Compatible-Scale Infill Housing (R-2 Zones) Project
|
|
- Camron Booker
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Project Scope: A targeted amendment to the regulations for building bulk/height in the R-2 zones. Objectives: Allow more housing opportunities in the R-2A, R-2D, and R-2M zones, while ensuring the height and scale of new development complements existing neighborhoods: Replace the 2.5-story construction limit with a more flexible standard for building size; Reduce the height exceptions for stairwell and elevator access enclosures; and Mitigate 3-story building design where abutting neighboring streets and properties. Status: Arose from comments by builders, designers, and neighborhoods; created by a team. One of a group of Anchorage 2040 Land Use Plan actions re: compact infill housing. Previously a community discussion draft; current draft is now a public hearing draft. Open House Presentation - December 11, 2018 with some illustrations clarified and enhanced on
2 R-2A, R-2D, and R-2M Zones Mixed-income, mixed-housing neighborhoods. Accommodate a range of low-rise housing types (shown in red-dashed box below). All of these housing types fit into a cohesive, house-scale neighborhood. 2
3 Where are R-2A, R-2D, and R-2M Zones? Distributed across the Bowl. > 1/3 of urban residential zone land. > 30,000 properties. Primarily built-up neighborhoods 3
4 Housing Capacity of R-2 Zones Approx. 20% of the 2040 Plan s forecast housing capacity in the Bowl. Focus on compact housing structure types, for which demand is greater than land capacity. Housing capacity is infill and redevelopment lots within built-up neighborhoods. R-2 Focus 4
5 Anchorage 2040 Goals and Policies set the direction: 2040 Goals 2, 4, and even 7 complement each other. Does not prioritize goals over each other. Goal seeks actions that bring the goals together, and carry out all the policies. Goal 4 Goal 7 5
6 Proposal Arises from Builder, Architect, and Neighborhood Consultations Builders and designers requested amending 2.5-story limit: 2.5-story limit constrains design options Harder for larger lots in R-2M zone to fit the full number of allowed units 2.5-story limit does not necessarily protect neighbors Concerns from neighborhoods and designers: Larger and taller new housing units on small infill lots can impact: Neighborhood character Livability on neighboring lots (sunlight access, privacy) Affordable housing stock (replacement of existing units with large, expensive units) Pre-consultations with a small group of expert builders and architects in June/July: Suggested exempting large sites from 2.5-story limit Suggested preference for a simpler FAR standard over 2.5-story limit Architects concerned about impacts of large, 3-story housing built on spec 6
7 Public Comments about the Community Discussion Draft About the Replacement of 2.5-story Height Limitation with FAR Limitations: Simply Delete the 2.5-story limit Retain the 2.5-story limit in Traditional Neighborhoods or on Smaller Lots Address Sunlight Shadowing Impacts before Replacing 2.5-story Limit Determine the Potential Economic and Housing Impacts before Imposing FAR Limits Increase the Proposed Maximum FARs Clarify the Measurement of a Home s Gross Floor Area, its FAR, and FAR Exemptions Make Sure the Muni has the Needed Expertise to Administer FARs Increase / Decrease the Exemptions for Detached Accessory Structures About the Revisions to Height Exceptions for Rooftop Appurtenances: Reduce the height exemption for elevator enclosures to five feet Simplify, relax, and/or allow administrative variances from the reduced height exceptions 7
8 More Public Comments about Community Discussion Draft About the Proposed Standards to Mitigate 3-Story Buildings: Retain the 2.5-story based limitation on building length in traditional neighborhoods Increase or delete the proposed maximum building length Do not require building articulation where not necessary to protect neighboring lots Require upper floor step-backs from neighboring properties Apply bldg. articulation standards consistently to all buildings in multi-unit developments About other aspects of infill housing / neighborhood compatibility: More strongly restrict front driveways and garages in traditional neighborhoods Require more northern climate design features (e.g., daylighting for proposed apt. units) Accommodate the need and desire for more housing near downtown Provide a grace period after adoption during which builders may select old regulations Provide more means of administrative variances/flexibility 8
9 List of Public Hearing Draft Materials for Public Review Proposed Code Changes: Draft Adopting Ordinance Draft Zoning Code Amendment Language ( Exhibit B ) Supporting Information*: Staff Report and Analysis Summary ( Exhibit A ) Policy Guidance from the Comprehensive Plan ( Exhibit D ) Public Comments Received ( Exhibit E ) Comment/Issue-Response Table ( Exhibit F ) * Supporting Information Materials are being posted on project web page as they are completed. Note: The information on this slide was presented verbally on This slide was added on
10 Public Hearing Draft Responds to Approximately 40 Issues Raised by Public Changes from Sept. 27 Community Discussion Draft (refers to page numbers in Public Hearing Draft) 1. Page 1, the Minor Modifications process is made available for maximum FAR requirements. 2. Page 2, maximum building length requirement for taller buildings is now based on height in feet rather than number of stories, and is increased from 125 feet to 150 feet (i.e., changed back to current code). 3. Page 2, building articulation requirements no longer apply to duplexes, and wall plane modulation is now required on only one elevation. 4. Page 2, building articulation applies when abutting any residential-zoned property, not just when abutting an existing residence. 5. Page 2, measurement of maximum height of stairs/main entry may be from either grade plane or finished grade at applicant s choice. 6. Page 3, Single-family home FAR is increased from 0.45 to 0.50 FAR in R-2A, R-2D, and R-2M districts. 7. Page 3, Two-family (duplex) and single-family attached dwelling FAR is increased from 0.50 to 0.60 in the R-2A; and increased from 0.60 to 0.65 in the R-2M district. 8. Page 3, Townhouse FAR is increased from 0.70 to 0.90 FAR in R-2M district. 9. Page 3, Multifamily FAR is increased from 0.70 to 0.80 FAR in R-2M district. 10. Page 4, line 28, the exempted height of stairwells is increased from 10 to 11 feet in R-1 and R-2 districts. 11. Page 4, the max exempted height of parapets is changed from 1 foot in R-1 and R-2 zones and 4 feet in other zones to 3 feet in all zones. 12. Page 4, the maximum exempted height of railings is no longer limited to 5 feet, and open/transparency requirement clarified. 13. Page 5, line 6, the minimum roof pitch for dormers exempted from height limits is relaxed to 2: Page 6, a solar access step-back requirement is added along northerly lot lines abutting other homes. 15. Page 7, line 17, the FAR exemption for crawl spaces is deleted as crawl spaces have never been counted as part of gross floor area. 16. Page 7, line 19, the FAR exemption for accessory structures is increased from 0.1 to 0.15, to correspond to the max allowed size of ADUs. 17. Page 7, lines 21-24, an FAR exemption is added to allow pre-existing homes and duplexes one addition that exceeds the maximum FAR. 18. Page 8, Alternative Compliance is made available for R-2M District-specific Standards for 3-story building articulation and max stair height. 19. Page 8, Alternative Equivalent Compliance is made available as a more flexible alternative to the solar access step-back proposed on page Page 11, The revised definition of half story is formatted differently, and the height of a sidewall on a half story is reduced from 5 to 4 feet. 21. Page 11, a definition related to the railings provision (see item #11 above) is added to clarify open or transparent railing. 10
11 What the Proposal Does Not Do Change the 30-foot height limit, 40% maximum lot coverage, or minimum setbacks. Rezone any property. Change how many housing units or what type of housing is allowed by the district. Make any existing, legally constructed or permitted building a nonconforming structure as a result of the proposed FAR building size limits. Apply the proposed FAR or district-specific design amendments to Chugiak-Eagle River. Address other site design regulations such as parking, driveways, or landscaping. 11
12 Related Anchorage 2040 Implementation Projects Anchorage 2040 Land Use Plan calls for improving land use regulations for infill housing. Draft code amendments for these projects will come forward separately, each on its own schedule: Completed 1. Unit Lot Subdivisions (2040 Action 4-17) 2. Accessory Dwelling Units (2040 Action 4-7) 3. R-3A Mixed-use Residential Zone (2040 Action 2-6) Over-parked Apartments Upcoming 1. Parking Reductions By-right (2040 Action 4-3) 2. R-4A Mixed-use Zone (2040 Actions 3-1 and 3-5) 3. Residential Driveways for Compact Housing (Action 4-6) 4. Reinvestment Focus Areas (RFAs) (Actions 2-1 to 2-4) Townhouse Driveway 5. Additional Housing Units by Design (2040 Action 4-4) Before After: More Units 12
13 1. Replace 2.5-story Limitation. Replace the 2.5-story construction limit with a more flexible standard for the size of new housing in proportion to the size of the lot, using a floor area ratio (FAR). Maximum floor space: 5,000 square feet Lot size: 10,000 square feet Two example lot sizes for a maximum FAR of 0.5. Maximum floor space: 3,500 square feet Lot size: 7,000 square feet 13
14 What replacing 2.5-story limit with FAR looks like in code: 14
15 FAR Features: More Flexible Builder/architect has discretion in building siting, style, and design. Design can respond to site conditions or a neighbor (e.g., backyard sunlight). Allows any 3-story massing configuration up to the 30 foot limit. Easier to fit all of the housing units allowed by the district, especially on larger sites. Allowed floor area increases with lot size. Amount of floor area also increases for housing types with more dwelling units. Three possible configurations of equally sized structures, all with the same floor area ratio (FAR). FAR closely links to building height and coverage. Housing can either be taller or more spread, but not both. 15
16 FAR Features: Simpler than 2.5-story Limit Simple tool for keeping the bulk of large structures in proportion to the size of the lot. A single number: a ratio of building floor space to the area of the lot. Divide the total gross floor area of the building(s) by the area of the lot. 16
17 FAR Features: More Familiar Used already in Title 21 multifamily and commercial zones for many years. Used in Girdwood gr-1, 2, 3, 4 single-family, two-family, and multi-family zones. Has worked fine in by-right, over-the-counter administrative reviews. More compatible than 2.5-story limit with the rest of Title 21 land use regulations. Square footage more familiar than ½ stories to building and design industry. Proposed R-2 amendment and its accompanying info includes further clarifications 17
18 FAR Features: Allows for Most Construction Sizes Most housing typically not built to the maximum size Number for Each FAR Value 6000 Proposed FARs exceed most recent construction sizes. Allows for the largest mansion units on larger lots Existing Floor Area Ratios for Residential Structures in R-2M Zone Pre-1970 Number All Years 7,000 Sq. Ft. Lots 18
19 FAR Features: Allowed Housing Structure Size increases with Lot Size Accommodates the Number of Housing Units and Housing Types Allowed in R-2 Zones Note: Graph depiction of common lot size ranges for single- and two-family was clarified on
20 FAR Features: Respects Neighborhood Scale Most housing typically is not built to the maximum size. Proposed FARs allows taller maximum building height but less max. building envelope. Note: This illustration was clarified and enhanced on ,000 Sq. Ft. Lots 20
21 FAR Features: Exempts Non-bulky Floor-spaces from FAR Maximums Daylight basements. Attic and half-story spaces with ceiling heights less than 7 6. Accessory structures (garages, ADUs, etc.) up to 0.15 FAR exempted. One addition to an existing single- or two-family home 400 sq. ft. or 0.10 FAR exempted. Note: This illustration was clarified and enhanced on
22 2. Revise Height Exceptions for Rooftop Appurtenances in R-1/R-2 Zones a. Reduce the maximum exempted height for rooftop access stairwells, mechanical penthouses, and elevator enclosures: Allow rooftop access enclosures on top of 3-story, 30-foot tall structures. But minimize the potential bulk, height, shadow impacts of rooftop enclosures. Base new minimum standards on industry expert consultations. Proposal: Reduce elevator enclosure exemption from 25 to 16 feet. Proposal: Reduce stairwell and mechanical enclosure exemption from 15 to 11 feet. 22
23 2. Revise Height Exceptions for Rooftop Appurtenances in R-1/R-2 Zones b. Reduce the height exception for solid parapet walls while continuing to allow railings to exceed the height limit. Reduce solid parapet wall height while allowing needed clearance above roof surface. Reduce height exemption for solid parapet walls from 4 feet to 3 feet. Allow open and transparent railings to exceed by more than 3 feet. 23
24 2. Revise Height Exceptions for Rooftop Appurtenances in R-1/R-2 Zones c. Exempt small dormers from building height measurement. Dormer increases building height as measured by Title 21. Currently no height exemption for dormers, a disincentive for attic spaces. Proposal: Exempt dormers with clear rules to ensure they stay a secondary roof mass. Provides certainty for builders. 24
25 3. Mitigate 3-story building design a. Re-state the limitation on length of 2.5-story buildings in terms of feet not stories. Current: Maximum 150 feet for building elevation 2.5 stories in height. Proposal: Maximum 150 feet for building greater than 25 feet height. 25
26 3. Mitigate 3-story building design b. Solar access step-back for 3-story structures abutting neighboring residences. Responds to a primary neighborhood concern with deleting 2.5-story limit. Applies only along side lot line abutting another residential lot. Intended to retain equivalent level of solar access protection as under 2.5-story limit. Exemptions and alternative equivalent compliance. 26
27 3. Mitigate 3-story building design c. New R-2M District-specific Standards for 3-story, multi-unit structures abutting neighboring streets and properties. Responds to neighborhood concerns and architect consultations comments. Apply an existing building articulation menu from Title 21 residential standards. Limit the height of exterior main entry stairs to the first floor (6 above grade). Alternative equivalent compliance available. 27
28 Building Facades Subject to Building Articulation Menu Requirement Facades Already Subject under Current Code Additional Facades under R-2 Zones Amendment Facades Exempted Due to Topography or Vegetation under R-2 Amendment 2-unit 2-unit 2-unit 2-unit 2-unit Zion Court (Lake Otis Dr.) Loussac Manor (A and C St.) Not considered to be street-facing building elevations by Title 21 because building grade level is eight feet or more below grade plane of the adjoining street pavement. Note: This slide was clarified with enhancements on
29 Administrative Adjustments and Flexibility: Minor Modifications: Allows 5% administrative adjustment to some dimensional requirements. FAR added to the list of code requirements that may have 5% adjustment. Alternative Equivalent Compliance (AEC): Allows approval of alternative means and methods for meeting intent of requirements. R-2M district-specific standards. Solar access step-back. Note: This slide was clarified with enhancements on
30 Project Objectives: Allow more housing opportunities in the R-2A, R-2D, and R-2M zones, while ensuring the height and scale of new development complements existing neighborhoods: Replace the 2.5-story construction limit with a more flexible standard for building size; Reduce the height exceptions for stairwell and elevator access enclosures; and Mitigate 3-story building design where abutting neighboring streets and properties. Summary of Key Features: Addresses the needs and impacts of infill housing in built-up neighborhoods. FAR is a more flexible and familiar than 2.5-story limit. Proposed FARs allow for most construction sizes. Allows for rooftop access and rooftop decks on 3-story (30-foot) buildings. R-2M District-specific standards to mitigate 3-stories and reduce neighbor conflicts. 30
31 Next Steps: Exhibits and Information will Appear on Project Website. Looking for Public Feedback on the Public Hearing Draft. Public Hearing at Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC) on March 4, PZC Recommended Draft will then be forwarded to the Assembly. The Public will have an opportunity for testimony on the PZC Recommended Draft. The Assembly may amend the PZC Recommended Draft before they vote to adopt it. Step 1: Community Discussion Draft Step 2: Public Hearing Draft to PZC Step 3: PZC Draft to Assembly. Step 1. Fall 2018 Discussion Draft 2. Winter Public Hearing Draft 3. Spring 2019 Final Draft to Assembly Public Involvement Initial Discussion Draft code changes were for released public review on September 27, for a public feedback period that ended in early November. Public Hearing Draft code changes available for public review December 10, and a public hearing at Planning Commission is scheduled for March 4. PZC Recommended Draft code changes available for public review prior to Assembly hearing, deliberations, and adoption. Note: This slide was updated on to reflect that the PZC public hearing date was changed to March 4,
32 Resource Slides Hardcopies of the following visuals and information were displayed at the December 11, 2018 Open House. 32
33 R-2 Zones Lot Sizes 63% of all R-2 lots are less than 8,500 sq. ft. 92% of all R-2 lots are less than 14,000 sq. ft. 4% of all R-2 lots are greater than 21,000 sq. ft. There is no threshold lot size for a 2.5-story limit: All lot sizes are mixed into neighborhoods. Smaller lots can be aggregated into bigger lots. Larger lots can be divided into smaller lots. 33
34 Shows maximum allowed size of a home on 7,000 square foot lot. Max. home size would increase on larger lots. Proposed maximum accommodates typical recent home sizes. Note: This illustration was not complete by Open House so could not be displayed. 34
35 Shows R-2M maximum allowed size of a duplex on 7,000 square foot lot. Allowed duplex size would increase on larger lots. Proposed maximum accommodates most duplex unit sizes. Note: This illustration is clarified and enhanced from the version displayed on
36 Max. building size and number of units would increase on larger lots. Proposed maximum accommodates typical recent unit sizes. Proposed max. allows for 3-story structures, as shown in green. Allowed building design and configurations can vary from what is shown. Note: This illustration was not complete by Open House so could not be displayed. 36
37 Shadow Analysis of Maximum Allowed Duplex Sizes, R-2M Zone Sunlight Shadowing Impacts on Abutting Lots at Equinox (March & September 21: Existing Older Home Proposed Max. Duplex Size (Half-story under pitched roof) Current Code Max. Duplex Size (Typical ceiling heights, 2.5-story limit) Proposed Max. Duplex Size (3-story, pitched roof design) Note: This illustration was clarified and enhanced on
38 Shadow Analysis of Maximum Allowed Duplex Sizes, R-2M Zone: 3-story Flat Roof Design Sunlight Shadowing Impacts on Abutting Lots at Equinox (March & September 21: Existing Older Home Proposed Max. Duplex Size (Half-story under pitched roof) Current Code Max. Duplex Size (Typical ceiling heights, 2.5-story limit) Proposed Max. Duplex Size (3-story, flat rooftop deck design) Note: This illustration was not complete by Open House so could not be displayed. 38
39 Existing FARs for Residential Structures in R-2A Zone By Use Type, Lot Size, and Era 39
40 Existing FARs for Residential Structures in R-2D Zone By Use Type, Lot Size, and Era 40
41 Existing FARs for Residential Structures in R-2M Zone By Use Type, Lot Size, and Era 41
Goal 1 - Retain and enhance Cherry Creek North s unique physical character.
Introduction This document summarizes the proposed new zoning for the area of roughly bordered by University Boulevard, Steele Street, 3rd Avenue, and 1st Avenue. It provides a high-level review of the
More informationINTRODUCTION TO HOUSING LDC AMENDMENTS
INTRODUCTION TO HOUSING LDC AMENDMENTS August 6, 2018 BACKGROUND The City is participating in a regional affordable housing initiative Staff presented the City s overall strategy at the March 2018 MPB
More informationLOT AREA AND FRONTAGE
LOT AREA AND FRONTAGE Lot Area & Frontage for the R2.1 Zone Lot Area & Frontage for the R2.4 Zone Minimum Lot Minimum Lot Zone Area Width R2.1 700 sq m 18 m R2.4 600 sq m 16 m Lot Area means the total
More informationWe contacted all RNOs in the area to come to their meetings and personally explain the draft, and take questions. Four RNOs took us up on the offer,
1 2 3 At the last TTF meeting at the end of April, the TTF reached a consensus recommendation on the draft zoning and directed staff to put it out in a draft for public review and feedback. I m going to
More information2. The modification is consistent with the objectives of this chapter.
DRAFT February 11, 2009 BMC 20.28 Infill Housing 20.28.010 Purpose. This chapter establishes special development regulations for a series of housing forms that are different than the traditional detached
More informationBUILDING AN ADU GUIDE TO ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS PLANNING DIVISION
BUILDING AN ADU GUIDE TO ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS PLANNING DIVISION 1 451 S. State Street, Room 406 Salt Lake City, UT 84114-5480 P.O. Box 145480 CONTENT 04 OVERVIEW 08 ELIGIBILITY 11 BUILDING AN ADU Types
More informationSECTION 7. RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS
SECTION 7. RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS 7.1 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS PURPOSE 7.2 PERMITTED AND SPECIAL USES 7.3 YARD AND BULK REGULATIONS 7.4 GENERAL STANDARDS OF APPLICABILITY 7.5 FLOOR AREA RATIO MEASUREMENT AND
More informationSalem HNA and EOA Advisory Committee Meeting #6
Salem HNA and EOA Advisory Committee Meeting #6 Residential Land Policies Employment Land Policies Policy Discussions with the Committee Outcome of today s meeting Direction from this Committee on proposed
More informationCity of Tacoma Planning and Development Services
Agenda Item D-3 City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services To: Planning Commission From: Elliott Barnett, Planning Services Division Subject: Affordable Housing Planning Work Program (Phase 3) Meeting
More informationAppendix1,Page1. Urban Design Guidelines. Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses. DRAFT September 2017
Appendix1,Page1 Urban Design Guidelines DRAFT September 2017 Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses Appendix1,Page2 Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose 1 1.2 Urban Design Objectives 1 1.3 Building
More informationUnderstanding the Development Review Process in the City of Minneapolis
Understanding the Development Review Process in the City of Minneapolis What is MDR? Minneapolis Development Review (MDR) providing efficient ways for the public to work with the City to get development
More informationSTAFF REPORT. Meeting Date: April 25, 2017
Meeting Date: April 25, 2017 Agency: City of Belmont Staff Contact: Damon DiDonato, Community Development Department, (650) 637-2908; ddidonato@belmont.gov Agenda Title: Amendments to Sections 24 (Secondary
More information8/26/2015 Item #10F Page 1
8/26/2015 Item #10F Page 1 MEETING DATE: August 26, 2015 PREPARED BY: Diane S. Langager, Principal Planner DEPT. DIRECTOR: Jeff Murphy DEPARTMENT: Planning and Building ACTING CITY MANAGER: Lisa Rudloff
More informationDEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPES: APPROPRIATE ZONES AND DENSITIES 2-1
2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPES: APPROPRIATE ZONES AND DENSITIES 2-1 This Chapter presents the development standards for residential projects. Section 2.1 discusses
More informationAction Recommendation: Budget Impact:
City of Fayetteville Staff Review Form Garner Stoll Submitted By 2018-0144 Legistar File ID 4/17/2018 City Council Meeting Date - Agenda Item Only N/A for Non-Agenda Item 3/22/2018 Submitted Date Action
More informationCity of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 of 3
City of Fayetteville, Arkansas 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 Legislation Text File #: 2018-0144, Version: 1 ADM 18-6094 (AMEND UDC 164.19/ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS): AN
More informationChapter 17-2 Residential Districts
Chapter 17-2 Residential Districts 17-2-0100 District Descriptions...2-1 17-2-0200 Allowed Uses...2-2 17-2-0300 Bulk and Density Standards...2-5 17-2-0400 Character Standards...2-18 17-2-0500 Townhouse
More informationWHEREAS, the direction from the Study is to amend the Land Use Code in the following particulars:
ORDINANCE NO. 033, 2013 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS MAKING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS LAND USE CODE PERTAINING TO IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EASTSIDE AND WESTSIDE NEIGHBORHOODS CHARACTER
More informationZoning Options. Key Questions:
Zoning Options This section explores zoning options to encourage Character Home retention and improve size and compatibility of new homes in the study areas. Options being explored include: A Floor Area
More informationResidential roof decks. Residential Roof Decks
Residential roof decks San Francisco Magazine cover Feb 2018 Issue Roof Decks and Discretionary Reviews Increasing number of cases / amount of time spent on Discretionary Reviews on projects involving
More informationAccessory Coach House
Updated July 2018 Accessory Coach House Development Permit Guidelines 1 Accessory Coach House Development Permit Guidelines Zoning Bylaw, 1995 DIVISION VII C. Contents Part I General Reglations 1 Introduction
More informationA DJUSTMENTS. A. Zoning Permits Required: Use Permit to construct a dwelling unit, as required by BMC Section 23D
Z O N I N G A DJUSTMENTS B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD ACTION AUGUST 14, 2008 2421 Ninth Street Use Permit 05-10000084 to construct a two-story 1,766 sq. ft., detached dwelling unit at the
More informationAccessory Structures Zoning Code Update-, 2015
Accessory Structures Zoning Code Update-, 2015 This detached ADU code update language on the next 5 pages is excerpted verbatim from the zoning code update, available in full at www.portlandoregon.gov/bps/ricap
More informationPolicy Issues City of Knoxville Zoning Code Update
Policy Issues City of Knoxville Zoning Code Update ADU's (Accessory Dwelling Units) The draft zoning ordinance update permits ADU s as an accessory use in all single-family residential zoning districts.
More informationComposition of traditional residential corridors.
Page 1 of 7 St. Petersburg, Florida, Code of Ordinances >> PART II - ST. PETERSBURG CITY CODE >> Chapter 16 - LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS >> SECTION 16.20.060. CORRIDOR RESIDENTIAL TRADITIONAL DISTRICTS
More informationA. Land Use Designations: General Plan: LDR Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1H Single Family Residential - Hillside Overlay
Z O N I N G A D J U S T M E N T S B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD ACTION FEBRUARY 26, 2015 1229 Oxford Street Use Permit #UP2014-0009 to 1) add a 1,171 square-foot third story which would result
More informationMinneapolis Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance
www.smartgrowthamerica.org Minneapolis Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance Aaron Hanauer Thursday, February 25, 2016 mother-in-law suite carriage house granny flat laneway house secondary suite ancillary
More informationCHAPTER 21.06: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS AND MEASUREMENTS
CHAPTER 21.06: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS AND MEASUREMENTS 21.06.010 PURPOSE... 6-2 A. Purpose... 6-2 B. Applicability... 6-2 21.06.020 DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS TABLES... 6-2 A. Table of Dimensional Standards:
More informationPublic Review of the Slot Home Text Amendment
Public Review of the Slot Home Text Amendment The proposed amendments to the Denver Zoning Code have been informed by the Slot Home Strategy Report. This document has been developed out of a robust process
More informationDIFFERENCES IN THE EXISTING & PROPOSED ZONING CODE IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS
DIFFERENCES IN THE EXISTING & PROPOSED ZONING CODE IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS FOUR CASE STUDIES OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT This guide is intended to illustrate the differences in development currently allowed
More information5. Housing. Other Relevant Policies & Bylaws. Several City-wide policies guide our priorities for housing diversity at the neighbourhood level: Goals
5. Housing Other Relevant Policies & Bylaws Several City-wide policies guide our priorities for housing diversity at the neighbourhood level: Goals 1. Encourage more housing diversity while maintaining
More informationACCESSORY STRUCTURES L D C I TEM #6 S U M M A RY A N A LY S I S
Staff Report to the Municipal Planning Board August 18, 2015 L D C 2 0 1 5-0 0 2 5 3 I TEM #6 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES S U M M A RY Owner N/A Applicant City of Orlando Project Planner Elisabeth Dang, AICP
More informationDAVIDSON PLANNING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS AFTER SEPTEMBER 2009 SECTION 9
AMENDMENT ADOPTED 6/12/2012 Section 9.1.3.3.1 Wall Murals Entire Section Added: 9.1.3.3.1 Wall Murals DAVIDSON PLANNING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS AFTER SEPTEMBER 2009 SECTION 9 Exterior wall murals are only
More informationACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS IN THE SOUTHEAST SECTOR
February 19, 2019 Staff Report to the Municipal Planning Board LDC2018-10020 Item #11 S U M M A R Y Applicant The City of Orlando ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS IN THE SOUTHEAST SECTOR Applicant s Request Update
More informationDuplex and Tandem Development Community Workshop. Presented by: Elisabeth Dang, AICP
Duplex and Tandem Development Community Workshop Presented by: Elisabeth Dang, AICP September 21, 2016 Staff presentation Agenda Overview Outreach to date Explanation of proposed code amendments Examples
More informationRS-1 EXPLANATORY NOTES. Authority - Director of Planning Effective February 1992 Amended March 2004 and July 21, 2009
City of Vancouver Planning - By-law Administration Bulletins Community Services, 43 W. 12th Ave Vancouver, BC VY 1V4 F 604.873.7000 fax 604.873.7060 planning@vancouver.ca RS-1 EXPLANATORY NOTES Authority
More informationResidential. Infill / Intensification Development Review
Residential Infill / Intensification Development Review How Best to Manage The Compatible Integration of New Housing Within Established Residential Neighbourhoods Identification of Issues Privacy/overlook/height
More information2 OVERVIEW & GUIDE. 2.1 ZONING ATLAS OVERVIEW...9 Zoning Districts 9 Transit Areas 10 Pedestrian Streets 10
2 OVERVIEW & GUIDE 2.1 ZONING ATLAS OVERVIEW...9 Zoning Districts 9 Transit Areas 10 Pedestrian Streets 10 2.2 BUILDING TYPES OVERVIEW...11 General 11 Building Assembly 11 Understanding the Building Type
More informationRM-7, RM-7N and RM-7AN Districts Schedules
1 Intent Districts Schedules The intent of this schedule is to encourage development of ground-oriented stacked townhouses or rowhouses, while continuing to permit lower intensity development. In RM-7AN,
More informationAGENDA SLOT HOME EVALUATION & TEXT AMENDMENT. 5:30 - Welcome
AGENDA 5:30 - Welcome Please sign-in, put a sticker on the map, grab snacks, materials and a seat 5:45 - Staff Presentation 6:15 - Open House Stations Background Information Mixed Use Districts Multi Unit
More informationDRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY. Port Credit Local Area Plan Built Form Guidelines and Standards DRAFT For Discussion Purposes
Port Credit Local Area Plan Built Form Guidelines and Standards DRAFT For Discussion Purposes 1 Local Area Plan - Project Alignment Overview Directions Report, October 2008 (General Summary Of Selected
More information6. RESIDENTIAL ZONE REGULATIONS
6. RESIDENTIAL ZONE REGULATIONS PART 6A PURPOSE OF CHAPTER (1) The purpose of this Chapter is to provide detailed regulations and requirements that are relevant only to residential zones and specific residential
More informationCity Council 1-15-08- Exhibit A Mansionization Code Amendments Recommended by Planning Commission 11-14-07 INCREASE OPEN SPACE AND SETBACKS Section 10.12.030 and A.12.030 Property Development Regulations:
More information900 BURRARD STREET CD-1 GUIDELINES (BY-LAW NO. 6421) (CD-1 NO. 229) CONTENTS. 1 Application and Intent... 1
50 City of Vancouver Land Use and Development Policies and Guidelines Community Services, 453 W. 12th Ave Vancouver, BC V5Y 1V4 F 604.873.7344 fax 873.7060 planning@city.vancouver.bc.ca 900 BURRARD STREET
More informationCity of Piedmont COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
City of Piedmont COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT DATE: May 15, 2017 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mayor and Council Paul Benoit, City Administrator Consideration of the 2 nd Reading of Ordinance 731 N.S. - Amending Division
More information130 - General Regulations for Residential Zones and Uses Only
Page 130-1 130 - General Regulations for Residential Zones and Uses Only 130.01 Accessory s and Structures (1) An accessory building or structure shall not be used as a dwelling. (2) An accessory building
More informationA By-law to amend Zoning and Development By-law No regarding Laneway Houses
Zoning & Development By-law Amendments regarding Laneway Houses Draft for Public Hearing A By-law to amend Zoning and Development By-law No. 3575 regarding Laneway Houses 1. This By-law amends or adds
More informationThe demolition required for the project came before the Landmark Preservation Commission (LPC) on November 3, 2016, where no action was taken.
D E S I G N R E V I E W C O M M I T T E E S t a f f R e p o r t 2072 ADDISON STREET PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW For Committee Discussion/ Majority Recommendation JULY 20, 2017 Design Review #DRCP2016-0002
More informationOrdinance No. 04 Series of 2013 RECITALS
AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF BASALT, COLORADO, APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO PORTIONS OF CHAPTER 16, ZONING, OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF BASALT, COLORADO, CREATING A NEW R-4 MIXED
More informationSide Setback Amendments to the (RF3) Small Scale Infill Development Zone Options to amend side setbacks for Row Housing
Side Setback Amendments to the (RF3) Small Scale Infill Development Zone Options to amend side setbacks for Row Housing Recommendation: That Administration prepare amendments to Zoning Bylaw 12800, as
More informationArticle 1 UNIVERSITY PARK ZONING DRAFT. LEGEND See inside front cover. August 31, 2018 DRAFT 4.0 ZONING ORDINANCE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK
Article 1 UNIVERSITY PARK ZONING DRAFT LEGEND See inside front cover DRAFT 4.0 August 31, 2-12018 Article 1 LEGEND Proposed deletion of existing ordinance provision (red text with red strke-through) Proposed
More informationZoning Code Amendments Completed and Proposed. November 2009 COMPLETED CODE AMENDMENTS. Parking Regulations Effective Sept 28, 2009 Ordinance No.
Zoning Code Amendments Completed and Proposed COMPLETED CODE AMENDMENTS Amendment/Issue Parking Regulations Effective Sept 28, 2009 Ordinance No. 1454 Residential Density in Planned Developments Effective
More informationMissing Middle Housing in Practice
Missing Middle Housing in Practice Daniel Parolek Principal, Opticos Design, Inc. dan@opticosdesign.com New Partners for Smart Growth Kansas City, MO 2013 1 Bungalow Courts Missing MIddle Housing 2012
More informationInfill & Other Residential Design Review
Infill & Other Residential Design Review December 2018 Infill and Other Residential Design Review applies to projects that are located within the Infill Regulations District, on properties immediately
More informationRT-11 and RT-11N Districts Schedules
Districts Schedules 1 Intent The intent of this schedule is to allow a variety of housing options by encouraging development of multiple small houses and duplexes on larger lots and assembled sites, while
More informationTable of Contents ARTICLE 5A CHARACTER-BASED ZONING 1
Table of Contents ARTICLE 5A CHARACTER-BASED ZONING 1 SECTION 10.5A10 GENERAL... 1 10.5A11 Purpose and Intent... 1 10.5A12 Applicability... 1 10.5A13 Compliance with Regulating Plan... 1 10.5A14 Relationship
More information17.13 RH HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL ZONES REGULATIONS SECTIONS:
Effective April 14, 2011 Chapter 17.13 RH HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL ZONES REGULATIONS SECTIONS: 17.13.010 Title, Intent, and Description 17.13.020 Required Design Review Process 17.13.030 Permitted and Conditionally
More informationRM-8 and RM-8N Districts Schedule
Districts Schedule 1 Intent The intent of this schedule is to encourage development of ground-oriented stacked townhouses or rowhouses, including courtyard rowhouses, while continuing to permit lower intensity
More informationHOUSING TYPES AND CHARACTERISTICS
HOUSING TYPES AND CHARACTERISTICS Market Study Housing Type Classification Single-Family Detached Townhouse Projected Dwelling Unit Demand 2010-2040 65.7 percent of total 9.1 percent of total Housing Variants
More informationAPPENDIX E PAGE 1 of 25 NOTE: ITALICS INDICATE ADDITIONS OR ALTERATIONS RM-9, RM-9A, RM-9N AND RM-9AN GUIDELINES DRAFT
PAGE 1 of 25 NOTE: ITALICS INDICATE ADDITIONS OR ALTERATIONS RM-9, RM-9A, RM-9N AND RM-9AN GUIDELINES DRAFT PAGE 2 of 25 Contents Page 1 Application and Intent... 4 1.1 Intent... 4 1.2 Application... 5
More informationArticle 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT
Article 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT this page left intentionally blank Contents ARTICLE 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT DIVISION 3.1 NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT DESCRIPTION...3.1-1 Section 3.1.1
More informationANCHORAGE, ALASKA AO No (S)
Submitted by: Chair of the Assembly at the Request of the Mayor Prepared by: Planning Department For reading: May, 0 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA AO No. 0- (S) 0 0 0 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ANCHORAGE MUNICIPAL CODE
More informationCHAPTER 21.06: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS AND MEASUREMENTS
1 CHAPTER 21.06: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS AND MEASUREMENTS 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 21.06.0 PURPOSE A. Purpose Specific purposes of this chapter include: 1.
More informationRESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS (Amended 11/13/14; 6/9/16; 10/13/16) PART I. R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
ARTICLE X. RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS (Amended 11/13/14; 6/9/16; 10/13/16) PART I. R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Section 108: Purpose This district is designed to accommodate single family detached
More informationNew Zoning Ordinance Program
City of Goleta New Zoning Ordinance Program Module 3: Regulations Applying to Multiple Districts General Site Regulations Landscaping Parking and Loading June 09, 2014 New Zoning Ordinance Program By:
More informationRT-5 and RT-5N Districts Schedule
Districts Schedule 1 Intent The intent of this District Schedule is to strongly encourage the retention and renovation of existing character houses by providing incentives such as increased floor area,
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION MAY 3, 2018 PUBLIC HEARING
PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 3, 2018 PUBLIC HEARING SUBJECT: REQUEST TO DEMOLISH TWO SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS ON TWO ADJOINING LOTS AND CONSTRUCT TEN RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS AT 947 GENESEE AVENUE AND 944
More information4 LAND USE 4.1 OBJECTIVES
4 LAND USE The Land Use Element of the Specific Plan establishes objectives, policies, and standards for the distribution, location and extent of land uses to be permitted in the Central Larkspur Specific
More informationMemorandum. Kenneth Johnstone, Community Development Director. November 25, 2015 (for December 3 Study Session)
Memorandum TO: THROUGH: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Commission Kenneth Johnstone, Community Development Director Lisa Ritchie, Planner II November 25, 2015 (for December 3 Study Session) Accessory Dwelling
More informationORDINANCE NO
ORDINANCE NO. 20060622-022 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 2-1 OF THE CITY CODE TO ADD ARTICLE 53 RELATING TO THE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN AND COMPATIBILITY COMMISSION; ADDING SECTION 25-2-566 TO THE CITY CODE
More informationCity of Coral Gables Planning and Zoning Staff Report
City of Coral Gables Planning and Zoning Staff Report Applicant: Application: Public Hearing: Date & Time: Location: City of Coral Gables Giralda Restaurant Row Overlay Zoning Code Text Amendment Planning
More informationPLANNING APPLICATION FORM RESIDENTIAL
Planning Application #: Date Received: Fee Paid: Receipt #: PLANNING APPLICATION FORM RESIDENTIAL Please complete the following application to initiate City review of your application. Please be aware
More information25 Leonard Avenue - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 25 Leonard Avenue - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report Date: March 8, 2017 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Toronto and East York
More informationM E M O. September 14, 2017 Agenda Item #4. Planning Commission. David Goodison, Planning Director
September 14, 2017 Agenda Item #4 M E M O To: From: Planning Commission David Goodison, Planning Director Re: Preliminary review of an application for a mixed-use development proposed for 870 Broadway
More informationARTICLE I ZONE BASED REGULATIONS
ARTICLE I ZONE BASED REGULATIONS RZC 21.08 RESIDENTIAL REGULATIONS 21.08.290 Cottage Housing Developments A. Purpose. The purpose of the cottage housing requirements is to: 1. Provide a housing type that
More informationRT-3 District Schedule
District Schedule 1 Intent The intent of this Schedule is to encourage the retention of neighbourhood and streetscape character, particularly through the retention, renovation and restoration of existing
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 21.06: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS AND MEASUREMENTS...3
TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 21.06: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS AND MEASUREMENTS...3 21.06.010 Purpose...3 A. Purpose...3 B. Applicability...3 21.06.020 Dimensional Standards Tables...3 A. Table of Dimensional
More informationLITTLE MOUNTAIN ADJACENT AREA REZONING POLICY
LITTLE MOUNTAIN ADJACENT AREA REZONING POLICY JANUARY 2013 CONTENTS 1.0 INTENT & PRINCIPLES...1 2.0 APPLICATION...2 3.0 HOUSING TYPES, HEIGHT & DENSITY POLICIES...3 3.1 LOW TO MID-RISE APARTMENT POLICIES...4
More informationZoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) Detached Accessory Dwellings
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING, HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT Housing Division 2100 Clarendon Boulevard, Suite 700, Arlington, VA 22201 TEL: 703-228-3765 FAX: 703-228-3834 www.arlingtonva.us Memorandum To:
More informationCOMMISSION ACTION FORM SUBJECT: ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT FOR LINCOLN WAY CORRIDOR PLAN DOWNTOWN GATEWAY COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT STANDARDS
ITEM #: 7 DATE: _02-07-18 COMMISSION ACTION FORM SUBJECT: ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT FOR LINCOLN WAY CORRIDOR PLAN DOWNTOWN GATEWAY COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT STANDARDS BACKGROUND: The Downtown Gateway area
More informationAN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS. By Palmisano
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS By Palmisano Amending Title 20, Chapter 520 of the Minneapolis Code of Ordinances relating to Zoning Code: Introductory Provisions. The City Council of the City
More informationTable of Contents ARTICLE 5A CHARACTER-BASED ZONING 1
Table of Contents ARTICLE 5A CHARACTER-BASED ZONING 1 SECTION 10.5A10 GENERAL... 1 10.5A11 Purpose and Intent... 1 10.5A12 Applicability... 1 10.5A13 Compliance with Regulating Plan... 1 10.5A14 Relationship
More information3.1. OBJECTIVES FOR RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS GENERAL OBJECTIVES FOR ALL RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATIONS
3. RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS INTRODUCTION The Residential land use designations provide for housing and other land uses that are integral to, and supportive of, a residential environment. Housing
More informationPLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT. For Planning Commission Meeting of May 6, 2014
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT For Planning Commission Meeting of May 6, 2014 SUBJECT: Amendments to Chapter 55 ( Ordinance) regarding Building and Requirements in the Main Street Character
More informationRT-7 District Schedule
District Schedule 1 Intent The intent this Schedule is to encourage the retention and renovation of existing buildings which maintain an architectural style and building form consistent with the historical
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 12, 2005 DATE: February 8, 2005 SUBJECT: Request to Advertise public hearings on the proposed Zoning Ordinance amendment to Section
More informationBerry/University Form Based Code and Urban Residential Development
Berry/University Form Based Code and Urban Residential Development Presented to the City Council by the Planning and Development Department October 11, 2016 Purpose Review proposed Berry/University formbased
More information4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR
4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL MIXED-USE PROJECTS This chapter presents standards for residential mixed-use projects in the Ashland-Cherryland Business District and the Castro Valley Central Business
More informationR0 Zones (Infill Housing) R08
R0 Zones (Infill Housing) R08 Building Size & Lot Coverage Items Zoning Current Regulations Issues to can regulate (By-law 1984-63) Consider These items are currently subject to two regulations in By-law
More informationRT-8 District Schedule
District Schedule 1 Intent The intent of this Schedule is to encourage the retention and renovation of existing buildings which maintain an architectural style and building form consistent with the historical
More informationC-2C District Schedule
District Schedule 1 Intent The intent of this Schedule is to provide for a wide range of goods and services, to maintain commercial activities and personal services that require central locations to serve
More informationChapter ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES
Chapter 11-05 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES Sections: 11-05-01 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW 11-05-01.1 Zoning Certificate 11-05-01.2 Zoning Certificate, Not Required 11-05-01.3
More informationAnnotated Outline of a New Zoning Ordinance... 1
Contents Annotated Outline of a New Zoning Ordinance... 1 Article 1: General Provisions... 1 Title and Effective Date... 1 Purpose... 1 Implementation of Comprehensive Plan... 1 Official Zoning Map...
More information1.1. SCHEDULE OF USES 1.2. SPECIAL DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Apartment unit: Any number of rooms comprising one complete housekeeping unit of not less than 700 square feet with its own cooking and food storage equipment and facilities and its own bathing and toilet
More informationLand Use Application
Land Use Application Check all permits you are applying for in the boxes provided. Submit this application form, the applicable materials listed in the corresponding permit application packet(s) and application
More informationAccessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Ordinance Update
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Ordinance Update Resource Management Agency, Planning Division Tricia Maier, Long-Range Planning Section Manager Jennifer Butler and Owen Deutsch, Project Planners What is
More informationMay 12, Chapter RH HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL ZONES REGULATIONS Sections:
May 12, 2017 Chapter 17.13 RH HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL ZONES REGULATIONS Sections: 17.13.010 Title, intent, and description. 17.13.020 Required design review process. 17.13.030 Permitted and conditionally
More informationA APPENDIX A: FORM-BASED BUILDING PROTOTYPES
A : A.1 Introduction Form-based prototypes are specific building types that are either encouraged or discouraged in historic multi-family residential or mixed-use neighborhoods. Their intent is to ensure
More informationLegislative Department Seattle City Council Memorandum
Legislative Department Seattle City Council Memorandum Date: May 21, 2010 To: From: Subject: Councilmember Sally J. Clark, Chair Councilmember Tim Burgess, Vice Chair Councilmember Sally Bagshaw, Member
More information2014 ANNUAL AMENDMENTS: AFFORDABLE HOUSING CODE (PHASE 2) Application # January 8, 2014
2014 ANNUAL AMENDMENTS: AFFORDABLE HOUSING CODE (PHASE 2) Application #2014-06 January 8, 2014 Previous 2014 scope INCENTIVES 10% affordable housing with voluntary upzones Review existing affordable housing
More information