City of Surrey 3 RD ADDITIONAL PLANNING COMMENTS File:

Transcription

1 City f Surrey 3 RD ADDITIONAL PLANNING COMMENTS Planning Reprt Date: March 23, 2015 PROPOSAL: Rezning frm RS (By-law N. 5942) and RA t RF and RF-12 in rder t allw subdivisin int 17 single family lts. LOCATION: OWNER: ZONING: OCP DESIGNATION: LAP DESIGNATION: Street Ujjal Dsanjh RA, RS Urban Urban Residential

2 3 rd Additinal Planning Cmments Page 2 RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY File Rezning By-law N By-law intrductin and set date fr Public Hearing fr rezning. DEVIATION FROM PLANS, POLICIES OR REGULATIONS Nne. RATIONALE OF RECOMMENDATION At the September 28, 2014 Public Hearing fr Rezning By-law N , which prpsed t rezne the subject prperty t RF and RF-12 t permit the creatin f 20 single family lts, residents expressed cncerns with regard t traffic and parking. Cuncil referred the applicatin back t staff in rder t address the cncerns raised during the Public Hearing. The applicant cnsidered the cncerns raised at the Public Hearing and prvided ratinale t staff, justifying supprt fr the 20-lt layut with access frm 169 Street and cmpletin f an expanded 169A Street cul-de-sac bulb. On September 29, 2014, Cuncil cnsidered an Additinal Planning Reprt, which recmmended the riginal 20-lt layut. As n Public Infrmatin Meeting (PIM) had been cnducted, Cuncil subsequently referred the applicatin back fr further public cnsultatin. In accrdance with Cuncil s directin, the applicant held a PIM n Nvember 6, Residents viced strng ppsitin t the riginal 20-lt layut with 61B Avenue accessed frm 169 Street. Cncerns regarding traffic and parking were expressed and mst in attendance indicated a preference fr access t 61B Avenue t be frm 170 Street. The applicant addressed sme f the issues raised at the Public Hearing and the subsequent PIM, and n January 12, 2015, Cuncil cnsidered a 2 nd Additinal Planning Reprt, which recmmended the riginal 20-lt layut. Cuncil referred the applicatin back t staff t review the density transitining between the RF lts t the suth and the RF-12 lts t the nrth and t cnduct additinal public cnsultatin with the Clverdale Cmmunity Assciatin. The applicant has revised the layut and is nw prpsing a rezning t RF and RF-12 t permit 4 lts (2 RF and 2 RF-12) frnting 170 Street, 4 RF lts frnting 169 Street and 9 lts (8 RF and 1 RF-12) frnting an expanded cul-de-sac bulb (169A Street), fr a ttal f 17 lts. The applicant has wrked with the Clverdale Cmmunity Assciatin t address issues related t density transitining, traffic and parking, and has revised their layut accrdingly. Fllwing the latest mailing f pre-ntificatin letters, staff did nt receive any respnses frm the neighburhd.

3 3 rd Additinal Planning Cmments Page 3 RECOMMENDATION The Planning & Develpment Department recmmends that: 1. Cuncil file Rezning By-law N a By-law be intrduced t rezne Blck A f the subject site frm "One-Acre Residential Zne (RA)" (By-law N ) and "Suburban Residential Zne (RS)" (By-law N. 5942) t "Single Family Residential Zne (RF)" and Blck B f the subject site frm "One-Acre Residential Zne (RA)" (By-law N ) t "Single Family Residential (12) Zne (RF-12) and a date be set fr Public Hearing (Appendix I). 3. Cuncil instruct staff t reslve the fllwing issues prir t final adptin: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) ensure that all engineering requirements and issues including restrictive cvenants, dedicatins, and rights-f-way where necessary, are addressed t the satisfactin f the General Manager, Engineering; submissin f a subdivisin layut t the satisfactin f the Apprving Officer; submissin f a finalized tree survey and a statement regarding tree preservatin t the satisfactin f the City Landscape Architect; the applicant address the cncern that the develpment will place additinal pressure n existing park facilities t the satisfactin f the General Manager, Parks, Recreatin and Culture; registratin f a Sectin 219 Restrictive Cvenant fr "n build" n a prtin f prpsed Lt 14 until future cnslidatin with the adjacent prperty at Street; and the applicant satisfy the deficiency in tree replacement n the site, t the satisfactin f the Planning and Develpment Department. REFERRALS Engineering: Schl District: The Engineering Department has n bjectin t the prject subject t the cmpletin f Engineering servicing requirements as utlined in Appendix III. Prjected number f students frm this 17-lt develpment: 9 Elementary students at Gerge Greenaway Elementary Schl 4 Secndary students at Lrd Tweedsmuir Secndary Schl (Appendix IV) The applicant has advised that the dwelling units in this prject are expected t be cnstructed and ready fr ccupancy by July 2016.

4 3 rd Additinal Planning Cmments Page 4 Parks, Recreatin & Culture: N cncerns. SITE CHARACTERISTICS Existing Land Use: Vacant 3.0-acre lt with single family dwelling under cnstructin, frnting 170 Street. Adjacent Area: Directin Existing Use OCP Designatin Existing Zne Nrth (Acrss 61B Avenue): Single family dwellings Urban RF-12 and RA and Clverdale Athletic Park beynd East (Acrss 170 Street): Single family dwellings Urban RF Suth: Single family dwellings Urban RF West (Acrss 169 Street): Single family dwellings Urban RF & CD (By-law N ) DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS Backgrund On July 23, 2014, the Initial Planning Reprt (Appendix IV) was presented t Cuncil that recmmended rezning the subject site frm RS (By-law N. 5942) and RA t RF and RF-12, t accmmdate a 20-lt single family subdivisin, accessed frm 169 Street. Fllwing cnsideratin f the Initial Planning Reprt, Cuncil gave First and Secnd Readings t the Rezning By-law N and set September 8, 2014 as the date fr Public Hearing. Nine (9) residents spke at the Public Hearing n September 8, 2014 and 3 area residents submitted written cmments t Cuncil. Residents expressed cncern abut ingress and egress t the subject site, n-street parking, secndary suites and the prpsed east-west walkway. In respnse t the neighburhd cncerns raised at the September 8, 2014 Public Hearing, Cuncil referred the applicatin back t staff. Cuncil cnsidered an Additinal Planning Cmments Reprt (Appendix V) n September 29, 2014, which incrprated the applicant s ratinale fr supprt f the layut initially presented t Cuncil. In respnse, Cuncil referred the applicatin back t staff t hst an additinal cmmunity cnsultatin meeting t mitigate cncerns raised by residents.

5 3 rd Additinal Planning Cmments Page 5 In accrdance with Cuncil s directin, the applicant held a Public Infrmatin Meeting (PIM) n Nvember 6, Twenty-five (25) residents attended the PIM and viced strng ppsitin t the riginal 20-lt layut with 61B Avenue accessed frm 169 Street. Cncerns regarding traffic and n-street parking were expressed and mst in attendance indicated a preference fr access t 61B Avenue t be frm 170 Street. Cuncil cnsidered a 2 nd Additinal Planning Cmments Reprt (Appendix VI) n January 12, 2015, in which the applicant s layut remained unchanged frm that previusly cnsidered by Cuncil, hwever infrmatin was prvided t address sme f the residents cncerns arund traffic vlume, n-street parking, pedestrian safety and secndary suites. In respnse, Cuncil passed the fllwing reslutin: "Amendment Bylaw, 2014, N be referred back t staff t: 1. Review the density transitining between the RF and RF-12 lts; 2. Wrk with the Applicant t cnduct additinal Public Cnsultatin with bth the Clverdale Cmmunity Assciatin and area residents; and 3. Review traffic patterns assciated with the prpsed develpment and explre the pssibility f diverting rad access t 170 Street." [RES.R15-24] Current Prpsal The applicant has wrked with the Clverdale Cmmunity Assciatin and has prpsed a revised single family layut that addresses their cncerns. The applicant is nw prpsing a rezning t RF and RF-12 t accmmdate 17 single family lts. The prpsal includes 4 lts (2 RF and 2 RF-12) frnting 170 Street, 4 RF lts frnting 169 Street and 9 lts (8 RF and 1 RF-12) frnting an expanded cul-de-sac bulb (169A Street) accessed via 169 Street, fr a ttal f 17 lts (Appendix II). The revised layut necessitated a mdified cul-de-sac design which will accmmdate a parking stall area with 12 parking spaces, which is a reductin frm the previusly prpsed 18 parking spaces. The revised layut maintains the pedestrian walkway alng the 3.0-metre (10-ft.) wide engineering right-f-way, which is required t cnnect water services frm 169A Street t 170 Street. DISCUSSION Density Transitining In respnse t Cuncil s cncern regarding the density transitin between the existing RF-12 lts t the nrth and the RF lts t the suth, the applicant has revised their layut and is nw prpsing 14 RF lts adjacent t the existing RF lts t the suth, and 3 RF-12 lts adjacent t the existing RF-12 lts t the nrth.

6 3 rd Additinal Planning Cmments Page 6 The prpsed RF lts range in size frm 560 square metres (6,028 sq. ft.) t 720 square metres (7,750 sq. ft.). The prpsed RF-12 lts range in size frm 458 square metres (4,930 sq. ft.) t 544 square metres (5,856 sq. ft.). Traffic Pattern & Access t 170 Street The prpsed 17-lt subdivisin layut cnsisting f a cul-de-sac accessed frm 169 Street (Appendix II) is generally cnsistent with the cul-de-sac cncept plan that was develped when the adjacent RF-12-zned lands t the nrth were rezned as part f Develpment Applicatin N , which was apprved by Cuncil n December 1, 2003 (Appendix VIII). Traffic vlume, n-street parking and pedestrian safety were the main cncerns raised at the Public Hearing and Public Infrmatin Meeting (PIM). The applicant explred alternative layuts t have traffic access via 170 Street, hwever was unsuccessful in establishing a layut that wuld meet Planning and Engineering requirements. Prpsed lts were duble frnting, and the rad gemetry did nt meet Design Criteria standards. The cncept plan presented t Cuncil at the time the lands t the nrth develped als allwed fr the RF lt prpsed at that time ( Street) t subdivide with the subject site in the future, and therefre a "n-build" Restrictive Cvenant was registered ver the suthern prtin f the RF lt. The prpsed subdivisin layut fr the subject site allws fr Street t develp in accrdance with the cncept plan. Mdifying the rad cncept wuld be cntrary t the expectatins f the wner f Street and f thse wners wh purchased hmes alng the nrthern prtin f 61B Avenue and alng 170 Street. Relcating access t the cul-de-sac t 170 Street (rather than 169 Street) and creating a dead end cul-de-sac at the western end f 61B Avenue wuld direct traffic nt 170 Street which is cntrary t the expectatins f residents n 170 Street. Engineering staff have advised that the existing rad netwrk can adequately service the traffic generated by the prpsed 17-lt subdivisin, cnsisting f 13 lts accessing 169 Street and 4 lts accessing 170 Street. ADDITIONAL PUBLIC CONSULTATION In accrdance with Cuncil s directin, the applicant wrked with the Clverdale Cmmunity Assciatin in rder t address their cncerns. Cmments frm the Clverdale Cmmunity Assciatin (Appendix IX) are summarized as fllws (with staff cmments in italics): Sidewalks shuld be prvided n the nrth and suth side f 61B Avenue and shuld extend arund the cul-de-sac, where pssible. Sidewalks shuld als be installed alng 169 Street frm 61 Avenue t 61B Avenue.

7 3 rd Additinal Planning Cmments Page 7 (Sidewalks already exist n the nrth side f 61B Avenue and will be required n the suth side as part f this develpment. Sidewalks arund the cul-de-sac will be cnsidered as part f the Engineering design review if they fllw pedestrian desire lines. The applicant will be required t cnstruct a sidewalk alng 169 Street frm 61A Avenue t 61B Avenue. In cnjunctin with their frntage bligatins, staff have requested the applicant t extend the sidewalk frm 61 Avenue t 61A Avenue t cnnect existing pedestrian infrastructure n 61 Avenue, prviding a safe and cntinuus walking cnnectin between the Clverdale Athletic Park and the existing sidewalks n 61 Avenue. The sidewalk will be cnstructed within the City rad allwance and will nt impact ff-street parking n private prperties alng 169 Street. These additinal wrks will be funded by the City.) 61B Avenue shuld be widened t accmmdate parking n bth sides f the street and the cul-de-sac shuld include the 18 additinal n-street parking stalls. Driveways shuld be placed s that maximum n-street parking can be achieved n 61B Avenue and 169 Street. (The applicant will be required t cmplete the frntages f 61B Avenue and 169 Street t their ultimate width including wider pavement, which will prvide pprtunities fr additinal n-street parking in additin t the 4 parking spaces per lt. The revised layut eliminates five driveways alng the suth side f 61B Avenue and shuld accmmdate apprximately 8 n-street parking spaces. Driveways alng 169 Street have been paired in rder t accmmdate 3 n-street parking spaces. The revised layut necessitated a mdified cul-de-sac design which will accmmdate a parking stall area with 12 n-street parking spaces, which is a reductin frm the previus 18 prpsed parking stalls. The parking spaces prpsed in the 169A Street cul-de-sac bulb will cmply with the standards in the Zning By-law. It is nt anticipated that the prpsed develpment will exacerbate any existing parking issues.) Residents are cncerned with speeding cars alng 169 Street and 61B Avenue, with particular cncern abut cars frm the existing twnhuse cmplex t the west entering the intersectin withut stpping. Speed humps shuld be installed in frnt f B Avenue and Street t address these cncerns. (In respnse t resident cncerns, the applicant s cnsultant has prpsed t mdify the existing cul-de-sac frnting Street int a curved radway by significantly reducing the amunt f asphalt within the intersectin. The prpsed cnfiguratin will clearly indicate that the cars travelling n 169 Street and 61B Avenue will have the right-f-way ver users exiting the twnhuse cmplex. Any further traffic calming measures will be facilitated thrugh the City s Traffic Calming prcess.)

8 3 rd Additinal Planning Cmments Page 8 The Clverdale Cmmunity Assciatin des nt supprt cnnecting 61B Avenue t 170 Street r relcating cul-de-sac access t 170 Street as it wuld reduce n-street parking. (The applicant is nt prpsing t mdify the rad netwrk. See Traffic Pattern sectin f this reprt.) Lts within the cul-de-sac shuld be wider in rder t reduce the amunt f paved area and t increase landscaped area. Having the frnt yards dminated by driveways is nt aesthetically pleasing. (The applicant has mdified their layut and are nw prpsing RF-zned lts within the cul-de-sac, which are wider than the previusly prpsed RF-12 lts.) In anticipatin f pssible secndary suites, a parking pad shuld be included n the RF lts, where pssible. There is n need t include parking pads n the RF-12 lts since secndary suites are nt likely. Restrictive Cvenants shuld be placed n all lts with parking pads. (Due t basements nt being prpsed, secndary suites are nt anticipated in the prpsed 17 new hmes. A minimum f 4 ff-street parking spaces will be prvided n all f the lts in accrdance with the Zning By-law and the applicant is prviding a 12-stall parking area within the cul-de-sac bulb. Staff d nt supprt the use f Restrictive Cvenants t require mre n-site parking than stipulated in the Zning By-law.) All garages, regardless f the zning, shuld be a minimum f 6.4 metres (21 ft.) deep by 6.1 metres (20 ft.) wide, which is equivalent t 39 square metres (420 sq. ft) in area. Restrictive Cvenants shuld be registered n all lts t ensure garage size. (The Zning By-law requires that 39 square metres (420 sq. ft.) f flr area is reserved fr the garage in the RF Zne. The applicant has included a prvisin in the Building Design Guidelines that the minimum garage size n all prpsed RF lts be 6.4 metres (21 ft.) deep by 6.1 metres (20 ft.) wide. The Building Scheme will be registered n title f all prpsed lts. The Zning By-law requires that the maximum width f a garage shall be 5.5 metres (18 ft.) fr RF-12 lts less than 14 metres (46 ft.) in width. Increasing the width f the garage frm 5.5 metres (18 ft.) t 6.1 metres (20 ft.) fr prpsed lts 13 thrugh 15 wuld require a variance that wuld be cntrary t the intent f the 5.5-metre (18-ft.) maximum width regulatin, which is t ensure that the garage des nt dminate the frnt façade f the huse.) Revised pre-ntificatin letters were mailed n March 5, 2015, and staff received n respnses.

9 3 rd Additinal Planning Cmments Page 9 CONCLUSION In respnse t cncerns raised by residents and Cuncil, the applicant has revised their layut frm that previusly cnsidered by Cuncil. The applicant is nw prpsing a rezning t RF and RF-12 t permit 4 lts (2 RF and 2 RF-12) frnting 170 Street, 4 RF lts frnting 169 Street and 9 lts (8 RF and 1 RF-12) frnting an expanded cul-de-sac bulb (169A Street). The revised layut remains generally cnsistent with the cul-de-sac cncept plan develped when the lands t the nrth were rezned as part f Develpment Applicatin N , which was apprved by Cuncil in 2003, and allws fr future develpment f Street. The revised layut respnds t Cuncil s cncerns f prviding an apprpriate density transitin between the existing RF-12 lts t the nrth and the existing RF lts t the suth. Traffic vlume, parking and pedestrian safety were the main cncerns raised at the Public Hearing and Public Infrmatin Meeting (PIM), hwever realigning 61B Avenue t functin as a cul-de-sac accessed frm 170 Street wuld nt reslve these issues. In additin, realignment f 61B Avenue wuld eliminate the develpment ptential f Street and wuld be cntrary t the expectatins f wners n the nrthern prtin 61B Avenue and thse alng 170 Street, wh purchased their hmes with the expectatins that 61B Avenue wuld nt daylight nt 170 Street. The applicant will be required t widen 169 Street and 61B Avenue t City standards, which will prvide pprtunities fr n-street parking in additin t the 12 n-street parking spaces prpsed in the expanded 169A Street cul-de-sac bulb and the 4 ff-street parking spaces that will be prvided n each f the prpsed single family lts. The requested cmpletin f the sidewalk alng 169 Street will prvide a safe and cntinuus walking cnnectin between Clverdale Athletic Park and the existing sidewalks n 61 Avenue, and the prpsed mdificatin at the intersectin adjacent t the twnhuse cmplex t the west shuld alleviate residents cncerns regarding intersectin and pedestrian safety. Secndary suites will be unlikely due t the lack f basements n the 17 prpsed lts. Staff have wrked with the applicant in prpsing a layut that generally cnfrms t the cncept plan develped when the single family lts t the immediate nrth were apprved. The applicant has revised the prpsed layut t address the cncerns raised previusly at the Public Hearing and the subsequent Public Infrmatin Meeting, as well as by the Clverdale Cmmunity Assciatin and Cuncil. It is recmmended that the previus rezning by-law (N ) be filed and a new rezning by-law be intrduced t rezne the site t RF (Blck A) and RF-12 (Blck B).

10 3 rd Additinal Planning Cmments Page 10 INFORMATION ATTACHED TO THIS REPORT The fllwing infrmatin is attached t this Reprt: Appendix I. Appendix II. Appendix III. Appendix IV. Appendix V. Appendix VI. Appendix VII. Lt Owners, Actin Summary and Prject Data Sheets and Survey Plan Prpsed Subdivisin Layut Revised Engineering Summary Revised Schl District Cmments Initial Planning Reprt, dated July 21, 2014 (with n attachments, except 20-lt layut) Additinal Planning Cmments, dated September 29, 2014 (with n attachments, except 20-lt layut) 2 nd Additinal Planning Cmments, dated January 12, 2015 (with n attachments, except 20-lt layut) Appendix VIII. Cncept Plan fr Develpment Applicatin N Appendix IX. Letter frm Clverdale Cmmunity Assciatin, dated March 9, 2015 riginal signed by Judith Rbertsn Jean Lamntagne General Manager Planning and Develpment LM/da \\file-server1\net-data\csdc\generate\areaprd\save\ dc DRV 3/19/15 11:03 AM

11 APPENDIX I Infrmatin fr City Clerk Legal Descriptin and Owners f all lts that frm part f the applicatin: 1. (a) Agent: Name: Theresa Rawle H.Y. Engineering Ltd. Address: Street, Unit 200 Surrey, BC V3R 4E7 Tel: Prperties invlved in the Applicatin (a) Civic Address: Street (b) Civic Address: Street Owner: Ujjal Dsanjh PID: Lt 9 Except: Nrth Feet, Sectin 7 Twnship 8 New Westminster District Plan Summary f Actins fr City Clerk's Office (a) File Rezning By-law N (b) Intrduce a By-law t rezne the prperty. \\file-server1\net-data\csdc\generate\areaprd\save\ dc DRV 3/19/15 11:03 AM

12 SUBDIVISION DATA SHEET Prpsed Zning: RF and RF-12 Requires Prject Data Prpsed GROSS SITE AREA Acres 3.0 Hectares 1.21 NUMBER OF LOTS Existing 1 Prpsed 17 SIZE OF LOTS Range f lt widths (metres) Range f lt areas (square metres) DENSITY Lts/Hectare & Lts/Acre (Grss) Lts/Hectare & Lts/Acre (Net) 14 lts/ha & 5.6 lts/acre 18.9 lts/ha & 7.5 lts/acre SITE COVERAGE (in % f grss site area) Maximum Cverage f Principal & 30.6 Accessry Building Estimated Rad, Lane & Driveway Cverage 32.4 Ttal Site Cverage 62.7 PARKLAND Area (square metres) % f Grss Site Required PARKLAND 5% mney in lieu YES TREE SURVEY/ASSESSMENT MODEL BUILDING SCHEME HERITAGE SITE Retentin BOUNDARY HEALTH Apprval DEV. VARIANCE PERMIT required Rad Length/Standards Wrks and Services Building Retentin Others YES YES NO NO NO NO NO NO \\file-server1\net-data\csdc\generate\areaprd\save\ dc DRV 3/19/15 11:03 AM

13

14

15 ltsurrey ~ the future lives here. INTER-OFFICE MEMO TO: FROM: Manager, Area Planning & Develpment - Nrth Surrey Divisin Planning and Develpment Department Develpment Services Manager, Engineering Department DATE: March 18,2015 (revisedfrmjulyts,zt4) PROJECT FILE: RE: Engineering Requirements Lcatin: Street REZONE/SUBDIVISION Prperty and Right-f Way Requirements dedicate 8.25-metres n 169 Street fr a 16.5 m lcal rad; dedicate s.-metres alng 61B Avenue fr a 16.5 m lcal rad and dedicate cul-de-sac bulb; dedicate 3.-metre x 3.-metre crner cut at the intersectin f169 Street and 61B Avenue; dedicate 3.-metre fr the engineering walkway cnnecting 169A Street t 170 Street; and register.s-metre statutry right-f-way alng 169 Street, 170 Street, and 61B Avenue. Wrks and Services cnstruct 170 Street t the 20.0 metre lcal rad standard with 8.-metre pavement, curb and gutter; and 1.5-metre sidewalk; cnstruct 169 Street t the 16.s-metre limited lcal rad standard with 8.-metre pavement, curb and gutter; and 1.5-metre sidewalk; cnstruct 61B Avenue including the cul-de-sac bulb t the 16.s-metre limited lcal rad standard with 8.-metre pavement, curb and gutter; and 1.5-metre sidewalk;; cnstruct 2.-metre walkway cnnectin frm 61B Avenue t 170 Street; cnstruct sidewalk alng the east side f 169 Street frm 61A Avenue t 61 Avenue, at City's cst; prvide n-lt strmwater measures t mitigate impacts f the develpment; cnstruct watermain thrugh the engineering walkway cnnecting 61B Avenue t 170 Street; prvide each lt with strm, water, and sanitary service cnnectins. A Servicing Agreement is required prir t Rezne/Subdivisin. ~ Remi Dube, P.Eng. U'- Develpment Services Manager sk NOTE: Detailed Land Develpment Engineering Review available n file

16 Mnday, March 02, 2015 Planning Schl Enrlment Prjectins and Planning Update: The fllwing tables illustrate the enrlment prjectins (with current/apprved ministry capacity) fr the elementary and secndary schls serving the prpsed develpment. The Gerges Greenaway Elementary catchment was expanded in 2013 t include sme f the Surrey Centre Elementary catchment. The schl is nt expected t exceed capacity in the near future. The schl district has received capital prject apprval fr a new Claytn Nrth Area secndary Schl (Site #215) t help relieve vercrwding at Lrd Tweedsmuir and Claytn Heights. The prpsed applicatin will nt have an impact n these prjectins. THE IMPACT ON SCHOOLS APPLICATION #: SUMMARY The prpsed 17 Single family with suites Gerge Greenaway Elementary are estimated t have the fllwing impact n the fllwing schls: 600 Prjected # f students fr this develpment: Elementary Students: 9 Secndary Students: Enrlment Capacity September 2014 Enrlment/Schl Capacity 200 Gerge Greenaway Elementary Enrlment (K/1-7): 50 K Capacity (K/1-7): 40 K Lrd Tweedsmuir Secndary Enrlment (8-12): 2001 Lrd Tweedsmuir Secndary Nminal Capacity (8-12): 1400 Functinal Capacity*(8-12); Prjected cumulative impact f develpment Nminal Capacity (8-12): subject prject) in the subject catchment areas: 2000 Elementary Students: 3 Secndary Students: 208 Ttal New Students: Enrlment Capacity Functinal Capacity *Functinal Capacity at secndary schls is based n space utilizatin estimate f 27 students per instructinal space. The number f instructinal spaces is estimated by dividing nminal facility capacity (Ministry capacity) by 25.

17 City f Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT Planning Reprt Date: July 21, 2014 PROPOSAL: Rezning frm RS (By-law N. 5942) and RA t RF and RF-12 in rder t allw subdivisin int 20 single family lts. LOCATION: Street OWNER: Ujjal Dsanjh ZONING: RA and RS (By-law N. 5942) OCP DESIGNATION: Urban LAP DESIGNATION: Urban Residential

18 Planning & Develpment Reprt Page 2 RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY By-law Intrductin and set date fr Public Hearing fr rezning. DEVIATION FROM PLANS, POLICIES OR REGULATIONS Nne. RATIONALE OF RECOMMENDATION Cmplies with Urban designatin in the OCP. The prpsed subdivisin cnfrms t the City's infill plicy. The prpsed subdivisin cntinues the pattern f small lt develpment that was established t the nrth (acrss 61B Avenue), in 2003, under Develpment Applicatin N The prpsed develpment is apprpriate fr this part f Clverdale.

19 Planning & Develpment Reprt Page 3 RECOMMENDATION The Planning & Develpment Department recmmends that: 1. a By-law be intrduced t rezne Blck A f the subject site frm "One-Acre Residential Zne (RA)" (By-law N ) and "Suburban Residential Zne (RS)" (By-law N. 5942) t "Single Family Residential (12) Zne (RF-12)", Blck B f the subject site frm "Suburban Residential Zne (RS)" (By-law N. 5942) t "Single Family Residential Zne (RF)" and Blck C f the subject site frm "One-Acre Residential Zne (RA)" (By-law N ) t "Single Family Residential Zne (RF)" and a date be set fr Public Hearing (Appendix I). 2. Cuncil instruct staff t reslve the fllwing issues prir t final adptin: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) ensure that all engineering requirements and issues including restrictive cvenants, dedicatins, and rights-f-way where necessary, are addressed t the satisfactin f the General Manager, Engineering; submissin f a subdivisin layut t the satisfactin f the Apprving Officer; submissin f a finalized tree survey and a statement regarding tree preservatin t the satisfactin f the City Landscape Architect; registratin f a Sectin 219 Restrictive Cvenant fr "n build" n a prtin f prpsed Lt 20 until future cnslidatin with the adjacent prperty at Street; and the applicant satisfy the deficiency in tree replacement n the site, t the satisfactin f the Planning and Develpment Department. REFERRALS Engineering: Schl District: The Engineering Department has n bjectin t the prject subject t the cmpletin f Engineering servicing requirements as utlined in Appendix III. Prjected number f students frm this develpment: 7 Elementary students at Gerge Greenaway Elementary Schl 3 Secndary students at Lrd Tweedsmuir Secndary Schl (Appendix IV) The applicant has advised that the dwelling units in this prject are expected t be cnstructed and ready fr ccupancy by July Parks, Recreatin & Culture: N cncerns.

20 Planning & Develpment Reprt Page 4 SITE CHARACTERISTICS Existing Land Use: Vacant 3.0-acre lt with single family dwelling under cnstructin. Adjacent Area: Directin Existing Use OCP Designatin Existing Zne Nrth (Acrss 61B Avenue): Single family dwellings and Urban RF-12 and RA Clverdale Athletic Park beynd East (Acrss 170 Street): Single family dwellings Urban RF Suth: Single family dwellings Urban RF West (Acrss 169 Street): Single family dwellings Urban RF & CD (Bylaw N ) DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS Backgrund The 1.21-hectare (3.0-acre) subject site cnsists f ne vacant lt lcated at Street in the Clverdale area. The site frnts 169 Street t the west and 170 Street t the east and is within the Infill Area f the West Clverdale Nrth Neighburhd Cncept Plan (NCP) as indicated in Schedule F (Area X) f Zning By-law N The prperty is designated "Urban" in the Official Cmmunity Plan (OCP), "Urban Residential" in the West Clverdale Lcal Area Plan and is split-zned "One-Acre Residential Zne (RA)" n the eastern prtin and "Suburban Residential Zne (RS)" (By-law N. 5942) n the western prtin. The subject site is the last large remaining prperty within this Infill Area (east f 168 Street, west f 170A Street, nrth f 60 Avenue and suth f Clverdale Athletic Park) with develpment ptential. The remainder f the Infill Area has been built-ut with the develpment f primarily single family husing (with twnhuses at 60 Avenue and 168 Street). There are existing RF-12 lts alng the nrth side 61B Avenue, which were created in 2003 under Develpment Applicatin N At the time f the applicatin, the applicant s engineer prepared a cncept plan fr the subject site which included RF-12 lts alng the suthern prtin f 61B Avenue. A huse is currently under cnstructin n the suth-eastern prtin f the site, frnting 170 Street.

21 Planning & Develpment Reprt Page 5 Current Prpsal The applicant prpses t rezne the prtin f the subject site, shwn as Blck A in Appendix I, frm "One-Acre Residential Zne (RA)" and "Suburban Residential Zne (RS)" t "Single Family Residential (12) Zne (RF-12)", the prtin f the subject site shwn as Blck B in Appendix I, frm "Suburban Residential Zne (RS)" t "Single Family Residential Zne (RF)", and the prtin f the subject site shwn as Blck C in Appendix I, frm "One-Acre Residential Zne (RA)" t "Single Family Residential Zne (RF)" in rder t permit subdivisin int fur (4) RF-zned single family lts and 16 RF-12-zned single family small lts. The prpsed subdivisin will cmplete this prtin f 61B Avenue and the adjining cul-desac at 169A Street. The layut prpses 4 lts frnting nt 170 Street and 2 lts frnting 169 Street. The remaining 14 lts will frnt nt 61B Avenue and the 169A Street cul-de-sac. A pedestrian walkway is prpsed alng the 3.0-metre (10-ft) wide engineering walkway which is required t cnnect water services frm 169A Street t 170 Street. The prpsed rezning is cnsistent with the Urban designatin f the OCP and the Urban Residential designatin in the West Clverdale Lcal Area Plan. The cmbinatin f RF-zned and RF-12-zned lts is cnsistent with the established subdivisin pattern in the area. Design Guidelines and Lt Grading The applicant has retained Tynan Cnsulting Ltd. as the Design Cnsultant. The Design Cnsultant cnducted a character study f the surrunding hmes and based n the findings f the study, prpsed a set f design guidelines fr the prpsed lts (Appendix V). The new hmes will be cnsistent in theme, representatin and character with the newer hmes cnstructed n the RF-12-zned lts n the nrth side f 61B Avenue. Based n the prpsed grading, basements cannt be achieved n any f the prpsed lts. A preliminary lt grading plan was submitted by H.Y. Engineering Ltd. and reviewed by staff and was determined t be adequate. PRE-NOTIFICATION Pre-ntificatin letters were mailed n May 21, 2014, and staff has received six (6) respnses, which are summarized belw (with staff s respnses in italics): Five (5) respndents were cncerned abut whether basements wuld be permitted. The callers were cncerned that allwing basements wuld allw fr secndary suites, resulting in increased traffic and n-street parking pressures. (Basements will nt be permitted n any f the prpsed lts as part f this develpment. Additinal n-street parking is being prvided by the applicant thrugh prvisin f an 18- stall parking area within the 169A Street cul-de-sac.)

22 Planning & Develpment Reprt Page 6 Tw (2) respndents expressed cncern abut the lack f sidewalks alng 169 Street. Many pedestrians access Clverdale Athletic Park via 169 Street. Increased density in this area will increase traffic, which will make it mre dangerus fr pedestrians. (A sidewalk will be required alng the 169 Street frntage as part f this applicatin.) Three (3) respndents wanted mre infrmatin abut the prpsed layut and density. They had n cncerns. (The prpsed layut is generally in keeping with the cncept that was prvided as part f Develpment Applicatin N , and is cnsistent with the established subdivisin pattern in the surrunding neighburhd.) TREES Peter Mennel, ISA Certified Arbrist f Mike Fadum and Assciates Ltd. prepared an Arbrist Assessment fr the subject prperty. The table belw prvides a summary f the tree retentin and remval by tree species: Table 1: Summary f Tree Preservatin by Tree Species: Tree Species Existing Remve Retain Alder and Cttnwd Trees Alder Cttnwd Deciduus Trees (excluding Alder and Cttnwd Trees) Cherry Silver Maple Trembling Aspen Ttal (excluding Alder and Cttnwd Trees) Additinal Trees in the prpsed Open Space / Riparian Area Ttal Replacement Trees Prpsed (excluding Bulevard Street Trees) Ttal Retained and Replacement Trees Cntributin t the Green City Fund N/A The Arbrist Assessment states that there are a ttal f five (5) prtected trees n the site, excluding Alder and Cttnwd trees. Thirteen (13) existing trees, apprximately 72 % f the ttal trees n the site, are Alder and Cttnwd trees. It was determined that n trees can be retained as part f this develpment prpsal. The prpsed tree retentin was assessed

23 Planning & Develpment Reprt Page 7 taking int cnsideratin the lcatin f services, building ftprints, rad dedicatin and prpsed lt grading. Fr thse trees that cannt be retained, the applicant will be required t plant trees n a 1 t 1 replacement rati fr Alder and Cttnwd trees, and a 2 t 1 replacement rati fr all ther trees. This will require a ttal f 23 replacement trees n the site. The applicant is prpsing 60 replacement trees, meeting this requirement. In summary, a ttal f 60 trees are prpsed t be replaced n the site. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT CHECKLIST The applicant prepared and submitted a sustainable develpment checklist fr the subject site n December 17, The table belw summarizes the applicable develpment features f the prpsal based n the seven (7) criteria listed in the Surrey Sustainable Develpment Checklist. Sustainability Criteria 1. Site Cntext & Lcatin (A1-A2) 2. Density & Diversity (B1-B7) 3. Eclgy & Stewardship (C1-C4) 4. Sustainable Transprt & Mbility (D1-D2) 5. Accessibility & Safety (E1-E3) 6. Green Certificatin (F1) 7. Educatin & Awareness (G1-G4) Sustainable Develpment Features Summary The prpsed develpment is cnsistent with the Urban designatin in the Official Cmmunity Plan (OCP). The prpsed develpment is within an Infill Area. N/A N/A N/A CPTED principles t be applied fr hmes cnstructed adjacent t the prpsed walkway. N/A N/A

24 Planning & Develpment Reprt Page 8 INFORMATION ATTACHED TO THIS REPORT The fllwing infrmatin is attached t this Reprt: Appendix I. Appendix II. Appendix III. Appendix IV. Appendix V. Appendix VI. Lt Owners, Actin Summary, Prject Data Sheets and Survey Plan Prpsed Subdivisin Layut Engineering Summary Schl District Cmments Building Design Guidelines Summary Summary f Tree Survey and Tree Preservatin riginal signed by Judith Rbertsn Jean Lamntagne General Manager Planning and Develpment LM/da \\file-server1\net-data\csdc\generate\areaprd\save\ dc DRV 7/16/14 3:55 PM

25 SURREY C ITY O J; PARKS Planning & Develpment Deprtment Avanus, SUrrey, 8rltl!1h Clumbl, Canada V3W 1K2 Tel. (604) Fax. (604) PROPOSED SUBDIVISION LAYOUT CIVIC ADDRESS: ST SURREY BC LEGAL: LOT 9, SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 7, N.W.D., PLAN 6872 File N: MAP #: 076 EXIST. ZONE: --=R'"=S""/-='R'='A'--'/R=F':--- PROP. ZONE: RF/RF B s ST ~ F ~ 0::: <( Q_ u i= w _j I ~ <( w _j <( 0 0::: w > 0 _j u m -q-...--,...; to... r<i -q-,...;...,...; & "' 70 --& ~ I cy."'!' H.l ($) ENGINEERING LTD c'.;, GROSS SITE AREA: 12,152sqm (3.00ac) PARK DEDICATION: 608sqm (CASH-IN-LIEU) NOTE: PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINTS ARE SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATI VE PURPOSES ONLY ~ NO-BUILD R/C FOR FUTURE #200-:!112B-152rld. ST. Surrsy. BC V3R 4E7 1EL S G1G NOTE: ALL EXISTlNG ONSITE ~ ~ SUBDIVISION OF ST. www. h~;;~lru!u!lr1ng.cam F"AX STRUCTlURES ARE TO BE REMOVED ~ UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ( H.Y.#: I ALTERNATIVE#02C I DATE: 30 APR/ 14 I SCALE: 1:750 ) Please dimensian lat frntages & areas, name ekisting rads and indicate nrth Preferred scales: 1:500, 1:1000, 1:2500, 1:10,000 Metric Lar ger f rmat drawings m y be attached as required

26 City f Surrey ADDITIONAL PLANNING COMMENTS Planning Reprt Date: September 29, 2014 PROPOSAL: Rezning frm RS (By-law N. 5942) and RA t RF and RF-12 in rder t allw subdivisin int 20 single family lts. LOCATION: OWNER: ZONING: OCP DESIGNATION: LAP DESIGNATION: Street Ujjal Dsanjh RA, RS Urban Urban Residential

27 Additinal Planning Cmments Page 2 RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY Cuncil cnsider Third Reading f Rezning By-law N , rezning the site frm RS (By-law N. 5942) and RA t RF and RF-12. DEVIATION FROM PLANS, POLICIES OR REGULATIONS Nne. RATIONALE OF RECOMMENDATION The applicant is prpsing a rezning t RF and RF-12 t permit the fllwing: 2 RF lts frnting 169 Street; 4 lts (2 RF and 2 RF-12) frnting 170 Street; and 14 RF-12 lts frnting 61B Avenue and the cul-de-sac bulb (169A Street). Fllwing the September 8, 2014, Public Hearing fr the subject rezning, Cuncil referred the applicatin back t staff in rder t address the cncerns raised during the Public Hearing including the issues relative t traffic. Alternative layuts were cnsidered and the layut presented at the September 8, 2014 is cnsidered the mst reasnable. The prpsed 20-lt subdivisin fr the subject site is cnsistent with the cncept plan prepared as part f the rezning t RF-12 f the lands t the nrth, under Develpment Applicatin N , which was apprved by Cuncil in The applicant has prvided additinal infrmatin clarifying the impacts f the prpsed prject based n the cncerns raised at the Public Hearing and has demnstrated that the prpsed layut is the preferred ptin frm an access, parking and cmmunity expectatin perspective.

28 Additinal Planning Cmments Page 3 RECOMMENDATION The Planning & Develpment Department recmmends that Cuncil cnsider Third Reading f "Surrey Zning By-law, 1993, N , Amendment By-law, 2013, N ", rezning Blck A f the subject site frm "One-Acre Residential Zne (RA)" (By-law N ) and "Suburban Residential Zne (RS)" (By-law N. 5942) t "Single Family Residential (12) Zne (RF-12)", Blck B f the subject site frm "Suburban Residential Zne (RS)" (By-law N. 5942) t "Single Family Residential Zne (RF)" and Blck C f the subject site frm "One-Acre Residential Zne (RA)" (Bylaw N ) t "Single Family Residential Zne (RF)". DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS Backgrund The applicant initially prpsed a rezning t develp the subject site int 6 RF lts and 13 RF-12 lts. In rder t increase the number f n-street parking stalls and t accmmdate the requirement fr a water main and pedestrian walkway, the applicatin was revised t rezne the site t create 4 RF lts and 16 RF-12 lts. On July 23, 2014, the Initial Planning Reprt (Appendix D) was presented t Cuncil that recmmended rezning the site frm RS (By-law N. 5942) and RA t RF and RF-12, t accmmdate the prpsed 20-lt single family subdivisin. The layut presented cnsists f tw (2) RF lts frnting 169 Street, fur (4) lts (2 RF and 2 RF-12) frnting 170 Street and furteen (14) RF-12 lts frnting 61B Avenue and its cul-de-sac bulb (169A Street). Fllwing cnsideratin f the Initial Planning Reprt, Cuncil gave First and Secnd Readings t the Rezning By-law and set September 8, 2014 as the date fr the Public Hearing. A ttal f nine (9) area residents and the wner s agent spke at the Public Hearing n September 8, In additin, three (3) area residents submitted written cmments t Cuncil. The cncerns expressed by the area residents are summarized belw: Traffic alng 169 Street is already very busy, and having access t the prpsed develpment frm 169 Street will increase the pressure n 169 Street and will increase the risk t pedestrians accessing Clverdale Athletic Park, as there are currently n sidewalks alng 169 Street. In the pinin f mst speakers, access t the develpment shuld cme frm 170 Street; Sme park users park their vehicles alng 169 Street and 170 Street instead f in the designated parking areas fr the park. Adding mre hmes n the subject site will add t the parking issues in the neighburhd; Owners will have secndary suites which will add t the traffic and parking issues in the neighburhd; and

29 Additinal Planning Cmments Page 4 The prpsed east-west walkway cnnecting 61B Avenue t 170 Street will create security issues fr the neighburhd as it may enable litering and may becme unsightly with litter and limited maintenance. In respnse t the neighburhd cncerns raised at the September 8, 2014 Public Hearing, Cuncil passed the fllwing reslutin: "Amendment Bylaw, 2014, N by referred back t staff t address the cncerns raised during the Public Hearing and address the issues relative t ingress and egress f vehicular traffic." [RES.R ] Applicant s Respnses t the Cncerns: The applicant has cnsidered each f the cncerns raised at the Public Hearing and cnsider the layut initially presented t Cuncil is supprtable fr the fllwing reasns (with staff cmments in italics): Rad Alignment The prpsed subdivisin layut cnsisting f a cul-de-sac accessed frm 169 Street (Appendix B) was prepared in accrdance with the cncept plan fr a cul-de-sac that was supprted by Cuncil in 2003 when the adjacent lands t the nrth were apprved (Appendix C). (Develpment Applicatin N was apprved n December 1, 2003, rezning the lands t the nrth t permit 11 RF-12 lts frnting a new 61B Avenue and 1 RF lt frnting 170 Street.) The cncept plan presented at the time the lands t the nrth develped als allwed fr the prpsed RF lt ( Street) t subdivide with the subject site in the future, and therefre a n-build Restrictive Cvenant was registered ver the suthern prtin f the RF lt. The prpsed subdivisin layut fr the subject site allws fr Street t develp in accrdance with the cncept plan. Mdifying the rad cncept wuld be cntrary t the expectatins f the wner f Street and f thse wners wh purchased hmes alng the nrthern prtin f 61B Avenue. (The prpsed layut is generally cnsistent with the cul-de-sac cncept plan develped when the lands t the nrth were rezned as part f Develpment Applicatin N , which was apprved by Cuncil in As part f the develpment t the nrth, a n-build Restrictive Cvenant was registered ver the suthern prtin f Street t allw the wner t subdivide in the future, in cperatin with the subject site. The subject applicatin makes prvisins fr further subdivisin ptential f prpsed Lt 20 with Street.) This area f Clverdale is predminantly cul-de-sac develpments. (The prpsed cul-de-sac is cnsistent with the pattern f develpment in the area, which generally ccurred in the 1990s, with the exceptin f the single family lts t the nrth.) Allwing 61B Avenue t be cmpleted as a thrugh rad is impractical and wuld exacerbate traffic vlume, parking and pedestrian safety issues in the neighburhd. A thrugh rad alignment wuld generate mre traffic vlume frm drivers taking shrtcuts thrugh the

30 Additinal Planning Cmments Page 5 neighburhd and wuld lead t an increased number f park-users parking in the neighburhd. In additin, the alignment f a thrugh-rad wuld be unsafe fr drivers. Mving the access t the cul-de-sac t 170 Street and creating a dead end cul-de-sac at the western end f 61B Avenue wuld increase traffic vlumes alng 170 Street, which is already a busy street. This ptin wuld als decrease the number f achievable parking spaces in the prpsed bulb parking area and wuld nt alleviate parking cncerns in the neighburhd. In additin, the alignment f 61B Avenue wuld be unsafe fr drivers and wuld create difficulty fr hme-wners wh are adjacent t dead end barricades t exit their driveways. (The existing rad netwrk can adequately service the traffic generated by the prpsed 20-lt subdivisin withut the need t create a new thrugh lcal rad cnnectin nt 170 Street. The applicant will be required t cmplete the frntages f 61B Avenue and 169 Street t their ultimate width including wider pavement, which will prvide pprtunities fr additinal nstreet parking. Engineering requirements will als include sidewalk alng 169 Street frm 61A Avenue t 61B Avenue. In cnjunctin with their frntage bligatins, staff requested the applicant extend the sidewalk frm 61 Avenue t 61A Avenue t cnnect existing pedestrian infrastructure. These additinal wrks will be funded by the City.) Parking There are six (6) existing n-street parking spaces n the nrthern prtin f 61B Avenue. The cmpletin f the prpsed cul-de-sac wuld create an additinal six (6) n-street parking spaces n the eastern prtin f 169 Street and an additinal eighteen (18) parking spaces in the prpsed parking stall area within the 169A Street cul-de-sac. In additin, there will be fur (4) parking spaces n each lt, based n tw (2) in the garage and tw (2) in the driveways. The prpsed develpment will nt exacerbate any existing parking issues. (The widening f 169 Street and 61B Avenue will prvide pprtunities fr additinal n-street parking in additin t the fur (4) parking spaces per lt and the prpsed parking stall area with 18 spaces. The parking stalls prpsed in the 169A Street cul-de-sac will cmply with the standards in the Zning By-law.) Basements and Secndary Suites Based n the prpsed grading, basements cannt be achieved n any f the 20 prpsed lts. (A preliminary lt grading plan was submitted by H.Y. Engineering Ltd. and reviewed by staff and was determined t be adequate. Accrding t the prpsed grading, basements cannt be achieved n any f the prpsed lts.) Installing secndary suites n the first r secnd level f a tw-strey huse is nt ecnmically viable in huses f this size. (The maximum huse sizes achievable n the prpsed lts is apprximately 342 square metres (3,681 sq. ft.) fr the RF lts and 260 square metres (2,800 sq. ft.) fr the RF-12 lts.

31 Additinal Planning Cmments Page 6 The Zning By-law permits ne secndary suite in all single family hmes. There are n registered secndary suites lcated in the immediate area.) Pedestrian Cnnectin The pedestrian walkway is prpsed t cincide with the 3.0-metre (10-ft.) wide engineering right-f-way which is required t cnnect water services frm 169A Street t 170 Street. (A right-f-way is required by Engineering in rder t cnnect water services frm 169A Street t 170 Street. A pedestrian walkway ver the right-f-way is standard practice and prvides pedestrian cnnectivity in an area that is predminantly cul-de-sacs.) At the time the walkway was prpsed, staff wrked with the applicant t ensure that Crime Preventin Thrugh Envirnmental Design (CPTED) principles such as clear sight lines, lw, permeable fencing, and active rms and windws facing the walkway were applied t the building design guidelines fr prpsed Lts 14, 15, 18 and 19. (The applicant s Design Cnsultant, Tynan Cnsulting Ltd., has applied CPTED principles t the lts adjacent t the walkway within the building design guidelines). Additinal Staff Cmments The applicant s prpsed subdivisin remains unchanged frm that previusly cnsidered. The prpsed layut is generally cnsistent with the cul-de-sac cncept plan develped when the lands t the nrth were rezned as part f Develpment Applicatin N , which was apprved by Cuncil in Traffic vlume, parking and pedestrian safety were the main cncerns raised at the Public Hearing, hwever realigning 61B Avenue t functin as a thrugh rad r as a cul-de-sac accessed frm 170 Street wuld nt reslve these issues. In additin, realignment wuld eliminate the develpment ptential f Street and wuld be cntrary t the expectatins f wners n the nrthern prtin 61B Avenue, wh purchased their hmes with the expectatins that 61B Avenue wuld be cmpleted as a cul-de-sac. Widening f 169 Street and 61B Avenue will prvide pprtunities fr n-street parking in additin t the fur (4) parking spaces that will be prvided per single family lt. The required sidewalk alng 169 Street will prvide a safe and cntinuus walking cnnectin between Clverdale Athletic Park and the existing sidewalks n 61 Avenue. Secndary suites will be impeded by the lack f basements n the 20 prpsed lts. CONCLUSION Staff have wrked with the applicant in prpsing a layut that cnfrms t the cncept plan develped when the lands t the nrth were apprved.

32 Additinal Planning Cmments Page 7 City staff are generally in supprt f the prpsed subdivisin layut presented at the September 8, 2014 Public Hearing and therefre recmmend that Cuncil cnsider Third Reading f Rezning By-law N INFORMATION ATTACHED TO THIS REPORT The fllwing infrmatin is attached t this Reprt: Appendix A. Lt Owners, Actin Summary, Prject Data Sheet and Survey Plan Appendix B. Prpsed Subdivisin Layut Appendix C. Cncept Plan fr Develpment Applicatin N Appendix D. Initial Planning Reprt N , dated July 21, 2014 riginal signed by Judith Rbertsn Jean Lamntagne General Manager Planning and Develpment LM/da \\file-server1\net-data\csdc\generate\areaprd\save\ dc DRV 9/25/14 1:09 PM

33 SURREY C ITY O J; PARKS Planning & Develpment Deprtment Avanus, SUrrey, 8rltl!1h Clumbl, Canada V3W 1K2 Tel. (604) Fax. (604) PROPOSED SUBDIVISION LAYOUT CIVIC ADDRESS: ST SURREY BC LEGAL: LOT 9, SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 7, N.W.D., PLAN 6872 File N: MAP #: 076 EXIST. ZONE: --=R'"=S""/-='R'='A'--'/R=F':--- PROP. ZONE: RF/RF B s ST ~ F ~ 0::: <( Q_ u i= w _j I ~ <( w _j <( 0 0::: w > 0 _j u m -q-...--,...; to... r<i -q-,...;...,...; & "' 70 --& ~ I cy."'!' H.l ($) ENGINEERING LTD c'.;, GROSS SITE AREA: 12,152sqm (3.00ac) PARK DEDICATION: 608sqm (CASH-IN-LIEU) NOTE: PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINTS ARE SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATI VE PURPOSES ONLY ~ NO-BUILD R/C FOR FUTURE #200-:!112B-152rld. ST. Surrsy. BC V3R 4E7 1EL S G1G NOTE: ALL EXISTlNG ONSITE ~ ~ SUBDIVISION OF ST. www. h~;;~lru!u!lr1ng.cam F"AX STRUCTlURES ARE TO BE REMOVED ~ UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ( H.Y.#: I ALTERNATIVE#02C I DATE: 30 APR/ 14 I SCALE: 1:750 ) Please dimensian lat frntages & areas, name ekisting rads and indicate nrth Preferred scales: 1:500, 1:1000, 1:2500, 1:10,000 Metric Lar ger f rmat drawings m y be attached as required

34 City f Surrey 2 ND ADDITIONAL PLANNING COMMENTS Planning Reprt Date: January 12, 2015 PROPOSAL: Rezning frm RS (By-law N. 5942) and RA t RF and RF-12 in rder t allw subdivisin int 20 single family lts. LOCATION: Street OWNER: Ujjal Dsanjh ZONING: RA and RS (By-law 5942) OCP DESIGNATION: Urban LAP DESIGNATION: Urban Residential

35 2 nd Additinal Planning Cmments Page 2 RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY Cuncil cnsider Third Reading f Rezning By-law N , rezning the site frm RS (By-law N. 5942) and RA t RF and RF-12. DEVIATION FROM PLANS, POLICIES OR REGULATIONS Nne. RATIONALE OF RECOMMENDATION The applicant is prpsing a rezning t RF and RF-12 t permit 2 RF lts frnting 169 Street, 4 lts (2 RF and 2 RF-12) frnting 170 Street and 14 RF-12 lts frnting either 61B Avenue r an expanded cul-de-sac bulb (169A Street). The Public Hearing fr the subject rezning was held n September 8, 2014 and 9 residents expressed cncerns, particularly regarding traffic and parking. Cuncil referred the applicatin back t staff in rder t address the cncerns raised during the Public Hearing. The applicant cnsidered the cncerns raised at the Public Hearing and prvided ratinale t staff, justifying supprt fr the 20-lt layut with access frm 169 Street and cmpletin f an expanded 169A Street cul-de-sac bulb. On September 29, 2014, Cuncil cnsidered an Additinal Planning Reprt, which recmmended the riginal 20-lt layut with 61B Avenue accessed frm 169 Street. As n Public Infrmatin Meeting (PIM) had been cnducted, Cuncil subsequently referred the applicatin back fr further public cnsultatin. In accrdance with Cuncil s directin, the applicant held a PIM n Nvember 6, Apprximately 25 residents, primarily frm the area west f the subject site, attended the meeting and strng ppsitin was viced t the riginal 20-lt layut with 61B Avenue accessed frm 169 Street. Cncerns regarding traffic and parking were expressed and mst in attendance indicated a preference fr access t 61B Avenue t be frm 170 Street. The riginal prpsed layut reflects the pattern f develpment anticipated fr this area, since the creatin f the 61B Avenue cul-de-sac in Shifting access t 170 Street wuld intrduce impacts n residents alng 170 Street, wh may have purchased their hmes with the anticipatin that the 61B Avenue cul-de-sac wuld be cmpleted with access t 169 Street. The applicant has addressed sme f the issues raised at Public Hearing and the subsequent PIM. The applicant will be incrprating 18 standard-sized parking spaces within the expanded 169A Street cul-de-sac bulb, each prpsed lt will accmmdate 4 parking spaces and n basements are prpsed and therefre secndary suites are nt anticipated. Staff supprt the riginal 20-lt layut accessed frm 169 Street as it is cnsistent with the cncept plan develped ver 12 years ag and the existing rad netwrk can adequately service the traffic generated by the prpsed 16 lts accessing 169 Street and 4 lts accessing 170 Street.

36 2 nd Additinal Planning Cmments Page 3 RECOMMENDATION The Planning & Develpment Department recmmends that Cuncil cnsider Third Reading f "Surrey Zning By-law, 1993, N , Amendment By-law, 2013, N ", rezning Blck A f the subject site frm "One-Acre Residential Zne (RA)" (By-law N ) and "Suburban Residential Zne (RS)" (By-law N. 5942) t "Single Family Residential (12) Zne (RF-12)", Blck B f the subject site frm "Suburban Residential Zne (RS)" (By-law N. 5942) t "Single Family Residential Zne (RF)" and Blck C f the subject site frm "One-Acre Residential Zne (RA)" (By-law N ) t "Single Family Residential Zne (RF)". BACKGROUND On July 23, 2014, the Initial Planning Reprt (Appendix IV) was presented t Cuncil that recmmended rezning the subject site frm RS (By-law N. 5942) and RA t RF and RF-12, t accmmdate the prpsed 20-lt single family subdivisin, accessed frm 169 Street. Fllwing cnsideratin f the Initial Planning Reprt, Cuncil gave First and Secnd Readings t the Rezning By-law and set September 8, 2014 as the date fr Public Hearing. Nine (9) residents spke at the Public Hearing n September 8, 2014 and 3 area residents submitted written cmments t Cuncil. Residents expressed cncern abut ingress and egress t the subject site, parking, secndary suites and the prpsed east-west walkway. In respnse t the neighburhd cncerns raised at the September 8, 2014 Public Hearing, Cuncil referred the applicatin back t staff. Cuncil cnsidered an Additinal Planning Cmments Reprt (Appendix V) n September 29, 2014, which incrprated the applicant s ratinale fr supprt f the layut initially presented t Cuncil. In respnse, Cuncil passed the fllwing reslutin: "Amendment Bylaw, 2014, N be referred back t staff t wrk with the applicant t hst an additinal cmmunity cnsultatin meeting with the bjective f mitigating cncerns raised by residents during the September 8, 2014 Regular Cuncil Public Hearing meeting." [RES.R ] PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING In accrdance with Cuncil s directin, the applicant held a Public Infrmatin Meeting (PIM) at A.J. McLellan Elementary Schl ( Avenue) n Nvember 6, The meeting was held in an pen huse frmat, as indicated in the invitatin. There were 2 representatives fr the applicatin in attendance, including the applicant s cnsultant, HY Engineering. Representatives frm the Planning & Develpment and Engineering Departments were als in attendance. Apprximately 25 residents attended the PIM, 23 f which registered n the sign-in sheet. Twenty-tw (22) cmment sheets were submitted t City staff by the applicant s cnsultant fllwing the Public Infrmatin Meeting.

37 2 nd Additinal Planning Cmments Page 4 The applicant presented 3 alternative layuts at the PIM (Appendix VI), as fllws: Alternative 1: riginal 20-lt layut presented t Cuncil n July 23, 2014, with a 61B Avenue cul-de-sac accessed frm 169 Street; Alternative 2: 18-lt layut with 61B Avenue as a thrugh rad cnnecting 169 Street and 170 Street; and Alternative 3: 18-lt layut with 169 Street clsed via a cul-de-sac and 61B Avenue accessed frm 170 Street and nt cnnected t 169 Street. The applicant prvided their ratinale t the residents fr the riginal 20-lt layut as fllws: The prpsed 20-lt layut cnsisting f a cul-de-sac accessed frm 169 Street was prepared in accrdance with the cncept plan fr a cul-de-sac that was supprted by Cuncil in 2003 when the adjacent lands t the nrth were apprved (Appendix III); Mdifying the rad cncept wuld be cntrary t the expectatins f the wner f the adjacent lt t the nrth-east at Street and f thse wners wh purchased hmes alng the nrthern prtin f 61B Avenue; There are 6 existing n-street parking spaces n the nrthern prtin f 61B Avenue. The cmpletin f the prpsed 20-lt layut wuld create an additinal 6 n-street parking spaces n the eastern prtin f 169 Street and an additinal 18 parking spaces in the prpsed parking area within the enlarged 169A Street cul-de-sac bulb. In additin, there will be 4 parking spaces n each lt, based n 2 in the garage and 2 in the driveway. The prpsed develpment will nt exacerbate any existing parking issues; and Mving the access t the cul-de-sac t 170 Street and creating a dead end cul-de-sac at the western end f 61B Avenue wuld increase traffic vlumes alng 170 Street, which is already a busy street. This ptin wuld als decrease the number f achievable parking spaces in the prpsed bulb parking area and wuld nt alleviate parking cncerns in the neighburhd. Three (3) residents preferred Alternative 1, hwever n additinal cmments r ratinale were prvided t staff. N residents were in supprt f Alternative 2, and 18 residents frm 15 husehlds preferred Alternative 3. Cmments frm the residents wh prefer Alternative 3 are summarized as fllws (with staff cmments in italics): Traffic alng 169 Street is already very busy, and having access t the prpsed develpment frm 169 Street will increase the pressure n 169 Street and will increase the risk t pedestrians accessing Clverdale Athletic Park, as there are currently n sidewalks alng 169 Street. 169 Street shuld be clsed via a cul-de-sac and access t the develpment shuld cme frm 170 Street, which can accmmdate mre traffic vlume and already has sidewalks.

38 2 nd Additinal Planning Cmments Page 5 (The existing rad netwrk can adequately service the traffic generated by the prpsed 20-lt subdivisin, cnsisting f 16 lts accessing 169 Street and 4 lts accessing 170 Street, withut the need t create a new thrugh lcal rad cnnectin nt 170 Street. The applicant will be required t install a sidewalk alng 169 Street frm 61A Avenue t 61B Avenue. In cnjunctin with their frntage bligatins, staff have requested the applicant t extend the sidewalk frm 61 Avenue t 61A Avenue t cnnect existing pedestrian infrastructure. These additinal wrks will be funded by the City.) Sme park users park their vehicles alng 169 Street and 170 Street instead f in the designated parking areas fr the park. Adding mre hmes n the subject site will add t the parking issues in the neighburhd. (The applicant will be required t cmplete the frntages f 61B Avenue and 169 Street t their ultimate width including wider pavement, which will prvide pprtunities fr additinal n-street parking in additin t the 4 parking spaces per lt and the prpsed parking stall area with 18 parking spaces. The parking spaces prpsed in the 169A Street cul-de-sac bulb will cmply with the standards in the Zning By-law.) Shuld the new hmes have secndary suites, this will add t the traffic and parking issues in the neighburhd. (Based n the prpsed lt grading, basements cannt be achieved n any f the prpsed lts and therefre secndary suites are unlikely. The Zning By-law permits ne secndary suite in all single family hmes, hwever, there are n registered secndary suites lcated in the immediate area.) The cnstructin f sidewalks alng 169 Street will impact the ability f wners t park additinal vehicles in their driveways. (It shuld be nted that prtins f the driveways which wuld be impacted by a new sidewalk are within the City rad allwance.) Staff nte that there were n residents frm 170 Street wh attended the PIM and therefre any cmments r cncerns they may have with respect t a 61B Avenue cul-de-sac accessed frm 170 Street have nt been received by staff. DISCUSSION Subsequent t the Public Infrmatin Meeting, the applicant s prpsed subdivisin layut, which is recmmended by staff, remains unchanged frm that previusly cnsidered by Cuncil. The prpsed 20-lt subdivisin layut cnsisting f a cul-de-sac accessed frm 169 Street (Appendix II) is generally cnsistent with the cul-de-sac cncept plan that was develped when the adjacent RF-12-zned lands t the nrth were rezned as part f Develpment Applicatin N , which was apprved by Cuncil n December 1, 2003 (Appendix III).

39 2 nd Additinal Planning Cmments Page 6 Traffic vlume, parking and pedestrian safety were the main cncerns raised at the Public Hearing and Public Infrmatin Meeting (PIM), hwever realigning 61B Avenue t functin as a cul-de-sac accessed frm 170 Street wuld nt reslve these issues. The cncept plan presented t Cuncil at the time the lands t the nrth develped als allwed fr the RF lt prpsed at that time ( Street) t subdivide with the subject site in the future, and therefre a "n-build" Restrictive Cvenant was registered ver the suthern prtin f the RF lt. The prpsed subdivisin layut fr the subject site allws fr Street t develp in accrdance with the cncept plan. Mdifying the rad cncept wuld be cntrary t the expectatins f the wner f Street and f thse wners wh purchased hmes alng the nrthern prtin f 61B Avenue and alng 170 Street. Relcating access t the cul-de-sac t 170 Street (rather than 169 Street) and creating a dead end cul-de-sac at the western end f 61B Avenue wuld direct traffic nt 170 Street and create an intersectin that was nt part f the riginal develpment cncept. The prpsed subdivisin layut als incrprates 18 standard-sized parking spaces within the expanded 169A Street cul-de-sac. Relcating access t the cul-de-sac t 170 Street wuld als decrease the number f achievable parking spaces in the prpsed "bulb" parking. The existing rad netwrk can adequately service the traffic generated by the prpsed 20-lt subdivisin, cnsisting f 16 lts accessing 169 Street and 4 lts accessing 170 Street. Althugh strng ppsitin t the prpsed layut was viced at the PIM, the applicant has addressed the cncerns raised regarding parking, secndary suites and pedestrian safety withut varying the layut. Parking There are 6 existing n-street parking spaces n the nrthern prtin f 61B Avenue. The required widening f 61B Avenue and the cmpletin f the prpsed cul-de-sac wuld create additinal n-street parking pprtunities n the eastern prtin f 169 Street and the suth side f 61B Avenue. The applicant has demnstrated the ptential fr an additinal 18 standard-sized parking spaces in the prpsed parking area within the enlarged 169A Street cul-de-sac bulb. In additin, there will be fur (4) parking spaces n each lt, based n 2 in the garage and 2 in the driveway. It is nt anticipated that the prpsed develpment will exacerbate any existing parking issues. Basements and Secndary Suites Based n the prpsed lt grading, basements cannt be achieved n any f the 20 prpsed lts. There are n basements in the surrunding hmes, and, althugh permitted by the Zning By-law, there are n registered secndary suites in the area.

40 2 nd Additinal Planning Cmments Page 7 Due t basements nt being prpsed, secndary suites are nt anticipated in the 20 prpsed new hmes. Pedestrian Safety Currently there are n sidewalks n 169 Street between 61 Avenue and 61B Avenue, yet the neighburhd residents advise that there is cnsiderable pedestrian activity n 169 Street t and frm the Clverdale Athletic Park t the nrth. The applicant will be required t install a sidewalk alng the east side f 169 Street between 61A Avenue and 61B Avenue. In additin, staff have requested that the applicant extend the sidewalk alng the east side f 169 Street frm 61A Avenue t 61 Avenue, which will prvide a safe and cntinuus walking cnnectin between Clverdale Athletic Park and the existing sidewalks n 61 Avenue. The sidewalks will be cnstructed within the City rad allwance and will nt impact parking n private prperties alng 169 Street. These additinal wrks will be funded by the City. CONCLUSION The applicant s prpsed subdivisin remains unchanged frm that previusly cnsidered by Cuncil. The prpsed layut is generally cnsistent with the cul-de-sac cncept plan develped when the lands t the nrth were rezned as part f Develpment Applicatin N , which was apprved by Cuncil in Traffic vlume, parking and pedestrian safety were the main cncerns raised at the Public Hearing and Public Infrmatin Meeting (PIM), hwever realigning 61B Avenue t functin as a cul-de-sac accessed frm 170 Street wuld nt reslve these issues. In additin, realignment f 61B Avenue wuld eliminate the develpment ptential f Street and wuld be cntrary t the expectatins f wners n the nrthern prtin 61B Avenue and thse alng 170 Street, wh purchased their hmes with the expectatins that 61B Avenue wuld nt daylight nt 170 Street. The applicant will be required t widen 169 Street and 61B Avenue t full standard, which will prvide pprtunities fr n-street parking in additin t the 18 parking spaces prpsed in the expanded 169A Street cul-de-sac bulb and the 4 parking spaces that will be prvided n each f the prpsed single family lts. The requested cmpletin f the sidewalk alng 169 Street will prvide a safe and cntinuus walking cnnectin between Clverdale Athletic Park and the existing sidewalks n 61 Avenue. Secndary suites will be unlikely due t the lack f basements n the 20 prpsed lts. Staff have wrked with the applicant in prpsing a layut that cnfrms t the cncept plan develped when the single family lts t the immediate nrth were apprved.

41 2 nd Additinal Planning Cmments Page 8 Despite the cncerns raised at the Public Hearing and the subsequent Public Infrmatin Meeting, City staff are in supprt f the prpsed subdivisin layut presented at the September 8, 2014 Public Hearing and therefre recmmend that Cuncil cnsider Third Reading f Rezning By-law N If, hwever, Cuncil supprts a layut with a new cul-de-sac accessed frm 170 Street, it is recmmended that Cuncil refer the applicatin back t staff and direct the applicant t cnsult the residents n 170 Street wh wuld be impacted by the new cul-de-sac. INFORMATION ATTACHED TO THIS REPORT The fllwing infrmatin is attached t this Reprt: Appendix I. Lt Owners, Actin Summary and Prject Data Sheet and Survey Plan Appendix II. Prpsed Subdivisin Layut Appendix III. Cncept Plan fr Develpment Applicatin N Appendix IV. Initial Planning Reprt, dated July 21, 2014 (with n attachments) Appendix V. Additinal Planning Cmments Reprt, dated September 29, 2014 (with n attachments) Appendix VI. Layut Alternatives presented at the Nvember 6, 2014 Public Infrmatin Meeting riginal signed by Judith Rbertsn Jean Lamntagne General Manager Planning and Develpment LM/da \\file-server1\net-data\csdc\generate\areaprd\save\ dc DRV 1/7/15 4:00 PM

42 SURREY C ITY O J; PARKS Planning & Develpment Deprtment Avanus, SUrrey, 8rltl!1h Clumbl, Canada V3W 1K2 Tel. (604) Fax. (604) PROPOSED SUBDIVISION LAYOUT CIVIC ADDRESS: ST SURREY BC LEGAL: LOT 9, SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 7, N.W.D., PLAN 6872 File N: MAP #: 076 EXIST. ZONE: --=R'"=S""/-='R'='A'--'/R=F':--- PROP. ZONE: RF/RF B s ST ~ F ~ 0::: <( Q_ u i= w _j I ~ <( w _j <( 0 0::: w > 0 _j u m -q-...--,...; to... r<i -q-,...;...,...; & "' 70 --& ~ I cy."'!' H.l ($) ENGINEERING LTD c'.;, GROSS SITE AREA: 12,152sqm (3.00ac) PARK DEDICATION: 608sqm (CASH-IN-LIEU) NOTE: PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINTS ARE SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATI VE PURPOSES ONLY ~ NO-BUILD R/C FOR FUTURE #200-:!112B-152rld. ST. Surrsy. BC V3R 4E7 1EL S G1G NOTE: ALL EXISTlNG ONSITE ~ ~ SUBDIVISION OF ST. www. h~;;~lru!u!lr1ng.cam F"AX STRUCTlURES ARE TO BE REMOVED ~ UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ( H.Y.#: I ALTERNATIVE#02C I DATE: 30 APR/ 14 I SCALE: 1:750 ) Please dimensian lat frntages & areas, name ekisting rads and indicate nrth Preferred scales: 1:500, 1:1000, 1:2500, 1:10,000 Metric Lar ger f rmat drawings m y be attached as required

43 ) / j Cncept Plan fr 6159 & Street APPENDIX IX ~ ~t--- -h '1 ~t--- ~ ~I 'It t I t\'\1 : I t-.1-j. ~ 1 ~ I "<:"\1 i ) ' e,..,. <;"II } / r ".. \ 't----" ' '... I I ' ' I I "-, I I ' I I ' I r- I : ' --- r--~ ~------J 1 t-----j 1 l I I ' I I I ~ Sl.Oil ~ la a~c\:l~ "-----J..--L-- ' '

44 Clverdale Cmmunity Assciatin Website: March 9, 2015 Leita Martin City f Surrey Planning and Develpment Department Avenue Surrey BC V3T 1V8 Re: Street / Dear Ms. Martin: The Clverdale Cmmunity Assciatin (CCA) has received a revised preliminary ntice fr the abve nted prperty address and prject file. The develper s agent cntacted us t meet and discuss what ur cncerns were and hw they culd address them. After ur meeting with the develper, we met with the lcal residents lcated acrss frm the future develpment t hear what they had t say and brught their cncerns t the Clverdale Cmmunity Assciatin s the members culd discuss it further. At the end, we all agreed that the fllwing items listed belw wuld have t be addressed in rder fr the prject t receive supprt frm the Clverdale Cmmunity Assciatin and the lcal residents: 1. Sidewalks shuld be available n bth sides f 61B Ave ging all the way arund in the cul-de-sac where pssible cnnecting t 169 Street. This shuld als include the sidewalks which the City f Surrey has als requested the develper t install alng 169 Street frm 61 Avenue t 61B Avenue inclusive at the cst f the City as mentined in the last planning reprt. (AGREED TO BE DONE BY THE DEVELOPER) 2. 61B Ave shuld be widened t accmmdate sidewalks n bth sides, Green Bulevard with trees and grass, dublesided parking and enugh clearance t allw emergency vehicles t drive thrugh. This shuld als include the additinal 18 n-street parking stalls which the develper was ging t prvide in the middle f the cul-de-sac (AGREED TO BE DONE BY THE DEVELOPER) 3. Install ne speed hump in frnt f B Avenue and ne speed hump in frnt f Street t address the residents cncerns with regards t speeding cars. The residents will nt be submitting a petitin since we are including their request in this letter. (ALTERNATIVE PROPOSED BY THE CITY OF SURREY) 4. We d nt suggest cnnecting 61B Avenue traffic t 170 Street due t the fact that 170 Street is used fr n-street parking by the park users and will reduce the number f n-street parking spts nr d we suggest putting cncrete barriers t clse ff the 169 Street cul-de-sac as riginally suggested by the residents. The residents have retracted this request after having further discussins with them. (AGREED TO BE DONE BY THE DEVELOPER) 5. T be practive as we all shuld be, we wuld like t see a parking pad t deal with the pssibility f secndary suites being built after the fact n the RF lts. Please create a separate parking pad (can be made using crushed gravel r pavers) alng the side f the driveway r where ever pssible. If the new hmewners aren t planning n putting in a

45 Clverdale Cmmunity Assciatin Website: secndary suite then the pad can be easily remved. There is n need t create a parking pad fr the RF12 lts since n ne will be able t build a side secndary suite due t the square ftage requirements f the primary living area vs. the secndary suite area. (AGREED TO BE DONE BY THE DEVELOPER) 6. Driveways shuld be placed s maximum n-street parking can be achieved n 61B avenue and 169 Street. (AGREED TO BE DONE BY THE DEVELOPER) 7. All garage sizes regardless f the zning shuld be 6.4m deep x 6.10m wide which is the standard nw (AGREED TO BE DONE BY THE DEVELOPER) 8. We wuld als like t have a restrictive cvenant placed n all the lts t ensure that the garage sizes, driveway lcatins, parking pads and their lcatins d nt change r get skipped after the prject receives final apprval. (AGREED TO BE DONE BY THE DEVELOPER) On February 2, 2015, the Clverdale Cmmunity Assciatin n the request f Ms. Theresa Rawle frm HY Engineering met with city staff members Leita Martin, Jeff Pang and Rn Gill. Ms. Theresa Rawle advised everyne that the develper was able t address all the issues listed abve and prvided tw revised layuts which are attached and label(pdf Filenames: ALT04A LAYOUT and ALT04A PARKING). The nly issue which they culd nt reslve was item 3 as this wuld require City f Surrey s Engineering/Transprtatin dept. t address which Jeff Pang said he wuld lk int t see if smething culd be dne. On March 2, 2015, Jeff Pang sent the CCA a revised layut f the rad infrastructure indicating hw traffic calming wuld ccur. This layut is als attached labeled (PDF Filename: ALT04A PARKING-Traffic Calming). We trust the abve infrmatin is satisfactry and as always, we expect ur cmments t be added in the planning reprt and prject file fr cuncil t review. If any changes are being prpsed utside f ur agreement then please advise ur assciatin s we can review and prvide ur cmments accrdingly. Thank yu. Sincerely, Mike Bla President Clverdale Cmmunity Assciatin Cc: Bard f Directrs

46 SURREY Planning & Develpment Deprtment Avenu"t:, SUrrey, British Clumbia, Canad V.3W IK2 PROPOSED Tel. (604) Fx. (604) EXIST. C l ry OJ- PARKS CIVIC ADDRESS: ST SURREY BC LEGAL: LOT 9, SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 7, N.W.D., PLAN 6872 SUBDIVISION LAYOUT File N:...:.7_,9'------=0~~~-_,0""0"- MAP #: 076 ZONE: _-='R='S/Y-R~A,.._/=.R7 F_ PROP. ZONE: RF/RF ALT04A LAYOUT s ST "" 1.2. F "'.,f 16.8,., JOsqm y 0::: <( Q_ u f- w _j ::r:: f- <( w _j <( 0 0::: w > 0 _j u "' 7 ~ 439sqm [ "' ::! 439sqm "' r<i sqm <f 70 "'.,f 6147 ~ I c a: 32.8 [ '<!' 3 ~ 439sqm "' n "' 2 ~ 439sqm "' r<i 32.8 rv :: - H.l ($) ENGINEERING LTD. ;+200-:!112.e-152rld. ST. Surray. BC V3R 4 7 TEL S04-5B3-1G1G 12.8 ~ I I I 86 "'"' 1~ ' GROSS SITE AREA: 12,152sqm (3.00ac) PARK DEDICATION: 608sqm (CASH-IN-LIEU) II NO-BUILD R/C FOR FUTURE L j SUBDIVISION OF ST....,,,;,., "m FAx c+-sb.j ALL PARKING STALLS WITHIN THE ISLAND ARE 6.5m x 3.0m H.Y.#:133B73 IALTERNATIVE#04A I DATE: 04 FEB/15 I Please dimensin Ia\ frntages & areas, name ekisling rads and indicate nrth Preferred scales: 1:500, 1:1000, 1:2500, 1:10,000 Metric Larger frmat drawings may be attached as required (!() w J 6135 NOTE: PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINTS ARE SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY NOTE: ALL EXISTlNG ONSITE ~ STRUCTURES ARE TO BE REMOVED ~ UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE I SCALE: 1:750 ) I

47 SURREY C l'l Y 0~ I,ARKS Planning at Develpment Deprtment Avenue. Surrey. British Clumbia, Canada VJW 1K2 Tel. (604) Fax. (604) PROPOSED SUBDIVISION LAYOUT PARKING CIVIC ADDRESS: ST SURREY BC LEGAL: LOT 9, SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 7, N.W.D.. PLAN 6872 File N: MAP If: 076 EXIST. ZONE: _-='R='S/Y-R::;:A,.._/=R 7 F _ PROP. ZONE: RFJRF ALT04A PARKING B w _j <( 0 0:: w > 0 _j u, I I I lly. ($)ENGINEERING LTD. GROSS SITE AREA: 12,152sqm (3.00ac) PARK DEDICATION: 608sqm (CASH-IN-LIEU) NOTE: PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINTS ARE SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY f20d-912&-152nd. ST. Su" Y> BC V30 <O Tn. 604-~J-1616 NOTE: ALL EXISTING ONSITE llf Weblt:...,...,.;..,;n.cm FAA e<~-se.hn7 ALL PARKING STALLS WITHIN THE STRUCTURES ARE TO BE REMOVED "' ISLAND ARE 6.5m x 3.0m UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE H.Y.#: IALTERNATIVE#04A IDATE: 04 FEB/15!SCALE: 1:750 ) Please dimensin lt frntages & areas, nme existing rds and indicate nrth Preferred scales: 1: 500, 1: 1000, 1:2500, f: 10,000 Metric Lrger frmat drawings may be attached s required

48 SURREY C:ITY OF PARKS Planning & Develpment Deprtment AV9nu.e, Si.Jrr.ay, Brltl!!h Clumbl, CanadiJ VJW IK2 Tel. (604) Fax. (604) PROPOSED SUBDIVISION LAYOUT PARKING CIVIC ADDRESS: ST SURREY BC LEGAL: LOT 9, SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 7, N.W.D., PLAN 6872 File N: MAP #: 076 EXIST. ZONE: --=-R='S/Y-R='=A,.._/=.R 7 F _ PROP. ZONE: RF/RF ALT04A PARKING- Traffic Calming B y 0:: <( Q_ u f--- w _j :r:: f--- <( w _j <( 0 0:: w > 0 _j u I H.l ($) ENGINEERING LTD. ;+200-:! rld. ST. Surray. BC V3R 4 7 TEL S04-5B3-1G1G GROSS SITE AREA: 12,152sqm (3.00ac) PARK DEDICATION: 608sqm (CASH-IN-LIEU).,.._;,., "m FAx a<--s"' ALL PARKING STALLS WITHIN THE ISLAND ARE 6.5m x 3.0m H.Y.#:133B73 IALTERNATIVE#04A I DATE: 16 FEB/ 15 Please dimensin lat frntages & areas, name ekisling raads and indicate nrth Preferred scales: 1:500, 1:1000, 1:2500, 1:10,000 Metric Lar ger f rm at drawings may be attached as required NOTE: PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINTS ARE SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY NOTE: ALL EXISTlNG ONSITE ;g STRUCTURES ARE TO BE REMOVED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE I SCALE: 1:750 )