LAND USE AMENDMENT SOUTHWOOD (WARD 11) MACLEOD TRAIL S AND ANDERSON ROAD SW BYLAWS 140D2018 AND 141D2018

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "LAND USE AMENDMENT SOUTHWOOD (WARD 11) MACLEOD TRAIL S AND ANDERSON ROAD SW BYLAWS 140D2018 AND 141D2018"

Transcription

1 Page 1 of 30 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This land use amendment application is to redesignate the parcel currently containing the Anderson Light Rail Transit (LRT) Station s Park N Ride surface parking lots from Special Purpose City and Regional Infrastructure (S-CRI) District to Direct Control Districts to accommodate mixed-use development on the site. PREVIOUS COUNCIL DIRECTION A previous Land Use Amendment application LOC for redevelopment of this site was referred back to Administration at the 2015 October 5 Combined Meeting of Council. AMENDMENT, Moved by Councillor Demong, Seconded by Councillor Keating, that the Agenda for today s meeting, as amended, be further amended by bringing forward and referring Report, Land Use Amendment, Southwood (Ward 11), Macleod Trail S and 109 Avenue SW, Bylaws 168D2015 and 169D2015, CPC , to the Administration for further refinement based upon other work streams including but not limited to the transit parking strategy, Transit Orientated Development funding work, the Calgary Parking Authority strategy, and the completion of the Anderson Station Area Redevelopment Plan, returning to Council, through the Calgary Planning Commission, when the work is complete. The above-referenced Land Use Amendment application LOC has since been cancelled. A new concept for the site has been submitted as part of this Land Use Amendment and Outline Plan Application. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2018 February 22 That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment. RECOMMENDATION(S) OF THE That Council hold a Public Hearing on Bylaws 140D2018 and 141D2018; and 1. ADOPT the proposed redesignation of 3.70 hectares ± (9.14 acres ±) located at Anderson Station Way SW (Plan , Block 1) from Special Purpose City and Regional Infrastructure (S-CRI) District to Special Purpose School, Park and Community Reserve (S-SPR) District and DC Direct Control District to accommodate mixed use development, in accordance with Administration s recommendation; and 2. Give three readings to the proposed Bylaw 140D2018.

2 Page 2 of ADOPT the proposed redesignation of 3.79 hectares ± (9.36 acres ±) located at Anderson Station Way SW (Plan , Block 1) from Special Purpose City and Regional Infrastructure (S-CRI) District to DC Direct Control District to accommodate mixed use development, in accordance with Administration s recommendation; and 4. Give three readings to the proposed Bylaw 141D2018. REASON(S) FOR RECOMMENDATION: This application would enable the redevelopment of the Anderson LRT Station with mixed-use, transit oriented development that is in line with the intensification targets set out in both the Calgary Transportation Plan and the Municipal Development Plan, as well as the specific policies guiding the redevelopment of the station in the Anderson Station Area Redevelopment Plan. The proposal would see the elimination of surface parking lots on this site, replaced with a structured parking facility, and will introduce amenities for all modes of travel to the site. ATTACHMENTS 1. Proposed Bylaw 140D Proposed Bylaw 141D2018

3 Page 3 of 30 LOCATION MAPS

4 Page 4 of 30 ADMINISTRATIONS RECOMMENDATION TO 1. Recommend that Council ADOPT, by bylaw, the proposed redesignation of 3.70 hectares ± (9.14 acres ±) located at Anderson Station Way SW (Plan , Block 1) from Special Purpose City and Regional Infrastructure (S-CRI) District to Special Purpose School, Park and Community Reserve (S-SPR) District and DC Direct Control District to accommodate mixed use development with guidelines (APPENDIX II). Moved by: C. Friesen Carried: 5 1 Opposed: E. Woolley 2. Recommend that Council ADOPT, by bylaw, the proposed redesignation of 3.79 hectares ± (9.36 acres ±) located at Anderson Station Way SW (Plan , Block 1) from Special Purpose City and Regional Infrastructure (S-CRI) District to DC Direct Control District to accommodate mixed use development with guidelines (APPENDIX II). Moved by: C. Friesen Carried: 5 1 Opposed: E. Woolley

5 Page 5 of 30 Applicant: NORR Architects Engineers Planners Landowner: The City of Calgary PLANNING EVALUATION SITE CONTEXT This application is for the proposed redevelopment of the Anderson Station Light Rail Transit (LRT) Park n Ride site. The area is currently one titled parcel that contains the LRT station itself, the bus drop-off areas and approximately 1,665 parking stalls. This application is intended to enable redevelopment of the site to include mixed-use and office development and achieve a more activated, pedestrian-friendly urban village adjacent to a busy transit station. This parcel lies within the primarily residential community of Southwood, with existing low density residential development located west of the parcel across the rail corridor, which has the potential to redevelop with densities up to 44 units per hectare. Adjacent to the southwestern boundary of the site is the Calgary Transit Anderson Yards, a large maintenance facility for buses and C-Trains. Future access to the maintenance facility will be accommodated via a new all-turns access onto Anderson Road SW, adjacent to the southern boundary of that site. An emergency access easement is proposed to be provided through this site for access to the maintenance facility across the rail corridor. Directly east of the parcel, across Macleod Trail S, are major retail developments including Southcentre Shopping Centre and Willow Park Village, as well as the Southcentre Executive Tower office building. A large auto dealership is located directly adjacent to the northern boundary of the site, with office towers and a restaurant further north of the dealership. Site constraints include the proximity to the CP Railway and adjacency to both Macleod Trail S and Anderson Road S. Additionally, a 25 KV transmission line runs adjacent to the eastern property line along Macleod Trail S, but lies outside the property line. Southwood Peak Population Year 1978 Peak Population 8, Current Population 6,214 Difference in Population (Number) -1,887 Difference in Population (Percent) -23%

6 Page 6 of 30 A previous Outline Plan application for this site was approved by Calgary Planning Commission at its 2015 August 27 meeting, and the associated Land Use amendment referred to Council with a recommendation of approval. However, at its 2015 October 5 Public Hearing, Council referred the item back to Administration; for further refinement based upon other work streams including but not limited to the transit parking strategy, Transit Oriented Development funding work, the Calgary Parking Authority strategy, and the completion of the Anderson Station Area Redevelopment Plan, returning to Council, through the Calgary Planning Commission, when the work is complete. The Anderson Station Park and Ride Plan was approved by Council at its 2016 October 03 meeting, following a recommendation of approval from the SPC on Transportation and Transit at its 2016 September 21 meeting. This plan provided details on how the loss of parking stalls on this site could be offset and replaced in alternative locations. The Anderson Station Mobility Hub Funding Model Report was approved by Council at its 2017 February 13 meeting. The report details the funding plan for the Anderson Station Mobility Hub s transit related infrastructure (Park and Ride Stalls, Anderson Station Pedestrian Bridge, Station Infrastructure and Anderson Road All Turns Access) through their inclusion and evaluation as an investment candidate in the next update of Investing in Mobility, Transportation s 10-year capital plan. The Anderson Station Area Redevelopment Plan was approved by City Council at its 2017 June 12 Public Hearing, containing specific policies for the redevelopment of this site as a major mixed-use redevelopment site. LAND USE DISTRICTS The application proposes six redevelopment sites, within two Mixed-Use-based DC Direct Control Districts. The site itself is affected by a number of external factors that influence the development potential of the site. One such constraint is the site s adjacency to the rail corridor and the Canadian Pacific (CP) Railway. As Administration is currently developing specific policies for development in proximity to railways, conditions have been added to the associated Outline Plan in order to ensure that a further review be completed at the development permit stage, to ensure that the build-out of those sites is in compliance with policies in place at that time. This Land Use Amendment application proposes that the central portion of the plan area be redesignated to S-SPR to accommodate the two future Municipal Reserve (MR) parcels that will become the central public plaza as required in the Anderson ARP. The LRT station building and surrounding lands will retain the existing S-CRI designation, and the remaining lands will be separated into two distinct DC Districts; one for the higher intensity mixed-use development north of the station and public plaza based on the Mixed Use Active Frontage (MU-2) land use, and a Mixed Use - General (MU-1) based DC for the lands south of the public plaza,

7 Page 7 of 30 intended to accommodate more flexible mixed-use development, with the allowance for larger use facades in this southern development area, while still ensuring a mix of uses that will complement the more intense development directly adjacent to the station itself. Both DC Districts propose lower heights for the sites closest to the existing residential development in the Southwood community in order to minimize the visual and shadowing impacts on the existing residences. The sites adjacent to Macleod Trail S have all been given higher building height maximums, increasing in height from north (46 metres) to south (70 metres) as determined on Map 8 of the Anderson Station ARP. Density targets in this application are proposed as Floor Area Ratio (FAR) maximums with both maximum and minimum building heights. All sites in this redevelopment area must have a minimum building height of 12 metres as per the policies contained in Section 5.1 of the ARP. The MU-2 based DC Sites 1 and 2, as well as the MU-1 based DC Site 1, all located along the western edge of the plan area, have the lowest maximum building heights at 26 metres due to their adjacency to the existing residential development, and in line with the building heights approved in the ARP. FAR maximums for these sites increase from 3.0 for the southernmost DC (MU-1) Site 1 parcel, to 3.5 for DC (MU-2) Site 2 directly across from the LRT platform, and further to 4.5 FAR for the northwestern parcel that is expected to contain the new Calgary Transit parkade, on DC (MU-2) Site 1. The two MU-2 based DC development parcels along Macleod Trail S and identified as Site 3 have a proposed FAR of 4.5 and maximum building heights of 46 metres, in order to accommodate mixed use development, including a potential hotel. The MU-1 based DC Sites 2 and 3, south of the new public plaza, have proposed building height maximums of 50 and 70 metres respectively, with FAR of 5.0 on both, given their adjacency to Macleod Trail S and their greater distance from the existing low density residential development. This is intended to allow flexibility for these sites to develop with larger towers without creating shadow impacts on adjacent sites. The MU-1 based DC District proposed for the redevelopment sites south of the existing Transit station and public plaza is intended to accommodate more flexible mixed-use development, with the allowance for larger use facades in this southern development area, while still ensuring a mix of uses that will complement the more intense northern development sites directly adjacent to the station itself. This DC District also includes provisions for floor plate sizes, building separation distances, building setbacks from parks and streets, building stepback rules, and façade articulation requirements. These rules have been designed to ensure that development on these sites respects the transit-oriented development vision for the area. The northern MU-2 based DC District establishes rules related to building orientation and uses that are intended to create a more pedestrian-friendly, activated street front within the site. The proposed DC contains the requirement for street-oriented entrances for all at-grade uses, regulates building setbacks to create a pedestrian-friendly, activated streetscape, and provides location flexibility for uses within the buildings. The rules in this district are intended to work in

8 Page 8 of 30 conjunction with the Design Guidelines that are included in the associated Outline Plan application, which establish guidelines related to the design of the buildings, streetscapes, and set active frontage areas in order to achieve a vibrant, attractive transit-oriented development area that prioritizes active modes of travel. The DC Districts also propose the inclusion of Signs Class F and Signs Class G with specific rules. These provisions are in order to permit the future installation of smaller, pedestrian-oriented Third Party Advertising Signs and Digital Third Party Advertising Signs with specific rules for the size, orientation and height of those signs. This section also includes a provision that allows the existing large Third Party Advertising sign (billboard sign) on site to remain operational until that site is redeveloped and the parcel is no longer under the City s ownership, at which point it would no longer meet the rules in the DC for that sign type and would be removed. The DC Districts also provide a provision that vehicular and bicycle parking stalls may be provided on any parcel in the district. This rule is intended to work in tandem with the policies in Section 4.7 of the ARP that state that reduced parking requirements shall be applied in the plan area, encouraging relaxations down to and including zero parking. These policies will be applied at the development permit stage when the proposed mix of uses are known and the parking requirements can be determined. Any necessary parking stalls are intended to be provided on any combination of parcels in order to encourage parking efficiencies in this TOD area. The MU-1 and MU-2 base districts allow for the provisions of a wide variety of residential and commercial uses in order to allow development to move with market demand as this site redevelops over a number of years. This plan anticipates an intensity at full build-out of 776 people and jobs per gross developable hectare, based on the development of 1,152 residential units mixed with commercial and office development. LEGISLATION & POLICY South Saskatchewan Regional Plan (SSRP) The recommendation by Administration in this report has considered and is aligned with the policy direction of the South Saskatchewan Regional Plan (SSRP). Municipal Development Plan (MDP) The Municipal Development Plan identifies this area as a Major Activity Centre, setting out a minimum intensity target of 200 people and jobs per gross developable hectare. This plan anticipates providing an intensity of 776 people and jobs per gross developable hectare, thus far exceeding the minimum target set out in the MDP. Calgary Transportation Plan (CTP) The Calgary Transportation Plan calls for compact, mixed-use development and pedestrianfriendly designs along the existing and future Primary Transit Network. This plan includes many features intended to improve the pedestrian experience at this station, such as the parks plazas linking the station to the pedestrian bridge over Macleod Trail S, stepbacks on buildings

9 Page 9 of 30 to create more human-scale buildings, and activated street frontages. The proposal also includes a broad range of uses to provide a varied, mixed-use development within close proximity to the station, in line with the direction in the CTP. Anderson Station Area Redevelopment Plan (ARP) The Anderson Station Area Redevelopment Plan was approved by Council at its 2017 June 12 Public Hearing, and identifies this site as the Anderson Transit Village. The policies in Section Anderson Transit Village provide guidance for this redevelopment proposal and assign the Community High Density building block (from the MDP s Developed Areas Guidebook) to the eastern portion of the site adjacent to Macleod Trail S, calling for high density residential developments and a wide range and combination of uses. The proposed DC Districts would allow the site to develop in alignment with the intent of the Community High Density building block. The western portion of the plan area, adjacent to the rail corridor and the existing Southwood community, is assigned the Community Centre building block, calling for high density residential uses, a concentration of non-residential uses including institutional, and a wide range and combination of uses. The proposed DC Districts would allow the site to develop in alignment with the intent of the Community Centre building block, while maintaining respect for the existing community. The ARP also contains policies in Section 3.3 guiding the development of the Anderson Transit Village Public Plaza, calling for the provision of the centrally-located park/plaza and providing direction on design elements for the park. This application proposes two centrally-located Municipal Reserve (MR) parcels that will form the Anderson Transit Village Public Plaza, thus satisfying the requirements, and meeting the intent of the ARP. This Outline Plan and Land Use Amendment application was evaluated considering all of the policies in the ARP and is considered to be in alignment with the vision and intent of the document for this major redevelopment site. TRANSPORTATION NETWORKS The Plan sets out a mobility network for the Plan area which provides for walking, cycling, public transportation as well as private vehicles. Although multiple modes of transportation are accommodated in the Plan area, creating a walkable community with a vibrant street life is a key principle of this Plan. A Transportation Impact Assessment (TIA) was undertaken to assess the impact redevelopment of the Plan area would have on the transportation network. Upgrades will be required to the transportation network in accordance with the conclusions of the TIA completed in support of this application and the proposed Anderson ARP. Upgrades to area intersections to support Transit movements are planned in the short term.

10 Page 10 of 30 A regional pathway is proposed along Macleod Trail S connecting the Plan area to the north and a proposed active modes bridge over the train tracks will provide connection to the west. Parking policies and supply ratios have been established in the Anderson ARP to support the TOD intent of the site and to mitigate vehicular impacts on the network. The parking relaxations are supported with adequate walking and cycling facilities, as well as primary transit service. UTILITIES & SERVICING Services are currently available on the subject site and can be upgraded to accommodate development on the site. Utility placement within the proposed roads can accommodate all utilities as well as the inclusion of District Energy. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Due to concerns related to the car dealership (north), and Anderson Transit Garage, west of the CPR tracks, an updated Phase II Environmental Site Assessment report will be required at the Development Permit stage. ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY Utility line assignments have been placed in order to include the potential for District Energy to serve this redevelopment site, providing more environmentally sustainable energy source for new buildings. Additionally, City of Calgary facilities are expected to achieve a LEED gold standard, and so the development of a new parking structure to serve the Park n Ride component of the project can be expected to include more environmentally sustainable features. GROWTH MANAGEMENT The proposed amendment does not trigger capital infrastructure investment and therefore there are no growth management concerns at this time. PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT Community Association Comments This application was circulated to the Federation of Calgary Communities, and the Southwood and Willow Ridge Community Associations. Only the Southwood Community Association submitted comments on this application, choosing to remain neutral on the application itself, but offering comments related to the future development of the site and its

11 Page 11 of 30 potential impact on the community. The letter also notes the importance of good pedestrian connections and bridges into Southwood, which will be considered with the Anderson Station Mobility Hub Funding Model. The comments received are included in APPENDIX III. Citizen Comments Notification letters were sent to adjacent property owners and no objections were received. One phone inquiry from an area resident was received and no concerns were raised. Public Meetings Public meetings were held in conjunction with the recently-approved Area Redevelopment Plan, therefore no further public engagement events were hosted in conjunction with this outline plan application.

12 Page 12 of 30 APPENDIX I APPLICANT S SUBMISSION Real Estate and Development Services (REDS) has submitted a Land Use Redesignation and Outline Plan application to facilitate the redevelopment of City owned lands at Anderson Station into a Transit Oriented Development precinct. The proposed development comprises 8.0 ha (19.9 ac) in the community of Southwood and falls entirely within a 400 metre radius of the Anderson LRT Station. The site includes the LRT station, bus terminal and park and ride area which currently provides 1,665 surface parking stalls. A Land Use and Outline Application was submitted in 2014 (LOC ). The Outline Plan was approved by Calgary Planning Commission in August 2015; however, Council referred the Land Use Amendment back to Administration in October 2015 for further refinement and alignment with other ongoing streams of work at the time including the Transit Parking Strategy, TOD Development Funding and the completion of the Anderson Station Area Redevelopment Plan (ARP). Since then, a significant amount of work has been conducted on a regional park and ride strategy and on finalizing the ARP. The Anderson Station Park and Ride Plan was approved in 2016, and the ARP was approved by Council in June With the completion of this work, a new Outline Plan and Land Use Amendment has been prepared by REDS that is consistent with these plans as well as the Municipal Development Plan which identifies the area as a Major Activity Centre. The current application continues to facilitate a compact, pedestrian oriented development that contains a mix of uses and a high quality public realm while maintaining a minimum of 500 park and ride stalls within a new parkade. Redevelopment aims to transform an underutilized asset and optimize existing infrastructure by introducing higher densities and transit supportive land uses into an existing community adjacent to a major transit hub. The mix of uses, density, building heights and non-standard street sections are consistent with the previous application (LOC ). Changes to the site design have been made to improve bus circulation and pedestrian mobility throughout the site. The proposed land use districts are Direct Control (DC) Districts based on the Mixed Use One (MU-1) and Mixed Use Two (MU-2) Districts, and Special Purpose School, Park and Community Reserve (S-SPR) District. DC Districts are required for several reasons namely to enable maximum building heights in excess of 10 storeys, allow district energy in structures below grade, and to facilitate shared parking between parcels. The S-SPR district will accommodate a public plaza/park area situated at the entrance of the station which will serve as the main gateway to the site and central public gathering space. The park spaces will also accommodate an east-west regional pathway that will connect Southwood to the station area and to other commercial, retail and recreational opportunities across Macleod Trail. To conclude, the application implements the vision of approved land use planning policy and provides a solid Park and Ride Plan that ensures minimal net loss of parking stalls corresponding to the phased redevelopment of the Anderson Station lands. The proposal will enable a greater range of housing choice and amenities in an established area at densities that support transit use. It also optimizes existing infrastructure, enhances pedestrian and cyclist connectivity and increases people s mobility choices while creating a new compact urban form with a distinct sense of place in south Calgary. For these reasons, we request the support of Calgary Planning Commission and City Council in this application.

13 Page 13 of 30 APPENDIX II PROPOSED DIRECT CONTROL GUIDELINES Bylaw 1: based on Mixed Use General (MU-1) District Purpose 1 This Direct Control District is intended to accommodate: a mix of residential and commercial uses in a compact urban form that are located in the same building or in multiple buildings throughout an area; developments where residential and commercial uses are supported at grade facing a street; and (c) mid to high rise development with varying building heights up to 70.0 metres.

14 Page 14 of 30 Compliance with Bylaw 1P Unless otherwise specified, the rules and provisions of Parts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 14 of Bylaw 1P2007 apply to this Direct Control District. Reference to Bylaw 1P Within this Direct Control District, a reference to a section of Bylaw 1P2007 is deemed to be a reference to the section as amended from time to time. Permitted Uses 4 The permitted uses of the Mixed Use General (MU-1) District of Bylaw 1P2007 are the permitted uses in this Direct Control District. Discretionary Uses 5 (1) The discretionary uses of the Mixed Use General (MU-1) District of Bylaw 1P2007 are the discretionary uses in this Direct Control District with the addition of: (c) Market; Restaurant: Food Service Only Large; and Restaurant: Licensed Large. (2) The following uses are discretionary uses only if they are owned or operated on by, or on behalf of, the City: Sign Class F; and Sign Class G. Bylaw 1P2007 District Rules 6 Unless otherwise specified, the rules of the Mixed Use General (MU-1) District of Bylaw 1P2007 apply to this Direct Control District. Additional Sign Class F and Sign Class G Rules 7 (1) Notwithstanding Section 111 (6) and Section (5) of Bylaw 1P2007, Third Party Advertising Signs and Digital Third Party Advertising Signs may contain copy visible from a pathway. (2) Notwithstanding Section (6) of Bylaw 1P2007, where a Digital Third Party Advertising Sign is visible from and located within metres of a building containing a Dwelling Unit, the sign must not operate, or must only display a blank screen between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m.

15 Page 15 of 30 (3) Notwithstanding Section 112 (1), (3) and (4) and Section (1), (2) and (3) of Bylaw 1P2007, Third Party Advertising Signs and Digital Third Party Advertising Signs must not be located within 20.0 metres of any Freestanding Sign facing the same oncoming traffic, nor any other Third Party Advertising Sign or Digital Third Party Advertising Sign. (4) Copy on Third Party Advertising Signs and Digital Third Party Advertising Signs must be oriented towards pedestrians. (5) Third Party Advertising Signs may only be illuminated indirectly in a manner that prevents the trespass of light onto adjacent parcels. (6) Notwithstanding Section 113 and Section of Bylaw 1P2007, the maximum height of a Third Party Advertising Sign or a Digital Third Party Advertising Sign is 3.0 metres and the maximum sign area is 4.5 square metres. (7) Sections 114 (11) and (e) and Section (10) and (d) of Bylaw 1P2007 do not apply in this Direct Control District. (8) Subsections (1) through (5) of this Section do not apply to a Third Party Advertising Sign or a Digital Third Party Advertising Sign where: (c) it existed on the date of approval of this Direct Control Bylaw; it is located on a parcel owned by The City; and it is approved by a development permit issued by The City on or before the date of approval of this Direct Control Bylaw. Façade Width for Uses Facing a Street 8 There is no restriction on the length of the building façade that faces a street containing an individual use on the floor closest to grade. Additional Rules for Multi-Residential and Commercial Uses 9 (1) All units in a Multi-Residential Development that are located on the floor closest to grade adjacent to a Park must have an individual, separate, direct access to grade along that frontage. (2) Developments which contain one or more commercial uses on the floor closest to grade adjacent to a Park must have direct access to grade along that frontage.

16 Page 16 of 30 Setback Area 10 There is no requirement for a minimum setback area except: (c) where a parcel shares a property line with a special purpose district, a minimum setback area of 6.0 metres is required. for the floor closest to grade, the maximum building setback from a property line shared with a street is 3.0 metres for 60 per cent of the length of the building façade that faces the street. for the floor closest to grade, the maximum building setback from a property line shared with Macleod Trail S is 6.0 metres for the entire length of the building façade. Building Separation 11 (1) Where the widest dimension of a balcony faces a property line shared with another parcel, the minimum setback of a balcony from the shared property line is 4.0 metres (2) The façade of a building located above 26.0 metres from grade must provide a minimum horizontal separation of: 24.0 metres from the façade of any other building on the same parcel; and 12.0 metres from a property line shared with another parcel, unless otherwise referenced in Sections 17, 20 and 23 of this Direct Control District. (3) The façade of a building referenced in subsection (2) does not include balconies. Ground Floor Height 12 (1) Unless otherwise referenced in subsection (2), the minimum height of the floor closest to grade of a building is 4.5 metres as measured vertically from the floor to the ceiling. (2) There is no minimum height for a Dwelling Unit that is located on the floor closest to grade in a building. Floor Plate Restrictions 13 (1) Each floor of a building located partially or wholly above 26.0 metres above grade has a maximum floor plate area of:

17 Page 17 of square metres of gross floor area for Residential Uses ; and 2,400 square metres of gross floor area for Commercial Uses. (2) Where this Section refers to "Commercial Uses, it refers to the uses listed in Sections 4 and 5 of this Direct Control District other than Residential Uses. (3) Where this Section refers to "Residential Uses, it refers to the uses listed in the Residential Group in Schedule A of Bylaw 1P2007. Additional Motor Vehicle Parking Requirements 14 Motor vehicle parking stalls and bicycle parking stalls required for uses in this Direct Control District may be shared and supplied on any one parcel or combination of parcels in this Direct Control District. Development Authority Power and Duties for Relaxations 15 The Development Authority may relax the rules in Sections 10, 11, 13, 16, 19 and 22 in this Direct Control District provided the test for relaxations as set out in Bylaw 1P2007 is met. Site 1 (0.99 ha/2.45 ac) Application 16 The provisions in sections 17 through 18 apply only to Site 1. Building Height and Street Wall Stepback 17 (1) The minimum building height is 12.0 metres. (2) Unless otherwise referenced in subsection (3), the maximum building height is 26.0 metres. (3) Where a parcel shares a property line with a street, the maximum building height is: 12.5 metres measured from grade within 5.0 metres of that shared property line; and 26.0 metres measured from grade at a distance greater than 5.0 metres of that shared property line. (4) A building façade adjacent to a street must have a minimum streetwall stepback of 2.0 metres at a building height of 12.5 metres or greater.

18 Page 18 of 30 Floor Area Ratio 18 The maximum floor area ratio is 3.0. Site 2 (0.90 ha/2.22 ac) 19 The provisions in sections 20 through 21 apply only to Site 2. Building Height and Street Wall Stepback 20 (1) The minimum building height is 12.0 metres. (2) Unless otherwise referenced in subsection (3), (5) and (6), the maximum building height is 50.0 metres. (3) Where a parcel shares a property line with a street or a Park, the maximum building height is: 12.5 metres measured from grade within 5.0 metres of that shared property line; and 50.0 metres measured from grade at a distance greater than 5.0 metres of that shared property line. (4) A building façade adjacent to a street must have a minimum streetwall stepback of 2.0 metres at a building height of 12.5 metres or greater. (5) Where a parcel shares a northern property line with a Park, the maximum building height is: (c) 12.5 metres measured from grade within 12.0 metres of that shared property line; 20.5 metres measured from grade between 12.0 metres and 30.0 metres from that shared property line; and 50.0 metres measured from grade at a distance greater than 30.0 metres from that shared property line. (6) Where a parcel shares a southern property line with a Park, the maximum building height is: 12.5 metres measured from grade within 8.0 metres of that shared property line; and 50.0 metres measured from grade at a distance greater than 8.0 metres from that shared property line.

19 Page 19 of 30 Floor Area Ratio 21 The maximum floor area ratio is 5.0. Site 3 (1.23 ha/3.04 ac) 22 The provisions in sections 23 through 24 apply only to Site 3. Building Height and Street Wall Stepback 23 (1) The minimum building height is 12.0 metres. (2) Unless otherwise referenced in subsections (3) and (5), the maximum building height is 70.0 metres. (3) Where a parcel shares a property line with a street, the maximum building height is: 12.5 metres measured from grade within 5.0 metres of that shared property line; and 70.0 metres measured from grade at a distance greater than 5.0 metres from that shared property line. (4) A building façade adjacent to a street must have a minimum streetwall stepback of 2.0 metres at a building height of 12.5 metres or greater. (5) Where a parcel shares a property line with a Park, the maximum building height is: (c) 12.5 metres measured from grade within 9.0 metres of that shared property line; 16.5 metres measured from grade between 9.0 metres and 70.0 metres from that shared property line; and 70.0 metres measured from grade at a distance greater than 70.0 metres from that shared property line. Floor Area Ratio 24 The maximum floor area ratio is 5.0.

20 Page 20 of 30 Bylaw 2: based on Mixed Use Active Frontage (MU-2) District Purpose 1 This Direct Control District is intended to accommodate: (c) (d) (e) a mix of commercial and residential uses in a compact urban form; developments where commercial uses are required at grade to promote activity at the street level; developments with storefronts along a continuous block face on the commercial street; mid to high rise development with varying building heights up to 46.0 metres; district energy operations within a building above or below grade. Compliance with Bylaw 1P Unless otherwise specified, the rules and provisions of Parts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 14 of Bylaw 1P2007 apply to this Direct Control District.

21 Page 21 of 30 Reference to Bylaw 1P Within this Direct Control District, a reference to a section of Bylaw 1P2007 is deemed to be a reference to the section as amended from time to time. Defined Uses 4 Utility Building With Functions Below Grade means a use: (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) where a building is greater than 10.0 square metres in gross floor area; where water steam, sewage treatment or disposal, irrigation, drainage, gas, electricity, heat, waste management, water heating and cooling for the purpose of district energy and telecommunications are located; where the use can be located partially or wholly below or above grade; and that does not include a Sewage Treatment Plant or a Water Treatment Plant. Permitted Uses 5 The permitted uses of the Mixed Use Active Frontage (MU-2) District of Bylaw 1P2007 are the permitted uses in this Direct Control District. Discretionary Uses 6 (1) The discretionary uses of the Mixed Use Active Frontage (MU-2) District of Bylaw 1P2007 are the discretionary uses in this Direct Control District with the addition of the following uses: (c) (d) (e) Utility Building With Functions Below Grade; Market; Power Generation Facility Medium; Restaurant: Food Service Only Large; and Restaurant: Licensed Large. (2) The following uses are discretionary uses only if they are owned or operated on by, or on behalf of, the City: Sign Class F; and Sign Class G.

22 Page 22 of 30 Bylaw 1P2007 District Rules 7 Unless otherwise specified, the rules of the Mixed Use Active Frontage (MU-2) District of Bylaw 1P2007 apply to this Direct Control District. Additional Sign Class F and Sign Class G Rules 8 (1) Notwithstanding Section 111 (6) and Section (5) of Bylaw 1P2007, Third Party Advertising Signs and Digital Third Party Advertising Signs may contain copy visible from a pathway. (3) Notwithstanding Section (6) of Bylaw 1P2007, where a Digital Third Party Advertising Sign is visible from and located within metres of a building containing a Dwelling Unit, the sign must not operate, or must only display a blank screen between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. (3) Notwithstanding Section 112 (1), (3) and (4) and Section (1), (2) and (3) of Bylaw 1P2007, Third Party Advertising Signs and Digital Third Party Advertising Signs must not be located within 20.0 metres of any Freestanding Sign facing the same oncoming traffic, nor any other Third Party Advertising Sign or Digital Third Party Advertising Sign. (4) Copy on Third Party Advertising Signs and Digital Third Party Advertising Signs must be oriented towards pedestrians. (5) Third Party Advertising Signs may only be illuminated indirectly in a manner that prevents the trespass of light onto adjacent parcels. (6) Notwithstanding Section 113 and Section of Bylaw 1P2007, the maximum height of a Third Party Advertising Sign or a Digital Third Party Advertising Sign is 3.0 metres and the maximum sign area is 4.5 square metres. (7) Sections 114 (11) and (e) and Section (10) and (d) of Bylaw 1P2007 do not apply in this Direct Control District. Location of Uses Within Buildings 9 The following uses must not be located on the floor closest to grade of a building facing 109 Avenue SW and the portion of Anderson Station Way south of 109 Avenue SW and north of Southport Way SW: (c) (d) (e) Addiction Treatment; Assisted Living; Catering Service Minor; Counselling Service; Custodial Care;

23 Page 23 of 30 (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) Dwelling Unit; Office; Place of Worship Medium; Place of Worship Small; and Residential Care. Façade Width for Uses Facing a Street 10 (1) Unless otherwise referenced in subsections (2) and (3), the length of the building façade that faces a street containing an individual use on the floor closest to grade is a maximum of 15.0 metres except where a use faces Macleod Trail and Southport Way SW. (2) For an individual Drinking Establishment Medium, Drinking Establishment Small, Market, Restaurant: Food Service Only Large, Restaurant: Food Service Only Medium, Restaurant: Food Service Only Small; Restaurant: Neighbourhood, Restaurant: Licensed Large, Restaurant: Licensed Medium, Restaurant: Licensed Small, Retail and Consumer Service or Supermarket use located on the floor closest to grade, the length of the building façade that faces a street may be increased to 30.0 metres where all of the other uses that share the same façade meet the requirements of subsection (1). (3) The length of the building façade that faces a street containing an individual Financial Institution, Medical Clinic, Medical Marihuana Counselling, Office, Parking Lot Structure or Payday Loan use on the floor closest to grade is a maximum of 9.0 metres. (4) Subsection (3) does not apply when the Financial Institution, Medical Clinic, Medical Marihuana Counselling, Office, Parking Lot Structure or Payday Loan use is contained within a building with a façade adjacent to Southport Way SW. Setback Area 11 There is no requirement for a minimum setback area except: where a parcel shares a property line with a special purpose district, a minimum setback area of 6.0 metres is required. for the floor closest to grade, the maximum building setback from a property line shared with a street is 3.0 metres for 60 per cent of the length of the building façade that faces the street.

24 Page 24 of 30 (c) for the floor closest to grade, the maximum building setback from a property line shared with Macleod Trail S is 6.0 metres for the entire length of the building façade. Building Separation 12 (1) Where the widest dimension of a balcony faces a property line shared with another parcel, the minimum setback of a balcony from the shared property line is 4.0 metres (2) The façade of a building located above 26.0 metres from grade must provide a minimum horizontal separation of: 24.0 metres from the façade of any other building on the same parcel; and 12.0 metres from a property line shared with another parcel unless otherwise referenced in Sections 18, 21, and 24. (3) The façade of a building referenced in subsection (2) does not include balconies. Ground Floor Height 13 (1) Unless otherwise referenced in subsection (2), the minimum height of the floor closest to grade of a building is 4.5 metres as measured vertically from the floor to the ceiling. (2) There is no minimum height for a Dwelling Unit that is located on the floor closest to grade in a building. Floor Plate Restrictions 14 (1) Each floor of a building located partially or wholly above 26.0 metres above grade has a maximum floor plate area of: 750 square metres of gross floor area for Residential Uses ; and 2,400 square metres of gross floor area for Commercial Uses. (2) Where this Section refers to "Commercial Uses, it refers to the uses listed in Sections 5 and 6 of this Direct Control District other than Residential Uses. (3) Where this Section refers to "Residential Uses, it refers to the uses listed in the Residential Group in Schedule A of Bylaw 1P2007.

25 Page 25 of 30 Additional Motor Vehicle Parking Stall Requirements 15 (1) Motor vehicle parking stalls and bicycle parking stalls required for uses in this Direct Control District may be shared and supplied on any one parcel or combination of parcels in this Direct Control District. (2) A Utility Building With Functions Below Grade: requires a minimum of 2.0 motor vehicle parking stalls per 100 square metres of gross useable floor area; and does not require bicycle parking stalls class 1 or bicycle parking stalls class 2. Development Authority Power and Duties for Relaxations 16 The Development Authority may relax the rules in Sections 10, 11, 12, 14, 18, 21 and 24 in this Direct Control District provided the test for relaxations as set out in Bylaw 1P2007 is met. Site 1 (0.73 ha/1.80 ac) Application 17 The provisions in sections 18 through 19 apply only to Site 1. Building Height and Streetwall Stepback 18 (1) The minimum building height is 12.0 metres. (2) Unless otherwise referenced in subsection (3), the maximum building height is 26.0 metres. (3) Where a parcel shares a property line with a street, the maximum building height is: 12.5 metres measured from grade within 5.0 metres of that shared property line; and 26.0 metres measured from grade at a distance greater than 5.0 metres of that shared property line. (4) A building façade adjacent to a street must have a minimum streetwall stepback of 2.0 metres at a building height of 12.5 metres or greater. Floor Area Ratio 19 The maximum floor area ratio is 4.5.

26 Page 26 of 30 Site 2 (1.25 ha/3.09 ac) Application 20 The provisions in sections 21 through 22 apply only to Site 2. Building Height and Street Wall Stepback 21 (1) The minimum building height is 12.0 metres. (2) Unless otherwise referenced in subsection (3), the maximum building height is 26.0 metres. (3) Where a parcel shares a property line with a street, the maximum building height is: 12.5 metres measured from grade within 5.0 metres of that shared property line; and 26.0 metres measured from grade at a distance greater than 5.0 metres of that shared property line. (4) A building façade adjacent to a street must have a minimum streetwall stepback of 2.0 metres at a building height of 12.5 metres or greater. Floor Area Ratio 22 The maximum floor area ratio is 3.5. Site 3 (1.81 ha/4.47 ac) Application 23 The provisions in sections 24 through 25 apply only to Site 3. Building Height and Street Wall Stepback 24 (1) The minimum building height is 12.0 metres. (2) Unless otherwise referenced in subsection (3), the maximum building height is 46.0 metres. (3) Where a parcel shares a property line with a street, the maximum building height is: 12.5 metres measured from grade within 5.0 metres of that shared property line; and

27 Page 27 of metres measured from grade at a distance greater than 5.0 metres of that shared property line. (4) A building façade adjacent to a street must have a minimum streetwall stepback of 2.0 metres at a building height of 12.5 metres or greater. Floor Area Ratio 25 The maximum floor area ratio is 4.5.

28 Page 28 of 30 APPENDIX III January 8, 2018 COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION COMMENTS Angie Dean - File Manager This is in response to the request for comments that is dated December 21, 2017 for LOC I am speaking on behalf of the Southwood Community Association, and we will remain neutral with this application. Below are concerns that I believe are imperative to the outcome of the development as a whole when relating to Southwood. I appreciate that these comments are not related to the land use applications, but they relate to the final paragraph of the applicant s submission in the application package. The outcome of this project will have a major impact on Southwood, and whether it is a positive or negative outcome will depend on the connectivity this site will have on the existing community. Given that all of the development associated with these lands are located to the east of the LRT and CP rail lines, it is imperative that the pedestrian connection the City is planning to construct allows for safe and smooth movement between the two sites. This pedestrian connection will be the only connection the west part of Southwood will have, rather than using the McLeod Trail access points. In discussions with engineers at previous board meetings, we were informed that the build life of the pedestrian bridge will be 75 years; however, the design that is being proposed will only support the current volume; it is not taking into account the population influx that could be felt in the coming 75 years. The MDP clearly outlines that the pedestrian realm is the most important aspect of transportation, followed closely by transit. If we are not provided an adequate pedestrian crossing to access the transit services then most of the people living on the west side of the rail lines in Southwood will continue to use their vehicles. What I am requesting, and I hope the City can accommodate this request, is designing and constructing a pedestrian bridge where the width can accommodate three (3) persons using wheelchairs. The average width of a wheelchair is 32 inches, a width that allows a user to access any door width (that is built to code). I would request that the City considers a minimum of 3m wide bridge. If the build life of the bridge is 75 years, but the design life of the it is only 20 years; why does the City not consider designing a bridge that could withstand its 75 years build life? If we are to come back to the pedestrian bridge in 20 years and determine that it does not support the volume, then it would most likely be demolished and rebuilt to accommodate the volume. The City has spent a lot of attention ensuring pedestrian bridges built in the core are able to accommodate greater volumes, so why can t this bridge? The final build out of Anderson could double the population of Southwood, and we could see greater increases in our population with other developments that could occur along McLeod. We

29 Page 29 of 30 have to remember that people living on the east side of the rail line will want to use the services that are located on the west side, they same as the west side using the east side services. If this bridge does not reflect these movements, then it has already failed before it has been constructed. I urge the City to think hard and long on the design of the pedestrian connection into the Anderson area from Southwood. We are excited to see what comes of the developments on this site, and many people living on the west side of the rail lines would like to access the site from the bridge rather than be forced to drive all the time. Regards, Becky Poschmann Director of Development Southwood Community Association

30 Page 30 of 30 APPENDIX IV OUTLINE PLAN

LAND USE AMENDMENT ITEM NO: 05

LAND USE AMENDMENT ITEM NO: 05 REPORT TO CALGARY PLANNING COMMISSION LAND USE AMENDMENT ITEM NO: 05 FILE NO: LOC2012-0069 CPC DATE: 2013 February 14 COUNCIL DATE: BYLAW NO: HILLHURST (Ward 7 - Alderman Farrell) ISC: Protected Page 1

More information

POLICY AMENDMENT AND LAND USE AMENDMENT RICHMOND (WARD 8) RICHMOND ROAD SW AND 24 STREET SW BYLAWS 10P2018 AND 52D2018

POLICY AMENDMENT AND LAND USE AMENDMENT RICHMOND (WARD 8) RICHMOND ROAD SW AND 24 STREET SW BYLAWS 10P2018 AND 52D2018 Page 1 of 12 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This land use amendment proposes to redesignate two parcels of approximately 0.30 hectares ± (0.74 acres ±) located in the community of Richmond from DC Direct Control District

More information

BYLAW NUMBER 159D2016

BYLAW NUMBER 159D2016 CPC2016-164 ATTACHMENT 1 BEING A BYLAW OF THE CITY OF CALGARY TO AMEND THE LAND USE BYLAW 1P2007 (LAND USE ) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS it is desirable to amend

More information

BYLAW NUMBER 20P2017

BYLAW NUMBER 20P2017 CPC2017-130 ATTACHMENT 1 BYLAW NUMBER 20P2017 BEING A BYLAW OF THE CITY OF CALGARY TO AMEND THE LAND USE BYLAW 1P2007 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS it is desirable

More information

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 May 04. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 May 04. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment. Page 1 of 14 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This proposed Land Use Amendment seeks to redesignate the subject parcel from Residential Contextual One/Two Dwelling (R-C2) District to a DC Direct Control District to accommodate

More information

BYLAW NUMBER 64D2010

BYLAW NUMBER 64D2010 . BEING A BYLAW OF THE CITY OF CALGARY TO AMEND THE LAND USE BYLAW 1P2007 (LAND USE AMENDMENT LOC2OI 0-0012) ************* **************** WHEREAS it is desirable to amend the Land Use Bylaw Number 1

More information

DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY. Port Credit Local Area Plan Built Form Guidelines and Standards DRAFT For Discussion Purposes

DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY. Port Credit Local Area Plan Built Form Guidelines and Standards DRAFT For Discussion Purposes Port Credit Local Area Plan Built Form Guidelines and Standards DRAFT For Discussion Purposes 1 Local Area Plan - Project Alignment Overview Directions Report, October 2008 (General Summary Of Selected

More information

Division 4: Commercial Community 1 (C-C1) District

Division 4: Commercial Community 1 (C-C1) District Division 4: Commercial Community 1 (C-C1) District 738 Purpose 738 (1) The Commercial Community 1 District is intended to be characterized by: (e) (f) (g) small to mid-scale commercial developments; developments

More information

BYLAW NUMBER 256D2017

BYLAW NUMBER 256D2017 BEING A BYLAW OF THE CITY OF CALGARY TO AMEND THE LAND USE BYLAW 1 P2007 (LAND USE ) ***************************** WHEREAS it is desirable to amend the Land Use Bylaw Number 1 P2007 to change the land

More information

Montreal Road District Secondary Plan [Amendment #127, October 9, 2013]

Montreal Road District Secondary Plan [Amendment #127, October 9, 2013] [Amendment #127, October 9, 2013] 1.0 General The following policies are applicable to the Montreal Road District as set out in Schedule 1. 1.1 District Objectives The objective of this Plan is to guide

More information

TH STREET NW

TH STREET NW 10th Street NW 227-301 2nd Avenue NW CTrain LOC 2012-0069 / CPC 2013-036 227 303 10 TH STREET NW Located at 10 th Street & 2 nd Avenue NW T intersection Location within policy areas: Within the Transit

More information

Bridgeland-Riverside Area Redevelopment Plan (ARP)

Bridgeland-Riverside Area Redevelopment Plan (ARP) Bridgeland-Riverside Area Redevelopment Plan (ARP) The current Bridgeland-Riverside Area Redevelopment Plan (ARP) was approved in 1980. Since then, a lot of changes have taken place in the city and the

More information

Jasper 115 Street DC2 Urban Design Brief

Jasper 115 Street DC2 Urban Design Brief Jasper 115 Street DC2 Urban Design Brief Greenlong Construction Ltd. Stantec Consulting Ltd. 2017 Overview The proposed rezoning application supports the development of two mixed-use high-rise buildings

More information

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 December 14. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 December 14. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment. Page 1 of 9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This land use amendment application seeks to redesignate a single residential parcel from a Residential Contextual One Dwelling (R-C1) District to a Residential Contextual

More information

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 January 26. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 January 26. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment. WEST OF NORTHMOUNT AND CHARLESWOOD Page 1 of 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This land use amendment application seeks to redesignate a single residential parcel located in the community of Brentwood from Residential

More information

Plan Dutch Village Road

Plan Dutch Village Road Plan Dutch Village Road Objective: The lands around Dutch Village Road are a minor commercial area that services the larger Fairview community. Maintaining the vibrancy of the area by planning for redevelopment

More information

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 July 27. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 July 27. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment. Page 1 of 9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This land use amendment application seeks to redesignate a single residential parcel from a Residential Contextual One Dwelling (R-C1) District to a Residential Contextual

More information

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2018 January 25. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2018 January 25. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment. Page 1 of 8 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This land use amendment application seeks to redesignate a single residential parcel from a Residential Contextual One Dwelling (R-C1) District to a Residential Contextual

More information

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 November 16. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 November 16. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment. Page 1 of 8 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This land use amendment application seeks to redesignate a single residential parcel from a Residential Contextual One Dwelling (R-C1) District to a Residential Contextual

More information

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 November 02. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 November 02. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment. Page 1 of 8 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This land use amendment application seeks to redesignate a single residential parcel from a Residential Contextual One Dwelling (R-C1) District to a Residential Contextual

More information

1417, , 1427 & 1429 Yonge Street - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

1417, , 1427 & 1429 Yonge Street - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 1417, 1421-1425, 1427 & 1429 Yonge Street - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report Date: March 24, 2015 To: From: Wards: Reference Number:

More information

BYLAW NO. 15/026 A BYLAW OF THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WOOD BUFFALO TO AMEND THE LAND USE BYLAW NO. 99/059

BYLAW NO. 15/026 A BYLAW OF THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WOOD BUFFALO TO AMEND THE LAND USE BYLAW NO. 99/059 Attachment 2 BYLAW NO. 15/026 A BYLAW OF THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WOOD BUFFALO TO AMEND THE LAND USE BYLAW NO. 99/059 WHEREAS Section 639 of the Municipal Government Act requires every municipality

More information

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 July 13. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 July 13. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment. Page 1 of 8 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This land use amendment application seeks to redesignate a single residential parcel from a Residential - One Dwelling (R-C1) District to a Residential - One Dwelling (R-1s)

More information

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 July 27. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 July 27. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment. Page 1 of 8 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This land use amendment application seeks to redesignate a single residential parcel from a Residential Contextual One Dwelling (R-C1) District to a Residential Contextual

More information

LITTLE MOUNTAIN ADJACENT AREA REZONING POLICY

LITTLE MOUNTAIN ADJACENT AREA REZONING POLICY LITTLE MOUNTAIN ADJACENT AREA REZONING POLICY JANUARY 2013 CONTENTS 1.0 INTENT & PRINCIPLES...1 2.0 APPLICATION...2 3.0 HOUSING TYPES, HEIGHT & DENSITY POLICIES...3 3.1 LOW TO MID-RISE APARTMENT POLICIES...4

More information

Appendix1,Page1. Urban Design Guidelines. Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses. DRAFT September 2017

Appendix1,Page1. Urban Design Guidelines. Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses. DRAFT September 2017 Appendix1,Page1 Urban Design Guidelines DRAFT September 2017 Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses Appendix1,Page2 Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose 1 1.2 Urban Design Objectives 1 1.3 Building

More information

STAFF REPORT. March 14, Toronto and East York Community Council. Director, Community Planning, South District

STAFF REPORT. March 14, Toronto and East York Community Council. Director, Community Planning, South District STAFF REPORT March 14, 2005 To: From: Subject: Toronto and East York Community Council Director, Community Planning, South District Preliminary Report Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning Application 05

More information

C Secondary Suite Process Reform

C Secondary Suite Process Reform 2018 March 12 Page 1 of 9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On 2017 December 11, through Notice of Motion C2017-1249 (Secondary Suite Process Reform) Council directed Administration to implement several items: 1. Land

More information

STAFF REPORT PLN September 11, 2017

STAFF REPORT PLN September 11, 2017 Page: 1 TO: SUBJECT: GENERAL COMMITTEE APPLICATIONS FOR OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT 37 JOHNSON STREET WARD: WARD 1 PREPARED BY AND KEY CONTACT: SUBMITTED BY: GENERAL MANAGER APPROVAL:

More information

Requirements for accepted development and assessment benchmarks for assessable development

Requirements for accepted development and assessment benchmarks for assessable development 9.3.10 Small Lot Housing Design Code 9.3.10.1 Application (1) This code applies to development identified as requiring assessment against the Small Lot Housing Design Code by the categories of development

More information

900 ALBERT STREET PLANNING RATIONALE ADDENDUM NO. 2

900 ALBERT STREET PLANNING RATIONALE ADDENDUM NO. 2 900 ALBERT STREET PLANNING RATIONALE ADDENDUM NO. 2 March 26, 2018 Planning Rationale Addendum No. 2 Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Prepared for: TIP Albert GP Inc. 485 Bank Street, Suite 200

More information

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2016 November 17

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2016 November 17 Page 1 of 15 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In October 2014 Council added the new Residential Grade-Oriented Infill (R-CG) District to Land Use Bylaw 1P2007. Since no lands were redesignated to the R-CG District when

More information

Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District STAFF REPORT September 1, 2005 To: From: Subject: Toronto and East York Community Council Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District Further Report Applications to amend Official Plan

More information

TOTTENHAM SECONDARY PLAN

TOTTENHAM SECONDARY PLAN TOTTENHAM SECONDARY PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 11 TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE TOWN OF NEW TECUMSETH The following text and schedules to the Official Plan of the Town of New Tecumseth constitute Amendment No. 11

More information

Appendix C Built Form Guidelines

Appendix C Built Form Guidelines Appendix C Built Form Guidelines VAUGHAN METROPOLITAN CENTRE DRAFT SECONDARY PLAN CREATING A NEW DOWNTOWN 93 C.1 > BUILT FORM GUIDELINES The following annotated axonometric diagrams illustrate many of

More information

25 Vickers Road, 5555 and 5559 Dundas Street West and 10 Shorncliffe Road - Zoning Amendment Application - Request for Direction Report

25 Vickers Road, 5555 and 5559 Dundas Street West and 10 Shorncliffe Road - Zoning Amendment Application - Request for Direction Report STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 25 Vickers Road, 5555 and 5559 Dundas Street West and 10 Shorncliffe Road - Zoning Amendment Application - Request for Direction Report Date: October 31, 2011 To: From: Wards:

More information

Weston Road (Phase 2) - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment and Lifting of the (H) Holding Symbol Applications - Preliminary Report

Weston Road (Phase 2) - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment and Lifting of the (H) Holding Symbol Applications - Preliminary Report STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 3415-3499 Weston Road (Phase 2) - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment and Lifting of the (H) Holding Symbol Applications - Preliminary Report Date: March 8, 2016 To:

More information

50+54 BELL STREET NORTH

50+54 BELL STREET NORTH 50+54 BELL STREET NORTH SITE PLAN CONTROL APPLICATION OCTOBER 2014 PREPARED BY: FOTENN Consultants Inc. 223 Mcleod Street Ottawa, ON K2P OZ8 (613) 730-5709 PREPARED FOR: Ottawa Chinese Alliance Church

More information

Yonge Street and 3 Gerrard Street East - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Yonge Street and 3 Gerrard Street East - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 363-391 Yonge Street and 3 Gerrard Street East - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report Date: May 22, 2015 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Toronto and East York

More information

Article 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

Article 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT Article 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT this page left intentionally blank Contents ARTICLE 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT DIVISION 3.1 NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT DESCRIPTION...3.1-1 Section 3.1.1

More information

CITY OF KAMLOOPS BYLAW NO A BYLAW TO AMEND THE ZONING BYLAW OF THE CITY OF KAMLOOPS

CITY OF KAMLOOPS BYLAW NO A BYLAW TO AMEND THE ZONING BYLAW OF THE CITY OF KAMLOOPS 67 68 CITY OF KAMLOOPS BYLAW NO. 5-1-2796 A BYLAW TO AMEND THE ZONING BYLAW OF THE CITY OF KAMLOOPS The Municipal Council of the City of Kamloops, in open meeting assembled, enacts as follows: 1. This

More information

LAND USE AMENDMENT SPRINGBANK HILL (WARD 6) ELMONT DRIVE SW AND 69 STREET SW BYLAW 114D2017

LAND USE AMENDMENT SPRINGBANK HILL (WARD 6) ELMONT DRIVE SW AND 69 STREET SW BYLAW 114D2017 Page 1 of 8 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This land use amendment application proposes to redesignate and subdivide 1.15 hectares of land located within the southwest community of East Springbank to accommodate 17

More information

SUBJECT: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications for 4853 Thomas Alton Boulevard

SUBJECT: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications for 4853 Thomas Alton Boulevard Page 1 of Report PB-100-16 SUBJECT: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications for 4853 Thomas Alton Boulevard TO: FROM: Development and Infrastructure Committee Planning and Building Department

More information

8.5.1 R1, Single Detached Residential District

8.5.1 R1, Single Detached Residential District 8.5.1 R1, Single Detached Residential District The purpose of this district is to provide for residential development in the form of single detached dwellings. Dwelling, Single Detached Home Business,

More information

Bylaw No , being "Official Community Plan Bylaw, 2016" Schedule "A" DRAFT

Bylaw No , being Official Community Plan Bylaw, 2016 Schedule A DRAFT Bylaw No. 2600-2016, being "Official Community Plan Bylaw, 2016" Schedule "A" Urban Structure + Growth Plan Urban Structure Land use and growth management are among the most powerful policy tools at the

More information

H6 Residential Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings Zone

H6 Residential Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings Zone H6. Residential Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings Zone [CIV-2016-404-002333: Franco Belgiorno-Nettis]-Note: The properties affected by this appeal are identified on the Auckland Unitary Plan viewer.

More information

From Policy to Reality

From Policy to Reality From Policy to Reality Updated ^ Model Ordinances for Sustainable Development 2000 Environmental Quality Board 2008 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Funded by a Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Sustainable

More information

2.35 BVT G Bow Valley Trail General Commercial District [ ]

2.35 BVT G Bow Valley Trail General Commercial District [ ] 2.35 BVT G Bow Valley Trail General Commercial District [2014 07] 2.35.1 Purpose This district is intended to form the core of Canmore s visitor accommodation outside the resorts and provide a variety

More information

MONROE WARD REZONING SUMMARY. October 2018

MONROE WARD REZONING SUMMARY. October 2018 MONROE WARD REZONING SUMMARY October 2018 WHY IS THE CITY REZONING MONROE WARD? In July of 2017 Richmond City Council adopted The Pulse Corridor Plan, a corridor-long planning document that outlines steps

More information

OPPORTUNITY TO ACQUIRE AN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING PART OF THE SOUTH HILL SAP

OPPORTUNITY TO ACQUIRE AN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING PART OF THE SOUTH HILL SAP 8825 SHEPARD ROAD SE CALGARY, ALBERTA OPPORTUNITY TO ACQUIRE AN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING PART OF THE SOUTH HILL SAP Mike Warner, + 1 403 261 1127 marc.rosso@cushwake.com + 1 403 261 1165 mike.warner@cushwake.com

More information

H4. Residential Mixed Housing Suburban Zone

H4. Residential Mixed Housing Suburban Zone H4. Residential Mixed Housing Suburban Zone H4.1. Zone description The Residential Mixed Housing Suburban Zone is the most widespread residential zone covering many established suburbs and some greenfields

More information

230 Oak Street- Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Bylaw Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

230 Oak Street- Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Bylaw Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 230 Oak Street- Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Bylaw Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report Date: February 6, 2014 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Toronto and East

More information

SECTION 10: COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE ZONES

SECTION 10: COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE ZONES 10.5a MIXED USE MEDIUM DENSITY PEDESTRIAN FOCUS (C5a) ZONE Explanatory Note: The C5a Zone is typically located along pedestrian oriented streets where permitted commercial and residential uses create an

More information

H5. Residential Mixed Housing Urban Zone

H5. Residential Mixed Housing Urban Zone H5. Residential Mixed Housing Urban Zone [ENV-2016-AKL-000197: Robert Adams] Addition sought H5.1. Zone description The Residential Mixed Housing Urban Zone is a reasonably high-intensity zone enabling

More information

50 and 52 Finch Avenue East - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

50 and 52 Finch Avenue East - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 50 and 52 Finch Avenue East - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report Date: August 16, 2016 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: North York

More information

3.1 Existing Built Form

3.1 Existing Built Form 3.1 Existing Built Form There is a wide variety of built form in the study area, generally comprising 2 and 3 storey buildings. This stretch of Queen Street East is somewhat atypical of Toronto's main

More information

STAFF REPORT PLN December 9, 2013

STAFF REPORT PLN December 9, 2013 Page: 1 TO: SUBJECT: PREPARED BY AND KEY CONTACT: SUBMITTED BY: GENERAL MANAGER APPROVAL: CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER APPROVAL: GENERAL COMMITTEE PROPOSED INTENSIFICATION NODE AND CORRIDOR ZONES A. SHAIKH,

More information

Outline of Land Use Bylaw, 1P2007 Changes

Outline of Land Use Bylaw, 1P2007 Changes Outline of Land Use Bylaw, 1P2007 Changes Changes to single and multi-family builders, renovators, land developers and trades The City s new Land Use Bylaw, 1P2007 has been approved by Council. The new

More information

REPORT TO THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER FROM THE DEVELOPMENT, ENGINEERING, AND SUSTAINABILITY DEPARTMENT

REPORT TO THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER FROM THE DEVELOPMENT, ENGINEERING, AND SUSTAINABILITY DEPARTMENT April 19, 2018 REPORT TO THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER FROM THE DEVELOPMENT, ENGINEERING, AND SUSTAINABILITY DEPARTMENT ON REZONING APPLICATION NO. REZ00631 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION NO. DPM00627

More information

66 Isabella Street Rezoning Application - Preliminary Report

66 Isabella Street Rezoning Application - Preliminary Report STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 66 Isabella Street Rezoning Application - Preliminary Report Date: November 15, 2010 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Toronto and East York Community Council Director, Community

More information

Kassner Goodspeed Architects Ltd.

Kassner Goodspeed Architects Ltd. Kassner Goodspeed Architects Ltd. 29 & State Street Developments Ltd. The Promenade at Robie South Case 20761: Application for Development Agreement Design Rationale The land assembly is a 1.3 Acre parcel

More information

SUBJECT: Character Area Studies and Site Plan Approval for Low Density Residential Areas. Community and Corporate Services Committee

SUBJECT: Character Area Studies and Site Plan Approval for Low Density Residential Areas. Community and Corporate Services Committee Page 1 of Report PB-70-16 SUBJECT: Character Area Studies and Site Plan Approval for Low Density Residential Areas TO: FROM: Community and Corporate Services Committee Planning and Building Department

More information

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2014 November 06. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2014 November 06. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment. Page 1 of 10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This land use amendment application seeks to redesignate a single residential parcel from Residential-Contextual One/Two Dwelling District (R-C2) to Multi-Residential-Contextual

More information

Sherwood Forest (Trinity) Housing Corporation. Urban Design Brief

Sherwood Forest (Trinity) Housing Corporation. Urban Design Brief Sherwood Forest (Trinity) Housing Corporation Sherwood Place Affordable Housing Apartments Trinity Presbyterian Church Orchard Park Nursery School 590 Gainsborough Road, London Urban Design Brief REVISED

More information

PLANNING PRIMER. Elective: Understanding Residential Intensification and Infill. Planning and Growth Management Department.

PLANNING PRIMER. Elective: Understanding Residential Intensification and Infill. Planning and Growth Management Department. PLANNING PRIMER Elective: Understanding Residential Intensification and Infill Planning and Growth Management Department Amended 2015 Agenda Information re: Infill and Intensification Initiatives Residential

More information

Urban Design Brief Dundas Street. London Affordable Housing Foundation. November Zelinka Priamo Ltd.

Urban Design Brief Dundas Street. London Affordable Housing Foundation. November Zelinka Priamo Ltd. Urban Design Brief 1039-1047 Dundas Street London Affordable Housing Foundation November 2017 Zelinka Priamo Ltd. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. INTRODUCTION... 3 SECTION 1 LAND USE PLANNING CONTEXT... 3 1.1

More information

PLANNING REPORT Gordon Street City of Guelph. Prepared on behalf of Ontario Inc. March 17, Project No. 1507

PLANNING REPORT Gordon Street City of Guelph. Prepared on behalf of Ontario Inc. March 17, Project No. 1507 PLANNING REPORT 1131 Gordon Street City of Guelph Prepared on behalf of 1876698 Ontario Inc. March 17, 2016 Project No. 1507 423 Woolwich Street, Suite 201, Guelph, Ontario, N1H 3X3 Phone (519) 836-7526

More information

20 Edward Street Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

20 Edward Street Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 20 Edward Street Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report Date: January 20, 2015 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Toronto and East York Community Council Director,

More information

RECOMMENDATION(S) OF THE CALGARY PLANNING COMMISSION

RECOMMENDATION(S) OF THE CALGARY PLANNING COMMISSION Page 1 of 11 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This land use amendment application seeks to redesignate a single residential parcel from R-C1 to R-C1s to allow for a secondary suite. The site contains an existing secondary

More information

1695 and Weston Road and 10 Victoria Avenue East Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

1695 and Weston Road and 10 Victoria Avenue East Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 1695 and 1705-1707 Weston Road and 10 Victoria Avenue East Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report Date: March 13, 2018 To: From: Wards: Reference Number:

More information

CITY OF VANCOUVER POLICY REPORT DEVELOPMENT AND BUILDING

CITY OF VANCOUVER POLICY REPORT DEVELOPMENT AND BUILDING P2 CITY OF VANCOUVER POLICY REPORT DEVELOPMENT AND BUILDING Report Date: May 1, 2007 Author: Michael Naylor Phone No.: 604.871.6269 RTS No.: 06621 VanRIMS No.: 11-3600-10 Meeting Date: May 15, 2007 TO:

More information

Division 8 General Urban (T4) Zone: Assessment Criteria and Assessment Tables

Division 8 General Urban (T4) Zone: Assessment Criteria and Assessment Tables Division 8 General Urban (T4) Zone: Assessment Criteria and Assessment Tables 15.8.1 General Urban (T4) Zone The provisions in this division relate to the General Urban (T4) Zone as follows overall outcomes

More information

25 Leonard Avenue - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

25 Leonard Avenue - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 25 Leonard Avenue - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report Date: March 8, 2017 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Toronto and East York

More information

CENTENNIAL NEIGHBOURHOODS SECONDARY PLAN STUDY. City of Hamilton

CENTENNIAL NEIGHBOURHOODS SECONDARY PLAN STUDY. City of Hamilton CENTENNIAL NEIGHBOURHOODS SECONDARY PLAN STUDY City of Hamilton PUBLIC EVENT #3 APRIL 2016 MEETING PURPOSE Recap of previous sessions/how we got here The purpose of this session is to provide an opportunity

More information

PLANNING RATIONALE REPORT CODEAU BUILDING LTD RIDEAU STREET OTTAWA DECEMBER 2013

PLANNING RATIONALE REPORT CODEAU BUILDING LTD RIDEAU STREET OTTAWA DECEMBER 2013 PLANNING RATIONALE REPORT CODEAU BUILDING LTD 541-545 RIDEAU STREET OTTAWA DECEMBER 2013 1 This report has been prepared on behalf of Codeau Building Ltd. in support of a Zoning By-law Amendment Application

More information

150 Eglinton Avenue East - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

150 Eglinton Avenue East - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 150 Eglinton Avenue East - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report Date: May 15, 2015 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Toronto and East York Community Council Director,

More information

Planning Justification Report

Planning Justification Report Planning Justification Report Kellogg s Lands City of London E&E McLaughlin Ltd. June 14, 2017 Zelinka Priamo Ltd. Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. 1.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 3.0 4.0 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6

More information

85, 87, 89, 91 Broadway Avenue & 198 Redpath Avenue Zoning Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition Applications Request for Direction Report

85, 87, 89, 91 Broadway Avenue & 198 Redpath Avenue Zoning Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition Applications Request for Direction Report REPORT FOR ACTION 85, 87, 89, 91 Broadway Avenue & 198 Redpath Avenue Zoning Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition Applications Request for Direction Report Date: August 17, 2017 To: Toronto and East

More information

H5. Residential Mixed Housing Urban Zone

H5. Residential Mixed Housing Urban Zone H5. Residential Mixed Housing Urban Zone H5.1. Zone description The Residential Mixed Housing Urban Zone is a reasonably high-intensity zone enabling a greater intensity of development than previously

More information

Update on the Avenues and Mid-Rise Buildings Action Plan

Update on the Avenues and Mid-Rise Buildings Action Plan STAFF REPORT INFORMATION ONLY Update on the Avenues and Mid-Rise Buildings Action Plan Date: May 15, 2009 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Planning and Growth Management Committee Chief Planner and Executive

More information

History of Broadview Avenue

History of Broadview Avenue History of Broadview Avenue Broadview Avenue was commissioned in 1799. It was originally called the Mill Road and subsequently Don Mills Road because of the mills and brickwork industries located in the

More information

MINOR VARIANCE REQUESTED:

MINOR VARIANCE REQUESTED: November 6 th, 2016 Committee of Adjustment 101 Centrepointe Dr. Ottawa, ON K2G 5K7 Re: 83 Hinton Avenue Ave. Applications for Minor Variances APPLICATION OVERVIEW The applicant proposes to construct a

More information

COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE zones COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE ZONES. Zoning By-law PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT DIVISION

COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE zones COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE ZONES. Zoning By-law PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT DIVISION Zoning By-law 05-200 COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE zones PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT DIVISION CONTENTS CONTEXT... 1 URBAN HAMILTON OFFICIAL PLAN... 2 COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE ZONES...

More information

3.1. OBJECTIVES FOR RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS GENERAL OBJECTIVES FOR ALL RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATIONS

3.1. OBJECTIVES FOR RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS GENERAL OBJECTIVES FOR ALL RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATIONS 3. RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS INTRODUCTION The Residential land use designations provide for housing and other land uses that are integral to, and supportive of, a residential environment. Housing

More information

Bathurst Street Zoning Amendment Application and Rental Housing Demolition Application under Municipal Code Chapter 667 Final Report

Bathurst Street Zoning Amendment Application and Rental Housing Demolition Application under Municipal Code Chapter 667 Final Report STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 1996-2000 Bathurst Street Zoning Amendment Application and Rental Housing Demolition Application under Municipal Code Chapter 667 Final Report Date: January 26, 2017 To: Toronto

More information

Director, Community Planning, North York District

Director, Community Planning, North York District STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 32-50, 52, 55, 56, 59, 60, 62, 65, 66, 70, 72, 76, 80, 85 & 90 Forest Manor Road, 100, 106, 110, 123, 123A, 125 and 130 Parkway Forest Drive, 1751 and 1761 Sheppard Avenue

More information

Richmond Street West - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Richmond Street West - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 457-457 Richmond Street West - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report Date: March 10, 2017 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Toronto and East York Community Council

More information

40-58 Widmer Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

40-58 Widmer Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 40-58 Widmer Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report Date: April 19, 2013 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Toronto and East York Community Council Director,

More information

45 & 77 Dunfield Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

45 & 77 Dunfield Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 45 & 77 Dunfield Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report Date: January 22, 2014 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Toronto and East York Community Council

More information

Staff Report. October 19, 2016 Page 1 of 17. Meeting Date: October 19, 2016

Staff Report. October 19, 2016 Page 1 of 17. Meeting Date: October 19, 2016 October 19, 2016 Page 1 of 17 Staff Report Report No.: PDSD-P-58-16 Meeting Date: October 19, 2016 Submitted by: Subject: Recommendation: Ben Puzanov, RPP, Senior Planner Application for Zoning By-law

More information

770 BROOKFIELD ROAD Site Plan Control Atlantis Investments November 2017

770 BROOKFIELD ROAD Site Plan Control Atlantis Investments November 2017 770 BROOKFIELD ROAD Site Plan Control Atlantis Investments November 2017 Prepared for: Atlantis Investments Inc. Prepared by: Fotenn Planning + Design 223 McLeod Street Ottawa, ON K2P 0Z8 fotenn.com October

More information

1.0 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE OF THE CIP VISION LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY Municipal Act Planning Act...

1.0 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE OF THE CIP VISION LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY Municipal Act Planning Act... April 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 2.0 PURPOSE OF THE CIP... 1 3.0 VISION... 1 4.0 COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AREA..3 5.0 LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY... 3 5.1 Municipal Act... 3 5.2 Planning

More information

836 St Clair Ave W - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

836 St Clair Ave W - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 836 St Clair Ave W - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report Date: October 24, 2013 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Toronto and East York Community Council Director,

More information

Village of Port Jefferson Urban Renewal Plan

Village of Port Jefferson Urban Renewal Plan Urban Renewal Plan Village of Port Jefferson Urban Renewal Plan Port Jefferson, New York PREPARED FOR Village of Port Jefferson Village Board 121 West Broadway Port Jefferson, NY 11777 631.473.4724 PREPARED

More information

44 Jackes Avenue and 33 Rosehill Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

44 Jackes Avenue and 33 Rosehill Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 44 Jackes Avenue and 33 Rosehill Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report Date: March 16, 2017 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Toronto and East York Community

More information

Urban Design Brief. Italian Seniors Project 1090, 1092, 1096 Hamilton Road City of London

Urban Design Brief. Italian Seniors Project 1090, 1092, 1096 Hamilton Road City of London Urban Design Brief Italian Seniors Project City of London October 1, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. INTRODUCTION... 2 1.0 LAND USE PLANNING CONCEPT... 2 1.1 Subject Lands... 2 1.2 Official Plan and Zoning

More information

6208 Jeanne D Arc Boulevard North. Planning Rationale. Site Plan Control

6208 Jeanne D Arc Boulevard North. Planning Rationale. Site Plan Control Site Plan Control Prepared By: NOVATECH Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 1P6 November / 24 / 2015 Novatech File: 115100 Ref: R-2015-179 November 24, 2015 City of Ottawa 110 Laurier

More information

INFILL DEVELOPMENT. Elective Course January 14, 2017 Derek Pomreinke Tammy Henry Nazim Virani

INFILL DEVELOPMENT. Elective Course January 14, 2017 Derek Pomreinke Tammy Henry Nazim Virani INFILL DEVELOPMENT Elective Course January 14, 2017 Derek Pomreinke Tammy Henry Nazim Virani Agenda 9:05 What is infill? 9:20 How is it regulated? 9:45 How do developers view infill? Break 10:30 Applications

More information

Downtown Development Focus Area: I. Existing Conditions

Downtown Development Focus Area: I. Existing Conditions Downtown Development Focus Area: I. Existing Conditions The Downtown Development Focus Area is situated along Route 1, south of the train tracks, except for the existing Unilever property. It extends west

More information

LAND USE AND BUILT FORM

LAND USE AND BUILT FORM 5 LAND USE AND BUILT FORM The existing zoning on Bank Street already allows for considerable general intensification, since the permitted Floor Space Index (FSI) would already allow several times more

More information