater Juneau Borough.

More information

Board of Directors System and Development Charge Workshop

Board of Directors System and Development Charge Workshop Bend Metro Park & Recreation District January 29, 2019 Board of Directors System and Development Charge Workshop www.bendparksandrec.org Our Vision To be a leader in building a community connected to nature,

More information

Understanding the Cost to Provide Community Services in the Town of Holland, La Crosse County, Wisconsin

Understanding the Cost to Provide Community Services in the Town of Holland, La Crosse County, Wisconsin Understanding the Cost to Provide Community Services in the Town of Holland, La Crosse County, Wisconsin Rebecca Roberts Land Use Specialist Center for Land Use Education and Karl Green Community Development

More information

TOWN OF PAYSON DEVELOPMENT FEE STUDY LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS, INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS PLAN, AND DEVELOPMENT FEE REPORT

TOWN OF PAYSON DEVELOPMENT FEE STUDY LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS, INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS PLAN, AND DEVELOPMENT FEE REPORT TOWN OF PAYSON DEVELOPMENT FEE STUDY LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS, INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS PLAN, AND DEVELOPMENT FEE REPORT Prepared for: May 15, 2014 4701 Sangamore Road, Suite S240 Bethesda, MD 301.320.6900

More information

ELSINORE VALLEY (ZONE 3) FLOOD CONTROL BENEFIT ASSESSMENT AREA

ELSINORE VALLEY (ZONE 3) FLOOD CONTROL BENEFIT ASSESSMENT AREA ENGINEER'S REPORT TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT ON THE ELSINORE VALLEY (ZONE 3) FLOOD CONTROL BENEFIT ASSESSMENT AREA JULY 2014 WARREN

More information

Funding Sources for Parks, Trails, and Greenspace in Salem, Oregon

Funding Sources for Parks, Trails, and Greenspace in Salem, Oregon Funding Sources for Parks, Trails, and Greenspace in Salem, Oregon Draft December 14, 2006 (revised March 1, 2007) Table of Contents Introduction...3 Executive Summary...4 Fiscal Portrait...6 Budget...6

More information

Amendment 1 Sponsor Committee Water and Land Conservation Amendment (850)

Amendment 1 Sponsor Committee Water and Land Conservation Amendment (850) ! Amendment 1 Text Amendment 1 Sponsor Committee Water and Land Conservation Amendment (850) 629-4656 emailus@floridawaterlandlegacy.org www.floridawaterlandlegacy.org TITLE: Water and Land Conservation

More information

CHAPTER CAPITAL FACILITIES, FEES, AND INCENTIVES RELATED TO FEES. B. Fire Combat and Rescue Service Impact Fee Study and Modifications

CHAPTER CAPITAL FACILITIES, FEES, AND INCENTIVES RELATED TO FEES. B. Fire Combat and Rescue Service Impact Fee Study and Modifications CHAPTER 1300. CAPITAL FACILITIES, FEES, AND INCENTIVES RELATED TO FEES SECTION 1302. IMPACT FEES 1302.6. Fire Combat and Rescue Service Impact Fees A. Intent and Purpose 1. To establish uniform fire combat

More information

FIRE DISTRICTS FUND. The Fire Districts Fund consists of primarily one funding source: property taxes (ad valorem revenue).

FIRE DISTRICTS FUND. The Fire Districts Fund consists of primarily one funding source: property taxes (ad valorem revenue). Description In 1973, a Special Act of the Florida Legislature (Chapter 73-600, Laws of Florida) created the Pinellas County Fire Protection Authority. This special legislation subsequently assumed ordinance

More information

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1154

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1154 ORDINANCE NUMBER 1154 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2005-1 (PERRIS VALLEY VISTAS) OF THE CITY OF PERRIS AUTHORIZING

More information

The Bonus Zoning policy will be applied in conjunction with the Implementation policies contained within the Official Plan.

The Bonus Zoning policy will be applied in conjunction with the Implementation policies contained within the Official Plan. Policy Title: Bonus Zoning Policy Number: 07-03-01 Section: Community Development Subsection: Planning Tools Effective Date: September 26, 2012 Last Review Date: Approved by: Council Owner Division/Contact:

More information

Community Associations & Maryland's New Stormwater Fees

Community Associations & Maryland's New Stormwater Fees 2018 Whiteford, Taylor & Preston LLP Community Associations & Maryland's New Stormwater Fees May 1, 2013 Highlight: Maryland has new local stormwater fees that will be implemented in certain counties beginning

More information

AGENDA BILL Beaverton City Council Beaverton, Oregon BUDGET IMPACT AMOUNT BUDGETED $-0-

AGENDA BILL Beaverton City Council Beaverton, Oregon BUDGET IMPACT AMOUNT BUDGETED $-0- AGENDA BILL Beaverton City Council Beaverton, Oregon SUBJECT: Authorize the Mayor to Sign an Amendment to an Intergovernmental Agreement with Clean Water Services FOR AGENDA OF: 06/13/17 BILL NO: 17125

More information

ARTICLE 18 PARK AND RECREATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES

ARTICLE 18 PARK AND RECREATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES ARTICLE 18 PARK AND RECREATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES Sec. 18-1. Legislative Findings. Sec. 18-2. Short Title and Applicability. Sec. 18-3. Intents and Purposes. Sec. 18-4. Rules of Construction. Sec.

More information

Shawnee Landing TIF Project. City of Shawnee, Kansas. Need For Assistance Analysis

Shawnee Landing TIF Project. City of Shawnee, Kansas. Need For Assistance Analysis Shawnee Landing TIF Project City of Shawnee, Kansas Need For Assistance Analysis December 17, 2014 Table of Contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 1 2 PURPOSE... 2 3 THE PROJECT... 3 4 ASSISTANCE REQUEST... 7

More information

Capital Improvement Plans and Development Impact Fees

Capital Improvement Plans and Development Impact Fees Capital Improvement Plans and Development Impact Fees City of Submitted to: City of September 29, 2011 Prepared by: 4701 Sangamore Road Suite S240 Bethesda, Maryland 20816 800.424.4318 www.tischlerbise.com

More information

Impact Fees. Section 1 Purpose and Intent.

Impact Fees. Section 1 Purpose and Intent. Impact Fees 1 Purpose and Intent 2 Definitions 3 Establishment of Impact Fees 4 Documentation Required 5 Segregated Accounts Required 6 Time Within Which To Use Impact Fees 7 Payment of Impact Fees 8 Appeals

More information

RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 3 (SEABRIDGE AT MANDALAY BAY) OF THE CITY OF OXNARD

RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 3 (SEABRIDGE AT MANDALAY BAY) OF THE CITY OF OXNARD RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 3 (SEABRIDGE AT MANDALAY BAY) OF THE CITY OF OXNARD A Special Tax as hereinafter defined shall be levied on all Assessor s Parcels

More information

FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS TO THE CITY

FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS TO THE CITY FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS TO THE CITY OF LOVELAND BRISTOL POINTE APARTMENTS LOVELAND, CO PREPARED FOR: MACY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY Economic & Market Research / Land & Development Planning Landscape Architecture

More information

CAMERON PARK COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT PARK IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY BOARD OF DIRECTORS

CAMERON PARK COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT PARK IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY BOARD OF DIRECTORS PARK IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY NOVEMBER 2015 FINAL REPORT PREPARED FOR: BOARD OF DIRECTORS PREPARED BY: SCIConsultingGroup 4745 MANGELS BOULEVARD FAIRFIELD, CALIFORNIA 94534 PHONE 707.430.4300 FAX 707.430.4319

More information

Analysis Prepared by David L. Sjoquist and Robert J. Eger III

Analysis Prepared by David L. Sjoquist and Robert J. Eger III GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY ANDREW YOUNG SCHOOL OF POLICY STUDIES FISCAL RESEARCH CENTER DECEMBER 1, 2006 SUBJECT: Estimated Effects of Population Growth on Atlanta Public School s Revenue and Expenditures

More information

COUNTY OF BRANT DEVELOPMENT CHARGE BACKGROUND STUDY AND PROPOSED BY-LAW

COUNTY OF BRANT DEVELOPMENT CHARGE BACKGROUND STUDY AND PROPOSED BY-LAW COUNTY OF BRANT DEVELOPMENT CHARGE BACKGROUND STUDY AND PROPOSED BY-LAW JULY 7, 2014 CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (i) 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose of this Document 1-1 1.2 Summary of the Process 1-1

More information

Report and Recommendations of the Chelsea City Study Committee

Report and Recommendations of the Chelsea City Study Committee Report and Recommendations of the Chelsea City Study Committee To the Honorable The Village President and Trustees The Village of Chelsea, Michigan Preamble By resolution dated June 9 1992 the Chelsea

More information

REPORT OF SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CFD 91-2 (Summerhill Public Improvements) Fiscal Year

REPORT OF SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CFD 91-2 (Summerhill Public Improvements) Fiscal Year REPORT OF SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CFD 91-2 (Summerhill Public Improvements) Fiscal Year 2002-03 Submitted to: City of Lake Elsinore Riverside County, California

More information

METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 390 North Robert Street, St. Paul, MN Phone (651) TDD (651)

METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 390 North Robert Street, St. Paul, MN Phone (651) TDD (651) METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 390 North Robert Street, St. Paul, MN 55101 Phone (651) 602-1000 TDD (651) 291-0904 DATE: December 3, 2012 TO: Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission FROM: Arne Stefferud, Manager

More information

CITY OF MEDFORD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BUILDABLE LAND INVENTORY

CITY OF MEDFORD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BUILDABLE LAND INVENTORY CITY OF MEDFORD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PREPARED BY CITY OF MEDFORD PLANNING DEPARTMENT 200 SOUTH IVY STREET MEDFORD, OREGON 97501 BIANCA PETROU, A.I.C.P., ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR LONG RANGE PLANNING SECTION

More information

Ada County Highway District Impact Fee Ordinance No. 231A Replacing the Ada County Highway District Impact Fee Ordinance No. 231

Ada County Highway District Impact Fee Ordinance No. 231A Replacing the Ada County Highway District Impact Fee Ordinance No. 231 Ada County Highway District Impact Fee Replacing the Ada County Highway District Impact Fee Ordinance No. 231 By the Board of Highway District Commissioners of Ada County, Idaho: Baker, Arnold, Hansen,

More information

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE. ORDINANCE No

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE. ORDINANCE No Municipal Clerk's Office Approved Date: January 9, 2018 MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE ORDINANCE No. 2017-173 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE SUBMISSION TO THE QUALIFIED VOTERS OF ANCHORAGE, ALASKA, THE QUESTION

More information

Town of Hull Planning Board PRESENTATION: COMMUNITY PRESERVATION ACT

Town of Hull Planning Board PRESENTATION: COMMUNITY PRESERVATION ACT Town of Hull Planning Board PRESENTATION: COMMUNITY PRESERVATION ACT 2015 WHAT IS CPA? CPA is a Community Development Tool that creates a local fund for the purpose of advancing: - Historic Preservation

More information

City of Palm Bay Stormwater Assessment Program. March 30, 2017

City of Palm Bay Stormwater Assessment Program. March 30, 2017 City of Palm Bay Stormwater Assessment Program March 30, 2017 What is a Stormwater Assessment? A charge imposed against real property to pay for stormwater services provided by the City. 2 Case Law Requirements

More information

FINAL SCHOOL IMPACT FEES

FINAL SCHOOL IMPACT FEES FINAL SCHOOL IMPACT FEES Prepared for: February 10, 2015 4701 Sangamore Road, Suite S240 Bethesda, MD 301.320.6900 www.tischlerbise.com i TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 1 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY...

More information

ORDINANCE NO. C-590(E0916)

ORDINANCE NO. C-590(E0916) ORDINANCE NO. C-590(E0916) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES ORDINANCE NO. C-590(D0314) RELATING TO THE REGULATION OF THE USE AND DEVELOPMENT OF LAND IN THE INCORPORATED LIMITS

More information

Date 19 July 2017 King City URA Project Management Team Marcy McInelly, AIA, Urbsworks, Inc., and Keith Liden, King City Planner

Date 19 July 2017 King City URA Project Management Team Marcy McInelly, AIA, Urbsworks, Inc., and Keith Liden, King City Planner Date 19 July 2017 To From King City URA Project Management Team Marcy McInelly, AIA, Urbsworks, Inc., and Keith Liden, King City Planner KING CITY URBAN RESERVE AREA 6D CONCEPT PLAN Technical Advisory

More information

Rent Stabilization, Vacancy Decontrol and Reinvestment in Rental Property in Berkeley, California

Rent Stabilization, Vacancy Decontrol and Reinvestment in Rental Property in Berkeley, California Rent Stabilization, Vacancy Decontrol and Reinvestment in Rental Property in Berkeley, California REVISED FINAL REPORT July 16, 2012 Jay Kelekian, Executive Director Stephen Barton, Ph.D., Project Manager

More information

Tahoe Truckee Unified School District. Developer Fee Justification Study

Tahoe Truckee Unified School District. Developer Fee Justification Study Tahoe Truckee Unified School District Developer Fee Justification Study October 2015 Developer Fee Justification Study TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 1 INTRODUCTION... 2 AVAILABLE CAPACITY... 3

More information

HB 2964: Promoting Affordable Homeownership Through Expanded Eligibility for the Homebuyer Opportunity Limited Tax Exemption

HB 2964: Promoting Affordable Homeownership Through Expanded Eligibility for the Homebuyer Opportunity Limited Tax Exemption HB 2964: Promoting Affordable Homeownership Through Expanded Eligibility for the Homebuyer Opportunity Limited Tax Exemption Andrea Matthiessen Portland Housing Bureau Testimony to House Committee on Revenue

More information

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF PORT ARANSAS, TEXAS, BY ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF PORT ARANSAS, TEXAS, BY ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER ORDINANCE NO. 2008-09 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF PORT ARANSAS, TEXAS, BY ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER TWENTY-SIX CONCERNING IMPACT FEES FOR ROADWAY FACILITIES; INCORPORATING

More information

POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018 IMPROVEMENT AREA D OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 10 June 29, 2017 PREPARED FOR: Poway Unified School District Planning Department

More information

Board of County Commissioners

Board of County Commissioners Board of County Commissioners A board of commissioners consisting of three elected people governs each county (except Marion County). In all except Lake and St. Joseph counties, the commissioners are elected

More information

Kane County. Division of Transportation. Technical Specifications Manual for Road Improvement Impact Fees Under Kane County Ordinance #07-232

Kane County. Division of Transportation. Technical Specifications Manual for Road Improvement Impact Fees Under Kane County Ordinance #07-232 Kane County Division of Transportation Technical Specifications Manual for Road Improvement Impact Fees Under Kane County Ordinance #07-232 Table of Contents Section 1: Introduction to the Impact Fee and

More information

TITLE TEXT HERE WRITE YOUR TEXT HERE

TITLE TEXT HERE WRITE YOUR TEXT HERE TITLE TEXT HERE WRITE YOUR TEXT HERE + City of Powder Springs Atlanta Regional Commission Bleakly Advisory Group Southeastern Engineering Morris & Fellows Springs in Motion is the 10-Year Update to the

More information