Presentation of the Biowaste Management Model (5.1 model design survey) WP5 Action 5.1

Transcription

1 Presentation of the Biowaste Management Model (5.1 model design survey) WP5 Action 5.1 PTC in Malta 23 24/04/2014 Prepared by HWE

2 Country Palestine Region/Community Ramallah & Al Bireh that participates in the Governorate. project Jericho Governorate.

3 Jericho Area Collection data nº towns to be attended 1 nº of inhabitants participating 0 % of total population participating Current Collection model of biowaste Current Collection model of residual waste Estimation of seasonal population nº of big producers attended Jericho Municipality 0% Collection with road There is no separation between solid waste container fractions Collection with road container 1,000, Hotels, Restaurants and Campsites

4 Collection of biowaste Door to door collection Collection with containers Type of containers 80: Two wheels container (240 l), 20: Four wheels container (1100 l) nº of containers 100 Direct delivery by the users at the facility NA Use of compostable bags for household and big producers? No Collection frequencies? 6 days week 1 Main reason for the selection of the collection system? Limited number of big producers

5 Biowaste to be treated Urban Biowaste Typology Hotels, Restaurants and campsites Maximum yearly (t year 1) 1000 Maximum monthly (t month 1) 100 Minimum monthly (t month 1) 70 % of impurities (non requested materials) 2% Manure Typology Cattle Manure Maximum yearly (t year 1) 700

6 Bulking/Complementary material Maximum yearly (t year 1) 1700 Typology Shredded agricultural waste (mainly from palm fronds) Origin pruning from palm farms Density (t m 3) 0.3 Mixture proportion biowaste: bulking (vol: vol) 1:2

7 Ramallah Area Collection data nº towns to be attended 2 nº of inhabitants participating 300 % of total population participating 1% Current Collection model of biowaste Current Collection model of residual waste Estimation of seasonal population nº of big producers attended Ramallah Municipality & Al Ettihad Municipality Collection with road There is no separation between solid waste container fractions Collection with road container 93,000 5 Hotels

8 Collection of biowaste Door to door collection for the hotels at Ramallah city Collection with road containers for the households at Beitello village Collection with containers Type of containers Two wheels container (240 l) nº of containers 80 Direct delivery by the users at the facility NA Use of compostable bags for household and big producers? No Collection frequencies? 3 days week 1 Main reason for the selection of the collection system? Limited number of big producers

9 Biowaste to be treated Urban Biowaste Typology Hotels, households Maximum yearly (t year 1) 750 Maximum monthly (t month 1) 80 Minimum monthly (t month 1) 50 % of impurities (non requested materials) 2% Manure Typology Poultry Manure Maximum yearly (t year 1) 90

10 Bulking/Complementary material Maximum yearly (t year 1) 480 Typology shredded wood Origin Small branches that result from pruning of olive trees, forest trees, fruit trees and ornamental trees. Density (t m 3) 0.3 Mixture proportion biowaste: bulking (vol: vol) 1:1

11 I Composting System/ Fermentation Stage Jericho Model Ramallah Model Open Turning windrows Open Turning windrows nº of fermentation units/modules 4 6 Volume or dimensions of each unit Length: 62 m Width: 3 m Height: 1.3 Length: 22 m Width: 3 m Height: 1.3 no no Spraying during the turning Spraying during the turning Type of system Forced aeration Management of process water Area reserved for fermentation stage (m2) Time of process (weeks)

12 II Composting System/ Maturation Stage Type of system nº of maturation units Volume or dimensions of each unit Forced aeration Area reserved for maturation stage (m2) Time of process (weeks) Jericho Model Ramallah Model Table Heap Table Heap 1 1 Length: 20 m Width: 20 m Height: 1.5 Length: 15 m Width: 15 m Height: 1.5 no no

13 II Composting System/ Post Treatment Stage Post maturation time (weeks) Area reserved for post maturation stage (m2) Total surface of the facility (m2) Main reason for the selection of the composting system Jericho Model Ramallah Model ,000 5,000

14 Compost Estimated compost production (t y 1) Use of the compost Compost minimum requirements in terms of physical, chemical and microbiological characteristics (indicate national law and single parameters forecast) % of compost produced by each ton of biowaste introduced Jericho Model Ramallah Model local farmers, ecological fruit plantations, public gardening There is no national standards for compost quality 30% 30%

15 Economical data Collection Collection costs(include VAT if it is eligible for you) Jericho Model Ramallah Model 8,000 5,000 Investment costs Costs of containers / buckets ( ) 0 Costs of vehicles ( ) Others ( ) TOTAL amount ( ) SCOW BUDGET LINE COVERING THE COSTS or Additional Sources of founds Potential unspent budget under the BL 4 (The project will use one of the collection truck that is owned by the JSC of Jericho) 65, ,000 70,000 yes Yes 0 0

16 Economical data I Facility Composting facility (include VAT if it is eligible for you) Jericho Model Ramallah Model Costs of civil work I(preparation of the ground and working surface construction) ( ) Costs of civil work II (others: collection, electricity, water supply, ) ( ) 90,400 67,725 10,000 33,000 Costs of buildings (offices, storages, lockers,..) ( ) 9,600 9, , ,000 Investment Cost of the constructive project / licenses ( ) Total ( )

17 Economical data II Facility Composting facility (include VAT if it is eligible for you) Jericho Model Ramallah Model Front Loader, Second Hand 45,000 35,000 Tractor with Trailer, Second Hand 35,000 30,000 Towed Turner, New, Locally manufactured 15,000 15,000 Shredder, New 62,000 20,000 Sieve, New, Locally Manufactured Packaging Machine, New 5,000 5,000 10,000 5, , ,000 Mobile machinery ( ) Fixed machinery ( ) Total Costs of machinery ( ):

18 Local Manufactured Machines

19 Economical data III Facility Composting facility TOTAL amount ( ) SCOW BUDGET LINE COVERING THE COSTS or Additional Sources of founds Potential unspent budget under the BL 3 Jericho Model Ramallah Model 282, ,000 yes Yes 0 0

20 Economical data IV Facility OPERATIONAL COSTS (not included in SCOW budget) Jericho Model Ramallah Model , ,100 2,100 11,780 4,200 5,260 3,400 Others ( y 1) 21,600 9,500 TOTAL amount ( ) 68,540 36,900 Nº of workers Workers ( year 1) Bulking material ( year 1) Energy consume (fuel, electricity, ) ( y 1) Maintenance ( y 1)

21 Economical data Other Depreciation Depreciation time Interest depreciation Annual payment ( y 1) Payment by ton of biowaste ( t 1) Gates fees for landfill and for the composting site Landfill gate fee ( t 1) Gate fee composting facility ( t 1) Jericho Model Ramallah Model 25 years for construction works, 10 years for machines and vehicles 8% 8% 22,400 22,400 NA NA Jericho Model Ramallah Model (Only for the solid waste of Ramallah city) 0 0

22 Economical data Campaign Campaign costs (include VAT if it is eligible for you) TOTAL amount ( ) 13,844 Timeline of the campaign and duration Workers devoted to the campaign SCOW BUDGET LINE COVERING THE COSTS or Additional Sources of founds Potential unspent budget under the BL Local Events or BL External experts Yes 0 Description of the communication activities/ or the type of campaign foreseen

23 Engagement Activities: 1 Municipal Level: Several meetings were conducted with the targeted municipalities and JSCs. The meeting objectives: To develop the collection and treatment models in order to reach a final agreement for implementing the project activities. To agree on the construction works and the required equipment for the composting plants. The mechanism of collecting biowaste and getting the Bulking materials. To define the role of each party in the project. To prepare for the communication activities that will be carried out.

24 The targeted municipalities and JSCs: Municipality Jericho Area Joint Services council for solid waste management at Jericho Governorate Jericho Municipality Role Participating in developing the collection and treatment model Ramallah Municipality Participating in developing the collection model of urban biowaste Al Ettihad Municipality Participating in developing the treatment model and collection of bulking material Ramallah Area

25 Preparing the MoUs: HWE agreed with the targeted municipalities on the project details and signed draft MoUs with them. There will be three agreements with three municipalities: Jericho Municipality. Ramallah Municipality. Al Ettihad Municipality.

26 Engagement Activities: 2 Governmental Level: Several meetings were conducted with the Environmental Quality Authority (EQA). The meeting objectives: To discuss the project criteria and the procedures that HWE should follow to get the approval for the project. EIA study should be prepared and submitted to EQA in order to get the approval. To discuss the communication activities.

27 Engagement Activities: 3 Local Manufacture: Field visits for composting plants that used local manufactured equipments and meeting with some of the local manufacturers. Yatta Landfill Al Nassareya Composting Plant

28 Time Table Jan 14 A Planning construction 1.Licenses for plant 2.Tenders for equipment 3.Tenders for construction 4.Acquisition of equipment 5.Construction B Collection 1.Definition of the collection model 2.Tenders for equipment and material 3.Beginning of the collection C Communication 1.Initial local events 2.Communication campaign feb 14 mar 14 apr 14 may 14 jun 14 jul 14 aug 14 sep 14 oct 14 nov 14 dec 14 jan 15 feb 15 mar 15 apr 15 may 15 jun 15 jul 15

29 Thank you